FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 000-51130
National Interstate Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-1607394 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
3250 Interstate Drive
Richfield, Ohio 44286-9000
(330) 659-8900
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o |
|
Accelerated filer
þ |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants sole class of common shares as of April 29,
2009 was 19,392,399.
National Interstate Corporation
Table of Contents
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
National Interstate Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
maturities available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost $479,897 and $462,562, respectively) |
|
$ |
476,014 |
|
|
$ |
459,237 |
|
Equity securities available-for-sale, at fair value (cost $30,002 and $30,143, respectively) |
|
|
24,066 |
|
|
|
27,233 |
|
Short-term investments, at cost which approximates fair value |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
500,165 |
|
|
|
486,555 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
72,104 |
|
|
|
77,159 |
|
Securities lending collateral, at fair value (cost $78,001 and $94,655, respectively) |
|
|
68,052 |
|
|
|
84,670 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
4,920 |
|
|
|
5,161 |
|
Premiums receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $568 and $587, respectively |
|
|
127,541 |
|
|
|
95,610 |
|
Reinsurance recoverables on paid and unpaid losses |
|
|
148,418 |
|
|
|
150,791 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
38,350 |
|
|
|
28,404 |
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
22,180 |
|
|
|
19,245 |
|
Deferred federal income taxes |
|
|
19,101 |
|
|
|
18,324 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
21,049 |
|
|
|
20,406 |
|
Funds held by reinsurer |
|
|
2,586 |
|
|
|
3,073 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,025,934 |
|
|
$ |
990,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
$ |
399,168 |
|
|
$ |
400,001 |
|
Unearned premiums and service fees |
|
|
185,644 |
|
|
|
156,598 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
Amounts withheld or retained for account of others |
|
|
51,406 |
|
|
|
48,357 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
21,260 |
|
|
|
10,267 |
|
Securities lending obligation |
|
|
79,597 |
|
|
|
95,828 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
35,323 |
|
|
|
35,813 |
|
Commissions payable |
|
|
9,768 |
|
|
|
9,274 |
|
Assessments and fees payable |
|
|
3,861 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
801,027 |
|
|
|
774,738 |
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares no par value
Authorized 10,000 shares
Issued 0 shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares $0.01 par value
Authorized 50,000 shares
Issued 23,350 shares, including 4,050 and 4,055 shares, respectively, in treasury |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
48,299 |
|
|
|
48,004 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
195,473 |
|
|
|
184,187 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(13,368 |
) |
|
|
(10,613 |
) |
Treasury shares |
|
|
(5,731 |
) |
|
|
(5,738 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
224,907 |
|
|
|
216,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,025,934 |
|
|
$ |
990,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
National Interstate Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned |
|
$ |
69,439 |
|
|
$ |
67,650 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
5,010 |
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
Net realized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(587 |
) |
Other |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
75,260 |
|
|
|
73,744 |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
39,326 |
|
|
|
41,685 |
|
Commissions and other underwriting expenses |
|
|
13,019 |
|
|
|
12,961 |
|
Other operating and general expenses |
|
|
3,292 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
Expense on amounts withheld |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
56,624 |
|
|
|
59,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before federal income taxes |
|
|
18,636 |
|
|
|
14,262 |
|
Provision for federal income taxes |
|
|
5,990 |
|
|
|
4,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,646 |
|
|
$ |
9,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share basic |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share diluted |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of common shares outstanding basic |
|
|
19,300 |
|
|
|
19,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average of common shares outstanding diluted |
|
|
19,353 |
|
|
|
19,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
National Interstate Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
48,004 |
|
|
$ |
184,187 |
|
|
$ |
(10,613 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,738 |
) |
|
$ |
216,074 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,646 |
|
Unrealized depreciation of investment securities,
net of tax benefit of $0.8 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,755 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,891 |
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
Issuance of 5,152 treasury shares from vesting of
restricted
stock, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
48,299 |
|
|
$ |
195,473 |
|
|
$ |
(13,368 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,731 |
) |
|
$ |
224,907 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
45,566 |
|
|
$ |
178,190 |
|
|
$ |
(5,321 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,863 |
) |
|
$ |
212,806 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,571 |
|
Unrealized depreciation of investment securities,
net of tax benefit of $671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,486 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,085 |
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
Issuance of 74,901 treasury shares upon exercise
of options
and restricted stock issued, net of forfeitures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
Tax benefit realized from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
46,818 |
|
|
$ |
186,596 |
|
|
$ |
(9,807 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,759 |
) |
|
$ |
218,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
National Interstate Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,646 |
|
|
$ |
9,571 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of bond premiums and discounts |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Provision for depreciation and amortization |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
587 |
|
Deferred federal income taxes |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Increase in deferred policy acquisition costs, net |
|
|
(2,935 |
) |
|
|
(5,037 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
25,028 |
|
Increase in premiums receivable |
|
|
(31,931 |
) |
|
|
(44,656 |
) |
Increase in unearned premiums and service fees |
|
|
29,046 |
|
|
|
47,823 |
|
Decrease in interest receivable and other assets |
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
1,375 |
|
Increase in prepaid reinsurance premiums |
|
|
(9,946 |
) |
|
|
(16,378 |
) |
Increase in accounts payable, commissions and other liabilities
and assessments and fees payable |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
4,337 |
|
Increase in amounts withheld or retained for account of others |
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
5,336 |
|
Decrease (increase) in reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
(11,506 |
) |
Increase in reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
10,993 |
|
|
|
17,531 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
35,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturities |
|
|
(125,372 |
) |
|
|
(171,439 |
) |
Purchases of equity securities |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of fixed maturities |
|
|
18,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of equity securities |
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
3,578 |
|
Proceeds from maturity and redemptions of investments |
|
|
89,825 |
|
|
|
152,483 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(1,096 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(18,399 |
) |
|
|
(16,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in securities lending collateral |
|
|
16,231 |
|
|
|
4,820 |
|
Decrease in securities lending obligation |
|
|
(16,231 |
) |
|
|
(4,820 |
) |
Tax benefit realized from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
361 |
|
Issuance of common shares from treasury upon exercise of stock options or
stock award grants |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
623 |
|
Cash dividends paid on common shares |
|
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
|
(1,165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(5,055 |
) |
|
|
17,963 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
77,159 |
|
|
|
43,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
72,104 |
|
|
$ |
61,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of National Interstate Corporation
(the Company) and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form
10-Q, which differ in some respects from statutory accounting principles permitted by state
regulatory agencies.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries,
National Interstate Insurance Company (NIIC), Hudson Indemnity, Ltd. (HIL), National Interstate
Insurance Company of Hawaii, Inc. (NIIC-HI), Triumphe Casualty Company (TCC), National
Interstate Insurance Agency, Inc. (NIIA), Hudson Management Group, Ltd. (HMG), American
Highways Insurance Agency, Inc., Safety, Claims and Litigation Services, Inc., Explorer RV
Insurance Agency, Inc. and Safety, Claims and Litigation Services, LLC. Significant intercompany
transactions have been eliminated.
These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are,
in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the results for the periods
presented. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the three
month period ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2009.
The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Changes in
circumstances could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimates. Certain
reclassifications have been made to financial information presented for prior years to conform to
the current years presentation.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments. This FASB Staff Position (FSP)
amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value
of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for
interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements.
This FSP also amends Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial
Reporting, to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting
periods.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. This FSP amends the other-than-temporary impairment guidance for
debt securities to make the guidance more operational and to improve the presentation and
disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities in the financial
statements. This FSP does not amend existing recognition and measurement guidance related to
other-than-temporary impairments of equity securities.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That
Are Not Orderly. This FSP provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance
with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the volume and level of activity for the asset
or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also includes guidance on identifying
circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly.
These FSPs are effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, with
early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The FSPs do not require
disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In periods
after initial adoption, the FSPs require comparative disclosures only for periods ending after
initial adoption. The Company does not expect the changes associated with adoption of these FSPs
will have a material effect on the determination or reporting of its current financial results.
7
3. Fair Value Measurements
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. Under SFAS No. 157, the Company must determine the appropriate level in the fair
value hierarchy for each fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy in SFAS No. 157
prioritizes the inputs, which refer broadly to assumptions market participants would use in pricing
an asset or liability, into three levels. It gives the highest priority to quoted prices
(unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair value measurement in
its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair
value measurement in its entirety.
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical securities that the
reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other
than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable for the security, either directly or
indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar securities in active markets, quoted
prices for identical or similar securities that are not active and observable inputs other than
quoted prices, such as interest rate and yield curves. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for
the asset or liability.
Level 1 consists of publicly traded equity securities whose fair value is based on quoted prices
that are readily and regularly available in an active market and cash and cash equivalents. Level
2 primarily consists of financial instruments whose fair value is based on quoted prices in markets
that are not active and include U.S. government and government agency securities, fixed maturity
investments, preferred stock and certain publicly traded common stocks that are not actively
traded. Included in Level 2 are $6.0 million of securities, which are valued based upon a
non-binding broker quote and validated by management by observable market data. Level 3 consists
of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market, whose fair value is estimated by
management based on inputs from independent financial institutions, which include non-binding
broker quotes, for which the Company believes reflects fair value, but are unable to verify inputs
to the valuation methodology. The Company obtained one quote or price per instrument from our
brokers and pricing services and did not adjust any quotes or prices that the Company obtained.
The following table presents the Companys investment and securities lending collateral portfolios,
categorized by the level within the SFAS No. 157 hierarchy in which the fair value measurements
fall at March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government agency obligations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,587 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
183,587 |
|
State and local government obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
151,383 |
|
|
|
6,313 |
|
|
|
157,696 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91,246 |
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,237 |
|
|
|
3,830 |
|
|
|
34,067 |
|
Preferred redeemable securities |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
9,418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities |
|
|
6,575 |
|
|
|
457,016 |
|
|
|
12,423 |
|
|
|
476,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual preferred stock |
|
|
1,513 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
3,685 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
10,936 |
|
|
|
9,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities |
|
|
12,449 |
|
|
|
9,464 |
|
|
|
2,153 |
|
|
|
24,066 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
19,024 |
|
|
|
466,565 |
|
|
|
14,576 |
|
|
|
500,165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
72,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments and cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
91,128 |
|
|
$ |
466,565 |
|
|
$ |
14,576 |
|
|
$ |
572,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities lending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
31,930 |
|
|
$ |
257 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
32,187 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,923 |
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
17,425 |
|
Corporate obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,424 |
|
|
|
2,016 |
|
|
|
18,440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities lending |
|
$ |
31,930 |
|
|
$ |
31,604 |
|
|
$ |
4,518 |
|
|
$ |
68,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for all
investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs during the three month
period ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State and local |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Perpetual |
|
|
Securities |
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
government |
|
|
Redeemable |
|
|
preferred |
|
|
lending |
|
|
|
obligations |
|
|
obligations |
|
|
preferred stock |
|
|
stock |
|
|
collateral |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2009 |
|
$ |
4,295 |
|
|
$ |
6,118 |
|
|
$ |
2,406 |
|
|
$ |
3,265 |
|
|
$ |
5,046 |
|
Total gains or (losses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(421 |
) |
Included in other comprehensive income |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
Purchases and (settlements) (1) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(257 |
) |
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
3,830 |
|
|
$ |
6,313 |
|
|
$ |
2,280 |
|
|
$ |
2,153 |
|
|
$ |
4,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains or (losses) for the
period included in earnings attributable to the
change in unrealized gains or (losses) relating
to assets still held at the reporting date |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(170 |
) |
|
$ |
(421 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts are attributable to either a) purchases of securities or b) principal
pay downs, calls or maturities during the three months ended March 31, 2009. |
4. Securities Lending Program
The Company participates in a securities lending program whereby certain fixed maturity and equity
securities from the Companys investment portfolio are loaned to other institutions for short
periods of time. The Company requires collateral equal to 102% of the market value of the loaned
securities plus accrued interest. The collateral is invested by the lending agent generating
investment income, net of applicable fees. The Company is not permitted to sell or re-pledge the
collateral on the securities lending program. The Company accounts for this program as a secured
borrowing and records the collateral held and corresponding liability to return the collateral on
the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The securities loaned remain a recorded
asset of the Company. Prior to 2008, collateral could be invested in investments with maturities
beyond the loan term, including asset backed securities and corporate obligations. However, in
light of the recent market turmoil, beginning in 2008, new cash collateral is only invested in
overnight investments.
We examine all investments, including securities lending collateral, held by the Company for
possible other-than-temporary declines in value. In the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a $0.4
million other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) on one fixed maturity investment within our
securities lending collateral portfolio, compared to $0.6 million recorded in the first quarter of
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Collateral obligation
|
|
$ |
79,597 |
|
|
$ |
95,828 |
|
Pretax unrealized loss on fair value of collateral held
|
|
|
(9,949 |
) |
|
|
(9,985 |
) |
Cumulative other-than-temporary impairment charges
|
|
|
(1,596 |
) |
|
|
(1,173 |
) |
Fair value of collateral held
|
|
|
68,052 |
|
|
|
84,670 |
|
Fair value of securities lent plus accrued interest
|
|
|
78,310 |
|
|
|
94,265 |
|
5. Shareholders Equity and Stock-Based Compensation
The Company grants options and other stock awards to officers of the Company under the Long Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP). At March 31, 2009, there were 826,504 of the Companys common shares
reserved for issuance under the LTIP and options for 607,050
9
shares were outstanding. Treasury
shares are used to fulfill the options exercised and other awards granted. Options and restricted
shares vest pursuant to the terms of a written grant agreement. Options must be exercised no later
than the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. As set forth in the LTIP, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors may accelerate vesting and exercisability of options.
For both the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized stock-based
compensation expense of $0.4 million. Related income tax benefits were approximately $0.1 million
for both the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The Company paid a dividend of $0.07 and
$0.06 per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
6. Transactions with Related Parties
The Companys principal insurance subsidiary, NIIC, is involved in both the cession and assumption
of reinsurance. NIIC is a party to a reinsurance agreement, and NIIA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
the Company, is a party to an underwriting management agreement with Great American Insurance
Company (Great American). As of March 31, 2009, Great American owned 52.6% of the outstanding
shares of the Company. The reinsurance agreement calls for the assumption by NIIC of all of the
risk on Great Americans net premiums written for public transportation and recreational vehicle
risks underwritten pursuant to the reinsurance agreement. NIIA provides administrative services to
Great American in connection with Great Americans underwriting of these risks. The Company also
cedes premiums through reinsurance agreements with Great American to reduce exposure in certain of
its property-casualty insurance programs.
The table below summarizes the reinsurance balance and activity with Great American:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Assumed premiums written
|
|
$ |
1,178 |
|
|
$ |
2,062 |
|
Assumed premiums earned
|
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
Assumed losses and loss adjustment expense incurred
|
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
Ceded premiums written
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
1,546 |
|
Ceded premiums earned
|
|
|
804 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
Ceded losses and loss adjustment expense recoveries
|
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Payable to Great American as of period end
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
Great American or its parent, American Financial Group, Inc., perform certain services for the
Company without charge including, without limitation, actuarial services and on a consultative
basis, as needed, internal audit, legal, accounting and other support services. If Great American
no longer controlled a majority of the Companys common shares, it is possible that many of these
services would cease or, alternatively, be provided at an increased cost to us. This could impact
our personnel resources, require us to hire additional professional staff and generally increase
our operating expenses. Management believes, based on discussions with Great American, that these
services will continue to be provided by the affiliated entity in future periods and the relative
impact on operating results is not material.
In 2008, Great American filed an Undertaking on Appeal as surety with the Superior Court of the
State of California for the County of Los Angeles in the amount of $17.9 million on behalf of NIIC.
This surety was purchased from Great American to secure a judgment amount associated with the
Companys pending appellate case as noted in Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies and was renewed
in January 2009.
10
7. Reinsurance
Premiums and reinsurance activity consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
|
Written |
|
|
Earned |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Direct |
|
$ |
115,579 |
|
|
$ |
86,371 |
|
|
$ |
130,560 |
|
|
$ |
83,042 |
|
Assumed |
|
|
1,839 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
2,463 |
|
Ceded |
|
|
(28,945 |
) |
|
|
(18,999 |
) |
|
|
(34,236 |
) |
|
|
(17,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Premium |
|
$ |
88,473 |
|
|
$ |
69,439 |
|
|
$ |
99,068 |
|
|
$ |
67,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company cedes premiums through reinsurance agreements with reinsurers to reduce exposure in
certain of its property-casualty insurance programs. Ceded losses and loss adjustment expense
recoveries recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $16.3 million and $7.7
million, respectively. The Company remains primarily liable as the direct insurer on all risks
reinsured and a contingent liability exists to the extent that the reinsurance companies are unable
to meet their obligations for losses assumed. To minimize its exposure to significant losses from
reinsurer insolvencies, the Company seeks to do business with only reinsurers rated Excellent or
better by A.M. Best Company and regularly evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers.
8. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company and its subsidiaries are subject at times to various claims, lawsuits and legal
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. All legal actions relating to claims made
under insurance policies are considered in the establishment of our loss and loss adjustment
expense reserves. In addition, regulatory bodies, such as state insurance departments, the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the Department of Labor and other regulatory bodies may make
inquiries and conduct examinations or investigations concerning our compliance with insurance laws,
securities laws, labor laws and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended.
Our insurance companies also have lawsuits pending in which the plaintiff seeks extra-contractual
damages from us in addition to damages claimed or in excess of the available limits under an
insurance policy. These lawsuits, which are in various stages of development, generally mirror
similar lawsuits filed against other carriers in the industry. Although we are vigorously
defending these lawsuits, the outcomes of these cases cannot be determined at this time. We have
established loss and loss adjustment expense reserves for lawsuits as to which we have determined
that a loss is both probable and estimable. In addition to these case reserves, we also establish
reserves for claims incurred but not reported to cover unknown exposures and adverse development on
known exposures. Based on currently available information, we believe that our reserves for these
lawsuits are reasonable and that the amounts reserved did not have a material effect on our
financial condition or results of operations. However, if any one or more of these cases results in
a judgment against or settlement by us for an amount that is significantly greater than the amount
so reserved, the resulting liability could have a material effect on our financial condition, cash
flows and results of operations.
On August 3, 2007, the Company was informed that the jury in a case pending in the Superior Court
of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles (the Court), had issued, on August 2,
2007, a special verdict adverse to the Companys interests in a pending lawsuit against one of the
Companys insurance companies. The Court entered a formal judgment on October 25, 2007 and the
Company received notice of that formal judgment on November 5, 2007. The current net exposure to
the Company for this judgment approximates $7.0 million and, as required by the Court, the Company
secured the judgment amount with a surety bond. However, the Company believes that it has a strong
appellate case and strategy and is vigorously pursuing the appellate process. Additionally, during
April 2009, the Association of California Insurance Companies, the California affiliate of the
Property Casualty Insurers Association of America, filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the
Companys legal position. The Company believes the matter will be resolved in a manner that will
not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had not established a case reserve for
this claim but has and will continue to closely monitor this case with counsel. The Company has
consistently established litigation expense reserves to account for the cost associated with the
defense of the Companys position, which it will continue to reserve for throughout the appeal
process.
As a direct writer of insurance, the Company receives assessments by state funds to cover losses to
policyholders of insolvent or rehabilitated companies and other authorized fees. These mandatory
assessments may be partially recovered through a reduction in
11
future premium taxes in some states over several years. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
the liability for such assessments was $3.9 million and $3.6 million, respectively, and will be
paid over several years as assessed by the various state funds.
9. Earnings Per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,646 |
|
|
$ |
9,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding during period |
|
|
19,300 |
|
|
|
19,262 |
|
Additional shares issuable under employee common stock
option plans using treasury stock method |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming exercise of
stock options |
|
|
19,353 |
|
|
|
19,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.66 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
For the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, there were 465,550 and 170,440, respectively,
outstanding options excluded from diluted earnings per share because they were anti-dilutive.
10. Segment Information
The Company operates its business as one segment, property and casualty insurance. The Company
manages this segment through a product management structure. The following table shows revenues
summarized by the broader business component description, which were determined based primarily on
similar economic characteristics, products and services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
|
$ |
34,062 |
|
|
$ |
28,715 |
|
Transportation |
|
|
16,125 |
|
|
|
18,594 |
|
Specialty Personal Lines |
|
|
13,790 |
|
|
|
12,895 |
|
Hawaii and Alaska |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premiums earned |
|
|
69,439 |
|
|
|
67,650 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
5,010 |
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
Net realized gains (losses) on investments |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(587 |
) |
Other |
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
75,260 |
|
|
$ |
73,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
11. Income Taxes
A reconciliation of the provision for federal income taxes for financial reporting purposes and the
provision for federal income taxes calculated at the prevailing federal income tax rate of 35% is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Expected federal income tax expense at statutory rate |
|
$ |
6,523 |
|
|
$ |
4,992 |
|
Tax effect of tax-exempt investment income |
|
|
(406 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
Valuation allowance on net capital losses |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other items, net |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,990 |
|
|
$ |
4,692 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the net deferred
tax assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Deferred Tax Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned premiums |
|
$ |
10,414 |
|
|
$ |
9,035 |
|
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses |
|
|
8,194 |
|
|
|
8,233 |
|
Assignments and assessments |
|
|
1,036 |
|
|
|
945 |
|
Unrealized losses on investments |
|
|
6,965 |
|
|
|
5,677 |
|
Realized losses on investments, primarily impairments |
|
|
8,136 |
|
|
|
7,936 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,937 |
|
|
|
32,699 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(7,941 |
) |
|
|
(7,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,996 |
|
|
|
25,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs |
|
|
(7,763 |
) |
|
|
(6,736 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(7,895 |
) |
|
|
(6,759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets |
|
$ |
19,101 |
|
|
$ |
18,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management has reviewed the recoverability of the deferred tax asset and believes that with the
exception of unrealized losses on investments and realized losses, the amount will be recoverable
against future earnings. The gross deferred tax assets have been reduced by a valuation allowance
on unrealized losses on equity investments of $0.5 million and $0.1 million for March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively, and a valuation allowance on net realized losses on investments of
$7.4 million and $7.5 million for March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, both
primarily related to impairment charges.
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This document, including information incorporated by reference, contains forward-looking
statements (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). All
statements, trend analyses and other information contained in this Form 10-Q relative to markets
for our products and trends in our operations or financial results, as well as other statements
including words such as may, target, anticipate, believe, plan, estimate, expect,
intend, project, and other similar expressions, constitute forward-looking statements. We made
these statements based on our plans and current analyses of our business and the insurance industry
as a whole. We caution that these statements may and often do vary from actual results and the
differences between these statements and actual results can be material. Factors that could
contribute to these differences include, among other things:
|
|
|
general economic conditions, weakness of the financial markets and other factors,
including prevailing interest rate levels and stock and credit market performance, which may
affect or continue to affect (among other things) our ability to sell our |
13
|
|
|
products and to collect amounts due to us, our ability to access capital resources and the
costs associated with such access to capital and the market value of our investments; |
|
|
|
|
customer response to new products and marketing initiatives; |
|
|
|
|
tax law changes; |
|
|
|
|
increasing competition in the sale of our insurance products and services and the
retention of existing customers; |
|
|
|
|
changes in legal environment; |
|
|
|
|
regulatory changes or actions, including those relating to regulation of the sale,
underwriting and pricing of insurance products and services and capital requirements; |
|
|
|
|
levels of natural catastrophes, terrorist events, incidents of war and other major
losses; |
|
|
|
|
adequacy of insurance reserves; and |
|
|
|
|
availability of reinsurance and ability of reinsurers to pay their obligations. |
The forward-looking statements herein are made only as of the date of this report. We assume no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements.
General
We underwrite and sell traditional and alternative risk transfer property and casualty insurance
products to the passenger transportation industry and the trucking industry, general commercial
insurance to small businesses in Hawaii and Alaska and personal insurance to owners of recreational
vehicles and commercial vehicles throughout the United States.
We have four property and casualty insurance subsidiaries: National Interstate Insurance Company
(NIIC), National Interstate Insurance Company of Hawaii, Inc. (NIIC-HI), Triumphe Casualty
Company (TCC), Hudson Indemnity, Ltd. (HIL) and six other agency and service subsidiaries. We
write our insurance policies on a direct basis through NIIC, NIIC-HI and TCC. NIIC is licensed in
all 50 states and the District of Columbia. NIIC-HI is licensed in Ohio, Hawaii, Michigan and New
Jersey. TCC, a Pennsylvania domiciled company, holds licenses for multiple lines of authority,
including auto-related lines, in 24 states and the District of Columbia. HIL is domiciled in the
Cayman Islands and provides reinsurance for NIIC, NIIC-HI and TCC primarily for the alternative
risk transfer product. We also assume a portion of premiums written by other affiliate companies
whose passenger transportation insurance business we manage. Insurance products are marketed
through multiple distribution channels, including independent agents and brokers, affiliated
agencies and agent internet initiatives. We use our six agency and service subsidiaries to sell and
service our insurance business.
As of March 31, 2009, Great American Insurance Company (Great American) owned 52.6% of our
outstanding common shares. Great American is a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Financial Group,
Inc.
Results of Operations
Overview
Through the operations of our subsidiaries, we are engaged in property and casualty insurance
operations. We generate underwriting profits by providing specialized insurance products, services
and programs not generally available in the marketplace. We focus on niche insurance markets where
we offer insurance products designed to meet the unique needs of targeted insurance buyers that we
believe are underserved by the insurance industry.
We derive our revenues primarily from premiums generated by our insurance policies and income from
our investment portfolio. Our expenses consist primarily of losses and loss adjustment expenses
(LAE), commissions and other underwriting expenses and other operating and general expenses.
14
Our March 31, 2009 and 2008 net earnings from operations, net realized gains and losses from
investments and net income are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Net income from operations |
|
$ |
12,507 |
|
|
$ |
0.64 |
|
|
$ |
9,953 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
After-tax net realized gains (losses) from investments |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(382 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,646 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
9,571 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net earnings from operations for the first quarter of 2009 were $12.5 million ($0.64 per share
diluted) compared to $10.0 million ($0.51 per share diluted) in 2008. During the first quarter of
2008, we experienced an unusual number of large claims. In the first quarter of 2009, we
experienced favorable large claims activity levels thus contributing to the $2.5 million increase
in earnings from operations. The large claims in the first quarter of 2008 resulted in a 5.6%
increase to the loss and LAE ratio or an approximate $2.5 million decrease to earnings from
operations. In addition to lower losses, we also maintained a relatively constant expense ratio of
22.4% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 22.7% in the first quarter of 2008.
We had after-tax net realized gains from investments of $0.1 million ($0.01 per share diluted) in
2009 compared to after-tax net realized losses from investments of $0.4 million ($0.02 per share
diluted) in 2008. Included in the 2009 after-tax net realized gains are other-than-temporary
impairment adjustments of $0.6 million compared to impairment adjustments of $0.9 million in 2008.
Despite recording these realized losses in accordance with other-than-temporary impairment
accounting guidelines, we believe that an economic loss is still not certain and intend to maximize
future potential recoveries related to these investments.
Gross Premiums Written
We operate our business as one segment, property and casualty insurance. We manage this segment
through a product management structure. The following table sets forth an analysis of gross
premiums written by business component during the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
|
$ |
79,377 |
|
|
|
67.6 |
% |
|
$ |
88,775 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
% |
Transportation |
|
|
16,196 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
22,701 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
% |
Specialty Personal Lines |
|
|
16,117 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
15,331 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
Hawaii and Alaska |
|
|
4,561 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
5,622 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Other |
|
|
1,167 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
117,418 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
133,304 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The group captive programs, which focus on specialty or niche businesses, provide various services
and coverages tailored to meet specific requirements of defined client groups and their members.
These services include risk management consulting, claims administration and handling, loss control
and prevention and reinsurance placement, along with providing various types of property and
casualty insurance coverage. Insurance coverage is provided primarily to associations or companies
with similar risk profiles and to specified classes of business of our agent partners.
Gross premiums written include both direct premium and assumed premium. During the first quarter of
2009, our gross premiums written decreased $15.9 million, or 11.9%. Our alternative risk transfer,
transportation and Hawaii and Alaska components all experienced decreases in gross premiums written
as compared to 2008. Several factors contributed to the decrease in our gross premiums written
including, the current U.S. economic crisis affecting our commercial customers, primarily through
lack of growth relative to vehicle counts and the effects of initiatives specific to a few of our
products that we put in place in the third quarter of 2008 centered on risk selection and pricing
adequacy. Our underwriting approach is to price our products to achieve an underwriting profit
even if we forgo volume in the short term as a result. The marketplace remains competitive, but we
continue to identify potential new products, which we will evaluate throughout the year.
15
As part of our captive programs, we have analyzed, on a quarterly basis, captive members loss
performance on a policy year basis to determine if there would be a premium assessment to
participants, or if there would be a return of premium to members as a result of less than expected
losses. We record assessment premium and return of premium as adjustments to written premium
(assessments increase written premium; returns of premium reduce written premium). For the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, we recorded $1.9 million and $2.3 million of returns of
premium, respectively.
Gross premiums written in the specialty personal lines component increased $0.8 million, or 5.1%,
compared to the same period in 2008. This increase is primarily related to continued vehicle count
growth in our commercial vehicle product from expanded marketing initiatives and product
enhancements. The growth in our commercial vehicle product in the first quarter of 2009 was offset
by increased competition associated with price sensitivity and a decline in new quotes as there is
less consumer demand for new recreational vehicles. Our Other component, which is comprised of
assigned risk policies that we receive from involuntary state insurance plans normally based on our
written premium in that state and over which we have no control, increased $0.3 million, or 33.4%,
compared to the same period in 2008.
Premiums Earned
2009 compared to 2008. The following table shows premiums earned summarized by the broader business
component description, which were determined based primarily on similar economic characteristics,
products and services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Premiums earned: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternative Risk Transfer |
|
$ |
34,062 |
|
|
$ |
28,715 |
|
|
$ |
5,347 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
Transportation |
|
|
16,125 |
|
|
|
18,594 |
|
|
|
(2,469 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
%) |
Specialty Personal Lines |
|
|
13,790 |
|
|
|
12,895 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
Hawaii and Alaska |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
4,396 |
|
|
|
(381 |
) |
|
|
(8.7 |
%) |
Other |
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
|
|
(1,603 |
) |
|
|
(52.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
69,439 |
|
|
$ |
67,650 |
|
|
$ |
1,789 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net premiums earned increased $1.8 million, or 2.6%, to $69.4 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009 compared to $67.6 million for the same period in 2008. This increase is
primarily attributable to the alternative risk transfer component, which grew $5.3 million over
2008 mainly due to three new captive programs introduced in 2008 and new participants during 2008
in our existing group captive programs. Our specialty personal lines component increased $0.9
million, or 6.9%, due to an increase in our commercial vehicle product. The transportation and
Hawaii and Alaska components decreased $2.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively, compared to
2008 due to reductions in gross premiums written in these components during 2008. The Other
component, which is comprised primarily of premium from assigned risk plans from the states in
which our insurance company subsidiaries operate and over which we have no control, decreased $1.6
million, or 52.6%, during the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Underwriting and Loss Ratio Analysis
Underwriting profitability, as opposed to overall profitability or net earnings, is measured by the
combined ratio. The combined ratio is the sum of the losses and LAE ratio and the underwriting
expense ratio. A combined ratio under 100% is indicative of an underwriting profit. Our
underwriting approach is to price our products to achieve an underwriting profit even if we forgo
volume as a result. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, we experienced a slight decrease in
rate levels on our renewal business due to the continued softening market.
16
The table below presents our net premiums earned and combined ratios for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
117,418 |
|
|
$ |
133,304 |
|
Ceded reinsurance |
|
|
(28,945 |
) |
|
|
(34,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
88,473 |
|
|
|
99,068 |
|
Change in unearned premiums, net of ceded |
|
|
(19,034 |
) |
|
|
(31,418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
$ |
69,439 |
|
|
$ |
67,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined Ratios: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and LAE ratio (1) |
|
|
56.6 |
% |
|
|
61.6 |
% |
Underwriting expense ratio (2) |
|
|
22.4 |
% |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
79.0 |
% |
|
|
84.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The ratio of losses and LAE to premiums earned. |
|
(2) |
|
The ratio of the sum of commissions and other underwriting expenses, other operating
expenses less other income to premiums earned. |
2009 compared to 2008. Losses and LAE are a function of the amount and type of insurance contracts
we write and of the loss experience of the underlying risks. We seek to establish case reserves at
the maximum probable exposure based on our historical claims experience. Our ability to accurately
estimate losses and LAE at the time of pricing our contracts is a critical factor in determining
our profitability. The amount reported under losses and LAE in any period includes payments in the
period net of the change in reserves for unpaid losses and LAE between the beginning and the end of
the period. The loss and LAE ratio for the first quarter of 2009 decreased 5.0 percentage points to
56.6% compared to 61.6% in the same period in 2008. The loss and LAE ratio for the first quarter
of 2009 includes a $0.8 million, or 1.2 percentage points, increase for unfavorable development of
losses from prior years compared to unfavorable development of $1.6 million, or 2.4 percentage
points, in the first quarter of 2008. We experienced no large losses during the first quarter of
2009 compared to two large losses that were incurred during the first quarter of 2008, which
increased our loss and LAE by $3.8 million and increased the loss ratio by approximately 5.6
percentage points.
Our underwriting expense ratio includes commissions and other underwriting expenses and other
operating and general expenses, offset by other income. Commissions and other underwriting expenses
consist principally of brokerage and agent commissions reduced by ceding commissions received from
assuming reinsurers, and vary depending upon the amount and types of contracts written and, to a
lesser extent, premium taxes. The underwriting expense ratio for the first quarter of 2009 remained
relatively flat at 22.4% compared to 22.7% for the same period in 2008.
Net Investment Income
2009 compared to 2008. Net investment income decreased $0.8 million, or 14.3%, to $5.0 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $5.8 million in the same period in 2008
reflecting lower yields on our portfolio. Yields declined throughout 2008 and remained low during
the first quarter of 2009 for most investment categories in which we are active.
Net
Realized Gains (Losses) on Investments
2009 compared to 2008. Net realized gains were $23 thousand for the first quarter of 2009 compared
to net realized losses of $0.6 million for the first quarter of 2008. Continuing turmoil in
investment markets have resulted in market declines in the portfolio, particularly in the financial
and real estate related holdings. This has had an impact on our investment portfolio in 2009, as
net realized gains from sales of $0.6 million were offset by an other-than-temporary impairment
charge of $0.6 million related primarily to a preferred stock holding and one fixed maturity
investment with market values that were significantly below cost.
17
Expense on Amounts Withheld
2009 compared to 2008. We invest funds in the participant loss layer for several of the alternative
risk transfer programs. We receive investment income and incur an equal expense on the amounts owed
to alternative risk transfer participants. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the expense
on amounts withheld decreased $0.4 million, or 31.1%, to $0.9 million from $1.3 million in the
comparable period in 2008. This decrease is primarily attributable to lower interest rate yields
experienced during the first quarter of 2009 compared to 2008, which reduced the related interest
expense by $0.3 million.
Financial Condition
Investments and Securities Lending Collateral
At March 31, 2009, our investment portfolio contained $476.0 million in fixed maturity securities,
$24.1 million in equity securities and $68.1 million in securities lending collateral, all carried
at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of shareholders
equity on an after-tax basis. At March 31, 2009, we had pretax net unrealized losses of $3.9
million on fixed maturities and pretax net unrealized losses of $5.9 million on equity securities.
At March 31, 2009, 99.0% of the fixed maturities in our portfolio were rated investment grade
(credit rating of AAA to BBB) by Standard & Poors Corporation. At March 31, 2009, 87.8% of the
securities lending collateral was rated investment grade by Standard & Poors Corporation or
invested in overnight repurchase agreements. Investment grade securities generally bear lower
yields and lower degrees of risk than those that are unrated or non-investment grade.
Summary information for securities with unrealized gains or losses at March 31, 2009 is shown in
the following table. Approximately $9.2 million of fixed maturities, $9.9 million of equity
securities and $34.2 million of securities lending collateral had no unrealized gains or losses at
March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with |
|
Securities with |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Fixed Maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of securities |
|
$ |
367,644 |
|
|
$ |
99,147 |
|
Amortized cost of securities |
|
|
359,348 |
|
|
|
111,326 |
|
Gross unrealized gain or (loss) |
|
$ |
8,296 |
|
|
$ |
(12,179 |
) |
Fair value as a % of amortized cost |
|
|
102.3 |
% |
|
|
89.1 |
% |
Number of security positions held |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Number individually exceeding $50,000 gain or (loss) |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Concentration of gains or (losses) by type or industry: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US government and government agencies |
|
$ |
2,680 |
|
|
$ |
(75 |
) |
State, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
3,296 |
|
|
|
(2,442 |
) |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
2,119 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Banks, insurance and brokers |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
(8,302 |
) |
Industrial and other |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(1,354 |
) |
Percentage rated investment grade (1) |
|
|
99.8 |
% |
|
|
96.1 |
% |
Equity Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of securities |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
$ |
13,349 |
|
Cost of securities |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
19,330 |
|
Gross unrealized gain or (loss) |
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
$ |
(5,981 |
) |
Fair value as a % of cost |
|
|
105.7 |
% |
|
|
69.1 |
% |
Number individually exceeding $50,000 gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Securities Lending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
33,849 |
|
Amortized cost of securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,798 |
|
Gross unrealized loss |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,949 |
) |
Fair value as a % of amortized cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.3 |
% |
Number of security positions held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Number individually exceeding $50,000 gain or (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Concentration of loss by type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements overnight |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,374 |
) |
Banks, insurance, and brokers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(575 |
) |
Percentage rated investment grade (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.2 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Investment grade of AAA to BBB by Standard & Poors Corporation. |
18
The table below sets forth the scheduled maturities of available for sale fixed maturity securities
at March 31, 2009, based on their fair values. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because certain securities may be called or prepaid by the issuers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities Portfolio |
|
Securities Lending Collateral |
|
|
Securities with |
|
Securities with |
|
Securities with |
|
Securities with |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
Maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due one year or less |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
42.9 |
% |
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
31.3 |
% |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Due after ten years |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
30.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75.4 |
% |
|
|
99.4 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
48.5 |
% |
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes the unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturities, equity securities
and securities lending by dollar amount:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
as % of |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
Cost Basis |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Fixed Maturities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with unrealized gains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceeding $50,000 and for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year (35 issues) |
|
$ |
61,002 |
|
|
$ |
2,589 |
|
|
|
104.4 |
% |
More than one year (4 issues) |
|
|
7,277 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
107.5 |
% |
Less than $50,000 (262 issues) |
|
|
299,365 |
|
|
|
5,197 |
|
|
|
101.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
367,644 |
|
|
$ |
8,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with unrealized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceeding $50,000 and for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year (24 issues) |
|
$ |
14,226 |
|
|
$ |
(2,965 |
) |
|
|
82.8 |
% |
More than one year (19 issues) |
|
|
14,867 |
|
|
|
(8,124 |
) |
|
|
64.7 |
% |
Less than $50,000 (70 issues) |
|
|
70,054 |
|
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
98.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
99,147 |
|
|
$ |
(12,179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with unrealized gains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceeding $50,000 and for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year (0 issues) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
More than one year (0 issues) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Less than $50,000 (8 issues) |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
105.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with unrealized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceeding $50,000 and for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year (15 issues) |
|
$ |
10,726 |
|
|
$ |
(2,518 |
) |
|
|
81.0 |
% |
More than one year (1 issue) |
|
|
1,695 |
|
|
|
(3,305 |
) |
|
|
33.9 |
% |
Less than $50,000 (11 issues) |
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
85.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,349 |
|
|
$ |
(5,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Lending: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with unrealized gains: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceeding $50,000 and for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year (0 issues) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than one year (0 issues) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than $50,000 (0 issues) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities with unrealized losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exceeding $50,000 and for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than one year (4 issues) |
|
$ |
8,545 |
|
|
$ |
(881 |
) |
|
|
90.7 |
% |
More than one year (7 issues) |
|
|
12,352 |
|
|
|
(9,020 |
) |
|
|
57.8 |
% |
Less than $50,000 (3 issues) |
|
|
12,952 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
99.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,849 |
|
|
$ |
(9,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
When a decline in the value of a specific investment is considered to be other-than-temporary, a
provision for impairment is charged to earnings (accounted for as a realized loss) and the cost
basis of that investment is reduced. The determination of whether unrealized losses are
other-than-temporary requires judgment based on subjective as well as objective factors. Factors
considered and resources used by management include those discussed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment.
Premiums and Reinsurance
In the alternative risk transfer component, under most captive programs, all members of the group
share a common renewal date. These common renewal dates are scheduled throughout the year.
However, we have several large captives that renew during the first quarter of a given fiscal year.
The captive renewals in the first quarter result in a large increase in premiums receivable,
unearned premiums, prepaid reinsurance premiums and reinsurance balances payable during the first
quarter of a given fiscal year.
Premiums receivable increased $31.9 million, or 33.4%, and unearned premiums increased $29.0
million, or 18.5%, from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. The increase in premiums receivable
and unearned premiums is primarily due to an increase in direct written premiums in our alternative
risk transfer component in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the fourth quarter of 2008.
Prepaid reinsurance premiums increased $9.9 million, or 35.0%, and reinsurance balances payable
increased $11.0 million, or 107.1%, from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009. The increase in
prepaid reinsurance premiums and reinsurance balances payable is primarily due to an increase in
ceded premiums written in the alternative risk transfer component in the first quarter of 2009
compared to the fourth quarter of 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The liquidity requirements of our insurance subsidiaries relate primarily to the liabilities
associated with their products as well as operating costs and payments of dividends and taxes to us
from insurance subsidiaries. Historically and during the first three months of 2009, cash flows
from premiums and investment income have provided more than sufficient funds to meet these
requirements, without requiring the sale of investments. If our cash flows change dramatically from
historical patterns, for example as a result of a decrease in premiums or an increase in claims
paid or operating expenses, we may be required to sell securities before their maturity and
possibly at a loss. Our insurance subsidiaries generally hold a significant amount of highly
liquid, short-term investments or cash and cash equivalents to meet their liquidity needs.
Continuing volatility in the capital markets presents challenges to us as we seek to manage our
portfolio and our capital position. Our historic pattern of using receipts from current premium
writings for the payment of liabilities incurred in prior periods has enabled us to extend slightly
the maturities of our investment portfolio beyond the estimated settlement date of our loss
reserves. Funds received in excess of cash requirements are generally invested in additional
marketable securities.
We believe that our insurance subsidiaries maintain sufficient liquidity to pay claims and
operating expenses, as well as meet commitments in the event of unforeseen events such as reserve
deficiencies, inadequate premium rates or reinsurer insolvencies.
Our principal sources of liquidity are our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased $5.0 million from $77.2
million at December 31, 2008 to $72.2 million at March 31, 2009. Net cash provided by operating
activities was $14.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2009, compared to $35.1
million during the comparable period in 2008. This decrease of $20.3 million is attributable to a
large amount of claims payments being made during the first quarter of 2009 and a reduction in our
premiums written in the first quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008.
Net cash used in investing activities was $18.4 million and $17.0 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The $1.4 million increase in cash used in investing
activities was primarily related to an increase of net purchases (purchases less sales and maturity
and redemptions of investments) of securities in 2009 compared to 2008.
We utilized net cash of $1.4 million and $0.2 million from financing activities for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We received cash and a related income tax
benefit in the first quarter of 2008 of $1.0 million from the exercise of stock options and had no
stock options exercised during the first quarter 2009. Our financing activities include those
related to stock option activity and dividends paid on our common shares.
We will have continuing cash needs for administrative expenses, the payment of principal and
interest on borrowings, shareholder dividends and taxes. Funds to meet these obligations will come
primarily from parent company cash, dividends and other payments from our insurance company
subsidiaries and from our line of credit.
20
We have a $50 million five-year unsecured Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement), which includes
a sublimit of $10 million for letters of credit. We have the ability to increase the line of credit
to $75 million subject to the Credit Agreements accordion feature. Amounts borrowed bear
interest at either (1) a rate per annum equal to the greater of the administrative agents prime
rate or 0.5% in excess of the federal funds effective rate or (2) rates ranging from 0.45% to 0.90%
over LIBOR based on our A.M. Best insurance group rating, or 0.65% at March 31, 2009. Commitment
fees on the average daily unused portion of the Credit Agreement also vary with our A.M. Best
insurance group rating and range from 0.090% to 0.175%, or 0.125% at March 31, 2009.
The Credit Agreement requires us to maintain specified financial covenants measured on a quarterly
basis, including consolidated net worth, fixed charge coverage ratio and debt-to-capital ratio. In
addition, the Credit Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants, including
negative covenants that limit or restrict our ability to, among other things, incur additional
indebtedness, effect mergers or consolidations, make investments, enter into asset sales, create
liens, enter into transactions with affiliates and other restrictions customarily contained in such
agreements. As of March 31, 2009, we were in compliance with all financial covenants. The Credit
Agreement will terminate on December 19, 2012.
On May 23, 2008, we drew $15 million from our Credit Agreement to redeem in full our outstanding
junior subordinated debentures, replacing higher variable rate debt of LIBOR plus 420 basis points
with lower variable rate debt. As of March 31, 2009, the interest rate on this debt is equal to the
six-month LIBOR (2.6% at November 24, 2008) plus 65 basis points, with interest payments due
quarterly.
We believe that funds generated from operations, including dividends from insurance subsidiaries,
parent company cash and funds available under our Credit Agreement will provide sufficient
resources to meet our liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, if these
funds are insufficient to meet fixed charges in any period, we would be required to generate cash
through additional borrowings, sale of assets, sale of portfolio securities or similar
transactions. If we were required to sell portfolio securities early for liquidity purposes rather
than holding them to maturity, we would recognize gains or losses on those securities earlier than
anticipated. If we were forced to borrow additional funds in order to meet liquidity needs, we
would incur additional interest expense, which could have a negative impact on our earnings. Since
our ability to meet our obligations in the long term (beyond a 12-month period) is dependent upon
factors such as market changes, insurance regulatory changes and economic conditions, no assurance
can be given that the available net cash flow will be sufficient to meet our operating needs.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts
reported in the financial statements. As more information becomes known, these estimates and
assumptions could change and thus impact amounts reported in the future. Management believes that
the establishment of losses and LAE reserves and the determination of other-than-temporary
impairment on investments are the two areas where the degree of judgment required in determining
amounts recorded in the financial statements make the accounting policies critical. For a more
detailed discussion of these policies, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Losses and LAE Reserves
Significant periods of time can elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of
that loss to us and our final payment of that loss, and its related LAE. To recognize liabilities
for unpaid losses, we establish reserves as balance sheet liabilities. At March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, we had $399.2 million and $400.0 million, respectively, of gross loss and LAE
reserves, representing managements best estimate of the ultimate loss. Management records, on a
monthly and quarterly basis, its best estimate of loss reserves. For purposes of computing the
recorded reserves, management utilizes various data inputs, including analysis that is derived from
a review of prior quarter results performed by actuaries employed by Great American. On an annual
basis, actuaries from Great American, utilizing current period data, review the recorded reserves
for NIIC, NIIC-HI and TCC. The actuaries provide a Statement of Actuarial Opinion, required
annually in accordance with state insurance regulations, on the statutory reserves recorded by
these U.S. insurance subsidiaries. The actuarial analysis of NIICs, NIIC-HIs and TCCs net
reserves for the year ending December 31, 2008 reflected point estimates that were within 2% of
managements recorded net reserves as of such date. Using this actuarial data along with its other
data inputs, management concluded that the recorded reserves appropriately reflect managements
best estimates of the liability as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The quarterly reviews of unpaid loss and LAE reserves by Great American actuaries are prepared
using standard actuarial techniques. These may include (but may not be limited to):
|
|
|
the Case Incurred Development Method; |
21
|
|
|
the Paid Development Method; |
|
|
|
|
the Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method; and |
|
|
|
|
the Incremental Paid LAE to Paid Loss Methods. |
The period of time from the occurrence of a loss through the settlement of the liability is
referred to as the tail. Generally, the same actuarial methods are considered for both short-tail
and long-tail lines of business because most of them work properly for both. The methods are
designed to incorporate the effects of the differing length of time to settle particular claims.
For short-tail lines, management tends to give more weight to the Case Incurred and Paid
Development Methods, although the various methods tend to produce similar results. For long-tail
lines, more judgment is involved, and more weight may be given to the Bornhuetter-Ferguson Method.
Liability claims for long-tail lines are more susceptible to litigation and can be significantly
affected by changing contract interpretation and the legal environment. Therefore, the estimation
of loss reserves for these classes is more complex and subject to a higher degree of variability.
Supplementary statistical information is reviewed to determine which methods are most appropriate
and whether adjustments are needed to particular methods. This information includes:
|
|
|
open and closed claim counts; |
|
|
|
|
average case reserves and average incurred on open claims; |
|
|
|
|
closure rates and statistics related to closed and open claim percentages; |
|
|
|
|
average closed claim severity; |
|
|
|
|
ultimate claim severity; |
|
|
|
|
reported loss ratios; |
|
|
|
|
projected ultimate loss ratios; and |
|
|
|
|
loss payment patterns. |
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
Our investments are exposed to at least one of three primary sources of investment risk: credit,
interest rate and market valuation risks. The financial statement risks are those associated with
the recognition of impairments and income, as well as the determination of fair values. We evaluate
whether other-than-temporary impairments have occurred on a case-by-case basis. Management
considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer and uses its best judgment in
evaluating the cause and amount of decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in
assessing the prospects for near-term recovery. Inherent in managements evaluation of the security
are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential.
Considerations we use in the impairment evaluation process include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been below amortized
cost; |
|
|
|
|
whether the issuer is experiencing significant financial difficulties; |
|
|
|
|
economic stability of an entire industry sector or subsection; |
|
|
|
|
whether the issuer, series of issuers or industry has a catastrophic type of loss; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which the unrealized loss is credit-driven or a result of changes in market
interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
historical operating, balance sheet and cash flow data; |
22
|
|
|
internally generated financial models and forecasts; |
|
|
|
|
our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow
for any anticipated recovery in market value; and |
|
|
|
|
other subjective factors, including concentrations and information obtained from
regulators and rating agencies. |
We closely monitor each investment that has a market value that is below its amortized cost and
make a determination each quarter for other-than-temporary impairment for each of those
investments. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we recorded $0.6 million in
other-than-temporary impairment adjustments, related to one preferred stock and one fixed maturity
investment. We recorded impairment adjustments of $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008. While it is not possible to accurately predict if or when a specific security will become
impaired, given the current turmoil and uncertainty in the market, charges for other-than-temporary
impairment could be material to results of operations in subsequent quarters. Management believes
it is not likely that future impairment charges will have a significant effect on our liquidity.
See Managements Discussions and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Investments and Securities Lending Collateral.
Contractual Obligations/Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the first quarter of 2009, our contractual obligations did not change materially from those
discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
We do not currently have any relationships with unconsolidated entities of financial partnerships,
such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would
have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of March 31, 2009, there were no material changes to the information provided in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 under Item 7A Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Our management, with participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has
evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e)) as of March 31, 2009. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March
31, 2009, to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or
submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in
other factors that have occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no material changes from the legal proceedings previously reported in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. For more information regarding such legal
matters please refer to Item 3 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008, Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included therein and Note 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this quarterly report.
23
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.
There are no material changes to the risk factors previously reported in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. For more information regarding such risk factors, please
refer to Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
ITEM 5. Other Information
None.
ITEM 6. Exhibits
|
3.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (1) |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Code of Regulations (1) |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These exhibits are incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement
on Form S-1, as amended (Registration No. 333-119270) filed on November 12,
2004. |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NATIONAL INTERSTATE CORPORATION |
|
|
Date: May 6, 2009 |
/s/ David W. Michelson
|
|
|
David W. Michelson |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 6, 2009 |
/s/ Julie A. McGraw
|
|
|
Julie A. McGraw |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
|
25