---

---

•	Part I - Item 1 - Financial Statements

•	Part I - Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

•	Part I - Item 4 - Controls and Procedures

•	Part II - Item 1A - Risk Factors

•	Part II - Item 6 - Exhibits

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

•

The Company completed the acquisition of GMSL on September 22, 2014, but treated the acquisition as having closed on September 30, 2014. As a result, eight days of activity were excluded from the results of operations. In addition, the Company subsequently identified items related to the opening balance sheet as well as conforming balance sheet reclassifications related to the purchase accounting for GMSL.

•	The Company amended the valuation of the ANG business acquisition which resulted in goodwill.

•	The Company identified other income which was recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2015 which should have been recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015.

•

The Company recorded a $2.3 million income tax benefit in the nine months ended September 30, 2015 which should have been recorded in the year ended December 31, 2014. The out of period adjustment resulted in an overstatement of income tax benefit which has been restated. The adjustment to income tax benefit on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 correctly reflects this additional benefit.

•	The Company reclassified redeemable non-controlling interest from permanent equity to temporary equity.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

•

Customer contracts were valued using a multi-period excess earnings methodology. Projected revenues and margins were used to forecast the earnings for each contract taking into consideration probabilities of contract renewals. Three customer contracts were valued at £5.0 million ($8.1 million using the exchange rate in effect at the time of acquisition) and are being amortized over a 15 year life.

•	The GMSL trade name was valued using a relief from royalty methodology. Given an element of uncertainty surrounding the GMSL trade name, and consistent with likely market participant use, a probability of continuing use

---

•

The developed technology was valued using a relief from royalty methodology. The fair value was estimated based on the revenue attributable to developed technology and the hypothetical royalties avoided by owning the technology as well as the current royalties earned, the revenue stream was adjusted for technology obsolescence, as the technology will decay over time and be replaced by new technologies. The developed technology was preliminarily valued £0.8 million ($1.3 million using the exchange rate in effect at the time of acquisition) and is being amortized over a 4 year life.

•

S. B. Submarine Systems Co., Ltd. (“SBSS”) – This investment was valued using an income approach (income capitalization method) and market approach (guideline public company method) and weighted each 50-50 to arrive at an operating value. From there, debt was added and a 35% ‘discount for the lack of marketability’ was applied to arrive at a fair value. That fair value was multiplied by GMSL’s ownership percentage to arrive a fair value applicable to GMSL. The income approach used year end 2014 results as acquisition-date financials as projections were not available. The multiples applied under the market approach were based on EBITDA and revenue multiples for entities operating in the same industry. The valuation resulted in a fair value of £8.4 million ($13.6 million using the exchange rate in effect at the time of acquisition).

•

Huawei Marine Networks Co., Ltd. – This investment was valued using a market approach (guideline public company method) and cost approach (book value of equity) and weighted each 50-50 to arrive at an operating value. There was no debt but a 30% ‘discount for the lack of marketability’ was applied to arrive at a fair value. That fair value was multiplied by GMSL’s ownership percentage to arrive a fair value applicable to GMSL. The multiples applied under the market approach were based on EBITDA and revenue multiples for entities operating in the same industry. The valuation resulted in a fair value of £4.3 million ($7.0 million using the exchange rate in effect at the time of acquisition).

•

International Cableship Pte., Ltd. – This investment was valued using a cost approach (book value of equity) to arrive at an operating value. There was no debt but a 20% ‘discount for the lack of marketability’ was applied to arrive at a fair value. That fair value was multiplied by GMSL’s ownership percentage to arrive a fair value applicable to GMSL. The valuation resulted in a fair value of £2.8 million ($4.5 million using the exchange rate in effect at the time of acquisition).

•

Sembawang Cable Depot Pte., Ltd. – This investment was valued using an income approach (income capitalization method) and market approach (guideline public company method) and weighted each 50-50 to arrive at an operating value. There was no debt, but a 20% ‘discount for the lack of marketability’ was applied to arrive at a fair value. That fair value was multiplied by GMSL’s ownership percentage to arrive a fair value applicable to GMSL. The income approach used year end 2014 results as acquisition-date financials as projections were not available. The multiples applied under the market approach were based on EBITDA and revenue multiples for entities operating in the same industry. The valuation resulted in a fair value of £0.7 million. ($1.1 million using the exchange rate in effect at the time of acquisition).

•	Other investments were valued at £0.3 million ($0.5 million using the exchange rate in effect at the time of acquisition). The fair value was determined to approximate carrying value.

•

Basis Differences – The total fair values of the named investments above was £16.5 million, while the carrying value (based on GMSL’s ownership percentage and using the balance sheets as of December 31, 2014) was £25.2 million. This resulted in a basis difference of £8.7 million ($14.1 million using the exchange rate in effect at the time of acquisition), of which the majority of was attributable to SBSS. This basis difference will be accreted up over a 9 year period which will result in the increase to the investment in SBSS.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

•	Level I — Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical financial instruments as of the reporting date.  The type of financial instruments in Level I include listed equities.  Under U.S. GAAP, the Company does not adjust the quoted price for these investments, even in situations where the Company holds a large position and a sale could reasonably impact the quoted price.

•	Level II — Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date, and fair value is determined through the use of models or other valuation methodologies.  Financial instruments which are generally included in this category include long-term debt.

•	Level III — Pricing inputs are unobservable for the financial instruments and includes situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the financial instrument.  The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

---

---

---

---

---

---

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(1)	Other includes Utilities, Life Sciences and income (loss) from equity investees not included in our Marine Services segment.

---

(1)	Other includes Utilities, Life Sciences and income (loss) from equity investees not included in our Marine Services segment.

---

---

---

---

---

•	any claims, investigations or proceedings arising as a result of the restatement of our previously issued financial results;

•	our ability to remediate the material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting described in Item 4 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A;

•	the possibility of indemnification claims arising out of divestitures of businesses;

•	uncertain global economic conditions in the markets in which our operating segments conduct their businesses;

•	the ability of our operating segments to attract and retain customers;

•	increased competition in the markets in which our operating segments conduct their businesses;

•	our possible inability to generate sufficient liquidity, margins, earnings per share, cash flow and working capital from our operating segments;

•	our expectations regarding the timing, extent and effectiveness of our cost reduction initiatives and management’s ability to moderate or control discretionary spending;

•	management’s plans, goals, forecasts, expectations, guidance, objectives, strategies and timing for future operations, acquisitions, synergies, asset dispositions, fixed asset and goodwill impairment charges, tax and withholding expense, selling, general and administrative expenses, product plans, performance and results;

•	management’s assessment of market factors and competitive developments, including pricing actions and regulatory rulings;

•	limitations on our ability to successfully identify and complete any strategic acquisitions, including our pending acquisitions of United Teacher Associates Insurance Company ("UTAIC") and Continental General Insurance Company ("CGIC" and, together with UTAIC, the "Insurance Companies"), or business opportunities and to compete for these opportunities with others who have greater resources;

•	our ability to integrate acquired businesses and otherwise obtain the benefits of acquisitions that we make;

•	the impact of additional material charges associated with our oversight of acquired or target businesses and the integration of our financial reporting;

•	the impact of expending significant resources in considering acquisition targets or business opportunities that are not consummated;

•	tax consequences associated with our acquisition, holding and disposition of target companies and assets;

•	our dependence on distributions from our subsidiaries to fund our operations and payments on our obligations;

•

the impact of covenants in the certificates of designation governing the Company’s Preferred Stock, the indenture (the "11%" Notes Indenture"), the credit agreements governing Schuff's Credit and Security Agreement ("Schuff Facility") and GMSL's term loan with DVB Bank ("GMSL Facility") and future financing or refinancing agreements, on our ability to operate our business and finance our pursuit of acquisition opportunities;

•	the impact on the holders of the Company’s common stock if we issue additional shares of the Company common stock or preferred stock;

•	the impact of decisions by the Company’s significant stockholders, whose interest may differ from those of the Company’s other stockholders, or their ceasing to remain significant stockholders;

•	the effect any interests our officers, directors, stockholders and their respective affiliates may have in certain transactions in which we are involved;

•	our dependence on certain key personnel;

•	our ability to effectively increase the size of our organization, if needed, and manage our growth;

•	the impact of a determination that we are an investment company or personal holding company;

•	the impact of delays or difficulty in satisfying the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 or negative reports concerning our internal controls;

•	costs and risks associated with litigation;

•	the impact on our business and financial condition of our substantial indebtedness and the significant additional indebtedness and other financing obligations we may incur;

•	our possible inability to raise additional capital when needed or refinance our existing debt, on attractive terms, or at all; and

---

•	our possible inability to hire and retain qualified executive management, sales, technical and other personnel.

•	the possibility of global recession or market downturn with a reduction in capital spending within the targeted market segments the business operates in;

•	project implementation issues and possible subsequent overruns;

•	risks associated with operating outside of core competencies when moving into different market segments;

•	possible loss or severe damage to marine assets;

•	vessel equipment aging or reduced reliability;

•	risks associated with operating two joint ventures in China (China Telecommunications Corp.; Huawei Marine Networks Co., Limited);

•	risks related to foreign corrupt practices and economic sanctions, laws and regulations;

•	changes to the local laws and regulatory environment in different geographical regions;

•	loss of key senior employees;

•	difficulties attracting enough skilled technical personnel;

•	foreign exchange rate risk;

•	liquidity risk; and

•	potential for financial loss arising from the failure by customers to fulfill their obligations as and when these obligations fall due.

•	its ability to realize cost savings from expected performance of contracts, whether as a result of improper estimates, performance, or otherwise;

•	uncertain timing and funding of new contract awards, as well as project cancellations;

•	cost overruns on fixed-price or similar contracts or failure to receive timely or proper payments on cost-reimbursable contracts, whether as a result of improper estimates, performance, disputes, or otherwise;

•	risks associated with labor productivity, including performance of subcontractors that Schuff hires to complete projects;

•	its ability to settle or negotiate unapproved change orders and claims;

•	changes in the costs or availability of, or delivery schedule for, equipment, components, materials, labor or subcontractors;

•	adverse impacts from weather affecting Schuff’s performance and timeliness of completion of projects, which could lead to increased costs and affect the quality, costs or availability of, or delivery schedule for, equipment, components, materials, labor or subcontractors;

•	fluctuating revenue resulting from a number of factors, including the cyclical nature of the individual markets in which our customers operate;

•	adverse outcomes of pending claims or litigation or the possibility of new claims or litigation, and the potential effect of such claims or litigation on Schuff’s business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow; and

•	lack of necessary liquidity to provide bid, performance, advance payment and retention bonds, guarantees, or letters of credit securing Schuff’s obligations under bids and contracts or to finance expenditures prior to the receipt of payment for the performance of contracts.

•	our expectations regarding increased competition, pricing pressures and usage patterns with respect to ICS’s product offerings;

---

•	significant changes in ICS’s competitive environment, including as a result of industry consolidation, and the effect of competition in its markets, including pricing policies;

•	its compliance with complex laws and regulations in the U.S. and internationally; and

•	further changes in the telecommunications industry, including rapid technological, regulatory and pricing changes in its principal markets.

•	CIG’s insurance subsidiaries’ ability to maintain statutory capital and maintain or improve their financial strength;

•	CIG’s insurance subsidiaries’ reserve adequacy, including the effect of changes to accounting or actuarial assumptions or methodologies;

•	the accuracy of CIG’s assumptions and estimates regarding future events and ability to respond effectively to such events, including mortality, morbidity, persistency, expenses, interest rates, tax liability, business mix, frequency of claims, severity of claims, contingent liabilities, investment performance, and other factors related to its business and anticipated results;

•	availability, affordability and adequacy of reinsurance and credit risk associated with reinsurance;

•	CIG’s insurance subsidiaries are extensively regulated and subject to numerous legal restrictions and regulations;

•	CIG’s ability to defend itself against litigation, inherent in the insurance business (including class action litigation) and respond to enforcement investigations or regulatory scrutiny;

•	the performance of third parties including distributors and technology service providers, and providers of outsourced services;

•	the impact of changes in accounting and reporting standards;

•	CIG’s ability to protect its intellectual property;

•	general economic conditions and other factors, including prevailing interest and unemployment rate levels and stock and credit market performance which may affect (among other things) CIG’s ability to access capital resources and the costs associated therewith, the fair value of CIG’s investments, which could result in impairments and other-than-temporary impairments, and certain liabilities;

•	CIG's exposure to any particular sector of the economy or type of asset through concentrations in its investment portfolio;

•	the ability to increase sufficiently, and in a timely manner, premiums on in-force long-term care insurance policies and/or reduce in-force benefits, as may be required from time to time in the future (including as a result of our failure to obtain any necessary regulatory approvals or unwillingness or inability of policyholders to pay increased premiums);

•	other regulatory changes or actions, including those relating to regulation of financial services affecting (among other things) regulation of the sale, underwriting and pricing of products, and minimum capitalization, risk-based capital and statutory reserve requirements for insurance companies, and CIG’s insurance subsidiaries’ ability to mitigate such requirements; and

•	CIG’s ability to effectively implement its business strategy or be successful in the operation of its business;

•	CIG's ability to retain, attract and motivate qualified employees;

•	interruption in telecommunication, information technology and other operational systems, or a failure to maintain the security, confidentiality or privacy of sensitive data residing on such systems;

•	medical advances, such as genetic research and diagnostic imaging, and related legislation; and

•	the occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or a pandemic.

---

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

---

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

•	the appointment of a new Chief Financial Officer;

•	hiring of additional certified public accountants, including a Controller;

•	engagement of external advisors to supplement the staff charged with compiling and filing our U.S. GAAP results;

•	implementation of organizational structure changes that better integrate the tax accounting and finance functions;

•	enhancement of our processes and procedures for determining, documenting and calculating our income tax provision;

•	increasing the level of certain tax review activities throughout the year and during the financial statement close process; and

•	enhancing the procedures and documentation requirements, including related training, surrounding the evaluation and recording of complex and/or non-routine transactions, such as business combinations.

---

---

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS

---

---

---

*

These certifications are being “furnished” and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.