UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-09141
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Maureen A. Gemma
Two International Place, Boston, Massachusetts 02110
(Name and Address of Agent for Services)
(617) 482-8260
(Registrant’s Telephone Number)
November 30
Date of Fiscal Year End
May 31, 2013
Date of Reporting Period
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust (EVN)
Semiannual Report
May 31, 2013
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Registration. Effective December 31, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) adopted certain regulatory changes that subject registered investment companies and advisers to regulation by the CFTC if a fund invests more than a prescribed level of its assets in certain CFTC-regulated instruments (including futures, certain options and swap agreements) or markets itself as providing investment exposure to such instruments. The Fund has claimed an exclusion from the definition of the term “commodity pool operator” under the Commodity Exchange Act and is not subject to the CFTC regulation. Because of its management of other strategies, the Fund’s adviser is registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator.
Fund shares are not insured by the FDIC and are not deposits or other obligations of, or guaranteed by, any depository institution. Shares are subject to investment risks, including possible loss of principal invested.
Semiannual Report May 31, 2013
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
Table of Contents
| Performance |
2 | |||
| Fund Profile |
2 | |||
| Endnotes and Additional Disclosures |
3 | |||
| Financial Statements |
4 | |||
| Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
21 | |||
| Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval |
22 | |||
| Officers and Trustees |
25 | |||
| Important Notices |
26 | |||
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Performance1,2
Portfolio Manager Thomas M. Metzold, CFA
| % Average Annual Total Returns |
Inception Date | Six Months | One Year | Five Years | Ten Years | |||||||||||||||
| Fund at NAV |
01/29/1999 | –2.68 | % | 10.92 | % | 6.72 | % | 6.50 | % | |||||||||||
| Fund at Market Price |
— | –2.92 | 2.77 | 7.44 | 6.43 | |||||||||||||||
| Barclays Long (22+) Year Municipal Bond Index |
— | –1.55 | % | 4.69 | % | 6.52 | % | 5.39 | % | |||||||||||
| % Premium/Discount to NAV | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6.85 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
| Distributions3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Distributions per share for the period |
$ | 0.470 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution Rate at NAV |
7.49 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at NAV |
13.23 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Distribution Rate at Market Price |
7.01 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Taxable-Equivalent Distribution Rate at Market Price |
12.39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| % Total Leverage4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Auction Preferred Shares (APS) |
22.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| Residual Interest Bond (RIB) |
24.75 | |||||||||||||||||||
Fund Profile
See Endnotes and Additional Disclosures in this report.
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value (NAV) or market price (as applicable) with all distributions reinvested. Fund performance at market price will differ from its results at NAV due to factors such as changing perceptions about the Fund, market conditions, fluctua-tions in supply and demand for Fund shares, or changes in Fund distributions. Investment return and principal value will fluctu-ate so that shares, when sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Performance less than one year is cumulative. Performance is for the stated time period only; due to market volatility, current Fund performance may be lower or higher than the quoted return. For performance as of the most recent month end, please refer to www.eatonvance.com.
| 2 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Endnotes and Additional Disclosures
| 3 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited)
| 4 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued
| 5 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued
| 6 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued
| 7 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued
| 8 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Portfolio of Investments (Unaudited) — continued
| (1) | Security represents the municipal bond held by a trust that issues residual interest bonds (see Note 1H). |
| (2) | Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933. These securities may be sold in certain transactions (normally to qualified institutional buyers) and remain exempt from registration. At May 31, 2013, the aggregate value of these securities is $14,801,212 or 5.2% of the Trust’s net assets applicable to common shares. |
| (3) | Security (or a portion thereof) has been pledged as collateral for residual interest bond transactions. The aggregate value of such collateral is $32,741,684. |
| (4) | Security is in default and making only partial interest payments. |
| (5) | Defaulted bond. |
| (6) | Build America Bond. Represents taxable municipal obligation issued pursuant to the America Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 or other legislation providing for the issuance of taxable municipal debt on which the issuer receives federal support. |
| (7) | Amount is less than 0.05%. |
| (8) | For fair value measurement disclosure purposes, security is categorized as Level 3 (see Note 10). |
| (9) | Represents a payment-in-kind security which may pay all or a portion of interest in additional par. |
| 9 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Statement of Assets and Liabilities (Unaudited)
| Assets | May 31, 2013 | |||
| Investments, at value (identified cost, $491,068,203) |
$ | 536,285,432 | ||
| Interest receivable |
6,345,395 | |||
| Receivable for investments sold |
702,229 | |||
| Deferred debt issuance costs |
47,636 | |||
| Total assets |
$ | 543,380,692 | ||
| Liabilities | ||||
| Payable for floating rate notes issued |
$ | 133,750,000 | ||
| Payable for investments purchased |
1,179,362 | |||
| Due to custodian |
1,180,775 | |||
| Payable to affiliates: |
||||
| Investment adviser fee |
251,883 | |||
| Administration fee |
78,713 | |||
| Trustees’ fees |
3,052 | |||
| Interest expense and fees payable |
268,396 | |||
| Accrued expenses |
72,504 | |||
| Total liabilities |
$ | 136,784,685 | ||
| Auction preferred shares at liquidation value plus cumulative unpaid dividends |
$ | 120,151,619 | ||
| Net assets applicable to common shares |
$ | 286,444,388 | ||
| Sources of Net Assets | ||||
| Common shares, $0.01 par value, unlimited number of shares authorized |
$ | 228,157 | ||
| Additional paid-in capital |
298,693,383 | |||
| Accumulated net realized loss |
(59,015,195 | ) | ||
| Accumulated undistributed net investment income |
1,320,814 | |||
| Net unrealized appreciation |
45,217,229 | |||
| Net assets applicable to common shares |
$ | 286,444,388 | ||
| Auction Preferred Shares Issued and Outstanding (Liquidation preference of $25,000 per share) |
4,806 | |||
| Common Shares Outstanding | 22,815,671 | |||
| Net Asset Value Per Common Share | ||||
| Net assets applicable to common shares ÷ common shares issued and outstanding |
$ | 12.55 | ||
| 10 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Statement of Operations (Unaudited)
| Investment Income | Six Months Ended May 31, 2013 |
|||
| Interest |
$ | 12,860,784 | ||
| Total investment income |
$ | 12,860,784 | ||
| Expenses | ||||
| Investment adviser fee |
$ | 1,507,350 | ||
| Administration fee |
462,062 | |||
| Trustees’ fees and expenses |
9,250 | |||
| Custodian fee |
96,077 | |||
| Transfer and dividend disbursing agent fees |
10,345 | |||
| Legal and accounting services |
56,051 | |||
| Printing and postage |
13,312 | |||
| Interest expense and fees |
464,853 | |||
| Preferred shares service fee |
86,910 | |||
| Miscellaneous |
64,719 | |||
| Total expenses |
$ | 2,770,929 | ||
| Deduct — |
||||
| Reduction of custodian fee |
$ | 520 | ||
| Total expense reductions |
$ | 520 | ||
| Net expenses |
$ | 2,770,409 | ||
| Net investment income |
$ | 10,090,375 | ||
| Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss) | ||||
| Net realized gain (loss) — |
||||
| Investment transactions |
$ | (1,963,732 | ) | |
| Financial futures contracts |
2,548,507 | |||
| Net realized gain |
$ | 584,775 | ||
| Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) — |
||||
| Investments |
$ | (18,714,058 | ) | |
| Financial futures contracts |
458,678 | |||
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
$ | (18,255,380 | ) | |
| Net realized and unrealized loss |
$ | (17,670,605 | ) | |
| Distributions to preferred shareholders |
||||
| From net investment income |
$ | (131,680 | ) | |
| Net decrease in net assets from operations |
$ | (7,711,910 | ) | |
| 11 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Statements of Changes in Net Assets
| Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets | Six Months Ended May 31, 2013 (Unaudited) |
Year Ended November 30, 2012 |
||||||
| From operations — |
||||||||
| Net investment income |
$ | 10,090,375 | $ | 20,625,920 | ||||
| Net realized gain (loss) from investment transactions, extinguishment of debt and financial futures contracts |
584,775 | (1,862,579 | ) | |||||
| Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) from investments and financial futures contracts |
(18,255,380 | ) | 63,692,315 | |||||
| Distributions to preferred shareholders — |
||||||||
| From net investment income |
(131,680 | ) | (307,291 | ) | ||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets from operations |
$ | (7,711,910 | ) | $ | 82,148,365 | |||
| Distributions to common shareholders — |
||||||||
| From net investment income |
$ | (10,720,043 | ) | $ | (21,802,523 | ) | ||
| Total distributions to common shareholders |
$ | (10,720,043 | ) | $ | (21,802,523 | ) | ||
| Capital share transactions — |
||||||||
| Reinvestment of distributions to common shareholders |
$ | 150,438 | $ | 443,634 | ||||
| Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions |
$ | 150,438 | $ | 443,634 | ||||
| Net increase (decrease) in net assets |
$ | (18,281,515 | ) | $ | 60,789,476 | |||
| Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares | ||||||||
| At beginning of period |
$ | 304,725,903 | $ | 243,936,427 | ||||
| At end of period |
$ | 286,444,388 | $ | 304,725,903 | ||||
| Accumulated undistributed net investment income included in net assets applicable to common shares |
||||||||
| At end of period |
$ | 1,320,814 | $ | 2,082,162 | ||||
| 12 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities | Six Months Ended May 31, 2013 |
|||
| Net decrease in net assets from operations |
$ | (7,711,910 | ) | |
| Distributions to preferred shareholders |
131,680 | |||
| Net decrease in net assets from operations excluding distributions to preferred shareholders |
$ | (7,580,230 | ) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net decrease in net assets from operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||
| Investments purchased |
(103,123,930 | ) | ||
| Investments sold |
89,373,071 | |||
| Net amortization/accretion of premium (discount) |
(1,713,262 | ) | ||
| Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs |
3,160 | |||
| Decrease in restricted cash |
2,590,000 | |||
| Decrease in interest receivable |
551,728 | |||
| Decrease in payable for variation margin on open financial futures contracts |
(140,625 | ) | ||
| Increase in payable to affiliate for investment adviser fee |
3,170 | |||
| Increase in payable to affiliate for administration fee |
2,770 | |||
| Increase in payable to affiliate for Trustees’ fees |
91 | |||
| Decrease in interest expense and fees payable |
(6,875 | ) | ||
| Decrease in accrued expenses |
(90,849 | ) | ||
| Net change in unrealized (appreciation) depreciation from investments |
18,714,058 | |||
| Net realized loss from investments |
1,963,732 | |||
| Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 546,009 | ||
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities | ||||
| Distributions paid to common shareholders, net of reinvestments |
$ | (10,569,605 | ) | |
| Cash distributions paid to preferred shareholders |
(131,861 | ) | ||
| Proceeds from secured borrowings |
12,250,000 | |||
| Repayment of secured borrowings |
(4,000,000 | ) | ||
| Increase in due to custodian |
1,180,775 | |||
| Net cash used in financing activities |
$ | (1,270,691 | ) | |
| Net decrease in cash |
$ | (724,682 | ) | |
| Cash at beginning of period |
$ | 724,682 | ||
| Cash at end of period |
$ | — | ||
| Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: | ||||
| Noncash financing activities not included herein consist of: |
||||
| Reinvestment of dividends and distributions |
$ | 150,438 | ||
| Cash paid for interest and fees |
468,568 | |||
| 13 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Financial Highlights
| Six Months Ended May 31, 2013 (Unaudited) |
Year Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Net asset value — Beginning of period (Common shares) |
$ | 13.360 | $ | 10.710 | $ | 11.080 | $ | 10.840 | $ | 8.110 | $ | 14.370 | ||||||||||||
| Income (Loss) From Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net investment income(1) |
$ | 0.442 | $ | 0.905 | $ | 0.988 | $ | 1.036 | $ | 0.981 | $ | 1.067 | ||||||||||||
| Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
(0.776 | ) | 2.715 | (0.352 | ) | 0.169 | 2.648 | (6.262 | ) | |||||||||||||||
| Distributions to preferred shareholders |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| From net investment income(1) |
(0.006 | ) | (0.013 | ) | (0.016 | ) | (0.022 | ) | (0.036 | ) | (0.258 | ) | ||||||||||||
| Total income (loss) from operations |
$ | (0.340 | ) | $ | 3.607 | $ | 0.620 | $ | 1.183 | $ | 3.593 | $ | (5.453 | ) | ||||||||||
| Less Distributions to Common Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| From net investment income |
$ | (0.470 | ) | $ | (0.957 | ) | $ | (0.990 | ) | $ | (0.943 | ) | $ | (0.863 | ) | $ | (0.807 | ) | ||||||
| Total distributions to common shareholders |
$ | (0.470 | ) | $ | (0.957 | ) | $ | (0.990 | ) | $ | (0.943 | ) | $ | (0.863 | ) | $ | (0.807 | ) | ||||||
| Net asset value — End of period (Common shares) |
$ | 12.550 | $ | 13.360 | $ | 10.710 | $ | 11.080 | $ | 10.840 | $ | 8.110 | ||||||||||||
| Market value — End of period (Common shares) |
$ | 13.410 | $ | 14.310 | $ | 12.270 | $ | 11.980 | $ | 11.480 | $ | 8.450 | ||||||||||||
| Total Investment Return on Net Asset Value(2) |
(2.68 | )%(3) | 34.28 | % | 5.66 | % | 10.74 | % | 46.43 | % | (39.72 | )% | ||||||||||||
| Total Investment Return on Market Value(2) |
(2.92 | )%(3) | 25.54 | % | 11.96 | % | 13.06 | % | 48.84 | % | (32.13 | )% | ||||||||||||
| 14 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Financial Highlights — continued
Selected data for a common share outstanding during the periods stated
| Six Months Ended May 31, 2013 (Unaudited) |
Year Ended November 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ratios/Supplemental Data | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Net assets applicable to common shares, end of period (000’s omitted) |
$ | 286,444 | $ | 304,726 | $ | 243,936 | $ | 250,731 | $ | 243,846 | $ | 140,254 | ||||||||||||
| Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares):(4) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expenses excluding interest and fees |
1.57 | %(5) | 1.68 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.73 | % | 2.00 | % | 1.84 | % | ||||||||||||
| Interest and fee expense(6) |
0.31 | %(5) | 0.34 | % | 0.39 | % | 0.34 | % | 0.47 | % | 0.73 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total expenses before custodian fee reduction |
1.88 | %(5) | 2.02 | % | 2.27 | % | 2.07 | % | 2.47 | % | 2.57 | % | ||||||||||||
| Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees |
1.57 | %(5) | 1.68 | % | 1.88 | % | 1.73 | % | 2.00 | % | 1.82 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
6.83 | %(5) | 7.44 | % | 9.46 | % | 9.00 | % | 10.44 | % | 8.45 | % | ||||||||||||
| Portfolio Turnover |
16 | %(3) | 25 | % | 15 | % | 16 | % | 44 | % | 53 | % | ||||||||||||
| The ratios reported above are based on net assets applicable to common shares. The ratios based on net assets, including amounts related to preferred shares, are as follows: |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ratios (as a percentage of average daily net assets applicable to common shares and preferred shares):(4) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Expenses excluding interest and fees |
1.11 | %(5) | 1.17 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.17 | % | ||||||||||||
| Interest and fee expense(6) |
0.22 | %(5) | 0.24 | % | 0.26 | % | 0.23 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.47 | % | ||||||||||||
| Total expenses before custodian fee reduction |
1.33 | %(5) | 1.41 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.55 | % | 1.64 | % | ||||||||||||
| Expenses after custodian fee reduction excluding interest and fees |
1.11 | %(5) | 1.17 | % | 1.25 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.26 | % | 1.16 | % | ||||||||||||
| Net investment income |
4.86 | %(5) | 5.19 | % | 6.28 | % | 6.15 | % | 6.56 | % | 5.40 | % | ||||||||||||
| Senior Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total preferred shares outstanding |
4,806 | 4,806 | 4,806 | 4,806 | 4,806 | 4,394 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Asset coverage per preferred share(7) |
$ | 84,602 | $ | 88,406 | $ | 75,757 | $ | 77,172 | $ | 75,739 | $ | 56,919 | ||||||||||||
| Involuntary liquidation preference per preferred share(8) |
$ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||||||||||
| Approximate market value per preferred share(8) |
$ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | $ | 25,000 | ||||||||||||
| (1) | Computed using average common shares outstanding. |
| (2) | Returns are historical and are calculated by determining the percentage change in net asset value or market value with all distributions reinvested. Distributions are assumed to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Trust’s dividend reinvestment plan. |
| (3) | Not annualized. |
| (4) | Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to preferred shareholders. |
| (5) | Annualized. |
| (6) | Interest and fee expense relates to the liability for floating rate notes issued in conjunction with residual interest bond transactions (see Note 1H). |
| (7) | Calculated by subtracting the Trust’s total liabilities (not including the preferred shares) from the Trust’s total assets, and dividing the result by the number of preferred shares outstanding. |
| (8) | Plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. |
| 15 | See Notes to Financial Statements. |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1 Significant Accounting Policies
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the Trust) is a Massachusetts business trust registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as a diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Trust seeks to provide current income exempt from regular federal income tax.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies of the Trust. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
A Investment Valuation — The following methodologies are used to determine the market value or fair value of investments.
Debt Obligations. Debt obligations (including short-term obligations with a remaining maturity of more than sixty days) are generally valued on the basis of valuations provided by third party pricing services, as derived from such services’ pricing models. Inputs to the models may include, but are not limited to, reported trades, executable bid and asked prices, broker/dealer quotations, prices or yields of securities with similar characteristics, benchmark curves or information pertaining to the issuer, as well as industry and economic events. The pricing services may use a matrix approach, which considers information regarding securities with similar characteristics to determine the valuation for a security. Short-term obligations purchased with a remaining maturity of sixty days or less are generally valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value.
Derivatives. Financial futures contracts are valued at the closing settlement price established by the board of trade or exchange on which they are traded.
Fair Valuation. Investments for which valuations or market quotations are not readily available or are deemed unreliable are valued at fair value using methods determined in good faith by or at the direction of the Trustees of the Trust in a manner that fairly reflects the security’s value, or the amount that the Trust might reasonably expect to receive for the security upon its current sale in the ordinary course. Each such determination is based on a consideration of relevant factors, which are likely to vary from one pricing context to another. These factors may include, but are not limited to, the type of security, the existence of any contractual restrictions on the security’s disposition, the price and extent of public trading in similar securities of the issuer or of comparable entities, quotations or relevant information obtained from broker/dealers or other market participants, information obtained from the issuer, analysts, and/or the appropriate stock exchange (for exchange-traded securities), an analysis of the entity’s financial condition, and an evaluation of the forces that influence the issuer and the market(s) in which the security is purchased and sold.
B Investment Transactions and Related Income — Investment transactions for financial statement purposes are accounted for on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the basis of interest accrued, adjusted for amortization of premium or accretion of discount.
C Federal Taxes — The Trust’s policy is to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies and to distribute to shareholders each year substantially all of its taxable, if any, and tax-exempt net investment income, and all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. The Trust intends to satisfy conditions which will enable it to designate distributions from the interest income generated by its investments in non-taxable municipal securities, which are exempt from regular federal income tax when received by the Trust, as exempt-interest dividends. The portion of such interest, if any, earned on private activity bonds issued after August 7, 1986, may be considered a tax preference item to shareholders.
At November 30, 2012, the Trust, for federal income tax purposes, had a capital loss carryforward of $59,055,476 and deferred capital losses of $3,103,526 which will reduce its taxable income arising from future net realized gains on investment transactions, if any, to the extent permitted by the Internal Revenue Code, and thus will reduce the amount of distributions to shareholders, which would otherwise be necessary to relieve the Trust of any liability for federal income or excise tax. Such capital loss carryforward will expire on November 30, 2015 ($1,728,781), November 30, 2016 ($11,985,328), November 30, 2017 ($19,113,316), November 30, 2018 ($195,807) and November 30, 2019 ($26,032,244). The deferred capital losses are treated as arising on the first day of the Trust’s next taxable year and are treated as realized prior to the utilization of the capital loss carryforward.
As of May 31, 2013, the Trust had no uncertain tax positions that would require financial statement recognition, de-recognition, or disclosure. The Trust files a U.S. federal income tax return annually after its fiscal year-end, which is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service for a period of three years from the date of filing.
D Expense Reduction — State Street Bank and Trust Company (SSBT) serves as custodian of the Trust. Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT receives a fee reduced by credits, which are determined based on the average daily cash balance the Trust maintains with SSBT. All credit balances, if any, used to reduce the Trust’s custodian fees are reported as a reduction of expenses in the Statement of Operations.
E Legal Fees — Legal fees and other related expenses incurred as part of negotiations of the terms and requirement of capital infusions, or that are expected to result in the restructuring of, or a plan of reorganization for, an investment are recorded as realized losses. Ongoing expenditures to protect or enhance an investment are treated as operating expenses.
F Use of Estimates — The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
| 16 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued
G Indemnifications — Under the Trust’s organizational documents, its officers and Trustees may be indemnified against certain liabilities and expenses arising out of the performance of their duties to the Trust. Under Massachusetts law, if certain conditions prevail, shareholders of a Massachusetts business trust (such as the Trust) could be deemed to have personal liability for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust contains an express disclaimer of liability on the part of Fund shareholders and the By-laws provide that the Trust shall assume the defense on behalf of any Fund shareholders. Moreover, the By-laws also provide for indemnification out of Fund property of any shareholder held personally liable solely by reason of being or having been a shareholder for all loss or expense arising from such liability. Additionally, in the normal course of business, the Trust enters into agreements with service providers that may contain indemnification clauses. The Trust’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Trust that have not yet occurred.
H Floating Rate Notes Issued in Conjunction with Securities Held — The Trust may invest in residual interest bonds, also referred to as inverse floating rate securities, whereby the Trust may sell a variable or fixed rate bond to a broker for cash. At the same time, the Trust buys a residual interest in the assets and cash flows of a Special-Purpose Vehicle (the SPV), (which is generally organized as a trust), set up by the broker. The broker deposits a bond into the SPV with the same CUSIP number as the bond sold to the broker by the Trust, and which may have been, but is not required to be, the bond purchased from the Trust (the Bond). The SPV also issues floating rate notes (Floating Rate Notes) which are sold to third-parties. The residual interest bond held by the Trust gives the Trust the right (1) to cause the holders of the Floating Rate Notes to generally tender their notes at par, and (2) to have the broker transfer the Bond held by the SPV to the Trust, thereby terminating the SPV. Should the Trust exercise such right, it would generally pay the broker the par amount due on the Floating Rate Notes and exchange the residual interest bond for the underlying Bond. Pursuant to generally accepted accounting principles for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishment of liabilities, the Trust accounts for the transaction described above as a secured borrowing by including the Bond in its Portfolio of Investments and the Floating Rate Notes as a liability under the caption “Payable for floating rate notes issued” in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The Floating Rate Notes have interest rates that generally reset weekly and their holders have the option to tender their notes to the broker for redemption at par at each reset date. Accordingly, the fair value of the payable for floating rates notes issued approximates its carrying value. If measured at fair value, the payable for floating rate notes would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 10) at May 31, 2013. Interest expense related to the Trust’s liability with respect to Floating Rate Notes is recorded as incurred. The SPV may be terminated by the Trust, as noted above, or by the broker upon the occurrence of certain termination events as defined in the trust agreement, such as a downgrade in the credit quality of the underlying Bond, bankruptcy of or payment failure by the issuer of the underlying Bond, the inability to remarket Floating Rate Notes that have been tendered due to insufficient buyers in the market, or the failure by the SPV to obtain renewal of the liquidity agreement under which liquidity support is provided for the Floating Rate Notes up to one year. Structuring fees paid to the liquidity provider upon the creation of an SPV have been recorded as debt issuance costs and are being amortized as interest expense to the expected maturity of the related trust. Unamortized structuring fees related to a terminated SPV are recorded as a realized loss on extinguishment of debt. At May 31, 2013, the amount of the Trust’s Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the related collateral were $133,750,000 and $189,235,273, respectively. The range of interest rates on the Floating Rate Notes outstanding at May 31, 2013 was 0.11% to 0.38%. For the six months ended May 31, 2013, the Trust’s average Floating Rate Notes outstanding and the average interest rate (annualized) including fees and amortization of deferred debt issuance costs were $115,143,956 and 0.81%, respectively.
The Trust may enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements with the broker by which the Trust agrees to reimburse the broker, in certain circumstances, for the difference between the liquidation value of the Bond held by the SPV and the liquidation value of the Floating Rate Notes, as well as any shortfalls in interest cash flows. The Trust had no shortfalls as of May 31, 2013.
The Trust may also purchase residual interest bonds from brokers in a secondary market transaction without first owning the underlying bond. Such transactions are not required to be treated as secured borrowings. Shortfall agreements, if any, related to residual interest bonds purchased in a secondary market transaction are disclosed in the Portfolio of Investments.
The Trust’s investment policies and restrictions expressly permit investments in residual interest bonds. Such bonds typically offer the potential for yields exceeding the yields available on fixed rate bonds with comparable credit quality and maturity. These securities tend to underperform the market for fixed rate bonds in a rising long-term interest rate environment, but tend to outperform the market for fixed rate bonds when long-term interest rates decline. The value and income of residual interest bonds are generally more volatile than that of a fixed rate bond. The Trust’s investment policies do not allow the Trust to borrow money except as permitted by the 1940 Act. Management believes that the Trust’s restrictions on borrowing money and issuing senior securities (other than as specifically permitted) do not apply to Floating Rate Notes issued by the SPV and included as a liability in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As secured indebtedness issued by an SPV, Floating Rate Notes are distinct from the borrowings and senior securities to which the Trust’s restrictions apply. Residual interest bonds held by the Trust are securities exempt from registration under Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933.
I Financial Futures Contracts — Upon entering into a financial futures contract, the Trust is required to deposit with the broker, either in cash or securities, an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract amount (initial margin). Subsequent payments, known as variation margin, are made or received by the Trust each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying security, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Trust. Gains (losses) are realized upon the expiration or closing of the financial futures contracts. Should market conditions change unexpectedly, the Trust may not achieve the anticipated benefits of the financial futures contracts and may realize a loss. Futures contracts have minimal counterparty risk as they are exchange traded and the clearinghouse for the exchange is substituted as the counterparty, guaranteeing counterparty performance.
J Statement of Cash Flows — The cash amount shown in the Statement of Cash Flows of the Trust is the amount included in the Trust’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities and represents the cash on hand at its custodian and does not include any short-term investments.
| 17 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued
K Interim Financial Statements — The interim financial statements relating to May 31, 2013 and for the six months then ended have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of the Trust’s management, reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements.
2 Auction Preferred Shares
The Trust issued 2,620 Series A and Series B Auction Preferred Shares (APS) on March 1, 1999 in a public offering. The underwriting discount and other offering costs incurred in connection with the offering were recorded as a reduction of the paid-in capital of the common shares. The Trust issued 806 Series C APS on May 28, 2009 in connection with the acquisition of Eaton Vance National Municipal Income Trust. Dividends on the APS, which accrue daily, are cumulative at rates which are reset every seven days by an auction, unless a special dividend period has been set. If the APS auctions do not successfully clear, the dividend payment rate over the next period for the APS holders is set at a specified maximum applicable rate until such time as the APS auctions are successful. The maximum applicable rate on the APS is 110% (150% for taxable distributions) of the greater of the 1) “AA” Financial Composite Commercial Paper Rate or 2) Taxable Equivalent of the Short-Term Municipal Obligation Rate on the date of the auction. The stated spread over the reference benchmark rate is determined based on the credit rating of the APS. Series of APS are identical in all respects except for the reset dates of the dividend rates.
The number of APS issued and outstanding as of May 31, 2013 is as follows:
| APS Issued and Outstanding |
||||
| Series A |
2,000 | |||
| Series B |
2,000 | |||
| Series C |
806 | |||
The APS are redeemable at the option of the Trust at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, on any dividend payment date. The APS are also subject to mandatory redemption at a redemption price equal to $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, if the Trust is in default for an extended period on its asset maintenance requirements with respect to the APS. If the dividends on the APS remain unpaid in an amount equal to two full years’ dividends, the holders of the APS as a class have the right to elect a majority of the Board of Trustees. In general, the holders of the APS and the common shares have equal voting rights of one vote per share, except that the holders of the APS, as a separate class, have the right to elect at least two members of the Board of Trustees. The APS have a liquidation preference of $25,000 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. The Trust is required to maintain certain asset coverage with respect to the APS as defined in the Trust’s By-Laws and the 1940 Act. The Trust pays an annual fee up to 0.15% of the liquidation value of the APS to broker/dealers as a service fee if the auctions are unsuccessful; otherwise, the annual fee is 0.25%.
3 Distributions to Shareholders
The Trust intends to make monthly distributions of net investment income to common shareholders, after payment of any dividends on any outstanding APS. In addition, at least annually, the Trust intends to distribute all or substantially all of its net realized capital gains (reduced by available capital loss carryforwards from prior years, if any). Distributions to common shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions to preferred shareholders are recorded daily and are payable at the end of each dividend period. The dividend rates for the APS at May 31, 2013, and the amount of dividends accrued (including capital gains, if any) to APS shareholders, average APS dividend rates (annualized), and dividend rate ranges for the six months then ended were as follows:
| APS Dividend Rates at May 31, 2013 |
Dividends Accrued to APS Shareholders |
Average APS Dividend Rates |
Dividend Rate Ranges (%) |
|||||||||||||
| Series A |
0.25 | % | $ | 54,448 | 0.22 | % | 0.13–0.38 | |||||||||
| Series B |
0.25 | 55,162 | 0.22 | 0.13–0.38 | ||||||||||||
| Series C |
0.25 | 22,070 | 0.22 | 0.13–0.38 | ||||||||||||
Beginning February 13, 2008 and consistent with the patterns in the broader market for auction-rate securities, the Trust’s APS auctions were unsuccessful in clearing due to an imbalance of sell orders over bids to buy the APS. As a result, the dividend rates of the APS were reset to the maximum applicable rates. The table above reflects such maximum dividend rates for each series as of May 31, 2013.
| 18 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued
The Trust distinguishes between distributions on a tax basis and a financial reporting basis. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that only distributions in excess of tax basis earnings and profits be reported in the financial statements as a return of capital. Permanent differences between book and tax accounting relating to distributions are reclassified to paid-in capital. For tax purposes, distributions from short-term capital gains are considered to be from ordinary income.
4 Investment Adviser Fee and Other Transactions with Affiliates
The investment adviser fee is earned by Eaton Vance Management (EVM) as compensation for investment advisory services rendered to the Trust. The fee is computed at an annual rate of 0.640% (0.655% prior to May 1, 2013) of the Trust’s average weekly gross assets and is payable monthly. Pursuant to a fee reduction agreement between the Trust and EVM that commenced on May 1, 2010, the annual adviser fee rate is reduced by 0.015% every May 1 thereafter for the next nineteen years. The fee reduction cannot be terminated without the consent of the Trustees and shareholders. Average weekly gross assets include the principal amount of any indebtedness for money borrowed, including debt securities issued by the Trust, and the amount of any outstanding APS issued by the Trust. Pursuant to a fee reduction agreement with EVM, average weekly gross assets are calculated by adding to net assets the liquidation value of the Trust’s APS then outstanding and the amount payable by the Trust to floating rate note holders, such adjustment being limited to the value of the APS outstanding prior to any APS redemptions by the Trust. The administration fee is earned by EVM for administering the business affairs of the Trust and is computed at an annual rate of 0.20% of the Trust’s average weekly gross assets. For the six months ended May 31, 2013, the investment adviser fee and administration fee were $1,507,350 and $462,062, respectively.
Trustees and officers of the Trust who are members of EVM’s organization receive remuneration for their services to the Trust out of the investment adviser fee. Trustees of the Trust who are not affiliated with EVM may elect to defer receipt of all or a percentage of their annual fees in accordance with the terms of the Trustees Deferred Compensation Plan. For the six months ended May 31, 2013, no significant amounts have been deferred. Certain officers and Trustees of the Trust are officers of EVM.
5 Purchases and Sales of Investments
Purchases and sales of investments, other than short-term obligations, aggregated $101,239,198 and $88,882,086, respectively, for the six months ended May 31, 2013.
6 Common Shares of Beneficial Interest
Common shares issued pursuant to the Trust’s dividend reinvestment plan for the six months ended May 31, 2013 and the year ended November 30, 2012 were 11,344 and 35,072, respectively.
7 Federal Income Tax Basis of Investments
The cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments of the Trust at May 31, 2013, as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
| Aggregate cost |
$ | 355,820,931 | ||
| Gross unrealized appreciation |
$ | 58,372,791 | ||
| Gross unrealized depreciation |
(11,658,290 | ) | ||
| Net unrealized appreciation |
$ | 46,714,501 | ||
8 Overdraft Advances
Pursuant to the custodian agreement, SSBT may, in its discretion, advance funds to the Trust to make properly authorized payments. When such payments result in an overdraft, the Trust is obligated to repay SSBT at the current rate of interest charged by SSBT for secured loans (currently, the Federal Funds rate plus 2%). This obligation is payable on demand to SSBT. SSBT has a lien on a Trust’s assets to the extent of any overdraft. At May 31, 2013, the Trust had a payment due to SSBT pursuant to the foregoing arrangement of $1,180,775. Based on the short-term nature of these payments and the variable interest rate, the carrying value of the overdraft advances approximated its fair value at May 31, 2013. If measured at fair value, overdraft advances would have been considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy (see Note 10) at May 31, 2013. The Trust’s average overdraft advances during the six months ended May 31, 2013 were not significant.
9 Financial Instruments
The Trust may trade in financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of its investing activities. These financial instruments may include financial futures contracts and may involve, to a varying degree, elements of risk in excess of the amounts recognized for financial statement
| 19 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited) — continued
purposes. The notional or contractual amounts of these instruments represent the investment the Trust has in particular classes of financial instruments and do not necessarily represent the amounts potentially subject to risk. The measurement of the risks associated with these instruments is meaningful only when all related and offsetting transactions are considered. At May 31, 2013, there were no obligations outstanding under these financial instruments.
The Trust is subject to interest rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objective. Because the Trust holds fixed-rate bonds, the value of these bonds may decrease if interest rates rise. The Trust purchases and sells U.S. Treasury futures contracts to hedge against changes in interest rates.
The effect of derivative instruments (not considered to be hedging instruments for accounting disclosure purposes) on the Statement of Operations and whose primary underlying risk exposure is interest rate risk for the six months ended May 31, 2013 was as follows:
| Derivative | Realized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on Derivatives Recognized in Income |
||||||
| Futures Contracts |
$ | 2,548,507 | (1) | $ | 458,678 | (2) | ||
| (1) | Statement of Operations location: Net realized gain (loss) – Financial futures contracts. |
| (2) | Statement of Operations location: Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) – Financial futures contracts. |
The average notional amount of futures contracts outstanding during the six months ended May 31, 2013, which is indicative of the volume of this derivative type, was approximately $41,429,000.
10 Fair Value Measurements
Under generally accepted accounting principles for fair value measurements, a three-tier hierarchy to prioritize the assumptions, referred to as inputs, is used in valuation techniques to measure fair value. The three-tier hierarchy of inputs is summarized in the three broad levels listed below.
| Ÿ | Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments |
| Ÿ | Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.) |
| Ÿ | Level 3 – significant unobservable inputs (including a fund’s own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments) |
In cases where the inputs used to measure fair value fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level disclosed is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
At May 31, 2013, the hierarchy of inputs used in valuing the Trust’s investments, which are carried at value, were as follows:
| Asset Description | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3* | Total | ||||||||||||
| Tax-Exempt Municipal Securities |
$ | — | $ | 527,420,364 | $ | — | $ | 527,420,364 | ||||||||
| Taxable Municipal Securities |
— | 8,798,342 | — | 8,798,342 | ||||||||||||
| Corporate Bonds & Notes |
— | — | 66,726 | 66,726 | ||||||||||||
| Total Investments |
$ | — | $ | 536,218,706 | $ | 66,726 | $ | 536,285,432 | ||||||||
| * | None of the unobservable inputs for Level 3 assets, individually or collectively, had a material impact on the Trust. |
Level 3 investments at the beginning and/or end of the period in relation to net assets were not significant and accordingly, a reconciliation of Level 3 assets for the six months ended May 31, 2013 is not presented. At May 31, 2013, there were no investments transferred between Level 1 and Level 2 during the six months then ended.
11 Subsequent Event
Pursuant to a registration statement filed with the SEC effective July 2, 2013, the Trust is authorized to issue up to an additional 2,281,789 common shares through a shelf offering. The Trust has not issued any shares under the shelf offering through July 17, 2013, the date the financial statements were issued.
| 20 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The Trust held its Annual Meeting of Shareholders on March 22, 2013. Scott E. Eston, Thomas E. Faust Jr. and Allen R. Freedman were elected Class II Trustees of the Trust for a three-year term expiring in 2016. Mr. Verni has been nominated for election by the holders of the Trust’s APS. Due to a lack of quorum of APS, the Trust was unable to act on election of Mr. Verni. Accordingly, Mr. Verni will remain in office and continue to serve as Trustee of the Trust.
| Nominees for Trustee Elected by All Shareholders |
Number of Shares | |||||||
| For | Withheld | |||||||
| Scott E. Eston (Class II) |
20,282,418 | 618,482 | ||||||
| Thomas E. Faust Jr. (Class II) |
20,250,197 | 650,703 | ||||||
| Allen R. Freedman (Class II) |
20,204,813 | 696,087 | ||||||
| Nominees for Trustee Elected by APS Shareholders |
Number of Shares | |||||||
| For | Withheld | |||||||
| Ralph F. Verni (Class II) |
1,280 | 227 | ||||||
| 21 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval
Overview of the Contract Review Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), provides, in substance, that each investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment adviser will continue in effect from year to year only if its continuation is approved at least annually by the fund’s board of trustees, including by a vote of a majority of the trustees who are not “interested persons” of the fund (“Independent Trustees”), cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
At a meeting of the Boards of Trustees (each a “Board”) of the Eaton Vance group of mutual funds (the “Eaton Vance Funds”) held on April 22, 2013, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of existing advisory and sub-advisory agreements for the Eaton Vance Funds for an additional one-year period. In voting its approval, the Board relied upon the affirmative recommendation of the Contract Review Committee of the Board, which is a committee comprised exclusively of Independent Trustees. Prior to making its recommendation, the Contract Review Committee reviewed information furnished by each adviser to the Eaton Vance Funds (including information specifically requested by the Board) for a series of meetings of the Contract Review Committee held between February and April 2013, as well as information considered during prior meetings of the committee. Such information included, among other things, the following:
Information about Fees, Performance and Expenses
| Ÿ | An independent report comparing the advisory and related fees paid by each fund with fees paid by comparable funds; |
| Ÿ | An independent report comparing each fund’s total expense ratio and its components to comparable funds; |
| Ÿ | An independent report comparing the investment performance of each fund (including, where relevant, yield data, Sharpe ratios and information ratios) to the investment performance of comparable funds over various time periods; |
| Ÿ | Data regarding investment performance in comparison to benchmark indices and customized peer groups, in each case as approved by the Board with respect to the funds; |
| Ÿ | For each fund, comparative information concerning the fees charged and the services provided by each adviser in managing other accounts (including mutual funds, other collective investment funds and institutional accounts) using investment strategies and techniques similar to those used in managing such fund; |
| Ÿ | Profitability analyses for each adviser with respect to each fund; |
Information about Portfolio Management and Trading
| Ÿ | Descriptions of the investment management services provided to each fund, including the investment strategies and processes employed, and any changes in portfolio management processes and personnel; |
| Ÿ | Information about the allocation of brokerage and the benefits received by each adviser as a result of brokerage allocation, including information concerning the acquisition of research through client commission arrangements and the fund’s policies with respect to “soft dollar” arrangements; |
| Ÿ | Data relating to portfolio turnover rates of each fund; |
| Ÿ | The procedures and processes used to determine the fair value of fund assets and actions taken to monitor and test the effectiveness of such procedures and processes; |
| Ÿ | Information about each adviser’s processes for monitoring best execution of portfolio transactions, and other policies and practices of each adviser with respect to trading; |
Information about each Adviser
| Ÿ | Reports detailing the financial results and condition of each adviser; |
| Ÿ | Descriptions of the qualifications, education and experience of the individual investment professionals whose responsibilities include portfolio management and investment research for the funds, and information relating to their compensation and responsibilities with respect to managing other mutual funds and investment accounts; |
| Ÿ | Copies of the Codes of Ethics of each adviser and its affiliates, together with information relating to compliance with and the administration of such codes; |
| Ÿ | Copies of or descriptions of each adviser’s policies and procedures relating to proxy voting, the handling of corporate actions and class actions; |
| Ÿ | Information concerning the resources devoted to compliance efforts undertaken by each adviser and its affiliates on behalf of the funds (including descriptions of various compliance programs) and their record of compliance with investment policies and restrictions, including policies with respect to market-timing, late trading and selective portfolio disclosure, and with policies on personal securities transactions; |
| Ÿ | Descriptions of the business continuity and disaster recovery plans of each adviser and its affiliates; |
| Ÿ | A description of Eaton Vance Management’s procedures for overseeing third party advisers and sub-advisers, including with respect to regulatory and compliance issues, investment management and other matters; |
| 22 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued
Other Relevant Information
| Ÿ | Information concerning the nature, cost and character of the administrative and other non-investment management services provided by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates; |
| Ÿ | Information concerning management of the relationship with the custodian, subcustodians and fund accountants by each adviser or the funds’ administrator; and |
| Ÿ | The terms of each advisory agreement. |
In addition to the information identified above, the Contract Review Committee considered information provided from time to time by each adviser throughout the year at meetings of the Board and its committees. Over the course of the twelve-month period ended April 30, 2013, with respect to one or more funds, the Board met eight times and the Contract Review Committee, the Audit Committee, the Governance Committee, the Portfolio Management Committee and the Compliance Reports and Regulatory Matters Committee, each of which is a Committee comprised solely of Independent Trustees, met eight, twenty-one, five, nine and thirteen times respectively. At such meetings, the Trustees participated in investment and performance reviews with the portfolio managers and other investment professionals of each adviser relating to each fund. The Board and its Committees considered the investment and trading strategies used in pursuing each fund’s investment objective, including, where relevant, the use of derivative instruments, as well as processes for monitoring best execution of portfolio transactions and risk management techniques. The Board and its Committees also evaluated issues pertaining to industry and regulatory developments, compliance procedures, fund governance and other issues with respect to the funds, and received and participated in reports and presentations provided by Eaton Vance Management and other fund advisers with respect to such matters.
For funds that invest through one or more underlying portfolios, the Board considered similar information about the portfolio(s) when considering the approval of advisory agreements. In addition, in cases where the fund’s investment adviser has engaged a sub-adviser, the Board considered similar information about the sub-adviser when considering the approval of any sub-advisory agreement.
The Contract Review Committee was assisted throughout the contract review process by Goodwin Procter LLP, legal counsel for the Independent Trustees. The members of the Contract Review Committee relied upon the advice of such counsel and their own business judgment in determining the material factors to be considered in evaluating each advisory and sub-advisory agreement and the weight to be given to each such factor. The conclusions reached with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement were based on a comprehensive evaluation of all the information provided and not any single factor. Moreover, each member of the Contract Review Committee may have placed varying emphasis on particular factors in reaching conclusions with respect to each advisory and sub-advisory agreement.
Results of the Process
Based on its consideration of the foregoing, and such other information as it deemed relevant, including the factors and conclusions described below, the Contract Review Committee concluded that the continuation of the investment advisory agreement of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust (the “Fund”) with Eaton Vance Management (the “Adviser”), including its fee structure, is in the interests of shareholders and, therefore, the Contract Review Committee recommended to the Board approval of the agreement. The Board accepted the recommendation of the Contract Review Committee as well as the factors considered and conclusions reached by the Contract Review Committee with respect to the agreement. Accordingly, the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees, voted to approve continuation of the investment advisory agreement for the Fund.
Nature, Extent and Quality of Services
In considering whether to approve the investment advisory agreement of the Fund, the Board evaluated the nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund by the Adviser.
The Board considered the Adviser’s management capabilities and investment process with respect to the types of investments held by the Fund, including the education, experience and number of its investment professionals and other personnel who provide portfolio management, investment research, and similar services to the Fund. In particular, the Board considered, where relevant, the abilities and experience of such investment personnel in analyzing factors such as credit risk, tax efficiency, and special considerations relevant to investing in municipal bonds. The Board considered the Adviser’s large municipal bond team, which includes portfolio managers and credit specialists who provide services to the Fund. The Board also took into account the resources dedicated to portfolio management and other services, including the compensation methods of the Adviser to recruit and retain investment personnel, and the time and attention devoted to the Fund by senior management.
The Board reviewed the compliance programs of the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof. Among other matters, the Board considered compliance and reporting matters relating to personal trading by investment personnel, selective disclosure of portfolio holdings, late trading, frequent trading, portfolio valuation, business continuity and the allocation of investment opportunities. The Board also evaluated the responses of the Adviser and its affiliates to requests in recent years from regulatory authorities such as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
The Board considered shareholder and other administrative services provided or managed by Eaton Vance Management and its affiliates, including transfer agency and accounting services. The Board evaluated the benefits to shareholders of investing in a fund that is a part of a large family of funds.
| 23 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Board of Trustees’ Contract Approval — continued
After consideration of the foregoing factors, among others, the Board concluded that the nature, extent and quality of services provided by the Adviser, taken as a whole, are appropriate and consistent with the terms of the investment advisory agreement.
Fund Performance
The Board compared the Fund’s investment performance to a relevant universe of similarly managed funds identified by an independent data provider and appropriate benchmark indices, and assessed the Fund’s performance on the basis of total return and current income return. The Board’s review included comparative performance data for the one-, three-, five- and ten-year periods ended September 30, 2012 for the Fund. The Board considered the impact of extraordinary market conditions in recent years on the Fund’s performance in light of, among other things, the Adviser’s efforts to generate competitive levels of tax exempt current income over time through investments that, relative to its peer universe, focus on higher quality municipal bonds with longer maturities. The Board noted that the Adviser had taken action to restructure the Fund’s portfolio as part of a long-term strategy for managing interest rate risk, consistent with the Fund’s objective of providing current income. The Board concluded that the Fund’s performance had been satisfactory on the basis of current income return, and that it was appropriate to continue to monitor the effectiveness of the actions taken by the Adviser to improve Fund performance on the basis of total return, which the Board noted had improved for periods ended as of December 31, 2012.
Management Fees and Expenses
The Board reviewed contractual investment advisory fee rates, including administrative fee rates, payable by the Fund (referred to as “management fees”). As part of its review, the Board considered the management fees and the Fund’s total expense ratio for the year ended September 30, 2012, as compared to a group of similarly managed funds selected by an independent data provider. The Board considered the financial resources committed by the Adviser in structuring the Fund at the time of its initial public offering and the waiver of fees provided by the Adviser for the first five years of the Fund’s life. The Board considered that, at the request of the Contract Review Committee, the Adviser had implemented a series of permanent reductions in management fees beginning in May 2010, which include a further fee reduction effective May 1, 2013. The Board also considered factors that had an impact on Fund expense ratios, as identified by management in response to inquiries from the Contract Review Committee, as well as actions taken by management in recent years to reduce expenses at the Eaton Vance fund complex level, including the negotiation of reduced fees for transfer agency and custody services.
After reviewing the foregoing information, and in light of the nature, extent and quality of the services provided by the Adviser, the Board concluded that the management fees charged for advisory and related services are reasonable.
Profitability
The Board reviewed the level of profits realized by the Adviser and relevant affiliates thereof in providing investment advisory and administrative services to the Fund and to all Eaton Vance Funds as a group. The Board considered the level of profits realized without regard to revenue sharing or other payments by the Adviser and its affiliates to third parties in respect of distribution services. The Board also considered other direct or indirect benefits received by the Adviser and its affiliates in connection with their relationships with the Fund, including the benefits of research services that may be available to the Adviser as a result of securities transactions effected for the Fund and other investment advisory clients.
The Board concluded that, in light of the foregoing factors and the nature, extent and quality of the services rendered, the profits realized by the Adviser and its affiliates are reasonable.
Economies of Scale
In reviewing management fees and profitability, the Board also considered the extent to which the Adviser and its affiliates, on the one hand, and the Fund, on the other hand, can expect to realize benefits from economies of scale as the assets of the Fund increase. The Board acknowledged the difficulty in accurately measuring the benefits resulting from the economies of scale with respect to the management of any specific fund or group of funds. The Board reviewed data summarizing the increases and decreases in the assets of the Fund and of all Eaton Vance Funds as a group over various time periods, and evaluated the extent to which the total expense ratio of the Fund and the profitability of the Adviser and its affiliates may have been affected by such increases or decreases. Based upon the foregoing, the Board concluded that the Fund currently shares in the benefits from economies of scale. The Board also considered the fact that the Fund is not continuously offered and that the Fund’s assets are not expected to increase materially in the foreseeable future. The Board concluded that, in light of the level of the Adviser’s profits with respect to the Fund, the implementation of breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule is not appropriate at this time.
| 24 |
Eaton Vance
Municipal Income Trust
May 31, 2013
Officers and Trustees
Officers of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
Trustees of Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
| * | Interested Trustee |
Number of Employees
The Trust is organized as a Massachusetts business trust and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a closed-end, management investment company and has no employees.
Number of Shareholders
As of May 31, 2013, Trust records indicate that there are 86 registered shareholders and approximately 9,908 shareholders owning the Trust shares in street name, such as through brokers, banks, and financial intermediaries.
If you are a street name shareholder and wish to receive Trust reports directly, which contain important information about the Trust, please write or call:
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc.
Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
1-800-262-1122
New York Stock Exchange symbol
The New York Stock Exchange symbol is EVN.
| 25 |
Eaton Vance Funds
IMPORTANT NOTICES
Privacy. The Eaton Vance organization is committed to ensuring your financial privacy. Each of the financial institutions identified below has in effect the following policy (“Privacy Policy”) with respect to nonpublic personal information about its customers:
| Ÿ | Only such information received from you, through application forms or otherwise, and information about your Eaton Vance fund transactions will be collected. This may include information such as name, address, social security number, tax status, account balances and transactions. |
| Ÿ | None of such information about you (or former customers) will be disclosed to anyone, except as permitted by law (which includes disclosure to employees necessary to service your account). In the normal course of servicing a customer’s account, Eaton Vance may share information with unaffiliated third parties that perform various required services such as transfer agents, custodians and broker-dealers. |
| Ÿ | Policies and procedures (including physical, electronic and procedural safeguards) are in place that are designed to protect the confidentiality of such information. |
| Ÿ | We reserve the right to change our Privacy Policy at any time upon proper notification to you. Customers may want to review our Privacy Policy periodically for changes by accessing the link on our homepage: www.eatonvance.com. |
Our pledge of privacy applies to the following entities within the Eaton Vance organization: the Eaton Vance Family of Funds, Eaton Vance Management, Eaton Vance Investment Counsel, Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc., Eaton Vance Trust Company, Eaton Vance Management’s Real Estate Investment Group and Boston Management and Research. In addition, our Privacy Policy applies only to those Eaton Vance customers who are individuals and who have a direct relationship with us. If a customer’s account (i.e., fund shares) is held in the name of a third-party financial advisor/broker-dealer, it is likely that only such advisor’s privacy policies apply to the customer. This notice supersedes all previously issued privacy disclosures. For more information about Eaton Vance’s Privacy Policy, please call 1-800-262-1122.
Delivery of Shareholder Documents. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) permits funds to deliver only one copy of shareholder documents, including prospectuses, proxy statements and shareholder reports, to fund investors with multiple accounts at the same residential or post office box address. This practice is often called “householding” and it helps eliminate duplicate mailings to shareholders. Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, may household the mailing of your documents indefinitely unless you instruct Eaton Vance, or your financial advisor, otherwise. If you would prefer that your Eaton Vance documents not be householded, please contact Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122, or contact your financial advisor. Your instructions that householding not apply to delivery of your Eaton Vance documents will be effective within 30 days of receipt by Eaton Vance or your financial advisor.
Portfolio Holdings. Each Eaton Vance Fund and its underlying Portfolio(s) (if applicable) will file a schedule of portfolio holdings on Form N-Q with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year. The Form N-Q will be available on the Eaton Vance website at www.eatonvance.com, by calling Eaton Vance at 1-800-262-1122 or in the EDGAR database on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Form N-Q may also be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. (call 1-800-732-0330 for information on the operation of the public reference room).
Proxy Voting. From time to time, funds are required to vote proxies related to the securities held by the funds. The Eaton Vance Funds or their underlying Portfolios (if applicable) vote proxies according to a set of policies and procedures approved by the Funds’ and Portfolios’ Boards. You may obtain a description of these policies and procedures and information on how the Funds or Portfolios voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling 1-800-262-1122 and by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
Additional Notice to Shareholders. A Fund also may purchase shares of its common stock in the open market when they trade at a discount to net asset value or at other times if the Fund determines such purchases are advisable. There can be no assurance that a Fund will take such action or that such purchases would reduce the discount. If applicable, a Fund may also redeem or purchase its outstanding auction preferred shares (APS) in order to maintain compliance with regulatory requirements, borrowing or rating agency requirements or for other purposes as it deems appropriate or necessary.
Closed-End Fund Information. The Eaton Vance closed-end funds make certain fund performance data and portfolio characteristics available on the Eaton Vance website after the end of each month. Portfolio holdings for the most recent month-end are also posted to the website approximately 30 days following the end of the month. This information is available at www.eatonvance.com on the fund information pages under “Individual Investors — Closed-End Funds”.
| 26 |
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
| 151-7/13 | CE-NASRC |
Item 2. Code of Ethics
Not required in this filing.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert
The registrant’s Board has designated William H. Park, an independent trustee, as its audit committee financial expert. Mr. Park is a certified public accountant who is a consultant and private investor. Previously, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of Aveon Group, L.P. (an investment management firm), as the Vice Chairman of Commercial Industrial Finance Corp. (specialty finance company), as President and Chief Executive Officer of Prizm Capital Management, LLC (investment management firm), as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Asset Management Corporation (an institutional investment management firm) and as a Senior Manager at Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers) (an independent registered public accounting firm).
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Not required in this filing.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants
Not required in this filing.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments
Please see schedule of investments contained in the Report to Stockholders included under Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies
Not required in this filing.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers
No such purchases this period.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No Material Changes.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures
(a) It is the conclusion of the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer that the effectiveness of the registrant’s current disclosure controls and procedures (such disclosure controls and procedures having been evaluated within 90 days of the date of this filing) provide reasonable
assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms and that the information required to be disclosed by the registrant has been accumulated and communicated to the registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer in order to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) There have been no changes in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits
| (a)(1) | Registrant’s Code of Ethics – Not applicable (please see Item 2). | |
| (a)(2)(i) | Treasurer’s Section 302 certification. | |
| (a)(2)(ii) | President’s Section 302 certification. | |
| (b) | Combined Section 906 certification. | |
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Eaton Vance Municipal Income Trust
| By: | /s/ Thomas M. Metzold | |
| Thomas M. Metzold | ||
| President | ||
| Date: | July 9, 2013 | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| By: | /s/ James F. Kirchner | |
| James F. Kirchner | ||
| Treasurer | ||
| Date: | July 9, 2013 | |
| By: | /s/ Thomas M. Metzold | |
| Thomas M. Metzold | ||
| President | ||
| Date: | July 9, 2013 | |