Form 10-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
(X) |
|
Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
OR |
|
|
( ) |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from
to . |
|
|
|
|
|
Commission File Number
|
|
Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter; State of Incorporation; Address and Telephone Number
|
|
IRS Employer Identification No.
|
|
|
|
1-14756 |
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
43-1723446 |
|
|
(Missouri Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
1901 Chouteau Avenue |
|
|
|
|
St. Louis, Missouri 63103 |
|
|
|
|
(314) 621-3222 |
|
|
|
|
|
1-2967 |
|
Union Electric Company |
|
43-0559760 |
|
|
(Missouri Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
1901 Chouteau Avenue |
|
|
|
|
St. Louis, Missouri 63103 |
|
|
|
|
(314) 621-3222 |
|
|
|
|
|
1-3672 |
|
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
37-0211380 |
|
|
(Illinois Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
607 East Adams Street |
|
|
|
|
Springfield, Illinois 62739 |
|
|
|
|
(888) 789-2477 |
|
|
|
|
|
333-56594 |
|
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
37-1395586 |
|
|
(Illinois Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
1901 Chouteau Avenue |
|
|
|
|
St. Louis, Missouri 63103 |
|
|
|
|
(314) 621-3222 |
|
|
|
|
|
1-2732 |
|
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
37-0211050 |
|
|
(Illinois Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
300 Liberty Street |
|
|
|
|
Peoria, Illinois 61602 |
|
|
|
|
(309) 677-5271 |
|
|
|
|
|
1-3004 |
|
Illinois Power Company |
|
37-0344645 |
|
|
(Illinois Corporation) |
|
|
|
|
370 South Main Street |
|
|
|
|
Decatur, Illinois 62523 |
|
|
|
|
(217) 424-6600 |
|
|
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
The following securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are listed on the New York Stock
Exchange:
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
|
|
|
|
|
Registrant
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
|
Union Electric Company |
|
Preferred Stock, cumulative, no par value, stated value $100 per share: |
|
|
$4.56 Series |
|
$4.50 Series |
|
|
$4.00 Series |
|
$3.50 Series |
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
Preferred Stock, cumulative, $100 par value per share: |
|
|
6.625% Series |
|
4.90% Series |
|
|
5.16% Series |
|
4.25% Series |
|
|
4.92% Series |
|
4.00% Series |
|
|
Depository Shares, each representing one-fourth of a share of 6.625% Preferred Stock, cumulative, $100 par value per
share |
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
Preferred Stock, cumulative, $100 par value per share: |
|
|
4.50% Series |
|
|
Ameren Energy Generating Company and Illinois Power Company do not have
securities registered under either Section 12(b) or 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Indicate by checkmark if each
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Union Electric Company |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Illinois Power Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Indicate by checkmark if each
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Union Electric Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Illinois Power Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
(X) |
Indicate by checkmark whether the
registrants: (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Union Electric Company |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Illinois Power Company |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of each registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
( ) |
Union Electric Company |
|
(X) |
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
(X) |
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
(X) |
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
(X) |
Illinois Power Company |
|
(X) |
Indicate by checkmark whether each
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
Yes |
|
(X) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Union Electric Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Illinois Power Company |
|
Yes |
|
( ) |
|
No |
|
( ) |
Indicate by checkmark
whether each registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer |
|
Accelerated Filer |
|
Non-accelerated Filer |
|
Smaller Reporting Company |
Ameren Corporation |
|
(X) |
|
( ) |
|
( ) |
|
( ) |
Union Electric Company |
|
( ) |
|
( ) |
|
(X) |
|
( ) |
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
( ) |
|
( ) |
|
(X) |
|
( ) |
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
( ) |
|
( ) |
|
(X) |
|
( ) |
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
( ) |
|
( ) |
|
(X) |
|
( ) |
Illinois Power Company |
|
( ) |
|
( ) |
|
(X) |
|
( ) |
Indicate by checkmark
whether each registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
Yes |
|
( |
) |
|
No |
|
(X |
) |
Union Electric Company |
|
Yes |
|
( |
) |
|
No |
|
(X |
) |
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
Yes |
|
( |
) |
|
No |
|
(X |
) |
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
Yes |
|
( |
) |
|
No |
|
(X |
) |
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
Yes |
|
( |
) |
|
No |
|
(X |
) |
Illinois Power Company |
|
Yes |
|
( |
) |
|
No |
|
(X |
) |
As of June 30, 2009, Ameren
Corporation had 214,228,275 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock outstanding. The aggregate market value of these shares of common stock (based upon the closing price of these shares on the New York Stock Exchange on that date) held by
nonaffiliates was $5,332,141,765. The shares of common stock of the other registrants were held by affiliates as of June 30, 2009.
The number of shares outstanding of each registrants classes of common stock as of January 29, 2010, was as follows:
|
|
|
Ameren Corporation |
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share: 237,503,643 |
|
|
Union Electric Company |
|
Common stock, $5 par value per share, held by Ameren Corporation (parent company of the registrant): 102,123,834 |
|
|
Central Illinois Public Service Company |
|
Common stock, no par value, held by Ameren Corporation (parent company of the registrant): 25,452,373 |
|
|
Ameren Energy Generating Company |
|
Common stock, no par value, held by Ameren Energy Resources Company, LLC (parent company of the registrant and subsidiary of Ameren Corporation): 2,000 |
|
|
Central Illinois Light Company |
|
Common stock, no par value, held by CILCORP Inc. (parent company of the registrant and subsidiary of Ameren Corporation): 13,563,871 |
|
|
Illinois Power Company |
|
Common stock, no par value, held by Ameren Corporation (parent company of the registrant): 23,000,000 |
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement of Ameren Corporation and portions of the definitive information statements of Union Electric Company,
Central Illinois Public Service Company, and Central Illinois Light Company for the 2010 annual meetings of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
OMISSION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION
Ameren Energy Generating Company meets
the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format allowed under that General Instruction.
This combined Form 10-K is separately filed by Ameren Corporation, Union Electric Company, Central Illinois Public Service Company, Ameren Energy
Generating Company, Central Illinois Light Company, and Illinois Power Company. Each registrant hereto is filing on its own behalf all of the information contained in this annual report that relates to such registrant. Each registrant hereto is not
filing any information that does not relate to such registrant, and therefore makes no representation as to any such information.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Form 10-K contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements should be read with the cautionary statements and important factors included on pages 3 and
4 of this Form 10-K under the heading Forward-looking Statements. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact, including those statements that are identified by the use of the words
anticipates, estimates, expects, intends, plans, predicts, projects, and similar expressions.
GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
We use the words our, we or us with respect to certain information that relates to all Ameren Companies, as defined
below. When appropriate, subsidiaries of Ameren are named specifically as we discuss their various business activities.
2007 Illinois Electric Settlement Agreement A comprehensive settlement of issues
in Illinois arising out of the end of ten years of frozen electric rates, effective January 2, 2007. The settlement, which became effective on August 28, 2007, was designed to avoid new rate rollback and freeze legislation and legislation
that would impose a tax on electric generation in Illinois. The settlement addressed the issue of power procurement, and it included a comprehensive rate relief and customer assistance program.
AERG AmerenEnergy Resources Generating Company, a CILCO subsidiary that operates a merchant electric generation business in
Illinois.
AFS Ameren Energy Fuels and Services Company, a Resources Company subsidiary that procures fuel and natural
gas and manages the related risks for the Ameren Companies.
AITC Ameren Illinois Transmission Company, an Ameren
Corporation subsidiary that is engaged in the construction and operation of transmission assets in Illinois and is regulated by the ICC.
Ameren Ameren Corporation and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In references to financing activities, acquisition activities, or liquidity arrangements, Ameren is defined as Ameren Corporation,
the parent.
Ameren Companies The individual registrants within the Ameren consolidated group.
Ameren Illinois Utilities CIPS, IP, and the rate-regulated electric and natural gas utility operations of CILCO.
Ameren Services Ameren Services Company, an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that provides support services to Ameren and its
subsidiaries.
AMIL The balancing authority area operated by Ameren, which includes the load of the Ameren Illinois
Utilities and the generating assets of Genco and AERG.
AMMO The balancing authority area operated by Ameren, which
includes the load and generating assets of UE.
AMT Alternative minimum tax.
ARO Asset retirement obligations.
Baseload The minimum amount of electric power delivered or required over a given period of time at a steady rate.
Btu British thermal unit, a standard unit for measuring the quantity of heat energy required to raise the temperature of one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit.
Capacity factor A percentage measure that indicates how much of an electric power generating units capacity was used during
a specific period.
CILCO Central Illinois Light Company, a CILCORP subsidiary that
operates a rate-regulated electric transmission and distribution business, a merchant electric generation business through AERG, and a rate-regulated natural gas transmission and distribution business, all in Illinois, as AmerenCILCO. CILCO
owns all of the common stock of AERG.
CILCORP CILCORP Inc., an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that operates as a holding
company for CILCO and its merchant generation subsidiary. CILCORP ceased filing periodic and current reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act as a result of the covenant defeasance of its remaining outstanding senior bonds.
CIPS Central Illinois Public Service Company, an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that operates a rate-regulated electric and natural
gas transmission and distribution business in Illinois as AmerenCIPS.
CIPSCO CIPSCO Inc., the former parent of CIPS.
CO2 Carbon dioxide.
COLA Combined nuclear plant construction and operating license application.
Cooling degree-days The summation of positive differences between the mean daily temperature and a 65-degree Fahrenheit base. This
statistic is useful for estimating electricity demand by residential and commercial customers for summer cooling.
CT
Combustion turbine electric generation equipment used primarily for peaking capacity.
Development Company Ameren
Energy Development Company, which was an Ameren Energy Resources Company subsidiary and parent of Genco, Marketing Company, AFS, and Medina Valley. It was eliminated in an internal reorganization in February 2008.
DOE Department of Energy, a U.S. government agency.
DRPlus Ameren Corporations dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan.
Dth (dekatherm) One million Btus of natural gas.
EEI Electric Energy,
Inc., an 80%-owned Ameren Corporation subsidiary that operates merchant electric generation facilities and FERC-regulated transmission facilities in Illinois. Prior to February 29, 2008, EEI was 40% owned by UE and 40% owned by Development
Company. On February 29, 2008, UEs 40% ownership interest and Development Companys 40% ownership interest were transferred to Resources Company. The remaining 20% is owned by Kentucky Utilities Company, a nonaffiliated entity.
Effective January 1, 2010, in an internal reorganization, Resources Company contributed its 80% ownership interest in EEI to its subsidiary, Genco.
EPA Environmental Protection Agency, a U.S. government agency.
Equivalent availability factor
A measure that indicates the percentage of time an electric power generating unit was available for service during a period.
ERISA Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
Exchange Act
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
FAC A fuel and purchased power cost recovery
mechanism that allows UE to recover, through customer rates, 95% of changes in fuel (coal, coal transportation, natural gas for generation, and nuclear) and purchased
1
power costs, net of off-system revenues, including MISO costs and revenues, greater or less than the amount set in base rates, without a traditional rate proceeding.
FASB Financial Accounting Standards Board, a rulemaking organization that establishes financial accounting and reporting standards
in the United States.
FERC The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, a U.S. government agency.
Fitch Fitch Ratings, a credit rating agency.
FTRs Financial transmission rights, financial instruments that entitle the holder to pay or receive compensation for certain congestion-related transmission charges between two designated points.
Fuelco Fuelco LLC, a limited-liability company that provides nuclear fuel management and services to its members. The
members are UE, Luminant, and Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
GAAP Generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America.
Genco Ameren Energy Generating Company, a Resources Company subsidiary that operates a
merchant electric generation business in Illinois and Missouri.
Gigawatthour One thousand megawatthours.
Heating degree-days The summation of negative differences between the mean daily temperature and a 65- degree Fahrenheit base.
This statistic is useful as an indicator of demand for electricity and natural gas for winter space heating for residential and commercial customers.
IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, a labor union.
ICC
Illinois Commerce Commission, a state agency that regulates Illinois utility businesses, including the rate-regulated operations of CIPS, CILCO and IP.
Illinois Customer Choice Law Illinois Electric Service Customer Choice and Rate Relief Law of 1997, which provided for electric utility restructuring and was designed to introduce competition into the
retail supply of electric energy in Illinois.
Illinois EPA Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, a state
government agency.
Illinois Regulated A financial reporting segment consisting of the regulated electric and natural
gas transmission and distribution businesses of CIPS, CILCO, IP and AITC.
IP Illinois Power Company, an Ameren
Corporation subsidiary. IP operates a rate-regulated electric and natural gas transmission and distribution business in Illinois as AmerenIP.
IP
LLC Illinois Power Securitization Limited Liability Company, which was a special-purpose Delaware limited-liability company. It was dissolved in February 2009 because the remaining TFNs, with respect to
which this entity was created, were redeemed by IP in September 2008.
IP SPT Illinois Power Special Purpose Trust,
which was created as a subsidiary of IP LLC to issue TFNs as allowed under the Illinois Customer Choice Law. It was dissolved in February 2009 because the remaining TFNs were redeemed by IP in September 2008.
IPA Illinois Power Agency, a state government agency that has broad authority to
assist in the procurement of electric power for residential and nonresidential customers.
ISRS Infrastructure system
replacement surcharge. A cost recovery mechanism in Missouri that allows UE to recover gas infrastructure replacement costs from utility customers without a traditional rate case.
IUOE International Union of Operating Engineers, a labor union.
Kilowatthour A measure of electricity consumption equivalent to the use of 1,000 watts of power over a period of one hour.
MACT Maximum Achievable Control Technology.
Marketing Company
Ameren Energy Marketing Company, a Resources Company subsidiary that markets power for Genco, AERG, EEI and Medina Valley.
Medina Valley AmerenEnergy Medina Valley Cogen LLC, a Resources Company subsidiary, which owns a 40-megawatt gas-fired electric generation plant.
Megawatthour One thousand kilowatthours.
Merchant Generation A financial reporting segment consisting primarily of the operations or activities of Genco, the CILCORP parent company, AERG, EEI, Medina Valley, and Marketing Company.
MGP Manufactured gas plant.
MISO Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., an RTO.
MISO Energy and Operating
Reserves Market A market that uses market-based pricing, incorporating transmission congestion and line losses, to compensate market participants for power and ancillary services.
Missouri Environmental Authority Environmental Improvement and Energy Resources Authority of the state of Missouri, a governmental
body authorized to finance environmental projects by issuing tax-exempt bonds and notes.
Missouri Regulated A
financial reporting segment consisting of UEs rate-regulated businesses.
Mmbtu One million Btus.
Money pool Borrowing agreements among Ameren and its subsidiaries to coordinate and provide for certain short-term cash and working
capital requirements. Separate money pools maintained for rate-regulated and non-rate-regulated business are referred to as the utility money pool and the non-state-regulated subsidiary money pool, respectively.
Moodys Moodys Investors Service Inc., a credit rating agency.
MoPSC Missouri Public Service Commission, a state agency that regulates Missouri utility businesses, including the rate-regulated
operations of UE.
MPS Multi-Pollutant Standard, an agreement, as amended, reached in 2006 among Genco,
CILCO (AERG), EEI and the Illinois EPA, which was codified in Illinois environmental regulations.
MTM Mark-to-market.
MW Megawatt.
Native
load Wholesale customers and end-use retail customers, whom we are obligated to serve by statute, franchise, contract, or other regulatory requirement.
2
NCF&O National Congress of Firemen and Oilers, a labor union.
NOx Nitrogen oxide.
Noranda
Noranda Aluminum, Inc.
NPNS Normal purchases and normal sales.
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission, a U.S. government agency.
NSR New Source
Review provisions of the Clean Air Act.
NYMEX New York Mercantile Exchange.
NYSE New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
OATT Open Access Transmission Tariff.
OCI Other comprehensive income (loss) as defined
by GAAP.
Off-system revenues Revenues from other than native load sales.
OTC Over-the-counter.
PGA
Purchased Gas Adjustment tariffs, which allow the passing through of the actual cost of natural gas to utility customers.
PJM PJM
Interconnection LLC.
PUHCA 2005 The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005, enacted as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005,
effective February 8, 2006.
Regulatory lag Adjustments to retail electric and natural gas rates are based on historic cost and
revenue levels. Rate increase requests can take up to 11 months to be acted upon by the MoPSC and the ICC. As a result, revenue increases authorized by regulators will lag behind changing costs and revenue.
Resources Company Ameren Energy Resources Company, LLC, an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that consists of non-rate-regulated operations, including
Genco, Marketing Company, EEI, AFS, and Medina Valley. It is the successor to Ameren Energy Resources Company, which was eliminated in an internal reorganization in February 2008.
RFP Request for proposal.
RTO Regional Transmission Organization.
S&P Standard & Poors Ratings Services, a credit rating agency that is a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Inc.
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission, a U.S. government agency.
SERC SERC Reliability Corporation, one of the regional electric reliability councils organized for coordinating the planning and operation of the
nations bulk power supply.
SO2 Sulfur dioxide.
TFN Transitional Funding Trust Notes issued by IP SPT as allowed under the Illinois Customer Choice Law. IP designated a portion of cash received
from customer billings to pay the TFNs. The designated funds received by IP were remitted to IP SPT. The designated funds were restricted for the sole purpose of making payments of principal and interest on, and paying other fees and expenses
related to, the TFNs. After the implementation of authoritative accounting guidance on the consolidation of variable-interest entities, IP did not consolidate IP SPT. In September 2008, IP redeemed the remaining TFNs.
TVA Tennessee Valley Authority, a public power authority.
UE Union Electric Company, an Ameren Corporation subsidiary that operates a rate-regulated
electric generation, transmission and distribution business, and a rate-regulated natural gas transmission and distribution business in Missouri as AmerenUE.
VIE Variable-interest entity.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this report not based on historical facts are considered forward-looking and, accordingly, involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. Although such
forward-looking statements have been made in good faith and are based on reasonable assumptions, there is no assurance that the expected results will be achieved. These statements include (without limitation) statements as to future expectations,
beliefs, plans, strategies, objectives, events, conditions, and financial performance. In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, we are providing this cautionary statement to
identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. The following factors, in addition to those discussed under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report and in our other filings with the SEC,
could cause actual results to differ materially from management expectations suggested in such forward-looking statements:
|
|
regulatory or legislative actions, including changes in regulatory policies and ratemaking determinations, such as the outcome of pending UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP
rate proceedings, and future rate proceedings or legislative actions that seek to limit or reverse rate increases; |
|
|
the effects of, or changes to, the Illinois power procurement process; |
|
|
changes in laws and other governmental actions, including monetary and fiscal policies; |
|
|
changes in laws or regulations that adversely affect the ability of electric distribution companies and other purchasers of wholesale electricity to pay their
suppliers, including UE and Marketing Company; |
|
|
the effects of increased competition in the future due to, among other things, deregulation of certain aspects of our business at both the state and federal
levels, and the implementation of deregulation, such as occurred when the electric rate freeze and power supply contracts expired in Illinois at the end of 2006; |
|
|
the effects on demand for our services resulting from technological advances, including advances in energy efficiency and distributed generation sources, which
generate electricity at the site of consumption; |
|
|
increasing capital expenditure and operating expense requirements and our ability to recover these costs in a timely fashion in light of regulatory lag;
|
|
|
the effects of participation in the MISO; |
|
|
the cost and availability of fuel such as coal, natural gas, and enriched uranium used to produce electricity; the cost and availability of purchased power and
natural
|
3
|
|
gas for distribution; and the level and volatility of future market prices for such commodities, including the ability to recover the costs for such commodities; |
|
|
the effectiveness of our risk management strategies and the use of financial and derivative instruments; |
|
|
prices for power in the Midwest, including forward prices; |
|
|
business and economic conditions, including their impact on interest rates, bad debt expense, and demand for our products; |
|
|
disruptions of the capital markets or other events that make the Ameren Companies access to necessary capital, including short-term credit and liquidity,
impossible, more difficult, or more costly; |
|
|
our assessment of our liquidity; |
|
|
the impact of the adoption of new accounting guidance and the application of appropriate technical accounting rules and guidance; |
|
|
actions of credit rating agencies and the effects of such actions; |
|
|
the impact of weather conditions and other natural phenomena on us and our customers; |
|
|
the impact of system outages; |
|
|
generation plant construction, installation and performance; |
|
|
the recovery of costs associated with UEs Taum Sauk pumped-storage hydroelectric plant incident and investment in a COLA for a second unit at its Callaway
nuclear plant; |
|
|
impairments of long-lived assets or goodwill; |
|
|
operation of UEs nuclear power facility, including planned and unplanned outages, and decommissioning costs; |
|
|
the effects of strategic initiatives, including mergers, acquisitions and divestitures; |
|
|
the impact of current environmental regulations on utilities and power generating companies and the expectation that more stringent requirements, including those
related to greenhouse gases and energy efficiency, will be enacted over time, which could limit, or terminate, the operation of certain of our generating units, increase our costs, reduce our customers demand for electricity or natural gas, or
otherwise have a negative financial effect; |
|
|
labor disputes, work force reductions, future wage and employee benefits costs, including changes in discount rates and returns on benefit plan assets;
|
|
|
the inability of our counterparties and affiliates to meet their obligations with respect to contracts, credit facilities and financial instruments;
|
|
|
the cost and availability of transmission capacity for the energy generated by the Ameren Companies facilities or required to satisfy energy sales made by
the Ameren Companies; |
|
|
legal and administrative proceedings; and |
|
|
acts of sabotage, war, terrorism, or intentionally disruptive acts. |
Given these uncertainties, undue
reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements. Except to the extent required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect new information or
future events.
PART I
GENERAL
Ameren, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a public utility holding company under PUHCA 2005
administered by FERC. Ameren was formed in 1997 by the merger of UE and CIPSCO. Ameren acquired CILCORP in 2003 and IP in 2004. Amerens primary assets are the common stock of its subsidiaries, including UE, CIPS, Genco, CILCO and IP.
Amerens subsidiaries are separate, independent legal entities with separate businesses, assets, and liabilities. These subsidiaries operate, as the case may be, rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution businesses,
rate-regulated natural gas transmission and distribution businesses, and merchant generation businesses in Missouri and Illinois. Dividends on Amerens common stock and the payment of other expenses by Ameren depend on distributions made to it
by its subsidiaries.
As part of an internal reorganization, Resources Company transferred its 80% ownership interest in EEI to Genco,
through a capital contribution, on January 1, 2010.
The following table presents our total employees at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
Ameren(a) |
|
9,780 |
UE |
|
4,425 |
CIPS |
|
657 |
Genco |
|
553 |
CILCO |
|
1,183 |
IP |
|
1,132 |
(a) |
Total for Ameren includes Ameren registrant and nonregistrant subsidiaries. |
As of January 1, 2010, the IBEW, the IUOE, the NCF&O and the Laborers and Gas Fitters labor unions collectively represented about 59% of Amerens total employees. They represented 64% of the employees
at UE, 83% at CIPS, 72% at Genco, 38% at CILCO, and 90% at IP. All collective bargaining agreements that expired in 2009 have been renegotiated and ratified. Most of the collective bargaining agreements have three- to five-year terms, and expire
between 2011 and 2013.
4
In 2009, Ameren initiated a voluntary separation program that provided eligible management employees the opportunity to voluntarily terminate their
employment and receive benefits consistent with Amerens standard management severance program. This program was offered to eligible management employees at Amerens subsidiaries, including UE, CIPS, Genco, CILCO and IP. Additionally,
Ameren initiated an involuntary separation program to reduce additional management positions under terms and benefits consistent with Amerens standard management severance program. In the third quarter of 2009, Genco announced operational
changes and staff reductions at three of its generating facilities. The affected three plants were the Meredosia, Grand Tower, and Hutsonville plants. In addition, Genco retired two of the four units at its Meredosia plant. The Grand Tower plant
will be operated seasonally from May through September; a very limited staff will maintain the plant during the other months. The number of positions eliminated as a result of these separation programs and operational changes was approximately 300.
For additional information about the development of our businesses, our business operations, and factors affecting our operations and
financial position, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, of this report and Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of
this report.
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Ameren has three reportable segments: Missouri Regulated, Illinois Regulated, and Merchant Generation. CILCO has two reportable segments: Illinois Regulated and Merchant Generation. See Note 18 Segment
Information under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information on reporting segments.
RATES AND
REGULATION
Rates
The rates
that UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP are allowed to charge for their utility services significantly influence the results of operations, financial position, and liquidity of these companies and Ameren. The electric and natural gas utility industry is highly
regulated. The utility rates charged to UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP customers are determined, in large part, by governmental entities, including the MoPSC, the ICC, and FERC. Decisions by these entities are influenced by many factors, including the cost
of providing service, the prudency of expenditures, the quality of service, regulatory staff knowledge and experience, economic conditions, public policy, and social and political views, and are largely outside of our control. Decisions made by
these governmental entities regarding rates, as well as the regulatory lag involved in filing and getting new rates approved, could have a material impact on the results of operations, financial position, and liquidity of Ameren, UE, CIPS, CILCO and
IP.
The ICC regulates rates and other matters for CIPS, CILCO and IP. The MoPSC regulates rates and other matters
for UE. The FERC regulates UE, CIPS, Genco, CILCO and IP as to their ability to charge market-based rates for the sale and transmission of energy in interstate commerce and various other matters
discussed below under General Regulatory Matters.
About 38% of Amerens electric and 14% of its gas operating revenues were subject
to regulation by the MoPSC in the year ended December 31, 2009. About 39% of Amerens electric and 86% of its gas operating revenues were subject to regulation by the ICC in the year ended December 31, 2009. Wholesale revenues for UE,
Genco and AERG are subject to FERC regulation, but not subject to direct MoPSC or ICC regulation.
Missouri Regulated
Electric
About 83% of UEs electric operating
revenues were subject to regulation by the MoPSC in the year ended December 31, 2009. Effective March 1, 2009, as a result of a MoPSC electric rate order issued in January 2009, UEs retail electric rates include a FAC for billing
adjustments for changes in prudently incurred fuel and purchased power costs.
FERC regulates the rates charged and the terms and
conditions for electric transmission services. Each RTO separately files regional transmission tariff rates for approval by FERC. All members within that RTO are then subjected to those rates. As a member of MISO, UEs transmission rate is
calculated in accordance with MISOs rate formula. The transmission rate is updated in June of each year based on FERC filings. This rate is charged directly to wholesale customers. This rate is not directly charged to Missouri retail customers
because the MoPSC includes transmission-related costs in setting bundled retail rates in Missouri.
Natural Gas
All of UEs natural gas operating revenues were subject to regulation by the MoPSC in the year ended December 31, 2009.
If certain criteria are met, UEs natural gas rates may be adjusted without a traditional rate proceeding. PGA clauses permit prudently incurred
natural gas costs to be passed directly to the consumer. The ISRS also permits prudently incurred natural gas infrastructure replacement costs to be passed directly to the consumer.
As part of a 2007 stipulation and agreement approved by the MoPSC that authorized an increase in annual natural gas delivery revenues of $6 million
effective April 1, 2007, UE agreed not to file a natural gas delivery rate case before March 15, 2010. This agreement did not prevent UE from filing to recover gas infrastructure replacement costs through an ISRS during this three-year
rate moratorium. Since April 1, 2007, the MoPSC has approved three separate requests from UE for an ISRS to recover annual revenues of $3 million, in the aggregate. These surcharges remain in place until new rates go into effect.
5
For additional information on Missouri rate matters, including UEs pending electric rate case
and UEs 2009 electric rate order, see Results of Operations and Outlook in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk under Part II, Item 7A, and Note 2 Rate and Regulatory Matters, and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
Illinois Regulated
The following table presents the approximate percentage of electric and
natural gas operating revenues subject to regulation by the ICC for each of the Illinois Regulated companies for the year ended December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
CIPS |
|
100 |
% |
|
100 |
% |
CILCO(a) |
|
41 |
|
|
100 |
|
IP |
|
100 |
|
|
100 |
|
(a) |
AERGs revenues are not subject to ICC regulation. |
Under the Illinois Customer Choice Law, all electric customers in Illinois may choose their own electric energy provider. However, the Ameren Illinois Utilities are required to serve as the provider of last resort (POLR) for electric
customers within their territory who have not chosen an alternative retail electric supplier. The Ameren Illinois Utilities obligation to provide full requirements electric service, including power supply, as a POLR varies by customer size.
The Ameren Illinois Utilities are not required to offer fixed priced electric service to many of their largest customers with electric demands of 400 kilowatts or greater, as this group of customers has been declared competitive. The power
procurement costs incurred by the Ameren Illinois Utilities are passed directly to their customers through a cost recovery mechanism.
Environmental adjustment rate riders authorized by the ICC permit the recovery of prudently incurred MGP remediation and litigation costs from CIPS, CILCOs and IPs Illinois electric and natural gas utility customers. In
addition, IP has a tariff rider to recover the costs of asbestos-related litigation claims, subject to the following terms: 90% of cash expenditures in excess of the amount included in base electric rates is recoverable by IP from a trust fund
established by IP. At December 31, 2009, the trust fund balance was $23 million, including accumulated interest. If cash expenditures are less than the amount in base rates, IP will contribute 90% of the difference to the fund. Once the trust
fund is depleted, 90% of allowed cash expenditures in excess of base rates will be recoverable through charges assessed to customers under the tariff rider.
In 2009, a new law became effective in Illinois that allows electric and natural gas utilities to recover through a rate adjustment the difference between their actual bad debt expense and the bad debt expense
included in their base rates. In February 2010, the ICC approved the Ameren Illinois Utilities electric and natural gas rate adjustment tariffs to recover bad debt expense not recovered in base rates.
If certain criteria are met, CIPS, CILCOs and IPs natural gas rates may be adjusted
without a traditional rate proceeding. PGA clauses permit prudently incurred natural gas costs to be passed directly to the consumer.
FERC regulates the rates charged and the terms and conditions for electric transmission services. Each RTO separately files regional transmission tariff rates for approval by FERC. All members within that RTO are then subjected to those
rates. As members of MISO, the Ameren Illinois Utilities transmission rate is calculated in accordance with MISOs rate formula. The transmission rate is updated in June of each year based on FERC filings. This rate is charged directly to
wholesale customers and alternative retail electric suppliers. For retail customers who have not chosen an alternative retail electric supplier, the transmission rate is collected through a rider mechanism.
For additional information on Illinois rate matters, including the currently pending electric and natural gas rate cases, see Results of Operations and
Outlook in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Part II, Item 7A, and Note 2 Rate and
Regulatory Matters, and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
Merchant Generation
Merchant Generation revenues are determined by market conditions and contractual arrangements. We expect the Merchant Generation fleet of assets to
have 6,370 megawatts of capacity available for the 2010 peak summer electrical demand. As discussed below, Genco, AERG and EEI sell all of their power and capacity to Marketing Company through power supply agreements. Marketing Company attempts to
optimize the value of those assets and mitigate risks through a variety of hedging techniques, including wholesale sales of capacity and energy, retail sales in the non-rate-regulated Illinois market, spot market sales primarily in MISO and PJM, and
financial transactions. Marketing Company enters into long-term and short-term contracts. Marketing Companys counterparties include cooperatives, municipalities, commercial and industrial customers, power marketers, MISO, and investor-owned
utilities such as the Ameren Illinois Utilities. For additional information on Marketing Companys hedging activities and Marketing Companys sales to the Ameren Illinois Utilities, see Outlook in Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7 and Note 7 Derivative Financial Instruments and Note 14 Related Party Transactions under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
General Regulatory Matters
UE, CIPS, CILCO and
IP must receive FERC approval to issue short-term debt securities and to conduct certain acquisitions, mergers and consolidations involving electric utility holding companies having a value in excess of $10 million. In addition, these Ameren
utilities must receive authorization from the applicable state public utility regulatory
6
agency to issue stock and long-term debt securities (with maturities of more than 12 months) and to conduct mergers, affiliate transactions, and various other activities. Genco, AERG and EEI are
subject to FERCs jurisdiction when they issue any securities.
Under PUHCA 2005, FERC and any state public utility regulatory
agencies may access books and records of Ameren and its subsidiaries that are determined to be relevant to costs incurred by Amerens rate-regulated subsidiaries with respect to jurisdictional rates. PUHCA 2005 also permits Ameren, the ICC, or
the MoPSC to request that FERC review cost allocations by Ameren Services to other Ameren companies.
Operation of UEs Callaway
nuclear plant is subject to regulation by the NRC. Its facility operating license expires on June 11, 2024. UE intends to submit a license extension application with the NRC to extend the plants operating license to 2044. UEs Osage
hydroelectric plant and UEs Taum Sauk pumped-storage hydroelectric plant, as licensed projects under the Federal Power Act, are subject to FERC regulations affecting, among other things, the general operation and maintenance of the projects.
The license for UEs Osage hydroelectric plant expires on March 30, 2047, and the license for UEs Taum Sauk plant expires on June 30, 2010. In June 2008, UE filed an application with FERC to relicense its Taum Sauk plant for
another 40 years. Approval and relicensure are expected in 2012. Operations are permitted to continue under the current license while the application for relicensing is pending. The Taum Sauk plant is currently out of service. It is being rebuilt
due to a major breach of the upper reservoir in December 2005. UE expects the Taum Sauk plant to become operational in the second quarter of 2010. UEs Keokuk plant and its dam, in the Mississippi River between Hamilton, Illinois, and Keokuk,
Iowa, are operated under authority granted by an Act of Congress in 1905.
For additional information on regulatory matters, see Note 2
Rate and Regulatory Matters and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report, which include a discussion about the December 2005 breach of the upper reservoir at UEs Taum Sauk pumped-storage
hydroelectric plant.
Environmental Matters
Certain of our operations are subject to federal, state, and local environmental statutes or regulations relating to the safety and health of personnel, the public, and the environment. These environmental statutes
and regulations include requirements for identification, generation, storage, handling, transportation, disposal, recordkeeping, labeling, reporting, and emergency response in connection with hazardous and toxic materials, safety and health
standards, and environmental protection requirements, including standards and limitations relating to the discharge of air and water pollutants and the management of waste and byproduct materials. Failure to comply with those statutes or regulations
could have material adverse effects on us. We could be subject to criminal or civil penalties by regulatory
agencies. We could be ordered to make payment to private parties by the courts. Except as indicated in this report, we believe that we are in material compliance with existing statutes and
regulations.
For additional discussion of environmental matters, including NOx, SO2, and mercury emission reduction requirements, global climate change, remediation efforts and UEs receipt in January 2010 of a
Notice of Violation from the EPA alleging violations of the Clean Air Acts NSR and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) provisions, see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item
8, of this report.
SUPPLY FOR ELECTRIC POWER
Ameren owns an integrated transmission system that comprises the transmission assets of UE, CIPS, CILCO, IP and AITC. Ameren also operates two
balancing authority areas, AMMO (which includes UE) and AMIL (which includes CIPS, CILCO, IP, AITC, Genco and AERG). During 2009, the peak demand in AMMO was 8,081 MW and in AMIL was 8,607 MW. The Ameren transmission system directly connects with 15
other balancing authority areas for the exchange of electric energy.
UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP are transmission-owning members of MISO.
Transmission service on the UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP transmission systems is provided pursuant to the terms of the MISO OATT on file with FERC. EEI operates its own balancing authority area and its own transmission facilities in southern Illinois. The
EEI transmission system is directly connected to MISO and TVA. EEIs generating units are dispatched separately from those of UE, Genco and AERG.
The Ameren Companies and EEI are members of SERC. SERC is responsible for the bulk electric power supply system in much of the southeastern United States, including all or portions of Missouri, Illinois, Arkansas,
Kentucky, Tennessee, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Virginia, Florida, Oklahoma, Iowa, and Texas.
See Note 2 Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
Missouri Regulated
UEs electric supply is obtained primarily from its own generation. Factors that could cause UE to purchase power include,
among other things, absence of sufficient owned generation, plant outages, the fulfillment of renewable energy requirements, the failure of suppliers to meet their power supply obligations, extreme weather conditions, and the availability of power
at a cost lower than the cost of generating it.
UE continues to evaluate its longer-term needs for new baseload and peaking electric
generation capacity. UEs
7
integrated resource plan filed with the MoPSC in February 2008 included the expectation that new baseload generation capacity would be required in the 2018 to 2020 time frame. Due to the
significant time required to plan, acquire permits for, and build a baseload power plant, UE is actively studying future plant alternatives, including energy efficiency programs that could help defer new plant construction. UEs 2008 integrated
resource plan included proposals to pursue energy efficiency programs, expand the role of renewable energy sources in UEs overall generation mix, increase operational efficiency at existing power plants, and possibly retire some generating
units that are older and less efficient. UE will file a new integrated resource plan with the MoPSC in 2011.
See also Outlook in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7 and Note 2 Rate and Regulatory Matters and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of
this report.
Illinois Regulated
As of January 1, 2007, CIPS, CILCO and IP were required to obtain from market sources all electric supply requirements for customers, except those declared competitive, who did not purchase electric supply from third-party suppliers.
The power procurement costs incurred by CIPS, CILCO and IP are passed directly to their customers through a cost recovery mechanism.
In September 2006, a reverse power procurement auction was held, as a result of which CIPS, CILCO and IP entered into power supply contracts with the winning bidders, including Marketing Company. Under these contracts, the electric
suppliers are responsible for providing to CIPS, CILCO and IP energy, capacity, certain transmission, volumetric risk management, and other services necessary for the Ameren Illinois Utilities to serve the electric load needs of fixed-price
residential and small commercial customers (with less than one MW of demand) at an all-inclusive fixed price. These contracts commenced on January 1, 2007, with one-third of the supply contracts expiring in May 2008, 2009 and 2010.
As part of the 2007 Illinois Electric Settlement Agreement, the reverse power procurement auction process was discontinued and a new competitive
power procurement process led by the IPA beginning in 2009 was established. In January 2009, the ICC approved the electric power procurement plan filed by the IPA for both the Ameren Illinois Utilities and Commonwealth Edison Company. The plan
outlined the wholesale products that the IPA procured on behalf of the Ameren Illinois Utilities for the period June 1, 2009, through May 31, 2014. The IPA procured capacity, energy swaps, and renewable energy credits through an RFP
process on behalf of the Ameren
Illinois Utilities in the second quarter of 2009. In August 2009, the IPA submitted its plan to the ICC for procurement of electric power for the Ameren Illinois Utilities and Commonwealth Edison
Company for the period June 1, 2010, through May 31, 2015. The plan was modified and approved by the ICC in December 2009. The IPA will procure energy swaps, capacity and renewable energy credits, and long-term renewable supply.
A portion of the electric power supply required for the Ameren Illinois Utilities to satisfy their distribution customers
requirements is purchased from Marketing Company on behalf of Genco, AERG and EEI. Also as part of the 2007 Illinois Electric Settlement Agreement, the Ameren Illinois Utilities entered into financial contracts with Marketing Company (for the
benefit of Genco and AERG) to lock in energy prices for 400 to 1,000 megawatts annually of their round-the-clock power requirements during the period June 1, 2008, through December 31, 2012, at relevant market prices at that time. These
financial contracts do not include capacity, are not load-following products, and do not involve the physical delivery of energy.
See
Note 2 Rate and Regulatory Matters, Note 14 Related Party Transactions and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information on power procurement in Illinois.
Merchant Generation
Genco and AERG have
entered into power supply agreements with Marketing Company whereby Genco and AERG sell and Marketing Company purchases all the capacity available from Gencos and AERGs generation fleets and the associated energy. These power supply
agreements continue through December 31, 2022, and from year to year thereafter unless either party elects to terminate the agreement by providing the other party with no less than six months advance written notice. EEI and Marketing Company
have entered into a power supply agreement for EEI to sell all of its capacity and energy to Marketing Company. This agreement expires on December 31, 2015. All of Gencos, AERGs and EEIs generating facilities compete for the
sale of energy and capacity in the competitive energy markets through Marketing Company. See Note 14 Related Party Transactions under Part II, Item 8, of this report for additional information.
Factors that could cause Marketing Company to purchase power for the Merchant Generation business segment include, among other things, absence of
sufficient owned generation, plant outages, the fulfillment of renewable energy requirements, the failure of suppliers to meet their power supply obligations, extreme weather conditions, and the availability of power at a cost lower than the cost of
generating it.
8
FUEL FOR POWER GENERATION
The following table presents the source of electric generation by fuel type, excluding purchased power, for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal |
|
|
Nuclear |
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
Hydroelectric |
|
|
Oil |
|
Ameren:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
83 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
|
1 |
% |
|
3 |
% |
|
(b |
)% |
2008 |
|
85 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
(b |
) |
2007 |
|
84 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
(b |
) |
Missouri Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
75 |
% |
|
21 |
% |
|
(b |
)% |
|
4 |
% |
|
- |
% |
2008 |
|
77 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
(b |
) |
2007 |
|
76 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
(b |
) |
Merchant Generation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genco: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
99 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
1 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
(b |
)% |
2008 |
|
99 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(b |
) |
2007 |
|
96 |
|
|
- |
|
|
4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(b |
) |
CILCO (AERG): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
100 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
(b |
)% |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
2008 |
|
99 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
2007 |
|
99 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(b |
) |
EEI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
100 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
- |
% |
2008 |
|
100 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
2007 |
|
100 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total Merchant Generation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
99 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
1 |
% |
|
- |
% |
|
(b |
)% |
2008 |
|
99 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(b |
) |
2007 |
|
98 |
|
|
- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(b |
) |
(a) |
Includes amounts for Ameren registrant and nonregistrant subsidiaries and intercompany eliminations. |
(b) |
Less than 1% of total fuel supply. |
9
The following table presents the cost of fuels for electric generation for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Fuels (Dollars per million Btus) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
Ameren: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal(a) |
|
$ |
1.654 |
|
$ |
1.572 |
(b) |
|
$ |
1.399 |
Nuclear |
|
|
0.620 |
|
|
0.493 |
|
|
|
0.490 |
Natural gas(c) |
|
|
8.685 |
|
|
10.503 |
|
|
|
7.939 |
Weighted average all fuels(d) |
|
$ |
1.591 |
|
$ |
1.573 |
(b) |
|
$ |
1.462 |
Missouri Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal(a) |
|
$ |
1.534 |
|
$ |
1.426 |
|
|
$ |
1.284 |
Nuclear |
|
|
0.620 |
|
|
0.493 |
|
|
|
0.490 |
Natural gas(c) |
|
|
8.544 |
|
|
10.264 |
|
|
|
7.580 |
Weighted average all fuels(d) |
|
$ |
1.386 |
|
$ |
1.340 |
|
|
$ |
1.271 |
Merchant Generation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genco: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal(a) |
|
$ |
1.877 |
|
$ |
1.958 |
(b) |
|
$ |
1.717 |
Natural gas(c) |
|
|
13.159 |
|
|
15.857 |
|
|
|
8.440 |
Weighted average all fuels(d) |
|
$ |
2.001 |
|
$ |
2.121 |
(b) |
|
$ |
1.939 |
CILCO (AERG): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal(a) |
|
$ |
1.643 |
|
$ |
1.598 |
|
|
$ |
1.309 |
Weighted average all fuels(d) |
|
$ |
1.673 |
|
$ |
1.721 |
|
|
$ |
1.450 |
EEI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal(a) |
|
$ |
1.855 |
|
$ |
1.438 |
|
|
$ |
1.329 |
Total Merchant Generation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal(a) |
|
$ |
1.813 |
|
$ |
1.746 |
(b) |
|
$ |
1.545 |
Natural gas(c) |
|
|
8.796 |
|
|
10.764 |
|
|
|
8.390 |
Weighted average all fuels(d) |
|
$ |
1.934 |
|
$ |
1.919 |
(b) |
|
$ |
1.759 |
(a) |
The fuel cost for coal represents the cost of coal, costs for transportation, which includes diesel fuel adders, and cost of emission allowances. |
(b) |
Excludes impact of the Genco coal supply contract settlement under which Genco received a lump-sum payment of $60 million in July 2008 from a coal mine owner. See Note 1
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report. |
(c) |
The fuel cost for natural gas represents the cost of natural gas and firm and variable costs for transportation, storage, balancing, and fuel losses for delivery to the plant. In
addition, the fixed costs for firm transportation and firm storage capacity are included in the calculation of fuel cost for the generating facilities. |
(d) |
Represents all costs for fuels used in our electric generating facilities, to the extent applicable, including coal, nuclear, natural gas, oil, propane, tire chips, paint
products, and handling. Oil, paint, propane, and tire chips are not individually listed in this table because their use is minimal. |
Coal
UE, Genco, AERG and EEI have agreements in place to purchase a portion of their coal needs and to transport it to electric generating facilities through 2019. UE, Genco, AERG and EEI expect to enter into additional contracts to purchase
coal from time to time. Coal supply agreements typically have an initial term of five years, with about 20% of the contracts expiring annually. Ameren burned 37.6 million tons (UE 21.3 million, Genco 7.9 million, AERG 4.0
million, EEI 4.4 million) of coal in 2009. See Part II, Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of this report for additional information about coal supply contracts.
About 96% of Amerens coal (UE 96%, Genco 99%, AERG 89%, EEI 100%) is purchased from the Powder River Basin in
Wyoming. The remaining coal is typically purchased from the Illinois Basin. UE, Genco, AERG and EEI have a policy to maintain coal inventory consistent with their projected usage. Inventory may be adjusted because of uncertainties of supply due to
potential
work stoppages, delays in coal deliveries, equipment breakdowns, and other factors. In the past, deliveries from the Powder River Basin have occasionally been restricted because of rail
maintenance, weather, and derailments. As of December 31, 2009, coal inventories for UE, Genco, AERG and EEI were at targeted levels. Disruptions in coal deliveries could cause UE, Genco, AERG and EEI to pursue a strategy that could include
reducing sales of power during low-margin periods, buying higher-cost fuels to generate required electricity, and purchasing power from other sources.
Nuclear
Developing nuclear fuel generally involves the mining and milling of uranium ore to produce uranium
concentrates, the conversion of uranium concentrates to uranium hexafluoride gas, the enrichment of that gas, and the fabrication of the enriched uranium hexafluoride gas into usable fuel assemblies. UE has entered into uranium, uranium conversion,
enrichment, and fabrication contracts to procure the fuel supply for its Callaway nuclear plant.
10
Fuel assemblies for the 2010 spring refueling at UEs Callaway nuclear plant have been manufactured and delivered to the plant. UE also has
agreements or inventories to price-hedge approximately 89% of Callaways 2011 and 79% of Callaways 2013 refueling requirements. UE has uranium (concentrate and hexafluoride) inventories and supply contracts sufficient to meet all of its
uranium and conversion requirements at least through 2014. UE has enriched uranium inventories and enrichment supply contracts sufficient to satisfy enrichment requirements through 2012. Fuel fabrication services are under contract through
2010. UE expects to enter into additional contracts to purchase nuclear fuel. As a member of Fuelco, UE can join with other member companies to increase its purchasing power and opportunities for volume discounts. The Callaway nuclear plant
normally requires refueling at 18-month intervals. The last refueling was completed in November 2008. The nuclear fuel markets are competitive, and prices can be volatile; however, we do not anticipate any significant problems in meeting our future
supply requirements.
Natural Gas Supply
To maintain gas deliveries to gas-fired generating units throughout the year, especially during the summer peak demand, Amerens portfolio of natural gas supply resources includes firm transportation capacity and firm no-notice storage
capacity leased from interstate pipelines. UE, Genco and EEI primarily use the interstate pipeline systems of Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, Trunkline Gas Company, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, and Mississippi River Transmission
Corporation to transport natural gas to generating units. In addition to physical transactions, Ameren uses financial instruments, including some in the NYMEX futures market and some in the OTC financial markets, to hedge the price paid for natural
gas.
UE, Genco and EEIs natural gas procurement strategy is designed to ensure reliable and immediate delivery of natural gas to
their generating units. UE, Genco and EEI do this in two ways. They optimize transportation and storage options and minimize cost and price risk through various supply and price-hedging agreements that allow them to maintain access to multiple gas
pools, supply basins, and storage. As of December 31, 2009, UE had price-hedged about 89% and Genco had price-hedged 100% of their expected natural gas supply requirements for generation in 2010. As of December 31, 2009, EEI did not have
any of its required gas supply for generation hedged for price risk.
Renewable Energy
Illinois and Missouri have enacted laws requiring electric utilities to include renewable energy resources in their portfolios. Illinois requires
renewable energy resources to equal or exceed 2% of the total electricity that each electric utility supplies to its eligible retail customers as of June 1, 2008, increasing to 10% by June 1, 2015, and to 25% by June 1, 2025. The
Ameren Illinois Utilities have procured renewable energy credits under the ICC-approved RFP to meet this requirement through May 2010. See Note 2 Rate
and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, for additional information about the Illinois power procurement process. In Missouri, utilities will be required to purchase or generate
electricity from renewable energy sources equaling at least 2% of native load sales by 2011, with that percentage increasing in subsequent years to at least 15% by 2021, subject to a 1% limit on customer rate impacts. At least 2% of each renewable
energy portfolio requirement must be derived from solar energy. UE expects to satisfy the 2011 requirement with existing renewable generation in its current fleet along with a 15-year, 102-MW power purchase agreement with a wind farm operator in
Iowa that began generation in 2009 and the 15-MW landfill gas project discussed below.
In September 2009, UE announced an agreement with
a landfill owner to install CTs at a landfill site in St. Louis County, Missouri, which would generate approximately 15-MW of electricity by burning methane gas collected from the landfill. Construction of the CTs is expected to begin in 2010, and
the CTs are expected to begin generating power in 2011. UE signed a 20-year supply agreement with the landfill owner to purchase methane gas.
Energy
Efficiency
Amerens regulated utilities have implemented energy efficiency programs to educate and help their customers become
more efficient users of energy. A new law in Missouri allows electric utilities to recover costs related to MoPSC-approved energy efficiency programs. The new law could, among other things, allow UE to earn a return on its energy efficiency programs
equivalent to the return UE could earn with supply-side capital investments, such as new power plants. UE introduced multiple energy efficiency programs in 2009. The goal of these recently announced and future UE energy efficiency programs is
to reduce usage by 540-MW by 2025. UE has set up a website at www.uefficiency.com in order to provide more information to its customers regarding energy efficiency.
The Ameren Illinois Utilities are participating in the Illinois Clean Energy Community Foundation, a program that supports energy efficiency, promotes renewable energy, and provides educational opportunities. In
June 2008, the ICC issued an order approving the Ameren Illinois Utilities electric energy efficiency plan as well as a cost recovery mechanism by which the program costs will be recovered from electric customers. In October 2008, the ICC
issued an order approving the Ameren Illinois Utilities natural gas energy efficiency plan as well as a cost recovery mechanism by which the program costs will be recovered from natural gas customers. The Ameren Illinois Utilities have set up
a website at www.actonenergy.com in order to provide more information to their customers regarding energy efficiency.
NATURAL GAS SUPPLY FOR DISTRIBUTION
UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP are responsible for the purchase and
delivery of natural gas to their gas utility customers. UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP develop and manage a portfolio of gas supply resources. These include firm gas supply under term
11
agreements with producers, interstate and intrastate firm transportation capacity, firm storage capacity leased from interstate pipelines, and on-system storage facilities to maintain gas
deliveries to customers throughout the year and especially during peak demand. UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP primarily use the Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, the Trunkline Gas Company, the Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, the Mississippi
River Transmission Corporation, and the Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation interstate pipeline systems to transport natural gas to their systems. In addition to physical transactions, financial instruments, including those entered into in the
NYMEX futures market and in the OTC financial markets, are used to hedge the price paid for natural gas. See Part II, Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk of this report for additional information about
natural gas supply contracts. Prudently incurred natural gas purchase costs are passed on to customers of UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP in Illinois and Missouri under PGA clauses, subject to prudency review by the ICC and the MoPSC.
For additional information on our fuel and purchased power supply, see Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources and Effects of
Inflation and Changing Prices in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, of this report. Also see Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk under Part
II, Item 7A, of this report, Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 7 Derivative Financial Instruments, Note 14 Related Party Transactions, Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies, and Note 16
Callaway Nuclear Plant under Part II, Item 8.
INDUSTRY ISSUES
We are facing issues common to the electric and natural gas utility industry and the merchant electric generation industry. These issues include:
|
|
political and regulatory resistance to higher rates, especially in a recessionary economic environment; |
|
|
the potential for changes in laws, regulation, and policies at the state and federal level, including those resulting from election cycles;
|
|
|
access to, and uncertainty in, the capital and credit markets; |
|
|
the potential for more intense competition in generation, supply and distribution, including new technologies; |
|
|
pressure on customer growth and usage in light of current economic conditions; |
|
|
the potential for reregulation in some states, including Illinois, which could cause electric distribution companies to build or acquire generation facilities
and to purchase less power from electric generating companies such as Genco, AERG and EEI; |
|
|
changes in the structure of the industry as a result of changes in federal and state laws, including the formation of merchant generating and independent
transmission entities and RTOs; |
|
|
increases or decreases in power prices due to the balance of supply and demand; |
|
|
the availability of fuel and increases or decreases in fuel prices; |
|
|
the availability of qualified labor and material, and rising costs; |
|
|
negative free cash flows due to rising investments and the regulatory framework; |
|
|
continually developing and complex environmental laws, regulations and issues, including air-quality standards, mercury regulations, and increasingly likely
greenhouse gas limitations and ash management requirements; |
|
|
public concern about the siting of new facilities; |
|
|
aging infrastructure and the need to construct new power generation, transmission and distribution facilities; |
|
|
proposals for programs to encourage or mandate energy efficiency and renewable sources of power; |
|
|
public concerns about nuclear plant operation and decommissioning and the disposal of nuclear waste; and |
|
|
consolidation of electric and natural gas companies. |
We are monitoring these issues. Except as otherwise noted in this report, we are unable to predict what impact, if any, these issues will have on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. For
additional information, see Risk Factors under Part I, Item 1A, and Outlook and Regulatory Matters in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, and Note 2 Rate
and Regulatory Matters, and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
12
OPERATING STATISTICS
The following tables present key electric and natural gas operating statistics for Ameren for the past three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Operating Statistics Year Ended December 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Electric Sales kilowatthours (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
13,413 |
|
|
|
13,904 |
|
|
|
14,258 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
14,510 |
|
|
|
14,690 |
|
|
|
14,766 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
7,037 |
|
|
|
9,256 |
|
|
|
9,675 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
Native load subtotal |
|
|
36,615 |
|
|
|
38,635 |
|
|
|
39,458 |
|
Off-system sales |
|
|
12,447 |
|
|
|
10,457 |
|
|
|
10,984 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
49,062 |
|
|
|
49,092 |
|
|
|
50,442 |
|
Illinois Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power supply and delivery service |
|
|
11,089 |
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
11,857 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power supply and delivery service |
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
6,095 |
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
Delivery service only |
|
|
6,797 |
|
|
|
6,147 |
|
|
|
5,178 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power supply and delivery service |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
Delivery service only |
|
|
10,712 |
|
|
|
11,300 |
|
|
|
11,199 |
|
Other |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
Native load subtotal |
|
|
34,893 |
|
|
|
37,206 |
|
|
|
37,648 |
|
Merchant Generation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaffiliate energy sales |
|
|
25,673 |
|
|
|
26,395 |
|
|
|
25,196 |
|
Affiliate native energy sales |
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
6,055 |
|
|
|
7,296 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
29,202 |
|
|
|
32,450 |
|
|
|
32,492 |
|
Eliminate affiliate sales |
|
|
(3,529 |
) |
|
|
(6,055 |
) |
|
|
(7,296 |
) |
Eliminate Illinois Regulated/Merchant Generation common customers |
|
|
(5,566 |
) |
|
|
(4,939 |
) |
|
|
(5,800 |
) |
Ameren total |
|
|
104,062 |
|
|
|
107,754 |
|
|
|
107,486 |
|
Electric Operating Revenues (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
982 |
|
|
$ |
948 |
|
|
$ |
980 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
839 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
Other |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Native load subtotal |
|
|
2,299 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
|
|
2,302 |
|
Off-system sales |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
2,700 |
|
|
$ |
2,756 |
|
|
$ |
2,786 |
|
Illinois Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power supply and delivery service |
|
$ |
1,094 |
|
|
$ |
1,112 |
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power supply and delivery service |
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
Delivery service only |
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Power supply and delivery service |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Delivery service only |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Other |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Native load subtotal |
|
$ |
1,933 |
|
|
$ |
2,222 |
|
|
$ |
2,276 |
|
Merchant Generation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaffiliate energy sales |
|
$ |
1,340 |
|
|
$ |
1,389 |
|
|
$ |
1,310 |
|
Affiliate native energy sales |
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Other |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
1,710 |
|
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
Eliminate affiliate revenues |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
(591 |
) |
Ameren total |
|
$ |
5,909 |
|
|
$ |
6,367 |
|
|
$ |
6,283 |
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Operating Statistics Year Ended December 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Electric Generation megawatthours (in millions): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri Regulated |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
50.3 |
|
Merchant Generation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genco |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
AERG |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
EEI |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Medina Valley |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
Ameren total |
|
|
76.2 |
|
|
|
80.8 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
Price per ton of delivered coal (average) |
|
$ |
29.85 |
|
|
$ |
26.90 |
(a) |
|
$ |
25.20 |
|
Source of energy supply: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal |
|
|
67.0 |
% |
|
|
70.1 |
% |
|
|
68.7 |
% |
Gas |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Nuclear |
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
Hydroelectric |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Purchased and interchanged, net |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas Operating Statistics Year Ended December 31, |
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gas Sales (millions of Dth) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Illinois Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Subtotal |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Eliminate affiliate sales |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Ameren total |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Natural Gas Operating Revenues (in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Other |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
$ |
174 |
|
Illinois Regulated: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
819 |
|
|
$ |
687 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
Industrial |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
Other |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
39 |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
1,255 |
|
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
Other: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Eliminate affiliate revenues |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Ameren total |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,472 |
|
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
Peak day throughput (thousands of Dth): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UE |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
CIPS |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
CILCO |
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
IP |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
Total peak day throughput |
|
|
1,516 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
(a) |
Includes impact of the Genco coal settlement under which Genco received a lump-sum payment of $60 million in July 2008 from a coal mine owner. See Note 1 Summary of
Significant Account Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report. |
14
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
The Ameren Companies make available free of charge through Amerens Web site (www.ameren.com) their annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments
to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably possible after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. These documents are also available through an
Internet Web site maintained by the SEC (www.sec.gov). Ameren also uses its Web site (www.ameren.com) as a channel of distribution of material information relating to the Ameren Companies. Financial and other material information regarding the
Ameren Companies is routinely posted and accessible at Amerens Web site.
The Ameren Companies also make available free of charge
through Amerens Web site (www.ameren.com) the charters of Amerens board of directors audit and risk committee, human resources committee, nominating and corporate governance committee, finance committee, nuclear oversight
committee, and public policy committee; the corporate governance guidelines; a policy regarding communications to the board of directors; a policy and procedures with respect to related-person transactions; a code of ethics for principal executive
and senior financial officers; a code of business conduct applicable to all directors, officers and employees; and a director nomination policy that applies to the Ameren Companies. The information on Amerens Web site, or any other Web site
referenced in this report, is not incorporated by reference into this report.
Investors should review carefully the following risk factors and the other information contained in this report. The risks that the Ameren Companies face are not limited to those in this section. There may be additional risks and
uncertainties (either currently unknown or not currently believed to be material) that could adversely affect the financial position, results of operations, and liquidity of the Ameren Companies. See Forward-looking Statements above and Outlook in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, of this report.
The electric and gas rates that UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP are allowed to charge are determined through regulatory proceedings and are subject to legislative actions, which are largely outside of their control. Any such events that prevent
UE, CIPS, CILCO or IP from recovering their respective costs or from earning appropriate returns on their investments could have a material adverse effect on future results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
The rates that UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP are allowed to charge for their utility services significantly influence the results of operations, financial
position, and liquidity of these companies and Ameren. The electric and natural gas utility industry is highly regulated. The utility rates charged to UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP customers are determined, in large part,
by governmental entities, including the MoPSC, the ICC, and FERC. Decisions by these entities are influenced by many factors, including the cost of providing service, the prudency of
expenditures, the quality of service, regulatory staff knowledge and experience, economic conditions, public policy, and social and political views, and are largely outside of our control. Decisions made by these governmental entities regarding
rates, as well as the regulatory lag involved in filing and getting new rates approved, could have a material adverse effect on results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP electric and gas utility rates are typically established in regulatory proceedings that take up to 11 months to complete. Rates
established in those proceedings are primarily based on historical costs and revenues, and they include an allowed return on investments by the regulator.
Our company, and the industry as a whole, is going through a period of rising costs and investments. The fact that rates at UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP are primarily based on historical costs and revenues means that
these companies may not be able to earn the allowed return established by their regulators and could result in deferral or elimination of planned capital investments. As a result, UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP expect to file rate cases frequently. A period
of increasing rates for our customers, especially during weak economic times, could result in additional regulatory and legislative actions, as well as competitive and political pressures, that could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations, financial position, and liquidity.
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations that require significant
capital expenditures or could result in closure of facilities, could increase our operating costs, and could adversely influence or limit our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity or expose us to environmental fines and
liabilities.
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations enforced by federal, state and local authorities. From the
beginning phases of siting and development to the ongoing operation of existing or new electric generating, transmission and distribution facilities, natural gas storage facilities, and natural gas transmission and distribution facilities, our
activities involve compliance with diverse laws and regulations. These laws and regulations address noise, emissions, impacts to air, land and water, protected and cultural resources (such as wetlands, endangered species, and archeological and
historical resources), and chemical and waste handling. Complex and lengthy processes are required to obtain approvals, permits, or licenses for new, existing or modified facilities. Additionally, the use and handling of various chemicals or
hazardous materials (including wastes) requires release prevention plans and emergency response procedures.
Compliance with
environmental laws and regulations can require significant capital expenditures and operating costs. Periodically, environmental statutes and regulations are amended and new statutes and regulations are adopted that
15
impose new or modified obligations on our facilities and operations. Actions required to ensure that our facilities and operations are in compliance with environmental laws and regulations could
be prohibitively expensive. As a result, we could be required to close or alter the operation of our facilities, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Failure to comply with environmental laws and regulations may also result in the imposition of fines, penalties, and injunctive measures affecting
operating assets. We are also subject to liability under environmental laws for remediating environmental contamination of property now or formerly owned by us or by our predecessors, as well as property contaminated by hazardous substances that we
generated. Such sites include MGP sites and third-party sites, such as landfills. Additionally, private individuals may seek to enforce environmental laws and regulations against us and could allege injury from exposure to hazardous materials.
Ameren also may be subject to risks in connection with changing or conflicting interpretations of existing laws and regulations. The EPA
is engaged in an enforcement initiative targeted at coal-fired power plants in the United States to determine whether those power plants failed to comply with the requirements of the NSR and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) provisions under
the Clean Air Act when the plants implemented modifications. Failure to comply with the NSR and NSPS provisions under the Clean Air Act can result in increased capital expenditures for the installation of control technology, increased operations and
maintenance expenses, and fines or penalties. In January 2010, UE received a Notice of Violation from the EPA alleging violations of the Clean Air Acts NSR and Title V programs. An outcome in this matter, adverse to UE, could require
substantial capital expenditures and the payment of substantial penalties, neither of which can be determined at this time. Such expenditures could affect unit retirement and replacement decisions and our results of operations, financial position,
and liquidity if such costs are not recovered through regulated rates.
Ameren, UE, Genco, AERG and EEI have incurred and expect to incur
significant costs related to environmental compliance and site remediation. New environmental regulations, voluntary compliance guidelines, enforcement initiatives, or legislation could result in a significant increase in capital expenditures and
operating costs, decreased revenues, increased financing requirements, penalties, or closure of facilities for UE, Genco, AERG and EEI. Although costs incurred by UE would be eligible for recovery in rates over time, subject to MoPSC approval in a
rate proceeding, there is no similar mechanism for recovery of costs for Genco, AERG or EEI. We are unable to predict the ultimate impact of these matters on our results of operations, financial position and liquidity.
Future limits on greenhouse gas emissions would likely require UE, Genco, CILCO (through AERG) and EEI to incur significant increases in capital
expenditures and operating costs, which, if excessive, could result in the closures of coal-fired generating plants, impairment of
assets, or otherwise materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Initiatives to limit greenhouse gas emissions and to address climate change are subject to active consideration in the U.S.
Congress. In June 2009, the U.S. House of Representatives passed energy legislation entitled The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 that, if enacted, would establish an economy-wide cap-and-trade program. The overarching goal
of this proposed cap-and-trade program is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from capped sources, including coal-fired electric generation units, to 3% below 2005 levels by 2012, 17% below 2005 levels by 2020, 42% below 2005 levels by 2030, and 83%
below 2005 levels by the year 2050. In September 2009, climate change legislation entitled The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act was introduced in the U.S. Senate that was similar to that passed by the U.S. House of
Representatives in June 2009, although it proposes a slightly greater reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in the year 2020 and grants fewer emission allowances to the electricity sector. Under both proposed pieces of legislation, large sources of
CO2 emissions will be required to obtain and retire an allowance for each ton of
CO2 emitted. The allowances may be allocated to the sources without cost, sold to
the sources through auctions or other mechanisms, or traded among parties. The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act was voted out of committee in November 2009. In December 2009, Senators Kerry, Graham and Lieberman introduced a
framework for Senate legislation in 2010. The framework lacks specifics, but it is consistent with the House-passed legislation except that it emphasizes the need for greater support for nuclear power and energy independence through support for
clean energy and drilling for oil and natural gas. Senate leadership has stated that consideration of climate legislation will be postponed until spring 2010. In addition, the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions has been identified as a high
priority by President Obamas administration. Although we cannot predict the date of enactment or the requirements of any future climate change legislation or regulations, we believe it is possible that some form of federal legislation or
regulations to control emissions of greenhouse gases will become law during the current administration.
Potential
impacts from climate change legislation could vary, depending upon proposed CO2
emission limits, the timing of implementation of those limits, the method of distributing allowances, the degree to which offsets are allowed and available, and provisions for cost containment measures, such as a safety valve provision
that provides a maximum price for emission allowances. As a result of our diverse fuel portfolio, our emissions of greenhouse gases vary among our generating facilities, but coal-fired power plants are significant sources of CO2, a principal greenhouse gas. Amerens analysis shows that if either The American
Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 or The Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act were enacted into law in its current form, household costs and rates for electricity could rise significantly. The burden could fall particularly
hard on electricity consumers and upon the economy in the Midwest
16
because of the regions reliance on electricity generated by coal-fired power plants. Natural gas emits about half the amount of CO2 that coal emits when burned to produce electricity. As a result, economy-wide shifts favoring natural gas as a fuel source for
electricity generation also could affect the cost of heating for our utility customers and many industrial processes. Ameren believes that wholesale natural gas costs could rise significantly as well. Higher costs for energy could contribute to
reduced demand for electricity and natural gas.
Additional requirements to control greenhouse gas emissions and address global climate
change may also arise pursuant to the Midwest Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord, an agreement signed by the governors of Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota to develop a strategy to achieve energy security and to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions through a cap-and-trade mechanism. The advisory group to the Midwest governors provided draft final recommendations on the design of a greenhouse gas reduction program in June 2009. The recommendations have not been endorsed
or approved by the state governors. It is uncertain whether legislation to implement the recommendations will be implemented or passed by any of the states, including Illinois.
With regard to the control of greenhouse gas emissions under federal regulation, in 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision
finding that the EPA has the authority to regulate CO2 and other greenhouse gases
from automobiles as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. This decision required the EPA to determine whether greenhouse gas emissions may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare, or, in the alternative, to
provide a reasonable explanation as to why greenhouse gas emissions should not be regulated. In December 2009, in response to the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, the EPA issued its endangerment finding determining that greenhouse gas
emissions, including CO2, endanger human health and welfare and that emissions of
greenhouse gases from motor vehicles contribute to that endangerment. It is expected that the EPA will issue a rule by the end of March 2010 to control greenhouse gas emissions from light-duty vehicles such as automobiles. Once this rule is
effective, greenhouse gases will, for the first time, be a regulated air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. The EPA has taken the position that the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions from new motor vehicles under the Clean Air Act will trigger
the applicability of other Clean Air Act programs, such as the Title V Operating Permit Program and the NSR program, which apply to greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources. This would include fossil fuel-fired electricity generating plants.
Recognizing the difficulties presented by regulating at once virtually all emitters of greenhouse gases, the EPA
announced in September 2009 a proposed rule, known as the tailoring rule, that would establish new higher thresholds for regulating greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources, such as power plants. The rule would require any source
that emits at least 25,000 tons per year of greenhouse gases measured as CO2
equivalents (CO2e) to obtain an operating permit under Title V Operating Permit
Program of
the Clean Air Act. Sources that already have an operating permit would have greenhouse gas-specific provisions added to their permits upon renewal. Currently, all Ameren power plants have
operating permits that, depending on the final rule, may be modified when they are renewed to address greenhouse gas emissions. The proposed tailoring rule also would set a new applicability threshold for subjecting stationary sources to the
requirements of the NSR program for greenhouse gas emissions and a new emissions threshold for determining when modifications at such stationary sources would require the source to obtain a permit and to implement control technology to address
greenhouse gas emissions.
Future federal and state legislation or regulations that mandate limits on the emission of greenhouse gases
would result in significant increases in capital expenditures and operating costs, which, in turn, could lead to increased liquidity needs and higher financing costs. Moreover, to the extent we request recovery of these costs through rates, our
regulators might deny some or all of, or defer timely recovery of, these costs. Excessive costs to comply with future legislation or regulations might force UE, Genco, CILCO (through AERG) and EEI as well as other similarly situated electric power
generators to close some coal-fired facilities and could lead to possible impairment of assets and reduced revenues. As a result, mandatory limits could have a material adverse impact on Amerens, UEs, Gencos, CILCOs (through
AERG) and EEIs results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
The construction of, and capital improvements to,
UEs, CIPS, CILCOs and IPs electric and gas utility infrastructure as well as to Gencos, CILCOs (through AERG) and EEIs merchant generation facilities involve substantial risks. These risks include escalating
costs, unsatisfactory performance by the projects when completed, the inability to complete projects as scheduled, cost disallowances by regulators and the inability to earn a reasonable rate of return on invested capital at our rate-regulated
utilities, any of which could result in higher costs and the closure of facilities.
Over the next five years, the Ameren Companies
will incur significant capital expenditures to comply with environmental regulations and to make investments in their electric and gas utility infrastructure and their merchant generation facilities. The Ameren Companies estimate that they will
incur up to $8.1 billion (UE up to $4.2 billion; CIPS up to $555 million; Genco up to $1.0 billion; CILCO (Illinois Regulated) up to $400 million; CILCO (AERG) up to $180 million; IP up to $1.1 billion;
EEI up to $460 million; Other up to $220 million) of capital expenditures during the period 2010 through 2014. These expenses include construction expenditures, capitalized interest or allowance for funds used during construction,
and compliance with environmental standards. Construction costs as well as the cost of capital have escalated in recent years and are expected to either stay at current levels or escalate further.
17
Investments in Amerens regulated operations are expected to be recoverable from ratepayers, but
are subject to prudency reviews and regulatory lag. The recoverability of amounts expended in merchant generation operations will depend on whether market prices for power adjust to reflect increased costs for generators.
The ability of the Ameren Companies to complete facilities under construction successfully, and to complete future projects within established
estimates, is contingent upon many variables and subject to substantial risks. These variables include, but are not limited to, project management expertise and escalating costs for materials, labor, and environmental compliance. Delays in obtaining
permits, shortages in materials and qualified labor, suppliers and contractors who do not perform as required under their contracts, changes in the scope and timing of projects, the inability to raise capital on favorable terms, or other events
beyond our control may occur that may materially affect the schedule, cost and performance of these projects. With respect to capital spent for pollution control equipment, there is a risk that electric generating plants will not be permitted to
continue to operate if pollution control equipment is not installed by prescribed deadlines or does not perform as expected. Should any such construction efforts be unsuccessful, the Ameren Companies could be subject to additional costs and to the
loss of their investment in the project or facility. The Ameren Companies may also be required to purchase electricity for their customers until the projects are completed. All of these risks may have a material adverse effect on the Ameren
Companies results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Our counterparties may not meet their obligations to us.
We are exposed to the risk that counterparties to various arrangements who owe us money, energy, coal, or other commodities or
services will not be able to perform their obligations or, with respect to our credit facilities, will fail to honor their commitments. Should the counterparties to commodity arrangements fail to perform, we might be forced to replace or to sell the
underlying commitment at then-current market prices. Should the lenders under our credit facilities fail to perform, the level of borrowing capacity under those arrangements would decrease unless we were able to find replacement lenders to assume
the nonperforming lenders commitment. In such an event, we might incur losses, or our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity could otherwise be adversely affected.
Certain of the Ameren Companies have obligations to other Ameren Companies or other Ameren subsidiaries as a result of transactions involving energy,
coal, other commodities and services, and as a result of hedging transactions. If one Ameren entity failed to perform under any of these arrangements, other Ameren entities might incur losses. Their results of operations, financial position, and
liquidity could be adversely affected, resulting in the nondefaulting Ameren entity being unable to meet its obligations, including to unrelated third parties.
Increasing costs associated with our defined benefit and postretirement plans, health care plans,
and other employee-related benefits could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
We offer defined benefit and postretirement plans that cover substantially all of our employees. Assumptions related to future costs, returns on investments, interest rates, and other actuarial matters have a significant impact on our
earnings and funding requirements. Ameren expects to fund its pension plans at a level equal to the greater of the pension expense or the legally required minimum contribution. Considering Amerens assumptions at December 31, 2009, its
investment performance in 2009, and its pension funding policy, Ameren expects to make annual contributions of $75 million to $225 million in each of the next five years, with aggregate estimated contributions of $740 million. We expect
UEs, CIPS, Gencos, CILCOs, and IPs portion of the future funding requirements to be 66%, 6%, 9%, 9%, and 10%, respectively. These amounts are estimates. They may change with actual investment performance, changes in
interest rates, changes in our assumptions, any pertinent changes in government regulations, and any voluntary contributions.
In
addition to the costs of our retirement plans, the costs of providing health care benefits to our employees and retirees have increased in recent years. We believe that our employee benefit costs, including costs of health care plans for our
employees and former employees, will continue to rise. The increasing costs and funding requirements associated with our defined benefit retirement plans, health care plans, and other employee benefits could increase our financing needs and
otherwise materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Our electric generating,
transmission and distribution facilities are subject to operational risks that could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
The Ameren Companies financial performance depends on the successful operation of electric generating, transmission, and distribution facilities.
Operation of electric generating, transmission, and distribution facilities involves many risks, including:
|
|
facility shutdowns due to operator error or a failure of equipment or processes; |
|
|
longer-than-anticipated maintenance outages; |
|
|
disruptions in the delivery of fuel or lack of adequate inventories; |
|
|
lack of water for cooling plant operations; |
|
|
inability to comply with regulatory or permit requirements, including those relating to environmental contamination; |
|
|
disruptions in the delivery of electricity, including impacts on us or our customers; |
|
|
handling and storage of fossil-fuel combustion waste products, such as coal ash; |
|
|
unusual or adverse weather conditions, including severe storms, droughts, and floods; |
18
|
|
a workplace accident that might result in injury or loss of life, extensive property damage, or environmental damage; |
|
|
information security risk, such as a breach of systems where sensitive utility customer data and account information are stored; |
|
|
catastrophic events such as fires, explosions, pandemic health events, or other similar occurrences; and |
|
|
other unanticipated operations and maintenance expenses and liabilities. |
Our natural gas distribution and storage activities involve numerous risks that may result in accidents and other operating risks and costs that
could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Inherent in our natural gas
distribution and storage activities are a variety of hazards and operating risks, such as leaks, accidental explosions and mechanical problems, which could cause substantial financial losses. In addition, these risks could result in serious injury
to employees and nonemployees, loss of human life, significant damage to property, environmental pollution and impairment of our operations, which in turn could lead to substantial losses to us. In accordance with customary industry practice, we
maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses. The location of distribution lines and storage facilities near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers, industrial sites, and other public
gathering places, could increase the level of damages resulting from these risks. The occurrence of any of these events not fully covered by insurance could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Even though agreements have been reached with the state of Missouri and the FERC, the breach of the upper reservoir of UEs Taum
Sauk pumped-storage hydroelectric facility could continue to have a material adverse effect on Amerens and UEs results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition.
In December 2005, there was a breach of the upper reservoir at UEs Taum Sauk pumped-storage hydroelectric facility. This resulted in significant
flooding in the local area, which damaged a state park. UE settled with FERC and the state of Missouri all issues associated with the December 2005 Taum Sauk incident.
UE has property and liability insurance coverage for the Taum Sauk incident, subject to certain limits and deductibles. Insurance does not cover lost electric margins and penalties paid to FERC. UE expects that the
total cost for cleanup, damage, and liabilities, excluding costs to rebuild the upper reservoir, will be approximately $205 million.
UE
received approval from FERC to rebuild the upper reservoir at its Taum Sauk plant and is in the process of testing the rebuilt facility. UE expects the Taum Sauk plant to become operational in the second quarter of 2010. The estimated cost to
rebuild the upper reservoir is in the range of $490 million.
Under UEs insurance policies, all claims by or against UE are subject to review by its
insurance carriers. In July 2009, three insurance carriers filed a petition against Ameren in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, seeking a declaratory judgment that the property insurance policy does not require these three insurers to
indemnify Ameren for their share of the entire cost of construction associated with the facility rebuild design being utilized. The three insurers allege that they, along with the other policy participants, presented a rebuild design that was
consistent with their insurance coverage obligations and that the insurance policies do not require these insurers to pay their share of the costs of construction associated with the design being used. These insurers have estimated a cost of
approximately $214 million for their rebuild design compared to the estimated $490 million cost of the design approved by FERC and implemented by Ameren. Ameren has filed an answer and counterclaim in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County,
Missouri, against these insurers. The counterclaim asserts that the three insurance carriers have breached their obligations under the property insurance policies issued to Ameren and UE. Ameren seeks payment of a sum to-be-determined for all
amounts covered by these policies incurred in the facility rebuild, including power replacement costs, interest, and attorneys fees. The insurers that are parties to the litigation represent approximately 40%, on a weighted average basis, of
the property insurance policy coverage between the disputed amounts of $214 million and $490 million.
Until Amerens remaining
insurance claims and the related litigation are resolved, among other things, we are unable to determine the total impact the breach could have on Amerens and UEs results of operations, financial position, and liquidity beyond those
amounts already recognized. Ameren and UE expect to recover, through insurance, 80% to 90% of the total property insurance claim for the Taum Sauk incident. Beyond insurance, the recoverability of any Taum Sauk facility rebuild costs from customers
is subject to the terms and conditions set forth in UEs November 2007 State of Missouri settlement agreement. In that settlement, UE agreed that it would not attempt to recover from rate payers costs incurred in the reconstruction expressly
excluding, however, enhancements, costs incurred due to circumstances or conditions that were not at that time reasonably foreseeable and costs that would have been incurred absent the Taum Sauk incident. Certain costs associated with the Taum Sauk
facility not recovered from property insurers may be recoverable from UEs electric customers through rates established in rate cases filed subsequent to the in-service date of the rebuilt facility. As of December 31, 2009, UE had
capitalized in property and plant qualifying Taum Sauk-related costs of $99 million that UE believes qualify for potential recovery in electric rates under the terms of the November 2007 State of Missouri Settlement. The inclusion of such costs in
UEs electric rates is subject to review and approval by the MoPSC in a future rate case. Any amounts not recovered through insurance, in electric rates, or otherwise could result in charges to earnings, which could be material.
19
Gencos, AERGs, and EEIs electric generating facilities must compete for the sale
of energy and capacity, which exposes them to price risks.
All of Gencos, AERGs, and EEIs generating facilities
compete for the sale of energy and capacity in the competitive energy markets.
To the extent that electricity generated by these
facilities is not under a fixed-price contract to be sold, the revenues and results of operations of these merchant subsidiaries generally depend on the prices that can be obtained for energy and capacity in Illinois and adjacent markets by
Marketing Company.
Market prices for energy and capacity may fluctuate substantially, sometimes over relatively short periods of time,
and at other times experience sustained increases or decreases. Demand for electricity and fuel can fluctuate dramatically, creating periods of substantial under- or over-supply. During periods of over-supply, prices might be depressed. Also, at
times legislators or regulators with jurisdiction over wholesale and retail energy commodity and transportation rates may impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address volatility and other issues in these markets.
For power products sold in advance, contract prices are influenced both by market conditions as well as the contract terms such as
damage provisions, credit support requirements and the number of available counterparties interested in contracting for the desired forward period. Depending on differences between market factors at the time of contracting versus current conditions,
Marketing Companys contract portfolio may have average contract prices greater than or less than current market prices, including at the expiration of the contracts, which could significantly affect Amerens, Gencos, AERGs,
and EEIs results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.
Among the factors that could influence such prices (all of
which are beyond our control to a significant degree) are:
|
|
current and future delivered market prices for natural gas, fuel oil, and coal, and related transportation costs; |
|
|
current and forward prices for the sale of electricity; |
|
|
the extent of additional supplies of electric energy from current competitors or new market entrants; |
|
|
the regulatory and market structures developed for evolving Midwest energy markets; |
|
|
changes enacted by the Illinois legislature, the ICC, the IPA, or other government agencies with respect to power procurement procedures;
|
|
|
the potential for reregulation of generation in some states; |
|
|
future pricing for, and availability of, services on transmission systems, and the effect of RTOs and export energy transmission constraints, which could limit
our ability to sell energy in our markets; |
|
|
the growth rate in electricity usage as a result of population changes, regional economic conditions, and the implementation of energy-efficiency programs;
|
|
|
climate conditions in the Midwest market and major natural disasters; and |
|
|
environmental laws and regulations. |
UEs ownership and operation of a nuclear generating facility creates business, financial,
and waste disposal risks.
UEs ownership of the Callaway nuclear plant subjects it to the risks of nuclear generation, which
include the following:
|
|
potential harmful effects on the environment and human health resulting from the operation of nuclear facilities and the storage, handling and disposal of
radioactive materials; |
|
|
the lack of a permanent waste storage site; |
|
|
limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available to cover losses that might arise in connection with the Callaway nuclear plant or other
U.S. nuclear operations; |
|
|
uncertainties with respect to contingencies and assessment amounts if insurance coverage is inadequate; |
|
|
public and governmental concerns over the adequacy of security at nuclear power plants; |
|
|
uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives (UEs facility
operating license for the Callaway nuclear plant expires in 2024); |
|
|
limited availability of fuel supply; and |
|
|
costly and extended outages for scheduled or unscheduled maintenance and refueling. |
The NRC has broad authority under federal law to impose licensing and safety requirements for nuclear generation facilities. In the event of
noncompliance, the NRC has the authority to impose fines, shut down a unit, or both, depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation, until compliance is achieved. Revised safety requirements promulgated from time to time by the NRC
could necessitate substantial capital expenditures at nuclear plants such as UEs. In addition, if a serious nuclear incident were to occur, it could have a material but indeterminable adverse effect on UEs results of operations,
financial position, and liquidity. A major incident at a nuclear facility anywhere in the world could cause the NRC to limit or prohibit the operation or relicensing of any domestic nuclear unit.
Our energy risk management strategies may not be effective in managing fuel and electricity procurement and pricing risks, which could result in
unanticipated liabilities or increased volatility in our earnings and cash flows.
We are exposed to changes in market prices for
natural gas, fuel, electricity, emission allowances, and transmission congestion. Prices for natural gas, fuel, electricity, and emission allowances may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time, and at other times experience
sustained increases or decreases, and expose us to commodity price risk. We use short-term and long-term purchase and sales contracts in addition to derivatives such as forward contracts, futures contracts, options, and swaps to manage these risks.
We attempt to manage our risk associated with these activities through enforcement of established risk limits and risk management procedures. We cannot ensure that these strategies will be successful in managing our pricing risk or that they will
not result in net liabilities because of future volatility in these markets.
20
Although we routinely enter into contracts to hedge our exposure to the risks of demand and changes in commodity prices, we do not hedge the entire
exposure of our operations from commodity price volatility. Furthermore, our ability to hedge our exposure to commodity price volatility depends on liquid commodity markets. To the extent that commodity markets are illiquid, we may not be able to
execute our risk management strategies, which could result in greater unhedged positions than we would prefer at a given time. To the extent that unhedged positions exist, fluctuating commodity prices can adversely affect our results of operations,
financial position, and liquidity.
Our facilities are considered critical energy infrastructure and may therefore be targets of
acts of terrorism.
Like other electric and natural gas utilities and other merchant electric generators, our power generation
plants, fuel storage facilities, and transmission and distribution facilities may be targets of terrorist activities that could result in disruption of our ability to produce or distribute some portion of our energy products. Any such disruption
could result in a significant decrease in revenues or significant additional costs for repair, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Our businesses are dependent on our ability to access the capital markets successfully. We may not have access to sufficient capital in the
amounts and at the times needed.
We use short-term and long-term debt as a significant source of liquidity and funding for capital
requirements not satisfied by our operating cash flow, including requirements related to future environmental compliance. As a result of rising costs and increased capital and operations and maintenance expenditures, coupled with near-term
regulatory lag, we expect to continue to rely on short-term and long-term debt financing. Ameren intends to replace or extend its credit facility agreements during 2010. The inability to raise debt or equity capital on favorable terms, or at all,
particularly during times of uncertainty in the capital markets, could negatively affect our ability to maintain and to expand our businesses. Our current credit ratings cause us to believe that we will continue to have access to the capital
markets. However, events beyond our control, such as the extreme volatility and disruption in global debt or equity capital and credit markets that occurred in 2008 and continued into 2009, may create uncertainty that could increase our cost of
capital or impair, or eliminate, our ability to access the debt, equity or credit markets, including the ability to draw on our bank credit facilities. Any adverse
change in the Ameren Companies credit ratings may reduce access to capital and trigger additional collateral postings and prepayments. Such changes may also increase the cost of borrowing
and fuel, power and gas supply, among other things, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity. Certain of the Ameren Companies rely, in part, on Ameren for access to capital.
Circumstances that limit Amerens access to capital, including those relating to its other subsidiaries, could impair its ability to provide those Ameren Companies with needed capital.
Amerens holding company structure could limit its ability to pay common stock dividends and to service its debt obligations.
Ameren is a holding company; therefore, its primary assets are the common stock of its subsidiaries. As a result, Amerens ability to
pay dividends on its common stock depends on the earnings of its subsidiaries and the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends or otherwise transfer funds to Ameren. Similarly, Amerens ability to service its debt obligations is also
dependent upon the earnings of operating subsidiaries and the distribution of those earnings and other payments, including payments of principal and interest under intercompany indebtedness. The payment of dividends to Ameren by its subsidiaries in
turn depends on their results of operations and cash flows and other items affecting retained earnings. Amerens subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay any dividends or make
any other distributions (except for payments required pursuant to the terms of intercompany borrowing arrangements) to Ameren. Certain of the Ameren Companies financing agreements and articles of incorporation, in addition to certain statutory
and regulatory requirements, may impose restrictions on the ability of such Ameren Companies to transfer funds to Ameren in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.
Failure to retain and attract key officers and other skilled professional and technical employees could have an adverse effect on our operations.
Our businesses depend upon our ability to employ and retain key officers and other skilled professional and technical
employees. A significant portion of our work force is nearing retirement, including many employees with specialized skills such as maintaining and servicing our electric and natural gas infrastructure and operating our generating units. Our
inability to retain and recruit qualified employees could adversely affect our results of operations.
ITEM 1B. |
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS. |
None.
For
information on our principal properties, see the generating facilities table below. See also Liquidity and Capital Resources and Regulatory Matters in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under
Part II, Item 7, of this report for any planned additions, replacements or transfers. See also Note 5 Long-term Debt and Equity Financings, and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
21
The following table shows what our electric generating facilities and capability are anticipated to be
at the time of our expected 2010 peak summer electrical demand:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary Fuel Source |
|
Plant |
|
Location |
|
Net Kilowatt Capability(a) |
|
Missouri Regulated (UE): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Labadie |
|
Franklin County, Mo. |
|
2,407,000 |
|
|
|
Rush Island |
|
Jefferson County, Mo. |
|
1,204,000 |
|
|
|
Sioux |
|
St. Charles County, Mo. |
|
986,000 |
|
|
|
Meramec |
|
St. Louis County, Mo. |
|
839,000 |
|
Total coal |
|
|
|
|
|
5,436,000 |
|
Nuclear |
|
Callaway |
|
Callaway County, Mo. |
|
1,190,000 |
|
Hydroelectric |
|
Osage |
|
Lakeside, Mo. |
|
234,000 |
|
|
|
Keokuk |
|
Keokuk, Ia. |
|
137,000 |
|
Total hydroelectric |
|
|
|
|
|
371,000 |
|
Pumped-storage |
|
Taum Sauk(b) |
|
Reynolds County, Mo. |
|
440,000 |
|
Oil (CTs) |
|
Meramec |
|
St. Louis County, Mo. |
|
59,000 |
|
|
|
Fairgrounds |
|
Jefferson City, Mo. |
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
Mexico, Mo. |
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
Moberly |
|
Moberly, Mo. |
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
Moreau |
|
Jefferson City, Mo. |
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
Howard Bend |
|
St. Louis County, Mo. |
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
Venice |
|
Venice, Ill. |
|
(c |
) |
Total oil |
|
|
|
|
|
322,000 |
|
Natural gas (CTs) |
|
Audrain(d) |
|
Audrain County, Mo. |
|
608,000 |
|
|
|
Venice(e) |
|
Venice, Ill. |
|
491,000 |
|
|
|
Goose Creek |
|
Piatt County, Ill. |
|
438,000 |
|
|
|
Pinckneyville |
|
Pinckneyville, Ill. |
|
316,000 |
|
|
|
Raccoon Creek |
|
Clay County, Ill. |
|
304,000 |
|
|
|
Kinmundy(e) |
|
Kinmundy, Ill. |
|
208,000 |
|
|
|
Peno Creek(d)(e) |
|
Bowling Green, Mo. |
|
188,000 |
|
|
|
Meramec(e) |
|
St. Louis County, Mo. |
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
Viaduct |
|
Cape Girardeau, Mo. |
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
Kirksville |
|
Kirksville, Mo. |
|
13,000 |
|
Total natural gas |
|
|
|
|
|
2,645,000 |
|
Total UE |
|
|
|
|
|
10,404,000 |
|
Merchant Generation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Genco: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal |
|
Newton |
|
Newton, Ill. |
|
1,194,000 |
|
|
|
Joppa Generating Station (EEI)(f) |
|
Joppa, Ill. |
|
1,002,000 |
|
|
|
Coffeen |
|
Coffeen, Ill. |
|
904,000 |
|
|
|
Meredosia |
|
Meredosia, Ill. |
|
203,000 |
|
|
|
Hutsonville |
|
Hutsonville, Ill. |
|
151,000 |
|
Total coal |
|
|
|
|
|
3,454,000 |
|
Oil |
|
Meredosia |
|
Meredosia, Ill. |
|
166,000 |
|
|
|
Hutsonville (Diesel) |
|
Hutsonville, Ill. |
|
3,000 |
|
Total oil |
|
|
|
|
|
169,000 |
|
Natural gas (CTs) |
|
Grand Tower |
|
Grand Tower, Ill. |
|
511,000 |
|
|
|
Elgin |
|
Elgin, Ill. |
|
460,000 |
|
|
|
Gibson City(e) |
|
Gibson City, Ill. |
|
228,000 |
|
|
|
Joppa 7B |
|
Joppa, Ill. |
|
165,000 |
|
|
|
Columbia(g) |
|
Columbia, Mo. |
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
Joppa (EEI)(f) |
|
Joppa, Ill. |
|
74,000 |
|
Total natural gas |
|
|
|
|
|
1,578,000 |
|
Total Genco |
|
|
|
|
|
5,201,000 |
|
CILCO (through AERG): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal |
|
E.D. Edwards |
|
Bartonville, Ill. |
|
715,000 |
|
|
|
Duck Creek |
|
Canton, Ill. |
|
410,000 |
|
Total coal |
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,000 |
|
Total CILCO |
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,000 |
|
Medina Valley: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas |
|
Medina Valley |
|
Mossville, Ill. |
|
44,000 |
|
Total Merchant Generation |
|
|
|
|
|
6,370,000 |
|
Total Ameren |
|
|
|
|
|
16,774,000 |
|
22
(a) |
Net Kilowatt Capability is the generating capacity available for dispatch from the facility into the electric transmission grid. |
(b) |
This facility is not currently operational because of a breach of its upper reservoir in December 2005. It is expected to become operational in the second quarter of 2010 and
therefore is expected to be available for the 2010 peak summer demand. For additional information on the Taum Sauk incident, see Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report. |
(c) |
This facility will be out of service in 2010. |
(d) |
There are economic development lease arrangements applicable to these CTs. |
(e) |
These CTs have the capability to operate on either oil or natural gas (dual fuel). |
(f) |
Ameren owns an 80% interest in EEI. This table reflects the full capability of EEIs facilities. As part of an internal reorganization, Resources Company transferred its 80%
ownership interest in EEI to Genco, through a capital contribution, on January 1, 2010. See Part I, Item 1, Business and Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
|
(g) |
Genco and the city of Columbia, Missouri currently are parties to a power purchase agreement pursuant to which Columbia is now purchasing up to 72 megawatts of capacity and
energy generated by the facility. Genco has granted Columbia options to purchase an ownership interest in the facility, which would result in a sale of up to 72 megawatts (about 50%) of the facility. Columbia can exercise one option for 36 megawatts
at the end of 2010 for a purchase price of $15.5 million, at the end of 2014 for a purchase price of $9.5 million, or at the end of 2020 for a purchase price of $4 million. The other option can be exercised for another 36 megawatts at the end of
2013 for a purchase price of $15.5 million, at the end of 2017 for a purchase price of $9.5 million, or at the end of 2023 for a purchase price of $4 million. The purchase power agreement will terminate if Columbia exercises the purchase
options. In addition, in February 2010, the city of Columbia approved the purchase of approximately 36 megawatts, or 25%, of the facility, subject to regulatory approvals. As part of this transaction, the structure of the first purchase option
described above will be amended. Instead of the ability to exercise the option to purchase 36 megawatts at the end of 2010 for a purchase price of $15.5 million, the option could be exercised at the end of 2011 for a purchase price of $14.9 million.
All other provisions of the options described above will remain the same. |
The following table presents electric and natural gas utility-related properties for UE, CIPS,
CILCO and IP as of December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UE |
|
|
CIPS |
|
|
CILCO |
|
|
IP |
|
Circuit miles of electric transmission lines |
|
2,942 |
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
331 |
|
|
1,869 |
|
Circuit miles of electric distribution lines |
|
33,012 |
|
|
14,929 |
|
|
8,926 |
|
|
21,639 |
|
Circuit miles of electric distribution lines underground |
|
22 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
|
13 |
% |
Miles of natural gas transmission and distribution mains |
|
3,259 |
|
|
5,359 |
|
|
3,915 |
|
|
8,818 |
|
Propane-air plants |
|
1 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Underground gas storage fields |
|
- |
|
|
3 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
7 |
|
Billion cubic feet of total working capacity of underground gas storage
fields |
|
- |
|
|
2 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
15 |
|
Our other properties include office buildings, warehouses, garages, and repair shops.
With only a
few exceptions, we have fee title to all principal plants and other units of property material to the operation of our businesses, and to the real property on which such facilities are located (subject to mortgage liens securing our outstanding
first mortgage bonds and credit facility indebtedness and to certain permitted liens and judgment liens). The exceptions are as follows:
|
|
A portion of UEs Osage plant reservoir, certain facilities at UEs Sioux plant, most of UEs Peno Creek and Audrain CT facilities, Gencos
Columbia CT facility, Medina Valleys generating facility, certain substations, and most transmission and distribution lines and gas mains are situated on lands occupied under leases, easements, franchises, licenses, or permits.
|
|
|
The United States or the state of Missouri may own or may have paramount rights to certain lands lying in the
|
|
|
bed of the Osage River or located between the inner and outer harbor lines of the Mississippi River on which certain of UEs generating and other properties are located.
|
|
|
The United States, the state of Illinois, the state of Iowa, or the city of Keokuk, Iowa, may own or may have paramount rights with respect to certain lands
lying in the bed of the Mississippi River on which a portion of UEs Keokuk plant is located. |
Substantially all
of the properties and plant of UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP are subject to the first liens of the indentures securing their mortgage bonds.
UE has conveyed most of its Peno Creek CT facility to the city of Bowling Green, Missouri, and leased the facility back from the city through 2022. Under the terms of this capital lease, UE is responsible for all operation and maintenance
for the facility. Ownership of the facility will transfer to UE at the expiration of the lease, at which time the property and plant will become subject to the lien of any outstanding UE first mortgage bond indenture.
UE operates a CT facility located in Audrain County, Missouri. UE has rights and obligations as lessee of the CT facility under a long-term lease
with Audrain County. The lease term will expire on December 1, 2023. Under the terms of this capital lease, UE is responsible for all operation and maintenance for the facility. Ownership of the facility will transfer to UE at the expiration of
the lease, at which time the property and plant will become subject to the lien of any outstanding UE first mortgage bond indenture.
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. |
We are involved in legal and administrative proceedings before various courts and agencies with respect to matters that arise in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve substantial amounts of money. We believe that the final
disposition of these proceedings, except as otherwise disclosed in this report,
23
will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity. Risk of loss is mitigated, in some cases, by insurance or contractual or statutory
indemnification. We believe that we have established appropriate reserves for potential losses.
In July 2009, Caterpillar Inc., in
conjunction with other industrial customers as a coalition, intervened in the 2009 rate cases filed by CILCO and IP with the ICC to modify its electric and natural gas delivery service rates. Douglas R. Oberhelman is an executive officer of
Caterpillar Inc. and a member of the board of directors of Ameren.
Mr. Oberhelman did not participate in Ameren Corporations board and committee deliberations relating to these matters.
For additional information on legal and administrative proceedings, see Rates and Regulation under Item 1, Business, and Item 1A, Risk
Factors, above. See also Liquidity and Capital Resources and Regulatory Matters in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, and Note 2 Rate and Regulatory Matters,
and Note 15 Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of this report.
ITEM 4. |
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS. |
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2009 with respect to any of the Ameren Companies.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTS (ITEM 401(b) OF REGULATION S-K):
The executive officers of the Ameren Companies, including major subsidiaries, are listed below, along with their ages as of December 31, 2009, all positions and offices held with the Ameren Companies, tenure as officer, and business
background for at least the last five years. Some executive officers hold multiple positions within the Ameren Companies; their titles are given in the description of their business experience.
AMEREN CORPORATION:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age at 12/31/09 |
|
Positions and Offices Held |
Gary L. Rainwater |
|
63 |
|
Executive Chairman and Director |
Rainwater joined UE in 1979 and has held various positions with UE and other Ameren subsidiaries during his employment. In 2004, Rainwater was elected to serve as chairman and
chief executive officer of Ameren, UE, and Ameren Services in addition to his position as president. At that time, he was elected chairman of CILCO in addition to his position as chief executive officer and president of CILCO, which he assumed in
2003. In 2004, upon Amerens acquisition of IP, Rainwater was also elected chairman, chief executive officer, and president of IP. He held the position of chairman of CIPS, CILCO and IP after relinquishing his position as president in October
2004. In 2007, Rainwater relinquished his positions as chairman, president and chief executive officer of UE and Ameren Services and as chairman and chief executive officer of CIPS, CILCO and IP. In 2009, Rainwater was succeeded as president and
chief executive officer of Ameren by Thomas R. Voss and will retire as executive chairman and director in April 2010. |
|
|
|
Thomas R. Voss |
|
62 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, and Director |
Voss joined UE in 1969. He was elected senior vice president of UE, CIPS, and Ameren Services in 1999, of Genco in 2001, of CILCO in 2003, and of IP in 2004. In 2003, Voss was
elected president of Genco; he relinquished his presidency of this company in 2004. In 2006, he was elected executive vice president of UE, CIPS, CILCO and IP. In 2007, Voss was elected chairman, president and chief executive officer of UE. He
relinquished his positions at CIPS, CILCO and IP in 2007. In 2009, Voss was elected president and chief executive officer of Ameren; at that time, he relinquished his other positions. |
|
|
|
Martin J. Lyons, Jr. |
|
43 |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Lyons joined Ameren, UE, CIPS, Genco, and Ameren Services in 2001 as controller. He was elected controller of CILCO in 2003. He was also elected vice president of Ameren, UE,
CIPS, Genco, CILCO, and Ameren Services in 2003 and vice president and controller of IP in 2004. In 2007, his position at UE was changed to vice president and principal accounting officer. In 2008, Lyons was elected senior vice president and chief
accounting officer of the Ameren Companies. In 2009, Lyons was also elected chief financial officer of the Ameren Companies. |
|
|
|
Steven R. Sullivan |
|
49 |
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Sullivan joined Ameren, UE, CIPS, and Ameren Services in 1998 as vice president, general counsel, and secretary. He added those positions at Genco in 2000. In 2003, Sullivan was
elected vice president, general counsel and secretary of CILCO. He was elected to his present position at Ameren, UE, CIPS, Genco, CILCO, and Ameren Services in 2003, and at IP in 2004. |
|
|
|
Jerre E. Birdsong |
|
55 |
|
Vice President and Treasurer |
Birdsong joined UE in 1977 and was elected treasurer of UE in 1993. He was elected treasurer of Ameren, CIPS, and Ameren Services in 1997, and Genco in 2000. In addition to being
treasurer, in 2001 he was elected vice president at Ameren and at the subsidiaries listed above. Additionally, he was elected vice president and treasurer of CILCO in 2003, and of IP in 2004. |
24
SUBSIDIARIES:
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age at 12/31/09 |
|
Positions and Offices Held |
Warner L. Baxter |
|
48 |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (UE) |
Baxter joined UE in 1995. He was elected senior vice president, finance, of Ameren, UE, CIPS, Ameren Services, and Genco in 2001 and of CILCO in 2003. Baxter was elected to the
position of executive vice president and chief financial officer of Ameren, UE, CIPS, Genco, CILCO, and Ameren Services in 2003 and of IP in 2004. He was elected chairman, chief executive officer, president, and chief financial officer of Ameren
Services effective in 2007. In 2009, Baxter was elected chairman, president and chief executive officer of UE; at that time, he relinquished his other positions. |
|
|
|
Scott A. Cisel |
|
56 |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (CIPS, CILCO and IP) |
Cisel joined CILCO in 1975. He was named senior vice president and leader of CILCOs Sales and Marketing Business Unit in 2001. Cisel assumed the position of vice president
and chief operating officer for CILCO in 2003, upon Amerens acquisition of that company. In 2004, Cisel was elected vice president of UE and president and chief operating officer of CIPS, CILCO and IP. In 2007, Cisel was elected chairman and
chief executive officer of CIPS, CILCO and IP, in addition to his position as president. He relinquished his position at UE in 2007. |
|
|
|
Daniel F. Cole |
|
56 |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Ameren Services) |
Cole joined UE in 1976. He was elected senior vice president of UE and Ameren Services in 1999, and of CIPS in 2001. He was elected president of Genco in 2001; he relinquished
that position in 2003. He was elected senior vice president of CILCO in 2003, and of IP in 2004. In 2009, Cole was elected chairman, president and chief executive officer of Ameren Services. |
|
|
|
Karen C. Foss |
|
65 |
|
Senior Vice President (Ameren Services) |
Foss joined UE in 2007 as vice president for public relations. She was elected senior vice president, communications and brand management, of Ameren Services in 2009. Foss
relinquished her position at UE in 2009. Prior to joining UE, Foss was a news anchor at KSDK-TV in St. Louis, Missouri. |
|
|
|
Adam C. Heflin |
|
45 |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer (UE) |
Heflin joined UE in 2005 as vice president of nuclear operations and was elected senior vice president and chief nuclear officer of UE in 2008. Prior to joining UE, Heflin served
as Unit 2 plant manager at Arkansas Nuclear One, owned by Entergy Corporation. He joined Entergy Corporations nuclear operations in 1992. |
|
|
|
Richard J. Mark |
|
54 |
|
Senior Vice President (UE) |
Mark joined Ameren Services in 2002 as vice president of customer service. In 2003, he was elected vice president of governmental policy and consumer affairs at Ameren Services,
with responsibility for government affairs, economic development, and community relations for Amerens operating utility companies. He was elected senior vice president at UE in 2005, with responsibility for Missouri energy delivery. In 2007,
Mark relinquished his position at Ameren Services. |
|
|
|
Michael L. Moehn |
|
40 |
|
Senior Vice President (Ameren Services) |
Moehn joined Ameren Services in 2000. He was named director of Ameren Services corporate modeling and transaction support in 2001 and elected vice president of business
services for Ameren Energy Resources Company in 2002. In 2004, Moehn was elected vice president of corporate planning for Ameren Services and relinquished his position at Ameren Energy Resources Company. In 2008, he was elected senior vice president
of Ameren Services. |
|
|
|
Michael G. Mueller |
|
46 |
|
President (AFS) |
Mueller joined UE in 1986. He was elected vice president of AFS in 2000 and president of AFS in 2004. |
|
|
|
Charles D. Naslund |
|
57 |
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Resources Company), and Chairman and President (Genco) |
Naslund joined UE in 1974. He was elected vice president of power operations at UE in 1999, vice president of Ameren Services in 2000, and vice president of nuclear operations at
UE in 2004. He relinquished his position at Ameren Services in 2001. Naslund was elected senior vice president and chief nuclear officer at UE in 2005. In 2008, he was elected chairman, president and chief executive officer of Resources Company and
chairman and president of Genco. Naslund relinquished his position at UE in 2008. |
|
|
|
Andrew M. Serri |
|
48 |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (Marketing Company) |
Serri joined Marketing Company as vice president of sales and marketing in 2000. He was elected vice president of marketing and trading of Ameren Services in 2004, before being
elected president and chief executive officer of Marketing Company that same year. He relinquished his position at Ameren Services in 2007. |
25
Officers are generally elected or appointed annually by the respective board of directors of each
company, following the election of board members at the annual meetings of shareholders. No special arrangement or understanding exists between any of the above-named executive officers and the Ameren Companies nor, to our knowledge, with any other
person or persons pursuant to which any executive officer was selected as an officer. There are no family relationships among the officers. Except for Karen C. Foss and Adam C. Heflin, all of the above-named executive officers have been employed by
an Ameren company for more than five years in executive or management positions.
PART II
ITEM 5. |
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES. |
Amerens common stock is listed on the NYSE (ticker symbol: AEE). Ameren common shareholders of record totaled 69,881 on January 29, 2010.
The following table presents the price ranges, closing prices, and dividends paid per Ameren common share for each quarter during 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Close |
|
Dividends Paid |
|
AEE 2009 Quarter Ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
35.35 |
|
$ |
19.51 |
|
$ |
23.19 |
|
38 1/2 |
¢ |
June 30 |
|
|
25.25 |
|
|
21.75 |
|
|
24.89 |
|
38 1/2 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
27.66 |
|
|
23.09 |
|
|
25.28 |
|
38 1/2 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
28.67 |
|
|
23.78 |
|
|
27.95 |
|
38 1/2 |
|
AEE 2008 Quarter Ended: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 |
|
$ |
54.29 |
|
$ |
40.92 |
|
$ |
44.04 |
|
63 1/2 |
¢ |
June 30 |
|
|
48.39 |
|
|
41.34 |
|
|
42.23 |
|
63 1/2 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
43.16 |
|
|
38.49 |
|
|
39.03 |
|
63 1/2 |
|
December 31 |
|
|
39.15 |
|
|
25.51 |
|
|
33.26 |
|
63 1/
2 |
|
There is no trading market for the common stock of UE, CIPS, Genco, CILCO or IP. Ameren holds all outstanding common stock of UE, CIPS and IP; Resources Company holds all outstanding common stock of Genco; and CILCORP holds all outstanding
common stock of CILCO.
The following table sets forth the quarterly common stock dividend payments made by Ameren and its subsidiaries
during 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Quarter Ended |
Registrant |
|
December 31 |
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
March 31 |
|
December 31 |
|
September 30 |
|
June 30 |
|
March 31 |
UE |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
47 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
71 |
|
$ |
88 |
|
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
77 |
CIPS |
|
|
35 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
Genco |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
17 |
|
|
- |
|
|
60 |
|
|
24 |
CILCO |
|
|
20 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
IP |
|
|
31 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
15 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
15 |
|
|
15 |
Nonregistrants |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
35 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
17 |
Ameren |
|
$ |
91 |
|
$ |
83 |
|
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
135 |
|
$ |
133 |
|
$ |
133 |
|
$ |
133 |
On February 12, 2010, the board of directors of Ameren declared a quarterly dividend on Amerens common stock of 38.5 cents per share. The
common share dividend is payable March 31, 2010, to stockholders of record on March 10, 2010.
For a discussion of restrictions
on the Ameren Companies payment of dividends, see Liquidity and Capital Resources in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Part II, Item 7, of this report.
26
Purchase of Equity Securities
The following table presents Ameren Corporations purchases of equity securities reportable under Item 703 of Regulation S-K:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased(a) |
|
(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit) |
|
(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or Programs |
|
(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
October 1 October 31, 2009 |
|
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
- |
|
- |
November 1 November 30, 2009 |
|
2,368 |
|
|
25.77 |
|
- |
|
- |
December 1 December 31, 2009 |
|
5,928 |
|
|
27.95 |
|
- |
|
- |
Total |
|
8,296 |
|
$ |
27.33 |
|
- |
|
- |
(a) |
Included in December were 2,850 shares of Ameren common stock purchased by Ameren in open-market transactions pursuant to Amerens 2006 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan
in satisfaction of Amerens obligations for Ameren board of directors compensation awards. The remaining shares of Ameren common stock were purchased by Ameren in open-market transactions pursuant to Amerens 2006 Omnibus Incentive
Compensation Plan in satisfaction of Amerens obligation to distribute shares of common stock for vested performance units. Ameren does not have any publicly announced equity securities repurchase plans or programs. |
None of the other registrants purchased equity securities reportable under Item 703 of Regulation S-K during the period from October 1, 2009
to December 31, 2009.
Performance Graph
The following graph shows Amerens cumulative total shareholder return during the five years ended December 31, 2009. The graph also shows the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 Index and the
Edison Electric Institute Index (EEI Index), which comprises most investor-owned electric utilities in the United States. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2004, in Ameren common stock and in each of the indices
shown, and it assumes that all of the dividends were reinvested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
Ameren |
|
$ |
100 |
|
$ |
107.26 |
|
$ |
118.11 |
|
$ |
125.12 |
|
$ |
81.84 |
|
$ |
73.08 |
S&P 500 Index |
|
|
100 |
|
|
104.91 |
|
|
121.48 |
|
|
128.14 |
|
|
80.73 |
|
|
102.09 |
EEI Index |
|
|
100 |
|
|
116.05 |
|
|
140.14 |
|
|
163.35 |
|
|
121.04 |
|
|
134.01 |
Ameren management cautions that the stock price performance shown in the graph above should not be considered indicative of potential future stock price performance.
27
ITEM 6. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, (In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
Ameren: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues(a) |
|
$ |
7,090 |
|
$ |
7,839 |
|
$ |
7,562 |
|
$ |
6,895 |
|
$ |
6,780 |
|
Operating income(a) |
|
|
1,416 |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
1,284 |
|
Net income attributable to Ameren Corporation(a) |
|
|
612 |
|
|
605 |
|
|
618 |
|
|
547 |
|
|
606 |
(b) |
Common stock dividends |
|
|
338 |
|
|
534 |
|
|
527 |
|
|
522 |
|
|
511 |
|
Earnings per share basic and diluted(a) |
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
2.88 |
|
|
2.98 |
|
|
2.66 |
|
|
3.02 |
(b) |
Common stock dividends per share |
|
|
1.54 |
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
2.54 |
|
As of December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
23,790 |
|
$ |
22,671 |
|
$ |
20,752 |
|
$ |
19,662 |
|
$ |
18,171 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities |
|
|
7,113 |
|
|
6,554 |
|
|
5,689 |
|
|
5,285 |
|
|
5,354 |
|
Preferred stock subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
16 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
19 |
|
Total Ameren Corporation stockholders equity |
|
|
7,853 |
|
|
6,963 |
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
6,583 |
|
|
6,364 |
|
UE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
2,874 |
|
$ |
2,960 |
|
$ |
2,961 |
|
$ |
2,823 |
|
$ |
2,889 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
566 |
|
|
514 |
|
|
590 |
|
|
620 |
|
|
640 |
|
Net income available to common stockholder |
|
|
259 |
|
|
245 |
|
|
336 |
|
|
343 |
|
|
346 |
|
Dividends to parent |
|
|
175 |
|
|
264 |
|
|
267 |
|
|
249 |
|
|
280 |
|
As of December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,301 |
|
$ |
11,529 |
|
$ |
10,903 |
|
$ |
10,290 |
|
$ |
9,277 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities |
|
|
4,018 |
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
2,934 |
|
|
2,698 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
4,057 |
|
|
3,562 |
|
|
3,601 |
|
|
3,153 |
|
|
3,016 |
|
CIPS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
869 |
|
$ |
982 |
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
$ |
954 |
|
$ |
934 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
68 |
|
|
42 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
85 |
|
Net income available to common stockholder |
|
|
26 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
35 |
|
|
41 |
|
Dividends to parent |
|
|
47 |
|
|
- |
|
|
40 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
35 |
|
As of December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,965 |
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
$ |
1,861 |
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities |
|
|
421 |
|
|
421 |
|
|
456 |
|
|
471 |
|
|
410 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
574 |
|
|
529 |
|
|
517 |
|
|
543 |
|
|
569 |
|
Genco: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
850 |
|
$ |
908 |
|
$ |
876 |
|
$ |
992 |
|
$ |
1,038 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
310 |
|
|
330 |
|
|
258 |
|
|
131 |
|
|
257 |
|
Net income |
|
|
155 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
49 |
|
|
97 |
(b) |
Dividends to parent |
|
|
- |
|
|
101 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
113 |
|
|
88 |
|
As of December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,535 |
|
$ |
2,244 |
|
$ |
1,968 |
|
$ |
1,850 |
|
$ |
1,811 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities |
|
|
823 |
|
|
774 |
|
|
474 |
|
|
474 |
|
|
474 |
|
Subordinated intercompany notes (current and long-term) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
87 |
|
|
126 |
|
|
163 |
|
|
197 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
862 |
|
|
695 |
|
|
648 |
|
|
563 |
|
|
444 |
|
CILCO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
$ |
1,147 |
|
$ |
1,011 |
|
$ |
747 |
|
$ |
742 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
252 |
|
|
132 |
|
|
143 |
|
|
78 |
|
|
63 |
|
Net income available to common stockholder |
|
|
134 |
|
|
68 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
45 |
|
|
24 |
(b) |
Dividends to parent |
|
|
20 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
65 |
|
|
20 |
|
As of December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,382 |
|
$ |
2,296 |
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities |
|
|
279 |
|
|
279 |
|
|
148 |
|
|
148 |
|
|
122 |
|
Preferred stock subject to mandatory redemption |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
16 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
19 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
855 |
|
|
684 |
|
|
622 |
|
|
535 |
|
|
562 |
|
IP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
$ |
1,504 |
|
$ |
1,696 |
|
$ |
1,646 |
|
$ |
1,694 |
|
$ |
1,653 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
230 |
|
|
103 |
|
|
109 |
|
|
141 |
|
|
202 |
|
Net income available to common stockholder |
|
|
77 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
55 |
|
|
95 |
|
Dividends to parent |
|
|
31 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
61 |
|
|
- |
|
|
76 |
|
As of December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
3,942 |
|
$ |
3,770 |
|
$ |
3,331 |
|
$ |
3,227 |
|
$ |
3,056 |
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities |
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
772 |
|
|
704 |
|
Long-term debt to IP SPT, excluding current maturities |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
92 |
|
|
184 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
1,308 |
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
1,287 |
|
28
(a) |
Includes amounts for Ameren registrant and nonregistrant subsidiaries and intercompany eliminations. |
(b) |
Included income (loss) from cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $(22) million ($(0.11) per share) for Ameren, $(16) million for Genco, and $(2) million for
CILCO. |
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
OVERVIEW
Ameren Executive Summary
Operations
At Amerens rate-regulated utilities, milder weather and the economic
slowdown led to a 3% decrease in kilowatthour sales to residential and commercial customers in 2009, compared with 2008. However, this sales decline was smaller, an estimated 1%, on a weather-normalized basis. The weak economy also led to a decline
in kilowatthour sales by Amerens rate-regulated utilities to their industrial customers. These sales declined 11% in 2009, compared with 2008, excluding the impact of reduced sales to Norandas smelter plant in New Madrid, Missouri.
Norandas plant sustained damage because of a power interruption on non-Ameren-owned power lines during a severe ice storm in January 2009. As a result, the smelters load was sharply reduced but has been rising steadily as repairs have
been made to the smelter plants production lines, with full production expected to be reached in the second quarter of 2010. Electric sales to industrial customers, including Noranda, declined 17% in 2009, compared with 2008.
For several years, Amerens rate-regulated utility businesses have been earning returns on investment that are well below their authorized
levels, in part, due to regulatory lag. Ameren is focused on improving earnings to levels that represent fair returns on its rate-regulated investments. Ameren has rate cases pending in both its Illinois and Missouri jurisdictions. Ameren is seeking
revenue levels that reflect the significant investments it has made in electric and gas utility infrastructure to improve reliability. Ameren is also seeking recovery of higher financing costs and, in Missouri, rising net fuel costs. The Ameren
Illinois Utilities are currently requesting a $130 million aggregate annual increase in base electric and natural gas delivery rates. The staff of the ICC currently supports a $46 million annual revenue increase. The staffs lower revenue
amount reflects its lower recommended return on equity of 10.1% compared to the Ameren Illinois Utilities request of 11.5%, on a rate base weighted basis, and use of a lower pension and benefits expense level, among other things. In February
2010, administrative law judges issued a consolidated proposed order, which included a recommended revenue increase for electric delivery service for the Ameren Illinois Utilities of $66 million in the aggregate (CIPS $26 million increase,
CILCO $6 million increase, and IP - $34 million increase) and a recommended revenue net decrease for natural gas delivery service of $10 million in the aggregate (CIPS $1 million increase, CILCO $6 million decrease, and IP
- $5 million decrease). The ICC is not bound by the proposed order issued by the administrative law judges. New rates should be effective by early May 2010.
UE filed a request with the MoPSC in July 2009 for an annual electric service rate increase of $402
million. More than half of the request was for anticipated higher net fuel costs. These increased net fuel costs would have been eligible for recovery through the FAC absent this filing. The MoPSC staff, in its direct testimony in the rate case,
recommended an annual electric service rate increase of $218 million to $251 million, with approximately $214 million of this related to higher net fuel costs. The staffs lower revenue amount reflects its lower recommended return on
equity range of 9.0% to 9.7%, which was lower than UEs initial request of 11.5%. The staffs revenue amount also incorporated lower depreciation, plant maintenance and financing cost levels, as well as other adjustments. The staff
testimony reflects continuation of the FAC and the pension and postretirement benefit cost trackers and a modified environmental cost recovery mechanism. Other parties filed testimony in the rate case, including a group of large industrial customers
and the Office of Public Counsel. The Missouri Office of Public Counsel recommended a return on equity of 10.2%. The large industrial customers recommended a rate increase of $139 million, which included a $181 million increase related to net
fuel costs. Their lower revenue requirement reflects their lower recommended return on equity of 10%, the use of significantly lower depreciation rates and plant maintenance expenses, as well as lower financing costs, among other things. The large
industrial customers testimony reflects continuation of the FAC, as well as a modified approach for the accounting and recovery of environmental costs. In February 2010, UE filed its rebuttal testimony in this rate case, which included, among
other things, a modification of its recommended return on equity to 10.8%. It is anticipated that certain major changes to revenues, expenses, rate base, and capital structure will be trued-up through January 31, 2010, in a March 2010 UE update. A
MoPSC order is expected by late May 2010 with new rates expected to be effective in late June 2010.
Current lower power prices are
very much linked to weak economic conditions. Weak economic conditions have reduced the demand for power and other energy commodities. Ameren believes that when the economy recovers, these prices should rise. In the meantime, Ameren continues to
look for opportunities to prudently reduce operating and capital spending in the Merchant Generation business, as well as protect and enhance margins. Amerens Merchant Generation business output is significantly hedged over the next few years.
Such hedging protects credit quality and reduces earnings and cash flow volatility. In addition, Ameren continues to focus on providing value-added electricity products to the market.
29
Leveraging Amerens competitive merchant generating assets, Marketing Company has a track record of enhancing margins through sales to wholesale and retail customers. To strengthen Merchant
Generations ability to successfully weather current lower power prices, Ameren has reduced planned operating and capital spending, improving the cash flow outlook for the Merchant Generation business. Ameren continues to evaluate Merchant
Generations spending plans in light of changing technologies, power prices and delivered fuel costs in order to ensure that the lowest cost options are identified in terms of both capital and ongoing operating costs.
Earnings
Ameren reported net income of $612
million, or $2.78 per share, for 2009 compared with net income of $605 million, or $2.88 per share, in 2008. Factors contributing to the 10 cent decline in earnings per share in 2009 compared with 2008 included lower electricity and natural gas
sales in Amerens rate-regulated businesses and lower margins in its Merchant Generation business, as a result of weak economic conditions, milder 2009 weather and, in the Missouri Regulated business, the impact of reduced sales to Noranda.
Higher depreciation and interest expense, the absence in 2009 of the benefit of a lump-sum payment from a coal supplier for higher fuel costs in 2009 as a result of a premature mine closure and contract termination, and an increased average number
of common shares outstanding also affected comparative results. Offsetting factors included new utility rates in Illinois and Missouri, favorable unrealized MTM activity on derivatives, and lower operations and maintenance expenses due, in part, to
the absence of a refueling and maintenance outage at the Callaway nuclear plant in 2009.
Liquidity
As a result of turmoil in the capital and credit markets in 2008 and 2009, we sought to improve our liquidity position. We replaced and extended the
expiration of our credit facilities and sought to reduce our reliance on borrowings from these credit facilities, increase cash balances and increase the equity content of our capitalization. We also sought to eliminate debt at CILCORP as a step in
simplifying our organizational structure. In addition, Ameren also reduced planned spending, headcount and capital investment across the company to mitigate the negative impact on sales of a weak economy and related power prices. At December 31,
2009, Ameren, on a consolidated basis, had available liquidity, in the form of cash on hand and amounts available under its existing credit facilities, of approximately $1.9 billion, which was $0.6 billion more than it had at the end of 2008.
Cash flows from operations of $2.0 billion in 2009 at Ameren, along with other funds, were used to pay dividends to common shareholders of $338 million and to fund capital expenditures of $1.7 billion.
Capital Spending
During 2009, Ameren was able
to significantly defer or reduce planned capital spending, including spending for environmental compliance, compared with previous plans.
Between 2010 and 2017, Ameren expects that certain Ameren Companies will be required to make cumulative investments of between $1.6 billion and $1.9 billion to retrofit their coal-fired
power plants with pollution control equipment in compliance with existing emissions-related environmental laws and regulations. Any pollution control investments will result in decreased plant availability during construction and higher ongoing
operating expenses. Approximately 20% of this investment is expected to be in Amerens Missouri Regulated operations, and it is therefore expected to be recoverable from ratepayers, but subject to prudency reviews.
Initiatives to limit greenhouse gas emissions and to address global climate change are subject to active consideration in the U.S.
Congress. Although we cannot predict the date of enactment or the requirements of any future climate change legislation or regulations, we believe it is possible that some form of federal legislation or regulations to control emissions of greenhouse
gases will become law during President Obamas administration. Potential impacts from the climate change legislation could vary depending upon proposed CO2 emission limits, the timing of implementation of those limits, the method of distributing allowances, the degree to which offsets
are allowed and available, and provisions for cost containment measures. Future federal and state legislation or regulations that mandate limits on the emission of greenhouse gases would result in significant increases in capital expenditures and
operating costs, which, in turn, could lead to increased liquidity needs and higher financing costs. Moreover, to the extent Ameren requests recovery of these costs through rates, its regulators might deny some or all of, or defer timely recovery
of, these costs. Excessive costs to comply with future legislation or regulations might force UE, Genco, CILCO (through AERG) and EEI and other similarly-situated electric power generators to close some coal-fired facilities, and it could lead to
possible impairment of assets and reduced revenues. As a result, mandatory limits could have a material adverse impact on Amerens, UEs, Gencos, CILCOs (through AERG) and EEIs results of operations, financial position,
or liquidity.
General
Ameren,
headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a public utility holding company under PUHCA 2005, administered by FERC. Amerens primary assets are the common stock of its subsidiaries. Amerens subsidiaries are separate, independent legal
entities with separate businesses, assets, and liabilities. These subsidiaries operate, as the case may be, rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution businesses, rate-regulated natural gas transmission and distribution
businesses, and merchant electric generation businesses in Missouri and Illinois. Dividends on Amerens common stock and the payment of other expenses by Ameren depend on distributions made to it by its subsidiaries. See Note 1 Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of this report for a detailed description of our principal subsidiaries.
|
|
UE operates a rate-regulated electric generation, transmission and distribution business, and a rate-
|
30
|
|
regulated natural gas transmission and distribution business in Missouri. |
|
|
CIPS operates a rate-regulated electric and natural gas transmission and distribution business in Illinois. |
|
|
Genco operates a merchant electric generation business in Illinois and Missouri. |
|
|
CILCO operates a rate-regulated electric transmission and distribution business, a merchant electric generation business (through its subsidiary, AERG), and a
rate-regulated natural gas transmission and distribution business, all in Illinois. |
|
|
IP operates a rate-regulated electric and natural gas transmission and distribution business in Illinois. |
The financial statements of Ameren are prepared on a consolidated basis and therefore include the accounts of its majority-owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. All tabular dollar amounts are expressed in millions, unless otherwise indicated.
In addition to presenting results of operations and earnings amounts in total, we present certain information in cents per share. These amounts reflect factors that directly affect Amerens earnings. We believe this per share
information helps readers to understand the impact of these factors on Amerens earnings per share. All references in this report to earnings per share are based on average diluted common shares outstanding during the applicable year.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Earnings Summary
Our results of operations and financial position are affected by many factors. Weather, economic
conditions, and the actions of key customers or competitors can significantly affect the demand for our services. Our results are also affected by seasonal fluctuations: winter heating and summer cooling demands. The vast majority of Amerens
revenues are subject to state or federal regulation. This regulation has a material impact on the price we charge for our services. Merchant Generation sales are also subject to market conditions for power. We principally use coal, nuclear fuel,
natural gas, and oil for fuel in our operations. The prices for these commodities can fluctuate significantly due to the global economic and political environment, weather, supply and demand, and many other factors. We have natural gas cost recovery
mechanisms for our Illinois and Missouri gas delivery service businesses, purchased power cost recovery mechanisms for our Illinois electric delivery service businesses, and a FAC for our Missouri electric utility business. See Note 2 Rate
and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, for a discussion of pending rate cases in Missouri and Illinois, including UEs request for approval to implement an environmental cost recovery mechanism and to continue its FAC. Fluctuations
in interest rates and conditions in the capital and credit markets affect our cost of borrowing and our pension and postretirement benefits costs. We employ various risk management strategies to reduce our exposure to commodity risk and other risks
inherent in our business. The reliability of our power plants and transmission and distribution systems and the level of purchased power
costs, operating and administrative costs, and capital investment are key factors that we seek to control to optimize our results of operations, financial position, and liquidity.
Net income attributable to Ameren Corporation was $612 million, or $2.78 per share, for 2009, $605 million, or $2.88 per share for 2008, and $618
million, or $2.98 per share, for 2007.
Net income attributable to Ameren Corporation increased $7 million and its earnings per share
decreased 10 cents in 2009 compared with 2008. Net income attributable to Ameren Corporation increased in the Illinois Regulated and Missouri Regulated segments by $92 million and $25 million, respectively, in 2009 compared with 2008, while net
income attributable to Ameren Corporation in the Merchant Generation segment decreased by $105 million in 2009 compared with 2008.
Compared with 2008 earnings, 2009 earnings were negatively affected by:
|
|
higher dilution and financing costs (31 cents per share); |
|
|
the impact on electric and natural gas margins in our rate-regulated businesses of higher net fuel costs at UE and lower demand (exclusive of weather impacts),
among other things (30 cents per share); |
|
|
the absence in 2009 of the benefit of a settlement agreement reached with a coal mine owner that reimbursed Genco, in the form of a lump-sum payment, for
increased costs for coal and transportation incurred in 2008 and 2009 due to the premature closure of an Illinois mine and contract termination (18 cents per share); |
|
|
the impact of milder weather conditions on energy demand (estimated at 15 cents per share); |
|
|
increased depreciation and amortization expenses (12 cents per share); |
|
|
reduced sales to Noranda because of an extended storm-related outage (11 cents per share); |
|
|
the absence in 2009 of a MoPSC rate order establishing two separate regulatory assets for previously incurred storm and MISO related costs (11 cents per share);
|
|
|
increased expense related to work force reductions through voluntary and involuntary separation programs and asset impairment charges recorded primarily at Genco
in 2009 (7 cents per share); |
|
|
increased taxes other than income taxes, primarily because of higher property taxes (6 cents per share); |
|
|
lower realized electric margins in the Merchant Generation segment largely due to lower sales volumes and higher fuel and related transportation costs (5 cents
per share); and |
|
|
increased distribution system reliability expenditures (5 cents per share). |
Compared with 2008 earnings, 2009 earnings were favorably affected by:
|
|
higher electric and natural gas delivery service rates, effective October 1, 2008, in the Illinois Regulated segment pursuant to an ICC consolidated rate
order for
|
31
|
|
CIPS, CILCO and IP (40 cents per share); |
|
|
higher electric rates, effective March 1, 2009, in the Missouri Regulated segment pursuant to a MoPSC rate order (40 cents per share);
|
|
|
favorable net unrealized MTM activity on derivatives and from changes in the market value of investments used to support Amerens deferred compensation
plans (21 cents per share); |
|
|
decreased plant operations and maintenance expense (15 cents per share); |
|
|
the absence in 2009 of a Callaway nuclear plant refueling and maintenance outage (9 cents per share); |
|
|
the absence in 2009 of asset impairment charges recorded to adjust the carrying value of CILCOs (through AERG) Indian Trails and Sterling Avenue generating
facilities to their estimated fair values as of December 31, 2008 (6 cents per share); and |
|
|
the reduced impact in 2009 of the electric rate relief and customer assistance programs provided to certain Ameren Illinois Utilities electric customers under
the 2007 Illinois Electric Settlement Agreement (5 cents per share). |
The cents per share information presented above
is based on average shares outstanding in 2008.
Net income attributable to Ameren Corporation decreased $13 million and its earnings
per share decreased 10 cents in 2008 compared with 2007. Net income attributable to Ameren Corporation increased in the Merchant Generation segment by $71 million in 2008 compared with 2007, while net income attributable to Ameren Corporation in the
Missouri Regulated and Illinois Regulated segments decreased by $47 million and $15 million, respectively. Other net income decreased $22 million in 2008 compared with 2007, primarily because of net unrealized MTM losses on nonqualifying
hedges mainly related to fuel-related transactions and reduced interest and dividend income.
Compared with 2007 earnings, 2008
earnings were negatively affected by:
|
|
higher fuel and related transportation prices, excluding net MTM losses on fuel-related transactions (27 cents per share); |
|
|
increased distribution system reliability expenditures (16 cents per share); |
|
|
higher plant operations and maintenance expenses (16 cents per share); |
|
|
the impact of unfavorable milder weather conditions on energy demand (estimated at 16 cents per share); |
|
|
net unrealized MTM losses on nonqualifying hedges (11 cents per share); |
|
|
higher dilution and financing costs (10 cents per share); |
|
|
asset impairment charges recorded to adjust the carrying value of CILCOs (through AERG) Indian Trails and Sterling Avenue generation facilities to their
estimated fair values as of December 31, 2008 (6 cents per share); |
|
|
increased depreciation and amortization expenses (6 cents per share); |
|
|
the absence in 2008 of the reversal, recorded in 2007, of the Illinois Customer Elect electric rate increase phase-in plan accrual (5 cents per share);
|
|
|
higher labor and employee benefit costs (5 cents per share); and |
|
|
higher bad debt expenses (3 cents per share). |
Compared with 2007 earnings, 2008 earnings were favorably affected by:
|
|
higher realized electric margins in the Merchant Generation segment; |
|
|
the absence in 2008 of costs that were incurred in January 2007 associated with electric outages caused by severe ice storms, and the amount of these costs that
UE will recover as a result of an accounting order issued by the MoPSC, which was recorded as a regulatory asset in 2008 (16 cents per share); |
|
|
the reduced impact in 2008 of the electric rate relief and customer assistance programs provided to certain Ameren Illinois Utilities electric customers under
the 2007 Illinois Electric Settlement Agreement (13 cents per share); |
|
|
the absence in 2008 of a March 2007 FERC order that resettled costs among MISO market participants retroactive to 2005 that was recorded in 2007, and the
subsequent recovery of a portion of these costs in 2008, through a MoPSC order (10 cents per share); |
|
|
higher electric and natural gas delivery service rates in the Illinois Regulated segment pursuant to the ICC consolidated rate order for CIPS, CILCO, and IP
issued in September 2008 (9 cents per share); |
|
|
the benefit of a settlement agreement with a coal mine owner reached in June 2008 that reimbursed Genco, in the form of a lump-sum payment, for increased costs
for coal and transportation that it expected to incur in 2009 due to the premature closure of an Illinois mine and contract termination (8 cents per share); |
|
|
higher electric rates, lower depreciation expense, and decreased income tax expense in the Missouri Regulated segment pursuant to the MoPSC electric rate order
for UE issued in May 2007 (8 cents per share); and |
|
|
the reduced impact of the Callaway nuclear plant refueling and maintenance outage in 2008, as compared with the prior-year refueling and maintenance outage (4
cents per share). |
The cents per share information presented above is based on average shares outstanding in 2007.
32
Because it is a holding company, Amerens net income and cash flows are primarily generated by
its principal subsidiaries: UE, CIPS, Genco, CILCO and IP. The following table presents the contribution by Amerens principal subsidiaries to Amerens consolidated net income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Net income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UE(a) |
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
$ |
336 |
CIPS |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
14 |
Genco |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
125 |
CILCO |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
74 |
IP |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
24 |
Other(b) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
45 |
Net income attributable to Ameren Corporation |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
$ |
618 |
(a) |
Includes earnings from a 40% interest in EEI through February 29, 2008. |
(b) |
Includes earnings from other merchant generation, including CILCORP, as well as corporate, general and administrative expenses, and intercompany eliminations. Includes a 40%
interest in EEI through February 29, 2008, and an 80% interest in EEI since that date. |
Below is a table of income
statement components by segment for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Missouri Regulated |
|
|
Illinois Regulated |
|
|
Merchant Generation |
|
|
Other / Intersegment
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Electric margins |
|
$ |
1,983 |
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
1,012 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
3,859 |
|
Natural gas margins |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
432 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other operations and maintenance |
|
|
(880 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(1,738 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(725 |
) |
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
(257 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(412 |
) |
Other income and (expenses) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
Interest charges |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
Income (taxes) benefit |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(332 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
624 |
|
Noncontrolling interest and preferred dividends |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to Ameren Corporation |
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
(18 |
) |
|
$ |
612 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric margins |
|
$ |
1,924 |
|
|
$ |
817 |
|
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
Natural gas margins |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
415 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other operations and maintenance |
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(219 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(685 |
) |
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
Other income and (expenses) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
49 |
|
Interest charges |
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
Income (taxes) benefit |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
Net income (loss) |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
644 |
|
Noncontrolling interest and preferred dividends |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
Net income (loss) attributable to Ameren Corporation |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
605 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric margins |
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
1,037 |
|
|
$ |
(51 |
) |
|
$ |
3,729 |
|
Natural gas margins |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
379 |
|
Other revenues |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other operations and maintenance |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(1,687 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(333 |
) |
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(681 |
) |
Taxes other than income taxes |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(381 |
) |
Other income and (expenses) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
Interest charges |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
Income (taxes) benefit |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
Noncontrolling interest and preferred dividends |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Net income attributable to Ameren Corporation |
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
281 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
618 |
|
33
Margins
The following table presents the favorable (unfavorable) variations in the registrants electric and natural gas margins from the previous year. Electric margins are defined as electric revenues less fuel and purchased power costs.
Natural gas margins are defined as gas revenues less gas purchased for resale. The table covers the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007. We consider electric and natural gas margins useful measures to analyze the change in
profitability of our electric and natural gas operations between periods. We have included the analysis below as a complement to the financial information we provide in accordance with GAAP. However, these margins may not be a presentation defined
under GAAP, and they may not be comparable to other companies presentations or more useful than the GAAP information we provide elsewhere in this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 versus 2008 |
|
Ameren(a) |
|
|
UE |
|
|
CIPS |
|
|
Genco |
|
|
CILCO |
|
|
IP |
|
Electric revenue change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of weather (estimate) |
|
$ |
(47 |
) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
Regulated rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in base rates |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
73 |
|
Noranda sales |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Illinois pass-through power supply costs |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
Sales price changes, including hedge effect |
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Off-system revenues |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
2007 Illinois Electric Settlement Agreement, net of reimbursement |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Supply Cost Adjustment factor |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Net unrealized MTM losses |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Generation output, load and other |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Total electric revenue change |
|
$ |
(458 |
) |
|
$ |
(56 |
) |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
(79 |
) |
Fuel and purchased power change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation and other |
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Net unrealized MTM gains |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Price |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Coal contract settlement |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Illinois pass-through power supply costs |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
FERC-ordered MISO resettlements |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total fuel and purchased power change |
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
145 |
|
Net change in electric margins |
|
$ |
(23 |
) |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
(19 |
) |
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
Natural gas margins change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of weather (estimate) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
Changes in base rates |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
33 |
|
Absence of capitalization of nonrecoverable gas costs |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Net unrealized 2008 MTM losses |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net change in natural gas margins |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
23 |
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 versus 2007 |
|
Ameren(a) |
|
|
UE |
|
|
CIPS |
|
|
Genco |
|
|
CILCO |
|
|
IP |
|
Electric revenue change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of weather (estimate) |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
(36 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
Regulated rates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in base rates |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Illinois pass-through power supply costs |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Sales price changes, including hedge effect |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Off-system revenues, excluding estimated weather impact of $53 million |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
2007 Illinois Electric Settlement Agreement, net of reimbursement |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
FERC-ordered MISO resettlements |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Supply Cost Adjustment factor |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Net unrealized MTM gains |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Generation output, load and other |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Total electric revenue change |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
Fuel and purchased power change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation and other |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
Net unrealized MTM losses |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Price |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Coal contract settlement for 2009 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchased power |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Illinois pass-through power supply costs |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
FERC-ordered MISO resettlements |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Total fuel and purchased power change |
|
$ |
69 |
|
|
$ |
(32 |
) |
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
(61 |
) |
|
$ |
60 |
|
Net change in electric margins |
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
(62 |
) |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
Natural gas margins change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of weather (estimate) |
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
Changes in base rates |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Capitalization of nonrecoverable gas costs |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net unrealized MTM losses |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Net change in natural gas margins |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
18 |
|