2011 Q2 10Q
Table of Contents

 
 
 
 
 


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 ___________________________________
FORM 10-Q
 ____________________________________
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011
Commission file number 000-50368
________________________________________________________________
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
________________________________________________________________
Delaware
 
26-1631624
(State of Incorporation)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
145 Hunter Drive
Wilmington, OH 45177
(Address of principal executive offices)
937-382-5591
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 ________________________________________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES x NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o
  
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  
Smaller reporting company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES o NO  x
As of August 3, 2011, Air Transport Services Group, Inc. had outstanding 64,069,154 shares of common stock, par value $0.01.
 
 
 
 
 


Table of Contents

AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 
Item 1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2.
 
 
 
Item 3.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
 
 
 
Item 1A.
 
 
 
Item 4.
 
 
 
Item 5.
 
 
 
Item 6.
 
 
 
 


Table of Contents

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are considered forward-looking statements (as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Words such as “projects,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “will,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,” “intends” and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on expectations, estimates and projections as of the date of this filing, and involve risks and uncertainties that are inherently difficult to predict. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements for any number of reasons, including those described in this report and in our 2010 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
The Securities and Exchange Commission maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding Air Transport Services Group, Inc. at www.sec.gov. Additionally, our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports, are available free of charge from our website at www.atsginc.com as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC.


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
Three Months Ended June 30
 
Six Months Ended June 30
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
REVENUES
$
193,061

 
$
160,111

 
$
368,188

 
$
321,055

OPERATING EXPENSES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries, wages and benefits
45,326

 
41,506

 
91,674

 
88,756

Fuel
48,640

 
33,852

 
88,316

 
64,458

Depreciation and amortization
23,878

 
21,752

 
46,249

 
42,552

Maintenance, materials and repairs
22,380

 
17,140

 
43,686

 
34,909

Landing and ramp
6,032

 
5,463

 
12,437

 
12,411

Travel
6,918

 
5,524

 
13,228

 
10,716

Rent
5,434

 
3,641

 
11,074

 
7,376

Insurance
2,394

 
2,154

 
4,744

 
4,992

Other operating expenses
9,258

 
8,672

 
18,550

 
18,578

 
170,260

 
139,704

 
329,958

 
284,748

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest income
33

 
85

 
99

 
158

Interest expense
(3,537
)
 
(4,594
)
 
(7,640
)
 
(9,783
)
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
(16
)
 

 
(2,886
)
 

Net gain/(loss) on derivative instruments
376

 

 
(3,556
)
 

 
(3,144
)
 
(4,509
)
 
(13,983
)
 
(9,625
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
19,657

 
15,898

 
24,247

 
26,682

INCOME TAXES
(7,377
)
 
(5,983
)
 
(9,086
)
 
(10,017
)
EARNINGS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
12,280

 
9,915

 
15,161

 
16,665

EARNINGS (LOSSES) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX
19

 
(233
)
 
(98
)
 
172

NET EARNINGS
$
12,299

 
$
9,682

 
$
15,063

 
$
16,837

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.19

 
$
0.16

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.27

Discontinued operations

 
(0.01
)
 

 

TOTAL NET EARNINGS PER SHARE - Basic
$
0.19

 
$
0.15

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.27

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Continuing operations
$
0.19

 
$
0.15

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.26

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

TOTAL NET EARNINGS PER SHARE - Diluted
$
0.19

 
$
0.15

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.26

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
63,333

 
62,811

 
63,233

 
62,802

Diluted
64,172

 
64,421

 
64,055

 
64,013


See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
ASSETS
 
 
 
CURRENT ASSETS:
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
37,895

 
$
46,543

Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,164 in 2011 and $1,090 in 2010
48,009

 
40,876

Inventory
7,460

 
7,205

Prepaid supplies and other
11,474

 
10,132

Deferred income taxes
12,879

 
12,879

TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
117,717

 
117,635

Property and equipment, net
728,030

 
658,756

Other assets
20,346

 
25,227

Intangibles
8,850

 
9,259

Goodwill
89,777

 
89,777

TOTAL ASSETS
$
964,720

 
$
900,654

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
61,854

 
$
40,558

Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
25,460

 
24,145

Accrued expenses
12,334

 
12,144

Current portion of debt obligations
12,131

 
36,591

Unearned revenue
12,525

 
10,794

TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
124,304

 
124,232

Long-term debt obligations
303,395

 
265,937

Post-retirement liabilities
110,442

 
116,614

Other liabilities
57,590

 
52,048

Deferred income taxes
49,433

 
39,746

Commitments and contingencies (Note F)

 

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
 
 
 
Preferred stock, 20,000,000 shares authorized, including 75,000 Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock

 

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 64,155,606 and 63,652,228 shares issued and outstanding in 2011 and 2010, respectively
642

 
637

Additional paid-in capital
519,290

 
518,925

Accumulated deficit
(156,188
)
 
(171,251
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(44,188
)
 
(46,234
)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
319,556

 
302,077

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
$
964,720

 
$
900,654

 
 
 
 
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
2011
 
2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Net earnings from continuing operations
$
15,161

 
$
16,665

Net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations
(98
)
 
172

Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
46,249

 
42,552

Pension and post-retirement
(1,161
)
 
(503
)
Deferred income taxes
8,523

 
9,640

Amortization of stock-based compensation
1,301

 
631

Amortization of DHL promissory note
(3,100
)
 
(1,550
)
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
2,886

 

Net loss on derivative instruments
3,556

 

(Gains)/losses on asset disposition
8

 
(8
)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
Accounts receivable
(7,545
)
 
40,613

Inventory and prepaid supplies
(859
)
 
(903
)
Accounts payable
9,122

 
(4,851
)
Unearned revenue
9,679

 
15,685

Accrued expenses, salaries, wages, benefits and other liabilities
(87
)
 
(32,558
)
Pension and post-retirement liabilities
(6,172
)
 
(27,518
)
Other
1,078

 
1,413

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
78,541

 
59,480

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Capital expenditures
(102,724
)
 
(58,344
)
Proceeds from the disposal of property and equipment
223

 
31,115

Proceeds from the redemption of interest-bearing investments
1,750

 

NET CASH (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
(100,751
)
 
(27,229
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 
 
Principal payments on long-term obligations
(198,902
)
 
(51,820
)
Proceeds from borrowings
215,000

 

Financing fees
(2,536
)
 

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES
13,562

 
(51,820
)
 
 
 
 
NET (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(8,648
)
 
(19,569
)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR
46,543

 
83,229

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
$
37,895

 
$
63,660

 
 
 
 
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
 
 
Interest paid, net of amount capitalized
$
6,680

 
$
9,151

Federal alternative minimum and state income taxes paid
$
2,368

 
$
325

SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INFORMATION:
 
 
 
Debt extinguished
$
3,100

 
$
1,550

Accrued capital expenditures
$
13,578

 
$
338

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2011


The condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the report should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the related notes contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

NOTE A—SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL STATEMENT PREPARATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Operations
Air Transport Services Group, Inc. is a holding company whose principal subsidiaries include an aircraft leasing company and three independently certificated airlines. The three airlines, ABX Air, Inc. (“ABX”), Capital Cargo International Airlines, Inc. (“CCIA”) and Air Transport International, LLC (“ATI”), each have the authority, through their separate U.S. Department of Transportation ("DOT") and Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") certificates, to transport cargo worldwide. The Company's leasing subsidiary, Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. (“CAM”), leases aircraft to each of the Company's airlines as well as to non-affiliated airlines and other lessees.
Through its airline subsidiaries, the Company provides aircraft, flight crews and airline operations to its customers. Since August of 2003, the Company, through ABX, has had long term contracts with affiliates of DHL Worldwide Express, B.V., which are collectively referred to as “DHL.” DHL, an international, integrated delivery company, is the Company's largest customer. In March 2010, the Company and DHL executed new follow-on agreements, effective March 31, 2010. Under the new agreements, DHL committed to lease 13 Boeing 767 freighter aircraft from CAM and ABX has been contracted to operate those aircraft for DHL under a separate crew, maintenance and insurance agreement (the "CMI agreement"). Prior to the new follow-on agreements, ABX provided aircraft, flight crews and maintenance to DHL under a cost-plus aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance agreement (“the DHL ACMI agreement”).
CCIA and ATI each have contracts to provide airlift to BAX Global, Inc. (“BAX/Schenker”), the Company's second largest customer. BAX/Schenker provides freight transportation and supply chain management services, specializing in the heavy freight market for business-to-business shipping. CCIA and ATI each provide ACMI (aircraft , crew, maintenance and insurance) services to DHL. Additionally, ATI provides passenger transportation, primarily to the U.S. Military, using its McDonnell Douglas DC-8 "combi" aircraft, which are certified to carry passengers as well as cargo on the main deck.
In addition to its airline operations and aircraft leasing services, the Company sells aircraft parts, provides aircraft and equipment maintenance services, operates mail sorting facilities for the U.S. Postal Service (“USPS”), and provides specialized services for aircraft fuel management.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Estimates and assumptions are used to record allowances for uncollectible amounts, self-insurance reserves, spare parts inventory, depreciation and impairments of property, equipment, goodwill and intangibles, post-retirement obligations, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. Changes in estimates and assumptions may have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Events
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

7

Table of Contents

Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company classifies short-term, highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase as cash and cash equivalents. These investments, consisting of money market funds, are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Substantially all deposits of the Company’s cash are held in accounts that exceed federally insured limits. The Company deposits cash in common financial institutions which management believes are financially sound.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
The Company's accounts receivable is primarily due from its significant customers (see Note B), other airlines, the U.S. Postal Service and freight forwarders. The Company performs a quarterly evaluation of the accounts receivable and the allowance for uncollectible accounts by reviewing specific customers recent payment history, growth prospects, financial condition and other factors that may impact a customer's ability to pay. The Company establishes an allowance for uncollectible accounts for probable losses due to a customer's potential inability or unwillingness to make contractual payments. Account balances are written off against the allowance when the Company ceases collection efforts.
Inventory
The Company’s inventory is comprised primarily of expendable spare parts and supplies used for its aircraft fleets. These items are generally charged to expense when issued for use. The Company values aircraft spare parts inventory at weighted-average cost and maintains a related obsolescence reserve. The Company records an obsolescence reserve on a base stock of inventory for each fleet type. The amortization of base stock for the obsolescence reserve corresponds to the expected life of each fleet type. Additionally, the Company monitors the usage rates of inventory parts and segregates parts that are technologically outdated or no longer used in its fleet types. Slow moving and segregated items are actively marketed and written down to their estimated net realizable values based on market conditions.
Management analyzes the inventory reserve for reasonableness at the end of each quarter. That analysis includes consideration of the expected fleet life, amounts expected to be on hand at the end of a fleet life, and recent events and conditions that may impact the usability or value of inventory. Events or conditions that may impact the expected life, usability or net realizable value of inventory include additional aircraft maintenance directives from the FAA, changes in DOT regulations, new environmental laws and technological advances.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company assesses, during the fourth quarter of each year, the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Impairment assessments may be performed on an interim basis if the Company finds it necessary. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful economic lives and are periodically reviewed for impairment.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost, net of any impairment recorded. The cost and accumulated depreciation of disposed property and equipment are removed from the accounts with any related gain or loss reflected in earnings from operations.

8

Table of Contents

Depreciation of property and equipment is provided on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the asset’s useful life or lease term. Depreciable lives are as follows:
 
Aircraft and flight equipment
3 to 20 years
Support equipment
5 to 10 years
Vehicles and other equipment
3 to 8 years

The Company periodically evaluates the useful lives, salvage values and fair values of property and equipment. Acceleration of depreciation expense or the recording of significant impairment losses could result from changes in the estimated useful lives of assets due to a number of reasons, such as an assessment done quarterly to determine if excess aircraft capacity exists or changes in regulations governing the use of aircraft.
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. For assets that are to be held and used, impairment is recognized when the estimated undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset or group of assets is less than the carrying value. If impairment exists, an adjustment is made to write the asset down to its fair value, and a loss is recorded as the difference between the carrying value and fair value. Fair values are determined considering quoted market values, discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable. Assets to be disposed of are carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value less the cost to sell.
The airlines’ General Electric CF6 engines that power the Boeing 767-200 aircraft are maintained under “power by the hour” agreements with an engine maintenance provider. Under the power by the hour agreements, the engines are maintained by the service provider for a fixed fee per flight hour; accordingly, the cost of engine maintenance is generally expensed as flight hours occur. Maintenance for the airlines’ other aircraft engines are typically contracted to service providers on a time and material basis. The Company’s accounting policy for major airframe and engine maintenance varies by subsidiary and aircraft type. ATI, CCIA and CAM capitalize the cost of major maintenance and amortize the costs over the useful life of the overhaul. ABX expenses the cost of Boeing 767-200 airframe maintenance and CF-6 engine maintenance as incurred.
Capitalized Interest
Interest costs incurred while aircraft are being modified are capitalized as an additional cost of the aircraft until the date the asset is placed in service. Capitalized interest was $0.6 million and $0.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $0.9 million and $1.2 million for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Discontinued Operations
A business component whose operations are discontinued is reported as discontinued operations if the cash flows of the component have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company, and the Company will no longer have any significant continuing involvement in the business component. The results of discontinued operations are aggregated and presented separately in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company reclassifies amounts presented in prior years that relate to discontinued business components to reflect the activities as discontinued operations.
The Company's results of discontinued operations consists primarily of pension expenses and other benefits for former employees previously associated with the Company's freight sorting and aircraft fueling services provided to DHL. ABX is self insured for medical coverage and workers’ compensation, and may incur expenses and cash outlays in the future related to pension obligations, reserves for medical expenses and wage loss for former employees.
Exit Activities
The Company accounts for the costs associated with exit activities in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 420-10 Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations. One-time, involuntary employee termination benefits are generally expensed when the Company communicates the benefit arrangement to the employee that it will no longer require the services of the

9

Table of Contents

employee beyond a minimum retention period. Liabilities for contract termination costs associated with exit activities are recognized in the period incurred and measured initially at fair value.
Self-Insurance
The Company is self-insured for workers’ compensation, employee healthcare, automobile, aircraft, and general liability claims. The Company maintains excess claim coverage with common insurance carriers to mitigate its exposure to large claim losses. The Company records a liability for reported claims and an estimate for incurred claims that have not yet been reported. Accruals for these claims are estimated utilizing historical paid claims data, recent claims trends and, in the case of employee healthcare and workers’ compensation, an independent actuarial evaluation. Other liabilities included $37.5 million and $39.2 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, for self-insurance reserves. Changes in claim severity and frequency could result in actual claims being materially different than the costs reserved.
Income Taxes
Income taxes have been computed using the asset and liability method, under which deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred taxes are measured using provisions of currently enacted tax laws. A valuation allowance against net deferred tax assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that such assets will not be fully realized. Tax credits are accounted for as a reduction of income taxes in the year in which the credit originates.
The Company recognizes the benefit of a tax position taken on a tax return, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. An uncertain income tax benefit is not recognized if it has a less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. The Company recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to uncertain tax positions in operating expense.
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net earnings and other comprehensive income or loss. Other comprehensive income or loss results from changes in the Company’s pension liability and gains and losses associated with interest rate hedging instruments.
Fair Value Information
Assets or liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value are reported using the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. FASB ASC Topic 820-10 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures establishes three levels of input that may be used to measure fair value:
 
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. 
Level 2: Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. 
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include items where the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues generated from airline service agreements are typically recognized based on hours flown or the amount of aircraft and crew resources provided during a reporting period. Certain agreements include provisions for incentive payments based upon on-time reliability. These incentives are typically measured on a monthly basis and recorded to revenue in the corresponding month earned. Revenues for operating expenses that are reimbursed through customer

10

Table of Contents

agreements, including consumption of aircraft fuel, are generally recognized as the costs are incurred. Revenues from charter service agreements are recognized on scheduled and non-scheduled flights when the specific flight has been completed. Revenues from the sale of aircraft parts are recognized when the parts are delivered. Revenues earned and expenses incurred in providing aircraft-related maintenance, repair or technical services are recognized in the period in which the services are completed and delivered to the customer. Revenues derived from transporting freight and sorting parcels are recognized upon delivery of shipments and completion of services. Aircraft lease revenues are recognized as operating lease revenues on a straight-line basis over the term of the applicable lease agreements.
Revenues from the former DHL ACMI agreement with DHL were generally determined based on expenses incurred during a period plus mark-ups and were recognized when the related services were performed. ABX and DHL amended the ACMI agreement to set mark-ups to specific quarterly amounts for the first quarter of 2010. In 2008, ABX and DHL executed a severance and retention agreement (“S&R agreement”) which specified employee severance, retention and other benefits that DHL reimbursed to ABX for payment to its employees that were affected in conjunction with DHL's U.S. restructuring plan. DHL was obligated to reimburse ABX for the cost of employee severance, retention, productivity bonuses and vacation benefits paid in accordance with the agreement. The Company's revenues for the first quarter of 2010 included reimbursement for expenses incurred under the DHL ACMI agreement, the incremental mark-up revenues set by the amendments thereto, and reimbursement for employee severance, retention and vacation benefits.


NOTE B—SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMERS
DHL
The Company, through ABX, has had contracts with DHL since August of 2003. The Company and DHL terminated the former DHL ACMI agreement and executed new follow-on agreements, effective March 31, 2010. Under the new agreements, DHL leases 13 Boeing 767 freighter aircraft from CAM, while ABX operates those aircraft for DHL under a separate CMI agreement. The CMI agreement is not based on a cost-plus pricing arrangement, but instead pricing is based on a pre-defined fee, scaled for the number of aircraft operated and the number of crews provided to DHL for its U.S. network. The initial term of the CMI agreement is five years, while the term of the aircraft leases are seven years. Under the CMI agreement, ABX contracted with Airborne Maintenance and Engineering Services, Inc. (“AMES”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to provide scheduled maintenance for the 13 Boeing 767 aircraft for at least the first three years of the CMI agreement.
Continuing revenues from leases and contracted services for DHL were approximately 34% and 35% of the Company's consolidated revenues from continuing operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to 32% and 36% for the corresponding periods of 2010. The Company’s balance sheets include accounts receivable and other long-term receivables with DHL of $15.3 million and $19.0 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
BAX/Schenker
A substantial portion of the Company’s revenues, and cash flows have historically been derived from providing airlift to BAX/Schenker's network in North America. Under their agreements with BAX/Schenker, ATI and CCIA have the right to be the exclusive providers of main deck freighter lift in the BAX/Schenker U.S. network through December 31, 2011. Revenues from the services performed for BAX/Schenker were approximately 31% and 32% of the Company’s total revenues from continuing operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to 30% and 29% for the corresponding periods of 2010. (Excluding directly reimbursable revenues, the revenues from the services performed for BAX/Schenker were approximately 22% and 23% of the Company's revenues for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011.) The Company has eight Boeing 727 and eight DC-8 aircraft that are currently dedicated to supporting the BAX/Schenker network in North America.
On July 22, 2011, BAX/Schenker announced its plans to adopt a new operating model that phases out the dedicated air cargo network in North America supported by the Company. BAX/Schenker has notified the Company that starting September 1, 2011, it will cease air cargo operations at its air hub in Toledo, Ohio and instead conduct air operations from the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky airport, which is also the location of DHL's U.S. air hub. Further, BAX/Schenker notified the Company that starting September 1, 2011, the air network will be reduced to four DC-8 and three

11

Table of Contents

Boeing 727 freighters operated by ATI and CCIA through the end of 2011, after which BAX/Schenker expects to outsource its air cargo operations to DHL. DHL has informed the management that it wishes to negotiate terms during the fourth quarter of 2011 whereby it would directly contract for all or some portion of those seven aircraft depending on its anticipated 2012 requirements.
Management is assessing the impact that the BAX/Schenker's announcement will have on its operating results, the number of Boeing 727 and DC-8 aircraft which may remain in service, their demand in other air cargo markets and the value of Boeing 727 and DC-8 aircraft if sold as parts. As of June 30, 2011, the Company's operating assets included a carrying value of approximately $48 million for aircraft, engines and aircraft parts in support of the BAX/Schenker air network.
As a result of BAX/Schenker's July decision, management plans to test the carrying value of its aircraft, engines, related operating assets, goodwill and other intangibles during the third quarter of 2011. Depending on the alternative demand that may be identified for excess aircraft, the Company will need to record impairment charges in the third quarter of 2011 due to prolonged recessionary conditions and trends toward higher fuel prices. Management expects the Company will incur wind-down costs beginning in August 2011. The wind-down costs will include employee severance and benefits, airport lease termination payments, aircraft and equipment repositioning and other expenses. Management expects that a portion of the wind-down costs will be recovered from BAX/Schenker. The amount of impairment charges, the costs and duration of the wind-down, as well as amounts which may be recoverable from BAX/Schenker are presently not reasonably estimable by management.
The Company’s balance sheets include accounts receivable with BAX/Schenker of $3.8 million and $5.5 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
 U.S. Military
A substantial portion of the Company's revenues are also derived from the U.S. military. The U.S. Military awards flights to U.S. certificated airlines through annual contracts and through temporary "expansion" routes. Revenues from services performed for the U.S. Military were approximately 12% and 11% of the Company's total revenues from continuing operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to 15% and 14% for the corresponding periods of 2010. The Company's balance sheets included accounts receivable with the U.S. Military of $16.4 million and $8.4 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

NOTE C—FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company’s money market funds and derivative financial instruments are reported on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at fair values based on market values from identical or comparable transactions. The fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments are based on observable inputs (Level 2) from comparable market transactions. The use of significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) was not necessary in determining the fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities.
The following table reflects assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
 
As of June 30, 2011
Fair Value Measurement Using
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents—money market
$

 
$
10,271

 
$

 
$
10,271

Total Assets
$

 
$
10,271

 
$

 
$
10,271

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
$

 
$
(3,699
)
 
$

 
$
(3,699
)
Total Liabilities
$

 
$
(3,699
)
 
$

 
$
(3,699
)

12

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2010
Fair Value Measurement Using
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents—money market
$

 
$
20,411

 
$

 
$
20,411

Total Assets
$

 
$
20,411

 
$

 
$
20,411

Liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate swap
$

 
$
(4,563
)
 
$

 
$
(4,563
)
Total Liabilities
$

 
$
(4,563
)
 
$

 
$
(4,563
)

As a result of lower market interest rates compared to the stated interest rates of the Company’s fixed and variable rate debt obligations, the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations was approximately $2.3 million more than the carrying value, which was $315.5 million at June 30, 2011. The non-financial assets, including goodwill and intangible assets, are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

NOTE D—PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
At June 30, 2011, the Company’s subsidiaries owned or leased under capital leases 61 aircraft in serviceable condition, consisting of 19 Boeing 767-200 aircraft leased to external customers and 42 aircraft operated by the Company's airlines. These 42 aircraft consist of 14 Boeing 767-200, one Boeing 767-300, two Boeing 757, 11 Boeing 727, and 14 McDonnell Douglas DC-8. Additionally, as of June 30, 2011, the Company had four Boeing 767-200 aircraft and one Boeing 767-300 aircraft undergoing modification to standard freighter configuration. Also, at June 30, 2011, the Company had two other Boeing 767-300 and one Boeing 757 aircraft which are expected to enter into the freighter modification process in 2011. The combined carrying value of aircraft in modification or scheduled to undergo modification was $99.1 million at June 30, 2011.
Property and equipment, to be held and used, consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
June 30,
2011
 
December 31,
2010
Aircraft and flight equipment
$
1,029,223

 
$
928,784

Support equipment
51,202

 
50,424

Vehicles and other equipment
1,531

 
1,604

Leasehold improvements
714

 
714

 
1,082,670

 
981,526

Accumulated depreciation
(354,640
)
 
(322,770
)
Property and equipment, net
$
728,030

 
$
658,756

Aircraft and flight equipment includes $13.6 million of property held under capital leases as of June 30, 2011 and $22.2 million as of December 31, 2010. Accumulated depreciation and amortization includes $7.7 million as of June 30, 2011 and $10.8 million as of December 31, 2010 for property held under capital leases. CAM owned aircraft with a carrying value of $294.4 million and $263.2 million that were under leases to external customers as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
At June 30, 2011, ACMI Services had four DC-8 airframes and one Boeing 727 airframe with a combined carrying value of $1.1 million, whose engines and rotables were being used for other aircraft in the Company's fleets.



13

Table of Contents

NOTE E—DEBT OBLIGATIONS
Long-term obligations consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
Unsubordinated term loan
$
150,000

 
$
178,000

Revolving credit facility
65,000

 

Aircraft loans
74,360

 
92,075

Capital lease obligations-Boeing 727
2,865

 
5,910

Promissory note due to DHL, unsecured
23,250

 
26,350

Other capital leases
51

 
193

Total long-term obligations
315,526

 
302,528

Less: current portion
(12,131
)
 
(36,591
)
Total long-term obligations, net
$
303,395

 
$
265,937

In 2011, the Company began to solicit lender interest for refinancing its debt obligations with extended repayment terms beyond December 2012. By March 31, 2011, certain banks had committed to provide the Company enough funds to refinance its unsubordinated term loan. On May 9, 2011, the Company executed a new, syndicated credit facility with a larger borrowing capacity through April 2016 ("Credit Facility"). The new Credit Facility, with a consortium of banks, includes a term loan of $150 million and a $175 million revolving credit loan, of which the Company has drawn $65 million. The former term loan, having a balance of $172.4 million, was completely paid-off on May 9, 2011, using the proceeds of the new term loan and revolving loan. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, interest rates are adjusted quarterly based on the Company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses ("EBITDA"), its outstanding debt level and prevailing LIBOR or prime rates. At the Company's current debt-to-EBITDA ratio, the LIBOR based financing for the unsubordinated term loan and revolving credit loan bear a variable interest rate of 2.25% and 2.19%, respectively. During the next twelve months, the Company expects to make further draws on the revolving credit loan to fund its fleet expansion plans. The new Credit Facility also has an accordion feature of $50 million which the Company may draw subject to the lenders' consent. Repayments of the term loan are scheduled to begin in June 2012. The Credit Facility provides for the issuance of letters of credit on the Company's behalf. As of June 30, 2011, unused revolving credit facility totaled $94.7 million, net of draws of $65.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $15.3 million.
In conjunction with the execution of the new Credit Facility, the Company terminated its previous credit agreement, which resulted in the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with that credit agreement and losses for certain interest rate swaps which had previously been designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments required by the former debt. These charges, which totaled $6.8 million before income taxes, were recorded in March 2011.
The aircraft loans are collateralized by six aircraft, and amortize monthly with a balloon payment of approximately 20% with maturities between 2016 and early 2018. Interest rates range from 6.74% to 7.36% per annum payable monthly. In May, the Company completely paid-off one of the aircraft loans at par value prior to maturity, remitting $13.8 million for the outstanding principal. Capital lease obligations for four Boeing 727 aircraft carry a fixed implicit rate of 6.50% and expire in 2011.
The promissory note due to DHL becomes due in August 2028 as a balloon payment, unless it is extinguished sooner under the terms of the DHL CMI agreement. Beginning April 1, 2010 and extending through the term of the DHL CMI agreement, the balance of the note is amortized ratably without cash payment, in exchange for services provided and thus is expected to be completely amortized by April 2015. The promissory note bears interest at a rate of 5% per annum, and DHL reimburses ABX the interest expense from the note through the term of the DHL CMI agreement.
The new Credit Facility is collateralized by certain of the Company's Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft that are not collateralized under aircraft loans. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain collateral coverage equal to 150% of the outstanding balance of the term loan and revolving credit loan. The Credit Facility

14

Table of Contents

contains covenants including, among other requirements, limitations on certain additional indebtedness and guarantees of indebtedness. The Credit Facility stipulates events of default, including unspecified events that may have material adverse effects on the Company. If an event of default occurs, the Company may be forced to repay, renegotiate or replace the Credit Facility. The Company is currently in compliance with the financial covenants specified in the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility limits the amount of dividends the Company can pay and the amount of common stock it can repurchase to $50.0 million during any calendar year. Under the provisions of its promissory note due to DHL, the Company is required to prepay the DHL note $0.20 for each dollar of dividend distributed to its stockholders. The same prepayment stipulation applies to stock repurchases.

NOTE F—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The Company leases airport facilities and certain operating equipment under operating lease agreements. ABX leases portions of the air park in Wilmington, Ohio under a lease agreement with a regional port authority, the term of which expires in May of 2019.
Commitments
In September 2008, CAM entered into an agreement with Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. (“IAI”) for the conversion of up to fourteen Boeing 767-200 passenger door freighters to a standard freighter configuration. The conversion primarily consists of the installation of a standard cargo door and loading system. Through June 30, 2011, ten such aircraft have completed the modification process. As of June 30, 2011, the last four of the fourteen Boeing 767-200 aircraft were undergoing modification to standard freighter configuration. As of June 30, 2011, to complete the aircraft currently undergoing modification, CAM will be obligated to pay IAI approximately $19.4 million.
In the third quarter of 2010, CAM purchased three passenger-configured Boeing 767-300 ER aircraft, each equipped with General Electric CF6 engines. In August 2010, CAM entered into an agreement with M&B Conversions Limited and IAI for the conversion by IAI of the three Boeing 767-300 series passenger aircraft to a standard freighter configuration. The agreement includes an option to convert up to seven additional Boeing 767-300 series passenger aircraft during the 10-year term of the agreement. As of June 30, 2011, one such aircraft has completed the modification process and one Boeing 767-300 aircraft was undergoing modification to a standard freighter configuration. In May 2011, CAM purchased another passenger-configured Boeing 767-300 ER aircraft equipped with General Electric CF6 engines and exercised one of the seven options to convert the aircraft to a standard freighter configuration. If CAM were to cancel the conversion program as of June 30, 2011, it would owe IAI approximately $6.0 million associated with additional conversion part kits which have been ordered.
In October 2010, CAM entered an agreement with Precision Conversions, LLC (“Precision”) for the design, engineering and certification of a Boeing 757 "combi" aircraft variant. The Boeing 757 "combi" variant to be developed by Precision will incorporate 10 full cargo pallet positions along with passenger seating for up to 58 occupants. In conjunction with the agreement, CAM made a deposit of $1.3 million toward the project. CAM is committed to convert at a minimum two Boeing 757 aircraft with Precision. In April 2011, CAM purchased a Boeing passenger 757 aircraft with the intent of modifying it for combi service. In July 2011, CAM purchased another Boeing 757 passenger aircraft and inducted it into the standard freighter modification process.
Guarantees and Indemnifications
Certain operating leases and agreements of the Company contain indemnification obligations to the lessor, or one or more other parties that are considered reasonable and customary (e.g. use, tax and environmental indemnifications), the terms of which range in duration and are often limited. Such indemnification obligations may continue after expiration of the respective lease or agreement.

Civil Action Alleging Violations of Immigration Laws
On December 31, 2008, a former ABX employee filed a complaint against ABX, a total of four current and former executives and managers of ABX, Garcia Labor Company of Ohio, and three former executives of the Garcia Labor companies, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The case was filed as a putative class action

15

Table of Contents

against the defendants, and asserts violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Practices Act (RICO). The complaint, which was later amended to include a second former employee plaintiff, seeks damages in an unspecified amount and alleges that the defendants engaged in a scheme to hire illegal immigrant workers to depress the wages paid to hourly wage employees during the period from December 1999 to January 2005. On March 18, 2010, the Court issued a decision in response to a motion filed by ABX and the other ABX defendants, dismissing three of the five claims constituting the basis of Plaintiffs' complaint. Most recently, the Court issued a decision on October 7, 2010, permitting the plaintiffs to amend their complaint for the purpose of reinstating one of their dismissed claims. On October 26, 2010, ABX and the other ABX defendants filed an answer denying the allegations contained in plaintiffs’ second amended complaint.
The complaint is similar to a prior complaint filed by another former employee in April 2007. The prior complaint was subsequently dismissed without prejudice at the plaintiff’s request on November 3, 2008.
FAA Enforcement Actions
The Company’s airline operations are subject to complex aviation and transportation laws and regulations that are continually enforced by the DOT and FAA. The Company’s airlines receive letters of investigation (“LOIs”) from the FAA from time to time in the ordinary course of business. The LOIs generally provide that some action of the airline may have been contrary to the FAA’s regulations. If the airline's response to the LOI is not satisfactory to the FAA, it can seek to impose a civil penalty for the alleged violation. Airlines are entitled to a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge or a Federal District Court Judge, depending on the amount of the penalty being sought, before any penalty order is deemed final.
The FAA issued LOIs to CCIA arising from a focused inspection of that airline’s operations during the fourth quarter of 2009, several of which resulted in the FAA seeking monetary penalties against CCIA. ABX received an LOI from the FAA alleging that ABX failed to comply with an FAA Airworthiness Directive involving its Boeing 767 aircraft and proposing a monetary settlement. The Company believes it has adequately reserved for those monetary penalties being proposed by the FAA, although it’s possible that the FAA may propose additional penalties exceeding the amounts currently reserved.
Other
In addition to the foregoing matters, the Company is also currently a party to legal proceedings in various federal and state jurisdictions arising out of the operation of their business. The amount of alleged liability, if any, from these proceedings cannot be determined with certainty; however, the Company believes that their ultimate liability, if any, arising from the pending legal proceedings, as well as from asserted legal claims and known potential legal claims which are probable of assertion, taking into account established accruals for estimated liabilities, should not be material to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Employees Under Collective Bargaining Agreements
As of June 30, 2011, the flight crewmember employees of ABX, ATI and CCIA were represented by the labor unions listed below:
 
Airline
Labor Agreement Unit
Percentage of
the Company’s
Employees
ABX
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
11.8%
ATI
Airline Pilots Association
11.3%
CCIA
Airline Pilots Association
5.6%



16

Table of Contents

NOTE G—PENSION AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
ABX sponsors a qualified defined benefit pension plan for its flight crewmembers and a qualified defined benefit pension plan for a major portion of its other ABX employees that meet minimum eligibility requirements. ABX also sponsors non-qualified defined benefit pension plans for certain employees. These non-qualified plans are unfunded. ABX also sponsors a post-retirement healthcare plan for its ABX employees, which is unfunded. During 2009, the Company amended each of the defined benefit pension plans to freeze the accrual of additional benefits. During 2010, the Company modified the post-retirement health plans for ABX employees to terminate benefits when a covered individual reaches age 65.
The accounting and valuation for these post-retirement obligations are determined by prescribed accounting and actuarial methods that consider a number of assumptions and estimates. The selection of appropriate assumptions and estimates is significant due to the long time period over which benefits will be accrued and paid. The long-term nature of these benefit payouts increases the sensitivity of certain estimates of our post-retirement costs. The Company's net periodic benefit costs for its qualified defined benefit pension and post retirement healthcare plans for both continuing and discontinued operations are as follows (in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Pension Plans
 
Post-Retirement Healthcare Plan
 
Pension Plans
 
Post-Retirement Healthcare Plan
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Service cost
$

 
$

 
$
62

 
$
59

 
$

 
$
2,286

 
$
124

 
$
221

Interest cost
9,290

 
9,169

 
97

 
146

 
18,581

 
18,338

 
194

 
508

Expected return on plan assets
(9,757
)
 
(8,900
)
 

 

 
(19,514
)
 
(17,800
)
 

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 
(1,388
)
 
(1,250
)
 

 

 
(2,776
)
 
(1,667
)
Amortization of net loss
675

 
517

 
132

 
104

 
1,350

 
1,034

 
264

 
155

Net periodic benefit cost
$
208

 
$
786

 
$
(1,097
)
 
$
(941
)
 
$
417

 
$
3,858

 
$
(2,194
)
 
$
(783
)
During the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company contributed $4.5 million and $4.6 million to the pension plans. The Company estimates that its minimum pension contributions will be $0.9 million more throughout the remainder of 2011. The Company is considering additional contributions of $12 million to $14 million in 2011.


NOTE H—INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes for interim periods is based on management's best estimate of the effective income tax rate expected to be applicable for the current year, plus any adjustments arising from changes in the estimated amount of taxable income related to prior periods. Income taxes recorded through June 30, 2011 have been estimated utilizing a 37.5% rate based on year-to-date income and projected results for the full year, excluding discrete items. The final effective tax rate to be applied to 2011 will depend on the actual amount of pre-tax book income generated by the Company for the full year.

NOTE I—DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
In conjunction with the unsubordinated term loan under the former credit agreement, the Company entered into interest rate swaps in January 2008 to reduce the effects of fluctuating LIBOR-based interest rates on forecasted interest payments stemming from scheduled repayment of the debt. Under the interest rate swap agreements, the Company pays a fixed rate of 3.105% and receives a floating rate that resets quarterly based on LIBOR. The notional value of the interest rate swaps step downward through December 31, 2012. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 815-30 Derivatives and Hedging, the Company accounted for the interest rate swaps as hedges of the forecasted cash flows. Accordingly, losses caused by lower floating interest rates had been recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income. Effective March 31, 2011, in conjunction with its decision to refinance the unsubordinated term loan, the

17

Table of Contents

Company ceased hedge accounting after determining that the forecasted interest payments will not occur near the time originally expected. As a result, the Company recorded a pre-tax charge of $3.9 million in the first quarter of 2011 based on the fair market value of the derivatives on March 31, 2011, to recognize the losses previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded an unrealized gain on derivatives of $0.2 million to reflect the interest rate swaps at market value. The liability for outstanding derivatives is recorded in other liabilities and in accrued expenses. The table below provides information about the Company’s interest rate swaps (in thousands):
 
 
 
June 30, 2011
 
December 31, 2010
Expiration Date
Stated
Interest
Rate
 
Notional
Amount
 
Market
Value
(Liability)
 
Notional
Amount
 
Market
Value
(Liability)
December 31, 2012
3.105
%
 
$
63,750

 
$
(2,329
)
 
$
68,000

 
$
(2,893
)
December 31, 2012
3.105
%
 
37,500

 
(1,370
)
 
40,000

 
(1,670
)
During the second quarter of 2011, in conjunction with the early extinguishment of an aircraft loan, the Company ceased hedge accounting of a related treasury lock derivative and recorded a pre-tax gain of $0.1 million which was previously reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income.
In addition to the interest rate swaps above, the Company's new Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain derivative instruments for protection from fluctuating interest rates, for at least fifty percent of the outstanding balance of the new subordinated term loan. As a result, the Company entered into a new interest rate swap in July of 2011 having an initial notional value of $75.0 million and a forward start date of December 31, 2011. Under this swap, the Company will pay a fixed rate of 2.02% and receive a floating rate that resets quarterly based on LIBOR. The Company did not designate the recent interest rate swap as a hedge for accounting purposes. The effects of future fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates on derivatives held by the Company will result in the recording of unrealized gains and losses into the statement of earnings.



18

Table of Contents

NOTE J—COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive income includes the following transactions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
Before Tax
 
Income Tax
(Expense)
or Benefit
 
Net of
Tax
 
Before Tax
 
Income Tax
(Expense)
or Benefit
 
Net of
Tax
2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
 
 
 
$
12,299

 
 
 
 
 
$
15,063

Other comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unrealized gain on derivative instruments
$

 
$

 

 
$
631

 
$
(229
)
 
402

Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedging gain realized
(168
)
 
61

 
(107
)
 
(193
)
 
70

 
(123
)
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments

 

 

 
3,932

 
(1,427
)
 
2,505

Pension actuarial loss
675

 
(246
)
 
429

 
1,350

 
(492
)
 
858

Post-retirement actuarial loss
132

 
(48
)
 
84

 
264

 
(96
)
 
168

Post-retirement negative prior service cost
(1,388
)
 
506

 
(882
)
 
(2,776
)
 
1,012

 
(1,764
)
Total other comprehensive income
$
(749
)
 
$
273

 
(476
)
 
$
3,208

 
$
(1,162
)
 
2,046

Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
$
11,823

 
 
 
 
 
$
17,109

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
 
 
 
$
9,682

 
 
 
 
 
$
16,837

Other comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Post-retirement liabilities negative prior service cost
$

 
$

 

 
$
22,014

 
$
(7,991
)
 
14,023

Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
(581
)
 
211

 
(370
)
 
(1,329
)
 
483

 
(846
)
Reclassifications to net income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Hedging gain realized
(27
)
 
10

 
(17
)
 
(54
)
 
20

 
(34
)
Pension actuarial loss
517

 
(188
)
 
329

 
1,034

 
(376
)
 
658

Post-retirement actuarial loss
93

 
(33
)
 
60

 
130

 
(47
)
 
83

Post-retirement negative prior service cost
(1,250
)
 
454

 
(796
)
 
(1,667
)
 
605

 
(1,062
)
Other comprehensive income
$
(1,248
)
 
$
454

 
(794
)
 
$
20,128

 
$
(7,306
)
 
12,822

 
 
 
 
 
$
8,888

 
 
 
 
 
$
29,659


NOTE K—STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company's Board of Directors has granted stock incentive awards to certain employees and board members pursuant to a long-term incentive plan which was approved by the Company's stockholders in May 2005. Employees have been awarded non-vested stock units with performance conditions, non-vested stock units with market conditions and non-vested restricted stock. The restrictions on the non-vested restricted stock awards lapse at the end of a specified service period, which is typically approximately three years from the date of grant. Restrictions could lapse sooner upon a business combination, death, disability or after an employee qualifies for retirement. The non-vested stock units will be converted into a number of shares of Company stock depending on performance and market conditions at the end of a specified service period, lasting approximately three years. The performance condition awards will be converted into a number of shares of Company stock based on the Company's average return on equity or invested capital, depending on the form of award, during the service period. Similarly, the market condition awards will be converted into a number of shares depending on the appreciation of the Company's stock compared to the NASDAQ Transportation

19

Table of Contents

Index. Board members were granted time-based awards with approximately a six-month vesting period, which will settle when the board member ceases to be a director of the Company. The Company expects to settle all of the stock unit awards by issuing new shares of stock. The table below summarizes award activity.
 
Six Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30, 2011
 
June 30, 2010
 
Number of
Awards
 
Weighted
average
grant-date
fair value
 
Number of
Awards
 
Weighted
average
grant-date
fair value
Outstanding at beginning of period
1,514,300

 
$
3.55

 
1,505,550

 
$
3.07

Granted
555,237

 
8.72

 
804,400

 
4.37

Converted
(291,500
)
 
3.14

 
(27,539
)
 
9.20

Expired

 

 
(39,211
)
 
9.20

Forfeited
(46,400
)
 
5.07

 
(65,400
)
 
3.00

Outstanding at end of period
1,731,637

 
$
5.22

 
2,177,800

 
$
3.37

Vested
390,037

 
$
4.45

 
326,400

 
$
3.71

The average grant-date fair value of each performance condition award, non-vested restricted stock award and time-based award granted by the Company in 2011 was $8.25, the fair value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. The average grant-date fair value of each market condition award granted in 2011 was $11.17. The market condition awards were valued using a Monte Carlo simulation technique, a risk-free interest rate of 1.27%, a term of 36 months, and a volatility of 125.0% based on historical volatility over three years using daily stock prices.
For the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded expense of $1.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, for stock incentive awards. At June 30, 2011, there was $4.7 million of unrecognized expense related to the stock incentive awards that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. None of the awards were convertible, and none of the outstanding shares of restricted stock had vested as of June 30, 2011. These awards could result in a maximum number of 1,991,237 additional outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock depending on service, performance and market results through December 31, 2013.

NOTE L—EARNINGS PER SHARE
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 
Three Months Ended
 
Six Months Ended
 
June 30,
 
June 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Earnings from continuing operations
$
12,280

 
$
9,915

 
$
15,161

 
$
16,665

Weighted-average shares outstanding for basic earnings per share
63,333

 
62,811

 
63,233

 
62,802

Common equivalent shares:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Effect of stock-based compensation awards
839

 
1,610

 
822

 
1,211

Weighted-average shares outstanding assuming dilution
64,172

 
64,421

 
64,055

 
64,013

Basic earnings per share from continuing operations
$
0.19

 
$
0.16

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.27

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations
$
0.19

 
$
0.15

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.26

The number of equivalent shares that were not included in weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive, was 54,000 at June 30, 2011 and immaterial at June 30, 2010.



20

Table of Contents

NOTE M—SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates in two reportable segments, as described below. The CAM segment consists of the Company's aircraft leasing operations and its segment earnings includes an allocation of interest expense. The ACMI Services segment consists of the Company's airline operations including the CMI with DHL, ACMI and charter service agreements that the Company provides to customers. The Company's other activities, which include contracts with the USPS, the sale of aircraft parts and maintenance services, management services for workers compensation, logistics services and fuel management, do not constitute reportable segments and are combined in “All other” with inter-segment profit eliminations. Inter-segment revenues are valued at arms-length, market rates. Cash, cash equivalents and deferred tax assets are reflected in Assets - All other below. The Company's segment information for continuing operations is presented below (in thousands):
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Total revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CAM
$
32,762

 
$
24,815

 
$
64,890

 
$
42,617

ACMI Services
164,709

 
138,814

 
311,414

 
285,527

All other
25,469

 
22,695

 
50,907

 
40,148

Eliminate inter-segment revenues
(29,879
)
 
(26,213
)
 
(59,023
)
 
(47,237
)
Total
$
193,061

 
$
160,111

 
$
368,188

 
$
321,055

Customer revenues:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CAM
$
15,824

 
$
10,585

 
$
29,895

 
$
14,351

ACMI Services
164,597

 
138,696

 
311,032

 
285,409

All other
12,640

 
10,830

 
27,261

 
21,295

Total
$
193,061

 
$
160,111

 
$
368,188

 
$
321,055

Depreciation and amortization expense:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CAM
$
13,663

 
$
10,414

 
$
25,926

 
$
17,154

ACMI Services
10,253

 
11,273

 
20,401

 
25,168

All other
(38
)
 
65

 
(78
)
 
230

Total
$
23,878

 
$
21,752

 
$
46,249

 
$
42,552

Segment earnings (loss):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CAM
$
13,634

 
$
9,752

 
$
27,100

 
$
16,291

ACMI Services
4,560

 
4,087

 
2,050

 
11,470

     All other
1,675

 
3,812

 
3,329

 
2,476

Net unallocated interest expense
(572
)
 
(1,753
)
 
(1,790
)
 
(3,555
)
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
(16
)
 

 
(2,886
)
 

Net gain/(loss) on derivative instruments
$
376

 

 
(3,556
)
 

Pre-tax earnings from continuing operations
$
19,657

 
$
15,898

 
$
24,247

 
$
26,682


21

Table of Contents

The Company's assets are presented below by segment (in thousands):
 
June 30,
 
December 31,
 
2011
 
2010
Assets:
 
 
 
CAM
$
688,115

 
$
600,245

ACMI Services
183,278

 
198,024

Discontinued operations
4,272

 
5,015

All other
89,055

 
97,370

Total
$
964,720

 
$
900,654

Interest expense of $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $0.4 million and $1.2 million for the corresponding periods of 2010, was reimbursed through the commercial agreements with DHL and included in the ACMI Services segment earnings above. Interest expense allocated to CAM was $2.6 million and $5.1 million for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $2.4 million and $4.9 million for the corresponding periods of 2010.

22

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis has been prepared with reference to the historical financial condition and results of operations of Air Transport Services Group, Inc., and its subsidiaries. Air Transport Services Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries may hereinafter individually and collectively be referred to as "the Company," "we," "our" or "us" from time to time. The following discussion and analysis describes the principal factors affecting the results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, liquidity and capital resources. It should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited financial statements and the related notes contained in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

INTRODUCTION
Air Transport Services Group, Inc. (the “Company”) is a holding company whose principal subsidiaries include three independently certificated airlines, ABX Air, Inc. (“ABX”), Capital Cargo International Airlines, Inc. (“CCIA”) and Air Transport International, LLC (“ATI”), and an aircraft leasing company, Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. (“CAM”). At June 30, 2011 the Company's in-service aircraft fleet consisted of 66 cargo aircraft and one passenger aircraft. Additionally, the Company owned eight other aircraft that we expect to place into service after they are modified to freighter aircraft. The Company has two reportable segments: ACMI Services, which primarily includes the cargo transportation operations of its three airlines and CAM, which includes the Company's aircraft leasing business. The Company's other business operations, including aircraft maintenance services, aircraft part sales, ground equipment leasing and maintenance, mail handling and fuel management, do not constitute reportable segments due to their size.
The Company has a concentrated base of leading customers which service international cargo traffic. The Company's three largest customers, which include affiliates of DHL Worldwide Express, B.V. ("DHL"), BAX Global, Inc. ("BAX/Schenker") and the U.S. Military, totaled 77% and 78% of the Company's consolidated revenue during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011.
The Company, through ABX, has had long-term contracts with DHL since August of 2003. Commencing March 31, 2010, the Company and DHL executed new commercial agreements under which DHL committed to lease 13 Boeing 767 freighter aircraft from CAM and contracted with ABX to operate those aircraft under a separate crew, maintenance and insurance (“CMI”) agreement. The CMI agreement pricing is based on pre-defined fees, scaled for the number of aircraft operated and the number of flight crews provided to DHL for its U.S. network. The initial term of the CMI agreement is five years and the term of the aircraft leases is seven years, with early termination provisions. Through June 30, 2011, CAM leased all 13 Boeing 767-200 aircraft to DHL.
Prior to the new agreements, ABX provided flight crews, maintenance and aircraft to DHL under an aircraft, crew, maintenance and insurance agreement (“DHL ACMI agreement”) which compensated ABX on a cost-plus mark-up basis. The follow-on agreements separate CAM's lease of freighter aircraft to DHL from the maintenance and operation of those aircraft by ABX on behalf of DHL.
A substantial portion of the Company’s revenues and cash flows have historically been derived from providing airlift to BAX/Schenker's network in North America. Under their agreements with BAX/Schenker, ATI and CCIA have the right to be the exclusive providers of main deck freighter lift for BAX/Schenker in the U.S. through December 31, 2011. The Company has eight Boeing 727 and eight DC-8 aircraft that are currently dedicated to supporting the BAX/Schenker network in North America. On July 22, 2011, BAX/Schenker announced its plans to adopt a new operating model that phases out the dedicated air cargo network in North America supported by the Company. BAX/Schenker has notified the Company that starting September 1, 2011, it will cease air cargo operations at its air hub in Toledo, Ohio and instead conduct air operations from the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky airport, which is also the location of DHL's U.S. air hub. Further, BAX/Schenker notified the Company that starting September 1, 2011, the air network will be reduced to four DC-8 and three Boeing 727 freighters operated by ATI and CCIA through the end of 2011, after which BAX/Schenker expects to outsource its air cargo operations to DHL. DHL has informed the management that it wishes to negotiate terms during the fourth quarter of 2011 whereby it would directly contract for all or some portion of those seven aircraft depending on its anticipated 2012 requirements.
Management is assessing the impact that the BAX/Schenker's announcement will have on its operating results, the number of Boeing 727 and DC-8 aircraft which may remain in service, their demand in other air cargo markets and the value of Boeing 727 and DC-8 aircraft if sold as parts. As of June 30, 2011, the Company's operating assets included

23

Table of Contents

carrying value of approximately $48 million for aircraft, engines and aircraft parts in support of the BAX/Schenker air network.
As a result of BAX/Schenker's July decision, management plans to test the carrying value of its aircraft, engines, related operating assets, goodwill and other intangibles during the third quarter of 2011. Depending on the alternative demand that may be identified for excess aircraft, the Company will need to record impairment charges in the third quarter of 2011 due to prolonged recessionary conditions and trends toward higher fuel prices. Management expects the Company will incur wind-down costs beginning in August 2011. The wind-down costs will include employee severance and benefits, airport lease termination payments, aircraft and equipment repositioning and other expenses. Management expects that a portion of the wind-down costs will be recovered from BAX/Schenker. The amount of impairments charges, the costs and duration of the wind-down, as well as amounts which may be recoverable from BAX/Schenker is presently not reasonably estimable by management.
The Company's revenues from the services performed for BAX/Schenker, derived primarily by providing Boeing 727 and DC-8 airlift, were $60.3 million and $116.3 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $48.6 million and $92.3 million for the corresponding periods of 2010. The Company's revenues from BAX/Schenker, comprised approximately 31% and 32% of the Company's total revenues during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively (22% and 23% of total revenues excluding directly reimbursable revenues, respectively.)
 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Summary
During 2011, the Company executed a new credit facility with a consortium of banks ("Credit Facility"). The new Credit Facility refinanced the Company's previous term loan and provides liquidity to expand the Company's aircraft fleet through April 2016. The new Credit Facility includes a term loan of $150 million and a $175 million revolving credit loan, of which the Company has drawn $65 million. In conjunction with the execution of the new Credit Facility, the Company terminated its previous credit agreement, which resulted in the write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs associated with that credit agreement and the recognition of losses for certain interest rate swaps which had previously been designated as cash flow hedges of interest payments stemming from the former term loan. These charges, which totaled $6.8 million before income tax effects, were recorded in March 2011.
Customer revenues from continuing operations increased by $33.0 million and $47.1 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2010 periods. Excluding directly reimbursed revenues, customer revenues increased by $19.6 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the corresponding 2010 period, driven primarily by ACMI Services which increased $12.5 million on 6% higher aircraft block hours and higher fuel prices, and by the placement of additional aircraft leases by CAM since June 30, 2010. Excluding directly reimbursed revenues, customer revenues increased by $14.8 million for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the corresponding 2010 period. Revenue growth comparisons to 2010 are affected by the termination of the DHL ACMI agreement and the termination of the severance and retention agreement ("S&R agreement") with DHL in March of 2010. Under the S&R agreement, DHL compensated and reimbursed ABX for its management and costs associated with DHL's network restructuring starting in May 2008 and continuing through March 2010. Revenues from the S&R agreement were $4.0 million in the first quarter of 2010. Certain revenues recorded as airline services under the former DHL ACMI agreement, are contractually reimbursed by DHL under the new CMI agreement and reflected in reimbursed revenues beginning April 1, 2010.
Consolidated net earnings and pre-tax earnings from continuing operations increased by $2.6 million and $3.8 million for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2010 period. Improved earnings were driven by CAM, which placed 14 additional aircraft under lease since June 30, 2010 and lower interest rate expense. Consolidated net earnings and pre-tax earnings from continuing operations declined by $1.8 million and $2.4 million, for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding 2010 period. The decline in net earnings and pre-tax earnings from continuing operations as compared to the first six months of 2010 resulted from the recognition of $6.8 million of expenses related to the refinancing of the Company's debt in 2011. Pre-tax earnings from continuing operations, adjusted to remove the effects related to the termination of former credit agreements and the earnings from the S&R agreement, were $30.7 million and $23.1 million for the first

24

Table of Contents

six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The $7.6 million increase in adjusted pre-tax earnings from continuing operations for the first six months of 2011 compared to the corresponding period of 2010, included improved CAM results of $10.8 million, increased earnings from the Company's maintenance and other activities of $0.9 million and lower interest expense, offset by declines in airline services. Pre-tax earnings from airline services declined by $5.9 million in the first six months of 2011 compared to the corresponding period of 2010 due primarily to unscheduled downtime within the ACMI Services' aircraft fleet.
A summary of our revenues and pre-tax earnings from continuing operations is shown below (in thousands):
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2011
 
2010
 
2011
 
2010
Revenues from Continuing Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CAM
$
32,762

 
$
24,815

 
$
64,890

 
$
42,617

ACMI Services
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Airline services
115,050

 
102,522

 
217,500

 
219,911

Other Reimbursable
49,659

 
36,292

 
93,914

 
61,616

S&R activities

 

 

 
4,000

Total ACMI Services
164,709

 
138,814

 
311,414

 
285,527

Other Activities
25,469

 
22,695

 
50,907

 
40,148

Total Revenues
222,940

 
186,324

 
427,211

 
368,292

Eliminate internal revenues
(29,879
)
 
(26,213
)
 
(59,023
)
 
(47,237
)
Customer Revenues
$
193,061

 
$
160,111

 
$
368,188

 
$
321,055

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-Tax Earnings from Continuing Operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CAM, inclusive of interest expense
$
13,634

 
$
9,752

 
$
27,100

 
$
16,291

ACMI Services
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Airline services
4,560

 
4,087

 
2,050

 
7,921

S&R activities

 

 

 
3,549

Total ACMI Services
4,560

 
4,087

 
2,050

 
11,470

Other Activities
1,675

 
3,812

 
3,329

 
2,476

Net unallocated interest expense
(572
)
 
(1,753
)
 
(1,790
)
 
(3,555
)
Write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
(16
)
 

 
(2,886
)
 

Net gain/(loss) on derivative instruments
376

 

 
(3,556
)
 

Pre-Tax Earnings from Continuing Operations
19,657

 
15,898

 
24,247

 
26,682

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Pre-Tax earnings, adjusted for infrequent transactions:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Add charges for write-off of unamortized debt issuance costs
16

 

 
2,886

 

Add net (gain)/loss on derivative instruments
(376
)
 

 
3,556

 

Less S&R activities

 

 

 
(3,549
)
Adjusted Pre-tax Earnings from Continuing Operations
$
19,297

 
$
15,898

 
$
30,689

 
$
23,133

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other Reimbursable revenues include certain operating costs that are reimbursed to the airlines by their customers. Such costs include fuel used, landing fees and certain aircraft maintenance expenses. The type of costs that are reimbursed varies by customer operating agreement. Management uses Adjusted Pre-tax Earnings from Continuing Operations, a non GAAP measure, to assess the performance of its core operating results among periods. Adjusted Pre-tax Earnings should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of the Company's results as reported under GAAP.

25

Table of Contents

CAM
As of June 30, 2011, CAM had 66 aircraft that were under lease, 47 of them to ABX, ATI and CCIA. CAM's pre-tax earnings, inclusive of an allocation of interest expense, increased by $3.9 million and $10.8 million, respectively, during the second quarter and first six months of 2011 compared to the corresponding periods of 2010, reflecting 14 more aircraft under lease since June 30, 2010. During the second quarter of 2011, CAM leased two Boeing 767-200 aircraft to DHL, fulfilling its commitment from March of 2010 to lease 13 aircraft to DHL under long-term lease provisions. Additionally, during 2011, CAM leased one additional Boeing 767-200 freighter aircraft to an external customer, bringing the total number of aircraft leased to external customers to 19 aircraft. During the second quarter of 2011, CAM completed the modification of its first Boeing 767-300 freighter aircraft and leased the aircraft internally to ATI.
CAM's revenues for the second quarter and first six months of 2011 grew to $32.8 million and $64.9 million, respectively, compared to $24.8 million and $42.6 million during the corresponding periods of 2010. Revenues from external customers, particularly DHL, accounted for $5.2 million and $15.5 million, respectively, of the increase for the second quarter and first six months of 2011. Since June 30, 2010, CAM has leased six Boeing 767-200 aircraft externally, including four aircraft to DHL and two aircraft to another external customer. CAM's revenues from the Company's airlines totaled $16.9 million and $35.0 million for the second quarter and first six months, respectively, compared to $14.2 million and $28.3 million for the corresponding periods of 2010.
At June 30, 2011 CAM was leasing eight Boeing 727 and eight DC-8 aircraft to CCIA and ATI, respectively, which were dedicated to BAX/Schenker's domestic air network. With respect to BAX/Schenker's recent announcement to terminate its domestic air network, CAM expects ATI and CCIA to return at least a portion of these aircraft after assessing market demand for airlift utilizing Boeing 727 and DC-8 aircraft. As aircraft are returned, CAM expects to scrap and sell for parts those aircraft in excess of current demand.
ACMI Services Segment
At June 30, 2011, ACMI Services included 48 in-service aircraft which the Company's airlines owned or leased and thirteen CAM-owned freighter aircraft which were under lease to DHL and operated by ABX under the CMI agreement. During 2011, ABX began to lease and operate two DHL-owned aircraft, bringing to four the number of DHL-owned aircraft that ABX leases from DHL and operates under the CMI agreement. Also during the second quarter of 2011, ATI leased a Boeing 767-300 aircraft from CAM and began to operate the aircraft during the second quarter.
ACMI Services revenues were $164.7 million and $311.4 million during the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively, compared to $138.8 million and $285.5 million for the corresponding periods of 2010. Revenues from airline services increased $12.5 million for the second quarter and decreased $2.4 million in the first six months of 2011 compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. Reimbursable revenues increased $13.4 million and $32.3 million for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The comparison of airline services revenues and reimbursable revenues to 2010 reflects the new commercial agreements between ABX and DHL which became effective in April 2010. Airline services revenues for the first quarter of 2010 include compensation based on aircraft depreciation and certain maintenance expense under the former cost-plus DHL ACMI agreement. Since April 2011, lease revenues for the DHL network aircraft have been reflected in CAM's revenues, while compensation for certain aircraft related maintenance costs have been reflected as reimbursable revenues. Revenues from S&R activities declined by $4.0 million during the first six months of 2011 compared to the first six months of 2010 due to the termination of the S&R agreement in March 2010.
ACMI Services had pre-tax earnings of $4.6 million and $2.1 million from airline services for the second quarter and first six months of 2011, respectively, compared to $4.1 million and $7.9 million from airline services for the corresponding periods of 2010. Aircraft block hours flown for customers increased 6% and 9% during the second quarter and first six months of 2011 compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. Operating results during 2011 were negatively impacted by unscheduled aircraft downtime for maintenance reasons. As a result, revenue flights were missed and higher operating expenses were incurred during the aircraft downtime. Some of the downtime affected DC-8 combi aircraft and a Boeing 767 freighter operating in remote regions that were difficult to service. The Company has developed contingency plans for quicker response times into these regions in the event that similar downtime events occur in the future. Revenues from the U.S. Military declined $4.2 million during the first six months of 2011 due to maintenance related cancellations and contractual rate reductions. Additionally, the 2011 results included approximately

26

Table of Contents

$0.8 million of expenses incurred by ATI for FAA proving runs and other start-up costs for a passenger authority. ATI began to fly under an ACMI agreement for a tourist operator on April 1, 2011. This agreement allows ATI to build passenger operating experience which is necessary for 12 months prior to flying passengers of the U. S. Military on the Boeing 767 aircraft.
DHL, BAX/Schenker and the U.S. Military accounted for 34%, 36% and 14% of ACMI Services revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Revenues from DHL and BAX/Schenker include the reimbursement of certain expenses. Excluding these reimbursable revenues, DHL, BAX/Schenker and the U.S. Military accounted for 36%, 22% and 20%, respectively, of ACMI Services revenues for the second quarter of 2011. Excluding reimbursable revenues, DHL, BAX/Schenker and the U.S. Military accounted for 40%, 23% and 23% of ACMI Services revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
As noted above, as of June 30, 2011, ACMI Services included the operation of eight Boeing 727 and eight DC-8 aircraft in BAX/Schenker's North America network. Future operating results will be impacted by the speed with which BAX/Schneker removes aircraft from service, the remaining number of aircraft, if any, that will be needed to support the BAX/Schenker network and our ability to redeploy removed aircraft into other markets profitably.
Other Activities
The Company sells aircraft parts and provides aircraft maintenance and modification services to other airlines. The Company also operates three U.S. Postal Service (“USPS”) sorting facilities. The Company provides ground equipment leasing and facility maintenance, as well as specialized services for aircraft fuel management. Other activities also include the management of workers' compensation claims under an agreement with DHL and gains from the reduction in employee post-retirement obligations. Prior to April 1, 2010, other activities included an allocation of ABX's overhead expenses that could not be charged to DHL under the former cost-plus agreements.
External customer revenues from all other activities increased to $12.6 million and $27.3 million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $10.8 million and $21.3 million for the corresponding periods of 2010. Increased revenues primarily reflect additional services provided to the USPS beginning in April 2011 and increased aircraft maintenance projects in 2011 compared to the previous year. The pre-tax earnings from all other activities were $1.7 million and $3.3 million for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $3.8 million and $2.5 million for the corresponding periods of 2010. The decline in pre-tax earnings of $2.1 million for the second quarter of 2011 compared to the corresponding 2010 period reflects higher facility expenses for its other businesses segments, additional corporate expenses to support the subsidiaries and additional business development expenses to support the Company's growth. Pre-tax earnings increased $0.9 million for the first six months of 2011 compared to the corresponding 2010 period. The increase in pre-tax earnings for the first six months of 2011 reflects the higher costs experienced during the second quarter of 2011, offset by reduced employee post-retirement obligations resulting from benefit plan changes beginning in March of 2010, increased service revenues for managing workers' compensation claims for DHL, and unallocated overhead charges of $1.0 million during the first quarter of 2010 that ABX could not charge to DHL under the former DHL ACMI agreement.

27

Table of Contents

Fleet Summary
The Company’s aircraft fleet is summarized below as of June 30, 2011 ($'s in thousands):
 
ACMI
Services
 
CAM
 
Total
In-service aircraft
 
 
 
 
 
Aircraft owned or under capital lease
 
 
 
 
 
Boeing 767-200
14

 
19

 
33

Boeing 767-300
1

 

 
1

Boeing 757
2

 

 
2

Boeing 727
11

 

 
11

DC-8
14

 

 
14

Total
42

 
19

 
61

Carrying value
 
 
 
 
$
578,978

Operating lease
 
 
 
 
 
Boeing 767-200
4

 

 
4

Boeing 767-300
1

 

 
1

Boeing 727
1

 

 
1

Total
6

 

 
6

Carrying value
 
 
 
 
$
1,407

Aircraft in freighter modification or awaiting modification
 
 
 
 
 
Boeing 767-200

 
4

 
4

Boeing 767-300

 
3

 
3

Boeing 757
 
 
1

 
1

 
 
 
 
 
 
Total

 
8

 
8

Carrying value
 
 
 
 
$
99,063

Idle aircraft (not scheduled for revenue)
 
 
 
 
 
Aircraft owned or under capital lease
 
 
 
 
 
DC-8
4

 

 
4

Boeing 727
1

 

 
1

Total
5

 

 
5

Carrying value
 
 
 
 
$
1,133


As of June 30, 2011, ACMI Services was leasing 42 of its 48 in-service aircraft internally from CAM. ACMI Services operated 13 of the 19 aircraft that CAM leases to external customers. ACMI Services had idle airframes with a carrying value of $1.1 million for which the engines and rotables were being used to support other aircraft in the Company’s fleets. Aircraft fleet changes during 2011 are summarized below by quarter:
During the first quarter of 2011
- ABX began to lease two additional Boeing 767-200 aircraft from DHL for service under the CMI agreement.
- ABX returned a Boeing 767-200 aircraft to CAM which in turn leased the aircraft to an external customer under a seven year lease.
- ATI leased a Boeing 767 passenger aircraft from CAM for an ACMI service that began in April 2011.
- ATI retired a DC-8 freighter aircraft from service when its airframe maintenance cycle ended.
During the second quarter of 2011
- CAM leased two Boeing 767-200 aircraft to DHL, bringing to 13 the total Boeing 767-200 aircraft leased to DHL.

28

Table of Contents

- CAM completed the freighter modification of a Boeing 767-300 aircraft and leased it to ATI, which began an ACMI service in June of 2011 for a customer serving North and South America.
- CAM purchased a Boeing 757 passenger aircraft with the intent of modifying it into a combi aircraft.
- CAM purchased a Boeing 767-300 passenger aircraft with the intent of modifying it into a standard freighter.
- CCIA removed a Boeing 727 aircraft from service when its airframe maintenance cycle ended.

In July 2011, CAM purchased a Boeing 757 passenger aircraft and inducted it into the standard freighter modification process. As of June 30, 2011, we expect to complete the modification of four Boeing 767-200 aircraft, three Boeing 767-300 aircraft and one Boeing 757 aircraft into standard cargo freighters over the next eight months. In February 2011, CAM executed a long term lease agreement with a Brazilian airline for a Boeing 767-200 aircraft which began in the third quarter of 2011, and recently agreed to terms for a second 767-200 aircraft lease to begin in the third quarter of 2011 with the same airline. In June 2011, a customer canceled an ACMI agreement with ATI to operate two 767-300 freighters which was scheduled to begin in the third quarter of 2011. However, customer demand and interest remains high for placing the Boeing 767 aircraft into service as their modification is completed. Management is currently negotiating with current and potential customers to place the Boeing 767-300 aircraft into service later this year. Lead times and start-up costs may impact future operating results.
Expenses from Continuing Operations
Salaries, wages and benefits expense increased by 9% and 3% during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The increase reflects a 9% increase in headcount since June 30, 2010 to support revenue growth and additional aircraft block hours.
Fuel expense increased by $14.8 million and $23.9 million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The increase reflects the higher cost of aviation fuel. The average price of a gallon of aviation fuel increased 39% and 33% during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The cost of fuel is generally reimbursed to our airlines under our operating agreements and reflected as revenues.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $2.1 million and $3.7 million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. Depreciation expense increased due to the deployment of six modified aircraft since June 2010.
Maintenance, materials and repairs expense increased by $5.2 million and $8.8 million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The increase in maintenance expense was primarily a result of increased flight hours on the Company's Boeing 767-200 aircraft engines. The Company maintains the General Electric CF6 engines that power its Boeing 767-200 aircraft through a "power by the hour" agreement ("PBH agreement") with a major service provider. The Company incurs a fee under the PBH agreement for each flight hour operated. The Company also has arranged for CAM's external leasing customers to participate under its PBH agreement. Engine maintenance expense increased due to the increase in hours flown by aircraft operated by the Company and an increase in hours flown by aircraft leased by CAM to external customers.
Landing and ramp expense, which includes the cost of deicing chemicals, increased by $0.6 million and remained flat for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The increase during 2011 reflects additional expenses associated with providing aircraft maintenance during unscheduled aircraft down time.
Travel expense increased by $1.4 million and $2.5 million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The increase is a result of additional flying, particularly in the Europe and Asia-Pacific regions.
Rent expense increased by $1.8 million and $3.7 million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The increase reflects five additional Boeing 767 freighter aircraft the Company is leasing since June 2010 and an increase in the rental rates for the Company's facilities in Wilmington, Ohio in conjunction with a new lease agreement executed with a regional port authority in May 2010. Four of the five aircraft leased by the Company are owned by DHL and operated by ABX under the CMI agreement.
Insurance expenses increased by $0.2 million and decreased by $0.2 million during the three and six month periods

29

Table of Contents

ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010 due to changes in certain employee insurance costs.
Other operating expenses include professional fees, navigational services, employee training, utilities, the cost of parts sold to customers and gains and losses from the disposition of aircraft. Other operating expenses increased by $0.6 million and remained flat during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010.
Interest expense decreased by $1.1 million and $2.1 million during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods of 2010. The decline in interest expense reflects the reduction in the Company’s debt since June 2010 and lower interest rates. Interest rates on the Company’s variable interest, unsubordinated term loan decreased from 3.2% in the second quarter of 2010 to 2.3% for the second quarter of 2011, while interest bearing debt decreased $8.5 million since June 30, 2010.
For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded a pre-tax net gain on derivatives of $0.4 million and a pre-tax net loss on derivatives of $3.6 million, respectively. The gains and losses were a result of the interest rate derivatives held by the Company as described in Note I of the accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Condenssed Consolidated Financial Statemetns. In the first quarter of 2011, in conjunction with the new Credit Facility, the Company terminated its hedge accounting of interest rate swaps related to the former term loan, which resulted in the recognition of losses which had previously been reflected in other comprehensive income. In the second quarter of 2011, the Company repaid an aircraft loan prior to maturity and, as a result, the hedge accounting for the associated treasury lock was terminated, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $0.1 million.
For the six month period ended June 30, 2011, the Company recorded charges of $2.9 million to write-off unamortized debt issuance costs. During the first quarter of 2011, the Company wrote off $2.9 million of unamortized costs associated with the former credit agreement. During the second quarter of 2011, the Company wrote off a small amount of unamortized costs associated with an aircraft loan which was completely paid off prior to maturity.
The effective tax rate for continuing operations for both the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011 was 37.5%, compared to 37.6% and 37.5%, respectively, for the corresponding periods in 2010. Income taxes recorded through June 30, 2011 have been estimated based on year-to-date income and projected results for the full year, excluding discrete items. The effective tax rate for the full year 2011 is projected to be approximately 37.5%.

FINANCIAL CONDITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows
Net cash generated from operating activities totaled $78.5 million for the first six months of 2011 compared to $59.5 million in the first six months of 2010. Improved cash flows for 2011 include a reduction in the Company's contribution to defined benefit pension plans during 2011 compared to 2010. Contributions to the pension trust were $25.9 million more during the first six months of 2010 compared to 2011. Cash flows during 2010 also included the receipt from DHL of amounts in reimbursement for severance payments made to employees and costs incurred arising from the termination of the former contracts with DHL.
Capital spending levels were primarily the result of aircraft modification costs for Boeing 767 aircraft. Cash payments for capital expenditures were $102.7 million in the first six months of 2011 compared to $58.3 million in the first six months of 2010. Capital expenditures in the first six months of 2011 included cargo modification costs related to nine aircraft compared to seven aircraft during the first six months of 2010. Capital expenditures in 2011 included $84.2 million for the acquisition and modification of aircraft, $17.1 million for required heavy maintenance and $1.4 million for other equipment costs.
During the first six months of 2011, we executed a new credit facility to refinance the former term loan of $172.4 million. The Company drew $150 million under the new term loan and $65 million from a revolving credit agreement. We made debt principal payments of $198.9 million, including the payoff of the former term loan of $172.4 million during the first six months of 2011. During the second quarter of 2011, we completely paid off an aircraft loan at par value prior to maturity, remitting $13.8 million for the outstanding principal. Additionally, $3.1 million of principal balance for the DHL promissory note was extinguished, pursuant to the CMI agreement with DHL during the first six months of 2011.

30

Table of Contents

Commitments
Through CAM, the Company continues to make investments in Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft. As these aircraft are modified, we will place them into service under dry leasing arrangements to external customers or ACMI operations using our airlines, depending on which alternative provides the best long term return and considering other factors, including geographical placement and customer diversification.
In September 2008, CAM entered into an agreement with Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. (“IAI”) for the conversion of up to fourteen Boeing 767-200 passenger door freighters to a standard freighter configuration. The conversion primarily consists of the installation of a standard cargo door and loading system. Through June 30, 2011, ten such aircraft have completed the modification process. As of June 30, 2011, the last four of the fourteen Boeing 767-200 aircraft were undergoing modification to standard freighter configuration. As of June 30, 2011, to complete the aircraft currently undergoing modification, CAM will be obligated to pay IAI approximately $19.4 million.
In the third quarter of 2010, CAM purchased three passenger-configured Boeing 767-300 ER aircraft, each equipped with General Electric CF6 engines. In August 2010, CAM entered into an agreement with M&B Conversions Limited and IAI for the conversion by IAI of the three Boeing 767-300 series passenger aircraft to a standard freighter configuration. The agreement includes an option to convert up to seven additional Boeing 767-300 series passenger aircraft during the 10-year term of the agreement. As of June 30, 2011, one such aircraft has completed the modification process and one Boeing 767-300 aircraft was undergoing modification to a standard freighter configuration. In May 2011, CAM purchased another passenger-configured Boeing 767-300 ER aircraft equipped with General Electric CF6 engines and exercised one of the seven options to convert the aircraft to a standard freighter configuration. If CAM were to cancel the conversion program as of June 30, 2011, it would owe IAI approximately $6.0 million associated with additional conversion part kits which have been ordered.
In October 2010, CAM entered an agreement with Precision Conversions, LLC (“Precision”) for the design, engineering and certification of a Boeing 757 "combi" aircraft variant. The Boeing 757 "combi" variant to be developed by Precision will incorporate 10 full cargo pallet positions along with passenger seating for up to 58 occupants. In conjunction with the agreement, CAM made a deposit of $1.3 million toward the project. CAM is committed to convert at a minimum two Boeing 757 aircraft with Precision. In April 2011, CAM purchased a Boeing passenger 757 aircraft with the intent of modifying it for combi service. In July 2011, CAM purchased another Boeing 757 passenger aircraft and inducted it into the standard freighter modification process.
We estimate that total capital expenditures for 2011 could total $170 million to $200 million for costs related to the freighter modifications of six Boeing 767-200 aircraft, four Boeing 767-300 aircraft and two Boeing 757 aircraft. Actual capital spending for any future period will be impacted by the number of aircraft we decide to modify and the progress in the aircraft modification process. We expect to finance the aircraft purchases and modifications from current cash balances, future operating cash flows and our Credit Facility.
Liquidity
On May 9, 2011, the Company executed a new credit facility with a consortium of banks ("Credit Facility") to refinance the term loan of $172.4 million and extend debt repayment terms. The new Credit Facility includes a term loan of $150 million and a $175 million revolving credit loan, of which the Company has drawn $65 million. The new Credit Facility has an additional accordion feature of $50 million which the Company may draw subject to the lenders' consent. Under the Credit Facility, interest rates will be adjusted quarterly based on the Company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses, outstanding debt level plus the prevailing LIBOR or prime rates. At the Company's current debt-to-earnings ratio, the unsubordinated term loan and revolving loan bear a variable interest rate of 2.25% and 2.19%, respectively. Repayments of the term loan are scheduled to begin in June 2012 and the Company expects to make further draws on the revolving loan to fund its fleet expansion plans. In conjunction with the execution of the new Credit Facility, the Company terminated its previous credit agreement.
The new Credit Facility is collateralized by certain of the Company's Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft that are not collateralized under aircraft loans. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain collateral coverage equal to 150% of the outstanding balance of the term loan and revolving credit loan. Under the Credit Facility, the Company is subject to expenses, covenants and warranties that are usual and customary. The Credit Facility contains covenants including, among other things, limitations on certain additional indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness, and the level of annual capital expenditures. The Credit Facility stipulates events of default including unspecified events

31

Table of Contents

that may have a material adverse effect on the Company. If an event of default occurs, the Company may be forced to repay, renegotiate or replace the Credit Facility.
At June 30, 2011, the Company had approximately $37.9 million of cash balances. The Company had $94.7 million of unused credit facility, net of draws of $65.0 million and outstanding letters of credit of $15.3 million, through its Credit Facility. As specified under terms of ABX's CMI agreement with DHL, the $23.3 million balance at June 30, 2011 of the unsecured note payable to DHL will be extinguished ratably without payment through March 31, 2015. We believe that the Company's current cash balances and forecasted cash flows provided from its operating agreements, combined with its Credit Facility, will be sufficient to fund operations, scheduled debt payments, required pension funding and planned capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as certain disclosures included elsewhere in this report, are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to select appropriate accounting policies and make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingencies. In certain cases, there are alternative policies or estimation techniques which could be selected. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our selection of policies and the estimation techniques we use, including those related to revenue recognition, post-retirement liabilities, bad debts, self-insurance reserves, valuation of spare parts inventory, useful lives, salvage values and impairment of property and equipment, income taxes, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience, current conditions and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources, as well as for identifying and assessing our accounting treatment with respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following significant and critical accounting policies involve the more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues generated from airline service agreements are typically recognized based on hours flown or the amount of aircraft and crew resources provided during a reporting period. Certain agreements include provisions for incentive payments based upon on-time reliability. These incentives are typically measured on a monthly basis and recorded to revenue in the corresponding month earned. Revenues for operating expenses that are reimbursed through customer agreements, including consumption of aircraft fuel, are generally recognized as the costs are incurred. Revenues from charter service agreements are recognized on scheduled and non-scheduled flights when the specific flight has been completed. Revenues from the sale of aircraft parts are recognized when the parts are delivered. Revenues earned and expenses incurred in providing aircraft-related maintenance, repair or technical services are recognized in the period in which the services are completed and delivered to the customer. Revenues derived from transporting freight and sorting parcels are recognized upon delivery of shipments and completion of services. Aircraft lease revenues are recognized as operating lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the applicable lease agreements.
The Company's revenues for the first quarter of 2010 included reimbursement for expenses incurred under the former DHL ACMI agreement, the incremental mark-up revenues set by amendments to the DHL ACMI agreement, and reimbursement for employee severance, retention, vacation and other benefit costs incurred during the period. Revenues from the former DHL ACMI agreement were generally determined based on expenses incurred during a period plus mark-ups and were recognized when the related services were performed. ABX and DHL amended the DHL ACMI agreement to set mark-ups to specific quarterly amounts for the first quarter of 2010. In 2008, ABX and DHL executed a severance and retention agreement (“S&R agreement”) which specified employee severance, retention and other benefits that DHL reimbursed to ABX for payment to its employees that were affected in conjunction with DHL's U.S. restructuring plan. DHL was obligated to reimburse ABX for the cost of employee severance, retention, productivity bonuses and vacation benefits paid in accordance with the agreement.

32

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 350-20 Intangibles—Goodwill and Other, we assess in the fourth quarter of each year whether the Company’s goodwill acquired in acquisitions is impaired. Additional assessments may be performed on an interim basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are not amortized but are assessed for impairment annually, or more frequently if impairment indicators occur. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful economic lives and are periodically reviewed for impairment.
Depreciation
Depreciation of property and equipment is provided on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the asset’s useful life or lease term. We periodically evaluate the estimated service lives and residual values used to depreciate our property and equipment. The acceleration of depreciation expense or the recording of significant impairment losses could result from changes in the estimated useful lives of our assets. We may change the estimated useful lives due to a number of reasons, such as the existence of excess capacity in our air system or ground networks, or changes in regulations grounding or limiting the use of aircraft.
Self-Insurance
We self-insure certain claims related to workers’ compensation, aircraft, automobile, general liability and employee healthcare. We record a liability for reported claims and an estimate for incurred claims that have not yet been reported. Accruals for these claims are estimated utilizing historical paid claims data, recent claims trends and, in the case of employee healthcare and workers’ compensation, an independent actuarial evaluation. Changes in claim severity and frequency could result in actual claims being materially different than the costs provided for in our results of operations. We maintain excess claim coverage with common insurance carriers to mitigate our exposure to large claim losses.
Contingencies
We are involved in legal matters that have a degree of uncertainty associated with them. We continually assess the likely outcomes of these matters and the adequacy of amounts, if any, provided for these matters. There can be no assurance that the ultimate outcome of these matters will not differ materially from our assessment of them. There also can be no assurance that we know all matters that may be brought against us at any point in time.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes under the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 740-10 Income Taxes. The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s financial statements or tax returns. Fluctuations in the actual outcome of expected future tax consequences could materially impact the Company’s financial position or its results of operations.
The Company has significant deferred tax assets including net operating loss carryforwards (“NOL CFs”) for federal income tax purposes which begin to expire in 2025. Based upon projections of taxable income, we determined that it was more likely than not that the NOL CF’s will be realized prior to their expiration. Accordingly, we do not have an allowance against these deferred tax assets at this time.
We recognize the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position.
Post-retirement Obligations
The Company sponsors qualified defined benefit pension plans for ABX’s flight crewmembers and other eligible employees. The Company also sponsors non-qualified, unfunded excess plans that provide benefits to executive management and crewmembers that are in addition to amounts permitted to be paid through our qualified plans under provisions of the tax laws. In 2009, we amended each defined benefit plan to freeze the accrual of additional benefits and we provided notification to the affected employees. The Company also sponsors unfunded post-retirement healthcare

33

Table of Contents

plans for ABX’s flight crewmembers and non-flight crewmember employees.
The accounting and valuation for these post-retirement obligations are determined by prescribed accounting and actuarial methods that consider a number of assumptions and estimates. The selection of appropriate assumptions and estimates is significant due to the long time period over which benefits will be accrued and paid. The long-term nature of these benefit payouts increases the sensitivity of certain estimates on our post-retirement costs. In actuarially valuing our pension obligations and determining related expense amounts, assumptions we consider most sensitive are discount rates and expected long-term investment returns on plan assets. Other assumptions concerning retirement ages, mortality and employee turnover also affect the valuations. For our post-retirement healthcare plans, consideration of future medical cost trend rates is an important assumption in valuing these obligations. Actual results and future changes in these assumptions could result in future costs that are materially different than those recorded in our annual results of operations.
Discontinued Operations
In accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 205-20 Presentation of Financial Statements, a business component whose operations are discontinued is reported as discontinued operations if the cash flows of the component have been eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company and the Company will no longer have any significant continuing involvement in the business component. The results of discontinued operations are aggregated and presented separately in the consolidated statement of operations. FASB ASC Topic 205-20 requires the reclassification of amounts presented for prior years to reflect their classification as discontinued operations.
Exit Activities
We account for the costs associated with exit activities in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 420-10 Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations. One-time, involuntary employee termination benefits are generally expensed when the Company communicates the benefit arrangement to the employee that it will no longer require the services of the employee beyond a minimum retention period. Liabilities for contract termination costs associated with exit activities are recognized in the period incurred and measured initially at fair value.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk for changes in interest rates and changes in the price of jet fuel. The risk associated with jet fuel, however, is largely mitigated by reimbursement through the agreements with our customers.
On May 9, 2011, the Company executed a new credit facility with a consortium of banks ("Credit Facility"). The new Credit Facility includes a term loan of $150 million. Under the Credit Facility, interest rates will be adjusted quarterly based on the Company's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization expenses ("EBITDA"), its outstanding debt level and prevailing LIBOR or prime rates (see note E to the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company's new Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain derivative instruments for fluctuating interest rates, for at least fifty percent of the outstanding balance of the new unsubordinated term loan. Accordingly, in July 2011, the Company entered into a new interest rate swap instrument. Additionally, the Company continues to hold certain interest rate swaps that were required for the former term loan (see note I to the Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). As a result, future fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates will result in the recording of unrealized gains and losses on interest rate derivatives held by the Company.


ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2011, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")). Based upon the evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted by it under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within time periods specified in the Securities and

34

Table of Contents

Exchange Commission rules and forms.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

35

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Civil Action Alleging Violations of Immigration Laws
On December 31, 2008, a former ABX employee filed a complaint against ABX, a total of four current and former executives and managers of ABX, Garcia Labor Company of Ohio, and three former executives of the Garcia Labor companies, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The case was filed as a putative class action against the defendants, and asserts violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Practices Act (RICO). The complaint, which was later amended to include a second former employee plaintiff, seeks damages in an unspecified amount and alleges that the defendants engaged in a scheme to hire illegal immigrant workers to depress the wages paid to hourly wage employees during the period from December 1999 to January 2005. On March 18, 2010, the Court issued a decision in response to a motion filed by ABX and the other ABX defendants, dismissing three of the five claims constituting the basis of Plaintiffs' complaint. Most recently, the Court issued a decision on October 7, 2010, permitting the plaintiffs to amend their complaint for the purpose of reinstating one of their dismissed claims. On October 26, 2010, ABX and the other ABX defendants filed an answer denying the allegations contained in plaintiffs’ second amended complaint.
The complaint is similar to a prior complaint filed by another former employee in April 2007. The prior complaint was subsequently dismissed without prejudice at the plaintiff’s request on November 3, 2008.
FAA Enforcement Actions
The Company’s airline operations are subject to complex aviation and transportation laws and regulations that are continually enforced by the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). The Company’s airlines receive letters of investigation (“LOIs”) from the FAA from time to time in the ordinary course of business. The LOIs generally provide that some action of the airline may have been contrary to the FAA’s regulations. The airlines respond to the LOIs and if the response is not satisfactory to the FAA, it can seek to impose a civil penalty for the alleged violations. Airlines are entitled to a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge or a Federal District Court Judge, depending on the amount of the penalty being sought, before any penalty order is deemed final.
The FAA issued LOIs to CCIA arising from a focused inspection of that airline’s operations during the fourth quarter of 2009, several of which resulted in the FAA seeking monetary penalties against CCIA. ABX received an LOI from the FAA alleging that ABX failed to comply with an FAA Airworthiness Directive involving its Boeing 767 aircraft and proposing a monetary settlement. The Company believes it has adequately reserved for those monetary penalties being proposed by the FAA, although it’s possible that the FAA may propose additional penalties exceeding the amounts currently reserved.
Other
In addition to the foregoing matters, we are also currently a party to legal proceedings in various federal and state jurisdictions arising out of the operation of our business. The amount of alleged liability, if any, from these proceedings cannot be determined with certainty; however, we believe that our ultimate liability, if any, arising from the pending legal proceedings, as well as from asserted legal claims and known potential legal claims which are probable of assertion, taking into account established accruals for estimated liabilities, should not be material to our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
The Company faces risks that could adversely affect its financial condition or results of operations. Many of these risks are disclosed in Item 1A of the Company's 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2011. Additional significant risks have been identified below. Other risks that are currently unknown to management or are currently considered immaterial or unlikely, could also adversely affect the Company.

36

Table of Contents

Operating results may be affected by fluctuations in interest rates.
Effective March 31, 2011, in conjunction with its decision to refinance the unsubordinated term loan, the Company ceased hedge accounting for certain interest rates swaps. The interest rate swaps were related to the former, unsubordinated term loan which was refinanced in May 2011. In addition to these interest rate swaps, the Company's new Credit Facility requires the Company to maintain derivative instruments for fluctuating interest rates, for at least fifty percent of the outstanding balance of the new unsubordinated term loan. Accordingly, in July 2011, the Company entered into new derivative instruments. The Company did not designate the derivative instruments as hedges. Future fluctuations in LIBOR interest rates will result in the recording of gains and losses on interest rate derivatives that the Company holds.
Operating results and cash flows will be impacted by BAX/Schenker's decision to terminate the air network in North America.
The Company's revenues from BAX/Schenker, derived primarily by providing Boeing 727 and DC-8 airlift, comprised approximately 32% of the Company's revenues during the first six months of 2011 (23% of total revenue excluding directly reimbursable revenues, primarily jet fuel.) Future operating results and cash flows will be impacted by management's ability to replace this revenue stream though the redeployment of the Boeing 727 and DC-8 aircraft as well as the placement of additional Boeing 767 and 757 aircraft as those aircraft become ready for cargo service.
Management is assessing the number of Boeing 727 and DC-8 aircraft which will be removed from service, their demand in other air cargo markets and their value if sold as parts. The Company plans to test the carrying value of its aircraft, engines, goodwill and other intangibles during the third quarter of 2011. The amount of any impairment charge will depend on a number of factors including the number of aircraft that are removed from service, the estimated market value of aircraft, engines and parts that are removed from service and the amount of capitalized maintenance that is recoverable from BAX/Schenker. Management expects the Company will incur wind-down costs beginning in August 2011. The wind-down costs will include employee severance and benefits, airport lease termination payments, aircraft and equipment repositioning and other expenses. Management expects that a portion of the wind-down costs will be recovered from BAX/Schenker. The amount of impairment charges, the costs and duration of the wind-down, as well as amounts which may be recoverable from BAX/Schenker is presently not reasonably estimable by management.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
The response to this item is contained in the Company's Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2011 and the information contained therein is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.


37

Table of Contents


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The following exhibits are filed as part of, or are incorporated in, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:
 
 
 
10.1
Agreement to purchase one Boeing 757-200ER passenger aircraft between Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. and Aircraft Lease Finance Corporation. (1)
 
 
10.2
Credit Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2011, among Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc., as Borrower, Air Transport Services Group, Inc., the Lenders from time to time party thereto, SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, Regions Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agents, and Bank of America, N.A., as Documentation Agent, filed herewith.
 
 
10.3
Guarantee and Collateral Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2011, made by Cargo Aircraft Management, Inc. and certain of its Affiliates in favor of SunTrust Bank, as Administrative Agent, filed herewith.
 
 
31.1
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
 
31.2
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
 
32.1
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
 
32.2
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.
 
 
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)
Incorporated by reference to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2011. Those portions of the Agreement marked with an [*] have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the SEC.

38

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
 
AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC.,
 
 
 
 
a Delaware Corporation
 
 
 
 
Registrant
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/S/  JOSEPH C. HETE
 
 
 
 
Joseph C. Hete
 
 
 
 
Chief Executive Officer
Date:
August 3, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
/S/  QUINT O. TURNER
 
 
 
 
Quint O. Turner
 
 
 
 
Chief Financial Officer
Date:
August 3, 2011
 
 
 


39