form10-q.htm
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
|
|
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 |
| |
|
|
|
Or |
| |
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
| |
|
|
|
For the transition period from to |
| |
|
|
|
Commission file number 0-26083 |
INSWEB CORPORATION
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Delaware |
|
94-3220749 |
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(IRS Employer
Identification Number) |
| |
|
|
|
11290 Pyrites Way, Suite 200 Gold River, California 95670 |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
| |
|
|
|
(916) 853-3300 |
|
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
| |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
The aggregate market value of registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of registrant, based upon the closing sale price of the common stock as of the last business day of registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2009), as reported on the Nasdaq Capital Market, was
approximately $6,945,000. Registrant is a smaller reporting company as defined in Regulation S-K. Shares of common stock held by each officer, director and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
The number of outstanding shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, on October 30, 2009 were 4,802,566 shares.
FORM 10-Q
INSWEB CORPORATION
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
3 |
| |
|
4 |
| |
|
5 |
| |
|
6 |
|
ITEM 2: |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
13 |
|
ITEM 3: |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
20 |
|
ITEM 4: |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
20 |
|
ITEM 4T: |
Controls and Procedures |
20 |
| |
|
|
|
PART II |
OTHER INFORMATION |
20 |
|
ITEM 1: |
Legal Proceedings |
20 |
|
ITEM 1A: |
Risk Factors |
20 |
|
ITEM 6: |
Exhibits |
20 |
| |
|
|
|
Signature |
|
21 |
|
Certifications |
|
|
2
|
PART I: |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INSWEB CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| |
|
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
$ |
9,238 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
2,286 |
|
1,450 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
588 |
|
711 |
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
2,105 |
|
— |
|
|
Total current assets |
|
10,815 |
|
11,399 |
|
|
Related party receivables |
|
309 |
|
304 |
|
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
144 |
|
249 |
|
|
Other assets |
|
247 |
|
329 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
11,515 |
|
$ |
12,281 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
$ |
2,138 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
609 |
|
1,014 |
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
495 |
|
437 |
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
3,954 |
|
3,589 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
|
Paid-in capital |
|
207,555 |
|
206,719 |
|
|
Treasury stock |
|
(6,334 |
) |
(6,334 |
) |
|
Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
|
— |
|
1 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
(193,668 |
) |
(191,702 |
) |
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
|
7,561 |
|
8,692 |
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|
$ |
11,515 |
|
$ |
12,281 |
|
See accompanying notes.
3
INSWEB CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
| |
Three Months
Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months
Ended September 30, |
|
|
| |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction fees |
$ |
8,907 |
|
$ |
8,955 |
|
$ |
26,332 |
|
$ |
30,677 |
|
|
|
Other |
42 |
|
55 |
|
126 |
|
174 |
|
|
|
Total revenues |
8,949 |
|
9,010 |
|
26,458 |
|
30,851 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct marketing |
5,834 |
|
6,497 |
|
17,713 |
|
22,040 |
|
|
|
Sales and marketing |
1,865 |
|
1,505 |
|
5,306 |
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
Technology |
1,092 |
|
774 |
|
2,951 |
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
General and administrative |
1,031 |
|
877 |
|
2,477 |
|
3,276 |
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
9,822 |
|
9,653 |
|
28,447 |
|
31,950 |
|
|
|
Loss from operations |
(873 |
) |
(643 |
) |
(1,989 |
) |
(1,099 |
) |
|
|
Interest income |
3 |
|
47 |
|
23 |
|
196 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
(870 |
) |
(596 |
) |
(1,966 |
) |
(903 |
) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit |
— |
|
44 |
|
— |
|
44 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
(870 |
) |
$ |
(552 |
) |
$ |
(1,966 |
) |
$ (859 |
) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average shares used in computing per share amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
4,799 |
|
4,703 |
|
4,793 |
|
4,677 |
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
INSWEB CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| |
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
|
| |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,966 |
) |
$ |
(859 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation |
|
792 |
|
576 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
142 |
|
119 |
|
|
Interest income from on related party receivables |
|
(5 |
) |
(2) |
|
|
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
(836 |
) |
18 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
123 |
|
(356) |
|
|
Other assets |
|
46 |
|
— |
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
712 |
|
220 |
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
(405 |
) |
(319) |
|
|
Deferred revenue |
|
58 |
|
21 |
|
|
Net cash used by operating activities |
|
(1,339 |
) |
(582 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in restricted cash |
|
(2,105 |
) |
— |
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment, and intangibles |
|
(3 |
) |
(354 |
) |
|
Notes receivable from employees |
|
— |
|
(252 |
) |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(2,108 |
) |
(606 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through stock plans |
|
45 |
|
386 |
|
|
Settlement of equity awards |
|
— |
|
(850 |
) |
|
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
45 |
|
(464 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(3,402 |
) |
(1,652 |
) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
9,238 |
|
10,777 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
5,836 |
|
$ |
9,125 |
|
See accompanying notes.
5
INSWEB CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
1. Business of InsWeb
InsWeb operates an online insurance marketplace that electronically matches consumers and providers of automobile, homeowners and term life insurance. InsWeb has combined knowledge of the insurance industry, technological expertise and close relationships with insurance companies, agents and other providers to develop an integrated online
marketplace. InsWeb’s marketplace enables consumers to research insurance-related topics, search for, analyze and compare insurance products, and apply for and receive quotes for coverage for automobile, homeowners and term life insurance. Management believes that InsWeb provides insurance providers with pre-qualified consumers at attractive acquisition costs, with the scalable, cost-efficient distribution capabilities of InsWeb’s Internet-based model.
For the automobile and homeowners insurance products, InsWeb’s principal source of revenues is transaction fees from participating insurance providers. While quotes obtained through InsWeb’s online insurance marketplace are provided to consumers free of charge, InsWeb earns revenues when a qualified lead is delivered to a participating
insurance provider or local agent. In certain instances, consumers are provided the opportunity to link directly to a third party insurance provider’s website. In these situations, InsWeb will be paid a fee for that consumer link or click-through. InsWeb also distributes leads to (and buys leads from) other lead aggregators/lead distributors, such as NetQuote. In these situations, InsWeb receives a share of the revenues earned by these aggregators on leads we send them (and pays them
a share of revenues we earn on leads we receive from them).
Beginning in 2008, substantially all of InsWeb’s term life insurance revenues are generated by the sale of leads to third parties and to local agents.
Also beginning in 2008, InsWeb began generating both subscription and display advertising revenues from sales of advertising on its Agent Directory pages. These pages display listings of insurance companies and local agents for the consumer to contact.
Beginning in 2009, InsWeb’s health and small business insurance revenues were being generated by the sale of leads to third parties or agents.
InsWeb is subject to all of the risks inherent in the electronic commerce industry and special risks related to the online insurance industry. These risks include, but are not limited to, uncertain economic conditions which could result in lower growth rates, the changing nature of the electronic commerce industry, variations in the availability
and cost of acquiring consumer traffic, unpredictability of future revenues, reliance on key customers —insurance carriers, agents and other providers – who are themselves subject to volatility in their operating cycles, and reliance on a third party intermediaries who provide leads to local insurance agents on InsWeb’s behalf. These risks and uncertainties, among others, could cause InsWeb’s actual results to differ materially from historical results or those currently anticipated. In
light of InsWeb’s ongoing modifications to its business model to better capitalize on its position as a leading insurance portal, InsWeb believes that period-to-period comparisons of its operating results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. Moreover, there is no assurance that InsWeb will be able to attain or sustain profitability.
2. Basis of Presentation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of InsWeb Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, InsWeb Insurance Services, Inc. and Goldrush Insurance Services, Inc. (“InsWeb” or the “Company”). All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in the
consolidated financial statements.
6
INSWEB CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in InsWeb’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and other information as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The December 31, 2008 condensed consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company believes the disclosures in its notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are adequate
to make the information presented not misleading.
Effective July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) became the single official source of authoritative, nongovernmental generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States. The historical GAAP hierarchy
was eliminated and the ASC became the only level of authoritative GAAP, other than guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. InsWeb’s accounting policies were not affected by the conversion to ASC. However, references to specific accounting standards in the footnotes to InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements have been changed to refer to the appropriate section of ASC.
In April 2009, the FASB issued ASC 855, “Subsequent Events”, which requires an entity to recognize in the financial statements the effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet. For non-recognized subsequent events that must be disclosed to
keep the financial statements from being misleading, an entity will be required to disclose the nature of the event as well as an estimate of its financial effect, or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. In addition, this standard requires an entity to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. InsWeb has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing these financial statements on November 10, 2009.
Effective January 1, 2009, InsWeb adopted ASC 805, “Business Combinations”. This requires recognition of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. In a business combination, this pronouncement requires
recognition of identifiable assets and liabilities, as well as the non-controlling interest in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values. In addition, any excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over purchase price and any subsequent changes in estimated contingencies are to be recorded in earnings. The adoption of ASC 805 did not have any material impact on InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued ASC 810 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. ASC 810 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of ASC 810 at the beginning
of 2009 did not have any material impact to InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements.
7
INSWEB CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
3. Share-Based Payments
InsWeb maintains a stock option plan and an employee stock purchase plan. The following table sets forth the total share-based compensation expense relating to these plans included in InsWeb’s operating expenses in its condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
(in thousands):
| |
Three Months Ended
September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
|
| |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology |
$ |
82 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
$ |
89 |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
Sales and marketing |
160 |
|
21 |
|
205 |
|
152 |
|
|
General and administrative |
402 |
|
141 |
|
498 |
|
367 |
|
| |
$ |
644 |
|
$ |
164 |
|
$ |
792 |
|
$ |
576 |
|
4. Concentration of Risk — Significant Customers
For the three months ended September 30, 2009, three customers accounted for 11%, 11%, and 12% of total revenues, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, two customers accounted for 10% each of total revenues. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, three customers accounted for 15%, 14%
and 10%; and 16%, 15%, and 11% of total revenues, respectively. At September 30, 2009, three customers accounted for 16%, 15%, and 11% of accounts receivable, respectively. At December 31, 2008, one customer accounted for 17% of accounts receivable.
5. Fair Value Measurements
InsWeb adopted ASC topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), formerly SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements,” effective January 1, 2008. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal
or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There was no impact relating to the adoption of ASC 820 to InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements.
ASC 820 also describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
| |
• |
|
Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
• |
|
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. |
| |
|
|
|
| |
• |
|
Level 3: Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value. |
8
INSWEB CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
The following table presents the financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2009 (in thousands):
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
128 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,233 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents and restricted cash include U.S. government obligations, money market funds and commercial paper from corporations whose credit ratings are P-1 by Moody’s or A-1 by Standard & Poor’s. For these securities, the Company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets to determine their fair value,
thus they are considered to be Level 1 instruments.
6. Related Party Receivables
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, related party receivables relate to promissory notes totaling $300,000 from three non-officer employees of InsWeb in exchange for cash and the related interest accrued on these notes. These notes are unsecured loans with a per annum rate of 2.42%. Principal and interest
are payable in full on or before July, 2011.
7. Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following (in thousands):
| |
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid software licenses |
$ |
59 |
|
$ |
293 |
|
|
Tax related assets |
|
29 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
Prepaid insurance |
205 |
|
124 |
|
|
Prepaid rent and current portion of lease deposits |
96 |
|
93 |
|
|
Other |
199 |
|
81 |
|
| |
$ |
588 |
|
$ |
711 |
|
8. Restricted Cash
As of September 30, 2009, restricted cash consists of $2.1 million in short-term investments used as collateral to obtain a commercial credit line. Pursuant to the agreement the collateral value of the securities account should be no less than $2.0 million, based upon the net margin percentage of the investment portfolio holdings. The collateral
value may become unrestricted, upon notification from InsWeb to the issuing bank.
9
INSWEB CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
9. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
| |
|
September 30,
2009 |
|
December 31,
2008 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts due to direct marketing partners |
|
$ |
33 |
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
Deferred rent |
|
178 |
|
262 |
|
|
Accrued employee compensation |
|
392 |
|
481 |
|
|
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
$ |
609 |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
10. Comprehensive Loss
Total comprehensive loss was as follows (in thousands):
| |
Three months ended
September 30, |
|
Nine months ended
September 30, |
|
| |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
(870) |
|
$ |
(552) |
|
$ |
(1,966) |
|
$ |
(859) |
|
|
Other comprehensive loss - change in unrealized loss on investments |
— |
|
(1) |
|
— |
|
(2) |
|
|
Comprehensive loss |
$ |
(870) |
|
$ |
(553) |
|
$ |
(1,966) |
|
$ |
(861) |
|
11. Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted loss per share is a measure of the potential dilution that would occur if stock options had been exercised. Potentially dilutive securities have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share, for the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The following table reconciles the numerator and denominator used to calculate basic and diluted net income per share of common stock:
| |
Three months ended
September 30, |
|
Nine months ended
September 30, |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
$ |
(870 |
) |
$ |
(552 |
) |
$ |
(1,966 |
) |
$ |
(859 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic—weighted average shares of common stock outstanding |
4,799 |
|
4,703 |
|
4,793 |
|
4,677 |
|
|
Dilutive effect of employee stock options |
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
|
Diluted |
4,799 |
|
4,703 |
|
4,793 |
|
4,677 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted —as reported |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
$ |
(0.41 |
) |
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
10
INSWEB CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
As a result of our net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, certain stock awards have been excluded from the diluted loss per share calculation as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Had InsWeb reported net income for this period, an additional 192,000 shares and 120,000 shares of common stock would
have been included in the number of shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.
Options to purchase 2.3 million shares of common stock were excluded from the computation of diluted shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, as their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the weighted-average exercise price of these shares was
$4.34 per share.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
InsWeb has a non-cancelable 10-year operating lease agreement through April 2011 for office space in the Sacramento area which houses its corporate headquarters. InsWeb has an option to extend the lease at the end of the lease term, and has the right of first refusal on other office space in the complex.
Securities Class Action
A securities class action lawsuit was filed on December 5, 2001 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, (the “Court”) purportedly on behalf of all persons who purchased our common stock from July 22, 1999 through December 6, 2000. The complaint named as defendants InsWeb, certain
current and former officers and directors, and three investment banking firms that served as underwriters for InsWeb’s initial public offering in July 1999. The complaint, as subsequently amended, alleges violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, on the grounds that the prospectuses incorporated in the registration statements for the offering failed to disclose, among other things, that (i) the underwriters had
solicited and received excessive and undisclosed commissions from certain investors in exchange for which the underwriters allocated to those investors material portions of the shares of our stock sold in the offerings and (ii) the underwriters had entered into agreements with customers whereby the underwriters agreed to allocated shares of the stock sold in the offering to those customers in exchange for which the customers agreed to purchase additional shares of InsWeb stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined
prices. No specific damages are claimed. Similar allegations have been made in lawsuits relating to more than 300 other initial public offerings conducted in 1999 and 2000, all of which have been consolidated for pretrial purposes. In October 2002, all claims against the individual defendants were dismissed without prejudice. In February 2003, the Court dismissed the claims in the InsWeb action alleging violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but allowed the plaintiffs to proceed with the
remaining claims. In June 2003, the plaintiffs in all of the cases presented a settlement proposal to all of the issuer defendants. Under the proposed settlement, the plaintiffs would dismiss and release all claims against participating defendants in exchange for a contingent payment guaranty by the insurance companies collectively responsible for insuring the issuers in all the related cases, and the assignment or surrender to the plaintiffs of certain claims the issuer defendants may have against the underwriters.
InsWeb and most of the other issuer defendants have accepted the settlement proposal. While the District Court was considering final approval of the settlement, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the class certification of plaintiffs’ claims against the underwriters in six cases designated as focus or test cases. On December 14, 2006, the District Court ordered a stay of all proceedings in all of the lawsuits pending the outcome of plaintiffs’ petition to the Second Circuit for rehearing
en banc and resolution of the class certification issue. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the plaintiffs’ petition for rehearing, but clarified that the plaintiffs may seek to certify a more limited class in the District Court. Because of the significant technical barriers presented by the Court’s decision, the parties withdrew the proposed settlement and the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. Representatives of all of the parties to the IPO litigation agreed to a revised settlement,
and this settlement was approved by the District Court on October 5, 2009. As
11
INSWEB CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)
12. Commitments and Contingencies (continued)
with the earlier settlement proposal, the revised settlement proposal does not require InsWeb to contribute any cash. There is no assurance that the new settlement will be finalized, and then approved. If the settlement is not finalized and subsequently approved, InsWeb intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. The litigation and settlement
process is inherently uncertain and management cannot predict the outcome, though, if unfavorable, it could have a material adverse effect on InsWeb’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Section 16(b) Lawsuit
On October 12, 2007, Vanessa Simmonds, a purported stockholder of InsWeb, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, against InsWeb and two investment banking firms that served as underwriters for the initial public offering of our common stock in July 1999. The complaint alleges
that: (i) the defendants, other underwriters of the offering, and unspecified officers, directors and principal stockholders of InsWeb constituted a “group” that owned in excess of 10% of InsWeb’s outstanding common stock between July 23, 1999 and July 20, 2000; (ii) the defendants were therefore subject to the “short swing” prohibitions of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Actgroup of 1934; and (iii) the defendants engaged in purchases
and sales, or sales and purchases, of InsWeb’s common stock within periods of less than six months in violation of the provisions of Section 16(b). The complaint seeks disgorgement of all profits allegedly received by the defendants, with interest and attorneys fees, for transactions in violation of Section 16(b). InsWeb, as the statutory beneficiary of any potential Section 16(b) recovery, is named as a nominal defendant in the complaint. A number of similar lawsuits against underwriters
of other public offerings have recently been filed by the same plaintiff and law firm. On February 11, 2008, the court approved a stipulated order that InsWeb need not answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. On February 28, 2008, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, and InsWeb was again excused from filing an answer. On March 12, 2009 the court issued an order dismissing the lawsuit with prejudice, but the plaintiff has appealed this order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. If
the lawsuit is reinstated on appeal, InsWeb intends to defend the lawsuit vigorously. The litigation and settlement process is inherently uncertain and management cannot predict the outcome, though, if unfavorable, it could have a material adverse effect on InsWeb’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
12
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and in particular Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains “forward-looking statements” with respect to InsWeb’s future financial performance. The words or phrases “expects,” “anticipates,”
“intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties, and InsWeb cautions you that any forward-looking information provided by, or on behalf of, InsWeb is not a guarantee of future performance. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking
statements due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond InsWeb’s control, including, but not limited to, uncertain economic conditions which could result in lower growth rates, fluctuations in revenues, anticipated and unanticipated losses, the unpredictability of consumer shopping and/or buying behavior, especially on the internet, potential increases in advertising and marketing costs on the internet, the rate of participation by insurance companies and agents, reliance on key customers, who are
themselves subject to volatility in their operating cycles, reliance on third party lead aggregators who provide leads to their networks of insurance providers on InsWeb’s behalf, competition, risks associated with system development and operation risks, management of potential growth and risks of new business areas, business combinations, litigation in which InsWeb is a party, and strategic alliances. These risks and uncertainties, as well as other risks and uncertainties, which are described
in greater detail in InsWeb’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, could cause InsWeb’s actual results to differ materially from historical results or those currently anticipated. All forward-looking statements are based on information available to InsWeb on the date hereof, and InsWeb assumes no obligation to update such statements.
Overview
InsWeb (the “Company,” “InsWeb,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) operates an online insurance marketplace that electronically matches consumers and providers of automobile, homeowners and term life insurance. InsWeb has combined extensive knowledge of the insurance industry, technological
expertise and close relationships with a significant number of insurance companies, agents and insurance providers to develop an integrated online marketplace.
For the automobile and homeowners insurance products, our principal source of revenues is transaction fees from participating insurance providers. While quotes obtained through our online insurance marketplace are provided to consumers free of charge, we earn revenues when a qualified lead is delivered to a participating insurance provider
or local agent. In certain instances, consumers are provided the opportunity to link directly to a third party insurance provider’s website. In these situations, we will be paid a fee for that consumer link or click-through. InsWeb also distributes leads to (and buys leads from) other lead aggregators/lead distributors, such as NetQuote. In these situations, InsWeb receives a share of the revenues earned by these aggregators on leads we send them (and pays them a share of revenues
we earn on leads we receive from them).
Beginning in 2008, substantially all of our term life insurance revenues are generated by the sale of leads to third parties and to local agents.
Also, beginning in 2008, InsWeb began generating both subscription and display advertising revenues from sales of advertising on its Agent Directory pages. These pages display listings of several insurance companies and not more than eight local agents for the consumer to contact.
Beginning in 2009, our health and small business insurance revenues were being generated by the sale of leads to third parties and to local agents.
We have focused our efforts on automobile insurance, which accounted for approximately 84% of our transaction revenues in 2008 and 2007. For the nine month period ending September 30, 2009 automobile insurance accounted for 83% of our transaction revenues. For the comparable nine month period in 2008, automobile insurance accounted
for approximately 85% of transaction revenues. We anticipate that automobile insurance will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenues for the foreseeable future.
13
Results of Operations
The following financial highlights and key metrics are provided as a resource for our investors
| |
Three months Ended |
|
Nine months Ended |
|
| |
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
| |
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Revenues (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto |
$ |
7,296 |
|
$ |
7,574 |
|
$ |
21,836 |
|
$ |
26,036 |
|
|
Property |
896 |
|
862 |
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
2,807 |
|
|
Term life |
562 |
|
377 |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
Agent directory |
105 |
|
134 |
|
|
339 |
|
|
590 |
|
|
Other |
48 |
|
8 |
|
|
136 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
Total transaction fees |
$ |
8,907 |
|
$ |
8,955 |
|
$ |
26,332 |
|
$ |
30,677 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct marketing costs (in thousands): |
$ |
5,834 |
|
$ |
6,497 |
|
$ |
17,713 |
|
$ |
22,040 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct marketing costs as a percent of transaction revenues: |
65 |
% |
73 |
% |
67 |
% |
72 |
% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (in thousands): |
$ |
7,941 |
|
$ |
9,125 |
|
$ |
7,941 |
|
$ |
9,125 |
|
|
Account receivable (in thousands): |
$ |
2,286 |
|
$ |
2,410 |
|
$ |
2,286 |
|
$ |
2,410 |
|
|
Day sales outstanding (DSO): |
22 |
|
24 |
|
22 |
|
24 |
|
|
Headcount: |
61 |
|
89 |
|
61 |
|
89 |
|
Transaction Fees.
Automobile insurance transaction fees (consisting of lead fees and click through fees) decreased to $7.3 million and $21.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $7.6 million and $26.0 million for the comparable periods in 2008. Revenue per consumer was $2.68 and $2.72 for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009, a decrease from $3.37 and $3.64 for the comparable periods in 2008. The decrease in revenue per consumer is a direct result of more consumers being acquired through other lead aggregators. Consumers acquired through aggregators generate less revenue since we are only able to sell these leads to insurance companies that the consumer has not already seen from the other aggregators. We expect revenue per consumer to remain at current levels for the remainder of 2009 as we do not expect
significant changes in our marketing sources.
Property insurance transaction fees (consisting primarily of lead fees) remained level at $0.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008, but decreased to $2.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $2.8 million for the comparable period in 2008. Revenue per
consumer was $2.77 and $3.14 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease from $4.06 and $4.62 for the comparable periods in 2008. The decrease in revenue per consumer can be partially attributed to more consumers being acquired through other lead aggregators. Consumers acquired through other aggregators generate less revenue since we are only able to sell these leads to insurance companies that the consumer has not already seen from the other aggregators. We expect revenue per consumer
to remain at current levels for the remainder of 2009, as we do not expect significant changes in our marketing sources.
Term life insurance transaction fees (consisting primarily of lead fees) increased to $0.6 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $0.4 million and $1.2 million for the comparable periods in 2008. The increase in term life transaction revenues in 2009 compared to 2008 is primarily due
to expanded distribution in July 2008 of term life leads to agents through our AgentInsider program.
Compared to the third quarter, auto, property and term life transaction fees are expected to decrease during our traditionally slower fourth quarter.
14
Transaction Fees (continued).
Agent directory revenues (consisting of subscription revenue and advertising revenues) remained level at $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, and decreased to $0.3 million for nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $0.6 million for the comparable period in 2008. This decrease was due
primarily to lower advertising revenues generated from sales of banner ads on the agent directory site. Agent directory revenues are expected to remain at current levels for the remainder of 2009.
Fees from sales of leads in all other lines of business (including health and small business) were immaterial and are expected to decrease in the fourth quarter.
Operating Expenses
| |
|
Three months ended
September 30, |
|
Percentage
change from |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
prior period |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct marketing |
|
$ |
5,834 |
|
$ |
6,497 |
|
(10 |
) |
% |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
1,865 |
|
1,505 |
|
24 |
|
% |
|
Technology |
|
1,092 |
|
774 |
|
41 |
|
% |
|
General and administrative |
|
1,031 |
|
877 |
|
18 |
|
|
| |
|
Nine months ended
September 30, |
|
Percentage
change from |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except percentages) |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
prior period |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct marketing |
|
$ |
17,713 |
|
$ |
22,040 |
|
(20 |
) |
% |
|
Sales and marketing |
|
5,306 |
|
4,233 |
|
25 |
|
% |
|
Technology |
|
2,951 |
|
2,401 |
|
23 |
|
% |
|
General and administrative |
|
2,477 |
|
3,276 |
|
(24 |
|
|
Direct Marketing. Direct marketing expenses consist of advertising, promotions and fees incurred to drive consumer traffic to the InsWeb online marketplace. Our marketing strategy is designed to increase consumer traffic to our website and to drive awareness of our
insurance products and services. We employ various means of advertising, which consist primarily of online advertising, sponsored search, portal advertising, e-mail campaigns and strategic partnerships with high-profile online companies and other online lead generators that use our network to complement their network of providers. Fees related to our online marketing are expensed in the period in which the consumer clicks through from a partner’s website to InsWeb’s website, or in some cases, when
the consumer’s activity on the InsWeb website generates a lead to an insurance provider.
Direct marketing expenses for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2009 decreased to $5.8 million and $17.7 million from $6.5 million and $22.0 million in the comparable periods in 2008. Direct marketing expenses as a percent of total revenues were 65% and 67% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared
to 72% and 71% for the comparable periods in 2008. Direct marketing expenses per consumer for all products were $1.30 and $1.33 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease from $2.27 and $2.35 for the comparable periods in 2008. The preceding numbers reflect a significant increase in consumers acquired through InsWeb’s agent directory program, with minimal costs associated with the acquisition of these consumers. Also, more consumers were acquired from other aggregators with whom
we have revenue sharing arrangements. As mentioned earlier, consumers acquired through other aggregators generate less revenue per consumer. As a result, direct marketing expenses per consumer, excluding consumers acquired through the agent directory, fell to $1.77 and $1.90 for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2009 from $2.59 and $2.75 for the comparable periods in 2008. Compared to the third quarter, direct marketing expenses are expected to be lower during the traditionally slower
fourth quarter. Marketing costs per consumer are expected to remain at current levels for the remainder of 2009.
15
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, including employee benefits, facility costs, telecommunications and systems costs, for our sales and marketing personnel. Sales and marketing expenses increased to
$1.9 million and $5.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $1.5 million and $4.2 million for the comparable periods in 2008. The increase was due to an increase in headcount related expenses in 2009 compared to 2008, and also reflects costs associated with the September 2009 staff reduction, share-based compensation expenses and consulting expenses. Sales and marketing expenses are expected to decrease for the remainder of 2009 and for the foreseeable future, primarily as a result
of the September 2009 staff reduction.
Technology. Technology expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, including employee benefits, facility and systems costs, for product and site development personnel involved with our technology initiatives. Technology expenses increased to $1.1 million
and $3.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $0.8 million and $2.4 million for the comparable periods in 2008. The increase was primarily due to an increase in headcount related expenses in 2009 compared to 2008, and also reflects costs associated with the September 2009 staff reduction, share-based compensation expenses and software licenses. Technology expenses are expected to decrease for the remainder of 2009 and for the foreseeable future, primarily reflecting lower costs
associated with the September 2009 staff reduction.
General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll and related expenses, including employee benefits, facility costs, telecommunications and systems costs, for our general management,
administrative and accounting personnel, as well as other general corporate expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $0.9 million for the comparable period in 2008, and decreased to $2.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, from $3.3 million for the comparable period in 2008. The increase in costs for the three-month period ending September 2009 was primarily due to costs associated with the staff reduction in September
2009. The decrease in costs for the nine month period ending September 2009 was primarily due to a decrease in legal costs following the patent litigation settlement in April 2009, a decrease in costs associated with accounting services, and recognition of severance related costs associated with the departure of the chief operating officer in June 2008. These decreases were offset by an increase in costs associated with the staff reduction in September 2009 and share-based compensation expense. General and administrative
expenses are expected to decrease for the remainder of 2009 and for the foreseeable future.
Income Taxes.
No provision or benefit for income taxes was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, compared to a benefit from income taxes of $44,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Interest Income
Interest income was $3,000 and $23,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, a decrease from $47,000 and $196,000 for the comparable periods in 2008 relating to the decrease in InsWeb’s cash and investment balances and decrease in yield on InsWeb’s investment securities.
Interest income represents interest earned on InsWeb’s investment securities.
16
Critical Accounting Policies
InsWeb’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based on InsWeb’s consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires InsWeb to make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. InsWeb bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. InsWeb believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. InsWeb’s principal source of revenues is transaction fees from participating insurance providers, either directly from an insurance company or from a local insurance agent. While
quotes and other information obtained through InsWeb’s online insurance marketplace are provided to consumers free of charge, InsWeb earns revenues from participating insurance companies or agents based on the delivery of qualified leads. In certain instances, consumers are provided the opportunity to link directly to a third-party insurance provider’s website (“Sponsored Web Link” program). In these situations, the consumer will complete the third-party company’s online application,
and InsWeb will be paid a fee for that consumer link or “click-through.” InsWeb recognizes revenue when (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement between InsWeb and the customer exists, (ii) delivery of the product to the customer has occurred or service has been provided to the customer, (iii) the price to the customer is fixed or determinable and (iv) collectability of the sales price is reasonably assured.
Contingencies. As discussed in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements — Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies.”Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this report, InsWeb is a defendant in: i) a class action lawsuit that alleges InsWeb violated
certain federal securities laws at the time of its initial public offering; and ii) a securities lawsuit alleging certain officers and directors and significant shareholders violated the short swing trading prohibition of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act. InsWeb cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of these matters at this time and therefore, cannot estimate the range of probable loss, if any, due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation. InsWeb believes it has meritorious
defenses; however InsWeb cannot assure that it will prevail in any of these actions. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse effect on InsWeb’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Share-Based Compensation. InsWeb accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation.” Under the provisions of ASC 718, share-based compensation cost is generally estimated at the grant date based on the award’s
fair value as calculated by the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) option-pricing model. The BSM model requires various highly judgmental assumptions including expected option life, volatility, and forfeiture rates. If any of the assumptions used in the BSM model change significantly, share-based compensation expense may differ materially in the future from that recorded in the current period. Generally, compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period. However, to the extent performance conditions affect
the vesting of an award; compensation cost will be recognized only if the performance condition is satisfied. Compensation cost will not be recognized, and any previously recognized compensation cost will be reversed, if the performance condition is not satisfied.
17
Critical Accounting Policies (continued)
InsWeb has unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $0.3 million (none of which, if recognized, would favorably affect InsWeb’s effective tax rate). InsWeb does not believe there will be material changes in its unrecognized tax positions over the next twelve months.
As of December 31, 2008, InsWeb had net operating loss carry forwards of approximately $190 million for federal income tax purposes and $76 million for state income tax purposes, respectively. The federal net operating loss carry forwards will begin to expire in the year 2011 and state net operating loss carry forwards will begin to
expire in 2012. InsWeb’s ability to utilize a portion of its net operating loss carry forwards to offset future taxable income may be subject to restrictions attributable to equity transactions that result in changes in ownership as defined in the Tax Reform Act of 1986. These restrictions may limit, on an annual basis, InsWeb’s future use of its net operating loss carry forwards.
The carrying value of our deferred tax assets, which was approximately $70 million at December 31, 2008, is dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient future taxable income. We have established a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets to reflect the uncertainty of realizing the deferred tax benefits, given
historical losses. A valuation allowance is required when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. This assessment requires a review and consideration of all available positive and negative evidence, including our past and future performance, the market environment in which we operate, the utilization of tax attributes in the past, and the length of carryforward periods and evaluation of potential tax planning strategies. We expect to continue to maintain
a full valuation allowance until an appropriate level of profitability is sustained or we are able to develop tax strategies that would enable us to conclude that it is more likely than not that a portion of our deferred tax assets would be realizable.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Summarized cash flow information is as follows (in thousands):
| |
|
Nine months ended
September 30, |
|
| |
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
|
Cash used by operating activities |
|
$ |
(1,339 |
) |
$ |
(582 |
) |
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
(2,108 |
) |
(606 |
) |
|
Cash provided (used) by financing activities |
|
45 |
|
(464 |
) |
At September 30, 2009, InsWeb’s principal source of liquidity was $5.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. Since inception, we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of preferred and common stock.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net cash used by operating activities was $1.3 million, primarily consisting of our net loss adjusted for non-cash share-based compensation and depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and intangible assets of $1.0 million. An increase in accounts receivable of $0.8 million
and a decrease in accrued expenses of $0.4 million decreased cash provided by operations, but were partially offset by an increase in accounts payable of $0.7 million and a decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $0.2 million. For the comparable nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash used by operating activities was $582,000, primarily due to our net loss of $859,000 as adjusted for non-cash share-based compensation of $576,000, depreciation and amortization of property, equipment
and intangible assets of $119,000, an decrease in accounts receivable of $18,000, an increase in prepaid expenses of $356,000 and decrease in accrued expenses of $319,000, offset by an increase in accounts payable of $220,000.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net cash used in investing activities was $2.1 million relating to cash restricted for the use as collateral to obtain a commercial credit line. InsWeb uses this commercial credit line for many of its larger, recurring accounts payable and will earn a cash rebate of approximately 50-95
basis points, dependent upon the purchase volume during the 2009 calendar year. For the comparable nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash used in investing activities was $606,000 primarily due to purchases of property, equipment and intangibles of $354,000 and notes receivable from employees for $252,000.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, net cash provided by financing activities was $45,000, and was primarily attributable to proceeds from our employee stock purchase plan. For the comparable nine month period ended September 30, 2008, net cash used by financing activities was $464,000, representing principally of $850,000
for the cash settlement of equity awards in connection with the departure of the president and COO in June, 2008, offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and stock issued from our employee stock purchase plan of $386,000.
We have a non-cancelable 10-year operating lease agreement through April 2011 for office space in the Sacramento area which currently houses our corporate headquarters. We have options to extend the lease at the end of the lease term, and have the right of first refusal on other office space in the complex.
Aggregate contractual cash obligations, net of contractual sublease income, as of September 30, 2009 is summarized as follows (in thousands):
| |
|
Gross lease
commitments |
|
Sublease
income |
|
Net lease
commitment |
|
|
Nine months ending December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
269 |
|
$ |
(15) |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2010 |
|
1,078 |
|
(17) |
|
1,061 |
|
|
Year ending December 31, 2011 |
|
359 |
|
— |
|
359 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
— |
|
— |
|
— |
|
| |
|
$ |
1,706 |
|
$ |
(32) |
|
$ |
1,674 |
|
We currently anticipate that our cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. Although we do not anticipate the need for additional financing, we nevertheless may require additional funds to meet operating needs, or to expand
our business internally or through acquisition. We cannot be certain that additional financing will be available when required, on favorable terms or at all. If we are not successful in raising additional capital as required, our business could be materially harmed. If additional funds were raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of our then-current stockholders would be reduced.
19
|
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK. |
There have been no material changes to our disclosures related to certain market risks as reported under Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
|
ITEM 4T. |
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
|
|
(a) |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. |
|
|
(b) |
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended September 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. |
|
PART II: |
OTHER INFORMATION |
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements — Note 12 — Commitments and Contingencies.”
Our future business, operating results and financial condition are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. There have
been no material changes to the risk factors as so disclosed.
|
Exhibit
Number |
|
Description of Document |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). |
| |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). |
| |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
20
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Dated: November 10, 2009 |
INSWEB CORPORATION |
| |
(Registrant) |
| |
|
| |
/s/ STEVEN J. YASUDA |
| |
Steven J. Yasuda |
| |
Chief Accounting Officer |
21