EMAGIN
CORPORATION
FORM
10-Q/A FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED
MARCH 31, 2005
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Item
1.
|
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Item
1.
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item
5.
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
20
|
CERTIFICATIONS
|
21
|
31.1
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
PART
I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION
eMAGIN
CORPORATION
(In
thousands)
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
|
|
December
31, 2004
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS: |
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
10,769 |
|
$ |
13,457 |
|
Accounts
receivables, net
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
536 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
2,018 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
880 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
14,702 |
|
|
16,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUIPMENT
AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS: |
|
|
4,304 |
|
|
4,072 |
|
Less:
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(2,956) |
|
|
(2,767) |
|
Total
equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
1,348 |
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets |
|
|
64 |
|
|
56 |
|
Less:
Accumulated amortization |
|
|
(3) |
|
|
(2) |
|
Total
intangible assets, net |
|
|
61 |
|
|
54 |
|
Other
long-term assets |
|
|
151 |
|
|
186 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
16,262 |
|
$ |
18,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
$ |
822 |
|
Accrued
payroll and benefits
|
|
|
577 |
|
|
674 |
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
357 |
|
Advanced
payments
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
64 |
|
Current
portion of capitalized lease obligation
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
14 |
|
Other
current liabilities
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
35 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
1,966 |
|
Capitalized
lease obligations - long term |
|
|
18 |
|
|
22 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
1,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, par value $0.001 per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
authorized - 100,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
issued and outstanding - 82,072,176 and 79,638,817
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
80 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
166,654 |
|
|
165,399 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(152,500) |
|
|
(149,031) |
|
Total
shareholders' equity
|
|
|
14,236 |
|
|
16,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
|
$ |
16,262 |
|
$ |
18,436 |
|
See
notes to financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
eMAGIN
CORPORATION
(In
thousands except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
|
|
March
31, 2004
|
|
REVENUE: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product
revenue, net of returns
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
$ |
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF
GOODS SOLD: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
cost of goods sold
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
209 |
|
Production
expenses
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
1,154 |
|
Total
cost of goods sold
|
|
|
1,957 |
|
|
1,363 |
|
Gross
Loss |
|
|
(1,267) |
|
|
(823) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
866 |
|
|
8 |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
84 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
615 |
|
Total
costs and expenses, net
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
707 |
|
Interest
income (expense), net
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
(5,076) |
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(3,469) |
|
$ |
(6,606) |
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per common share |
|
$ |
(0.04) |
|
$ |
(0.13) |
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding |
|
|
81,432 |
|
|
51,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
eMAGIN
CORPORATION
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
$
|
|
Capital
|
|
Deficit
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
79,639 |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
165,399 |
|
$ |
(149,031 |
) |
$ |
16,448 |
|
Stock
options exercised
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Stock
warrants exercised
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
1,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Issuance
of common stock for services
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Net
loss for period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,469 |
) |
|
(3,469 |
) |
Balance,
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
82,072
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
166,654 |
|
$ |
152,500 |
|
$ |
14,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial
statements.
|
eMAGIN
CORPORATION
(In
thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
|
|
March
31, 2004
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(3,469) |
|
$ |
(6,606) |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
used
in operating activities-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and
amortization
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
159 |
|
Bad
debt
expense
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
34 |
|
Amortization
of financing
fees
|
|
|
- |
|
|
8 |
|
Non-cash
charge for stock based
compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
84 |
|
Non-cash
interest related
charges
|
|
|
- |
|
|
126 |
|
Non-cash
charge for services
received
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
8 |
|
Non-cash
financing
expense
|
|
|
- |
|
|
4,955 |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
151 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(908) |
|
|
(38) |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current
assets
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
(658) |
|
Other
long-term
assets
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
- |
|
Advanced
payment on contracts to be
completed
|
|
|
(47) |
|
|
2 |
|
Accounts
payable, accrued expenses and accrued
payroll
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
(425) |
|
Other
current
liabilities
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
(4) |
|
Net
cash used in operating
activities
|
|
|
(3,699)
|
|
|
(2,204) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases/Sales
of equipment,
net
|
|
|
(232) |
|
|
(109) |
|
Net
cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(232) |
|
|
(109) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from sales of common stock, net of issuance
costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
3,916 |
|
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options and
warrants
|
|
|
1,246 |
|
|
2,073 |
|
Payments
of long term debt and capital leases
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
(15) |
|
Net
cash provided by financing
activities
|
|
|
1,243 |
|
|
5,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH
EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(2,688) |
|
|
3,661 |
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of
period
|
|
|
13,457 |
|
|
1,054 |
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of
period
|
|
$ |
10,769 |
|
$ |
4,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Disclosure: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
of debt to equity |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
8,567 |
|
Payments
of A/P through issuance of stock |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
35 |
|
Stock
issued for prepaid services |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
17 |
|
Cash
payments of interest |
|
$ |
1 |
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
notes to financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
eMAGIN
CORPORATION
Basis
of
Presentation
In
the
opinion
of management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial
information reflects all adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring
accruals, necessary for a fair presentation. Certain information
and
footnote disclosure normally included in financial statements prepared
in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in
the
United States have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to instructions, rules
and regulations prescribed by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company believes that the
disclosures
provided herein are adequate to make the information presented
not misleading when these unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements
are read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements contained
in
the company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the year
ended December 31, 2004. The results of operations for
the period ended March 31, 2005 are not necessarily indicative of
the
results to be expected for the full year.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25 ("APB No. 25"),
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under
APB
No. 25, when the exercise price of employee stock options equals the market
price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense
is recorded. The Company discloses information relating
to the fair value of stock-based compensation awards in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No.123 ("SFAS No. 123"), "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
"The
following table illustrates the effect on net loss and loss per share
as if
the Company had applied the fair value recognition provision of SFAS No.
123.
The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant
using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following assumptions used for grants in the first
quarter of
2005 and 2004, respectively: (1) average expected volatility of 64%
and
63%, (2) average risk-free interest rates of 4.33% and
3.31%, and
(3) expected lives of seven years.
The
pro
forma amounts that are disclosed in accordance with SFAS No. 123 reflect
the
portion of the estimated fair value of awards that were earned for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004.
For
the three months ended March 31, |
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common stockholders', as reported |
|
$ |
(3,469) |
|
$ |
(6,606) |
|
Add:
Stock based employee compensation expense included in reported
net
loss |
|
|
- |
|
|
84 |
|
Deduct:
Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair
value
method |
|
|
(1,481) |
|
|
(1,288) |
|
Pro
forma net loss |
|
$ |
(4,950) |
|
$ |
(7,810) |
|
Net
loss per share applicable to common stockholders': |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted, as reported |
|
$ |
(0.04) |
|
$ |
(0.13) |
|
Basic
and diluted, pro forma |
|
$ |
(0.06) |
|
$ |
(0.15) |
|
In
March
of 2005 the Company granted 1,100,000 stock options to certain officers and
employees of the Company. The exercise price of these options was
equal to
the market price of the stock on the date of grant. The options vest
over
five years unless there is a change in control or a dismissal without cause
in
which case the options would vest immediately.
Note
2 -
NATURE OF BUSINESS
eMagin
Corporation is a developer and manufacturer of
optical systems and microdisplays for use in
the
electronics industry. eMagin also develops and markets
microdisplay systems and optics technology for commercial,
industrial and military applications.
Note
3 -
REVENUE AND COST RECOGNITION
Revenue
is recognized when products are shipped to customers, net of allowances
for
anticipated returns. The
Company’s revenue-earning activities generally
involve delivering products and revenues are considered to
be earned
when the Company has completed the process by which
it
is entitled to such revenues. Revenue is recognized when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists,
delivery has
occurred, selling price is fixed or determinable and collection is
reasonably assured.
The
Company also earns revenues from certain of eMagin's
R&D activities under
both firm fixed-price contracts and cost-type contracts, including some
cost-plus-fee contracts. Revenues relating to firm
fixed-price contracts are generally recognized on
the percentage-of-completion method of accounting as costs
are
incurred (cost-to-cost basis). Revenues on
cost-plus-fee contracts include costs incurred plus a portion
of
estimated fees or profits based on the relationship of costs incurred to
total
estimated costs. Contract costs include all direct material
and labor
costs and an allocation of allowable indirect costs
as defined by
each contract, as periodically adjusted to reflect revised
agreed upon
rates. These rates are subject to audit by the other party. Amounts
can
be billed on a bi-monthly basis.
Note
4 -
RECEIVABLES
The
majority of our commercial accounts receivable are
due
from Original Equipment Manufacturers ("OEM"s). Credit
is
extended based on an evaluation of a customers'
financial condition and, generally, collateral is not
required.
Accounts receivable are payable in U.S. dollars, are due within
30-90
days and are stated at amounts due from customers net
of
an allowance for doubtful accounts. Any account outstanding
longer than the contractual payment terms is considered past due. The Company
determines the allowance by considering a number of
factors,
including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due,
eMagin's previous loss history, the customer's current ability to pay
its obligation, and the condition of the general economy and
the
industry as a whole. The Company writes
off accounts receivable when they become uncollectable, and
payments subsequently received on such receivables are
reported as income in the year the payment is received.
Receivables
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
|
|
December
31, 2004
|
|
Trade
receivables |
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
$ |
1,282 |
|
Contract
receivables |
|
|
- |
|
|
25 |
|
Total |
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
1,307 |
|
Less
allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(790) |
|
|
(771) |
|
Net
receivables |
|
$ |
507 |
|
$ |
536 |
|
Note
5 -
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Note
6 -
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
In
accordance with SFAS No. 128, net loss per common share amounts ("basic EPS")
were computed by dividing net loss by
the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding and excluding any potential dilution.
Net loss per
common share assuming dilution ("diluted EPS") was
computed by
reflecting potential dilution from the exercise of stock options
and warrants. Common equivalent shares totaling 6,010,882
and
36,594,874 have been excluded from the computation of diluted EPS
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and March
31, 2004,
respectively.
Note
7 -
INVENTORIES
Inventory
is stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in
first-out method. The Company reviews the value of its inventory
and
reduces the inventory value to its net realized value based upon current
market prices and contracts for future sales. The components of inventories
are
as follows:
|
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
|
|
December
31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials |
|
$ |
2,265 |
|
$ |
1,420 |
|
Work
in process |
|
|
114 |
|
|
169 |
|
Finished
goods |
|
|
547 |
|
|
429 |
|
Total
Inventory |
|
$ |
2,926 |
|
$ |
2,018 |
|
Note
8 -
DEBT
Debt consisted of capitalized leased obligation for equipment
as
follows:
|
|
|
March
31, 2005
|
|
|
December
31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of capitalized lease obligations |
|
$ |
15 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
Long-term
capitalized lease obligations |
|
|
18 |
|
|
22 |
|
Total
debt |
|
$ |
33
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
Note
9 -
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
The
authorized common stock of the Company consists of 200,000,000 shares with
a par
value of $0.001 per share.
In
the
first quarter of 2005, the Company received $1,246,046 for the exercise
of
2,421,359 warrants and options.
The
Company also issued 12,000 shares of common stock for the payment of $12,000
for
services rendered and to be rendered in the future. As such, the
Company recorded the fair value of the services rendered
in
selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying unaudited consolidated statement of operations
for
the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Note
10 -
STOCK COMPENSATION
As
of
March 31, 2005, the Company has outstanding options to purchase 15,252,688
shares. The Company issued all outstanding options at or above fair market
value, or has previously expensed those options repriced below fair market
value.
Note
11 -
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
[a]
Royalty payments:
The Company, in accordance with
a royalty agreement, is obligated to make minimum annual royalty
payments of $125,000 to a corporation which commented on January 1,
2001.
Under this agreement, the Company must pay to the corporation a certain
percentage of net sales of certain products, which percentages
are
defined in the agreement. The percentages are on a sliding scale depending
on
the amount of sales generated. Any minimum royalties paid will
be
credited against the amounts due based on the percentage of sales. The
royalty agreement terminates upon the expiration of the last-to-expire
issued patent.
In
April
2005, the Company paid $125,000 for the minimum amount due for 2005. The
amount
was recorded in prepaid expenses and will be mortized as the
Company records the royalty expense as defined in the agreement. Royalty
expense was $22,556 and $22,855, respectively, for the three months ended
March
31, 2005 and 2004.
[b]
Contractual obligations:
The Company leases
certain office facilities and office, lab and
factory
equipment under operating leases expiring through 2009. Certain leases
provide for payments of monthly operating expenses. The approximate future
minimum lease payments for 2005 are as follows:
We
currently lease space from IBM for approximately
$74,000
per month that houses our own equipment for OLED microdisplay fabrication
and for research and development plus additional space for assembly
and administrative offices. In 2004 we entered into
an amended
lease agreement which extends the term of this lease to May 31, 2009.
Statement
of Forward-Looking Information
This
report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934. These statements relate to future events or
our future financial performance. In some cases, you
can identify forward-looking statements by terminology
such
as "may," "will," "should," "expect," "plan," "anticipate,"
"believe," "estimate," "predict," "potential" or
"continue," the negative of such terms, or
other comparable terminology.
These statements are only predictions. Actual events
or results
may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements
as a
result of various important factors. Although we believe that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements
are
reasonable, such should not be regarded as a representation by the
Company, or any other person, that such forward-looking statements
will be achieved. The business and operations of the Company are
subject
to substantial risks, which increase the uncertainty inherent in the
forward-looking statements contained in this release. We undertake no duty
to
update any of the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. Readers are cautioned not
to
place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in
this
report.
Overview
We
design and manufacture miniature displays, which we refer
to
as OLED-on-silicon microdisplays, and microdisplay modules
for virtual
imaging, primarily for incorporation into the products of other
manufacturers. Microdisplays are typically smaller than many postage
stamps, but when viewed through a magnifier they can contain all of
the
information appearing on a high-resolution personal computer screen.
Our microdisplays use organic light emitting diodes, or OLEDs, which emit
light themselves when a current is passed through the device.
Our technology permits OLEDs to
be coated onto silicon chips to produce high
resolution
OLED-on-silicon microdisplays.
We
believe that our OLED-on-silicon microdisplays offer a number
of
advantages in near to the eye applications over other
current
microdisplay technologies,
including lower power requirements, less weight, fast
video speed without
flicker, and wider viewing angles.
In addition, many computer and video electronic
system functions can be built directly into
the OLED-on-silicon microdisplay, resulting in compact systems
with lower expected overall system costs relative to alternate microdisplay
technologies.
Since
our
inception in 1996, we derived the majority of our revenues
from fees
paid to us under research and development contracts,
primarily
with the U.S. federal government. We have
devoted significant resources to the development
and commercial launch of our products. We commenced limited
initial sales of our SVGA+ microdisplay in May 2001 and commenced shipping
samples of our SVGA-3D microdisplay in February 2002. As of March
31,
2005, we have recognized an aggregate of approximately $8.0 million
from
sales of our products, and have a backlog of more than
$28
million in products ordered for delivery through 2007. These
products
are being applied or considered for
near-eye and headset applications in products such
as entertainment and gaming headsets, handheld Internet and
telecommunication appliances, viewfinders, and wearable computers to be
manufactured by original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers.
In
addition to marketing OLED-on-silicon microdisplays as components, we also
offer
microdisplays as an integrated package, which we call Microviewer that includes
a compact lens for viewing the microdisplay and electronic interfaces to
convert
the signal from our customer's product into a viewable image on the
microdisplay. Through our operations in Washington State we are also developing
head-wearable displays that incorporate our Microviewer.
We
license our core OLED technology from Eastman Kodak and we have developed
our
own technology to create high performance OLED-on-silicon microdisplays and
related optical systems. We believe our technology licensing agreement with
Eastman Kodak, coupled with our own intellectual property portfolio, gives
us a
leadership position in OLED and OLED-on-silicon microdisplay technology.
We are
the only company to demonstrate publicly and market full-color OLED-on-silicon
microdisplays.
Company
History
Our
history has been as a developmental stage company. As of January 1, 2003,
we are
no longer a development stage Company. We have transitioned to manufacturing
our
product and intend to significantly increase
our marketing, sales, and research and development efforts,
and
expand our operating infrastructure. Most of our operating
expenses are fixed in the near term. If we are unable
to
generate significant revenues, our net losses
in any
given period could be greater than expected.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
Securities and Exchange Commission
("SEC") defines "critical accounting policies" as those
that
require application of management's most difficult, subjective
or
complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about
the
effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and
may
change in subsequent periods.
Not all
of
the accounting policies require management to make difficult,
subjective or complex judgments or estimates. However, the following
policies could be deemed to be critical within the SEC definition.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue on product sales is
recognized when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists, such as when a purchase order or contract
is
received from the customer, the price is fixed, title to the goods
has
changed and there is a reasonable assurance of collection of
the
sales proceeds. We obtain written purchase authorizations
from
our customers for a specified amount of product at
a specified price and consider delivery to
have occurred at the time of shipment.
Revenue is recognized at shipment and we record
a reserve for estimated sales returns, which is reflected
as
a reduction of revenue at the time of revenue recognition.
Revenues
from research and development activities relating to firm fixed-price
contracts are generally recognized on the percentage-of-completion
method of accounting as costs are incurred
(cost-to-cost basis). Revenues from research and
development activities relating to
cost-plus-fee contracts include costs incurred plus
a portion of
estimated fees or profits based on the relationship of costs incurred to
total estimated costs. Contract costs include all direct
material and labor costs and an allocation of allowable
indirect costs as defined by each contract, as periodically adjusted
to
reflect revised agreed upon rates. These rates are subject to audit
by the
other party.
Use
of estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure
of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements
as
well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. These estimates
and
assumptions relate to recording net revenue, collectibility of accounts
receivable, useful lives and impairment of tangible and intangible assets,
accruals, income taxes, inventory realization and other factors. Management
has
exercised reasonable judgment in deriving these estimates. Consequently,
a
change in conditions could affect these estimates.
Fair
value of financial instruments
The
Company's cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable
are
earned at cost which appropriates fair value due to the short-term nature
of
these instruments.
Results
of Operations
THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2005 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004
Revenues
Revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2005 were
$0.7
million, a 28% increase as compared to $0.5 million for the three
months
ended March 31, 2004. The increase was attributable to increased
unit
shipments of our microdisplays. Average selling price per unit decreased
to $332 from $434 as compared to the first quarter of 2004. This was due
to
quantity discounts.
Cost
of Goods Sold
Cost
of
goods sold includes direct and indirect costs associated with
production. Cost of goods sold for the three months ended March 31,
2005
was $2.0 million, as compared to $1.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2004. Gross loss for the
three
months ended March 31, 2005 was ($1.3) million, as compared
to
($0.8) million for the three months ended March 31, 2004. This
translates to a Gross Margin of (183%) and (152%) for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
We
currently record all expenses associated with manufacturing in Cost
of
Goods Sold. The full facility overhead as well as the expense of non-capitalized
raw materials is matched against our units sold. While our production volume
is
low, the Gross Margin reflects the costs that will
be
shared when quantities increase.
The
increased costs of goods sold is directly attributable to our preparation
for
increased production volumes. Expenses for the three months ended
March
31, 2005 reflect two full shifts of production and a partial third
shift. Expenses for the three months ended March
31, 2004 represented staff required to run a single shift at relatively
low
throughput. During the first quarter of 2005 we redesigned our processes
to support what we believe will be increased throughput of between 10-30
times
year ago levels. While these changes were being implemented, the
majority
of overhead and staff cost was directly expensed to cost of goods sold.
Operating
Expenses
Research
and Development. Research and development expenses included salaries,
development materials and other costs specifically allocated to the development
of new products. Gross research and development expenses
for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 was $0.9 million, as compared to
$8
thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
During
the second half of 2004 we initiated two new design projects that are projected
to yield future microdisplay products. To accommodate these efforts
our
costs for the three months ended March 31, 2005 reflect expanded staff size
and
outsourced design services as compared to the three months ended March 31,
2004.
Non-cash
Stock Based Compensation. Non-cash expenses related
to
stock-based compensation amortization for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 was $0 as
compared to
$84 thousand for the three months ending March 31, 2004. Non-cash
stock-based compensation costs are the result of amortization of
the intrinsic value ascribed for the issuance of stock options
at
below fair market values. The amortization is done over the vesting period
of
such options and was fully expensed during 2004.
Selling,
General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative
expenses consist principally of salaries and fees
for professional services, legal fees incurred in
connection with patent filings and related matters, as well
as other
marketing and administrative expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses, for the three months ended March 31,
2005
were $1.3 million, as compared to $0.6 million for the three months
ended
March 31, 2004. The $0.7 million increase was
primarily due
to an increase in staff and personnel costs. Company headcount increased
from 37 on March 31, 2004 to 79 on March 31, 2005.
Interest Income
(expense). Interest income (expense) for the three months ending March 31,
2005
was $18 thousand as compared to ($5.1) million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004. The ($5.1) million
decrease in interest expense for the three months
ended
March 31, 2005 was attributable to three factors recorded in 2004; (1) $3.18
million of non-cash charges related to the value of the warrants issued to
induce the holders of the $7.825 million in Notes to agree to an early
conversion of the Notes into common stock, (2) $1,598,325
in non-cash charges related to the remaining
unamortized debt discount and beneficial conversion
feature
associated with the aforementioned Notes, and (3) $74,637
in non-cash charges related to the write-off of the remaining
unamortized deferred financing costs.
Current
Financial Position
We
have
total liabilities and contractual obligations of $6,650,746 as of
March
31, 2005. These contractual obligations, along
with the
dates on which such payments are due, are described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
Year
|
|
|
More
Than
|
|
Contractual
Obligations |
|
|
Total
|
|
|
or
Less
|
|
|
One
Year
|
|
Operating
leases |
|
$ |
3,747 |
|
$ |
927 |
|
$ |
2,820 |
|
Royalties |
|
|
625 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
500 |
|
Capital
leases |
|
|
38 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
20 |
|
Total
contractual obligations |
|
$ |
4,410 |
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
$ |
3,340 |
|
We
currently anticipate that we will experience a significant increase in sales
if
we are successful in fulfilling product shipments to clients reflected in
our
backlog and if our new products meet with commercial success. As
a result
we anticipate that working capital to facilitate higher accounts receivable
and
inventories will be our most significant use of cash in 2005.
We anticipate that we will continue to experience moderate
growth in
our operating expenses for the foreseeable future as
well and
that our operating expenses will be one of the principal uses
of our
cash. In particular, we expect that salaries for employees
engaged in
production operations, purchase of inventory and expenses of
increased sales and marketing efforts should also be
a principle
uses of cash. We expect that our cash requirements over the next 12
months
will be met by a combination of cash on
hand, additional financing, exercising of outstanding
options and warrants, and revenues generated by operations.
We
have
received purchase agreements for approximately $28
million
for our products to be delivered now through early 2007.
Scheduled deliveries against our purchase
agreements and other customer requirements are subject
to
change depending on a number of factors including, our
production capacity, our customers' production timing
of
related systems into which they are integrating our products and their other
supplier schedules, changes in
the expected procurement periods for military programs and
the requirements of the individual agreements and contracts
that we
have with our customers. We currently are undergoing a ramp up in
our
supplies and staffing in order to be prepared to meet the currently
anticipated shipping schedules, which we anticipate will require significant
added effort.
Our
longer term cash requirements depend on numerous factors, including
completion of our product development activities, ability to
continue
to commercialize our products, timely market acceptance of our products and
our customers' products, and other factors.
We expect
to carefully devote capital resources to continue these
efforts.
EFFECT
OF
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
November 2004, the FASB issued FAS No. 151, "An amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter
4" This statement amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, "Inventory
Pricing", to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage). This Statement
requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless
of
whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal". In addition, this statement
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of
conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities.
The
statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005 with
early
adoption permitted. eMagin is currently evaluating the requirements and impact
of FAS No. 151, but at this point does not believe the adoption will have
a
material impact on its financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
FASB
Statement 123R (Revision 2004), "Share-Based Payment", was issued in December
2004 and is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 31,
2005.
The new statement requires all share-based payments to employees to be
recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The Company
currently accounts for its share-based payments to employees under the intrinsic
value method of accounting set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No.
25, "Accounting for Stock Issues to Employees". Additionally, the Company
complies with the stock-based employer compensation disclosure requirements
of
SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and
Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123". The Company will adopt
the
new statement in its financial statements for the quarter ending March 31,
2006.
Factors
Which May Affect Future Results
In evaluating our
business, prospective investors and shareholders should
carefully consider the risks factors, any of which could have a material
adverse
impact on our business, operating results and financial condition
and
result in a complete loss of your investment.
Risks
Related To Our Financial Results
WE
HAVE A HISTORY OF LOSSES SINCE OUR INCEPTION AND MAY INCUR LOSSES FOR THE
FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
Accumulated
losses excluding non-cash transactions as of March 31, 2005, were $51 million
and acquisition related non-cash transactions were $102 million, which resulted
in an accumulated deficit of $153 million, the majority of which was
related to the March 2000 merger and the subsequent write-down of our goodwill.
The non-cash losses were dominated by the amortization and write-down of
goodwill and purchased intangibles and write-down of acquired in process
research and development related to the March 2000 acquisition, and also
included some non-cash stock-based compensation. We have not yet achieved
profitability and we can give no assurances that we will achieve profitability
within the foreseeable future as we fund operating and capital expenditures
in
areas such as establishment and expansion of markets, sales and marketing,
operating equipment and research and development. We cannot assure investors
that we will ever achieve or sustain profitability or that our operating
losses
will not increase in the future.
WE
MAY NOT BE ABLE TO EXECUTE OUR BUSINESS PLAN AND MAY NOT GENERATE CASH FROM
OPERATIONS
In
the
event that cash flow from operations is less than anticipated and we are
unable
to secure additional funding to cover our expenses, in order to preserve
cash,
we would be required to reduce expenditures and effect reductions in our
corporate infrastructure, either of which could have a material adverse effect
on our ability to continue our current level of operations. To the extent
that
operating expenses increase or we need additional funds to make acquisitions,
develop new technologies or acquire strategic assets, the need for additional
funding may be accelerated and there can be no assurances that any such
additional funding can be obtained on terms acceptable to us, if at all.
If we
were not able to generate sufficient capital, either from operations or through
additional debt or equity financing, to fund our current operations, we would
be
forced to significantly reduce or delay our plans for continued research
and
development and expansion. This could significantly reduce the value of our
securities.
RISKS
RELATED TO MANUFACTURING
THE
MANUFACTURE OF OLED-ON-SILICON IS NEW AND OLED MICRODISPLAYS HAVE NOT BEEN
PRODUCED IN SIGNIFICANT QUANTITIES.
If
we are
unable to produce our products in sufficient quantity, we will be unable
to meet
our customers time requirements and would have difficulties in attracting
new
customers. In addition, we cannot assure you that once we commence volume
production we will attain yields at high throughput that will result in
profitable gross margins or that we will not experience manufacturing problems
which could result in delays in delivery of orders or product introductions.
WE
ARE DEPENDENT ON A SINGLE MANUFACTURING LINE.
We
initially expect to manufacture our products on a single manufacturing line.
If
we experience any significant disruption in the operation of our manufacturing
facility or a serious failure of a critical piece of equipment, we may be
unable
to supply microdisplays to our customers. For this reason, some OEMs may
also be
reluctant to commit a broad line of products to our microdisplays without
a
second production facility in place. Interruptions in our manufacturing could
be
caused by manufacturing equipment problems, the introduction of new equipment
into the manufacturing process or delays in the delivery of new manufacturing
equipment. Lead-time for delivery of manufacturing equipment can be extensive.
No assurance can be given that we will not lose potential sales or be unable
to
meet production orders due to production interruptions in our manufacturing
line. In order to meet the requirements of certain OEMs for multiple
manufacturing sites, we will have to expend capital to secure additional
sites
and may not be able to manage multiple sites successfully.
WE
EXPECT TO DEPEND ON SEMICONDUCTOR CONTRACT MANUFACTURERS TO SUPPLY OUR SILICON
INTEGRATED CIRCUITS AND OTHER SUPPLIERS OF KEY COMPONENTS, MATERIALS AND
SERVICES.
We
do not
manufacture the silicon integrated circuits on which we incorporate our OLED
technology. Instead, we expect to provide the design layouts to semiconductor
contract manufacturers who will manufacture the integrated circuits on silicon
wafers. We also expect to depend on suppliers of a variety of other components
and services, including circuit boards, graphic integrated circuits, passive
components, materials and chemicals, and equipment support. Our inability
to
obtain sufficient quantities of high quality silicon integrated circuits
or
other necessary components, materials or services on a timely basis could
result
in manufacturing delays, increased costs and ultimately in reduced or delayed
sales or lost orders which could materially and adversely affect our operating
results.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
We
rely
on our license agreement with Eastman Kodak for the development of our products,
and the termination of this license, Eastman Kodak's licensing of its OLED
technology to others for microdisplay applications, or the sublicensing by
Eastman Kodak of our OLED technology to third parties, could have a material
adverse impact on our business.
Our
principal products under development utilize OLED technology that we license
from Eastman Kodak. We rely upon Eastman Kodak to protect and enforce key
patents held by them, relating to OLED display technology. Eastman Kodak's
patents expire at various times in the future. Our license with Eastman Kodak
could terminate if we fail to perform any material term or covenant under
the
license agreement. Since our license from Eastman Kodak is non-exclusive,
Eastman Kodak could also elect to become a competitor itself or to license
OLED
technology for microdisplay applications to others who have the potential
to
compete with us. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material
adverse impact on our business.
WE
MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN PROTECTING OUR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND PROPRIETARY
RIGHTS.
We
rely
on a combination of patents, trade secret protection, licensing agreements
and
other arrangements to establish and protect our proprietary technologies.
If we
fail to successfully enforce our intellectual property rights, our competitive
position could suffer, which could harm our operating results. Patents may
not
be issued for our current patent applications, third parties may challenge,
invalidate or circumvent any patent issued to us, unauthorized parties could
obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary despite our efforts
to
protect our proprietary rights, rights granted under patents issued to us
may
not afford us any competitive advantage, others may independently develop
similar technology or design around our patents, our technology may be available
to licensees of Eastman Kodak, and protection of our intellectual property
rights may be limited in certain foreign countries. We may be required to
expend
significant resources to monitor and police our intellectual property rights.
Any future infringement or other claims or prosecutions related to our
intellectual property could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Any
such claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming to defend, result
in
costly litigation, divert management's attention and resources, or require
us to
enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing
agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us,
if at
all. Protection of intellectual property has historically been a large yearly
expense for eMagin. We have not been in a financial position to properly
protect
all of our intellectual property, and may not be in a position to properly
protect our position or stay ahead of competition in new research and the
protecting of the resulting intellectual property.
RISKS
RELATED TO THE MICRODISPLAY INDUSTRY
THE
COMMERCIAL SUCCESS OF THE MICRODISPLAY INDUSTRY DEPENDS ON THE WIDESPREAD
MARKET
ACCEPTANCE OF MICRODISPLAY SYSTEMS PRODUCTS.
The
market for microdisplays is emerging. Our success will depend on consumer
acceptance of microdisplays as well as the success of the commercialization
of
the microdisplay market. As an OEM supplier, our customer's products must
also
be well accepted. At present, it is difficult to assess or predict with any
assurance the potential size, timing and viability of market opportunities
for
our technology in this market. The viewfinder microdisplay market sector
is well
established with entrenched competitors with whom we must compete.
THE
MICRODISPLAY SYSTEMS BUSINESS IS INTENSELY COMPETITIVE.
We
do
business in intensely competitive markets that are characterized by rapid
technological change, changes in market requirements and competition from
both
other suppliers and our potential OEM customers. Such markets are typically
characterized by price erosion. This intense competition could result in
pricing
pressures, lower sales, reduced margins, and lower market share. Our ability
to
compete successfully will depend on a number of factors, both within and
outside
our control. We expect these factors to include the following:
|
·
|
our
success in designing, manufacturing and delivering expected new
products,
including those implementing new technologies on a timely basis;
|
|
|
|
·
|
our
ability to address the needs of our customers and the quality of
our
customer services;
|
|
|
|
·
|
the
quality, performance, reliability, features, ease of use and pricing
of
our products;
|
|
|
|
·
|
successful
expansion of our manufacturing capabilities;
|
|
|
|
·
|
our
efficiency of production, and ability to manufacture and ship products
on
time;
|
|
|
|
·
|
the
rate at which original equipment manufacturing customers incorporate
our
product solutions into their own products;
|
|
|
|
·
|
the
market acceptance of our customers' products; and
|
|
|
|
·
|
product
or technology introductions by our competitors.
|
|
|
Our
competitive position could be damaged if one or more potential OEM customers
decide to manufacture their own microdisplays, using OLED or alternate
technologies. In addition, our customers may be reluctant to rely on a
relatively small company such as eMagin for a critical component. We cannot
assure you that we will be able to compete successfully against current and
future competition, and the failure to do so would have a materially adverse
effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.
THE
DISPLAY INDUSTRY IS CYCLICAL.
The
display industry is characterized by
fabrication facilities that
require large capital expenditures and long lead
times
for supplies and the subsequent processing time, leading to
frequent mismatches between supply and demand. The OLED microdisplay
sector
may experience overcapacity if and when all of the facilities
presently in the planning stage come on line leading to a difficult
market in which to sell our products.
COMPETING
PRODUCTS MAY GET TO MARKET SOONER THAN OURS.
Our competitors are
investing substantial resources in the development and
manufacture of microdisplay systems using alternative
technologies such as reflective liquid crystal displays
(LCDs), LCD-on-Silicon ("LCOS") microdisplays, active
matrix
electroluminescence and scanning image systems, and transmissive active matrix
LCDs.
OUR
COMPETITORS HAVE MANY ADVANTAGES OVER US.
As
the microdisplay market develops, we expect to experience
intense competition from numerous domestic and foreign
companies including well-established corporations possessing worldwide
manufacturing and production facilities, greater name recognition,
larger retail bases and significantly greater
financial, technical, and marketing resources than us, as well
as from
emerging companies attempting to obtain a share of the various markets
in
which our microdisplay products have the potential to compete.
OUR
PRODUCTS ARE SUBJECT TO LENGTHY OEM DEVELOPMENT PERIODS.
We
plan
to sell most of our microdisplays and related products to OEMs who will
incorporate them into or with products they sell. OEMs determine during their
product development phase whether they will incorporate our products. The
time
elapsed between initial sampling of our products by OEMs, the custom design
of
our products to meet specific OEM product requirements, and the ultimate
incorporation of our products into OEM consumer products is significant.
If our
products fail to meet our OEM customers' cost, performance or technical
requirements or if unexpected technical challenges arise in the integration
of
our products into OEM consumer products, our operating results could be
significantly and adversely affected. Long delays in achieving customer
qualification and incorporation of our products could adversely affect our
business.
OU
R PRODUCTS WILL LIKELY EXPERIENCE RAPIDLY DECLINING UNIT PRICES.
In
the
markets in which we expect to compete, prices of established products tend
to
decline significantly over time. In order to maintain our profit margins
over
the long term, we anticipate that we will need to continuously develop
product enhancements and new technologies that will either slow price declines
of our products or reduce the cost of producing and delivering our products.
While we anticipate many opportunities to reduce production costs over time,
there can be no assurance that these cost reduction plans will be time, there
can be no assurance that these cost reduction plans will be successful. We
may
also attempt to offset the anticipated decrease in our average selling price
by
introducing new products, increasing our sales volumes or adjusting our product
mix. If we fail to do so, our results of operations would be materially and
adversely affected.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
OUR
SUCCESS DEPENDS ON ATTRACTING AND RETAINING HIGHLY SKILLED AND QUALIFIED
TECHNICAL AND CONSULTING PERSONNEL.
We
must
hire highly skilled technical personnel as employees and as independent
contractors in order to develop our products. The competition for skilled
technical employees is intense and we may not be able to retain or recruit
such
personnel. We must compete with companies that possess greater financial
and
other resources than we do, and that may be more attractive to potential
employees and contractors. To be competitive, we may have to increase the
compensation, bonuses, stock options and other fringe benefits offered to
employees in order to attract and retain such personnel. The costs of retaining
or attracting new personnel may have a materially adverse affect on our business
and our operating results. In addition, difficulties in hiring and retaining
technical personnel could delay the implementation of our business plan.
OUR
SUCCESS DEPENDS IN A LARGE PART ON THE CONTINUING SERVICE OF KEY PERSONNEL.
Changes
in management could have an adverse effect on our business. We are dependent
upon the active participation of several key management personnel, including
Gary W. Jones, our chief executive officer. We will also need to recruit
additional management in order to expand according to our business plan.
The
failure to attract and retain additional management or personnel could have
a
material adverse effect on our operating results and financial performance.
OUR
BUSINESS DEPENDS ON NEW PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES.
The
market for our products is characterized by rapid changes in product, design
and
manufacturing process technologies. Our success depends to a large extent
on our
ability to develop and manufacture new products and technologies to match
the
varying requirements of different customers in order to establish a competitive
position and become profitable. Furthermore, we must adopt our products and
processes to technological changes and emerging industry standards and practices
on a cost-effective and timely basis. Our failure to accomplish any of the
above
could harm our business and operating results.
WE
GENERALLY DO NOT HAVE LONG-TERM CONTRACTS WITH OUR CUSTOMERS.
Our
business is operated on the basis of short-term purchase orders and we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to obtain long-term contracts for some time.
Our
current purchase agreements can be cancelled or revised without penalty,
depending on the circumstances. In the absence of a backlog of orders that
can
only be canceled with penalty, we plan production on the basis of internally
generated forecasts of demand, which makes it difficult to accurately forecast
revenues. If we fail to accurately forecast operating results, our business
may
suffer and the value of your investment in the Company may decline.
OUR
BUSINESS STRATEGY MAY FAIL IF WE CANNOT CONTINUE TO FORM STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS
WITH COMPANIES THAT MANUFACTURE AND USE PRODUCTS THAT COULD INCORPORATE OUR
OLED-ON-SILICON TECHNOLOGY.
Our
prospects will be significantly affected by our ability to develop strategic
alliances with OEMs for incorporation of our OLED-on-silicon technology into
their products. While we intend to continue to establish strategic relationships
with manufacturers of electronic consumer products, personal computers,
chipmakers, lens makers, equipment makers, material suppliers and/or systems
assemblers, there is no assurance that we will be able to continue to establish
and maintain strategic relationships on commercially acceptable terms, or
that
the alliances we do enter in to will realize their objectives. Failure to
do so
would have a material adverse effect on our business.
OUR
BUSINESS DEPENDS TO SOME EXTENT ON INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS.
We
purchase needed materials from companies located abroad and may be adversely
affected by political and currency risk, as well as the additional costs
of
doing business with a foreign entity. Some customers in other countries have
longer receivable periods or warranty periods. In addition, many of the OEMs
that are the most likely long-term purchasers of our microdisplays are located
abroad exposing us to additional political and currency risk. We may find
it
necessary to locate manufacturing facilities abroad to be closer to our
customers which could expose us to additional risks, including management
of a multi-national organization, the complexities of complying with foreign
laws and customs, political instability and the complexities of taxation
in
multiple jurisdictions.
OUR
BUSINESS MAY EXPOSE US TO PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS.
Our
business may expose us to potential product liability claims. Although no
such
claims have been brought against us to date, and to our knowledge no such
claim
is threatened or likely, we may face liability to product users for damages
resulting from the faulty design or manufacture of our products. While we
plan
to maintain product liability insurance coverage, there can be no assurance
that
product liability claims will not exceed coverage limits, fall outside the
scope
of such coverage, or that such insurance will continue to be available at
commercially reasonable rates, if at all.
OUR
BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND POSSIBLE LIABILITY ARISING
FROM POTENTIAL EMPLOYEE CLAIMS OF EXPOSURE TO HARMFUL SUBSTANCES USED IN
THE
DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURE OF OUR PRODUCTS.
We
are
subject to various governmental regulations related to toxic, volatile,
experimental and other hazardous chemicals used in our design and manufacturing
process. Our failure to comply with these regulations could result in the
imposition of fines or in the suspension or cessation of our operations.
Compliance with these regulations could require us to acquire costly equipment
or to incur other significant expenses. We develop, evaluate and utilize
new
chemical compounds in the manufacture of our products. While we attempt to
ensure that our employees are protected from exposure to hazardous materials,
we
cannot assure you that potentially harmful exposure will not occur or that
we
will not be liable to employees as a result.
RISKS
RELATED TO OUR STOCK
THE SUBSTANTIAL NUMBER
OF SHARES THAT ARE OR WILL BE ELIGIBLE FOR SALE COULD CAUSE
OUR COMMON
STOCK PRICE TO DECLINE EVEN IF THE COMPANY IS SUCCESSFUL.
Sales
of
significant amounts of common stock in the public market, or the perception
that
such sales may occur, could materially affect the market price
of our
common stock. These sales might also make it more difficult for us
to sell
equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price
that
we deem appropriate. As of April 30, 2005, we have outstanding
(i)
options to purchase 15,252,688 shares; and (ii) warrants to
purchase 18,273,439 shares of common stock.
WE
HAVE A STAGGERED BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND OTHER ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS, WHICH
COULD INHIBIT POTENTIAL INVESTORS OR DELAY OR PREVENT A CHANGE OF CONTROL
THAT
MAY FAVOR YOU.
Our
Board
of Directors is divided into three classes and our Board members are elected
for
terms that are staggered. This could discourage the efforts by others to
obtain
control of the company. Some of the provisions of our certificate of
incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law could, together or separately,
discourage potential acquisition proposals or delay or prevent a change in
control. In particular, our board of directors is authorized to issue up
to
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock (less any outstanding shares of preferred
stock) with rights and privileges that might be senior to our common stock,
without the consent of the holders of the common stock.
We
did
not have material exposure to market risk from derivatives or other financial
instruments as of March 31, 2005, and we do not expect any significant effect
on
our results of operations from interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations.
(a)
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period
covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision
and
with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon this evaluation, our
chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required
to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified
in the Commission's rules and forms.
(b)
Changes in internal controls. There was no change in our internal controls
or in
other factors that could affect these controls during our last fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
The
company is party to certain legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course
of
business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of such legal matters
will
not have a material adverse effect on the company's results of operations
or
financial position.
None.
None
None.
None.
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Section 302
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Sarbanes Oxley Section 302
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350
|
|
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
EMAGIN
CORPORATION
|
|
Date: November
2, 2005
|
By:
|
/s/ Gary
Jones
Gary
Jones
|
|
|
CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER,
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November
2, 2005
|
By:
|
/s/ John
Atherly
John
Atherly
|
|
|
|
|