Edgar Filing: HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.

HII 2013 Q2 10-Q 6.30

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_____________________________________

FORM 10-Q

_____________________________________



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 001-34910

_____________________________________

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_____________________________________



DELAWARE		90-0607005
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4101 Washington Avenue, Newport News, Virginia 23607

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(757) 380-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

_____________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	ý		Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of August 2, 2013, 49,781,490 shares of the registrant's common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS




	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	40
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	40

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	41
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	41
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	41
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	41
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	41
Item 5.	Other Information	41
Item 6.	Exhibits	42

Signatures		43

Table of Contents

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)



	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
(in millions, except per share amounts)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Sales and service revenues
Product sales	$	1,423		$	1,504		$	2,744		$	2,857
Service revenues	260			217			501			432
Total sales and service revenues	1,683			1,721			3,245			3,289
Cost of sales and service revenues
Cost of product sales	1,157			1,252			2,243			2,391
Cost of service revenues	227			191			440			376
Income (loss) from operating investments, net	2			4			4			6
General and administrative expenses	185			176			355			342
Operating income (loss)	116			106			211			186
Other income (expense)
Interest expense	(29		)	(29		)	(59		)	(59		)
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	87			77			152			127
Federal income taxes	30			27			51			44
Net earnings (loss)	$	57		$	50		$	101		$	83

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	1.14		$	1.01		$	2.02		$	1.69
Weighted-average common shares outstanding	50.2			49.5			50.0			49.2

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	1.12		$	1.00		$	2.00		$	1.67
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding	50.7			50.1			50.5			49.8

Dividends declared per share	$	0.10		$	—		$	0.20		$	—

Net earnings (loss) from above	$	57		$	50		$	101		$	83
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Change in unamortized benefit plan costs	210			21			215			45
Other	(1		)	—			1			—
Tax benefit (expense) for items of other comprehensive income	(81		)	(8		)	(86		)	(17		)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	128			13			130			28
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	185		$	63		$	231		$	111

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION (UNAUDITED)



($ in millions)	June 30 2013			December 31 2012
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	623		$	1,057
Accounts receivable, net	1,101			905
Inventoried costs, net	321			288
Deferred income taxes	179			213
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	45			21
Total current assets	2,269			2,484
Property, plant, and equipment, net	1,990			2,034
Goodwill	881			881
Other purchased intangibles, net	537			548
Long-term deferred tax asset	253			329
Miscellaneous other assets	117			116
Total assets	$	6,047		$	6,392
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Trade accounts payable	$	287		$	377
Accrued employees’ compensation	193			235
Current portion of long-term debt	52			51
Current portion of postretirement plan liabilities	148			166
Current portion of workers’ compensation liabilities	223			216
Advance payments and billings in excess of revenues	108			134
Other current liabilities	209			205
Total current liabilities	1,220			1,384
Long-term debt	1,765			1,779
Pension plan liabilities	1,065			1,301
Other postretirement plan liabilities	654			799
Workers’ compensation liabilities	406			403
Other long-term liabilities	64			59
Total liabilities	5,174			5,725
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 13)	—			—
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150 million shares authorized; 50.3 million issued and 49.8 million outstanding as of June 30, 2013, and 49.6 million issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012	1			—
Additional paid-in capital	1,904			1,894
Retained earnings (deficit)	91			—
Treasury stock	(27		)	(1		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(1,096		)	(1,226		)
Total stockholders’ equity	873			667
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	6,047		$	6,392

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)



	Six Months Ended June 30
($ in millions)	2013			2012
Operating Activities
Net earnings (loss)	$	101		$	83
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Depreciation	82			82
Amortization of purchased intangibles	11			10
Amortization of debt issuance costs	4			4
Stock-based compensation	19			16
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation	(3		)	—
Deferred income taxes	28			29
Change in
Accounts receivable	(196		)	(167		)
Inventoried costs	(25		)	25
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(28		)	(11		)
Accounts payable and accruals	(146		)	(158		)
Retiree benefits	(184		)	(92		)
Other non-cash transactions, net	—			1
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(337		)	(178		)
Investing Activities
Additions to property, plant, and equipment	(55		)	(57		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	(55		)	(57		)
Financing Activities
Repayment of long-term debt	(13		)	(15		)
Dividends paid	(10		)	—
Repurchases of common stock	(25		)	—
Proceeds from stock option exercises	3			4
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation	3			—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(42		)	(11		)
Change in cash and cash equivalents	(434		)	(246		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	1,057			915
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	623		$	669
Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosure
Cash paid for income taxes	$	41		$	8
Cash paid for interest	$	55		$	55
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Capital expenditures accrued in accounts payable	$	3		$	2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (UNAUDITED)



Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 ($ in millions)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Stockholders' Equity
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	—	$	1,862	$	(141	)	$	—		$	(849	)	$	872
Net earnings (loss)	—		—		83			—			—			83
Additional paid-in capital	—		11		—			—			—			11
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—		—			—			28			28
Balance as of June 30, 2012	$	—	$	1,873	$	(58	)	$	—		$	(821	)	$	994

Balance as of December 31, 2012	$	—	$	1,894	$	—		$	(1	)	$	(1,226	)	$	667
Net earnings (loss)	—		—		101			—			—			101
Dividends declared	—		—		(10		)	—			—			(10		)
Additional paid-in capital	—		10		—			—			—			10
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	—		—		—			—			130			130
Common stock	1		—		—			—			—			1
Treasury stock activity	—		—		—			(26		)	—			(26		)
Balance as of June 30, 2013	$	1	$	1,904	$	91		$	(27	)	$	(1,096	)	$	873

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

HUNTINGTON INGALLS INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

For more than a century, Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. ("HII" or the "Company") has been designing, building, overhauling and repairing ships primarily for the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Coast Guard. HII is organized into two operating segments, Ingalls and Newport News, which also represent its reportable segments. Through its Ingalls segment, HII is a builder of amphibious assault and expeditionary ships for the U.S. Navy, the sole builder of National Security Cutters for the U.S. Coast Guard, and one of only two companies that builds the Navy's current fleet of DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. Through its Newport News segment, HII is the nation's sole designer, builder and refueler of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, and one of only two companies currently designing and building nuclear-powered submarines for the U.S. Navy. HII is one of the nation's leading full-service providers for the design, engineering, construction and life cycle support of major surface ship programs for the U.S. Navy. As prime contractor, principal subcontractor, team member or partner, HII participates in many high-priority U.S. defense technology programs. The Company conducts substantially all of its business with the U.S. Government, principally the Department of Defense ("DoD").

On March 29, 2011, HII entered into a Separation and Distribution Agreement with its former parent company, Northrop Grumman Corporation ("Northrop Grumman"), and Northrop Grumman's subsidiaries (Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. and Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation), pursuant to which HII was legally and structurally separated from Northrop Grumman.

In connection with the spin-off, HII entered into a Transition Services Agreement with Northrop Grumman, under which Northrop Grumman or certain of its subsidiaries provided HII with certain enterprise shared services (including information technology, resource planning, financial, procurement and human resource services), benefits support services and other specified services to HII at cost. The term of the Transition Services Agreement ended on October 9, 2012. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, costs incurred for services under the Transition Services Agreement were approximately $5 million and $16 million, respectively.

In connection with the spin-off, HII entered into new borrowing arrangements to provide the Company with adequate liquidity and to fund a $1,429 million contribution to Northrop Grumman. Specifically, HII issued $1,200 million in senior notes and entered into the HII Credit Facility ("Credit Facility") with third-party lenders that includes a $650 million revolver and a $575 million term loan. See Note 10: Debt.

The spin-off from Northrop Grumman was a transaction under common control; therefore, no change in the historical basis of HII's assets or liabilities was recorded as part of the spin-off.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Principles of Consolidation - The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of HII and its subsidiaries have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and the instructions to Form 10-Q promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. For classification of current assets and liabilities related to its long-term production contracts, the Company uses the duration of these contracts as its operating cycle, which is generally longer than one year. Additionally, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary by management for a fair presentation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

The quarterly information is labeled using a calendar convention; that is, first quarter is consistently labeled as ending on March 31, second quarter as ending on June 30, and third quarter as ending on September 30. It is management's long-standing practice to establish interim closing dates using a "fiscal" calendar, which requires the businesses to close their books on a Friday near these quarter-end dates in order to normalize the potentially

Table of Contents

disruptive effects of quarterly closings on business processes. The effects of this practice only exist for interim periods within a reporting year.

Equity - On each of March 15, 2013 and June 14, 2013, the Company paid quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per share, which totaled $10 million. During 2012, the Company's board of directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $150 million of the Company's common stock over the next three years. Purchases under the stock repurchase program may be made from time to time in the discretion of management in the open market, through privately negotiated transactions or through other means, are subject to prevailing market conditions and other factors, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company repurchased 465,210 shares at a cost of $26 million, which is recorded as treasury stock in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position.

Accounting Estimates - The preparation of the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates have been prepared on the basis of the most current and best available information and actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

The Budget Control Act of 2011 will result in significant decreases in DoD spending starting in 2013, which could negatively impact the Company's revenues and its estimated recovery of goodwill and other long-lived assets.

The Company recognizes changes in estimates of contract sales, costs and profits using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting. This method recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods. Hence, the effect of the changes on future periods of contract performance is recognized as if the revised estimate had been the original estimate. For the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, net cumulative catch-up adjustments increased operating income by $35 million and $34 million, respectively, and increased diluted earnings per share by $0.44 and $0.44, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, net cumulative catch-up adjustments increased operating income by $65 million and $48 million, respectively, and increased diluted earnings per share by $0.84 and $0.63, respectively.

3. ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATES

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update 2013-02 "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income" ("ASU 2013-02"). This update requires entities to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, and their corresponding effects on net income if required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period; otherwise, cross-reference to other disclosures is required. ASU 2013-02 is effective for all reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted ASU 2013-02 as of January 1, 2013 without material impact on the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. See Note 15: Employee Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits.

4. AVONDALE

In July 2010, plans were announced to consolidate the Company's Ingalls operations by winding down and subsequently closing the Avondale, Louisiana facility in 2013 after completing LPD-class ships that were under construction at this facility. The Company intends to build future LPD-class ships at the Company's Pascagoula, Mississippi facility, although the Company may continue to utilize the Avondale facility beyond 2013 to construct certain LPD assemblies. The consolidation is intended to reduce costs, increase efficiency, and address shipbuilding overcapacity.

In connection with and as a result of the decision to wind down military shipbuilding at the Avondale, Louisiana facility, the Company began incurring and paying related costs, including, but not limited to, severance expense, relocation expense, and asset write-downs related to the Avondale facilities. Management's current estimate of these expenditures is $256 million. Such costs are expected to be recoverable under existing flexibly-priced contracts or future negotiated contracts in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation ("FAR") provisions for the treatment of restructuring and shutdown related costs. The Company is currently in discussions with the U.S. Navy regarding its cost submission to support the recoverability of these costs under the FAR and applicable contracts.

Table of Contents

The Defense Contract Audit Agency ("DCAA"), a DoD agency, prepared an initial audit report on the Company's July 30, 2010 cost proposal for restructuring and shutdown related costs of $310 million, which stated that the proposal was not adequately supported for the DCAA to reach a conclusion and questioned approximately $25 million, or 8%, of the costs submitted by the Company. The Company then submitted a revised proposal dated October 12, 2011 to address the concerns of the DCAA and to reflect a revised estimated total cost of $271 million. The Company received a supplemental audit report, which again stated that the proposal was not sufficiently supported to allow the DCAA to reach a conclusion. However, the report, while qualified and not final, supports the Company's position that, in general, most of the categories of costs incorporated in the proposal are allowable as restructuring activities. The amount and percentage of questioned costs are materially unchanged from the previous audit report. The Company submitted another revised proposal further addressing the DCAA concerns and supporting management's current restructuring cost estimate of $256 million.

Ultimately, the Company anticipates agreement with the U.S. Navy that is substantially in accordance with management's cost recovery expectations. Accordingly, HII has treated these costs as allowable costs in determining the earnings performance on its contracts in process. The actual restructuring expenses related to the wind down may be greater than the Company's current estimate, and any inability to recover such costs could result in a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company also evaluated the effect that the wind down of the Avondale facilities might have on the benefit plans in which HII employees participate. HII determined that the potential impact of a curtailment in these plans was not material to its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Although closure is still the baseline assumption for Avondale, the Company is pursuing engineering and manufacturing opportunities in the energy infrastructure market as well as other industrial manufacturing opportunities. We are also evaluating opportunities for commercial vessel construction, which are being driven by demand in support of Jones Act requirements. In addition, in the event that Avondale remains open beyond the end of 2013, the Company may continue to utilize the facility beyond 2013 to construct certain LPD assemblies. Ultimately, if the Company is successful in pursuing such opportunities, and Avondale were to remain open, the Company would submit a revised restructuring proposal to the U.S. Navy consistent with this change. In such event, the Company expects the total estimated restructuring costs would decrease. While the restructuring costs that are currently capitalized as incurred, consisting primarily of severance and retention payments, should remain recoverable under existing or future U.S. Navy contracts, other costs would remain as part of the Avondale cost structure associated with Avondale's new line of business.

The table below summarizes the changes in the Company's liability for restructuring and shutdown related costs associated with winding down the Avondale facility. As of June 30, 2013 and 2012, these costs were comprised primarily of employee severance and retention payments as well as incentive bonuses. These amounts were capitalized in inventoried costs, and will be recognized as expenses in cost of product sales beginning in 2014.



($ in millions)
Balance as of December 31, 2011	$	50
Payments	(20		)
Adjustments	2
Balance as of June 30, 2012	$	32

Balance as of December 31, 2012	$	24
Payments	(9		)
Adjustments	8
Balance as of June 30, 2013	$	23

Table of Contents

5. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share was as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
(in millions, except per share amounts)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Net earnings (loss)	$	57	$	50	$	101	$	83

Weighted-average common shares outstanding	50.2		49.5		50.0		49.2
Net effect of dilutive stock options	0.3		0.2		0.3		0.2
Net effect of dilutive restricted stock rights	0.2		0.2		0.2		0.2
Net effect of dilutive restricted performance stock rights	—		0.2		—		0.2
Dilutive weighted-average common shares outstanding	50.7		50.1		50.5		49.8

Earnings (loss) per share - basic	$	1.14	$	1.01	$	2.02	$	1.69
Earnings (loss) per share - diluted	$	1.12	$	1.00	$	2.00	$	1.67

The Company's calculation of diluted earnings per common share includes the dilutive effects of the assumed exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock based on the treasury stock method. Under this method, the Company has excluded the effects of 0.7 million stock options, 0.3 million Restricted Stock Rights ("RSRs"), and 1.4 million Restricted Performance Stock Rights ("RPSRs") from the diluted share amounts presented above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013. The amounts presented above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, exclude the impact of 1.2 million shares related to stock options, 0.5 million shares related to RSRs and 1.3 million shares related to RPSRs under the treasury stock method.

6. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company is organized into two reportable segments: Ingalls and Newport News. The following table presents segment results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012:



	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
($ in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012
Sales and Service Revenues
Ingalls	$	672		$	756		$	1,303		$	1,448
Newport News	1,031			979			1,981			1,874
Intersegment eliminations	(20		)	(14		)	(39		)	(33		)
Total sales and service revenues	$	1,683		$	1,721		$	3,245		$	3,289
Operating Income (Loss)
Ingalls	$	35		$	38		$	61		$	58
Newport News	101			89			195			170
Total segment operating income (loss)	136			127			256			228
Non-segment factors affecting operating income (loss)
FAS/CAS Adjustment	(18		)	(19		)	(41		)	(36		)
Deferred state income taxes	(2		)	(2		)	(4		)	(6		)
Total operating income (loss)	$	116		$	106		$	211		$	186

FAS/CAS Adjustment - The FAS/CAS Adjustment reflects the difference between expenses for pension and other postretirement benefits determined in accordance with GAAP and the expenses for these items included in segment operating income in accordance with U.S. Cost Accounting Standards ("CAS").

Table of Contents

7. INVENTORIED COSTS, NET

Inventoried costs were composed of the following:



($ in millions)	June 30 2013			December 31 2012
Production costs of contracts in process	$	227		$	198
General and administrative expenses	2			3
	229			201
Progress payments received	(1		)	(1		)
	228			200
Raw material inventory	93			88
Total inventoried costs, net	$	321		$	288

8. GOODWILL AND OTHER PURCHASED INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill

HII performs impairment tests for goodwill as of November 30 of each year and between annual impairment tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the Company's reporting units below their carrying value.

Accumulated goodwill impairment losses as of both June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, were $2,755 million. The accumulated goodwill impairment losses for Ingalls as of both June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, were $1,568 million. The accumulated goodwill impairment losses for Newport News as of both June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, were $1,187 million.

Purchased Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the Company's aggregate purchased intangible assets, all of which are contract or program related intangible assets.



($ in millions)	June 30 2013			December 31 2012
Gross carrying amount	$	939		$	939
Accumulated amortization	(402		)	(391		)
Net carrying amount	$	537		$	548

The Company's remaining purchased intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over an aggregate weighted-average period of 40 years. Remaining unamortized intangible assets consist principally of amounts pertaining to nuclear-powered aircraft carrier and submarine contract intangibles whose useful lives have been estimated based on the life cycle of the related programs. Aggregate amortization expense was $5 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Aggregate amortization expense was $11 million and $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company expects amortization for purchased intangibles of approximately $20 million annually for the next five years.

9. INCOME TAXES

The Company's earnings are entirely domestic and its effective tax rates on earnings from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were 34.5% and 35.1%, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company's effective tax rates were 33.6% and 34.6%, respectively.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company's effective tax rate differed from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the enactment of the American Taxpayer Relief Act in January 2013. The Company's effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2013, reflects the entire 2012 income tax benefit for the research and development tax credit, which expired at the end of 2011. The American Taxpayer Relief Act

Table of Contents

retroactively extended the research and development tax credit through the end of 2013. Due to the timing of enactment, the impact on the Company's effective tax rate for the 2012 credit was reflected in the first quarter of 2013. The Company's effective tax rate can also differ from the federal statutory rate as a result of nondeductible expenditures, the domestic manufacturing deduction and its Tax Matters Agreement with Northrop Grumman.

For current state income tax purposes, the stand-alone tax amounts have been computed as if they were allowable costs under the terms of the Company's existing contracts in the applicable period and are included in general and administrative expenses.

Net deferred tax assets as presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position were as follows:



($ in millions)	June 30 2013		December 31 2012
Net current deferred tax assets	$	179	$	213
Net non-current deferred tax assets	253		329
Total net deferred tax assets	$	432	$	542

10. DEBT

Long-term debt consisted of the following:



($ in millions)	June 30 2013		December 31 2012
Term loan due March 30, 2016	$	512	$	525
Senior notes due March 15, 2018, 6.875%	600		600
Senior notes due March 15, 2021, 7.125%	600		600
Mississippi economic development revenue bonds due May 1, 2024, 7.81%	84		84
Gulf opportunity zone industrial development revenue bonds due December 1, 2028, 4.55%	21		21
Total long-term debt	1,817		1,830
Less current portion	52		51
Long-term debt, net of current portion	$	1,765	$	1,779

Credit Facility - In connection with the spin-off, the Company entered into the Credit Facility with third-party lenders. The Credit Facility is comprised of a five-year term loan facility of $575 million, which was funded on March 30, 2011, and a revolving credit facility of $650 million, which may be drawn upon during a period of five years from the date of the funding. The revolving credit facility includes a letter of credit subfacility of $350 million, and a swingline loan subfacility of $100 million. The term loan and revolving credit facility have a variable interest rate on outstanding borrowings based on the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a spread based upon the Company's leverage ratio. The current spread as of June 30, 2013, was 2.5% and may vary between 2.0% and 3.0%. The revolving credit facility also has a commitment fee rate on the unutilized balance based on the Company's leverage ratio. The current fee rate as of June 30, 2013, was 0.5% and may vary between 0.35% and 0.5%. As of June 30, 2013, approximately $46 million in letters of credit were issued but undrawn, and the remaining $604 million was unutilized.

The term loan facility is subject to amortization in three-month intervals from the funding date, expected to be in an aggregate amount equal to 5% during each of the first year and the second year, 10% during the third year, 15% during the fourth year, and 65% during the fifth year, of which 5% is payable on each of the first three quarterly payment dates during such year, and the balance is payable on the term maturity date.

Senior Notes - In connection with the spin-off, the Company issued $600 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875% senior notes due March 15, 2018, and $600 million aggregate principal amount of 7.125% senior notes due March 15, 2021.

Table of Contents

Mississippi Economic Development Revenue Bonds - As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $84 million outstanding under Industrial Revenue Bonds issued by the Mississippi Business Finance Corporation. These bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.81% per annum (payable semi-annually) and mature in 2024.

Gulf Opportunity Zone Industrial Development Revenue Bonds - As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $21 million outstanding under Gulf Opportunity Zone Industrial Development Revenue Bonds issued by the Mississippi Business Finance Corporation. These bonds accrue interest at a fixed rate of 4.55% per annum (payable semi-annually), and mature in 2028.

The Company's debt arrangements contain customary affirmative and negative covenants, including a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

The estimated fair value of the Company's total long-term debt, including current portions, as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was $1,935 million and $1,974 million, respectively. The fair value of the Company's long-term debt was calculated based on either recent trades of the Company's debt instruments in inactive markets or yields available on debt with substantially similar risks, terms and maturities, which fall within Level 2 under the fair value hierarchy.

11. BUSINESS ARRANGEMENTS

HII periodically enters into business arrangements with non-affiliated entities. These arrangements generally consist of business ventures designed to deliver collective capabilities that would not have been available to the venture's participants individually, and provide a single point of contact during contract performance to the entity's principal customer. In some arrangements, each equity participant receives a subcontract from the business venture for a pre-determined scope of work. In other cases, the arrangements rely primarily on the assignment of key personnel to the venture from each equity participant rather than subcontracts for a specific work scope. Based on the terms of these arrangements and the relevant GAAP related to consolidation accounting for such entities, the Company does not consolidate the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of these entities into its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, but accounts for them under the equity method. To the extent HII acts as a subcontractor in these arrangements, HII's subcontract activities are recorded in the same manner as sales to non-affiliated entities.

In May 2007, the Company signed a joint venture agreement with Fluor Federal Services, Inc. and Honeywell International Inc. for a nominal initial investment, whereby Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, LLC ("SRNS") was formed to manage and operate the Savannah River Site for the Department of Energy and the National Nuclear Security Administration. As of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, the Company's ownership interest was approximately 34%, with carrying amounts of $5 million and $4 million, respectively. The investment in SRNS is being accounted for using the equity method and the total investment is classified as miscellaneous other assets in the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, the Company received cash dividends from SRNS of $4 million and $5 million, respectively, which were recorded as reductions in the Company's investment in SRNS.

The following table presents summarized financial information for the Company's equity method investments:

Results of Operations



	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
($ in millions)	2013		2012		2013		2012
Sales and services revenues	$	258	$	344	$	504	$	665
Operating income	7		9		12		17
Net earnings	7		9		12		17

Table of Contents

12. INVESTIGATIONS, CLAIMS, AND LITIGATION

The Company is involved in legal proceedings before various courts and administrative agencies, and is periodically subject to government examinations, inquiries and investigations. Pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 450 Contingencies, the Company has accrued for losses associated with investigations, claims and litigation when, and to the extent that, loss amounts related to the investigations, claims and litigation are probable and can be reasonably estimated. The actual losses that might be incurred to resolve such investigations, claims and litigation may be higher or lower than the amounts accrued. For matters where a material loss is probable or reasonably possible and the amount of loss cannot be reasonably estimated, but the Company is able to reasonably estimate a range of possible losses, the Company will disclose such estimated range in these notes. This estimated range is based on information currently available to the Company and involves elements of judgment and significant uncertainties. This estimated range of possible loss does not represent the Company's maximum possible loss exposure. For matters as to which the Company is not able to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss, the Company is required to indicate the reasons why it is unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss. For matters not specifically described in these notes, the Company does not believe, based on information currently available to it, that it is reasonably possible that the liabilities, if any, arising from such investigations, claims and litigation will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company has, in certain cases, provided disclosure regarding certain matters for which the Company believes at this time that the likelihood of material loss is remote.

False Claims Act Complaint - In January 2011, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DoJ") first informed the Company through Northrop Grumman of a False Claims Act complaint (the "Complaint") that was filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The redacted copy of the Complaint the Company received alleges that, through largely unspecified fraudulent means, the Company and Northrop Grumman obtained federal funds that were restricted by law for the consequences of Hurricane Katrina, and used those funds to cover costs under certain shipbuilding contracts that were unrelated to Katrina and for which Northrop Grumman and the Company were not entitled to recovery under the contracts. The Complaint seeks monetary damages of at least $835 million, plus penalties, attorneys' fees and other costs of suit. Damages under the False Claims Act may be trebled upon a finding of liability.

In July 2012, the District Court entered an order permitting the Company to disclose certain information not included in the redacted copy of the Complaint received by the Company, including the date the Complaint was filed, the decision of the DoJ to decline intervention in the case, and the principal parties involved in the case. The Complaint was filed on June 2, 2010, by relators Gerald M. Fisher and Donald C. Holmes. On December 8, 2011, the DoJ filed a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention in the case. As of August 29, 2012, Gerald M. Fisher was no longer a relator in or party to this case. On February 28, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted the defendants' motion to transfer venue and the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the case, and all other matters are stayed pending resolution of that motion.

Based upon a review to date of the information available to the Company, the Company believes that it has substantive defenses to the allegations in the Complaint, that the claims as set forth in the Complaint evidence a fundamental lack of understanding of the terms and conditions in the Company's shipbuilding contracts, including the post-Katrina modifications to those contracts, and the manner in which the parties performed in connection with the contracts, and that the claims as set forth in the Complaint lack merit. The Company, therefore, believes that the claims as set forth in the Complaint will not result in a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company intends to defend the matter vigorously, but the Company cannot predict what new or revised claims might be asserted or what information might come to light and can, therefore, give no assurances regarding the ultimate outcome.

U.S. Government Investigations and Claims - Departments and agencies of the U.S. Government have the authority to investigate various transactions and operations of the Company, and the results of such investigations may lead to administrative, civil or criminal proceedings, the ultimate outcome of which could be fines, penalties, repayments or compensatory or treble damages. U.S. Government regulations provide that certain findings against a contractor may lead to suspension or debarment from future U.S. Government contracts or the loss of export privileges for a company or an operating division or subdivision. Any suspension or debarment would likely have a material effect on the Company because of its reliance on government contracts.

Table of Contents

In January 2013, the Company disclosed to the DoD, including the U.S. Navy, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, including the U.S. Coast Guard, pursuant to the FAR, that it had initiated an internal investigation regarding whether certain employees at Ingalls mischarged time or misstated progress on U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard contracts. The Company conducted an internal investigation, led by external counsel, and has taken remedial actions, including the termination of employees in instances where the Company believed grounds for termination existed. The Company is providing information regarding its investigation to the relevant government agencies. The Company agreed with the U.S. Navy and U.S. Coast Guard that they would initially withhold $24 million in payments on existing contracts pending receipt of additional information from the Company's internal investigation. Based on the results of the internal investigation, the Company estimates that the maximum amount of the mischarging is approximately $4 million. The Company is in discussions with its U.S. Government customers regarding the potential release of a substantial portion of the withheld funds, but it cannot predict whether these customers will agree to a lower withhold amount. Depending upon the U.S. Government's assessment of the matters under investigation, the Company could be subject to significant civil penalties, criminal fines, and suspension or debarment from U.S. Government contracting. Although the Company does not currently believe that this matter will have a material effect on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, the Company cannot predict what new information might come to light in the future and can therefore give no assurances regarding the ultimate outcome of this matter.

Asbestos Related Claims - HII and its predecessors-in-interest are defendants in a longstanding series of cases filed in numerous jurisdictions around the country, wherein former and current employees and various third-party persons allege exposure to asbestos containing materials while on or associated with HII premises or while working on vessels constructed or repaired by HII. The cases allege various injuries, including those associated with pleural plaque disease, asbestosis, cancer, mesothelioma and other alleged asbestos related conditions. In some cases, several of HII's former executive officers are also named as defendants. In some instances, partial or full insurance coverage is available to the Company for its liability and that of its former executive officers. Although the Company believes the ultimate resolution of these cases will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, it cannot predict what new or revised claims or litigation might be asserted or what information might come to light and can, therefore, give no assurances regarding the ultimate outcome of asbestos related litigation.

Litigation - The Company is party to various claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although the Company believes that the resolution of any of these various claims and legal proceedings will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows, it cannot predict what new or revised claims or litigation might be asserted or what information might come to light and can, therefore, give no assurances regarding the ultimate outcome of these matters.

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Contract Performance Contingencies - Contract profit margins may include estimates of revenues not contractually agreed to between the customer and the Company for matters such as settlements in the process of negotiation, contract changes, claims and requests for equitable adjustment for previously unanticipated contract costs. These estimates are based upon management's best assessment of the underlying causal events and circumstances, and are included in determining contract profit margins to the extent of expected recovery based on contractual entitlements and the probability of successful negotiation with the customer. As of June 30, 2013, the recognized amounts related to claims and requests for equitable adjustment are not material individually or in aggregate.

Guarantees of Performance Obligations - From time to time in the ordinary course of business, HII may enter into joint ventures, teaming and other business arrangements to support the Company's products and services as described in Note 11: Business Arrangements. The Company generally strives to limit its exposure under these arrangements to its investment in the arrangement, or to the extent of obligations under the applicable contract. In some cases, however, HII may be required to guarantee performance of the arrangement and, in such cases, generally obtains cross-indemnification from the other members of the arrangement. As of June 30, 2013, the Company was not aware of any existing event of default that would require HII to satisfy any of these guarantees.

Environmental Matters -The estimated cost to complete environmental remediation has been accrued where it is probable that the Company will incur such costs in the future to address environmental conditions at currently or formerly owned or leased operating facilities, or at sites where it has been named a Potentially Responsible Party ("PRP") by the Environmental Protection Agency, or similarly designated by another environmental agency, and these costs can be estimated by management. These accruals do not include any litigation costs related to

Table of Contents

environmental matters, nor do they include amounts recorded as asset retirement obligations. To assess the potential impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements, management estimates the range of reasonably possible remediation costs that could be incurred by the Company, taking into account currently available facts on each site as well as the current state of technology and prior experience in remediating contaminated sites. These estimates are reviewed periodically and adjusted to reflect changes in facts and technical and legal circumstances. Management estimates that as of June 30, 2013, the probable future cost for environmental remediation is $2 million, which is accrued in other current liabilities. Factors that could result in changes to the Company's estimates include: modification of planned remedial actions, increases or decreases in the estimated time required to remediate, changes to the determination of legally responsible parties, discovery of more extensive contamination than anticipated, changes in laws and regulations affecting remediation requirements, and improvements in remediation technology. Should other PRPs not pay their allocable share of remediation costs, the Company may have to incur costs exceeding those already estimated and accrued. In addition, there are certain potential remediation sites where the costs of remediation cannot be reasonably estimated. Although management cannot predict whether new information gained as projects progress will materially affect the estimated liability accrued, management does not believe that future remediation expenditures will have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Financial Arrangements - In the ordinary course of business, HII uses standby letters of credit issued by commercial banks and surety bonds issued by insurance companies principally to support the Company's self-insured workers' compensation plans. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $46 million in standby letters of credit issued but undrawn and $352 million of surety bonds outstanding.

U.S. Government Claims - From time to time, the U.S. Government advises the Company of claims and penalties concerning certain potential disallowed costs. When such findings are presented, the Company and U.S. Government representatives engage in discussions to enable HII to evaluate the merits of these claims as well as to assess the amounts being claimed. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any such matters will have a material effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

14. IMPACTS FROM HURRICANES

In August 2005, the Company's Ingalls operations were significantly impacted by Hurricane Katrina, and the Company's shipyards in Louisiana and Mississippi sustained significant windstorm damage from the hurricane. As a result of the storm, the Company incurred costs to replace or repair destroyed or damaged assets, suffered losses under its contracts, and incurred substantial costs to clean up and recover its operations. At the time of the storm, the Company had a comprehensive insurance program that provided coverage for, among other things, property damage, business interruption impact on net profitability, and costs associated with clean-up and recovery. The Company has recovered a portion of its Hurricane Katrina claim, including $62 million in recovery of lost profits in 2007. In November 2011, the Company recovered an additional $18.8 million from Munich-American Risk Partners, one of its two remaining insurers with which a resolution had not been reached, in connection with settlement of an arbitration proceeding.

The Company is pursuing legal action against its remaining insurer, Factory Mutual Insurance Company ("FM Global"). The case was commenced against FM Global on November 4, 2005, and is now pending in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division. In an interlocutory appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that the FM Global excess policy unambiguously excludes damage from the storm

surge caused by Hurricane Katrina under its "Flood" exclusion and remanded the case to the U.S. District Court to determine whether the California efficient proximate cause doctrine afforded coverage under the policy, even if the Flood exclusion of the policy is unambiguous. In August 2010, the U.S. District Court granted FM Global's motion for summary judgment based upon California's doctrine of efficient proximate cause and denied FM Global's motion for summary judgment based upon breach of contract, finding that triable issues of fact remained as to whether and to what extent the Company sustained wind damage apart from the hurricane storm surge. In September 2011, the U.S. District Court granted FM Global's motion for summary judgment to dismiss the claims for bad faith damages and for contract reformation. The Company intends to continue to pursue the breach of contract action against FM Global, and trial on the merits is currently scheduled to start in October 2013. In addition, in January 2011, Northrop Grumman, as the Company's predecessor-in-interest, filed suit against Aon, which acted as the Company's broker in connection with the policy with FM Global, in Superior Court in California, seeking damages for breach of contract, professional negligence and negligent misrepresentation, as well as declaratory relief. No assurances can be provided as to the ultimate outcome of these matters. If, however, either of these claims is successful, the

Table of Contents

potential impact to the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows would be favorable.

The Company has full entitlement to any insurance recoveries related to business interruption impacts on net profitability resulting from hurricanes. However, because of uncertainties concerning the ultimate determination of recoveries related to business interruption claims, in accordance with Company policy no such amounts are recognized until the underlying claims are resolved with the insurers. Furthermore, due to the uncertainties with respect to the Company's disagreement with FM Global in relation to the Hurricane Katrina claim, no receivables for insurance recoveries from FM Global have been recognized by the Company in its unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

In accordance with U.S. Government cost accounting regulations affecting the majority of the Company's contracts, the cost of insurance premiums for property damage and business interruption coverage, other than "coverage of profit," is an allowable expense that may be charged to contracts. Because a substantial portion of the Company's long-term contracts is flexibly-priced, the U.S. Government customer would benefit from a portion of insurance recoveries in excess of the net book value of damaged assets and clean-up and restoration costs paid by the Company. When such insurance recoveries occur, the Company is obligated to return a portion of these amounts to the U.S. Government.

The Company believes that all of the replacement costs associated with damage caused by Hurricane Katrina are recoverable under its insurance coverage, and the amounts in question are included in the insurance claim. In the event HII is unsuccessful in its insurance recovery, the Company believes there are specific rules in the CAS and FAR that would still render the depreciation on those assets allowable and recoverable through its contracts with the U.S. Navy. The U.S. Navy has, however, expressed its intention to challenge the allowability of certain post-Katrina depreciation costs charged or expected to be charged on contracts under construction in the Ingalls shipyards. The Company believes that its depreciation practices are in conformity with the FAR, and, if the U.S. Navy were to challenge the allowability of such costs, the Company will be able to successfully resolve this matter with no material impact to its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In February 2013, the Company submitted a certified claim requesting a final decision on the allowability and allocability of the post-Katrina depreciation and other Katrina-related expenses and on the apportionment of insurance proceeds.

15. EMPLOYEE PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

The Company provides defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans and defined contribution pension benefit plans to eligible employees.

The cost of the Company's defined benefit plans and other postretirement plans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, was as follows:



	Three Months Ended June 30												Six Months Ended June 30
	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits						Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
($ in millions)	2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012			2013			2012
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Service cost	$	36		$	33		$	6		$	4		$	73		$	66		$	11		$	8
Interest cost	54			53			8			9			107			106			18			18
Expected return on plan assets	(72		)	(66		)	—			—			(144		)	(133		)	—			—
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)	5			3			(5		)	(3		)	9			6			(7		)	(5		)
Amortization of net actuarial loss (gain)	29			19			4			3			59			39			8			5
Net periodic benefit cost	$	52		$	42		$	13		$	13		$	104		$	84		$	30		$	26

Table of Contents

The Company's cash contributions for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were as follows:



	Six Months Ended June 30
($ in millions)	2013		2012
Pension plans
Qualified minimum	$	—	$	120
Discretionary
Qualified	301		63
Non-qualified	2		2
Other benefit plans	15		17
Total contributions	$	318	$	202

As of June 30, 2013, the Company anticipates no further cash contributions to its qualified defined benefit pension plans. For the year ending December 31, 2013, the Company expects its cash contributions to its qualified defined benefit pension plans to be $301 million, all of which will be discretionary.

In March 2013, the Company concluded negotiations on one of its collective bargaining agreements, which required an amendment to one of the Company's pension plans. As a result of the amendment, the remeasurement of the plan increased the pension liability and pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive loss by approximately $30 million.

In May 2013, the Company amended its postretirement benefit plan for salaried post-65 participants, which replaced a Company-sponsored indemnity plan with coverage offered through a third-party vendor and permanently capped the Company's contributions. As a result of the amendment, the remeasurement of the plan decreased the postretirement liability and pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive loss by approximately $177 million.

Other comprehensive income (loss) refers to gains and losses recorded as an element of stockholders' equity but excluded from net earnings (loss). The accumulated other comprehensive loss as of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, was comprised of unamortized benefit plan costs of $1,097 million and $1 million of other items (net of tax benefits of $716 million) and unamortized benefit plan costs of $1,226 million (net of tax benefits of $802 million), respectively. The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, were as follows:



($ in millions)	Benefit Plans			Other		Total
Balance as of March 31, 2013	$	(1,225	)	$	1	$	(1,224	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	108			—		108
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Amortization of prior service credit (cost)	—			—		—
Amortization of actuarial gain (loss)	20			—		20
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	128			—		128
Balance as of June 30, 2013	$	(1,097	)	$	1	$	(1,096	)



($ in millions)	Benefit Plans			Other		Total
Balance as of December 31, 2012	$	(1,226	)	$	—	$	(1,226	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	87			1		88
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Amortization of prior service credit (cost)	1			—		1
Amortization of actuarial gain (loss)	41			—		41
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)	129			1		130
Balance as of June 30, 2013	$	(1,097	)	$	1	$	(1,096	)

Table of Contents

16. STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS

The following table summarizes the status of the Company's stock option awards as of June 30, 2013:



	Shares Under Option (in thousands)	Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($ in millions)
Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2013	1,017	$	35.34	2.2	$	23

In the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company issued new equity awards as follows:

Restricted Performance Stock Rights - On February 19, 2013, the Company granted approximately 0.4 million RPSRs at a share price of $45.54. These rights are subject to cliff vesting based on service over two years, ten months from the date of grant. The RPSRs are subject to the achievement of performance-based targets at the end of the vesting period. Based upon the Company's results measured against such targets, between 0% and 200% of the original stated grants are expected to ultimately vest.

The following table summarizes the status of the Company's outstanding stock awards as of June 30, 2013:



	Stock Awards (in thousands)	Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
Total stock awards	2,128	$	41.25	1.3

Compensation Expense

The Company recorded stock-based compensation for the value of awards granted to Company employees and non-employee members of the board of directors during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, of $10 million and $8 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, stock-based compensation was $19 million and $16 million, respectively.

The Company recognized tax benefits for stock-based compensation in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, of $4 million and $3 million, respectively. Tax benefits for stock-based compensation recognized for each of the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, were $7 million.

Unrecognized Compensation Expense

As of June 30, 2013, the Company had $6 million of unrecognized compensation expense associated with the RSRs granted in 2011, which will be recognized over a period of 0.8 years, and $42 million of unrecognized expense associated with the RPSRs granted in 2013, 2012 and 2011, which will be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years.

17. SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS

Performance of the Company's obligations under the senior notes, including any repurchase obligations resulting from a change of control, is unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured basis, by each of HII's existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantees debt under the Credit Facility (the "Subsidiary Guarantors"). The guarantees rank equally with all other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness of the Subsidiary Guarantors. The Subsidiary Guarantors are each directly or indirectly 100% owned by HII.

Set forth below are the unaudited condensed consolidating statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, unaudited condensed consolidating statements of financial position as of June 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012, and the unaudited condensed consolidating

Table of Contents

statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, for HII, its aggregated subsidiary guarantors and its aggregated non-guarantor subsidiaries:

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)	Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales and service revenues
Product sales	$	—		$	1,423		$	—	$	—		$	1,423
Service revenues	—			260			6		(6		)	260
Total sales and service revenues	—			1,683			6		(6		)	1,683
Cost of sales and service revenues
Cost of product sales	—			1,157			—		—			1,157
Cost of service revenues	—			227			6		(6		)	227
Income (loss) from operating investments, net	—			2			—		—			2
General and administrative expenses	—			185			—		—			185
Operating income (loss)	—			116			—		—			116
Interest expense	(27		)	(2		)	—		—			(29		)
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries	75			—			—		(75		)	—
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	48			114			—		(75		)	87
Federal income taxes	(9		)	39			—		—			30
Net earnings (loss)	$	57		$	75		$	—	$	(75	)	$	57
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	128			128			—		(128		)	128
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	185		$	203		$	—	$	(203	)	$	185

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2012
($ in millions)	Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales and service revenues
Product sales	$	—		$	1,504		$	—	$	—		$	1,504
Service revenues	—			217			6		(6		)	217
Total sales and service revenues	—			1,721			6		(6		)	1,721
Cost of sales and service revenues
Cost of product sales	—			1,252			—		—			1,252
Cost of service revenues	—			191			6		(6		)	191
Income (loss) from operating investments, net	—			4			—		—			4
General and administrative expenses	—			176			—		—			176
Operating income (loss)	—			106			—		—			106
Interest expense	(27		)	(2		)	—		—			(29		)
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries	67			—			—		(67		)	—
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	40			104			—		(67		)	77
Federal income taxes	(10		)	37			—		—			27
Net earnings (loss)	$	50		$	67		$	—	$	(67	)	$	50
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	13			13			—		(13		)	13
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	63		$	80		$	—	$	(80	)	$	63



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2013
($ in millions)	Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales and service revenues
Product sales	$	—		$	2,744		$	—	$	—		$	2,744
Service revenues	—			501			12		(12		)	501
Total sales and service revenues	—			3,245			12		(12		)	3,245
Cost of sales and service revenues
Cost of product sales	—			2,243			—		—			2,243
Cost of service revenues	—			440			12		(12		)	440
Income (loss) from operating investments, net	—			4			—		—			4
General and administrative expenses	—			355			—		—			355
Operating income (loss)	—			211			—		—			211
Interest expense	(55		)	(4		)	—		—			(59		)
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries	138			—			—		(138		)	—
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	83			207			—		(138		)	152
Federal income taxes	(18		)	69			—		—			51
Net earnings (loss)	$	101		$	138		$	—	$	(138	)	$	101
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	130			130			—		(130		)	130
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	231		$	268		$	—	$	(268	)	$	231

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
($ in millions)	Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.			Subsidiary Guarantors			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Sales and service revenues
Product sales	$	—		$	2,857		$	—	$	—		$	2,857
Service revenues	—			432			7		(7		)	432
Total sales and service revenues	—			3,289			7		(7		)	3,289
Cost of sales and service revenues
Cost of product sales	—			2,391			—		—			2,391
Cost of service revenues	—			376			7		(7		)	376
Income (loss) from operating investments, net	—			6			—		—			6
General and administrative expenses	—			342			—		—			342
Operating income (loss)	—			186			—		—			186
Interest expense	(55		)	(4		)	—		—			(59		)
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries	118			—			—		(118		)	—
Earnings (loss) before income taxes	63			182			—		(118		)	127
Federal income taxes	(20		)	64			—		—			44
Net earnings (loss)	$	83		$	118		$	—	$	(118	)	$	83
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	28			28			—		(28		)	28
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	111		$	146		$	—	$	(146	)	$	111

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION



	June 30, 2013
($ in millions)	Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc.		Subsidiary Guarantors		Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	622	$	—	$	1	$	—		$	623
Accounts receivable, net	—		1,101		—		—			1,101
Inventoried costs, net	—		321		—		—			321
Deferred income taxes	—		179		—		—			179
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	—		46		16		(17		)	45
Total current assets	622		1,647		17		(17		)	2,269
Property, plant, and equipment, net	—		1,990		—		—			1,990
Goodwill	—		881		—		—			881
Other purchased intangibles, net	—		537		—		—			537
Miscellaneous other assets	35		335		—		—			370
Investment in subsidiaries	2,503		—		—		(2,503		)	—
Intercompany receivables	—