UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009

 

Commission File Number: 001-32657

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD.

 

Incorporated in Bermuda

Mintflower Place

8 Par-La-Ville Road

Hamilton, HM08

Bermuda

(441) 292-1510

 

98-0363970

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   YES þ     NO o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   YES o     NO o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES o  NO þ

 

The number of common shares, par value $.001 per share, outstanding as of May 4, 2009 was 283,041,152. In addition, our subsidiary, Nabors Exchangeco (Canada) Inc., had 101,392 exchangeable shares outstanding as of May 4, 2009 that are exchangeable for Nabors common shares on a one-for-one basis, and have essentially identical rights as Nabors Industries Ltd. common shares, including but not limited to voting rights and the right to receive dividends, if any.

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

INDEX

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY — (Continued)
(Unaudited)

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

Nabors is the largest land drilling contractor in the world, with approximately 534 actively marketed land drilling rigs. We conduct oil, gas and geothermal land drilling operations in the U.S. Lower 48 states, Alaska, Canada, South America, Mexico, the Caribbean, the Middle East, the Far East, Russia and Africa. We are also one of the largest land well-servicing and workover contractors in the United States and Canada. We actively market approximately 591 land workover and well-servicing rigs in the United States, primarily in the southwestern and western United States, and actively market approximately 172 land workover and well-servicing rigs in Canada. Nabors is a leading provider of offshore platform workover and drilling rigs, and actively markets 39 platform rigs, 13 jack-up units and 3 barge rigs in the United States and multiple international markets. These rigs provide well-servicing, workover and drilling services. We have a 51% ownership interest in a joint venture in Saudi Arabia, which owns and actively markets 9 rigs in addition to the rigs we lease to the joint venture. We also offer a wide range of ancillary well-site services, including engineering, transportation, construction, maintenance, well logging, directional drilling, rig instrumentation, data collection and other support services in selected domestic and international markets. We provide logistics services for onshore drilling in Canada using helicopters and fixed-winged aircraft. We manufacture and lease or sell top drives for a broad range of drilling applications, directional drilling systems, rig instrumentation and data collection equipment, pipeline handling equipment and rig reporting software. We also invest in oil and gas exploration, development and production activities in the U.S., Canada and international areas through both our wholly-owned subsidiaries and our separate joint venture entities in which we have 49.7% ownership interests in the U.S. and international entities and a 50% ownership interest in the Canadian entity. Each joint venture pursues development and exploration projects with both existing customers of ours and with other operators in a variety of forms including operated and non-operated working interests, joint ventures, farm-outs and acquisitions.

 

The majority of our business is conducted through our various Contract Drilling operating segments, which include our drilling, workover and well-servicing operations, on land and offshore. Our oil and gas exploration, development and production operations are included in a category labeled Oil and Gas for segment reporting purposes. Our operating segments engaged in drilling technology and top drive manufacturing, directional drilling, rig instrumentation and software, and construction and logistics operations are aggregated in a category labeled Other Operating Segments for segment reporting purposes.

 

Effective January 1, 2009, Nabors changed its method of accounting for certain of its convertible debt instruments in accordance with Financial Staff Position (“FSP”) APB No. 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).” Additionally, Nabors changed its method for calculating its basic and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method in accordance with EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections,” financial information and earnings per share calculations for prior periods have been adjusted to reflect retrospective application of the FSP and EITF. See Notes 5 and 9 for additional information.

 

As used in the Report, “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” and “Nabors” means Nabors Industries Ltd. and, where the context requires, includes our subsidiaries and “Nabors Delaware” means Nabors Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation and our subsidiary.

 

 

Interim Financial Information

 

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Nabors are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Pursuant to the rules and regulations

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted. Therefore, these financial statements should be read along with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. In our management’s opinion, the consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly our financial position as of March 31, 2009 and the results of our operations and our cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, in accordance with GAAP. Interim results for the three months ended March 31, 2009 may not be indicative of results that will be realized for the full year ending December 31, 2009.

 

Our independent registered public accounting firm has performed a review of, and issued a report on, these consolidated interim financial statements in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), this report should not be considered a part of any registration statement prepared or certified within the meanings of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act.

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Nabors, all majority-owned and non-majority owned subsidiaries required to be consolidated under Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation No. 46(R), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51” (“FIN 46R”). Our consolidated financial statements exclude majority-owned entities for which we do not have either (1) the ability to control the operating and financial decisions and policies of that entity or (2) a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

 

Investments in operating entities where we have the ability to exert significant influence, but where we do not control their operating and financial policies, are accounted for using the equity method. Our share of the net income of these entities is recorded as earnings from unconsolidated affiliates in our consolidated statements of income, and our investment in these entities is included as a single amount in our consolidated balance sheets. Investments in net assets of unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the equity method totaled $404.5 million and $410.8 million and investments in net assets of unconsolidated affiliates accounted for using the cost method totaled $.9 million and $.9 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Similarly, investments in certain offshore funds classified as non-marketable are accounted for using the equity method of accounting based on our ownership interest in each fund. Our share of the gains and losses of these funds is recorded in investment income in our consolidated statements of income, and our investments in these funds are included in long-term investments and other receivables in our consolidated balance sheets.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In September 2006 the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements for assets and liabilities. We adopted and applied the provisions of SFAS No. 157 to our financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2008 and our nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The disclosures and related fair value measures are provided in Note 3.

 

In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), “Business Combinations.” This statement retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business combinations and expands the same method of accounting to all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains control over one or more other businesses or assets at the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. This statement replaces SFAS No. 141 by requiring

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

measurement at the acquisition date of the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest. Additionally, SFAS No. 141(R) requires that acquisition-related costs, including restructuring costs, be recognized as expense separately from the acquisition. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We adopted SFAS No. 141(R) on January 1, 2009 and will apply it to future acquisitions.

 

In December 2007 the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.” This statement establishes the accounting and reporting standards for a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. This statement clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS No. 160 requires retroactive adoption of the presentation and disclosure requirements for existing minority interests and applies prospectively to business combinations for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In March 2008 the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an Amendment to FASB Statement No. 133.” This statement is intended to improve financial reporting about derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced qualitative and quantitative disclosures regarding derivative instruments, gains and losses on such instruments and their effects on an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS No. 161 on January 1, 2009 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In May 2008 the FASB issued FSP APB No. 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).” The FSP clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of this FSP and applied them, on a retrospective basis, to our consolidated financial statements. The impact of this FSP is provided in Note 5.

 

In June 2008 the FASB issued FSP EITF (“EITF”) 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” This EITF provides that securities which are granted in share-based transactions are “participating securities” prior to vesting if they have a nonforfeitable right to participate in any dividends, and such securities therefore, should be included in computing basic earnings per share. Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of this EITF and applied them, on a retrospective basis, to our consolidated financial statements. The impact of this EITF is provided in Note 9.

 

In December 2008 the SEC issued a Final Rule, “Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting.” This Final Rule revises certain oil and gas reporting disclosures in Regulation S-K and Regulation S-X under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as well as Industry Guide 2. The amendments are designed to modernize and update oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them with current practices and changes in technology. Additionally, this new accounting standard requires that entities use a trailing twelve month average natural gas and oil price when performing the full cost ceiling test calculation which will impact the accounting by our oil and gas joint ventures. The disclosure requirements are effective for registration statements filed on or after January 1, 2010 and for annual financial statements filed on or after December 31, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that this Final Rule may have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 157-4, “Determining Whether a Market Is Not Active and a Transaction Is Not Distressed.” This FSP provides additional guidance for determining whether a market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is not distressed for fair value measurements under SFAS No. 157. The requirements of this FSP are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that this FSP may have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 115-2 and SFAS No. 124-2, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” This FSP changes the method for determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists with respect to debt securities. The requirements of this FSP are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that this FSP may have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In April 2009 the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.” This FSP increases the frequency of fair value disclosures as required by SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” from annual only to quarterly reporting periods. The requirements of this FSP are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that this FSP may have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which among other things, requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value.

 

As defined in SFAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). We utilize market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements and endeavor to utilize the best information available. Accordingly, we utilize valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The use of unobservable inputs is intended to allow for fair value determinations in situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. We are able to classify fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy such that Level 1 measurements include unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market, Level 2 measurements include quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market which have been adjusted for items such as effects of restrictions for transferability and those that are not quoted but are observable through corroboration with observable market data, including quoted market prices for similar assets, and Level 3 measurements include those that are unobservable and of a subjective measure.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009. As required by SFAS No. 157, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

 

Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, relating to our nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis which primarily consist of goodwill, intangible assets and other long-lived assets, assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination and asset retirement obligations. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, there were no triggering events that required fair value measurements of our nonfinancial assets and liabilities.

 

 

The Company has several share-based employee compensation plans, which are more fully described in Note 4 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company awarded 9,979,498 stock options which are exercisable in varying periods to its employees and executive officers. These awards include 3.0 million and 1.7 million stock options, with a grant date fair value of $8.8 million and $5.0 million granted to Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello, respectively, in February 2009.

 

The fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2009 was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

 

 

 

There were no stock options granted and, as a result, no fair value determinations made during the three months ended March 31, 2008.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $.4 million and $4.1 million, respectively. The total fair value of options that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $9.4 million and $4.1 million, respectively.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company awarded 60,000 shares of restricted stock to its directors. These awards had an aggregate value at their date of grant of $.6 million and will vest over a period of three years. The fair value of restricted stock that vested during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $12.6 million and $31.4 million, respectively.

 

Total share-based compensation expense, which includes both stock options and restricted stock, totaled $23.3 million and $9.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Share-based compensation expense has been allocated to our various operating segments. See Note 12.

 

 

Prior to January 1, 2009, we accounted for the embedded conversion option in our convertible long-term debt following the recognition and measurement principles under APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants” and EITF 90-19, “Convertible Bonds with Issuer Option to Settle for Cash upon Conversion.” Under this authoritative guidance, separate accounting for the embedded conversion option was not required when the conversion spread feature did not qualify to be accounted for as a derivative instrument.

 

Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB issued FSP APB No. 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement).” The FSP clarifies the position that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by paragraph 12 of APB Opinion No. 14, “Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.” The FSP requires that convertible debt instruments be accounted for with a liability component based on the fair value of a similar nonconvertible debt instrument and an equity component based on the excess of the initial proceeds from the convertible debt instrument over the liability component. Such excess represents proceeds related to the conversion option and is recorded as capital in excess of par value. The liability is recorded at a discount, which is then amortized as additional non-cash interest expense over the convertible debt instrument’s expected life. Our adoption of this FSP has been applied retrospectively to all past periods presented for all convertible debt instruments within its scope. Both, our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes issued May 2006 and our $700 million zero coupon senior exchangeable notes issued June 2003, are within the scope of this FSP.

 

Under the provisions of this FSP, the following assumptions were made in our adoption:

 

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

The effect of the adoption of FSP APB No. 14-1 on our consolidated balance sheet is as follows:

 

 

The increase to deferred income tax liabilities was partially related to a reduction of a deferred tax asset of $215.9 million which had been previously recorded in the second quarter of 2006 for the effect of the future tax benefits related to the exchangeable note hedge.

 

The effect of the adoption of FSP APB No. 14-1 on our consolidated statement of income is as follows:

 

 

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

The following information is presented for comparative purposes and illustrates the effect of FSP APB No. 14-1 on our convertible debt instruments. The balances of the liability and equity components as of each period presented are as follows:

 

 

The remaining debt discount is being amortized into interest expense over the expected remaining life of the convertible debt instruments using the effective interest rate. Interest expense related to the convertible debt instruments was recognized as follows:

 

 

During 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009 we purchased $760.6 million par value of our $2.75 billion 0.94% senior exchangeable notes in the open market, leaving approximately $2.0 billion par value outstanding.

 

On January 12, 2009, Nabors Delaware completed a private placement of $1.125 billion aggregate principal amount of 9.25% senior notes due 2019 with registration rights, which are unsecured and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by us. The issue of senior notes was resold by the initial purchasers to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A and to certain investors outside of the United States under Regulation S of the Securities Act. The senior notes bear interest at a rate of 9.25% per year, payable semiannually on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning July 15, 2009. The senior notes will mature on January 15, 2019.

 

The senior notes are unsecured and are effectively junior in right of payment to any of Nabors Delaware’s future secured debt. The senior notes rank equally with any of Nabors Delaware’s other existing and future unsubordinated debt and are senior in right of payment to any of Nabors Delaware’s future senior subordinated debt. Our guarantee of the senior notes is unsecured and ranks equal in right of payments to all of our unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness from time to time outstanding. The senior notes are subject to redemption by Nabors Delaware, in whole or in part, at any time at a redemption price equal to the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the senior notes then outstanding to be redeemed; or (ii) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest, determined in the manner set forth in the indenture. In the event of a change in control triggering event, as defined in the indenture, the holders of senior notes may require Nabors Delaware to purchase all or any part of each senior note in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of purchase, except to the extent Nabors Delaware has exercised its right to redeem the senior notes. Nabors Delaware is using the proceeds of the offering of the senior notes for the repayment or repurchase of indebtedness and general corporate purposes.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

On March 30, 2009, we and Nabors Delaware filed a registration statement on Form S-4 under the Securities Act. The registration statement related to the exchange offer to noteholders required under the registration rights agreement related to the $1.125 senior notes. On May 11, 2009, the registration statement was declared effective by the SEC.

 

Our $225 million 4.875% senior notes are due in August 2009 and were reclassified from long-term debt to current portion of long-term debt in our balance sheet as of September 30, 2008. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we repurchased $56.6 million par value of our $225 million principal amount of 4.875% senior notes due August 2009 in the open market for cash totaling $56.8 million.

 

 

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Internationally, income tax returns from 1995 through 2007 are currently under audit. The Company anticipates that several of these audits could be finalized within 12 months. It is possible that the benefit that relates to our unrecognized tax positions could significantly increase or decrease within 12 months. However, based on the current status of examinations, and the protocol for finalizing audits with the relevant tax authorities, which could include formal legal proceedings, it is not possible to estimate the future impact of the amount of changes, if any, to recorded uncertain tax positions at March 31, 2009. We recognize interest and penalties related to income tax reserves in the income tax expense line item in our consolidated statements of income.

 

The Company has recorded a deferred tax asset of approximately $1.4 billion as of March 31, 2009 relating to net operating loss carryforwards that have an indefinite life in one foreign jurisdiction. A valuation allowance of approximately $1.4 billion has been recognized because the Company believes it is more likely than not that none of the deferred tax asset will be realized.

 

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we did not repurchase any of our common shares in the open market. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased .15 million of our common shares in the open market for $4.2 million, all of which are held in treasury. When shares are reissued, we use the weighted average cost method for determining cost. The difference between the cost of the shares and the issuance price is added to or deducted from our capital in excess of par value account.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company withheld .1 million and .3 million of our common shares with a fair value of $.9 million and $9.7 million, respectively, to satisfy certain tax withholding obligations due in connection with grants of stock awards under our 2003 Employee Stock Plan.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, our employees exercised vested options to acquire .1 million and .3 million of our common shares resulting in proceeds of $.5 million and $6.8 million, respectively.

 

 

Commitments

 

Employment Contracts

 

Nabors’ Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Eugene M. Isenberg, and its Deputy Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer, Anthony G. Petrello, had in effect through the first quarter of 2009, employment agreements which had been amended and restated effective October 1, 1996. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company entered into amended and restated employment agreements (“new employment agreements”) with Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello with terms extending through March 30, 2013.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Mr. Isenberg’s employment agreement was originally negotiated with a creditors committee in 1987 in connection with the reorganization proceedings of Anglo Energy, Inc., which subsequently changed its name to Nabors. These contractual arrangements subsequently were approved by the various constituencies in those reorganization proceedings, including equity and debt holders, and confirmed by the United States Bankruptcy Court.

 

Mr. Petrello’s employment agreement was first entered into effective October 1, 1991. Mr. Petrello’s employment agreement was agreed upon as part of arm’s length negotiations with the Board of Directors before he joined Nabors in October 1991, and was reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board and the full Board of Directors at that time.

 

The employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello were restated in 1996 and subsequently amended in 2002, 2005, 2006 (in the case of Mr. Isenberg) and 2008 (as amended, the “prior employment agreements”). These amendments were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board and the full Board of Directors at the time of each amendment. The new employment agreements were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board, which is comprised of all directors other than Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello.

 

Effective April 1, 2009, the new employment agreements for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello amend and restate the prior employment agreements. The new employment agreements provide for an extension of the employment term through March 30, 2013, with automatic one-year extensions beginning April 1, 2011, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal. The base salaries for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello were increased to $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Mr. Isenberg has agreed to donate the after-tax proceeds of his base salary to an educational fund intended to benefit Company employees or other worthy candidates.

 

In addition to a base salary, the prior employment agreements provided for annual cash bonuses in an amount equal to 6% and 2%, for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello, respectively, of Nabors’ net cash flow (as defined in the respective employment agreements) in excess of 15% of the average shareholders’ equity for each fiscal year. (Mr. Isenberg’s cash bonus formula originally was set at 10% in excess of a 10% return on shareholders’ equity and he has voluntarily reduced it over time to its current 6% in excess of 15% level.) Mr. Petrello’s bonus is subject to a minimum of $700,000 per year. In 18 of the last 19 years, Mr. Isenberg has agreed voluntarily to accept a lower annual cash bonus (i.e., an amount lower than the amount provided for under his employment agreement) in light of his overall compensation package. Mr. Petrello has agreed voluntarily to accept a lower annual cash bonus (i.e., an amount lower than the amount provided for under his employment agreement) in light of his overall compensation package in 15 of the last 18 years.

 

For 2008, the annual cash bonuses for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello pursuant to the formula described in the prior employment agreements were $70.8 million and $23.1 million, respectively. In October 2008, consistent with historical practice, Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello agreed to accept a portion of their bonuses in restricted stock awards and were awarded 2,078,900 and 851,246 shares of restricted stock, respectively. These stock awards had a value at the date of grant of $28.4 million and $11.6 million, respectively, for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello, and will vest over a period of approximately three years. Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello also agreed to further reduce the cash bonus payable by accepting, in February 2009, 3.0 million and 1.7 million stock options, with a value of $8.8 million and $5.0 million, respectively. Half of the stock options granted to Mr. Isenberg vest over a period of two years. The remaining stock options vested immediately. They received the balance of their bonuses in cash ($33.6 million and $6.5 million, respectively).

 

The new employment agreements provide for annual cash bonuses in an amount equal to 2.25% and 1.5%, for Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello, respectively, of Nabors’ net cash flow (as defined in the respective employment agreements) in excess of 15% of the average shareholders’ equity for each fiscal year. The new employment agreements provide a quarterly deferred bonus of $.6 million and $.25 million, respectively, to the accounts of Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello under Nabors’ executive deferred compensation plan for each quarter they are employed beginning June 30, 2009 and, in Mr. Petrello’s case, ending March 30, 2019.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello also are eligible for awards under Nabors’ equity plans and may participate in annual long-term incentive programs and pension and welfare plans, on the same basis as other executives, and may receive special bonuses from time to time as determined by the Board of Directors. The new employment agreements effectively eliminate the risk of forfeiture of outstanding stock awards. For Mr. Isenberg, as of April 1, 2009, the unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock and stock options was approximately $51 million. For Mr. Petrello, as of April 1, 2009, the unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock was approximately $21 million. Mr. Petrello has no unvested stock options.

 

Termination in the event of death, disability, or termination without cause.  The new employment agreements provide for severance payments in the event that either Mr. Isenberg’s or Mr. Petrello’s employment agreement is terminated (i) upon death or disability (as defined in the respective employment agreements), (ii) by Nabors prior to the expiration date of the employment agreement for any reason other than for Cause (as defined in the respective employment agreements) or (iii) by either individual for Constructive Termination Without Cause (as defined in the respective employment agreements). Mr. Isenberg would be entitled to receive within 30 days of any such triggering event a payment of $100 million. Mr. Petrello would be entitled to receive within 30 days of his death or disability a payment of $50 million or in the event of termination without cause or constructive termination without cause, a payment based on a formula of three times the average of his base salary and annual bonus (calculated as though the bonus formula under the new employment agreement had been in effect) paid during the three fiscal years preceding the termination. If, by way of example, there was a termination without cause event that applied subsequent to March 31, 2009, then the payment to Mr. Petrello would be approximately $58 million. The formula will be further reduced to two times the average stated above effective April 1, 2015.

 

Based on the prior employment agreements in effect at March 31, 2009, Mr. Isenberg would have been entitled to a payment of approximately $264 million, subject to a “true-up” equal to the amount of cash bonus he would have earned under the formula during the remaining term of the agreement, based upon actual results, but the payment would not be less than approximately $264 million. Similarly, with respect to Mr. Petrello, had the prior provisions applied at March 31, 2009, Mr. Petrello would have been entitled to a payment of approximately $90 million, subject to a “true-up” equal to the amount of cash bonus he would have earned under the formula during the remaining term of the agreement, based upon actual results, but the payment would not be less than approximately $90 million. Depending upon future operating results, the true-up could have resulted in the payment of amounts which could have been significantly higher. The Company does not have insurance to cover its obligations in the event of death, disability, or termination without cause for either Messrs. Isenberg or Petrello and the Company has not recorded an expense or accrued a liability relating to these potential obligations.

 

In addition, under both the prior employment agreements and the new employment agreements the affected individual is entitled to receive (a) any unvested restricted stock outstanding, which shall immediately and fully vest; (b) any unvested outstanding stock options, which shall immediately and fully vest; (c) any amounts earned, accrued or owing to the executive but not yet paid (including executive benefits, life insurance, disability benefits and reimbursement of expenses and perquisites), which shall be continued through the later of the expiration date or three years after the termination date; (d) continued participation in medical, dental and life insurance coverage until the executive receives equivalent benefits or coverage through a subsequent employer or until the death of the executive or his spouse, whichever is later; and (e) any other or additional benefits in accordance with applicable plans and programs of Nabors.

 

Termination in the event of a Change in Control.  The new employment agreements provide that a termination of Messrs. Isenberg’s or Petrello’s employment related to a Change in Control (as defined in their respective employment agreements) is considered a constructive termination without cause. Accordingly, Mr. Isenberg would be entitled to receive within 30 days of the triggering event a payment of $100 million and Mr. Petrello would be entitled to receive within 30 days of the triggering event a payment based on a formula of three times the average of his base salary and annual bonus (calculated as though the new bonus formula had been in effect) paid during the three fiscal years preceding the termination. If, by way of example, there was a change of

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

control event that applied subsequent to March 31, 2009, then the payment to Mr. Petrello would be approximately $58 million. The formula is further reduced to two times the average stated above effective April 1, 2015. The new employment agreements eliminate all tax gross-ups, including without limitation tax gross-ups on golden parachute excise taxes, which applied under the prior employment agreements.

 

Based on the prior employment agreements in effect at March 31, 2009 if there had been a change of control event, then the payments to Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello would have been approximately $264 million and $90 million, respectively. Depending upon future operating results, the true-up could have resulted in the payment of amounts which could have been significantly higher but the payment would not have been less than $264 million and $90 million, respectively. In addition, in the event that an excise tax was applicable, they would have received a gross-up payment to make them whole with respect to any excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. With respect to the preceding sentence, by way of example, if there was a change of control event that applied on March 31, 2009, and assuming that the excise tax was applicable to the transaction, then the additional payments to Messrs. Isenberg and Petrello for the gross-up would have been up to approximately $90 million and $29 million, respectively.

 

Under both the prior employment agreements and the new employment agreements, the affected individual would receive (a) any unvested restricted stock outstanding, which shall immediately and fully vest; (b) any unvested outstanding stock options, which shall immediately and fully vest; (c) any amounts earned, accrued or owing to the executive but not yet paid (including executive benefits, life insurance, disability benefits and reimbursement of expenses and perquisites), which shall be continued through the later of the expiration date or three years after the termination date; (d) continued participation in medical, dental and life insurance coverage until the executive receives equivalent benefits or coverage through a subsequent employer or until the death of the executive or his spouse, whichever is later; and (e) any other or additional benefits in accordance with applicable plans and programs of Nabors.

 

Contingencies

 

Income Tax Contingencies

 

We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision for income taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We are regularly under audit by tax authorities. Although we believe our tax estimates are reasonable, the final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different than that which is reflected in our income tax provisions and accruals. Based on the results of an audit or litigation, a material effect on our financial position, income tax provision, net income, or cash flows in the period or periods for which that determination is made could result.

 

It is possible that future changes to tax laws (including tax treaties) could have an impact on our ability to realize the tax savings recorded to date as well as future tax savings, resulting from our 2002 corporate reorganization. See Note 11 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for additional discussion.

 

On September 14, 2006, Nabors Drilling International Limited, one of our wholly owned Bermuda subsidiaries (“NDIL”), received a Notice of Assessment (the “Notice”) from the Mexican Servicio de Administracion Tributaria (the “SAT”) in connection with the audit of NDIL’s Mexican branch for tax year 2003. The Notice proposes to deny depreciation expense deductions relating to drilling rigs operating in Mexico in 2003. The notice also proposes to deny a deduction for payments made to an affiliated company for the procurement of labor services in Mexico. The amount assessed by the SAT was approximately $19.8 million (including interest and penalties). Nabors and its tax advisors previously concluded that the deduction of said amounts was appropriate and more recently that the position of the SAT lacks merit. NDIL’s Mexican branch took similar deductions for depreciation and labor expenses for tax years 2004 to 2009. It is likely that the SAT will propose the disallowance of these deductions upon audit.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Self-Insurance Accruals

 

We are self-insured for certain losses relating to workers’ compensation, employers’ liability, general liability, automobile liability and property damage. Effective April 1, 2009, with our insurance renewal, certain changes have been made to our self-insured retentions. Certain workers’ compensation claims are subject to a minimum $1.0 million deductible and employers’ liability and marine employers’ liability are subject to a $2.0 million per occurrence deductible. Certain automobile liability is subject to a $.5 million per occurrence deductible plus an additional $1.0 million corridor deductible. General liability claims are subject to a $5.0 million per occurrence deductible.

 

In addition, we are subject to a $5.0 million deductible for all land rigs and a $10.0 million deductible for offshore rigs. This applies to all kinds of risks of physical damage except for named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Effective April 1, 2009, our risks of physical damage from named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico are self-insured.

 

Litigation

 

Nabors and its subsidiaries are defendants or otherwise involved in a number of lawsuits in the ordinary course of business. We estimate the range of our liability related to pending litigation when we believe the amount and range of loss can be estimated. We record our best estimate of a loss when the loss is considered probable. When a liability is probable and there is a range of estimated loss with no best estimate in the range, we record the minimum estimated liability related to the lawsuits or claims. As additional information becomes available, we assess the potential liability related to our pending litigation and claims and revise our estimates. Due to uncertainties related to the resolution of lawsuits and claims, the ultimate outcome may differ from our estimates. In the opinion of management and based on liability accruals provided, our ultimate exposure with respect to these pending lawsuits and claims is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or cash flows, although they could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations for a particular reporting period.

 

On July 5, 2007, we received an inquiry from the U.S. Department of Justice relating to its investigation of one of our vendors and compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The inquiry relates to transactions with and involving Panalpina, a vendor which provides freight forwarding and customs clearance services to certain of our affiliates. To date, the inquiry has focused on transactions in Kazakhstan, Saudi Arabia, Algeria and Nigeria. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has engaged outside counsel to review certain transactions with this vendor and their review is ongoing. The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has received periodic updates at its regularly scheduled meetings and the Chairman of the Audit Committee has received updates between meetings as circumstances warrant. The investigation includes a review of certain amounts paid to and by Panalpina in connection with the obtaining of permits for the temporary importation of equipment and clearance of goods and materials through customs. Both the SEC and the U.S. Department of Justice have been advised of the Company’s investigation. The ultimate outcome of this review or the effect of implementing any further measures which may be necessary to ensure full compliance with the applicable laws cannot be determined at this time.

 

A court in Algeria has entered a judgment against the Company related to certain alleged customs infractions. The Company believes it did not receive proper notice of the judicial proceedings against it, and that the amount of the judgment is excessive. We intend to assert the lack of legally required notice as a basis for challenging the judgment on appeal. Based upon our understanding of applicable law and precedent, we believe that this challenge will be successful. We do not believe that a loss is probable and have not accrued any amounts related to this matter. However, the ultimate resolution of this matter, and the timing of such resolution, is uncertain. If the Company is ultimately required to pay a fine or judgment related to this matter, the amount of the loss could range from approximately $140,000 to $20 million.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements (Including Guarantees)

 

We are a party to certain transactions, agreements or other contractual arrangements defined as “off-balance sheet arrangements” that could have a material future effect on our financial position, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. The most significant of these off-balance sheet arrangements involve agreements and obligations in which we provide financial or performance assurance to third parties. Certain of these agreements serve as guarantees, including standby letters of credit issued on behalf of insurance carriers in conjunction with our workers’ compensation insurance program and other financial surety instruments such as bonds. We have also guaranteed payment of contingent consideration in conjunction with an acquisition in 2005. Potential contingent consideration is based on future operating results of the acquired business. In addition, we have provided indemnifications to certain third parties which serve as guarantees. These guarantees include indemnification provided by Nabors to our share transfer agent and our insurance carriers. We are not able to estimate the potential future maximum payments that might be due under our indemnification guarantees.

 

Management believes the likelihood that we would be required to perform or otherwise incur any material losses associated with any of these guarantees is remote. The following table summarizes the total maximum amount of financial and performance guarantees issued by Nabors:

 

 

 

Prior to January 1, 2009, the Company excluded unvested restricted stock awards in the calculation of basic earnings per share under the provisions of SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per share” and applied the treasury stock method of accounting in calculating the effect on fully diluted shares of unvested restricted stock. In June 2008 the FASB issued FSP EITF (“EITF”) 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” This EITF provides that securities which are granted in share-based transactions are “participating securities” prior to vesting if they have a nonforfeitable right to participate in any dividends, and such securities therefore should be included in computing basic and diluted earnings per share. Our awards of restricted stock are considered participating securities under this definition. This EITF was applicable to our financial statements effective January 1, 2009 and required that all prior period earnings per share data be adjusted retrospectively to conform with the provisions of the EITF.

 

Effective January 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of FSP EITF 03-6-1 and are now required to include unvested restricted stock awards in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method. The adoption of this EITF resulted in a reduction to our diluted earnings per share calculation of $.01 for the three months ended March 31, 2008, but had no effect on our basic earnings per share calculation.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations is as follows:

 

 

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

 

For all periods presented, the computation of diluted earnings per share excludes outstanding stock options and warrants with exercise prices greater than the average market price of Nabors’ common shares, because the inclusion of such options and warrants would be anti-dilutive and such options and warrants are not considered participating securities. The average number of options and warrants that were excluded from diluted earnings per share that would potentially dilute earnings per share in the future were 31,023,161 shares during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 5,433,755 shares during the three months ended March 31, 2008. In any period during which the average market price of Nabors’ common shares exceeds the exercise prices of these stock options and warrants, such stock options and warrants will be included in our diluted earnings per share computation using the if converted method of accounting. Restricted stock will be included in our basic and diluted earnings per share computation using the two-class method of accounting in all periods because such stock is considered participating securities.

 

 

Our cash and cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments and other receivables consist of the following:

 

 

As of March 31, 2009, our short-term investments consist of investments in available-for-sale marketable debt and equity securities of $108.7 million and trading securities of $18.0 million and our long-term investments and other receivables consist of investments of $14.4 million in non-marketable securities accounted for by the equity method and $240.3 million in oil and gas financing receivables. Earnings associated with our oil and gas financing receivables are recognized as operating revenues. As of December 31, 2008, our short-term investments consist of investments in available-for-sale marketable debt and equity securities of $127.9 million and trading securities of $14.3 million and our long-term investments and other receivables consist of investments of $15.7 million in non-marketable securities accounted for by the equity method and $224.2 million in oil and gas financing receivables.

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The December 31, 2008 other current assets amount represents $1.9 million in cash proceeds receivable from brokers from the sale of certain investment securities.

 

In March 2008 our investment in a privately held company became a marketable equity security subsequent to a public offering on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. Accordingly, we have accounted for the marketable equity security in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” and classified a portion of this security as trading securities and a portion of this security as available-for-sale securities based on our investment strategy. As of March 31, 2009, the fair market value of the securities classified as trading and available-for-sale was $18.0 million and $49.4 million, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded in our income statement net unrealized gains of $3.7 million and $31.2 million, respectively, on the trading portion of the security.

 

Accrued liabilities include the following:

 

 

Investment income (loss) includes the following:

 

 

Losses (gains) on sales, retirements and impairments of long-lived assets and other expense (income), net includes the following:

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

Our U.S. oil and gas joint venture (49.7% ownership) accounted for using the equity method is included in investment in unconsolidated affiliates. Our earnings (losses) from unconsolidated affiliates includes impairment charges of $75.0 million, representing our proportionate share of a non-cash pre-tax ceiling test writedown from this joint venture during the three months ended March 31, 2009. This writedown resulted from the ceiling test application of the full cost method of accounting for costs related to oil and natural gas properties. Presented below is summarized income statement information for our U.S. joint venture:

 

 

 

The following table sets forth financial information with respect to our reportable segments:

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

NABORS INDUSTRIES LTD. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)