þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 |
||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the transition period from ___to ___ |
Delaware | 13-6167838 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
|
4000 Dain Rauscher Plaza, 60 South Sixth Street | ||
Minneapolis, Minnesota | 55402 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 1,064.2 | $ | 982.9 | $ | 2,977.9 | $ | 2,831.7 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
630.6 | 569.8 | 1,767.0 | 1,637.5 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
433.6 | 413.1 | 1,210.9 | 1,194.2 | ||||||||||||
Selling, delivery and administrative expenses |
323.6 | 293.6 | 928.5 | 890.5 | ||||||||||||
Fructose settlement income |
| 1.8 | | 15.1 | ||||||||||||
Special charges, net |
| | 2.2 | 2.5 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
110.0 | 121.3 | 280.2 | 316.3 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
27.0 | 22.3 | 74.5 | 67.5 | ||||||||||||
Other expense, net |
0.1 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes and equity in net earnings of
nonconsolidated companies |
82.9 | 97.1 | 201.7 | 245.5 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
30.0 | 36.6 | 75.1 | 91.6 | ||||||||||||
Equity in net earnings of nonconsolidated companies |
0.2 | 3.2 | 5.6 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 53.1 | $ | 63.7 | $ | 132.2 | $ | 157.1 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
126.6 | 134.2 | 128.2 | 135.7 | ||||||||||||
Incremental effect of stock options and awards |
1.8 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 2.4 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
128.4 | 136.7 | 130.2 | 138.1 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.42 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 1.16 | ||||||||
Diluted |
0.41 | 0.47 | 1.02 | 1.14 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.125 | $ | 0.085 | $ | 0.375 | $ | 0.255 |
2
End of | End of | |||||||
Third Quarter | Fiscal Year | |||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
ASSETS: |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 154.4 | $ | 116.0 | ||||
Receivables, net |
294.2 | 213.8 | ||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials and supplies |
94.5 | 88.2 | ||||||
Finished goods |
139.3 | 106.0 | ||||||
Total inventories |
233.8 | 194.2 | ||||||
Other current assets |
75.9 | 74.2 | ||||||
Total current assets |
758.3 | 598.2 | ||||||
Property and equipment |
2,534.0 | 2,387.0 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(1,402.5 | ) | (1,272.9 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment |
1,131.5 | 1,114.1 | ||||||
Goodwill |
2,019.6 | 1,859.0 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
302.7 | 301.1 | ||||||
Other assets |
120.4 | 181.4 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,332.5 | $ | 4,053.8 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Short-term debt, including current maturities of long-term debt |
$ | 287.8 | $ | 290.4 | ||||
Payables |
249.7 | 208.4 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
228.2 | 223.2 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
765.7 | 722.0 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
1,541.7 | 1,285.9 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
243.7 | 245.1 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
226.9 | 231.5 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
2,778.0 | 2,484.5 | ||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value, 12.5 million shares authorized; no shares issued) |
| | ||||||
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 350 million shares authorized; 137.6 million shares
issued - 2006 and 2005) |
1,279.4 | 1,267.1 | ||||||
Retained income |
515.4 | 432.0 | ||||||
Unearned stock-based compensation |
| (16.5 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(11.7 | ) | (25.1 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost (10.7 million shares - 2006 and 4.6 million shares - 2005) |
(228.6 | ) | (88.2 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders equity |
1,554.5 | 1,569.3 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 4,332.5 | $ | 4,053.8 | ||||
3
First Nine Months | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
$ | 132.2 | $ | 157.1 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by
operating activities of continuing operations: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
146.2 | 139.8 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3.5 | (3.8 | ) | |||||
Special charges, net |
2.2 | 2.5 | ||||||
Cash outlays related to special charges |
(2.0 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| 5.6 | ||||||
Pension contributions |
(10.0 | ) | (6.7 | ) | ||||
Gain on sale of investment |
(0.9 | ) | | |||||
Equity in net earnings of nonconsolidated companies |
(5.6 | ) | (3.2 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from shared-based payment arrangements |
(6.4 | ) | | |||||
Other |
14.8 | 21.7 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, exclusive of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Increase in receivables |
(62.7 | ) | (17.5 | ) | ||||
Increase in inventories |
(25.0 | ) | (18.1 | ) | ||||
Increase in payables |
15.6 | 1.3 | ||||||
Net change in other assets and liabilities |
25.1 | 34.5 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
227.0 | 312.0 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Franchises and companies acquired, net of cash acquired |
(88.5 | ) | (354.6 | ) | ||||
Capital investments |
(127.7 | ) | (98.4 | ) | ||||
Purchase of equity investment |
| (51.0 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from the sale of investment |
0.9 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of property |
6.8 | 3.4 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(208.5 | ) | (500.6 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net borrowings of short-term debt |
84.6 | 52.9 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
247.4 | 793.3 | ||||||
Repayment of long-term debt |
(134.7 | ) | (457.0 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock purchases |
(150.7 | ) | (196.1 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
6.4 | | ||||||
Issuance of common stock |
23.0 | 59.6 | ||||||
Cash dividends |
(43.3 | ) | (23.6 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
32.7 | 229.1 | ||||||
Net operating cash flows used in discontinued operations |
(11.5 | ) | (6.9 | ) | ||||
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(1.3 | ) | 1.3 | |||||
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
38.4 | 34.9 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of fiscal year |
116.0 | 74.9 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of third quarter |
$ | 154.4 | $ | 109.8 | ||||
4
1. | Significant Accounting Policies | |
Quarterly reporting. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein have been prepared by PepsiAmericas, Inc. (referred to herein as PepsiAmericas, we, our and us) without audit. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The year-end Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by United States generally accepted accounting principles. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2005. In the opinion of management, the information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. | ||
Our fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Saturday closest to December 31st. Our 2005 fiscal year contained 52 weeks and ended December 31, 2005. Our third quarter and first nine months of 2006 and 2005 were based on the thirteen and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 and October 1, 2005, respectively. Due to the timing of the receipt of available financial information from Quadrant-Amroq Bottling Company Limited (QABCL), we record results from such operations on a one-month lag basis. Our business is seasonal; accordingly, the operating results and cash flow from operations of any individual quarter may not be indicative of a full years results. | ||
Earnings per share. Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share includes dilutive common stock equivalents, using the treasury stock method. | ||
The following options and restricted stock awards were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because they were antidilutive: |
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Shares under options outstanding |
1,338,700 | 471,410 | | 471,410 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average exercise price per share |
$ | 22.63 | $ | 24.79 | $ | | $ | 24.79 | ||||||||
Shares under nonvested restricted stock awards |
| | 941,956 | 12,500 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average grant date fair value per share |
$ | | $ | | $ | 24.31 | $ | 24.83 |
Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the prior period Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the current years presentation. | ||
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which establishes a framework for reporting fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 becomes effective beginning in the first quarter of 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact SFAS No. 157 will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements. | ||
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. We will be required to fully recognize the funded status associated with our defined benefit plans. We will also be required to measure our plans assets and liabilities as of the end of our fiscal year instead of our current measurement date of September 30. The recognition provisions of SFAS No. 158 will be effective as of the end of fiscal year 2006. The measurement date provisions will be effective as of the end of fiscal year 2008. We anticipate that the impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 will reduce total assets by approximately $45 million and reduce total liabilities by approximately $35 million, resulting in a reduction of shareholders equity of approximately $10 million with no impact to the Consolidated Statements of Income or Cash Flows. We do not anticipate that the impact of the measurement date provisions will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements. |
5
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, to address diversity in practice in quantifying financial statement misstatements. SAB No. 108 requires that we quantify misstatements based on their impact on each of our financial statements and related disclosures. SAB No. 108 is effective as of the end of fiscal year 2006, allowing a one-time transitional cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2006 for errors that were not previously deemed material, but are material under the guidance in SAB No. 108. We are currently evaluating the impact SAB No. 108 will have on our Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption. | ||
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 provides guidance regarding the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position either taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. It requires the recognition of a tax position if it is more likely than not that position would be sustained during an examination based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective as of the beginning of fiscal year 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact FIN 48 will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption. | ||
2. | Special Charges | |
In the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, we recorded special charges in Central Europe of $2.2 million and $2.5 million, respectively. These special charges related to a reduction in the workforce, primarily for severance costs and related benefits. | ||
The following table summarizes activity associated with the special charges (in millions): |
Beginning of | Special | Application | End of the | |||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year | Charges, | of Special | Other | Third Quarter | ||||||||||||||||
2006 | Net | Charges | Adjustments | of 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Employee related costs |
$ | | $ | 2.0 | $ | (1.9 | ) | $ | | $ | 0.1 | |||||||||
Lease terminations and
other costs |
| 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||||
Asset write-downs |
| 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Total accrued liabilities |
$ | | $ | 2.2 | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.2 | |||||||||
The total accrued liabilities remaining at the end of the third quarter of 2006 were comprised of deferred severance payments and certain employee benefits, lease obligations and other costs. We expect the remaining special charge liability of $0.2 million to be paid using cash from operations during the next twelve months; accordingly, such amounts are classified as Other current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. | ||
3. | Interest Expense, Net | |
Interest expense, net was comprised of the following (in millions): |
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 27.9 | $ | 22.8 | $ | 77.5 | $ | 70.4 | ||||||||
Interest income |
(0.9 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (3.0 | ) | (2.9 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 27.0 | $ | 22.3 | $ | 74.5 | $ | 67.5 | ||||||||
6
4. | Income Taxes | |
The effective income tax rate, which is income tax expense expressed as a percentage of income before income taxes, was 37.2 percent for the first nine months of 2006, compared to 37.3 percent in the first nine months of 2005. The effective income tax rate was favorably impacted by the mix of our international operations. In addition, we recorded a $0.9 million benefit in the second quarter of 2005 due to a state income tax law change in Ohio. | ||
5. | Comprehensive Income | |
Comprehensive income was as follows (in millions): |
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 53.1 | $ | 63.7 | $ | 132.2 | $ | 157.1 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
5.3 | 2.6 | 13.4 | (21.3 | ) | |||||||||||
Net unrealized investment and hedging gains
(losses) |
3.3 | 0.3 | | (10.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 61.7 | $ | 66.6 | $ | 145.6 | $ | 125.1 | ||||||||
Net unrealized investment and hedging gains (losses) are presented net of income tax expense of $2.0 million and $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and net of income tax benefit of $6.5 million in the first nine months of 2005. | ||
6. | Goodwill and Intangible Assets | |
The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by geographic segment for the first nine months of 2006 were as follows (in millions): |
Central | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. | Europe | Caribbean | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of fiscal year 2006 |
$ | 1,821.3 | $ | 21.2 | $ | 16.5 | $ | 1,859.0 | ||||||||
Acquisitions |
7.7 | 148.8 | | 156.5 | ||||||||||||
Purchase accounting adjustments |
0.2 | | (0.3 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
| 4.2 | | 4.2 | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of third quarter of 2006 |
$ | 1,829.2 | $ | 174.2 | $ | 16.2 | $ | 2,019.6 | ||||||||
7
Intangible asset balances were as follows (in millions): |
End of Third | End of Fiscal | |||||||
Quarter of 2006 | Year 2005 | |||||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization |
||||||||
Gross carrying amount |
||||||||
Franchise and distribution agreements |
$ | 3.3 | $ | 3.6 | ||||
Customer relationships and lists |
8.0 | 8.0 | ||||||
Other |
2.9 | 0.5 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 14.2 | $ | 12.1 | ||||
Accumulated amortization |
||||||||
Franchise and distribution agreements |
$ | (0.8 | ) | $ | (1.0 | ) | ||
Customer relationships and lists |
(1.2 | ) | (0.7 | ) | ||||
Other |
(0.5 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Total |
$ | (2.5 | ) | $ | (2.0 | ) | ||
Intangible assets subject to amortization, net |
$ | 11.7 | $ | 10.1 | ||||
Intangible assets not subject to amortization: |
||||||||
Franchise and distribution agreements |
$ | 288.5 | $ | 288.5 | ||||
Pension intangible assets |
2.5 | 2.5 | ||||||
Intangible assets not subject to amortization |
$ | 291.0 | $ | 291.0 | ||||
Total intangible assets, net |
$ | 302.7 | $ | 301.1 | ||||
Total amortization expense was $0.3 million and $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively. Total amortization expense was $0.9 million and $0.2 million in the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. | ||
In the first nine months of 2006, we acquired the remaining 51 percent interest in QABCL, resulting in an allocation of $148.8 million to goodwill. This preliminary allocation included the goodwill that was associated with the first step of the acquisition completed in fiscal year 2005. This initial investment was recorded under the equity method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investment in Common Stock, and this amount was previously recorded in Other assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. We are in the process of valuing the assets and liabilities acquired in connection with the acquisition. We anticipate that the valuation will be completed in the first quarter of 2007. | ||
During the first nine months of 2006, we acquired Ardea Beverage Co., resulting in an allocation of $7.7 million to goodwill and $2.4 million to other intangibles. The process of valuing the assets, liabilities and intangibles acquired in connection with the Ardea acquisition was completed in the second quarter of 2006. | ||
The decrease in gross carrying amount of franchise and distribution agreements and related accumulated amortization since the end of fiscal year 2005 reflected the write-off of fully amortized franchise rights for products we no longer distribute. | ||
7. | Acquisitions | |
On July 3, 2006, we acquired the remaining 51 percent of the outstanding stock of QABCL for $81.9 million, net of $17.0 million cash acquired. We acquired $55.4 million of debt as part of the acquisition. QABCL is a holding company that, through subsidiaries, produces, sells and distributes Pepsi and other beverages throughout Romania with distribution rights in Moldova. On June 16, 2005, we had initially acquired 49 percent of the outstanding stock of QABCL for $51.0 million. The increased purchase price for the remainder of QABCL was due to the improved operating performance subsequent to the initial acquisition of our 49 percent minority interest. Due to the timing of the receipt of available financial information from QABCL, we record results from such operations on a one-month lag basis. Equity in net earnings of nonconsolidated companies was $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2006 and $3.2 million in the third quarter of 2005. Equity in net earnings of nonconsolidated companies was $5.6 million in the first nine months of 2006 compared to $3.2 million in the first nine months of 2005. |
8
On January 23, 2006, we completed the acquisition of Ardea Beverage Co., the maker of the airforce Nutrisoda line of soft drinks. | ||
During the first nine months of 2005, we completed the acquisition of the capital stock of Central Investment Corporation (CIC) and the capital stock of FM Vending. CIC had bottling operations in southeast Florida and central Ohio, and was the seventh largest Pepsi bottler in the U.S. | ||
The results of operations for the acquisitions described above are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income since the date of acquisition. These acquisitions are not material to our consolidated results of operations; therefore, pro forma financial information is not included in this note. | ||
8. | Debt | |
In the first nine months of 2006, we repaid the remaining outstanding principal of $134.7 million of the 6.5 percent notes and 5.95 percent notes, both due February 2006. We had $237.5 million of commercial paper borrowings at the end of the third quarter of 2006, compared to $141.5 million at the end of fiscal year 2005. The increase in commercial paper borrowings was primarily due to funding maturing debt. | ||
In May 2006, we issued $250 million of notes with a coupon rate of 5.625 percent due May 2011. Net proceeds from this transaction were $247.4 million, which reflected the discount reduction of $1.0 million and debt issuance costs of $1.6 million. A portion of the proceeds from the issuance was used to repay our commercial paper and other general obligations. The notes were issued from our automatic shelf registration statement filed May 16, 2006 (the Registration Statement). Under the Registration Statement, additional debt securities may be offered. The debt securities are unsecured, senior debt obligations and rank equally with all of our other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness. | ||
On June 6, 2006, we entered into a new five-year, $600 million unsecured revolving credit facility. The facility is for general corporate purposes, including commercial paper backstop. It replaces our previous five-year, $500 million credit facility on substantially similar terms. During the first nine months of 2006, there were no borrowings made on the revolving credit facility. | ||
9. | Financial Instruments | |
We use derivative financial instruments to reduce our exposure to adverse fluctuations in commodity prices, foreign currency transactions and interest rates. These financial instruments are over-the-counter instruments and were designated at their inception as hedges of underlying exposures. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. | ||
Cash Flow Hedges. We enter into derivative financial instruments to hedge against volatility in future cash flows on anticipated aluminum purchases and diesel fuel purchases, the prices of which are indexed to their respective market prices. We consider these hedges to be highly effective, because of the high correlation between the commodity prices and our contractual costs. There were no significant changes in our derivative financial instrument positions for aluminum and bulk diesel fuel in the first nine months of 2006. | ||
In anticipation of a long-term debt issuance, we had entered into treasury rate lock instruments and a forward starting swap instrument. We accounted for these treasury rate locks and forward starting swap as cash flow hedges, as each hedged against the variability of interest payments attributable to changes in interest rates on the forecasted issuance of fixed-rate debt. These treasury rate locks and forward starting swap were considered highly effective in eliminating the variability of cash flows associated with the forecasted debt issuance. |
9
The following table summarizes the net derivative gains or losses deferred in Accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified to earnings in the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 (in millions): |
First Nine | First Nine | |||||||
Months 2006 | Months 2005 | |||||||
Unrealized (losses) gains on derivatives at beginning of fiscal year |
$ | (2.4 | ) | $ | 1.2 | |||
Deferral of net derivative losses in accumulated other
comprehensive loss |
(0.5 | ) | (6.5 | ) | ||||
Reclassification of net derivative (gains) losses
to income |
(0.4 | ) | 4.9 | |||||
Unrealized losses on derivatives at end of third quarter |
$ | (3.3 | ) | $ | (0.4 | ) | ||
Fair Value Hedges. Periodically, we enter into interest rate swap contracts to convert a portion of our fixed rate debt to floating rate debt, with the objective of reducing overall borrowing costs. We account for these swaps as fair value hedges, since they hedge against the change in fair value of fixed rate debt resulting from fluctuations in interest rates. In the third quarter of 2004, we terminated all outstanding interest rate swap contracts and received $14.4 million for the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts. Amounts included in the cumulative fair value adjustment to long-term debt will be reclassified into earnings commensurate with the recognition of the related interest expense. At the end of the third quarter of 2006 and the end of fiscal year 2005, the cumulative fair value adjustments to long-term debt were $6.8 million and $8.7 million, respectively. | ||
Amounts recorded for all derivatives on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows (in millions): |
End of Third | End of Fiscal | |||||||
Quarter 2006 | Year 2005 | |||||||
Unrealized gains: |
||||||||
Commodities |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 1.4 | ||||
Interest rate instruments |
8.9 | 11.1 | ||||||
Unrealized losses: |
||||||||
Commodities |
$ | (0.7 | ) | $ | (0.1 | ) | ||
Interest rate instruments |
(7.0 | ) | (7.7 | ) |
Net Investment Hedges. We use foreign currency forward contracts as net investment hedges of long-term investments in the corresponding foreign currency. Hedges that meet the effectiveness requirements are accounted for under net investment hedging rules. At the end of the third quarter of 2006, net losses of $1.0 million arising from effective hedges of net investments have been reflected in cumulative foreign currency translation in Accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. | ||
10. | Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans | |
Net periodic pension cost for the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 and 2005 included the following components (in millions): |
Third Quarter | First Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 0.9 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 2.8 | $ | 2.5 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
2.5 | 2.4 | 7.6 | 7.2 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(3.5 | ) | (2.9 | ) | (10.4 | ) | (8.8 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
0.1 | | 0.2 | | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
1.0 | 0.5 | 2.9 | 1.7 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 1.0 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 3.1 | $ | 2.6 | ||||||||
10
During the first nine months of 2006, we have contributed $10.0 million to the plans. Although we do not expect to make any additional contributions in the remainder of fiscal year 2006, we will continue to evaluate our funding requirements and will fund to levels deemed necessary for the plans. | ||
11. | Share-Based Compensation | |
Our 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2000 Plan), originally approved by shareholders in fiscal year 2000, provides for granting incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, related stock appreciation rights (SARs), restricted stock awards, performance awards or any combination of the foregoing. Generally, outstanding nonqualified stock options are exercisable during a ten-year period beginning one to three years after the date of grant. The exercise price of all options is equal to the fair market value on the date of grant. We generally use shares from treasury to satisfy option exercises. There are no outstanding stock appreciation rights under the 2000 Plan at the end of the third quarter of 2006. | ||
Restricted stock awards are granted to key members of our U.S. and Caribbean management teams and members of our Board of Directors under the 2000 Plan. Beginning with shares granted in fiscal year 2004, restricted stock awards granted to employees vest in their entirety on the third anniversary of the award. Restricted stock awards granted to employees before 2004 vest ratably on an annual basis over a three-year period. Employees must complete the requisite service period in order for their awards to vest. Restricted stock awards granted to directors vest immediately upon grant. Pursuant to the terms of such awards, directors may not sell such stock while they serve on the Board of Directors. Dividends are paid to the holders of restricted stock awards either at the dividend payment date or upon vesting, depending on the terms of the restricted stock award. We have a policy of using shares from treasury to satisfy restricted stock award vesting. We measure the fair value of restricted stock based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant. | ||
Restricted stock units are granted to key members of our Central Europe management team. The restricted stock units are payable to these employees in cash upon vesting at the prevailing market value of PepsiAmericas common stock plus accrued dividends. Restricted stock units vest after three years, equal to the employees requisite service period. We measure the fair value of the restricted stock unit award liability based upon the market price of the underlying common stock at the date of grant and each subsequent reporting date. | ||
Under the 2000 Plan, 14,000,000 shares were originally reserved for share-based awards. As of the end of the third quarter of 2006, there were 5,009,551 shares available for future grants. | ||
Our Stock Incentive Plan (the 1982 Plan), originally established and approved by the shareholders in 1982, has been subsequently amended from time to time, most recently in 1999 when the shareholders approved an allocation of additional shares to this plan. The types of awards and terms of the 1982 Plan are similar to the 2000 Plan. There are no outstanding stock appreciation rights under the 1982 Plan as of the end of the third quarter of 2006. | ||
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment. We adopted using the modified prospective method as provided by SFAS No. 123(R). Accordingly, financial statement amounts for the prior periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have not been restated. | ||
Changes in options outstanding are summarized as follows: |
Range of | Weighted-Average | |||||||||||
Options | Shares | Exercise Prices | Exercise Price | |||||||||
Balance, beginning of fiscal year 2006 |
6,941,495 | $ | 10.81 - $22.63 | $ | 16.57 | |||||||
Exercised |
(1,548,438 | ) | 10.81 - 22.63 | 14.86 | ||||||||
Forfeited |
(16,357 | ) | 12.01 - 22.63 | 17.24 | ||||||||
Balance, end of third quarter of 2006 |
5,376,700 | 10.81 - 22.63 | 17.06 | |||||||||
Exercisable, end of third quarter of 2006 |
4,957,675 | 10.81 - 22.63 | 16.90 |
11
The Black-Scholes model was used to estimate the grant date fair values of options. There were no options granted during the first nine months of 2006 and 2005. We recorded $0.5 million ($0.3 million net of tax) and $1.9 million ($1.2 million net of tax) of compensation expense related to options in Sales, delivery and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the third quarter of 2006 and 2005 was $2.2 million and $4.2 million, respectively, and during the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 was $12.9 million and $26.1 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of fully vested options and options expected to vest as of the end of the third quarter of 2006 was $23.7 million. | ||
The following table summarizes information regarding stock options outstanding and exercisable at the end of the third quarter of 2006: |
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Options | Remaining Life | Average | Options | Average | |||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Outstanding | (in years) | Exercise Price | Exercisable | Exercise Price | |||||||||||||||
$10.81 - $12.75 |
1,783,431 | 5.1 | $ | 12.30 | 1,783,431 | $ | 12.30 | |||||||||||||
14.37 - 18.06 |
1,041,758 | 2.8 | 15.78 | 1,041,758 | 15.78 | |||||||||||||||
18.48 - 22.63 |
2,551,511 | 4.3 | 20.91 | 2,132,486 | 21.30 | |||||||||||||||
Total Options |
5,376,700 | 4.3 | 17.06 | 4,957,675 | 16.90 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in nonvested restricted stock awards are summarized as follows: |
Weighted-Average | ||||||||||||
Range of Grant-Date | Grant-Date Fair | |||||||||||
Nonvested Shares | Shares | Fair Value | Value | |||||||||
Nonvested at the beginning of fiscal year
2006 |
1,645,292 | $ | 12.01 - $24.83 | $ | 19.15 | |||||||
Granted |
970,877 | 24.31 | 24.31 | |||||||||
Vested |
(404,776 | ) | 12.01 - 24.31 | 12.54 | ||||||||
Forfeited |
(35,997 | ) | 18.92 - 24.31 | 21.96 | ||||||||
Nonvested at the end of the third quarter
2006 |
2,175,396 | 18.92 - 24.83 | 22.64 |
The weighted-average fair value (at the date of grant) for restricted stock awards granted in the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 was $24.31 and $22.55, respectively. We did not grant any restricted stock awards in the third quarter of 2006 or 2005. We recognized compensation expense of $3.9 million ($2.4 million net of tax) and $2.6 million ($1.6 million net of tax) in the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $10.6 million ($6.6 million net of tax) and $7.8 million ($4.9 million net of tax) in the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to restricted stock award grants. The fair value of restricted stock awards that vested during the first nine months of 2006 and 2005 was $9.3 million and $12.0 million, respectively. No restricted stock awards vested in the third quarter of 2006 or 2005. | ||
In February 2006, we granted 72,900 restricted stock units at a weighted average fair value of $24.31 on the date of grant to key members of management. In the first nine months of 2005, we granted 78,440 restricted stock units at a weighted-average fair value of $22.52 on the date of grant. We recognized compensation expense of $0.2 million and $0.1 million in the third quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and we recognized compensation expense of $0.7 million and $0.4 million in the first nine months of 2006 and 2005, respectively, related to restricted stock unit grants. There are currently 144,090 restricted stock units outstanding, and no restricted stock units vested during the first nine months of 2006 or 2005. | ||
Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), cash retained as a result of excess tax benefits relating to stock-based compensation is presented in cash flows from financing activities on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Previously, cash retained as a result of excess tax benefits was presented in cash flows from operating activities. Tax benefits resulting from stock-based compensation deductions in excess of amounts reported for financial reporting purposes were $0.8 million and $6.4 million during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, respectively. | ||
At the end of the third quarter of 2006, there was $28.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures of $2.8 million, related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements. This compensation cost is expected to be recognized over the next 1.9 years. |
12
In periods prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), we used the intrinsic value method of accounting for our stock-based compensation under Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. No stock-based employee compensation cost for options was reflected in net income, as all options granted had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense for restricted stock awards and restricted stock units was reflected in net income, and this expense was recognized ratably over the awards vesting period. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share had compensation expense been recognized based upon the estimated fair value on the grant date of the awards in accordance with SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (in millions, except per share data): |
Third | First | |||||||||
Quarter | Nine Months | |||||||||
2005 | 2005 | |||||||||
Net income, as reported | $ | 63.7 | $ | 157.1 | ||||||
Add: Total stock-based compensation expense included in net income as reported, net of tax | 1.6 | 4.9 | ||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under fair value
method for all options and restricted stock awards, net of tax |
(2.2 | ) | (6.8 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma net income | $ | 63.1 | $ | 155.2 | ||||||
Basic: |
As reported | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.16 | |||||
Pro forma | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.14 | ||||||
Diluted: |
As reported | $ | 0.47 | $ | 1.14 | |||||
Pro forma | $ | 0.46 | $ | 1.12 | ||||||
12. | Supplemental Cash Flow Information | |
Net cash provided by operating activities reflected cash payments and receipts for interest and income taxes as follows (in millions): |
First Nine Months | ||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 74.0 | $ | 69.8 | ||||
Interest received |
3.0 | 3.1 | ||||||
Income taxes paid, net of refunds |
63.5 | 54.2 |
Income taxes paid, net of refunds includes $12.8 million of tax refunds received in the first nine months of 2005 relating to the utilization of a portion of our net operating loss carryforwards for tax returns filed through fiscal year 2002. | ||
13. | Environmental and Other Commitments and Contingencies | |
Current Operations. We maintain compliance with federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to materials used in production and to the discharge or emission of wastes, and other laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The capital costs of such management and compliance, including the modification of existing plants and the installation of new manufacturing processes, are not material to our continuing operations. | ||
We are defendants in lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of business, none of which is expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, although amounts recorded in any given period could be material to the results of operations or cash flows for that period. | ||
We participate in a number of trustee-managed multi-employer pension and health and welfare plans for employees covered under collective bargaining agreements. Several factors, including unfavorable investment performance, changes in demographics and increased benefits to participants could result in potential funding deficiencies, which could cause us to make higher future contributions to these plans. | ||
Discontinued Operations Remediation. Under the agreement pursuant to which we sold our subsidiaries, Abex Corporation and Pneumo Abex Corporation (collectively, Pneumo Abex), in 1988 and a subsequent settlement agreement entered into in September 1991, we have assumed indemnification obligations for certain environmental liabilities of Pneumo Abex, after any insurance recoveries. Pneumo Abex has been and is subject to a number of environmental cleanup proceedings, including responsibilities under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and other related federal and state laws regarding release or disposal of wastes at on-site and off-site locations. In some proceedings, federal, state and local government agencies are involved and other major corporations have been named as potentially responsible parties. Pneumo Abex is also subject to private claims and lawsuits for remediation of properties previously owned by Pneumo Abex and its subsidiaries. |
13
There is an inherent uncertainty in assessing the total cost to investigate and remediate a given site. This is because of the evolving and varying nature of the remediation and allocation process. Any assessment of expenses is more speculative in an early stage of remediation and is dependent upon a number of variables beyond the control of any party. Furthermore, there are often timing considerations, in that a portion of the expense incurred by Pneumo Abex, and any resulting obligation of ours to indemnify Pneumo Abex, may not occur for a number of years. | ||
In fiscal year 2001, we investigated the use of insurance products to mitigate risks related to our indemnification obligations under the 1988 agreement, as amended. The insurance carriers required that we employ an outside consultant to perform a comprehensive review of the former facilities operated or impacted by Pneumo Abex. Advances in the techniques of retrospective risk evaluation and increased experience (and therefore available data) at our former facilities made this comprehensive review possible. The consultants review was completed in fiscal year 2001 and was updated in the fourth quarter of 2005. We have recorded our best estimate of our probable liability under our indemnification obligations using this consultants review and the assistance of other professionals. | ||
At the end of the third quarter of 2006, we had $63.7 million accrued to cover potential indemnification obligations, compared to $87.5 million recorded at the end of fiscal year 2005. This indemnification obligation includes costs associated with approximately 20 sites in various stages of remediation. At the present time, the most significant remaining indemnification obligation is associated with the Willits site, as discussed below, while no other single site has significant estimated remaining costs associated with it. Of the total amount accrued, $27.8 million was classified as a current liability at the end of the third quarter of 2006 and $30.5 million at the end of fiscal year 2005. The amounts exclude possible insurance recoveries and are determined on an undiscounted cash flow basis. The estimated indemnification liabilities include expenses for the investigation and remediation of identified sites, payments to third parties for claims and expenses (including product liability and toxic tort claims), administrative expenses, and the expenses of on-going evaluations and litigation. We expect a significant portion of the accrued liabilities will be resolved during the next 10 years. | ||
Included in our indemnification obligations is financial exposure related to certain remedial actions required at a facility that manufactured hydraulic and related equipment in Willits, California. Various chemicals and metals contaminate this site. In August 1997, a final consent decree was issued in the case of the People of the State of California and the City of Willits, California v. Remco Hydraulics, Inc. This final consent decree was amended in December 2000 and established a trust which is obligated to investigate and clean up this site. We are currently funding the investigation and interim remediation costs on a year-to-year basis according to the final consent decree. We have accrued $22.8 million for future remediation and trust administration costs, with the majority of this amount to be spent over the next several years. | ||
Although we have certain indemnification obligations for environmental liabilities at a number of sites other than the site discussed above, including Superfund sites, it is not anticipated that additional expense at any specific site will have a material effect on us. At some sites, the volumetric contribution for which we have an obligation has been estimated and other large, financially viable parties are responsible for substantial portions of the remainder. In our opinion, based upon information currently available, the ultimate resolution of these claims and litigation, including potential environmental exposures, and considering amounts already accrued, should not have a material effect on our financial condition, although amounts recorded in a given period could be material to our results of operations or cash flows for that period. | ||
Discontinued OperationsInsurance. During the second quarter of 2002, as part of a comprehensive program concerning environmental liabilities related to the former Whitman Corporation subsidiaries, we purchased new insurance coverage related to the sites previously owned and operated or impacted by Pneumo Abex and its subsidiaries. In addition, a trust, which was established in 2000 with the proceeds from an insurance settlement (the Trust), purchased insurance coverage and funded coverage for remedial and other costs (Finite Funding) related to the sites previously owned and operated or impacted by Pneumo Abex and its subsidiaries. |
14
Essentially all of the assets of the Trust were expended by the Trust in connection with the purchase of the insurance coverage, the Finite Funding and related expenses. These actions have been taken to fund remediation and related costs associated with the sites previously owned and operated or impacted by Pneumo Abex and its subsidiaries and to protect against additional future costs in excess of our self-insured retention. The original amount of self-insured retention (the amount we must pay before the insurance carrier is obligated to begin payments) was $114.0 million of which $41.5 million has been eroded, leaving a remaining self-insured retention of $72.5 million at the end of the third quarter of 2006. The estimated range of aggregate exposure related only to the remediation costs of such environmental liabilities is approximately $31 million to $50 million. We had accrued $31.4 million at the end of the third quarter of 2006 for remediation costs, which is our best estimate of the contingent liabilities related to these environmental matters. The Finite Funding may be used to pay a portion of the $31.4 million and thus reduces our future cash obligations. Amounts recorded in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets related to Finite Funding were $14.2 million and $19.6 million at the end of the third quarter of 2006 and the end of fiscal year 2005, respectively, and are recorded in Other assets, net of $3.5 million and $5.4 million recorded in Other current assets, at the end of the third quarter of 2006 and the end of fiscal year 2005, respectively. | ||
In addition, we had recorded other receivables of $7.9 million and $11.4 million at the end of the third quarter of 2006 and at the end of fiscal year 2005, respectively, for future probable amounts to be received from insurance companies and other responsible parties. These amounts were recorded in Other assets in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the end of each respective period. Of this total, no portion of the receivable was reflected as current at the end of the third quarter of 2006 or at the end of fiscal year 2005. | ||
On May 31, 2005, Cooper Industries, LLC (Cooper) filed and later served a lawsuit against us, Pneumo Abex, LLC, and the Trustee of the Trust (the Trustee), captioned Cooper Industries, LLC v. PepsiAmericas, Inc., et al., Case No. 05 CH 9214 (Cook Cty. Cir. Ct.). The claims involve the Trust and insurance policy described above. Cooper asserts that it was entitled to access the $34 million that previously was in the Trust and used to purchase the insurance policy. Cooper claims that Trust funds should have been distributed for underlying Pneumo Abex asbestos claims indemnified by Cooper. Cooper complains that it was deprived of access to money in the Trust because of the Trustees decision to use the Trust funds to purchase the insurance policy described above. Pneumo Abex, LLC, the corporate successor to our prior subsidiary, has been dismissed from the suit. | ||
During the second quarter of 2006, the Trustees motion to dismiss was granted and three counts against us based on Coopers claims against the Trust were dismissed with prejudice as were all counts against the Trustee on the grounds that Cooper lacks standing to pursue its claims because it is not a beneficiary under the Trust. We then filed a separate motion to dismiss the remaining counts against us. Our motion was granted during the third quarter of 2006 and all remaining counts against us were dismissed with prejudice. Cooper subsequently filed a notice of appeal with regard to all rulings by the court dismissing the counts against us and the Trustee. Briefing of Coopers appeal is expected to take place during the first or second quarter of 2007. | ||
Discontinued OperationsProduct Liability and Toxic Tort Claims. We also have certain indemnification obligations related to product liability and toxic tort claims that might emanate out of the 1988 agreement with Pneumo Abex. Other companies not owned by or associated with us also are responsible to Pneumo Abex for the financial burden of all asbestos product liability claims filed against Pneumo Abex after a certain date in 1998, except for certain claims indemnified by us. The sites and product liability and toxic tort claims included in the aggregate accrued liabilities we have recorded are described more fully in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2005. No significant changes in the status of those sites or claims occurred and we were not notified of any significant new sites or claims during the first nine months of 2006. | ||
14. | Segment Reporting | |
We operate in one industry located in three geographic areas the U.S., Central Europe and the Caribbean. We operate in 19 states in the U.S. Outside the U.S., we operate in Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Republic of Slovakia, Romania, Puerto Rico, Jamaica, the Bahamas and Trinidad and Tobago. We have distribution rights and distribute in Moldova, Barbados, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Net sales and operating income from the QABCL acquisition since the date QABCL was consolidated are included in the Central Europe geographic segment in the table below. |
15
The following tables present net sales and operating income of our geographic segments for the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 and 2005 (in millions): |
Third Quarter | ||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | Operating Income | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 841.5 | $ | 822.8 | $ | 90.1 | $ | 111.5 | ||||||||
Central Europe |
157.2 | 99.6 | 18.0 | 7.8 | ||||||||||||
Caribbean |
65.5 | 60.5 | 1.9 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,064.2 | $ | 982.9 | $ | 110.0 | $ | 121.3 | ||||||||
First Nine Months | ||||||||||||||||
Net Sales | Operating Income | |||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 2,462.0 | $ | 2,397.4 | $ | 263.7 | $ | 311.3 | ||||||||
Central Europe |
337.5 | 266.7 | 14.7 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||
Caribbean |
178.4 | 167.6 | 1.8 | 1.4 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,977.9 | $ | 2,831.7 | $ | 280.2 | $ | 316.3 | ||||||||
15. | Related Party Transactions | |
We are a licensed producer and distributor of PepsiCo branded carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks and other non-alcoholic beverages in the U.S., Central Europe and the Caribbean. We operate under exclusive franchise agreements with soft drink concentrate producers, including master bottling and fountain syrup agreements with PepsiCo, Inc. (PepsiCo) for the manufacture, packaging, sale and distribution of PepsiCo branded products. The franchise agreements exist in perpetuity and contain operating and marketing commitments and conditions for termination. As of the end of the third quarter of 2006, PepsiCo beneficially owned approximately 44 percent of PepsiAmericas outstanding common stock. | ||
We purchase concentrate from PepsiCo to be used in the production of PepsiCo branded carbonated soft drinks and other non-alcoholic beverages. PepsiCo also provides us with various forms of bottler incentives (marketing support programs) to promote Pepsis brands. These bottler incentives cover a variety of initiatives, including direct marketplace, shared media and advertising, to support volume and market share growth. There are no conditions or requirements that could result in the repayment of any support payments we have received. | ||
We manufacture and distribute fountain products and provide fountain equipment service to PepsiCo customers in certain territories in accordance with various agreements. There are other products that we produce and/or distribute through various arrangements with PepsiCo or partners of PepsiCo. We also purchase finished beverage products from PepsiCo and certain of its affiliates including tea, concentrate and finished beverage products from a Pepsi/Lipton partnership and a Pepsi/Starbucks partnership. | ||
PepsiCo provides various procurement services under a shared services agreement. Under such agreement, PepsiCo negotiates with various suppliers the cost of certain raw materials by entering into raw material contracts on our behalf. PepsiCo also collects and remits to us certain rebates from the various suppliers related to our procurement volume. In addition, PepsiCo acts as our agent for the execution of derivative contracts associated with certain anticipated raw material purchases. | ||
We have an existing arrangement with a subsidiary of the Pohlad Companies related to the joint ownership of an aircraft. This transaction is not material to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Robert C. Pohlad, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is the President and owner of approximately 33 percent of the capital stock of Pohlad Companies. | ||
See additional discussion of our related party transactions in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year 2005. |
16
16. | Subsequent Event | |
On October 25, 2006, we publicly announced a plan to strategically realign our U.S. business to further strengthen our customer focused go-to-market strategy. The U.S. operations will be aligned by customer and channel with dedicated functional support teams to better service our customers and foster mutual growth and our plan is to put this new structure in place at the beginning of 2007. We expect to incur certain charges related to severance and other termination costs with the majority of the charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2006 with the remainder of the charge recorded in fiscal year 2007. We are unable to make an estimate of the anticipated charge at this time. |
17
18
19
20
As reported | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
U.S. |
0.6 | % | 7.9 | % | ||||
Central Europe |
50.5 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||
Caribbean |
3.8 | % | (0.4 | %) | ||||
Worldwide |
9.0 | % | 6.7 | % |
Constant territory | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
U.S. |
0.6 | % | 0.4 | % | ||||
Central Europe |
13.1 | % | 4.3 | % | ||||
Caribbean |
3.8 | % | (0.4 | %) | ||||
Worldwide |
2.8 | % | 1.0 | % |
21
Net Sales | 2006 | 2005 | Change | |||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 841.5 | $ | 822.8 | 2.3 | % | ||||||
Central Europe |
157.2 | 99.6 | 57.8 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
65.5 | 60.5 | 8.3 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 1,064.2 | $ | 982.9 | 8.3 | % | ||||||
Net Pricing Growthas reported | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
1.3 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
8.3 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
4.6 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
(0.2 | %) | 3.6 | % | ||||||||
Net Pricing Growthconstant territory | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
1.3 | % | 3.4 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
8.5 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
4.6 | % | 6.2 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
1.5 | % | 3.3 | % |
22
Cost of Goods Sold | 2006 | 2005 | Change | |||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 490.8 | $ | 467.1 | 5.1 | % | ||||||
Central Europe |
91.5 | 58.6 | 56.1 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
48.3 | 44.1 | 9.5 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 630.6 | $ | 569.8 | 10.7 | % | ||||||
Cost of Goods Sold per Unit Increaseas reported | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
4.0 | % | 3.3 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
7.2 | % | 6.8 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
7.2 | % | 3.6 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
2.2 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold per Unit Increaseconstant territory | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
4.0 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
8.2 | % | 6.8 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
7.2 | % | 3.6 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
4.1 | % | 3.8 | % |
23
SD&A Expenses | 2006 | 2005 | Change | |||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 260.6 | $ | 246.0 | 5.9 | % | ||||||
Central Europe |
47.7 | 33.2 | 43.7 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
15.3 | 14.4 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 323.6 | $ | 293.6 | 10.2 | % | ||||||
SD&A as Percent of Net Sales | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
31.0 | % | 29.9 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
30.3 | % | 33.3 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
23.4 | % | 23.8 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
30.4 | % | 29.9 | % |
2006 | 2005 | Change | ||||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 90.1 | $ | 111.5 | (19.2 | %) | ||||||
Central Europe |
18.0 | 7.8 | 130.8 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
1.9 | 2.0 | (5.0 | %) | ||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 110.0 | $ | 121.3 | (9.3 | %) | ||||||
24
As reported | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
U.S. |
0.9 | % | 7.5 | % | ||||
Central Europe |
24.0 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||
Caribbean |
1.1 | % | 8.5 | % | ||||
Worldwide |
4.3 | % | 6.8 | % |
Constant territory | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||
U.S. |
0.9 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||
Central Europe |
9.7 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||
Caribbean |
1.1 | % | 8.5 | % | ||||
Worldwide |
2.2 | % | 1.1 | % |
25
Net Sales | 2006 | 2005 | Change | |||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 2,462.0 | $ | 2,397.4 | 2.7 | % | ||||||
Central Europe |
337.5 | 266.7 | 26.5 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
178.4 | 167.6 | 6.4 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 2,977.9 | $ | 2,831.7 | 5.2 | % | ||||||
Net Pricing Growth-as reported | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
1.3 | % | 3.4 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
4.0 | % | 7.4 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
5.5 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
0.7 | % | 4.1 | % | ||||||||
Net Pricing Growth-constant territory | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
1.3 | % | 3.5 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
3.8 | % | 7.4 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
5.5 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
1.3 | % | 3.8 | % |
26
Cost of Goods Sold | 2006 | 2005 | Change | |||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 1,432.7 | $ | 1,352.1 | 6.0 | % | ||||||
Central Europe |
201.8 | 161.3 | 25.1 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
132.5 | 124.1 | 6.8 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 1,767.0 | $ | 1,637.5 | 7.9 | % | ||||||
Cost of Goods Sold per Unit Increase-as reported | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
4.3 | % | 3.1 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
2.7 | % | 14.9 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
6.5 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
3.3 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||||
Cost of Goods Sold per Unit Increase-constant territory | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
4.3 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
3.2 | % | 14.9 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
6.5 | % | 4.6 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
4.0 | % | 4.2 | % |
27
SD&A Expenses | 2006 | 2005 | Change | |||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 765.6 | $ | 749.1 | 2.2 | % | ||||||
Central Europe |
118.8 | 99.3 | 19.6 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
44.1 | 42.1 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 928.5 | $ | 890.5 | 4.3 | % | ||||||
SD&A as Percent of Net Sales | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||
U.S. |
31.1 | % | 31.2 | % | ||||||||
Central Europe |
35.2 | % | 37.2 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
24.7 | % | 25.1 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
31.2 | % | 31.4 | % |
2006 | 2005 | Change | ||||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 263.7 | $ | 311.3 | (15.3 | %) | ||||||
Central Europe |
14.7 | 3.6 | 308.3 | % | ||||||||
Caribbean |
1.8 | 1.4 | 28.6 | % | ||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 280.2 | $ | 316.3 | (11.4 | %) | ||||||
28
29
30
31
32
33
(a) | Not applicable. | ||
(b) | Not applicable. | ||
(c) | Our share repurchase program activity for each of the three months and the quarter ended September 30, 2006 was as follows: |
Total Number of | Maximum Number | |||||||||||||||
Total | Average | Shares Purchased | of Shares that May | |||||||||||||
Number of | Price | as Part of Publicly | Yet Be Purchased | |||||||||||||
Shares | Paid per | Announced Plans | Under the Plans or | |||||||||||||
Period | Purchased | Share | or Programs | Programs (1) | ||||||||||||
July 2 July 29, 2006 |
| $ | | 30,165,500 | 9,834,500 | |||||||||||
July 30
August 26, 2006 |
| | 30,165,500 | 9,834,500 | ||||||||||||
August 27 September 30, 2006 |
| | 30,165,500 | 9,834,500 | ||||||||||||
For the Quarter Ended
September 30, 2006 |
| $ | | |||||||||||||
(1) | On July 21, 2005, we announced that our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 20 million additional shares under a previously authorized repurchase program. This repurchase authorization does not have a scheduled expiration date. |
(a) | Item 8.01. Other Events. On November 2, 2006, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.125 per share on PepsiAmericas common stock. The dividend is payable January 2, 2007 to shareholders of record on December 15, 2006. Our Board of Directors reviews the dividend policy on a quarterly basis. | ||
(b) | Not applicable. |
See Exhibit Index. |
34
PEPSIAMERICAS, INC. |
||||
Date: November 3, 2006 | By: | /s/ ALEXANDER H. WARE | ||
Alexander H. Ware | ||||
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (As Chief Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Officer of PepsiAmericas, Inc.) |
||||
35
31.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
36