e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-13079
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
73-0664379 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
One Gaylord Drive
Nashville, Tennessee 37214
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(615) 316-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No o
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding as of April 30, 2010 |
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
47,099,190 shares |
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
INDEX
2
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
216,690 |
|
|
$ |
212,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
131,993 |
|
|
|
131,365 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
42,772 |
|
|
|
44,861 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,076 |
|
|
|
28,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
14,849 |
|
|
|
8,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(20,115 |
) |
|
|
(18,600 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
(Loss) income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
16,557 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes and
discontinued operations |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
|
9,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
6,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(1,871 |
) |
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully diluted (loss) income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.09 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted |
|
$ |
179,495 |
|
|
$ |
180,033 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents restricted |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Trade receivables, less allowance of $874 and $977, respectively |
|
|
49,834 |
|
|
|
40,917 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,740 |
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
82,921 |
|
|
|
80,888 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
315,203 |
|
|
|
305,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
2,128,572 |
|
|
|
2,149,814 |
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion |
|
|
132,233 |
|
|
|
142,311 |
|
Long-term deferred financing costs |
|
|
16,528 |
|
|
|
18,081 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
46,803 |
|
|
|
45,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,639,339 |
|
|
$ |
2,661,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
2,279 |
|
|
$ |
1,814 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
150,365 |
|
|
|
151,863 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
153,485 |
|
|
|
154,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
1,152,291 |
|
|
|
1,176,874 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
101,151 |
|
|
|
100,590 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
24,397 |
|
|
|
25,661 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
128,506 |
|
|
|
124,421 |
|
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 100,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 150,000 shares authorized, 47,050 and 46,990 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
883,102 |
|
|
|
881,512 |
|
Treasury stock of 385 shares, at cost |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
232,878 |
|
|
|
234,728 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(32,793 |
) |
|
|
(33,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,079,058 |
|
|
|
1,078,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,639,339 |
|
|
$ |
2,661,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
Amounts to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
Loss (income) from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(129 |
) |
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
7,573 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,076 |
|
|
|
28,071 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
1,314 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
Amortization of discount on convertible notes |
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(1,199 |
) |
|
|
(16,557 |
) |
Loss on sales of long-lived assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Changes in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(8,917 |
) |
|
|
(11,929 |
) |
Interest receivable |
|
|
4,866 |
|
|
|
(3,741 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
(10,221 |
) |
Other assets and liabilities |
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
(4,392 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities continuing operations |
|
|
27,733 |
|
|
|
(4,681 |
) |
Net cash flows (used in) provided by operating activities discontinued operations |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
27,678 |
|
|
|
(4,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(5,181 |
) |
|
|
(21,821 |
) |
Collection of notes receivable |
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
12,715 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
(2,307 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(3,463 |
) |
|
|
(9,450 |
) |
Net cash flows provided by investing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(3,463 |
) |
|
|
(9,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings under credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Repurchases of senior notes |
|
|
(25,082 |
) |
|
|
(37,180 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock option and purchase plans |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(24,753 |
) |
|
|
33,077 |
|
Net cash flows provided by financing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(24,753 |
) |
|
|
33,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(538 |
) |
|
|
18,951 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted, beginning of period |
|
|
180,033 |
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted, end of period |
|
$ |
179,495 |
|
|
$ |
19,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION:
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Gaylord Entertainment
Company and its subsidiaries (the Company) and have been prepared by the Company, without audit,
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the financial information presented not misleading. These condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods have been
included. All adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The results of operations for such
interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year because of seasonal
and short-term variations.
The Company analyzes its variable interests, including loans, guarantees, and equity investments,
to determine if an entity in which it has a variable interest is a variable interest entity
(VIE). This analysis primarily includes a qualitative review, which is based on a review of the
design of the entity, its organizational structure, including decision-making ability, and relevant
financial agreements. This analysis is also used to determine if the Company must consolidate the
VIE as the primary beneficiary.
Certain amounts in previously issued financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
2010 presentation. Intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization), goodwill, indefinite lived
intangible assets and investments in the amounts of $0.1 million, $0.3 million, $1.5 million and
$0.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2009 have been included in other long-term assets in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
2. NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS:
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) modified FASB Accounting Standards
Codification (ASC) 810, Consolidation (Topic 810) to amend the guidance governing the
determination of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. This modification
requires a qualitative analysis, rather than a quantitative analysis, that considers who has the
power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance, as well as an assessment of who has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This modification
also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE.
Before this modification, reconsideration of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a
VIE was required only when specific events occurred. The Company adopted the provisions of this
statement in the first quarter of 2010, and the adoption of Topic 810 did not have a material
impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. See Note 1 and Note 13 for
additional disclosures.
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Topic 820, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures, to require more detailed disclosures regarding transfers in
and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements, including the amounts and reasons for the
transfers. Level 3 fair value measurements should present separate information about purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements. In addition, this ASU requires that a reporting entity should
provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities, defined as a
subset of assets or liabilities within a line item in the statement of
6
financial position, as well as disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to
measure fair value in either Level 2 or Level 3. The disclosure requirements related to the Level 3
fair value measurement activities will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter
of 2011, and the Company does not expect this requirement to have a material impact on its
consolidated financial statements. The Company adopted the remaining disclosure requirements of
this ASU in the first quarter of 2010, and the adoption did not have a material impact on the
Companys consolidated financial statements.
3. INCOME PER SHARE:
The weighted average number of common shares outstanding is calculated as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
47,011 |
|
|
|
40,906 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding -
assuming dilution |
|
|
47,011 |
|
|
|
41,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the effect of dilutive stock options was the
equivalent of approximately 434,000 shares of common stock outstanding. Because the Company had a
loss from continuing operations in the three months ended March 31, 2010, these incremental shares
were excluded from the computation of dilutive earnings per share for that period as the effect of
their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
The Company had stock-based compensation awards outstanding with respect to approximately 3,047,000
and 5,266,000 shares of common stock as of March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, that could
potentially dilute earnings per share in the future but were excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as the
effect of their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
As discussed in Note 7, during September 2009, the Company issued 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes
(the Convertible Notes) due 2014. In connection with the issuance of these notes, the Company
entered into a warrant transaction with the note underwriters to sell common stock warrants. The
initial strike price of these warrants is $32.70 per share of the Companys common stock and the
warrants cover an aggregate of 13.2 million shares of the Companys common stock. If the average
closing price of the Companys stock during the reporting period exceeds this strike price, these
warrants will be dilutive. It is the Companys intention to settle the face value of the
Convertible Notes in cash upon conversion/maturity. The warrants may only be settled in shares of
the Companys common stock.
4. COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME:
Comprehensive (loss) income is as follows for the respective periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
Unrealized loss on natural gas swaps, net of deferred income tax provision (benefit) of $(105) and $(142) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of deferred income tax provision (benefit) of $452
and $(90) |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
(302 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,216 |
) |
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
A rollforward of the amounts included in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to the fair
value of financial derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting, net of taxes, for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Natural |
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Gas |
|
Total |
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
(16,481 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(16,481 |
) |
2010 changes in fair value, net of deferred taxes |
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
Reclassification to earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
(15,669 |
) |
|
$ |
(166 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,835 |
) |
|
|
|
5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
Property and equipment of continuing operations at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is recorded
at cost and summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Land and land improvements |
|
$ |
212,805 |
|
|
$ |
212,953 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
2,194,600 |
|
|
|
2,195,367 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
513,144 |
|
|
|
507,454 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
33,675 |
|
|
|
34,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,954,224 |
|
|
|
2,950,438 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(825,652 |
) |
|
|
(800,624 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
$ |
2,128,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,149,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense of continuing operations, including amortization of assets under capital lease
obligations, was $25.1 million and $26.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
6. NOTES RECEIVABLE:
In connection with the development of the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center (Gaylord
National), the Company is currently holding two issuances of bonds and will receive the debt
service thereon, which is payable from tax increments, hotel taxes and special hotel rental taxes
generated from the development of the Gaylord National. The Company is recording the amortization
of discount on these notes receivable as interest income over the life of the notes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded interest income of $3.2
million and $3.7 million, respectively, on these bonds, which each included $3.1 million of
interest that accrued on the bonds subsequent to their delivery to the Company and $0.1 million and
$0.6 million, respectively, related to amortization of the discount on the bonds. The Company
received payments of $11.8 million and $12.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively, relating to this note receivable.
8
7. DEBT:
The
Companys debt and capital lease obligations related to continuing operations at
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
$1.0 Billion Credit Facility, interest and maturity as
described below |
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
Convertible Senior Notes, interest and maturity as
described below,
net of debt discount of $62,334 and $65,136 |
|
|
297,666 |
|
|
|
294,864 |
|
Senior Notes, interest at 6.75%, maturing November 15, 2014 |
|
|
154,180 |
|
|
|
180,700 |
|
Nashville Predators Promissory Note, interest at 6.00%,
maturing
October 5, 2010 |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
|
1,154,570 |
|
|
|
1,178,688 |
|
Less amounts due within one year |
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
(1,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,152,291 |
|
|
$ |
1,176,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants related to its
debt.
$1.0 Billion Credit Facility
On July 25, 2008, the Company refinanced its previous $1.0 billion credit facility by entering into
a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility) by and
among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company party thereto, as guarantors, the lenders
party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. The New $1.0 Billion Credit
Facility consists of the following components: (a) $300.0 million senior secured revolving credit
facility, which includes a $50.0 million letter of credit sublimit and a $30.0 million sublimit for
swingline loans, and (b) a $700.0 million senior secured term loan facility. The term loan facility
was fully funded at closing. The New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility also includes an accordion
feature that will allow the Company to increase the New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility by a total of
up to $400.0 million in no more than three occasions, subject to securing additional commitments
from existing lenders or new lending institutions. The revolving loan, letters of credit, and term
loan mature on July 25, 2012. At the Companys election, the revolving loans and the term loans
will bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% or a base rate (the higher of the lead
banks prime rate and the federal funds rate) plus 0.50%. As further discussed in Note 8, the
Company entered into interest rate swaps with respect to $500.0 million aggregate principal amount
of borrowings under the term loan portion to convert the variable rate on those borrowings to a
fixed weighted average interest rate of 3.94% plus the applicable margin on these borrowings during
the term of the swap agreements. Interest on the Companys borrowings is payable quarterly, in
arrears, for base rate loans and at the end of each interest rate period for LIBOR rate-based
loans. Principal is payable in full at maturity. The Company will be required to pay a commitment
fee of 0.25% per year of the average unused portion of the New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility.
The New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility is (i) secured by a first mortgage and lien on the real
property and related personal and intellectual property of the Companys Gaylord Opryland hotel,
Gaylord Texan hotel, Gaylord Palms hotel and Gaylord National hotel, and pledges of equity
interests in the entities that own such properties and (ii) guaranteed by each of the four wholly
owned subsidiaries that own the four hotels. Advances are subject to a 55% borrowing base, based on
the appraisal value of the hotel properties (reduced to 50% in the event a hotel property is sold).
As of March 31, 2010, $700.0 million of borrowings were outstanding under the New $1.0 Billion
Credit Facility, and the lending banks had issued $8.9 million of letters of credit under the
facility for the Company,
9
which left $291.1 million of availability under the credit facility (subject to the satisfaction of
debt incurrence tests under the indentures governing the Companys senior notes).
Convertible Senior Notes
During September 2009, the Company issued $360 million, including the exercise of an overallotment
option, of 3.75% Convertible Senior Notes (the Convertible Notes). The Convertible Notes have a
maturity date of October 1, 2014, and interest is payable semiannually in cash in arrears on April
1 and October 1, beginning April 1, 2010. The Notes are convertible, under certain circumstances as
described below, at the holders option, into shares of the Companys common stock, at an initial
conversion rate of 36.6972 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes,
which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $27.25 per share. The Company
may elect, at its option, to deliver shares of its common stock, cash or a combination of cash and
shares of its common stock in satisfaction of its obligations upon conversion of the Convertible
Notes.
The Company accounts for the liability (debt) and the equity (conversion option) components of the
Convertible Notes in a manner that reflects the Companys nonconvertible debt borrowing rate.
Accordingly, the Company recorded a debt discount and corresponding increase to additional paid-in
capital of $68.0 million as of the date of issuance. The Company is amortizing the debt discount
utilizing the effective interest method over the life of the Convertible Notes, which increases the
effective interest rate of the Convertible Notes from its coupon rate of 3.75% to 8.46%. During the
three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company incurred cash interest expense of $3.4 million
relating to the interest coupon on the Convertible Notes and non-cash interest expense of $2.8
million related to the amortization of the debt discount on the Convertible Notes. In addition,
transaction costs of approximately $10.0 million were proportionally allocated between the
liability and equity components.
The Convertible Notes are convertible under any of the following circumstances: (1) during any
calendar quarter ending after September 30, 2009 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the
closing price of the Companys common stock for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive
trading day period ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter
exceeds 120% of the applicable conversion price per share of common stock on the last trading day
of such preceding calendar quarter; (2) during the ten business day period after any five
consecutive trading day period in which the Trading Price (as defined in the Indenture) per $1,000
principal amount of Convertible Notes, as determined following a request by a Convertible Note
holder, for each day in such five consecutive trading day period was less than 98% of the product
of the last reported sale price of the Companys common stock and the applicable conversion rate,
subject to certain procedures; (3) if specified corporate transactions or events occur; or (4) at
any time on or after July 1, 2014, until the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding
October 1, 2014. As of March 31, 2010, none of the conditions permitting conversion had been
satisfied.
The Convertible Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured unsubordinated basis
by generally all of the Companys active domestic subsidiaries. Each guarantee will rank equally in
right of payment with such subsidiary guarantors existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness
and senior in right of payment to all future subordinated indebtedness, if any, of such subsidiary
guarantor. The Convertible Notes will be effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness and
effectively subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of the Companys subsidiaries
that do not guarantee the Convertible Notes.
Concurrently with the offering of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into convertible note
hedge transactions with respect to its common stock (the Purchased Options) with counterparties
affiliated with the initial purchasers of the Convertible Notes, for purposes of reducing the
potential dilutive effect upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. The initial strike price of the
Purchased Options is $27.25 per share of the Companys common stock (the same as the initial
conversion price of the Convertible Notes) and is subject to certain customary adjustments. The
Purchased Options cover, subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to the
Convertible Notes, approximately 13.2 million shares of common stock. The Company may settle
10
the Purchased Options in shares, cash or a combination of cash and shares, at the Companys option.
The cost of the Purchased Options was approximately $76.7 million, which was recorded as a
reduction to additional paid-in capital. The Purchased Options will expire on October 1, 2014.
Separately and concurrently with entering into the Purchased Options, the Company also entered into
warrant transactions whereby it sold warrants to each of the hedge counterparties to acquire,
subject to anti-dilution adjustments, up to approximately 13.2 million shares of common stock at an
initial exercise price of $32.70 per share. The warrants may only be settled in shares of the
Companys common stock. The aggregate proceeds from the warrant transactions were approximately
$43.7 million, which was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital.
Repurchase of Senior Notes
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company repurchased $26.5 million in aggregate
principal amount of its outstanding 6.75% senior notes for $25.1 million. After adjusting for the
write-off of $0.2 million in deferred financing costs and other costs, the Company recorded a
pretax gain of $1.2 million as a result of the repurchases, which is recorded as a net gain on
extinguishment of debt in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2010.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company repurchased $59.9 million in aggregate
principal amount of its outstanding senior notes ($39.9 million of 8% senior notes and $20.0
million of 6.75% senior notes) for $42.4 million, of which a portion was accrued at March 31, 2009.
After adjusting for the write-off of $0.8 million in deferred financing costs and other costs, the
Company recorded a pretax gain of $16.6 million as a result of the repurchases, which is recorded
as a net gain on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
8. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary
risks managed by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk and commodity price risk.
Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with portions of the
Companys fixed and variable rate borrowings. Natural gas price swaps are entered into to manage
the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of natural gas and electricity used by the
Companys hotels. The Company designates its interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of variable
rate borrowings and its natural gas price swaps as cash flow hedges of forecasted purchases of
natural gas and electricity. The Company had designated certain interest rate swaps of its fixed
rate borrowings as fair value hedges prior to the termination of these interest rate swaps in the
second quarter of 2009. All of the Companys derivatives are held for hedging purposes. Prior to
July 2009, a portion of the Companys natural gas price swap contracts were considered economic
hedges and did not qualify for hedge accounting. The Company does not engage in speculative
transactions, nor does it hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. All of the
counterparties to the Companys derivative agreements are financial institutions with at least
investment grade credit ratings.
11
Cash Flow Hedging Strategy
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective
portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other
comprehensive income (OCI) and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with
the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction
affects earnings (e.g., in interest expense when the hedged transactions are interest cash flows
associated with variable rate debt). The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in
excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, or
ineffectiveness, if any, is recognized in the statement of operations during the current period.
The interest rate swap agreement currently utilized by the Company effectively modifies the
Companys exposure to interest rate risk by converting $500.0 million, or 71%, of the Companys
variable rate debt outstanding under the term loan portion of the Companys New $1.0 Billion Credit
Facility to a weighted average fixed rate of 3.94% plus the applicable margin on these borrowings,
thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. This agreement
involves the receipt of variable rate amounts in exchange for fixed rate interest payments through
July 25, 2011, without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. The critical terms of the
swap agreements match the critical terms of the borrowings under the term loan portion of the New
$1.0 Billion Credit Facility. Therefore, the Company has designated these interest rate swap
agreements as cash flow hedges. As the terms of these derivatives match the terms of the underlying
hedged items, there should be no gain (loss) from ineffectiveness recognized in income on
derivatives unless there is a termination of the derivative or the forecasted transaction is
determined to be unlikely to occur.
The Company has entered into natural gas price swap contracts to manage the price risk associated
with a portion of the Companys forecasted purchases of natural gas and electricity used by the
Companys hotels. The objective of the hedge is to reduce the variability of cash flows associated
with the forecasted purchases of these commodities. At March 31, 2010, the Company had nine
variable to fixed natural gas price swap contracts that mature from April 2010 to December 2010
with an aggregate notional amount of approximately 792,000 dekatherms. The Company has designated
these natural gas price swap contracts as cash flow hedges. The Company assesses the correlation of
the terms of these derivatives with the terms of the underlying hedged items on a quarterly basis.
As these terms are currently highly correlated, there should be no gain (loss) from ineffectiveness
recognized in income on these derivatives unless there is a termination of the derivative or the
forecasted transaction is determined to be unlikely to occur.
Fair Value Hedging Strategy
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges, the gain or loss
on the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item
attributable to the hedged risk, is recognized in the same line item associated with the hedged
item in current earnings (e.g., in interest expense when the hedged item is fixed-rate debt).
The Company previously entered into two interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk
exposure on its fixed rate debt. The interest rate swap agreements utilized by the Company
effectively modified the Companys exposure to interest rate risk by converting $125.0 million of
the Companys fixed rate debt outstanding under its previously outstanding 8% senior notes to a
variable rate equal to six-month LIBOR plus 2.95%, thus reducing the impact of interest rate
changes on the fair value of the underlying fixed rate debt. These agreements involved the receipt
of fixed rate amounts in exchange for variable rate interest payments through November 15, 2013,
without an exchange of the underlying principal amount. The critical terms of the swap agreements
mirrored the terms of the 8% senior notes. Therefore, the Company designated these interest rate
swap agreements as fair value hedges. The counterparties, as permitted by the agreements, each
opted to terminate its portion of the $125.0 million swap agreement effective May 15, 2009. As
stated in the agreement, the two counterparties each paid a $2.5 million termination fee, plus
accrued interest, to the Company on May
12
15, 2009. Prior to the redemption of the 8% senior notes in 2009, the Company amortized the
resulting $5.0 million gain on the swap agreements over the remaining term of the 8% senior notes
using the effective interest method. As a result of the redemption of the 8% senior notes in 2009,
the Company recognized the remaining unamortized gain on the swap agreement during the fourth
quarter of 2009.
The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments based upon quotes, with appropriate
adjustments for non-performance risk of the parties to the derivative contracts, at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
31, 2009 |
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps cash flow hedges |
|
$ |
24,397 |
|
|
$ |
25,661 |
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
24,667 |
|
|
$ |
25,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivatives |
|
$ |
24,667 |
|
|
$ |
25,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The effect of derivative instruments on the statement of operations for the respective periods
is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss |
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income |
Derivatives in Fair Value |
|
Location of Loss Recognized in Income on |
|
Three Months Ended |
Hedging Relationships |
|
Derivative |
|
March 31, 2009 |
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$(1,235) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain |
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income |
Hedged Items in Fair Value |
|
Location of Gain Recognized in Income on |
|
Three Months Ended |
Hedging Relationships |
|
Related Hedged Item |
|
March 31, 2009 |
Fixed Rate Debt
|
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$1,235 |
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain (Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in OCI on |
|
|
|
|
Amount Reclassified from |
|
|
|
Derivative (Effective Portion) |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income |
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
Three |
|
|
Three |
|
Derivatives in |
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
Months |
|
Cash Flow |
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Location of Amount |
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
Hedging |
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
Reclassified from |
|
March 31, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Relationships |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Accumulated OCI into Income |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
1,264 |
|
|
$ |
(392 |
) |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Natural gas swaps |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
Operating costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
994 |
|
|
$ |
(759 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on |
|
|
|
|
Derivative |
Derivatives Not |
|
Location of Loss |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Designated |
|
Recognized in Income on |
|
Ended March 31, |
|
Three Months Ended |
as Hedging Instruments |
|
Derivative |
|
2010 |
|
March 31, 2009 |
Natural gas swaps
|
|
Other gains and (losses), net
|
|
$
|
|
$(98) |
9. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
Cash paid for interest related to continuing operations for the respective periods was comprised of
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Debt interest paid |
|
$ |
10,279 |
|
|
$ |
10,657 |
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest paid, net of capitalized
interest |
|
$ |
10,070 |
|
|
$ |
10,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash refunds of income tax payments for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were
$0.1 million and $3.9 million, respectively (net of cash payments of income taxes of $0 and $0,
respectively).
10. STOCK PLANS:
The Companys 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Plan) permits the grant of stock options,
restricted stock, and restricted stock units to its directors and employees for up to 2,690,000
shares of common stock. The Plan also provides that no more than 1,350,000 of those shares may be
granted for awards other than options or stock appreciation rights. The Company records
compensation expense equal to the fair value of each stock option award granted on a straight line
basis over the options vesting period unless the option award contains a market provision, in
which case the Company records compensation expense equal to the fair value of each award on a
straight line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the
award. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing formula. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the
Company granted 497,996 stock options with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $11.47.
Including shares permitted under previous plans, at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there
were 3,738,732 and 3,364,183 shares, respectively, of the Companys common stock reserved for
future issuance pursuant to the exercise of outstanding stock options.
The Plan also provides for the award of restricted stock and restricted stock units
(Restricted Stock Awards). The fair value of Restricted Stock Awards is determined based on the
market price of the Companys stock at the date of grant. The Company records compensation expense
equal to the fair value of each Restricted Stock Award granted over the vesting period. During the
three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company granted
14
210,480 Restricted Stock Awards with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of $20.08. At March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Restricted Stock Awards of 471,750 and 318,768 shares,
respectively, were outstanding.
Under its long term incentive plan for key executives (LTIP) pursuant to the Plan, in February
2008, the Company granted selected executives and other key employees 449,500 restricted stock
units (LTIP Restricted Stock Units), which cliff vest at the end of their four-year term. The
number of LTIP Restricted Stock Units that vest will be determined at the end of their term based
on the achievement of various company-wide performance goals. Based on current projections, the
Company expects that portions of the performance goals will be achieved and only one-half of the
LTIP Restricted Stock Units granted will vest at the end of their term. The Company is currently
recording compensation expense equal to the fair value of one-half of the LTIP Restricted Stock
Units granted on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. If there are changes in the
expected achievement of the performance goals, the Company will adjust compensation expense
accordingly. The fair value of the LTIP Restricted Stock Units was determined based on the market
price of the Companys stock at the date of grant. At both March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
LTIP Restricted Stock Units of 365,750 shares were outstanding.
Under the LTIP, in February 2008, the Company also granted selected executives and other key
employees 650,000 stock options (LTIP Stock Options), which vested two to four years from the
date of grant and had a term of ten years. The LTIP Stock Options were granted with an exercise
price of $38.00, while the market price of the Companys common stock on the grant date was $31.02.
As a result of this market condition, prior to August 6, 2009, the Company recorded compensation
expense equal to the fair value of each LTIP Stock Option granted on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award.
On August 6, 2009, the Company entered into Stock Option Cancellation Agreements with certain
members of its management team, pursuant to which such individuals surrendered and cancelled
510,000 LTIP Stock Options with an exercise price of $38.00 per share, as well as 472,200 stock
options with exercise prices ranging from $40.22 to $56.14 per share, to purchase shares of the
Companys common stock (the Cancelled Stock Options), in order to make additional shares
available under the Companys 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan for future equity grants to Company
personnel. Pursuant to the terms of the Stock Option Cancellation Agreements, these individuals and
the Company acknowledged and agreed that the surrender and cancellation of the Cancelled Stock
Options was without any expectation to receive, and was without any obligation on the Company to
pay or grant, any cash payment, equity awards or other consideration presently or in the future in
regard to the cancellation of the Cancelled Stock Options. The Company determined that because the
Cancelled Stock Options were cancelled without a concurrent grant of a replacement award, the
cancellation should be accounted for as a settlement for no consideration. Therefore, the Company
recorded the previously unrecognized compensation cost related to the Cancelled Stock Options of
$3.0 million during the third quarter of 2009. At both March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, LTIP
Stock Options of 76,666 shares were outstanding.
The compensation cost that has been charged against pre-tax income for all of the Companys
stock-based compensation plans was $1.7 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
15
11. RETIREMENT AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSION PLANS:
Net periodic pension expense reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations included the following components for the respective periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Interest cost |
|
$ |
1,188 |
|
|
$ |
1,254 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
(962 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net periodic pension expense |
|
$ |
510 |
|
|
$ |
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit expense reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements
of operations included the following components for the respective periods (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Amortization of net gain |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Amortization of curtailment gain |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net postretirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. INCOME TAXES:
The Companys effective tax rate as applied to pre-tax (loss) income was (101)% and 64% for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, which became law on March 23, 2010, as amended by the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, the Company and other companies that receive a subsidy under
Medicare Part D to provide retiree prescription drug coverage will no longer receive a Federal
income tax deduction for the expenses incurred in connection with providing the subsidized coverage
to the extent of the subsidy received. Because future anticipated retiree health care liabilities
and related subsidies were already reflected in the Companys financial statements, this change
required the Company to reduce the value of the related tax benefits recognized in its financial
statements during the period the law was enacted. As a result, the Company recorded a one-time,
non-cash tax charge of $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 to reflect the
impact of this change. This charge, as well as changes in the Companys valuation allowances during
the 2010 period, resulted in the change to the effective tax rate noted above.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had $16.0 million and $16.1 million of
unrecognized tax benefits, respectively, of which $9.1 million and $8.0 million, respectively,
would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized. These liabilities are recorded in
other long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. It is
expected that the unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months; however, the
Company does not expect the change to have a significant impact on the results of operations or the
financial position of the Company. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had
accrued $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of interest and $0.1 million of penalties
related to uncertain tax positions.
16
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
On September 3, 2008, the Company announced it had entered into a land purchase agreement with DMB
Mesa Proving Grounds LLC, an affiliate of DMB Associates, Inc. (DMB), to create a resort and
convention hotel at the Mesa Proving Grounds in Mesa, Arizona, which is located approximately 30
miles from downtown Phoenix. The DMB development is planned to host an urban environment that
features a Gaylord resort property, a retail development, a golf course, office space, residential
offerings and significant other mixed-use components. The Companys purchase agreement includes the
purchase of 100 acres of real estate within the 3,200-acre Mesa Proving Grounds. The project is
contingent on the finalization of entitlements and incentives, and final approval by the Companys
board of directors. The Company made an initial deposit of a portion of the land purchase price
upon execution of the agreement with DMB, and additional deposit amounts are due upon the
occurrence of various development milestones, including required governmental approvals of the
entitlements and incentives. These deposits are refundable to the Company upon a termination of the
agreement with DMB during a specified due diligence period, except in the event of a breach of the
agreement by the Company. The timing of this development is uncertain, and the Company has not made
any financing plans or, except as described above, made any commitments in connection with the
proposed development.
The Company is considering other potential hotel sites throughout the country. The timing and
extent of any of these development projects is uncertain, and the Company has not made any
commitments, received any government approvals or made any financing plans in connection with these
development projects.
Through a joint venture arrangement with RREEF Global Opportunities Fund II, LLC, a private real
estate fund managed by DB Real Estate Opportunities Group (RREEF), the Company holds an 18.1%
ownership interest in Waipouli Holdings, LLC, which it acquired in exchange for its initial capital
contribution of $3.8 million to Waipouli Holdings, LLC in 2006. Through a wholly-owned subsidiary,
Waipouli Owner, LLC, Waipouli Holdings, LLC owns the 311-room ResortQuest Kauai Beach at Makaiwa
Hotel and related assets located in Kapaa, Hawaii (the Kauai Hotel). Waipouli Owner, LLC financed
the purchase of the Kauai Hotel in 2006 by entering into a series of loan transactions with Morgan
Stanley Mortgage Capital, Inc. (the Kauai Hotel Lender) consisting of a $52.0 million senior loan
secured by the Kauai Hotel, an $8.2 million senior mezzanine loan secured by the ownership interest
of Waipouli Owner, LLC, and an $8.2 million junior mezzanine loan secured by the ownership interest
of Waipouli Owner, LLC (collectively, the Kauai Hotel Loans). In connection with Waipouli Owner,
LLCs execution of the Kauai Hotel Loans, RREEF entered into three separate Guaranties of Recourse
Obligations with the Kauai Hotel Lender whereby it guaranteed Waipouli Owner, LLCs obligations
under the Kauai Hotel Loans for as long as those loans remain outstanding (i) in the event of
certain types of fraud, breaches of environmental representations or warranties, or breaches of
certain special purpose entity covenants by Waipouli Owner, LLC, or (ii) in the event of
bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings of Waipouli Owner, LLC. As a part of the joint venture
arrangement and simultaneously with the closing of the purchase of the Kauai Hotel, the Company
entered into a Contribution Agreement with RREEF, whereby the Company agreed that, in the event
that RREEF is required to make any payments pursuant to the terms of these guarantees, it will
contribute to RREEF an amount equal to its pro rata share of any such guaranty payments. The
guarantee of the $52.0 million senior loan was terminated in July 2009. The Company estimates that
the maximum potential amount that the Company could be liable for under this contribution agreement
is $3.0 million, which represents 18.1% of the $16.4 million of total debt that is subject to the
guarantees. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had not recorded any liability in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet associated with this guarantee. The Company has determined that Waipouli
Holdings, LLC is a VIE, as the voting rights of the Company are not proportional to its right to
receive the expected residual returns of the entity. The Company has determined that it is not the
primary beneficiary of this VIE, as it does not have the power to direct the activities that most
significantly impact the VIEs economic performance.
Through a joint venture arrangement with G.O. IB-SIV US, a private real estate fund managed by
DB Real Estate Opportunities Group (IB-SIV), the Company holds a 19.9% ownership interest in RHAC
Holdings,
17
LLC, which it acquired in exchange for its initial capital contribution of $4.7 million to RHAC
Holdings, LLC in 2005. Through a wholly-owned subsidiary, RHAC, LLC, RHAC Holdings LLC owns the
716-room Aston Waikiki Beach Hotel and related assets located in Honolulu, Hawaii (the Waikiki
Hotel). RHAC, LLC financed the purchase of the Waikiki Hotel by entering into a series of loan
transactions with Greenwich Capital Financial Products, Inc. (the Waikiki Hotel Lender)
consisting of a $70.0 million senior loan secured by the Waikiki Hotel and a $16.3 million
mezzanine loan secured by the ownership interest of RHAC, LLC (collectively, the Waikiki Hotel
Loans). On September 29, 2006, RHAC, LLC refinanced the Waikiki Hotel Loans with the Waikiki Hotel
Lender, which resulted in the mezzanine loan increasing from $16.3 million to $34.9 million. In
connection with RHAC, LLCs execution of the Waikiki Hotel Loans, IB-SIV, entered into two separate
Guaranties of Recourse Obligations with the Waikiki Hotel Lender whereby it guaranteed RHAC, LLCs
obligations under the Waikiki Hotel Loans for as long as those loans remain outstanding (i) in the
event of certain types of fraud, breaches of environmental representations or warranties, or
breaches of certain special purpose entity covenants by RHAC, LLC, or (ii) in the event of
bankruptcy or reorganization proceedings of RHAC, LLC. As a part of the joint venture arrangement
and simultaneously with the closing of the purchase of the Waikiki Hotel, the Company entered into
a Contribution Agreement with IB-SIV, whereby the Company agreed that, in the event that IB-SIV is
required to make any payments pursuant to the terms of these guarantees, it will contribute to
IB-SIV an amount equal to 19.9% of any such guaranty payments. The Company estimates that the
maximum potential amount for which the Company could be liable under this contribution agreement is
$20.9 million, which represents 19.9% of the $104.9 million of total debt that RHAC, LLC owes to
the Waikiki Hotel Lender as of March 31, 2010. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had not recorded
any liability in the condensed consolidated balance sheet associated with this guarantee.
On February 22, 2005, the Company concluded the settlement of litigation with Nashville Hockey Club
Limited Partnership (NHC), which owned the Nashville Predators NHL hockey team, over (i) NHCs
obligation to redeem the Companys ownership interest, and (ii) the Companys obligations under the
Nashville Arena Naming Rights Agreement dated November 24, 1999. Under the Naming Rights Agreement,
which had a 20-year term through 2018, the Company was required to make annual payments to NHC,
beginning at $2,050,000 in 1999 and with a 5% escalation each year thereafter, and to purchase a
minimum number of tickets to Predators games each year. At the closing of the settlement, NHC
redeemed all of the Companys outstanding limited partnership units in the Predators pursuant to a
Purchase Agreement dated February 22, 2005, effectively terminating the Companys ownership
interest in the Predators. In addition, the Naming Rights Agreement was cancelled pursuant to the
Acknowledgment of Termination of Naming Rights Agreement. As a part of the settlement, the Company
made a one-time cash payment to NHC of $4 million and issued to NHC a 5-year, $5 million promissory
note bearing interest at 6% per annum. The note is payable at $1 million per year for 5 years and
has an outstanding balance of $1.0 million as of March 31, 2010. The Companys obligation to pay
the outstanding amount under the note shall terminate immediately if, at any time before the note
is paid in full, the Predators cease to be an NHL team playing their home games in Nashville,
Tennessee. In addition, pursuant to a Consent Agreement among the Company, the National Hockey
League and owners of NHC, the Companys guaranty described below has been limited as described
below.
In connection with the Companys execution of an Agreement of Limited Partnership with NHC on June
25, 1997, the Company, its subsidiary CCK, Inc., Craig Leipold, Helen Johnson-Leipold (Mr.
Leipolds wife) and Samuel C. Johnson (Mr. Leipolds father-in-law) entered into a guaranty
agreement executed in favor of the National Hockey League (NHL). This agreement provides for a
continuing guarantee of the following obligations for as long as either of these obligations
remains outstanding: (i) all obligations under the expansion agreement between NHC and the NHL; and
(ii) all operating expenses of NHC. The maximum potential amount which the Company and CCK,
collectively, could be liable under the guaranty agreement is $15.0 million, although the Company
and CCK would have recourse against the other guarantors if required to make payments under the
guarantee. In connection with the legal settlement with the Nashville Predators consummated on
February 22, 2005, this guaranty has been limited so that the Company is not responsible for any
debt, obligation or liability of NHC that arises from any act, omission or circumstance occurring
after the date of the
18
legal settlement. As of March 31, 2010, the Company had not recorded any liability in the condensed
consolidated balance sheet associated with this guarantee.
The Company has purchased stop-loss coverage in order to limit its exposure to any significant
levels of claims relating to workers compensation, employee medical benefits and general liability
for which it is self-insured.
The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain officers, which provides for
severance payments upon certain events, including certain terminations in connection with a change
of control.
As of March 31, 2010, approximately 16% of the Companys employees were represented by labor unions
and are working pursuant to the terms of the collective bargaining agreements which have been
negotiated with the four unions representing these employees.
The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is involved in certain legal actions and claims on
a variety of other matters. It is the opinion of management that such legal actions will not have a
material effect on the results of operations, financial condition or liquidity of the Company.
14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:
The Company uses a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring
fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in
active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are
either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
As of March 31, 2010, the Company held certain assets and liabilities that are required to be
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included the Companys derivative instruments
related to interest rates and natural gas prices and investments held in conjunction with the
Companys non-qualified contributory deferred compensation plan.
The Companys interest rate and natural gas derivative instruments consist of over-the-counter swap
contracts, which are not traded on a public exchange. See Note 8 for further information on the
Companys derivative instruments and hedging activities. The Company determines the fair values of
these swap contracts based on quotes, with appropriate adjustments for any significant impact of
non-performance risk of the parties to the swap contracts. Therefore, the Company has categorized
these swap contracts as Level 2. The Company has consistently applied these valuation techniques in
all periods presented and believes it has obtained the most accurate information available for the
types of derivative contracts it holds.
The investments held by the Company in connection with its deferred compensation plan consist of
mutual funds traded in an active market. The Company determined the fair value of these mutual
funds based on the net asset value per unit of the funds or the portfolio, which is based upon
quoted market prices in an active market. Therefore, the Company has categorized these investments
as Level 1. The Company has consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods
presented and believes it has obtained the most accurate information available for the types of
investments it holds.
19
The Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2010,
were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
|
March 31, |
|
Identical Assets |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
|
2010 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
Deferred compensation plan
investments |
|
$ |
11,895 |
|
|
$ |
11,895 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured
at fair value |
|
$ |
11,895 |
|
|
$ |
11,895 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable to fixed
natural gas swaps |
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Variable to fixed
interest rate swaps |
|
|
24,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities measured
at fair value |
|
$ |
24,667 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,667 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The remainder of the assets and liabilities held by the Company at March 31, 2010 are not
required to be measured at fair value. The carrying value of certain of these assets and
liabilities do not approximate fair value, as described below.
As further discussed in Note 6, in connection with the development of Gaylord National, the Company
received two notes receivable from Prince Georges County, Maryland which had an aggregate carrying
value of $132.6 million as of March 31, 2010. The aggregate fair value of these notes receivable,
based upon current market interest rates of notes receivable with comparable market ratings and
current expectations about the timing of debt service payments under the notes, was approximately
$159 million as of March 31, 2010.
As more fully discussed in Note 7, the Company has $700.0 million in borrowings outstanding under
the New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility that accrue interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.50%. Because
the margin of 2.50% is fixed, the carrying value of borrowings outstanding do not approximate fair
value. The fair value of the $700.0 million in borrowings outstanding under the New $1.0 Billion
Credit Facility, based upon the present value of cash flows discounted at current market interest
rates, was approximately $663 million as of March 31, 2010.
As more fully discussed in Note 7, the Company has outstanding $360.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of Convertible Notes due 2014 that accrue interest at a fixed rate of 3.75%. The
carrying value of these notes on March 31, 2010 was $297.7 million, net of discount. The fair value
of the Convertible Notes, based upon the present value of cash flows discounted at current market
interest rates, was approximately $316 million as of March 31, 2010.
As shown in Note 7, the Company has outstanding $154.2 million in aggregate principal amount of
senior notes due 2014 that accrue interest at a fixed rate of 6.75%. The fair value of these notes,
based upon quoted market prices, was $149.2 million as of March 31, 2010.
The carrying amount of short-term financial instruments (cash, short-term investments, trade
receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities) approximates fair value due to the short
maturity of those instruments. The concentration of credit risk on trade receivables is minimized
by the large and diverse nature of the Companys customer base.
20
15. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
Shareholder Rights Plan
On August 12, 2008, the Companys Board of Directors adopted a shareholder rights plan, as set
forth in the Rights Agreement dated as of August 12, 2008 (the Original Rights Agreement), by and
between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent (Computershare).
Pursuant to the terms of the Original Rights Agreement, the Board of Directors declared a dividend
of one preferred share purchase right (a Right) for each outstanding share of common stock, par
value $.01 per share. The dividend was payable on August 25, 2008 to the shareholders of record as
of the close of business on August 25, 2008.
The Rights initially trade with, and are inseparable from, the Companys common stock. The Rights
are evidenced only by the balances indicated in the book-entry account system of the transfer agent
for the Companys common stock or, in the case of certificated shares, the certificates that
represent such shares of common stock. New Rights will accompany any new shares of common stock the
Company issues after August 25, 2008 until the earlier of the Distribution Date, the redemption
date or the final expiration date of the Original Rights Agreement, each as described below.
Each Right will allow its holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Preferred Share) for $95.00, once the Rights
become exercisable. This portion of a Preferred Share will give the shareholder approximately the
same dividend, voting, and liquidation rights as would one share of common stock. Prior to
exercise, the Right does not give its holder any dividend, voting, or liquidation rights.
Based on the terms of the Original Rights Agreement, as amended, the Rights will not be exercisable
until the earlier of the following (the Distribution Date):
|
|
|
10 days after the public announcement that a person or group has
become an Acquiring Person by obtaining beneficial ownership of 22%
or more of the Companys outstanding common stock; or |
|
|
|
|
10 business days (or a later date determined by the Board before any
person or group becomes an Acquiring Person) after a person or group
begins a tender or exchange offer (other than a Qualified Offer as
defined) which, if completed, would result in that person or group
becoming an Acquiring Person. |
After the Distribution Date, each Right will generally entitle the holder, except the Acquiring
Person or any associate or affiliate thereof, to acquire, for the exercise price of $95.00 per
Right (subject to adjustment as provided in the Rights Agreement), shares of the Companys common
stock (or, in certain circumstances, Preferred Shares) having a market value equal to twice the
Rights then-current exercise price. In addition, if, the Company is later acquired in a merger or
similar transaction after the Distribution Date, each Right will generally entitle the holder,
except the Acquiring Person or any associate or affiliate thereof, to acquire, for the exercise
price of $95.00 per Right (subject to adjustment as provided in the Rights Agreement), shares of
the acquiring corporation having a market value equal to twice the Rights then-current exercise
price.
Each one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share, if issued:
|
|
|
will not be redeemable; |
|
|
|
|
will entitle holders to quarterly dividend payments of $.01 per one
one-hundredth of a share, or an amount equal to the dividend paid on
one share of common stock, whichever is greater; |
|
|
|
|
will entitle holders upon liquidation either to receive $1 per one
one-hundredth of a share or an amount equal to the payment made on one
share of common stock, whichever is greater; |
21
|
|
|
will have the same voting power as one share of common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
if shares of the Companys common stock are exchanged via merger,
consolidation, or a similar transaction, will entitle holders to a per
share payment equal to the payment made on one share of common stock. |
The value of one one-hundredth of a Preferred Share will generally approximate the value of one
share of common stock.
The Rights will expire on August 12, 2011, unless previously redeemed, or such later date as
determined by the Board (so long as such determination is made prior to the earlier of the
Distribution Date or August 12, 2011).
The Board may redeem the Rights for $.001 per Right at any time prior to the Distribution Date. If
the Board redeems any Rights, it must redeem all of the Rights. Once the Rights are redeemed, the
only right of the holders of Rights will be to receive the redemption price of $.001 per Right. The
redemption price will be adjusted if the Company has a stock split or stock dividends of the
Companys common stock.
After a person or group becomes an Acquiring Person, but before an Acquiring Person owns 50% or
more of the Companys outstanding common stock, the Board may extinguish the Rights by exchanging
one share of common stock or an equivalent security for each Right, other than Rights held by the
Acquiring Person and its associates and affiliates.
Agreements with Stockholders
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company incurred various costs in connection with
preparing for a proxy contest, reaching agreements with two of its larger stockholders, and
reimbursing certain expenses pursuant to one of the agreements of $0.9 million. In addition, the
Company incurred costs of $0.9 million in connection with the settlement of the Companys
shareholder rights plan litigation. These costs are included in selling, general and administrative
expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.
Treasury Stock
On December 18, 2008, following approval by the Human Resources Committee and the Board of
Directors, the Company and the Companys Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer (Executive) entered into an amendment to Executives employment agreement. The amendment
provided Executive with the option of making an irrevocable election to invest his existing
Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan (SERP) benefit in Company common stock, which election
Executive subsequently made. The investment was made by a rabbi trust in which, during January
2009, the independent trustee of the rabbi trust purchased shares of Company common stock in the
open market in compliance with applicable law. Executive is only entitled to a distribution of the
Company common stock held by the rabbi trust in satisfaction of his SERP benefit. As such, the
Company believes that the ownership of shares of common stock by the rabbi trust and the
distribution of those shares to Executive in satisfaction of his SERP benefit meets the
requirements necessary so that the Company will not recognize any increase or decrease in expense
as a result of subsequent changes in the value of the Company common stock and the purchased shares
are treated as treasury stock and the SERP benefit is included in additional paid-in capital in the
Companys accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.
22
16. EMPLOYEE SEVERANCE COSTS:
In the three months ended March 31, 2009, as part of the Companys cost containment initiative, the
Company eliminated approximately 350 employee positions, which included positions in all segments
of the organization. As a result, the Company recognized approximately $4.5 million in severance
costs in the three months ended March 31, 2009. These costs are comprised of operating costs and
selling, general and administrative costs of $2.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
17. FINANCIAL REPORTING BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS:
The Companys continuing operations are organized into three principal business segments:
|
|
|
Hospitality, which includes the Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center, the
Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention Center, the Gaylord Texan Resort and Convention Center,
the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center and the Radisson Hotel at Opryland, as
well as the Companys ownership interests in two joint ventures; |
|
|
|
|
Opry and Attractions, which includes the Grand Ole Opry, WSM-AM, Corporate Magic, and
the Companys Nashville-based attractions; and |
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Other, which includes the Companys corporate expenses. |
23
The following information from continuing operations is derived directly from the segments
internal financial reports used for corporate management purposes (amounts in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
$ |
203,695 |
|
|
$ |
200,647 |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
12,970 |
|
|
|
11,644 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
216,690 |
|
|
$ |
212,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
$ |
23,219 |
|
|
$ |
24,589 |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
Corporate and Other |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
27,076 |
|
|
$ |
28,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
$ |
30,246 |
|
|
$ |
26,151 |
|
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
(868 |
) |
|
|
(2,508 |
) |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(14,529 |
) |
|
|
(15,621 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
14,849 |
|
|
|
8,022 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(20,115 |
) |
|
|
(18,600 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
(Loss) income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
16,557 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before provision for income taxes |
|
$ |
(931 |
) |
|
$ |
9,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
The Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center, which is located adjacent to the Cumberland
River and is protected by levees accredited by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) (which, according to FEMA, was
based on information provided by the Company), and built to
sustain a 100-year flood, suffered flood damage on May 3, 2010 as the river rose to
levels that over-topped the levees. The resort is currently closed. While it is too early to determine
how long the hotel will be closed, and thus, the financial impact on the Company, the Company
believes it is reasonable to conclude that the hotel will likely be closed for several months. The
Company carries business interruption and property insurance associated with flood damage with an
aggregate limit of $50.0 million.
19. INFORMATION CONCERNING GUARANTOR AND NON-GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES:
Not all of the Companys subsidiaries have guaranteed the Companys 6.75% senior notes. The
Companys 6.75% senior notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by generally all of the
Companys active domestic subsidiaries (the Guarantors). The Companys investment in joint
ventures and certain discontinued operations and inactive subsidiaries (the Non-Guarantors) do
not guarantee the Companys 6.75% senior notes.
The following condensed consolidating financial information includes certain allocations of
revenues and expenses based on managements best estimates, which are not necessarily indicative of
financial position, results of operations and cash flows that these entities would have achieved on
a stand alone basis.
24
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,592 |
|
|
$ |
216,732 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,634 |
) |
|
$ |
216,690 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
131,993 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
37,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
42,772 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
25,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,076 |
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(5,026 |
) |
|
|
19,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,849 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(20,465 |
) |
|
|
(28,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,289 |
|
|
|
(20,115 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
24,068 |
|
|
|
4,808 |
|
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
(29,289 |
) |
|
|
3,222 |
|
Loss from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
(Loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(4,345 |
) |
|
|
3,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(931 |
) |
(Provision) benefit for income taxes |
|
|
(656 |
) |
|
|
1,507 |
|
|
|
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(940 |
) |
Equity in subsidiaries losses, net |
|
|
(973 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
(2,838 |
) |
|
|
1,844 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
(1,871 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,838 |
) |
|
$ |
1,865 |
|
|
$ |
973 |
|
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
|
25
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
2,056 |
|
|
$ |
212,311 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,048 |
) |
|
$ |
212,319 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,365 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
5,436 |
|
|
|
39,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,861 |
|
Management fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,048 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1,379 |
|
|
|
26,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,071 |
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(4,759 |
) |
|
|
12,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,022 |
|
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(19,148 |
) |
|
|
(28,891 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
29,521 |
|
|
|
(18,600 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
6,223 |
|
|
|
23,689 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
(29,521 |
) |
|
|
3,846 |
|
Income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
16,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,557 |
|
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
(Loss) income before (benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,128 |
) |
|
|
7,559 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,804 |
|
Benefit (provision) for income taxes |
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
(5,361 |
) |
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,286 |
) |
Equity in subsidiaries earnings, net |
|
|
4,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
|
(4,031 |
) |
|
|
3,518 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
$ |
2,221 |
|
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
$ |
(4,031 |
) |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
|
|
26
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted |
|
$ |
176,183 |
|
|
$ |
3,312 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
179,495 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents restricted |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,834 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,740 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
29,596 |
|
|
|
53,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
82,921 |
|
Intercompany receivables, net |
|
|
1,625,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283,192 |
|
|
|
(1,908,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,832,974 |
|
|
|
107,243 |
|
|
|
284,018 |
|
|
|
(1,909,032 |
) |
|
|
315,203 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
45,415 |
|
|
|
2,083,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,128,572 |
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,233 |
|
Long-term deferred financing costs |
|
|
16,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,528 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
743,850 |
|
|
|
353,779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,050,826 |
) |
|
|
46,803 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,638,767 |
|
|
$ |
2,676,412 |
|
|
$ |
284,018 |
|
|
$ |
(2,959,858 |
) |
|
$ |
2,639,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,279 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,279 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
28,838 |
|
|
|
121,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(421 |
) |
|
|
150,365 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270 |
|
Intercompany payables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,826,465 |
|
|
|
82,441 |
|
|
|
(1,908,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
30,108 |
|
|
|
1,949,692 |
|
|
|
83,012 |
|
|
|
(1,909,327 |
) |
|
|
153,485 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
1,151,847 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152,291 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(26,368 |
) |
|
|
126,785 |
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,151 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
24,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,397 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
54,731 |
|
|
|
73,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
128,506 |
|
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
451 |
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
470 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
883,102 |
|
|
|
1,088,457 |
|
|
|
(47,521 |
) |
|
|
(1,040,936 |
) |
|
|
883,102 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
557,872 |
|
|
|
(564,834 |
) |
|
|
247,341 |
|
|
|
(7,501 |
) |
|
|
232,878 |
|
Other stockholders equity |
|
|
(32,793 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32,793 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,404,052 |
|
|
|
526,011 |
|
|
|
199,821 |
|
|
|
(1,050,826 |
) |
|
|
1,079,058 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,638,767 |
|
|
$ |
2,676,412 |
|
|
$ |
284,018 |
|
|
$ |
(2,959,858 |
) |
|
$ |
2,639,339 |
|
|
|
|
27
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents unrestricted |
|
$ |
175,871 |
|
|
$ |
4,162 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
180,033 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents restricted |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Trade receivables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,917 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
1,431 |
|
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,525 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
29,653 |
|
|
|
51,361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
80,888 |
|
Intercompany receivables, net |
|
|
1,629,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279,626 |
|
|
|
(1,909,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,836,979 |
|
|
|
97,871 |
|
|
|
280,452 |
|
|
|
(1,909,726 |
) |
|
|
305,576 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
|
|
47,317 |
|
|
|
2,102,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,149,814 |
|
Notes receivable, net of current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,311 |
|
Long-term deferred financing costs |
|
|
18,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,081 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
743,157 |
|
|
|
353,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,051,799 |
) |
|
|
45,241 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,645,534 |
|
|
$ |
2,696,562 |
|
|
$ |
280,452 |
|
|
$ |
(2,961,525 |
) |
|
$ |
2,661,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,814 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
13,585 |
|
|
|
138,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
151,863 |
|
Intercompany payables, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,828,124 |
|
|
|
81,476 |
|
|
|
(1,909,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
14,585 |
|
|
|
1,967,506 |
|
|
|
82,145 |
|
|
|
(1,909,890 |
) |
|
|
154,346 |
|
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations, net of current portion |
|
|
1,175,564 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176,874 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(28,574 |
) |
|
|
129,260 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,590 |
|
Estimated fair value of derivative liabilities |
|
|
25,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,661 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
54,620 |
|
|
|
69,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
124,421 |
|
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2,389 |
) |
|
|
470 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
881,512 |
|
|
|
1,088,457 |
|
|
|
(47,521 |
) |
|
|
(1,040,936 |
) |
|
|
881,512 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
559,722 |
|
|
|
(561,996 |
) |
|
|
245,476 |
|
|
|
(8,474 |
) |
|
|
234,728 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(33,427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,427 |
) |
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,403,678 |
|
|
|
528,849 |
|
|
|
197,956 |
|
|
|
(1,051,799 |
) |
|
|
1,078,684 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,645,534 |
|
|
$ |
2,696,562 |
|
|
$ |
280,452 |
|
|
$ |
(2,961,525 |
) |
|
$ |
2,661,023 |
|
|
|
|
28
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
$ |
25,988 |
|
|
$ |
1,690 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27,733 |
|
Net cash used in discontinued operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
25,988 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(5,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,181 |
) |
Collection of notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
(1,094 |
) |
|
|
(1,213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,307 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
|
|
(2,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,463 |
) |
Net cash provided by investing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
|
|
(2,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,463 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of senior notes |
|
|
(25,082 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,082 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock option and purchase plans |
|
|
381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock based compensation |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(24,567 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,753 |
) |
Net cash provided by financing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(24,567 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,753 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(538 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
175,871 |
|
|
|
4,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,033 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
176,183 |
|
|
$ |
3,312 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
179,495 |
|
|
|
|
29
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Issuer |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Guarantors |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operating activities |
|
$ |
(12,388 |
) |
|
$ |
7,712 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4,681 |
) |
Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
|
|
(12,388 |
) |
|
|
7,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,676 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(21,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,821 |
) |
Collection of notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,715 |
|
Other investing activities |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities continuing operations |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(9,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,450 |
) |
Net cash provided by investing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(9,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings under credit facility |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
Repurchases of senior notes |
|
|
(37,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,180 |
) |
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,599 |
) |
Other financing activities, net |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities continuing operations |
|
|
33,207 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,077 |
|
Net cash provided by financing activities discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
33,207 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
20,488 |
|
|
|
(1,537 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,951 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
(5,724 |
) |
|
|
6,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,043 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
$ |
14,764 |
|
|
$ |
5,230 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,994 |
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
ITEM 2. |
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated
financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and our audited
consolidated financial statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2009, appearing
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) on February 26, 2010.
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements intended to qualify for
the safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or
current facts. These statements contain words such as may, will, project, might, expect,
believe, anticipate, intend, could, would, estimate, continue or pursue, or the
negative or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. In particular, they include
statements relating to, among other things, future actions, new projects, strategies, future
performance, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings and future financial results.
We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about
future events.
We caution the reader that forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that cannot
be predicted or quantified and, consequently, actual results may differ materially from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but
are not limited to, those factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 or described from time to time in our other reports filed with the SEC. Any
forward-looking statements are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 and, as such, speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overall Outlook
Our concentration in the hospitality industry, and in particular the large group meetings sector of
the hospitality industry, exposes us to certain risks outside of our control. Recessionary
conditions in the national economy have resulted in economic pressures on the hospitality industry
generally, and on our Companys operations and expansion plans. In portions of 2008 and the first
half of 2009, we experienced declines in hotel occupancy, weakness in future bookings by our core
large group customers, lower spending levels by groups, increased cancellation levels, and
increases in groups not fulfilling the minimum number of room nights originally contract for, or
rooms attrition. In recent quarters, we have begun to see stabilization in our industry and
specifically in our business, as further discussed below. While we continue to focus our sales and
marketing efforts on booking rooms in 2010, in addition to later years, there can be no assurance
that we can continue to achieve improvements in occupancy and revenue levels. We cannot predict
when or if hospitality demand and spending will return to historical levels, but we anticipate that
our future financial results and growth will be harmed if the economic slowdown continues for a
significant period or becomes worse.
The Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center, which is located adjacent to the Cumberland
River and is protected by levees accredited by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) (which, according to FEMA, was
based on information provided by us), and built to
sustain a 100-year flood, suffered flood damage on May 3, 2010 as the river rose to
levels that over-topped the levees. The resort is currently closed. While it is too early to determine
how long the hotel will be closed, and thus, the financial impact on us, we believe it is
reasonable to conclude that the hotel will likely be closed for several months. We carry business
interruption and property insurance associated with flood damage with an aggregate limit of $50.0
million. We expect to incur significant revenue losses and costs associated with the hotel closure
and the rebuilding effort, which, in the aggregate, may exceed the coverage under the Companys
insurance policies. It is likely that financial results for the Gaylord Opryland Resort and
Convention Center and, thus the Company, will be impacted for at least the next two quarters.
31
See Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2010, as well as Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors below,
for important information regarding forward-looking statements made in this report and risks and
uncertainties we face.
Recent Events
Repurchase of Senior Notes. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we repurchased $26.5
million in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 6.75% senior notes for $25.1 million.
After adjusting for deferred financing costs and other costs, we recorded a pretax gain of $1.2
million as a result of the repurchases, which is recorded as a net gain on extinguishment of debt
in the accompanying financial information. We used available cash to finance the purchases and
intend to consider additional repurchases of our senior notes from time to time depending on market
conditions.
Labor Union Activity. As of March 31, 2010, approximately 1,448 employees at Gaylord National were
represented by labor unions, and are working pursuant to the terms of the collective bargaining
agreements which have been negotiated with the four unions representing these employees. As a
result, we anticipate an increase in labor and benefit costs in 2010.
Development Update
We invested heavily in our operations during 2007 and 2008, primarily in connection with continued
improvements of Gaylord Opryland, and the construction of Gaylord National beginning in 2005 and
continuing through 2008. Our investments in 2009 consisted primarily of ongoing maintenance capital
expenditures for our existing properties. Our investments in 2010 are also expected to consist
primarily of ongoing maintenance capital expenditures for our
existing properties and capital expenditures associated with the flood damage and reopening of Gaylord Opryland.
As described above in Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 included herewith, we have entered into a land purchase
agreement with respect to a potential hotel development in Mesa, Arizona.
We are
also considering expansions at Gaylord Texan and Gaylord Palms, as well
as other potential hotel sites throughout the country. In addition, we are reevaluating our prior considerations regarding a possible expansion of Gaylord Opryland. We have made no commitments to construct
expansions of our current facilities or to build new facilities. We are closely monitoring the
condition of the economy, the availability of attractive financing, and the restoration needs of Gaylord Opryland. We are unable to predict at this
time when we might make such commitments or commence construction of these proposed expansion
projects.
Our Current Operations
Our ongoing operations are organized into three principal business segments:
|
|
|
Hospitality, consisting of our Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center (Gaylord
Opryland), our Gaylord Palms Resort and Convention Center (Gaylord Palms), our Gaylord
Texan Resort and Convention Center (Gaylord Texan), our Gaylord National Resort and
Convention Center (Gaylord National) and our Radisson Hotel at Opryland (Radisson
Hotel), as well as our ownership interests in two joint ventures. |
|
|
|
|
Opry and Attractions, consisting of our Grand Ole Opry assets, our Corporate Magic event
planning business, WSM-AM and our Nashville attractions. |
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Other, consisting of our corporate expenses. |
32
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, our total revenues were divided among these
business segments as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
Segment |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Hospitality |
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
We generate a significant portion of our revenues from our Hospitality segment. We believe that we
are the only hospitality company whose stated primary focus is on the large group meetings and
conventions sector of the lodging market. Our strategy is to continue this focus by concentrating
on our All-in-One-Place self-contained service offerings and by emphasizing customer rotation
among our convention properties, while also offering additional entertainment opportunities to
guests and target customers.
Key Performance Indicators
The operating results of our Hospitality segment are highly dependent on the volume of customers at
our hotels and the quality of the customer mix at our hotels. These factors impact the price we can
charge for our hotel rooms and other amenities, such as food and beverage and meeting space. Key
performance indicators related to revenue are:
|
|
|
hotel occupancy (volume indicator); |
|
|
|
|
average daily rate (ADR) (price indicator); |
|
|
|
|
Revenue per Available Room (RevPAR) (a summary measure of hotel results calculated by
dividing room sales by room nights available to guests for the period); |
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue per Available Room (Total RevPAR) (a summary measure of hotel results
calculated by dividing the sum of room, food and beverage and other ancillary service
revenue by room nights available to guests for the period); and |
|
|
|
|
Net Definite Room Nights Booked (a volume indicator which represents the total number of
definite bookings for future room nights at Gaylord hotels confirmed during the applicable
period, net of cancellations). |
We recognize Hospitality segment revenue from rooms as earned on the close of business each day and
from concessions and food and beverage sales at the time of sale. Attrition fees, which are charged
to groups when they do not fulfill the minimum number of room nights or minimum food and beverage
spending requirements originally contracted for, as well as cancellation fees, are recognized as
revenue in the period they are collected. Almost all of our Hospitality segment revenues are either
cash-based or, for meeting and convention groups meeting our credit criteria, billed and collected
on a short-term receivables basis. Our industry is capital intensive, and we rely on the ability of
our hotels to generate operating cash flow to repay debt financing, fund maintenance capital
expenditures and provide excess cash flow for future development.
The results of operations of our Hospitality segment are affected by the number and type of group
meetings and conventions scheduled to attend our hotels in a given period. We attempt to offset any
identified shortfalls in occupancy by creating special events at our hotels or offering incentives to groups in order to
attract increased
33
business during this period. A variety of factors can affect the results of any
interim period, including the nature and quality of the group meetings and conventions attending
our hotels during such period, which meetings and conventions have often been contracted for
several years in advance, the level of attrition we experience, and the level of transient business
at our hotels during such period.
Selected Financial Information
The following table contains our unaudited selected summary financial data for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. The table also shows the percentage relationships to total revenues
and, in the case of segment operating income (loss), its relationship to segment revenues (in
thousands, except percentages).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited |
|
|
|
Three Months ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% |
|
Income Statement Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
$ |
203,695 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
% |
|
$ |
200,647 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
% |
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
12,970 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
11,644 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
216,690 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
212,319 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
131,993 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
% |
|
|
131,365 |
|
|
|
61.9 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
42,772 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
44,861 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
|
23,219 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
24,589 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
% |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
|
27,076 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
|
28,071 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
201,841 |
|
|
|
93.1 |
% |
|
|
204,297 |
|
|
|
96.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality |
|
|
30,246 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
26,151 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
% |
Opry and Attractions |
|
|
(868 |
) |
|
|
-6.7 |
% |
|
|
(2,508 |
) |
|
|
-21.5 |
% |
Corporate and Other |
|
|
(14,529 |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
(15,621 |
) |
|
|
(A |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income |
|
|
14,849 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
8,022 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
|
|
(20,115 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(18,600 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
(Loss) income from unconsolidated companies |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
16,557 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(6,286 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
(B |
) |
|
$ |
3,427 |
|
|
|
(B |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
|
These amounts have not been shown as a percentage of segment revenue because the Corporate
and Other segment generates only minimal revenue. |
|
(B) |
|
These amounts have not been shown as a percentage of total revenue because they have no
relationship to total revenue. |
34
Summary Financial Results
Results
The following table summarizes our financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009 (in thousands, except percentages and per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
%
Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
216,690 |
|
|
$ |
212,319 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Total operating expenses |
|
|
201,841 |
|
|
|
204,297 |
|
|
|
-1.2 |
% |
Operating income |
|
|
14,849 |
|
|
|
8,022 |
|
|
|
85.1 |
% |
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(1,850 |
) |
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
-154.0 |
% |
Net (loss) income per share fully
diluted |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
-150.0 |
% |
Total Revenues
The increase in our total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
same period in 2009, is attributable to an increase in our Hospitality segment revenues of $3.0
million for the 2010 period and an increase in our Opry and Attractions segment revenue of $1.3
million for the 2010 period, as discussed more fully below.
Total Operating Expenses
The decrease in our total operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared
to the same period in 2009, is primarily due to the 2009 period including $4.5 million in severance
costs associated with our cost containment initiative, as discussed more fully below.
Operating Income
The increase in our operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
same period in 2009, was due primarily to the 2009 period including $4.5 million in severance costs
associated with our cost containment initiative, as well as increased revenues during 2010, as more
fully described below.
Net (Loss) Income
Our net loss of $1.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to net income
of $3.4 million for the same period in 2009, was due primarily to the increase in our operating
income described above, offset by the following factors:
|
|
|
A $15.4 million decrease in our net gain on the extinguishment of debt for the three
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, relating to the
repurchase of a portion of our senior notes, described more fully below, which served to
decrease our net income. |
|
|
|
|
A decrease in our provision for income taxes of $5.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, described more fully below, which
served to increase our net income. |
35
|
|
|
A $1.5 million increase in our interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, as described
more fully below, which served to decrease our net income. |
Factors and Trends Contributing to Operating Performance
The most important factors and trends contributing to our operating performance during the periods
described herein have been:
|
|
|
Increased occupancy levels (an increase of 6.6 percentage points of occupancy for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009) resulting from
increased levels of group business during the period, offset by lower ADR during the period
(a decrease of 10.3% for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same
period in 2009), due primarily to continued pressure on room rates. This combination, when
combined with increased outside-the-room spending, resulted in slightly decreased RevPAR,
but increased Total RevPAR for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
same period in 2009. |
|
|
|
|
Decreased attrition and cancellation levels for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
as compared to the same period in 2009, which increased our operating income, RevPAR and
Total RevPAR. Attrition for the 2010 period was 10.6% of bookings, compared to 17.0% for
the 2009 period. |
36
Operating Results Detailed Segment Financial Information
Hospitality Segment
Total Segment Results. The following presents the financial results of our Hospitality segment
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except percentages and
performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Hospitality revenue (1) |
|
$ |
203,695 |
|
|
$ |
200,647 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Hospitality operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
120,972 |
|
|
|
120,080 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
29,258 |
|
|
|
29,827 |
|
|
|
-1.9 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
23,219 |
|
|
|
24,589 |
|
|
|
-5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Hospitality operating expenses |
|
|
173,449 |
|
|
|
174,496 |
|
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality operating income |
|
$ |
30,246 |
|
|
$ |
26,151 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hospitality performance metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
67.9 |
% |
|
|
61.3 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
165.86 |
|
|
$ |
184.96 |
|
|
|
-10.3 |
% |
RevPAR (2) |
|
$ |
112.62 |
|
|
$ |
113.32 |
|
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
Total RevPAR (3) |
|
$ |
279.59 |
|
|
$ |
275.41 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Net Definite Room Nights Booked |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
107,000 |
|
|
|
236.4 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Hospitality results and performance metrics include the results
of our Gaylord hotels and our Radisson Hotel for all periods
presented. |
|
(2) |
|
We calculate Hospitality RevPAR by dividing room sales by room
nights available to guests for the period. Hospitality RevPAR is
not comparable to similarly titled measures such as revenues. |
|
(3) |
|
We calculate Hospitality Total RevPAR by dividing the sum of room
sales, food and beverage, and other ancillary services (which
equals Hospitality segment revenue) by room nights available to
guests for the period. Hospitality Total RevPAR is not comparable
to similarly titled measures such as revenues. |
The increase in total Hospitality segment revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as
compared to the same period in 2009, is primarily due to increased occupancy rates and increased
outside-the-room spending resulting from higher levels of group business during the period.
Total Hospitality segment operating expenses consist of direct operating costs, selling, general
and administrative expenses, and depreciation and amortization expense. The decrease in Hospitality
operating expenses in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in
2009, is primarily attributable to an increase at Gaylord National and a slight increase at Gaylord
Texan, offset by a decrease in operating expenses at each of our other Hospitality segment
properties, as described below.
Total Hospitality segment operating costs, which consist of direct costs associated with the daily
operations of our hotels (primarily room, food and beverage and convention costs), increased
slightly in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, as
described below.
Total Hospitality segment selling, general and administrative expenses, consisting of
administrative and overhead costs, decreased slightly in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as
compared to the same period in 2009, as described below.
37
Total Hospitality segment depreciation and amortization expense decreased in the three months ended
March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily as a result of a decrease at
Gaylord Palms due to the initial furniture, fixtures and equipment placed in service at the hotels
opening in 2002 becoming fully depreciated during the 2010 period.
Property-Level Results. The following presents the property-level financial results of our
Hospitality segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
Gaylord Opryland Results. The results of Gaylord Opryland for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages and performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
54,669 |
|
|
$ |
54,522 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
34,561 |
|
|
|
36,932 |
|
|
|
-6.4 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
7,443 |
|
|
|
8,505 |
|
|
|
-12.5 |
% |
Hospitality performance
metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
62.7 |
% |
|
|
58.3 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
143.08 |
|
|
$ |
155.52 |
|
|
|
-8.0 |
% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
89.67 |
|
|
$ |
90.64 |
|
|
|
-1.1 |
% |
Total RevPAR |
|
$ |
210.99 |
|
|
$ |
210.42 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
% |
Total revenue increased slightly at Gaylord Opryland in the three months ended March 31, 2010,
as compared to the same period in 2009, due to a combination of increased occupancy, primarily
corporate groups, and increased outside-the-room spending, partially offset by lower ADR, primarily
due to continued pressure on room rates, and lower collection of attrition and cancellation fees.
RevPAR and Total RevPAR remained fairly stable during the 2010 period.
Operating costs at Gaylord Opryland in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
same period in 2009, decreased primarily due to the 2009 period including severance costs
associated with the Companys cost containment initiative that did not recur in 2010. Selling,
general and administrative expenses at Gaylord Opryland decreased in the three months ended March
31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to reductions in employment costs
and overall expense reductions associated with the Companys cost containment initiative.
38
Gaylord Palms Results. The results of Gaylord Palms for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages and performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
43,317 |
|
|
$ |
45,904 |
|
|
|
-5.6 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
23,106 |
|
|
|
24,123 |
|
|
|
-4.2 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
7,113 |
|
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
-2.9 |
% |
Hospitality performance
metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
74.2 |
% |
|
|
68.8 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
176.84 |
|
|
$ |
197.70 |
|
|
|
-10.6 |
% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
131.24 |
|
|
$ |
135.95 |
|
|
|
-3.5 |
% |
Total RevPAR |
|
$ |
342.31 |
|
|
$ |
362.77 |
|
|
|
-5.6 |
% |
The decrease in Gaylord Palms revenue, RevPAR and Total RevPAR in the three months ended March
31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, was primarily due to the combination of increased
occupancy during the period, primarily associations, offset by a lower ADR, primarily due to a
recent increase in room supply in the Orlando, Florida market that has seen slow absorption due to
the challenging economic environment. Revenue and Total RevPAR were also negatively impacted by a
decrease in collections of attrition and cancellation fees during the 2010 period.
Operating costs at Gaylord Palms in the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased as compared to
the same period in 2009, primarily due to the 2009 period including severance costs associated with
our cost containment initiative. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased slightly
during the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due
to lower employment costs.
39
Gaylord Texan Results. The results of the Gaylord Texan for the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages and performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
46,871 |
|
|
$ |
42,396 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
25,032 |
|
|
|
24,754 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
5,964 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
Hospitality performance
metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
72.8 |
% |
|
|
61.2 |
% |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
168.68 |
|
|
$ |
185.38 |
|
|
|
-9.0 |
% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
122.78 |
|
|
$ |
113.38 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
Total RevPAR |
|
$ |
344.67 |
|
|
$ |
311.76 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
% |
The increase in Gaylord Texan revenue, RevPAR and Total RevPAR in the three months ended March
31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, was primarily due to higher occupancy, partially
offset by lower ADR, during the 2010 period, as the hotel experienced an increase in group
business. This increase in group business also led to increases in banquet, catering and other
outside-the-room spending at the hotel, which increased the hotels Total RevPAR for the period.
Operating costs at Gaylord Texan in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same
period in 2009, increased primarily due to increased variable operating costs associated with the
higher levels of occupancy and outside-the-room spending at the hotel. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased during the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
same period in 2009, primarily due to increased incentive compensation expense.
40
Gaylord National Results. The results of Gaylord National for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 are as follows (in thousands, except percentages and performance metrics):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
57,523 |
|
|
$ |
56,091 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
37,486 |
|
|
|
33,241 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
8,370 |
|
|
|
8,196 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Hospitality performance
metrics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy |
|
|
70.5 |
% |
|
|
61.8 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
ADR |
|
$ |
192.50 |
|
|
$ |
225.61 |
|
|
|
-14.7 |
% |
RevPAR |
|
$ |
135.77 |
|
|
$ |
139.33 |
|
|
|
-2.6 |
% |
Total RevPAR |
|
$ |
320.21 |
|
|
$ |
312.24 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Gaylord National revenue and Total RevPAR increased in the three months ended March 31, 2010,
as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily as a result of higher occupancy and higher
outside-the-room spending during the 2010 period, primarily due to an increase in corporate groups.
Gaylord National RevPAR decreased during the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
same period in 2009, due to a decreased ADR during the 2010 period, primarily due to continued
pressure on room rates and the 2009 period including an increased ADR due to the presidential
inauguration.
Operating costs at Gaylord National in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
same period in 2009, increased primarily due to increased variable operating costs associated with
the increase in occupancy, as well as higher employment costs as a result of new collective
bargaining agreements. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased during the three
months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, primarily due to increased
incentive compensation.
41
Opry and Attractions Segment
Total Segment Results. The following presents the financial results of our Opry and
Attractions segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except
percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
12,970 |
|
|
$ |
11,644 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
|
8,729 |
|
|
|
-2.0 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
3,917 |
|
|
|
4,309 |
|
|
|
-9.1 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(868 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,508 |
) |
|
|
65.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in revenues in the Opry and Attractions segment for the three months ended March
31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, is primarily due to increases in substantially
all of our Opry and Attractions segment businesses.
The decrease in Opry and Attractions operating costs and selling, general and administrative costs
in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the same period in 2009, was due primarily
to the 2009 period including severance costs associated with our cost containment initiative.
42
Corporate and Other Segment
Total Segment Results. The following presents the financial results of our Corporate and Other
segment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
|
-10.7 |
% |
Operating expense data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
|
2,467 |
|
|
|
2,556 |
|
|
|
-3.5 |
% |
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
9,597 |
|
|
|
10,725 |
|
|
|
-10.5 |
% |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(14,529 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,621 |
) |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and Other segment revenue consists of rental income and corporate sponsorships.
Corporate and Other operating costs, which consist primarily of costs associated with information
technology, decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the 2009 period, due
primarily to lower software and hardware maintenance and consulting costs. Corporate and Other
selling, general and administrative expenses, which consist of senior management salaries and
benefits, legal, human resources, accounting, pension and other administrative costs, also
decreased in the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to 2009 period, due primarily to
expenses incurred in the 2009 period associated with preparing for a proxy contest, settlement of
the Companys shareholder rights plan litigation, and $1.2 million in severance costs related to
the Companys cost containment initiative, which were not incurred in the 2010 period, partially
offset by consulting costs incurred for a consulting project in the 2010 period. Corporate and
Other depreciation and amortization expense increased in the three months ended March 31, 2010 as
compared with the same period in 2009 primarily due to additional information technology equipment
and software costs placed in service.
43
Non-Operating Results Affecting Net Income
General
The following table summarizes the other factors which affected our net income for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
Interest expense, net of
amounts capitalized |
|
$ |
(20,115 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,600 |
) |
|
|
-8.1 |
% |
Interest income |
|
|
3,222 |
|
|
|
3,846 |
|
|
|
-16.2 |
% |
(Loss) income from
unconsolidated companies |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
-156.6 |
% |
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
16,557 |
|
|
|
-92.8 |
% |
Other gains and (losses), net |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
91.3 |
% |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
6,286 |
|
|
|
-85.0 |
% |
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations, net of taxes |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
123.1 |
% |
Interest Expense, Net of Amounts Capitalized
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, increased $1.5 million to $20.1 million (net of
capitalized interest of $0.2 million) during the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to
the same period in 2009, due primarily to an increase in interest expense associated with our
convertible notes issued in the third quarter of 2009, partially offset by a decrease in interest
expense associated with our remaining outstanding senior notes as a result of the repurchase of a
portion of these notes during 2009 and 2010.
Our weighted average interest rate on our borrowings, excluding the write-off of deferred financing
costs during the period, was 6.6% and 6.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively.
Interest Income
The decrease in interest income during the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the
same period in 2009, was primarily due to the discount on a portion of the notes receivable that
were received in connection with the development of Gaylord National becoming fully amortized into
interest income during 2009.
44
(Loss) income from Unconsolidated Companies
We account for our investments in RHAC Holdings, LLC (the joint venture entity which owns the Aston
Waikiki Beach Hotel) and Waipouli Holdings, LLC (the joint venture entity which owns the
ResortQuest Kauai Beach at Makaiwa Hotel) under the equity method of accounting. During 2008, we
wrote off our investment in Waipouli Holdings, LLC. As we do not expect to make future
contributions to the joint venture entity, we have not reduced the carrying value of our investment
in Waipouli Holdings, LLC below zero or recognized our share of gains or losses of the joint
venture for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. (Loss) income from unconsolidated
companies for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of equity method (loss)
income from these investments as follows (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
% Change |
|
RHAC Holdings, LLC |
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
|
-156.6 |
% |
Waipouli Holdings, LLC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total: |
|
$ |
(73 |
) |
|
$ |
129 |
|
|
|
-156.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Gain on Extinguishment of Debt
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we repurchased $26.5 million in aggregate principal
amount of our outstanding 6.75% senior notes for $25.1 million. After adjusting for deferred
financing costs and other costs, we recorded a pretax gain of $1.2 million as a result of the
repurchases.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we repurchased $59.9 million in aggregate principal
amount of our outstanding senior notes ($39.9 million of 8% senior notes and $20.0 million of 6.75%
senior notes) for $42.4 million, of which a portion was accrued at March 31, 2009. After adjusting
for deferred financing costs and other costs, we recorded a pretax gain of $16.6 million as a
result of the repurchases.
Other Gains and (Losses)
Our other gains and (losses) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 primarily consisted
of miscellaneous income and expense.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate as applied to pretax income from continuing operations differed from the
statutory federal rate due to the following (as of March 31, 2010):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
U.S. Federal statutory rate |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
State taxes (net of federal tax benefit and
change in valuation allowance) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
Change in treatment of Medicare Part D subsidies |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
(101 |
)% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which became law on March 23, 2010, as
amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, we and other companies that
receive a subsidy under Medicare Part D to provide retiree prescription drug coverage will no
longer receive a Federal income tax deduction for the expenses incurred in connection with
providing the subsidized coverage to the extent of the subsidy received. Because future anticipated
retiree health care liabilities and related subsidies were previously reflected in our financial
statements, this change required us to reduce the value of the related tax benefits recognized in
our financial statements during the period the law was enacted. As a result, we recorded a
one-time, non-cash tax charge of $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 to
reflect the impact of this change. This charge, as well as changes in our valuation allowances
during the 2010 period, resulted in the change in effective tax rate shown above.
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Taxes
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes, for the three months ended March 31, 2010
and 2009 primarily consisted of miscellaneous income and expense from our former ResortQuest
business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows From Operating Activities. Cash flow from operating activities is the principal source
of cash used to fund our operating expenses, interest payments on debt, and maintenance capital
expenditures. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, our net cash flows provided by
operating activities continuing operations were $27.7 million, reflecting primarily our loss from
continuing operations before non-cash depreciation expense, amortization expense, income tax
provision, stock-based compensation expense, excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation,
loss from unconsolidated companies, net gain on extinguishment of debt, and losses on the sales of
certain fixed assets of approximately $31.2 million, partially offset by unfavorable changes in
working capital of approximately $3.4 million. The unfavorable changes in working capital primarily
resulted from an increase in trade receivables due to a seasonal change in the timing of payments
received from corporate group customers at Gaylord Opryland, Gaylord Texan and Gaylord Palms, and a
decrease in accrued expenses primarily related to the payment of accrued property taxes, accrued
compensation, and accrued expenses associated with our hotel holiday programs, partially offset by the receipt of a payment on the interest receivable related to the bonds that were received in
connection with the development of Gaylord National, an increase in deferred revenues due to
increased receipts of deposits on advanced bookings of hotel rooms at Gaylord Opryland and Gaylord
Palms and an increase in interest payable, attributable to interest accrued on our senior notes and the Convertible Notes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, our net cash flows used in operating activities
continuing operations were $4.7 million, reflecting primarily our income from continuing operations
before non-cash depreciation expense, amortization expense, income tax provision, stock-based
compensation expense, income from unconsolidated companies, net gain on extinguishment of debt, and
losses on the sales of certain fixed assets
of approximately $25.6 million, offset by unfavorable changes in working capital of approximately
$30.3 million. The unfavorable changes in working capital primarily resulted from an increase in
trade receivables due to a seasonal change in the timing of payments received from corporate group
guests at all of our hotels and a decrease in accrued expenses primarily related to the payment of
accrued property taxes and accrued compensation. These unfavorable changes in working capital were
partially offset by an increase in accrued interest on our senior notes.
Cash Flows From Investing Activities. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, our primary
uses of funds for investing activities were purchases of property and equipment, which totaled $5.2
million, partially offset by the receipt of a $3.8 million principal payment on the bonds that were
received in April 2008 in connection with the development of Gaylord National. Our capital
expenditures during the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily included ongoing maintenance
capital expenditures for our existing properties.
46
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, our primary uses of funds and investing activities
were purchases of property and equipment, which totaled $21.8 million, partially offset by the
receipt of a $12.6 million payment on the bonds that were received in April 2008 in connection with
the development of Gaylord National. Our capital expenditures during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 primarily included ongoing maintenance capital expenditures for our existing
properties.
Cash Flows From Financing Activities. Our cash flows from financing activities reflect primarily
the incurrence of debt and the repayment of long-term debt. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, our net cash flows used in financing activities were approximately $24.8 million, primarily
reflecting the payment of $25.1 million to repurchase portions of our 6.75% senior notes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, our net cash flows provided by financing activities
were approximately $33.1 million, primarily reflecting $75.0 million in net borrowings under our
credit facility, partially offset by the payment of $37.2 million to repurchase portions of our
senior notes and the payment of $4.6 million to purchase shares of our common stock to fund a
supplemental employee retirement plan.
Liquidity
As discussed above, Gaylord Opryland Resort and Convention Center is currently closed as a result
of extensive flood damage. The Companys New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility contains covenants
regarding the continuance of business and the prompt repair of property damage which may apply in
the event of an incident such as this. The New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility also contains financial
covenants at levels that assume that all of its properties are operational. See Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 for a description of the financial
covenants. The Company currently believes it will be able to comply with the
requirements in its New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility, but given the financial covenants, the risk
exists that the Company may need to seek waivers of covenants or other amendments to its New $1.0
Billion Credit Facility in order to avoid a default.
As further described above, during September 2009, we issued $360 million in Convertible Notes and
offered and sold six million shares of our common stock. Our total proceeds of these offerings,
after deducting discounts, commissions, expenses and the cost of convertible note hedge
transactions, was approximately $442.4 million. We used the majority of these proceeds, together
with cash on hand, to purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire all of our 8% senior notes due 2013.
The remaining balance of the net proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes, which may
include acquisitions, future development opportunities for new hotel properties, potential
expansions or ongoing maintenance of Gaylord Palms and Gaylord Texan,
capital expenditures associated with repairing the flood damage and
reopening of Gaylord Opryland, investments, or the repayment
or refinancing of all or a portion of any of our outstanding indebtedness. We will continue to
evaluate these possibilities in light of economic conditions and other factors. We are unable to
predict at this time if or when acquisition opportunities may present themselves. In addition, we
are unable to predict at this time when we might make commitments or commence construction related
to the proposed development in Mesa, Arizona or our proposed expansions. Furthermore, we do not
anticipate making significant capital expenditures on the development in Mesa, Arizona or the
proposed expansions of Gaylord Palms and Gaylord Texan during 2010,
but may incur capital expenditures to the extent not covered by
insurance proceeds to repair the flood damage and reopen Gaylord
Opryland. We do not expect
any liquidity issues given our insurance proceeds, cash on hand, cash
flow from our other operations and available borrowing capacity.
Principal Debt Agreements
$1.0 Billion Credit Facility. On July 25, 2008, we refinanced our previous $1.0 billion credit
facility by entering into a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the New $1.0 Billion
Credit Facility) by and among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company party thereto, as
guarantors, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. The New
$1.0 Billion Credit Facility consists of the following components: (a) $300.0 million senior
secured revolving credit facility, which includes a $50.0 million letter of credit sublimit and a
$30.0 million sublimit for swingline loans, and (b) a $700.0 million senior secured term loan
facility. The term loan facility was fully funded at closing. The New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility
also
47
includes an accordion feature that will allow us to increase the New $1.0 Billion Credit
Facility by a total of up to $400.0 million in no more than three occasions, subject to securing
additional commitments from existing lenders or new lending institutions. The revolving loan,
letters of credit, and term loan mature on July 25, 2012. At our election, the revolving loans and
the term loans will bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.50% or a base rate (the higher
of the lead banks prime rate and the federal funds rate) plus 0.50%. We entered into interest rate
swaps with respect to $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of borrowings under the term loan
portion to convert the variable rate on those borrowings to a fixed weighted average interest rate
of 3.94% plus the applicable margin on these borrowings during the term of the swap agreements.
Interest on our borrowings is payable quarterly, in arrears, for base rate loans and at the end of
each interest rate period for LIBOR rate-based loans. Principal is payable in full at maturity. We
will be required to pay a commitment fee of 0.25% per year of the average unused portion of the New
$1.0 Billion Credit Facility.
The New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility is (i) secured by a first mortgage and lien on the real
property and related personal and intellectual property of our Gaylord Opryland hotel, Gaylord
Texan hotel, Gaylord Palms hotel and Gaylord National hotel, and pledges of equity interests in the
entities that own such properties and (ii) guaranteed by each of the four wholly owned subsidiaries
that own the four hotels. Advances are subject to a 55% borrowing base, based on the appraisal
value of the hotel properties (reduced to 50% in the event a hotel property is sold).
As of March 31, 2010, $700.0 million of borrowings were outstanding under the New $1.0 Billion
Credit Facility, and the lending banks had issued $8.9 million of letters of credit under the
facility for us, which left $291.1 million of availability under the credit facility (subject to
the satisfaction of debt incurrence tests under the indentures governing our senior notes).
3.75% Convertible Senior Notes. During September 2009, we issued $360 million, including the
exercise of an overallotment option, of the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes have a
maturity date of October 1, 2014, and interest is payable semiannually in cash in arrears on April
1 and October 1, beginning April 1, 2010. The Notes are convertible, under certain circumstances as
described below, at the holders option, into shares of our common stock, at an initial conversion
rate of 36.6972 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is
equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $27.25 per share. We may elect, at our
option, to deliver shares of our common stock, cash or a combination of cash and shares of our
common stock in satisfaction of our obligations upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.
The Convertible Notes are convertible under any of the following circumstances: (1) during any
calendar quarter ending after September 30, 2009 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the
closing price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading
day period ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds
120% of the applicable conversion price per share of common stock on the last trading day of such
preceding calendar quarter; (2) during the ten business day period after any five consecutive
trading day period in which the Trading Price (as defined in the Indenture) per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, as determined following a request by a
Convertible Note holder, for each day in such five consecutive trading day period was less than 98%
of the product of the last reported sale price of our common stock and the applicable conversion
rate, subject to certain procedures; (3) if specified corporate transactions or events occur; or
(4) at any time on or after July 1, 2014, until the second scheduled trading day immediately
preceding October 1, 2014. As of March 31, 2010, none of the conditions permitting conversion had
been satisfied.
The Convertible Notes are general unsecured and unsubordinated obligations of us and rank equal in
right of payment with all of our existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including our
6.75% senior notes due 2014, and senior in right of payment to all of our future subordinated
indebtedness, if any. The Convertible Notes will be effectively subordinated to any of our secured
indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness.
48
The Convertible Notes are guaranteed, jointly and severally, on an unsecured unsubordinated basis
by generally all of our active domestic subsidiaries. Each guarantee will rank equally in right of
payment with such subsidiary guarantors existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness and
senior in right of payment to all future subordinated indebtedness, if any, of such subsidiary
guarantor. The Convertible Notes will be effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness and
effectively subordinated to all indebtedness and other obligations of our subsidiaries that do not
guarantee the Convertible Notes.
Upon a Fundamental Change (as defined), holders may require us to repurchase all or a portion of
their Convertible Notes at a purchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the
Convertible Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to (but
excluding) the Fundamental Change Repurchase Date (as defined). The Convertible Notes are not
redeemable at our option prior to maturity.
We do not intend to file a registration statement for the resale of the Convertible Notes or any
common stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. As a result, holders may only
resell the Convertible Notes or common stock issued upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, if
any, pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act and other
applicable securities laws.
6.75% Senior Notes. On November 30, 2004, we completed our offering of $225 million in aggregate
principal amount of senior notes bearing an interest rate of 6.75% (the 6.75% Senior Notes).
The 6.75% Senior Notes, which mature on November 15, 2014, bear interest semi-annually in cash
in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, starting on May 15, 2005. The 6.75% Senior Notes
are redeemable, in whole or in part, at any time on or after November 15, 2009 at a designated
redemption amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The 6.75% Senior Notes rank equally in right
of payment with our other unsecured unsubordinated debt, but are effectively subordinated to all of
our secured debt to the extent of the assets securing such debt. The 6.75% Senior Notes are fully
and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior unsecured basis by generally all
of our active domestic subsidiaries. In addition, the 6.75% Senior Notes indenture contains certain
covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness (including
additional indebtedness under the term loan portion of our senior secured credit facility),
investments, dividends, transactions with affiliates, asset sales, capital expenditures, mergers
and consolidations, liens and encumbrances and other matters customarily restricted in such
agreements. The 6.75% Senior Notes are cross-defaulted to our other indebtedness.
As described above, during the three months ended March 31, 2010, we repurchased $26.5 million in
aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 6.75% Senior Notes for $25.1 million. After adjusting
for deferred financing costs and other costs, we recorded a pretax gain of $1.2 million as a result
of the repurchases, which is recorded as a net gain on extinguishment of debt in the accompanying
financial information. We used available cash to finance the purchases and intend to consider
additional repurchases of our 6.75% Senior Notes from time to time depending on market conditions.
As of March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all of our covenants related to our debt.
Future Developments
As described in Development Update above, we are considering other potential hotel sites
throughout the country, including Mesa, Arizona.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As described in Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included herein, we have
investments in two unconsolidated entities, each of which owns a hotel located in Hawaii. Our joint
venture partner in each of these unconsolidated entities has guaranteed certain loans made to
wholly-owned subsidiaries of each of these entities, and we have agreed to contribute to these
joint venture partners our pro rata share of
49
any payments under such guarantees required to be made
by such joint venture partners. In addition, we enter into commitments under letters of credit,
primarily for the purpose of securing our deductible obligations with our workers compensation
insurers, and lending banks under our credit facility had issued $8.9 million of letters of credit
as of March 31, 2010 for us. Except as set forth above, we do not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Commitments and Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations as of March 31, 2010,
including long-term debt and operating and capital lease commitments (amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts |
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
Contractual obligations |
|
committed |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
1-3 years |
|
|
3-5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,214,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
700,000 |
|
|
$ |
514,180 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital leases |
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note payable to Nashville Predators |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction commitments |
|
|
23,582 |
|
|
|
23,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases (1) |
|
|
659,415 |
|
|
|
6,332 |
|
|
|
11,323 |
|
|
|
9,066 |
|
|
|
632,694 |
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
1,899,901 |
|
|
$ |
32,193 |
|
|
$ |
711,711 |
|
|
$ |
523,303 |
|
|
$ |
632,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The total operating lease commitments of $659.4 million above includes the 75-year
operating lease agreement we entered into during 1999 for 65.3 acres of land located in
Osceola County, Florida where Gaylord Palms is located. |
The cash obligations in the table above do not include future cash obligations for interest
associated with our outstanding long-term debt, capital lease obligations and promissory note
payable to the Nashville Predators. See Note 9 to our condensed consolidated financial statements
included herewith for a discussion of the interest we paid during the three months ended March 31,
2010 and 2009.
Due to the uncertainty with respect to the timing of future cash flows associated with our
unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2010, we cannot make reasonably certain estimates of the
period of cash settlement, if any, with the respective taxing authority. Therefore, $16.0 million
of unrecognized tax benefits have been excluded from the contractual obligations table above.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Certain of our accounting policies, including those
related to revenue recognition, impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill, stock-based
compensation, derivative financial instruments, income taxes, retirement and postretirement
benefits other than pension plans, and legal contingencies, require that we apply significant
judgment in defining the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their
nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Our judgments are based
on our historical experience, our observance of trends in the industry, information provided by our
customers and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. There can be no
assurance that actual results will not differ from our estimates. For a discussion of our critical
accounting policies and estimates, please refer to Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. There were no
newly identified critical accounting policies in the first quarter of 2010 nor were there any
material changes to the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
50
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
For a discussion of recently issued accounting standards, see Note 2 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 included herewith.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as
interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposures to
market risk are from changes in interest rates, natural gas prices and equity prices and changes in
asset values of investments that fund our pension plan.
Risk Related to Changes in Interest Rates
Borrowings outstanding under our New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility bear interest at an annual rate
at our election of either LIBOR plus 2.50% or a base rate (the higher of the lead banks prime rate
and the federal funds rate) plus 0.50%. In connection with the refinancing of our $1.0 billion
credit facility, we entered into a new series of forward-starting interest rate swaps to
effectively convert the variable rate on $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of borrowings
under the term loan portion of our New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility to a fixed rate. These interest
rate swaps, which expire on various dates through July 25, 2011, effectively adjust the variable
interest rate on those borrowings to a fixed weighted average interest rate of 3.94% plus the
applicable margin on these borrowings during the term of the swap agreements. These interest rate
swaps are deemed effective and therefore the hedges have been treated as effective cash flow
hedges.
If LIBOR were to increase by 100 basis points, our annual interest cost on the remaining $200.0
million in borrowings outstanding under our New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility as of March 31, 2010
would increase by approximately $2.0 million.
Certain of our outstanding cash balances are occasionally invested overnight with high credit
quality financial institutions. We do not have significant exposure to changing interest rates on
invested cash at March 31, 2010. As a result, the interest rate market risk implicit in these
investments at March 31, 2010, if any, is low.
Risk Related to Changes in Natural Gas Prices
As of March 31, 2010, we held nine variable to fixed natural gas price swaps with respect to the
purchase of 792,000 dekatherms of natural gas in order to fix the prices at which we purchase that
volume of natural gas for our hotels. These natural gas price swaps, which have remaining terms of
up to nine months, effectively adjust the price on that volume of purchases of natural gas to a
weighted average price of $4.62 per dekatherm. These natural gas swaps are deemed effective, and,
therefore, the hedges have been treated as an effective cash flow hedge. If the forward price of
natural gas futures contracts for delivery at the Henry Hub as of March 31, 2010 as quoted on the
New York Mercantile Exchange was to increase or decrease by 10%, the derivative liability
associated with the fair value of our natural gas swaps outstanding as of March 31, 2010 would have
decreased or increased by $0.3 million.
Risk Related to Changes in Equity Prices
The $360 million aggregate principal amount of Convertible Notes we issued in September 2009 may be
converted prior to maturity, at the holders option, into shares of our common stock under certain
circumstances as described in Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included
herein. The initial conversion price is approximately $27.25 per share. Upon conversion, we may
elect, at our option, to deliver shares of our common stock, cash or a combination of cash and
shares of our common stock in satisfaction of
51
our obligations upon conversion of the Convertible Notes. As such, the fair value of the
Convertible Notes will generally increase as our share price increases and decrease as the share
price declines.
Concurrently with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge
transactions intended to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes in
the event that the market value per share of our common stock, as measured under the Convertible
Notes, at the time of exercise is greater than the conversion price of the Convertible Notes. The
convertible note hedge transactions involved us purchasing from four counterparties options to
purchase approximately 13.2 million shares of our common stock at a price per share equal to the
initial conversion price of the Convertible Notes. Separately we sold warrants to the same
counterparties whereby they have the option to purchase 13.2 million shares of our common stock at
a price of $32.70 per share. As a result of the convertible note hedge transactions and related
warrants, the Convertible Notes will not have a dilutive impact on shares outstanding if the share
price of our commons stock is below $32.70. For every $1 increase in the share price of our common
stock above $32.70, we will be required to deliver, upon the exercise of the warrants, the
equivalent of $13.2 million in shares of our common stock (at the relevant share price).
Risk Related to Changes in Asset Values that Fund our Pension Plans
The expected rates of return on the assets that fund our defined benefit pension plan are based on
the asset allocation of the plan and the long-term projected return on those assets, which
represent a diversified mix of equity securities, fixed income securities and cash. As of March 31,
2010, the value of the investments in the pension fund was $61.9 million, and an immediate ten
percent decrease in the value of the investments in the fund would have reduced the value of the
fund by approximately $6.2 million.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company carried out an evaluation under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation
of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the
period covered by this report. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
52
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The Company is a party to certain litigation, as described in Note 13 to our condensed consolidated
financial statements included herein and which is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
The following risk factors should be considered in addition to the risk factors set forth in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The flood damage and rebuilding of Gaylord Opryland pose risks to the Company and its financial
condition.
In May 2010, as previously announced, Gaylord Opryland suffered severe flood damage in
unprecedented flooding in Davidson County, Tennessee, and the hotel is expected to be closed for an
undetermined period of time, likely for several months. No assessment of the damage is available at this time, and the Company has withdrawn its 2010 financial guidance, given the
likelihood that financial results of Gaylord Opryland and the Company will be affected for at least
the second and third quarters of 2010. The Company carries business interruption and property
insurance associated with flood damage with an aggregate limit of $50 million. The Company expects
to incur significant revenue losses and costs associated with the hotel closure and the rebuilding
effort, which, in the aggregate, may exceed the coverage under the Companys insurance policies. In
addition, the Company will be subject to risks inherent in the construction process, including the
risk of fluctuations in the costs of materials and labor and diversion of management time and
attention. Other associated effects of the hotel closure may be the loss of experienced employees,
the loss of customer goodwill, uncertainty of future hotel bookings and other negative factors yet
to be determined. The Companys New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility contains covenants regarding the
continuance of business and the prompt repair of property damage which may apply in the event of an
incident such as this. The New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility also contains financial covenants at
levels that assume that all of its properties are operational. See Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009 for a description of the
financial covenants. The Company currently believes it will be able to comply with the requirements
in its New $1.0 Billion Credit Facility, but given the financial covenants, the risk exists that
the Company may need to seek waivers of covenants or other amendments to its New $1.0 Billion
Credit Facility in order to avoid a default.
Recent healthcare legislation could adversely affect our results of operations.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and
Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the Health Reform Law), was enacted. Among
other things, the Health Reform Law contains provisions that will affect employer-sponsored health
plans, impose excise taxes on certain plans, and reduce the tax benefits available to employers
that receive the Medicare Part D subsidy. These provisions may significantly raise our employee
health benefits costs and/or alter the benefits we are required to provide. In the first quarter of
2010 we recorded a one-time, non-cash tax charge of $0.8 million to reflect the impact of the
reduced tax benefits available to employers that receive the Medicare Part D subsidy. We are
currently reviewing provisions of the Health Reform Law and their impact on our company-sponsored
plans. Costs associated with compliance with the Health Reform Law are currently difficult to
estimate, but we anticipate increased expenses relating to our company-sponsored plans. If we are
not able to limit or offset future cost increases, those costs could have an adverse affect on our
results of operations.
53
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
The following table sets forth information with respect to purchases of shares of the Companys
common stock made during the three months ended March 31, 2010 by or on behalf of the Company or
any affiliated purchaser, as defined by Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
Shares that May Yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Be Purchased Under |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
the Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs |
|
January 1 January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 1 February 28, 2010 (1) |
|
|
736 |
|
|
$ |
19.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1 March 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
736 |
|
|
$ |
19.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents shares withheld from vested restricted stock to satisfy the minimum
withholding requirement for federal and state taxes. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
Inapplicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
Inapplicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
See Index to Exhibits following the Signatures page.
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY
|
|
Date: May 7, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Colin V. Reed
|
|
|
|
Colin V. Reed |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Mark Fioravanti
|
|
|
|
Mark Fioravanti |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Rod Connor
|
|
|
|
Rod Connor |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
55
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION |
3.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (restated for SEC filing
purposes only) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, as amended (restated for SEC filing
purposes only) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-3 filed on May 7, 2009). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Gaylord
Entertainment Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current
Report on Form 8-K dated August 13, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Form of Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement of each of David C. Kloeppel and Mark
Fioravanti (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (File No. 1-13079)). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with respect to time-vesting restricted stock
units granted pursuant to the Companys 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.52 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (File No. 1-13079)). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Colin V. Reed pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Mark Fioravanti pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Colin V. Reed and Mark Fioravanti pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
56