UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant  ☑                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ☐

Check the appropriate box:

Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

November 13, 2018

Dear Stockholder:

We are pleased to announce that the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. will be held on December 19, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. Central Time, at the Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove, 1500 Opus Place, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515.

Please refer to the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement for detailed information on each of the matters to be acted upon and the Annual Meeting. Your vote is important. Please vote as soon as possible even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement contain instructions on how you can vote your shares over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail.

Thank you for your interest in Roadrunner.

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 19, 2018

Dear Stockholder:

The 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held on December 19, 2018 at 1:00 p.m. Central Time, at the Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove, 1500 Opus Place, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, for the following purposes as more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

After careful consideration and upon the recommendation of the special financing alternatives committee of our board of directors (or the “special committee”), consisting solely of independent directors, and for the reasons set forth in more detail in the accompanying Proxy Statement, our board of directors, other than Ralph (“Cody”) W. Kittle III and Scott L. Dobak, has unanimously (a) determined that the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock from 105,000,000 shares to 1,100,000,000 shares, the rights offering and the Standby Purchase Agreement, and the transactions contemplated thereby, and the amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation set forth in Proposal Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 are advisable and in the best interests of our company and our stockholders; and (b) approved and authorized the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock from 105,000,000 shares to 1,100,000,000 shares, the rights offering and the Standby Purchase Agreement, and the transactions contemplated thereby, and the amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation set forth in Proposal Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16.

After careful consideration and upon the recommendation of the special committee, consisting solely of independent directors, and for the reasons set forth in more detail in the accompanying Proxy Statement, our board of directors, other than Messrs. Kittle and Dobak, unanimously (a) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock from 105,000,000 shares to 1,100,000,000 shares (Proposal No. 6); (b) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of the issuance and sale of 900,000,000 shares of our common stock upon exercise of rights to purchase shares of our common stock at a subscription price of $0.50 per share to raise $450 million pursuant to a rights offering (Proposal No. 7); (c) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of the issuance and sale to Elliott of all unsubscribed shares of our common stock in the rights offering pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement (Proposal No. 8); (d) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholder action by written consent (Proposal No. 9); (e) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding common stock to request that the company call a special meeting (Proposal No. 10); (f) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding common stock to remove directors with or without cause (Proposal No. 11); (g) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding common stock to amend or repeal the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or any provision thereof (Proposal No. 12); (h) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to permit stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding common stock to amend or repeal the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws or any provision thereof (Proposal No. 13); (i) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to designate the courts in the state

of Delaware as the exclusive forum for all legal actions (Proposal No. 14); (j) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to opt-out of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (Proposal No. 15); and (k) recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to renounce any interest or expectancy of the company in, or in being offered an opportunity to participate in, any business opportunity that is presented to Elliott or its directors, officers, shareholders, or employees (Proposal No. 16).

Messrs. Kittle and Dobak have not participated in any discussions regarding the terms of the rights offering or the Standby Purchase Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and have abstained from all votes related to Proposal Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, and do not make any recommendation regarding Proposal Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. Pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement, Elliott, who beneficially owned approximately 9.6% of our common stock as of November 6, 2018, has agreed to use its commercially reasonably efforts to vote (or cause to be voted) the shares of our common stock owned by it in favor of Proposal Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 at the Annual Meeting.

Neither our board of directors nor the special committee of our board of directors has made, nor will they make, any recommendation to stockholders regarding the exercise of rights pursuant to the rights offering. Stockholders should make an independent investment decision whether to exercise their rights pursuant to the rights offering.

In addition, for the reasons set forth in more detail in the accompanying Proxy Statement, our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the three Class I director nominees and each of the four Class II director nominees (Proposal No. 1); “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 2); “1 YEAR” on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 3); “FOR” the approval and adoption of our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (Proposal No. 4); “FOR” the approval of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to (a) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio in the range of 1-for-35 to 1-for-100, with such ratio to be determined in the discretion of our board of directors and with such reverse stock split to be effected at such time and date, if at all, as determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion, and (b) reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock in a corresponding proportion to the reverse stock split, rounded to the nearest whole share (Proposal No. 5); “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 (Proposal No. 17); and “FOR” the adjournment of the meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes in favor of Proposal Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, or 16 (Proposal No. 18).

These items of business are more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement. Our board of directors has fixed the close of business on November 16, 2018 as the record date (the “record date”) for determination of the stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting and any postponements or adjournments of the Annual Meeting.

All stockholders are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. To assure your representation at the meeting, however, we urge you to vote by proxy as promptly as possible over the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions in the accompanying Proxy Statement. Of course, you may also vote by signing, dating, and returning the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed pre-addressed envelope. No postage is required if mailed in the United States. You may vote in person at the meeting even if you have previously returned a proxy.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC.

1431 Opus Place, Suite 530

Downers Grove, Illinois 60515

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

This Proxy Statement and the enclosed form of proxy are furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our board of directors for use at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”), and any postponements or adjournments thereof. The Annual Meeting will be held on December 19, 2018, beginning at 1:00 p.m. Central Time, at the Chicago Marriott Suites Downers Grove, 1500 Opus Place, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515. If you need directions to the location of the meeting, please call (630) 852-1500. We intend to mail this Proxy Statement and the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, proxy card, and our 2017 Annual Report to Stockholders (the “Annual Report”), on or about November 13, 2018. For information on how to vote your shares, see the instructions included on the proxy card and under “About the Meeting—If I am a stockholder of record of shares, how do I vote?” and “About the Meeting—If I am the beneficial owner of shares in street name, how do I vote?” below.

The information provided in the “question and answer” format below is for your convenience only and is merely a summary of the information contained in this Proxy Statement. You should read this entire Proxy Statement carefully.

In this Proxy Statement, our “company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” all refer to Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Our principal executive offices are located at 1431 Opus Place, Suite 530, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515, and our telephone number is (414) 615-1500. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available at our offices for a period of ten days prior to the meeting and at the meeting itself for examination by any stockholder.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on December 19, 2018. These proxy materials, which include the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, this Proxy Statement, and the Annual Report, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

ABOUT THE MEETING

What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to vote on the following items of business:

1

2

What are the recommendations of our board of directors?

After careful consideration and upon the recommendation of the special committee of our board of directors, consisting solely of independent directors, and for the reasons set forth in more detail in this Proxy Statement, our board of directors, other than Messrs. Kittle and Dobak, has unanimously (a) determined that the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock from 105,000,000 shares to 1,100,000,000 shares, the rights offering and the Standby Purchase Agreement, and the transactions contemplated thereby, and the amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation set forth in Proposal Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 are advisable and in the best interests of our company and our stockholders; and (b) approved and authorized the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of our common stock from 105,000,000 shares to 1,100,000,000 shares, the rights offering and the Standby Purchase Agreement, and the transactions contemplated thereby, and the amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation set forth in Proposal Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16.

After careful consideration and upon the recommendation of the special committee of our board of directors, consisting solely of independent directors, and for the reasons set forth in more detail in this Proxy Statement, our board of directors, other than Messrs. Kittle and Dobak, unanimously (a) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Authorized Share Increase Proposal (Proposal No. 6); (b) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Rights Offering Proposal (Proposal No. 7); (c) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal (Proposal No. 8); (d) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Written Consent Proposal (Proposal No. 9); (e) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal No. 10); (f) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Director Removal Proposal (Proposal No. 11); (g) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Certificate of Incorporation Amendment Proposal (Proposal No. 12); (h) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Bylaw Amendment Proposal (Proposal No. 13); (i) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Forum Selection Proposal (Proposal No. 14); (j) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Section 203 Opt-Out Proposal (Proposal No. 15); and (k) recommends that you vote “FOR” the Business Opportunity Proposal (Proposal No. 16). Messrs. Kittle and Dobak have not participated in any discussions regarding the terms of the rights offering or the Standby Purchase Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and have abstained from all votes related to Proposal Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16, and do not make any recommendation regarding Proposal Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16. Pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement, Elliott, who beneficially owned approximately 9.6% of our common stock as of November 6, 2018, has agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to vote (or cause to be voted) the shares of our common stock owned by it in favor of Proposal Nos. 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 at the Annual Meeting.

Neither our board of directors nor the special committee of our board of directors has made, nor will they make, any recommendation to stockholders regarding the exercise of rights pursuant to the rights offering. Stockholders should make an independent investment decision whether to exercise their rights pursuant to the rights offering.

In addition, for the reasons set forth in more detail in this Proxy Statement, our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the three Class I director nominees and each of the four Class II director nominees (Proposal No. 1); “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 2); “1 YEAR” on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 3); “FOR” the approval and adoption of our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (Proposal No. 4); “FOR” the Reverse Stock Split Proposal (Proposal No. 5); “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 (Proposal No. 17); and “FOR” the approval of the Meeting Adjournment Proposal (Proposal No. 18).

3

Who is entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting?

You are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting (and any postponements or adjournments thereof) if our records indicate that you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on November 16, 2018, the record date. The shares of common stock outstanding on November 16, 2018 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. You are entitled to one vote for each share held, and you may vote on each matter to come before the meeting. We do not have cumulative voting rights for the election of directors.

What is the difference between holding shares as a stockholder of record and as a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name”?

Stockholder of Record: If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the proxy materials will be sent directly to you. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name: If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other nominee, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the proxy materials will be forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. You are also invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote these shares in person at the Annual Meeting unless you request, complete, and deliver the proper documentation provided by your nominee and bring it with you to the Annual Meeting.

If I am a stockholder of record of shares, how do I vote?

If you are a stockholder of record, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy on the Internet, by telephone, or by mail, all as described below. We recommend that you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting so that your vote will be counted even if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting. You can always change your vote at the Annual Meeting. The Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate stockholders and to allow you to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone or on the Internet, you do not need to return a written proxy card by mail. The Internet and telephone voting facilities will close at 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on December 18, 2018.

By Internet: You may submit your proxy over the Internet by going to www.proxyvote.com and completing an electronic proxy card in accordance with the instructions provided on the proxy card. You will need the control number that appears on your proxy card included with this Proxy Statement.

By Telephone: You may submit your proxy by telephone in accordance with the instructions provided on the proxy card. You will need the control number that appears on your proxy card included with this Proxy Statement.

By Mail: You may choose to vote by mail by marking your proxy card, dating and signing it, and returning it in the postage-paid envelope provided by following the instructions on the proxy card. If the envelope is missing, please mail your completed proxy card to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Please allow sufficient time for mailing if you decide to vote by mail.

In Person: You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Valid, government issued photographic identification is required to enter the meeting. We will give you a ballot when you arrive.

4

If I am the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, how do I vote?

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may vote in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy on the Internet, by telephone, or by mail, by following the voting instructions you will receive from the holder of record, which is the brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other nominee holding your shares. You must follow these voting instructions to vote your shares. If you wish to vote in person at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a legal proxy from the holder of record. Valid, government issued photographic identification is required to enter the meeting.

Can I revoke my proxy and change my vote?

Yes. You may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the Annual Meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote by submitting another proxy on a later date on the Internet or by telephone (only your latest Internet or telephone proxy submitted prior to the Annual Meeting will be counted), or by signing and returning a new proxy card with a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. Your attendance at the Annual Meeting will not automatically revoke your proxy unless you vote again at the Annual Meeting or specifically request in writing that your prior proxy be revoked by providing a written notice of revocation to our secretary at Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., 1431 Opus Place, Suite 530, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you may change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to the holder of record following the instructions they provided or, if you have obtained a legal proxy from the holder of record giving you the right to vote your shares, by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

What if I don’t give specific voting instructions?

Stockholders of Record: If you are a stockholder of record and you indicate that you wish to vote as recommended by our board of directors, or you return a signed proxy card but do not specify how you wish to vote, then your shares will be voted “FOR” the election of each of the three Class I director nominees and each of the four Class II director nominees (Proposal No. 1); “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 2); “1 YEAR” on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 3); “FOR” the approval and adoption of our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (Proposal No. 4); “FOR” the Reverse Stock Split Proposal (Proposal No. 5); “FOR” the Authorized Share Increase Proposal (Proposal No. 6); “FOR” the Rights Offering Proposal (Proposal No. 7); “FOR” the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal (Proposal No. 8); “FOR” the Written Consent Proposal (Proposal No. 9); “FOR” the Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal No. 10); “FOR” the Director Removal Proposal (Proposal No. 11); “FOR” the Certificate of Incorporation Amendment Proposal (Proposal No. 12); “FOR” the Bylaw Amendment Proposal (Proposal No. 13); “FOR” the Forum Selection Proposal (Proposal No. 14); “FOR” the Section 203 Opt-Out Proposal (Proposal No. 15); “FOR” the Business Opportunity Proposal (Proposal No. 16); “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 (Proposal No. 17); and “FOR” the Meeting Adjournment Proposal (Proposal No. 18). If you indicate a choice with respect to any matter to be acted upon on your proxy card, your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions on such matter.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name: If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in street name and do not provide the organization that holds your shares with voting instructions, your broker or other nominee will vote your shares only on those proposals on which it has received instructions or on which it has discretion to vote; if your broker or nominee does not have discretion to vote, your returned proxy will be considered a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes will be considered as represented for purposes of determining a quorum, but are not counted for purposes of determining the number of votes cast with respect to a particular proposal. Your

5

broker or nominee does not have discretion to vote your shares on the non-routine matters such as the election of directors (Proposal No. 1), the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 2), the advisory vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 3), the proposal for the approval and adoption of our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (Proposal No. 4), the Reverse Stock Split Proposal (Proposal No. 5), the Authorized Share Increase Proposal (Proposal No. 6), the Rights Offering Proposal (Proposal No. 7), the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal (Proposal No. 8), the Written Consent Proposal (Proposal No. 9), the Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal No. 10), the Director Removal Proposal (Proposal No. 11), the Certificate of Incorporation Amendment Proposal (Proposal No. 12), the Bylaw Amendment Proposal (Proposal No. 13), the Forum Selection Proposal (Proposal No. 14), the Section 203 Opt-Out Proposal (Proposal No. 15), the Business Opportunity Proposal (Proposal No. 16), and the Meeting Adjournment Proposal (Proposal No. 18). However, your broker or nominee does have discretion to vote your shares on routine matters. The only routine matter at the Annual Meeting is the proposal for the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 (Proposal No. 17).

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

In accordance with Delaware law, only votes cast “for” a matter constitute affirmative votes. A properly executed proxy marked “abstain” with respect to any matter will not be voted, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Abstentions will have the same effect as negative votes for Proposal Nos. 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18. For Proposal No. 1, which is determined by a plurality of the votes cast, stockholders will only have the option to vote “for” or “withhold” and will not have the option to abstain. For Proposal No. 3, which is also determined by a plurality of the votes cast, abstentions will be considered a non-vote.

If you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, your broker or nominee will not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with respect to the election of directors (Proposal No. 1), the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 2), the advisory vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal No. 3), the proposal for the approval and adoption of our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (Proposal No. 4), the Reverse Stock Split Proposal (Proposal No. 5), the Authorized Share Increase Proposal (Proposal No. 6), the Rights Offering Proposal (Proposal No. 7), the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal (Proposal No. 8), the Written Consent Proposal (Proposal No. 9), the Special Meeting Proposal (Proposal No. 10), the Director Removal Proposal (Proposal No. 11), the Certificate of Incorporation Amendment Proposal (Proposal No. 12), the Bylaw Amendment Proposal (Proposal No. 13), the Forum Selection Proposal (Proposal No. 14), the Section 203 Opt-Out Proposal (Proposal No. 15), the Business Opportunity Proposal (Proposal No. 16), or the Meeting Adjournment Proposal (Proposal No. 18) without your instructions. Thus, if you do not give your broker or nominee specific instructions with respect to a non-discretionary matter, your shares will not be voted on such matter and will not be counted as shares entitled to vote on such matter. However, shares represented by such “broker non-votes” will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum. As “broker non-votes” are not considered entitled to vote on the proposal, they will have no effect on the outcome other than reducing the number of shares present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal from which a majority is calculated.

What is the effect of giving a proxy?

Proxies are solicited by and on behalf of our board of directors. The persons named in the proxy have been designated as proxies by our board of directors. When proxies are properly dated, executed, and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instruction of the stockholder. Except as described above with respect to broker non-votes, if no specific instructions are given, the shares will be voted in accordance with the recommendations of our board of directors as described above. If any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned, the proxy

6

holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date as well, unless you have properly revoked your proxy instructions.

What constitutes a quorum?

The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to vote on the record date will constitute a quorum, permitting the conduct of business at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions, broker non-votes (discussed above), and “withhold” votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting.

If the holders of less than a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote are represented at the meeting, a majority of the shares present at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another date, time, or place, and notice need not be given of the new date, time, or place if the new date, time, or place is announced at the meeting before an adjournment is taken.

What vote is required to approve each proposal?

Proposal No. 1 – Election of Directors. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast. This means that the three nominees receiving the largest number of affirmative votes of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal will be elected as the Class I directors and the four nominees receiving the largest number of affirmative votes of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal will be elected as the Class II directors.

Proposal No. 2 – Advisory Vote on the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding. However, our board of directors and compensation committee will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.

Proposal No. 3 – Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Stockholder Advisory Votes on the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers. A plurality of the votes cast will be required to approve the frequency with which we should seek future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. This means that the option receiving the highest number of affirmative votes of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal will be determined to be the preferred frequency. As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding. However, our board of directors and compensation committee will consider the choice that receives the most votes when making future decisions regarding the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

Proposal No. 4 – Approval and Adoption of our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve and adopt our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan.

Proposal No. 5 – Approval of the Reverse Stock Split Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Reverse Stock Split Proposal.

Proposal No. 6 – Approval of the Authorized Share Increase Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Authorized Share Increase Proposal.

7

Proposal No. 7 – Approval of the Rights Offering Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Rights Offering Proposal. In addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal, excluding the shares of our common stock held by Elliott, will be required to approve the Rights Offering Proposal.

Proposal No. 8 – Approval of the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal. In addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal, excluding the shares of our common stock held by Elliott, will be required to approve the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal.

Proposal No. 9 – Approval of the Written Consent Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Written Consent Proposal

Proposal No. 10 – Approval of the Special Meeting Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Special Meeting Proposal.

Proposal No. 11 – Approval of the Director Removal Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Director Removal Proposal.

Proposal No. 12 – Approval of the Certificate of Incorporation Amendment Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Certificate of Incorporation Amendment Proposal.

Proposal No. 13 – Approval of the Bylaw Amendment Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Bylaw Amendment Proposal.

Proposal No. 14 – Approval of the Forum Selection Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Forum Selection Proposal.

Proposal No. 15 – Approval of the Section 203 Opt-Out Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Section 203 Opt-Out Proposal.

Proposal No. 16 – Approval of the Business Opportunity Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Business Opportunity Proposal.

Proposal No. 17 – Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.

8

Proposal No. 18 – Approval of the Meeting Adjournment Proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required to approve the Meeting Adjournment Proposal.

If any other matter is properly submitted to the stockholders at the annual meeting, its adoption generally will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on that matter.

If the Rights Offering Proposal (Proposal No. 7) is approved by the stockholders, but the Authorized Share Increase Proposal (Proposal No. 6) or the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal (Proposal No. 8) are not approved by the stockholders, will the company still conduct the rights offering?

No. If the Rights Offering Proposal is approved by the stockholders, but the Authorized Share Increase Proposal or the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal are not approved by our stockholders, the company will not conduct the rights offering. If the Authorized Share Increase Proposal is not approved by our stockholders, we will not have a sufficient number of authorized shares of our common stock to issue upon the exercise of rights, which will make it impossible to consummate the rights offering as currently contemplated. If the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal is not approved by our stockholders, we do not intend to conduct the rights offering because we would not be certain that the rights offering, absent the backstop commitment (as defined herein), would be fully subscribed to raise the $450 million. In addition, pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement, the Written Consent Proposal, the Special Meeting Proposal, the Director Removal Proposal, the Certificate of Incorporation Amendment Proposal, the Bylaw Amendment Proposal, the Forum Selection Proposal, the Section 203 Opt-Out Proposal, and the Business Opportunity Proposal must be approved by our stockholders as a condition to Elliott’s obligation to provide the backstop commitment. As a result, if our stockholders do not approve any of the Written Consent Proposal, the Special Meeting Proposal, the Director Removal Proposal, the Certificate of Incorporation Amendment Proposal, the Bylaw Amendment Proposal, the Forum Selection Proposal, the Section 203 Opt-Out Proposal, or the Business Opportunity Proposal, and Elliott does not waive such condition, the company will not conduct the rights offering because we would not receive the backstop commitment from Elliott and would not be certain that the rights offering would be fully subscribed to raise the $450 million.

If the Rights Offering Proposal (Proposal No. 7) is approved by the stockholders and the company conducts the rights offering, am I required to exercise the rights I receive in the rights offering?

No. If the Rights Offering Proposal (Proposal No. 7) is approved by the requisite stockholder vote, and the company conducts the rights offering, you may exercise any number of your rights or you may choose not to exercise any rights.

Why am I being asked to vote on the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal (Proposal No. 8) to approve the issuance and sale of our common stock to Elliott pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement?

Section 312.03 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual requires us to obtain stockholder approval prior to issuing securities that will result in a change in control. This rule does not specifically define when a change in control of an issuer may be deemed to occur. However, guidance suggests that a change in control may be deemed to occur, subject to certain limited exceptions, if, after a transaction, a person or entity will hold 20% or more of an issuer’s then outstanding capital stock. As of November 6, 2018, Elliott beneficially owned approximately 9.6% of our issued and outstanding common stock. Following consummation of the rights offering and backstop commitment (as defined herein), depending on the number of unsubscribed shares of our common stock Elliott purchases pursuant to the backstop commitment, Elliott may be deemed to beneficially own 20% or more of our issued and outstanding common stock. See Proposal No. 8—Approval of the Standby Purchase Agreement Proposal for further discussion.

9

How can I receive my proxy materials electronically in the future?

Although we are delivering paper copies of the proxy materials this year, we may send proxy materials to stockholders electronically going forward. Stockholders who sign up to receive proxy materials electronically will receive an e-mail prior to next year’s annual meeting with links to the proxy materials, which may give them faster delivery of the materials and will help us save printing and mailing costs and conserve natural resources. Your election to receive proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate your election. To receive proxy materials electronically by e-mail in the future, follow the instructions described below.

If you would like to sign up to receive proxy materials electronically in the future, please have your proxy card available and register using one of the following choices:

Stockholders of Record: If you are a stockholder of record of shares, please go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions for requesting meeting materials.

Street Name Holders: If you are a beneficial owner of shares in street name, you may either go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions to enroll for electronic delivery or contact your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other nominee that holds your shares.

What does it mean if I receive more than one notice?

This means that your shares are registered differently and are held in more than one account. To ensure that all shares are voted, please either vote each account over the Internet or by telephone or sign and return by mail all proxy cards. We encourage you to register all of your shares in the same name and address by contacting the Shareholder Services Department at our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, at (800) 937-5449. If you hold your shares through an account with a bank or broker, you should contact your bank or broker and request consolidation of your accounts.

What is “householding” and how does it affect me?

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries, such as brokers, to satisfy the delivery requirements for proxy statements and annual reports with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single set of proxy materials addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially means extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies.

If you and other stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of our proxy materials and would like to participate in our householding program, please contact Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. by calling toll-free at (800) 542-1061, or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. Alternatively, if you participate in householding and wish to revoke your consent and receive separate copies of our proxy materials, please contact Broadridge as described above. In addition, we will promptly deliver, upon the written or oral request to Broadridge at the address or telephone number above, a separate copy of our proxy materials to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the documents was delivered.

A number of brokerage firms have instituted householding. If you hold your shares in street name, please contact your bank, broker, or other holder of record to request information about householding.

Who will count the vote?

Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. will act as the inspector of elections and will tabulate the votes.

10

When will the voting results be announced?

Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting and final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed within four business days after the Annual Meeting. If final voting results are not available to us in time to include them in such Current Report on Form 8-K, we will file a Current Report on Form 8-K to publish preliminary results and will provide the final results in an amendment to the Current Report on Form 8-K as soon as final results become available.

Who will pay for the solicitation of proxies?

We will pay the cost of soliciting proxies. In addition to the use of mail, our employees may solicit proxies personally, by e-mail, facsimile, and by telephone. Our employees will receive no compensation for soliciting proxies other than their regular salaries. We may request banks, brokers, and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries to forward copies of the proxy materials to the beneficial owners of our common stock and to request authority for the execution of proxies, and we may reimburse such persons for their expenses incurred in connection with these activities.

Who should I contact if I have any questions about the proxy materials or voting?

If you have any questions about the proxy materials or if you need assistance submitting your proxy or voting your shares or need additional copies of this proxy statement or the enclosed proxy card, you should contact Innisfree M&A Incorporated, the proxy solicitation agent, toll-free at (888) 750-5834.

11

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information set forth in this Proxy Statement may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements, other than statements of historical fact, included in this Proxy Statement regarding our strategy, prospects, plans, objectives, future operations, future revenue and earnings, projected margins and expenses, markets for our services, potential acquisitions or strategic alliances, financial position, and liquidity and anticipated cash needs and availability are forward-looking statements. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “projects,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions or the negatives thereof are intended to identify forward-looking statements. However, not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements represent our current reasonable expectations and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, and achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We cannot guarantee the accuracy of the forward-looking statements, and you should be aware that results and events could differ materially and adversely from those contained in the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, those described in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on September 19, 2018, and the following:

12

We urge you to consider these factors and to review carefully the section captioned “Risk Factors” in our Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on September 19, 2018 for a more complete discussion of the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the applicable cautionary statements. The forward-looking statements included in this Proxy Statement are made only as of their respective dates, and we undertake no obligation to update these statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

13

PROPOSAL NO. 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our board of directors, which is currently comprised of ten directors. Our board of directors is divided into three classes with staggered three-year terms. Only one class of directors will be elected at each annual meeting of our stockholders, with the other classes continuing for the remainder of their respective three-year terms.

On April 16, 2018, Mark A. DiBlasi, Scott D. Rued, and Judith A. Vijums resigned from our board of directors. On April 17, 2018, our board of directors elected Michael L. Gettle, our President, Chief Operating Officer, and Secretary, to serve as a Class III director to fill one of the vacancies created by the resignations described above. On April 17, 2018, our board of directors also approved a reduction in the size of our board of directors from twelve members to ten members.

Our directors are currently divided among the three classes as follows:

Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one-third of our directors. The division of our board of directors into three classes with staggered three-year terms may delay or prevent a change of our management or a change in control.

Because we did not hold an annual meeting of stockholders in 2017 due to the restatement of our financial statements, the three Class I directorships and four Class II directorships are up for election at the Annual Meeting. Each person elected as a Class I director at the Annual Meeting will serve a two-year term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2020 or until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified, and each person elected as a Class II director at the Annual Meeting will serve a three-year term expiring at the annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2021 or until their respective successors have been duly elected and qualified. Our board of directors has nominated Christopher L. Doerr, Brian C. Murray, and James D. Staley for reelection as Class I directors at the Annual Meeting and Scott L. Dobak, Curtis W. Stoelting, William S. Urkiel, and Michael P. Ward for reelection as Class II directors at the Annual Meeting.

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast, and the three nominees who receive the largest number of affirmative votes of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote will be elected as the Class I directors and the four nominees who receive the largest number of affirmative votes of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote will be elected as the Class II directors. Withheld and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the election.

Our board of directors has no reason to believe that any of its nominees will refuse or be unable to accept election. However, if any nominee is unable to accept election or if any other unforeseen contingencies should arise, our board of directors may designate a substitute nominee. If our board of directors designates a substitute nominee, the persons named as proxies will vote for the substitute nominee designated by our board of directors.

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees named herein.

14

The following table, together with the accompanying text, sets forth the names and certain other information as of November 6, 2018 for each of the nominees for election as a director and for each of the continuing members of our board of directors.

Nominees for Class I Director

Christopher L. Doerr has served as a director of our company since October 2010. Mr. Doerr is currently the sole member of Passage Partners, LLC, a private investment company. Mr. Doerr served as Co-Chief Executive Officer of Sterling Aviation Holdings, Inc., an aircraft management and charter company, from 2004 to 2014. From 2009 to 2011, Mr. Doerr served as Executive Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Karl’s Rental, Inc., a global manufacturer and supplier of portable event structures and related equipment. Prior to that, Mr. Doerr served as President and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Leeson Electric Corporation from 1986 to 2001. Mr. Doerr currently serves on the board of directors and compensation committee of Regal Beloit Corporation (NYSE: RBC), a publicly traded manufacturer of commercial, industrial, and HVAC electric motors, electric generators and controls, and mechanical motion control products. Mr. Doerr was nominated to our board of directors because of his proven business acumen and executive and operational experience, having served as the chief executive officer of several companies, and because of his experience on other public company boards of directors.

Brian C. Murray has served as a director of our company since August 2015. Effective June 1, 2018, Mr. Murray was appointed the Chief Executive Officer of Ryan Companies US, Inc., a national firm providing real estate services including architecture and engineering, development, construction, capital markets and real estate management. Previously, Mr. Murray served as Chief Financial Officer of Ryan Companies since November 2009 and as Chief Operating Officer of Ryan Companies since May 2014. Prior to joining Ryan Companies, Mr. Murray held various positions with UnitedHealth Group, Inc., most recently serving as the Chief Financial Officer of its Specialized Care Services division. Mr. Murray was nominated to our board of directors because of his expertise with accounting and audit matters, his deep understanding of financial reporting rules and regulations, and his experience with executive functions as a chief financial officer.

James D. Staley has served as the chairman of our board of directors since November 2017 and has been a director of our company since October 2010. Mr. Staley previously served as the lead independent director of our board of directors from December 2016 to November 2017. Mr. Staley is presently retired. From 2004 through December 2007, Mr. Staley served in various capacities for YRC Worldwide, Inc. (NASDAQ: YRCW) and its

15

subsidiaries, one of the world’s largest transportation services providers, including as President and Chief Executive Officer of Roadway Group and YRC Regional Transportation. Prior to that, Mr. Staley served for over 30 years in various capacities for Roadway Express, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Staley currently serves as the Lead Director and on the audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance committees of Douglas Dynamics, Inc. (NYSE: PLOW), a designer, manufacturer, and seller of snow and ice control equipment for light trucks. Mr. Staley was nominated to our board of directors because of his executive and operational experience with a public company in the transportation industry, and his experience on other public company boards of directors.

Nominees for Class II Director

Scott L. Dobak has served as a director of our company since June 2017. Mr. Dobak currently serves as the Chief Executive Officer of Dicom Transportation Group, where he has been employed since January 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Dobak served in various leadership roles with our company from January 2007 to December 2013, most recently serving as our President—Less-than-Truckload and Transportation Management Solutions. Mr. Dobak was nominated to our board of directors in connection with our entry into an Investment Agreement, dated May 1, 2017 (the “Investment Agreement”), with Elliott, and because of his proven business acumen, his executive and operational experience in the transportation industry, and his familiarity with our business.

Curtis W. Stoelting has served as our Chief Executive Officer since April 2017 and has been a director of our company since January 2016. Mr. Stoelting previously served as our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer from April 2017 until March 2018 and our President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2016 until April 2017. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Stoelting served as the Chief Executive Officer and a director of TOMY International (formerly RC2 Corporation) from January 2003 to March 2013. RC2 Corporation (NASDAQ: RCRC) was acquired by TOMY Company, Ltd. in April 2011. Mr. Stoelting previously served as RC2’s Chief Operating Officer from 2000 to 2003, Executive Vice President from 1998 to 2000 and Chief Financial Officer from 1994 to 1998. Prior to that, Mr. Stoelting was with Arthur Andersen for 12 years. Mr. Stoelting currently serves on the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee of Regal-Beloit Corporation (NYSE: RBC), a publicly traded manufacturer of commercial, industrial, and HVAC electric motors, electric generators and controls, and mechanical motion control products. Mr. Stoelting was nominated to our board of directors because of his role as our chief executive officer, which enables him to provide the board with insight based on his day-to-day interactions with our company, and because of his operational expertise. As a management representative on our board of directors, Mr. Stoelting provides an insider’s perspective in board discussions about the business and strategic direction of our company.

William S. Urkiel has served as a director of our company since May 2010. Mr. Urkiel currently serves on the board of directors and audit committee of Crown Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CCK), where he has been a director since December 2004. Mr. Urkiel served as a director of Suntron Corporation from August 2006 until June 2013. From May 1999 until January 2005, Mr. Urkiel served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of IKON Office Solutions. From February 1995 until April 1999, Mr. Urkiel served as the Corporate Controller and Chief Financial Officer at AMP Incorporated. Prior to 1999, Mr. Urkiel held various financial management positions at IBM Corporation. Mr. Urkiel was nominated to our board of directors because of his financial and accounting expertise evidenced by his position as chief financial officer of multiple companies, his knowledge of corporate finance, accounting principles, and audit procedures, as well as his corporate governance experience.

Michael P. Ward has served as a director of our company since February 2016. Mr. Ward currently serves as an equity analyst at Williams Research Partners, where he has been employed since 2018. Prior to that time, Mr. Ward served as a Managing Director at Seaport Global Securities between 2016 and 2017 and, between 2011 and 2016, Mr. Ward served as a Managing Director at Sterne Agee CRT. From 2005 to 2011, Mr. Ward was President of Ward Transportation Research, an independent research boutique which specialized in the automotive and transportation sectors. Prior to that time, Mr. Ward worked for major Wall Street brokerage firms for 10 years, including Kidder, Peabody & Co., PaineWebber, and Salomon Smith Barney. Mr. Ward was nominated to our board of directors because of his proven business acumen and his extensive expertise as a sell-side analyst following the auto and auto parts sectors.

16

Continuing Directors

Michael L. Gettle has served as our President, Chief Operating Officer, and Secretary since April 2017 and has been a director of our company since April 2018. Mr. Gettle previously served as our Executive Vice President from May 2016 until April 2017. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Gettle served as Americas Chief Executive Officer of TNS, a division of British multinational WPP plc from January 2013 to May 2016 and as Global Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer from October 2008 to December 2012. Prior to that time, Mr. Gettle served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Millward Brown from 1992 to October 2008. Prior to joining Millward Brown, Mr. Gettle served in various positions with Arthur Andersen LLP for nine years. Mr. Gettle was nominated to our board of directors because of his role as our president and chief operating officer, which enables him to provide the board with insight based on his day-to-day interactions with our company, and because of his operational expertise. As a management representative on our board of directors, Mr. Gettle provides an insider’s perspective in board discussions about the business and strategic direction of our company.

John G. Kennedy, III has served as a director of our company since December 2012. Mr. Kennedy served as Senior Advisor and Managing Director and Head of Capital Markets at Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. Securities, Inc., an integrated energy investment and merchant bank, from 2010 until 2017. Mr. Kennedy currently serves as a Manager for TMX Finance LLC. Mr. Kennedy has more than 30 years of experience in investment banking. Mr. Kennedy served as a Managing Director of Deutsche Bank’s investment banking group and served as a Managing Director of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette until its sale to Credit Suisse First Boston. Mr. Kennedy has served or currently serves as trustee or director of various private companies, foundations, and not-for-profit institutions. Mr. Kennedy was nominated to our board of directors because of his proven business acumen and his extensive banking and capital markets experience.

Ralph (“Cody”) W. Kittle III has served as a director of our company since June 2017. Mr. Kittle currently serves as an investment professional with Elliott Management Corporation, where he has been employed since August 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Kittle served as an associate at Wind Point Partners, a private equity firm based in Chicago, and in Investment Banking at J.P. Morgan, where he focused on mergers and acquisitions in the industrial and consumer industries. Mr. Kittle was nominated to our board of directors in connection with the Investment Agreement and because of his significant business and investment experience across a wide range of industries, including in the transportation and logistics sectors, as well as experience with financial and operational matters for businesses.

17

BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Independence of Directors

Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”). Under the rules of the NYSE, independent directors must comprise a majority of a listed company’s board of directors.

Our board of directors has undertaken a review of its composition, the composition of its committees, and the independence of each director. Based upon all of the relevant facts and circumstances, including information requested from and provided by each director concerning his or her background, employment, and affiliations, including family relationships, our board of directors has affirmatively determined that each of Messrs. Dobak, Doerr, Kennedy, Murray, Staley, Urkiel, and Ward is “independent” as that term is defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing requirements and rules of the NYSE. Accordingly, a majority of our directors are independent, as required under applicable NYSE rules. Our board of directors found that none of these directors had a material or other disqualifying relationship with our company. In making this determination, our board of directors considered the current and prior relationships that each non-employee director has with our company and all other facts and circumstances our board of directors deemed relevant in determining their independence, including each non-employee director’s beneficial ownership of our capital stock. Messrs. Stoelting and Gettle are not considered independent directors as a result of their positions as executive officers of our company. Mr. Kittle is not considered “independent” as a result of his relationship with Elliott, which beneficially owned approximately 9.6% of our outstanding common stock and all of our outstanding preferred stock as of November 6, 2018. In addition to dividend payments on the preferred stock, we paid to Elliott a daily payment from the closing of the preferred stock investment on May 2, 2017 until the repayment of the Series F preferred stock on July 21, 2017, which totaled $2.7 million.

There are no family relationships among any of our directors, director nominees, or executive officers.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our board of directors has the authority to appoint committees to perform certain management and administration functions. Our board of directors has an audit committee, a compensation committee, and a nominating/corporate governance committee. The composition and responsibilities of each committee are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by the board of directors.

Audit Committee

The current members of our audit committee are Messrs. Murray (chairman), Kennedy, and Urkiel, each of whom satisfies the independence requirements under the NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3(b)(1) of the Exchange Act. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Murray is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of SEC regulations. Each member of our audit committee can read and understand fundamental financial statements in accordance with audit committee requirements. In arriving at this determination, our board of directors has examined each audit committee member’s professional experience and the nature of their employment in the corporate finance sector. Our audit committee held 48 meetings during fiscal 2017 and 11 meetings during fiscal 2016.

Our audit committee assists our board of directors with oversight of matters relating to accounting, internal control, auditing, financial reporting, risk, and legal and regulatory compliance. The committee oversees the audit and other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm and is directly responsible for the appointment, independence, qualifications, compensation, and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm, which reports directly to the committee. The committee also oversees our

18

internal audit function. The audit committee has the following responsibilities, among other things, as set forth in the audit committee charter:

Compensation Committee

The current members of our compensation committee are Messrs. Ward (chairman), Dobak, Doerr, Staley, and Urkiel, each of whom our board of directors has determined to be independent under the NYSE listing standards, including the enhanced independence for members of the compensation committee, a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and an “outside director” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Our compensation committee held four meetings during fiscal 2017 and four meetings during fiscal 2016.

Our compensation committee approves the compensation of our chief executive officer and our other executive officers, administers our executive benefit plans, including the granting of awards under our incentive compensation plan, and advises our board of directors on director compensation. The compensation committee has the following responsibilities, among other things, as set forth in the compensation committee’s charter:

19

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

The current members of our nominating/corporate governance committee are Messrs. Staley (chairman), Dobak, Doerr, and Kennedy, each of whom our board of directors has determined to be independent under the NYSE listing standards. Our nominating/corporate governance committee held three meetings during fiscal 2017 and two meetings during fiscal 2016.

Our nominating/corporate governance committee identifies individuals qualified to become members of our board of directors, recommends candidates for election or reelection to our board of directors, oversees the evaluation of our board of directors, and advises our board of directors regarding committee composition and structure and other corporate governance matters. The nominating/corporate governance committee has the following responsibilities, among other things, as set forth in the nominating/corporate governance committee’s charter:

Identifying and Evaluating Director Candidates

Our nominating/corporate governance committee identifies and evaluates nominees for our board of directors, including nominees recommended by stockholders, based on numerous factors it considers appropriate, some of which may include strength of character, mature judgment, career specialization, relevant technical skills, diversity, and the extent to which the nominee would fill a present need on our board of directors. Our nominating/corporate governance committee evaluates nominees for director in the same manner, regardless of whether the nominee is recommended by a stockholder or other person or entity.

In making its selection of director candidates, our nominating/corporate governance committee bears in mind that the foremost responsibility of a director is to represent the interests of our stockholders as a whole. Directors are expected to exemplify the highest standards of personal and professional integrity and to constructively challenge management through their active participation and questioning. In consideration of these expectations, our nominating/corporate governance committee seeks directors with established strong professional reputations and expertise in areas relevant to the strategy and operations of our company. The activities and associations of candidates are reviewed for any legal impediment, conflict of interest, or other consideration that might prevent service on our board of directors.

The charter of our nominating/corporate governance committee provides that the value of diversity on our board of directors should be considered, and our nominating/corporate governance committee includes diversity

20

as one of its criteria for board composition. While we do not have a formal policy outlining the diversity standards to be considered when evaluating director candidates, our objective is to foster diversity of thought on our board of directors. To accomplish that objective, our nominating/corporate governance committee considers ethnic and gender diversity, as well as differences in perspective, professional experience, education, skill, and other qualities in the context of the needs of our board of directors. Our nominating/corporate governance committee evaluates its effectiveness in achieving diversity on the board of directors through its annual review of board member composition.

Our nominating/corporate governance committee will consider persons recommended by stockholders for inclusion as nominees for election to our board of directors if the information required by our bylaws is submitted in writing in a timely manner addressed and delivered to our secretary at Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., 1431 Opus Place, Suite 530, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515.

Availability of Corporate Governance Information

Our board of directors has adopted charters for our audit, compensation, and nominating/corporate governance committees describing the authority and responsibilities delegated to these committees by our board of directors. Our board of directors has also adopted corporate governance guidelines, a whistle blower policy, a code of business conduct and ethics, and a code of ethics for our chief executive officer and senior financial officers. We post on our website, at www.rrts.com, the charters of our audit, compensation, and nominating/corporate governance committees; our corporate governance guidelines; our whistle blower policy; our code of business conduct and ethics; our code of ethics for our chief executive officer and senior financial officers, and any amendments or waivers thereto. These documents are also available in print to any stockholder requesting a copy in writing from our secretary at Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., 1431 Opus Place, Suite 530, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515.

Communication with our Board of Directors

Interested parties may communicate with our board of directors or specific members of our board of directors, including the members of our various board committees, by submitting a letter addressed to the board of directors of Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., c/o any specified individual director or directors, at 1431 Opus Place, Suite 530, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515. We will forward any such letters to the indicated directors.

Meeting Attendance Information for the Board of Directors and Committees

Our board of directors held 21 meetings during fiscal 2017. All of our directors serving during 2017 attended at least 75% of the aggregate of (i) the total number of meetings of the board of directors held during the period each director served as a director in 2017, and (ii) the total number of meetings held by all committees of our board of directors during the period each director served as a director in 2017 and on which such person served during 2017.

While we do not have a specific policy requiring our directors to attend annual meetings of stockholders, we encourage our directors to attend such meetings and, in furtherance of this, we schedule a meeting of our board of directors on the same day as the annual meeting of stockholders. As we did not hold a 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, there was no annual meeting last year for our directors to attend; however, all of our directors serving at the time of our 2016 annual meeting attended the 2016 annual meeting.

Executive Sessions

We regularly schedule executive sessions in which non-management directors meet without the presence or participation of management. The chairman of our board of directors serves as the presiding director of such executive sessions.

21

Board Leadership Structure

We separate the roles of chief executive officer and chairman of the board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. Our chief executive officer, with guidance from the chairman of the board, develops the business strategy for our company and is responsible for the day-to-day leadership and performance of our company. The chairman of our board helps determine our company’s strategic direction and provides leadership for our board of directors. Our board of directors believes that separating these roles is in the best interests of our stockholders because it provides the appropriate balance between strategy development, flow of information between management and our board of directors, and oversight of management. By segregating the role of the chairman, we reduce any duplication of effort between the chief executive officer and the chairman. We believe this provides guidance for our board of directors, while also positioning our chief executive officer as the leader of our company in the eyes of our customers, employees, and other stakeholders. By having another director serve as chairman of our board of directors, Mr. Stoelting is better able to focus his attention on running our company. Our board of directors believes that Mr. Staley is the most appropriate individual to serve as chairman because of his experience in our industry, his deep knowledge of our business and strategy, and his experience with corporate governance matters.

Our board of directors has seven independent members and three non-independent members. A number of our independent board members are currently serving or have served as members of senior management of other public companies, including companies within our industry, and have served as directors of other public companies. We believe that the number of independent, experienced directors that make up our board of directors benefits our company and our stockholders.

We believe that we have a strong corporate governance structure that ensures independent discussion and evaluation of, communication with, and access to senior management. All of our board committees are composed solely of independent directors, which provides independent oversight of management. Also, our corporate governance guidelines provide that our non-management directors will meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions, generally in connection with regularly scheduled board meetings.

Role of the Board of Directors in Risk Management and Oversight

While our management is primarily responsible for managing risk, our board of directors and each of its committees plays a role in overseeing our risk management practices. The role of our board of directors in our company’s risk oversight process includes receiving reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to our company, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks. Our board of directors receives these reports from the appropriate executive within our organization to enable it to understand our risk identification, risk management, and risk mitigation strategies. This direct communication from management enables our board of directors to coordinate its risk oversight role, particularly with respect to risk interrelationships within our organization. Our board of directors believes that its leadership structure has the effect of enhancing its risk oversight function because of the chairman’s direct involvement in risk oversight matters and his strong efforts to increase open communication regarding risk issues among directors and the committees of our board of directors. Our board of directors also believes that Mr. Staley’s knowledge of our company’s business, industry, and risks significantly contributes to our board of directors’ understanding and appreciation of risk issues.

Our board of directors allocates responsibility for overseeing risk management for our company among the board and each of its committees. Specifically, the full board oversees significant risks primarily relating to operations, strategy, and finance. In addition, each of our committees considers risks within its area of responsibilities, as follows:

22

Through the activities of our audit, compensation, and nominating/corporate governance committees, as well as our board of directors’ interactions with management concerning our business and the material risks that may impact our company, our board of directors is able to monitor our risk management process and offer critical insights to our management.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

In 2017, Messrs. Urkiel, Dobak, Doerr, Staley, and Ward served as members of our compensation committee. During such fiscal year, none of these individuals had any relationship requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

None of Messrs. Urkiel, Doerr, Staley or Ward has, at any time, been an officer or employee of our company. Mr. Dobak served in various leadership roles with our company from January 2007 to December 2013, most recently as our President—Less-than-Truckload and Transportation Management Solutions. During 2017, none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee or board of directors of any entity whose executive officers serve as a member of our board of directors or compensation committee.

Related Party Transaction Policies and Procedures

It is the responsibility of our board of directors, with the assistance of our audit committee, to review and approve related party transactions. It is our management’s responsibility to bring such related party transactions to the attention of our board of directors. From time to time our nominating/corporate governance committee, in accordance with its charter, will also review potential conflict of interest transactions involving members of our board of directors and our executive officers.

Application of NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards

If Elliott owns more than 50% of our common stock following consummation of the rights offering, we will be a controlled company within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards. Under the NYSE listing standards, a controlled company may elect to not comply with certain NYSE corporate governance standards, including the requirements that (i) a majority of the board of directors consist of independent directors, (ii) it maintain a nominating and corporate governance committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a

23

written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities, (iii) it maintain a compensation committee that is composed entirely of independent directors with a written charter addressing the committee’s purpose and responsibilities, and (iv) the requirement for an annual performance evaluation of the nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees. If Elliott owns more than 50% of our common stock following the consummation of the rights offering, we may utilize any of these exemptions and others afforded to controlled companies. Consequently, you may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance rules and requirements. Our status as a controlled company could make our common stock less attractive to some investors or otherwise harm our stock price.

24

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

We use a combination of cash and share-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve on our board of directors. In setting director compensation, we consider the amount of time that directors spend fulfilling their duties as a director, including committee assignments.

We seek to provide director compensation packages that are customary for boards of directors for similarly situated companies. For fiscal 2017, we paid each independent director an annual cash retainer of $35,000, payable quarterly. Payments to directors are prorated for service provided for partial years. In addition, for fiscal 2017, our lead independent director received an annual cash retainer of $20,000, the chairman of our audit committee received an annual cash retainer of $7,500, the chairman of our compensation committee received an annual cash retainer of $5,000, and the chairman of our nominating/corporate governance committee received an annual cash retainer of $3,000. In May 2018, our board of directors approved an increase, effective July 1, 2018, to the annual cash compensation payable to the independent directors, which provides each independent director with an annual cash retainer of $60,000. The increase also provides the chairman of the board of directors with an annual cash retainer of $20,000, the chairman of our audit committee with an annual cash retainer of $15,000, the chairman of our compensation committee with an annual cash retainer of $10,000, the chairman of our nominating/corporate governance committee with an annual cash retainer of $6,750, and each committee member an additional annual cash retainer of $2,500.

In February 2017, each of our independent directors received a grant of 7,613 restricted stock units (“RSUs”) having a value on the grant date of $55,000 based upon the 20-day trailing average closing sales price for our common stock as of the grant date. Each RSU is equal in value to one share of our common stock, and the RSUs vest 25% each year over four years. Each independent director generally must remain a member of our board of directors through the end of the relevant vesting period in order to receive any amount of the RSUs covered by that award, except that recipients may be entitled to accelerated delivery of a portion of unvested RSUs in the case of the recipient’s death or disability, or upon a change in control.

We also reimburse each director for travel and related expenses incurred in connection with attendance at board and committee meetings.

Our non-independent directors are not compensated for service as directors.

Director Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2017

The following table sets forth the compensation earned by our independent directors in respect of their services as a director or committee chair during fiscal 2017.

25

The following table lists all outstanding stock awards held by our independent directors as of December 31, 2017:

26

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 6, 2018 by the following:

Beneficial ownership is determined according to the rules of the SEC and generally means that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he, she, or it possesses sole or shared voting or investment power of that security, including options and warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of November 6, 2018 and RSUs that are currently vested or will be vested within 60 days of November 6, 2018. Shares issuable pursuant to options, warrants, and RSUs are deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of the person holding such options, warrants, or RSUs but are not deemed outstanding for computing the percentage of any other person. Except as indicated by the footnotes below, we believe, based on the information furnished to us, that the persons named in the table below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable. The information does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Our calculation of the percentage of beneficial ownership is based on 38,515,600 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 6, 2018.

Except as otherwise indicated, the address of each person listed in the table is c/o Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc., 1431 Opus Place, Suite 530, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515.

27

28

29

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership. Directors, executive officers, and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon our review of the copies of such forms that we received during the year ended December 31, 2017, and written representations that no other reports were required, we believe that each person who at any time during such year was a director, executive officer, or beneficial owner of more than 10% of our common stock complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements during the year ended December 31, 2017, except that (i) the Form 3 filed by Mr. Cousins on February 8, 2017 was late; (ii) the Form 4 filed by Mr. Goodgion on May 9, 2017 was late; (iii) the Form 4 filed by Mr. Hurst on February 5, 2018 was late; (iv) the Form 4 filed by Mr. Rogers on May 25, 2017 was late; and (v) the Form 3 filed by Mr. Milane on March 23, 2018 was late.

30

MANAGEMENT

The following table, together with the accompanying text, sets forth the names and certain other information as of November 6, 2018 for each of our executive officers.

Curtis W. Stoelting’s biography is set forth under the heading “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors” above.

Michael L. Gettle’s biography is set forth under the heading “Proposal No. 1—Election of Directors” above.

Terence R. Rogers has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since May 2017. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Rogers served as the Chief Financial Officer of The Heico Companies, LLC, the parent company for a diversified portfolio of over 35 businesses, from April 2012 to February 2017. Prior to that time, Mr. Rogers served in various financial positions with Ryerson Inc., a leading distributor and value-added processor of industrial metals, from December 1994 to April 2012, most recently as Chief Financial Officer.

Scott B. Cousins has served as our Chief Information Officer since January 2017. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Cousins served as the Chief Information Officer of KeHE from 2007 to 2017 and NCH Marketing Services from 2005 to 2007. Prior to that time, Mr. Cousins served as Senior Vice President of Information Technology at IndyMac Bank from 2004 to 2005. Prior to joining IndyMac Bank, Mr. Cousins was an Associate Partner at Accenture for 14 years. On October 16, 2018, Mr. Cousins resigned as our Chief Information Officer effective October 26, 2018.

Robert M. Milane has served as our Chief Compliance Officer since April 2017 and as our General Counsel since November 2015. Mr. Milane has also served as our Executive Vice President of Risk Management since November 2015. Mr. Milane served as our Vice President of Risk Management from June 2014 to October 2015. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Milane served as Managing Director for Risk Management at FedEx Ground from 1999 to 2010 and as Assistant Vice President of Risk Management for Canal Insurance from 2011 to 2013.

Frank L. Hurst has served as our President—Roadrunner Freight since June 2017. Mr. Hurst previously served as our Senior Vice President of Sales and Marketing of Roadrunner Freight from January 2017 to June 2017. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Hurst served as VP/GM for North American Corporation, a distributor of packaging products, equipment, and service based in Glenview, Illinois, from January 2014 to December 2016. From August 2012 to December 2013, Mr. Hurst served as Executive Vice President for Vitran Express, where he was responsible for the turnaround, sale, and transition of the US LTL operation. Prior to joining Vitran Express, Mr. Hurst spent 16 years at FedEx Freight, where he was most recently served as VP—Divisional Operations from July 2007 to August 2012.

31

William R. Goodgion has served as our President—Ascent Global Logistics since April 2015. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Goodgion served as Managing Director—Operations (Central Region) for FedEx Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage, Inc., a subsidiary of FedEx Corporation, from December 2014 through April 2015, and as Managing Director—Global Distribution & Surface Transportation for FedEx Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage, Inc. from March 2000 through April 2015.

Patrick K. McKay has served as our Senior Vice President—Enterprise Fleet Services since February 2017 and was previously our President—Truckload Logistics from July 2014 until February 2017 and our President—Truckload Services from March 2012 to July 2014. Prior to joining our company, Mr. McKay served as a General Manager—Operations for the van truckload division of Schneider National, Inc. from 2008 to 2012. Prior to that, Mr. McKay held various leadership positions with FedEx Ground, Inc. from 1992 to 2008, most recently serving as a Division Managing Director.

Craig T. Paulson has served as our Senior Vice President—Human Resources since October 2017. Prior to joining our company, Mr. Paulson served as the Director of Human Resources of Generac Corporation since June 2016. Prior to that time, Mr. Paulson served as Vice President of Human Resources—Pump Solutions Group of Dover Corporation from January 2015 to September 2015 and as Vice President of Human Resources—Waukesha Bearings Corporation of Dover Corporation from August 2011 to January 2015. Prior to joining Dover Corporation, Mr. Paulson served in various human resources roles for 11 years.

32

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis provides an overview of our executive compensation program, together with a description of the material factors underlying the decisions that resulted in the compensation paid to our named executive officers.

Named Executive Officers and Recent Changes in Executive Officers

Our executive officers whose 2017 compensation is discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, who we refer to as our named executive officers, are:

In January 2016, Mr. Stoelting was appointed our President and Chief Operating Officer. In April 2017, Mr. Stoelting was appointed our Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer and Michael L. Gettle was appointed our President, Chief Operating Officer, and Secretary.

In January 2017, Scott B. Cousins was appointed our Chief Information Officer. On October 16, 2018, Mr. Cousins resigned as our Chief Information Officer effective October 26, 2018. In April 2017, Robert M. Milane was appointed as our General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer. In May 2017, Terence R. Rogers was appointed our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, but he did not serve as our principal financial officer until 2018. In June 2017, Frank L. Hurst was appointed the President of our Roadrunner Freight business unit. In October 2017, Craig T. Paulson was appointed our Senior Vice President of Human Resources.

Executive Summary

For 2017, our compensation committee continued to:

33

In February 2018, our compensation committee determined to:

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation philosophy is to structure our pay at levels that enable us to attract, motivate, and retain highly qualified executives and key employees and reward the creation of stockholder value. We seek to provide executive compensation packages that are competitive with comparable companies and reward the achievement of short-term and long-term performance goals.

Like most companies, we use a combination of fixed and variable compensation programs to reward and incentivize strong performance, as well as to align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders. Our compensation philosophy is to target total compensation at approximately the 50th percentile of comparable companies, with higher comparable levels of pay based on higher level of company and individual performance. However, our compensation committee’s decisions on target compensation for specific individuals have also been influenced by a variety of additional factors, including but not limited to market conditions, our company’s recent financial performance and operational challenges, and individual performance, including scope of duties within our organizational structure, institutional knowledge, position readiness, internal pay equity, and/or level of difficulty in recruiting a replacement executive.

Our pay mix consists primarily of base salary, annual performance-based cash incentives, time-based equity incentives, and performance-based equity incentives. We have no guaranteed bonuses, no pension plans or other executive retirement plans except our 401(k) plan available to all of our employees, no significant tax gross-up arrangements, and no material executive perquisites such as company-paid personal travel, financial planning assistance, or car allowances. Total compensation levels reflect corporate positions, responsibilities, and achievement of goals. Accordingly, compensation levels may vary significantly from year to year and among our various executive officers.

We believe that we have closely linked executive officer pay to performance primarily through two components of our compensation system. In 2015, we added a performance-based element to our long-term equity incentive program through the award of PRSUs. For 2017, we also continued to use an annual cash incentive program that was based on our company-wide EBIT before all non-recurring charges approved by our compensation committee.

An important principle driving our executive compensation programs is our belief that it benefits our stockholders for the target total direct compensation opportunities of our executive officers to be tied to our

34

company’s current and long-term performance. As a result, at-risk pay is expected to comprise an increasingly significant portion of our executive compensation, particularly for our most senior executive officers.

Role of the Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:

Our compensation committee also analyzes the reasonableness of our overall executive compensation packages. Our compensation committee has a formal written charter that delineates its responsibilities, a full copy of which is posted on our website at www.rrts.com.

While our chief executive officer and other executive officers may attend meetings of our compensation committee from time to time, the ultimate decisions regarding executive officer compensation are made solely by the members of our compensation committee or, for certain determinations relating to our chief executive officer, our board of directors. These decisions are based not only on our compensation committee’s deliberations, but also from input requested from outside advisors, including in some years our compensation committee’s outside compensation consultant, with respect to, among other things, market data analyses. The final decisions relating to our chief executive officer’s compensation have historically been based on recommendations of our compensation committee and included discussions with and approval by all of our non-employee directors without the presence of management. Our compensation committee typically discusses proposals for our chief executive officer’s compensation with him but the final decisions regarding his compensation are made when he is not present. Decisions regarding the compensation of our other executive officers have historically been based on recommendations of our compensation committee, after considering recommendations from our chief executive officer (or, in the case of compensation determinations made in February 2017, our then president and chief operating officer Mr. Stoelting).

Compensation-Setting Process

Overall compensation levels for our executive officers are generally determined based on our compensation committee’s evaluation of the following factors:

Each year our compensation committee, after consultation with our senior management, establishes performance targets for our annual incentive bonus plan and our PRSU Program that requires the achievement of specified target financial results. Each year our compensation committee also determines performance-based

35

compensation by assessing prior year actual financial results against these pre-established financial targets. In addition, our compensation committee’s decisions on target compensation for specific individuals have also been and will continue to be influenced by a variety of additional factors such as internal pay equity, the executive officer’s ability to impact strategic goals, the length of service with our company, and the level of difficulty in recruiting a replacement executive. Ultimately, the amount of compensation awarded to our executives is determined based on our performance and what our compensation committee believes is in the best interest of our stockholders.

Role of Compensation Consultant

Our compensation committee typically engages the services of an outside compensation consultant to provide independent analysis and advice in connection with making executive compensation decisions.

In mid-2015, our compensation committee engaged Compensia, Inc. (“Compensia”) to provide the committee with an executive compensation assessment for 2016. The chairman of our compensation committee, in consultation with other committee members, defined the scope of Compensia’s 2016 engagement and related responsibilities. These responsibilities included, among other things, advising on issues of executive compensation and equity compensation structure, assisting with the identification of relevant peer companies, and assisting in the preparation of compensation disclosure for inclusion in our SEC filings.

Our compensation committee determined not to engage Compensia or any other compensation consultant to assist with its 2017 executive compensation analyses and determinations. This decision was primarily based on the company’s poor financial performance in late 2016 and the committee’s belief that it would not be appropriate to adjust the compensation of our senior executive officers in light of those results.

Subsequently, in mid-2017, our compensation committee engaged Compensia to provide the committee with executive and director compensation assessments for 2018.

Compensia did not perform any consulting or advisory services for our management team in 2017 and has not been retained to perform any consulting or advisory services for our management team in 2018.

Role of Management in Setting Compensation

Our senior human resources executive and members of our finance team have historically worked with our chief executive officer to:

Historically, our chief executive officer has been actively engaged in setting compensation for our other executive officers through a variety of means, including recommending for compensation committee approval the financial goals and the annual variable pay amounts for such other executive officers. For 2017, Mr. Stoelting, our then president and chief operating officer, had primary responsibility for these activities. Our chief executive officer and president are generally subject to the same financial performance metrics and related target levels as our other executive officers.

36

Compensation Structure

Although the final structure may vary from year to year and individual to individual, our compensation committee utilizes three main components for executive officer compensation:

Pay Mix

In determining the allocation among base salary, annual incentive bonus opportunity, and long-term incentive compensation, our compensation committee considers the following factors:

When considering a proposed compensation package for an executive officer, our compensation committee considers the compensation package as a whole, including each element of total compensation. For example, before determining officer compensation for 2017, our compensation committee reviewed, for each executive officer, each element of compensation paid in 2016, including base salary, the 2016 annual incentive bonus earned, and the value of equity awards made in prior years. Our compensation committee and management use this information to assess the overall effect and long-term implications of compensation decisions, rather than viewing individual decisions in isolation. We have no pre-established policy for allocating between either cash and non-cash or short-term or long-term compensation.

Our compensation committee believes that the particular elements of compensation identified above produce a well-balanced mix of cash versus stock-based compensation, retention value, and “at-risk” compensation that collectively provide each executive officer with both short-term and long-term performance incentives. Base salary provides the executive officer with a measure of security as to the minimum level of compensation he or she will receive while the annual and long-term incentive compensation elements motivate the executive officer to focus on the financial and operational metrics that will produce a high level of company performance over both the annual and long term. Our compensation committee believes that this approach should lead to increases in stockholder value, provide an appropriate reward for our executive officers, and reduce the risk of loss of executive officers to competitors.

While each of the elements of our compensation program is intended to motivate and encourage all executive officers to drive performance and achieve superior results for our stockholders, there is a different emphasis on the three primary elements based on an executive officer’s position and ability to impact our financial results. Historically, the percentage of performance-based pay, or “at-risk” pay, has increased with job responsibility. This is intended to offer an opportunity for increased compensation in the event of successful performance, matched with the prospect of reduced compensation when performance falls short of established financial goals.

For 2017, compensation for our named executive officers (other than Messrs. DiBlasi and Armbruster, who were terminated from their former positions as executive officers effective April 30, 2017 and March 29, 2017,

37

respectively) had been structured so that more than half the compensation consisted of equity awards and an annual incentive bonus opportunity that would be performance-based and dependent on our 2017 financial results, with the other portion comprising base salary.

While the annual incentive bonus program for our executive officers is based primarily on our company-wide performance, such compensation program is also designed to provide payments to certain executive officers who lead our business units based on a combination of consolidated company and business unit results. For example, a portion of the 2017 annual cash incentive opportunity for the president of our Ascent business unit was based on the performance of that business unit, for which he is primarily responsible. We believe this blended program design motivates business units to work together to achieve greater returns for our stockholders. In any one year, because we are comprised of different business units, executive officers leading high-performing business units may receive significantly more compensation than executive officers leading business units that do not perform well.

Compensation Peer Group

As discussed above, our compensation committee did not engage a compensation consultant to assist with its 2017 executive compensation decisions, and did not use peer group or other benchmarking information.

Compensation-Related Risk Considerations

Our compensation committee believes that our annual incentive bonus and long-term incentive compensation programs provide incentives to create long-term stockholder value. Several elements of these programs are also designed to discourage behavior that leads to inappropriate or excessive risk-taking:

Individual Executive Officer Compensation

Base Salary. Base salaries for our newly hired or appointed executive officers are generally set based on the position within our company, competitive salary levels for comparable positions at other companies, and the

38

executive’s experience. Base salaries of our executive officers are reviewed each year by our compensation committee, and adjustments to base salaries are based on factors such as the overall performance of our company, new roles and responsibilities assumed by the executive, the performance of the executive officer’s area of responsibility, the executive officer’s impact on strategic goals, the length of service with our company, and revisions to our compensation philosophy. However, there is no specific weighting applied to any one factor in setting or adjusting base salaries, and the process ultimately relies on the subjective exercise of our compensation committee’s judgment.

Although salaries have historically been targeted at the 25th to 50th percentile of our peer group and relevant compensation survey data, our compensation committee has also taken into account historical compensation, internal parity with other executives, potential as a key contributor, and special recruiting situations.

Base Salaries for 2017. Base salary deliberations for 2017 were conducted from November 2016 through February 2017. Mr. Stoelting, who was then serving as our president and chief operating officer, met with Mr. DiBlasi (our then chief executive officer), Mr. Staley (our then lead independent director), and Mr. Rued (the then chairman of our board of directors) regarding the compensation of our executive officers. Following these discussions, Mr. Staley met with the other members of our compensation committee to discuss the base salary recommendations of Messrs. Stoelting, Staley, and Rued.

For 2017, our compensation committee considered potential future changes in our senior management team as well as the other factors discussed in “Compensation-Setting Process” above and, in connection therewith, determined to maintain the base salaries for each of Messrs. DiBlasi and Armbruster at their current levels, and increased the base salaries for Messrs. Stoelting and Gettle. The 2017 changes in base salary for Messrs. Stoelting and Gettle became effective on May 1, 2017. A summary of the base salary changes made for 2017 is outlined below for each of our named executive officers:

Annual Incentive Bonus Plan. In addition to base salary, our compensation committee believes that annual performance-based cash bonuses play an important role in providing incentives to our executive officers to achieve near-term performance goals.

Our compensation committee has historically believed that EBIT is a good indicator of our financial performance relative to competitors given the market in which we compete, and is also a metric that management can easily track and communicate to employees throughout the performance period. Each executive officer has a

39

target annual incentive bonus opportunity, expressed as a percentage of base salary, with the ability to earn above or below that target based on our company’s actual performance.

When determining the EBIT target for our annual incentive bonus plan, our chief executive officer typically submits to our compensation committee the initial recommendation for the target based upon our company’s annual board-approved budget, as well as the target annual incentive bonus opportunity for each executive officer, and these recommendations are reviewed and discussed by our compensation committee. The major factors used in setting one or more target levels for a particular year are the results for the most recently-completed year and the budget for the current year, as well as general economic and market conditions. Our compensation committee sets the final EBIT target levels during our first quarter, typically at levels our compensation committee believes are challenging, but reasonable, for our company to achieve.

After our financial statements are available each year, our compensation committee determines the level of achievement for the specified EBIT target (after making any appropriate adjustments to such goal for the effects of corporate and economic factors that were not anticipated in establishing the performance measure) and awards credit for the achievement of a percentage of the target. Final determinations as to annual incentive bonus awards are then based on that percentage. If earned, actual bonuses are generally paid to our executive officers early in the second quarter of the subsequent fiscal year.

2017 Annual Incentive Bonus Plan. Our compensation committee determined that the 2017 annual incentive bonus plan for our executive officers would be based on a company-wide EBIT target that was consistent with our board-approved 2017 budget. For 2017, our compensation committee established a target annual incentive bonus opportunity for each executive officer, expressed as a percentage of base salary, with the ability to earn above or below that target based on our company’s actual performance. Mr. DiBlasi did not participate in our 2017 annual incentive bonus plan.

The following table lists the 2017 base salaries and the 2017 annual incentive bonus plan levels for each of our named executive officers (other than Mr. DiBlasi):

For 2017, our company-wide EBIT was less than 80% of the pre-established target. Accordingly, no annual incentive bonus awards were made to our named executive officers for 2017.

Long-Term Incentives. We believe that providing long-term incentive compensation opportunities in the form of equity awards as a significant portion of our executive officers’ total compensation packages aligns their interests with the interests of our stockholders and with our long-term success. By compensating our executive officers with our equity, they receive a stake in our company’s financial future, and the gains realized in the long term depend on their ability to drive our financial performance. Equity awards are also a useful vehicle for attracting and retaining executive talent in a competitive market.

40

Our compensation committee develops its equity award decisions based on its judgment as to whether the total compensation packages provided to our executive officers, including prior equity awards and the level of outstanding vested and unvested equity awards then held by each executive officer, are sufficient to retain, motivate, and adequately reward them. In addition, our compensation committee considers the accounting costs that will be reflected in our financial statements when establishing the form of equity to be granted and the size of the awards as well as the potential dilution associated with the equity awards.

We grant equity awards under our 2010 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2010 Plan”), which was adopted by our board of directors and approved by our stockholders and permits the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, RSUs, performance shares, and other stock-based awards to our officers, directors, employees, and consultants.

Our compensation committee may adjust the mix of equity award types or approve different awards as part of future long-term incentive awards. Awards made in connection with a new, extended, or expanded employment relationship may involve a different mix of PRSUs, time-based RSUs, stock options, or other equity-related awards depending on our compensation committee’s assessment of the total compensation package being offered.

Stock Options. Stock options represent the right to purchase shares of our common stock at a specified exercise price for a specified period of time. The stock options vest and become exercisable in installments as determined by our compensation committee. Although our long-term equity incentives have in recent years consisted primarily of PRSUs and RSUs, we continue to grant stock options to certain of our executive officers on a selective basis. As described more fully below, in 2017 our compensation committee granted time-based stock options to Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, and Cousins.

Restricted Stock Unit Awards. RSUs represent the right to receive one share of our common stock for each RSU upon the settlement date, which is the date on which certain conditions, such as continued employment with us for a pre-established period of time, are satisfied. RSU awards reflect both increases and decreases in the market prices of our common stock from the grant-date market prices and thus tie compensation more closely to changes in stockholder value at all levels compared to stock options, whose intrinsic value changes only when the market price of our common stock increases above the exercise price. RSUs also have retention value even during periods in which the market price of our common stock does not appreciate, which supports continuity in the senior management team. In addition, RSUs allow our compensation committee to deliver equivalent value with use of fewer authorized shares than stock option awards.

Shares of our stock are issued to RSU holders as the awards vest. The vesting schedule for RSUs granted to our executive officers and other employees provides that each award vests in four equal annual installments. Recipients of RSU awards generally must remain employed by us on a continuous basis through the end of the relevant vesting period in order to receive any shares of our common stock covered by that award, except that recipients may be entitled to accelerated delivery of a portion of their unvested RSUs in the case of the recipient’s death or disability, or upon a change in control of our company.

Performance RSU Awards. In 2015, our compensation committee added a performance-based element to our long-term incentive compensation program (the “PRSU Program”) in order to strengthen the alignment of pay-for-performance. Under the PRSU Program, PRSUs were granted to eligible employees, including our executive officers, in 2017 (other than to Mr. DiBlasi). PRSU awards are intended to reward recipients to the extent we achieve specific pre-established financial performance goals.

Under the PRSU Program, a target number of PRSUs are awarded at the beginning of each one-year performance period. Under the PRSU Program, financial performance goals are set at the beginning of each year, and performance is reviewed at the end of that year. The number of PRSUs ultimately earned will range from zero to 1.5 times the target number depending on our performance during the period. Each PRSU is equal in

41

value to one share of our common stock, and the PRSUs earned vest in four equal installments of 25% on the date our compensation committee certifies the performance results and on March 1 of each of the next three succeeding years. Recipients of PRSU awards generally must remain employed by us on a continuous basis through the end of the relevant vesting period in order to receive any shares of our common stock covered by the PRSU award, except that recipients may be entitled to accelerated delivery of a portion of unvested PRSUs in the case of the recipient’s death or disability, or upon a change in control.

Under our PRSU Program for 2017, our compensation committee once again selected company-wide EBITDA as the financial performance metric. The calculation of EBITDA excluded non-cash compensation expense attributable to the PRSU Program, acquisition transaction expenses, the results of any acquisitions made during the year, and all non-recurring changes approved by our compensation committee. The percentage to be applied to each recipient’s target number of PRSUs ranged from zero to 150%, based upon the extent to which the actual EBITDA is achieved:

Our adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2017 did not meet the minimum performance level under the PRSU Program for 2017. Accordingly, none of the PRSUs awarded under the PRSU Program for 2017 were earned.

2017 Equity Awards. For 2017, our compensation committee determined that the equity awards to be granted to our executive officers would consist of a combination of time-based RSUs and PRSUs, as well as time-based stock options for Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, and Cousins. The following table sets forth the time-based RSUs and target number of PRSUs granted to our named executive officers (other than Mr. DiBlasi, who did not receive any equity awards in 2017, and other than Mr. Rogers, who received only stock options awards in 2017) on February 28, 2017:

For 2017, our compensation committee also granted stock options to Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, and Cousins to provide additional long-term incentives. On February 28, 2017, the committee granted Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, and Cousins seven-year non-qualified stock options to purchase 167,000, 167,000, and 65,000 shares of our common stock, respectively, each with an exercise price equal to $7.54 per share (the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date), subject to vesting over four years, with 25% vesting on each annual anniversary of the grant date. On May 22, 2017, and pursuant to our employment agreement with Mr. Rogers, the committee granted Mr. Rogers a seven-year, non-qualified stock option to purchase 165,000 shares of our common stock at a per share exercise price of $6.30 (the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date), subject to vesting over four years, with 25% vesting on each annual anniversary of the grant date.

42

Other Compensation Elements

Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation. None of our executive officers participate in or have account balances in nonqualified defined contribution plans or other nonqualified deferred compensation plans maintained by us.

Other Compensation. All of our executive officers are eligible to participate in our employee benefit plans, including medical, dental, life insurance, and Section 401(k) plans. These plans are available to all of our employees and do not discriminate in favor of executive officers. It is generally our policy to not extend significant perquisites to our executive officers that are not broadly available to our other employees. In designing these compensation elements, we seek to provide an overall level of benefits that is competitive with that offered by companies in the markets in which we operate based upon our general understanding of industry practice. These benefits are not considered by our compensation committee in determining the compensation of our executive officers.

Employment Agreements. Historically, we did not maintain employment contracts with our executive officers or other employees. However, in recent periods we have used employment agreements with various executive officers. For example, we entered into employment agreements with Messrs. Stoelting and Gettle upon joining our company, which were subsequently amended and restated in connection with their April 30, 2017 appointments as our chief executive officer and chief operating officer, respectively. Those restated agreements, as well as our employment agreements with Messrs. Rogers, Hurst, and Paulson, each of whom was hired and appointed as an executive officer in 2017, are described below under “Executive Compensation—Employment and Other Agreements” below.

Severance Payments due Upon Termination of Employment and/or a Change in Control. We currently provide for the accelerated vesting of outstanding and unvested equity awards in connection with any “change in control” of our company. Our compensation committee believes that for our executive officers, accelerated vesting of equity awards in the event of a change in control is generally appropriate because in some change in control situations, equity of the target company is cancelled, making immediate acceleration necessary in order to preserve the value of the award. In addition, we rely primarily on equity awards to provide our executive officers with the opportunity to accumulate substantial resources to fund their retirement income, and our compensation committee believes that a change in control event is an appropriate liquidation point for awards designed for such purpose.

In addition, Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, Cousins, Hurst, and Paulson are, and Messrs. DiBlasi and Armbruster were, eligible to receive cash severance payments in certain circumstances related to involuntary terminations of employment. These payments are intended to provide a level of transition assistance in the event of an involuntary termination of employment. Our compensation committee believes these provisions are fair and reasonable based on its understanding of market practices among industry competitors and within the broader environment of similarly sized businesses.

We believe these post-employment severance payments and benefits are an essential element of our compensation package for our executive officers and assist us in recruiting and retaining talented individuals. In addition, we believe that it is more equitable to offer severance payments based on a standard formula determined as a multiple of base pay because severance often serves as a bridge when employment is involuntarily terminated, and should therefore not be affected by other, longer-term compensation arrangements. As a result, other compensation decisions are not generally based on the existence of this severance protection. For a detailed description of the post-employment compensation of our named executive officers, see Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control below.

Prohibitions on Hedging and Pledging of Shares. Among other things, our insider trading policy prohibits our executive officers from engaging in put, call, derivative, or short sale transactions, as well as pledging our securities as collateral for a loan.

43

Stock Ownership Guidelines. We do not currently maintain stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers.

Compensation Recovery (“Clawback”) Policy. We do not currently maintain a formal compensation recovery “clawback” policy or practice regarding the adjustment or recovery of awards or payments if the relevant performance measures upon which they are based are restated or otherwise adjusted in a manner that would reduce the size of an award or payment. However, in connection with the adoption of rules under the Dodd-Frank Act, our compensation committee expects that in the future it will establish mechanisms to recover incentive compensation in the event of a financial restatement or similar event.

Approval Process for Equity Awards

Our executive officers and other employees receive long-term equity awards pursuant to the terms of the 2010 Plan. Our compensation committee administers the 2010 Plan and establishes the rules for all awards granted thereunder, including grant guidelines, vesting schedules, and other provisions. Our compensation committee reviews these rules from time to time and considers, among other things, the interests of our stockholders, market conditions, information provided by the compensation committee’s compensation consultant and our legal advisor, performance objectives, and recommendations made by our chief executive officer.

Our compensation committee reviews awards for all employees. Our compensation committee has established a process in which it reviews the recommendations of our chief executive officer for our executive officers (other than himself) and other employees, modifies the proposed grants in certain circumstances, and approves the awards effective as of the date of its approval.

We have no practice of timing the grant of equity awards to coordinate with the release of material non-public information, and we have not timed the release of material non-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of named executive officer compensation. In addition, our practice of calculating the number of shares of our common stock subject to equity awards based on the 20-day trailing average closing sale price of our common stock mitigates the effects of both our stock price volatility and the impact of grant timing.

In August 2013, our compensation committee created an employee RSU committee and appointed Mr. DiBlasi as the committee’s sole member. In August 2017, Mr. Stoelting replaced Mr. DiBlasi as the committee’s sole member. The employee RSU committee has the authority to grant RSUs pursuant to the 2010 Plan solely to newly hired non-executive officer employees of our company (other than “Covered Employees” as defined in the 2010 Plan) as follows:

Impact of Tax and Accounting

As a general matter, our compensation committee takes into account the various tax and accounting implications of the compensation vehicles employed by us. While structuring compensation programs to result in more favorable tax and financial reporting treatment is a general objective, our compensation committee balances this goal with other business needs that may be inconsistent with obtaining the most favorable tax and accounting treatment for each component of compensation.

44

Deductibility. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, the federal income tax deduction for compensation paid to certain executive officers of publicly-held companies is limited to $1 million per officer per fiscal year. Prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Reform Act”), that limitation did not apply if the compensation met certain qualifying performance based requirements. As a result of the Tax Reform Act, however, that performance-based exception is generally no longer available. As a result, more of our executive compensation will likely not be tax deductible, although the impact of the loss of this tax benefit may be partially offset by the lower corporate income tax rate applicable under the Tax Reform Act. Although our compensation committee considers the impact of Section 162(m) of the Code as well as other tax and accounting consequences when developing and implementing our executive compensation programs, the compensation committee retains the flexibility to design and administer compensation programs that are in the best interests of our company and its stockholders.

Additional Tax Implications. Section 409A of the Code imposes additional income taxes on executive officers and others for certain types of deferred compensation that do not comply with Section 409A. We attempt, in good faith, to structure compensation so that it either conforms with the requirements of or qualifies for an exception under Section 409A. Sections 280G and 4999 of the Code impose an excise tax on payments to executive officers who hold significant equity interests and certain other service providers of payments and benefits received in connection with a change in control of our company that exceed the levels specified in the Section 280G rules. Our executive officers may receive the amounts shown in the section entitled “Executive Compensation—Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control” as change in control payments and benefits that could trigger this excise tax. We do not offer our executive officers, as part of their change in control benefits, any gross ups or other payments related to this excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code.

Accounting Considerations. When determining the size of long-term incentive awards to our executive officers and employees, our compensation committee examines the accounting cost associated with such awards. Under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, “Compensation—Stock Compensation,” grants of stock options, PRSUs, and RSUs result in an accounting charge for us equal to the grant date fair value of those securities. For stock options, the accounting cost is calculated using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The cost is then amortized over the requisite vesting period. For time-based RSUs, the accounting cost is generally equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of the award. The cost is then amortized over the requisite service period. For PRSUs, the accounting cost is generally equal to the fair market value of the underlying shares of common stock on the date of the award that are expected to vest under the performance criteria. Adjustments to the accounting cost are made each quarter based on re-evaluations of expected vesting under the performance criteria.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Our compensation committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement. Based on such review and discussion, the compensation committee recommended to our board of directors, and our board of directors approved, that our Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Michael P. Ward, Chairman

Scott L. Dobak

Christopher L. Doerr

James D. Staley

William S. Urkiel

45

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Fiscal Year 2017 Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth compensation information for our named executive officers.

46

The table below reflects the target number of PRSUs granted under the PRSU Program to our named executive officers (other than Messrs. DiBlasi and Rogers) for 2017, the grant date fair value of the target PRSUs reflected in the table above for fiscal 2017, and the actual number of PRSUs earned under the PRSU Program for 2017. Since our financial performance did not meet the threshold financial performance level under the PRSU Program for 2017, none of the PRSUs awarded under the PRSU Program for 2017, including to our named executive officers, were earned. See Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Individual Executive Officer Compensation—Performance RSU Awards.

Employment and Other Agreements

Historically, we did not have written employment agreements with our executive officers. We have, however, provided employment letter agreements to our executive officers, which provided them with the right

47

to participate in our incentive compensation plans and the right to participate in all insurance, retirement, and other fringe benefit plans as may from time to time be provided to our executives. The employment letter agreement with Mr. Cousins also contains, and the employment letter agreements with Messrs. DiBlasi and Armbruster also contained, severance benefits. Recently, however, we have entered into employment agreements with certain of our new executive officers, which are described below. In addition, we have also recently entered into management retention agreements with certain of our executive officers and a supplemental pay agreement with one executive officer, all of which are described below. For a discussion of the severance benefits provided to our named executive officers, see Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control below.

On April 30, 2017, in connection with our appointment of Mr. Stoelting as our Chief Executive Officer, we entered into a second amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Stoelting. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Stoelting will receive an annual base salary of $571,000. Mr. Stoelting is also eligible to earn bonus compensation under our bonus plan and is entitled to participate in and receive all benefits under our employee benefit programs. The employment agreement provides that, in the event we terminate Mr. Stoelting’s employment without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Stoelting terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), we will continue to pay Mr. Stoelting his base salary for the 18-month period following the date of such termination, and we will pay Mr. Stoelting a lump sum amount equal to 18 times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for an 18-month period. If, however, we terminate Mr. Stoelting’s employment without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Stoelting terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) during the two-year period immediately following a “change in control” (as such term is defined in the 2010 Plan), then in lieu of the payments described in the preceding sentence, we will continue to pay Mr. Stoelting his base salary for the 24-month period following the date of such termination, we will pay Mr. Stoelting a lump sum amount equal to two times Mr. Stoelting’s bonus, based on the target established under our bonus plan, payable during the year in which the termination of employment occurs, and we will pay Mr. Stoelting a lump sum amount equal to 24 times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for an 24-month period. Mr. Stoelting must execute a general release in order to receive any severance benefits.

On April 30, 2017, in connection with our appointment of Mr. Gettle as our President and Chief Operating Officer, we entered into a second amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Gettle. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Gettle will receive an annual base salary of $571,000. Mr. Gettle is also eligible to earn bonus compensation under our bonus plan and is entitled to participate in and receive all benefits under our employee benefit programs. The employment agreement provides that, in the event we terminate Mr. Gettle’s employment without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Gettle terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), we will continue to pay Mr. Gettle his base salary for the 18-month period following the date of such termination, and we will pay Mr. Gettle a lump sum amount equal to 18 times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for an 18-month period. If, however, we terminate Mr. Gettle’s employment without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Gettle terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) during the two-year period immediately following a “change in control” (as such term is defined in the 2010 Plan), then in lieu of the payments described in the preceding sentence, we will continue to pay Mr. Gettle his base salary for the 24-month period following the date of such termination, we will pay Mr. Gettle a lump sum amount equal to two times Mr. Gettle’s bonus, based on the target established under our bonus plan, payable during the year in which the termination of employment occurs, and we will pay Mr. Gettle a lump sum amount equal to 24 times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for an 24-month period. Mr. Gettle must execute a general release in order to receive any severance benefits.

48

On May 22, 2017, in connection with our appointment of Mr. Rogers as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Rogers. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Rogers will receive an annual base salary of $400,000. Mr. Rogers is also eligible to earn bonus compensation under our bonus plan and is entitled to participate in and receive all benefits under our employee benefit programs. The employment agreement provides that, in the event we terminate Mr. Rogers’ employment without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Rogers terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), we will continue to pay Mr. Rogers his base salary for the 12-month period following the date of such termination, and we will pay Mr. Rogers a lump sum amount equal to 12 times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for a 12-month period. If, however, we terminate Mr. Rogers’ employment without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Rogers terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) during the two-year period immediately following a “change in control” (as such term is defined in the 2010 Plan), then in lieu of the payments described in the preceding sentence, we will continue to pay Mr. Rogers his base salary for the 18-month period following the date of such termination, we will pay Mr. Rogers a lump sum amount equal to one and one-half times Mr. Rogers’ bonus, based on the target established under our bonus plan, payable during the year in which the termination of employment occurs, and we will pay Mr. Rogers a lump sum amount equal to 18 times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for an 18-month period. Mr. Rogers must execute a general release in order to receive any severance benefits.

On July 18, 2018, we entered into a Supplemental Pay Agreement with Mr. Rogers. The Supplemental Pay Agreement generally provides that, if we redeem shares of our outstanding preferred stock with an aggregate redemption price of at least $200 million, we will (i) continue to pay Mr. Rogers his base salary for a 12-month period following any termination of his employment by us occurring at least 60 days after such “Specified Redemption” of preferred stock, and (ii) pay Mr. Rogers a lump sum equal to 12 times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for such 12-month period. In order to receive such severance benefits, Mr. Rogers must execute a general release, must not have voluntarily terminated his employment with us during the 60 days following the “Specified Redemption” and must continue compliance with the “Protective Covenants” set forth in his May 22, 2017 Employment Agreement . If any severance benefits are paid under the Supplemental Pay Agreement, Mr. Rogers will not be entitled to receive any severance payments under the May 22, 2017 Employment Agreement with Mr. Rogers, even if Mr. Rogers is terminated without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Rogers terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement). Additionally, our payment obligations under this Supplemental Pay Agreement will terminate upon the earlier occurrence of (a) a “Liquidity Event” (as defined in the July 9, 2018 Retention Agreement with Mr. Rogers) that will entitle Mr. Rogers to a retention bonus as provided in the July 9, 2018 Retention Agreement with Mr. Rogers, (b) termination of the July 9, 2018 Retention Agreement with Mr. Rogers or (c) termination of Mr. Rogers’ employment with us for any reason within a 60-day period after such “Specified Redemption.”

On July 31, 2017, in connection with our appointment of Mr. Hurst as our President—Roadrunner Freight, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Hurst. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Hurst will receive an annual base salary of $295,000. Mr. Hurst is also eligible to earn bonus compensation under our bonus plan and is entitled to participate in and receive all benefits under our employee benefit programs. The employment agreement provides that, in the event we terminate Mr. Hurst’s employment without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Hurst terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), we will continue to pay Mr. Hurst his base salary for the 12-month period following the date of such termination, and we will pay Mr. Hurst a lump sum amount equal to 12 times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for a 12-month period. Mr. Hurst must execute a general release in order to receive any severance benefits.

49

On October 4, 2017, in connection with our appointment of Mr. Paulson as our Senior Vice President—Human Resources, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Paulson. Pursuant to the terms of the employment agreement, Mr. Paulson will receive an annual base salary of $200,000. Mr. Paulson is also eligible to earn bonus compensation under our bonus plan and is entitled to participate in and receive all benefits under our employee benefit programs. The employment agreement provides that, in the event we terminate Mr. Paulson’s employment without “cause” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement) or Mr. Paulson terminates his employment for “good reason” (as such term is defined in the employment agreement), we will continue to pay Mr. Paulson his base salary for the nine-month period following the date of such termination, and we will pay Mr. Paulson a lump sum amount equal to nine times the monthly COBRA premium that would be necessary to permit him to continue group insurance coverage under our plans for a nine-month period. Mr. Paulson must execute a general release in order to receive any severance benefits.

On July 9, 2018, we entered into management retention agreements with each of Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, and Cousins that provide for potential retention bonuses of $3,178,000, $2,858,000, $995,000, and $783,000, respectively. Each management retention agreement provides that we will pay the executive the retention bonus if we consummate a “Liquidity Event” prior to June 30, 2019. A Liquidity Event is generally defined as a change of control transaction with any person other than Elliott Associates, L.P. and its affiliates. Each retention bonus would be payable 50% within one week upon the consummation of the Liquidity Event and 50% on the six-month anniversary of such closing, with accelerated payments if the executive is terminated without “Cause” (as defined in each executive’s employment agreement) or resigns for “Good Reason” (as defined in each executive’s employment agreement). The second installment of the retention bonus may be forfeited by the executive if the executive is employed by the purchaser or if, within the six-month anniversary of the closing, the executive’s employment is terminated by us for “Cause” or by the executive without “Good Reason.” However, our obligation to pay retention bonuses will automatically terminate upon the grant to the executive of additional RSUs and performance RSUs for a specified minimum number of shares of our common stock.

On July 9, 2018, our compensation committee granted Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, and Cousins RSUs pursuant to our 2010 Plan for 210,000, 210,000, 75,000, and 63,000 shares of our common stock, respectively. Each of these 2018 RSU awards vest 25% each year over four years and are subject to the same terms and conditions as other RSUs, including the potential accelerated delivery of a portion of these RSUs in the case of the recipient’s death or disability, or upon a change in control of our company.

50

Fiscal Year 2017 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information with respect to grants of plan-based awards to our named executive officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

51

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End 2017

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards held by our named executive officers as of December 31, 2017.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested in Fiscal Year 2017

The following table sets forth information concerning the value realized by each of our named executive officers upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock awards during 2017.

52

Pension Benefits

We do not offer any defined benefit pension plans for any of our employees. We have a 401(k) plan in which our employees may participate. In 2017, no discretionary contributions to our 401(k) plan were made on behalf of our executive officers.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation and Retirement Plans

We do not offer any deferred compensation plans, defined benefit pension plans, or supplemental retirement plans for our executive officers.

401(k) Plan

We sponsor a defined contribution profit sharing plan for our full-time employees, which is intended to qualify as a tax qualified plan under Section 401 of the Code. The plan provides that each participant may contribute up to 100% of his or her pre-tax compensation, up to the statutory limit. The plan permits us to make discretionary contributions of up to an additional 50% of each participant’s contributions not to exceed 4% of his or her pre-tax compensation, up to the statutory limit, which generally vest over three years. We match 50% of each participant’s contributions up to the first 6% contributed.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

As described above, the employment agreements with Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, Hurst, and Paulson provide for severance benefits upon certain terminations of employment, including following a change in control. See Employment and Other Agreements. In addition, the employment letter agreement with Mr. Cousins provides for, and the employment letter agreements with Messrs. DiBlasi and Armbruster provided for severance benefits upon certain terminations of employment. Pursuant to the employment letter agreement with Mr. Cousins, if Mr. Cousins (i) is terminated for any reason other than for cause or (ii) is terminated because of a change in control, in each case during the first three years of his employment, he is entitled to receive a severance payment equal to 12 months of his base pay. Our obligation to pay severance benefits is subject to Mr. Cousins’ execution and delivery to us of a release. Pursuant to the employment letter agreements with Messrs. DiBlasi and Armbruster, if Messrs. DiBlasi and Armbruster (i) was terminated for any reason other than for cause, (ii) terminated his employment voluntarily for good reason, or (iii) was terminated without cause during the one-year period following a change in control, he was entitled to receive his current base salary for a period of 12 months in accordance with our normal payroll practices and would be eligible to receive all benefits under all benefit plans and programs provided by us (including medical and group life plans and programs) for the same period. Our obligation to pay severance benefits was subject to Messrs. DiBlasi’s or Armbruster’s compliance with any confidentiality, non-competition, and non-solicitation agreements with us, as well as Messrs. DiBlasi’s or Armbruster’s execution and delivery to us of a release. Additionally, pursuant to the management retention agreements we entered into on July 9, 2018 with each of Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, and Cousins providing for potential retention bonuses of $3,178,000, $2,858,000, $995,000, $783,000, respectively, we will pay each of Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, Rogers, and Cousins the retention bonus if we consummate a “Liquidity Event” prior to June 30, 2019. A Liquidity Event is generally defined as a change of control transaction with any person other than Elliott Associates, L.P. and its affiliates. Each retention bonus would be payable 50% upon the consummation of the Liquidity Event and 50% on the six-month anniversary of such closing, with accelerated payments if the executive is terminated without “cause” or resigns for “good reason.” The second installment of the retention bonus may be forfeited by the executive if the executive is employed by the purchaser or if, within the six-month anniversary of the closing, the executive’s employment is terminated by us for “cause” or by the executive without “good reason.” Additionally, our obligations under the retention agreements will automatically terminate upon the grant to the executives of additional RSUs and performance RSUs for a specified minimum number of shares of our common stock. The definitions of “change in control,” “cause,” and “good reason” and the descriptions of the payments and benefits can be found in the employment letter agreements, which we have

53

filed with the SEC. The arrangements reflected in these agreements are designed to encourage the officers’ full attention and dedication to our company currently and, in the event of termination following a change in control, provide these officers with individual financial security.

In addition, in the event of a change in control (as defined in the 2010 Plan), all outstanding and unvested stock options, RSUs, and earned PRSUs, as well as the target number of PRSUs if the change in control occurs before the “Performance Determination Date” (as defined in the PRSU Award Agreement, a form of which has been filed with the SEC) with respect to such PRSUs, including those held by our named executive officers, will immediately vest as of the date of the change in control.

The tables below provide certain information regarding potential payments and other benefits that would be payable to our named executive officers upon any termination of employment or a change in control of our company. The tables below assume that the termination or change in control event occurred on December 31, 2017.

Curtis W. Stoelting

Michael L. Gettle

54

Terence R. Rogers

Scott B. Cousins

In connection with entering into the Standby Purchase Agreement, Messrs. Stoelting, Gettle, and Rogers waived the change in control provision for their outstanding equity awards and certain other benefits that may be accelerated as a result of a change in control of the company that could occur following consummation of the rights offering.

CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

As required by SEC rules, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our CEO to that of our median employee. The pay ratio and annual total compensation amount disclosed in this section are reasonable estimates that have been calculated using methodologies and assumptions permitted by SEC rules.

Median Employee Determination

We identified our median employee by calculating the 2017 cash compensation for all employees, excluding the CEO, who were employed by us on December 31, 2017. This included 4,391 employees, and included all full-time, part-time and seasonal employees that had been employed by us for at least one month. The calculation included employees who were active on December 31, 2017 but not employed for all of 2017 and the calculation did not annualize their compensation. In accordance with SEC rules, we excluded all non-U.S. employees who were active on December 31, 2017, which represented less than 5% of our total U.S. and non-U.S. workforce.

55

Cash compensation included all earnings paid to each employee during the calendar year, including base salary and wages, bonuses and incentive payments, commissions, company 401(k) matching contributions, overtime and holiday or PTO pay.

Annual Compensation of Median Employee Using Summary Compensation Table Methodology

After identifying the median employee as described above, we calculated annual total compensation for this employee using the same methodology we use for our CEO in the 2017 Summary Compensation Table. This compensation calculation includes base salary and wages, bonuses and incentive payments, commissions, company 401(k) matching contributions, overtime and holiday or PTO pay, equity awards, and a gross-up tax reimbursement to cover taxes on term life insurance premiums. The compensation for our median employee was $41,390 and the compensation for the CEO was $1,609,589.

2017 Pay Ratio

Based on the above information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median employee is 39:1. The pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, due to variances in business mix, proportion of seasonal and part-time employees and distribution of employees across geographies. We seek to attract, incentivize and retain our employees through a combination of competitive base pay, bonus opportunities, 401(k) contributions, and other benefits.

56

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

The following table sets forth information with respect to our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of stock options, warrants, and rights under our incentive compensation plans as of December 31, 2017.

2010 Incentive Compensation Plan

The purpose of the 2010 Plan is to assist our company and our subsidiaries and other designated affiliates (“Related Entities”), in attracting, motivating, retaining, and rewarding high-quality executives and other employees, officers, directors, consultants, and other persons who provide services to our company or our Related Entities by enabling such persons to acquire or increase a proprietary interest in our company in order to strengthen the mutuality of interests between such persons and our stockholders, and providing such persons with annual and long-term performance incentives to expend their maximum efforts in the creation of stockholder value. The 2010 Plan was intended to qualify certain compensation awarded under the 2010 Plan for tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code to the extent deemed appropriate by the plan administrator, although as a result of the Tax Reform Act, this provision of the Code has been repealed; as a result, for years after 2017, compensation for certain of our executive officers will not be deductible to the extent it exceeds $1 million per officer.

Eligibility

Officers, directors, employees, and consultants of our company and our Related Entities, as determined by the plan administrator (described below), are eligible to participate in the 2010 Plan (an “Eligible Person”).

Shares Available for Awards; Annual Per-Person Limitations

Subject to certain adjustments as described in the 2010 Plan, a total of 2,500,000 shares of our common stock were initially reserved for issuance as awards under the 2010 Plan. As of December 31, 2017, a total of 333,882 shares had been issued under the 2010 Plan, 1,607,620 shares were subject to outstanding awards under the 2010 Plan, and 558,498 shares were available for the future grant of awards under the 2010 Plan.

57

If any shares of our common stock subject to an award under the 2010 Plan are forfeited, repurchased by our company, expire, or otherwise terminate without issuance of such shares, or any award is settled for cash or otherwise does not result in the issuance of all or a portion of the shares subject to such award, the shares will, to the extent of such forfeiture, repurchase, expiration, termination, cash settlement, or non-issuance, again be available for awards under the 2010 Plan. In the event that any option or other award is exercised by the withholding of shares from the award by our company, or withholding tax liabilities arising from such option or other award are satisfied by the withholding of shares from the award by our company, then only the net number of shares actually issued to the participant, excluding the shares withheld, will be counted as issued for purposes of determining the maximum number of shares available for grant under the 2010 Plan.

Administration

Our board of directors has the authority to administer the 2010 Plan as the plan administrator. However, our board of directors has the authority to delegate its authority as plan administrator to one or more committees, including its compensation committee. Subject to the terms of the 2010 Plan, the plan administrator determines which of the Eligible Persons will be granted awards, when and how each award will be granted, what type or combination of types of awards will be granted, the provisions of each award granted (which need not be identical), including the time or times when a person will be permitted to receive shares or cash pursuant to an award, and the number of shares or amount of cash with respect to which an award will be granted to each such person. In addition, the plan administrator may construe, interpret, and make all determinations under the 2010 Plan and awards granted under it, and establish, amend, and revoke rules and regulations for the 2010 Plan’s administration. The plan administrator may, with the consent of any adversely affected participant, (i) reduce the exercise price of any outstanding award under the 2010 Plan, (ii) cancel any outstanding award and grant a new award and/or cash or other valuable consideration in substitution thereof, or (iii) perform any other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles.

Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights

Each stock option and stock appreciation right award granted pursuant to the 2010 Plan must be set forth in an award agreement. The plan administrator determines the terms of the stock options and stock appreciation rights granted under the 2010 Plan, including the exercise price in the case of a stock option, the grant price in the case of a stock appreciation right, the vesting schedule, the maximum term of the stock option or stock appreciation right, and the period of time the stock option or stock appreciation right remains exercisable after the participant’s termination of service. The exercise price of a stock option, however, may not be less than the fair market value of the stock on its grant date. All stock options granted under the 2010 Plan are nonstatutory stock options. Stock appreciation rights may be either freestanding or in tandem with other awards.

Restricted Stock Awards

Restricted stock awards must be granted pursuant to an award agreement. The plan administrator determines the terms of the restricted stock award, including the restrictions on transferability, risk of forfeiture and other restrictions, if any, for the restricted stock, and the vesting schedule, if any, for the restricted stock award. Except to the extent restricted under the terms of the 2010 Plan and any award agreement relating to the restricted stock award, a participant granted restricted stock will have all of the rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote the restricted stock and the right to receive dividends thereon (subject to any mandatory reinvestment or other requirement imposed by the plan administrator).

Stock Units

Stock unit awards must be granted pursuant to an award agreement. The plan administrator determines the terms of the stock unit award, including any restrictions (which may include a risk of forfeiture) as the plan administrator may impose, if any, which restrictions may lapse at the expiration of the time period or at earlier

58

specified times (including based on achievement of performance goals and/or future service requirements), separately or in combination, in installments or otherwise, as the plan administrator may determine. A stock unit award may be satisfied by delivery of shares of common stock, cash equal to the fair market value of the specified number of shares of common stock covered by the stock unit award, or a combination thereof, as determined by the plan administrator at the date of grant or thereafter. Prior to satisfaction of an award of stock units, an award of stock units carries no voting or dividend or other rights associated with share ownership.

Bonus Stock and Awards in Lieu of Obligations

The plan administrator is authorized to grant shares of our common stock as a bonus, or to grant shares of our common stock or other awards in lieu of our obligations to pay cash or deliver other property under the 2010 Plan or under other plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to such terms as determined by the plan administrator and subject to certain limitations under the 2010 Plan.

Dividend Equivalents

The plan administrator is authorized to grant dividend equivalents to receive cash, shares of our common stock, other awards, or other property equal in value to dividends paid with respect to a specified number of shares of our common stock, or other periodic payments. Dividend equivalents may be awarded on a free-standing basis or in connection with another award. The terms of an award of dividend equivalents will be set forth in a written award agreement which will contain provisions determined by the plan administrator and not inconsistent with the 2010 Plan. The plan administrator may provide that dividend equivalents will be paid or distributed when accrued or will be deemed to have been reinvested in additional shares of our common stock, awards, or other investment vehicles, and subject to such restrictions on transferability and risks of forfeiture, as the plan administrator may specify.

Other Stock-Based Awards

The plan administrator is authorized, subject to limitations under applicable law, to grant such other awards that may be denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, shares of our common stock, as deemed by the plan administrator to be consistent with the purposes of the 2010 Plan, including, without limitation, convertible or exchangeable debt securities, other rights convertible or exchangeable into shares of our common stock, purchase rights for shares of our common stock, awards with value and payment contingent upon our performance or any other factors designated by the plan administrator, and awards valued by reference to the book value of our common stock or the value of securities of or the performance of specified Related Entities or business units. The plan administrator will determine the terms and conditions of such awards, which will be set forth in a written award agreement. Cash awards, as an element of or supplement to any other award under the 2010 Plan, may also be granted under the 2010 Plan.

Performance Awards

Performance awards are payable in cash, shares of our common stock, other property, or other awards, on terms and conditions established by the plan administrator. The performance criteria to be achieved during any performance period and the length of the performance period will be determined by the plan administrator upon the grant of each performance award. Except as provided in the 2010 Plan or as may be provided in an award agreement, performance awards will be distributed only after the end of the relevant performance period.

Other Terms of Awards

Awards granted under the 2010 Plan may, in the discretion of the plan administrator, be granted either alone or in addition to, in tandem with, or in substitution or exchange for, any other award or any award granted under another plan of our company, any Related Entity, or any business entity to be acquired by our company or a

59

Related Entity, or any other right of a participant to receive payment from our company or any Related Entity. In addition, awards may be granted in lieu of cash compensation, including in lieu of cash amounts payable under other plans of our company or any Related Entity.

Subject to the terms of the 2010 Plan and any applicable award agreement, payments to be made by our company or a Related Entity upon the exercise of an option or other award or settlement of an award may be made in such forms as the plan administrator determines, including, without limitation, cash, other awards, or other property, and may be made in a single payment or transfer, in installments, or on a deferred basis. Except as may be prohibited by Section 409A of the Code, the settlement of any award may be accelerated in the discretion of the plan administrator or upon occurrence of one or more specified events. Installment or deferred payments may be required by the plan administrator (subject to certain provisions of the 2010 Plan) or permitted at the election of the participant on terms and conditions established by the plan administrator.

Except as provided in an award agreement, a participant may not assign, sell, transfer, or otherwise encumber or subject to any lien any award or other right or interest granted under the 2010 Plan, in whole or in part, other than by will or by operation of the laws of descent and distribution, and such awards or rights that may be exercisable will be exercised during the lifetime of the participant only by the participant or his or her guardian or legal representative. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the plan administrator, in its sole discretion, may permit the transfer of an option as follows: (i) by gift to certain members of the participant’s immediate family (as set forth in the 2010 Plan) or (ii) by transfer by instrument to a trust providing that the option is to be passed to beneficiaries upon death of the participant.

Change in Control; Corporate Transaction

The plan administrator may, in its discretion, accelerate the vesting, exercisability, lapsing of restrictions, or expiration of deferral of any award, including upon a “change in control,” as defined in the 2010 Plan. In addition, the plan administrator may provide in an award agreement that the performance goals relating to any award will be deemed to have been met upon the occurrence of any change in control.

In the event of a “corporate transaction,” as defined in the 2010 Plan, any surviving corporation or acquiring corporation, which we refer to as a successor corporation, may either (i) assume any or all awards outstanding under the 2010 Plan; (ii) continue any or all awards outstanding under the 2010 Plan; or (iii) substitute similar stock awards for outstanding awards. In the event that any successor corporation does not assume or continue any or all such outstanding awards or substitute similar stock awards for such outstanding awards, then with respect to awards that have been not assumed, continued, or substituted, then such awards will terminate if not exercised (if applicable) at or prior to such effective time (contingent upon the effectiveness of the corporate transaction).

In the event that the successor corporation in a corporate transaction refuses to assume, continue, or substitute for an award, then the award will fully vest and be exercisable (if applicable) as to all of the shares of our common stock subject to such award, including shares of our common stock as to which such award would not otherwise be vested or, if applicable, exercisable.

The plan administrator, in its discretion and without the consent of any participant, may (but is not obligated to) either (i) accelerate the vesting of any awards (and, if applicable, the time at which such awards may be exercised) in full or as to some percentage of the award to a date prior to the effective time of such corporate transaction as the plan administrator will determine (contingent upon the effectiveness of the corporate transaction) or (ii) provide for a cash payment in exchange for the termination of an award or any portion thereof where such cash payment is equal to the fair market value of the shares of our common stock that the participant would receive if the award were fully vested and exercised (if applicable) as of such date (less any applicable exercise price).

If the rights offering results in a “change in control,” as defined in the 2010 Plan, it could result in the accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards. However, we have obtained waivers from our senior

60

management and directors to the provisions in the 2010 Plan that would result in potential acceleration in the event the rights offering constitutes a change in control.

Adjustments

In the event that any dividend or other distribution (whether in the form of cash, shares of our common stock, or other property), recapitalization, forward or reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase, share exchange, liquidation, dissolution, or other similar corporate transaction or event affects our common stock and/or such other securities of our company or any other issuer, then the plan administrator will, to avoid anti-dilution or other enlargement or loss of value to awards, equitably adjust (i) the number and kind of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance in connection with awards granted thereafter, (ii) the number and kind of shares of common stock by which annual per-person award limitations are measured, (iii) the number and kind of shares of our common stock subject to or deliverable in respect of outstanding awards, (iv) the exercise price, grant price, or purchase price relating to any award and/or make provision for payment of cash or other property in respect of any outstanding award, and (v) any other aspect of any award that the plan administrator determines to be appropriate.

In addition, the plan administrator is authorized to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, awards (including awards subject to performance goals) in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events affecting our company, any Related Entity, or any business unit, or the financial statements of our company or any Related Entity, or in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, tax rates and regulations or business conditions or in view of the plan administrator’s assessment of the business strategy of our company, any Related Entity, or business unit thereof, performance of comparable organizations, economic and business conditions, personal performance of a participant, and any other circumstances deemed relevant.

Amendment and Termination

Our board of directors may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the 2010 Plan, or any committee’s authority to grant awards under the 2010 Plan, without the consent of stockholders or participants. Any amendment or alteration to the 2010 Plan will be subject to the approval of our company’s stockholders if such stockholder approval is deemed necessary and advisable by our board of directors. However, without the consent of an affected participant, no such amendment, alteration, suspension, discontinuance, or termination of the 2010 Plan may materially and adversely affect the rights of such participant under any previously granted and outstanding award. The plan administrator may waive any conditions or rights under, or amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any award theretofore granted and any award agreement relating thereto, except as otherwise provided in the 2010 Plan; provided that, without the consent of an affected participant, no such action may materially and adversely affect the rights of such participant under such award. The 2010 Plan will terminate no later than ten years from the date of the later of (i) the 2010 Plan’s effective date and (ii) the date an increase in the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2010 Plan is approved by our board of directors (so long as such increase is also approved by our stockholders).

61

PROPOSAL NO. 2

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In accordance with the rules of the SEC, we are providing stockholders with a non-binding advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. This non-binding advisory vote is commonly referred to as a “say on pay” vote and gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers by voting on the non-binding resolution below. The non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, will be determined by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the item.

Stockholders are urged to read the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation” sections of this Proxy Statement, which discuss how our executive compensation policies and procedures implement our compensation philosophy and contain tabular information and narrative discussion about the compensation of our named executive officers. Our compensation committee and board of directors believe that these policies and procedures are effective in implementing our compensation philosophy and in achieving our goals.

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the following resolution, which will be submitted for a stockholder vote at the Annual Meeting:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, narrative discussion, and related matters.”

You may vote “for” or “against” the foregoing resolution, or you may “abstain.” This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers and the philosophy, policies, and procedures described in this Proxy Statement.

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding. However, our board of directors and compensation committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation program, value the opinions expressed by stockholders in their vote on this proposal, and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our named executive officers.

62

PROPOSAL NO. 3

ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE STOCKHOLDER

ADVISORY VOTES ON THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

In addition to providing stockholders with a non-binding advisory vote on compensation of our named executive officers, and in accordance with the rules of the SEC, we are also providing our stockholders with the opportunity to cast a non-binding advisory vote on how frequently we should seek future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. This non-binding advisory vote is commonly referred to as a “say on frequency” vote. Under this proposal, our stockholders may cast a non-binding advisory vote on whether they would prefer to have a vote on the compensation of our named executive officers every one year, every two years, or every three years.

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “1 YEAR” on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

The non-binding advisory vote on the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, will be determined by a plurality of the votes cast in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the item. This means that the option receiving the highest number of affirmative votes of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the item will be determined to be the preferred frequency.

As an advisory vote, this proposal is not binding. However, our board of directors and compensation committee, which is responsible for designing and administering our executive compensation program, value the opinions expressed by stockholders in their vote on this proposal, and will consider the option that receives the most votes in determining the frequency of future votes on the compensation of our named executive officers.

63

PROPOSAL NO. 4

APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF THE ROADRUNNER TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, INC.

2018 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

Background and Purpose

On November 7, 2018, our board of directors adopted the Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”), and recommended that it be submitted to our stockholders for their approval at the next annual meeting.

The purpose of the 2018 Plan is to assist our company and our subsidiaries in attracting, motivating, retaining, and rewarding high-quality executives and other employees, officers, directors, and individual consultants who provide services to our company or our subsidiaries, by enabling such persons to acquire or increase a proprietary interest in our company in order to strengthen the mutuality of interests between such persons and our stockholders, and providing such persons with performance incentives to expend their maximum efforts in the creation of stockholder value.

The effective date of the 2018 Plan is November 7, 2018. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, no Awards (as defined below) have been granted under the 2018 Plan. The exercise and/or delivery of the stock subject to such Awards is contingent upon approval of the 2018 Plan by our stockholders.

The grant of incentive stock options under the 2018 Plan will be subject to approval by our stockholders within 12 months after the date the 2018 Plan was adopted excluding incentive stock options issued in substitution for outstanding incentive stock options pursuant to Section 424(a) of the Code. The Committee (as defined in the 2018 Plan) may grant incentive stock options under the 2018 Plan prior to approval by our stockholders, but until such approval is obtained, no such incentive stock option shall be exercisable. In the event that stockholder approval is not obtained within the 12-month period provided above, all incentive stock options previously granted under the 2018 Plan will be exercisable as non-qualified stock options.

Stockholder approval of the 2018 Plan is required (a) for purposes of complying with the stockholder approval requirements for listing shares of our common stock (the “Shares”) on the NYSE, (b) to comply with the incentive stock options rules under Section 422 of the Code, and (c) for the 2018 Plan to be eligible under the “plan lender” exemption from the margin requirements of Regulation U promulgated under the Exchange Act.

The following is a summary of certain principal features of the 2018 Plan. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the 2018 Plan. Stockholders are urged to read the actual text of the 2018 Plan in its entirety, which is attached as Annex A to this Proxy Statement.

Our board of directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the approval of our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan.

Shares Available for Awards; Annual Per Person Limitations

Under the 2018 Plan, the total number of Shares reserved and available for delivery under the 2018 Plan (“Awards”) at any time during the term of the 2018 Plan will be equal to 3,000,000 Shares. However, such number shall be increased after the date on which our stockholders approve the 2018 Plan (the “Stockholder Approval Date”) by 7.5% of the Shares issued by the company in the rights offering (or 67,500,000 Shares), if the Rights Offering Proposal is approved and the rights offering is consummated. As such, if the rights offering is consummated, the total number of Shares reserved and available for delivery under the 2018 Plan will be equal to 70,500,000 following the date on which our stockholders approve the 2018 Plan (the “Stockholder Approval Date”).

If any Shares subject to an Award, or after the Stockholder Approval Date, Shares subject to any awards granted under the 2010 Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Prior

64

Plan”), are forfeited, expire, or otherwise terminate without issuance of such Shares, or any Award, or after the Stockholder Approval Date, Shares subject to any award granted under the Prior Plan, is settled for cash or otherwise does not result in the issuance of all or a portion of the Shares subject to such Award or award under the Prior Plan, the Shares to which those Awards or awards under the Prior Plan were subject will, to the extent of such forfeiture, expiration, termination, non-issuance, or cash settlement, again be available for delivery with respect to Awards under the 2018 Plan.

In the event that any option or other Award granted under the 2018 Plan, or after the Stockholder Approval Date, any award granted under the Prior Plan, is exercised through the tendering of Shares (either actually or by attestation) or by the withholding of Shares by our company, or withholding tax liabilities arising from option or other Award, or after the Stockholder Approval Date, any award granted under the Prior Plan, are satisfied by the tendering of Shares (either actually or by attestation) or by the withholding of Shares by our company, then only the number of Shares issued net of the Shares tendered or withheld will be counted for purposes of determining the maximum number of Shares available for grant under the 2018 Plan.

Substitute Awards will not reduce the Shares authorized for delivery under the 2018 Plan or authorized for delivery to a participant in any period. Additionally, in the event that an entity acquired by us or any of our subsidiaries or with which we or any of our subsidiaries combines has shares available under a pre-existing plan approved by its stockholders and not adopted in contemplation of such acquisition or combination, the shares available for delivery pursuant to the terms of such pre-existing plan (as adjusted, to the extent appropriate, using the exchange ratio or other adjustment or valuation ratio or formula used in such acquisition or combination to determine the consideration payable to the holders of common stock of the entities party to such acquisition or combination) may be used for Awards under the 2018 Plan and will not reduce the Shares authorized for delivery under the 2018 Plan if and to the extent that the use of such Shares would not require approval of our stockholders under the rules of the NYSE; provided, that Awards using such available shares will not be made after the date awards or grants could have been made under the terms of the pre-existing plan, absent the acquisition or combination, and will only be made to individuals who were not employees or directors of our company or any of our subsidiaries prior to such acquisition or combination.

Any Shares that are subject to Awards of options or stock appreciation rights are to be counted against the foregoing limit as one Share for every one Share granted. Any Shares that are subject to Awards other than options or stock appreciation rights will be counted against this limit as one and one-half Shares for every one Share granted.

The aggregate fair market value of Shares on the date of grant underlying incentive stock options that can be exercisable by any individual for the first time during any calendar year cannot exceed $100,000 (or such other amount as specified in Section 422 of the Code). Any excess will be treated as a non-qualified stock option.

The maximum number of Shares that may be delivered under the 2018 Plan as a result of the exercise of incentive stock options is 1,000,000 Shares, subject to certain adjustments.

Subject to adjustment as provided in the 2018 Plan, in any fiscal year of our company during any part of which the 2018 Plan is in effect, no participant who is a director but is not also an employee or consultant may be granted any Awards that have a “fair value” as of the date of grant, as determined in accordance with ASC Topic 718 (or any other applicable accounting guidance), that exceed $75,000 in the aggregate.

The Committee is authorized to adjust the limitations on the number of Shares available for issuance under the 2018 Plan and the individual limitations on the amount of certain Awards (other than the $100,000 limitation described above with respect to incentive stock option awards) and is authorized to adjust outstanding Awards (including adjustments to exercise prices of options and other affected terms of Awards) to the extent it deems equitable in the event that a dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, Shares, or other property), recapitalization, forward or reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination,

65

repurchase, share exchange, or other similar corporate transaction or event affects the Shares so that an adjustment is appropriate. See the sections entitled “Acceleration of Vesting; Change in Control” and “Other Adjustments” below for a summary of certain additional adjustment provisions of the 2018 Plan.

Except with respect to the adjustments referenced in the foregoing paragraphs, the Committee is generally not permitted to take any of the following actions without the approval of our stockholders: (a) lower the exercise price per Share of a stock option or grant price per Share of a stock appreciation right after it is granted, (b) cancel an option or a stock appreciation right when the exercise or grant price per Share exceeds the fair market value of the underlying Shares in exchange for cash or another Award, (c) cancel an outstanding option or stock appreciation right in exchange for an option or stock appreciation right with an exercise or grant price per Share that is less than the exercise or grant price per Share of the original options or stock appreciation rights, or (d) take any other action with respect to an option or a stock appreciation right that may be treated as a repricing pursuant to the applicable rules of the NYSE (any such action described in (a)-(d) being referred to as a “Repricing”).

The 2018 Plan will serve as the successor to the Prior Plan. Outstanding awards granted under the Prior Plan will continue to be governed by the terms of the Prior Plan but no awards may be made under the Prior Plan after the Stockholder Approval Date. Accordingly, any shares remaining available for issuance under the Prior Plan will not be issued except to the extent of awards granted under the Prior Plan on or prior to the Stockholder Approval Date.

Eligibility

The persons eligible to receive Awards under the 2018 Plan are the officers, directors, employees, consultants, and other persons who provide services to our company or any of our subsidiaries. The foregoing notwithstanding, only employees of our company, or any parent corporation or subsidiary corporation of our company (as those terms are defined in Sections 424(e) and (f) of the Code, respectively), are eligible for purposes of receiving any incentive stock options that are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Code. An employee on leave of absence may be considered as still in the employ of our company or any of our subsidiaries for purposes of eligibility for participation in the 2018 Plan.

Administration

The 2018 Plan is to be administered by the Committee, provided, however, that except as otherwise expressly provided in the 2018 Plan, the independent members of the Board may elect to exercise any power or authority granted to the Committee under the 2018 Plan. Subject to the terms of the 2018 Plan, the Committee is authorized to select eligible persons to receive Awards, grant Awards, determine the type, number, and other terms and conditions of, and all other matters relating to, Awards, prescribe Award agreements (which need not be identical for each participant) and the rules and regulations for the administration of the 2018 Plan, construe and interpret the 2018 Plan and Award agreements, correct defects, supply omissions or reconcile inconsistencies therein, and make all other decisions and determinations as the Committee may deem necessary or advisable for the administration of the 2018 Plan. Decisions of the Committee shall be final, conclusive, and binding on all persons or entities, including our company, any of our subsidiaries or any participant or beneficiary, or any transferee under the 2018 Plan or any other person claiming rights from or through any of the foregoing persons or entities.

Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights

The Committee is authorized to grant (a) stock options, including both incentive stock options, which can result in potentially favorable tax treatment to the participant, and non-qualified stock options, and (b) stock appreciation rights, entitling the participant to receive the amount by which the fair market value of a Share on the date of exercise exceeds the grant price of the stock appreciation right. The exercise price per share subject to

66

an option and the grant price of a stock appreciation right are determined by the Committee. The exercise price per share of an option and the grant price of a stock appreciation right may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a Share on the date the option or stock appreciation right is granted. An option granted to a person who owns or is deemed to own stock representing 10% or more of the voting power of all classes of stock of our company or any parent company (sometimes referred to as a “10% owner”) will not qualify as an incentive stock option unless the exercise price for the option is not less than 110% of the fair market value of a Share on the date the incentive stock option is granted.

For purposes of the 2018 Plan, the term “fair market value” means the fair market value of Shares, Awards, or other property as determined by the Committee or under procedures established by the Committee. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, the fair market value of a Share as of any given date is the closing sales price per Share as reported on the principal stock exchange or market on which Shares are traded on the date as of which such value is being determined (or as of such later measurement date as determined by the Committee on the date the Award is authorized by the Committee), or, if there is no sale on that date, then on the last previous day on which a sale was reported. The maximum term of each option or stock appreciation right, the times at which each option or stock appreciation right will be exercisable, and provisions requiring forfeiture of unexercised options or stock appreciation rights at or following termination of employment or service generally are fixed by the Committee, except that no option or stock appreciation right may have a term exceeding ten years, and no incentive stock option granted to a 10% owner (as described above) may have a term exceeding five years (to the extent required by the Code at the time of grant). Methods of exercise and settlement and other terms of options and stock appreciation rights are determined by the Committee. Accordingly, the Committee may permit the exercise price of options awarded under the 2018 Plan to be paid in cash, Shares, other Awards, or other property (including loans to participants).

The Company may grant stock appreciation rights in tandem with options (“Tandem stock appreciation rights”) under the 2018 Plan. A Tandem stock appreciation right may be granted at the same time as the related option is granted or, for options that are not incentive stock options, at any time thereafter before exercise or expiration of such option. A Tandem stock appreciation right may only be exercised when the related option would be exercisable and the fair market value of the Shares subject to the related option exceeds the option’s exercise price. Any option related to a Tandem stock appreciation right will no longer be exercisable to the extent the Tandem stock appreciation right has been exercised and any Tandem stock appreciation right will no longer be exercisable to the extent the related option has been exercised.

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units

The Committee is authorized to grant restricted stock and restricted stock units. Restricted stock is a grant of Shares which are subject to such risks of forfeiture and other restrictions as the Committee may impose, including time or performance restrictions or both. A participant granted restricted stock generally has all of the rights of a stockholder of our company (including voting and dividend rights), unless otherwise determined by the Committee. An Award of restricted stock units confers upon a participant the right to receive Shares or cash equal to the fair market value of the specified number of Shares covered by the restricted stock units at the end of a specified deferral period, subject to such risks of forfeiture and other restrictions as the Committee may impose. Prior to settlement, an Award of restricted stock units carries no voting or dividend rights or other rights associated with Share ownership, although dividend equivalents may be granted, as discussed below.

Dividend Equivalents

The Committee is authorized to grant dividend equivalents conferring on participants the right to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, cash, Shares, other Awards, or other property equal in value to dividends paid on a specific number of Shares or other periodic payments. Dividend equivalents may be granted alone or in connection with another Award, may be paid currently or on a deferred basis, and, if deferred, may be deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares, Awards, or otherwise as specified by the Committee. Notwithstanding

67

the foregoing, dividend equivalents credited in connection with an Award that vests based on the achievement of performance goals will be subject to restrictions and risk of forfeiture to the same extent as the Award with respect to which such dividend equivalents have been credited.

Bonus Stock and Awards in Lieu of Cash Obligations

The Committee is authorized to grant Shares as a bonus free of restrictions, or to grant Shares or other Awards in lieu of company obligations to pay cash under the 2018 Plan or other plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to such terms as the Committee may specify.

Other Stock Based Awards

The Committee is authorized to grant Awards that are denominated or payable in, valued by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to Shares. The Committee determines the terms and conditions of such Awards.

Performance Awards

The Committee is authorized to grant performance Awards to participants on terms and conditions established by the Committee. The performance criteria to be achieved during any performance period and the length of the performance period will be determined by the Committee upon the grant of the performance Award. Performance Awards may be valued by reference to a designated number of Shares (in which case they are referred to as performance shares) or by reference to a designated amount of property including cash (in which case they are referred to as performance units). Performance Awards may be settled by delivery of cash, Shares, or other property, or any combination thereof, as determined by the Committee.

Other Terms of Awards

Awards may be settled in the form of cash, Shares, other Awards, or other property, in the discretion of the Committee. The Committee may require or permit participants to defer the settlement of all or part of an Award in accordance with such terms and conditions as the Committee may establish, including payment or crediting of interest or dividend equivalents on deferred amounts, and the crediting of earnings, gains, and losses based on deemed investment of deferred amounts in specified investment vehicles. The Committee is authorized to place cash, Shares, or other property in trusts or make other arrangements to provide for payment of our obligations under the 2018 Plan. The Committee may condition any payment relating to an Award on the withholding of taxes and may provide that a portion of any Shares or other property to be distributed will be withheld (or that previously acquired Shares or other property be surrendered by the participant) to satisfy withholding and other tax obligations. Awards granted under the 2018 Plan generally may not be pledged or otherwise encumbered and are not transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or to a designated beneficiary upon the participant’s death, except that the Committee may, in its discretion, permit transfers, subject to any terms and conditions the Committee may impose pursuant to the express terms of an Award agreement, and such transfers are by gift or pursuant to a domestic relations order and are to a “permitted assignee” that is a permissible transferee under the applicable rules of the SEC for registration of shares of stock on a Form S-8 registration statement. For this purpose, a “permitted assignee” means (a) the participant’s spouse, children, or grandchildren (including any adopted and step children or grandchildren), parents, grandparents, or siblings, (b) a trust for the benefit of one or more of the participant or the persons referred to in clause (a), (c) a partnership, limited liability company, or corporation in which the participant or the persons referred to in clause (a) are the only partners, members, or stockholders, or (d) a foundation in which any person or entity designated in clauses (a), (b) or (c) above control the management of assets. A beneficiary, transferee, or other person claiming any rights under the 2018 Plan from or through any participant will be subject to all terms and conditions of the 2018 Plan and any Award agreement applicable to such participant, except as otherwise determined by the Committee, and to any additional terms and conditions deemed necessary or appropriate by the Committee.

68

Awards under the 2018 Plan generally are granted without a requirement that the participant pay consideration in the form of cash or property for the grant (as distinguished from the exercise), except to the extent required by law. The Committee may, however, grant Awards in exchange for other Awards under the 2018 Plan, awards under other company plans, or other rights to payment from our company, and may grant Awards in addition to and in tandem with such other Awards, rights, or other awards.

Except for certain limited situations (including death, disability, retirement, a “change in control” of our company (as defined in the 2018 Plan), grants to new hires to replace forfeited compensation, grants representing payment of earned performance Awards or other incentive compensation, substitute Awards, or grants to directors of our company or any of our subsidiaries), restricted stock, restricted stock unit, performance, and other stock-based Awards (a) that are not subject to performance-based vesting requirements will vest over a period of not less than three years from date of grant (but permitting pro-rata vesting over such time), and (b) that are subject to performance-based vesting requirements will vest over a period of not less than one year. The Committee will not waive the vesting requirements set forth in the foregoing sentence.

The limitations set forth above will not apply with respect to up to ninety-five percent (95%) of the maximum number of Shares available for delivery under the 2018 Plan (subject to adjustment as provided under the 2018 Plan).

Acceleration of Vesting; Change in Control

Subject to certain limitations, the Committee may, in its discretion, accelerate the exercisability, the lapsing of restrictions, or the expiration of deferral or vesting periods of any Award. In the event of a “change in control” of our company, and only to the extent provided in any employment or other agreement between the participant and our company or any of our subsidiaries, or in any Award agreement, or to the extent otherwise determined by the Committee in its sole discretion in each particular case, (a) any option or stock appreciation right that was not previously vested and exercisable at the time of the “change in control” will become immediately vested and exercisable; (b) any restrictions, deferral of settlement and forfeiture conditions applicable to a restricted stock award, a restricted stock unit award, or another stock-based award subject only to future service requirements will lapse and such Awards will be deemed fully vested; and (c) with respect to any outstanding Award subject to achievement of performance goals and conditions under the 2018 Plan, the Committee may, in its discretion, consider such Awards to have been earned and payable based on achievement of performance goals or based upon target performance (either in full or pro-rata based on the portion of the performance period completed as of the “change in control”).

Except as otherwise provided in any employment or other agreement for services between the participant and our company or any of our subsidiaries, and unless the Committee otherwise determines in a specific instance, each outstanding Award will not be accelerated as described above, if either (a) the Company is the surviving entity in the “change in control” and the Award continues to be outstanding after the “change in control” on substantially the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the “change in control,” or (b) the successor company or its parent company assumes or substitutes for the applicable Award, as determined in accordance the terms of the 2018 Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, unless otherwise provided in an Award agreement, in the event a participant’s employment is terminated without “cause” by our company or any of our subsidiaries or by such successor company or by the participant for “good reason,” as those terms are defined in the 2018 Plan, within 24 months following such “change in control,” each Award held by such participant at the time of the “change in control” will be accelerated as described above.

Subject to any limitations contained in the 2018 Plan relating to the vesting of Awards in the event of any merger, consolidation, or other reorganization in which our company does not survive, or in the event of any “change in control,” the agreement relating to such transaction and/or the Committee may provide for: (a) the continuation of the outstanding Awards by our company, if our company is a surviving entity, (b) the assumption or substitution for outstanding Awards by the surviving entity or its parent or subsidiary pursuant to the

69

provisions contained in the 2018 Plan, (c) full exercisability or vesting and accelerated expiration of the outstanding Awards, or (d) settlement of the value of the outstanding Awards in cash or cash equivalents or other property followed by cancellation of such. The foregoing actions may be taken without the consent or agreement of a participant in the 2018 Plan and without any requirement that all such participants be treated consistently.

Other Adjustments

The Committee is authorized to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards (a) in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and assets) affecting our company, any of our subsidiaries, or any of our business units, or the financial statements of our company or any of our subsidiaries, (b) in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations, accounting principles, tax rates, and regulations or business conditions, or (c) in view of the Committee’s assessment of the business strategy of our company, any of our subsidiaries, or any of our business units thereof, performance of comparable organizations, economic and business conditions, personal performance of a participant, and any other circumstances deemed relevant. However, without the approval of our stockholders, the Committee may not make any adjustment described in this paragraph if such adjustment would result in a Repricing.

Clawback of Benefits

We may (a) cause the cancellation of any Award, (b) require reimbursement of any Award by a participant or beneficiary, and (c) effect any other right of recoupment of equity or other compensation provided under the 2018 Plan or otherwise in accordance with any company policies that currently exist or that may from time to time be adopted or modified in the future by our company and/or applicable law (each, a “clawback policy”). In addition, a participant may be required to repay to us certain previously paid compensation, whether provided under the 2018 Plan or an Award agreement or otherwise, in accordance with any clawback policy. By accepting an Award, a participant is also agreeing to be bound by any existing or future clawback policy adopted by us, or any amendments that may from time to time be made to the clawback policy in the future by us in our discretion (including without limitation any clawback policy adopted or amended to comply with applicable laws or stock exchange requirements) and is further agreeing that all of the participant’s Award agreements (and/or awards issued under the Prior Plan) may be unilaterally amended by us, without the participant’s consent, to the extent that we in our discretion determine to be necessary or appropriate to comply with any clawback policy.

If the participant, without our consent, while employed by or providing services to us or any of our subsidiaries or after termination of such employment or service, violates a non-competition, non-solicitation, or non-disclosure covenant or agreement, then (a) any outstanding, vested or unvested, earned or unearned portion of the Award may, at the Committee’s discretion, be canceled and (b) the Committee, in its discretion, may require the participant or other person to whom any payment has been made or Shares or other property have been transferred in connection with the Award to forfeit and pay over to us, on demand, all or any portion of the gain (whether or not taxable) realized upon the exercise of any option or stock appreciation right and the value realized (whether or not taxable) on the vesting or payment of any other Award during the time period specified in the Award agreement or otherwise specified by the Committee.

Amendment and Termination

Our board of directors may amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the 2018 Plan or the Committee’s authority to grant Awards without the consent of stockholders or participants or beneficiaries, except that stockholder approval must be obtained for any amendment or alteration if such approval is required by law or regulation or under the rules of any stock exchange or quotation system on which Shares may then be listed or quoted; provided that, except as otherwise permitted by the 2018 Plan or an Award agreement, without the consent of an affected participant, no such board action may materially and adversely affect the rights of such participant under the terms of any previously granted and outstanding Award. The Committee may waive any

70

conditions or rights under, or amend, alter, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any Award theretofore granted and any Award agreement relating thereto, except as otherwise provided in the 2018 Plan; provided that, except as otherwise permitted by the 2018 Plan or Award agreement, without the consent of an affected participant, no such Committee or board action may materially and adversely affect the rights of such participant under terms of such Award. The 2018 Plan will terminate at the earliest of (a) such time as no Shares remain available for issuance under the 2018 Plan, (b) termination of the 2018 Plan by our board of directors, or (c) the tenth anniversary of the Stockholder Approval Date. Awards outstanding upon expiration of the 2018 Plan will remain in effect until they have been exercised or terminated, or have expired.

Federal Income Tax Consequences of Awards

The 2018 Plan is not qualified under the provisions of Section 401(a) of the Code and is not subject to any of the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.

Non-Qualified Stock Options

An optionee generally is not taxable upon the grant of a non-qualified stock option granted under the 2018 Plan. On exercise of a non-qualified stock option granted under the 2018 Plan, an optionee will recognize ordinary income equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value on the date of exercise of the Shares acquired on exercise of the option over the exercise price. If the optionee is an employee of our company or any of our subsidiaries, that income will be subject to the withholding of federal income tax. The optionee’s tax basis in those Shares will be equal to their fair market value on the date of exercise of the option, and his or her holding period for those Shares will begin on that date.

If an optionee pays for Shares on exercise of an option by delivering Shares, the optionee will not recognize gain or loss on the Shares delivered, even if their fair market value at the time of exercise differs from the optionee’s tax basis in them. The optionee, however, otherwise will be taxed on the exercise of the option in the manner described above as if he or she had paid the exercise price in cash. If a separate identifiable stock certificate or other indicia of ownership is issued for that number of Shares equal to the number of Shares delivered on exercise of the option, the optionee’s tax basis in the Shares represented by that certificate or other indicia of ownership will be equal to his or her tax basis in the Shares delivered, and his or her holding period for those Shares will include his or her holding period for the Shares delivered. The optionee’s tax basis and holding period for the additional Shares received on exercise of the option will be the same as if the optionee had exercised the option solely in exchange for cash.

We generally will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of ordinary income taxable to the optionee, provided that amount constitutes an ordinary and necessary business expense for our company and is reasonable in amount, and either the employee includes that amount in income or we timely satisfy our reporting requirements with respect to that amount.

Incentive Stock Options

Under the Code, an optionee generally is not subject to tax upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. In addition, if the optionee holds a Share received on exercise of an incentive stock option for at least two years from the date the option was granted and at least one year from the date the option was exercised (the “Required Holding Period”), the difference, if any, between the amount realized on a sale or other taxable disposition of that Share and the holder’s tax basis in that Share will be long-term capital gain or loss.

If an optionee disposes of a Share acquired on exercise of an incentive stock option before the end of the Required Holding Period (a “Disqualifying Disposition”), the optionee generally will recognize ordinary income in the year of the Disqualifying Disposition equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Share on the date the incentive stock option was exercised over the exercise price. If, however, the Disqualifying

71

Disposition is a sale or exchange on which a loss, if realized, would be recognized for federal income tax purposes, and if the sales proceeds are less than the fair market value of the Share on the date of exercise of the option, the amount of ordinary income recognized by the optionee will not exceed the gain, if any, realized on the sale. If the amount realized on a Disqualifying Disposition exceeds the fair market value of the Share on the date of exercise of the option, that excess will be short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on whether the holding period for the Share exceeds one year.

An optionee who exercises an incentive stock option by delivering Shares acquired previously pursuant to the exercise of an incentive stock option before the expiration of the Required Holding Period for those Shares is treated as making a Disqualifying Disposition of those Shares. This rule prevents “pyramiding” or the exercise of an incentive stock option (that is, exercising an incentive stock option for one Share and using that Share, and others so acquired, to exercise successive incentive stock options) without the imposition of current income tax.

For purposes of the alternative minimum tax, the amount by which the fair market value of a Share acquired on exercise of an incentive stock option exceeds the exercise price of that option generally will be an adjustment included in the optionee’s alternative minimum taxable income for the year in which the option is exercised. If, however, there is a Disqualifying Disposition of the Share in the year in which the option is exercised, there will be no adjustment with respect to that Share. If there is a Disqualifying Disposition in a later year, no income with respect to the Disqualifying Disposition is included in the optionee’s alternative minimum taxable income for that year. In computing alternative minimum taxable income, the tax basis of a Share acquired on exercise of an incentive stock option is increased by the amount of the adjustment taken into account with respect to that Share for alternative minimum tax purposes in the year the option is exercised.

We are not allowed an income tax deduction with respect to the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option or the disposition of a Share acquired on exercise of an incentive stock option after the Required Holding Period. However, if there is a Disqualifying Disposition of a Share, we generally are allowed a deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income includible in income by the optionee, provided that amount constitutes an ordinary and necessary business expense for our company and is reasonable in amount, and either the employee includes that amount in income or we timely satisfy our reporting requirements with respect to that amount.

Stock Awards

Generally, the recipient of a stock award will recognize ordinary compensation income at the time the Shares are received equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Shares received over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the Shares. If, however, the Shares are not vested when they are received under the 2018 Plan (for example, if the recipient is required to work for a period of time in order to have the right to sell the Shares), the recipient generally will not recognize income until the Shares become vested, at which time the recipient will recognize ordinary compensation income equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Shares on the date they become vested over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the Shares. A recipient may, however, file an election with the Internal Revenue Service, within 30 days of his or her receipt of the Award, to recognize ordinary compensation income, as of the date the recipient receives the Award, equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the Shares on the date the Award is granted over any amount paid by the recipient in exchange for the Shares.

The recipient’s basis for the determination of gain or loss upon the subsequent disposition of Shares acquired as Awards will be the amount paid for the Shares plus any ordinary income recognized either when the Shares are received or when the Shares become vested. Upon the disposition of any Shares received as a Share Award under the 2018 Plan, the difference between the sales price and the recipient’s basis in the Shares will be treated as a capital gain or loss and generally will be characterized as long-term capital gain or loss if the Shares have been held for more the one year from the date as of which he or she would be required to recognize any compensation income.

We generally will not be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes.

72

Stock Appreciation Rights

We may grant stock appreciation rights, separate from any other Award (“Stand-Alone stock appreciation rights”), or Tandem stock appreciation rights, under the 2018 Plan. Generally, the recipient of a Stand-Alone stock appreciation right will not recognize any taxable income at the time the Stand-Alone stock appreciation right is granted.

With respect to Stand-Alone stock appreciation rights, if the recipient receives the appreciation inherent in the stock appreciation rights in cash, the cash will be taxable as ordinary compensation income to the recipient at the time that the cash is received. If the recipient receives the appreciation inherent in the stock appreciation rights in Shares, the recipient will recognize ordinary compensation income equal to the excess of the fair market value of the Shares on the day they are received over any amounts paid by the recipient for the Shares.

With respect to Tandem stock appreciation rights, if the recipient elects to surrender the underlying option in exchange for cash or Shares equal to the appreciation inherent in the underlying option, the tax consequences to the recipient will be the same as discussed above relating to the Stand-Alone stock appreciation rights. If the recipient elects to exercise the underlying option, the holder will be taxed at the time of exercise as if he or she had exercised a non-qualified stock option (discussed above), i.e., the recipient will recognize ordinary income for federal tax purposes measured by the excess of the then fair market value of the Shares over the exercise price.

In general, there will be no federal income tax deduction allowed to us upon the grant or termination of Stand-Alone stock appreciation rights or Tandem stock appreciation rights. Upon the exercise of either a Stand-Alone stock appreciation right or a Tandem stock appreciation right, however, we generally will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of ordinary income that the employee is required to recognize as a result of the exercise, provided that the deduction is not otherwise disallowed under the Code.

Dividend Equivalents

Generally, the recipient of a dividend equivalent award will recognize ordinary compensation income at the time the dividend equivalent award is received equal to the fair market value of the amount received. We generally will be entitled to a deduction for federal income tax purposes equal to the amount of ordinary income that the recipient is required to recognize as a result of the dividend equivalent award, provided that the deduction is not otherwise disallowed under the Code.

Section 409A of the Code

The 2018 Plan is intended to comply with Section 409A of the Code to the extent that such section would apply to any Award under the 2018 Plan. Section 409A of the Code governs the taxation of deferred compensation. Any participant that is granted an Award that is deemed to be deferred compensation, such as a grant of restricted stock units that does not qualify for an exemption from Section 409A of the Code, and does not comply with Section 409A of the Code, could be subject to taxation on the Award as soon as the Award is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (even if the Award is not exercisable) and an additional 20% tax (and a further additional tax based upon an amount of interest determined under Section 409A of the Code) on the value of the Award.

Importance of Consulting Tax Adviser

The information set forth above is a summary only and does not purport to be complete. In addition, the information is based upon current federal income tax rules and therefore is subject to change when those rules change. Moreover, because the tax consequences to any recipient may depend on his or her particular situation, each recipient should consult his or her tax adviser as to the federal, state, local, foreign, and other tax consequences of the grant or exercise of an Award or the disposition of Shares acquired as a result of an Award.

73

PROPOSAL NO. 5

APPROVAL OF THE REVERSE STOCK SPLIT PROPOSAL

Our board of directors has adopted and is recommending that our stockholders approve proposed amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to (a) effect a reverse stock split (the “Reverse Split”) of our common stock at a ratio of between 1-for-35 and 1-for-100, with such ratio to be determined at the sole discretion of our board of directors and with such Reverse Split to be effected at such time and date, if at all, as determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion prior to our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and (b) reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock in a corresponding proportion to the Reverse Split, rounded to the nearest whole share. The form of proposed amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Split and corresponding reduction in our authorized shares of common stock is attached as Annex B to this Proxy Statement. However, the text of the proposed amendments is subject to revision to include such changes as may be required by the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and as our board of directors deems necessary or advisable to effect the proposed amendment of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

By approving the Reverse Stock Split Proposal, stockholders will approve a series of amendments to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation pursuant to which any whole number of outstanding shares between and including 35 and 100 would be combined into one share of our common stock, and the total number of authorized shares of common stock, assuming the total shares of common stock authorized in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as of November 6, 2018 and not giving effect to the Authorized Share Increase Proposal, will be reduced by a corresponding proportion from 105,000,000 shares to between 3,000,000 shares (in the event of a 1-for-35 Reverse Split) and 1,050,000 shares (in the event of a 1-for-100 Reverse Split), and authorize our board of directors to file only one such amendment, as determined by our board of directors in the manner described herein, and to abandon each amendment not selected by our board of directors. Our board of directors believes that stockholder approval of amendments granting our board of directors this discretion, rather than approval of a specified exchange ratio, provides our board of directors with maximum flexibility to react to then-current market conditions and, therefore, is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. Our board of directors may effect only one Reverse Split as a result of this authorization. Our board of directors may also elect not to do any Reverse Split. Our board of directors’ decision as to whether and when to effect the Reverse Split will be based on a number of factors, including market conditions, existing and expected trading prices for our common stock, and the continued listing requirements of the NYSE. Although our stockholders may approve the Reverse Split, we will not effect the Reverse Split if our board of directors does not deem it to be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. Our board of directors will not effect the Reverse Split after the date of the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

The Reverse Split will take effect, if at all, after it is approved by our stockholders holding a majority of the shares of our common stock outstanding on the record date, is deemed by our board of directors to be in the best interests of our company and our stockholders, and after filing an amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.

This description of the proposed amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to effect the Reverse Split is only a summary of such amendment and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the actual text of the form of proposed amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation attached as Annex B to this Proxy Statement.

Our board of directors unanimously recommends a vote “FOR” the Reverse Stock Split Proposal.

Background

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE. In order for our common stock to continue to be listed on the NYSE, we must satisfy various continued listing requirements of the NYSE. If we are unable to meet the NYSE continued listing requirements, our common stock will be subject to delisting.

74

Under the NYSE’s continued listing requirements, if the average closing price of our common stock over a consecutive 30 trading-day period is less than $1.00 per share, our common stock would be subject to delisting by the NYSE.

On October 12, 2018, the NYSE notified us that the average closing price of our common stock on the previous 30 consecutive trading day period had fallen below $1.00 per share and, accordingly, that we were not in compliance with this continued listing requirement. Pursuant to the NYSE continued listing standard, we have six months to cure this deficiency and regain compliance. The Company can regain compliance with this continued listing standard if, on the last trading day of any calendar month during the six-month period following receipt of the notice of non-compliance or on April 12, 2019, which is the date that is six months following receipt of the notice of non-compliance, the Company’s common stock has a closing price of at least $1.00 per share and an average closing price of at least $1.00 per share over the previous 30 consecutive trading day period. Following receipt of this notice of non-compliance from the NYSE, our board of directors adopted resolutions, subject to approval by our stockholders, to amend our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to (a) effect a reverse stock split of our common stock at a ratio of between 1-for-35 and 1-for-100, with such ratio to be determined at the sole discretion of our board of directors and with such Reverse Split to be effected at such time and date, if at all, as determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion prior to our 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and (b) reduce the number of authorized shares of our common stock in a corresponding proportion to the Reverse Split, rounded to the nearest whole share. These resolutions were approved as a means of increasing the share price comfortably above the amount per share required to regain compliance.

Purpose of the Proposed Reverse Split

Our board of directors’ primary objective in proposing the Reverse Split is to raise the per share trading price of our common stock. Our board of directors believes that the Reverse Split will result in a higher per share trading price, which is intended to enable us to maintain the listing of our common stock on the NYSE and generate greater investor interest in our company.

Our board of directors believes that maintaining the listing of our common stock on the NYSE is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders. If our common stock were delisted from the NYSE, our board of directors believes such delisting would adversely affect the market liquidity of our common stock, decrease the market price of our common stock, adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for the continuation of our operations, and result in the loss of confidence in our company.

If the Reverse Split is approved by our stockholders and implemented by our board of directors, we expect to satisfy the $1.00 per share minimum price requirement for continued listing. However, despite the approval of the Reverse Split by our stockholders and implementation by our board of directors, there can be no assurance that the Reverse Split will result in our meeting and maintaining the $1.00 per share minimum price requirement. The effect of the Reverse Split upon the market price for our common stock cannot be predicted, and the history of similar reverse stock splits for companies in like circumstances is varied. The market price per share of our common stock after the Reverse Split may not rise in proportion to the reduction in the number of shares of our common stock outstanding resulting from the Reverse Split due to, among other reasons, our performance and other factors which may be unrelated to the number of shares outstanding. The common stock could also be delisted from the NYSE due to our failure to comply with one or more other continued listing requirements of the NYSE.

75

Effect on Outstanding Common Stock and Authorized Common Stock

The following table illustrates the effects of a 1-for-35, 1-for-70 and 1-for-100 Reverse Split on our outstanding common stock as of November 6, 2018 (without giving effect to any adjustments for factional shares), and corresponding reduction in the number of authorized shares of our common stock: