Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
Eversource Energy | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
On behalf of the Board of Trustees and employees of Eversource Energy, it is my pleasure to invite you to attend the May 1, 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Eversource Energy.
In 2018, we continued to achieve very positive financial and operating performance and also expanded our development of clean energy. We implemented several constructive multi-year rate plans among our utilities, integrated Aquarion Water into our family of companies, and continued to provide a total shareholder return better than both our utility peers and the broader market.
We reported earnings per share of $3.25, compared to $3.11 in 2017, grew our common dividend by 6.3 percent to an annualized rate of $2.02 per share, and realized total shareholder return of 6.4 percent. In February 2019, we announced a common dividend increase of another 6 percent to an annualized rate of $2.14 per share. We expanded our partnership with Ørsted, the world's leading offshore wind provider, and we continue to support our states' clean energy policies, with a nearly $500 million investment in energy efficiency, the expansion of utility-scale solar capacity, and initiation of work on grid-scale energy storage in Massachusetts. We are also accelerating our deployment of electric vehicle charging infrastructure in Massachusetts, a project that could ultimately support thousands of individual electric vehicle charging ports.
Workplace and boardroom Diversity & Inclusion (D&I) are a part of our core values. I have signed onto the CEO Action for D&I letter a nationwide effort to drive inclusiveness. Our D&I programs support initiatives to integrate inclusive practices and drive accountability in all areas of our business, for which we received industry group awards for employee diversity leadership, and recognition in 2018 of our Board of Trustees by the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) as one of only eight large-cap finalists for NACD's first Board Diversity Award. I am also very proud of our long history of partnering with local and regional community organizations. We provided nearly $18 million in grants to non-profit organizations and worthwhile regional activities across our tri-state service area in 2018 and devoted 30,000 employee hours to volunteerism.
As a Company, we are more focused than ever on shareholder value, excellent customer service, compliance, environmental stewardship and being a strong partner in the communities we serve. This is all made possible through the dedication of our employees, whom we provide with the competitive wages and benefits that their high performance merits.
Before closing, I want to recognize Dennis R. Wraase, who will retire from the Board of Trustees effective on the date of our Annual Meeting. We are grateful for his exceptional service to the Board and the Company.
On behalf of your Board of Trustees, I thank you for your continued support of Eversource Energy.
Very truly yours,
James J. Judge |
March 22, 2019
Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders |
DATE: | Wednesday, May 1, 2019 | |
TIME: | 10:30 a.m. | |
PLACE: | Infinity Hall, 32 Front Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103 |
Business Items/Agenda
Adjournments and Postponements
The business items to be considered at the Annual Meeting may be considered at the meeting or following any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
Record Date
You or your proxy are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournment or postponement if you were an Eversource Energy shareholder at the close of business on March 5, 2019.
Voting
Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented at the meeting. For specific instructions on how to vote your shares, please refer to the section entitled "Questions and Answers About the Annual Meeting and Voting" beginning on page 66. This Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and our proxy statement are first being made available to shareholders on or about March 22, 2019.
Meeting Attendance Information
You or your proxy are entitled to attend the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement if you were an Eversource Energy shareholder at the close of business on March 5, 2019 or hold a valid proxy to vote at the Annual Meeting. Please be prepared to present photo identification to be admitted to the meeting. If your shares are not registered in your name but are held in "street name" through a bank, broker or other nominee, and you plan to attend, please bring proof of ownership.
By Order of the Board of Trustees, | ||
Richard J. Morrison Secretary |
March 22, 2019
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Statement Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 1, 2019. The Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 1, 2019 and the 2018 Annual Report are available on the Internet at www.envisionreports.com/ES
Table of Contents
2019 Proxy Statement i
ii 2019 Proxy Statement
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This is only a summary, and we encourage you to review the entire proxy statement, as well as our 2018 Annual Report.
A Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, our 2018 Annual Report and a form of proxy or voting instruction card are first being made available to shareholders on or about March 22, 2019.
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | |
Annual Meeting of Shareholders | |||||||||
Time and Date: |
10:30 a.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, May 1, 2019 |
||||||||
Location: |
Infinity Hall 32 Front Street Hartford, Connecticut 06103 |
||||||||
Record Date: |
March 5, 2019 |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | |
In 2018, we continued to achieve very positive financial and operational performance results. The following are brief summaries of some of our most important accomplishments in 2018. Please refer to "Summary of 2018 Accomplishments" found on page 31 of this proxy statement.
Financial |
Operational |
ESG |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
2018 earnings were $3.25 per share, a 4.5% increase from 2017.
Our Board of Trustees increased the annual dividend rate by 6.3% for 2018 to $2.02 per share, exceeding the Edison Electric Institute (EEI) Index companies median dividend growth rate of 5.1%.
Our Total Shareholder Return in 2018 was 6.4%, compared to 3.7% for the EEI Index companies.
We significantly advanced our clean energy leadership through the expansion of our offshore wind energy partnership with Ørsted.
Our Standard & Poor's (S&P) Credit Rating remained at A+, two notches higher than any other utility holding company. |
On average, 2018 customer power interruptions were 17.2 months apart, and average service restoration time was 77.5 minutes; this performance ranks us in the first quartile of the industry.
We achieved our 2018 established targets in safety performance and response to gas service calls.
We achieved several constructive regulatory outcomes in all states where we provide service.
We responded extremely well to major weather events affecting our natural gas, electric and water systems, as well as a series of major gas explosions which occurred in another company's service territory, and at the request of the Governor of Massachusetts, we successfully led the initial phase of the incident response. |
The energy efficiency, offshore wind, large scale solar, battery storage and electric vehicle infrastructure programs and initiatives we describe in this proxy statement have significantly advanced our long-term strategy of being a clean energy leader.
We continue to be an industry leader in SF6 emission reductions.
Our 2019 Trustee nominees include seven who have served on the Board for seven or fewer years and five who are women and/or persons of color.
We were recognized by a significant number of organizations for our leadership in energy efficiency, workplace diversity, investor relations, sustainability and ESG.
We are making a difference in our communities through our corporate philanthropy and employee volunteer programs. |
2019 Proxy Statement 1
INFORMATION SUMMARY |
We maintain effective corporate governance standards:
What we DO:
What we DON'T do:
2 2019 Proxy Statement
INFORMATION SUMMARY |
2019 Business Items
The Board of Trustees of Eversource Energy is asking you to vote on three items:
Item 1 Election of Trustees |
The Board has nominated ten Trustees, nine of whom are independent, for reelection to our Board of Trustees. Linda Dorcena Forry was elected to the Board by the Trustees effective May 2, 2018. Each of the other
nominees was elected to the Board by at least 92% of the shares voted at the 2018 Annual Meeting. The following table provides summary information about each nominee:
|
|
|
|
Board Committees | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trustee |
Age |
Trustee Since |
Independent |
Audit |
Compensation |
Corporate Governance |
Executive |
Finance |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Cotton M. Cleveland |
66 | 1992 | Y | | | M | | M | ||||||||
Sanford Cloud, Jr. * |
74 | 2000 | Y | M | C | M | ||||||||||
James S. DiStasio |
71 | 2012 | Y | | M | | M | C | ||||||||
Francis A. Doyle |
70 | 2012 | Y | C | M | M | ||||||||||
Linda Dorcena Forry |
45 | 2018 | Y | | | M | | M | ||||||||
James J. Judge |
63 | 2016 | N | C | ||||||||||||
John Y. Kim |
58 | 2018 | Y | M | M | | | | ||||||||
Kenneth R. Leibler |
70 | 2006 | Y | M | M | |||||||||||
William C. Van Faasen |
70 | 2012 | Y | M | C | | M | | ||||||||
Frederica M. Williams |
60 | 2012 | Y | M | M | |||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Board Composition
Of our ten nominees, nine are independent, seven have served on the Board for seven or fewer years and five are women and/or persons of color. Please see the sections marked "Election of Trustees," "Selection of Trustees,"
"Trustee Qualifications, Skills and Experience" and "Evaluation of Board and Board Refreshment" beginning on page 6.
Item 2 Advisory Vote to Approve the Compensation of our Named Executive Officers |
We are asking shareholders to approve the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As noted in the 2018 Performance Highlights, we achieved excellent financial and operating performance results in 2018, and our total shareholder return has consistently outperformed the utility industry
over both the short and long term. Our Board is committed to executive compensation programs that reflect market-based incentive compensation and that align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders, and we believe that the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers in 2018 reflects that alignment between pay and performance. Please see pages 60 - 61.
2019 Proxy Statement 3
INFORMATION SUMMARY |
Item 3 Ratify the Selection of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for 2019 |
Our Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2019. The Board is seeking shareholder ratification of this selection. Please see pages 62 - 64.
The Board of Trustees recommends that shareholders vote FOR Items 1, 2, and 3.
4 2019 Proxy Statement
Proxy Statement
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 1, 2019
We are furnishing this proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Trustees of Eversource Energy for use at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting). We are holding the Annual Meeting on Wednesday, May 1, 2019, at 10:30 a.m., at the Infinity Hall, 32 Front Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103.
We have provided to our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of our proxy materials or paper copy with instructions on how to access our proxy materials online and how to vote. We will continue to provide printed materials to those shareholders who have requested them. If you would like to change the method of delivery of your proxy materials, please contact our transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, P. O. Box 43078, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3078; Toll free: 800-999-7269; or at www.computershare.com/investors. You may do the same as a beneficial owner by contacting the bank, broker, or other nominee where your shares are held.
We are making this proxy statement available to solicit your proxy to vote on the matters presented at the Annual Meeting. Our Board requests that you submit your proxy by the Internet, telephone, or mail so that your shares will be represented and voted at our Annual Meeting. The proxies will vote your common shares as you direct. For each item, you may vote "FOR" or
"AGAINST" the item, or you may abstain from voting on the item.
If you submit a signed proxy card without any instructions, the proxies will vote your common shares consistent with the recommendations of our Board of Trustees as stated in this proxy statement and in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If any other matters are properly presented at the Annual Meeting for consideration, the proxies will have discretion to vote your common shares on those matters. As of the date of this proxy statement, we did not know of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting.
Only holders of common shares of record at the close of business on March 5, 2019 (the record date) are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. On the record date, there were 35,729 holders of record and 317,302,260 common shares outstanding and entitled to vote. You are entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting for each common share that you held on the record date.
The principal office of Eversource Energy is located at 300 Cadwell Drive, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104. The general offices of Eversource Energy are located at 800 Boylston Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02199 and 56 Prospect Street, Hartford, Connecticut 06103-2818.
2019 Proxy Statement 5
Our Board of Trustees oversees the business affairs and management of Eversource Energy. The Board currently consists of eleven Trustees, only one of whom, James J. Judge, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, is a member of management.
The Board has nominated ten Trustees for reelection at the Annual Meeting to hold office until the next Annual Meeting or otherwise until the succeeding Board of Trustees has been elected and until at least a majority of the succeeding Board is qualified to act. Dennis R. Wraase is retiring from the Board effective on the date of the Annual Meeting. The number of Trustees was last set at 14; this provides the Board with flexibility to add Trustees when appropriate. Shareholders may vote for up to ten nominees. Unless you specify otherwise, we will vote the enclosed proxy to elect the ten nominees named on pages 7 - 11 as Trustees.
We describe below and on the following pages each nominee's name, age, and date first elected as a Trustee, Committees served on, and a brief summary of the nominee's business experience, including the nominee's particular qualifications, skills and experience that led the Board to conclude that the nominee should continue
to serve as a Trustee. Please see the Trustees' biographies below and the sections captioned "Selection of Trustees," "Trustee Qualifications, Skills and Experience" and "Evaluation of the Board and Board Refreshment" beginning on page 12. Each nominee has indicated to our Lead Trustee that they will stand for election and will serve as a Trustee if elected. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the common shares outstanding as of the record date will be required to elect each nominee. This means that each nominee must receive the affirmative vote of the holders of more than 50% of the total common shares outstanding. You may either vote "FOR" or "AGAINST" all, some, or none of the Trustees, or you may abstain from voting. Broker non-votes and abstentions will be counted in the determination of a quorum and will have the same effect as a vote against a nominee.
The Board of Trustees recommends that shareholders vote FOR the election of the nominees listed below.
6 2019 Proxy Statement
ITEM 1: ELECTION OF TRUSTEES |
Cotton M. Cleveland
Age: 66
Trustee since 1992
Committees: Finance and Corporate Governance
BACKGROUND
Ms. Cleveland is President of Mather Associates, a firm specializing in leadership and organizational development for business, public and nonprofit organizations. She is a director of Main Street America Holdings, Inc. and Ledyard National Bank, and was the founding Executive Director of the state-wide Leadership New Hampshire program. She served on the Board of Directors of the Bank of Ireland from 1986 to 1996, and as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the New Hampshire Women's Foundation for 2016. She was elected and served as the Moderator of the Town of New London, New Hampshire and The New London/Springfield Water Precinct from 2000 to 2010. Ms. Cleveland has also served as Chair, Vice Chair and a member of the Board of Trustees of the University System of New Hampshire, as Co-Chair of the Governor's Commission on New Hampshire in the 21st Century, and as an incorporator for the New Hampshire Charitable Foundation. Ms. Cleveland received a B.S. degree magna cum laude from the University of New Hampshire, Whittemore School of Business and Economics. She is a certified and practicing Court Appointed Special Advocate/Guardian ad Litem (CASA/GAL) volunteer for abused and neglected children.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Ms. Cleveland founded and serves as President of her own consulting firm. She has experience serving on the boards of directors of numerous companies. She also benefits from her policy-making level experience in education at the university level as the Chair, Vice Chair and member of the Board of Trustees of the University System of New Hampshire. In addition, she has policy-making level experience in financial and capital markets as a result of her service as a director of Ledyard National Bank and Bank of Ireland. Her ties to the State of New Hampshire also provide the Board with valuable perspective. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Ms. Cleveland should continue to serve as a Trustee.
Sanford Cloud, Jr.
Age: 74
Lead Trustee since 2012
Trustee since 2000
Committees: Compensation, Corporate Governance and Executive
BACKGROUND
Mr. Cloud has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Cloud Company, LLC, a real estate development and business investment firm, since 2005. Mr. Cloud served as past President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Conference for Community and Justice from 1994 to 2004, was a former partner at the law firm of Robinson and Cole from 1993 to 1994, and served two terms as a state senator of Connecticut. He was Vice President of Corporate Public Involvement and Executive Director of the Aetna Foundation from 1986 to 1992, has served as Chairman of the Connecticut Health Foundation and continues as a member of its Board. Mr. Cloud served as a director of The Phoenix Companies, Inc. from 2001 to 2016 and is currently a director of Ironwood Mezzanine Fund, L.P. He is also a director of the MetroHartford Alliance, Inc. and the University of Connecticut Health Center. Mr. Cloud is also a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Connecticut and serves as director of its Thomas J. Dodd Center for Human Rights. Mr. Cloud received a B.A. degree from Howard University, a J.D. degree cum laude from the Howard University Law School, and an M.A. degree in Religious Studies from the Hartford Seminary.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Cloud has significant policy-making level experience in business and financial affairs as a business executive and as a director of several publicly-traded and privately-held companies. He provides the Board with great benefits from his experience as a law firm partner and Connecticut state senator and through his significant ties and service to the City of Hartford and the State of Connecticut. His service as Lead Trustee has significantly helped advance the Company's strategy. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Mr. Cloud should continue to serve as a Trustee.
2019 Proxy Statement 7
ITEM 1: ELECTION OF TRUSTEES |
James S. DiStasio
Age: 71
Trustee since 2012
Committees: Compensation, Executive and Finance
BACKGROUND
Mr. DiStasio served as Senior Vice Chairman and Americas Chief Operating Officer at Ernst & Young, a registered public accounting firm, from 2003 until his retirement in 2007. Mr. DiStasio joined Ernst & Young in 1969 and became a partner in 1977. He served as a director of EMC Corporation from 2010 until its sale to Dell Technologies, Inc. in 2016. He served as a trustee of NSTAR from 2009 until NSTAR's merger with the Company in 2012. He has served as a director of the United Way of Massachusetts Bay and Merrimack Valley and as trustee of each of Catholic Charities of Boston, the Boston Public Library Foundation and the Wang Center for the Performing Arts. Mr. DiStasio received a B.S. degree in Accounting from the University of Illinois at Chicago.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. DiStasio has significant experience overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of major public companies, derived from his service as a senior executive at one of the largest public accounting firms in the world. In his position as Senior Vice Chairman and Americas Chief Operating Officer, Mr. DiStasio also acquired important management and leadership skills that provide additional value and support to the Board. He has served on several boards of for-profit and non-profit companies and their committees. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Mr. DiStasio should continue to serve as a Trustee.
Francis A. Doyle
Age: 70
Trustee since 2012
Committees: Audit, Corporate Governance and Executive
BACKGROUND
Mr. Doyle has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Connell Limited Partnership, whose businesses have produced components and related supplies for the automotive, power, mining, appliance, farm equipment, warehouse automation, and medical and food packaging industries, since 2001. Prior to that, he was Vice Chairman of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was Global Technology Leader and a member of the firm's Global Leadership Team, having served in various capacities during his 29 years with the firm, including Geographic Office and Regional Managing Partner, Mergers & Acquisition Managing Partner and Engagement Partner on significant publicly listed companies. Since leaving PricewaterhouseCoopers, he has served as lead director and chairman of the audit committee and a member of the executive and compensation committees of Tempur Sealy International, Inc. and as chairman of the audit committee and a member of the executive committee, nominating and governance committee and investment committee of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc. (policyholder owned) since 2003. Mr. Doyle has served as a director of Citizens Financial Group, where he was a member of the executive committee and chaired the compensation committee, as a trustee of the Joslin Diabetes Center, where he chaired the finance committee, and as a trustee of Boston College. Mr. Doyle is a certified public accountant and holds a B.S. degree and an M.B.A. degree from Boston College.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Doyle has significant merger and acquisition, financial, accounting, financial reporting and technology risk management experience and an in-depth understanding of finance and capital markets through his years at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. He also has extensive senior management experience as the President and Chief Executive Officer of a global manufacturer. Mr. Doyle has served on the boards of directors of several public and private companies and on various committees of those boards. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Mr. Doyle should continue to serve as a Trustee.
8 2019 Proxy Statement
ITEM 1: ELECTION OF TRUSTEES |
Linda Dorcena Forry
Age: 45
Trustee since 2018
Committees: Corporate Governance and Finance
BACKGROUND
Ms. Forry has served as the Vice President of Diversity, Inclusion and Community Relations, Northeast Region, of Suffolk Construction since 2018. Ms. Forry served in the Massachusetts State Senate from 2005 to 2018, where she was appointed Assistant Majority Whip in 2017. She served as Acting Chief of Staff and Executive Staff of the Neighborhood Development for the City of Boston from 1999 to 2005 and was a Legislative Assistant for the Massachusetts State Legislature from 1997 to 1999. Ms. Forry serves on numerous boards and civic organizations, including the John F. Kennedy Library Advisory Board, the Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston at the Harvard Kennedy School of Government, the Boys and Girls Club of Dorchester and the Institute of Justice and Democracy in Haiti. Ms. Forry received her bachelor's degree from Boston College Carroll School of Management in 1998 and her Masters of Public Administration from Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government in 2014.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
As Vice President of Diversity, Inclusion and Community Relations at Suffolk Construction, Ms. Forry provides her company with tools by which it can increase diversity and inclusion and maintain excellent relations between Suffolk Construction and the Northeast community. Ms. Forry also has significant policy-making level experience from her tenure in state and local government in Massachusetts. She also has experience serving on the boards of directors of several non-profit boards. Her experience and expertise provide the Board and the Company with insight into how Eversource can continue its important work in furthering diversity and inclusion in Eversource's workplace and maintaining a close relationship with our customer communities. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Ms. Forry should continue to serve as a Trustee.
James J. Judge
Age: 63
Trustee since 2016
Committee: Executive
BACKGROUND
Mr. Judge is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Eversource Energy. He also is Chairman and a director of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, NSTAR Gas Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire, Yankee Gas Services Company and Eversource Aquarion Holdings, Inc. Previously, Mr. Judge was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Eversource Energy, and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and a director of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, NSTAR Gas Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire and Yankee Gas Services Company from April 2012 until May 2016. Mr. Judge served as a director of Analogic Corporation since 2005 and as chairman of its audit committee until Analogic Corporation's sale in 2018. He serves on the Board of Directors of the Edison Electric Institute, the Massachusetts Competitive Partnership and the J. F. Kennedy Library Foundation. He has also served on the Board of Directors of the United Way of Massachusetts Bay and Merrimack Valley. Mr. Judge received both a B.S. degree magna cum laude and an M.B.A. degree magna cum laude from Babson College.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Judge is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. His extensive experience in the energy industry and diverse financial and management skills provide the necessary background to lead the Company. He is an experienced public company director and audit committee chair. He also serves our customer community through his service on and work with many non-profit boards. Mr. Judge represents management on the Board as the sole management Trustee. Since becoming Chief Executive Officer and then Chairman, he has continued the Company's financial and operational success and has positioned Eversource as a national clean energy leader. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Mr. Judge should continue to serve as a Trustee.
2019 Proxy Statement 9
ITEM 1: ELECTION OF TRUSTEES |
John Y. Kim
Age: 58
Trustee since 2018
Committees: Audit and Compensation
BACKGROUND
Mr. Kim served as President of New York Life Insurance Company from 2015 until his retirement in 2018 and also served in a variety of other management positions at New York Life, including as the company's Chief Investment Officer, since 2008. Mr. Kim served as President of Prudential Retirement and its predecessor CIGNA Retirement and Investment Services from 2002 to 2007 and served as the Chief Executive Officer of Aeltus Investment Management, a subsidiary of Aetna, Inc., from 2001 to 2004. Mr. Kim serves as a director of Fiserv, Inc. and is a member of its audit committee. He has served as the vice chair of the Connecticut Business and Industry Association, as a member of the MetroHartford Alliance, Inc. and as chairman of the University of Connecticut Foundation. He has also been active with the Greater Hartford Arts Council, The Hartford Stage Company, and the Connecticut Opera Association. Mr. Kim received his B.A. degree from the University of Michigan in 1983 and his M.B.A. degree from the University of Connecticut in 1987.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Kim has more than 30 years of experience in the financial services area. His varied and comprehensive accounting, financial, technology risk and financial reporting experience acquired at several nationally known insurance companies, including New York Life Insurance Company, Prudential Retirement, CIGNA Retirement and Investment Services and Aetna, and provides the Board and its Committees with valuable insight and perspective. He also is closely associated with several important Connecticut business and non-profit groups and is an experienced public company director. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Mr. Kim should continue to serve as a Trustee.
Kenneth R. Leibler
Age: 70
Trustee since 2006
Committees: Audit and Finance
BACKGROUND
Mr. Leibler currently serves as Chairman of the Board of The Putman Mutual Funds. He has served as a trustee of The Putnam Mutual Funds since 2006 and served as Vice Chairman from 2016 - 2018. He serves as Trustee Emeritus of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and served as both a trustee and as vice chairman of Beth Israel Medical Center from 2009 to 2012. He is a founding partner of the Boston Options Exchange and served as its chairman from 2004 to February 2007. He is a past vice chairman of the Board of Directors of ISO New England, Inc., the independent operator of New England's bulk electric transmission system, where he served until 2006. He also served as a director of The Ruder Finn Group from 2005 to 2010. Mr. Leibler received a B.A. degree magna cum laude from Syracuse University.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Leibler has considerable senior executive level experience in business and management, including experience in financial markets and risk assessment, as the former Chairman of the Boston Options Exchange, former Chairman and CEO of the Boston Stock Exchange, and former President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the American Stock Exchange, as well as through his current service as Chairman of The Putnam Mutual Funds, where he serves on the contract, executive, nominating and investment oversight committees. He also has policy-making level experience in the electric utility industry through his service as the Vice Chairman of ISO New England. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Mr. Leibler should continue to serve as a Trustee.
10 2019 Proxy Statement
ITEM 1: ELECTION OF TRUSTEES |
William C. Van Faasen
Age: 70
Trustee since 2012
Committees: Audit and Compensation
BACKGROUND
Mr. Van Faasen served as Chief Executive Officer of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. (BCBSMA), a health care services provider, from 1992 until his retirement in 2007. He is Chairman Emeritus of BCBSMA and also served as interim Chief Executive Officer in 2010. He has served as a director of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc. (policyholder owned) since 2002 and as Lead Director since April 2012, and has served as a Director of Acreage Holdings, Inc. since 2018. He served as a director of IMS Health, Inc. from 1996 to 2010 and as Lead Director from 2006 to 2010. He also served as a director of PolyMedica Corporation from 2005 to 2008 and served as a trustee of NSTAR from 2002 until NSTAR's merger with the Company in 2012. He is an honorary director of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce and previously served as a director of the United Way of Massachusetts Bay and Merrimack Valley. Mr. Van Faasen received a B.A. degree from Hope College and an M.B.A. degree from Michigan State University.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Mr. Van Faasen brings to the Board extensive management, leadership, and financial experience derived from leading a large company in a regulated industry. He also brings in-depth experience and insight as a director of several public companies, including service as a lead director and on board committees, and has also served on area non-profit boards. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Mr. Van Faasen should continue to serve as a Trustee.
Frederica M. Williams
Age: 60
Trustee since 2012
Committees: Audit and Finance
BACKGROUND
Ms. Williams has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Whittier Street Health Center in Boston, an urban community health care facility serving residents of Boston and surrounding communities, since 2002. Prior to joining Whittier Street Health Center, she served as the Senior Vice President of Administration and Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Dimock Center, a large health care and human services facility in Boston. She was elected as a trustee of NSTAR in March 2012 and served as a trustee until NSTAR's merger with the Company in April 2012. Ms. Williams is a member of the Board of Trustees of Dana Farber Cancer Institute, the Massachusetts League of Community Health Centers and Boston Health Net. She is a Fellow of the National Association of Corporate Directors, a member of the Massachusetts Women's Forum, International Women's Forum, and Women Business Leaders of the U.S. Health Care Industry Foundation. Ms. Williams attended the London School of Accountancy, passed the examinations of the Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Financial Administrators, (United Kingdom) (ICSA) and of the Institute of Administrative Management (United Kingdom), with distinction, and was elected a Fellow of the ICSA in 2000. She obtained a graduate certificate in Administration and Management from the Harvard University Extension School and an M.B.A. degree with a concentration in Finance from Anna Maria College in Paxton, Massachusetts.
QUALIFICATIONS, SKILLS AND EXPERIENCE
Ms. Williams has more than 20 years of experience in a regulated industry, and has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Whittier Street Health Center, a national model for providing equitable access to high quality and cost effective health care, for more than fifteen years. This service has provided her with a broad base of financial, leadership, management and community experience and skills. She also has significant experience serving on several non-profit boards. Based on these qualifications, skills and experience, the Board of Trustees determined that Ms. Williams should continue to serve as a Trustee.
2019 Proxy Statement 11
James J. Judge is our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. Sanford Cloud, Jr. serves as our Lead Trustee.
As Lead Trustee, Mr. Cloud presides at executive sessions of the independent Trustees; facilitates communication between the Chief Executive Officer and
the Board members; participates with the Compensation Committee in its evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer; and provides ongoing information to the Chief Executive Officer about his or her performance. He also attends all Committee meetings.
This section and the next two sections discuss how we select individuals to become Trustees and how we continually ensure that we have a fully-qualified, effective and diverse Board.
As set forth in its charter, it is the responsibility of the Corporate Governance Committee to identify individuals qualified to become a Trustee and to recommend to the Board a slate of Trustee candidates to be submitted to a vote of our shareholders at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Committee has from time to time retained the services of a third party executive search firm to assist it in identifying and evaluating such individuals.
As provided in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Corporate Governance Committee seeks nominees with the following qualifications:
Trustees should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. They must also have an inquisitive and objective perspective, practical wisdom and mature judgment. The Board should represent diverse experience at policy-making levels in business, government, education, community and charitable organizations, as well as areas that are relevant to our business activities. The Corporate Governance Committee also seeks diversity in gender, ethnicity and personal background when considering Trustee candidates.
Applying these criteria and those noted elsewhere in this proxy statement, the Corporate Governance Committee considers Trustee candidates suggested by its members as well as by management and shareholders. In anticipation of Trustee retirements in 2018, and acting on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, the Board of Trustees elected Linda
Dorcena Forry to the Board effective May 2, 2018, having elected John Y. Kim as a Trustee effective January 1, 2018.
As part of the annual nomination process for re-election, the Corporate Governance Committee reviews the independence, qualifications, skills and experience of each nominee for Trustee and reports its findings to the Board. At its February 6, 2019 meeting, the Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Trustees determined that each Trustee (except for our Chief Executive Officer) is independent, that each Trustee possesses the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and that each Trustee remains committed to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders. The Committee's review also focused on each Trustee's experience at policy-making levels in business, government, education, community and charitable organizations, and other areas relevant to our business activities, as described below. Based on this review, the Committee advised the Board on February 6, 2019 that each of the Trustees was qualified to serve on the Board under the Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The Corporate Governance Committee and the Board annually review the skills and qualifications that they determine are necessary for the proper oversight of the Company by the Trustees in furtherance of their fiduciary duties. The Committee and the Board remain focused on ensuring that the individual and collective abilities of the Trustees continue to meet the changing needs of the Company and its constituencies. The Board is committed to nominating individuals who satisfy the applicable criteria for outstanding service to our Company and who together comprise the appropriate Board composition in light of evolving business demands. The Board evaluates the effectiveness of each Trustee in contributing to the Board's work and the potential contributions of each new nominee.
12 2019 Proxy Statement
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
Eversource Energy is a holding company with electric, gas and water utility subsidiaries that provide service to customers in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire. The Company is a leader in enabling the development of clean energy. Combined with our successful and effective energy efficiency programs, the Company is positioned at the forefront in the fight against climate change. We stress great reliability and customer service for our customers, solid financial performance for our shareholders, a safe, respectful workplace for our employees that provides good wages and benefits, and continuous involvement with and support of our communities. Our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer has set a very clear goal for the Company: to be known as the best energy company in the nation. To help us accomplish this, we seek Trustees with both overall skills and experience and some that are specialized. We describe here and elsewhere the qualifications, skills and experience that we feel are necessary and that our Trustees possess.
Set forth below is a list of the qualifications, skills and experience we seek, followed by a description noting how these qualifications, skills and experience are particularly important to our Board:
Regulatory Experience. Each of our utility subsidiaries is regulated in virtually all aspects of its business by various federal and state agencies, including the SEC, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and various state and/or local regulatory authorities with jurisdiction over the industry and the service areas in which each subsidiary operates. Accordingly, the Board values the policy-making level experience in a heavily regulated industry that several of our Trustees possess.
Accounting Experience. As a publicly-traded electric, gas and water holding company whose companies are subject to substantial federal, state and accounting industry rules, it is especially important that the Board have significant accounting experience. Several of our Trustees are career accounting and financial executives
and provide us with superior strength in the Board's oversight of this important element of the Board's responsibilities.
Senior Executive and Director Experience. Many of our Trustees serve or have served as senior executives or directors of other companies, providing us with unique insights. These individuals possess extraordinary leadership qualities as well as the ability to identify and develop those qualities in others. They demonstrate a practical understanding of organizations, processes, long-term strategic planning, risk management and corporate governance, and know how to drive change and growth.
Diversity. The Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Trustees seek diversity in gender, ethnicity and personal background when considering Trustee candidates. Diverse thoughts and views emanating from different backgrounds, life experiences, gender and race, career experiences and skills are critical to a well-functioning Board and essential to embracing opportunities and confronting challenges in the future. To ensure the success of our business strategy, the Board of Trustees strives to identify and pursue Trustee candidates with diverse skills, knowledge, background and experience that complement the skills, knowledge and experience of our current Trustees. Our refreshed Board is now one of the most diverse in the industry. Of the ten nominees, three are women, three are African-American, and one is Asian-American.
Risk Management Experience. Assessing and managing risk in a rapidly changing clean energy environment is critical to our success. Several of our Trustees have served in leadership positions and have the experience to understand and evaluate the most significant risks we face and the experience and leadership to provide effective oversight of risk management processes.
Finance Experience. The vast majority of our ongoing capital program is expected to be funded through cash flows provided by operating activities, as well as new debt issuances and, less frequently, equity issuances. As a result, the Board highly values the policy-making level experience and understanding of capital and financial markets, accounting and financial reporting, and credit markets, that many of our Trustees have acquired.
Community and Charitable Organization Involvement. Public utility companies have a unique position and role in the communities they serve beyond that of most corporations. The Board supports and encourages
2019 Proxy Statement 13
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
community involvement and development, and philanthropic goals and activities. The Eversource Energy Foundation, Inc. was established in 1998 to focus on our community investments and to provide grants to our nonprofit community partners. Consistent with our business strategy and core values, the Foundation invests primarily in projects that address issues of economic and community development and the environment. Each Trustee has experience in one or more community or charitable organizations. We operate New England's largest energy delivery system in three different states. Because a majority of our Trustees also reside in our service territory, they not only have ties to local communities, but they understand our customers' needs.
Our Board's Qualifications, Skills and Experience
Independence, Tenure and Diversity
Of our ten nominees, nine are independent, seven have served on the Board for seven or fewer years, and five are women and/or persons of color.
14 2019 Proxy Statement
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
The Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews and evaluates the performance of the Board of Trustees, Board Committees and individual Board Members. The Committee periodically assesses the Board's contribution as a whole and identifies areas in which the Board or senior management believes a better contribution may be made. The Committee also reviews the attributes and skills of the Board Members as a way to refresh and continually ensure that the Board has the proper mix of skills. The Board and each of the Committees, other than the Executive Committee, also conduct annual performance self-evaluations to increase the effectiveness of the Board and its Committees; the results of these are reviewed and discussed with the Board. Our self-evaluation program includes the completion of Board and Committee questionnaires, interviews by the Lead Trustee with each Board member, and discussions by the Board and each Committee of any issues raised by our Board Members during the self-evaluation process. In addition to the Committee reviews and the annual self-evaluations conducted by the Committee and the Board, the Committee and the
Board also annually review the independence, performance and qualifications of each Trustee prior to nominations being made for an additional term. These reviews are discussed by the Committee, following which it makes recommendations to the Board regarding nominees for election as Trustees.
Our Board has an average tenure of nine years. We believe that the mix of longer tenured Trustees and recently elected Trustees provides for the kind of balance that contributes to the overall effectiveness of the Board.
Shareholders who desire to suggest potential candidates for membership on the Board of Trustees may address such information, in writing, to our Secretary at the mailing address set forth on page 65 of this proxy statement. The communication must identify the writer as a shareholder of the Company and provide sufficient detail about the nominee for the Corporate Governance Committee to consider the individual's qualifications. Our Declaration of Trust also provides for proxy access.
2019 Proxy Statement 15
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
The Board of Trustees has five standing committees, described below. The Board has adopted charters for each of these committees. These charters can be found
at
www.eversource.com/content/ema-c/about/investors/
corporate-governance/board-committee-charters.
|
|
|
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Audit Committee |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Members: Francis A. Doyle, Chair |
The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the Company's financial statements, the internal audit function, and compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements. The Committee also oversees:
The appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm.
The independent registered public accounting firm's qualifications, performance and independence, as well as the performance of our internal audit function.
The review of guidelines and policies that govern management's processes in assessing, monitoring and mitigating major financial risk exposures. |
|||||||
|
Financial reporting and review of accounting standards and systems of internal control. |
|||||||
|
Significant accounting policies, management judgments and accounting estimates, earnings releases. |
|||||||
The Audit Committee has sole authority to appoint or replace the independent registered public accounting firm (for which it seeks shareholder ratification), and to approve all audit engagement fees and terms. |
||||||||
The Committee meets independently with the internal audit staff, the independent registered public accounting firm, management, and then solely as a Committee, at least quarterly. Following each Committee meeting, the Audit Committee reports to the full Board. The Audit Committee met six times during 2018, including the annual joint meeting with the Finance Committee. |
||||||||
Additional information regarding the Audit Committee is contained in Item 3 of this proxy statement beginning on page 62. |
||||||||
Financial Expertise: Each member of the Audit Committee meets the financial literacy requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the SEC and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board has affirmatively determined that Mr. Doyle is an "audit committee financial expert," as defined by the SEC. |
||||||||
Independence: The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE, SEC and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
16 2019 Proxy Statement
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Compensation Committee |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Members: William C. Van Faasen, Chair |
The Compensation Committee is responsible for the compensation and benefit programs for all executive officers of Eversource Energy and has overall authority to establish and interpret our executive compensation programs. The Compensation Committee
also:
Reviews our executive compensation strategy, evaluates components of total compensation, and assesses performance against goals, market competitive data and other appropriate factors, and makes compensation-related decisions based upon Company and executive performance.
Reviews and recommends to the Board of Trustees the compensation of the non-employee members of the Board. |
|||||||
|
Reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer's compensation and, with the participation of the Lead Trustee and subject to the further review and approval of the independent Trustees, evaluates the performance of the Chief Executive Officer in light of those goals and objectives. |
|||||||
|
In collaboration with the Chief Executive Officer, oversees the evaluation of executive officers and engages in the succession planning process for the Chief Executive Officer and other executives. |
|||||||
|
Has the sole authority to select and retain experts and consultants in the field of executive compensation to provide advice to the Committee with respect to market data, competitive information, and executive compensation trends. |
|||||||
|
Retains an independent compensation consulting firm to provide compensation consulting services solely to the Compensation Committee. |
|||||||
Following each Committee meeting, the Compensation Committee reports to the full Board. The Compensation Committee met four times during 2018. |
||||||||
For additional information regarding the Compensation Committee, including the Committee's processes for determining executive compensation, see the CD&A beginning on page 31. |
||||||||
Independence: The Board has affirmatively determined that each member of the Compensation Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE, the SEC, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
2019 Proxy Statement 17
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate Governance Committee |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Members: Sanford Cloud, Jr., Chair |
The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for developing, overseeing and regularly reviewing Governance Guidelines and related policies. The Corporate Governance Committee also:
Serves as a nominating committee, establishing criteria for new Trustees and identifying and recommending prospective Board candidates and the appointment of Trustees to Board Committees.
Annually reviews the independence and qualifications of the Trustees and recommends to the Board appointments of the Committee Members, of the Lead Trustee, and the Chairman of the Board and the election of officers of the Company. |
|||||||
|
Annually evaluates the performance of the Board and its Committees. |
|||||||
|
Annually reviews the charters of the Board Committees. |
|||||||
Following each Committee meeting, the Corporate Governance Committee reports to the full Board. The Corporate Governance Committee met four times in 2018. |
||||||||
Independence: The Board has affirmatively determined that each member of the Corporate Governance Committee meets the independence requirements of the NYSE, the SEC, and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Executive Committee |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Members: James J. Judge, Chair |
The Executive Committee is empowered to exercise all the authority of the Board, subject to certain limitations set forth in our Declaration of Trust, during the intervals between meetings of the Board. Following each Committee meeting, the Executive Committee reports to the full Board. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2018. Independence: Except for Mr. Judge, who is the Company's Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, each member of the Executive Committee is independent. |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | |
18 2019 Proxy Statement
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Finance Committee |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Members: James S. DiStasio, Chair |
The Finance Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities relating to financial plans, policies and programs for Eversource Energy and its subsidiaries. The Finance Committee also:
Reviews the Company's plans and actions to assure liquidity; financial goals and proposed financing programs; operating plans, budgets, capital expenditure forecasts; plans and recommendations regarding common share repurchase programs; early extinguishment and refunding of debt and preferred stock obligations; and other proposals that modify the Company's capital structure.
Reviews the Company's Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) program, including practices to monitor and mitigate cyber, physical security and other risk exposures. |
|||||||
|
Reviews and recommends the Company's dividend policy, as well as new business ventures and initiatives which may result in substantial expenditures, commitments and exposures. |
|||||||
|
Conducts an annual review of counter-party credit policy, insurance coverages and pension plan performance. |
|||||||
Following each Committee meeting, the Finance Committee reports to the full Board. The Finance Committee met four times during 2018, including the annual joint meeting with the Audit Committee. |
||||||||
Independence: Each member of the Finance Committee is independent, and while the Committee is not specifically subject to NYSE or SEC independence regulations, each member meets the independence criteria set forth in the NYSE and SEC regulations and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
No member of the Compensation Committee is employed by Eversource Energy or any of its subsidiaries. No executive officer of Eversource Energy serves as a member of the compensation committee or
on the board of directors of any company at which a Member of the Eversource Energy Compensation Committee or Board of Trustees serves as an executive officer.
In 2018, the Board of Trustees held seven meetings, three of which included executive sessions attended only by the independent Trustees, and the Board and the Committees held a total of 24 meetings. In 2018, each Trustee attended at least 75% of the aggregate number
of the Board and Committee meetings, and all Trustees attended the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 2, 2018. Our Trustees are expected to attend our Annual Meetings of Shareholders, but we do not have a formal policy addressing this subject.
2019 Proxy Statement 19
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
The Board of Trustees, both as a whole and through its Committees, is responsible for the oversight of the Company's risk management processes and programs. The Board believes that this approach is appropriate to carry out its risk oversight responsibilities and is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Each year, the Board evaluates its risk assessment function as part of its Board evaluation process.
As set forth below, each Committee reviews management's assessment of risk for that Committee's respective area of responsibility. Each Committee member has expertise on risks relative to the nature of the Committee on which he or she sits. With each Committee Chair reporting to the Board following each Committee meeting, the entire Board is able to discuss risk related issues, assess their implications and provide oversight on appropriate actions for management to take. All Board Committees meet periodically with members of senior management to discuss the relevant risks and challenges facing the Company.
The Board of Trustees oversees the Company's comprehensive operating and strategic planning. The operating plan, which is reviewed and formally approved by the Board in February following review by the Finance Committee, consists of the goals and objectives for the year, key performance indicators, and financial forecasts. The strategic planning process consists of long-term corporate objectives, specific strategies to achieve those goals, and plans designed to implement each strategy. The ERM program is integrated with the annual operating and strategic planning processes. The top enterprise-wide financial risks are identified during the development of the annual operating plan and are tracked throughout the year. These risks are presented to the Board of Trustees during development of the annual operating plan and at the Board's annual strategic planning session. Detailed risk mitigation plans for the principal enterprise-wide risks are updated periodically and presented to the Finance Committee.
The Finance Committee is responsible for oversight of the Company's ERM program and enterprise-wide risks, as well as specific risks associated with insurance, credit, financing and pension investments. Our ERM program involves the application of a well-defined, enterprise-wide methodology designed to allow our executives to identify, categorize, prioritize, and mitigate the principal risks to the Company. The ERM program is integrated with other assurance functions throughout the Company, including compliance, auditing, and insurance to ensure appropriate coverage of risks that
could impact the Company. In addition to known risks, the ERM program identifies emerging risks to the Company, through participation in industry groups, discussions with management, and in consultation with outside advisors. Our management then analyzes risks to determine materiality, likelihood and impact, and develops mitigation strategies. Management broadly considers our business model, the utility industry, the global economy and the current environment to identify risks. The findings of this process are discussed with the Finance Committee and the full Board, including reporting on an individual risk-by-risk basis on how these issues are being measured and managed. The ERM Program was recognized as a mature program for the second year in a row by the Risk Management Society.
In addition to the regularly scheduled reports by ERM of all of the Company's enterprise-wide risks and the results of the ERM program, management reports periodically to both the Board of Trustees and the Finance Committee in depth on specific top enterprise risks at the Company. ERM also reports regularly to the Finance Committee on the activities of the Company's Risk Committee. The Company's Risk Committee consists of senior officers of the Company, and is responsible for ensuring that the Company is managing its principal enterprise-wide risks, as well as other key risk areas such as operations, environmental, information technology, compliance and business continuity.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the oversight of the integrity of the Company's financial statements, including oversight of the guidelines, policies and controls that govern management's processes for assessing, monitoring and mitigating major financial risk exposures. The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for the oversight of compliance with various governance regulations as required by the SEC, the NYSE and other regulators. The Executive Vice President and General Counsel reports on any changes in regulations and best practices as part of the annual review of Committee charters and the Board's Corporate Governance Guidelines and also at Committee and Board meetings. The Board of Trustees administers its compensation risk oversight function primarily through its Compensation Committee. The process by which the Board and the Compensation Committee oversee executive compensation risk is described in greater detail within the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 31.
20 2019 Proxy Statement
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
The Company continues to devote substantial resources to protecting its cyber and operational assets. Simultaneously, the Board and its Committees continue to provide substantial and focused attention to cyber and system security. At the Board and Committee level, comprehensive cyber security reports are provided and discussed at each meeting of the Finance Committee, which has primary responsibility for cyber and system security oversight at the Committee level. These reports are provided to all members of the Board and discussed by the Board at the time the Finance Committee Chair reports on the Committee's meetings. The reports focus on the Company's most critical assets, describe cyber security drills and exercises, any attempted breaches, and mitigation strategies, including insurance. In addition, assessments by third-party experts of cyber and
physical security risks to the utility industry and the Company in particular are provided periodically. The Company regularly reviews and updates its cyber and system security programs and the Board and its Committees continue to enhance their strong oversight activities, including joint meetings of the Audit and Finance Committees, at which cyber and system security programs and issues that might affect the Company's financial statements and operational systems are discussed by both Committees with financial, information technology, legal and accounting management, other members of the Board, representatives of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, and outside advisors and expert speakers.
At Eversource, sustainability is embedded into how we conduct our business today and for future generations, with environmental, social and governance (ESG) initiatives integrated into the policies and principles that govern our Company. Our vision is to be recognized as the best energy company in the nation by serving the needs and expectations of our shareholders, customers, employees and the communities we serve. We are committed to top-tier reliability, superior customer service, effective corporate governance, expanding energy options for our region, environmental stewardship, and providing transparency and clarity about our position and our performance on these and other topics.
In 2017, we released Eversource's Commitment to Environmental Sustainability, which underscores our environmental priorities and highlights our role as a key catalyst for clean energy development in New England. This statement is a critical component of our vision for how we conduct our business today. We have been a leader within our trade groups, the Edison Electric Institute and the American Gas Association, in standardizing ESG disclosures. In 2017, the nation's electric companies became the first industry in the country to adopt a common set of ESG disclosures. In December 2018, natural gas companies similarly adopted a common set of ESG disclosures. Eversource Energy was one of the first companies to post such disclosures for both our electric and gas operations; they can be found on our website at www.eversource.com. We are also active in the Electric Utility Sustainability Supply Chain Alliance, working to embed sustainability
throughout the transmission and distribution supply chain.
Set forth below is a list of the considerations and topics that we feel are important to our comprehensive sustainability and ESG policies and practices, followed by a description of each and how we integrate them into everything that we do:
Sustainability Governance. Sustainability is embedded into our governance processes, and Board level oversight of ESG is reflected in many of the financial, operational and sustainability/ESG accomplishments outlined in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement. Key metrics that are reported to the Board periodically and at management presentations focus directly on ESG, including financial performance,
2019 Proxy Statement 21
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
reliability, safety, diversity and inclusion, customer experience, and strategic projects. Additionally, in February 2019, our Compensation Committee added an executive sustainability/ESG performance goal that will be reported on monthly and assessed in February 2020 by the Committee.
Our Sustainability Steering Committee, comprised of executive level management from key ESG areas, oversees a team of employees who engage with operational and business partners to develop and manage strategic priorities, set sustainability goals and coordinate sustainability reporting. The sustainability team meets regularly throughout the year to assess current practices and identify improvement opportunities.
Eversource regularly partners with like-minded companies and stakeholders to conduct our business in a responsible and sustainable way, providing the best solutions for our customers and the communities we serve.
Electric Transmission. Eversource has sited and built complex and varied projects in densely populated, congested areas in our service territory. These projects have enhanced the reliability of the electric grid, eased congestion, accelerated retirement of older, higher emission coal and oil-fueled power plants, and helped to provide greater access to new, clean renewable power sources. Over the next five years, Eversource plans to invest approximately $3.3 billion in projects and upgrades to modernize our electric transmission system and meet the region's renewable energy needs. A more reliable, more efficient electric grid will provide New England with the infrastructure that is critical to help the region meet its aggressive greenhouse gas reduction goals.
Natural Gas. Our Distribution Integrity Management Programs are designed to improve service for our customers by identifying and prioritizing operational and infrastructure enhancements. Replacement of aging natural gas infrastructure is an example of a top priority to enhance safety and minimize the potential for natural gas emissions, thereby preventing the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.
Water. Eversource is committed to the protection of water resources through conservation and water quality management. Aquarion Water Company provides water services to residential, commercial, industrial, fire protection and other customers in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire. Our water utilities obtain their water supplies from wholly-owned surface water sources and groundwater supplies, as well as water purchased from other water suppliers. Approximately 98 percent of our annual production is self-supplied and processed at ten surface water treatment plants and
numerous well stations, all wholly-owned and located in Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.
Aquarion conservation programs ensure that local water supplies remain sufficient for critical needs such as human consumption and fire protection. Recent actions include the completion of a Water Data Analysis Study and implementation of programs that encourage customers to reduce water usage, a survey of all water mains in our service territory to reduce unaccounted for water, identifying and addressing energy efficiency opportunities at our large water treatment plants, and utilizing EPA software tools to identify infrastructure vulnerabilities for Connecticut coastal water systems due to environmental risks.
Aquarion's reservoirs are surrounded by more than 15,000 acres of forest, which serve as both a critical safeguard and an invaluable resource. Sustainably managing the land and natural resources is critical to protecting and enhancing water quality. Environmental review of proposed developer projects, property inspections, and investigation activities are utilized for the protection of our numerous sources of water supply and increased land development pressures, construction proposals, and active construction projects within Aquarion source water areas. Also, long-range initiatives are utilized to preserve and protect our sources of supply into the future. Aquarion's commitment to providing the highest quality water is evidenced by the efforts it makes to protect its reservoir and groundwater supply from contamination. Aquarion continually conducts site inspections and monitors land use activities and water quality at hundreds of locations throughout our watershed and aquifer areas.
Energy Efficiency. Being efficient with our country's limited energy and water resources is one of our primary goals. We work with our customers to improve their energy efficiency. We invested approximately $500 million a year on average over the past three years on energy efficiency and consider these investments to be the most economical way to reduce our region's emissions and improve its competitiveness. Eversource's recent rankings confirm the success of our programs. Eversource was ranked first for incremental energy efficiency as a percentage of overall sales in the last study performed by the Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (Ceres), a leading sustainability advocacy organization. The design and deployment of our energy-saving programs and services has contributed substantially to consistent top tier state Energy Efficiency Scorecard rankings for Massachusetts and Connecticut by the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), with Massachusetts retaining the top spot for the past eight years.
22 2019 Proxy Statement
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
Connecticut ranked fifth in 2018 and consistently ranks in the top ten.
Our nationally recognized energy efficiency portfolio of services provides energy solutions for all Eversource customers residential (including low-income), municipal, commercial and industrial. These solutions address energy-efficient new construction, weatherization, lighting, appliances, heating, cooling, mechanical and process equipment replacement that go beyond code compliance and are transforming the marketplace. Combined with online customer engagement tools and on-site education, green-job training and community outreach services, energy efficiency is generating savings that enhance our region's economy. These investments are expected to continue to reduce carbon emissions by millions of tons per year.
Corporate and Compensation Governance. We remain committed to effective corporate governance and executive compensation standards. Our Board of Trustees is "super independent" (90% of this year's Trustee nominees). Our standards include: majority of outstanding shares Trustee election requirement, board and committee self-assessment and refreshment mechanisms, proxy access, mandatory trustee retirement age, and a vigorous shareholder engagement program. Our executive compensation governance program includes share ownership and holding requirements for Trustees and executives, an expanded clawback policy, broad hedging and pledging prohibition, and double trigger change in control agreements. Please see the Corporate Governance and Executive Compensation Highlights on page 2 of this proxy statement for further discussion of these standards and others.
Diversity and Human Capital. D&I are a part of our core values, with focus areas that result in true business outcomes. Our Chief Executive Officer, who has signed the CEO Action for D&I letter, drives accountability for progress throughout our organization. Our D&I Councils and Business Resource Groups actively contribute to the integration of D&I practices across all three states that we provide service in and within all business areas, and our D&I Employee Engagement score increased from 2016 to 2018 by 7 percent. Eversource is proud to be one of 230 companies selected for the 2019 Bloomberg Gender-Equality Index (GEI), which distinguishes companies committed to transparency in gender reporting and advancing women's equality, and to have received recognition by Associated Industries of Massachusetts for diversity leadership. In addition, our Board of Trustees was recognized in 2018 by the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) as one of only eight large cap finalists for NACD's first Board Diversity Award.
This recognition represents Eversource's broader commitment to D&I both in the workplace and in the boardroom.
We are dedicated to ensuring that all of our employees are given the tools to perform their jobs effectively and safely, and that for their efforts they receive competitive compensation, quality healthcare, retirement savings plans, and other benefits. To help ensure that we develop and maintain a skilled workforce, we partner with educational institutions in the region, offer internship and co-op experiences, and provide employees training opportunities and tuition assistance.
Our Communities. Eversource is committed to the health and economic well-being of the residents, businesses and institutions of Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire. We recognize and value our role as a corporate citizen in the cities and towns across our service territory. We are helping to build healthier, stronger communities through strategic charitable partnerships, employee volunteerism and economic development opportunities. We have a dedicated team responsible for all philanthropy, working to ensure our continued commitment to community outreach and corporate giving.
We have a long history of partnering with local and regional community organizations. Through grants, we support economic and community development, the environment, and initiatives that address local, high-priority concerns and needs. We provided nearly $18 million in grants and other local support to nonprofit organizations and worthwhile regional activities across our tri-state service area in 2018. We devoted 30,000 employee hours in 2018 to volunteerism and have strong partnerships with key community organizations across New England, including our continued support of the Eversource Walk for Boston Children's Hospital, the Eversource Everyday Amazing Race for Massachusetts General Hospital, the Eversource Hartford Marathon, the Eversource Walk and 5K Run for Easter Seals New Hampshire, the United Way, and the Special Olympics.
Environmental Stewardship. We take great care to promote conservation and responsibly manage natural and cultural resources. We dedicate professional expertise to maintain the integrity and long-term vitality of the land we manage. We created the Eversource Land Trust to protect open space and critical resource areas and wildlife habitat. Our focus on environmentally sensitive rights-of-way maintenance practices is designed to minimize impacts to important resource areas and promote critical diverse habitats. Our vegetation management program is an industry best-practice plan to balance the needs of our customers and communities
2019 Proxy Statement 23
GOVERNANCE OF EVERSOURCE ENERGY |
with the goal of providing safe, reliable electric service for our customers, while monitoring growth of trees around power lines. We partner with state Historic Preservation and Tribal Historic Preservation offices to identify and protect cultural resources of significance during construction projects.
Climate Leadership. We have developed meaningful strategies to reduce our carbon footprint and are proud to be one of the greenest utilities in the nation. We have committed to specific targets to reduce fugitive emissions from our natural gas system. We collaborate with other utilities and industry partners across the country to better understand storm hazards and develop green solutions to improve our system reliability. Our employees are committed to ensuring that our comprehensive emergency preparedness and resiliency plans will keep our communities safe. We lead by example, operating Eversource facilities and fleet in a sustainable, responsible manner. We also have partnered with the world's leader in off-shore wind development to build at least 4,000 megawatts of off-shore wind turbines southeast of the Massachusetts coast. Also, in 2018, we completed construction of an additional 62 megawatts of solar generation in Massachusetts to bring our total installed capacity of solar energy to 70 megawatts.
Eversource continues to be an industry leader in reducing emissions of SF6 (a greenhouse gas); our SF6 emission rate is estimated to be less than one percent (almost 50 percent below the industry average of 1.9 percent) due to effective operational controls,
including the careful management, handling and recordkeeping of SF6 and SF6 containing equipment.
Transparency and Accountability. We hold ourselves accountable for the impact our business might have on the environment, meeting, and in many cases exceeding, all environmental laws and regulatory commitments and requirements. We actively work with customers, community members, environmental groups, regulatory agencies, and civic and business partners to promote transparent operations. Our employees, as well as vendors, suppliers, and contractors, are expected to adhere to all environmental laws as stated in our Code of Business Conduct, Supplier Code of Conduct and procurement process. We are committed to tracking and monitoring our progress via a set of metrics, which receive regular executive leadership review. We work every day to ensure that our operations have minimal impact on the environment, including project permitting, spill response, and emissions reporting.
For additional information on these initiatives and our progress to date, you can access the Company's comprehensive sustainability report, which describes in greater detail our commitment to safety, reliability, expanding energy options for our region, environmental stewardship, a sustainable supply chain, our investments in our workforce, our communities and other objectives, through the Company's website at www.eversource.com/content/ema-c/about/investors-relations/sustainability-the-environment/sustainability.
In 2018, we continued with our mature shareholder engagement program, whereby we engage throughout the year with our shareholders, participating in meetings or calls with both our investors' financial teams and their corporate governance specialists. We reach out initially to shareholders representing more than a majority of our total outstanding shares, and over the course of 2018 we engaged at in-person or telephonic meetings with all shareholders who accepted our invitation, which totaled approximately 35% of our outstanding shares. At most of the meetings held with the corporate governance teams of our issuers, we provide a short overview of our corporate governance, executive compensation and enterprise risk oversight programs, along with a general description of the sustainability and ESG practices noted
in this proxy statement. We also discuss issues such as Board member refreshment, Board self-assessments, stock incentive plan metrics, and Board and workplace diversity. At other meetings, the greater part of the discussions center around ESG and climate change, including our Company's multi-faceted clean energy initiatives and carbon reduction efforts, which we disclose in detail within this proxy statement. We also continued our active year-round program, which in 2018 included approximately 250 in-person meetings with our shareholders, led by our Company's senior Investor Relations executive. These meetings focus more on financial issues and provide information showing why Eversource is an especially attractive socially responsible investment.
24 2019 Proxy Statement
We have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines incorporating independence standards that meet the listing standards of the NYSE. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at www.eversource.com/Content/general/about/investors/corporate-governance/guidelines. In addition, we have adopted an additional standard under which a charitable relationship will not be considered to be a material relationship that would impair a Trustee's independence if a Trustee serves as an officer or director of a charitable organization, and our discretionary charitable contributions to the organization, in the aggregate, do not exceed the greater of $200,000 or two percent of the organization's total annual charitable receipts or latest publicly available operating budget. The Trustee Independence Guidelines are available on our website at www.eversource.com/Content/general/about/investors/corporate-governance/board-independence-guidelines.
The Corporate Governance Committee conducts an annual review of the independence of the members of the Board, including all nominees, and reports its findings to the full Board. Applying the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Committee, assisted by legal counsel, reviews and considers relationships and transactions between Eversource Energy, its affiliates and subsidiaries, and each Trustee, entities affiliated with him or her, and/or any member of his or her immediate family. The Committee also reviews Eversource Energy's charitable donations to organizations in which the Trustees or their immediate family members serve as officers or directors. Similarly, the Committee examines relationships and transactions between each Trustee and our independent registered public accounting firm as well as entities associated with our senior management. The Committee determined on February 6, 2019 that none of these relationships was material to the nominees for Trustee or likely to impair the independence of any of the nominees for Trustee.
The Board of Trustees separately considered that the utility operating company subsidiaries of Eversource Energy provide electric service, natural gas service or water service to the residences of Trustees and/or companies with which some of the Trustees are associated. These utility services are provided in the ordinary course of business, on an arm's length basis and pursuant to rates determined by the applicable public utility commission and available to all similar customers of the utility. The Board has determined that relationships that exist solely due to an individual or entity purchasing electric service, natural gas service or water service from any of the utility operating company
subsidiaries of Eversource Energy in the ordinary course of business, on an arm's length basis and pursuant to rates determined by the applicable public utility commission, are immaterial to the independence of the Trustees.
On February 6, 2019, based on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee following its review, the Board of Trustees affirmatively determined that each of the Trustees, with the exception of Mr. Judge, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, satisfied the independence criteria (including the enhanced criteria with respect to members of the Audit and Compensation Committees) set forth in the current listing standards and rules of the NYSE and the SEC and under our Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The Board of Trustees has adopted a Related Person Transactions Policy, which is administered by the Corporate Governance Committee. The Policy generally defines a Related Person Transaction as any transaction or series of transactions in which (i) Eversource Energy or a subsidiary is a participant, (ii) the aggregate amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (iii) any Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest. A Related Person is defined as any Trustee or nominee for Trustee, any executive officer, any shareholder owning more than 5% of our total outstanding shares, and any immediate family member of any such person. The Board has determined that the provision of utility services noted in the previous section does not constitute a Related Person Transaction for reasons similar to those reviewed in the previous section's discussion of independence. Management submits to the Corporate Governance Committee for consideration any proposed Related Person Transaction. The Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board of Trustees for approval only those transactions that are in our best interests. Related Person Transactions are considered in light of the requirements set forth in our Code of Business Conduct, including the Conflicts of Interest Policy, and our Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. If management causes us to enter into a Related Person Transaction prior to approval by the Committee, the transaction will be subject to ratification by the Board of Trustees. If the Board determines not to ratify the transaction, then management will make all reasonable efforts to cancel or annul such transaction. On February 6, 2019, based on facts of which we are aware, as reported on the Trustees questionnaires completed by each Trustee and on reviews of all
2019 Proxy Statement 25
TRUSTEE INDEPENDENCE |
transactions involving the Company and all Related Persons conducted by both management and our independent registered public accounting firm, and after applying the NYSE Listing Standards and the Trustee Independence Guidelines, the Board of Trustees
determined that none of the Eversource Related Persons, including the Trustees, has a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction involving the Company or its subsidiaries.
We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers (Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller) and a Code of Business Conduct which include requirements applicable in whole or in part to all of the Trustees, directors, officers, employees, contractors and agents of Eversource Energy and its subsidiaries. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.eversource.com/Content/general/about/investors/corporate-governance/code-of-ethics-for-senior-financial-officers, and our
Code of Business Conduct is available on our website at www.eversource.com/Content/docs/default-source/Investors/Code_of_business_conduct. You may obtain a printed copy of the Code of Ethics and the Code of Business Conduct, without charge, by contacting our Secretary at the address set forth on page 65 of this proxy statement. Any amendments to or waivers under the Code of Ethics or the Code of Business Conduct will be posted to our website at www.eversource.com/Content/general/about/investors/corporate-governance.
Interested parties, including shareholders, who desire to communicate directly with the Board of Trustees, the non-management Trustees as a group, or individual Trustees, including the Lead Trustee, Mr. Cloud, should send written communications in care of our Secretary at the mailing address set forth on page 65 of this proxy
statement. The Secretary will review each communication and forward all communications that properly identify the sender to the intended recipient or recipients, other than those relating to billing and service issues, which are forwarded directly to a specialized team for resolution.
26 2019 Proxy Statement
The following table provides information as to persons who are known to us to beneficially own more than five percent of the common shares of Eversource Energy. We do not have any other class of voting securities.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership |
Percent of Class |
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | |
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 100 Vanguard Blvd. Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355 |
| 35,253,280 | (1) | | 11.29% | (1) | ||
BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, New York 10055 |
28,130,030 |
(2) |
8.9% |
(2) |
||||
State Street Corporation State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 |
|
15,847,306 |
(3) |
|
5.0% |
(3) |
||
| | | | | | | | |
2019 Proxy Statement 27
The table below shows the number of our common shares beneficially owned as of March 1, 2019, by each of our Trustees and Named Executive Officers, as well as the number of common shares beneficially owned by all of our Trustees and executive officers as a group. We do not have any other class of voting securities. Together, these individuals beneficially own less than one percent of our outstanding common shares. The table also includes information about restricted share units and deferred shares credited to the accounts of our Trustees and executive officers under certain compensation and benefit plans. The address for the shareholders listed below is c/o Eversource Energy, 300 Cadwell Drive, Springfield, Massachusetts 01104.
Name of Beneficial Owner |
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1)(2) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
Gregory B. Butler |
| 96,570 | (3) | |
Cotton M. Cleveland |
71,262 | |||
Sanford Cloud, Jr. |
| 57,413 | (4) | |
James S. DiStasio |
29,089 | |||
Francis A. Doyle |
| 24,482 | (5) | |
Linda Dorcena Forry |
3,689 | |||
James J. Judge |
| 214,310 | (3) | |
John Y. Kim |
4,333 | |||
Kenneth R. Leibler |
| 38,098 | ||
Philip J. Lembo |
49,222 | (3)(6) | ||
Leon J. Olivier |
| 100,338 | (3) | |
Werner J. Schweiger |
225,966 | (3)(7) | ||
William C. Van Faasen |
| 49,440 | ||
Frederica M. Williams |
18,092 | |||
Dennis R. Wraase |
| 33,553 | (8) | |
All Trustees and Executive Officers as a group (20 persons) |
1,165,769 | (9) | ||
| | | | |
28 2019 Proxy Statement
The Compensation Committee periodically reviews the compensation of our non-employee Trustees and, when it deems appropriate and upon consultation with the Committee's independent compensation consultant, recommends adjustments to be approved by the Board of Trustees. The Compensation Committee recommends to the Board compensation for the Trustees based on competitive market practices for both the total value of compensation and the allocation of cash and equity. The Committee uses data obtained from similarly sized utility and general industry companies as guidelines for setting Trustee compensation. The level of Trustee compensation recommended by the Committee and approved by the Board enables us to attract Trustees who have a broad range of backgrounds and experiences.
Each non-employee Trustee serving on January 1 receives a grant under the Company's Incentive Plan, generally effective on the tenth business day of each such year, consisting of the number of restricted stock units (RSUs) resulting from dividing $135,000 by the average closing price of our common shares as reported on the NYSE for the 10 trading days immediately preceding
such date and rounding the resulting amount to the nearest whole RSU. RSUs generally vest on the next business day following the grant. In 2018, these RSU grants were made subject to shareholder approval of the Company's 2018 Incentive Plan, which was approved on May 2, 2018. As a result, RSUs granted in January 2018 vested on May 2, 2018. Beginning with grants made in 2019, each non-employee Trustee was entitled to elect distribution of up to 50 percent of the common shares issuable in respect of such RSUs immediately upon vesting of their RSU grant, subject to satisfaction of the Board's share ownership guidelines noted here. The distribution of all common shares entitled to be received upon vesting, but not distributed immediately, will be deferred until the tenth business day of January of the year following retirement from Board service. Any individual who is elected to serve as a Trustee after January 1 of any calendar year receives an RSU grant prorated from the date of such election and granted on the first business day of the month following such election.
Compensation Element |
Amount |
|
---|---|---|
| | |
Annual Cash Retainer |
$115,000 | |
Annual Stock Retainer |
$135,000 | |
Board and Committee Attendance Fees |
None | |
Annual Lead Trustee Retainer |
$30,000 | |
Annual Committee Chair Retainer |
$20,000 Audit Committee | |
|
$15,000 Compensation Committee | |
|
$15,000 Corporate Governance Committee | |
|
$15,000 Finance Committee | |
| | |
Annual cash retainers of $115,000 per Trustee, additional Committee Chair and Lead Trustee cash retainers and annual RSU grants for service on the Board for 2018 based on the amounts above were paid as described in this section.
The share ownership guidelines set forth in the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines require each Trustee to attain and hold 7,500 common shares and/or RSUs of the Company within five years from January 1 of the year succeeding their date of election to the Board. All of the current Trustees exceed the required share ownership threshold except for Mr. Kim and Ms. Forry, who were each elected to the Board in 2018.
Prior to the year earned, each Trustee may irrevocably elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of their cash
compensation. Deferred funds are credited with deemed earnings on various deemed investments as permitted by the Company's Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferred cash compensation is payable either in a lump sum or in installments in accordance with the Trustee's prior election. There were no above-market earnings in deferred compensation value during 2018, as the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan provide for market-based investments, including Company common shares.
Our Incentive Plan places a limit on the amount of total annual compensation that can be paid to any Trustee. When applicable, we pay travel-related expenses for spouses of Trustees who attend Board functions, but we do not pay tax gross-up payments in connection with any taxes on such expenses, nor do we pay pension benefits to our non-employee Trustees.
2019 Proxy Statement 29
TRUSTEE COMPENSATION |
The table below sets forth all compensation paid to or accrued by each non-employee Trustee in 2018.
Trustee |
Fees Earned Or Paid in Cash ($)(1) |
Stock Awards ($)(2) |
Total ($) |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
John S. Clarkeson(3) |
| 57,500 | | 132,566.25 | | 190,066.25 | ||||
Cotton M. Cleveland |
115,000 | 132,566.25 | 247,566.25 | |||||||
Sanford Cloud, Jr. |
| 160,000 | | 132,566.25 | | 292,566.25 | ||||
James S. DiStasio |
130,000 | 132,566.25 | 262,566.25 | |||||||
Francis A. Doyle |
| 135,000 | | 132,566.25 | | 267,566.25 | ||||
Linda Dorcena Forry |
86,250 | 132,566.25 | 218,816.25 | |||||||
Charles K. Gifford(3) |
| 65,000 | | 132,566.25 | | 197,566.25 | ||||
John Y. Kim |
115,000 | 132,566.25 | 247,566.25 | |||||||
Paul A. La Camera(3) |
| 57,500 | | 132,566.25 | | 190,066.25 | ||||
Kenneth R. Leibler |
115,000 | 132,566.25 | 247,566.25 | |||||||
William C. Van Faasen |
| 126,500 | | 132,566.25 | | 259,066.25 | ||||
Frederica M. Williams |
115,000 | 132,566.25 | 247,566.25 | |||||||
Dennis R. Wraase |
| 115,000 | | 132,566.25 | | 247.566.25 | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires the Trustees and executive officers of Eversource Energy and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our outstanding common shares to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. We assist our Trustees and executive officers by monitoring
transactions and completing and filing Section 16 reports on their behalf. Based on such reports and the written representations of our Trustees and executive officers, we believe that for the year ended December 31, 2018, all such reporting requirements were complied with in a timely manner.
30 2019 Proxy Statement
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) provides information about the principles behind our compensation objectives, plans, policies and actions for our Named Executive Officers. The discussion describes the specific components of our compensation programs, how Eversource Energy measures performance, and how our compensation principles were applied to compensation awards and decisions that were made by the Compensation Committee for our Named Executive Officers, as presented in the tables and narratives that
follow. While this discussion focuses primarily on 2018 information, it also addresses decisions that were made in prior periods to the extent that these decisions are relevant to the full understanding of our compensation programs and the specific awards that were made for performance through 2018. The CD&A also contains an assessment of performance measured against the established 2018 goals, the compensation awards made by the Compensation Committee, and other information relating to our compensation programs, including:
Summary of 2018 Accomplishments | |||
Pay for Performance Philosophy | |||
Executive Compensation Governance | |||
Named Executive Officers | |||
Overview of our Compensation Program | |||
Market Analysis | |||
Elements of 2018 Compensation | |||
2018 Annual Incentive Program | |||
2018 Assessment of Financial and Operational Goals | |||
Performance Goal Assessment Matrix |
Description of our Long-Term Incentive Program, Grants and Performance Plan Results | |||
Disclosure of our: | |||
o Clawbacks and No Hedging and No Pledging Policies |
|||
o Share Ownership Guidelines |
|||
o Other Benefits |
|||
Contractual Agreements | |||
Tax and Accounting Considerations | |||
Equity Grant Practices |
In 2018, we achieved very positive overall financial, operational and related results. The following is a summary of some of our most important accomplishments in 2018:
2018 Financial Accomplishments
2019 Proxy Statement 31
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Total Shareholder Return |
2018 |
5-Year |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | |
Eversource |
| 6.4 | % | | 80.4 | % | |
EEI Index |
3.7 | % | 68.5 | % | |||
S&P 500 |
| 4.4 | % | | 50.3 | % | |
| | | | | | | |
2018 Operational Accomplishments
and average system outage duration per customer was 77.5 minutes.
Reliability Performance
Months Between Interruptions
Restoration Performance
Average Time of Resolution In Minutes
32 2019 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
2018 Clean Energy/ESG Accomplishments
Achievement of the 2018 performance goals, additional accomplishments and the Compensation Committee's assessment of Company and executive performance are more fully described in the section below titled "2018 Annual Incentive Program." Specific decisions regarding executive compensation based upon the Committee's assessment of Company and executive performance and market data are also described below.
The Committee links the compensation of our executive officers, including the Named Executive Officers, to performance that will ultimately benefit our customers and shareholders. Our compensation program is intended to attract and retain the best executive talent in the industry, motivate our executives to meet or exceed specific stretch financial and operational goals each year,
and compensate our executives in a manner that aligns compensation directly with performance. We strive to provide executives with base salary, performance-based annual incentive compensation, and performance-based long-term incentive compensation opportunities that are competitive with market practices and that reward excellent performance.
2019 Proxy Statement 33
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Executive Compensation Governance
What we DO: |
||
✓
|
Pay for Performance |
|
✓
|
Share ownership and holding guidelines |
|
✓
|
Broad clawback policy relating to incentive compensation |
|
✓
|
Double-trigger change in control vesting provisions |
|
✓
|
100% of long-term incentive compensation paid in stock |
|
✓
|
Independent compensation consultant |
|
✓
|
Annual Say-on-Pay vote |
|
✓
|
Payout limitations on incentive awards |
|
✓
|
Limited executive trading window |
What we DON'T do: |
||
✕
|
No tax gross-ups in any new or materially amended executive compensation agreements |
|
✕
|
No hedging, pledging or similar transactions by executives and Trustees |
|
✕
|
No liberal share recycling |
|
✕
|
No dividends on equity awards before vesting |
|
✕
|
No discounts or repricing of options or SARs |
The executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table and whose compensation is discussed in this CD&A are referred to as the "Named Executive Officers" under SEC regulations. For 2018, the Named Executive Officers were:
34 2019 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The Role of the Compensation Committee. The Board of Trustees has delegated to the Compensation Committee overall responsibility for establishing the compensation program for those senior executive officers, whom we refer to in this CD&A as "executives" and whom are deemed to be "officers" under the SEC's regulations that determine the persons whose compensation is subject to disclosure. In this role, the Committee sets compensation policy and compensation levels, reviews and approves performance goals and evaluates executive performance. Although this discussion and analysis refers principally to compensation for the Named Executive Officers, the same compensation principles and practices apply to all executives. The compensation of the Chief Executive Officer is subject to the further review and approval of all of the independent Trustees.
Elements of Compensation. Total direct compensation consists of three elements: base salary, annual cash incentive awards and long-term equity-based incentive awards. Indirect compensation is provided through certain retirement, perquisite, severance, and health and welfare benefit programs.
Our Compensation Objectives. The objectives of our compensation program are to attract and retain superior executive talent, motivate our executives to achieve annual and long-term performance goals set each year, and provide total compensation opportunities that are competitive with market practices. With respect to incentive compensation, the Committee believes it is important to balance short-term goals, such as producing earnings, with longer-term goals, such as long-term value creation for shareholders and maintaining a strong balance sheet. The Committee also places great emphasis on system reliability and customer service. Our compensation program utilizes performance-based incentive compensation to reward individual and corporate performance and to align the interests of executives with Eversource Energy's customers and shareholders. The Committee continually increases expectations to motivate our executives and employees to achieve continuous improvement in carrying out their responsibilities to our customers to deliver energy reliably, safely, with respect for the environment and our employees, and at a reasonable cost, while providing an above-average total return to our shareholders.
Setting Compensation Levels. To ensure that the Company achieves its goal of providing market-based compensation levels to attract and retain top quality management, the Committee provides our executives with target compensation opportunities approximately equal to median compensation levels for executive
officers of companies in the utility industry comparable to us in size. To achieve that goal, the Committee and its independent compensation consultant work together to determine the market values of executive direct compensation elements (base salaries, annual incentives and long-term incentives), as well as total compensation, by using competitive market compensation data. The Committee reviews competitive compensation data obtained from utility and general industry surveys and a specific group of peer utility companies. Levels may be lower than median for those executives who are new to their roles, while long-tenured, high performing executives may be compensated above median. The review by Pay Governance performed in late 2018 indicated that the Company's aggregate executive compensation levels were aligned with median market rates.
Role of the Compensation Consultant. The Committee has retained Pay Governance as its independent compensation consultant. Pay Governance reports directly to the Committee and does not provide any other services to the Company. With the consent of the Committee, Pay Governance works cooperatively with the Company's management to develop analyses and proposals for presentation to the Committee. The Committee generally relies on Pay Governance for peer group market data and information as to market practices and trends to assess the competitiveness of the compensation we pay to our executives and to review the Committee's proposed compensation decisions.
Pay Governance Independence. In February 2019, the Committee assessed the independence of Pay Governance pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules, and concluded that it is independent and that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Pay Governance from independently advising the Committee. In making this assessment, the Committee considered the independence factors enumerated in Rule 10C-1(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as the written representations of Pay Governance that Pay Governance does not provide any other services to the Company, the level of fees received from the Company as a percentage of Pay Governance's total revenues, the policies and procedures employed by Pay Governance to prevent conflicts of interest, and whether the individual Pay Governance advisers with whom the Committee consulted own any Eversource Energy common shares or have any business or personal relationships with members of the Committee or our executives.
Role of Management. Management's roles, and specifically the roles of the Chief Executive Officer and
2019 Proxy Statement 35
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
the Executive Vice President of Human Resources and Information Technology, are to provide current compensation information to the compensation consultant and analyses and recommendations on executive compensation to the Committee based on the market value of the position, individual performance,
experience and internal pay equity. The Chief Executive Officer also provides recommendations on the compensation for the other Named Executive Officers. None of the executives makes recommendations that affect his or her individual compensation.
The Compensation Committee seeks to provide our executives with target compensation opportunities using a range that is approximately equal to the median compensation levels for executive officers of utility companies comparable to the Company. Set forth below is a description of the sources of the compensation data used by the Committee when reviewing 2018 compensation:
a close correlation between the market data and the Company's scope of operations. The Committee references this information, which it obtains from Pay Governance, to evaluate and determine base salaries and incentive opportunities.
| | | | | | | | |
Alliant Energy Corporation | DTE Energy Company | PPL Corporation | ||||||
Ameren Corporation | Edison International | Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc. | ||||||
American Electric Power Co., Inc. | Entergy Corporation | SCANA (2018) | ||||||
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | FirstEnergy Corp. | Sempra Energy | ||||||
CMS Energy Corp. | NiSource Inc. | WEC Energy Group, Inc. | ||||||
Consolidated Edison, Inc. | PG&E Corporation | Xcel Energy Inc. | ||||||
Dominion Energy, Inc. | Pinnacle West Capital Corporation | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | |
The Committee reviews the appropriateness of the peer group periodically and adjusts the target percentages of annual and long-term incentives based on the survey data and recommendations from the CEO, after discussion with the compensation consultant, to ensure that they are approximately equal to competitive median levels.
The Committee also determines perquisites to the extent they serve business purposes and sets supplemental benefits at levels that provide appropriate compensation opportunities to the executives. The Committee periodically reviews the general market for supplemental benefits and perquisites using utility and general industry survey data, including data obtained from companies in the peer group.
36 2019 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
We target the mix of compensation for our Chief Executive Officer and the other Named Executive Officers so that the percentages of each compensation element are approximately equal to the competitive median market mix. The mix is heavily weighted toward incentive compensation, and incentive compensation is heavily weighted toward long-term compensation. Since our most senior positions have the greatest responsibility for implementing our long-term business plans and strategies, a greater proportion of total compensation is based on performance with a long-term focus.
The Committee determines the compensation for each executive based on the relative authority, duties and responsibilities of the executive. Our Chief Executive Officer's responsibilities for the strategic direction and daily operations and management of Eversource are greater than the duties and responsibilities of our other executives. As a result, our Chief Executive Officer's compensation is higher than the compensation of our other executives. Assisted by the compensation consultant, the Committee regularly reviews market compensation data for executive officer positions similar to those held by our executives, including our Chief Executive Officer.
The following table sets forth the contribution to 2018 Total Direct Compensation (TDC) of each element of compensation at target, reflected as a percentage of TDC, for the Named Executive Officers. The percentages shown in this table are at target and therefore do not correspond to the amounts appearing in the Summary Compensation Table.
|
Percentage of TDC at Target | |
||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Long-Term Incentives | |
||||||||||||
Named Executive Officer (NEO) |
Base Salary |
Annual Incentive(1) |
Performance Shares(1) |
RSUs(2) |
TDC |
|||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
James J. Judge |
| 15 | % | | 17 | % | | 34 | % | | 34 | % | | 100% | ||
Philip J. Lembo |
26 | % | 20 | % | 27 | % | 27 | % | 100% | |||||||
Leon J. Olivier |
| 26 | % | | 20 | % | | 27 | % | | 27 | % | | 100% | ||
Werner J. Schweiger |
26 | % | 20 | % | 27 | % | 27 | % | 100% | |||||||
Gregory B. Butler |
| 30 | % | | 20 | % | | 25 | % | | 25 | % | | 100% | ||
NEO average, excluding CEO |
27 | % | 20 | % | 26.5 | % | 26.5 | % | 100% | |||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Total Direct Compensation - CEO |
Total Direct Compensation - All other NEO's |
|
---|---|---|
The overall compensation program includes a mix of compensation elements ranging from a fixed base salary that is not at risk to annual and long-term incentive compensation programs intended to motivate executives
and eligible employees to achieve individual and corporate performance goals that reflect an appropriate level of risk. The fundamental objective of the compensation program is to foster the continued growth
2019 Proxy Statement 37
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
and success of our business. The design and implementation of the overall compensation program provides the Committee with opportunities throughout the year to assess risks within the compensation program that may have a material effect on the Company and our shareholders.
The Compensation Committee assesses the risks associated with the executive compensation program on an on-going basis by reviewing the various elements of incentive compensation. The annual incentive program was designed to ensure an appropriate balance between individual and corporate goals, which were deemed appropriate and supportive of the Company's annual business plan. Similarly, the long-term incentive program was designed to ensure that the performance metrics were properly weighted and supportive of the Company's strategy. The Committee reviewed the overall compensation program in the context of risks identified in the annual operating plan. The annual and long-term incentive programs were designed to include mechanisms to mitigate risk. These mechanisms include realistic goal setting and discretion with respect to actual payments, in addition to:
Based on these factors, the Compensation Committee and the Board of Trustees believe the overall compensation program risks are mitigated to reduce overall compensation risk.
We are requesting that shareholders cast the annual advisory vote on executive compensation (a Say-on-Pay proposal). At the Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 2, 2018, 90% of the votes cast on the Say-on-Pay proposal were voted to approve the 2017 compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as described in our 2018 proxy statement. Say-on-Pay results of the Company, along with utility and general
industry peers, are reviewed by the Committee annually to help assess whether our shareholders continue to deem our executives' compensation to be appropriate. The Committee has and will continue to consider the outcome of the Company's Say-on-Pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers. Please see Item 2 in this proxy statement.
Base Salary
Base salary is designed to attract and retain key executives by providing an element of total compensation at levels competitive with those of other executives employed by companies of similar size and complexity in the utility and general industries. In establishing base salary, the Compensation Committee relies on compensation data obtained from independent third-party surveys of companies and from an industry peer group to ensure that the compensation opportunities we offer are capable of attracting and
retaining executives with the experience and talent required to achieve our strategic objectives. Adjustments to base salaries are made on an annual basis except in instances of promotions.
When setting or adjusting base salaries, the Committee considers annual executive performance appraisals; market pay movement across industries (determined through market analysis); targeted market pay positioning for each executive; individual experience; strategic importance of a position; recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer; and internal pay equity.
38 2019 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Incentive Compensation
Annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation are provided under the Company's 2018 Incentive Plan. The annual incentive program provides cash compensation intended to reward performance under our annual operating plan. The long-term stock-based incentive program is designed to reward demonstrated performance and leadership, motivate future performance, align the interests of the executives with those of our shareholders, and retain the executives
during the term of grants. The annual and long-term programs are designed to strike a balance between the Company's short- and long-term objectives so that the programs work in tandem.
In addition to the specific performance goals, the Committee assesses other factors, as well as the executives' roles and individual performance and then makes annual incentive program awards at the levels and amounts disclosed in this proxy statement.
In February 2018, the Committee established the terms of the 2018 Annual Incentive Program. As part of the overall program, and after consulting with Pay Governance, the Committee set target award levels for each of the Named Executive Officers that ranged from 65% to 120% of base salary.
At the February 2018 meeting, the Committee determined that for 2018 it would continue to base 70% of the annual incentive performance goals on the Company's overall financial performance and 30% of the annual performance goals on the Company's overall operational performance. The Committee also determined the specific goals that would be used to
assess performance, with potential ratings on each goal ranging from 0% to 200% of target. The Committee assigned weightings to each of these specific goals. For the financial component, the following goals were used: earnings per share, weighted at 60%, dividend growth, weighted at 10%, and advancement of strategic growth initiatives, weighted at 30%. For the operational component, the Committee used the following goals: combined service reliability and restoration goals, weighted at 60%, and combined safety ratings, gas service response, diversity promotions and hires of leadership employee positions goals and key initiatives, weighted at 40%.
At the December 2018 meeting of the Committee, management provided an initial review of the Company's 2018 performance, followed in February 2019 by a full assessment of the performance goals, the additional accomplishments noted below under the caption "Additional Factors" and the overall performance of the Company and the executives. In addition to these meetings, the Committee and the Board were continuously provided updates during 2018 on corporate performance. At the February 6, 2019 meeting, the Committee determined, based on its assessment of the financial and operational performance goals, to set the level of achievement of combined
financial and operational performance goals results at 157% of target, reflecting the overall strong performance of the Company and the executive team. In arriving at this determination, the Committee determined that the financial performance goals result was 151% of target and the operational performance goals result was 171% of target. In particular, the Committee discussed its assessment of the Strategic Growth Initiative goal, and in determining the assessment of 150% of a possible 200%, it considered the success of the Company in establishing itself as a leader in clean energy through the greatly expanded Ørsted offshore wind partnership; its best in industry ranking in energy efficiency; the
2019 Proxy Statement 39
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
completed construction of 62 MW in utility scale solar; and the advancement of the Company's battery storage and electric vehicle infrastructure initiatives. The Chief Executive Officer recommended to the Committee awards for the executives (other than himself) based on his assessment of each executive's individual performance towards achievement of the performance goals and the additional accomplishments of the Company, together with each executive's contributions to the overall performance of the Company. The actual awards determined by the Committee were also based on the same criteria.
Financial Performance Goals Assessment
Operational Performance Goals Assessment
40 2019 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
2018 Annual Incentive Program Performance Assessments |
Financial Performance Goals
Category |
2018 Goal |
Company Performance |
Assessment |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share | Increase earnings by 3.5% | Exceeded: $3.25 per share, a 4.5% increase over 2017 and exceeding goal | | 150% | ||||
Dividend Growth | Increase dividend beyond industry average | Exceeded: Increased to $2.02 per share, a $0.12 increase and 6.3% growth, exceeding the industry median of 5.1% | 155% | |||||
Strategic Growth Initiatives | Advancement of Key Strategic Projects | Achieved: Significantly advanced the Company's status as a clean energy leader through the major expansion of our offshore wind partnership with Ørsted; our Northern Pass project appeal was accepted by New Hampshire Supreme Court; and we completed construction of 62MW of solar in Massachusetts and advanced battery storage and electric vehicle infrastructure initiatives | | 150% | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Weightings = Earnings Per Share 60%; Dividend Growth 10%; Strategic Growth Initiatives 30% | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Operational Performance Goals
Category |
2018 Goal |
Company Performance |
Assessment |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | |
Reliability Average Months Between Interruptions (MBI) | Achieve MBI of within 15.5 to 18.5 months | Exceeded: MBI = 17.2 months. At upper level of targeted performance zone, exceeding industry peers | | 175% | ||||
Average Restoration Duration (SAIDI) | Achieve SAIDI of 80 to 67 minutes | Exceeded: SAIDI = 77.5 minutes. Within targeted performance and significantly exceeding industry peers | 175% | |||||
Safety Rate | 0.5 - 0.9 days away/restricted | Achieved: 0.7 DART Within targeted performance and exceeding industry peers | | 130% | ||||
Gas Service Response | 99.2% - 99.6% | Achieved: 99.5%; Upper level of performance range and ahead of industry average. Exceeded all internal and regulatory pipeline safety requirements | 150% | |||||
Diverse Leadership | 37% hires or promotions of leadership level to be women or people of color | Exceeded: 42% Performed well above target, with 83 of 200 leadership positions filled with diverse candidates. Recognized by industry organizations for diversity leadership | | 200% | ||||
Transform the Customer Experience | Successfully complete new customer outage map, increase accuracy of estimate time to restoration of 85% and achieve digital customer engagement participation at 83% | Achieved: Enhanced web/digital capabilities with new outage map and improved outage communications. Key customer metrics finished above target. Estimated Times for Restoration given to customers were well managed 89% of the time and digital customer engagement finished above target at 83.2% | 150% | |||||
Positive Regulatory Outcomes | Obtain constructive rate case outcomes | Exceeded: Successfully completed constructive settlements on CL&P and Yankee Gas with PURA. Constructive rate outcome in MA for Aquarion. Reached settlement on FERC Transparency docket with 30 intervenors, and progress made on 4 open FERC ROE complaints, including dismissal of one | | 200% | ||||
| | | | | | | | |
Weightings = Reliability and Restoration 60%; Safety, Gas Response, Diversity and Key Initiatives 40% |
||||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Performance Goals Assessment |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
Financial Performance at 151% (weighted 70%) |
| 106% | ||
Operational Performance at 171% (weighted 30%) |
51% | |||
Overall Performance |
| 157% | ||
| | | | |
2019 Proxy Statement 41
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Additional Factors |
The following key financial, strategic, environmental and customer-focused results were also considered significant by the Committee in making an assessment of overall financial and operational performance, but were not given specific weightings or assigned a specific performance assessment score:
Individual Executives' Performance Factors Considered by the Committee |
It is the Committee's philosophy to provide incentives for Company executives to work together as a highly
effective, integrated team to achieve or exceed the financial, operational, safety, customer, strategic and diversity goals and objectives. The Committee also reviews and assesses individual executive performance. The Committee based the annual incentive payments on team performance and also on the Committee's assessment of each executive's individual performance in supporting the performance goals, additional achievements and overall Company performance. With respect to the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee and all other independent Trustees assessed the performance of our Chief Executive Officer and, based on the recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer as to executives other than himself, the Committee assessed the performance of the Named Executive Officers to determine the individual incentive payments as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Based on the Committee's review, which included its assessment of the performance goals, the significant other accomplishments of the Company and the Named Executive Officers, and the overall performance of the Company and each of the Named Executive Officers, considered in its totality by the Committee to have been excellent, the Committee approved annual incentive program payments for the Named Executive Officers at levels that ranged from 151% to 163% of target. These payments reflected the individual and team contributions of the Named Executive Officers in achieving the goals and the additional accomplishments and the overall performance of the Company.
In determining Mr. Judge's annual incentive payment of $2,430,000, which was 157% of target and which reflects his and the Company's continued strong performance, the Committee and the Board considered the totality of the Company's success in accomplishing the goals set by the Committee, the additional accomplishments of the Company, and the superior leadership of Mr. Judge in every part of the business.
2018 Annual Incentive Program Awards |
Named Executive Officer |
Award |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
James J. Judge |
$ | 2,430,000 | ||
Philip J. Lembo |
765,000 | |||
Leon J. Olivier |
| 800,000 | ||
Werner J. Schweiger |
815,000 | |||
Gregory B. Butler |
| 645,000 |
42 2019 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
General |
Our long-term incentive program is intended to focus on the Company's longer-term strategic goals and to help retain our executives. A new three-year program commences every year. For the three programs described below, each executive's target long-term incentive opportunity consisted of 50% Performance Shares and 50% RSUs. Performance Shares are designed to reward long-term achievements as measured against pre-established performance measures. RSUs are designed to provide executives with an incentive to increase the value of Company common shares in alignment with shareholder interests, while also serving as a retention component for executive talent. We believe these compensation elements create a focus on continued Company and share price growth to further align the interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholders.
Performance Share Grants |
General |
Performance Shares are designed to reward future financial performance, measured by long-term earnings growth and shareholder returns over a three-year performance period, therefore aligning management compensation with performance. Performance Shares are granted as a target number of Eversource common shares. The number of Performance Shares is determined by dividing the target grant value in dollars by the average daily closing prices of Eversource common shares on the New York Stock Exchange for the ten business days preceding the grant date and rounding to the nearest whole share. Until the end of the performance period, the value of dividends that would have been paid with respect to the Performance Shares had the Performance Shares been actual common shares will be deemed to be invested in additional Performance Shares, which remain at risk and do not vest until actual performance for the period is determined.
Performance Shares under the 2017 2019 and 2018 2020 Programs |
For the 2018 - 2020 Program, the Committee determined it would continue to measure performance using: (i) average diluted earnings per share growth (EPSG); and (ii) relative total shareholder return (TSR) measured against the performance of companies that
comprise the EEI Index. As in 2017 and 2016, the Committee selected EPSG and TSR as performance measures because the Committee continues to believe that they are generally recognized as the best indicators of overall corporate performance. Further, the Committee considers it a best practice to use a combination of relative and absolute metrics, with EPS growth serving as a key input to shareholder value and TSR serving as the output.
The number of Performance Shares awarded at the end of the three-year period ranges from 0% to 200% of target, depending on EPSG and relative TSR performance as set forth in the performance matrix below. Performance Share grants are based on a percentage of annualized base salary at the time of the grant and measured in dollars. The target number of shares under the 2018 - 2020 Program ranged from 35% to 233% of base salary. For the 2018 - 2020 Program, EPSG ranges from 0% to 9%, while TSR ranges from below the 10th percentile to above the 90th percentile. The award target is 100%, which the Committee determined is challenging but achievable. As a result, vesting at 100% of target occurs at various combinations of EPSG and TSR performance. In addition, the value of any performance shares that actually vest may increase or decrease over the vesting period based on the Company's share price performance. The number of performance shares granted at target were approved as set forth in the table below. The Committee and the independent Members of the Board determined the Performance Share grants for the Chief Executive Officer. Based on input from the Chief Executive Officer, the Committee determined the Performance Share grants for each of the other executive officers, including the other Named Executive Officers.
For the 2017 - 2019 Program, the Committee used the same performance measures of EPSG and TSR and the same criteria used in the 2018 - 2020 Program described above.
The performance matrix set forth below describes how the Performance Share payout will be determined under the 2017 - 2019 and 2018 - 2020 Long-Term Incentive Programs and how the Performance Share payout was determined under the 2016 - 2018 Program. Three-year average EPSG is cross-referenced with the actual three-year TSR percentile to determine actual performance share payout as a percentage of target.
2019 Proxy Statement 43
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
2016 2018, 2017 2019 and 2018 2020 Long-Term Incentive Programs Performance
Share
Potential Payout
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Three-Year | Three-Year Relative Total Shareholder Return Percentiles | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Average EPS Growth |
Below 10th |
20th | 30th | 40th | 50th | 60th | 70th | 80th | 90th | Above 90th |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| 9% | | 110% | | 120% | | 130% | | 140% | | 150% | | 160% | | 170% | | 180% | | 190% | | 200% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
8% | 100% | 110% | 120% | 130% | 140% | 150% | 160% | 170% | 180% | 190% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 7% | | 90% | | 100% | | 110% | | 120% | | 130% | | 140% | | 150% | | 160% | | 170% | | 180% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
6% | 80% | 90% | 100% | 110% | 120% | 130% | 140% | 150% | 160% | 170% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 5% | | 70% | | 80% | | 90% | | 100% | | 110% | | 120% | | 130% | | 140% | | 150% | | 160% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
4% | 60% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 100% | 110% | 120% | 130% | 140% | 150% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 3% | | 40% | | 50% | | 70% | | 80% | | 90% | | 100% | | 110% | | 120% | | 130% | | 140% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2% | 20% | 40% | 60% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 100% | 110% | 120% | 130% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 1% | | | | 10% | | 40% | | 60% | | 70% | | 80% | | 90% | | 100% | | 110% | | 120% | ||||||||||||||||||
|
0% | | | 20% | 30% | 50% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 100% | 110% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Below 0% | | | | | | | | | | 10% | | 20% | | 30% | | 40% | | 50% | | 60% | ||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Incentive Program Performance
Share Grants at Target
Named Executive Officer |
2017 2019 Performance Share Grant |
2018 2020 Performance Share Grant |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | |
James J. Judge |
| 48,259 | | 48,912 | |||
Philip J. Lembo |
11,520 | 10,682 | |||||
Leon J. Olivier |
| 12,526 | | 11,498 | |||
Werner J. Schweiger |
11,703 | 10,845 | |||||
Gregory B. Butler |
| 9,052 | | 8,410 |
Results of the 2016 2018 Performance Share Program |
The 2016 - 2018 Program, which used the same criteria used in the 2018 - 2020 Program described above, was completed on December 31, 2018. The actual performance level achieved under the Program was a three-year average adjusted EPS growth of 5.0% and a three-year total shareholder return at the 34th percentile, which when interpolated in accordance with the criteria established by the Committee in 2016 resulted in vesting performance share units at 94% of target. At its February 6, 2019 meeting, the Committee confirmed that the actual results achieved were calculated in accordance with established performance criteria. The
number of Performance Shares awarded to the Named Executive Officers were approved as set forth in the table below.
2016 2018 Long-Term Incentive Program |
||||
| | | | |
Named Executive Officer |
Performance Share Award |
|||
| | | | |
James J. Judge |
| 13,206 | ||
Philip J. Lembo* |
2,029 | |||
Leon J. Olivier |
| 13,869 | ||
Werner J. Schweiger |
12,987 | |||
Gregory B. Butler |
| 8,571 |
44 2019 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Restricted Share Units (RSUs) |
General |
Each RSU granted under the long-term incentive program entitles the holder to receive one Company common share at the time of vesting. All RSUs granted under the long-term incentive program vest in equal annual installments over three years. RSU holders are eligible to receive reinvested dividend units on outstanding RSUs held by them to the same extent that dividends are declared and paid on our common shares. Reinvested dividend equivalents are accounted for as additional RSUs that accrue and are distributed with the common shares issued upon vesting of the underlying RSUs. Common shares, including any additional common shares in respect of reinvested dividend equivalents, are not issued for any RSUs that do not vest.
The Committee determined RSU grants for each executive officer participating in the long-term incentive program. RSU grants are based on a percentage of
annualized base salary at the time of the grant and measured in dollars. In 2018, the percentage used for each executive officer was based on the executive officer's position in the Company and ranged from 35% to 233% of base salary. The Committee reserves the right to increase or decrease the RSU grant from target for each officer under special circumstances. The Committee and all other independent members of the Board determined the RSU grants for the Chief Executive Officer. Based on input from our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee determined the RSU grants for each of the other executive officers, including the other Named Executive Officers.
All RSUs are granted on the date of the Committee meeting at which they are approved. RSU grants are subsequently converted from dollars into common share equivalents by dividing the value of each grant by the average closing price for our common shares over the ten trading days prior to the date of the grant. RSU grants at 100% of target were approved as set forth in the table below.
|
RSUs Granted | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Named Executive Officer |
2016 |
2017 |
2018 |
|||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
James J. Judge |
| 12,004 | | 48,259 | | 48,912 | ||||
Philip J. Lembo |
1,844 | * | 11,520 | 10,682 | ||||||
Leon J. Olivier |
| 12,607 | | 12,526 | | 11,498 | ||||
Werner J. Schweiger |
11,805 | 11,703 | 10,845 | |||||||
Gregory B. Butler |
| 7,791 | | 9,052 | | 8,410 |
If our earnings were to be restated as a result of noncompliance with accounting rules caused by fraud or misconduct, or if a plan participant engages in a willful material violation of our Code of Business Conduct or material corporate policy, or the breach of a material covenant in an employment agreement, as
determined by the Board of Trustees, the participant will be required by our 2018 Incentive Plan to reimburse us for incentive compensation awards received by them just for that year.
We have adopted a policy prohibiting the purchase of financial instruments or otherwise entering into transactions designed to have the effect of hedging or offsetting any decrease in the value of our common shares by our Trustees and executives. This policy also prohibits all pledging, forward sale contracts, zero cost
collars, short sales, the holding of any Company common shares in a margin account, or otherwise pledging the Company's common shares. This policy will be reviewed and amended as appropriate to comply with the SEC's new rules governing disclosure of hedging policies affecting all employees.
2019 Proxy Statement 45
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The Committee has approved share ownership guidelines to further emphasize the importance of share ownership by our officers. As indicated in the table below, the guidelines call for the Chief Executive Officer to own common shares equal to six times base salary, executive vice presidents to own a number of common shares equal to three times base salary, senior vice presidents to own common shares equal to two times base salary, and all other officers to own a number of common shares equal to one to one and one half times base salary. Officers and Trustees may only transact in Eversource Energy common shares during approved trading windows and subject to continuing compliance with our share ownership guidelines.
Executive Officer |
Base Salary Multiple |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | |
Chief Executive Officer |
| 6 | ||
Executive Vice Presidents |
3 | |||
Operating Company Presidents/Senior Vice Presidents |
| 2 | ||
Vice Presidents |
1-1.5 | |||
| | | | |
We require that our officers attain these ownership levels within five years. All of our officers, including the Named Executive Officers, have satisfied the share ownership guidelines or are expected to satisfy them within the applicable timeframe. Common shares, whether held of record, in street name, or in individual 401(k) accounts, and RSUs satisfy the guideline requirements to hold 100% of the net shares. Unvested performance shares do not count toward the ownership guidelines. In addition to the share ownership guidelines noted above, all officers must hold all the shares awarded under the Company's incentive compensation plan until the share ownership guidelines have been met.
Retirement Benefits
The Company provides a qualified defined benefit pension program for certain officers, which is a final average pay program subject to tax code limits. Because of such limits, we also maintain a supplemental non-qualified pension program. Benefits are based on base salary and certain incentive payments, which is consistent with the goal of providing a retirement benefit that replaces a percentage of pre-retirement income. The supplemental program compensates for benefits barred by tax code limits, and generally provides (together with the qualified pension program) benefits equal to approximately 60% of pre-retirement compensation (subject to certain reductions) for Messrs. Judge, Lembo and Schweiger, and approximately 50% of such compensation for Mr. Butler. The supplemental program has been discontinued for newly-elected officers.
As set forth on page 49 in footnote (2) of the Summary Compensation Table, Mr. Judge and Mr. Lembo were elected to the positions of President and Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, in 2016, such that 2017 was the first year that each served in his new position. Each had a resulting substantial increase in the actuarial,
formula-based present values of their pension benefit due to the increase in their base pay and annual bonus. These increases are disclosed in the Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Earnings column of the Summary Compensation Table. These accounting-based increases for Mr. Judge and Mr. Lembo, while representing a substantial portion of their 2017 and 2018 total compensation disclosed in the SEC Total column of the Summary Compensation Table, resulted in no actual 2017 or 2018 W-2 earnings for either of them.
For certain participants, the benefits payable under the Supplemental Non-Qualified Pension Program differ from those described above. Mr. Olivier's employment agreement provides retirement benefits similar to those of a previous employer instead of the supplemental program benefits described above. Under this agreement, he will receive a pension based on a prescribed formula if he meets certain eligibility requirements. The program benefit payable to Mr. Schweiger is fully vested and is further reduced by benefits he is entitled to receive under previous employers' retirement plans.
Also see the narrative accompanying the "Pension Benefits" table and accompanying notes for more detail on the above program.
46 2019 Proxy Statement
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
401(k) Benefits
The Company offers a qualified 401(k) program for all employees, including executives, subject to tax code limits. After applying these limits, the program provides a match of 50% of the first 8% of eligible base salary, up to a maximum of $11,000 per year for Messrs. Judge, Lembo and Schweiger. For Messrs. Olivier and Butler, we provide a match of 100% of the first 3% of eligible base salary, up to a maximum of $8,250 per year.
Deferred Compensation
The Company offers a non-qualified deferred compensation program for our executives. In 2018, the program allowed deferral of up to 100% of base salary,
annual incentives and long-term incentive awards. The program allows participants to select investment measures for deferrals based on an array of deemed investment options (including certain mutual funds and publicly traded securities).
See the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table and accompanying notes for additional details on the above program.
Perquisites
The Company provides executives with limited financial planning benefits, vehicle leasing and access to tickets to sporting events. The current level of perquisites does not factor into decisions on total compensation.
We maintain contractual agreements with all of our Named Executive Officers that provide for potential compensation in the event of certain terminations, including termination following a Change in Control. We believe these agreements are necessary to attract and retain high quality executives and to ensure executive focus on Company business during the period leading up to a potential Change in Control. The agreements are "double-trigger" agreements that provide executives with compensation in the event of a Change in Control followed by termination of employment due to one or
more of the events set forth in the agreements, while still providing an incentive to remain employed with the Company for the transition period that follows.
Under the agreements, certain compensation is generally payable if, during the applicable change in control period, the executive is involuntarily terminated (other than for cause) or terminates employment for "good reason." These agreements are described more fully in the Tables following this CD&A under "Payments Upon Termination."
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code precludes a public corporation from taking an income tax deduction in any one year for compensation in excess of $1 million payable to its named executive officers who are employed on the last day of the fiscal year, unless certain specific performance goals are satisfied. Until January 1, 2018, there was an exception to the $1 million limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements. This exception was repealed, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and the limitation on deductibility generally was expanded to include all Named Executive Officers. As a result, compensation paid to the Named Executive Officers in excess of $1 million per officer will not be deductible unless it qualifies for transition relief applicable to certain arrangements in place as of and not modified after November 2, 2017.
The Committee believes that the availability of a tax deduction for forms of compensation should be one of many factors taken into consideration of providing market-based compensation to attract and retain highly qualified executives. The Committee believes it is in the Company's best interests to retain discretion to make compensation awards, whether or not deductible.
The Company has adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718, Compensation Stock Compensation. In general, the Company and the Committee do not consider accounting considerations in structuring compensation arrangements.
2019 Proxy Statement 47
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Equity awards noted in the compensation tables are made annually at the February meeting of the Compensation Committee (subject to further approval by all of the independent members of the Board of Trustees of the Chief Executive Officer's award) when the Committee also determines base salary, annual and
long-term incentive compensation targets and annual incentive awards. The date of this meeting is chosen at least a year in advance, and therefore awards are not coordinated with the release of material non-public information.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Trustees has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee has recommended to the Board of Trustees that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in
the 2019 proxy statement and our 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Compensation Committee
William
C. Van Faasen, Chair
Sanford Cloud, Jr.
James S. DiStasio
John Y. Kim
Dennis R. Wraase
February 20, 2019
48 2019 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The table below summarizes the total compensation paid or earned by our principal executive officer (Mr. Judge), principal financial officer (Mr. Lembo) and the three other most highly compensated executive officers in 2018, determined in accordance with the applicable SEC disclosure rules (collectively, the Named Executive Officers). As explained in the tables and footnotes below, the amounts reflect the economic benefit to each
Named Executive Officer of the compensation item paid or accrued on behalf of the Named Executive Officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 in accordance with such rules. All salaries, annual incentive amounts and long-term incentive amounts shown for each Named Executive Officer were paid for all services rendered to the Company and its subsidiaries, in all capacities.
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary(1) |
Stock Awards(2) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan(3) |
Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Earnings(4) |
All Other Compensation(5) |
SEC Total |
Adjusted SEC Total(6) |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
James J. Judge |
| 2018 | $ | 1,277,078 | $ | 5,632,217 | $ | 2,430,000 | $ | 5,560,877 | $ | 25,209 | $ | 14,925,381 | $ | 9,364,504 | |||||||||
Chairman, President and |
2017 | 1,230,694 | 5,504,904 | 2,285,000 | 6,869,854 | 25,009 | 15,915,461 | 9,045,607 | |||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
| 2016 | | 959,690 | | 1,382,021 | | 2,200,000 | | 1,616,742 | | 24,809 | | 6,183,262 | | 4,566,520 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Philip J. Lembo |
2018 | 648,271 | 1,230,032 | 765,000 | 1,535,216 | 21,685 | 4,200,204 | 2,664,988 | |||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and |
| 2017 | | 613,847 | | 1,314,086 | | 700,000 | | 1,246,325 | | 21,485 | | 3,895,743 | | 2,649,418 | |||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
2016 | 439,208 | 212,300 | 600,000 | 543,133 | 21,285 | 1,815,926 | 1,272,793 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leon J. Olivier |
| 2018 | | 699,617 | | 1,323,995 | | 800,000 | | 0 | | 14,778 | | 2,838,389 | | 2,838,389 | |||||||||
Executive Vice President- |
2017 | 678,270 | 1,428,841 | 775,000 | 397,791 | 14,464 | 3,294,366 | 2,896,575 | |||||||||||||||||
Enterprise Energy Strategy |
| 2016 | | 654,832 | | 1,451,444 | | 725,000 | | 389,011 | | 14,034 | | 3,234,320 | | 2,522,361 | |||||||||
and Business Development |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Werner J. Schweiger |
| 2018 | | 658,271 | | 1,248,802 | | 815,000 | | 538,978 | | 53,896 | | 3,314,947 | | 2,775,969 | |||||||||
Executive Vice President and |
2017 | 634,078 | 1,334,961 | 775,000 | 1,225,581 | 21,418 | 3,991,038 | 2,765,457 | |||||||||||||||||
Chief Operating Officer |
| 2016 | | 592,108 | | 1,359,110 | | 700,000 | | 1,156,328 | | 21,135 | | 3,828,681 | | 2,672,353 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gregory B. Butler |
2018 | 618,271 | 968,412 | 645,000 | 634,394 | 15,143 | 2,881,220 | 2,246,826 | |||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and |
| 2017 | | 597,886 | | 1,032,562 | | 625,000 | | 1,670,745 | | 15,361 | | 3,941,554 | | 2,270,809 | |||||||||
General Counsel |
2016 | 514,494 | 896,978 | 575,000 | 539,638 | 12,886 | 2,538,996 | 1,999,358 | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2019 Proxy Statement 49
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
substantial increase in the actuarial, formula-based present value of his pension benefit due to the increase in their base pay and annual bonus and the effect of interest rates. These accounting-based increases, while representing for Mr. Judge and Mr. Lembo a substantial portion of their 2017 and 2018 total compensation disclosed in the SEC Total above, resulted in no actual 2017 W-2 earnings for either of them. Mr. Olivier's pension value decreased by $243,000 from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018.
50 2019 Proxy Statement
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table provides information on the range of potential payouts under all incentive plan awards during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. The table also discloses the
underlying equity awards and the grant date for equity-based awards. We have not granted any stock options since 2002.
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#)(2) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(3) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant Date |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold ($) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
James J. Judge |
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incentive(4) |
| 02/07/18 | $ | 774,000 | $ | 1,548,000 | $ | 3,096,000 | $ | | | | | | | | $ | | ||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive(5) |
| 02/07/18 | | | | | | | | | | 48,912 | | 97,824 | | 48,912 | | 5,632,217 | ||||||||||
Philip J. Lembo |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incentive(4) |
02/07/18 | 245,500 | 491,000 | 982,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive(5) |
02/07/18 | | | | | 10,682 | 21,364 | 10,682 | 1,230,032 | |||||||||||||||||||
Leon J. Olivier |
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incentive(4) |
| 02/07/18 | | 264,500 | | 529,000 | | 1,058,000 | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive(5) |
| 02/07/18 | | | | | | | | | | 11,498 | | 22,996 | | 11,498 | | 1,323,995 | ||||||||||
Werner J. Schweiger |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incentive(4) |
02/07/18 | 249,500 | 499,000 | 998,000 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive(5) |
02/07/18 | | | | | 10,845 | 21,690 | 10,845 | 1,248,802 | |||||||||||||||||||
Gregory B. Butler |
| | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Annual Incentive(4) |
| 02/07/18 | | 203,000 | | 406,000 | | 812,000 | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||
Long-Term Incentive(5) |
| 02/07/18 | | | | | | | | | | 8,410 | | 16,820 | | 8,410 | | 968,412 | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2019 Proxy Statement 51
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
The following table sets forth RSU and performance share grants outstanding at the end of our fiscal year
ended December 31, 2018 for each of the Named Executive Officers. There are no outstanding options.
|
Stock Awards(1) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(5) |
|||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
James J. Judge |
| 89,263 | | 5,805,692 | | 115,219 | | 7,493,837 | |||||
Philip J. Lembo |
19,907 | 1,294,719 | 25,353 | 1,648,967 | |||||||||
Leon J. Olivier |
| 25,413 | | 1,652,833 | | 39,110 | | 2,543,687 | |||||
Werner J. Schweiger |
23,857 | 1,551,685 | 36,675 | 2,385,329 | |||||||||
Gregory B. Butler |
| 17,985 | | 1,169,714 | | 26,915 | | 1,750,582 | |||||