UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 6-K

Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 Under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Cameco Corporation

(Commission file No. 1-14228)

2121-11th Street West
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7M 1J3
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.

Form 20-F o       Form 40-F þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes o       No þ

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):

 

 

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.		Description		Page No.
1.		Cameco Corporation — Annual and Special Meeting — May 15, 2008, Report of Voting Results

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 16, 2008		Cameco Corporation
		By:
		/s/ Gary M.S. Chad   Gary M.S. Chad, Q.C. Senior Vice-President, Governance, Law and Corporate Secretary

Cameco Corporation
Annual and Special Meeting May 15, 2008
Report of Voting Results
Under National Instrument 51-102

In accordance with Section 11.3 of National Instrument 51-102 — Continuous Disclosure Obligations, we hereby advise of the results of the voting on the matters submitted to the annual and special meeting (the “Meeting”) of the shareholders (the “Shareholders”) of Cameco Corporation (the “Corporation”) held on May 15, 2008. Each of the matters set forth below is described in greater detail in the Notice for the Meeting and Management Proxy Circular mailed to Shareholders prior to the Meeting.

The matters voted upon at the Meeting and the results of the voting were as follows:

Item 1: Election of Directors

The following directors were elected to hold office for the ensuing year or until their successors are elected or appointed:

John S. Auston		Nancy E. Hopkins
John H. Clappison		Oyvind Hushovd
Joe F. Colvin		J.W. George Ivany
Harry D. Cook		A. Anne McLellan
James. R. Curtiss		A. Neil McMillan
George S. Dembroski		Robert W. Peterson
Gerald W. Grandey		Victor J. Zaleschuk

NUCLEAR. The Clean Air Energy.

May 16, 2008
Page 2

If a ballot vote had been taken, based upon proxy votes by Shareholders received by the Corporation and after giving effect to the twenty-five (25%) percent non-resident Shareholder voting restriction, the voting results for the election of directors would have been:

Nominee		Votes For				% Votes For				Withheld				% Votes Withheld
John S. Auston			206,847,697				99.74	%			531,650				0.26	%
John H. Clappison			204,745,739				98.73	%			2,633,608				1.27	%
Joe Colvin			206,658,825				99.65	%			720,522				0.35	%
Harry D. Cook			206,722,391				99.68	%			656,955				0.32	%
James R. Curtiss			180,365,206				86.97	%			27,014,140				13.03	%
George S. Dembroski			206,652,829				99.65	%			726,518				0.35	%
Gerald W. Grandey			206,872,923				99.76	%			506,424				0.24	%
Nancy E. Hopkins			206,716,881				99.68	%			662,466				0.32	%
Oyvind Hushovd			206,076,564				99.37	%			1,302,782				0.63	%
J.W. George Ivany			206,066,666				99.37	%			1,312,681				0.63	%
A. Anne McLellan			206,745,791				99.69	%			633,556				0.31	%
A. Neil McMillan			206,881,866				99.76	%			497,480				0.24	%
Robert W. Peterson			206,689,913				99.67	%			689,433				0.33	%
Victor J. Zaleschuk			206,900,742				99.77	%			478,604				0.23	%

Item 2: Appointment of Auditors

By a vote by way of show of hands, KPMG LLP was appointed auditors of the Corporation to hold office until the next annual meeting of Shareholders, or until their successors are appointed.

If a ballot vote had been taken, based upon proxy votes by Shareholders received by the Corporation and after giving effect to the twenty-five (25%) percent non-resident Shareholder voting restriction, the voting results for appointment of auditors would have been:

Votes For		% Votes For		Votes Withheld		% Votes Withheld
206,579,891		99.61%		798,905		0.39%

Item 3: Shareholder Proposal

On a vote by ballot, the shareholder proposal on majority voting for director elections was defeated.

May 16, 2008
Page 3

The outcome of the ballot vote, after giving effect to the twenty-five (25%) percent non-resident voting restriction, was as follows:

Votes For		% Votes For		Votes Against		% Votes Against
48,453,267		24.51%		149,204,509		75.49%