e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended May 31, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Commission File Number: 0-19417
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
MASSACHUSETTS
|
|
04-2746201 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
14 Oak Park
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
Telephone Number: (781) 280-4000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2008, there were 41,153,000 shares of the registrants common stock, $.01 par value
per share, outstanding.
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2008
INDEX
2
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
November 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
216,613 |
|
|
$ |
53,879 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
42,413 |
|
|
|
285,646 |
|
|
Total cash and short-term investments |
|
|
259,026 |
|
|
|
339,525 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
88,041 |
|
|
|
93,998 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
24,384 |
|
|
|
17,891 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
12,124 |
|
|
|
13,009 |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
383,575 |
|
|
|
464,423 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
63,916 |
|
|
|
64,949 |
|
Acquired intangible assets, net |
|
|
55,159 |
|
|
|
59,931 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
153,289 |
|
|
|
149,057 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,074 |
|
|
|
17,617 |
|
Investments |
|
|
67,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
12,298 |
|
|
|
5,851 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
755,002 |
|
|
$ |
761,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion, long-term debt |
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
305 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
12,524 |
|
|
|
12,684 |
|
Accrued compensation and related taxes |
|
|
35,502 |
|
|
|
50,092 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
3,409 |
|
Other accrued liabilities |
|
|
26,490 |
|
|
|
26,493 |
|
Short-term deferred revenue |
|
|
148,402 |
|
|
|
135,487 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
223,651 |
|
|
|
228,470 |
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
10,981 |
|
|
|
11,200 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,507 |
|
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
5,129 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and additional paid-in capital;
authorized, 100,000
shares; issued and outstanding, 41,269 shares in 2008
and 42,380 shares in 2007 |
|
|
230,466 |
|
|
|
240,647 |
|
Retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive
gains of $3,731 in 2008 and $4,833 in 2007 |
|
|
279,078 |
|
|
|
277,227 |
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
509,544 |
|
|
|
517,874 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
755,002 |
|
|
$ |
761,828 |
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
Three Months Ended May 31, |
|
Six Months Ended May 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
$ |
45,015 |
|
|
$ |
44,555 |
|
|
$ |
90,117 |
|
|
$ |
89,284 |
|
Maintenance and services |
|
|
82,927 |
|
|
|
75,087 |
|
|
|
159,392 |
|
|
|
145,587 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
127,942 |
|
|
|
119,642 |
|
|
|
249,509 |
|
|
|
234,871 |
|
|
Costs of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software licenses |
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
1,880 |
|
|
|
4,460 |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
Cost of maintenance and services |
|
|
17,715 |
|
|
|
16,871 |
|
|
|
35,356 |
|
|
|
33,133 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles for
purchased technology |
|
|
2,817 |
|
|
|
2,493 |
|
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
4,984 |
|
|
Total costs of revenue |
|
|
22,696 |
|
|
|
21,244 |
|
|
|
45,306 |
|
|
|
41,669 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
105,246 |
|
|
|
98,398 |
|
|
|
204,203 |
|
|
|
193,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
48,158 |
|
|
|
45,745 |
|
|
|
94,000 |
|
|
|
90,390 |
|
Product development |
|
|
20,530 |
|
|
|
20,389 |
|
|
|
41,223 |
|
|
|
41,184 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
14,605 |
|
|
|
19,029 |
|
|
|
28,505 |
|
|
|
34,060 |
|
Amortization of other acquired intangibles |
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
1,946 |
|
|
|
2,723 |
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
84,642 |
|
|
|
87,109 |
|
|
|
166,451 |
|
|
|
169,560 |
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
20,604 |
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
37,752 |
|
|
|
23,642 |
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and other |
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
5,814 |
|
|
|
4,249 |
|
Foreign currency loss |
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
(710 |
) |
|
|
(563 |
) |
|
|
(1,538 |
) |
|
Total other income, net |
|
|
2,185 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
5,251 |
|
|
|
2,711 |
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes |
|
|
22,789 |
|
|
|
12,910 |
|
|
|
43,003 |
|
|
|
26,353 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
8,318 |
|
|
|
4,519 |
|
|
|
15,696 |
|
|
|
9,224 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,471 |
|
|
$ |
8,391 |
|
|
$ |
27,307 |
|
|
$ |
17,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
41,483 |
|
|
|
41,178 |
|
|
|
41,861 |
|
|
|
41,123 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
43,238 |
|
|
|
43,636 |
|
|
|
43,706 |
|
|
|
43,537 |
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Six Months Ended May 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27,307 |
|
|
$ |
17,129 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment |
|
|
5,275 |
|
|
|
4,849 |
|
Write-down for asset impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,388 |
|
Amortization of capitalized software costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
8,213 |
|
|
|
8,910 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
8,080 |
|
|
|
12,408 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
(1,477 |
) |
Tax benefit from stock options |
|
|
2,294 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock options |
|
|
(1,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects
from acquisitions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
8,625 |
|
|
|
(925 |
) |
Other current assets |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
(879 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
|
|
(17,582 |
) |
|
|
(17,927 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(4,442 |
) |
|
|
1,178 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
8,784 |
|
|
|
13,047 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
46,831 |
|
|
|
39,018 |
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments available for sale |
|
|
(140,806 |
) |
|
|
(108,061 |
) |
Sales and maturities of investments available for sale |
|
|
312,484 |
|
|
|
80,557 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(3,935 |
) |
|
|
(9,622 |
) |
Acquisition, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(5,728 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment in IONA Technologies |
|
|
(6,668 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Increase in other non-current assets |
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
(827 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
154,936 |
|
|
|
(37,953 |
) |
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
18,024 |
|
|
|
17,359 |
|
Excess tax benefit from stock options |
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
1,039 |
|
Payment of long-term debt |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
Repurchase of common stock |
|
|
(62,921 |
) |
|
|
(19,529 |
) |
|
Net cash used for financing activities |
|
|
(43,629 |
) |
|
|
(1,269 |
) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
4,596 |
|
|
|
2,162 |
|
|
Net increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
162,734 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
53,879 |
|
|
|
46,449 |
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
216,613 |
|
|
$ |
48,407 |
|
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
We have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regarding interim
financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete
financial statements and these unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2007.
In our opinion, we have prepared the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements on the same basis as the audited financial statements, and these financial statements
include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair
presentation of the results of the interim periods presented. The operating results for the
interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full
fiscal year.
On December 1, 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities (SFAS 159) and have not elected to use fair value measurement on any assets
or liabilities under this statement.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141R,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R establishes a framework to improve the relevance,
representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity
provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. SFAS 141R applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We will apply SFAS
141R to any acquisition after the date of adoption.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 161) as an amendment to SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. SFAS 161 requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be
disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation. SFAS 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently
evaluating whether adoption of SFAS 161 will have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Note 2: Revenue Recognition
We recognize software license revenue upon shipment of the product or, if delivered electronically,
when the customer has the right to access the software, provided that the license fee is fixed or
determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and collection is probable. We do not
consider software license arrangements with payment terms greater than ninety days beyond our
standard payment terms to be fixed and determinable and therefore such software license fees are
recognized upon due date. We do not license our software with a right of return and generally do
not license our software with conditions of acceptance. If an arrangement does contain conditions
of acceptance, we defer recognition of the revenue until the acceptance criteria are met or the
period of acceptance has passed. We generally recognize revenue for products distributed through
application partners and distributors when sold through to the end-user.
We generally sell our software licenses with maintenance services and, in some cases, also with
consulting services. For the undelivered elements, we determine vendor-specific objective evidence
(VSOE) of fair value to be the price charged when the undelivered element is sold separately. We
determine VSOE for maintenance sold in connection with a software license based on the amount that
will be separately charged for the maintenance renewal period. We determine VSOE for consulting
services by reference to the amount charged for similar engagements when a software license sale is
not involved.
6
We generally recognize revenue from software licenses sold together with maintenance and/or
consulting services upon shipment using the residual method, provided that the above criteria have
been met. If VSOE of fair value for the undelivered elements cannot be established, we defer all
revenue from the arrangement until the earlier of the point at which such sufficient VSOE does
exist or all elements of the arrangement have been delivered, or if the only undelivered element is
maintenance, then we recognize the entire fee ratably. If payment of the software license fees is
dependent upon the performance of consulting services or the consulting services are essential to
the functionality of the licensed software, then we generally recognize both the software license
and consulting fees using the percentage of completion method.
We recognize maintenance revenue ratably over the term of the applicable agreement. We generally
recognize revenue from services, primarily consulting and customer education, as the related
services are performed.
Note 3: Earnings Per Share
We calculate basic earnings per share using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding. We compute diluted earnings per share on the basis of the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding plus the effects of outstanding stock options using the treasury stock
method. The following table provides the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share on an
interim basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
Three Months Ended May 31, |
|
Six Months Ended May 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
14,471 |
|
|
$ |
8,391 |
|
|
$ |
27,307 |
|
|
$ |
17,129 |
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
41,483 |
|
|
|
41,178 |
|
|
|
41,861 |
|
|
|
41,123 |
|
Dilutive impact from outstanding stock
Options |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
2,458 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
2,414 |
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding |
|
|
43,238 |
|
|
|
43,636 |
|
|
|
43,706 |
|
|
|
43,537 |
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
Stock options to purchase approximately 2,865,000 shares and 2,156,000 shares of common stock were
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal years
2008 and 2007, respectively, because these options were anti-dilutive. Stock options to purchase
approximately 2,715,000 shares and 2,561,000 shares of common stock were excluded from the
calculation of diluted earnings per share in the first six months of fiscal years 2008 and 2007,
respectively, because these options were anti-dilutive.
Note 4: Stock-based Compensation
Our stock-based compensation expense reflects the fair value of stock-based awards measured at the
grant date, is recognized over the relevant service period, and is adjusted each period for
anticipated forfeitures. We estimate the fair value of each stock-based award on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model
incorporates assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options, a risk-free
interest rate and dividend yield.
7
The following table provides the classification of stock-based compensation as reflected in our
consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three Months Ended May 31, |
|
Six Months Ended May 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software licenses |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
74 |
|
Cost of maintenance and services |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
862 |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
Product development |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
1,856 |
|
|
|
2,850 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
2,846 |
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
Total stock-based
compensation expense |
|
$ |
4,110 |
|
|
$ |
7,531 |
|
|
$ |
8,080 |
|
|
$ |
12,408 |
|
|
Note 5: Income Taxes
We provide for income taxes during interim periods based on the estimated effective tax rate for
the full fiscal year. We record cumulative adjustments to the tax provision in an interim period in
which a change in the estimated annual effective rate is determined. We record valuation
allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
We have not provided for U.S. income taxes on the undistributed earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries,
as these earnings have been permanently reinvested or would be principally offset by foreign tax
credits.
On December 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 contains a two-step approach
to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with Statement
109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates
that it is more likely than not that, on an evaluation of the technical merits, the tax position
will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes.
The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement.
The total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 1, 2007 (the date of adoption of
FIN 48) was $4.4 million which was reclassified to non-current liabilities. In addition, as of the
date of adoption, $4.3 million of unrecognized benefits would affect our effective tax rate if
realized. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a nominal decrease to our retained earnings. We
recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a component of our provision
for income taxes and the gross amount of interest and penalties accrued as of the date of adoption
was $0.3 million.
Domestically, U.S. federal and state taxing authorities are currently examining our income tax
returns for years through fiscal 2005. Many issues are at an advanced stage in the examination
process, the most significant of which relates to research and development credits. With all
domestic audit issues considered in the aggregate, we believe it was reasonably possible that, as
of December 1, 2007, the unrecognized tax benefits related to these audits could decrease (whether
by payment, release, or a combination of both) in the next 12 months by as much as $1.5 million.
Our U.S. federal and, with some exceptions, our state income tax returns have been examined or are
closed by statute for all years prior to fiscal 2003, and we are no longer subject to audit for
those periods.
Internationally, tax authorities for certain non-U.S. jurisdictions are also examining returns
affecting unrecognized tax benefits. With some exceptions, we are generally no longer subject to
tax examinations in non-U.S. jurisdictions for years prior to fiscal 2001.
We believe that we have adequately provided for any reasonably foreseeable outcomes related to our
tax audits and that any settlement will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position or results of operations. However, there can be no assurances as to the possible
outcomes.
8
Note 6: Adoption of SFAS 157 Fair Value Measurements
On December 1, 2007, we adopted SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157). In February
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No.
157, which provides a one year deferral of the effective date of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets
and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial
statements at fair value at least annually. Therefore, we only have adopted the provisions of SFAS
157 with respect to our financial assets and liabilities. This statement defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value
hierarchy of our financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at the Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active Markets |
|
|
Significant Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
Using Identical |
|
|
Observable Inputs |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
Description |
|
2008 |
|
|
Assets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
Inputs (Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
110,104 |
|
|
$ |
42,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,691 |
|
Investment in IONA |
|
|
6,534 |
|
|
|
6,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
117,203 |
|
|
$ |
48,947 |
|
|
$ |
565 |
|
|
$ |
67,691 |
|
|
Since the end of the first quarter, we have reclassified our investments related to auction rate
securities (ARS) to the Level 3 category, which total $67.7 million and are classified as
non-current. Previously, such investments were classified in the Level 2 category. We
reclassified our ARS to the Level 3 category as some of the inputs used in the trinomial discount
model (described below) included unobservable inputs. Our ARS are floating rate securities with
longer-term maturities which are marketed by financial institutions with auction reset dates at
primarily 28 or 35 day intervals to provide short-term liquidity. The underlying collateral of the
ARS consist primarily of municipal bonds, which are insured by monoline insurance companies, with
the remainder consisting of student loans, which are supported by the federal government as part of
the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) and by the monoline insurance companies.
Beginning in February, auctions for these securities began to fail, and the interest rates for
these ARS reset to the maximum rate per the applicable investment offering document. As of
February 29, 2008, our ARS investments totaled $109.8 million. During the second quarter,
investments totaling $38.2 million were either redeemed at par by the issuer or sold at a
successful auction, reducing the par value of our ARS investments to $71.6 million. We will not be
able to access these remaining funds until a future auction for these ARS is successful, we sell
the securities in a secondary market which currently is not active, or they are redeemed by the
issuer. As such, these remaining investments currently lack short-term liquidity and were
therefore reclassified as non-current on our balance sheet.
The following table reflects the activity for our major classes of assets measured at fair value
using level 3 inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Available |
|
|
|
For-sale |
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
|
|
Transfers from Level 2 |
|
|
109,800 |
|
Redemptions and sales |
|
|
(38,245 |
) |
Unrealized losses included in accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(3,864 |
) |
|
Balance, May 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
67,691 |
|
|
For each of our ARS, we evaluated the risks related to the structure, collateral and liquidity of
the investment, and forecasted the probability of issuer default, auction failure and a successful
auction at par or a redemption at par for
9
each future auction period. Using a trinomial discount model, the weighted average cash flow for
each period was then discounted back to present value for each security. Based on this methodology,
we determined that the fair value of our ARS investments is $67.7 million, and we recorded a
temporary impairment charge of $3.9 million to reduce the value of our ARS. Based on our cash and
short-term investments balance of $259.0 million and expected operating cash flows, we do not
anticipate the lack of liquidity associated with our ARS to adversely affect our ability to conduct
business and believe we have the ability to hold the remaining securities throughout the currently
estimated recovery period, therefore the impairment was only temporary in nature.
Note 7: Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income include net income, foreign currency translation adjustments
and unrealized gains and losses on investments. The following table provides the composition of
comprehensive income on an interim basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three Months Ended May 31, |
|
Six Months Ended May 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income, as reported |
|
$ |
14,471 |
|
|
$ |
8,391 |
|
|
$ |
27,307 |
|
|
$ |
17,129 |
|
Foreign currency
translation adjustments,
net of tax |
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
1,386 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses)
on investments, net of tax |
|
|
(2,465 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(2,401 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
12,885 |
|
|
$ |
9,760 |
|
|
$ |
26,205 |
|
|
$ |
18,313 |
|
|
Note 8: Common Stock Repurchases
In September 2007, the Board of Directors authorized, for the period from October 1, 2007 through
September 30, 2008, the purchase of up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, at such times that
management deems such purchases to be an effective use of cash. We purchased and retired
approximately 2,088,000 shares of our common stock for $62.9 million in the first six months of
fiscal 2008 as compared to approximately 705,000 shares of our common stock for $19.5 million in
the first six months of fiscal 2007.
Note 9: Goodwill
Goodwill is the amount by which the cost of acquired net assets in a business acquisition exceeded
the fair value of net identifiable assets on the date of purchase. Goodwill in certain
jurisdictions changes each period due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. During the
first quarter of fiscal 2008, we completed our annual testing for impairment of goodwill and, based
on those tests, concluded that no impairment of goodwill existed as of December 15, 2007. For
purposes of the annual impairment test, we assigned goodwill of $30.3 million to the OpenEdge and
SOA operating segment, $88.2 million to the DataDirect Technologies operating segment, excluding a
preliminary allocation of $4.2 million of goodwill related to the Xcalia acquisition which occurred
in February 2008, and $30.6 million to the other operating segment. See Note 10 for a description
of each operating segment.
Note 10: Segment Information
At the beginning of fiscal 2008, we reorganized our business into five operating segments. The
reorganization resulted in the separation of the DataXtend Division as its own separate operating
segment from the Enterprise Infrastructure Division and the combination of the remainder of the
Enterprise Infrastructure Division with the OpenEdge Division, which created the OpenEdge and SOA
Group. Our principal operating segment conducts business as the OpenEdge and SOA Group. The
OpenEdge and SOA Group provides the Progress® OpenEdge platform and the Sonic and Actional product
sets, interoperable, best-in-class service infrastructure products used to build, deploy and manage
a service-oriented architecture. Another significant operating segment, DataDirect Technologies,
provides standards-based data connectivity software. Our other three operating segments include
the DataXtend Division, the Apama Division and the EasyAsk Division.
10
Segment information is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. This standard is based on a management approach, which
requires segmentation based upon our internal organization and disclosure of revenue and operating
income based upon internal accounting methods. Our chief decision maker (CDM) is our Chief
Executive Officer.
For fiscal 2008, we have two operating segments which met the requirements for separate disclosure:
OpenEdge and SOA Group and DataDirect Technologies. The other three operating segments are below
the threshold for separate disclosure and are included in the Other segment. We do not manage our
assets, capital expenditures, total other income or provision for income taxes by segment. We
managed such items on a company basis.
The following table provides revenue and income from operations from our reportable segments on an
interim basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Three months ended, |
|
Six months ended, |
|
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
May 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OpenEdge and SOA segment |
|
$ |
102,654 |
|
|
$ |
201,866 |
|
DataDirect Technologies segment |
|
|
17,512 |
|
|
|
34,610 |
|
Other segment |
|
|
9,363 |
|
|
|
16,054 |
|
Reconciling items |
|
|
(1,587 |
) |
|
|
(3,021 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
127,942 |
|
|
$ |
249,509 |
|
|
Income (loss) from operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OpenEdge and SOA segment |
|
$ |
31,052 |
|
|
$ |
60,213 |
|
DataDirect Technologies segment |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
Other segment |
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
(5,054 |
) |
Reconciling items |
|
|
(9,172 |
) |
|
|
(19,976 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
20,604 |
|
|
$ |
37,752 |
|
|
We did not include prior year comparisons as it is not practical to restate the fiscal 2007 data
into the fiscal 2008 structure or the fiscal 2008 data into the fiscal 2007 structure.
The reconciling items within revenue primarily represent intersegment sales, which are accounted
for as if sold under an equivalent arms-length basis arrangement. Amounts included under
reconciling items within income from operations represent amortization of acquired intangibles,
stock-based compensation and certain unallocated administrative expenses.
Total revenue by significant product line, regardless of which segment generated the revenue, is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Three Months Ended May 31, |
|
Six Months Ended May 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DataDirect |
|
$ |
17,512 |
|
|
$ |
16,892 |
|
|
$ |
34,610 |
|
|
$ |
33,197 |
|
Enterprise Infrastructure |
|
|
23,316 |
|
|
|
20,894 |
|
|
|
44,796 |
|
|
|
38,016 |
|
Progress OpenEdge and other |
|
|
87,114 |
|
|
|
81,856 |
|
|
|
170,103 |
|
|
|
163,658 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
127,942 |
|
|
$ |
119,642 |
|
|
$ |
249,509 |
|
|
$ |
234,871 |
|
|
Note 11: Acquisition of Xcalia
On February 5, 2008, we acquired, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the stock of Xcalia SA
(Xcalia) for an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 million, net of cash acquired. Xcalia is a leader
in the development and adoption of service data objects standard and data integration technologies.
The purpose of the acquisition was to expand the product offerings within the DataDirect product
line. Upon the closing of the transaction, Xcalia became part of our DataDirect Technologies
operating segment. We accounted for the acquisition as a purchase, and accordingly, we
11
included the results of operations of Xcalia in our operating results from February 5, 2008, the
date of acquisition. Transaction costs related to this acquisition included $0.9 million of direct
acquisition costs. We paid the purchase price in cash from available funds.
For this acquisition, we obtained a valuation from an independent appraiser for the amounts
assigned to intangible assets. The preliminary allocation of the purchase price as of February 29,
2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Total |
|
Life (in years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities, including cash |
|
$ |
(440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Acquired intangible assets |
|
|
3,700 |
|
|
|
3 to 4 years |
|
Goodwill (not deductible for tax purposes) |
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
|
6,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: cash acquired |
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash paid |
|
$ |
5,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma financial information has not been presented, as the historical operations of Xcalia are
not significant to our consolidated financial statements.
Note 12: Contingencies
On June 23, 2006, we received written notice that the Enforcement Staff in the Boston,
Massachusetts office of the SEC had begun an informal inquiry into our option-granting practices
during the period December 1, 1995 through November 30, 2002. On December 19, 2006, the SEC
informed us that it had issued a formal order of investigation into our option-granting practices
during the period December 1, 1995 through the present. We are unable to predict with certainty
what consequences may arise from the SEC investigation. We have already incurred, and expect to
continue to incur, significant legal expenses arising from the investigation. If the SEC
institutes legal action, we could face significant fines and penalties and be required to take
remedial actions determined by the SEC or a court. Although we have filed certain restated
financial statements that we believe correct the accounting errors arising from our past
option-granting practices, the filing of those financial statements did not resolve the pending SEC
inquiry. The SEC has not indicated to us whether it has reviewed our restated financial statements,
and any SEC review could lead to further restatements or other modifications of our financial
statements.
On August 17, 2006, a derivative complaint styled Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Derivatively
on Behalf of Progress Software Corporation, v. Joseph Alsop et al, Civ. Act. No. 06-CA-11459 RCL
was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts by a party
identifying itself as one of our shareholders purporting to act on our behalf against our directors
and certain of our present and former officers. We were also named as a nominal defendant. The
complaint alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
10b-5, breaches of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust
enrichment arising from the allegedly improper backdating of certain stock option grants. The
complaint sought monetary damages, restitution, disgorgement, rescission of stock options, punitive
damages and other relief. A Special Litigation Committee was formed by our Board of Directors to
investigate and determine our response to the complaint. On September 25, 2007, the Court, in
response to our motion, dismissed the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System complaint on the grounds
that the Plaintiff failed to make a proper pre-filing demand upon our Board of Directors, and
entered judgment for Defendants. On May 5, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a second derivative
complaint, largely identical to the first, in the same court. By agreement of the parties, the
court has stayed all proceedings while the Special Litigation Committees investigation is ongoing.
On January 16, 2007, another party identifying itself as one of our shareholders purporting to act
on our behalf filed a derivative complaint styled Acuna, Derivatively on Behalf of Progress
Software Corporation v. Joseph Alsop et al., Civ. Act. No. 07-0157 against our directors and
certain of our present and former officers in Massachusetts Superior Court. We are named as a
nominal defendant in this action as well. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duty, aiding
and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment arising from the allegedly
12
improper backdating of certain stock option grants. The complaint seeks monetary damages and
disgorgement, among other forms of relief.
Further, on March 28, 2007, an additional party identifying itself as one of our shareholders
purporting to act on our behalf filed a derivative complaint styled White, Derivatively on Behalf
Of Nominal Defendant Progress v. Progress Software Corporation et al., Civ 07-01172, in
Massachusetts Superior Court. This complaint involves substantially the same defendants,
allegations and demands for relief as the Acuna complaint described above. On June 26, 2007, the
White and Acuna cases were consolidated. The consolidated case has been stayed while the Special
Litigation Committees investigation is ongoing.
The ultimate outcome of any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. These matters could divert the attention of our management and harm our business. In
addition, we have incurred, and expect to continue to incur legal expenses arising from these
matters, which may be significant, including the advancement of legal expenses to our directors and
officers. We have certain indemnification obligations to our directors and officers, and the
outcome of derivative or any other litigation may require that we indemnify some or all of our
directors and officers for expenses they may incur in defending the litigation and other losses.
We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which
arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these other claims cannot be
predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these other legal
matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Note 13: Subsequent Events
On June 13, 2008, we acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of
Mindreef, Inc. (Mindreef) for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $6 million, net of cash
acquired. The purpose of the acquisition is to expand the capabilities of our Actional
product-line. The Mindreef assets will be combined into our OpenEdge and SOA segment. The
purchase price was paid in cash from available funds.
On June 25, 2008, we signed a definitive agreement under which we have agreed to acquire IONA
Technologies plc (IONA) for $4.05 per share in cash. This represents a total equity value of
approximately $162 million and approximately $106 million net of cash and marketable securities
reported by IONA on March 31, 2008. The IONA Technologies Board of Directors has unanimously
approved the transaction and each IONA Technologies director has entered into an agreement to vote
their IONA shares in favor of the transaction. The acquisition will be effected by means of a
scheme of arrangement under Irish law. The acquisition will be subject to the terms and conditions
to be set forth in the scheme of arrangement document to be delivered to IONA shareholders. To
become effective, the scheme of arrangement requires, among other things, the approval of a
majority in number of IONA shareholders, present and voting either in person or by proxy,
representing 75% or more in value of the IONA shares held by such holders. We own 362,000 shares
of IONA common stock and have an economic interest, through contracts for difference, in 1,443,000
shares of IONA common stock. Such equity was purchased in the second quarter and represents
approximately 5% of the issued share capital of IONA. The acquisition is also subject to
regulatory approval in the U.S. and the approval of the Irish High Court. Assuming the necessary
approvals are obtained and all conditions have been satisfied, the acquisition will become
effective upon delivery to the Registrar of Companies in Ireland of the court order of the Irish
High Court sanctioning the scheme. Upon the acquisition becoming effective, it will be binding on
all IONA shareholders. The acquisition is expected to close in September 2008.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains certain safe harbor provisions
regarding forward-looking statements. This Form 10-Q, and other information provided by us or
statements made by our directors, officers or employees from time to time, may contain
forward-looking statements and information, which involve risks and uncertainties. Actual future
results may differ materially. Statements indicating that we expect, estimate, believe, are
planning or plan to are forward-looking, as are other statements concerning future
13
financial results, product offerings or other events that have not yet occurred. There are several
important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those
anticipated by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include those referenced in Part II,
Item 1A of this Form 10-Q under the heading Risk Factors. Although we have sought to identify
the most significant risks to our business, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of
such risks may be realized. We also cannot assure you that we have identified all possible issues
which we might face. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements that we
make.
Overview
We develop, market and distribute software to simplify and accelerate the development, deployment,
integration and management of business applications. Our mission is to deliver software products
and services that empower partners and customers to improve their development, deployment,
integration and management of quality applications worldwide. Our products include development
tools, databases, application servers, messaging servers, application management tools, data
connectivity products and integration products that enable the highly distributed deployment of
responsive applications across internal networks, the Internet and occasionally-connected users.
Through our various operating units, we market our products globally to a broad range of
organizations in manufacturing, distribution, finance, retail, healthcare, telecommunications,
government and many other fields.
We derive a significant portion of our revenue from international operations. In all of fiscal
2007 and the first six months of fiscal 2008, the weakening of the U.S. dollar against most major
currencies, primarily the euro and the British pound, positively affected the translation of our
results into U.S. dollars.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based
upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We make estimates and assumptions
in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ from these
estimates.
We have identified the following critical accounting policies that require the use of significant
judgments and estimates in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. This listing
is not a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. For further information regarding
the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 1 in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November
30, 2007, as well as the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 of this
Form 10-Q.
Revenue Recognition Our revenue recognition policy is significant because revenue is a key
component affecting results of operations. In determining when to recognize revenue from a
customer arrangement, we are often required to exercise judgment regarding the application of our
accounting policies to a particular arrangement. For example, judgment is required in determining
whether a customer arrangement has multiple elements. When such a situation exists, judgment is
also involved in determining whether vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of fair value for
the undelivered elements exists. While we follow specific and detailed rules and guidelines
related to revenue recognition, we make and use significant management judgments and estimates in
connection with the revenue recognized in any reporting period, particularly in the areas described
above, as well as collectibility. If management made different estimates or judgments, material
differences in the timing of the recognition of revenue could occur.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated
losses resulting from the inability of customers to make required payments. We establish this
allowance using estimates that we make based on factors such as the composition of the accounts
receivable aging, historical bad debts, changes in payment patterns, changes to customer
creditworthiness and current economic trends. If we used different estimates, or if the financial
condition of customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, we would require additional provisions for doubtful accounts that would increase bad debt
expense.
14
Goodwill and Intangible Assets We had goodwill and net intangible assets of approximately $208
million at May 31, 2008. We assess the impairment of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets
on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
of the asset may not be recoverable. We would record an impairment charge if such an assessment
were to indicate that the fair value of such assets was less than the carrying value. Judgment is
required in determining whether an event has occurred that may impair the value of goodwill or
identifiable intangible assets. Factors that could indicate that an impairment may exist include
significant underperformance relative to plan or long-term projections, changes in business
strategy, significant negative industry or economic trends or a significant decline in our stock
price or in the value of one of our reporting units for a sustained period of time. We utilize
cash flow models to determine the fair value of our reporting units. We must make assumptions
about future cash flows, future operating plans, discount rates and other factors in our models.
Different assumptions and judgment determinations could yield different conclusions that would
result in an impairment charge to income in the period that such change or determination was made.
Income Tax Accounting We had a net deferred tax asset of approximately $27 million at May 31,
2008. We record valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more
likely than not to be realized. We consider scheduled reversals of temporary differences,
projected future taxable income, ongoing tax planning strategies and other matters in assessing the
need for and the amount of a valuation allowance. If we were to change our assumptions or otherwise
determine that we were unable to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future,
an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period that such change
or determination was made. On a quarterly basis we provide for income taxes based on the estimated
effective tax rate for the full fiscal year.
On December 1, 2007, we adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48). FIN 48 contains a two-step approach
to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with Statement
109, Accounting for Income Taxes. The first step is to evaluate the tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates
that it is more likely than not that, on an evaluation of the technical merits, the tax position
will be sustained on audit, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes.
The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of
being realized upon ultimate settlement. Management judgment is required for each step. If
management made different estimates or judgments, material differences in the amount accrued for
uncertain tax positions could have occurred.
Stock-Based Compensation We account for stock-based compensation expense in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Share-based Payments, (SFAS 123R).
Under SFAS 123R, stock-based compensation expense reflects the fair value of stock-based awards
measured at the grant date, is recognized over the relevant service period, and is adjusted each
period for anticipated forfeitures. We estimate the fair value of each stock-based award on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation
model incorporates assumptions as to stock price volatility, the expected life of options, a
risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. Many of these assumptions are highly subjective and
require the exercise of management judgment. Our management must also apply judgment in developing
an estimate of awards that may be forfeited. If our actual experience differs significantly from
our estimates and we choose to employ different assumptions in the future, the stock-based
compensation expense that we record in future periods may differ materially from that recorded in
the current period.
Investments in Debt Securities As of May 31, 2008, we had approximately $67.7 million in
investments related to auction rate securities (ARS), all of which are classified as non-current.
This balance is after recording a temporary reduction in value of $3.9 million. Our ARS are
floating rate securities with longer-term maturities which are marketed by financial institutions
with auction reset dates at primarily 28 or 35 day intervals to provide short-term liquidity. The
underlying collateral of the ARS consist primarily of municipal bonds, which are insured by
monoline insurance companies, with the remainder consisting of student loans, which are supported
by the federal government as part of the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) and by the
monoline insurance companies. Beginning in February, auctions for certain of these securities
began to fail, which has resulted in higher interest rates being earned on these securities and
less certainty around the short-term liquidity of these securities. As of February 29, 2008, our
ARS investments totaled $109.8 million. During the second quarter, investments totaling $38.2
million were either redeemed at par by the issuer or sold at a successful auction, reducing the par
15
value of our ARS investments to $71.6 million. We will not be able to access these funds until a
future auction for these ARS is successful or until we sell the securities in a secondary market
which currently is not active, although there have been instances of redemptions at par by
municipalities through refinance of new debt to date. As such, certain of these investments
currently lack short-term liquidity and were therefore reclassified as non-current on our balance
sheet. If the credit rating of either the security issuer or the third-party insurer underlying
the investments deteriorates, we may be required to adjust the carrying value of the ARS through an
impairment charge.
Results of Operations
The following table provides certain income and expense items as a percentage of total revenue, and
the percentage change in dollar amounts of such items compared with the corresponding period in the
previous fiscal year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Total Revenue |
|
Period-to-Period Change |
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Three |
|
|
Six |
|
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
May 31, |
|
|
Month |
|
|
Month |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Period |
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
38 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
Maintenance and services |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Costs of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of software licenses |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Cost of maintenance and services |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased
technology |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
Total costs of revenue |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Product development |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Amortization of other acquired
intangibles |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
Income from operations |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Other income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
Income before provision for taxes |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Net income |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
72 |
% |
|
|
59 |
% |
|
Revenue. Our total revenue increased 7% from $119.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to
$127.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Total revenue would have increased by 1% if
exchange rates had been constant in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to exchange rates
in effect in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Total revenue increased 6% from $234.9 million in
the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $249.5 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008.
Total revenue would have increased by 1% if exchange rates had been constant in the first six
months of fiscal 2008 as compared to exchange rates in effect in the first six months of fiscal
2007.
Revenue from our Progress OpenEdge product line increased 6% from $81.9 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2007 to $87.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and increased 4% from
$163.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $170.1 million in the first six months of
fiscal 2008. Revenue derived from our Enterprise Infrastructure product lines increased 12% from
$20.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to $23.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2008 and increased 18% from $38.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $44.8 million
in the first six months of fiscal 2008. Revenue from our DataDirect product line increased 4% from
16
$16.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to $17.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2008 and increased 4% from $33.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $34.6 million in
the first six months of fiscal 2008.
Software license revenue increased 1% from $44.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to
$45.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Software license revenue would have decreased
by 4% if exchange rates had been constant in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to
exchange rates in effect in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Software license revenue increased
1% from $89.3 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $90.1 million in the first six
months of fiscal 2008. Software license revenue would have decreased by 4% if exchange rates had
been constant in the first six months of fiscal 2008 as compared to exchange rates in effect in the
first six months of fiscal 2007. Excluding the impact of changes in exchange rates, the decrease
in software license revenue was due to decreases in our OpenEdge and DataDirect product lines
partially offset by an increase in our Enterprise Infrastructure product line.
Maintenance and services revenue increased 10% from $75.1 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2007 to $82.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Maintenance and services revenue would
have increased by 3% if exchange rates had been constant in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 as
compared to exchange rates in effect in the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Maintenance and
services revenue increased 9% from $145.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $159.4
million in the first six months of fiscal 2008. Maintenance and services revenue would have
increased by 3% if exchange rates had been constant in the first six months of fiscal 2008 as
compared to exchange rates in effect in the first six months of fiscal 2007. Excluding the impact
of changes in exchange rates, the increase in maintenance and services revenue was primarily the
result of growth in our installed customer base and renewal of maintenance agreements.
Total revenue generated in markets outside North America increased 12% from $68.0 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2007 to $76.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and represented
57% of total revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 and 60% of total revenue in the second
quarter of fiscal 2008. Revenue from the three major regions outside North America, consisting of
EMEA, Latin America and Asia Pacific, each increased in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 as
compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2007. Total revenue generated in markets outside North
America would have represented 57% of total revenue if exchange rates had been constant in the
second quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to the exchange rates in effect in the second quarter of
fiscal 2007.
Total revenue generated in markets outside North America increased 11% from $133.1 million in the
first six months of fiscal 2007 to $147.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008 and
represented 57% of total revenue in the first six months of fiscal 2007 and 59% of total revenue in
the first six months of fiscal 2008. Revenue from the three major regions outside North America,
consisting of EMEA, Latin America and Asia Pacific, each increased in fiscal 2008 as compared to
fiscal 2007. Total revenue generated in markets outside North America would have represented 57%
of total revenue if exchange rates had been constant in the first six months of fiscal 2008 as
compared to the exchange rates in effect in the first six months of fiscal 2007.
Cost of Software Licenses. Cost of software licenses consists primarily of costs of product
media, documentation, duplication, packaging, electronic software distribution, royalties and
amortization of capitalized software costs. Cost of software licenses increased 15% from $1.9
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to $2.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008,
and increased as a percentage of software license revenue from 4% in the first quarter of fiscal
2007 to 5% in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Cost of software licenses increased 26% from
$3.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $4.5 million in the first six months of
fiscal 2008, and increased as a percentage of software licenses revenue from 4% in the first six
months of fiscal 2007 to 5% in the first six months of fiscal 2008. The dollar increase for the
second quarter and for the first six months was primarily due to higher royalty expense for
products and technologies licensed or resold from third parties. Cost of software licenses as a
percentage of software license revenue may vary from period to period depending upon the relative
product mix.
Cost of Maintenance and Services. Cost of maintenance and services consists primarily of costs of
providing customer technical support, education and consulting. Cost of maintenance and services
increased 5% from $16.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to $17.7 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2008, and decreased as a percentage of maintenance and services revenue from 22%
in the first quarter of fiscal 2007 to 21% in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Cost of
maintenance and services increased 7% from $33.1 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to
$35.4 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008, and decreased as a percentage of maintenance
and
17
services revenue from 23% to 22%. The total dollar amount in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and
in the first six months of fiscal 2008 increased primarily due to higher usage of third-party
contractors for service engagements. Our technical support, education and consulting headcount
decreased by 1% from the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to the end of the second quarter
of fiscal 2008.
Amortization of Acquired Intangibles for Purchased Technology. Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased technology primarily represents the amortization of the value assigned to
technology-related intangible assets obtained in business combinations. Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased technology increased 13% from $2.5 million in the second quarter of
fiscal 2007 to $2.8 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Amortization of acquired
intangibles for purchased technology increased 10% from $5.0 million in the first six months of
fiscal 2007 to $5.5 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008. The increase was due to
amortization expense associated with the acquisition of Xcalia in the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit increased 7% from $98.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal
2007 to $105.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Our gross profit percentage of total
revenue remained the same at 82% in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the second
quarter of fiscal 2008. Our gross profit increased 6% from $193.2 million in the first six months
of fiscal 2007 to $204.2 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008. Our gross profit
percentage of total revenue remained the same at 82% in the first six months of fiscal 2007
compared to the first six months of fiscal 2008.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased 5% from $45.7 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2007 to $48.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, and remained the same
as a percentage of total revenue at 38%. Sales and marketing expenses increased 4% from $90.4
million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $94.0 million in the first six months of fiscal
2008, and remained the same as a percentage of total revenue at 38%. The increase in sales and
marketing expenses was due to higher average selling costs per head, partially offset by a decrease
in marketing program expenses. Our sales support and marketing headcount decreased by 2% from the
end of the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Product Development. Product development expenses increased 1% from $20.4 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2007 to $20.5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, and decreased as a
percentage of revenue from 17% to 16%. Product development expenses remained the same at $41.2
million in the first six months of fiscal 2007 and the first six months of fiscal 2008, and
decreased as a percentage of revenue from 18% to 17%. The dollar increase in the first six months
of fiscal 2008 as compared to the first six months of fiscal 2007 was primarily due to expenses
related to the development team associated with the acquisition of Xcalia at the end of the first
quarter of fiscal 2008, partially offset by a decrease in stock-based compensation expense included
in product development in fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007. Our product development
headcount increased 3% from the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to the end of the second
quarter of fiscal 2008.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses include the costs of our finance,
human resources, legal, information systems and administrative departments. General and
administrative expenses decreased 23% from $19.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to
$14.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008, and decreased as a percentage of revenue from
16% to 11%. General and administrative expenses decreased 16% from $34.1 million in the first six
months of fiscal 2007 to $28.5 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008, and decreased as a
percentage of revenue from 14% to 11%. The dollar decrease was primarily due to a write-down
associated with a portion of the implementation of a new ERP system of $2.4 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2007, payments made to compensation committee members for cancelled options of
$1.3 million, and professional services fees associated with the investigation and shareholder
derivative lawsuits related to our historical stock option grant practices of $0.8 million in the
second quarter of fiscal 2007 and $2.4 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007. Our
administrative headcount decreased 4% from the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to the end
of the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Amortization of Other Acquired Intangibles. Amortization of other acquired intangibles primarily
represents the amortization of value assigned to non-technology-related intangible assets obtained
in business combinations. Amortization of other acquired intangibles decreased from $1.9 million
in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to $1.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Amortization of other acquired intangibles decreased from $3.9 million in the first six months of
fiscal 2007 to $2.7 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008. The decrease in both
18
periods was related to certain intangibles becoming fully amortized partially offset by
amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired in the Xcalia acquisition.
Income From Operations. Income from operations increased 83% from $11.3 million in the second
quarter of fiscal 2007 to $20.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 and increased as a
percentage of total revenue from 9% in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to 16% in the second
quarter of fiscal 2008. Income from operations increased 60% from $23.6 million in the first six
months of fiscal 2007 to $37.8 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008 and increased as a
percentage of total revenue from 10% in the first six months of fiscal 2007 to 15% in the first six
months of fiscal 2008.
The increase in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2007
was driven by the expense decrease which was due to lower stock-based compensation, lower
professional services fees related to the derivative lawsuits and investigation of our historical
stock option grant practices, partially offset by an increase in headcount related expense. Our
total headcount increased 1% from the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to the end of the
second quarter of fiscal 2008.
Other Income. Other income increased 35% from $1.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 to
$2.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. Other income increased 94% from $2.7 million in
the first six months of fiscal 2007 to $5.3 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008. The
increase in both periods was primarily due to an increase in interest income resulting from higher
interest rates earlier in the year, including higher interest rates earned on ARS, higher average
cash and short-term investment balances, and lower foreign exchange losses.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was 36.5% in the first six months of fiscal
2008 as compared to 35% in the first six months of fiscal 2007. The increase in our effective tax
rate was due to the expiration of the research and development credit provisions in the federal tax
code which have not been renewed. We estimate that our effective tax rate will be approximately 36%
for all of fiscal 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2008, our cash and short-term investments totaled $259.0
million. The decrease of $80.5 million since the end of fiscal 2007 resulted primarily from the
reclassification of approximately $67.7 million of auction rate securities to non-current
investments (see below), purchases of our common stock, and cash used for acquisitions, offset by
cash generated from operations and proceeds from issuances of common stock.
In addition to the $259.0 million of cash and short-term investments, we had $67.7 million in
investments related to ARS that are classified as non-current. Our ARS are floating rate
securities with longer-term maturities which are marketed by financial institutions with auction
reset dates at primarily 28 or 35 day intervals to provide short-term liquidity. The underlying
collateral of the ARS consist primarily of municipal bonds, which are insured by monoline insurance
companies, with the remainder consisting of student loans, which are supported by the federal
government as part of the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) and by the monoline
insurance companies. Beginning in February, auctions for these securities began to fail, and the
interest rates for these ARS reset to the maximum rate per the applicable investment offering
document. As of February 29, 2008, our ARS investments totaled $109.8 million. During the second
quarter, investments totaling $38.2 million were either redeemed at par by the issuer or sold at a
successful auction, reducing the par value of our ARS investments to $71.6 million. We will not be
able to access these remaining funds until a future auction for these ARS is successful, we sell
the securities in a secondary market which currently is not active, or they are redeemed by the
issuer. As such, these remaining investments currently lack short-term liquidity and were
therefore reclassified as non-current on the balance sheet.
For each of our ARS, we evaluated the risks related to the structure, collateral and liquidity of
the investment, and forecasted the probability of issuer default, auction failure and a successful
auction at par or a redemption at par for each future auction period. Using a trinomial discount
model, the weighted average cash flow for each period was then discounted back to present value for
each security. Based on this methodology, we determined that the fair value of our ARS investments
is $67.7 million, and we recorded a temporary impairment charge of $3.9 million to reduce the value
of our ARS. Based on our cash and short-term investments balance of $259.0 million and expected
operating cash flows, we do not anticipate the lack of liquidity associated with our ARS to
adversely affect our
19
ability to conduct business and believe we have the ability to hold the remaining securities
throughout the currently estimated recovery period, therefore the impairment was only temporary in
nature.
We generated $46.8 million in cash from operations in the first six months of fiscal 2008 as
compared to $39.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007. The increase in cash generated
from operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2008 over the second quarter of fiscal 2007 was
primarily due to increased profitability.
A summary of our cash flows from operations for the first six months of fiscal years 2008 and 2007
is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Six Months Ended May 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27,307 |
|
|
$ |
17,129 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and other noncash charges |
|
|
21,568 |
|
|
|
28,642 |
|
Tax benefit from stock plans |
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
(2,921 |
) |
|
|
(6,983 |
) |
|
Total |
|
$ |
46,831 |
|
|
$ |
39,018 |
|
|
Accounts receivable decreased by $6.0 million from the end of fiscal 2007. Accounts receivable
days sales outstanding, or DSO, remained the same at 62 days at the end of the second quarter of
fiscal 2008 as compared to the end of fiscal 2007 and decreased by 2 days from 64 days at the end
of the second quarter of fiscal 2007. We target a DSO range of 60 to 80 days.
We purchased property and equipment totaling $3.9 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008 as
compared to $9.6 million in the first six months of fiscal 2007. The purchases consisted primarily
of computer equipment and software and building and leasehold improvements. The decrease primarily
related to higher costs associated with our ongoing ERP implementation in the first six months of
fiscal 2007 as compared to the first six months of fiscal 2008.
On February 5, 2008, we acquired, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, the stock of Xcalia SA
(Xcalia) for an aggregate purchase price of $5.7 million, net of cash acquired. Xcalia is a leader
in the development and adoption of service data objects standard and data integration technologies.
The purpose of the acquisition was to expand the product offerings within the DataDirect product
line. Upon the closing of the transaction, Xcalia became part of our DataDirect Technologies
operating segment. We accounted for the acquisition as a purchase, and accordingly, we included
the results of operations of Xcalia in our operating results from February 5, 2008, the date of
acquisition. Transaction costs related to this acquisition included $0.9 million of direct
acquisition costs. We paid the purchase price in cash from available funds.
In September 2007, the Board of Directors authorized, for the period from October 1, 2007 through
September 30, 2008, the purchase of up to 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, at such times that
we deem such purchases to be an effective use of cash. We purchased and retired approximately
2,088,000 shares of our common stock for $62.9 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008 as
compared to approximately 705,000 shares of our common stock for $19.5 million in the first six
months of fiscal 2007.
We received $18.0 million in the first six months of fiscal 2008 from the exercise of stock options
and the issuance of shares under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan as compared to $17.4 million in
the first six months of fiscal 2007.
On June 25, 2008, we signed a definitive agreement under which we have agreed to acquire IONA
Technologies plc (IONA) for $4.05 per share in cash. This represents a total equity value of
approximately $162 million and approximately $106 million net of cash and marketable securities
reported by IONA on March 31, 2008. The IONA Technologies Board of Directors has unanimously
approved the transaction and each IONA Technologies director has entered into an agreement to vote
their IONA shares in favor of the transaction. The acquisition will be effected by means of a
scheme of arrangement under Irish law. The acquisition will be subject to the terms and conditions
to be set forth in the scheme of arrangement document to be delivered to IONA shareholders. To
become effective, the scheme of arrangement requires, among other things, the approval of a
majority in number of IONA
20
shareholders, present and voting either in person or by proxy, representing 75% or more in value of
the IONA shares held by such holders. We own 362,000 shares of IONA common stock and have an
economic interest, through contracts for difference, in 1,443,000 shares of IONA common stock.
Such equity was purchased in the second quarter and represents approximately 5% of the issued share
capital of IONA. The acquisition is also subject to regulatory approval in the U.S. and the
approval of the Irish High Court. Assuming the necessary approvals are obtained and all conditions
have been satisfied, the acquisition will become effective upon delivery to the Registrar of
Companies in Ireland of the court order of the Irish High Court sanctioning the scheme. Upon the
acquisition becoming effective, it will be binding on all IONA shareholders. The acquisition is
expected to close in September 2008.
We believe that existing cash balances together with funds generated from operations will be
sufficient to finance our operations and meet our foreseeable cash requirements (including planned
capital expenditures, lease commitments, debt payments, cash acquisitions and other long-term
obligations) through at least the next twelve months.
Revenue Backlog Our aggregate revenue backlog at May 31, 2008 was approximately $184 million of
which $159 million was included on our balance sheet as deferred revenue, primarily related to
unexpired maintenance and support contracts. At May 31, 2008, the remaining amount of backlog of
approximately $25 million was composed of multi-year licensing arrangements of approximately $23
million and open software license orders received but not shipped of approximately $2 million. Our
backlog of orders not included on the balance sheet is not subject to our normal accounting
controls for information that is either reported in or derived from our basic financial statements.
Our aggregate revenue backlog at May 31, 2007 was approximately $167 million of which $142 million
was included on our balance sheet as deferred revenue, primarily related to unexpired maintenance
and support contracts. At May 31, 2007, the remaining amount of backlog of approximately $25
million was composed of multi-year licensing arrangements of approximately $21 million and open
software license orders received but not shipped of approximately $4 million. Our backlog of orders
not included on the balance sheet is not subject to our normal accounting controls for information
that is either reported in or derived from our basic financial statements.
We typically fulfill most of our software license orders within 30 days of acceptance of a purchase
order. Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met, we recognize software
license revenue upon shipment of the product, or if delivered electronically, when the customer has
the right to access the software. Because there are many elements governing when revenue is
recognized, including when orders are shipped, credit approval, completion of internal control
processes over revenue recognition and other factors, management has some control in determining
the period in which certain revenue is recognized. We frequently have open software license orders
at the end of the quarter which have not shipped or have otherwise not met all the required
criteria for revenue recognition. Although the amount of open software license orders may vary at
any time, we generally do not believe that the amount, if any, of such software license orders at
the end of a particular quarter is a reliable indicator of future performance. In addition, there
is no industry standard for the definition of backlog and there may be an element of estimation in
determining the amount. As such, direct comparisons with other companies may be difficult or
potentially misleading.
Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations
We include standard intellectual property indemnification provisions in our licensing agreements in
the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to our product license agreements, we will indemnify,
hold harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the
indemnified party, generally business partners or customers, in connection with certain patent,
copyright or other intellectual property infringement claims by third parties with respect to our
products. Other agreements with our customers provide indemnification for claims relating to
property damage or personal injury resulting from the performance of services by us or our
subcontractors. Historically, our costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims relating to such
indemnity agreements have been insignificant. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of these
indemnification provisions is immaterial.
Legal and Other Regulatory Matters
See discussion regarding legal and other regulatory matters in Part II, Item 1. Legal
Proceedings.
21
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Our only significant off-balance sheet commitments relate to operating lease obligations. We have
no off-balance sheet arrangements within the meaning of Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K. Future
annual minimum rental lease payments are detailed in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2007.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141R,
Business Combinations (SFAS 141R). SFAS 141R establishes a framework to improve the relevance,
representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity
provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. SFAS 141R applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We will apply SFAS
141R to any acquisition after the date of adoption.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities (SFAS 161) as an amendment to SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. SFAS 161 requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be
disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation. SFAS 161 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. We are currently
evaluating whether adoption of SFAS 161 will have an impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to a variety of risks, including changes in interest rates affecting the return on
our investments and foreign currency fluctuations. We have established policies and procedures to
manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
Exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates to our investment portfolio. We
have not used derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We place our
investments with high-quality issuers and have policies limiting, among other things, the amount of
credit exposure to any one issuer. We seek to limit default risk by purchasing only
investment-grade securities. In addition, we have classified all of our debt securities as
available for sale. This classification reduces the income statement exposure to interest rate risk
if such investments are held until their maturity date because changes in fair value due to market
changes in interest rates are recorded on the balance sheet in accumulated other comprehensive
income. Based on a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in interest rates, the potential losses in
future earnings, fair value of risk-sensitive instruments and cash flows are immaterial. See
discussion concerning ARS Part I, Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations in Liquidity and Capital Resources.
We use derivative instruments to manage exposures to fluctuations in the value of foreign
currencies, which exist as part of our on-going business operations. Certain assets and forecasted
transactions are exposed to foreign currency risk. Our objective for holding derivatives is to
eliminate or reduce the impact of these exposures. We periodically monitor our foreign currency
exposures to enhance the overall effectiveness of our foreign currency hedge positions. Principal
currencies hedged include the euro, British pound, Brazilian real, Japanese yen and Australian
dollar. We do not enter into derivative instruments for speculative purposes, nor do we hold or
issue any derivative instruments for trading purposes. We enter into certain derivative
instruments that may not be designated as hedges under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133). Although these derivatives do not qualify for hedge
accounting, we believe that such instruments are closely correlated with the underlying exposure,
thus managing the associated risk. The gains or losses from changes in the fair value of such
derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges are recognized in earnings.
We use foreign currency option contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS
133, to hedge a portion of forecasted international intercompany revenue for up to one year in the
future. There were outstanding foreign currency option contracts with a fair value of $0.3 million
(and a notional value of $129.6 million) at May
22
31, 2008. Major U.S. multinational banks are counterparties to the option contracts. We also use
forward contracts that are not designated as hedging instruments under SFAS 133 to hedge the impact
of the variability in exchange rates on accounts receivable and collections denominated in certain
foreign currencies. We generally do not hedge the net assets of our international subsidiaries.
The unrealized gains (losses) of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts were $0.3
million and $0.2 million at May 31, 2008 and May 31, 2007, respectively.
The foreign exchange exposure from a 10% movement of currency exchange rates would have a material
impact on our revenue and net income. Based on a hypothetical 10% adverse movement in all foreign
currency exchange rates, our revenue would be adversely affected by approximately 5% and our net
income would be adversely affected by approximately 20% (excluding any offsetting positive impact
from our ongoing hedging programs), although the actual effects may differ materially from the
hypothetical analysis.
The table below details outstanding forward contracts, which mature in ninety days or less, at May
31, 2008 where the notional amount is determined using contract exchange rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
Foreign Currency |
|
|
U.S. Dollars |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
For U.S. Dollars |
|
|
For Foreign Currency |
|
|
Average |
|
Functional Currency: |
|
(Notional Amount) |
|
|
(Notional Amount) |
|
|
Exchange Rate* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australian dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,731 |
|
|
|
1.05 |
|
Brazilian real |
|
$ |
6,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.67 |
|
Euro |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,401 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
Japanese yen |
|
|
3,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.07 |
|
South African rand |
|
|
1,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.67 |
|
U.K. pound |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,990 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,127 |
|
|
$ |
92,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
expressed as local currency unit per U.S. dollar |
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. Our management, including the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness
of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide a reasonable level of assurance
that the information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted by us under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
requisite time periods.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. No changes in our internal control over
financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended May 31, 2008 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On June 23, 2006, we received written notice that the Enforcement Staff in the Boston,
Massachusetts office of the SEC had begun an informal inquiry into our option-granting practices
during the period December 1, 1995 through November 30, 2002. On December 19, 2006, the SEC
informed us that it had issued a formal order of investigation into our option-granting practices
during the period December 1, 1995 through the present. We are unable to predict with certainty
what consequences may arise from the SEC investigation. We have already incurred, and expect to
continue to incur, significant legal expenses arising from the investigation. If the SEC
institutes legal action, we could face significant fines and penalties and be required to take
remedial actions determined by the SEC or a court. Although we have filed certain restated
financial statements that we believe correct the accounting errors arising from our past
option-granting practices, the filing of those financial statements did not resolve the pending SEC
23
inquiry. The SEC has not indicated to us whether it has reviewed our restated financial statements,
and any SEC review could lead to further restatements or other modifications of our financial
statements.
On August 17, 2006, a derivative complaint styled Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, Derivatively
on Behalf of Progress Software Corporation, v. Joseph Alsop et al, Civ. Act. No. 06-CA-11459 RCL
was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts by a party
identifying itself as one of our shareholders purporting to act on our behalf against our directors
and certain of our present and former officers. We were also named as a nominal defendant. The
complaint alleged violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
10b-5, breaches of fiduciary duty, aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust
enrichment arising from the allegedly improper backdating of certain stock option grants. The
complaint sought monetary damages, restitution, disgorgement, rescission of stock options, punitive
damages and other relief. A Special Litigation Committee was formed by our Board of Directors to
investigate and determine our response to the complaint. On September 25, 2007, the Court, in
response to our motion, dismissed the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System complaint on the grounds
that the Plaintiff failed to make a proper pre-filing demand upon our Board of Directors, and
entered judgment for Defendants. On May 5, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a second derivative
complaint, largely identical to the first, in the same court. By agreement of the parties, the
court has stayed all proceedings while the Special Litigation Committees investigation is ongoing.
On January 16, 2007, another party identifying itself as one of our shareholders purporting to act
on our behalf filed a derivative complaint styled Acuna, Derivatively on Behalf of Progress
Software Corporation v. Joseph Alsop et al., Civ. Act. No. 07-0157 against our directors and
certain of our present and former officers in Massachusetts Superior Court. We are named as a
nominal defendant in this action as well. The complaint alleges breaches of fiduciary duty, aiding
and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment arising from the allegedly improper
backdating of certain stock option grants. The complaint seeks monetary damages and disgorgement,
among other forms of relief.
Further, on March 28, 2007, an additional party identifying itself as one of our shareholders
purporting to act on our behalf filed a derivative complaint styled White, Derivatively on Behalf
Of Nominal Defendant Progress v. Progress Software Corporation et al., Civ 07-01172, in
Massachusetts Superior Court. This complaint involves substantially the same defendants,
allegations and demands for relief as the Acuna complaint described above. On June 26, 2007, the
White and Acuna cases were consolidated. The consolidated case has been stayed while the Special
Litigation Committees investigation is ongoing.
The ultimate outcome of any of these matters could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations. These matters could divert the attention of our management and harm our business. In
addition, we have incurred, and expect to continue to incur legal expenses arising from these
matters, which may be significant, including the advancement of legal expenses to our directors and
officers. We have certain indemnification obligations to our directors and officers, and the
outcome of derivative or any other litigation may require that we indemnify some or all of our
directors and officers for expenses they may incur in defending the litigation and other losses.
We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which
arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these other claims cannot be
predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these other legal
matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of
operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves certain risks and uncertainties, some of
which are beyond our control. You should carefully review and consider the information regarding
certain factors that could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results
set forth under Part II, Item 1A (Risk Factors) in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended November 30, 2007. No material changes have occurred since the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2007 to the risk factors previously presented, other than the addition of the
following:
Funds associated with certain of our auction rate securities may not be accessible in the short
term, and we may be required to adjust the carrying value of these securities through an impairment
charge. As of May 31, 2008,
24
we had approximately $67.7 million in investments related to auction rate securities (ARS) that are
classified as non-current. Our ARS are floating rate securities with longer-term maturities which
are marketed by financial institutions with auction reset dates at primarily 28 or 35 day intervals
to provide short-term liquidity. Beginning in February 2008, auctions for these securities began
to fail, which has resulted in higher interest rates being earned on these securities, but the
investments lack short-term liquidity. While we do not currently anticipate the lack of liquidity
of the ARS to adversely affect our ability to conduct business, we will not be able to access these
funds until a future auction for these ARS is successful or until we sell the securities in a
secondary market, which currently is not active. In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we recorded
a temporary impairment charge in accumulated other comprehensive losses of $3.9 million. In
addition, if the credit rating of either the security issuer or the third-party insurer underlying
the investments deteriorates, we may be required to further adjust the carrying value of the ARS
through an other than temporary impairment charge.
We face various risks in connection with our proposed acquisition of IONA Technologies, plc. On
June 25, 2008, we entered into a definitive agreement with IONA Technologies, plc under which we
agreed to acquire IONA. We face various risks in connection with our proposed acquisition of IONA,
including uncertainties as to the timing of the closing of our acquisition of IONA, uncertainties
as to whether the shareholders of IONA will vote in favor of the acquisition, the risk that
competing offers to acquire IONA will be made, the possibility that various closing conditions for
the transaction may not be satisfied or waived, including that a governmental entity may prohibit,
delay or refuse to grant approval for the consummation of the transaction, the effects of
disruption from the transaction making it more difficult to maintain relationships with employees,
licensees, other business partners or governmental entities, other business effects, including the
effects of industry, economic or political conditions outside of our or IONAs control, transaction
costs, actual or contingent liabilities, uncertainties as to whether anticipated synergies will be
realized and uncertainties as to whether IONAs business will be successfully integrated with our
business.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Items 2(a) and 2(b) are not applicable.
(c) Stock Repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
As Part of Publicly |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
|
Of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans |
|
|
Under the Plans or |
|
Period: |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Or Programs |
|
|
Programs (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar. 1, 2008 Mar. 31, 2008 |
|
|
33 |
|
|
$ |
29.78 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
7,867 |
|
Apr. 1, 2008 Apr. 30, 2008 |
|
|
244 |
|
|
$ |
29.58 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
7,623 |
|
May 1, 2008 May 31, 2008 |
|
|
287 |
|
|
$ |
29.88 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
564 |
|
|
$ |
29.74 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
7,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In September 2007, our Board of Directors authorized, for the period from October 1,
2007 through September 30, 2008, the purchase of up to 10,000,000 shares of our common
stock. This authorization superseded the previous authorization that expired on September
30, 2007. |
25
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the annual meeting of our shareholders held on April 24, 2008, the shareholders voted on
the items described below:
|
|
To fix the number of directors constituting the full board at six: |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
37,645,100
|
|
641,541
|
|
27,428 |
|
|
To elect the following six directors: Joseph W. Alsop, Barry N. Bycoff, Roger J. Heinen,
Jr., Charles F. Kane, David A. Krall, and Michael L. Mark: |
|
|
|
|
|
Nominee |
|
For |
|
Withhold Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
Joseph W. Alsop
|
|
38,027,467
|
|
286,604 |
Barry N. Bycoff
|
|
37,948,885
|
|
365,186 |
Roger J. Heinen, Jr.
|
|
34,993,469
|
|
3,320,602 |
Charles F. Kane
|
|
37,965,444
|
|
348,627 |
David A. Krall
|
|
35,775,027
|
|
2,539,044 |
Michael L. Mark
|
|
36,312,912
|
|
2,001,159 |
|
|
To act upon a proposal to adopt and approve the Companys 2008 Stock Option and Incentive Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Vote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,896,657
|
|
10,445,558
|
|
70,523
|
|
3,901,333 |
|
|
To act upon a proposal to ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys
independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Against |
|
Abstain |
|
Broker Non-Vote |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,012,150
|
|
288,482
|
|
13,439
|
|
0 |
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed or furnished as part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Progress Software Corporation 2008 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to our Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration
No. 333-150555) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Form of Notice of Grant of Stock Options and Grant Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the
Progress Software Corporation 2008 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (Initial Grant)
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on April 28, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Non-Employee Directors under the
Progress Software Corporation 2008 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (Annual Grant)
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on April 28, 2008) |
26
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
|
10.5 |
|
|
Form of Deferred Stock Unit Agreement under the Progress Software Corporation 2008
Stock Option and Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2008) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.6* |
|
|
Progress Software Corporation 2008 Fiscal Year Director Compensation Program |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Joseph W. Alsop |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Norman R. Robertson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1* |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act |
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PROGRESS SOFTWARE CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: July 10, 2008 |
/s/ Joseph W. Alsop
|
|
|
Joseph W. Alsop |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: July 10, 2008 |
/s/ Norman R. Robertson
|
|
|
Norman R. Robertson |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: July 10, 2008 |
/s/ David H. Benton, Jr.
|
|
|
David H. Benton, Jr. |
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
28