nvcsrs
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number 811-21471
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
Kevin J. McCarthy
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (312) 917-7700
Date of
fiscal year end: December 31
Date of
reporting period: June 30, 2010
Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with
the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of
any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1
under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may
use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review,
inspection, and policymaking roles.
A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR,
and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not
required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR
unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the
information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the
burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information
under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. SS. 3507.
ITEM 1. REPORTS
TO SHAREHOLDERS
Closed-End Funds
|
|
|
|
Nuveen Investments
Closed-End Funds
Opportunities
for Capital Appreciation and Tax-Advantaged
Distributions from a Portfolio of
Value Equities and Senior Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
Semi-Annual Report
June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund
JTA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NUVEEN
INVESTMENTS ANNOUNCES STRATEGIC COMBINATION WITH FAF
ADVISORS
On July 29, 2010, Nuveen Investments, Inc. announced that
U.S. Bancorp will receive a 9.5% stake in Nuveen Investments and
cash consideration in exchange for the long-term asset business
of U.S. Bancorps FAF Advisors (FAF). Nuveen Investments is
the parent of Nuveen Asset Management (NAM), the investment
adviser for the Funds included in this report.
FAF Advisors, which currently manages about $25 billion of
long-term assets and serves as the advisor of the First American
Funds, will be combined with NAM, which currently manages about
$75 billion in municipal fixed income assets. Upon
completion of the transaction, Nuveen Investments, which
currently manages about $150 billion of assets across
several high-quality affiliates, will manage a combined total of
about $175 billion in institutional and retail assets.
This combination will not affect the investment objectives,
strategies or policies of this Fund. Over time, Nuveen
Investments expects that the combination will provide even more
ways to meet the needs of investors who work with financial
advisors and consultants by enhancing the multi-boutique model
of Nuveen Investments, which also includes highly respected
investment teams at NWQ Investment Management, Santa Barbara
Asset Management, Symphony Asset Management, Tradewinds Global
Investors, Winslow Capital and Nuveen HydePark.
The transaction is expected to close late in 2010, subject to
customary conditions.
Chairmans
Letter to Shareholders
Dear
Shareholder,
The economic environment in which your Fund operates reflects
continuing but uneven economic recovery. The U.S. and other
major industrial countries are experiencing steady but
comparatively low levels of economic growth, while emerging
market countries are seeing a resumption of relatively strong
economic expansion. The potential impact of steps being
considered by many governments to counteract the extraordinary
governmental spending and credit expansion to deal with the
recent financial and economic crisis is injecting uncertainty
into global financial markets. The implications for future tax
rates, government spending, interest rates and the pace of
economic recovery in the U.S. and other leading economies are
extremely difficult to predict at the present time. The long
term health of the global economy depends on restoring some
measure of fiscal discipline around the world, but since all of
the corrective steps require economic pain, it is not surprising
that governments are reluctant to undertake them.
In the near term, governments remain committed to furthering
economic recovery and realizing a meaningful reduction in their
national unemployment rates. Such an environment should produce
continued economic growth and, consequently, attractive
investment opportunities. Over the longer term, the larger
uncertainty mentioned earlier carries the risk of unexpected
potholes in the road to sustained recovery. For this reason,
Nuveens investment management teams are working hard to
balance return and risk by building well-diversified portfolios,
among other strategies. I encourage you to read the following
commentary on the management of your Fund. As always, I also
encourage you to contact your financial consultant if you have
any questions about your Nuveen Fund investment. Please consult
the Nuveen website for the most recent information on your
Nuveen Fund at: www.nuveen.com.
On behalf of the other members of your Funds Board, we
look forward to continuing to earn your trust in the months and
years ahead.
Sincerely,
Robert P. Bremner
Chairman of the Board
August 17, 2010
Portfolio
Managers Comments
Nuveen
Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund (JTA)
The Fund features management by two affiliates of Nuveen
Investments. The Funds investments in dividend-paying
common and preferred stocks are managed by NWQ Investment
Management Company, LLC (NWQ), while the Funds investments
in senior corporate loans and other debt instruments are managed
by Symphony Asset Management, LLC (Symphony).
Jon Bosse, Chief Investment Officer of NWQ, leads the
Funds management team at that firm. He has more than
27 years of corporate finance and investment management
experience.
The Symphony team is led by Gunther Stein, who serves as that
firms Chief Investment Officer. Gunther has more than
20 years of investment management experience, much of it in
evaluating and purchasing senior corporate loans and other
high-yield debt.
Here Jon and Gunther talk about their management strategies
and the performance of the Fund for the six-month period ended
June 30, 2010.
What key
strategies were used to manage the Fund during this reporting
period?
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking
statements. Discussions of specific investments are for
illustration only and are not intended as recommendations of
individual investments. The forward-looking statements and other
views expressed herein are those of the portfolio managers as of
the date of this report. Actual future results or occurrences
may differ significantly from those anticipated in any
forward-looking statements and the views expressed herein are
subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other
factors. The Fund disclaims any obligation to update publicly or
revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed
herein.
The Funds investment objective is to achieve a high level
of after-tax total return consisting primarily of tax-advantaged
dividend income and capital appreciation. The Fund seeks to
achieve this objective by investing primarily (at least 60% of
its managed assets) in dividend-paying common stocks that the
Fund believes at the time of investment are eligible to pay
dividends that may be eligible for favorable income taxation
(Qualified Dividend Income or QDI). The Fund also invests to a
more limited extent in preferred stocks that are eligible to pay
tax-advantaged dividends, as well as in senior loans and other
debt instruments.
During the second half of the reporting period, there was a
severe, negative change in the market and economic environment.
The backdrop of economic growth/stability and market complacency
experienced earlier this year was shattered in May and June as
global equity markets fell sharply amidst concerns of recession
and deflation. Unemployment rates in the U.S. and the world
remained stubbornly high. Recent economic data indicates a
slowdown was likely at hand, and worries about the global
economy heading back into a recession abound. Positive equity
markets and returns through April turned into losses given the
double-digit declines experienced in May and June. Ten-year U.S.
Treasury bonds, which declined earlier in the year as yields
approached 4%, rallied in a stunning fashion and closed June
with yields below 3%.
With this as the backdrop, we continued to employ an
opportunistic,
bottom-up
strategy in the common and preferred equity portion of the
Funds portfolio. Specifically, we
focused on identifying undervalued companies possessing
favorable risk/reward characteristics as well as emerging
catalysts that can unlock value or improve profitability. These
catalysts included management changes, restructuring efforts,
recognition of hidden assets, or a positive change in the
underlying fundamentals. We also focused on downside protection,
and paid a great deal of attention to company balance sheets and
cash flow statements, not just the income statements. We
believed that cash flow analysis offered a more objective and
truer picture of a companys financial position than an
evaluation based on earnings alone.
We also continued to benefit from a change in the Funds
investment policies. In February 2009, the Funds Board
approved allowing NWQ to invest up to 5% of its portion of the
Funds assets in emerging market equity securities. Shortly
before, several Fund holdings had been reclassified as emerging
market securities, and this change allowed the Fund to retain
these positions.
In the senior loan and other debt portion of the Funds
portfolio, we focused on macro, technical, and fundamental
factors. While the market consensus is that fundamentals will
remain stable for the next several quarters with below-average
default rates and some level of growth in the economy, we will
continue to look at the whole picture to assess risk. Beyond the
next two years, in the second half of 2012 and 2013 the loan
market will see significant maturities. How companies deal with
this wall of maturities will be a function both of
the environment as well as company-specific factors. Monitoring
both will be critical to navigating the market, which we believe
holds significant value for income-seeking investors who are
concerned about rising interest rates. Regardless, floating rate
senior loans should continue to play a critical role in the
credit market as companies look to refinance, deleverage, or in
some cases expand their businesses.
How did the Fund
perform over this six-month period?
The performance of JTA, as well as a comparative benchmark and a
general market index, is presented in the accompanying table.
Average Annual
Total Return on Common Share Net Asset Value
For periods ended 6/30/10
|
|
|
Past performance is not predictive
of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower
than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of
taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or
upon the sale of Fund shares.
|
For additional information, see the
individual Performance Overview for the Fund in this report.
|
|
1
|
The Comparative Benchmark designed
to reflect the portfolio composition of JTA is calculated by
combining: 1) 56% of the return of the Russell 3000 Value
Index, which measures the performance of those Russell 3000
Index companies with lower price-to book ratios and lower
forecasted growth values, 2) 16% of the return of the MSCI
EAFE ex-Japan Value Index, a capitalization weighted index that
selects the lower 50% of the
price-to-book
ranked value stocks traded in the developed markets of Europe,
Asia and the Far East, excluding Japan, 3) 8% of the return
of the Merrill Lynch DRD (dividends received deduction)
Preferred Index, which consists of investment-grade,
DRD-eligible, exchange-traded preferred stocks with one year or
more to maturity, and 4) 20% of the return of the CSFB
Leveraged Loan Index, which consists of approximately
$150 billion of tradable term loans with at least one year
to maturity and rated BBB or lower. Index returns are not
leveraged, and do not include the effects of any sales charges
or management fees. It is not possible to invest directly in an
index.
|
|
2
|
The S&P 500 Index is an
unmanaged index generally considered representative of the U.S.
stock market. Index returns do not reflect the effects of any
sales charges or management fees. It is not possible to invest
directly in an index.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6-Month
|
|
1-Year
|
|
5-Year
|
JTA
|
|
-5.03%
|
|
20.38%
|
|
-5.14%
|
Comparative
Benchmark1
|
|
-4.94%
|
|
16.37%
|
|
0.73%
|
S&P 500
Index2
|
|
-6.65%
|
|
14.43%
|
|
-0.79%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six-month returns are cumulative; all other returns are
annualized.
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2010, the common
share total return on net asset value for the Fund
underperformed its comparative benchmark, but outperformed the
S&P 500 Index.
For the equity portion of the Fund, Biovail Corp., a specialty
pharmaceutical that we added to the portfolio in May, rose
sharply as the company agreed to merge with Valeant
Pharmaceutical. The deal significantly expands the asset base
for Biovail, thus reducing the risk of any single pipeline asset
derailing its growth trajectory. Valeant brings with it a strong
portfolio of growing pharmaceutical assets with extremely
limited patent expiration risk.
Our insurance investments MetLife Inc. and Genworth Financial
Inc. outperformed, although the stocks were pressured late in
the period on concerns that increased volatility in the equity
markets and the sovereign debt crisis in Europe could have
significant negative implications on capital and liquidity
ratios. MetLife Inc. appreciated as the company announced the
acquisition of American Life Insurance Co. (ALICO), which was
AIGs second largest foreign life insurance unit. The
acquisition will transform MetLifethe number one life
insurance company in the U.S.into a global powerhouse.
Shares of Genworth Financial Inc. rose on increasing confidence
that the companys operating results are turning the
corner, especially in its domestic mortgage insurance business,
which had been the largest source of concern for investors.
Although mortgage delinquencies continue to rise, higher
rescission rates, better pricing on new home sales, and signs of
stabilization in the housing market are providing reasons for
optimism.
Gold bullion hit a new nominal high above $1,250 per ounce
during the period, spurred by the sovereign debt crisis and a
flight to safety into gold on fears over the future of the
European currency. Our gold mining equities benefited from the
rising bullion price as well as stable input costs, particularly
energy costs, which translated into higher margins. As a result,
our gold equity holdings AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. and Barrick Gold
Corp. contributed positive returns, outperforming the price of
gold bullion. Barrick Gold posted record unit margins and
operating cash flow for the first quarter, surpassing market
expectations on production and unit costs. AngloGold continues
to work though electricity and labor cost issues that have
plagued its South African mines.
Several positions contributed negatively to the Funds
performance. Our energy investments declined, given the weak
outlook for natural gas and concerns about increased regulation
and the cost of doing business given the tragic accident and oil
spill that began in the Gulf of Mexico in the second quarter of
2010. Natural gas prices have been pressured this year due to
rising gas rig counts, productivity gains, and a more sluggish
recovery in demand than had originally been expected. Our energy
investments are levered more towards international oil drilling
activity (versus the domestic natural gas markets) where we
believe the fundamentals are more attractive. Our energy
holdings include Exxon Mobil Corp., Occidental Petroleum Corp.,
as well as foreign holdings Eni S.p.A. and Total S.A., where the
ADRs declined significantly more than their ordinary
shares given the sharp decline in the Euro currency. None of our
energy investments have a significant presence in the Gulf of
Mexico.
Fears of potential pricing pressure in Europe as a result of
fiscal tightening weighed on our large-cap pharmaceutical
investments, an industry we have made significant purchases
recently. Portfolio holdings include Amgen Inc., GlaxoSmithKline
Plc, Merck & Co. Inc., Pfizer Inc., and
Sanofi-Aventis. Large pharmaceutical companies generally operate
with healthy margins, and we expect that the European
governments may look towards these companies to help offset some
of their budget deficits through increased taxes
and/or price
reductions.
Microsoft Corp. performed poorly in a weak technology sector.
Microsoft reported better than expected earnings; however, its
shares declined on investor concern that its product cycle may
have peaked, removing a catalyst for the upward momentum in the
stock price.
Throughout the reporting period, we added several positions to
the Fund. One was a new position in Occidental Petroleum Corp.,
one of the largest integrated oil companies in the
U.S. Occidental has a strong balance sheet, low cost structure,
and one of the highest returns on capital employed in the
industry with an asset base/project list that we believe should
allow this to continue.
We also added to our health care investments with new positions
in Amgen Inc. and Biovail Corp. Biovail is a specialty Canadian
pharmaceutical with new management in place that is reinventing
the company to target attractive niches in the specialty central
nervous system (CNS) market such as Huntingtons and
Parkinsons disease, and Schizophrenia. We invested in
Amgen as our valuation models suggests that downside risk should
be limited due to the companys strong cash flows, solid
balance sheet, cost cutting opportunities, and future growth
potential given its pipeline of new drugs.
Unum Group is also a new holding in the portfolio. Unum is the
largest writer of disability income products in the U.S. and
U.K. with an estimated 20% and 50%-plus market share,
respectively. It is also a leading provider of supplemental
health products such as group life, group long-term care,
accidental death & dismemberment, and employer- and
employee-paid benefits. Despite the economic and market turmoil
that has wreaked havoc on other life insurers, Unum has
continued to deliver steadily rising earnings.
We invested in freight railcar manufacturer Trinity Industries
Inc. The company controls
40-45% of
the railcar market, and also produces barges, highway products,
and structural wind towers. Trinitys operations have been
severely impacted by the economic recession with the
companys earnings projected to be down at least 50% in
2010among the worst in the industrial space. Given the
negative short-term outlook, investors have priced in very low
expectations, which provided an attractive risk reward
opportunity as we believe the company is well-positioned to
benefit as the economy recovers.
We eliminated several positions throughout the period including
our investment in cable operator Comcast Corp. based on
valuation. We also were disappointed in managements
decision to enter into a joint-venture with GE to own a majority
stake in NBC Universal. AT&T Inc. was eliminated following
the companys successful restructuring efforts and concerns
over slower growth in the wireless market. After initially
reducing our investment in ConocoPhillips and investing in
Occidental Petroleum, we eliminated the remaining position in
ConocoPhillips. We believed the share price reflected the
companys current restructuring efforts and therefore had a
less attractive risk/reward valuation. Also eliminated from the
portfolio during the period were AEGON, Banco Santander S.A.,
Energias de Portugal S.A., and Reinsurance Group of America Inc.
The preferred market faced a number of large challenges during
the reporting period, which negatively impacted the Funds
performance. The issue of European sovereign credit risk,
particularly surrounding Greece and its ability to service
outstanding debts, caused spreads of Euro zone financial issuers
to widen as investors scrambled to quantify the risk of a Greek
default or restructuring on their portfolios. In the U.S., the
market faced both financial reform legislation and the
uncertainties such reform brought to bank profits and capital
levels going forward, as well as the high profile investigations
into the
sub-prime
mortgage dealings of several systemic financial institutions.
The insurance and banking sectors were particularly hard hit due
to market uncertainties and outweighed the positive
contributions of industrials, REITS, utilities and finance
sectors.
Our holdings of European financials Banco Santander, AEGON and
Barclays suffered relative to our benchmark.
There are several other factors in play at this time in the
preferred markets which likely will serve to make any potential
gains for 2010 much more muted. First, the great credit spread
normalization that began in March 2009 has pretty much run its
course. Preferred yields and spreads versus U.S. Treasuries are
much lower than they were then, and more in line with historical
levels. Second, while yields have continued to decline due to
the economys soft patch, the Federal Reserve has been
reducing its stimulus measures and at some point late in 2011
may begin to raise short-term interest rates. The extent and
timing of any such move will most likely have a negative effect
on preferred returns. Third, the favorable tax treatment for
Qualified Dividend Income is scheduled to expire at the end of
this year. To the extent that Congress and the President work
towards resolving this tax treatment of dividends issue, prices
of tax-advantaged preferreds may experience some volatility.
The senior loan portion of the Fund performed relatively well,
largely as a result of the higher quality profile of the
Funds senior loan assets. Some of the higher quality names
that did well during the period on a relative basis were Warner
Chilcott and Reynolds Brands. Market performance over this
period was mixed, with selling pressure focused primarily on
higher beta names, which are often lower quality,
have lower coupons, and are debt of companies which were targets
of leveraged buyout offers in
2005-2007.
We did not believe that these assets represented buying
opportunities, and had relatively small amounts invested in
these types of positions. However, these higher beta names
represented roughly half of the secondary market and were
difficult to completely avoid. During the reporting period, our
exposure to issuers such as Univision and TXU hindered
performance.
IMPACT OF THE
FUNDS CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND LEVERAGE STRATEGY ON
PERFORMANCE
One important factor impacting the returns of the Fund relative
to the comparative Index and benchmark was the Funds use
of financial leverage, primarily through bank borrowings. The
Fund uses leverage because its managers believe that, over time,
leveraging provides opportunities for additional income and
total returns for common shareholders. However, use of leverage
also can expose common shareholders to additional
riskespecially when market conditions are unfavorable. For
example, as the prices of securities held by the Fund decline,
the negative impact of these valuation changes on common share
net asset value and common shareholder total return is magnified
by the use of leverage. Conversely, leverage may enhance common
share returns during periods when the prices of securities held
by the Fund generally are rising.
Over this six-month period, the use of financial leverage
contributed positively to the overall performance of the Fund.
RECENT EVENTS
CONCERNING THE REDEMPTION OF AUCTION RATE PREFERRED
SHARES
Shortly after its inception, the Fund issued auction rate
preferred shares (ARPS) to create financial leverage. As noted
in past shareholder reports, the weekly auctions for those ARPS
shares began in February 2008 to consistently fail, causing the
Fund to pay the so-called maximum rate to ARPS
shareholders under the terms of the ARPS in the Funds
charter
documents. With the goal of lowering the relative cost of
leverage over time for common shareholders and providing
liquidity at par for preferred shareholders, the Fund sought to
refinance all of its outstanding ARPS beginning shortly
thereafter. The Fund completed this refinancing process during
2009 and since then has relied upon bank borrowings to create
financial leverage.
In April and May 2010, 30 Nuveen leveraged closed-end funds, not
including this Fund, received a demand letter from a law firm on
behalf of a purported holder of common shares of each fund,
alleging that Nuveen and the funds officers and Board of
Directors/Trustees breached their fiduciary duties related to
the redemption at par of the funds ARPS. In response, the
Board established an ad hoc Demand Committee consisting of
disinterested and independent Board members to investigate the
claims. The Demand Committee retained independent counsel to
assist it in conducting an extensive investigation.
Upon completion of its review, the Demand Committee found that
it was not in the best interests of those funds or their
shareholders to take the actions suggested in the demand letters
and recommended that the full Board reject the demands made in
the demand letter. After reviewing the findings and
recommendations of the Demand Committee, the Board of
Directors/Trustees for the funds unanimously adopted the
Committees recommendation to reject the demands contained
in the letters. At the time this report was produced, lawsuits
pursuing claims made in the demand letter had been filed on
behalf of shareholders of several funds, not including this
Fund, against Nuveen Asset Management, the Nuveen holding
company, the majority owner of the holding company, the lone
interested trustee, and current and former officers of the
various funds. Nuveen Investments and the other named defendants
believe these lawsuits to be without merit, and all named
parties intend to defend themselves vigorously. The funds
believe that these lawsuits will not have a material effect on
the funds or on Nuveen Asset Managements ability to serve
as investment adviser to the funds.
Common Share
Distribution
and Share Price Information
The following information regarding your Funds
distributions is current as of June 30, 2010, and likely
will vary over time based on the Funds investment
activities and portfolio investment changes.
During the six-month reporting period, the Fund did not make any
changes to its quarterly distribution to common shareholders.
Some of the important factors affecting the amount and
composition of these distributions are summarized below.
The Fund employs financial leverage through the use of bank
borrowings. Financial leverage provides the potential for higher
earnings (net investment income), total returns and
distributions over time, butas noted earlieralso
increases the variability of common shareholders net asset
value per share in response to changing market conditions.
During the current reporting period, the Funds financial
leverage contributed positively to common share income and
common share net asset value price return.
The Fund has a managed distribution program. The goal of this
program is to provide shareholders relatively consistent and
predictable cash flow by systematically converting the
Funds expected long-term return potential into regular
distributions. As a result, regular distributions throughout the
year are likely to include a portion of expected long-term gains
(both realized and unrealized), along with net investment income.
Important points to understand about the managed distribution
program are:
|
|
|
The Fund seeks to establish a relatively stable common share
distribution rate that roughly corresponds to the projected
total return from its investment strategy over an extended
period of time. However, you should not draw any conclusions
about the Funds past or future investment performance from
its current distribution rate.
|
|
|
Actual common share returns will differ from projected long-term
returns (and therefore the Funds distribution rate), at
least over shorter time periods. Over a specific timeframe, the
difference between actual returns and total distributions will
be reflected in an increasing (returns exceed distributions) or
a decreasing (distributions exceed returns) Fund net asset value.
|
|
|
Each distribution is expected to be paid from some or all of the
following sources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
net investment income (regular interest and dividends),
|
|
|
|
realized capital gains, and
|
|
|
|
unrealized gains, or, in certain cases, a return of principal
(non-taxable distributions).
|
|
|
|
A non-taxable distribution is a payment of a portion of the
Funds capital. When the Funds returns exceed
distributions, it may represent portfolio gains generated, but
not realized as a taxable capital gain. In periods when the
Funds returns fall short of distributions, the shortfall
will represent a portion of your original principal, unless the
|
|
|
|
shortfall is offset during other time periods over the life of
your investment (previous or subsequent) when the Funds
total return exceeds distributions.
|
|
|
|
Because distribution source estimates are updated during the
year based on the Funds performance and forecast for its
current fiscal year (which is the calendar year for the Fund),
these estimates may differ from both the tax information
reported to you in your Funds IRS
Form 1099 statement provided at year end, as well as
the ultimate economic sources of distributions over the life of
your investment.
|
The following table provides estimated information regarding the
Funds common share distributions and total return
performance for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The
distribution information is presented on a tax basis rather than
a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis. This
information is intended to help you better understand whether
the Funds returns for the specified time period were
sufficient to meet the Funds distributions.
|
|
3 |
The Fund elected to retain a portion of its realized long-term
capital gains for the tax years ended December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, and pay required federal corporate
income taxes on these amounts. As reported on Form 2439,
Common shareholders on record date must include their pro-rata
share of these gains on their applicable federal tax returns,
and are entitled to take offsetting tax credits, for their
pro-rata share of the taxes paid by the Fund. The total returns
Including retained gain tax credit/refund include
the economic benefit to Common shareholders on record date of
these tax credits/refunds. The Fund had no retained capital
gains for the tax years ended December 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of 6/30/10 (Common
Shares)
|
|
JTA
|
|
Inception date
|
|
|
1/27/04
|
|
Six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Per share distribution:
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
From realized capital gains
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
Return of capital
|
|
|
0.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total per share distribution
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized distribution rate on NAV
|
|
|
9.07%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average annual total returns:
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding retained gain tax
credit/refund3:
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month (Cumulative) on NAV
|
|
|
-5.03%
|
|
1-Year on NAV
|
|
|
20.38%
|
|
5-Year on NAV
|
|
|
-5.14%
|
|
Since inception on NAV
|
|
|
-1.37%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including retained gain tax
credit/refund3:
|
|
|
|
|
Six-Month (Cumulative) on NAV
|
|
|
-5.03%
|
|
1-Year on NAV
|
|
|
20.38%
|
|
5-Year on NAV
|
|
|
-4.85%
|
|
Since inception on NAV
|
|
|
-0.81%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The qualified dividend income provisions of the federal tax code
are set to expire on December 31, 2010. In the event that
Congress does not extend these provisions, beginning in calendar
2011, dividends previously referred to as qualified
dividends would be taxed at normal marginal tax rates.
Common Share
Repurchases and Share Price Information
As of June 30, 2010, and since the inception of the
Funds repurchase program, the Fund has cumulatively
repurchased common shares as shown in the accompanying table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
% of Outstanding
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
79,700
|
|
|
|
0.6%
|
|
During the six-month reporting period, the Fund did not
repurchase any of its outstanding shares.
As of June 30, 2010, the Funds common share price was
trading at a discount of -4.06% to its net asset value, compared
with an average discount of -6.47% for the entire
six-month
period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JTA
Performance
OVERVIEW
|
|
|
Nuveen
Tax-Advantaged
Total Return
Strategy Fund
|
|
|
|
as
of June 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fund Snapshot
|
Common Share Price
|
|
$10.16
|
|
|
|
Common Share Net Asset Value
|
|
$10.59
|
|
|
|
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
|
|
-4.06%
|
|
|
|
Current Distribution
Rate1
|
|
9.45%
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares ($000)
|
|
$146,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Composition
|
(as a % of total
investments)2
|
Insurance
|
|
15.4%
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals
|
|
12.9%
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
|
|
5.4%
|
|
|
|
Media
|
|
4.5%
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining
|
|
4.3%
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
|
|
4.3%
|
|
|
|
Software
|
|
4.2%
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services
|
|
4.1%
|
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense
|
|
4.0%
|
|
|
|
Machinery
|
|
3.6%
|
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies
|
|
2.8%
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities
|
|
2.7%
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks
|
|
2.6%
|
|
|
|
Tobacco
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers & Services
|
|
2.3%
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments
|
|
5.6%
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
18.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total Return
|
(Inception 1/27/04)
|
|
|
On Share Price
|
|
On NAV
|
6-Month (Cumulative)
|
|
-0.48%
|
|
-5.03%
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Year
|
|
35.51%
|
|
20.38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-Year
|
|
-3.92%
|
|
-5.14%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since Inception
|
|
-2.04%
|
|
-1.37%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Total
Return3
|
(Including retained gain tax
credit/refund)
|
|
|
On Share Price
|
|
On NAV
|
6-Month (Cumulative)
|
|
-0.48%
|
|
-5.03%
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Year
|
|
35.51%
|
|
20.38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-Year
|
|
-3.15%
|
|
-4.85%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since Inception
|
|
-1.60%
|
|
-0.81%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio
Allocation (as a % of total
investments)2
2009-2010
Distributions Per Common Share
Share Price
PerformanceWeekly Closing
Price
|
|
1
|
Current Distribution Rate is based on the Funds current
annualized quarterly distribution divided by the Funds
current market price. The Funds quarterly distributions to
its shareholders may be comprised of ordinary income, net
realized capital gains and, if at the end of the calendar year
the Funds cumulative net ordinary income and net realized
gains are less than the amount of the Funds distributions,
a return of capital for tax purposes.
|
2
|
Excluding investments in derivatives.
|
3
|
As previously explained in the Common Share Distribution and
Share Price Information section of this report, the Fund elected
to retain a portion of its realized long-term capital gains for
the tax years ended December 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006, and pay required federal corporate income taxes on these
amounts. These standardized total returns include the economic
benefit to Common shareholders of record of this tax
credit/refund. The Fund had no retained capital gains for the
tax years ended December 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
|
Shareholder Meeting
Report
The annual meeting of shareholders was held in the offices of
Nuveen Investments on April 6, 2010; at this meeting the
shareholders were asked to vote on the election of Board Members.
|
|
|
|
|
JTA
|
Approval of the Board Members
was reached as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
William C. Hunter
|
|
|
For
|
|
12,249,280
|
Withhold
|
|
798,036
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
13,047,316
|
|
|
|
Judith M. Stockdale
|
|
|
For
|
|
12,226,968
|
Withhold
|
|
820,348
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
13,047,316
|
|
|
|
Carole E. Stone
|
|
|
For
|
|
12,237,808
|
Withhold
|
|
809,508
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
13,047,316
|
|
|
|
William J. Schneider
|
|
|
For
|
|
12,271,675
|
Withhold
|
|
775,641
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
13,047,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JTA
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return
Strategy Fund
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stocks 92.7% (67.7% of Total
Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aerospace & Defense 5.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,200
|
|
|
Lockheed Martin Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,633,900
|
|
|
68,600
|
|
|
Raytheon Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,319,554
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Aerospace & Defense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,953,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology 1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,000
|
|
|
Amgen Inc., (7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,261,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks 1.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106,500
|
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,726,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies 3.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,300
|
|
|
Pitney Bowes Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,552,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications Equipment 3.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667,000
|
|
|
Motorola, Inc., (7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,348,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Containers & Packaging 1.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,800
|
|
|
Packaging Corp. of America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,536,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services 4.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,546,500
|
|
|
Citigroup Inc., (7), (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,814,840
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication
Services 2.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,300
|
|
|
Verizon Communications Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,398,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food & Staples Retailing 2.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,500
|
|
|
Kroger Co.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,983,035
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Household Products 3.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,600
|
|
|
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,522,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Conglomerates 1.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
General Electric Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,523,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance 19.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,400
|
|
|
Genworth Financial Inc., Class A, (7), (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,481,848
|
|
|
243,600
|
|
|
Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,390,868
|
|
|
72,500
|
|
|
Loews Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,414,975
|
|
|
136,900
|
|
|
MetLife, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,169,344
|
|
|
231,344
|
|
|
Symetra Financial Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,776,128
|
|
|
119,600
|
|
|
Travelers Companies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,890,300
|
|
|
133,500
|
|
|
Unum Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,896,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,020,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery 4.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,800
|
|
|
Caterpillar Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,051,556
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
Ingersoll Rand Company Limited, Class A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,586,750
|
|
|
55,200
|
|
|
Trinity Industries Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
978,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Machinery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,616,450
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media 0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,177
|
|
|
SuperMedia Inc., (7)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metals & Mining 6.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,000
|
|
|
AngloGold Ashanti Limited, Sponsored ADR, (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,540,760
|
|
|
114,500
|
|
|
Barrick Gold Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,199,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Metals & Mining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,740,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 7.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87,000
|
|
|
Eni S.p.A., Sponsored ADR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,179,850
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
Exxon Mobil Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597,960
|
|
|
32,400
|
|
|
Occidental Petroleum Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,499,660
|
|
|
81,600
|
|
|
Total S.A., Sponsored ADR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,642,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
|
|
|
10,920,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JTA
|
|
|
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund
(continued)
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals 15.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189,500
|
|
|
Biovail Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,645,980
|
|
|
94,500
|
|
|
GlaxoSmithKline PLC, ADR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,213,945
|
|
|
185,500
|
|
|
Merck & Company Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,486,935
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
Pfizer Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,634,500
|
|
|
178,800
|
|
|
Sanofi-Aventis, ADR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,374,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,356,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail 1.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
Union Pacific Corporation, (13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,293,830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software 5.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338,600
|
|
|
CA Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,230,240
|
|
|
100,700
|
|
|
Microsoft Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,317,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,547,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tobacco 3.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,400
|
|
|
Philip Morris International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,014,896
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Common Stocks (cost $142,257,797)
|
|
|
136,190,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings (2)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible Preferred Securities 0.3% (0.2% of
Total Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks 0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company, Convertible Bond
|
|
|
7.500%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
465,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Convertible Preferred Securities (cost $421,350)
|
|
|
465,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings (2)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
$25 Par (or similar) Preferred
Securities 6.5% (4.8% of Total Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Markets 0.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,600
|
|
|
Credit Suisse
|
|
|
7.900%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
524,270
|
|
|
19,900
|
|
|
Deutsche Bank Capital Funding Trust V
|
|
|
8.050%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
493,520
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
|
|
|
6.200%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
42,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,059,820
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks 1.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,900
|
|
|
Banco Santander Finance
|
|
|
10.500%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
450,554
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
|
|
8.125%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
122,500
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
Barclays Bank PLC
|
|
|
6.625%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
508,500
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
HSBC Holdings PLC
|
|
|
8.000%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A+
|
|
|
|
25,219
|
|
|
22,500
|
|
|
PNC Financial Services, Series F
|
|
|
9.875%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
639,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Banks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,746,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance 0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
Heller Financial Inc.
|
|
|
6.687%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A+
|
|
|
|
580,125
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
HSBC Finance Corporation
|
|
|
6.360%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
105,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consumer Finance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
686,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities 2.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
Connecticut Power & Light Company
|
|
|
4.960%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baa3
|
|
|
|
532,500
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
Georgia Power Company
|
|
|
6.125%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
618,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Gulf Power Company
|
|
|
6.450%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB+
|
|
|
|
510,371
|
|
|
16,200
|
|
|
Mississippi Power Company
|
|
|
5.250%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
404,271
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
PPL Electric Utilities Corporation
|
|
|
6.250%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
602,345
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Southern California Edison Company
|
|
|
6.125%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baa2
|
|
|
|
466,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Electric Utilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,133,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance 1.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
Allianz SE
|
|
|
8.375%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A+
|
|
|
|
253,438
|
|
|
22,800
|
|
|
Arch Capital Group Limited
|
|
|
8.000%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
574,788
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
Endurance Specialty Holdings Limited
|
|
|
7.750%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
592,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings (2)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
Principal Financial Group
|
|
|
5.563%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
$
|
413,281
|
|
|
28,500
|
|
|
Prudential PLC
|
|
|
6.750%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
658,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,492,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-Utilities 0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,400
|
|
|
Consolidated Edison Company of New York Inc.
|
|
|
5.000%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
480,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total $25 Par (or similar) Preferred Securities (cost
$9,643,833)
|
|
|
9,598,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount (000)
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Maturity (4)
|
|
|
Ratings (2)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate Senior Loan Interests 29.2%
(21.3% of Total Investments) (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemicals 0.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
897
|
|
|
Rockwood Specialties Group, Inc., Term Loan H
|
|
|
6.000%
|
|
|
|
5/15/14
|
|
|
|
Ba2
|
|
|
$
|
897,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Services & Supplies 0.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
Universal City Development Partners, Ltd., Term Loan
|
|
|
5.500%
|
|
|
|
11/06/14
|
|
|
|
Ba2
|
|
|
|
992,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services 1.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
MSCI Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
4.750%
|
|
|
|
6/01/16
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
2,001,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Telecommunication
Services 0.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
Intelsat, Tranche B2, Term Loan A
|
|
|
2.792%
|
|
|
|
1/03/14
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
306,353
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
Intelsat, Tranche B2, Term Loan B
|
|
|
2.792%
|
|
|
|
1/03/14
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
306,259
|
|
|
330
|
|
|
Intelsat, Tranche B2, Term Loan C
|
|
|
2.792%
|
|
|
|
1/03/14
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
306,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
Total Diversified Telecommunication Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electric Utilities 1.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., Delayed Term Loan
|
|
|
4.100%
|
|
|
|
4/02/13
|
|
|
|
Ba2
|
|
|
|
727,528
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
Dynegy Holdings, Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
4.100%
|
|
|
|
4/02/13
|
|
|
|
Ba2
|
|
|
|
201,898
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
TXU Corporation, Term Loan B2
|
|
|
3.975%
|
|
|
|
10/10/14
|
|
|
|
B+
|
|
|
|
1,442,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,938
|
|
|
Total Electric Utilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,372,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Food Products 0.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
Michael Foods Group, Inc., Term Loan B
|
|
|
6.250%
|
|
|
|
6/29/16
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
1,303,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health Care Providers &
Services 3.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
Community Health Systems, Inc., Delayed Term Loan
|
|
|
2.788%
|
|
|
|
7/25/14
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
90,781
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
Community Health Systems, Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
2.788%
|
|
|
|
7/25/14
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
1,769,399
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
Quintiles Transnational Corporation, Term Loan B
|
|
|
2.471%
|
|
|
|
3/31/13
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
918,472
|
|
|
1,946
|
|
|
Rehabcare Group, Inc., Term Loan B
|
|
|
6.000%
|
|
|
|
11/24/15
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
1,938,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,890
|
|
|
Total Health Care Providers & Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,717,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure 5.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
24 Hour Fitness Worldwide, Inc., New Term Loan
|
|
|
6.750%
|
|
|
|
4/22/16
|
|
|
|
Ba2
|
|
|
|
1,857,500
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
CBRL Group, Inc., Term Loan B1
|
|
|
1.850%
|
|
|
|
4/27/13
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
625,126
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
CBRL Group, Inc., Term Loan B2
|
|
|
1.850%
|
|
|
|
4/26/13
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
23,767
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
Reynolds Group Holdings, Inc., US Term Loan
|
|
|
6.250%
|
|
|
|
11/05/15
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
989,278
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
|
SW Acquisitions Co., Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
5.750%
|
|
|
|
6/01/16
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
1,989,067
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
Travelport LLC, Letter of Credit
|
|
|
3.033%
|
|
|
|
8/23/13
|
|
|
|
Ba3
|
|
|
|
83,725
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
Travelport LLC, Term Loan
|
|
|
2.811%
|
|
|
|
8/23/13
|
|
|
|
Ba3
|
|
|
|
417,269
|
|
|
588
|
|
|
Venetian Casino Resort LLC, Delayed Term Loan
|
|
|
2.100%
|
|
|
|
5/23/14
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
521,278
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
Venetian Casino Resort LLC, Term Loan
|
|
|
2.100%
|
|
|
|
5/23/14
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
2,063,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,100
|
|
|
Total Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,570,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial Conglomerates 0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
747
|
|
|
CF Industries, Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
4.500%
|
|
|
|
4/05/15
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
748,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance 0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498
|
|
|
Conseco, Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
7.500%
|
|
|
|
10/10/13
|
|
|
|
B2
|
|
|
|
482,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IT Services 2.4%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,945
|
|
|
First Data Corporation, Term Loan B1
|
|
|
3.097%
|
|
|
|
9/24/14
|
|
|
|
B+
|
|
|
|
1,640,553
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
|
SunGard Data Systems, Inc., Term Loan B
|
|
|
2.100%
|
|
|
|
2/28/14
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
1,878,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,936
|
|
|
Total IT Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,519,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JTA
|
|
|
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund
(continued)
Portfolio of INVESTMENTS
June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount (000)
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Maturity (4)
|
|
|
Ratings (2)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery 0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
|
Manitowoc Company, Term Loan
|
|
|
7.500%
|
|
|
|
11/06/14
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
$
|
692,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Media 6.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
Charter Communications Operating Holdings LLC, Term Loan C
|
|
|
3.790%
|
|
|
|
9/06/16
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
1,783,051
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
Charter Communications Operating Holdings LLC, Term Loan
|
|
|
2.350%
|
|
|
|
3/06/14
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
218,637
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
Mediacom Broadband LLC, Tranche D, Term Loan
|
|
|
5.500%
|
|
|
|
3/31/17
|
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
291,547
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
Mediacom Broadband LLC, Tranche F, Term Loan
|
|
|
4.500%
|
|
|
|
10/23/17
|
|
|
|
N/R
|
|
|
|
1,910,500
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Studios, Inc., Term Loan B, (10)
|
|
|
18.500%
|
|
|
|
4/09/12
|
|
|
|
N/R
|
|
|
|
436,934
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
Nielsen Finance LLC, Term Loan A
|
|
|
2.350%
|
|
|
|
8/09/13
|
|
|
|
Ba3
|
|
|
|
269,786
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
Nielsen Finance LLC, Term Loan B
|
|
|
4.100%
|
|
|
|
5/02/16
|
|
|
|
Ba3
|
|
|
|
587,317
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
SuperMedia, Term Loan
|
|
|
8.000%
|
|
|
|
12/31/15
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
621,173
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
Tribune Company, Term Loan B, (5), (6)
|
|
|
3.000%
|
|
|
|
6/04/14
|
|
|
|
Ca
|
|
|
|
901,963
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
Tribune Company, Term Loan X, (5), (6)
|
|
|
2.750%
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Ca
|
|
|
|
206,791
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
Univision Communications, Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
2.597%
|
|
|
|
9/29/14
|
|
|
|
B2
|
|
|
|
1,672,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,821
|
|
|
Total Media
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,900,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceuticals 1.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248
|
|
|
Mylan Laboratories, Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
3.754%
|
|
|
|
10/02/14
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
1,240,372
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
Warner Chilcott Corporation, Add on Term Loan
|
|
|
5.750%
|
|
|
|
4/30/15
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
177,032
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
Warner Chilcott Corporation, Term Loan A
|
|
|
5.500%
|
|
|
|
10/30/14
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
482,809
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
Warner Chilcott Corporation, Term Loan B1
|
|
|
5.750%
|
|
|
|
4/30/15
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
227,349
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
Warner Chilcott Corporation, Term Loan B2
|
|
|
5.750%
|
|
|
|
4/30/15
|
|
|
|
BB+
|
|
|
|
378,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,515
|
|
|
Total Pharmaceuticals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,506,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Management &
Development 0.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
LNR Property Corporation, Term Loan B
|
|
|
7.750%
|
|
|
|
7/12/11
|
|
|
|
CCC
|
|
|
|
1,112,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Road & Rail 1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,731
|
|
|
Swift Transportation Company, Inc., Term Loan
|
|
|
8.250%
|
|
|
|
5/12/14
|
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
1,606,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury
Goods 0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation, Tommy Hilfiger B.V., U.S.
Tranche B, Term Loan
|
|
|
4.750%
|
|
|
|
5/06/16
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
721,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Companies &
Distributors 0.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
Brenntag Holdings GmbH & Co. KG, Acquisition Facility
|
|
|
4.070%
|
|
|
|
1/20/14
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
114,691
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
Brenntag Holdings GmbH & Co. KG, Facility B2
|
|
|
4.078%
|
|
|
|
1/20/14
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
659,118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
782
|
|
|
Total Trading Companies & Distributors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,703
|
|
|
Total Variable Rate Senior Loan Interests (cost
$46,183,551)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,839,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount (000)/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
Ratings (2)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Preferred Securities 0.5% (0.4% of
Total Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banks 0.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
Wells Fargo & Company, Series K
|
|
|
7.980%
|
|
|
|
N/A (11
|
)
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
$
|
258,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified Financial Services 0.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Company
|
|
|
7.900%
|
|
|
|
N/A (11
|
)
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
|
517,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital Preferred Securities (cost $687,673)
|
|
|
775,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount (000)
|
|
|
Description (1)
|
|
Coupon
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Investments 7.7% (5.6% of Total
Investments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,344
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreement with Fixed Income Clearing Corporation,
dated 6/30/10,
|
|
|
0.000%
|
|
|
|
7/01/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,343,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
repurchase price $11,343,903, collateralized by: $6,985,000 U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes, 2.500%, due 6/30/17, value $6,958,806 and $4,580,000 U.S. Treasury
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes, 1.500%, due 12/31/13, value $4,620,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Short-Term Investments (cost $11,343,903)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,343,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments (cost $210,538,107) 136.9%
|
|
|
201,214,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings (35.8)% (8), (9)
|
|
|
(52,600,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets Less Liabilities (1.1)%
|
|
|
(1,634,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares 100%
|
|
$
|
146,979,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in
Derivatives
Call Options
Written at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
Strike
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Type
|
|
Amount (12)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call Options Written
|
|
(820
|
)
|
|
Anglogold Ashanti Limited
|
|
$
|
(3,280,000
|
)
|
|
|
10/16/10
|
|
|
$
|
40.0
|
|
|
$
|
(426,400
|
)
|
|
(7,320
|
)
|
|
Citigroup Inc.
|
|
|
(2,928,000
|
)
|
|
|
9/18/10
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
(172,020
|
)
|
|
(2,664
|
)
|
|
Genworth Financial Inc.
|
|
|
(4,528,800
|
)
|
|
|
9/18/10
|
|
|
|
17.0
|
|
|
|
(63,936
|
)
|
|
(330
|
)
|
|
Union Pacific Corporation
|
|
|
(2,475,000
|
)
|
|
|
8/21/10
|
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
(51,975
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,134
|
)
|
|
Total Call Options Written (premiums recieved $1,193,024)
|
|
$
|
(13,211,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(714,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Fund portfolio compliance purposes, the Funds industry
classifications refer to any one or more of the industry
sub-classifications
used by one or more widely recognized market indexes or ratings
group indexes,
and/or as
defined by Fund management. This definition may not apply
for purposes of this report, which may combine industry
sub-classifications
into sectors for reporting ease.
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based
on net assets applicable to Common shares unless otherwise noted.
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Ratings: Using the highest of Standard & Poors
Group (Standard & Poors),
Moodys Investor Service, Inc. (Moodys)
or Fitch, Inc. (Fitch) rating. Ratings below BBB by
Standard & Poors, Baa by Moodys or BBB by
Fitch are considered to be below investment grade.
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Senior Loans generally pay interest at rates which are
periodically adjusted by reference to a base short-term,
floating lending rate plus an assigned fixed rate. These
floating lending rates are generally (i) the lending rate
referenced by the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate
(LIBOR), or (ii) the prime rate offered by one
or more major United States banks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Loans may be considered restricted in that the Fund
ordinarily is contractually obligated to receive approval from
the Agent Bank
and/or
Borrower prior to the disposition of a Senior Loan.
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Senior Loans generally are subject to mandatory
and/or
optional prepayment. Because of these mandatory prepayment
conditions and because there may be significant economic
incentives for a Borrower to prepay, prepayments of Senior Loans
may occur. As a result, the actual remaining maturity of Senior
Loans held may be substantially less than the stated maturities
shown.
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
At or subsequent to June 30, 2010, this issue was under the
protection of the Federal Bankruptcy Court.
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Non-income producing; denotes that the issuer has defaulted on
the payment of principal or interest or has filed for bankruptcy.
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
|
Non-income producing; issuer has not declared a dividend within
the past twelve months.
|
|
|
|
|
(8)
|
|
The Fund may pledge up to 100% of its eligible investments in
the Portfolio of Investments as collateral for Borrowings. As of
June 30, 2010, investments with a value of $107,513,110
have been pledged as collateral for Borrowings.
|
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Borrowings as a percentage of Total Investments is 26.1%.
|
|
|
|
|
(10)
|
|
The Funds Adviser concluded this issue is not likely to
meet its future interest payment obligations and has directed
the Funds custodian to cease accruing additional income
and write-off any remaining recorded balances on the
Funds records.
|
|
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
Perpetual secutity. Maturity date is not applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
For disclosure purposes, Notional Amount is calculated by
multiplying the Number of Contracts by the Strike Price by 100.
|
|
|
|
|
(13)
|
|
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged as
collateral for call options written.
|
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Not applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
N/R
|
|
Not rated.
|
|
|
|
|
ADR
|
|
American Depositary Receipt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
ASSETS & LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at value (cost $210,538,107)
|
|
$
|
201,214,038
|
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
338,840
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
206,031
|
|
Investments sold
|
|
|
1,283,563
|
|
Reclaims
|
|
|
87,807
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
47,152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
203,177,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
52,600,000
|
|
Call options written, at value (premiums received $1,193,024)
|
|
|
714,331
|
|
Payable for common share dividends
|
|
|
2,651,808
|
|
Accrued expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on borrowings
|
|
|
4,544
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
122,532
|
|
Other
|
|
|
104,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
56,197,523
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common shares
|
|
$
|
146,979,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,878,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset value per Common share outstanding (net assets
applicable to Common shares, divided by Common shares
outstanding)
|
|
$
|
10.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common shares consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $.01 par value per share
|
|
$
|
138,786
|
|
Paid-in surplus
|
|
|
260,321,948
|
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income
|
|
|
(5,381,713
|
)
|
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(99,253,737
|
)
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
|
|
|
(8,845,376
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common shares
|
|
$
|
146,979,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized shares:
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Unlimited
|
|
FundPreferred
|
|
|
Unlimited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends (net of foreign tax withheld of $115,051)
|
|
$
|
2,577,000
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
44,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
2,621,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
Management fees
|
|
|
940,009
|
|
Shareholders servicing agent fees and expenses
|
|
|
533
|
|
Interest expense on borrowings
|
|
|
359,385
|
|
Custodians fees and expenses
|
|
|
33,567
|
|
Trustees fees and expenses
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
14,472
|
|
Shareholders reports printing and mailing
expenses
|
|
|
41,224
|
|
Stock exchange listing fees
|
|
|
4,507
|
|
Investor relations expense
|
|
|
14,844
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
4,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses before custodian fee credit and expense
reimbursement
|
|
|
1,417,773
|
|
Custodian fee credit
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Expense reimbursement
|
|
|
(184,332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expenses
|
|
|
1,233,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1,388,425
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) from:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
3,879,833
|
|
Call options written
|
|
|
(723,124
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(12,564,522
|
)
|
Call options written
|
|
|
257,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
(9,150,442
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common
shares from operations
|
|
$
|
(7,762,017
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
1,388,425
|
|
|
$
|
5,579,569
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
3,879,833
|
|
|
|
(21,963,005
|
)
|
Call options written
|
|
|
(723,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
(12,564,522
|
)
|
|
|
60,072,275
|
|
Call options written
|
|
|
257,371
|
|
|
|
221,322
|
|
Distributions to FundPreferred shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(320,130
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common
shares from operations
|
|
|
(7,762,017
|
)
|
|
|
43,590,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Common Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From and in excess of net investment income
|
|
|
(6,661,712
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
From net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,252,314
|
)
|
Return of capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,706,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net assets applicable to Common shares from
distributions to Common shareholders
|
|
|
(6,661,712
|
)
|
|
|
(12,959,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Share Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares repurchased and retired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(773,627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common
shares from capital share transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(773,627
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to Common
shares
|
|
|
(14,423,729
|
)
|
|
|
29,857,242
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common shares at the beginning of period
|
|
|
161,403,637
|
|
|
|
131,546,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets applicable to Common shares at the end of period
|
|
$
|
146,979,908
|
|
|
$
|
161,403,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at
the end of period
|
|
$
|
(5,381,713
|
)
|
|
$
|
(108,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of
CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common
Shares from Operations
|
|
$
|
(7,762,017
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile the net increase (decrease) in net
assets applicable to Common shares from operations to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(39,871,342
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
|
|
|
51,857,000
|
|
Proceeds from (Purchases of) short-term investments, net
|
|
|
(8,901,564
|
)
|
Cash paid for terminated and expired call options written
|
|
|
(1,199,146
|
)
|
Premiums received for call options written
|
|
|
1,193,024
|
|
Amortization (Accretion) of premiums and discounts, net
|
|
|
(42,144
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in receivable for dividends
|
|
|
15,795
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in receivable for interest
|
|
|
97,967
|
|
(Increase) Decrease in receivable for investments sold
|
|
|
(1,121,970
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in receivable for reclaims
|
|
|
(9,584
|
)
|
(Increase) Decrease in other assets
|
|
|
(6,958
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in payable for investments purchased
|
|
|
(180,966
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in accrued interest on borrowings
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
Increase (Decrease) in accrued management fees
|
|
|
3,793
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in accrued other liabilities
|
|
|
(23,102
|
)
|
Net realized (gain) loss from investments
|
|
|
(3,879,833
|
)
|
Net realized (gain) loss from call options written
|
|
|
723,124
|
|
Net realized (gain) loss from paydowns
|
|
|
890,550
|
|
Change in net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of
investments
|
|
|
12,564,522
|
|
Change in net unrealized (appreciation) depreciation of call
options written
|
|
|
(257,371
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
4,088,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) in cash overdraft balance
|
|
|
(78,847
|
)
|
Cash distributions paid to Common shareholders
|
|
|
(4,009,904
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(4,088,751
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at the End of Period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid for interest on borrowings during the six months ended
June 30, 2010, was $360,412.
See accompanying notes to
financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
General
Information and Significant Accounting Policies
|
Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund (the
Fund) is a closed-end management investment company
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
The Funds Common shares are listed on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE) and trade under the ticker symbol
JTA. The Fund was organized as a Massachusetts
business trust on October 1, 2003.
The Funds investment objective is to achieve a high level
of after-tax total return consisting primarily of tax-advantaged
dividend income and capital appreciation by investing primarily
in a portfolio of dividend-paying common stocks that the Fund
believes at the time of investment are eligible to pay dividends
that may be eligible for favorable federal income taxation at
rates applicable to long-term capital gains
(tax-advantaged dividends). The Fund also invests,
to a more limited extent, in preferred securities that are
eligible to pay tax-advantaged dividends, as well as in senior
loans (both secured and unsecured), domestic corporate bonds,
notes and debentures, convertible debt securities, and other
similar types of corporate instruments, including high-yield
debt securities, that are not eligible to pay tax-advantaged
dividends. The qualified dividend income provisions of the tax
code are set to expire on December 31, 2010. In the event
that Congress does not extend these provisions, beginning in
calendar 2011, dividends previously referred to as
qualified dividends would be taxed at normal
marginal tax rates.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies
followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial
statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (U.S. GAAP).
Investment
Valuation
Common stocks and other equity-type securities are valued at the
last sales price on the securities exchange on which such
securities are primarily traded and are generally classified as
Level 1. Securities primarily traded on the NASDAQ National
Market (NASDAQ) are valued, except as indicated
below, at the NASDAQ Official Closing Price and are generally
classified as Level 1. However, securities traded on a
securities exchange or NASDAQ for which there were no
transactions on a given day or securities not listed on a
securities exchange or NASDAQ are valued at the mean between the
quoted bid and ask prices. Prices of certain American Depository
Receipts (ADR) held by the Fund that trade in only
limited volume in the United States are valued based on the mean
between the most recent bid and ask prices of the underlying
non-U.S.-traded
stock, adjusted as appropriate for the
underlying-to-ADR
conversion ratio and foreign exchange rate, and from
time-to-time
may also be adjusted further to take into account material
events that may take place after the close of the local
non-U.S. market
but before the close of the NYSE generally represent a transfer
from a Level 1 to a Level 2 security.
Prices of fixed-income securities, senior loans and derivative
instruments are provided by a pricing service approved by the
Funds Board of Trustees. Fixed-income securities are
valued by a pricing service that values portfolio securities at
the mean between the quoted bid and ask prices or the yield
equivalent when quotations are readily available. These
securities are generally classified as Level 2. Securities
for which quotations are not readily available are valued at
fair value as determined by the pricing service using methods
that may include consideration of the following: yields or
prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue,
coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of
value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash
flows or collateral, general market conditions and other
information and analysis, including the obligors credit
characteristics considered relevant. The pricing service may
employ electronic data processing techniques
and/or a
matrix system to determine valuations. These securities are
generally classified as Level 2. Highly rated zero coupon
fixed-income securities, like U.S. Treasury Bills, issued
with maturities of one year or less, are valued using the
amortized cost method when 60 days or less remain until
maturity. With amortized cost, any discount or premium is
amortized each day, regardless of the impact of fluctuating
rates on the market value of the security. These securities will
generally be classified as Level 1 or Level 2.
Like most fixed income instruments, the senior loans in which
the Funds invest are not listed on an organized exchange. The
secondary market of senior loans may be less liquid relative to
markets for other fixed-income securities. Consequently, the
value of senior loans, determined as described above, may differ
significantly from the value that would have been determined had
there been an active market for that senior loan. These
securities are generally classified as Level 2.
The value of exchange-traded options are based on the last sale
price or, in the absence of such a price, at the mean of the bid
and ask prices. Exchange-traded options are generally classified
as Level 1. Options traded in the
over-the-counter
market are valued using market implied volatilities and are
generally classified as Level 2.
Temporary investments in securities that have variable rate and
demand features qualifying them as short-term investments are
valued at amortized cost, which approximates market value. These
securities are generally classified as Level 1.
Certain securities may not be able to be priced by the
pre-established pricing methods as described above. Such
securities may be valued by the Funds Board of Trustees or
its designee at fair value. These securities generally include,
but are not limited to, restricted securities (securities which
may not be publicly sold without registration under the
Securities Act) for which a pricing service is unable to provide
a market price; securities whose trading has been formally
suspended; fixed-income securities that have gone into default
and for which there is no current market quotation; a security
whose market price is not available from a pre-established
pricing source; a security with respect to which an event has
occurred that is likely to materially affect the value of the
security after the market has closed but before the calculation
of a Funds net asset value (as may be the case in
non-U.S. markets
on which the security is primarily traded) or make it difficult
or impossible to obtain a reliable market quotation; and a
security whose price, as provided by the pricing service, is not
deemed to reflect the securitys fair value. As a general
principle, the fair value of an issue of securities would appear
to be the amount that the owner might reasonably expect to
receive for them in a current sale. A variety of factors may be
considered in determining the fair value of these securities,
which may include consideration of the following: yields or
prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue,
coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of
value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash
flows or collateral, general market conditions and other
information and analysis, including the obligors credit
characteristics considered relevant. These securities are
classified as Level 2 or as Level 3 depending on the
priority of the significant inputs. Regardless of the method
employed to value a particular security, all valuations are
subject to review by the Funds Board of Trustees or its
designee.
Refer to Footnote 2 Fair Value Measurements for
further details on the leveling of securities held by the Fund
as of the end of the reporting period.
Investment
Transactions
Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis.
Trade date for senior loans purchased in the primary
market is considered the date on which the loan
allocations are determined. Trade date for senior loans
purchased in the secondary market is the date on
which the transaction is entered into. Realized gains and losses
from investment transactions are determined on the specific
identification method. Investments purchased on a
when-issued/delayed delivery basis may have extended settlement
periods. Any investments so purchased are subject to market
fluctuation during this period. The Fund has instructed the
custodian to segregate assets with a current value at least
equal to the amount of the when-issued/delayed delivery purchase
commitments. At June 30, 2010, the Fund had no such
outstanding when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments.
Investment
Income
Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date or, for
foreign securities, when information is available. Interest
income, which includes the amortization of premiums and
accretion of discounts for financial reporting purposes, is
recorded on an accrual basis. Interest income also includes
paydown gains and losses and fee income, if any. Fee income
consists primarily of amendment fees. Amendment fees are earned
as compensation for evaluating and accepting changes to an
original senior loan agreement and are recognized when received.
Income
Taxes
The Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its
investment company taxable income to shareholders and to
otherwise comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the
Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment
companies. In any year when the Fund realizes net capital gains,
the Fund may choose to distribute all or a portion of its net
capital gains to shareholders, or alternatively, to retain all
or a portion of its net capital gains and pay federal corporate
income taxes on such retained gains.
For all open tax years and all major taxing jurisdictions,
management of the Fund has concluded that there are no
significant uncertain tax positions that would require
recognition in the financial statements. Open tax years are
those that are open for examination by taxing authorities (i.e.,
generally the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period
since then). Furthermore, management of the Fund is also not
aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible
that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will
significantly change in the next twelve months.
Distributions to
Common Shareholders
Distributions to Common shareholders are recorded on the
ex-dividend date. The amount and timing of distributions are
determined in accordance with federal corporate income tax
regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP.
The Fund makes quarterly cash distributions to Common
shareholders of a stated dollar amount per share. Subject to
approval and oversight by the Funds Board of Trustees, the
Fund seeks to maintain a stable distribution level designed to
deliver the long-term return potential of the Funds
investment strategy through regular quarterly distributions (a
Managed Distribution Program). Total distributions
during a calendar year generally will be made from the
Funds net investment income, net realized capital gains
and net unrealized capital gains in the Funds portfolio,
if any. The portion of distributions paid from net unrealized
gains, if any, would be distributed from the Funds assets
and would be treated by shareholders as a non-taxable
distribution for tax purposes. In the event that total
distributions during a calendar year exceed the Funds
total return on net asset value, the difference will be treated
as a return of capital for tax purposes and will reduce net
asset value per share. If the Funds total return on net
asset value exceeds total distributions during a calendar year,
the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (continued)
|
excess will be reflected as an
increase in net asset value per share. The final determination
of the source and character of all distributions for the fiscal
year are made after the end of the fiscal year and are reflected
in the financial statements contained in the annual report as of
December 31 each year.
The actual character of distributions made by the Fund during
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, is reflected in
the accompanying financial statements.
The distributions made by the Fund during the six months ended
June 30, 2010, are provisionally classified as being
From and in excess of net investment income, and
those distributions will be classified as being from net
investment income, net realized capital gains
and/or a
return of capital for tax purposes after the fiscal year end.
For purposes of calculating Undistributed
(Over-distribution of) net investment income as of
June 30, 2010, the distribution amounts provisionally
classified as From and in excess of net investment
income were treated as being entirely from net investment
income. Consequently, the financial statements at June 30,
2010, reflect an over-distribution of net investment income.
Fund
Notes
The Fund is authorized to issue Series F FundNotes. The Fund
did not have any FundNotes issued or outstanding during the six
months ended June 30, 2010.
FundPreferred
Shares
The Fund is authorized to issue FundPreferred shares. As of
December 31, 2009, the Fund redeemed all $45,000,000 of its
outstanding FundPreferred shares, at liquidation value.
Options
Transactions
The Fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of
pursuing its investment objectives and is authorized to purchase
and write (sell) call and put options on securities, futures,
swaps (swaptions) or currencies in an attempt to
manage this and other possible risks. The purchase of put
options involves the risk of loss of all or a part of the cash
paid for the options. Put options purchased are accounted for in
the same manner as portfolio securities. The market risk
associated with purchasing put options is limited to the premium
paid. The counterparty credit risk of purchasing options,
however, needs also to take into account the current value of
the option, as this is the performance expected from the
counterparty. When the Fund writes an option, an amount equal to
the net premium received (the premium less commission) is
recognized as a component of Call options written, at
value on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and
is subsequently adjusted to reflect the current value of the
written option until the option expires or the Fund enters into
a closing purchase transaction. The changes in value of options
written during the fiscal period are recognized as Change
in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of call options
written on the Statement of Operations. When a written
call or put option expires or the Fund enters into a closing
purchase transaction, the difference between the net premium
received and any amount paid at expiration or on the closing
purchase transaction, including commission, is recognized as
Net realized gain (loss) from call options written
on the Statement of Operations. The Fund, as a writer of an
option, has no control over whether the underlying instrument
may be sold (called) or purchased (put) and as a result bears
the risk of an unfavorable change in the market value of the
instrument underlying the written option. There is the risk a
Fund may not be able to enter into a closing transaction because
of an illiquid market.
The Fund did not purchase put or call options during the six
months ended June 30, 2010. The average notional amount of
call options written during the six months ended June 30,
2010, was $(9,939,867). Refer to Footnote 3
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for further
details on call options written.
Market and
Counterparty Credit Risk
In the normal course of business the Fund may invest in
financial instruments and enters into financial transactions
where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market
(market risk) or failure of the other party to the transaction
to perform (counterparty credit risk). The potential loss could
exceed the value of the financial assets recorded on the
financial statements. Financial assets, which potentially expose
the Fund to counterparty credit risk, consist principally of
cash due from counterparties on forward, option and swap
transactions, when applicable. The extent of the Funds
exposure to counterparty credit risk in respect to these
financial assets approximates their carrying value as recorded
on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Futures contracts,
when applicable, contracts expose the Fund to minimal
counterparty credit risk as they are exchange traded and the
exchanges clearing house, which is counterparty to all
exchange traded futures, guarantees the futures contracts
against default.
The Fund helps manage counterparty credit risk by entering into
agreements only with counterparties Nuveen Asset Management (the
Adviser), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen
Investments, Inc. (Nuveen), believes have the
financial resources to honor their obligations and by having the
Adviser monitor the financial stability of the counterparties.
Additionally, counterparties may be required to pledge
collateral daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial
asset) on behalf of the Fund with a value approximately equal to
the amount of any unrealized gain above a pre-determined
threshold. Reciprocally, when the Fund has an unrealized loss,
the Fund has instructed the custodian to pledge assets of the
Fund as collateral with a value approximately equal to the
amount of the unrealized loss above a pre-determined threshold.
Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if
and when the valuations fluctuate, either up or down, by at
least the predetermined threshold amount.
Repurchase
Agreements
In connection with transactions in repurchase agreements, it is
the Funds policy that its custodian take possession of the
underlying collateral securities, the fair value of which
exceeds the principal amount of the repurchase transaction,
including accrued interest, at all times. If the seller
defaults, and the fair value of the collateral declines,
realization of the collateral may be delayed or limited.
Custodian Fee
Credit
The Fund has an arrangement with the custodian bank whereby
certain custodian fees and expenses are reduced by net credits
earned on the Funds cash on deposit with the bank. Such
deposit arrangements are an alternative to overnight
investments. Credits for cash balances may be offset by charges
for any days on which the Fund overdraws its account at the
custodian bank.
Indemnifications
Under the Funds organizational documents, its officers and
trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out
of the performance of their duties to the Fund. In addition, in
the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts
that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The
Funds maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown
as this would involve future claims that may be made against the
Fund that have not yet occurred. However, the Fund has not had
prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects
the risk of loss to be remote.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.
GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
increases and decreases in net assets applicable to Common
shares from operations during the reporting period. Actual
results may differ from those estimates.
|
|
2.
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
In determining the value of the Funds investments, various
inputs are used. These inputs are summarized in the three broad
levels listed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
|
Level 2
|
|
|
|
Other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for
similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit
risk, etc.).
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
Significant unobservable inputs (including managements
assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
|
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not
an indication of the risk associated with investing in those
securities. The following is a summary of the Funds fair
value measurements as of June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stocks
|
|
$
|
136,190,427
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
136,190,427
|
|
Preferred Securities*
|
|
|
6,680,736
|
|
|
|
4,159,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,840,222
|
|
Variable Rate Senior Loan Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,839,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,839,486
|
|
Short-Term Investments
|
|
|
11,343,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,343,903
|
|
Derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Call Options Written
|
|
|
(714,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(714,331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
153,500,735
|
|
|
$
|
46,998,972
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
200,499,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Preferred Securities includes Convertible Preferred Securities,
$25 Par (or similar) Preferred Securities and Capital Preferred
Securities held by the Fund at the end of the reporting period,
if any.
|
|
|
3.
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
|
The Fund records derivative instruments at fair value, with
changes in fair value recognized on the Statement of Operations,
when applicable. Even though the Funds investments in
derivatives may represent economic hedges, they are not
considered to be hedge transactions for financial reporting
purposes. For additional information on the derivative
instruments in which the Fund was invested during and at the end
of the reporting period, refer to the Portfolio of Investments,
Financial Statements and Footnote 1 General Information
and Significant Accounting Policies.
The following table presents the fair value of all derivative
instruments held by the Fund as of June 30, 2010, the
location of these instruments on the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities, and the primary underlying risk exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities
|
|
Underlying
|
|
Derivative
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
Risk Exposure
|
|
Instrument
|
|
Location
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Value
|
|
Equity Price
|
|
Options
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Call options written, at value
|
|
$
|
714,331
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (continued)
|
The following tables present the amount of net realized gain
(loss) and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2010, on
derivative instruments, as well as the primary risk exposure
associated with each.
|
|
|
|
|
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from Call Options Written
|
|
|
|
Risk Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Price
|
|
$
|
(723,124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) of Call
Options Written
|
|
|
|
Risk Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Price
|
|
$
|
257,371
|
|
Common
Shares
Transactions in Common shares were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
Common shares repurchased and retired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(79,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price per Common share repurchased and retired
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.69
|
|
Discount per Common share repurchased and retired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.97
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FundPreferred
Shares
Transactions in FundPreferred shares were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
6/30/10
|
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
FundPreferred Series W shares redeemed
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
|
$
|
28,850,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A The Fund redeemed all $45,000,000 of its
outstanding FundPreferred shares as of December 31, 2009.
|
|
5.
|
Investment
Transactions
|
Purchases and sales (including maturities but excluding
short-term investments and derivative transactions) during the
six months ended June 30, 2010, aggregated $39,871,342 and
$51,857,000, respectively.
Transactions in call options written during the six months ended
June 30, 2010, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Received
|
|
Outstanding, beginning of period
|
|
|
2,830
|
|
|
$
|
476,022
|
|
Options written
|
|
|
11,134
|
|
|
|
1,193,024
|
|
Options terminated in closing purchase transactions
|
|
|
(2,664
|
)
|
|
|
(448,100
|
)
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(27,922
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of period
|
|
|
11,134
|
|
|
$
|
1,193,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Income Tax
Information
|
The following information is presented on an income tax basis.
Differences between amounts for financial statement and federal
income tax purposes are primarily due to the treatment of
paydown gains and losses, recognition of premium amortization
and timing differences in recognizing certain gains and losses
on investment transactions. To the extent that differences arise
that are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified
within capital accounts on the Statement of Assets and
Liabilities presented in the annual report, based on their
federal tax basis treatment; temporary differences do not
require reclassification. Temporary and permanent differences do
not impact the net asset value of the Fund.
At June 30, 2010, the cost and unrealized appreciation
(depreciation) of investments (excluding investments in
derivatives), determined on a federal income tax basis, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of investments
|
|
$
|
213,670,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized:
|
|
|
|
|
Appreciation
|
|
$
|
16,655,979
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(29,112,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments
|
|
$
|
(12,456,793
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax components of undistributed net ordinary income and net
long-term capital gains at December 31, 2009, the
Funds last tax year end, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed net ordinary income*
|
|
$
|
|
|
Undistributed net long-term capital gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Net ordinary income consists of net taxable income derived from
dividends, interest, and net short-term capital gains, if any.
|
The tax character of distributions paid during the Funds
last tax year ended December 31, 2009, was designated for
purposes of the dividends paid deduction as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions from net ordinary income*
|
|
$
|
5,573,750
|
|
Distributions from net long-term capital gains
|
|
|
|
|
Return of capital
|
|
|
7,706,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Net ordinary income consists of net taxable income derived from
dividends, interest, and net short-term capital gains, if any.
|
At December 31, 2009, the Funds last tax year end,
the Fund had unused capital loss carryforwards available for
federal income tax purposes to be applied against future capital
gains, if any. If not applied, the carryforwards will expire as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Expiration:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
67,127,564
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
32,157,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
99,285,515
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Management Fees
and Other Transactions with Affiliates
|
The Funds management fee is separated into two
components a
fund-level
fee, based only on the amount of assets within the Fund, and a
complex-level fee, based on the aggregate amount of all fund
assets managed by the Adviser. This pricing structure enables
Fund shareholders to benefit from growth in the assets within
the Fund as well as from growth in the amount of complex-wide
assets managed by the Adviser.
The annual fund-level fee, payable monthly, is calculated
according to the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
Average Daily Managed
Assets*
|
|
Fund-Level Fee Rate
|
For the first $500 million
|
|
|
.7000
|
%
|
For the next $500 million
|
|
|
.6750
|
|
For the next $500 million
|
|
|
.6500
|
|
For the next $500 million
|
|
|
.6250
|
|
For Managed Assets over $2 billion
|
|
|
.6000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited) (continued)
|
The annual complex-level fee, payable monthly, is calculated
according to the following schedule:
|
|
|
|
|
Complex-Level Managed Asset
Breakpoint Level*
|
|
Effective Rate at Breakpoint
Level
|
$55 billion
|
|
|
.2000
|
%
|
$56 billion
|
|
|
.1996
|
|
$57 billion
|
|
|
.1989
|
|
$60 billion
|
|
|
.1961
|
|
$63 billion
|
|
|
.1931
|
|
$66 billion
|
|
|
.1900
|
|
$71 billion
|
|
|
.1851
|
|
$76 billion
|
|
|
.1806
|
|
$80 billion
|
|
|
.1773
|
|
$91 billion
|
|
|
.1691
|
|
$125 billion
|
|
|
.1599
|
|
$200 billion
|
|
|
.1505
|
|
$250 billion
|
|
|
.1469
|
|
$300 billion
|
|
|
.1445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The complex-level fee is calculated based upon the aggregate
daily managed assets of all Nuveen funds, with such daily
managed assets defined separately for each fund in its
management agreement, but excluding assets attributable to
investments in other Nuveen funds. For the complex-level and
fund-level fees, daily managed assets include closed-end fund
assets managed by the Adviser that are attributable to financial
leverage. For these purposes, financial leverage includes the
funds use of preferred stock and borrowings and certain
investments in the residual interest certificates (also called
inverse floating rate securities) in tender option bond (TOB)
trusts, including the portion of assets held by a TOB trust that
has been effectively financed by the trusts issuance of
floating rate securities, subject to an agreement by the Adviser
to limit the amount of such assets for determining managed
assets in certain circumstances. As of June 30, 2010, the
complex level fee rate was .1857%.
|
The management fee compensates the Adviser for overall
investment advisory and administrative services and general
office facilities. The Adviser has entered into
Sub-Advisory Agreements with NWQ Investment Management Company,
LLC (NWQ) and Symphony Asset Management, LLC
(Symphony), both subsidiaries of Nuveen. NWQ manages
the portion of the Funds investment portfolio
allocated to dividend-paying common and preferred stocks
including American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) and
the Funds call option strategy. Symphony manages the
portion of the Funds investment portfolio allocated to
senior loans and other debt instruments. NWQ and Symphony are
compensated for their services to the Fund from the management
fee paid to the Adviser.
The Fund pays no compensation directly to those of its trustees
who are affiliated with the Adviser or to its officers, all of
whom receive remuneration for their services to the Fund from
the Adviser or its affiliates. The Board of Trustees has adopted
a deferred compensation plan for independent trustees that
enables trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion
of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from
certain Nuveen advised funds. Under the plan, deferred amounts
are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in
shares of select Nuveen advised funds.
For the first eight years of the Funds operations, the
Adviser has agreed to reimburse the Fund, as a percentage of
average daily managed assets, for fees and expenses in the
amounts and for the time periods set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
|
January 31,
|
|
|
2004*
|
|
|
.32
|
%
|
|
2009
|
|
|
.32
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
.32
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
.24
|
|
2006
|
|
|
.32
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
.16
|
|
2007
|
|
|
.32
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
.08
|
|
2008
|
|
|
.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
From the commencement of operations.
|
The Adviser has not agreed to reimburse the Fund for any portion
of its fees and expenses beyond January 31, 2012.
|
|
8.
|
Senior Loan
Commitments
|
Unfunded
Commitments
Pursuant to the terms of certain of the variable rate senior
loan agreements, the Fund may have unfunded senior loan
commitments. The Fund will maintain with its custodian, cash,
liquid securities and/or liquid senior loans having an aggregate
value at least equal to the amount of unfunded senior loan
commitments. At June 30, 2010, the Fund had no unfunded
senior loan commitments.
Participation
Commitments
With respect to the senior loans held in the Funds
portfolio, the Fund may: 1) invest in assignments; 2) act as a
participant in primary lending syndicates; or 3) invest in
participations. If the Fund purchases a participation of a
senior loan interest, the Fund would typically enter into a
contractual agreement with the lender or other third party
selling the participation, rather than directly with the
Borrower. As such, the Fund not only assumes the credit risk of
the Borrower, but also that of the Selling Participant or other
persons interpositioned between the Fund and the Borrower. At
June 30, 2010, there were no such outstanding participation
commitments.
|
|
9.
|
Borrowing
Arrangements
|
The Fund has entered into a $60 million prime brokerage
facility with BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage, Inc. Amounts drawn on
the facility are recognized as Borrowings on the
Statement of Assets and Liabilities. As of June 30, 2010,
the Funds outstanding balance on this facility was
$52.6 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2010,
the average daily balance outstanding and average interest rate
on these borrowings were $52.6 million and 1.38%,
respectively.
In order to maintain the facility, the Fund must meet certain
collateral, asset coverage and other requirements. Borrowings
outstanding are fully secured by securities held in the
Funds Portfolio of Investments. Interest is charged on
these borrowings at
3-Month
LIBOR (London Inter-bank Offered Rate) plus .95% on the amount
borrowed and .50% on the undrawn balance. Interest expense
incurred on the borrowed amount and undrawn balance are
recognized as Interest expense on borrowings on the
Statement of Operations.
|
|
10.
|
New Accounting
Pronouncements
|
On January 21, 2010, Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued changes to the authoritative guidance under
U.S. GAAP for fair value measurements. The objective of
which is to provide guidance on how investment assets and
liabilities are to be valued and disclosed. Specifically, the
amendment requires reporting entities disclose Level 3
activity for purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the
Level 3 roll-forward on a gross basis rather than as one
net number. The effective date of the amendment is for interim
and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2010. At
this time, management is evaluating the implications of this
guidance and the impact it will have to the financial statement
amounts and footnote disclosures, if any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
HIGHLIGHTS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Selected data for a Common share outstanding throughout each
period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Operations
|
|
|
Less Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from Net
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
from Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Return of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized/
|
|
|
Income to
|
|
|
Gains to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income to
|
|
|
Gains to
|
|
|
Capital to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
FundPreferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
FundPreferred
|
|
|
FundPreferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
Net Asset
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Share-
|
|
|
Share-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-
|
|
|
Share-
|
|
|
Share-
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Underwriting
|
|
|
Net Asset
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Income(a)
|
|
|
(Loss)(b)
|
|
|
holders(c)
|
|
|
holders(c)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
holders
|
|
|
holders
|
|
|
holders
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Retired
|
|
|
Discounts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
Year Ended 12/31:
|
2010(h)
|
|
$
|
11.63
|
|
|
$
|
.10
|
|
|
$
|
(.66
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
$
|
(.48
|
)***
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(.48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.59
|
|
|
$
|
10.16
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
|
.40
|
|
|
|
2.75
|
|
|
|
(.02
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
(.38
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.55
|
)
|
|
|
(.93
|
)
|
|
|
.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.63
|
|
|
|
10.66
|
|
2008
|
|
|
23.54
|
|
|
|
.77
|
|
|
|
(13.06
|
)
|
|
|
(.12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.41
|
)
|
|
|
(.70
|
)
|
|
|
(.21
|
)
|
|
|
(.80
|
)
|
|
|
(1.71
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.42
|
|
|
|
7.58
|
|
2007
|
|
|
25.98
|
|
|
|
.90
|
|
|
|
(1.22
|
)
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
(.11
|
)
|
|
|
(.48
|
)
|
|
|
(.82
|
)
|
|
|
(1.14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.96
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.54
|
|
|
|
21.81
|
|
2006
|
|
|
22.33
|
|
|
|
.89
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
(.09
|
)
|
|
|
5.23
|
|
|
|
(.88
|
)
|
|
|
(.70
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.58
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
25.98
|
|
|
|
27.09
|
|
2005
|
|
|
21.54
|
|
|
|
.83
|
|
|
|
1.76
|
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
(.05
|
)
|
|
|
2.49
|
|
|
|
(.78
|
)
|
|
|
(.91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.69
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.01
|
)
|
|
|
22.33
|
|
|
|
21.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FundNotes at End of Period
|
|
|
FundPreferred Shares at End of Period
|
|
|
Borrowings at End of Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Market
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Value Per
|
|
|
Coverage Per
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
$25,000 of
|
|
|
$1,000 of
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
and Market
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Coverage
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Coverage
|
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
(000)
|
|
|
Per $1,000
|
|
Year Ended 12/31:
|
2010(h)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
52,600
|
|
|
$
|
3,794
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,600
|
|
|
|
4,069
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,850
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
138,992
|
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
5,583
|
|
2007
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
5,789
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
207,531
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
14,684
|
|
2006
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
6,202
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
225,411
|
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
15,659
|
|
2005
|
|
|
78,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
5,544
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
196,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Per share Net Investment Income is
calculated using the average daily shares method.
|
(b)
|
|
Net of federal corporate income
taxes on long-term capital gains retained by the Fund per share
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
|
|
Capital Gains
|
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
Year Ended 12/31:
|
2010(h)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2009
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2008
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
2006
|
|
|
.33
|
|
2005
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
The amounts shown are based on
Common share equivalents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Returns
|
|
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets
|
|
|
Ratios to Average Net Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
Applicable to Common Shares
|
|
|
Applicable to Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
Before Reimbursement(e)
|
|
|
After Reimbursement(e)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Applicable to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Turnover
|
|
|
|
Value(d)
|
|
|
Value(d)
|
|
|
Shares (000)
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.48
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.03
|
)%
|
|
$
|
146,980
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%**
|
|
|
1.51
|
%**
|
|
|
1.55
|
%**
|
|
|
1.74
|
%**
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
|
56.47
|
|
|
|
35.50
|
|
|
|
161,404
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
|
|
|
3.71
|
|
|
|
1.53
|
|
|
|
4.04
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
(60.54
|
)
|
|
|
(55.29
|
)
|
|
|
131,546
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
|
4.53
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
(12.99
|
)
|
|
|
(2.38
|
)
|
|
|
328,557
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
35.52
|
|
|
|
24.19
|
|
|
|
360,740
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
11.93
|
|
|
|
309,452
|
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
|
|
3.36
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Total Return Based on
Market Value is the combination of changes in the market price
per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and
reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average
price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last
dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the
first business day of the following month, is assumed to be
reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment
for the last dividend declared in the period takes place over
several days, and in some instances may not be based on the
market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different
from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not
annualized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return Based on Common Share
Net Asset Value is the combination of changes in Common Share
net asset value, reinvested dividend income at net asset value
and reinvested capital gains distributions at net asset value,
if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is
typically paid on the first business day of the following month,
is assumed to be reinvested at the ending net asset value. The
actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the
period may often be based on the Funds market price (and
not its net asset value), and therefore may be different from
the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not
annualized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Fund elected to
retain a portion of its realized long-term capital gains for the
following tax years ended December 31, (which is the fiscal
year end for the Fund) and pay required federal corporate income
taxes on these amounts. As reported on Form 2439, Common
shareholders on record date must include their pro-rata share of
these gains on their applicable federal tax returns, and are
entitled to take offsetting tax credits, for their pro-rata
share of the taxes paid by the Fund. The standardized total
returns shown above do not include the economic benefit to
Common shareholders on record date of these tax credits/refunds.
The Funds corresponding Total Return Based on Market Value
and Common Share Net Asset Value when these benefits are
included are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Returns
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
|
|
|
Based on
|
|
|
Common Share
|
|
|
|
of Record on
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
Net Asset Value
|
|
Year Ended 12/31:
|
2010(h)
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(.48
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.03
|
)%
|
2009
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
56.47
|
|
|
|
35.50
|
|
2008
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(60.54
|
)
|
|
|
(55.29
|
)
|
2007
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
(12.18
|
)
|
|
|
(1.54
|
)
|
2006
|
|
|
December 29
|
|
|
|
37.15
|
|
|
|
25.75
|
|
2005
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
11.93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
Ratios do not reflect
the effect of dividend payments to FundPreferred shareholders,
where applicable.
|
|
|
|
Net Investment Income
ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets
attributable to FundPreferred shares, FundNotes and/or
borrowings, where applicable.
|
|
|
|
Each Ratio of Expenses
to Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares and each Ratio
of Net Investment Income to Average Net Assets Applicable to
Common Shares includes the effect of the interest expense paid
on FundNotes and borrowings as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios of FundNotes Interest
Expense to
|
|
|
Ratios of Borrowings Interest
Expense to
|
|
|
|
Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares
|
|
|
Average Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares(g)
|
|
Year Ended 12/31:
|
2010(h)
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
.45
|
%**
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.44
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
.51
|
|
2006
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
.23
|
|
2005
|
|
|
.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
After expense reimbursement from
the Adviser, where applicable. Ratios do not reflect the effect
of custodian fee credits earned on the Funds net cash on
deposit with the custodian bank, where applicable.
|
(g)
|
|
Borrowing Interest Expense includes
amortization of borrowing costs. Borrowing costs were fully
amortized and expensed as of December 31, 2009.
|
(h)
|
|
For the six months ended
June 30, 2010.
|
N/A
|
|
Not applicable for the six months
ended June 30, 2010. The Fund had no retained capital gains
for the tax years ended December 31, 2009,
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2005.
|
|
*
|
|
Rounds to less than $.01 per
share.
|
**
|
|
Annualized.
|
***
|
|
Represents distributions paid
From and in excess of net investment income for the
six months ended June 30, 2010.
|
See accompanying notes to the
financial statements.
Annual Investment
Management
Agreement Approval Process
The Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the
1940 Act), provides, in substance, that each
investment advisory agreement between a fund and its investment
adviser (including
sub-advisers)
will continue in effect from year to year only if its
continuance is approved at least annually by the funds
board members, including by a vote of a majority of the board
members who are not parties to the advisory agreement or
interested persons of any parties (the
Independent Board Members), cast in person at
a meeting called for the purpose of considering such approval.
In connection with such approvals, the funds board members
must request and evaluate, and the investment adviser is
required to furnish, such information as may be reasonably
necessary to evaluate the terms of the advisory agreement.
Accordingly, at a meeting held on May
25-26, 2010
(the May Meeting), the Board of Trustees (the
Board, and each Trustee, a Board
Member) of the Fund, including a majority of the
Independent Board Members, considered and approved the
continuation of the advisory and
sub-advisory
agreements for the Fund for an additional one-year period. These
agreements include the investment advisory agreement between
Nuveen Asset Management (NAM) and the Fund
and the
sub-advisory
agreements between NAM and NWQ Investment Management Company,
LLC (NWQ) and NAM and Symphony Asset
Management LLC (Symphony and, together with
NWQ, the
Sub-Advisers).
In preparation for their considerations at the May Meeting, the
Board also held a separate meeting on April
21-22, 2010
(the April Meeting). Accordingly, the factors
considered and determinations made regarding the renewals by the
Independent Board Members include those made at the April
Meeting.
In addition, in evaluating the advisory agreement (the
Investment Management Agreement) and
sub-advisory
agreements (each, a
Sub-advisory
Agreement, and the Investment Management Agreement and
Sub-advisory
Agreements are each an Advisory Agreement),
the Independent Board Members reviewed a broad range of
information relating to the Fund, NAM and the
Sub-Advisers
(NAM and the
Sub-Advisers
are each a Fund Adviser), including
absolute and comparative performance, fee and expense
information for the Fund (as described in more detail below),
the profitability of Nuveen for its advisory activities (which
includes its wholly owned subsidiaries), and other information
regarding the organization, personnel, and services provided by
the respective Fund Adviser. The Independent Board Members
also met quarterly as well as at other times as the need arose
during the year and took into account the information provided
at such meetings and the knowledge gained therefrom. Prior to
approving the renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the
Independent Board Members reviewed the foregoing information
with their independent legal counsel and with management,
reviewed materials from independent legal counsel describing
applicable law and their duties in reviewing advisory contracts,
and met with independent legal counsel in private sessions
without management present. The Independent Board Members
considered the legal advice provided by independent legal
counsel and relied upon their knowledge of the
Fund Adviser, its services and the Fund resulting from
their meetings and other interactions throughout the year and
their own business judgment in determining the factors to be
considered in evaluating the Advisory Agreements. Each Board
Member may have accorded different weight to the various factors
in reaching his or her conclusions with respect to the
Funds Advisory Agreements. The Independent Board Members
did not identify any single factor as all-important or
controlling. The Independent Board Members considerations
were instead based on a comprehensive consideration of all the
information presented. The principal factors considered by the
Board and its conclusions are described below.
|
|
A.
|
Nature, Extent
and Quality of Services
|
In considering renewal of the Advisory Agreements, the
Independent Board Members considered the nature, extent and
quality of the Fund Advisers services, including
advisory services and administrative services. The Independent
Board Members reviewed materials outlining, among other things,
the Fund Advisers organization and business; the
types of services that the Fund Adviser or its affiliates
provide and are expected to provide to the Fund; the performance
record of the Fund (as described in further detail below); and
any initiatives Nuveen had taken for the applicable fund product
line, including continued activities to refinance auction rate
preferred securities, manage leverage during periods of market
turbulence and implement an enhanced leverage
management process, modify
investment mandates in light of market conditions and seek
shareholder approval as necessary, maintain the fund share
repurchase program and maintain shareholder communications to
keep shareholders apprised of Nuveens efforts in
refinancing preferred shares. In addition to the foregoing, the
Independent Board Members also noted the additional services
that NAM or its affiliates provide to closed-end funds,
including, in particular, Nuveens continued commitment to
supporting the secondary market for the common shares of its
closed-end funds through a variety of programs designed to raise
investor and analyst awareness and understanding of closed-end
funds. These efforts include maintaining an investor relations
program to provide timely information and education to financial
advisers and investors; providing marketing for the closed-end
funds; maintaining and enhancing a closed-end fund website;
participating in conferences and having direct communications
with analysts and financial advisors.
As part of their review, the Independent Board Members also
evaluated the background, experience and track record of the
Fund Advisers investment personnel. In this regard,
the Independent Board Members considered any changes in the
personnel, and the impact on the level of services provided to
the Fund, if any. The Independent Board Members also reviewed
information regarding portfolio manager compensation
arrangements to evaluate the Fund Advisers ability to
attract and retain high quality investment personnel, preserve
stability, and reward performance but not provide an incentive
for taking undue risks.
In addition to advisory services, the Independent Board Members
considered the quality of administrative services provided by
NAM and its affiliates including product management, fund
administration, oversight of service providers, shareholder
services, administration of Board relations, regulatory and
portfolio compliance and legal support. Given the importance of
compliance, the Independent Board Members also considered
NAMs compliance program, including the report of the chief
compliance officer regarding the Funds compliance policies
and procedures.
The Independent Board Members also considered NAMs
oversight of the performance, business activities and compliance
of the
Sub-Advisers.
In that regard, the Independent Board Members reviewed an
evaluation of each
Sub-Adviser
from NAM. The evaluation also included information relating to
the respective
Sub-Advisers
organization, operations, personnel, assets under management,
investment philosophy, strategies and techniques in managing the
Fund, developments affecting each
Sub-Adviser,
and an analysis of each
Sub-Adviser.
As described in further detail below, the Board also considered
the performance of the portion of the investment portfolio for
which each
Sub-Adviser
is responsible. In addition, the Board recognized that the
Sub-advisory
Agreements were essentially agreements for portfolio management
services only and the
Sub-Advisers
were not expected to supply other significant administrative
services to the Fund. As part of their oversight, the
Independent Board Members also continued their program of
seeking to visit each
sub-adviser
to the Nuveen funds at least once over a multiple year rotation,
meeting with key investment and business personnel. In this
regard, the Independent Board Members met with NWQ in 2009 and
2010 and Symphony in 2010. The Independent Board Members noted
that NAM recommended the renewal of the
Sub-advisory
Agreements and considered the basis for such recommendations.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members found that,
overall, the nature, extent and quality of services provided
(and expected to be provided) to the Fund under the respective
Investment Management Agreement or
Sub-advisory
Agreement, as applicable, were satisfactory.
|
|
B.
|
The Investment
Performance of the Fund and Fund Advisers
|
The Board considered the performance results of the Fund over
various time periods. The Board reviewed, among other things,
the Funds historic investment performance as well as
information comparing the Funds performance information
with that of other funds (the Performance Peer
Group) based on data provided by an independent
provider of mutual fund data and with recognized
and/or
customized benchmarks. In this regard, the performance
information the Board reviewed included the Funds total
return information compared to the returns of its Performance
Peer Group and recognized
and/or
customized benchmarks for the quarter, one-, three- and
five-year periods ending December 31, 2009 and for the same
periods ending March 31, 2010. In addition, the Independent
Board Members also reviewed, among other things, the returns of
each sleeve of the Fund relative to the benchmark of such sleeve
for the quarter, one- and three-year periods ending
December 31, 2009 and for the same periods ending
March 31, 2010. Moreover, the Board reviewed the peer
ranking of the Nuveen funds
sub-advised
by each
Sub-Adviser,
respectively, in the aggregate. The Independent Board Members
Annual Investment Management
Agreement Approval Process
(continued)
also reviewed historic premium and
discount levels. This information supplemented the Fund
performance information provided to the Board at each of its
quarterly meetings.
In reviewing peer comparison information, the Independent Board
Members recognized that the Performance Peer Group of certain
funds may not adequately represent the objectives and strategies
of the funds, thereby limiting the usefulness of comparing a
funds performance with that of its Performance Peer Group.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members determined
that the Funds investment performance over time had been
satisfactory. Although the Fund lagged its peers over various
periods, the Board noted the differences with the Performance
Peer Group and that the Fund outperformed its benchmark in the
one-year period.
|
|
C.
|
Fees, Expenses
and Profitability
|
1. Fees and
Expenses
The Board evaluated the management fees and expenses of the Fund
reviewing, among other things, the Funds gross management
fees, net management fees and net expense ratios in absolute
terms as well as compared to the fee and expenses of a
comparable universe of funds based on data provided by an
independent fund data provider (the Peer
Universe) and in certain cases, to a more focused
subset of funds in the Peer Universe (the Peer
Group) and any expense limitations.
The Independent Board Members further reviewed the methodology
regarding the construction of the applicable Peer Universe
and/or Peer
Group. In reviewing the comparisons of fee and expense
information, the Independent Board Members took into account
that in certain instances various factors such as: the asset
level of a fund relative to peers; the limited size and
particular composition of the Peer Universe or Peer Group; the
investment objectives of the peers; expense anomalies; changes
in the funds comprising the Peer Universe or Peer Group from
year to year; levels of reimbursement; the timing of information
used; and the differences in the type and use of leverage may
impact the comparative data, thereby limiting the ability to
make a meaningful comparison with peers.
In reviewing the fee schedule for the Fund, the Independent
Board Members also considered the fund-level and complex-wide
breakpoint schedules (described in further detail below) and any
fee waivers and reimbursements provided by Nuveen (applicable,
in particular, for certain closed-end funds launched since
1999). The Independent Board Members noted that the Fund had a
net management fee
and/or net
expense ratio below the peer average of its Peer Group or Peer
Universe.
Based on their review of the fee and expense information
provided, the Independent Board Members determined that the
Funds management fees were reasonable in light of the
nature, extent and quality of services provided to the Fund.
2. Comparisons
with the Fees of Other Clients
The Independent Board Members further reviewed information
regarding the nature of services and fee rates offered by NAM to
other clients. Such clients include separately managed accounts
(both retail and institutional accounts), foreign investment
funds offered by Nuveen and funds that are not offered by Nuveen
but are
sub-advised
by one of Nuveens investment management teams. In
evaluating the comparisons of fees, the Independent Board
Members noted that the fee rates charged to the Fund and other
clients vary, among other things, because of the different
services involved and the additional regulatory and compliance
requirements associated with registered investment companies,
such as the Fund. Accordingly, the Independent Board Members
considered the differences in the product types, including, but
not limited to, the services provided, the structure and
operations, product distribution and costs thereof, portfolio
investment policies, investor profiles, account sizes and
regulatory requirements. The Independent Board Members noted, in
particular, that the range of services provided to the Fund (as
discussed above) is much more extensive than that provided to
separately managed accounts. Given the inherent differences in
the products, particularly the extensive services provided to
the Fund, the Independent Board Members believe such facts
justify the different levels of fees.
In considering the fees of the
Sub-Advisers,
the Independent Board Members also considered the pricing
schedule or fees that each
Sub-Adviser
charges for similar investment management services for other
fund sponsors or clients (such as retail
and/or
institutional managed accounts) as applicable. With respect to
Symphony, the Independent Board
Members also reviewed the fees it assesses for equity and
taxable fixed-income hedge funds it manages, which include a
performance fee.
3. Profitability
of Fund Advisers
In conjunction with its review of fees, the Independent Board
Members also considered the profitability of Nuveen for its
advisory activities (which incorporated Nuveens
wholly-owned affiliated
sub-advisers)
and its financial condition. The Independent Board Members
reviewed the revenues and expenses of Nuveens advisory
activities for the last two years, the allocation methodology
used in preparing the profitability data and an analysis of the
key drivers behind the changes in revenues and expenses that
impacted profitability in 2009. The Independent Board Members
noted this information supplemented the profitability
information requested and received during the year to help keep
them apprised of developments affecting profitability (such as
changes in fee waivers and expense reimbursement commitments).
In this regard, the Independent Board Members noted that they
had also appointed an Independent Board Member as a point person
to review and keep them apprised of changes to the profitability
analysis
and/or
methodologies during the year. The Independent Board Members
also considered Nuveens revenues for advisory activities,
expenses, and profit margin compared to that of various
unaffiliated management firms with similar amounts of assets
under management and relatively comparable asset composition
prepared by Nuveen.
In reviewing profitability, the Independent Board Members
recognized the subjective nature of determining profitability
which may be affected by numerous factors including the
allocation of expenses. Further, the Independent Board Members
recognized the difficulties in making comparisons as the
profitability of other advisers generally is not publicly
available and the profitability information that is available
for certain advisers or management firms may not be
representative of the industry and may be affected by, among
other things, the advisers particular business mix,
capital costs, types of funds managed and expense allocations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Independent Board Members
reviewed Nuveens methodology and assumptions for
allocating expenses across product lines to determine
profitability. In reviewing profitability, the Independent Board
Members recognized Nuveens investment in its fund
business. Based on their review, the Independent Board Members
concluded that Nuveens level of profitability for its
advisory activities was reasonable in light of the services
provided.
In evaluating the reasonableness of the compensation, the
Independent Board Members also considered other amounts paid to
a Fund Adviser by the Fund as well as any indirect benefits
(such as soft dollar arrangements, if any) the Fund Adviser
and its affiliates receive, or are expected to receive, that are
directly attributable to the management of the Fund, if any. See
Section E below for additional information on indirect
benefits a Fund Adviser may receive as a result of its
relationship with the Fund. Based on their review of the overall
fee arrangements of the Fund, the Independent Board Members
determined that the advisory fees and expenses of the Fund were
reasonable.
|
|
D.
|
Economies of
Scale and Whether Fee Levels Reflect These Economies of
Scale
|
With respect to economies of scale, the Independent Board
Members have recognized the potential benefits resulting from
the costs of a fund being spread over a larger asset base,
although economies of scale are difficult to measure and predict
with precision, particularly on a
fund-by-fund
basis. One method to help ensure the shareholders share in these
benefits is to include breakpoints in the advisory fee schedule.
Generally, management fees for funds in the Nuveen complex are
comprised of a fund-level component and a complex-level
component, subject to certain exceptions. Accordingly, the
Independent Board Members reviewed and considered the applicable
fund-level breakpoints in the advisory fee schedules that reduce
advisory fees as asset levels increase. Further, the Independent
Board Members noted that although closed-end funds may from time
to time make additional share offerings, the growth of their
assets will occur primarily through the appreciation of such
funds investment portfolio.
In addition to fund-level advisory fee breakpoints, the Board
also considered the Funds complex-wide fee arrangement.
Pursuant to the complex-wide fee arrangement, the fees of the
funds in the Nuveen complex are generally reduced as the assets
in the fund complex reach certain levels. The complex-wide fee
arrangement seeks to provide the benefits of economies of scale
to fund shareholders when total fund complex assets increase,
even if assets of a particular fund are unchanged or have
decreased. The approach reflects the notion
Annual Investment Management
Agreement Approval Process
(continued)
that some of Nuveens costs
are attributable to services provided to all its funds in the
complex and therefore all funds benefit if these costs are
spread over a larger asset base.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded
that the breakpoint schedules and complex-wide fee arrangement
were acceptable and reflect economies of scale to be shared with
shareholders when assets under management increase.
In evaluating fees, the Independent Board Members received and
considered information regarding potential fall out
or ancillary benefits the respective Fund Adviser or its
affiliates may receive as a result of its relationship with the
Fund. In this regard, the Independent Board Members considered
any revenues received by affiliates of NAM for serving as agent
at Nuveens trading desk and as co-manager in initial
public offerings of new closed-end funds.
In addition to the above, the Independent Board Members
considered whether each Fund Adviser received any benefits
from soft dollar arrangements whereby a portion of the
commissions paid by the Fund for brokerage may be used to
acquire research that may be useful to the Fund Adviser in
managing the assets of the Fund and other clients. With respect
to NAM, the Independent Board Members noted that NAM does not
currently have any soft dollar arrangements; however, to the
extent certain bona fide agency transactions that occur on
markets that traditionally trade on a principal basis and
riskless principal transactions are considered as generating
commissions, NAM intends to comply with the
applicable safe harbor provisions.
With respect to NWQ, the Independent Board Members considered
that such
Sub-Adviser
may benefit from its soft dollar arrangements pursuant to which
it receives research from brokers that execute the Funds
portfolio transactions. The Independent Board Members further
noted that NWQs profitability may be lower if it were
required to pay for this research with hard dollars. With
respect to Symphony, the Board considered that Symphony
currently does not enter into soft dollar arrangements; however,
it has adopted a soft dollar policy in the event it does so in
the future.
Based on their review, the Independent Board Members concluded
that any indirect benefits received by a Fund Adviser as a
result of its relationship with the Fund were reasonable and
within acceptable parameters.
The Independent Board Members did not identify any single factor
discussed previously as all-important or controlling. The Board
Members, including the Independent Board Members, unanimously
concluded that the terms of the Investment Management Agreement
and
Sub-advisory
Agreements are fair and reasonable, that the respective
Fund Advisers fees are reasonable in light of the
services provided to the Fund and that the Investment Management
Agreement and the
Sub-advisory
Agreements be renewed.
Reinvest
Automatically
Easily and Conveniently
Nuveen makes
reinvesting easy. A phone call is all it takes to set up your
reinvestment account.
Nuveen Closed-End
Funds Automatic Reinvestment Plan
Your Nuveen Closed-End Fund allows you to conveniently reinvest
distributions in additional Fund shares.
By choosing to reinvest, youll be able to invest money
regularly and automatically, and watch your investment grow
through the power of compounding. Just like distributions in
cash, there may be times when income or capital gains taxes may
be payable on distributions that are reinvested.
It is important to note that an automatic reinvestment plan does
not ensure a profit, nor does it protect you against loss in a
declining market.
Easy and
convenient
To make recordkeeping easy and convenient, each quarter
youll receive a statement showing your total
distributions, the date of investment, the shares acquired and
the price per share, and the total number of shares you own.
How shares are
purchased
The shares you acquire by reinvesting will either be purchased
on the open market or newly issued by the Fund. If the shares
are trading at or above net asset value at the time of
valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at the greater of the
net asset value or 95% of the then-current market price. If the
shares are trading at less than net asset value, shares for your
account will be purchased on the open market. If the Plan Agent
begins purchasing Fund shares on the open market while shares
are trading below net asset value, but the Funds shares
subsequently trade at or above their net asset value before the
Plan Agent is able to complete its purchases, the Plan Agent may
cease open-market purchases and may invest the uninvested
portion of the distribution in newly-issued Fund shares at a
price equal to the greater of the shares net asset value
or 95% of the shares market value on the last business day
immediately prior to the purchase date. Distributions received
to purchase shares in the open market will normally be invested
shortly after the distribution payment date. No interest will be
paid on distributions awaiting reinvestment. Because the market
price of the shares may increase before purchases are completed,
the average purchase price per share may exceed the market price
at the time of valuation, resulting in the acquisition of fewer
shares than if the distribution had been paid in shares issued
by the Fund. A pro rata portion of any applicable brokerage
commissions on open market purchases will be paid by Plan
participants. These commissions usually will be lower than those
charged on individual transactions.
Flexible
You may change your distribution option or withdraw from the
Plan at any time, should your needs or situation change.
You can reinvest whether your shares are registered in your
name, or in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other
nominee. Ask your financial advisor if his or her firm will
participate on your behalf. Participants whose shares are
registered in the name of one firm may not be able to transfer
the shares to another firm and continue to participate in the
Plan.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at
any time. Although the Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan
to include a service charge payable by the participants, there
is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan at this
time.
Call today to
start reinvesting distributions
For more information on the Nuveen Automatic Reinvestment Plan
or to enroll in or withdraw from the Plan, speak with your
financial advisor or call us at (800) 257-8787.
Glossary of Terms
Used in this Report
|
|
n
|
Average Annual Total Return: This is a commonly
used method to express an investments performance over a
particular, usually multi-year time period. It expresses the
return that would have been necessary each year to equal the
investments actual cumulative performance (including
change in NAV or market price and reinvested dividends and
capital gains distributions, if any) over the time period being
considered.
|
|
n
|
Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs):
Collateralized debt obligations are a type of asset-backed
security constructed from a portfolio of fixed-income assets.
CDOs usually are divided into different tranches having
different ratings and paying different interest rates. Losses,
if any, are applied in reverse order of seniority and so junior
tranches generally offer higher coupons to compensate for added
default risk.
|
|
n
|
Current Distribution Rate: Current distribution
rate is based on the Funds current annualized quarterly
distribution divided by the Funds current market price.
The Funds quarterly distributions to its shareholders may
be comprised of ordinary income, net realized capital gains and,
if at the end of the calendar year the Funds cumulative
net ordinary income and net realized gains are less than the
amount of the Funds distributions, a tax return of capital.
|
|
n
|
Net Asset Value (NAV): A Funds NAV per
common share is calculated by subtracting the liabilities of the
Fund (including any debt or preferred shares issued in order to
leverage the Fund) from its total assets and then dividing the
remainder by the number of common shares outstanding. Fund NAVs
are calculated at the end of each business day.
|
Other Useful
Information
Board of
Trustees
John P. Amboian
Robert P. Bremner
Jack B. Evans
William C. Hunter
David J. Kundert
William J. Schneider
Judith M. Stockdale
Carole E. Stone
Terence J. Toth
Fund
Manager
Nuveen Asset Management
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Custodian
State Street Bank & Trust Company
Boston, MA
Transfer Agent
and
Shareholder Services
State Street Bank & Trust Company
Nuveen Funds
P.O. Box 43071
Providence, RI 02940-3071
(800) 257-8787
Legal
Counsel
Chapman and Cutler LLP
Chicago, IL
Independent
Registered
Public Accounting
Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
Chicago, IL
Quarterly
Portfolio of Investments and Proxy Voting Information
You may obtain (i) the Funds quarterly portfolio of
investments, (ii) information regarding how the Fund voted
proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the most
recent
twelve-month
period ended June 30, and (iii) a description of the
policies and procedures that the Fund used to determine how to
vote proxies relating to portfolio securities without charge,
upon request, by calling Nuveen Investments toll-free at
(800) 257-8787
or on Nuveens website at www.nuveen.com.
You may also obtain this and other Fund information directly
from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The SEC may charge a copying fee for this information. Visit the
SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov or in person at the SECs
Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call the SEC at
(202) 942-8090
for room hours and operation. You may also request Fund
information by sending an
e-mail
request to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing to the SECs
Public Reference Section at 100 F Street NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549.
CEO Certification
Disclosure
The Funds Chief Executive Officer has submitted to the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) the annual CEO
certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the
NYSE Listed Company Manual.
The Fund has filed with the SEC the certification of its Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Common Share
Information
The Fund intends to repurchase shares of its own common stock in
the future at such times and in such amounts as is deemed
advisable. During the period covered by this report, the Fund
repurchased shares of its common stock as shown in the
accompanying table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any future repurchases
and/or
redemptions will be reported to shareholders in the next annual
or semi-annual report.
Nuveen
Investments:
Serving Investors for Generations
Since 1898, financial advisors and their clients have relied on
Nuveen Investments to provide dependable investment solutions
through continued adherence to proven, longterm investing
principles. Today, we offer a range of high quality equity and
fixed-income solutions designed to be integral components of a
well-diversified core portfolio.
Focused on
meeting investor needs.
Nuveen Investments is a global investment management firm that
seeks to help secure the long-term goals of institutions and
high net worth investors as well as the consultants and
financial advisors who serve them. We market our growing range
of specialized investment solutions under the high-quality
brands of HydePark, NWQ, Nuveen, Santa Barbara, Symphony,
Tradewinds and Winslow Capital. In total, Nuveen Investments
managed approximately $150 billion of assets on
June 30, 2010.
Find out how we
can help you.
To learn more about the products and services of Nuveen
Investments may be able to help you meet your financial goals,
talk to your financial advisor, or call us at
(800) 257-8787.
Please read the information provided carefully before you
invest. Investors should consider the investment objective and
policies, risk considerations, charges and expenses of any
investment carefully. Where applicable, be sure to obtain a
prospectus, which contains this and other relevant information.
To obtain a prospectus, please contact your securities
representative or Nuveen Investments, 333 W. Wacker Dr.,
Chicago, IL 60606. Please read the prospectus carefully
before you invest or send money.
Learn more about Nuveen Funds at: www.nuveen.com/cef
Nuveen makes
things e-simple.
It only takes a minute to sign up for
e-Reports.
Once enrolled, youll receive an
e-mail as
soon as your Nuveen Fund information is readyno more
waiting for delivery by regular mail. Just click on the link
within the
e-mail to
see the report and save it on your computer if you wish.
Free
e-Reports
right to your e-mail!
www.investordelivery.com
If you receive your Nuveen Fund distributions and statements
from your financial advisor or brokerage account.
OR
www.nuveen.com/accountaccess
If you receive your Nuveen Fund distributions and statements
directly from Nuveen.
|
|
|
Distributed by
Nuveen Investments, LLC
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
www.nuveen.com
|
|
|
ESA-C-0610D
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.
|
(a) |
|
See Portfolio of Investments in Item 1. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Not applicable. |
ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.
Not applicable to this filing.
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT
COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.
Not applicable.
ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may
recommend nominees to the Registrants Board implemented after the registrant
last provided disclosure in response to this item.
ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|
(a) |
|
The registrants principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded
that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended (the 1940 Act) (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of
a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that
includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their
evaluation of the controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b)
under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or
15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)(17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)). |
|
|
(b) |
|
There were no changes in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act
(17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter
of the period covered by this report that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.
File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form.
(a)(1) Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the
disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to
satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Not applicable to
this filing.
(a)(2) A separate certification for each principal executive officer and
principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under
the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) in the exact form set forth below: Ex-99.CERT
attached hereto.
(a)(3) Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under
the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.23c-1) sent or given during the period covered by the
report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons: Not applicable.
(b) If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act,
provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR
270.30a-2(b)); Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished
pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by
reference. Ex-99.906 CERT attached hereto.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be
signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title) |
/s/ Kevin J. McCarthy
|
|
|
|
Kevin J. McCarthy |
|
|
|
Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
Date:
September 8, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title) |
/s/ Gifford R. Zimmerman
|
|
|
|
Gifford R. Zimmerman |
|
|
|
Chief Administrative Officer
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
Date:
September 8, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By (Signature and Title) |
/s/ Stephen D. Foy
|
|
|
|
Stephen D. Foy |
|
|
|
Vice President and Controller
(principal financial officer) |
|
|
|
Date:
September 8, 2010