Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

(Mark One)

x   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012

OR

o    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                            to                         

Commission file number:  1-13923

WAUSAU PAPER CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

100 Paper Place

Mosinee, Wisconsin  54455-9099

(Address of principal executive office)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:  715-693-4470

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such report), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x  No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  x  No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2) of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

The number of common shares outstanding at July 31, 2012 was 49,322,921.

Table of Contents

WAUSAU PAPER CORP.

AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

i

Table of Contents

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.                    Financial Statements

Wausau Paper Corp. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

Table of Contents

Wausau Paper Corp. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

Table of Contents

Wausau Paper Corp. and Subsidiaries

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)

Note 1.                                  Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of Wausau Paper Corp. and our consolidated subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.  The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which are normal and recurring in nature and which are necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented.  Results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of future results.  In all regards, the financial statements have been presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Refer to notes to consolidated financial statements, which appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, for our accounting policies and other disclosures, which are pertinent to these statements.

The results of operations of the Paper segment’s Brokaw, Wisconsin paper mill have been reported as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for all periods presented.  The corresponding assets and liabilities of the discontinued operation in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets have been reclassified at June 30, 2012 in accordance with the authoritative literature on assets held for sale and discontinued operations.  The assets and liabilities of the discontinued operation were not retroactively reclassified in the December 31, 2011 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, and as a result, the balances are not comparable between periods.  Also, in accordance with the authoritative literature, we have elected to not separately disclose the cash flows related to the discontinued operation.  See Note 3 for further information regarding discontinued operations.

Note 2.                                  New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update  No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), which amends Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 220, “Comprehensive Income”. This guidance requires the presentation of total comprehensive income, total net income and the components of net income and comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. The requirements do not change how earnings per share is calculated or presented. We adopted ASU 2011-05 in the first quarter of 2012, and have presented comprehensive income as a single continous statement in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

On January 1, 2012, we adopted FASB ASU 2011-04, an amendment to ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements”. The amendments in ASU 2011-04 generally represent clarifications of fair value measurement, but also include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair measurements has changed.  ASU 2011-04 results in common principles and requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements.  Adopting these amendments had no effect on the condensed consolidated financial statements.

The FASB defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The FASB’s guidance classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 — Inputs, other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs based on the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

4

Table of Contents

Note 3.                                  Discontinued Operations and Other

In December 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved the sale of our premium Print & Color brands, and the closure of our Brokaw, Wisconsin paper mill.  The sale of the premium Print & Color brands, select paper inventory, and certain manufacturing equipment to Neenah Paper, Inc. closed on January 31, 2012.  We permanently ceased papermaking operations at the mill on February 10, 2012.  We have determined that the assets of the Brokaw mill, which are part of our Paper segment, meet the criteria for held for sale classification, and are reported as discontinued operations in accordance with FASB ASC Subtopic 205-20, “Discontinued Operations.”  We expect to complete the disposal of the Brokaw mill assets within the next nine months.  In addition, at June 30, 2012, we have evaluated the recoverability of the carrying amount of the long-lived assets of the discontinued operation.  As part of the evaluation, we have estimated the future cash flows related to the long-lived assets using a probability weighted estimate and determined those cash flows are sufficient to recover the carrying value of the assets recorded at June 30, 2012.  As there are no quoted market prices available for these or similar assets, we have used our best estimates in determining the fair value of the long-lived assets of the discontinued operation based upon a range of anticipated sales prices for these assets.  The use of these unobservable inputs, or level 3 inputs, resulted in no pre-tax impairment charges for the three months ended June 30, 2012.  For the six months ended, we recorded impairment charges of $2.1 million, which are included in earnings from discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

The sale of the premium Print & Color brands, select paper inventory, and certain manufacturing equipment generated a pre-tax gain of $12.2 million, which is recorded in earnings from discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the six months ended June 30, 2012.  With the sale of the premium Print & Color brands and closure of the Brokaw mill, we have eliminated our material participation in the Print & Color markets in which we have historically competed.  We continue to manufacture and convert select Print & Color products for the buyer during a post-closing period which is expected to expire in late 2012.  The continuing cash flows from this supply agreement are not a result of participation in an active market, and are not considered direct cash flows under ASC 205-20.

5

Table of Contents

The following table details the components of assets and liabilities that are classified as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets:

The following table summarizes certain Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income information for discontinued operations:

6

Table of Contents

During the second quarter of 2012, we continued to execute restructuring activities related to the closure of the Brokaw mill, and have recognized pre-tax charges of $2.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012, and, exclusive of the gain recorded for the sales transaction, net pre-tax charges of $6.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012.  These net charges, which are detailed in the following table, are recorded in earnings from discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Additional pre-tax closure charges of approximately $0.6 million are expected to be incurred during the remainder of 2012.

Following is a summary of the liabilities for restructuring expenses through June 30, 2012, related to the closure of the Brokaw mill, all of which are included in liabilities of discontinued operations - current:

In the first quarter of 2012, we incurred pre-tax charges of $3.3 million related to a previously terminated natural gas contract for our previously closed Groveton, New Hampshire mill.  The charge is included in selling and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.  During the first six months of 2012, we have made payments related to this natural gas contract of $0.9 million. We will continue to make payments related to the contract over the original contractual term.  At June 30, 2012, $2.2 million and $10.5 million are included in current liabilities and noncurrent liabilities, respectively, consisting of contract termination costs associated with the Groveton, New Hampshire mill.  At December 31, 2011, $2.3 million and $7.9 million are included in current liabilities and noncurrent liabilities, respectively, related to these contract termination costs.

7

Table of Contents

Note 4.                                  Earnings Per Share (“EPS”)

The following table reconciles basic weighted average outstanding shares to diluted weighted average outstanding shares:

Stock options for which the exercise price exceeds the average market price over the applicable period have an antidilutive effect on EPS, and accordingly, are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.  Due to the net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2012, stock-based grants for 1,821,546 shares were considered to be antidilutive.  For the three months ended June 30, 2011, stock-based grants for 1,861,835 shares were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation because the shares were antidilutive.  For the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, stock-based grants for 1,187,959 shares and 1,962,792 shares, respectively, were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation because the shares were antidilutive.

8

Table of Contents

Note 5.                                  Receivables

Receivables at June 30, 2012 exclude discontinued operations.  The receivables related to discontinued operations were not retroactively reclassified and are included in the following table at December 31, 2011.

Note 6.                                  Inventories

Inventories at June 30, 2012 exclude discontinued operations.  The inventories related to discontinued operations were not retroactively reclassified and are included in the following table at December 31, 2011.

9

Table of Contents

Note 7.                                  Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment at June 30, 2012 excludes discontinued operations.  Property, plant, and equipment related to discontinued operations was not retroactively reclassified and is included in the following table at December 31, 2011.

Excluding discontinued operations, the provision for depreciation, amortization, and depletion for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $11.4 million and $12.6 million, respectively.  Excluding discontinued operations, the provision for depreciation, amortization, and depletion for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $22.8 million and $25.1 million, respectively.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, interest capitalized on projects with a construction period exceeding one year totaled $1.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Interest capitalized on projects with a construction period exceeding one year during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, amounted to $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively.

10

Table of Contents

Note 8.                                  Debt

A summary of total debt is as follows:

On March 31, 2010, we entered into a note purchase and private-shelf agreement.  This agreement provided for the April 9, 2010, issuance of $50 million of unsecured senior notes having an interest rate of 5.69% with a maturity date of April 9, 2017, and also established a three-year private shelf facility under which up to $125 million of additional promissory notes may be issued at terms agreed upon by the parties at the time of issuance.  On April 4, 2011, we issued an additional aggregate principal amount of $50 million of our senior notes under the terms of this note purchase and private-shelf agreement.  The notes bear interest at 4.68% and mature on April 4, 2018.  On August 22, 2011, the private-shelf agreement was amended to expand the total amount available under the private-shelf agreement to $150 million.  On April 9, 2012, we issued an additional aggregate principal amount of $50 million of our senior notes under this note purchase and private-shelf agreement.  The notes bear interest at 4.00% and mature on June 30, 2016.  At June 30, 2012, $150 million was currently outstanding under the note purchase and private-shelf agreement.

We have estimated the fair value of our long-term debt in accordance with FASB authoritative guidance. The FASB defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between participants at the measurement date. Fair value information for long-term debt is within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and is based on current market interest rates and estimates of current market conditions for instruments with similar terms and maturities. At June 30, 2012, the estimated fair value of long-term debt is approximately $163 million, which compares to the carrying value of $150 million.  At December 31, 2011, the estimated fair value of long-term debt was approximately $138 million, which compares to the carrying value of $128 million.

During the second quarter of 2012, we settled our obligations related to the $19 million of industrial development bonds.  There were no prepayment penalties or additional costs associated with the retirement of these obligations.

On June 23, 2010, we entered into a $125 million revolving-credit agreement with five financial institutions that will expire on June 23, 2014.  At June 30, 2012, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving-credit agreement.

During the second quarter of 2011, we settled our obligations related to the $35 million unsecured private placement notes scheduled to expire in August 2011.  The settlement of these obligations resulted in the recognition of a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011, which reflects the premiums paid to retire the unsecured private placement notes, net of unamortized premiums and issuance costs.

We are subject to certain financial and other covenants under the revolving-credit agreement and the note purchase and private-shelf agreement.  At June 30, 2012, we were in compliance with all required covenants and expect to remain in full compliance throughout the remainder of 2012.

11

Table of Contents

Note 9.                                  Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefit Plans

Inclusive of discontinued operations, the components of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

The settlement recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2012, relates to settlement charges associated with the payment of pension liabilities with respect to one of our defined benefit pension plans.

Inclusive of discontinued operations, the components of net periodic benefit cost recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

The settlement recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2012, relates to settlement charges associated with the payment of pension liabilities with respect to one of our defined benefit pension plans.  The other post-retirement benefits curtailment recognized in the six months ended June 30, 2012, relates to the closure of the Paper segment’s Brokaw, Wisconsin mill.

We previously disclosed in our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 that we anticipate making contributions of approximately $23 million directly to our pension and retirement plans as a result of minimum funding requirements and elective contributions in 2012.  As of June 30, 2012, we have made payments of approximately $3.2 million to our pension and retirement plans in 2012.  We now expect to contribute approximately $25 million to our pension and retirement plans.  In addition, as previously reported, we expected to contribute approximately $4 million, net of subsidy reimbursements, directly to other post-retirement plans in 2012.  As of June 30, 2012, we have contributed approximately $1.6 million to our other post-

12

Table of Contents

retirement plans.  We now expect to contribute approximately $3 million to our other post-retirement plans in 2012.

Note 10.                           Share-Based Compensation

We account for share-based compensation pursuant to the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Subtopic 718-10.

Stock Options, Restricted Stock Awards, and Performance Units

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, share-based compensation expense related to non-qualified stock option grants, restricted stock awards, and performance unit awards was approximately $0.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, share-based compensation expense related to non-qualified stock option grants, restricted stock awards, and performance unit awards was approximately $0.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively.  We recognize compensation expense on grants of stock options, and performance unit share-based compensation awards on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of each award.  Forfeiture rates are estimated based upon our historical experience for each grant type.  As of June 30, 2012, total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to share-based compensation awards was approximately $3.0 million, which we expect to recognize over a weighted average period of approximately 1.0 years.

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, as part of compensation for our directors and certain employees of Wausau Paper, we granted awards of performance units.  Of the awards granted, 46,787 performance units were granted to directors.  The grants to certain employees were comprised of three types of awards.  The first type of award included 74,435 performance units with vesting based upon the completion of a requisite period of service.  The second type of award included 288,387 of performance units with the award subject to achievement of a targeted shareholder return on our common stock over a three-year period.  The third type of award was comprised of 531,985 performance units with vesting contingent on (1) achieving certain operating profit levels and (2) completion of a service requirement.  We have recognized compensation expense related to these performance-based awards during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, as it is probable a portion of the awards will vest as performance criteria are met.

Stock Appreciation Rights and Dividend Equivalents

Share-based compensation provisions or credits related to stock appreciation rights and dividend equivalents are determined based upon a remeasurement to their fair value at each interim reporting period in accordance with the provisions of ASC Subtopic 718-10.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, we recognized expense of less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million, respectively, in share-based compensation related to stock appreciation rights and dividend equivalents.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, we recognized credits of less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.1 million, respectively, in share-based compensation related to stock appreciation rights and dividend equivalents.

13

Table of Contents

Note 11.                           Interim Segment Information

Factors Used to Identify Reportable Segments

We have evaluated our disclosures of our business segments in accordance with ASC Subtopic 280-10, and as a result we have classified our operations into two principal reportable segments:  Tissue and Paper, each providing different products.  Separate management of each segment is required because each business unit is subject to different marketing, production, and technology strategies.

Products from which Revenue is Derived

The Tissue segment produces a complete line of towel and tissue products that are marketed along with soap and dispensing systems for the “away-from-home” market.  Tissue operates a paper mill in Middletown, Ohio, and a converting facility in Harrodsburg, Kentucky.

The Paper segment produces specialty papers within three core markets — Food, Tape & Industrial, and Coated & Liner.  These products are produced at manufacturing facilities located in Brainerd, Minnesota, and in Rhinelander and Mosinee, Wisconsin.  In 2011 and into 2012, the Paper segment produced fine printing and writing papers at a manufacturing facility in Brokaw, Wisconsin.  Papermaking operations at the Brokaw facility permanently ceased on February 10, 2012.  In accordance with authoritative literature, we have reported the Brokaw facility as a discontinued operation.  See Note 3 for additional information on facility closures.

14

Table of Contents

Reconciliations

The following are reconciliations to corresponding totals in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements. The sales and operating profit (loss) information excludes discontinued operations in all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations were not retroactively reclassified in the December 31, 2011 Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, and as a result, the asset information for the Paper segment includes assets of discontinued operations at December 31, 2011.