UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
| x | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
or
| ¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File No. 1-9767
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
| Delaware | 94-2579751 | |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
9172 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 91311
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s Telephone Number: (818) 709-1244
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a well seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.).
Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of the shares of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $284.8 million based upon the closing price of $17.80 per share of Common Stock as reported on the NASDAQ National Market on June 30, 2005. Solely for the purpose of determining “non-affiliates” in this context, shares of Common Stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a determination for other purposes.
The Registrant had 17,435,074 shares of Common Stock outstanding on March 10, 2006.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
i
Overview
IRIS International, Inc., (NASDAQ: IRIS) was incorporated in California in 1979 and reincorporated in Delaware in 1987. Our company consists of three operating units. Our largest business unit, Iris Diagnostics Division, designs, manufactures and markets in vitro diagnostics (IVD) systems, consumables and supplies for urinalysis and body fluids testing. StatSpin, Inc., d.b.a. Iris Sample Processing Division, markets small centrifuges, DNA processing stations and other equipment and accessories for rapid specimen processing. Advanced Digital Imaging Research LLC (ADIR), our third business unit, assists in the advancement of proprietary imaging technology while conducting government-sponsored research and contract development in imaging and pattern recognition.
Our vision is to advance our position as a global leader in both diagnostic urinalysis and sample processing market segments through the development of innovative platforms that yield high value applications with significant recurring consumable revenues. In 2005, we directed our Diagnostics Division research and development efforts at next generation products in urine microscopy, a proprietary urine chemistry platform and a revolutionary system for bacteria detection in urine. To accelerate the expansion of our proprietary product platforms, we acquired the urine chemistry product lines from Quidel Corporation in June 2005. This acquisition along with our internal development efforts will enable us to broaden our product lines, enter new markets and strengthen our competitive position globally. Our Sample Processing Division released a next generation bench top centrifuge, the StatSpin™ Express 3, and made significant strides entering the molecular diagnostics segment with the release of the ThermoBrite™ DNA processing workstation. By entering the molecular diagnostics market, our Sample Processing Division is poised for continued expansion in the fastest growing segment in diagnostics.
Diagnostics Division
Our Diagnostics Division is a global leader in automated in vitro diagnostics technology with instruments and chemical consumables for urine chemistry analysis and automated microscopic analysis of urine and other body fluids. Our systems provide customers more accurate and rapid results and significant labor cost-savings over traditional manual methods. We sell our products directly in the US and through distributors internationally. Our end-user customers consist of hospitals and clinical reference laboratories throughout the world.
Market Overview
Urinalysis is performed as part of most routine medical examinations and is necessary for the diagnosis and monitoring of certain conditions including kidney and bladder disease, and urinary tract infections. The global urinalysis market is divided into three primary segments: urine chemistry, urine microscopy, and urine culture.
Urine chemistry consists of a panel of tests that identify a variety of chemical constituents in urine such as glucose, ketones, bilirubin, protein, nitrite, etc. Urine microscopy is the microscopic analysis of solid particles and cells (formed elements) suspended in urine. The particles analyzed include red blood cells, white blood cells, hyaline casts, pathological casts, crystals, bacteria, sperm, yeast, etc. Urine culture studies the propagation of microorganisms such as bacteria and yeast in agar media. In the urine culture market, all testing is done manually using agar plates requiring from 16 to 72 hours to receive results.
Current manual testing of urine and body fluids requires the clinical laboratory to split samples, perform automated and manual procedures and consolidate the separate results into one report. Urine chemistry is broadly used and fairly generic, however, manual urine sediment analysis is used less frequently despite the fact that it provides significant clinical information. The analysis of other body fluids is critical for the diagnosis of
1
infection, inflammation, hemorrhage and a variety of disease states. The manual procedure for microscopy requires a highly qualified medical technologist to accurately categorize formed elements observed under the microscope. However, inherent variability in sample preparation, (i.e. initial sample volume, spin down time, speed, and slide preparation technique) all contribute to significant variability in the quantitative accuracy of the diagnostic result. Furthermore, these tests represent very tedious and costly procedures for the clinical laboratory. On a total available market of approximately 6,500 sites, we estimate that approximately 60% continue to perform manual urine microscopies, representing a significant market opportunity for us. We believe the full automation and integration of results in the iQ200 product platform has accelerated the adoption of automated urine microscopy as a routine test.
The chemistry market is estimated to be in excess of $500 million annually with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 4%. The automated microscopy market is estimated at approximately $100 million annually with a CAGR exceeding 25% in comparison to the global in vitro diagnostics market CAGR of 6%. The urine culture market today is currently not automated. We estimate the total market opportunity of automating this segment to be approximately $300 million, making the addressable urinalysis market over $900 million annually.
Diagnostics Products
iQ200 and iQ200 Sprint Automated Urine Microscopy Analyzers
Our iQ200 Automated Urine Microscopy Analyzer was launched in August 2003 and we have sold 777 iQ200 analyzers as of December 31, 2005. The iQ200 technology platform utilizes proprietary image flow cytometry and neural network-based Automated Particle Recognition (APR™) software to achieve significant reductions in cost and processing time as compared to manual microscopic analysis. Our APR technology enables high-speed digital processing to classify and display images of microscopic particles in an easy-to-view graphical user interface. We believe our iQ200 product line has numerous benefits over competing products, including increased accuracy, digital imaging of particles and fully automated walk-away analysis of urine and body fluids.
The iQ200 Sprint™ Automated Urine Microscopy Analyzer, released in the first quarter of 2005, is the fastest automated microscopy analyzer available today. It performs 101 tests per hour and is 68% faster than the original iQ200 Analyzer. It also provides new functionality for high volume clinical reference laboratories and hospital laboratories, such as Load and Unload Stations capable of handling 210 specimens at a time and improved image editing routines to increase work flow and productivity.
In May 2005, we expanded the iQ200 test menu by adding the iQ Body Fluids Module that enables the rapid diagnosis of malignant cells, bacteria and other abnormalities in body fluids such as cerebro-spinal, pleural, pericardial, peritoneal fluids and a variety of other serous fluids.
iQ200 System
When the iQ200 and iQ200 Sprint Automated Urine Microscopy Analyzers are combined with ARKRAY’s AUTION MAX AX-4280 Automated Urine Chemistry Analyzer (AX-4280), these analyzers constitute the first fully integrated urinalysis system performing both urine chemistry and urine microscopy simultaneously, as well as the analysis of body fluids.
The commercialization of the iQ200 platform dramatically expanded our available market, allowing us to penetrate both the high volume and mid-sized laboratory segments. The iQ200 system addresses the mid-sized laboratory market and the iQ200 Sprint system addresses the high volume hospital, clinical reference and commercial laboratory market segments. The second quarter 2005 release of the iQ Body Fluids Module further improves the economic justification of automation in an available global market of 6,500 laboratory sites.
2
Domestically, we sell the three major instruments: the AX-4280, the iQ200 and the iQ200 Sprint as stand-alone units or fully integrated as a complete system. Internationally, we sell the iQ200 and the iQ200 Sprint as stand-alone instruments since we do not have international distribution rights for the AX-4280. However, the large installed base of AX-4280 analyzers in service throughout the world is a readily available target for integration with one of the iQ200 product family of automated microscopy analyzers. All of our international distributors sell the Bridge System required to integrate the two analyzers.
iChem 100 and vChem Strips
In June 2005, we completed the acquisition of assets (primarily technology and inventory) of the urine chemistry business of Quidel Corporation. With this acquisition, we acquired significant core technology and know-how in urine chemistry strips, patents and trademarks, product designs, a strip manufacturing facility in Germany and a semi-automated urine chemistry analyzer that will enable us to offer a more complete product line. Our new urine chemistry product line will be branded iChem™ for instruments and vChem™ for visual read strips. We are re-launching these product lines in the second quarter of 2006 targeting the physician’s office laboratory and alternate care sites domestically and in the international market. These products will be sold through independent distributors worldwide.
Legacy Products
Prior to the iQ200 platform we sold legacy product Models 500 and 939UDx™, which are larger and more expensive workstations that perform microscopy and chemistry testing. The Model 500 is an operator-attended workstation that performs IVD testing on urine and eight other body fluids, but requires a medical technologist to manually load the specimens and characterize the microscopic particles manually. The 939UDx is a semi-automated workstation that performs IVD testing on urine only, but uses our first generation neural-network algorithms to automatically characterize the microscopic particles. As of December 31, 2005, we have an installed base of approximately 275 legacy systems. This reduction is due to the replacement of our legacy models with our iQ200 platforms. Although the legacy consumable revenue stream is declining, it will continue to produce a significant source of revenue from its consumables, parts, accessories and domestic service agreements.
Consumables and Service
After market sales of consumables and service provide an accumulating and significant source of recurring revenue for each instrument placed. We provide recurring sales of consumables for our iQ200 and iQ200 Sprint Analyzers and legacy products manufactured by Iris, and urine chemistry products sourced from ARKRAY. Consumables include urine and body fluids reagents, calibrators and controls for our microscopy systems and test strips, calibrators, controls, and other solutions for the urine chemistry analyzers we distribute. In the US and France, our customers purchase consumables directly from us. Internationally, customers purchase consumables through our distribution network.
Domestic sales of our instruments include installation, customer training and a one-year warranty. Following the initial warranty period, the majority of domestic customers purchase annual service contracts from us. Such services are provided by our qualified service technicians located throughout the United States. Internationally, with the exception of France, our products are serviced by independent distributors.
StatSpin® Subsidiary, d.b.a. Iris Sample Processing Division
Iris Sample Processing Division is a global leader in accelerated sample preparation for blood, urine, and body fluids analysis. The division makes centrifuges, semi-automated DNA processing workstations and blood analysis products, including the world’s fastest blood separator, which separates blood in under 30 seconds. Our bench top centrifuges are dedicated to applications for manual specimen preparation for coagulation, cytology,
3
hematology and urinalysis. In 2005, revenue growth in this division was driven by the release of two new products, the ThermoBrite™ DNA workstation and the Express 3 centrifuge. The ThermoBrite™ DNA processing workstations automate the DNA denaturation and hybridization steps in a number of fluorescent in situ hybridization procedures. Over 1,000 DNA workstations have been sold since the launch of this product. Our worldwide markets include medical institutions, commercial laboratories, clinics, doctors’ offices, veterinary laboratories and research facilities.
ADIR Division
Our imaging research and development subsidiary assists in the advancement of our proprietary imaging technology while conducting government-sponsored research and development in medical imaging and software. In addition, it pursues contract research for corporate clients, although to date such research for corporate clients has not been significant. In 2005, ADIR focused its efforts on advancing our proprietary pattern recognition technology platform targeting applications in both the security and biometrics markets.
Growth Strategy
Our growth strategy is to advance our position as a leader in the global diagnostic market through increased market penetration, internal product development efforts and selective acquisitions of related medical device companies, technologies or product lines. We plan to expand our core technologies, develop new product applications and platforms such as a proprietary urine chemistry product line and enter new high value segments like microbiology, cancer detection, and molecular diagnostics.
Accelerate new product development. We have identified three significant product opportunities: a full urine chemistry product line to fill gaps in our product portfolio, a revolutionary method to eliminate most urine cultures and unique, high value applications in rare cell detection (cancer, etc). We have achieved encouraging results in our research program for the detection of bacteria at low concentrations in urine. Therefore, we are continuing our efforts to develop instruments and consumables to address this large and important market that we estimate at approximately $300 million. Our technology plans are based on a staged product development program in line with our resources and market priorities.
Increase market penetration. With the release of the iQ200 product family (iQ200, iQ200 Sprint and iQ Body Fluids Module) and the future release of the urine chemistry line, we are able to address the needs of a much broader market. We expect to initiate sales in the physician’s office laboratory with our chemistry products as well as offer a complete chemistry and microscopy system in the international market to further our market penetration.
Expand into new geographic markets. We will continue to expand our international market penetration. During 2005, international sales comprised approximately 30% of our total revenue, an increase of 67% over 2004. Over the past year, we have expanded our international distribution network to approximately 40 distributors covering approximately 60 countries. We opened a French subsidiary, Iris France S.A. that markets our diagnostics products directly to customers in France and supports all European distributors. We also expanded our direct sales, applications support and field service teams in the U.S and expanded our sales team in the Asia-Pac and Americas region. We believe the sales and service support systems are in place to sustain our rapidly expanding global distribution network.
Increase sales of consumables and service. Currently, we have an installed base of analyzers worldwide that provides significant recurring revenue of consumables and service. As we continue to increase our installed base, we will benefit from a cumulative increase in revenue from global consumables, both for chemistry and microscopy, and revenue from domestic service contracts and international spare parts. Our recently released iQ200 Sprint, is often placed in laboratories that use significantly higher consumables. In line with our objective to continue releasing product applications with increased or new consumable streams, our new iQ Body Fluids Module was launched in the second quarter of 2005. We anticipate that approximately 40% of iQ200 analyzers
4
sold worldwide will utilize the iQ Body Fluids Module, which will increase the consumables revenue per analyzer.
Continuously enhance and expand system features. Another key element of our growth strategy is to expand and improve the features of the iQ200 system. We plan to expand the iQ200 clinical applications to (i) increase the clinical utility of the platform, -providing new information that is not currently available in routine testing, (ii) diversify the technology applications beyond the field of urinalysis and (iii) improve efficiency for medical professionals. As a result, we anticipate this will expand the potential market for our systems.
Pursue selective acquisitions. We intend to pursue selective acquisitions to augment our organic growth. Our acquisition strategy is to target companies, product lines and/or technologies that complement our product offering in urinalysis and specimen processing and, provide synergies with our existing infrastructure. We plan to maximize the utilization of our manufacturing capabilities, distribution channels and technical and managerial expertise in the field of medical devices and scientific instrumentation. In 2005 we acquired the urinalysis product line from Quidel Corporation as part of our acquisition strategy.
Summary of Revenues by Product Line
The following table presents a summary of revenues by product line for each of the three years ended December 31, 2005:
| Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||||||
| (000s omitted) | ||||||||||||||||||
| IVD instruments |
$ | 27,542 | 44 | % | $ | 14,845 | 34 | % | $ | 7,470 | 24 | % | ||||||
| IVD consumables and service |
25,708 | 41 | % | 20,126 | 46 | % | 17,252 | 55 | % | |||||||||
| Sample Processing instruments and supplies |
9,530 | 15 | % | 8,343 | 19 | % | 6,076 | 19 | % | |||||||||
| Royalty and license revenues |
— | — | 336 | 1 | % | 547 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
| Total |
$ | 62,780 | 100 | % | $ | 43,650 | 100 | % | $ | 31,345 | 100 | % | ||||||
See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Segment and Geographic Information,” for financial information regarding our operating segments and geographic areas.
Backlog
We did not have a material amount of backlog as of December 31, 2005. Products are usually shipped within thirty to sixty days of receipt of sales orders. We do not believe that backlog is necessarily indicative of sales for any succeeding period.
Research and Development
Over the past three years, our product technology investments (including amounts reimbursed by third parties under research and development contracts and amounts capitalized) totaled $18 million. In 2006, we plan to increase our investment in research and development, net of amounts received from grants, to approximately 10% of revenues. Our current research and development efforts include developing new product applications and platforms such as a proprietary urine chemistry product line and new systems to enter new high value segments like microbiology, cancer detection, molecular diagnostics and biometric imaging.
With the technology we acquired from Quidel Corporation, we are developing an automated urine chemistry analyzer to address the international market gap created by the lack of an IRIS urine chemistry product. We plan to offer this product fully integrated with the iQ200 Urine Microscopy Analyzer.
We are also developing a next generation iQ microscopy instrument with increased performance that virtually eliminates technologist intervention for the routine microscopic examination of bacteria and other particles in urine.
5
The automation of urine culture screening has been limited by the inability to rapidly detect low concentrations of bacteria and yeast. Our market research indicates that 70% of urine cultures are negative and require significant labor, cost and 16 to 48 hours to confirm a negative result. To address this market need, we are developing a revolutionary product that will rapidly detect extremely low concentrations of bacteria, therefore eliminating 70% of the urine cultures in the microbiology laboratory. The potential market is estimated at approximately $300 million annually.
Our Sample Processing division will continue its organic growth programs and actively pursue technology licensing agreements as well as product acquisitions to supplement its core technologies and accelerate growth.
ADIR will continue advancing our proprietary pattern recognition technology platform targeting applications in both the security and biometrics markets. During 2005, ADIR developed a functional prototype of its facial recognition system for access control for potential use at ports of entry. Testing is anticipated to begin during 2006.
Marketing and Sales
Domestically, we sell and service our Diagnostics division products through our own sales and service forces. Our customers include hospital laboratories, clinical reference laboratories and alternate care sites. We have been successful in securing supply agreements with the five of the top six group purchasing organizations (GPO). Domestic sales activities consist of direct sales by field sales representatives, telemarketing to initiate and aid in pursuing sales opportunities, logistics support of the field sales representatives and support to customers in the operation of their systems. In addition to our sales activities, we promote our products through advertising in trade journals, attendance at trade shows, direct mail and our website. We also maintain a rental program for our urinalysis systems. Under the terms of the rental agreements, payments generally are based on the number of tests performed with a guaranteed monthly minimum payment. We are responsible for supply and service of the rental instruments. Alternatively, some customers either lease systems from us or from medical equipment leasing companies that, in turn purchase the instruments and consumables from us.
Internationally, we sell our products through distributors in markets around the world with the exception of France where we sell direct. In January 2005, we launched a direct commercial operation, Iris France S.A., headquartered just outside of Paris. The new operation addressed the issue of limited availability of independent capital equipment distributors in this market. We are adding sales and service personnel in step with the growing unit sales volume of this operation. As of March 1, 2006, we have agreements with distributors covering 60 countries in comparison to 45 countries at the end of 2004. The international market is contributing significantly to the success of our new products.
With the acquisition of the urine chemistry business of Quidel Corporation we will initiate sales of our proprietary urine chemistry instruments and strips. We are re-launching these product lines in the second quarter of 2006 targeting the physician’s office laboratory and alternate care sites domestically and in the international market. These products will be sold through independent distributors worldwide.
Our Sample Processing division products are sold through distributors and to other manufacturers as OEM components of their respective products.
Competition
In the urine chemistry segment, Bayer and Roche are our principal competitors selling urine analyzers and test strips used in determining the concentration of various chemical substances found in urine. In the automated urine microscopy segment, Sysmex Corporation markets its automated urine sediment analyzers globally and remains our principal competitor. We believe the Sysmex systems have several significant limitations including the inability to perform particle and cellular imaging, an incomplete testing menu, and are not designed to
6
perform body fluid analysis. These limitations result in repeat testing, requiring the technologist to retrieve the original sample, prepare a slide and conduct a manual microscopic analysis. The principal competitive factors in the urinalysis market are cost-per-test, ease of use and quality of result. We believe our automated systems compete favorably with respect to these factors.
In 2004, however, Bayer and Sysmex formed a distribution alliance in the US market, whereby Bayer markets the ADVIA® Urinalysis WorkCell, comprised of the Bayer Clinitek Atlas® chemistry instrument and Sysmex UF100™ Urine Cell Analyzer. These two instruments are linked with a sample transport and the software to combine results. Despite the fact that these instruments are connected, we believe they have not overcome the limitations described above.
The iQ200 and the iQ200 Sprint Systems are the first instruments to fully integrate urine chemistry and urine microscopy analysis. We believe these systems provide the broadest menu available and are the only systems to provide digital images of urine and body fluids particles, which provides significant competitive advantages over these other systems. We believe the clinical utility and ease of use of our iQ200 product family will result in a better economic return for clinical laboratories and hospitals.
In addition to industry competitors, we are experiencing increased domestic and international pricing pressures in the urinalysis market due to the ongoing consolidation of both hospitals and medical device suppliers. Competitors are attempting to offer one-stop shopping for a variety of laboratory instruments, supplies and service. In the US, competitors typically offer hospitals annual rebates based on the hospital’s total volume of business. We have been successful in preventing this type of “product bundling” by negotiating contracts with five of the six largest GPOs in the US allowing GPO members to purchase our products and receive comparable product discounts but not rebates.
Intellectual Property
We have a long history of innovation. Our diversified core technology spans through a number of scientific endeavors, which include in vitro diagnostics, specimen processing and handling, pattern recognition and image analysis. Our commercial success depends on our ability to protect and maintain our proprietary rights. We protect our proprietary technology by filing various patent applications. We have 40 active US patents and 11 pending patents for our technologies and a number of corresponding foreign patents. These patents cover developments in imaging analysis and processing software, blood processing, digital refractometers, fluidics, centrifuges, automated slide handling and disposable urinalysis products sold by us.
We have trade secrets, unpatented technology and proprietary knowledge about the sale, promotion, operation, development and manufacturing of our products. We have confidentiality agreements with our employees and consultants to protect these rights.
We claim copyright in our software and the ways in which it assembles and displays images, and have filed copyright registrations with the United States Copyright Office. We also own various federally registered trademarks, including “IRIS”, “iQ”, “ThermoBrite”, and “StatSpin.” We own other registered and unregistered trademarks, and have certain trademark rights in foreign jurisdictions. We intend to aggressively protect our patents, copyrights and trademarks.
Government Regulations
Most of our products are subject to stringent government regulation in the United States and other countries. These laws and regulations govern product testing, manufacture, labeling, storage, record keeping, distribution, sale, marketing, advertising and promotion. The regulatory process can be lengthy, expensive and uncertain, and securing clearances or approvals often requires the submission of extensive testing and other supporting information. If we do not comply with regulatory requirements, we may be subject to fines, recall or seizure of
7
products, total or partial suspension of production, withdrawal of existing product approvals or clearances, refusal to approve or clear new applications or notices and criminal prosecution. Further, any change in existing federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, or in their interpretation or enforcement, or the enactment of any additional laws or regulations, could affect us both materially and adversely.
In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration regulates medical devices under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDC Act”). Before a new medical device can be commercially introduced in the United States, the manufacturer usually must obtain FDA clearance by filing a pre-market notification under Section 510(k) of the FDC Act (a “510(k) Notification”) or obtain FDA approval by filing a pre-market approval application (a “PMA Application”). The PMA Application process is significantly more complex, expensive, time-consuming and uncertain than the 510(k) Notification process. To date, we have cleared all of our regulated products with the FDA through the 510(k) Notification process. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to use the 510(k) Notification process for future products. Furthermore, FDA clearance of a 510(k) Notification or approval of a PMA Application is subject to continual review, and the subsequent discovery of previously unknown facts may result in restrictions on a product’s marketing or withdrawal of the product from the market. We have pending one 510(k) Pre-Market Notification for a new semi-automated chemistry analyzer and related test strips.
We are also required to register as a medical device manufacturer with the FDA and comply with FDA regulations concerning good manufacturing practices for medical devices (“GMP Standards”). In 1997, the FDA expanded the scope of the GMP Standards with new regulations requiring medical device manufacturers to maintain control procedures for the design process, component purchases and instrument servicing. The FDA periodically inspects our manufacturing facilities for compliance with GMP Standards. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the expanded GMP Standards.
Labeling, advertising and promotional activities for medical devices are subject to scrutiny by the FDA and, in certain instances, by the Federal Trade Commission. The FDA also enforces statutory and policy prohibitions against promoting or marketing medical devices for unapproved uses.
Many states have also enacted statutory provisions regulating medical devices. The State of California’s requirements in this area, in particular, are extensive, and require registration with the state and compliance with regulations similar to the GMP Standards established by the FDA. While the impact of such laws and regulations has not been significant to date, it is possible that future developments in this area could affect us both materially and adversely.
In addition to domestic regulation of medical devices, many of our products are subject to regulations in foreign jurisdictions. The requirements for the sale of medical devices in foreign markets vary widely from country to country, ranging from simple product registrations to detailed submissions similar to those required by the FDA. Our business strategy includes expanding the geographic distribution of these and other products, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to secure the necessary clearances and approvals in the relevant foreign jurisdictions. Furthermore, the regulations in certain foreign jurisdictions continue to develop and we cannot be sure that new laws or regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our existing business or future plans. Among other things, CE Mark certifications are required for the sale of many products in certain international markets such as the European Community. We secured CE Mark certification for our existing product lines.
We have obtained the ISO 9001, EN 46001 and ISO 13485 certifications for our manufacturing facilities and are subject to surveillance by European notified bodies. During 2005, we received Canadian Medical Devices Conformity Assessment System (CMDCAS) certification and applied for the latest ISO standard, ISO 13485:2003 certification.
Our products are also subject to regulation by the United States Department of Commerce export controls, primarily as they relate to the associated computers and peripherals. We have not experienced any material difficulties in obtaining necessary export licenses to date.
8
Employees
We had 236 full-time employees at March 10, 2006. We also use outside consultants and part-time and temporary employees in production, administration, marketing and engineering. No employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, and we believe that our employee relations are satisfactory.
Available Information
Our Internet website address is http://www.proiris.com. Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our Internet website and the content contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
9
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, which reflect our current views about future events and financial results. We have made these statements in reliance on the safe harbor created by that Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include our views on future financial results, financing sources, product development, capital requirements, market growth and the like, and are generally identified by phrases such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans” and similar words. Forward-looking statements are merely predictions and therefore inherently subject to uncertainties and other factors which could cause the actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statement.
These uncertainties and other factors include, among other things:
| • | unexpected technical and marketing difficulties inherent in major product development efforts such as the new applications for our urinalysis workstation, |
| • | the potential need for changes in our long-term strategy in response to future developments, |
| • | future advances in diagnostic testing methods and procedures, as well as potential changes in government regulations and healthcare policies, both of which could adversely affect the economics of the diagnostic testing procedures automated by our products, |
| • | increasing competition from imaging and non-imaging based in-vitro diagnostic products. |
Set forth below are additional significant uncertainties and other factors affecting forward-looking statements. The readers should understand that the uncertainties and other factors identified in this Annual Report are not a comprehensive list of all the uncertainties and other factors that may affect forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements or the list of uncertainties and other factors that could affect those statements.
Related to Our Business
Our success depends largely on the acceptance of our iQ200 product line.
Our current strategy assumes that our iQ200 operating platform will be adopted by a large number of end-users. We have invested and continue to invest a substantial amount of our resources in promotion and marketing of the iQ200 product line in order to increase its market penetration, expand sales into new geographic areas and enhance and expand its system features. Failure of our iQ200 operating platform to achieve and maintain a significant market presence, or the failure to successfully implement our promotion and marketing strategy, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Any failure to successfully introduce our future products and systems into the market could adversely affect our business.
The commercial success of our future products and systems depends upon their acceptance by the medical community. Our future product plans include capital-intensive laboratory instruments. We believe that these products can significantly reduce labor costs, improve precision and offer other distinctive benefits to the medical research community. However, there is often market resistance to products that require significant capital expenditures or which eliminate jobs through automation. We have no assurance that the market will accept our future products and systems, or that sale of our future products and systems will grow at the rates expected by our management.
Any failure to successfully develop new products could adversely affect our business.
Our commercial success depends on the timely development of new products that are needed for future growth. These new products depend on our success in demonstrating technical feasibility and achieving cost targets and functionality demanded by the market. Significant delays in product releases will result in budget over-runs and lower revenues.
10
If we fail to meet changing demands of technology, we may not continue to be able to compete successfully with our competitors.
The market for our products and systems is characterized by rapid technological advances, changes in customer requirements, and frequent new product introductions and enhancements. Our future success depends upon our ability to introduce new products that keep pace with technological developments, enhance current product lines and respond to evolving customer requirements. Our failure to meet these demands could result in a loss of our market share and competitiveness and could harm our revenues and results of operations.
Any failure or inability to protect our technology and confidential information could adversely affect our business.
Patents. Our commercial success depends in part on our ability to protect and maintain our Automated Intelligent Microscopy (or AIM) and other proprietary technology. We have received patents with respect to portions of the technologies of AIM. However, ownership of technology patents may not insulate us from potentially damaging competition. Patent litigation relating to clinical laboratory instrumentation patents (like the ones we own) often involves complex legal and factual questions. Therefore, we can make no assurance that claims under patents currently held by us, or our pending or future patent applications, will be sufficiently broad to adequately protect what we believe to be our proprietary rights. Additionally, one or more of our patents could be circumvented by a competitor. We believe that our proprietary rights do not infringe upon the proprietary rights of third parties. However, third parties may assert infringement claims against us in the future. If we are unsuccessful in our defense against any infringement claim our patents, or patents in which we have licensed rights, may be held invalid and unenforceable.
Trade Secrets. We have trade secrets, unpatented technology and proprietary knowledge related to the sale, promotion, operation, development and manufacturing of our products. We generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees, suppliers and consultants. However, we cannot guarantee that our trade secrets, unpatented technology or proprietary knowledge will not become known or be independently developed by competitors. If any of this proprietary information becomes known to third parties, we may have no practical recourse against these parties.
Copyrights and Trademarks. We claim copyrights in our software and the ways in which it assembles and displays images. We also claim trademark rights in the United States and other foreign countries. However, we can make no assurance that we will be able to obtain enforceable copyright and trademark protection, nor that this protection will provide us a significant commercial advantage.
Potential Litigation Expenses. Offensive or defensive litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights could be time-consuming and expensive. Additionally, litigation could demand significant attention from our technical and management personnel. Any change in our ability to protect and maintain our proprietary rights could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our products could infringe on the intellectual property rights of others.
Given the complete factual and legal issues associated with intellectual property rights, there can be no assurance that our current and future products do not or will not infringe the intellectual property rights of others. A determination that such infringement exists or even a claim that it exists could involve us in costly litigation and have an adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
We operate in a consolidating industry that creates barriers to our market penetration.
The healthcare industry in recent years has been characterized by consolidation. Large hospital chains and groups of affiliated hospitals prefer to negotiate comprehensive supply contracts for all of their supply needs at
11
once. Large suppliers can often equip an entire laboratory and offer hospital chains and groups one-stop shopping for laboratory instruments, supplies and service. Larger suppliers also typically offer annual rebates to their customers based on the customer’s total volume of business with the supplier. The convenience and rebates offered by these large suppliers are administrative and financial incentives that we do not offer our customers. Our plans for further market penetration in the urinalysis market will depend in part on our ability to overcome these and any new barriers resulting from continued consolidation in the healthcare industry. The failure to overcome such barriers could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operation.
Since we operate in the medical technology industry, our products are subject to government regulation that could impair our operations.
Most of our products are subject to stringent government regulation in the United States and other countries. These regulatory processes can be lengthy, expensive and uncertain. Additionally, securing necessary clearances or approvals may require the submission of extensive official data and other supporting information. Our failure to comply with applicable requirements could result in fines, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, withdrawal of existing product approvals or clearances, refusal to approve or clear new applications or notices, or criminal prosecution. If any of these events were to occur, they could harm our business. Changes in existing federal, state or foreign laws or regulations, or in the interpretation or enforcement of these laws, could also materially and adversely affect our business.
Changes in government regulation of the healthcare industry could adversely affect our business.
Federal and state legislative proposals are periodically introduced or proposed that would affect major changes in the healthcare system, nationally, at the state level or both. Future legislation, regulation or payment policies of Medicare, Medicaid, private health insurance plans, health maintenance organizations and other third-party payors could adversely affect the demand for our current or future products and our ability to sell our products on a profitable basis. Moreover, healthcare legislation is an area of extensive and dynamic change, and we cannot predict future legislative changes in the healthcare field or their impact on our industry or our business. Any impairment in our ability to market our products could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation.
We may not be able to realize the deferred tax asset relating to our tax net operating loss carry forward.
As of December 31, 2005, we have deferred tax assets of approximately $10 million resulting from the differences between the financial statement and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized through future taxable income or alternative tax strategies. However, the net deferred tax assets could be reduced in the near term if management’s estimates of taxable income during the carryforward period are not realized or are significantly reduced or alternative tax strategies are not available. Although the Company believes that the deferred tax asset is recoverable, there is no assurance that we will be able to generate taxable income in the years that the differences reverse. Also, if we undergo an ownership change as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, NOLs generated prior to the ownership change would be subject to an annual limitation. If this occurs, a valuation allowance may be necessary.
We rely on independent and some single-source suppliers for key components of our instruments. Any delay or disruption in the supply of components may prevent us from selling our products and negatively impact our operations.
Certain of our components are obtained from outside vendors, and the loss or breakdown of our relationships with these outside vendors could subject us to substantial delays in the delivery of our products to our customers. Furthermore certain key components of our instruments are manufactured by only one supplier.
12
For example, ARKRAY is the single source supplier for our line of urine chemistry analyzers and related consumable products and spare parts. Roche Diagnostics is the sole source for our proprietary CHEMSTRIP/IRIStrip urine test strips and related urine test strip readers, both used in our legacy instruments, the Model 500 and 939UDx urinalysis workstations. Because these suppliers are the only vendors with which we have a relationship for a particular component, we may be unable to sell products if one of these suppliers becomes unwilling or unable to deliver components meeting our specifications. Our inability to sell products to meet delivery schedules could have a material adverse effect on our reputation in the industry, as well as our financial condition and results of operation.
One of our single-source suppliers has terminated its agreement with us.
Roche Diagnostics has exercised its right to terminate its agreements with us relating to the supply of test strips and related urine test strip readers. Roche will continue to supply test strips and replacement readers to our installed base of legacy workstations until 2009. The failure to successfully and timely complete the phase out of their strips and readers with the introduction of our new iQ200 analyzers would have a material adverse affect on our instrument sales and the revenue growth for system consumables and service.
We face intense competition and our failure to compete effectively, particularly against larger, more established companies will cause our business to suffer.
The healthcare industry is highly competitive. We compete in this industry based primarily on product performance, service and price. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than we do, and may also have substantially greater experience in developing products, obtaining regulatory approvals and manufacturing and marketing and distribution. As a result, they may be better able to compete for market share, even in areas in which our products may be superior. Further, our competitive position could be harmed by the establishment of patent protection by our competitors or other companies. The existing competitors or other companies may succeed in developing technologies and products that are more effective or affordable than those being developed by us or that would render our technology and products less competitive or obsolete. If we are unable to effectively compete in our market, our financial condition and results of operation will materially suffer.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate management and other skilled employees.
Our success depends in significant part upon the continued services of key management and skilled personnel. Competition for qualified personnel is intense and there are a limited number of people with knowledge of, and experience in, our industry. We do not have employment agreements with most of our key employees nor maintain life insurance polices on them. The loss of key personnel, especially without advance notice, or our inability to hire or retain qualified personnel, could have a material adverse effect on our instrument sales and our ability to maintain our technological edge. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to retain our key management and skilled personnel, or that we will be able to attract, assimilate and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future.
Defective products may subject us to liability.
Our products are used to gather information for medical decisions and diagnosis. Accordingly, a defect in the design or manufacture of our products, or a failure of our products to perform for the use that we specify, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation in the industry and subject us to claims of liability arising from inaccurate or allegedly inaccurate test results. Misuse of our products by a technician that results in inaccurate or allegedly inaccurate test results could similarly subject us to claims of liability. We currently maintain product liability insurance coverage for up to $1.0 million per incident and up to an aggregate of $2.0 million per year. We also currently maintain a product liability umbrella policy for coverage of claims
13
aggregating to $10.0 million. Although management believes this liability coverage is sufficient protection against future claims, there can be no assurance of the sufficiency of these policies. Any substantial underinsured loss would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation. Furthermore, any impairment of our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our sales and prospects for future business. We have not received any indication that our insurance carrier will not renew our product liability insurance at or near current premiums; however, we cannot guarantee that this will continue to be the case. In addition, any failure to comply with Federal Drug Administration regulations governing manufacturing practices could hamper our ability to defend against product liability lawsuits.
Business interruptions could adversely affect our business.
Products for Iris Diagnostics and Sample Processing are manufactured in a single facility for each division and are vulnerable to interruption in the event of war, terrorism, fire, earthquake, power loss, floods, telecommunications failure and other events beyond our control. If our facilities were significantly damaged or destroyed by any cause, we would experience delays in locating a new facility and equipment and qualifying the new facility with the FDA. Our results would suffer. In addition, we may not carry adequate business interruption insurance to compensate us for losses that may occur and any losses or damages incurred by us could be substantial.
If we are unable to manage our growth, our results could suffer.
We have been experiencing significant growth in the scope of our operations. This growth has placed significant demands on our management, as well as operational resources. In order to achieve our business objectives, we anticipate that we will need to continue to grow. If this growth occurs, it will continue to place additional significant demands on our management and our operational resources, and will require that we continue to develop and improve our operational, financial and other internal controls both in the US and internationally. In particular, if our growth continues, it will increase the challenges in implementing appropriate control systems, expanding our sales and marketing infrastructure capabilities, providing adequate training and supervision to maintain high quality standards, and preserving our cultural values. The main challenge associated with our growth has been the management of our expenses. Our inability to scale our business appropriately or otherwise adapt to growth, could cause our business, financial condition and results of operations to suffer.
Our quarterly sales and operating results may fluctuate in future periods, and if we fail to meet expectations the price of our common stock may decline.
Our quarterly sales and operating results have fluctuated significantly in the past and are likely to do so in the future due to a number of factors, many of which are not within our control. If our quarterly sales or operating results fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, the price of our common stock could decline substantially. Factors that might cause quarterly fluctuations in our sales and operating results include the following:
| • | variation in demand for our products, including seasonality; |
| • | our ability to develop, introduce, market and gain market acceptance of new products and product enhancements in a timely manner; |
| • | our ability to manage inventories, accounts receivable and cash flows; |
| • | our ability to control costs; |
| • | the size, timing, rescheduling or cancellation of orders from consumers and distributors; and |
| • | our ability to forecast future sales and operating results and subsequently attain them. |
The amount of expenses we incur depends, in part, on our expectations regarding future sales. In particular, we expect to continue incurring substantial expenses relating to the marketing and promotion of our products.
14
Since many of our costs are fixed in the short term, if we have a shortfall in sales, we may be unable to reduce expenses quickly enough to avoid losses. If this occurs, we will not be profitable. Accordingly, you should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results as an indication of our future performance.
We depend on independent distributors to sell our products in international markets.
We sell our products in international markets through independent distributors. These distributors may not command the necessary resources to effectively market and sell our products. If a distributor fails to meet annual sales goals, it may be difficult and costly to locate an acceptable substitute distributor. If a change in our distributors becomes necessary, we may experience increased costs, as well as substantial disruption and a resulting loss of sales.
Our sales in international markets are subject to a variety of laws and political and economic risks that may adversely impact our sales and results of operations in certain regions.
Our ability to capitalize on growth in international markets is subject to risks including:
| • | changes in currency exchange rates which impact the price to international consumers; |
| • | the burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws and regulations; |
| • | unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; and |
| • | the difficulties associated with promoting products in unfamiliar cultures. |
We are also subject to general, political, economic and regulatory risks in connection with our international sales operations, including:
| • | political instability; |
| • | changes in diplomatic and trade relationships; |
| • | general economic fluctuations in specific countries or markets; and |
| • | changes in regulatory schemes. |
Any of the above mentioned factors could adversely affect our sales and results of operations in international markets.
We are subject to currency fluctuations.
We are exposed to certain foreign currency risks in the importation of goods from Japan. The line of urine chemistry analyzers, two assemblies for our iQ200 platform and related consumables strips and spare parts are sourced from ARKRAY, a supplier located in Kyoto, Japan. Our purchases from this supplier are denominated in Japanese Yen. These components represent a significant portion of our material costs. Fluctuations in the US Dollar/ Japanese Yen exchange rate could result in increased costs for our key components. Any increases would reduce our gross margins and would be likely to result in a material adverse effect on our profitability. Similarly, we are also exposed to currency fluctuations with respect to the exportation of our products. All of our sales are denominated in US Dollars. Accordingly, any fluctuation in the exchange rate between the US Dollar and the currency of the country with which we are exporting products could also affect our ability to sell internationally.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Anti-takeover provisions of Delaware law could delay or prevent an acquisition of our Company.
We are subject to the anti-takeover provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which regulates corporate acquisitions. These provisions could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could delay or prevent a change in control transaction. They could also have the effect of discouraging others from making tender offers for our common stock or preventing changes in our management.
15
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
We lease all of our facilities. Our headquarters are located at 9172 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California 91311. The table below sets forth certain information regarding our leaseholds as of March 10, 2006:
| Location |
Approximate Floor Space (Sq. Ft.) |
Monthly Rent |
Use | ||||
| Chatsworth, CA |
76,462 | $ | 52,363 | Corporate Headquarters and Manufacturing | |||
| Westwood, MA |
18,000 | $ | 19,000 | Sample Processing Subsidiary | |||
| League City, TX |
4,645 | $ | 8,547 | Research and Development Subsidiary | |||
We believe our facilities are adequate to meet our current and near-term needs.
We are not currently involved in any litigation that requires disclosure in this Report.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We did not submit any matters to vote of security holders during the quarter ended December 31, 2005.
16
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On April 7, 2004 our common stock listing was transferred from the American Stock Exchange under the symbol “IRI” to the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol “IRIS.”
The closing price of the Common Stock on March 10, 2006 was $15.66 per share. The table below sets forth high and low closing prices during the period January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2005:
| Price per share | ||||||
| Low |
High | |||||
| Fiscal 2005 |
||||||
| First Quarter |
$ | 8.96 | $ | 11.51 | ||
| Second Quarter |
11.22 | 19.11 | ||||
| Third Quarter |
14.02 | 19.36 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter |
19.00 | 27.96 | ||||
| Fiscal 2004 |
||||||
| First Quarter |
$ | 5.80 | $ | 7.15 | ||
| Second Quarter |
6.22 | 9.18 | ||||
| Third Quarter |
6.29 | 7.80 | ||||
| Fourth Quarter |
7.45 | 9.75 | ||||
As of March 10, 2006, we had approximately 2,500 holders of record of our common stock.
We have never paid any cash dividends. We presently intend to retain any future earnings for use in our business. Furthermore, we may not pay any cash dividends on the common stock, or repurchase any shares of the common stock, without the written consent of our lender.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K in order to understand fully factors that may affect the comparability of the financial data presented below.
| Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||||||
| (in thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Statement of Operations Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Net revenues |
$ | 62,780 | $ | 43,650 | $ | 31,345 | $ | 28,188 | $ | 28,648 | |||||||||
| Operating income (loss) from continuing operations |
8,941 | 4,465 | (543 | ) | 1,902 | 3,306 | |||||||||||||
| Interest and other income (expense), net |
605 | (666 | ) | (340 | ) | (441 | ) | (740 | ) | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
6,131 | 2,280 | (530 | ) | 877 | 1,539 | |||||||||||||
| Basic net Income (loss) per share |
0.37 | 0.16 | (0.05 | ) | 0.08 | 0.15 | |||||||||||||
| Diluted net Income (loss) per share |
0.35 | 0.14 | (0.05 | ) | 0.08 | 0.14 | |||||||||||||
| Balance Sheet Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Working capital |
33,879 | 24,959 | 6,614 | 6,445 | 8,636 | ||||||||||||||
| Total assets |
63,929 | 48,136 | 32,480 | 27,223 | 26,503 | ||||||||||||||
| Total debt |
0 | 0 | 5,032 | 4,245 | 5,249 | ||||||||||||||
| Total liabilities |
10,160 | 8,963 | 13,013 | 9,874 | 10,538 | ||||||||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity |
53,769 | 39,173 | 19,467 | 17,349 | 15,965 | ||||||||||||||
17
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
IRIS International, Inc. consists of three operating units. Our largest unit, Iris Diagnostics Division, designs, manufactures and markets in vitro diagnostics (IVD) systems, consumables and supplies for urinalysis. Our Sample Processing division markets small centrifuges and other processing equipment and accessories for rapid specimen processing, and our Advanced Digital Imaging and Research LLC (ADIR) subsidiary assists in the advancement of proprietary imaging technology while conducting government-sponsored research and contract development in imaging and pattern recognition.
We generate revenues primarily from sales of IVD instruments, IVD consumables and service and sample processing instruments and supplies. Revenues from IVD instruments include sales of urine microscopy analyzers manufactured by us and urine chemistry analyzers purchased from a Japanese manufacturer. We sell the urine microscopy analyzers worldwide and fully automated urine chemistry analyzers domestically. In addition, we expect to initiate sales of a semi-automated chemistry analyzer, the iChem 100 in the second quarter of 2006. Consumables include products such as chemical reagents and urine test strips. Service revenues are derived primarily from annual service contracts purchased by our domestic customers after the initial year of sale, which is covered by product warranties. Once the analyzers are installed, we generate recurring revenue from sales of consumables. Consumable and service revenue will continue to expand as the installed base of related instruments increases. Revenue is also generated from sales of sample processing instruments and related supplies, which primarily consists of centrifuge systems, DNA processing workstations and blood analysis products. These products are sold worldwide through distributors.
Domestic sales are direct to the customer through our sales force, whereas international sales, with the exception of France, are through independent distributors. Sales in France are direct to end use customers. International sales represented 30% of consolidated revenues in 2005 as compared to 18% in 2004. Since the launch of our iQ200 product line, we have increased our sales efforts in the international marketplace, with the ultimate goal of balancing our urinalysis business between domestic and international markets. Since international sales are made through independent distributors, gross profit margin is lower than domestic sales of the same products, but we do not incur sales and marketing costs for such sales.
On June 2, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the assets (primarily technology and inventory) of the urinalysis business of Quidel Corporation. Our total acquisition cost amounted to $0.8 million. With this acquisition, we acquired significant core technology and know-how in urine chemistry strips, patents and trademarks, product designs, a strip manufacturing facility in Germany and a semi-automated urine chemistry analyzer that will enable us to offer a more complete product line.
We make significant investments in research and development for new products and enhancements to existing products. We internally fund research and development programs, and through ADIR, we also receive government grants to fund various research activities.
The following table summarizes product technology expenditures for the periods indicated:
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Total product technology expenditures during year |
$ | 6,857 | $ | 5,448 | $ | 5,929 | ||||||
| Less: amounts capitalized during year to software development costs as reported in the consolidated statements of cash flow |
(171 | ) | (64 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||||
| Less: amounts reimbursed through grants for government sponsored research and development |
(1,649 | ) | (1,464 | ) | (936 | ) | ||||||
| Research and development expense as reported in the consolidated statements of operations |
$ | 5,037 | $ | 3,920 | $ | 4,393 | ||||||
18
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations require us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-K describes the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. We regularly discuss with our audit committee the basis of our estimates. Actual results may differ from these estimates and such differences may be material.
We believe the following critical accounting policies, among others, affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue recognition – Revenues are primarily derived from the sale of IVD instruments, sales of consumable supplies and services for IVD systems as well as sales of sample processing instruments and related supplies. Revenue is recognized once all of the following conditions have been met: a) an authorized purchase order has been received in writing with a fixed and determinable sales price, b) customer credit worthiness has been established, and c) delivery of the product based on shipping terms. The majority of domestic IVD instrument sales generally include installation and training to be performed.
Revenue is recorded in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Statement 00-21 “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” and Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements which generally requires revenue earned on product sales involving multiple-elements to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of those elements. Multiple elements of our domestic product sales include IVD instruments and training. Training elements are valued based on hourly rates, which we charge for these services when sold apart from hardware sales.
Accordingly, we allocate revenue to each element in a multiple-element arrangement based on the element’s respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold and specifically defined in a quotation or contract.
A portion of our revenues are derived from sale-type leases as we provide lease financing to certain customers that purchase our diagnostic instruments. Leases under these arrangements are classified as sales-type leases. These leases typically have terms of five years. Revenue from sales-type leases are recognized when collectibility of the minimum lease payments is reasonably predictable and no important uncertainties surround the amount of unreimbursable costs yet to be incurred by us as lessor under the lease. The minimum lease payments that accrue to our benefit as lessor are recorded as the gross investment in the lease. The difference between the gross investment in the lease and the sum of the present value of the minimum lease payments and unguaranteed residual value, accruing to our benefit as lessor, are recorded as unearned income.
We recognize revenues from service contracts ratably over the term of the service period, which typically ranges from twelve to sixty months. Payments for service contracts are generally received in advance. Deferred revenue represents the revenues to be recognized over the remaining term of the service contracts.
Inventory valuation – We value inventories at the lower of cost or market value on a first-in, first-out basis. Provision for potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory is made based on management’s analysis of inventory levels and future sales forecasts. We recognize that although we have introduced our new iQ200 product line of analyzers, an installed based of our legacy products still exist. We maintain a base supply of service parts for these products, a portion of which is classified as a long-term asset on our balance sheet. Management will periodically review the carrying value of such parts to ensure that they continue to have net realizable value.
19
Capitalized Software – We capitalize software development costs in connection with our development of our urine analyzers in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 86, “Accounting for the Cost of Capitalized Software to Be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed.” We capitalize software development costs once technological feasibility is established and such costs are determined to be recoverable against future revenues.
Capitalized software development costs are expensed to cost of sales over periods up to five years. When, in management’s estimate, future revenues will not be sufficient to recover previously capitalized software development costs, we will expense such items as additional software development amortization in the period the impairment is identified. Such adjustments are normally attributable to changes in market conditions or product quality considerations.
Income taxes – We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense represents the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
20
Results of Operations
The following table summarizes results of operations data for the periods indicated. The percentages in the table are based on total revenues with the exception of percentages for cost of goods sold which are computed on related revenue.
| Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||
| IVD instruments |
$ | 27,542 | 44 | % | $ | 14,845 | 34 | % | $ | 7,470 | 24 | % | ||||||||
| IVD consumables and service |
25,708 | 41 | % | 20,126 | 46 | % | 17,252 | 55 | % | |||||||||||
| Sample Processing instruments and supplies |
9,530 | 15 | % | 8,343 | 19 | % | 6,076 | 19 | % | |||||||||||
| Royalty and license revenues |
— | — | 336 | 1 | % | 547 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total revenues |
62,780 | 100 | % | 43,650 | 100 | % | 31,345 | 100 | % | |||||||||||
| Gross Profit* |
||||||||||||||||||||
| IVD instruments |
12,086 | 44 | % | 4,753 | 32 | % | 1,488 | 20 | % | |||||||||||
| IVD consumable and supplies |
14,524 | 56 | % | 12,144 | 60 | % | 10,623 | 62 | % | |||||||||||
| Sample Processing instruments and supplies |
4,535 | 48 | % | 4,158 | 50 | % | 2,975 | 49 | % | |||||||||||
| Royalty and license revenues |
— | — | 336 | — | 547 | — | ||||||||||||||
| Gross profit |
31,145 | 50 | % | 21,391 | 49 | % | 15,633 | 50 | % | |||||||||||
| Operating expenses |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Marketing and selling |
10,026 | 16 | % | 7,165 | 16 | % | 5,346 | 17 | % | |||||||||||
| General and administrative |
7,141 | 11 | % | 5,841 | 13 | % | 6,437 | 21 | % | |||||||||||
| Research and development, net |
5,037 | 8 | % | 3,920 | 9 | % | 4,393 | 14 | % | |||||||||||
| Total operating expenses |
22,204 | 35 | % | 16,926 | 39 | % | 16,176 | 52 | % | |||||||||||
| Operating income (loss) |
8,941 | 14 | % | 4,465 | 10 | % | (543 | ) | 2 | % | ||||||||||
| Other income (expense) |
605 | (666 | ) | (340 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Income (loss) before for income taxes (benefit) |
9,546 | 15 | % | 3,799 | 9 | % | (883 | ) | 3 | % | ||||||||||
| Income taxes (benefit)** |
3,415 | 36 | % | 1,519 | 40 | % | (353 | ) | 40 | % | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,131 | 10 | % | $ | 2,280 | 5 | % | $ | (530 | ) | 2 | % | |||||||
| * | Gross Profit Margin percentages are based on the related sales of each category. |
| ** | Income tax percentage is computed based on the relationship of income taxes to pre-tax income. |
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2005 to 2004
Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 increased by 44% over the prior year. Revenues in the IVD segment increased 51% to $53.3 million in 2005, up from $35.3 million in the prior year. Sales of IVD instruments increased to $27.5 million from $14.8 million, an increase of $12.7 million, or 86% over our 2004 sales. The increase is primarily due to the demand for the iQ200 product line. In 2004, we discontinued sales of our legacy instrument systems. We will continue to service and support the installed base of legacy systems until such time as all customers convert to our iQ200 systems. Sales of IVD consumables and service also increased during the year to $25.7 million from $20.1 million, an increase of $5.6 million or 28% over 2004, primarily due to the larger installed base of instruments. Revenues from the sample processing instruments and supplies increased to $9.5 million from $8.3 million, or 14% over 2004. This increase is primarily due to increased sales of centrifuges, parts and service within this segment.
Our unit volume of instruments sold increased substantially during 2005 with average revenue per system sold domestically up approximately 6% whereas international revenue per instrument was up approximately 5%
21
as compared to the previous year. Unit sales of the iQ200 microscopy analyzer since its launch in 2003 increased to 777 units. 437 iQ200 analyzers were sold during the current year as compared to 234 during 2004. Domestically we sell the iQ200 microscopy analyzer separately or combined with a chemistry analyzer, which we acquire from a Japanese company. A majority of domestic sales are sold as systems and include an iQ200 microscopy analyzer and a chemistry analyzer. We sell our instruments and consumables direct to customers domestically. In the international market, the average sale prices of the iQ200 analyzer and related consumables are lower due to the fact that such sales, with the exception of France, are made through independent distributors in 60 countries. International revenues accounted for 30% of consolidated revenue during 2005 compared to 18% during 2004.
Overall gross profit margin increased from 49% in 2004 to 50% in 2005. The gross profit margin of our IVD instruments increased to 44% in 2005 up from 32% in 2004 primarily due to cost reduction programs and increased efficiencies related to volume of the iQ200 microscopy analyzers. The gross profit margin of our IVD consumables and services decreased to 56% during 2005 compared to 60% in 2004. The decrease resulted primarily from the acquisition of the chemistry strip manufacturing operation acquired in June 2005 which is operating below capacity. Gross profit margin for our sample processing laboratory instrument and supply segment amounted to 48% in 2005, compared to 50% for 2004. This decrease was due to a combination of lower margins on increased sales to OEM accounts at lower gross profit margins, new product introduction expenses and costs related to the move to a new facility for this division.
Marketing and selling expenses totaled $10.0 million during 2005, as compared to $7.2 million in 2004. As a percentage of sales, such expenses were 16% of revenues during both 2005 and 2004. The dollar increase relates to additional payroll-related expenditures of $1.5 million; expanded participation in industry shows of $184,000; increased commissions on higher revenue of $213,000; fees paid to GPOs (group purchasing organizations) of $198,000; expanded marketing research and professional support of $266,000; and travel and related costs of $400,000.
General and administrative expenses increased during 2005 to $7.1 million from $5.8 million in the prior year. The $1.3 million increase is comprised of the following: payroll-related expenses due to additional employees of $553,000; outside consultants increased costs of $394,000; increased amortization of deferred compensation related to our employee stock ownership program of $134,000; additional Sarbanes Oxley compliance costs of $129,000 and higher recruiting fees of $111,000.
Research and development expenses increased to $5.0 million for 2005, as compared to $3.9 million in 2004. Research and Development expenses were net of capitalized software development costs during the year of $171,000 and reimbursed costs under research and development grants and contracts of $1.6 million related to our ADIR division. R&D expenses increased due to product development activity for new product platforms currently in development. Prior year expenditures related primarily to the development of the iQ200 Sprint instrument, released in the first quarter of 2005, plus ongoing development activities relating to enhancements to existing product lines and research into new products. We expect to continue to invest in research and development during 2006 at an increased rate of approximately 10% of revenues.
Interest income during 2005 amounted to $607,000, an increase from $111,000 in 2004 and relates to our investment of cash during the year and interest earned on lease financing from the sale of instruments to customers. Interest expense decreased to $15,000 in 2005 down from $243,000 in the prior year as a result of the outstanding debt being repaid in the second quarter of 2004. Other expense in 2004 included the permanent write-down of a security held for sale in the amount of $531,000. During 2005, this security was completely sold.
Income tax expense during the year amounted to 36% of pre-tax income as compared to 40%. The improvement resulted primarily from tax credits realized from research and development activities. The tax provision is a non-cash item, since we have significant deferred tax assets, primarily relating to tax loss carryforwards.
22
Comparison of Year Ended December 31, 2004 to 2003
Net revenues for the year ended December 31, 2004 increased by 39% over 2003. Revenues from the IVD urinalysis segment totaled $35.3 million in 2004, up from $25.3 million in 2003. Sales of IVD instruments increased to $14.8 million in 2004 from $7.5 million in 2003, an increase of 99% over 2003. The increase is primarily due to robust sales of the iQ200 analyzers and systems, which accounted for $7.4 million of instrument sales. As expected, sales of the older models diminished during 2004. Sales of IVD system consumables and services increased to $20.1 million in 2004 from $17.3 million, an increase of $2.8 million or 17% over 2003, primarily due to the larger installed base of instruments. Revenues from the small laboratory devices segment increased to $8.3 million in 2004 from $6.1 million, or 37% over 2003. This increase is primarily due to increased sales of centrifuges, parts and service within this segment. Revenues also include royalty and license fees of approximately $336,000 in 2004 as compared to $556,000 during 2003. As expected such revenue ceased in the third quarter of 2004, as the related license expired.
Gross profit margins decreased to 49% during 2004 compared to 50% during 2003. Gross profit margin for the IVD urinalysis segment totaled 49% in 2004, from 50% in 2003. Gross profit margin for IVD instruments was 32% during 2004 as compared to 20% in 2003. The improvement is due to a number of factors; higher production levels in the first full year of production of the iQ200 analyzer whereby overhead could be absorbed, as well as other efficiencies associated with continued production of the iQ200. The improvement was impacted by sales of our product to international independent distributors were at lower margin and a $250,000 addition to our reserves during 2004 for obsolescence of slow moving inventory. Gross profit margin IVD consumables and services as a percentage of related sales was 60% during 2004 as compared to 62% during 2003, the decrease resulted primarily from sale to international independent distributors. Gross profit margin for sample processing division’s instruments segment totaled 50% for 2004 as compared to 49% in 2003. This improvement is due primarily to a higher sales base during 2004.
Marketing and selling expenses totaled $7.2 million during 2004 as compared to $5.3 million in 2003, a 34% increase. As a percentage of sales such expenses during 2004 were 16% of revenues compared to 17% the prior year. The increase relates to additional sales and marketing personnel (including commissions) amounting to approximately $900,000 plus approximately $670,000 relating to the cost of installation, training and customer support for the increased number of instrument installations during the year. In addition, we incurred $400,000 of additional costs relating to the expansion of our international sales organization.
General and administrative expenses decreased during 2004 to $5.8 million from $6.4 million in the prior year. The decrease relates to management severance costs during 2003 of $1.2 million and lower compensation expense of $346,000, relating to compensation expense portion of our Employee Stock Purchase Plan transactions, offset by the cost of compliance with Section 404 of Sarbanes Oxley of $400,000; NASDAQ listing fee paid during the year of $100,000 plus higher legal fees of $274,000.
Research and development expenses decreased to $3.9 million for 2004, as compared to $4.4 million in 2003. R&D expenses were net of capitalized software development costs of $64,000 and reimbursed costs under research and development grants and contracts of $1.5 million. Expenses were down during 2004 with the launch in 2003 of the iQ200 Analyzer. During 2004, expenditures relate to the new iQ200 Sprint product, which was released in the first quarter of 2005 plus ongoing development activities relating to enhancements to existing product lines.
Interest expense decreased to $243,000 in 2004 down from $351,000 during 2003 as a result of the repayment of debt in the second quarter of 2004. Interest income for the year amounted to $111,000, an increase over $40,000 and relates to our investment of excess funds during the year.
During 2004 we incurred an income tax provision of approximately $1.5 million as compared to an tax benefit of $353,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003.
23
Contractual Obligations and Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
The following table aggregates our expected minimum contractual obligations and commitments subsequent to December 31, 2005:
| Total |
Less than 1 year |
1-3 years |
3-5 years |
More than 5 years | |||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Contractual Obligations* |
|||||||||||||||
| Operating lease commitments |
$ | 5,402 | $ | 1,095 | $ | 1,712 | $ | 1,608 | $ | 987 | |||||
| Capital lease commitments |
90 | 37 | 39 | 14 | — | ||||||||||
| Total contractual cash commitments |
$ | 5,492 | $ | 1,132 | $ | 1,751 | $ | 1,622 | $ | 987 | |||||
| * | Not included in the table above are normal recurring accounts payable or accrued expenses which are presented on the accompanying consolidated financial statements. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary source of liquidity is cash from operations, which depends heavily on sales of our IVD instruments, consumables and service, as well as sales of sample processing instruments and supplies. In 2005 our cash and cash equivalents increased $6.3 million to $19.1 million.
On June 2, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the assets of the urinalysis business of Quidel Corporation. Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, we paid $500,000 in cash and assumed approximately $34,000 in accrued liabilities. We also incurred approximately $243,000 in professional and other fees. We anticipate investing additional funds in expanding this product line during 2006.
Operating Cash Flows. Cash flow provided by operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 amounted to $4.6 million compared to $1.5 million in the prior year. The improvement includes increased net income of $6.1 million as compared to $2.3 million during 2004 plus $3.4 million from deferred taxes and $1.8 million from depreciation and amortization. Trade receivables increased by $3.5 million due to the higher sales volume during the fourth quarter and we also invested an additional $4.7 million in financing sale-type leases for customers.
The relationship of receivables to revenues has improved over the prior year. The number of days sales in accounts receivable has improved to 69 days at the end of 2005 from 74 days at the end of 2004. The number of days sales in inventory decreased to 86 days at the end of 2005 compared to 114 days at the end of 2004. The lower number of days sales in inventory is due to; higher volume; improved inventory planning procedures and reduced amount of lead-time required for safety stock on hand.
Our cash flow continues to be favorably affected by the fact that we have approximately $20.0 million in tax loss carryforwards known as NOLs as well as R&D credit carryforwards of approximately $2.8 million, the majority of which don’t expire in the near future. We also realize tax deductions from both the exercise of stock options and the purchase by employees of the our common stock at a discount to market. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we realized tax deductions of approximately $10.0 million relating to these items and expect to realize similar amounts during 2006.
24
Investing Activities. Cash used in investing activities totaled $2.1 million in 2005, as compared to $1.1 million in the prior year. Included in 2005 were expenditures for property and equipment of $1.4 million and $743,000, net of accrued liabilities of $34,000, relating to the acquisition of the assets of the urinalysis business of Quidel Corporation described above.
Financing Activities. For the year ended December 31, 2005, financing activities provided $3.8 million of cash primarily from the issuances of common stock for stock options and warrant exercises as well as purchases of shares by employees through the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan compared to $15.1 million received during 2004. During 2004 we utilized $5.0 million for repayment of debt.
In May 2004, we signed a credit facility with a major bank. The credit facility consists of a $6.5 million revolving line of credit for working capital and a $10.0 million line of credit for acquisitions and product opportunities. Borrowings under the revolving line of credit are limited to a percentage of eligible receivables and inventory. The entire credit facility has variable interest rates, which will change from time to time based on changes to either the LIBOR rate or the lender’s prime rate. As of December 31, 2005, there were no borrowings under the credit facility. We are subject to certain financial covenants under the credit facility with the bank and as of December 31, 2005, we were in compliance with such covenants.
We believe that our current cash on hand, together with cash generated from operations and cash available under the credit facility is sufficient to fund normal operations during the foreseeable future. However additional funding may be required to fund significant expansion of our business. There is no assurance that such funding will be available, on terms acceptable to us.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” that establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which a company exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services or incurs a liability in exchange for goods and services that is based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. The primary focus of this pronouncement is on issuing share-based payments for services provided by employees. This pronouncement also requires recognition of compensation expense for new equity instruments awarded or for modifications, cancellations or repurchases of existing awards starting January 1, 2006. Compensation expense for new equity awards, in most cases, will be based on the fair value of the stock on the date of grant and will be recognized over the vesting service period. An award of a liability instrument, as defined by this pronouncement, will initially be recorded at fair value and will be adjusted each reporting period to the new fair value through the date of settlement. Under the terms of this pronouncement, we and other issuers will begin to expense equity awards using a modified version of prospective application. Under that transition method, compensation cost is recognized on or after the required effective date for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on the fair value of those awards on their respective grant dates. For periods before the required effective date for which financial statements have not yet been issued, we had the option to elect to apply a modified version of retrospective application under which financial statements for prior periods are adjusted on a basis consistent with the pro forma disclosures required by Statement No. 123.
In October 2005, the Board of Directors approved a resolution whereby all employee options then outstanding were fully vested. In accordance with FIN 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Options”, we recorded a charge to earnings in the amount of $112,000 representing an estimate for employee turnover during the remaining vesting period. Management took this action to mitigate the effect on future earnings of implementing SFAS No. 123R.
We adopted SFAS No. 123R effective January 1, 2006 and began to expense previously issued equity awards for which service has not been rendered on that date. As of December 31, 2005, existing employee stock options were fully vested; accordingly there was no expense for such options that would be recognized in year subsequent to 2005.
25
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) be recorded as current period charges and that the allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for us on January 1, 2006. We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Inflation
We do not foresee any material impact on our operations from inflation.
Healthcare Reform Policies
In recent years, an increasing number of legislative proposals have been introduced or proposed in Congress and in some state legislatures that would effect major changes in the healthcare system, nationally, at the state level or both. Future legislation, regulation or payment policies of Medicare, Medicaid, private health insurance plans, health maintenance organizations and other third-party payors could adversely affect the demand for our current or future products and our ability to sell our products on a profitable basis. Moreover, healthcare legislation is an area of extensive and dynamic change, and we cannot predict future legislative changes in the healthcare field or their impact on our business.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
Our business is exposed to various market risks, including changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not invest in derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We had no debt at December 31, 2005.
Foreign Currencies
We are subject to some currency risk on purchases of product from a Japanese manufacturer. Our purchases of product are negotiated annually and may be affected by changing foreign currency rates.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our Index to Financial Statements, Consolidated Financial Statements, the reports thereon, and the notes thereto commence on Page 32 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, immediately following the signature page to this report.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer, or CEO, and chief financial officer, or CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
26
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, an evaluation was performed on the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2005.
An evaluation was also performed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, of any change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. That evaluation did not identify any change in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during our latest fiscal quarter and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as this term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2005.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions and that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 has been audited by BDO Seidman LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included below.
27
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of IRIS International, Inc.
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that IRIS International, Inc. (IRIS) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). IRIS’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of IRIS’ internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that IRIS maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, IRIS maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of IRIS International, Inc., as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 of IRIS and our report dated March 3, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ BDO SEIDMAN LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 3, 2006
None
28
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Information regarding directors and executive officers will appear in the definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of IRIS shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference. This proxy statement will be filed within 120 days following December 31, 2005.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information regarding executive compensation will appear in the definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of IRIS shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters will appear in the definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of IRIS shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions will appear in the definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of IRIS shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information regarding principal accounting fees and services will appear in the definitive proxy statement for the 2006 annual meeting of IRIS shareholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
29
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules:
Reference is made to the Index to Financial Statements, Consolidated Financial Statements, the reports thereon, and the notes thereto commencing on Page 30 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Exhibits
| Exhibit Number |
Description |
Reference Document | ||
| 2.1 | Asset Purchase Agreement by and between by and between IRIS International, Inc., Blitz 05-047 GmbH, Quidel Corporation and Quidel Deutschland GmbH, dated April 26, 2005** | (2) | ||
| 3.1(a) | Certificate of Incorporation, as amended | (1) | ||
| 3.1(b) | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series C Preferred | (3) | ||
| 3.1(c) | Certificate of Ownership and Merger | (10) | ||
| 3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws | (10) | ||
| 4.1 | Specimen of Common Stock Certificate | (4) | ||
| 4.2 | Rights Agreement, dated as of January 21, 2000, between the Company and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, with related exhibits. | (3) | ||
| 4.3 | Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series C Preferred | (3) | ||
| 4.4 | Form of Warrant issued to April 2004 investors to purchase an aggregate of 319,500 shares of Common Stock | (11) | ||
| 4.5 | Warrant Certificate dated April 19, 2004, issued to Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. to purchase 122,475 shares of Common Stock | (13) | ||
| 10.1(a) | Lease for Property Located at 9172 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California (Headquarters), dated November 28, 2001 | (5) | ||
| 10.1(b) | Amendment No. 1, dated October 17, 2005, to the Lease for Property Located at 9172 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California (Headquarters), dated November 28, 2001 | (14) | ||
| 10.1(c) | Lease for Property Located at 9158-9162 Eton Avenue, Chatsworth, California, dated October 17, 2005 | (14) | ||
| 10.2(a) | 1994 Stock Option Plan and forms of Stock Option Agreement | (6)† | ||
| 10.2(b) | Certificate of Officer With Respect to Amendment of 1994 Stock Option Plan | (7) | ||
| 10.2(c) | Employee Stock Purchase Plan | (9)† | ||
| 10.2(d) | 1997 Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option Agreement | (7)† | ||
| 10.2(e) | 1998 Stock Option Plan and form of Stock Option Agreement | (8)† | ||
| 10.3(a) | Change in Terms Agreement dated May 25, 2004 by and between the Company and California Bank & Trust | (13) | ||
| 10.3(b) | Business Loan Agreement dated May 25, 2004 by and between the Company and California Bank & Trust | (13) | ||
30
| Exhibit Number |
Description |
Reference Document | ||
| 10.3(c) | Promissory Note dated May 25, 2004 by and between the Company and California Bank & Trust | (13) | ||
| 10.3(d) | Commercial Security Agreements dated May 25, 2004 by and between the Company and California Bank & Trust | (13) | ||
| 10.3(e) | Landlord’s Consent dated February 7, 2002 by and between the Company, the Company’s Landlord and California Bank & Trust | (10) | ||
| 10.3(f) | Commercial Guaranty Agreement dated May 25, 2004 by and between the Company, Statspin, Inc (the Company’s affiliate) and California Bank & Trust | (10) | ||
| 10.3(g) | Commercial Guaranty Agreement dated May 25, 2004 by and between the Company, Advanced Digital Imaging Research, LLP (the Company’s affiliate) and California Bank & Trust | (10) | ||
| 10.4 | Employment Agreement dated January 5, 2004 by and between the Company and Martin G. Paravato | (11)† | ||
| 10.5 | Employment Agreement dated February 13, 2004 by and between the Company and Cesar M Garcia | (11)† | ||
| 10.6 | Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 19, 2004, by and between the Company and the purchasers identified therein. | (12) | ||
| 21 | List of Subsidiaries | * | ||
| 23 | Consent of BDO Seidman, LLP | * | ||
| 31.1 | Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 By Chief Executive Officer | * | ||
| 31.2 | Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 By Chief Financial Officer | * | ||
| 32.1 | Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 By Chief Executive Officer | * | ||
| 32.2 | Statement Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 By Chief Financial Officer | * | ||
| * | Filed herewith |
| † | Each a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 10-K. |
| ** | Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the schedules to the Asset Purchase Agreement have been omitted. The Registrant undertakes to supplementally furnish a copy of the omitted schedules to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
Exhibits followed by a number in parenthesis are incorporated by reference to the similarly numbered Company document cited below:
| (1) | Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 1987 and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1993. |
| (2) | Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 3, 2005. |
| (3) | Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 26, 2000. |
| (4) | Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1994. |
31
| (5) | Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 |
| (6) | Registration Statement on Form S-8, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 1994 (File No. 33-82560). |
| (7) | Registration Statement on Form S-8, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 16, 1997 (File No. 333-31393). |
| (8) | Registration Statement on Form S-8, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 9, 1998 (File No. 333-65547). |
| (9) | Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 |
| (10) | Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 |
| (11) | Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 |
| (12) | Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 22, 2004. |
| (13) | Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 |
| (14) | Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 |
32
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Chatsworth, California, on March 14, 2006.
| IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
|
/s/ CESAR M. GARCÍA |
| Cesar M. García, |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Signature |
Title |
Date | ||
| /s/ CESAR M. GARCÍA Cesar M. García |
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
March 14, 2006 | ||
| /s/ MARTIN G. PARAVATO Martin G. Paravato |
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer) |
March 14, 2006 | ||
| /s/ THOMAS RICKS Thomas Ricks |
Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
March 14, 2006 | ||
| /s/ RICHARD H. WILLIAMS Richard H. Williams |
Chairman of the Board |
March 14, 2006 | ||
| /s/ THOMAS ADAMS Thomas Adams |
Director |
March 14, 2006 | ||
| /s/ STEVEN M. BESBECK Steven M. Besbeck |
Director |
March 14, 2006 | ||
| /s/ MICHAEL D. MATTE Michael D. Matte |
Director |
March 14, 2006 | ||
| /s/ RICHARD G. NADEAU Richard G. Nadeau |
Director |
March 14, 2006 | ||
33
34
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of IRIS International, Inc.
Chatsworth, California
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of IRIS International, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, cash flows and comprehensive income (loss) for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of IRIS International, Inc. at December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of its operations, cash flows and comprehensive income (loss) for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of IRIS International, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 3, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 3, 2006
35
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| At December 31, |
||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Assets | ||||||||
| Current assets: |
||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 19,145 | $ | 12,839 | ||||
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts and sales returns of $288 and $336 |
11,874 | 8,348 | ||||||
| Inventories, net (note 4) |
7,590 | 7,834 | ||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
1,132 | 579 | ||||||
| Investment in sales-type leases (note 6) |
1,455 | 499 | ||||||
| Deferred tax asset (note 9) |
2,792 | 3,650 | ||||||
| Total current assets |
43,988 | 33,749 | ||||||
| Property and equipment, at cost, net (note 5) |
4,076 | 3,880 | ||||||
| Goodwill |
189 | 189 | ||||||
| Software development costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,704 and $2,186 |
1,570 | 1,930 | ||||||
| Deferred tax asset (note 9) |
7,237 | 5,665 | ||||||
| Inventories – long term portion (note 4) |
632 | 290 | ||||||
| Investment in sales-type leases (note 6) |
5,841 | 2,142 | ||||||
| Other assets |
396 | 291 | ||||||
| Total assets |
$ | 63,929 | $ | 48,136 | ||||
| Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity | ||||||||
| Current liabilities: |
||||||||
| Accounts payable |
$ | 4,464 | $ | 4,258 | ||||
| Accrued expenses (note 7) |
4,188 | 3,398 | ||||||
| Deferred service contract revenue |
1,457 | 1,134 | ||||||
| Total current liabilities |
10,109 | 8,790 | ||||||
| Deferred service contract revenue, long term |
51 | 173 | ||||||
| Total liabilities |
10,160 | 8,963 | ||||||
| Commitments and contingencies (note 11) |
||||||||
| Shareholders’ equity: (note 10) |
||||||||
| Common stock, $.01 par value |
||||||||
| Authorized: 50 million shares; |
172 | 159 | ||||||
| Additional paid-in capital |
70,856 | 61,972 | ||||||
| Unearned compensation |
(546 | ) | (125 | ) | ||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income |
— | 11 | ||||||
| Accumulated deficit |
(16,713 | ) | (22,844 | ) | ||||
| Total shareholders’ equity |
53,769 | 39,173 | ||||||
| Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
$ | 63,929 | $ | 48,136 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
36
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| For the Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share amounts) |
||||||||||||
| Sales of IVD instruments |
$ | 27,542 | $ | 14,845 | $ | 7,470 | ||||||
| Sales of IVD consumables and service |
25,708 | 20,126 | 17,252 | |||||||||
| Sales of sample processing instruments and supplies |
9,530 | 8,343 | 6,076 | |||||||||
| Royalty and license revenues |
— | 336 | 547 | |||||||||
| Total revenues |
62,780 | 43,650 | 31,345 | |||||||||
| Cost of goods – IVD instruments |
15,456 | 10,092 | 5,982 | |||||||||
| Cost of goods – IVD consumable and supplies |
11,185 | 7,982 | 6,629 | |||||||||
| Cost of goods – sample processing instruments and supplies |
4,994 | 4,185 | 3,101 | |||||||||
| Total cost of goods sold |
31,635 | 22,259 | 15,712 | |||||||||
| Gross profit |
31,145 | 21,391 | 15,633 | |||||||||
| Marketing and selling |
10,026 | 7,165 | 5,346 | |||||||||
| General and administrative |
7,141 | 5,841 | 6,437 | |||||||||
| Research and development, net |
5,037 | 3,920 | 4,393 | |||||||||
| Total operating expenses |
22,204 | 16,926 | 16,176 | |||||||||
| Operating income (loss) |
8,941 | 4,465 | (543 | ) | ||||||||
| Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||
| Interest income |
607 | 111 | 40 | |||||||||
| Interest expense |
(15 | ) | (243 | ) | (351 | ) | ||||||
| Other income (expense) |
13 | (534 | ) | (29 | ) | |||||||
| Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes (Note 9) |
9,546 | 3,799 | (883 | ) | ||||||||
| Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
3,415 | 1,519 | (353 | ) | ||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,131 | $ | 2,280 | $ | (530 | ) | |||||
| Basic net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.37 | $ | 0.16 | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
| Diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic |
16,758 | 14,459 | 11,245 | |||||||||
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted |
17,654 | 15,818 | 11,245 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
37
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
| Common Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Unearned Compensation |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
Accumulated Deficit |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, January 1, 2003 |
10,845 | $ | 108 | $ | 41,891 | $ | (17 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | $ | (24,594 | ) | $ | 17,348 | ||||||||
| Common stock issued on exercise of stock options |
518 | 5 | 709 | — | — | — | 714 | |||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan for cash |
38 | 1 | 139 | (70 | ) | — | — | 70 | ||||||||||||||||
| Private placement of stock, net of offering costs |
500 | 5 | 1,613 | — | — | — | 1,618 | |||||||||||||||||
| Effect of variable accounting for options granted to certain employees |
— | — | 336 | (70 | ) | — | — | 266 | ||||||||||||||||
| Issuance of warrants for services |
— | — | 29 | (29 | ) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of unearned compensation |
— | — | — | 141 | — | — | 141 | |||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized losses on investments |
— | — | — | — | (160 | ) | — | (160 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net loss for year |
— | — | — | — | — | (530 | ) | (530 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2003 |
11,901 | $ | 119 | $ | 44,717 | $ | (45 | ) | $ | (200 | ) | $ | (25,124 | ) | $ | 19,467 | ||||||||
| Common stock issued on exercise of stock options & warrants |
1,864 | 18 | 3,285 | — | — | — | 3,303 | |||||||||||||||||
| Tax benefit from stock options exercises |
— | — | 2,015 | — | — | — | 2,015 | |||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan for cash |
67 | 1 | 470 | (224 | ) | — | — | 247 | ||||||||||||||||
| Private placement of stock, net of offering costs |
2,130 | 21 | 11,485 | — | — | — | 11,506 | |||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of unearned compensation |
— | — | — | 144 | — | — | 144 | |||||||||||||||||
| Realized loss on investments |
— | — | — | — | 538 | — | 538 | |||||||||||||||||
| Unrealized loss on investments |
— | — | — | — | (327 | ) | — | (327 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net income for year |
— | — | — | — | — | 2,280 | 2,280 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2004 |
15,962 | $ | 159 | $ | 61,972 | $ | (125 | ) | $ | 11 | $ | (22,844 | ) | $ | 39,173 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
38
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (continued)
| Common Stock |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Unearned Compensation |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Accumulated Deficit |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Shares |
Amount |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| (in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2004 |
15,962 | $ | 159 | $ | 61,972 | $ | (125 | ) | $ | 11 | $ | (22,844 | ) | $ | 39,173 | |||||||||
| Common stock issued on exercise of options & warrants |
1,140 | 12 | 3,029 | — | — | — | 3,041 | |||||||||||||||||
| Tax benefit from stock options exercises |
— | — | 4,080 | — | — | — | 4,080 | |||||||||||||||||
| Common stock issued under employee stock purchase plan for cash |
120 | 1 | 1,775 | (850 | ) | — | — | 926 | ||||||||||||||||
| Amortization of unearned compensation |
— | — | — | 429 | — | — | 429 | |||||||||||||||||
| Realized loss on investments |
— | — | — | — | (11 | ) | — | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Net income for year |
— | — | — | — | — | 6,131 | 6,131 | |||||||||||||||||
| Balance, December 31, 2005 |
17,222 | $ | 172 | $ | 70,856 | $ | (546 | ) | $ | — | $ | (16,713 | ) | $ | 53,769 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
39
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| For the Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,131 | $ | 2,280 | $ | (530 | ) | |||||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operations: |
||||||||||||
| Deferred taxes |
3,356 | 1,353 | (408 | ) | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
1,818 | 1,731 | 1,010 | |||||||||
| Common stock and stock based compensation |
541 | 144 | 406 | |||||||||
| Loss (gain) on sale/write down of investment |
(11 | ) | 538 | 30 | ||||||||
| Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
| Accounts receivable |
(3,526 | ) | (1,654 | ) | (2,916 | ) | ||||||
| Deferred service contract revenue |
201 | (82 | ) | 307 | ||||||||
| Inventories, net |
645 | (1,798 | ) | (902 | ) | |||||||
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(741 | ) | 81 | (131 | ) | |||||||
| Sales-type leases |
(4,655 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Other assets |
(196 | ) | (2,200 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||
| Accounts payable |
206 | 622 | 982 | |||||||||
| Accrued expenses |
827 | 497 | 1,152 | |||||||||
| Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
4,596 | 1,512 | (1,087 | ) | ||||||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
| Acquisition of property and equipment |
(1,392 | ) | (1,203 | ) | (1,375 | ) | ||||||
| Software development costs |
(171 | ) | (64 | ) | (600 | ) | ||||||
| Acquisition of subsidiary |
(743 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Sale of short-term investments |
198 | 197 | — | |||||||||
| Loan repaid by related party |
— | — | 125 | |||||||||
| Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,108 | ) | (1,070 | ) | (1,850 | ) | ||||||
| Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
| Issuance of common stock and warrants for cash |
3,855 | 15,056 | 2,401 | |||||||||
| Borrowings under line of credit |
— | 2,900 | 10,800 | |||||||||
| Repayments of line of credit |
— | (5,800 | ) | (8,900 | ) | |||||||
| Repayments of term loan |
— | (1,079 | ) | (329 | ) | |||||||
| Repayments of notes payable |
— | (1,069 | ) | (875 | ) | |||||||
| Payments of capital lease obligations |
(37 | ) | (55 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||||
| Net cash provided by financing activities |
3,818 | 9,953 | 3,044 | |||||||||
| Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
6,306 | 10,395 | 107 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
12,839 | 2,444 | 2,337 | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 19,145 | $ | 12,839 | $ | 2,444 | ||||||
| Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing activities: |
||||||||||||
| Non-cash issuance of common stock and common stock warrants |
$ | 850 | $ | 224 | $ | 169 | ||||||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
| Cash paid for income taxes |
72 | 74 | 64 | |||||||||
| Cash paid for interest |
15 | 97 | 176 | |||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
40
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
| For the Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
| (In thousand) | ||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) |
$ | 6,131 | $ | 2,280 | $ | (530 | ) | |||||
| Realized loss on investment |
(11 | ) | 538 | — | ||||||||
| Unrealized losses on investment, net of taxes |
— | (327 | ) | (160 | ) | |||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 6,120 | $ | 2,491 | $ | (690 | ) | |||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Company History
IRIS International, Inc. was incorporated in California in 1979 and reincorporated during 1987 in Delaware under the name of International Remote Imaging Systems, Inc. We changed our name to IRIS International, Inc. in December 2003. We design, develop, manufacture and market in vitro diagnostic (“IVD”) equipment, including IVD imaging systems based on patented and proprietary automated intelligent microscopy (“AIM”) technology, as well as special purpose centrifuges and other small instruments for automating microscopic procedures performed in clinical laboratories.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. The significant estimates in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements relate to the assessment of the carrying value of accounts receivables, inventories, purchased intangibles, estimated provisions for warranty costs and deferred tax assets. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation
Our financial statements include the accounts of IRIS International, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments
Short-term investments principally include certificates of deposit and debt instruments of the United States Government with maturities greater than three months and less than one year. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, we consider all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. We place our cash and investments with high credit quality financial institutions. At times, these deposits may be in excess of the federally insured limit.
Accounts Receivable
We sell predominantly to entities in the healthcare industry. We grant uncollateralized credit to customers, primarily hospitals, clinical and research laboratories, and distributors. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of customers before granting uncollateralized credit. No single customer accounts for 10% or more of our consolidated revenues or 10% or more of our accounts receivable at the balance sheet date.
Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under normal trade terms. We sell our products to distributors and customers in the health care industry. We perform credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and although we generally do not require collateral, letters of credit may be required from our customers in certain circumstances.
Management reviews accounts receivable on a monthly basis to determine if any receivables will potentially be uncollectible. We include accounts receivable balances that are determined to be uncollectible, along with a general reserve, in our allowance for doubtful accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance. Based on the information available to us, we believe our allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2005 is adequate.
42
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Inventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market on a first in, first out basis. Provision for potentially obsolete or slow-moving inventory is made based on management’s analysis of inventory levels and future sales forecasts. We currently have approximately $632,000 of non-current inventory relating to spare parts for our legacy instruments which we no longer produce but continue to support and provide maintenance repairs for our customers. Other inventory that is considered excess inventory is fully reserved.
Investment available for sale
Management classifies an investment in common equity securities as available for sale. Investments in available for sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a separate component of shareholders’ equity until realized, or until management believes a permanent decline in value has occurred. Realized gains and losses are included in earnings.
During 2004, management determined that a permanent decline in the value of its investment in equity securities had taken place and recorded a write-down in the carrying value of this investment in the amount of $531,000. The write-down is included in other expense in 2004 on the accompanying statements of operations. The investment was sold during 2005.
Property and Equipment and Depreciation
Property and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is generally computed using the straight-line method over three to five years, the estimated useful lives of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their useful life or the remaining term of the lease.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recorded at cost. The realizability of goodwill is evaluated periodically, at least annually, or as events or circumstances indicates a possible inability to recover the carrying amount. Such evaluation is based on various analyses, including cash flow and profitability projections. The analysis necessarily involves significant management judgment to evaluate the capacity of an acquired business to perform within projections. At December 31, 2005, we evaluated goodwill and determined that fair value had not decreased below carrying value and no adjustment to impair goodwill was necessary in accordance with SFAS No. 142.
Software Development Costs
We capitalize certain software development costs for new products and product enhancements once all planning, designing, coding and testing activities necessary to establish that the product can be produced to meet our design specifications are completed, and conclude capitalization when the product is ready for general release. Research and development costs relating to software development are expensed as incurred. Amortization of capitalized software development costs is provided on a product-by-product basis at the greater of the amount computed using (a) the ratio of current revenues for a product to the total of current and anticipated future revenues or (b) the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product up to five years. We capitalized the following software development costs; $171,000 in 2005; $64,000 in 2004 and $600,000 in 2003. Amortization expense of software development costs was $531,000 in 2005; $531,000 in 2004, and $110,000 in 2003.
43
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Long-Lived Assets
We will identify and record impairment losses for long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances result in the carrying amount of the assets exceed the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows associated with such assets. The measurement of the impairment losses recognized is based on the difference between the fair values and the carrying amounts of the assets. There were no impairments at December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Stock Based Compensation
We have adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 123 defines a fair value based method of accounting for an employee stock option. Fair value of the stock option is determined considering factors such as the exercise price, the expected life of the option, the current price of the underlying stock and its volatility, expected dividends on the stock, and the risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option. Under the fair value based method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period. Pro forma disclosures for entities that elect to continue to measure compensation cost under the intrinsic method provided by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 must include the effects of all awards granted. We account for stock-based awards to non-employees in accordance with SFAS No. 123 and EITF 96-18. An expense is recognized for common stock, warrants or options issued or repriced, for services rendered by non-employees based on the estimated fair value of the security exchanged.
On October 27, 2005, our Board of Directors passed a resolution whereby all existing employee stock options would be granted 100% vesting as of that date. In accordance with the provisions of FIN 44, “Accounting for Certain Transaction involving Stock Compensation”, we recorded an expense in the amount of $112,000.
We have adopted the disclosure only provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation”, as amended by Statement No. 148. If compensation expense for the stock options had been determined using “fair value” at the grant date for awards in 2005, 2004 and 2003, consistent with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, our net income (loss) and income (loss) per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) as reported |
$ | 6,131 | $ | 2,280 | $ | (530 | ) | |||||
| Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported income, net of related tax effects |
352 | 86 | 244 | |||||||||
| Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(3,610 | ) | (924 | ) | (557 | ) | ||||||
| Net income (loss) pro forma |
$ | 2,873 | $ | 1,442 | $ | (843 | ) | |||||
| Income (loss) per diluted share as reported |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.14 | $ | (0.05 | ) | |||||
| Income (loss) per diluted share proforma |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.09 | $ | (0.07 | ) | |||||
The pro forma calculations above are for informational purposes only. Future calculations of the pro forma effects of stock options may vary significantly due to changes in the assumptions described above as well as future grants, and for forfeitures of stock options.
44
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Revenue recognition
Revenues are primarily derived from the sale of IVD instruments, sales of consumable supplies and service contracts for IVD systems, as well as sales of sample processing instruments and related supplies. Revenue is recognized once all of the following conditions have been met: a) an authorized purchase order has been received in writing with a fixed and determinable sales price, b) customer credit worthiness has been established, and c) delivery of the product based on shipping terms. The majority of domestic IVD instrument sales generally require installation and training to be performed.
Revenue is recorded in accordance with the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Statement 00-21 “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” and Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 104 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” which generally requires revenue earned on product sales involving multiple-elements to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of those elements. Multiple elements of our domestic product sales include IVD instruments and training. Training elements are valued based on hourly rates, which we charge for these services when sold apart from hardware sales.
Accordingly, we allocate revenue to each element in a multiple- element arrangement based on the element’s respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold and specifically defined in a quotation or contract.
A portion of our revenues are derived from sale-type leases when we provide lease financing to certain customers that purchase its diagnostic instruments. Leases under these arrangements are classified as sales-type leases. These leases typically have terms of five years. Revenue from sales-type leases are recognized when collectibility of the minimum lease payments is reasonably predictable and no important uncertainties surround the amount of unreimbursable costs yet to be incurred by us as lessor under the lease. The minimum lease payments that accrue to our benefit as lessor are recorded as the gross investment in the lease. The difference between the gross investment in the lease and the sum of the present value of the minimum lease payments and unguaranteed residual value, accruing to our benefit as lessor, are recorded as unearned income.
We recognize revenues from service contracts ratably over the term of the service period, which typically ranges from twelve to sixty months. Payments for service contracts are generally received in advance. Deferred revenue represents the revenues to be recognized over the remaining term of the service contracts.
Warranties
We recognize warranty expense, based on management’s estimate of expected cost, as an accrued liability at the time of sale. Warranty expenses amounted to $873,000, $550,000 and $405,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
Research and Development Expenditures
Except for certain software development costs capitalized as described above (see Software Development Costs), research and development expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. Net research and development expense includes total research and development costs incurred, including costs incurred under research and development grants and contracts, less costs reimbursed under research and development contracts.
From time to time we receive grants from agencies of the US Government. We do not recognize any revenue from such grants since they are cost reimbursement grants whereby the Company submits requests for reimbursement for certain costs incurred. There are no ongoing obligations or requirements with respect to the
45
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
grants received, we retains ownership of any intellectual property that results from the research and development and the US Government receives a right to use the results of the research for government projects. We received costs reimbursements (government grants) of $1.6 million, $1.5 million and $0.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109 “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense represents the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
Marketing Costs
All costs related to marketing our products are expensed at the time the marketing takes place.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and payable, accrued and other current liabilities and current maturities of long-term debt approximate fair value due to their short maturity. The carrying amount of our long-term liabilities also approximates fair value based on interest rates currently available to us for debt of similar terms and remaining maturities.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and common stock equivalents outstanding, calculated on the treasury stock method for options and warrants or the converted method for convertible preferred stock. Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation when their effect is antidilutive.
New Accounting Pronouncement
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” that establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which a company exchanges its equity instruments for goods and services or incurs a liability in exchange for goods and services that is based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. The primary focus of this pronouncement is on issuing share-based payments for services provided by employees. This pronouncement also requires recognition of compensation expense for new equity instruments awarded or for modifications, cancellations or repurchases of existing awards starting January 1, 2006. Compensation expense for new equity awards, in most cases, will be based on the fair value of the stock on the date of grant and will be recognized over the vesting service period. An award of a liability instrument, as defined by this pronouncement, will initially be recorded at fair value and will be adjusted each reporting period to the new fair value through the date of settlement. Under the terms of this pronouncement, we and other issuers
46
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
will begin to expense equity awards using a modified version of prospective application. Under that transition method, compensation cost is recognized on or after the required effective date for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service has not yet been rendered, based on the fair value of those awards on their respective grant dates. For periods before the required effective date for which financial statements have not yet been issued, we had the option to elect to apply a modified version of retrospective application under which financial statements for prior periods are adjusted on a basis consistent with the pro forma disclosures required by Statement No. 123.
We adopted SFAS No. 123R effective January 1, 2006 and began to expense previously issued equity awards for which service has not been rendered on that date. As of December 31, 2005, existing employee stock options were fully vested; accordingly there was no expense for such options that would be recognized in year subsequent to 2005.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) be recorded as current period charges and that the allocation of fixed production overhead to inventory be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for us on January 1, 2006. We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 and 2003 financial statements to conform to the 2005 presentation with no change in the previously reported net income or shareholders’ equity.
Certain Risks and Uncertainties
Dependence on Instrument Sales: We derive most of our revenues from the sale of the urinalysis analyzers, and related supplies and services. Relatively modest declines in unit sales or gross margins could have a material adverse effect on our revenues and profits.
Certain of our components are obtained from outside vendors, and the loss or breakdown of our relationships with these outside vendors could subject us to substantial delays in the delivery of our products to our customers. Furthermore certain key components of our instruments are manufactured by only one supplier. For example, ARKRAY is the single source supplier for our line of urine chemistry analyzers and related consumable products and spare parts. Roche Diagnostics is the sole source for our proprietary CHEMSTRIP/IRIStrip urine test strips and related urine test strip readers, both used in our legacy instruments, the Model 500 and 939UDx urinalysis workstations. Because these suppliers are the only vendors with which we have a relationship for a particular component, we may be unable to sell products if one of these suppliers becomes unwilling or unable to deliver components meeting our specifications. Our inability to sell products to meet delivery schedules could have a material adverse effect on our reputation in the industry, as well as our financial condition and results of operation.
Roche Diagnostics has exercised its right to terminate its agreements with us relating to the supply of test strips and related urine test strip readers. Roche will continue to supply test strips and replacement readers to our installed base of legacy workstations until 2009. The failure to successfully and timely complete the phase out of their strips and readers with the introduction of our iQ200 analyzers would have a material adverse affect on our instrument sales and the revenue growth for system consumables and service.
47
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
3. Acquisition
On June 2, 2005, we completed the acquisition of the assets (primarily technology and inventory) of the urinalysis business of Quidel Corporation. With this acquisition, we acquired significant core technology and know-how in urine chemistry strips, patents and trademarks, product designs, a strip manufacturing facility in Germany and a semi-automated urine chemistry analyzer that will enable us to offer a more complete product line internationally.
Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, we paid $500,000 in cash and assumed approximately $34,000 in accrued liabilities. We also incurred approximately $243,000 in professional and other fees, the total acquisition cost amounting to $777,000. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase with the purchase price allocated on a preliminary basis, subject to adjustment, to the fair value of the assets acquired. The preliminary allocation of the acquisition price resulted in an excess of the fair value of the assets acquired over the purchase price and resulted in negative goodwill. The negative goodwill reduced the non-current assets to zero with the acquisition cost of $777,000 allocated to the fair value of the inventory acquired.
The following unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma statement of operations data shows the results of our operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 as if the acquisition described above had occurred at the beginning of each period presented:
| 2005 |
2004 | |||||
| (In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||
| Revenues |
$ | 63,210 | $ | 45,335 | ||
| Net income |
5,943 | 1,752 | ||||
| Net income per share – diluted |
0.34 | 0.11 | ||||
These unaudited condensed consolidated pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of the actual results of operations had the acquisitions taken place as of the beginning of the respective periods or the results of our future operations. Furthermore, the pro forma results do not give effect to all cost savings or incremental costs that may occur as a result of the integration and consolidation of the acquisitions.
4. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
| At December 31, |
||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Finished goods |
$ | 2,800 | $ | 2,642 | ||||
| Work-in-process |
337 | 664 | ||||||
| Raw materials, parts and sub-assemblies |
5,085 | 4,818 | ||||||
| 8,222 | 8,124 | |||||||
| Less non-current portion, net of reserves |
(632 | ) | (290 | ) | ||||
| Inventories – current portion |
$ | 7,590 | $ | 7,834 | ||||
48
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
5. Properties and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following:
| At December 31, |
||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Leasehold improvements |
$ | 2,010 | $ | 1,878 | ||||
| Furniture and fixtures |
681 | 509 | ||||||
| Machinery and equipment |
6,457 | 4,863 | ||||||
| Tooling, dies and molds |
1,485 | 1,947 | ||||||
| Rental units |
242 | 300 | ||||||
| 10,875 | 9,497 | |||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation. |
(6,799 | ) | (5,617 | ) | ||||
| $ | 4,076 | $ | 3,880 | |||||
Property and equipment includes $3,413,000 and $2,913,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, of fully depreciated assets that remain in service. Depreciation expense was $1,196,000, $936,000 and $658,000 in 2005, 2004 and 2003.
6. Sales-type Leases
The components of net investment in sales-type leases consist of the following:
| At December 31, |
|||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||
| Total minimum lease payments |
$ | 8,264 | 2,981 | ||||
| Less unearned income |
(968 | ) | (340 | ) | |||
| Net investment in sales-type leases |
7,296 | 2,641 | |||||
| Less current portion |
(1,455 | ) | (499 | ) | |||
| $ | 5,841 | 2,142 | |||||
Future minimum lease payments due from customers under sales-type leases for each of the five succeeding years: $1,455,000 in 2006, $1,556,000 in 2007, $1,626,000 in 2008, $1,675,000 in 2009 and $984,000 in 2010.
7. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
| At December 31, | ||||||
| 2005 |
2004 | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| Accrued bonuses |
$ | 634 | $ | 777 | ||
| Accrued commissions |
584 | 338 | ||||
| Accrued payroll |
496 | 476 | ||||
| Accrued vacation |
554 | 539 | ||||
| Accrued professional fees |
158 | 155 | ||||
| Accrued warranty |
704 | 356 | ||||
| Accrued – other |
1,058 | 757 | ||||
| $ | 4,188 | $ | 3,398 | |||
49
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Changes in the accrued warranty liability were as follows:
| At December 31, |
||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Balance – beginning of year |
$ | 356 | $ | 370 | ||||
| Additions for provisions during year |
873 | 550 | ||||||
| Reductions during year |
(525 | ) | (564 | ) | ||||
| Balance – end of year |
$ | 704 | $ | 356 | ||||
8. Bank Line
In May 2004, we signed a new credit facility with a major bank. The credit facility consists of a $6.5 million revolving line of credit for working capital and a $10.0 million line of credit for acquisitions and product opportunities. Borrowings under the revolving line of credit are limited to a percentage of eligible receivables and inventory. The entire credit facility has variable interest rates, which will change from time to time based on changes to either the LIBOR rate or the lender’s prime rate. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, there were no borrowings under the new credit facility. We subject to certain financial covenants under the credit facility with the bank and as of December 31, 2005, we were in compliance with such covenants.
Prior to May 2004, we had an $8.0 million credit facility, which consisted of a $500,000 term loan, a $1.0 million term loan and a $6.5 million revolving line of credit. Borrowings under the line of credit were limited to a percentage of eligible receivables and inventory. In April 2004, all our then outstanding debt was repaid including interest with the net proceeds from the private placement described in Note 10.
9. Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following:
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||
| Current: State |
$ | 49 | $ | 24 | $ | — | |||||
| Deferred: |
|||||||||||
| Federal |
2,722 | 914 | (314 | ) | |||||||
| State |
644 | 581 | (39 | ) | |||||||
| Foreign |
(240 | ) | — | — | |||||||
| 3,366 | 1,495 | (353 | ) | ||||||||
| $ | 3,415 | $ | 1,519 | $ | (353 | ) | |||||
Income taxes (benefit) have been based on the following components of pre-tax income (loss):
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||
| Domestic |
10,166 | 3,799 | (833 | ) | |||||||
| Foreign |
(620 | ) | — | — | |||||||
| $ | 9,546 | $ | 3,799 | $ | (883 | ) | |||||
50
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount obtained by applying the federal statutory income tax rate to income before provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 as follows:
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||
| Tax provision (benefit) computed at Federal statutory rate |
$ | 3,246 | $ | 1,291 | $ | (300 | ) | |||||
| State taxes, net of federal benefit |
400 | 190 | (44 | ) | ||||||||
| R&D tax credits |
(455 | ) | (341 | ) | (416 | ) | ||||||
| Expiration of Federal or State NOLs |
49 | 62 | 598 | |||||||||
| Nondeductible expenses |
504 | 166 | 17 | |||||||||
| Change in valuation allowance |
— | 341 | (153 | ) | ||||||||
| Foreign branch losses |
(240 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
| Other |
(89 | ) | (190 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||||
| $ | 3,415 | $ | 1,519 | $ | (353 | ) | ||||||
At December 31, 2005, we had federal net operating loss carry forward of approximately $19.9 million, and state net operating loss carry forward of $4.4 million, which expire in fiscal years ending in 2006 through 2024.
The primary components of temporary differences, which give rise to our net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2005 and 2004, are as follows:
| At December 31, |
||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
|||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 550 | $ | 528 | ||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts |
116 | 139 | ||||||
| Accrued liabilities |
1,345 | 1,646 | ||||||
| Deferred revenue-service contracts |
(100 | ) | 270 | |||||
| Net operating loss carry forward |
7,348 | 6,840 | ||||||
| R&D tax credits |
2,530 | 2,006 | ||||||
| Valuation allowance |
(1,781 | ) | (1,781 | ) | ||||
| Other |
21 | (333 | ) | |||||
| $ | 10,029 | $ | 9,315 | |||||
Realization of deferred tax assets associated with net operating losses (“NOL”) and tax credit carry forward is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient taxable income prior to their expiration. Management believes it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will be realized through future taxable income or alternative tax strategies. However, the net deferred tax assets could be reduced in the near term if management’s estimates of taxable income during the carryforward period are not realized or are significantly reduced or alternative tax strategies are not available. However, we have established a valuation allowance for the R&D tax credits based on our estimate of future utilization. We will continue to review estimates of taxable income and will make adjustments to the valuation allowance, when necessary.
Also, should we undergo an ownership change as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, our NOLs generated prior to the ownership change would be subject to an annual limitation. If this occurs, a valuation allowance may be necessary.
51
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
10. Capital Stock
Private Placements
In April 2004, we sold 2,130,000 shares of our common stock in a private placement at a price of $5.85 per share (a 10% discount to market). In addition, the investors received five-year warrants to purchase 319,500 additional shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.80 per share. In addition, the investment bank received five-year warrants to purchase 122,475 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $7.80 per share. The agreement required us to file a registration statement within 30 days of closing and to have the registration statement declared effective within 90 days of closing. In May 2004, we filed a registration statement, which was declared effective on May 21, 2004. We realized net proceeds (after deducting offering expense of $1.0 million) of approximately $11.5 million. We used approximately $5.5 million of the net proceeds to retire all our outstanding indebtedness.
Stock Issuances
During 1990, the IRIS Board of Directors adopted an Employee Stock Purchase Plan designed to allow our employees to buy its shares at 50% of the current market price, provided that the employee agrees to hold the shares purchased for a minimum of one year. The employee’s 50% portion of stock purchases under the plan may not exceed 15% of the employee’s total compensation during any year. The remaining 50% portion is recorded as deferred compensation and amortized over the vesting period. The shares purchased pursuant to this plan may not be transferred, except following the death of the employee or a change in control, for a period of one year following the date of purchase. During the period of the limitation on transfer, we have the option to repurchase the shares at the employee’s purchase price if the employee terminates employment with the Company either voluntarily or as a result of termination for cause. During 2005, 2004 and 2003, IRIS issued 120,000, 67,000 and 38,000 shares of common stock in this Plan and recorded deferred compensation in the amounts of $850,000, $224,000 and $70,000. On December 22, 2005 the Plan was amended by our Board of Directors, whereby effective January 1, 2006, our employees can purchase shares at 85% of the then current market price; all other aspects of the Plan remain the same.
Stock Option Plans and Employee Benefit Plans
As of December 31, 2005, we had three stock option plans under which we may grant non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options and stock appreciation rights. No stock appreciation rights have been granted under these plans.
In October 2005, the Board of Directors approved a resolution whereby all employee options then outstanding were fully vested. In accordance with FIN 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Options”, we recorded a charge to earnings in the amount of $112,000 representing an estimate for employee turnover during the remaining vesting period.
The following schedule sets forth options authorized, exercised, outstanding and available for grant under our three stock option plans as of December 31, 2005:
| Number of Option Shares | ||||||||
| Plan |
Authorized |
Exercised |
Outstanding |
Available for Grant | ||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||
| 1994 Plan |
700 | 582 | 75 | — | ||||
| 1997 Plan |
600 | 536 | 64 | — | ||||
| 1998 Plan |
4,100 | 1,566 | 1,488 | 1,046 | ||||
| 5,400 | 2,684 | 1,627 | 1,046 | |||||
52
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
In addition to the above, as of December 31, 2005 there were stock options outstanding to purchase 90,000 shares of common stock that were issued under special inducement grants.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determines the exercise price of options. Payment of the exercise price may be made either in cash or with shares of common stock that have been held at least six months. The options generally vest over either three or four years and expire either five or ten years from the date of grant. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions used for grants in 2005, 2004 and 2003:
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||
| Risk free interest rate |
4.3 | % | 3.6 | % | 3.2 | % | |||
| Expected lives (years) |
3 | 5 | 5 | ||||||
| Expected volatility |
40 | % | 39 | % | 44 | % | |||
| Expected dividend yield |
— | — | — | ||||||
The following table sets forth certain information relative to stock options during the three years ended December 31, 2005.
| Shares |
Range |
Weighted Average |
Weighted Fair value at Grant Date | |||||||||
| (In thousands, except for per share) | ||||||||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2002 |
2,676 | $ | 0.69 to $4.38 | $ | 1.73 | |||||||
| Granted |
1,004 | $ | 2.50 to $5.71 | $ | 3.82 | $ | 1.68 | |||||
| Exercised |
(518 | ) | $ | 0.88 to $3.01 | $ | 1.38 | ||||||
| Canceled or expired |
(253 | ) | $ | 1.25 to $3.01 | $ | 2.32 | ||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
2,909 | $ | 0.69 to $5.71 | $ | 2.46 | |||||||
| Granted |
528 | $ | 6.25 to $8.58 | $ | 7.73 | $ | 3.06 | |||||
| Exercised |
(1,033 | ) | $ | 0.88 to $5.71 | $ | 1.77 | ||||||
| Canceled or expired |
(115 | ) | $ | 1.31 to $5.71 | $ | 3.05 | ||||||
| Outstanding at December 31, 2004 |
2,289 | $ | 0.69 to $8.58 | $ | 3.97 | |||||||
| Granted |
288 | $ | 10.05 to $26.02 | $ | 11.63 | $ | 15.51 | |||||
| Exercised |
(811 | ) | $ | 0.81 to $10.05 | $ | 3.03 | ||||||
| Canceled or expired |
(49 | ) | $ | 2.00 to $8.58 | $ | 5.18 | ||||||
| Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2005, average life – 48 months |
1,717 | $ | 6.89 | |||||||||
In 1996, we adopted a 401(k) Plan. All employees are eligible to participate in the plan at the beginning of the first quarter following their start date. Although our contributions are discretionary, our current practice is to match $0.25 per $1 contributed by the employees up to 4% of the employees’ contributions. Effective January 1, 2006 we will match $0.50 per $1 contributed by the employees up to 6% of the employee’ contributions. Employees vest in amounts contributed by us immediately. We contributed $89,000, $83,000 and $73,000 to the plan for 2005, 2004 and 2003.
53
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Warrants
At December 31, 2005, there were warrants outstanding to purchase 74,300 shares of common stock at $7.80 per share. These warrants are exercisable and will expire April 23, 2009. During the year ended December 31, 2005, no warrants were issued, cancelled or expired and warrants to purchase 328,784 shares were exercised and we received proceeds amounting to $1,010,000.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
We lease real property and equipment under agreements, which expire at various times over the next five years. Certain leases contain renewal options and generally require us to pay utilities, insurance, taxes and other operating expenses.
Future minimum rental payments required under capital and operating leases that have an initial term in excess of one year as of December 31, 2005, are as follows:
| Capital Leases |
Operating Leases | |||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
| 2006 |
$ | 37 | $ | 1,095 | ||
| 2007 |
21 | 856 | ||||
| 2008 |
18 | 856 | ||||
| 2009 |
14 | 856 | ||||
| 2010 |
— | 752 | ||||
| Thereafter |
— | 987 | ||||
| $ | 90 | $ | 5,402 | |||
Rent expense under all operating leases during 2005, 2004 and 2003 was $822,000, $636,000 and $608,000.
Litigation
From time to time, we are party to certain litigation arising in the normal course of business. Management believes that the resolution of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Guarantees
We enter into indemnification provisions under (i) agreements with other companies in its ordinary course of business, typically with business partners, contractors, and customers, landlords and (ii) agreements with investors. Under these provisions, we generally indemnifies and hold harmless the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party as a result of our activities or, in some cases, as a result of the indemnified party’s activities under the agreement. These indemnification provisions often include indemnifications relating to representations made by us with regard to intellectual property rights. These indemnification provisions generally survive termination of the underlying agreement. In addition, in some cases, we have agreed to reimburse employees for certain expenses and to provide salary continuation during short-term disability. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these
54
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
indemnification provisions is unlimited. We have not incurred material costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, we believe the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal. Accordingly, we have no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2005.
12. Earnings per Share
The computation of per share amounts for 2005, 2004 and 2003 is based on the average number of common shares outstanding for each period. Options and warrants to purchase 199,000, 805,000 and 3,891,000 shares of common stock were not considered in the computation of diluted EPS for 2005, 2004 and 2003, because their inclusion would have been antidilutive.
The following is a reconciliation of weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share:
| 2005 |
2004 |
2003 | ||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||
| Weighted average number of shares – basic |
16,758 | 14,459 | 11,245 | |||
| Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||
| Options |
887 | 926 | — | |||
| Warrants |
206 | 433 | — | |||
| Weighed average number of shares – diluted |
17,851 | 15,818 | 11,245 | |||
13. License
Sysmex Corporation developed several urine sediment analyzers under licenses (which expired in July 2004), from us using our technology. IRIS received royalties under these licenses of 0, $336,000 and $547,000 in 2005, 2004 and 2003.
14. Segments and Geographic Information
Our operations are organized on the basis of products and related services and under SFAS No. 131, we operate in two segments: (1) IVD and (2) sample processing.
The IVD segment designs, develops, manufactures, markets and distributes IVD systems based on patented and proprietary technology for automating microscopic procedures for urinalysis. The segment also provides ongoing sales of supplies and services necessary for the operation of installed urinalysis workstations. In the United States, these products are sold through a direct sales force. Internationally, these products are sold through distributors. The segment also includes the operations of the ADIR research subsidiary.
The sample processing segment designs, develops, manufactures and markets a variety of benchtop centrifuges, small instruments and supplies. These products are used primarily for manual specimen preparation and dedicated applications in coagulation, cytology, hematology and urinalysis. These products are sold worldwide through distributors.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”. We evaluate the performance of our segments and allocate resources to them based on earnings before income taxes, excluding corporate charges (“Segment Profit”).
55
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The tables below present information about reported segments for the three years ended December 31, 2005:
| IVD |
Sample Processing |
Unallocated Corporate Expenses |
Total |
|||||||||||
| (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
||||||||||||||
| Revenues |
$ | 53,250 | $ | 9,530 | $ | — | $ | 62,780 | ||||||
| Interest income |
600 | 7 | — | 607 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense |
10 | — | 5 | 15 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization* |
1,894 | 164 | 189 | 2,247 | ||||||||||
| Other non-cash items |
11 | — | — | 11 | ||||||||||
| Segment profit (loss) |
11,543 | 1,831 | (3,828 | ) | 9,546 | |||||||||
| Segment assets |
50,075 | 3,815 | 10,039 | 63,929 | ||||||||||
| Investment in long-lived assets |
12,196 | 508 | — | 12,704 | ||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||
| Revenues |
35,307 | 8,343 | — | 43,650 | ||||||||||
| Interest income |
106 | 5 | — | 111 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense |
6 | — | 237 | 243 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization* |
1,729 | 90 | 56 | 1,875 | ||||||||||
| Other non-cash items |
538 | — | — | 538 | ||||||||||
| Segment profit (loss) |
5,658 | 1,945 | (3,804 | ) | 3,799 | |||||||||
| Segment assets |
35,769 | 3,052 | 9,315 | 48,136 | ||||||||||
| Investment in long-lived assets |
8,518 | 204 | — | 8,722 | ||||||||||
| For the Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||
| Revenues |
25,269 | 6,076 | — | 31,345 | ||||||||||
| Interest income |
38 | 1 | — | 39 | ||||||||||
| Interest expense |
8 | — | 343 | 351 | ||||||||||
| Depreciation and amortization* |
921 | 91 | 140 | 1,152 | ||||||||||
| Other non-cash items |
30 | — | 266 | 296 | ||||||||||
| Segment profit (loss) |
2,445 | 960 | (4,288 | ) | (883 | ) | ||||||||
| Segment assets |
21,348 | 2,339 | 8,793 | 32,480 | ||||||||||
| Investment in long-lived assets |
7,524 | 129 | — | 7,653 | ||||||||||
| * | Included in depreciation and amortization in the table above is amortization of deferred compensation in the amounts of $429,000 in 2005; $144,000 in 2004, and $142,000 in 2003. |
We ship products from two locations in the United States. Substantially all long-lived assets were located in the United States and totaled $12.7 million and $8.7 million as of December 31, 2005 and 2004. Sales to international customers amounted to approximately $19.0 million in 2005, $8.0 million in 2004 and $4.1 million in 2003.
Long-lived assets include property and equipment, goodwill, software development costs, long-term portion of inventory and other long-term assets. Deferred income tax is excluded from long-lived assets. Segment assets attributed to corporate unallocated expenses are deferred taxes.
56
IRIS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
15. Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)
The following table summarizes certain financial information by quarter:
| 2005 Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||
| March 31 |
June 30 |
September 30 |
December 31 | |||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share) | ||||||||||||
| Net revenues |
$ | 13,964 | $ | 15,577 | $ | 16,002 | $ | 17,237 | ||||
| Gross profit |
6,894 | 7,596 | 8,108 | 8,547 | ||||||||
| Net income |
1,271 | 1,577 | 1,542 | 1,741 | ||||||||
| Net income per share – basic: |
0.08 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | ||||||||
| Net income per share – diluted: |
0.07 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | ||||||||
| 2004 Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||
| March 31 |
June 30 |
September 30 |
December 31 | |||||||||
| (In thousands, except per share) | ||||||||||||
| Net revenues |
$ | 9,375 | $ | 10,325 | $ | 11,764 | $ | 12,186 | ||||
| Gross profit |
4,704 | 4,780 | 5,811 | 6,096 | ||||||||
| Net income |
529 | 439 | 481 | 831 | ||||||||
| Net income per share – basic: |
0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | ||||||||
| Net income per share – diluted: |
0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.05 | ||||||||
16. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
| Beginning Balance |
Charged To Cost and Expenses |
Additions Charged To Other Accounts |
Deductions |
Ending Balance | |||||||||||
| (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2005 |
|||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 208 | $ | 103 | — | $ | (80 | )(1) | $ | 231 | |||||
| Allowance for sales returns |
128 | — | (71 | )(1) | 57 | ||||||||||
| Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
1,193 | 838 | — | (1,142 | )(1) | 889 | |||||||||
| Valuation of deferred tax assets |
1,781 | — | — | — | 1,781 | ||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 262 | $ | 24 | — | $ | (78 | )(1) | $ | 208 | |||||
| Allowance for sales returns |
50 | 237 | — | (159 | )(1) | 128 | |||||||||
| Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
959 | 304 | — | (70 | )(1) | 1,193 | |||||||||
| Valuation of deferred tax assets |
1,387 | 394 | — | — | 1,781 | ||||||||||
| Year Ended December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts |
$ | 298 | $ | — | $ | (36 | )(1) | $ | 262 | ||||||
| Allowance for sales returns |
— | 50 | — | — | 50 | ||||||||||
| Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
798 | 265 | — | (104 | ) | 959 | |||||||||
| Valuation of deferred tax assets |
1,472 | 484 | — | (569 | )(2) | 1,387 | |||||||||
| (1) | Relates to the write-off of accounts receivable, return of merchandise, disposal of obsolete inventory or specific portion of the accounts receivable reserve or reserve for sales returns no longer needed. |
| (2) | Valuation adjustment relating to realization of deferred tax assets. |
57