e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
.
Commission File Number 1-10272
ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
74-6056896
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.) |
9200 E Panorama Circle, Suite 400
Englewood, Colorado 80112
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(303) 708-5959
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ No o
At
August 1, 2005 there were approximately 32,961,000 of the Registrants Common Units
outstanding held by non-affiliates.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
ASSETS |
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
8,872,304 |
|
|
$ |
8,842,611 |
|
Real estate held for sale |
|
|
400,766 |
|
|
|
378,427 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
841,539 |
|
|
|
763,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,431,531 |
|
|
|
8,457,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities |
|
|
124,598 |
|
|
|
111,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investments |
|
|
8,556,129 |
|
|
|
8,568,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
12,765 |
|
|
|
203,255 |
|
Restricted cash in tax-deferred exchange escrow |
|
|
124,041 |
|
|
|
120,095 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
254,391 |
|
|
|
173,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,947,326 |
|
|
$ |
9,066,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND UNITHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unsecured credit facilities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,000 |
|
Long-Term Unsecured Debt |
|
|
2,379,209 |
|
|
|
2,099,132 |
|
Mortgages payable |
|
|
1,742,872 |
|
|
|
2,013,730 |
|
Mortgages payable held for sale |
|
|
17,649 |
|
|
|
17,775 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
283,503 |
|
|
|
325,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
4,423,233 |
|
|
|
4,474,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other common unitholders interest, at redemption value (A-1 Common Units: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,036,384 in 2005 and 23,117,498 in 2004) |
|
|
928,285 |
|
|
|
885,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual Preferred Units |
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
69,522 |
|
Common unitholders equity (A-2 Common Units: 199,304,169 in 2005 and
199,577,459 in 2004) |
|
|
3,551,211 |
|
|
|
3,638,729 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive earnings (loss) |
|
|
(5,403 |
) |
|
|
(4,425 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unitholders equity |
|
|
3,595,808 |
|
|
|
3,703,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and unitholders equity |
|
$ |
8,947,326 |
|
|
$ |
9,066,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(In thousands, except per unit amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
226,375 |
|
|
$ |
198,911 |
|
|
$ |
446,291 |
|
|
$ |
389,526 |
|
Other income |
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
11,975 |
|
|
|
8,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233,223 |
|
|
|
204,120 |
|
|
|
458,266 |
|
|
|
398,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
56,700 |
|
|
|
49,454 |
|
|
|
115,261 |
|
|
|
97,480 |
|
Real estate taxes |
|
|
22,644 |
|
|
|
19,328 |
|
|
|
45,280 |
|
|
|
38,031 |
|
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
54,832 |
|
|
|
47,419 |
|
|
|
108,609 |
|
|
|
91,979 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
46,330 |
|
|
|
37,724 |
|
|
|
93,826 |
|
|
|
74,265 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
13,755 |
|
|
|
12,092 |
|
|
|
28,044 |
|
|
|
24,525 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
28,472 |
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,651 |
|
|
|
166,917 |
|
|
|
419,492 |
|
|
|
328,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
31,572 |
|
|
|
37,203 |
|
|
|
38,774 |
|
|
|
70,028 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
Equity in earnings/(loss) from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
5,794 |
|
|
|
7,354 |
|
|
|
16,911 |
|
|
|
12,630 |
|
Other non-operating income |
|
|
4,778 |
|
|
|
9,951 |
|
|
|
28,783 |
|
|
|
20,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations |
|
|
42,144 |
|
|
|
54,508 |
|
|
|
84,468 |
|
|
|
103,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued apartment communities |
|
|
20,190 |
|
|
|
36,563 |
|
|
|
51,708 |
|
|
|
101,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
62,334 |
|
|
|
91,071 |
|
|
|
136,176 |
|
|
|
205,033 |
|
Preferred Unit distributions |
|
|
(958 |
) |
|
|
(4,459 |
) |
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
(8,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Basic |
|
$ |
61,376 |
|
|
$ |
86,612 |
|
|
$ |
133,520 |
|
|
$ |
196,127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Units outstanding Basic |
|
|
223,093 |
|
|
|
219,845 |
|
|
|
223,719 |
|
|
|
219,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Units outstanding Diluted |
|
|
224,199 |
|
|
|
220,791 |
|
|
|
224,757 |
|
|
|
223,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Common Unit Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Common Unit Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before discontinued operations |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
Discontinued operations, net |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions paid per Common Unit |
|
$ |
0.4325 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
$ |
0.8650 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Unitholders Equity,
Other Common Unitholders Interest and Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
Unitholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2004. |
|
$ |
69,522 |
|
|
$ |
3,638,729 |
|
|
$ |
(4,425 |
) |
|
$ |
3,703,826 |
|
|
$ |
885,400 |
|
|
$ |
4,589,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,058 |
|
|
|
15,118 |
|
|
|
136,176 |
|
Change in fair value of
cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411 |
|
Change in fair value of
marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
attributable to Common Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Unit distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(173,413 |
) |
|
|
(20,360 |
) |
|
|
(193,773 |
) |
A-1 Common Units converted
into A-2 Common Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
(3,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit repurchases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56,495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Unit repurchases |
|
|
(19,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of A-1 Common Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,660 |
|
|
|
41,660 |
|
Issuance of A-2 Common Units
under Compensation Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to redemption value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,596 |
) |
|
|
9,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,551,211 |
|
|
$ |
(5,403 |
) |
|
$ |
3,595,808 |
|
|
$ |
928,285 |
|
|
$ |
4,524,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
136,176 |
|
|
$ |
205,033 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash flow provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
114,390 |
|
|
|
111,640 |
|
Gains on dispositions of depreciated real estate, net |
|
|
(60,262 |
) |
|
|
(93,482 |
) |
Gains on sale of marketable equity securities and property management business |
|
|
(27,948 |
) |
|
|
(20,461 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(352 |
) |
Equity in earnings/(loss) from unconsolidated entities |
|
|
(16,911 |
) |
|
|
(12,630 |
) |
Change in other assets |
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
(8,682 |
) |
Change in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(8,231 |
) |
|
|
(16,488 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(4,399 |
) |
|
|
(4,826 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities |
|
|
134,103 |
|
|
|
159,752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate investments, net |
|
|
(457,763 |
) |
|
|
(581,739 |
) |
Change in investments in unconsolidated entities, net |
|
|
8,312 |
|
|
|
26,958 |
|
Proceeds from dispositions, net of closing costs |
|
|
465,099 |
|
|
|
272,339 |
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
(3,946 |
) |
|
|
163,368 |
|
Change in notes receivable, net |
|
|
(73,408 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
14,844 |
|
|
|
83,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow used in investing activities |
|
|
(46,862 |
) |
|
|
(35,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on Long-Term Unsecured Debt |
|
|
(18,750 |
) |
|
|
(40,450 |
) |
Proceeds from Long-Term Unsecured Debt |
|
|
296,034 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds/Repayments from unsecured credit facilities, net |
|
|
(19,000 |
) |
|
|
206,843 |
|
Principal prepayment of mortgages payable, including prepayment penalties |
|
|
(263,456 |
) |
|
|
(56,468 |
) |
Regularly scheduled principal payments on mortgages payable |
|
|
(5,321 |
) |
|
|
(6,396 |
) |
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
32,003 |
|
Proceeds from Common Units issued under employee stock options |
|
|
20,556 |
|
|
|
29,129 |
|
Repurchase of Common Units |
|
|
(56,495 |
) |
|
|
(85,441 |
) |
Repurchase of Series E and G Perpetual Preferred Units |
|
|
(19,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions paid on Common Units |
|
|
(214,935 |
) |
|
|
(191,160 |
) |
Cash distributions paid on Preferred Units |
|
|
(2,656 |
) |
|
|
(8,906 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
(682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow used in financing activities |
|
|
(277,731 |
) |
|
|
(121,528 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(190,490 |
) |
|
|
2,709 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
203,255 |
|
|
|
5,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
12,765 |
|
|
$ |
7,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1 Common Units issued in exchange for real estate |
|
$ |
41,660 |
|
|
$ |
10,788 |
|
A-1 Common Units converted to A-2 Common Units |
|
|
3,129 |
|
|
|
34,064 |
|
Assumption of mortgages payable upon purchase of apartment communities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,900 |
|
A-2 Common Units issued in exchange for real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,502 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
(1) Description of the Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Business
Archstone-Smith is structured as an UPREIT under which all property ownership and business
operations are conducted through the Operating Trust. Archstone-Smith is our sole trustee and owns
approximately 89.2% the Operating Trusts outstanding Common Units; the remaining 10.8% owned by
minority interest holders. As used herein, we, our and the company refers to the Operating
Trust and Archstone-Smith, collectively, except where the context otherwise requires.
Archstone-Smith is an equity REIT organized under the laws of the State of Maryland. We focus on
creating value for our unitholders by acquiring, developing and operating apartments in markets
characterized by very expensive single-family home prices, limited land on which to build new
housing and a strong, diversified economic base with employment growth potential.
Interim Financial Reporting
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Operating Trust are
unaudited and certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements have been omitted. While management believes that the disclosures presented are
adequate for interim reporting, these interim financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the financial statements and notes included in the Operating Trusts 2004 Form 10-K. See the
glossary in our 2004 Form 10-K for all defined terms not defined herein.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all
adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Operating Trusts financial statements for the
interim periods presented. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire year.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect amounts reported in the financial statements and the related notes. Actual results could
differ from managements estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the
effects of revisions are reflected in the period they are determined to be necessary.
Loss Contingencies
We accrue for loss contingencies when it is probable that a loss will be incurred and that
loss can be reasonably estimated consistent with the criteria established in SFAS No. 5 Accounting
for Contingencies. We also record insurance recoveries up to the amount of the actual loss
contingency when the insurance recovery is both probable and can be reasonably estimated.
Legal Fees
We generally recognize legal expenses as incurred; however, if such fees are related to the
accrual for an estimated legal settlement, we accrue for the related incurred and anticipated legal
fees at the same time we accrue the cost of settlement.
7
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Marketable Securities and Other Investments
All publicly traded equity securities are classified as available for sale and carried at
fair value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of unitholders
equity. Private investments, for which we do not have the ability to exercise significant
influence, are accounted for at cost. Declines in the value of public and private investments that
management determines are other than temporary are recorded as a provision for loss on investments.
Real Estate Depreciation
We allocate the cost of newly acquired properties between net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets. The primary intangible asset associated with an apartment community acquisition
is the value of the existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired property, we
first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to
the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the property is vacant. We estimate
the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a
hypothetical lease-up. We depreciate the building and fixtures based on the expected useful life of
the asset and amortize the intangible value of the lease agreements over the average remaining life
of the existing leases.
Income Taxes
Archstone-Smith made an election to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended, and we believe we qualify as a REIT and have made all required distributions of
our taxable income. Accordingly, no provision has been made for federal income taxes at the trust
level.
We primarily incur income taxes through our consolidated taxable REIT subsidiary called
Ameriton. Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax basis, operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years
in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on
deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the
period that includes the enactment date.
Preferred Unit Redemptions
When redeeming Preferred Units, we recognize unit issuance costs as a charge to earnings in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
Topic D-42, The Effect on the Calculation of Earnings per Share for the Redemption or Induced
Conversion of Preferred Stock. In July 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff
issued a clarification of the SECs position on the application of FASB-EITF Topic D-42. The SEC
staffs position, as clarified, is that in applying Topic D-42, the carrying value of preferred
units that are redeemed should be reduced by the amount of original issuance costs, regardless of
where in unitholders equity those costs are reflected.
8
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation
As of June 30, 2005, the company has one stock-based employee compensation plan. Effective
January 1, 2003, the company adopted the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, prospectively to all employee awards granted, modified
or settled after January 1, 2003, which results in expensing of options. During 2005, we granted
approximately 325,000 Restricted Share Units and 513,000 stock options. During 2004, we granted
approximately 300,000 Restricted Share Units and 648,000 stock options. For employee awards granted
prior to January 1, 2003, the company accounted for this plan under the recognition and measurement
provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
Interpretations. With respect to options granted under the plan prior to January 1, 2003, no
stock-based employee compensation expense is reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated
statements of earnings, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price equal to the
market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates
the effect on net earnings and earnings per unit if the fair value based method had been applied to
all outstanding and unvested awards in each period (dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Basic |
|
$ |
61,376 |
|
|
$ |
86,612 |
|
|
$ |
133,520 |
|
|
$ |
196,127 |
|
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included
in reported net earnings |
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for all awards |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
(790 |
) |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net earnings attributable to Common Units Basic |
|
$ |
61,235 |
|
|
$ |
86,179 |
|
|
$ |
133,178 |
|
|
$ |
195,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per Common Unit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic pro forma |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as reported |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted pro forma |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average risk-free interest rate |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
|
|
3.77 |
% |
|
|
3.48 |
% |
Weighted average Distribution yield |
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
6.92 |
% |
|
|
5.63 |
% |
|
|
6.92 |
% |
Weighted average volatility |
|
|
21.97 |
% |
|
|
15.33 |
% |
|
|
21.97 |
% |
|
|
15.33 |
% |
Weighted average expected option life |
|
5.0 years |
|
5.0 years |
|
5.0 years |
|
5.0 years |
Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income, which is defined as net earnings and all other non-owner changes in
equity, is displayed in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Unitholders Equity,
Other Common Unitholders Interest and Comprehensive Income/(Loss). Other comprehensive
income/(loss) reflects unrealized holding gains and losses on the available-for-sale investments
and changes in the fair value of effective cash flow hedges.
9
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Our
accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) for the six months ended June 30,
2005 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other |
|
|
|
Marketable |
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Hedges |
|
|
Income/(Loss) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
1,398 |
|
|
$ |
(5,823 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,425 |
) |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
|
|
2,270 |
|
Fair value of long-term debt hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,859 |
) |
|
|
(1,859 |
) |
Mark to market for marketable equity securities |
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
690 |
|
Reclassification adjustments for realized net gains |
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,079 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
(5,412 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit Data
Following is a reconciliation of basic net earnings attributable to Common Units to diluted
net earnings per Common Unit for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Reconciliation of numerator between basic and diluted net earnings per Common Unit (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Basic |
|
$ |
61,376 |
|
|
$ |
86,612 |
|
|
$ |
133,520 |
|
|
$ |
196,127 |
|
Distributions on Convertible Preferred Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings attributable to Common Units Diluted |
|
$ |
61,376 |
|
|
$ |
86,612 |
|
|
$ |
133,520 |
|
|
$ |
198,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of denominator between basic and diluted net earnings per Common Unit (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Units
outstanding Basic |
|
|
223,093 |
|
|
|
219,845 |
|
|
|
223,719 |
|
|
|
219,962 |
|
Assumed
conversion of Convertible Preferred Units into
Common Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,583 |
|
Assumed exercise of options |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of Common Units
outstanding Diluted |
|
|
224,199 |
|
|
|
220,791 |
|
|
|
224,757 |
|
|
|
223,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the impact of potentially dilutive equity securities during periods in which they are anti-dilutive. |
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. This Statement is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supercedes APB No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The Statement requires companies to recognize, in the
income statement, the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity based compensation
issued to employees. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of the first interim or
annual period that commences after January 1, 2006. We do not believe that the adoption of SFAS
No. 123R will have a material impact on our financial position, net earnings or cash flows.
10
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF No. 04-5, Determining Whether a
General Partner, or the General Partners as a Group, Controls a Limited Partnership or Similar
Entity When the Limited Partners Have Certain Rights. (EITF No. 04-5) This Issue provides a
framework for evaluating whether a general partner or group of general partners or managing members
controls a limited partnership or limited liability company and therefore should consolidate the
entity. EITF No. 04-5 is effective for general partners or managing members of all new limited
partnerships formed and for existing limited partnerships for which the partnership agreements are
modified, the guidance in this Issue is effective after June 29, 2005. For general partners or
managing members in all other limited partnerships, the guidance in this Issue is effective no
later than the beginning of the first reporting period in fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2005. Although we have yet to complete our analysis, we do not believe that the adoption of EITF
No. 04-5 will have a material impact on our financial position, net earnings or cash flows.
(2) Real Estate
Investments in Real Estate
Investments in real estate, at cost, were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Units (1) |
|
|
Investment |
|
|
Units (1) |
|
Operating Trust Apartment Communities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating communities |
|
$ |
8,097,273 |
|
|
|
57,730 |
|
|
$ |
8,018,658 |
|
|
|
58,486 |
|
Communities under construction |
|
|
537,345 |
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
|
|
499,239 |
|
|
|
3,237 |
|
Development communities In Planning |
|
|
22,360 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
51,822 |
|
|
|
1,251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Trust apartment
communities |
|
|
8,656,978 |
|
|
|
61,597 |
|
|
|
8,569,719 |
|
|
|
62,974 |
|
Ameriton apartment communities (2) |
|
|
533,189 |
|
|
|
7,200 |
|
|
|
581,910 |
|
|
|
6,791 |
|
Other real estate assets(3) |
|
|
82,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total real estate |
|
$ |
9,273,070 |
|
|
|
68,797 |
|
|
$ |
9,221,038 |
|
|
|
69,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unit information is based on managements estimates and has not been reviewed by our
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
|
(2) |
|
Ameritons investment as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 for development communities
Under Control was $0.8 million, 253 units and $1.5 million, 593 units, respectively, and are
reflected in the Other assets caption of our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes land that is not In Planning and other real estate assets. |
The change in investments in real estate, at cost, consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
9,221,038 |
|
Acquisition-related expenditures |
|
|
286,311 |
|
Redevelopment expenditures |
|
|
23,465 |
|
Recurring capital expenditures |
|
|
16,676 |
|
Development expenditures, excluding land acquisitions |
|
|
152,895 |
|
Dispositions |
|
|
(435,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net apartment community activity |
|
|
44,063 |
|
Change in other real estate assets |
|
|
7,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
9,273,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2005 we had unfunded contractual commitments related to real estate investment
activities aggregating approximately $563.0 million, of which $540.9 million related to communities
under construction.
11
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(3) Discontinued Operations
The results of operations for properties sold during the period or designated as held-for-sale
at the end of the period are required to be classified as discontinued operations. The
property-specific components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include
rental revenues, rental expenses, real estate taxes, depreciation expense, estimated income taxes
(for Ameriton properties), debt extinguishment expense and interest expense (actual interest
expense for encumbered properties and a pro-rata allocation of interest expense for any
unencumbered property up to our weighted average leverage ratio), as well as the net gain or loss
on the disposition of properties.
Consistent with our capital recycling program, we have ten operating apartment communities,
representing 3,868 units (unaudited), classified as held for sale under the provisions of SFAS No.
144, at June 30, 2005. Accordingly, we have classified the operating earnings from these ten
properties within discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we sold nine Operating Trust and Ameriton
operating communities. The operating results of these nine communities and the related gain/loss
on sale are also included in discontinued operations for 2005 and 2004. During the twelve months
ended December 31, 2004, we sold 30 Operating Trust and Ameriton operating communities. The
operating results of these 30 communities and the related gain/loss on the sale are also included
in discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
The following is a summary of net earnings from discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
12,322 |
|
|
$ |
47,506 |
|
|
$ |
27,261 |
|
|
$ |
95,786 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
(4,046 |
) |
|
|
(15,454 |
) |
|
|
(9,351 |
) |
|
|
(31,256 |
) |
Real estate taxes |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
(5,921 |
) |
|
|
(2,523 |
) |
|
|
(12,034 |
) |
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
(7,119 |
) |
|
|
(4,896 |
) |
|
|
(16,330 |
) |
Interest expense (1) |
|
|
(3,681 |
) |
|
|
(13,057 |
) |
|
|
(7,536 |
) |
|
|
(26,688 |
) |
Estimated income taxes (Ameriton properties) |
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(6,120 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs related to dispositions |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(5,389 |
) |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
Gains on disposition of taxable REIT subsidiary real estate investments, net |
|
|
6,937 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
20,703 |
|
|
|
14,513 |
|
Gains on dispositions of REIT real estate investments, net. |
|
|
13,405 |
|
|
|
29,169 |
|
|
|
39,559 |
|
|
|
78,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued apartment communities |
|
$ |
20,190 |
|
|
$ |
36,563 |
|
|
$ |
51,708 |
|
|
$ |
101,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The portion of interest expense included in discontinued operations that is allocated to
properties based on the companys leverage ratio was $3.3 million and $9.5 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and $6.0 million and $19.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
Assets held for sale as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, represented gross real estate
of $400.8 million and $378.4 million with $17.6 million and $17.8 million related mortgages payable
at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Additionally, of our investment in real
estate at December 31, 2004, we disposed of $435.3 million of real estate and paid off related
mortgages of $85.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005.
12
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(4) Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Entities
Real Estate Joint Ventures
We have investments in entities that we account for using the equity method. At June 30,
2005, the investment balance consisted of $92.5 million in our joint ventures and $32.1 million in
Ameriton joint ventures. At December 31, 2004, the investment balance consisted of $74.1 million
in our joint ventures and $37.4 million in Ameriton joint ventures.
Combined summary balance sheet data for our investments in unconsolidated entities presented
on a stand-alone basis follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
1,118,018 |
|
|
$ |
1,115,563 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
189,962 |
|
|
|
52,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,307,980 |
|
|
$ |
1,167,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and owners equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inter-company debt payable to the Operating Trust |
|
$ |
3,125 |
|
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
Mortgages payable(1) |
|
|
903,774 |
|
|
|
777,924 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
30,971 |
|
|
|
24,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
937,870 |
|
|
|
806,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owners equity |
|
|
370,110 |
|
|
|
361,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and owners equity |
|
$ |
1,307,980 |
|
|
$ |
1,167,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We guarantee $190.5 million of the outstanding debt balance as of June 30, 2005 and
are committed to guarantee another $93.5 million upon funding of additional debt. |
Selected combined summary results of operations for our unconsolidated investees presented on
a stand-alone basis follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Operating Trust Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
32,863 |
|
|
$ |
35,424 |
|
|
$ |
66,152 |
|
|
$ |
70,836 |
|
Net Earnings(1) |
|
|
11,244 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
26,732 |
|
|
|
10,098 |
|
Ameriton Joint Ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
1,174 |
|
|
$ |
1,697 |
|
|
$ |
2,263 |
|
|
$ |
3,320 |
|
Net Earnings(2) |
|
|
4,816 |
|
|
|
7,417 |
|
|
|
11,934 |
|
|
|
7,160 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
34,037 |
|
|
$ |
37,121 |
|
|
$ |
68,415 |
|
|
$ |
74,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
$ |
16,060 |
|
|
$ |
8,333 |
|
|
$ |
38,666 |
|
|
$ |
17,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes gains associated with the disposition of our Joint Ventures of $4.6 million
during the three months ended June 30, 2005, none for the same period ended 2004, and $22.0
million and $8.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Ameritons share of pre-tax gains associated with the disposition of real
estate joint ventures. These gains aggregated $5.0 million and $3.8 million during the
three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and $12.9 million and $7.0 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
13
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(5) Mezzanine Notes Receivable
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we entered into six mezzanine note agreements as a
lender to third parties to fund certain real estate projects. As of June 30, 2005 and December 31,
2004, we had a total of $60.9 million and $8.7 million in mezzanine notes receivable, respectively
and a commitment to fund an additional $23.8 million under existing agreements. Our rights to the
underlying collateral in the event of default are subordinate to the primary mortgage lender.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we recognized a total of $2.6 million in interest income
associated with mezzanine notes receivable. There was no comparable interest income for the same
period in 2004.
(6) Borrowings
Unsecured Credit Facilities
The following table summarizes our revolving credit facility borrowings under our line of
credit (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
As of and for the |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Total unsecured revolving credit facility |
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
Borrowings outstanding at end of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
Outstanding letters of credit under this facility |
|
|
5,329 |
|
|
|
13,983 |
|
Weighted average daily borrowings |
|
|
63,486 |
|
|
|
81,317 |
|
Maximum borrowings outstanding during the period. |
|
|
141,000 |
|
|
|
375,000 |
|
Weighted average daily nominal interest rate |
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
1.58 |
% |
Weighted average daily effective interest rate |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
2.62 |
% |
We also have a short-term unsecured borrowing agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, which
provides for maximum borrowings of $100 million. The borrowings under the agreement bear interest
at an overnight rate agreed to at the time of borrowing and ranged from 2.75% to 3.60% during 2005.
There were no borrowings outstanding under the agreement at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
Long-Term Unsecured Debt
A summary of our Long-Term Unsecured Debt outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004
follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Coupon |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
Remaining |
|
Type of Debt |
|
Rate (1) |
|
|
Rate (2) |
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Life (Years) |
|
Long-term unsecured senior notes |
|
|
6.08 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
$ |
2,300,707 |
|
|
$ |
2,019,607 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Unsecured tax-exempt bonds |
|
|
2.88 |
% |
|
|
3.14 |
% |
|
|
78,502 |
|
|
|
79,525 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total/average |
|
|
5.97 |
% |
|
|
6.15 |
% |
|
$ |
2,379,209 |
|
|
$ |
2,099,132 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents a fixed rate for the long-term unsecured notes and a variable rate for the
unsecured tax-exempt bonds. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the effect of fair value hedges, loan cost amortization and other ongoing fees and
expenses, where applicable. |
14
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
During May 2005, the Operating Trust issued $300 million in long-term unsecured ten-year
senior notes with a coupon rate of 5.25% and an effective interest rate of 5.4% from its shelf
registration statement.
Mortgages payable
Our mortgages payable generally feature either monthly interest and principal payments or
monthly interest-only payments with balloon payments due at maturity. A summary of mortgages
payable follows (dollar amounts in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding Balance at (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
Rate (2) |
|
Secured floating rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt debt |
|
$ |
495,381 |
|
|
$ |
508,923 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Construction loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,868 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Conventional mortgages |
|
|
21,705 |
|
|
|
21,705 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Floating |
|
|
517,086 |
|
|
|
571,496 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
% |
Secured fixed rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional mortgages |
|
|
1,223,510 |
|
|
|
1,439,558 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
Other secured debt |
|
|
19,925 |
|
|
|
20,451 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed |
|
|
1,243,435 |
|
|
|
1,460,009 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt outstanding at end of period |
|
$ |
1,760,521 |
|
|
$ |
2,031,505 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes the unamortized fair market value adjustment recorded in connection with the Smith
Merger of $41.1 million and $48.4 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively. This amount is being amortized into interest expense over the life of the
underlying debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes the effect of fair value hedges, credit enhancement fees, the amortization of fair
market value purchase adjustment, and other related costs, where applicable. |
The change in mortgages payable during the six months ended June 30, 2005 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
|
$ |
2,031,505 |
|
Regularly scheduled principal amortization |
|
|
(5,321 |
) |
Prepayments, final maturities and other(1) |
|
|
(266,318 |
) |
Proceeds from mortgage notes payable |
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
1,760,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We incurred $23.2 million of debt extinguishment costs in connection with these mortgage prepayments. |
15
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Other
The book value of total assets pledged as collateral for mortgage loans and other obligations
at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 is $3.4 billion and $3.8 billion, respectively. Our debt
instruments generally contain covenants common to the type of facility or borrowing, including
financial covenants establishing minimum debt service coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios.
We were in compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our debt instruments during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005.
The
total interest paid on all outstanding debt was $35.5 million and $40.5 million for three
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 and $120.1 million and $114.3 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. We capitalize interest incurred during the construction
period as part of the cost of apartment communities under development. Interest capitalized was
$9.3 million and $5.4 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively and $17.5 million and $11.3 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(7) Distributions to Unitholders
The following table summarizes the quarterly cash distributions paid per unit on Common and
Preferred Units during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and the annualized distribution we
expect to pay for 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly |
|
|
Annualized |
|
|
|
Cash Distributions |
|
|
Cash Distributions |
|
|
|
Per Unit |
|
|
Per Unit |
|
Common Units and A-1 Units |
|
$ |
0.4325 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
Series E Preferred Units (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1977 |
|
Series G Preferred Units (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3714 |
|
Series I Perpetual Preferred Units (3) |
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
7,660 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
200,000 Series E Preferred Units were redeemed in February 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
600,000 Series G Preferred Units were redeemed in March 2005. |
|
(3) |
|
Series I Preferred Units have a par value of $100,000 per unit. |
(8) Segment Data
We have determined that each of our garden communities and each of our high-rise properties
have similar economic characteristics and also meet the other GAAP criteria, which permit the
garden communities and high-rise properties to be aggregated into two reportable segments.
Additionally, we have defined the activity from Ameriton as an individual operating segment as its
primary focus is the opportunistic acquisition, development and eventual disposition of real estate
with a short-term investment horizon. NOI is defined as rental revenues less rental expenses and
real estate taxes. We rely on NOI for purposes of making decisions about resource allocations and
assessing segment performance. We also believe NOI is a valuable means of comparing year-to-year
property performance.
16
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Following are reconciliations, which exclude the amounts classified as discontinued
operations, of each reportable segments (i) revenues to consolidated revenues; (ii) NOI to
consolidated earnings from operations; and (iii) assets to consolidated assets, for the periods
indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Reportable apartment communities segment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
115,394 |
|
|
$ |
112,118 |
|
|
$ |
227,969 |
|
|
$ |
222,330 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
76,711 |
|
|
|
74,577 |
|
|
|
144,673 |
|
|
|
140,275 |
|
Non Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
17,008 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
|
|
32,532 |
|
|
|
11,040 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
10,236 |
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
28,069 |
|
|
|
8,463 |
|
Ameriton(1) |
|
|
6,169 |
|
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
11,622 |
|
|
|
5,882 |
|
Other non-reportable operating segment revenues |
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment and consolidated rental revenues |
|
$ |
226,375 |
|
|
$ |
198,911 |
|
|
$ |
446,291 |
|
|
$ |
389,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Reportable apartment communities segment NOI: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
76,828 |
|
|
$ |
74,868 |
|
|
$ |
150,534 |
|
|
$ |
147,699 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
49,319 |
|
|
|
48,434 |
|
|
|
90,477 |
|
|
|
90,336 |
|
Non Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
11,126 |
|
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
20,776 |
|
|
|
6,402 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
5,813 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
17,072 |
|
|
|
5,531 |
|
Ameriton(1) |
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
5,648 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
Other non-reportable operating segment NOI |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment NOI |
|
|
147,031 |
|
|
|
130,129 |
|
|
|
285,750 |
|
|
|
254,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
11,975 |
|
|
|
8,906 |
|
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(54,832 |
) |
|
|
(47,419 |
) |
|
|
(108,609 |
) |
|
|
(91,979 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(46,330 |
) |
|
|
(37,724 |
) |
|
|
(93,826 |
) |
|
|
(74,265 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(13,755 |
) |
|
|
(12,092 |
) |
|
|
(28,044 |
) |
|
|
(24,525 |
) |
Other expenses |
|
|
(7,390 |
) |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
(28,472 |
) |
|
|
(2,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated earnings from operations |
|
$ |
31,572 |
|
|
$ |
37,203 |
|
|
$ |
38,774 |
|
|
$ |
70,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
While rental revenue and NOI are the primary measures we use to evaluate the
performance of our assets, management also utilizes gains from the disposition of real
estate when evaluating the performance of Ameriton as its primary focus is the
opportunistic acquisition, development and eventual disposition of real estate with a short
term investment horizon. During the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, pre-tax gains
from the disposition of Ameriton real estate were $20.7 million and $5.4 million,
respectively. Additionally, Ameriton had gains of $12.9 million and $7.0 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively from the sale of unconsolidated
joint venture assets. These gains are classified within income from unconsolidated
entities. Ameriton assets are excluded from our Same-Store population as they are acquired
or developed to achieve short-term opportunistic gains, and therefore, the average holding
period is typically much shorter than the holding period of assets operated by the REIT. |
17
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Reportable operating communities segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
3,123,171 |
|
|
$ |
3,186,395 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
2,516,184 |
|
|
|
2,534,774 |
|
Non Same-Store: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
1,150,619 |
|
|
|
1,053,259 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
833,547 |
|
|
|
869,379 |
|
Ameriton |
|
|
403,038 |
|
|
|
483,712 |
|
Other non-reportable operating segment assets |
|
|
76,268 |
|
|
|
69,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
8,102,827 |
|
|
|
8,197,461 |
|
Real estate held for sale, net |
|
|
328,704 |
|
|
|
260,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
8,431,531 |
|
|
|
8,457,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciling items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment in and advances to unconsolidated
entities |
|
|
124,598 |
|
|
|
111,481 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
12,765 |
|
|
|
203,255 |
|
Restricted cash in tax-deferred exchange escrow |
|
|
124,041 |
|
|
|
120,095 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
254,391 |
|
|
|
173,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
$ |
8,947,326 |
|
|
$ |
9,066,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures for garden communities included in continuing operations were $15.9
million and $12.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Total
capital expenditures for high-rise properties included in continuing operations were $24.3 million
and $12.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Total capital
expenditures for Ameriton properties included in continuing operations were $0.5 million and $1.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
(9) Litigation and Contingencies
During 2004, we incurred estimated losses associated with multiple hurricanes in Florida. As
a result of this damage, we recorded a loss contingency for both wholly owned and unconsolidated
apartment communities. During the first quarter of 2005, we increased the reserve for our
unconsolidated apartment communities by $0.7 million. Based on currently available information
from our insurance adjustors during the second quarter of 2005, we accrued an estimated insurance
recovery of $2.5 million, $1.3 million of which related to our unconsolidated apartment
communities.
During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement in the United
States District Court for the District of Maryland with three national disability organizations and
agreed to make capital improvements in a number of our communities in order to make them fully
compliant with the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The
litigation, settled by this agreement, alleged lack of full compliance with certain design and
construction requirements under the two federal statutes at 71 of the companys communities. As
part of the settlement, the three disability organizations all recognized that we had no intention
to build any of our communities in a manner inconsistent with the FHA or ADA.
The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the communities named in the
settlement is not quantifiable at the present time. These expenditures will generally be
capitalized as they are incurred. The settlement agreement approved by the court allows us to
remediate the designated communities over the next three years, and also provides that we are not
restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation period. We agreed to pay
damages totaling $1.4 million, which include legal fees and costs incurred by the plaintiffs. In
addition to the settlement, we incurred $1.0 million for legal and consulting fees during the first
six months of 2005 related to this lawsuit and have accrued an estimate of $1.6 million for legal,
consulting and other expenses, most of which are expected to be incurred during the remainder of
2005.
We are a party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or
results of operations.
18
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
(10) Derivatives and Hedging Activities
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and will occasionally utilize interest
rate swaps and interest rate caps as hedges with the objective of lowering our overall borrowing
costs. These derivatives are designated as either cash flow or fair value hedges. We do not use
these derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes. Further, as a matter of policy, we
only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based upon their credit ratings and
other factors. When viewed in conjunction with the underlying and offsetting exposure that the
derivatives are designed to hedge, we have not, nor do we expect to sustain a material loss from
the use of these hedging instruments.
We formally assess, both at inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether each
derivative is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged
item. We measure hedge effectiveness by comparing the changes in the fair value or cash flows of
the derivative instrument with the changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item. We
assess effectiveness of purchased interest rate caps based on overall changes in the fair value of
the caps. If a derivative ceases to be a highly effective hedge, we discontinue hedge accounting
prospectively.
To determine the fair values of derivative and other financial instruments, we use a variety
of methods and assumptions that are based on market value conditions and risks existing at each
balance sheet date. These methods and assumptions include standard market conventions and
techniques such as discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models, replacement cost and
termination cost. All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value,
and therefore, are not necessarily indicative of the actual amounts that we could realize upon
disposition.
During June 2005, we entered into two forward-starting swap transactions to mitigate the risk
of changes in the interest-related cash outflows on a forecasted issuance of long-term unsecured
debt. At inception, these swap transactions had an aggregate notional amount of $143.0 million and
a fair value of zero. The long-term unsecured debt these swap transactions related to was issued
in July 2005 (see Note 11). At the time of the debt issuance, the fair value of the cash flow
hedge was a benefit of approximately $587,000. The benefit associated with these cash flow hedges
will be included in comprehensive income and amortized over the term of the underlying debt as a
reduction to interest expense.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 we recorded an increase/(decrease) to
interest expense of $(36,000) and $72,000, respectively, for hedge ineffectiveness caused by a
difference between the interest rate index on a portion of our outstanding variable rate debt and
the underlying index of the associated interest rate swap. We pursue hedging strategies that we
expect will result in the lowest overall borrowing costs under the accounting standards.
(11) Subsequent Events
During July 2005, we issued $200 million in long-term unsecured ten-year senior notes with a
coupon rate of 5.25% and an effective interest rate of 5.26% from its shelf registration statement.
The notes were issued under a re-opening of the long-term unsecured ten-year senior notes issued
in May 2005.
During July 2005, we redeemed $200 million of long-term unsecured ten-year senior notes with a
coupon rate of 8.2% and an effective interest rate of 8.4%.
On July 29, 2005, we closed the first round of apartment community acquisitions from various
partnerships of Oakwood Worldwide, comprising 25 communities, 8,228 units, and a total expected
investment of $1.1 billion. We funded this initial tranche of the acquisition with a combination
of operating partnership units, assumed mortgage debt and cash. Operating partnership units
represented $319 million, or 8.9 million units, of the total. In addition, we assumed $372 million
of mortgage debt, which has an all-in rate of approximately 5.1%. The cash component of the
transaction was $438 million, with $195 million used to pay off of existing Oakwood mortgage debt.
In total, we expect to acquire 36 communities from Oakwood; with the remaining communities,
representing 4,548 units and a total expected investment of $412.0 million, anticipated to close
later this year or during 2006.
19
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Trustees and Unitholders
Archstone-Smith Operating Trust:
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Archstone-Smith
Operating Trust and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005, and the related condensed consolidated
statements of earnings for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, the
condensed consolidated statement of unitholders equity, other common unitholders interest and
comprehensive income/(loss) for the six-month period ended June 30, 2005 and the condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004. These
condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of Archstone-Smith Operating
Trusts management.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of
applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of
which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to
the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Archstone-Smith Operating Trust
as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, unitholders equity,
other common unitholders interest and comprehensive income/(loss), and cash flows for the year
then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated February 28, 2005, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set
forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004 is fairly
stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has
been derived.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Denver, Colorado
August 5, 2005
20
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with Archstone-Smith Operating Trusts
2004 Form 10-K as well as the financial statements and notes included in Item 1 of this report.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking
statements as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations, beliefs, assumptions,
estimates and projections about the industry and markets in which we operate. Words such as
expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, seeks, estimates and variations of
such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
Information concerning expected investment balances, expected funding sources, planned investments,
forecasted dates and revenue and expense growth assumptions are examples of forward-looking
statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our
control. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed,
forecasted or implied in such forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update
publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
Our operating results depend primarily on income from apartment communities, which is
substantially influenced by supply and demand for apartment units, operating expense levels,
property level operations and the pace and price at which we can develop, acquire or dispose of
apartment communities. Capital and credit market conditions, which affect our cost of capital,
also influence operating results. See the Archstone-Smith Operating Trusts 2004 Form 10-K Item
1. Business for a more complete discussion of risk factors that could impact our future financial
performance.
The Company
We are engaged primarily in the operation, development, redevelopment, acquisition, management
and long-term ownership of apartment communities throughout the United States. The company is
structured as an UPREIT, with all property ownership and business operations conducted through the
Operating Trust and its subsidiaries and affiliates. Archstone-Smith is our sole trustee and owns
89.2% of our common units as of June 30, 2005
Results of Operations
Executive Summary
We produced diluted net earnings per unit of $0.27 for the quarter ending June 30, 2005,
compared with $0.39 per unit for the same period in 2004. Our earnings this quarter were lower
than one year ago principally due to lower profits from the sale of assets.
Most markets continue to improve, with year over year Same-Store revenue growth accelerating
in each of the last five quarters. Our Same-Store revenues increased 2.9% in the second quarter of
2005. The New York City metropolitan area, Southeast Florida, Southern California and the
Washington, D.C. metropolitan area produced second quarter same-store revenue growth of 6.9%, 4.5%,
3.0% and 2.9%, respectively. Additionally, our Same-Store net operating income (rental revenues
less rental expenses and real estate taxes) was up 2.2% in the second quarter.
Year-to-date through July 26, 2005, the Operating Trust acquired $250 million in apartment
communities, including Archstone Fox Plaza, a 444-unit high-rise in downtown San Francisco. In
addition, we began our first development in Manhattan, a joint venture: The Mosaic, a 627-unit
community in the very desirable Clinton neighborhood. As of July 26, 2005, we have 5,393 units,
representing a total expected investment of $1.6 billion, under construction, including Ameriton
and joint ventures, in markets that include midtown Manhattan, downtown Boston, downtown
Washington, D.C. and coastal Southern California. As of July 26, 2005, our current pipeline totals
$2.5 billion, including Ameriton and joint venture communities under construction and in planning.
21
Earlier this year, we announced that we would acquire a $1.6 billion portfolio of apartment
communities from various partnerships of Oakwood Worldwide. We closed on 25 communities in the
portfolio, representing a total expected investment of $1.1 billion, on July 29, 2005, with the
remaining communities expected to close later this year or in 2006. This acquisition is consistent
with our objective to improve the quality of our portfolio with every investment we make. We
funded this initial tranche of the acquisition with a combination of operating partnership units,
assumed mortgage debt and cash. Operating partnership units represented $319 million, or 8.9
million units, of the total. In addition, we assumed $372 million of mortgage debt, which has an
all-in rate of approximately 5.1%. The cash component of the transaction was $438 million, with
$195 million used to pay off of existing Oakwood mortgage debt.
We completed a $300 million unsecured debt offering in May, which was recently re-opened
during July and increased by $200 million to a total of $500 million. The notes mature in May
2015, and have an all-in cost of approximately 5.3%. Proceeds from the offerings provide a portion
of the financial capacity to close the Oakwood acquisition.
Our second quarter 2005 results include the following items: (i) operating community sales
gains from Ameriton, the companys wholly owned subsidiary, which contributed $7.7 million, or
$0.034 per unit, to second quarter net earnings attributable to common units; (ii) a positive
adjustment of $2.4 million, or $0.011 per unit, to the gain from the sale of our interest in
Rent.com to eBay, which closed in February 2005; (iii) a $1.8 million realized gain, or $0.008 per
unit, from the sale of previously acquired stock in another real estate company; and (iv) accrued
insurance recoveries of $2.5 million, or $0.011 per unit, associated with hurricane damage in 2004.
In addition, we incurred total expenses of $4.5 million, or $0.020 per unit, related to the
settlement of the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit and other
litigation costs. We believe that a substantial portion of these costs will be recovered from our
insurance carriers, although the amount is not quantifiable at this time.
We will pay a distribution of $0.4325 per common unit payable on August 31, 2005 to
unitholders of record as of August 17, 2005. On an annualized basis, this represents a distribution
of $1.73 per common unit.
In conjunction with our capital recycling strategy, rental revenues and rental expenses,
including real estate taxes, will fluctuate based upon the timing and volume of dispositions,
acquisitions and development lease-ups. Accordingly, our results are not only driven by the
performance of our operating portfolio, but also by gains/losses from the disposition of real
estate, the corresponding loss of ongoing income from assets sold, and increased income generated
from acquisitions and new developments. These factors all contribute to the overall financial
performance of the company.
Quarter-to-Date Earnings Analysis
Basic net earnings attributable to Common Units decreased $25.3 million, or 29.1%, for the
three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. This decrease is
primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
A $10.7 million decrease in gains from the sale of operating communities, which
includes gains from the sale of assets by Ameriton for the three months ended June 30,
2005 as compared to the same period in 2004; |
|
|
|
|
A $4.5 million charge related to the settlement of the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit and other litigation costs; |
|
|
|
|
A $3.3 million gain from the disposition of our property management business during
the three months ended June 30, 2004; |
|
|
|
|
The recognition of $7.4 million related to the sale of Consolidated Engineering
Services (CES), including contingent proceeds associated with the expiration of
certain indemnifications and collection and recognition of the settlement of an ongoing
CES lawsuit during the three months ended June 30, 2004; |
|
|
|
|
A $2.3 million decrease in gains related to the sale of marketable equity
securities; and, |
|
|
|
|
The loss of rental revenues and a corresponding decrease in operating expenses due
to $435.3 million and $1.5 billion in total REIT and Ameriton dispositions in the first
six months of 2005 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, respectively. |
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
The accrual of $2.5 million for anticipated insurance recoveries during the three
months ended June 30, 2005 related to 2004 hurricane damage in South Florida; |
22
|
|
|
A $1.7 million gain on the sale of land for the three months ended June 30, 2005; |
|
|
|
|
Increased revenues partially offset by a corresponding increase in operating
expenses associated with $286.3 million and $1.1 billion in REIT and Ameriton operating
asset acquisitions in the first six months of 2005 and the twelve months ended December
31, 2004, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
Increased income from the continued lease-up of new development projects; |
|
|
|
|
A 2.2% increase in Same-Store NOI during the second quarter of 2005 as compared to 2004; and, |
|
|
|
|
A $2.2 million reduction in Preferred Unit distributions due to the redemption of
Series D Preferred Units in August 2004, the conversion of Series K Preferred Units in
September 2004 and the early conversion of Series L Preferred Units in December 2004.
These conversions and the redemption also eliminated the impact of the related
Preferred Unit distributions on our fixed charge coverage ratio. |
Year-to-Date Earnings Analysis
Basic net earnings attributable to Common Units decreased $62.6 million, or 31.9%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. This decrease is primarily
attributable to:
|
|
|
A $33.2 million decrease in gains from the sale of operating communities, which
includes gains from the sale of assets by Ameriton for the six months ended June 30,
2005 as compared to the same period in 2004; |
|
|
|
|
A $23.2 million expense for early extinguishment of debt related to the payoff of
$221.9 million of mortgages during the six months ended June 30, 2005, $5.4 million of
which related to asset dispositions. The elimination of these mortgages will reduce
future interest expense; |
|
|
|
|
A $6.5 million charge related to the settlement of the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit and other litigation costs; |
|
|
|
|
A $3.3 million gain from the disposition of our property management business during
the six months ended June 30, 2004; |
|
|
|
|
The recognition of $8.0 million related to the sale of Consolidated Engineering
Services (CES) including contingent proceeds associated with the expiration of
certain indemnifications and collection and recognition of the settlement of an ongoing
CES lawsuit during the six months ended June 30, 2004; and, |
|
|
|
|
The loss of rental revenues and a corresponding decrease in rental expenses due to
$435.3 million and $1.5 billion in total REIT and Ameriton dispositions in the first
six months of 2005 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2004, respectively. |
These decreases were partially offset by:
|
|
|
The accrual of $2.5 million for anticipated insurance recoveries during the six
months ended June 30, 2005 related to 2004 hurricane damage in South Florida; |
|
|
|
|
A $3.1 million gain on the sale of land for the six months ended June 30, 2005; |
|
|
|
|
Increased revenues partially offset by a corresponding increase in operating
expenses associated with $286.3 million and $1.1 billion in REIT and Ameriton operating
asset acquisitions in the first six months of 2005 and the twelve months ended December
31, 2004, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
Increased income from the continued lease-up of new development projects; |
|
|
|
|
A 1.2% increase in Same-Store NOI during the six months ended June 30, 2005 as
compared to 2004; |
|
|
|
|
A $4.3 million increase in income from unconsolidated entities due to higher gains
on the disposition of joint venture properties during the six months ended June 30,
2005 compared to the same period in 2004; |
|
|
|
|
A $25.9 million gain on the sale of our Rent.com investment to eBay and $2.1 million
gains on the sale of marketable equity securities during the six months ended June 30,
2005, compared to a $17.0 million gain on the sale of marketable equity securities
during the same period in 2004; and, |
|
|
|
|
A $4.4 million reduction in Preferred Unit distribution due to the redemption of
Series D Preferred Units in August 2004, the conversion of Series K Preferred Units in
September 2004 and the early conversion of Series L Preferred Units in December 2004.
These conversions and the redemption also eliminated the impact of the related
Preferred Unit distribution on our fixed charge coverage ratio. |
23
Apartment Community Operations
We utilize NOI as the primary measure to evaluate the performance of our operating
communities. NOI is defined as rental revenues less rental expenses and real estate taxes for each
of our operating properties. We rely on NOI for purposes of making decisions about resource
allocations and assessing segment performance. We also believe NOI is a valuable means of
comparing period-to-period property performance. The following is a reconciliation of NOI to
earnings from operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net operating income |
|
$ |
147,031 |
|
|
$ |
130,129 |
|
|
$ |
285,750 |
|
|
$ |
254,015 |
|
Other income |
|
|
6,848 |
|
|
|
5,209 |
|
|
|
11,975 |
|
|
|
8,906 |
|
Depreciation of real estate investments |
|
|
(54,832 |
) |
|
|
(47,419 |
) |
|
|
(108,609 |
) |
|
|
(91,979 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(46,330 |
) |
|
|
(37,724 |
) |
|
|
(93,826 |
) |
|
|
(74,265 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(13,755 |
) |
|
|
(12,092 |
) |
|
|
(28,044 |
) |
|
|
(24,525 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
(7,390 |
) |
|
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
(28,472 |
) |
|
|
(2,124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
$ |
31,572 |
|
|
$ |
37,203 |
|
|
$ |
38,774 |
|
|
$ |
70,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2005, investments in operating apartment communities comprised over 99% of our
total real estate portfolio, based on NOI. The following table summarizes the performance of our
operating portfolio (in thousands, except for percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Variance |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Variance |
|
Rental revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
$ |
132,402 |
|
|
$ |
118,351 |
|
|
$ |
14,051 |
|
|
$ |
260,501 |
|
|
$ |
233,370 |
|
|
$ |
27,131 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
86,947 |
|
|
|
75,957 |
|
|
|
10,990 |
|
|
|
172,742 |
|
|
|
148,738 |
|
|
|
24,004 |
|
Ameriton |
|
|
6,169 |
|
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
11,622 |
|
|
|
5,882 |
|
|
|
5,740 |
|
Non-multifamily |
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
1,536 |
|
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
226,375 |
|
|
|
198,911 |
|
|
|
27,464 |
|
|
|
446,291 |
|
|
|
389,526 |
|
|
|
56,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses (rental expenses and
real estate taxes): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
44,448 |
|
|
|
40,054 |
|
|
|
(4,394 |
) |
|
|
89,191 |
|
|
|
79,269 |
|
|
|
(9,922 |
) |
High-rise properties |
|
|
31,815 |
|
|
|
26,710 |
|
|
|
(5,105 |
) |
|
|
65,193 |
|
|
|
52,871 |
|
|
|
(12,322 |
) |
Ameriton |
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
(1,060 |
) |
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
(2,819 |
) |
Non-multifamily |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
79,344 |
|
|
|
68,782 |
|
|
|
(10,562 |
) |
|
|
160,541 |
|
|
|
135,511 |
|
|
|
(25,030 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
87,954 |
|
|
|
78,297 |
|
|
|
9,657 |
|
|
|
171,310 |
|
|
|
154,101 |
|
|
|
17,209 |
|
High-rise properties |
|
|
55,132 |
|
|
|
49,247 |
|
|
|
5,885 |
|
|
|
107,549 |
|
|
|
95,867 |
|
|
|
11,682 |
|
Ameriton |
|
|
3,161 |
|
|
|
1,787 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
5,648 |
|
|
|
2,727 |
|
|
|
2,921 |
|
Non-multifamily |
|
|
784 |
|
|
|
798 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
|
1,320 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net operating income |
|
|
147,031 |
|
|
|
130,129 |
|
|
|
16,902 |
|
|
|
285,750 |
|
|
|
254,015 |
|
|
|
31,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI classified as discontinued operations |
|
|
7,012 |
|
|
|
26,131 |
|
|
|
(19,119 |
) |
|
|
15,387 |
|
|
|
52,496 |
|
|
|
(37,109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOI including discontinued operations |
|
$ |
154,043 |
|
|
$ |
156,260 |
|
|
$ |
(2,217 |
) |
|
$ |
301,137 |
|
|
$ |
306,511 |
|
|
$ |
(5,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Margin (NOI/rental revenues): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
66.4 |
% |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
65.8 |
% |
|
|
66.0 |
% |
|
|
(0.2 |
%) |
High-rise properties |
|
|
63.4 |
% |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
|
|
(1.4 |
%) |
|
|
62.3 |
% |
|
|
64.5 |
% |
|
|
(2.2 |
%) |
Average occupancy during period (1): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden communities |
|
|
95.4 |
% |
|
|
94.8 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
94.8 |
% |
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.3 |
%) |
High-rise properties |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.6 |
%) |
|
|
94.4 |
% |
|
|
95.1 |
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include occupancy at Ameriton properties. |
24
The following table reflects revenue, expense and NOI growth/(decline) for Same-Store
communities that were fully operating during each respective comparison period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same-Store |
|
|
Same-Store |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Same-Store |
|
|
|
Growth/(Decline) |
|
|
Growth/(Decline) |
|
|
NOI Growth/(Decline) |
|
Q2 2005 vs. Q2 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
High-Rise |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
Total |
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD 2005 vs. YTD 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garden |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
High-Rise |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
Total |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
Quarter-to-date NOI Analysis
NOI, excluding discontinued operations, increased by $16.9 million, or 13.0%, during the three
months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. Of this increase, $9.7 million
was produced by our garden communities, $5.9 million by our high-rise communities and $1.4 million
by Ameriton.
The $9.7 million increase in garden NOI during the second quarter of 2005 as compared to 2004
was primarily attributable to the acquisition of seven garden communities subsequent to April 1,
2004 for a total of $508.2 million and the ongoing lease-up and stabilization of development
communities, which significantly increased both rental revenues and rental expenses. Additionally,
Same-Store revenue growth increased by 2.9% compared to the prior year primarily due to increased
rental rates and higher occupancy. This increase was partially offset by a 3.7% increase in
Same-Store operating expenses primarily due to higher personnel costs and higher costs resulting
from the rollout of new technologies. These cost increases were partially offset by lower
insurance costs.
The $5.9 million increase in high-rise NOI during the second quarter of 2005 compared to 2004
was primarily attributable to the acquisition of one high-rise property in the New York area and
one in the Washington D.C. metropolitan market subsequent to April 1, 2004 for a total of $183.5
million. Additionally, Same-Store revenues increased by 2.8% compared to prior year primarily due
to increased rental rates, which were partially offset by a slight decrease in occupancy. This
increase was partially offset by a 4.8% increase in Same-Store operating expenses primarily
attributable to higher personnel costs, higher costs resulting from the rollout of new technologies
and property tax reassessments in Chicago and Washington, D.C.
The $1.4 million increase in Ameriton NOI during the second quarter of 2005 as compared to
2004 was primarily attributable to the acquisition of two operating communities subsequent to April
1, 2004 and the ongoing lease-up and stabilization of Ameriton developments.
NOI for our entire portfolio, including properties classified within discontinued operations,
decreased by $2.2 million, or 1.4%, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the
same period in 2004. This net decrease in NOI was attributable to the loss of $19.1 million in NOI
from the disposition of $435.3 million and $1.5 billion in operating assets, including Ameriton,
for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and the twelve months ended December 31 2004, respectively.
This decrease was partially offset by an increase in NOI of $0.2 million from communities
classified as held for sale as of June 30, 2005 and increased NOI from our Same-Store communities
as well as incremental NOI from the acquisitions and lease-ups as described previously.
25
Year-to-date NOI Analysis
NOI, excluding discontinued operations, increased by $31.7 million, or 12.5%, during the six
months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. Of this increase, $17.2 million
was produced by our garden communities, $11.7 million by our high-rise communities and $2.9 million
by Ameriton.
The $17.2 million increase in garden NOI during the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared
to 2004 was primarily attributable to garden acquisitions, including those described in the
quarter-to-date NOI analysis above, and lease-ups and an increase in Same-Store sales revenue of
2.6% resulting primarily from higher rental rates. This increase was partially offset by a 3.9%
increase in Same-Store expense growth, which was driven by increased personnel costs, higher costs
resulting from the roll-out of new technologies and increased utilities associated with the severe
winter in the Northeast. These increases were partially offset by lower insurance costs.
The $11.7 million increase in high-rise NOI during the second quarter of 2005 compared to 2004
was primarily attributable to acquisitions, including those described in the quarter-to-date NOI
analysis above, and an increase in Same-Store sales revenue of 3.1% resulting primarily from higher
rental rates. This increase was partially offset by an 8.4% increase in Same-Store operating
expenses primarily attributable to higher personnel costs, higher costs resulting from the roll-out
of new technologies, property tax reassessments in Chicago and Washington, D.C., increased
utilities associated with the severe winter in the Northeast and the benefit of a $1.0 million
ground lease accrual true-up in the first quarter of 2004.
The $2.9 million increase in Ameriton NOI for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared
to 2004 was primarily attributable to acquisitions, including those described in the
quarter-to-date NOI analysis above, and the ongoing lease-up and stabilization of Ameriton
developments.
NOI for our entire portfolio, including properties classified within discontinued operations,
decreased by $5.4 million, or 1.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same
period in 2004. This net decrease in NOI was attributable to the loss of $37.8 million NOI from
the disposition of $435.3 million and $1.5 billion in operating assets, including Ameriton, for the
six months ended June 30, 2005 and the twelve months ended December 31 2004, respectively;
partially offset by an increase in NOI of $0.7 million from the communities classified as held for
sale as of June 30, 2005 and increased NOI from our Same-Store communities as well as incremental
NOI from the acquisitions and lease-ups as described previously.
Other Income
Other income increased $1.6 million, or 31.5%, and $3.1 million, or 34.5% for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2004. The
increase is due to $1.7 million and $3.1 million of pre-tax gains from the sale of land during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, with no comparable gains during the same
periods in 2004, an increase of $2.7 million and $4.0 million in interest income on notes
receivable and cash balances during the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, and
the accrual of $1.2 million of anticipated insurance recoveries related to 2004 Florida hurricanes
in the second quarter of 2005.
These increases were offset by the benefit of $4.2 million and $4.7 million related to the
sale of CES in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively and a $1.3 million
insurance recovery related to a moisture infiltration claim during the first quarter of 2004.
Depreciation Expense
Depreciation expense increased $7.4 million, or 15.6%, and $16.6 million, or 18.1% for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2004.
This increase is primarily due to community acquisitions and newly completed developments and a
higher average balance of short-lived capital items.
Including depreciation expense on properties classified within discontinued operations,
depreciation expense increased $2.0 million, or 3.7% and $5.2 million, or 4.8% for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2005, respectively as compared to the same periods in 2004. These
increases are principally attributable to the reasons described above partially offset by decreases
associated with communities sold or classified as held for sale. Depreciation is suspended when an
asset is classified as held for sale.
26
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased $8.6 million, or 22.8%, and $19.6 million, or 26.3%, for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same periods in 2004. This increase is
primarily due to a greater number of operating assets classified within discontinued operations
during 2004, resulting in a $9.4 million and $19.2 million higher interest allocated to
discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 as compared to the same
periods in 2005.
Including interest expense on properties classified within discontinued operations, there was
no significant difference in interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as
compared to the same periods in 2004. Notable differences in contributions to interest expense
were additional interest on long-term debt issuances of $300 million in August of 2004 and May of
2005; offset by lower average line of credit and mortgage balances and increased capitalized
interest due to more units under construction during 2005.
General and Administrative Expenses
The $1.7 million, or 13.8%, and $3.5 million, or 14.3% increase in general and administrative
expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004 is
primarily due to higher employee related expenses.
Other Expenses
The $6.5 million increase in other expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as
compared to the same period in 2004 is primarily due to a $4.5 million charge related to the
settlement of the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit and other
litigation costs.
The $26.3 million increase in other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as compared
to the same period in 2004 is primarily due to a $17.9 million expense for early extinguishment of
debt related to the payoff of $136.5 million of mortgages on currently owned properties during the
first six months of 2005. Additionally, we incurred $6.5 million related to the settlement of the
Fair Housing Act (FHA) and American with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit and other litigation costs.
Income from Unconsolidated Entities
Income from unconsolidated entities decreased $1.6 million, or 21.2%, for the three months
ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to the recognition of
$3.2 million of contingent proceeds from the expiration of certain indemnifications related to the
sale of Consolidated Engineering Services (CES) during the three months ended June 30, 2004,
partially offset by the recognition of $1.3 million of insurance recoveries in the three months
ended June 30, 2005 related to Florida hurricane losses sustained in 2004.
Income from unconsolidated entities increased $4.3 million, or 33.9%, for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to increased gains from the
sale of joint venture operating communities, offset by the factors described above for the three
months ended June 30, 2005.
Other Non-Operating Income
Other non-operating income decreased by $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005
as compared to the same period in 2004 primarily due to $4.6 million lower gains recognized on the
sale of marketable equity securities for the three months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the
same period in 2004 and a $3.3 million gain on the sale of our property management business during
the second quarter of 2004, partially offset by the recognition of $2.4 million additional gains
from the sale of our Rent.com investment during the second quarter of 2005.
Other non-operating income increased by $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 as
compared to the same period in 2004 primarily due to a $25.9 million gain from the sale of our
Rent.com investment to eBay in 2005, partially offset by a $14.9 million higher gains on the sale
of marketable equity securities and the recognition of a $3.3 million gain on the sale of our
property management business in 2004.
27
Preferred Unit Distributions
Preferred Unit distributions decreased by $3.5 million and $6.3 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005, respectively as compared to the same periods in 2004. This decrease
was primarily due to the redemption of our Series D Preferred Units in August 2004, the conversion
of Series K Preferred Units into Common Units in September 2004 and the early conversion of Series
L Preferred Units into Common Units in December 2004. The decrease in Preferred Unit distributions
due to conversions is offset by an increase in Common Unit distributions.
Discontinued Operations
The results of operations for properties sold during the period or designated as held-for-sale
at the end of the period are required to be classified as discontinued operations. The
property-specific components of net earnings that are classified as discontinued operations include
rental revenues, rental expenses, real estate taxes, depreciation expense, estimated income taxes
(for Ameriton properties), debt extinguishment expense and interest expense (actual interest
expense for encumbered properties and a pro-rata allocation of interest expense for any
unencumbered property up to our weighted average leverage ratio), as well as the net gain or loss
on the disposition of properties.
Consistent with our capital recycling program, we have ten operating apartment communities,
representing 3,868 units (unaudited), classified as held for sale under the provisions of SFAS No.
144, at June 30, 2005. Accordingly, we have classified the operating earnings from these ten
properties within discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and
2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we sold nine Operating Trust and Ameriton
operating communities. The operating results of these nine communities and the related gain/loss
on sale are also included in discontinued operations for 2005 and 2004. During the twelve months
ended December 31, 2004, we sold 30 Operating Trust and Ameriton operating communities. The
operating results of these 30 communities and the related gain/loss on the sale are also included
in discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004.
The following is a summary of net earnings from discontinued operations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Rental revenues |
|
$ |
12,322 |
|
|
$ |
47,506 |
|
|
$ |
27,261 |
|
|
$ |
95,786 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
(4,046 |
) |
|
|
(15,454 |
) |
|
|
(9,351 |
) |
|
|
(31,256 |
) |
Real estate taxes |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
|
|
(5,921 |
) |
|
|
(2,523 |
) |
|
|
(12,034 |
) |
Depreciation on real estate investments |
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
(7,119 |
) |
|
|
(4,896 |
) |
|
|
(16,330 |
) |
Interest expense (1) |
|
|
(3,681 |
) |
|
|
(13,057 |
) |
|
|
(7,536 |
) |
|
|
(26,688 |
) |
Estimated income taxes (Ameriton properties) |
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(6,120 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
Debt extinguishment costs related to dispositions |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
(5,389 |
) |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
Gains on disposition of taxable REIT subsidiary real estate
investments, net |
|
|
6,937 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
20,703 |
|
|
|
14,513 |
|
Gains on dispositions of REIT real estate investments, net |
|
|
13,405 |
|
|
|
29,169 |
|
|
|
39,559 |
|
|
|
78,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from discontinued apartment communities |
|
$ |
20,190 |
|
|
$ |
36,563 |
|
|
$ |
51,708 |
|
|
$ |
101,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The portion of interest expense included in discontinued operations that is allocated to
properties based on the companys leverage ratio was $3.3 million and $9.5 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, and $6.0 million and $19.4 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
Assets held for sale as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, represented gross real estate
of $400.8 million and $378.4 million with $17.6 million and $17.8 million related mortgages payable
at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Additionally, of our investment in real
estate at December 31, 2004, we disposed of $435.3 million of real estate and paid off related
mortgages of $85.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005.
28
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are committed to maintaining a strong balance sheet and preserving our financial
flexibility, which we believe enhances our ability to capitalize on attractive investment
opportunities as they become available. As a result of the significant cash flow generated by our
operations, current cash positions, the available capacity under our unsecured credit facilities,
the ability to produce cash gains from the disposition of real estate and ready access to the
capital markets by issuing securities under our existing shelf registrations, we believe our
liquidity and financial condition are sufficient to meet all of our reasonably anticipated cash
flow needs during 2005.
Operating Activities
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased $25.6 million, or 16.1%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004. This decrease was primarily due
to a decrease in net operating income associated with $435.3 million and $1.5 billion in
dispositions in the six months ended June 30, 2005 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2004,
respectively. See Results of Operations for a more complete discussion of the factors impacting
our operating performance.
Investing and Financing Activities
Net cash flows from investing activities decreased by $11.3 million, or 31.9%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to $134.5 million
more invested in acquisitions and developments, lower proceeds from the sale of marketable equity
securities during the first six months of 2005 as compared to 2004, the use of $26.9 million of
restricted funds for construction, and the use of $50.6 million to fund mezzanine and other loans
extended to third parties during the first six months of 2005. The decreases are partially offset
by $244.5 million more cash received from disposition activity in the first six months of 2005 as
compared to the same period in 2004. The disposition, acquisition and development amounts above
exclude transactions funded by tax-deferred exchange proceeds.
Net cash flows from financing activities decreased by $156.2 million, or 128.5%, for the six
months ended June 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004, due to $207.0 million used to
repay mortgage debt and $225.8 million used to pay down the line of credit during the six months
ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. Additionally, $19.5 million was used
during 2005 to repurchase Series E and G perpetual preferred units and we had $31.3 million fewer
proceeds from new mortgages during 2005 as compared to 2004. These decreases were partially offset
by the net proceeds from $300 million of long-term debt issued in May of 2005 and $28.9 million
less used to repurchase common and preferred units and $21.7 million less in long-term unsecured
debt payments during the first six months of 2005 as compared to 2004.
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2004 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
Issued $41.7 and $10.8 million of A-1 Common Units as partial consideration for
acquired properties during the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively; |
|
|
|
|
Issued $4.5 million of Common Units as partial consideration for real estate during
the first quarter of 2004; |
|
|
|
|
Redeemed $3.1 million and $34.1 million A-1 Common Units for A-2 Common Units during
the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively; and, |
|
|
|
|
Assumed mortgage debt of $74.9 million during the first quarter of 2004. |
Scheduled Debt Maturities and Interest Payment Requirements
We have structured the repayments of our long-term debt to create a relatively level principal
maturity schedule and to avoid significant repayment obligations in any year which would impact our
financial flexibility. We have $242.4 million in scheduled maturities during 2005, and $284.7
million and $540.4 million of long-term debt maturing during 2006 and 2007, respectively.
At August 1, 2005, we had $242.4 million of liquidity, including cash, restricted cash in
tax-deferred escrows and capacity on our unsecured credit facilities. Our unsecured credit
facilities, Long-Term Unsecured Debt and mortgages payable had effective average interest rates of
3.14%, 6.15% and 5.25%, respectively, during the six months ended June 30, 2005. These rates give
effect to the impact of interest rate swaps and caps, as applicable.
29
We were in compliance with all financial covenants pertaining to our debt instruments during
the period ended June 30, 2005.
Unitholder Distribution Requirements
Based on anticipated distribution levels for 2005 and the number of units outstanding as of
June 30, 2005, we anticipate that we will pay distributions of $390.5 million in the aggregate
during the year ended December 31, 2005, which includes $0.3 million of distributions for the
Series E Preferred Units and Series G Preferred Units that were redeemed during the first quarter
of 2005. This amount represents distributions on our Common Units and all of our Preferred Units.
Planned Investments
Following is a summary of planned investments as of June 30, 2005, including amounts for
Ameriton (dollar amounts in thousands). The amounts labeled Discretionary represent future
investments that we plan to make, although there is not a contractual commitment to do so. The
amounts labeled Committed represent the approximate amount that we are contractually committed to
fund for communities under construction in accordance with construction contracts with general
contractors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Planned Investments |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Discretionary |
|
|
Committed |
|
Communities under redevelopment |
|
|
634 |
|
|
$ |
3,851 |
|
|
$ |
22,128 |
|
Communities under construction |
|
|
4,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540,877 |
|
Communities In Planning and owned |
|
|
3,646 |
|
|
|
548,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Communities In Planning and Under Control |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
25,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
Community acquisitions under contract |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
327,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
10,058 |
|
|
$ |
904,137 |
|
|
$ |
563,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the planned investments noted above, we expect to make additional investments
relating to planned expenditures on recently acquired communities as well as recurring expenditures
to improve and maintain our established operating communities.
We anticipate completion of most of the communities that are currently under construction and
the planned operating community improvements by the end of 2007. No assurances can be given that communities we do not currently own will be acquired or
that planned developments will actually occur. In addition, actual costs incurred could be greater
or less than our current estimates.
On July 29, 2005, we closed the first round of apartment community acquisitions from various
partnerships of Oakwood Worldwide, comprising 25 communities, 8,228 units, and a total expected
investment of $1.1 billion. We funded this initial tranche of the acquisition with a combination
of operating partnership units, assumed mortgage debt and cash. Operating partnership units
represented $319 million, or 8.9 million units, of the total. In addition, we assumed $372 million
of mortgage debt, which has an all-in rate of approximately 5.1%. The cash component of the
transaction was $438 million, with $195 million used to pay off of existing Oakwood mortgage debt.
In total, we expect to acquire 36 communities from Oakwood; with the remaining communities,
representing 4,548 units and a total expected investment of $412.0 million, anticipated to close
later this year or during 2006.
Funding Sources
We anticipate that net cash flow from operating activities and gains on dispositions during
2005 will be sufficient to fund anticipated distribution requirements and debt principal
amortization payments. To fund planned investment activities, we had $178.9 million in available
capacity on our unsecured credit facilities and $63.5 million in cash in tax-deferred exchange
escrow at August 1, 2005.
In April 2005, the Operating Trust filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 to
register an additional $300 million (for a total of $1 billion) in unsecured debt securities. This
registration statement was declared effective in May 2005; subsequently, $300 million of long-term
debt was issued during May of 2005 and $200 million of long-term debt was issued during July of
2005. In April 2005, we filed a registration statement on Form S-3 registering 1,120,806 Common
Units to be issued upon redemption of certain A-1 Common Units. This registration statement
30
was declared effective in May 2005. The Operating Trust has $1.0 billion available in shelf
registration debt and equity securities.
Other Contingencies and Hedging Activities
During 2004, we incurred losses associated with multiple hurricanes in Florida. As a result
of this damage, in 2004, we recorded estimated losses of $4.8 million for both wholly owned and our
share of unconsolidated apartment communities. During the first quarter of 2005, we increased our
share of the reserve for our unconsolidated apartment communities by $0.7 million. Based on
currently available information from our insurance adjustors during the second quarter of 2005, we
accrued an estimated insurance recovery of $2.5 million, $1.3 million of which related
to our share of unconsolidated apartment communities.
During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement of litigation
with three national disability organizations and agreed to make capital improvements in a number of
our communities in order to make them fully compliant with the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA). The litigation, settled by this agreement, alleged lack of full
compliance with certain design and construction requirements under the two federal statutes at 71
of the companys communities. As part of the settlement, the three disability organizations all
recognized that we had no intention to build any of our communities in a manner inconsistent with
the FHA or ADA. We agreed to pay damages totaling $1.4 million, which include legal fees and costs
incurred by the plaintiffs. In addition to the settlement, we incurred $1.0 million for legal and
consulting fees during the first six months of 2005 related to this lawsuit and have accrued an
estimate of $1.6 million for legal, consulting and other expenses, most of which are expected to be
incurred during the remainder of 2005.
The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the communities named in the
settlement is not quantifiable at the present time. These expenditures will generally be
capitalized as they are incurred. The settlement agreement approved by the court allows us to
remediate the designated communities over the next three years, and also provides that we are not
restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation period.
We are a party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course
of business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims or litigation, individually or
in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or
results of operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
We define critical accounting policies as those accounting policies that require our
management to exercise their most difficult, subjective and complex judgments. Our management has
discussed the development and selection of all of these critical accounting policies with our audit
committee, and the audit committee has reviewed the disclosure relating to these policies. Our
critical accounting policies relate principally to the following key areas:
Internal Cost Capitalization
We have an investment organization that is responsible for development and redevelopment of
apartment communities. Consistent with GAAP, all direct and certain indirect costs, including
interest and real estate taxes, incurred during development and redevelopment activities are
capitalized. Interest is capitalized on real estate assets that require a period of time to get
them ready for their intended use. The amount of interest capitalized is based upon the average
amount of accumulated development expenditures during the reporting period. Included in capitalized
costs are managements estimates of the direct and incremental personnel costs and indirect project
costs associated with our development and redevelopment activities. Indirect project costs consist
primarily of personnel costs associated with construction administration and development
accounting, legal fees, and various office costs that clearly relate to projects under development.
Because the estimation of capitalizable internal costs requires managements judgment, we believe
internal cost capitalization is a critical accounting estimate.
Valuation of Real Estate
Long-lived assets to be held and used are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted. We also evaluate
assets for potential impairment when we deem them to be held for sale. Valuation of real estate is
considered a critical accounting estimate because the evaluation of impairment and the
determination of fair values involve a number of management assumptions relating to future economic
events that could materially affect the determination of the ultimate value, and therefore, the
carrying amounts of our real estate.
31
When determining if there is an indication of impairment, we estimate the assets NOI over the
anticipated holding period on an undiscounted cash flow basis and compare this amount to its
carrying value. Estimating the expected NOI and holding period requires significant management
judgment. If it is determined that there is an indication of impairment for assets to be held and
used, or if an asset is deemed to be held for sale, we then determine the assets fair value.
The apartment industry uses capitalization rates as the primary measure of fair value.
Specifically, annual NOI for a community is divided by an estimated capitalization rate to
determine the fair value of the community. Determining the appropriate capitalization rate requires
significant judgment and is typically based on many factors including the prevailing rate for the
market or submarket. Further, capitalization rates can fluctuate up or down due to a variety of
factors in the overall economy or within local markets. If the actual capitalization rate for a
community is significantly different from our estimated rate, the impairment evaluation for an
individual asset could be materially affected. Historically we have had limited and infrequent
impairment charges, and the majority of our apartment community sales have produced gains. We
evaluate a real estate asset for potential impairment when events or changes in circumstances
indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.
Capital Expenditures and Depreciable Lives
We incur costs relating to redevelopment initiatives, revenue enhancing and expense reducing
capital expenditures, and recurring capital expenditures that are capitalized as part of our real
estate. These amounts are capitalized and depreciated over estimated useful lives determined by
management. We allocate the cost of newly acquired properties between net tangible and identifiable
intangible assets. The primary intangible asset associated with an apartment community acquisition
is the value of the existing lease agreements. When allocating cost to an acquired property, we
first allocate costs to the estimated intangible value of the existing lease agreements and then to
the estimated value of the land, building and fixtures assuming the property is vacant. We estimate
the intangible value of the lease agreements by determining the lost revenue associated with a
hypothetical lease-up. We depreciate the building and fixtures based on the expected useful life of
the asset and amortize the intangible value of the lease agreements over the average remaining life
of the existing leases.
Determining whether expenditures meet the criteria for capitalization, the assignment of
depreciable lives and determining the appropriate amounts to allocate between tangible and
intangible assets for property acquisitions requires our management to exercise significant
judgment and is therefore considered a significant accounting estimate.
Pursuit Costs
We incur costs relating to the potential acquisition of real estate which we refer to as
pursuit costs. To the extent that these costs are identifiable with a specific property and would
be capitalized if the property were already acquired, the costs are accumulated by project and
capitalized in the Other Asset section of the balance sheet. If these conditions are not met, the
costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized costs include but are not limited to earnest money,
option fees, environmental reports, traffic reports, surveys, photos, blueprints, direct and
incremental personnel costs and legal costs. Upon acquisition, the costs are included in the basis
of the acquired property. When it becomes probable that a prospective acquisition will not be
acquired, the accumulated costs for the property are charged to other expense on the statement of
earnings in the period such a determination is made. Because of the inherent judgment involved in
evaluating whether a prospective property will ultimately be acquired, we believe capitalizable
pursuit costs are a critical accounting estimate.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our real estate investments in entities that do not qualify as a variable interest entity and
are not controlled through majority economic interest are not consolidated and are reported as
investments in unconsolidated entities. Our investments in and advances to unconsolidated entities
at June 30, 2005, aggregated $124.6 million.
32
Contractual Commitments
The following is a summary of significant changes in contractual commitments for the six
months ended June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
We issued $300 million and $200 million in long-term unsecured ten-year senior notes
with a coupon rate of 5.25% and an effective interest rate of 5.4% and 5.26% from its shelf
registration statement during May and July of 2005, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
We redeemed $200 million of long-term unsecured ten-year senior notes with a coupon rate
of 8.2% and an effective interest rate of 8.4% during July of 2005. |
|
|
|
|
We guaranteed $175.0 million of the outstanding mortgage debt during July, 2005 and are
committed to guarantee another $93.5 million upon funding of additional debt in connection
with one of our unconsolidated joint ventures. |
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2005, we entered into a full and final settlement in the
United States District Court for the District of Maryland with three national disability
organizations and agreed to make capital improvements in a number of our communities in
order to make them fully compliant with the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA). The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the
communities named in the settlement is not quantifiable at the present time. These
expenditures will generally be capitalized as they are incurred. The settlement agreement
approved by the court allows us to remediate the designated communities over the next three
years. |
|
|
|
|
Please reference Planned Investments for a summary of amounts committed for investing
activities. |
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our capital structure includes the use of both fixed and floating rate debt and we are exposed
to the impact of changes in interest rates. We also use interest rate swap and interest rate cap
derivative financial instruments in order to modify interest rate characteristics of our debt in an
effort to minimize our overall borrowing costs. We do not utilize these derivative financial
instruments for speculative purposes. To assist us in evaluating our interest rate risk and
counter-party credit risk, we use the services of third party consultants.
As a result of our balance sheet management philosophy, we have managed our debt maturities to
create a relatively level principal maturity schedule, without significant repayment obligations in
any year. If current market conditions do not permit us to replace maturing debt at comparable
interest rates, we are not exposed to significant portfolio level interest rate volatility due to
the management of our maturity schedules. There have been no material changes to our market risk
profile since December 31, 2004. See Item 7a in our 2004 Form 10-K for detailed information about
the qualitative and quantitative disclosures about our market risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-14(c) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934). Based on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting were, to the best of
their knowledge, effective as of June 30, 2005, to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in reports that are filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act are recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission
rules and forms. Subsequent to June 30, 2005, there were no significant changes in the Trusts
internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect
these controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses.
33
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Equal Rights Center, et al. v. Archstone-Smith Trust, et al., was settled on June 8, 2005. We
entered into a full and final settlement in the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland with three national disability organizations and agreed to make capital improvements in a
number of our communities in order to make them fully compliant with the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The litigation, settled by this agreement, alleged lack of
full compliance with certain design and construction requirements under the two federal statutes at
71 of the companys communities. As part of the settlement, the three disability organizations all
recognized that Archstone-Smith had no intention to build any of its communities in a manner
inconsistent with the FHA or ADA.
The amount of the capital expenditures required to remediate the communities named in the
settlement is not quantifiable at the present time. These expenditures will generally be
capitalized as they are incurred. The settlement agreement approved by the court allows us to
remediate the designated communities over the next three years, and also provides that we are not
restricted from selling any of our communities during the remediation period. We agreed to pay
damages totaling $1.4 million, which include legal fees and costs incurred by the plaintiffs. In
addition to the settlement, we incurred $1.0 million for legal and consulting fees during the first
six months of 2005 related to this lawsuit and have accrued an estimate of $1.6 million for legal,
consulting and other expenses, most of which are expected to be incurred during the remainder of
2005
We are party to various other claims and routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of
business. We do not believe that the results of any such claims and litigation, individually or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results
of operations.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes the A-1 Common Units that were repurchased for either cash or
A-2 Units during the three months ended June 30, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Units |
|
|
Maximum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Value That May |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Unit |
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Under the Plan |
|
4/1/05 4/30/05 |
|
|
35,242 |
|
|
$ |
35.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
5/1/05 5/31/05 |
|
|
32,500 |
|
|
|
36.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6/1/05 6/30/05 |
|
|
39,391 |
|
|
|
38.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
107,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions |
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Awareness Letter |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
34
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARCHSTONE-SMITH OPERATING TRUST |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ R. SCOT SELLERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Scot Sellers
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ CHARLES E. MUELLER, JR. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charles E. Mueller, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
|
|
/s/ MARK A. SCHUMACHER |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark A. Schumacher
Senior Vice-President and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date: August 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
35
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
12.1
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Unit Distributions |
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Awareness Letter |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 |
36