TW-2014.3.31-10Q


 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
___________________________________________________
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
OR
¨
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission File Number: 001-34594
___________________________________________________
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
___________________________________________________
Delaware
 
27-0676603
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
875 Third Avenue
New York, NY
 
10022
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(zip code)
(212) 725-7550
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 
___________________________________________________
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
x
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer
¨  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
As of April 30, 2014, there were 70,299,510 outstanding shares of Class A Common Stock at a par value of $0.01 per share.
 

TOWERS WATSON & CO.
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q
For the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2014
 




 
Page
Certifications
 





PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Revenue
$
904,833

 
$
892,977

 
$
2,602,927

 
$
2,597,233

Costs of providing services:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Salaries and employee benefits
547,385

 
542,271

 
1,574,535

 
1,590,530

Professional and subcontracted services
57,729

 
62,908

 
188,203

 
189,751

Occupancy
33,961

 
34,666

 
102,288

 
107,116

General and administrative expenses
82,844

 
76,381

 
236,651

 
233,163

Depreciation and amortization
44,250

 
43,166

 
130,931

 
130,970

Transaction and integration expenses
241

 
12,328

 
1,049

 
30,753

 
766,410

 
771,720

 
2,233,657

 
2,282,283

Income from operations
138,423

 
121,257

 
369,270

 
314,950

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loss from affiliates

 

 

 
(56
)
Interest income
758

 
613

 
1,847

 
2,118

Interest expense
(2,090
)
 
(3,483
)
 
(6,553
)
 
(10,043
)
Other non-operating income
4,053

 
12

 
9,743

 
5,060

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
141,144

 
118,399

 
374,307

 
312,029

Provision for income taxes
39,231

 
35,254

 
96,322

 
99,649

INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
101,913

 
83,145

 
277,985

 
212,380

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax of $175, $6,621, $41,012, and $11,158, respectively
3,939

 
11,700

 
5,980

 
20,858

NET INCOME BEFORE NON-CONTROLLING INTERESTS
105,852

 
94,845

 
283,965

 
233,238

Less: Income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests
3,346

 
(71
)
 
7,057

 
(2,695
)
NET INCOME (attributable to common stockholders)
$
102,506

 
$
94,916

 
$
276,908

 
$
235,933

Basic earnings per share (attributable to common stockholders):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
1.40

 
$
1.18

 
$
3.83

 
$
3.03

Income from discontinued operations
0.06

 
0.17

 
0.09

 
0.29

Net income
$
1.46

 
$
1.35

 
$
3.92

 
$
3.32

Diluted earnings per share (attributable to common stockholders):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income from continuing operations
$
1.39

 
$
1.17

 
$
3.81

 
$
3.00

Income from discontinued operations
0.06

 
0.17

 
0.09

 
0.29

Net income
$
1.45

 
$
1.34

 
$
3.90

 
$
3.29

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average shares of common stock, basic (000)
70,447

 
70,530

 
70,685

 
71,094

Weighted average shares of common stock, diluted (000)
70,884

 
71,076

 
71,047

 
71,639

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

1



TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Net income before non-controlling interests
$
105,852

 
$
94,845

 
$
283,965

 
$
233,238

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign currency translation
(797
)
 
(96,135
)
 
87,938

 
(47,412
)
Defined pension and post-retirement benefit costs
2,806

 
(4,137
)
 
9,337

 
(21,260
)
Hedge effectiveness
292

 
546

 
(738
)
 
(250
)
Available-for-sale securities
(483
)
 
93

 
(261
)
 
149

Other comprehensive income/(loss) before non-controlling interests
1,818

 
(99,633
)
 
96,276

 
(68,773
)
Comprehensive income before non-controlling interests
107,670

 
(4,788
)
 
380,241

 
164,465

Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to non-controlling interest
3,325

 
(1,316
)
 
6,422

 
(3,072
)
Comprehensive income/(loss) (attributable to common stockholders)
$
104,345

 
$
(3,472
)
 
$
373,819

 
$
167,537

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements


2



TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
(Unaudited)
 
 
March 31,
2014
 
June 30,
2013
Assets
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
636,960

 
$
532,805

Fiduciary assets
10,651

 
148,414

Short-term investments
28,455

 
56,645

Receivables from clients:
 
 
 
Billed, net of allowances of $10,528 and $12,768
492,353

 
519,580

Unbilled, at estimated net realizable value
322,714

 
306,258

 
815,067

 
825,838

Other current assets
131,700

 
148,519

Total current assets
1,622,833

 
1,712,221

Fixed assets, net
362,317

 
346,915

Deferred income taxes
77,537

 
86,313

Goodwill
2,284,097

 
2,218,935

Intangible assets, net
671,178

 
687,758

Other assets
324,707

 
279,935

Total Assets
$
5,342,669

 
$
5,332,077

Liabilities
 
 
 
Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred income
$
349,602

 
$
351,648

Employee-related liabilities
448,548

 
560,831

Fiduciary liabilities
10,651

 
148,414

Term loan - current
25,000

 
25,000

Other current liabilities
65,891

 
26,980

Total current liabilities
899,692

 
1,112,873

Revolving credit facility

 

Term loan
206,250

 
225,000

Accrued retirement benefits and other employee-related liabilities
667,985

 
771,429

Professional liability claims reserve
261,126

 
251,191

Other noncurrent liabilities
270,528

 
226,750

Total Liabilities
2,305,581

 
2,587,243

Commitments and contingencies

 

Stockholders’ Equity
 
 
 
Class A Common Stock — $0.01 par value: 300,000,000 shares authorized; 74,552,661 and 69,178,097 issued and 70,371,311 and 65,341,759 outstanding
746

 
692

Class B Common Stock — $0.01 par value: 93,500,000 shares authorized; 0 and 5,374,070 issued and outstanding

 
54

Additional paid-in capital
1,854,733

 
1,850,448

Treasury stock, at cost — 4,181,350 and 3,836,338 shares
(280,416
)
 
(221,643
)
Retained earnings
1,650,410

 
1,394,407

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(202,553
)
 
(299,464
)
Total Stockholders’ Equity
3,022,920

 
2,724,494

Non-controlling interest
14,168

 
20,340

Total Equity
3,037,088

 
2,744,834

Total Liabilities and Total Equity
$
5,342,669

 
$
5,332,077

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

3



TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands of U.S. dollars)
(Unaudited)
 
Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
Net income before non-controlling interests
$
283,965

 
$
233,238

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities:
 
 
 
Provision for doubtful receivables from clients
4,241

 
8,204

Depreciation
73,967

 
73,762

Amortization of intangible assets
57,402

 
59,287

Gain on sale of discontinued operations, pretax
(23,631
)
 

Provision for deferred income taxes
64,052

 
39,120

Stock-based compensation
16,045

 
24,203

Other, net
(3,743
)
 
(2,333
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
 
 
 
Receivables from clients
16,846

 
112

Fiduciary assets
113,017

 
(6,796
)
Other current assets
1,016

 
(10,053
)
Other noncurrent assets
(6,432
)
 
1,260

Accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred income
(34,948
)
 
(8,706
)
Employee-related liabilities
(128,510
)
 
(40,326
)
Fiduciary liabilities
(113,017
)
 
6,796

Accrued retirement benefits and other employee-related liabilities
(113,690
)
 
(118,029
)
Professional liability claims reserves
9,418

 
(4,997
)
Other current liabilities
(607
)
 
(223
)
Other noncurrent liabilities
(14,141
)
 
1,508

Income tax related accounts
21,501

 
30,484

Cash flows from operating activities
$
222,751

 
$
286,511

Cash flows used in investing activities:
 
 
 
Cash paid for business acquisitions
$
(210,814
)
 
$
(5,678
)
Cash transferred with discontinued operations
(25,066
)
 

Proceeds from discontinued operations
256,953

 
4,285

Cash acquired from business acquisitions
3,949

 
636

Fixed assets and software for internal use
(50,825
)
 
(66,626
)
Purchases of investments of consolidated variable interest entity
(109,510
)
 

Capitalized software costs
(36,596
)
 
(41,768
)
Purchases of held-to-maturity securities
(14,994
)
 

Purchases of available-for-sale securities
(44,891
)
 
(18,188
)
Sales and redemptions of available-for-sale securities
74,246

 
36,258

Cash flows used in investing activities
$
(157,548
)
 
$
(91,081
)
Cash flows from/(used in) financing activities:
 
 
 
Borrowings under credit facility
$
220,600

 
$
391,600

Repayments under credit facility
(220,600
)
 
(464,600
)
Repayments of notes payable
(18,750
)
 

Cash received from consolidated variable interest entity
109,510

 

Contingent retention liability
21,746

 

Cash paid on retention liabilities
(1,939
)
 

Dividends paid
(11,165
)
 
(48,147
)
Repurchases of common stock
(74,506
)
 
(41,596
)
Payroll tax payments on vested shares
(7,457
)
 
(24,879
)
Excess tax benefit
9,800

 

Cash flows from/(used in) financing activities
$
27,239

 
$
(187,622
)
Effect of exchange rates on cash
$
11,713

 
$
(13,296
)
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
104,155

 
(5,488
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
532,805

 
478,179

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
$
636,960

 
$
472,691





4




Supplemental disclosures:
 
 
 
Cash paid for interest
$
2,831

 
$
6,278

Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds
$
45,414

 
$
43,398

Transfers into consolidated investment funds
$
223,212

 
$

Deconsolidation of investment funds (see Note 9)
$
339,019

 
$

See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

5



TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands of U.S. Dollars and numbers of shares in thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Class A
Common
Stock
Outstanding
 
Class A
Common
Stock
 
Class B
Common
Stock
Outstanding
 
Class B
Common
Stock
 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Treasury
Stock, at
Cost
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss)/Income
 
Non-
Controlling
Interest
 
Total
Balance as of June 30, 2012
63,522

 
$
635

 
11,036

 
$
110

 
$
1,833,799

 
$
(168,901
)
 
$
1,117,622

 
$
(350,745
)
 
$
24,797

 
$
2,457,317

Net income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 
235,933

 

 
(2,695
)
 
233,238

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(68,396
)
 
(377
)
 
(68,773
)
Repurchases of common stock

 

 

 

 

 
(46,618
)
 

 

 

 
(46,618
)
Shares received for employee taxes upon vesting of restricted stock units
(429
)
 
(4
)
 

 

 

 
(24,875
)
 

 

 

 
(24,879
)
Exercises of stock options

 

 

 

 
(5,560
)
 
6,378

 

 

 

 
818

Vesting of restricted stock units
(89
)
 

 

 

 
(30,570
)
 
31,492

 

 

 

 
922

Class A Common Stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 
(42,023
)
 

 

 
(42,023
)
Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 
24,203

 

 

 

 

 
24,203

Acceleration of Class B shares to Class A shares
5,661

 
56

 
(5,662
)
 
(56
)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of March 31, 2013
68,665

 
$
687

 
5,374

 
$
54

 
$
1,821,872

 
$
(202,524
)
 
$
1,311,532

 
$
(419,141
)
 
$
21,725

 
$
2,534,205

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of June 30, 2013
69,178

 
$
692

 
5,374

 
$
54

 
$
1,850,448

 
$
(221,643
)
 
$
1,394,407

 
$
(299,464
)
 
$
20,340

 
$
2,744,834

Net income

 

 

 

 

 

 
276,908

 

 
7,057

 
283,965

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
96,911

 
(635
)
 
96,276

Repurchases of common stock

 

 

 

 

 
(74,506
)
 

 
 
 

 
(74,506
)
Shares received for employee taxes upon vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

 

 

 
(7,457
)
 

 

 

 
(7,457
)
Exercises of stock options

 

 

 

 
(4,380
)
 
5,064

 

 

 

 
684

Vesting of restricted stock units

 

 

 

 
(24,934
)
 
18,126

 

 

 

 
(6,808
)
Acquisitions

 

 

 

 
6,717

 

 

 

 
(6,297
)
 
420

Redeemable non-controlling interest from consolidated variable interest entity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
332,722

 
332,722

Deconsolidation of redeemable non-controlling interest from variable interest entity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
(339,019
)
 
(339,019
)
Class A Common Stock:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Cash dividends declared

 

 

 

 

 

 
(20,905
)
 

 

 
(20,905
)
Excess tax benefits

 

 

 

 
9,800

 

 

 

 

 
9,800

Stock-based compensation

 

 

 

 
17,082

 

 

 

 

 
17,082

Conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares
5,374

 
54

 
(5,374
)
 
(54
)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of March 31, 2014
74,552

 
$
746

 

 
$

 
$
1,854,733

 
$
(280,416
)
 
$
1,650,410

 
$
(202,553
)
 
$
14,168

 
$
3,037,088


See accompanying notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

6



TOWERS WATSON & CO.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular amounts are in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Organization and Basis of Presentation.
The accompanying unaudited quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements of Towers Watson & Co. (“Towers Watson”, the “Company” or “we”) and our subsidiaries are presented in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In the opinion of management, these condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements and results for the interim periods. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read together with the Towers Watson audited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, which was filed with the SEC on August 15, 2013, and may be accessed via EDGAR on the SEC’s web site at www.sec.gov. Balance sheet data as of June 30, 2013 was derived from Towers Watson’s audited financial statements.
Towers Watson was formed on January 1, 2010, upon the merger (the “Merger”) of Watson Wyatt Worldwide, Inc. (“Watson Wyatt”) and Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. (“Towers Perrin”).
Our fiscal year 2014 began July 1, 2013 and ends June 30, 2014.
The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, 2014. The results reflect certain estimates and assumptions made by management including those estimates used in calculating acquisition consideration and fair value of tangible and intangible assets and liabilities, professional liability claims, estimated bonuses, valuation of billed and unbilled receivables, and anticipated tax liabilities that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes.
As discussed further in Note 2Acquisitions and Divestitures, we have classified the operating results of our reinsurance and property and casualty insurance brokerage business as discontinued operations for all periods presented in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. This business was sold in November 2013.
Note 2 — Acquisitions and Divestitures.
Acquisition
There was one acquisition in the nine months ended March 31, 2014, which was not material for the purposes of financial statement disclosures as required by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805. Our acquisition information is included to provide our investors with a better understanding of our strategic acquisitions.
Liazon Corporation Acquisition
On November 22, 2013, Towers Watson purchased Liazon Corporation (“Liazon”), a leader in developing and delivering private benefit exchanges for active employees, for $203.2 million in cash and assumed equity awards valued at $8.0 million. See Note 12 for further information on the assumed stock options. The Liazon business became a new line of business, which complements our existing OneExchange offerings under the Exchange Solutions segment. Together these solutions help organizations, both large and small, deliver self- and fully-insured benefits to both employees as well as pre- and post-65 retirees. We included the results of Liazon's operations since the acquisition date in the Exchange Solutions segment and in our condensed consolidated financial statements.
During the second and third quarters of fiscal 2014, we recorded the tangible assets received, liabilities assumed, and the preliminary fair value of intangibles. The intangibles included developed technology, valued at $34.3 million, and other intangibles that were collectively immaterial. Our estimate of fair value for the technology intangible was developed using the multi-period excess earnings method valuation model. Significant assumptions used in the valuation were estimated revenues and expenses, contributory asset charges, required rates of return, and discount rates. Based on the fair value of these intangibles, we also recorded a net deferred tax liability of $0.7 million. It was determined that total consideration was $211.2 million, and we recorded $174.0 million of goodwill related to the acquisition of Liazon.

7



Divestitures
Sale of our Brokerage business.
On September 19, 2013, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell our Reinsurance and Property and Casualty Insurance Brokerage (“Brokerage”) business to Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group plc (“JLT”) for cash consideration of $250 million. The Brokerage business was a component of our Risk and Financial Services segment. The sale closed during our second quarter of fiscal year 2014. We divested this business as part of our strategy to focus on the businesses where we are market leaders. We continue to focus on risk consulting, software and other services for the insurance industry. The business will be branded for a transitional period of 15 months from the closing date as JLT Towers Re.
As part of the transaction, we entered into an Alliance Agreement with JLT that will ensure clients have continued access to our risk consulting and software services. This agreement will also provide JLT Towers Re with continued use of Towers Watson’s proprietary actuarial models and software.
The Company assessed the guidance under ASC 205 to determine if the Alliance Agreement or any other terms of the sale agreement constituted significant continuing direct cash flows or significant continuing involvement with the Brokerage business after the sale. The Company compared the cash flows expected to be recognized from the Brokerage business as a result of the continuation or migration of activities after the disposal transaction to the projected generation of cash flows by the Brokerage business that we could have expected absent the disposal transaction. Based on this analysis, the expected annual cash inflows or outflows related to the portion of revenues shared or commissions received or paid and software sales under the Alliance Agreement are each expected to represent approximately 1% or less of the annual revenues generated by our Brokerage business operations prior to the disposal. This was deemed not significant.
The Company also calculated the expected cash flows associated with the placement of its insurance and reinsurance arrangements. The Company agreed to use JLT as its broker-of-record for all insurance and reinsurance transactions to which the Company’s wholly-owned captive insurance company, Stone Mountain Insurance Company, is a party for the next five years. These amounts were previously eliminated as intercompany transactions, and are $2.8 million for fiscal year 2014. Additionally, the Company agreed to a Transitional Services Agreement with JLT for a two-year period ending November 5, 2015. The Company expects to incur approximately $6.3 million each year in occupancy or other infrastructure costs, which were prepaid as part of deal consideration or will be repaid by JLT over the next two years. The cash flows associated with these arrangements represent approximately 7.4% of the annual expenses generated by our Brokerage operations prior to the disposal, which was deemed not significant.
The Company noted that none of the aforementioned agreements or arrangements constituted significant continuing involvement because they do not afford the Company the ability to influence the financial or operating decisions of JLT. Accordingly, we concluded that the continuing cash flows expected after the sale of our Brokerage business do not preclude discontinued operations presentation, and the Company has therefore reclassified the results of our Brokerage business’s operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. The following selected financial information relates to the Brokerage business’s operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:
 
 
Three Months Ended 
 March 31,
 
Nine Months Ended 
 March 31,
 
2014
 
2013
 
2014
 
2013
Revenue from discontinued operations
$

 
$
47,990

 
$
63,762

 
$
124,227

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(Loss)/income from discontinued operations before taxes
(1,037
)
 
18,321

 
23,361

 
32,016

Tax expense on discontinued operations
188

 
6,621

 
8,989

 
11,158

Net (loss)/income from discontinued operations
(1,225
)
 
11,700

 
14,372

 
20,858

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gain from sale of discontinued operations
5,151

 

 
23,631

 

Tax (credit)/expense on gain from sale of discontinued operations
(13
)
 

 
32,023

 

Net income/(loss) from sale of discontinued operations
5,164

 

 
(8,392
)
 

Total net income from discontinued operations
$
3,939

 
$
11,700

 
$
5,980

 
$
20,858


8



Only the fiduciary assets and liabilities associated with the European businesses were sold. North American fiduciary assets and liabilities have not been disposed of due to certain legal restrictions which do not permit the transfer of these assets and liabilities.
In addition to the stated $250 million cash consideration stipulated in the sale agreement, a preliminary purchase price adjustment of $28.7 million was paid to the Company by JLT representing the preliminary value of net assets transferred in the sale. The completion accounts and this purchase price adjustment were finalized during the Company’s third fiscal quarter and an additional $2.7 million is expected to be received during the fourth fiscal quarter.
As part of the sale, the Company agreed to repay JLT for retention payments made to certain employees of Brokerage if they remain with the business on the 30-day anniversary of the sale and the first and second anniversary of the sale. The value ascribed to this portion of the obligation is $21.7 million at the time of the sale. The remaining liability at March 31, 2014 is carried at fair value on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets (see Note 5Fair Value Measurements). The total amount has been classified as current or non-current liabilities based on the expected payment dates.
The obligation for retention payments and certain other negotiated terms reduced total consideration received at close to $215.1 million. Total transaction and integration costs were approximately $6.4 million. We finalized the completion accounts and the purchase price adjustments during the third quarter of fiscal 2014. Our final pre-tax gain on the sale is $23.6 million. The sale of our Brokerage business resulted in a significant taxable gain since the disposal of the goodwill and intangible assets associated with the business is not deductible for tax.
Note 3 — Investments.
We hold available-for-sale investments comprised of fixed income securities, equity securities and mutual funds / exchange-traded funds. We also hold held-to-maturity investments comprised of fixed income securities. See Note 5Fair Value Measurements for the investments by type of security. The fixed income securities all mature within twelve months of the balance sheet date and are classified as short-term investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. We held no material trading securities as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013.
Additional information on available-for-sale security balances is provided in the following table as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013:
 
 
As of March 31, 2014
 
As of June 30, 2013
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair Value
 
Amortized
Cost
 
Unrealized
Gains
 
Unrealized
Losses
 
Estimated
Fair Value
Fixed income securities (a)
$
14,992

 
$
2

 
$

 
$
14,994

 
$
56,602

 
$
15

 
$
(2
)
 
$
56,615

Equity securities (a)
114

 
16

 
(3
)
 
127

 
853

 
476

 
(1
)
 
1,328

Mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (b)
47,912

 
1,641

 

 
49,553

 
26,666

 
14

 
(97
)
 
26,583

(a)
As of March 31, 2014, all fixed income securities are classified as held-to-maturity and are reflected as short-term investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of June 30, 2013, all fixed income securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reflected as short-term investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Certain liquid short-term investments, such as term deposits and certificates of deposits, are classified as short-term investments on the balance sheet but are not available-for-sale or held-to-maturity investments and therefore, are not included in the table above.
(b)
Reflected as short-term investments or other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013.
For all investments, other than fixed income securities, amortized cost represents the cost basis of the investment as of the purchase or Merger date. Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments of available-for-sale securities during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 were $59.3 million, resulting in realized gains of $0.8 million that is reflected as income from discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated statement of operations. For the nine months ended March 31, 2014, $1.6 million of these proceeds related to the sale of investments as part of the divestiture of our Brokerage business. Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments of available-for-sale securities during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 were $34.7 million, resulting in no realized gains/losses. There were no proceeds from sales and maturities of held-to-maturity securities during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013.

9



There were no material investments that have been in a continuous loss position for more than six months, and there have been no other-than-temporary impairments recognized. There were no material investments with unrealized losses as of March 31, 2014. The aggregate fair value of investments with unrealized losses as of June 30, 2013 was $36.3 million.
Note 4 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets.
The components of goodwill and intangible assets are outlined below for the nine months ended March 31, 2014:
 
 
Benefits
 
Risk and
Financial
Services
 
Talent and
Rewards
 
Exchange
Solutions
 
All Other
 
Total
Balance as of June 30, 2013
$
1,233,272

 
$
534,150

 
$
108,850

 
$
341,449

 
$
1,214

 
$
2,218,935

Goodwill related to acquisitions

 

 

 
173,968

 

 
173,968

Goodwill related to disposals

 
(167,822
)
 

 

 

 
(167,822
)
Translation adjustment
38,260

 
17,647

 
3,109

 

 

 
59,016

Balance as of March 31, 2014
$
1,271,532

 
$
383,975

 
$
111,959

 
$
515,417

 
$
1,214

 
$
2,284,097

Included in the Risk and Financial Services activity is a $167.8 million reduction in goodwill related to the disposal of our Brokerage business, which was completed on November 6, 2013. See Note 2 for additional information regarding the sale of this business.
Included in the Exchange Solutions goodwill acquired is $174.0 million of goodwill related to the acquisition of Liazon, which closed on November 22, 2013. We recorded the consideration less the tangible assets and liabilities as goodwill as of March 31, 2014. See Note 2 for additional information regarding this acquisition.
The following table reflects changes in the net carrying amount of the components of finite-lived intangible assets for the nine months ended March 31, 2014:
 
 
Customer
related
intangible
 
Core/
developed
technology
 
Favorable
lease
agreements
 
Trademarks & trade names
 
Total
Balance as of June 30, 2013
$
246,247

 
$
69,515

 
$
3,565

 
$

 
$
319,327

Intangibles acquired
600

 
34,300

 

 
150

 
35,050

Intangibles related to disposal
(8,254
)
 

 

 

 
(8,254
)
Amortization
(35,106
)
 
(22,146
)
 
(710
)
 
(150
)
 
(58,112
)
Translation adjustment
5,187

 
715

 
(16
)
 

 
5,886

Balance as of March 31, 2014
$
208,674

 
$
82,384

 
$
2,839

 
$

 
$
293,897


For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014, we recorded $19.4 million and $57.4 million, respectively, of amortization related to our intangible assets, exclusive of favorable lease agreements. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013, we recorded $19.4 million and $59.3 million, respectively, of amortization related to our intangible assets. These amounts include amortization that has been classified within income from discontinued operations on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Included in the change in customer related intangible assets is the reduction of $8.3 million associated with the sale of our Brokerage business, which closed on November 6, 2013.

As part of the integration of our Retirement business, during the second quarter of fiscal 2012, management decided to discontinue the use of an application that was acquired in the Merger with an expected useful life of ten years. We calculated no impairment associated with this application and we shortened the life of the intangible asset and accelerated the amortization in the same pattern in which our clients are transitioned to the surviving application, which is expected to occur predominantly over the next two to three years. To develop our estimated useful remaining life of the application, we are using client engagement revenue and the planned transition developed by our business management. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014, we recorded $0.4 million and $1.7 million, respectively, of additional amortization expense and $3.8 million and $6.3 million of additional amortization expense for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013, respectively.

10




Our indefinite-lived non-amortizable intangible assets consist of acquired trade names. The carrying value of these assets were $377.3 million and $368.4 million as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. The change during the period was due to foreign currency translation.

Our acquired unfavorable lease liabilities were $11.0 million and $13.5 million as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively, and are recorded in the other noncurrent liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The change for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 was comprised of a reduction to rent expense of $2.5 million.

The following table reflects the carrying value of finite-lived intangible assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013:
 
 
As of March 31, 2014

As of June 30, 2013

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization
Finite-lived intangible assets and liabilities:








Trade name
$
520

 
$
520

 
$
370

 
$
370

Customer related intangibles
387,223

 
178,549

 
390,027

 
143,780

Core/developed technology
175,566

 
93,182

 
164,762

 
95,247

Favorable lease agreements
6,453

 
3,614

 
6,496

 
2,931

Total finite-lived intangible assets
$
569,762


$
275,865


$
561,655


$
242,328

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Unfavorable lease agreements
25,982

 
14,947

 
25,591

 
12,122

Total finite-lived intangible liabilities
$
25,982


$
14,947


$
25,591


$
12,122

Certain trademark and trade-name intangible assets have indefinite useful lives and are not amortized. The weighted average remaining life of amortizable intangible assets and liabilities at March 31, 2014 was 5.3 years.
The following table reflects:
1) future estimated amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets consisting of customer related intangibles and core/developed technology, and
2) the rent offset resulting from the amortization of the net lease intangible assets and liabilities for the remainder of fiscal 2014 and for subsequent fiscal years:
 
Fiscal year ending June 30,
Amortization

Rent (Offset)
Expense
2014
$
17,937

 
$
(575
)
2015
67,783

 
(2,027
)
2016
57,714

 
(1,567
)
2017
53,379

 
(1,864
)
2018
42,967

 
(1,981
)
Thereafter
51,278

 
(182
)
Total
$
291,058


$
(8,196
)
Note 5 — Fair Value Measurements.
We have categorized our financial instruments into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). In some cases, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such

11



cases, for disclosure purposes, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.
Financial assets and liabilities recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized based on the inputs in the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity can access at the measurement date.
Level 2 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3 — Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The following presents our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013:
 
 
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis at
March 31, 2014
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Corporate bonds (a)
$

 
$
14,994

 
$

 
$
14,994

Equity securities (a)
127

 

 

 
127

Mutual funds / exchange traded funds (b)
49,553

 

 

 
49,553

Derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forwards (c)

 
417

 

 
417

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forwards (c)
$

 
$
1,183

 
$

 
$
1,183

Contingent Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Retention bonus liability (d)

 

 
19,807

 
19,807

 
 
Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis at
June 30, 2013
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Total
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Available-for-sale securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. treasury securities and obligations of the U.S government, government agencies and authorities (a)
$
2,014

 
$

 
$

 
$
2,014

U.S. Corporate bonds (a)

 
53,100

 

 
53,100

Foreign corporate bonds (a)

 
1,501

 

 
1,501

Equity securities (a)
1,328

 

 

 
1,328

Mutual funds / exchange-traded funds (b)
26,583

 

 

 
26,583

Derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forwards (c)

 
546

 

 
546

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Derivatives:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forwards (c)
$

 
$
353

 
$

 
$
353

_________________________
(a)
These assets are included in short-term investments on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.
(b)
These assets are included in short-term investments or other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

12



(c)
These derivative investments are included in other current assets or accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred income on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. See Note 6 for further information on our derivative investments.
(d)
These liabilities are included in other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The fair value was determined using a discounted cash flow model. There have been no material changes in the fair value of this liability subsequent to initial recognition.
We record gains or losses related to the changes in the fair value of our financial instruments for foreign exchange forward contracts accounted for as foreign currency hedges in general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014, we recorded gains of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for instruments still held at March 31, 2014. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013, we recorded losses of $1.5 million and $1.5 million for instruments still held at March 31, 2013, respectively. There were no material gains or losses recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for available-for-sale securities still held at March 31, 2014 or 2013.
To determine the fair value of our derivative positions, we use valuations from the counterparty of each hedge. This is a Level 2 valuation based on observable rates in the market. Counterparties use proprietary models to calculate values and are not actual quotes that could be used to terminate the contracts, but we believe the valuations are very close to the value of each contract if terminated since we review the valuations and compare these valuations against our own calculated fair value. We monitor the counterparty default risk both before the hedge is placed and prospectively throughout the life of the contract and would adjust fair values if asset impairment was deemed significant.
The U.S. Treasury securities, equity securities, exchange traded funds and mutual funds are valued using quoted market prices as of the end of the trading day. Corporate bonds and certain obligations of government agencies or states, municipalities and political subdivisions are valued based on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings. We monitor the value of the investments for other-than-temporary impairment on a quarterly basis.
The availability of observable market data is monitored to assess the appropriate classification of financial instruments within the fair value hierarchy. Changes in economic conditions or model-based valuation techniques may require the transfer of financial instruments from one fair value level to another. In such instances, the transfer is reported at the beginning of the reporting period. There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 or 3 during the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014.
Note 6 — Derivative Financial Instruments.
We are exposed to market risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Where possible, we identify exposures in our business that can be offset internally. Where no natural offset is identified, we may choose to enter into various derivative

13



transactions. These instruments have the effect of reducing our exposure to unfavorable changes in foreign currency rates. We do not enter into derivative transactions for trading purposes.
A number of our foreign subsidiaries receive revenues (through either internal or external billing) in currencies other than their functional currency. As a result, the foreign subsidiary’s functional currency revenue will fluctuate as the currency exchange rates change. To reduce this variability, we use foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk of the forecasted collections. We have designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges of its forecasted foreign currency denominated collections. We also use derivative financial contracts, principally foreign exchange forward contracts, to hedge other non-functional currency obligations. These exposures primarily arise from intercompany lending and other liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. At March 31, 2014, the longest outstanding maturity was 15 months. As of March 31, 2014, a net $0.9 million pretax loss was deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and is expected to be recognized in general and administrative expenses during the next 12 months when the hedged revenue is recognized.
As of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, we had cash flow and economic hedges with a notional value of $63.3 million and $107.2 million, respectively, to hedge cash flow and balance sheet exposures. We determine the fair value of our foreign currency derivatives based on quoted prices received from the counterparty for each contract, which we evaluate using pricing models whose inputs are observable. The net fair value of all derivatives held as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013 was a liability of $0.8 million and an asset of $0.2 million, respectively. See Note 5, Fair Value Measurements, for further information regarding the determination of fair value.
The fair value of our derivative instruments held as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013 and their location in the condensed consolidated balance sheet are as follows:
 
 
Derivative assets

Derivative liabilities
 
Balance sheet
location

Fair value

Balance sheet
location

Fair value
 
 

March 31, 2014

June 30, 2013

 

March 31, 2014

June 30, 2013
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forwards
Other current assets
 
$
295

 
$
395

 
Accounts payable,
accrued liabilities
and deferred income
 
$
(1,181
)
 
$
(159
)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Foreign exchange forwards
Other current assets
 
122

 
151

 
Accounts payable,
accrued liabilities
and deferred income
 
(2
)
 
(194
)
Total derivative assets (liabilities)


$
417


$
546




$
(1,183
)

$
(353
)
The effects of derivative instruments that are designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of changes in stockholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
 

14



Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments for the three months ended
March 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
Gain recognized in OCI
(effective portion)
 
Location
of loss reclassified
from OCI into income
(effective portion)
 
Loss reclassified
from OCI into income
(effective portion)
 
Location of loss recognized in income
(ineffective portion and
amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)
 
Loss recognized
in income (ineffective
portion and
amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)
 
 
2014

2013
 
 

2014

2013
 
 
 
2014

2013
Foreign exchange Forwards
 
$
85

 
$
556

 
General and
administrative
expenses
 
$
(520
)
 
$
(386
)
 
General and
administrative
expenses
 
$
(4
)
 
$
(1
)
Total

$
85


$
556




$
(520
)

$
(386
)



$
(4
)

$
(1
)
 
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments for the nine months ended
March 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
Loss
recognized in OCI
(effective portion)
 
Location
of loss reclassified
from OCI into income
(effective portion)
 
Loss reclassified
from OCI into income
(effective portion)
 
Location of loss
recognized in income
(ineffective portion and
amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)
 
Loss recognized
in income (ineffective
portion and
amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)
 
 
2014

2013
 
 
 
2014

2013
 
 

2014

2013
Foreign exchange forwards
 
$
(1,978
)
 
$
(503
)
 
General and
administrative
expenses
 
$
852

 
$
(121
)
 
General and
administrative
expenses
 
$
(1
)
 
$
(1
)
Total

$
(1,978
)

$
(503
)



$
852


$
(121
)



$
(1
)

$
(1
)
Included in the notional values above are $25.8 million and $33.6 million as of March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively, of derivatives held as economic hedges primarily to hedge intercompany loans denominated in currencies other than the functional currency. The effects of derivatives that have not been designated as hedging instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
 
 

 

(Loss) gain recognized in income
 



Three Months Ended 
 March 31,

Nine Months Ended 
 March 31,
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Location of (loss) gain
recognized in income

2014

2013

2014

2013
Foreign exchange forwards
 
General and administrative expenses
 
$
(365
)
 
$
(146
)
 
$
697

 
$
1,928

Total



$
(365
)

$
(146
)

$
697


$
1,928

Note 7 — Retirement Benefits.
Defined Benefit Plans
Towers Watson sponsors both qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans in North America and Europe. As of June 30, 2013, these funded and unfunded plans represented 98 percent of Towers Watson’s pension and other post-retirement benefit obligations and are disclosed herein. Towers Watson also sponsors funded and unfunded defined benefit pension plans in certain other countries as well, representing the remaining two percent of the liability.
All expenses and contributions presented in this note are inclusive of amounts classified as discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost for Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The following tables set forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s defined benefit pension plan for North America and Europe for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
 

15



 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
2014

2013
 
North
America

Europe

North
America

Europe
Service cost
$
17,493

 
$
3,054

 
$
17,731

 
$
3,074

Interest cost
35,062

 
10,182

 
33,854

 
9,182

Expected return on plan assets
(46,968
)
 
(11,457
)
 
(46,586
)
 
(10,168
)
Amortization of net loss
5,473

 
2,235

 
11,440

 
1,441

Amortization of prior service (credit)/cost
(2,095
)
 
10

 
(2,094
)
 
10

Net periodic benefit cost
$
8,965


$
4,024


$
14,345


$
3,539

 
 
Nine Months Ended March 31,
 
2014

2013
 
North
America

Europe

North
America

Europe
Service cost
$
52,819

 
$
9,162

 
$
53,189

 
$
9,221

Interest cost
105,628

 
30,545

 
101,566

 
27,545

Expected return on plan assets
(141,375
)
 
(34,370
)
 
(139,540
)
 
(30,505
)
Amortization of net loss
16,597

 
6,706

 
34,325

 
4,324

Amortization of prior service (credit)/cost
(6,284
)
 
31

 
(6,283
)
 
29

Net periodic benefit cost
$
27,385


$
12,074


$
43,257


$
10,614

The decrease in our North American pension expense was due to a decrease in the amortization of actuarial losses. This decrease was driven primarily by an increase in the discount rate from fiscal year 2013 to fiscal year 2014. Additionally, favorable investment returns during fiscal year 2013 combined with the recognition of the majority of our previously deferred actuarial losses during fiscal year 2013 have resulted in reduced actuarial losses being recognized in fiscal year 2014.
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost for Other Postretirement Plans
The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s post-retirement plans for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
 
 
Three Months Ended 
 March 31,

Nine Months Ended 
 March 31,
 
2014

2013

2014

2013
Service cost
$
365


$
441

 
$
1,097

 
$
1,323

Interest cost
2,216


2,197

 
6,647

 
6,590

Expected return on plan assets
(28
)

(33
)
 
(84
)
 
(98
)
Amortization of net (gain) loss
(436
)

83

 
(1,309
)
 
250

Amortization of prior service credit
(1,751
)

(2,051
)
 
(5,253
)
 
(6,152
)
Net periodic benefit cost
$
366


$
637


$
1,098


$
1,913

Employer Contributions to Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The Company made $67.0 million in contributions to the North American plans during the first nine months of fiscal year 2014 and anticipates making $5.9 million in contributions over the remainder of the fiscal year. The Company made $24.6 million in contributions to European plans during the first nine months of fiscal year 2014 and anticipates making $13.8 million in contributions over the remainder of the fiscal year. Of the amount contributed for the European plans, $10.1 million was a contribution to the German pension plan which was previously unfunded. The Company expects to fund the German plan obligation over the next 10 years.
Defined Contribution Plans

16



The cost of the Company’s contributions to the various U.S. defined contribution plans for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $9.9 million and $9.3 million, respectively. The cost of the Company’s contributions to the plans for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $22.3 million and $22.3 million, respectively.
The cost of the Company’s contributions to the various U.K. defined contribution plans for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $5.2 million and $5.6 million, respectively. The cost of the Company’s contributions to the plans for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 amounted to $15.1 million and $16.8 million, respectively.
Note 8 — Debt, Commitments and Contingent Liabilities.
The debt, commitments and contingencies described below are currently in effect and would require Towers Watson, or domestic subsidiaries, to make payments to third parties under certain circumstances. In addition to commitments and contingencies specifically described below, Towers Watson has historically provided guarantees on an infrequent basis to third parties in the ordinary course of business.
Towers Watson Senior Credit Facility
On November 7, 2011, Towers Watson and certain subsidiaries entered into a five-year, $500 million revolving credit facility, which amount may be increased by an aggregate amount of $250 million, subject to the satisfaction of customary terms and conditions, with a syndicate of banks (the “Senior Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility bear interest at a spread to either LIBOR or the Prime Rate. During the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the weighted-average interest rate on borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility was 1.93% and 1.49%, respectively. We are charged a quarterly commitment fee, currently 0.175% of the Senior Credit Facility, which varies with our financial leverage and is paid on the unused portion of the Senior Credit Facility. Obligations under the Senior Credit Facility are guaranteed by Towers Watson and all of its domestic subsidiaries (other than Professional Consultants Insurance Company (“PCIC”), a majority-owned captive insurance company, and Stone Mountain Insurance Company (“SMIC”), a wholly-owned captive insurance company).
The Senior Credit Facility contains customary representations and warranties and affirmative and negative covenants. The Senior Credit Facility requires Towers Watson to maintain certain financial covenants that include a minimum Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio and a maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio (which terms in each case are defined in the Senior Credit Facility). In addition, the Senior Credit Facility contains restrictions on the ability of Towers Watson to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness; pay dividends; make distributions; create liens on assets; make acquisitions; dispose of property; engage in sale-leaseback transactions; engage in mergers or consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and make changes in lines of businesses. As of March 31, 2014, we were in compliance with our covenants.
As of March 31, 2014, Towers Watson had no borrowings outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility.
Letters of Credit under the Senior Credit Facility
As of March 31, 2014, Towers Watson had standby letters of credit totaling $21.4 million associated with our captive insurance companies in the event that we fail to meet our financial obligations. Additionally, Towers Watson had $1.4 million of standby letters of credit covering various other existing or potential business obligations. The aforementioned letters of credit are issued under the Senior Credit Facility, and therefore reduce the amount that can be borrowed under the Senior Credit Facility by the outstanding amount of these standby letters of credit.
Term Loan Agreement Due June 2017
On June 1, 2012, the Company entered into a five-year $250 million amortizing term loan facility (“the Term Loan”) with a consortium of banks. The interest rate on the term loan is based on the Company’s choice of one, three or six month LIBOR plus a spread of 1.25% to 1.75%, or alternatively the bank base rate plus 0.25% to 0.75%. The spread to each index is dependent on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. The weighted-average interest rate on the Term Loan during the nine months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was 1.42% and 1.47%, respectively. The Term Loan amortizes at a rate of $6.25 million per quarter, beginning in September 2013, with a final maturity date of June 1, 2017 . The Company has the right to prepay a portion or all of the outstanding Term Loan balance on any interest payment date without penalty. At March 31, 2014, the balance on the Term Loan was $231.3 million.

17



This agreement contains substantially the same terms and conditions as our Senior Credit Facility, including guarantees from all of the domestic subsidiaries of Towers Watson (other than PCIC and SMIC). The Company entered into the Term Loan as part of the financing of our acquisition of Extend Health on May 29, 2012.
Indemnification Agreements
Towers Watson has various agreements which provide that it may be obligated to indemnify the other party to the agreement with respect to certain matters. Generally, these indemnification provisions are included in contracts arising in the normal course of business and in connection with the purchase and sale of certain businesses. Although it is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments that may become due under these indemnification agreements because of the conditional nature of Towers Watson’s obligations and the unique facts of each particular agreement, Towers Watson does not believe any potential liability that might arise from such indemnity provisions is probable or material. There are no provisions for recourse to third parties, nor are any assets held by any third parties that any guarantor can liquidate to recover amounts paid under such indemnities.
Legal Proceedings
From time to time, Towers Watson and its subsidiaries, including Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin, are parties to various lawsuits, arbitrations or mediations that arise in the ordinary course of business. The matters reported on below are the material pending claims against Towers Watson and its subsidiaries. We do not expect the impact of claims not described below to be material to Towers Watson’s financial statements. We also receive subpoenas in the ordinary course of business and, from time-to-time, receive requests for information in connection with governmental investigations.
Towers Watson carries substantial professional liability insurance which, effective July 1, 2010, has been provided by SMIC. For the policy period beginning July 1, 2011 certain changes were made to our professional liability insurance program. These changes remain in-force for the policy periods beginning July 1, 2011 and ending July 1, 2014. Our professional liability insurance includes a $10 million aggregate self-insured retention above the $1 million self-insured retention per claim, including the cost of defending such claims. SMIC provides us with $40 million of coverage per claim and in the aggregate, above the retentions, including the cost of defending such claims. SMIC secured $25 million of reinsurance from unaffiliated reinsurance companies in excess of the $15 million SMIC retained layer. Excess insurance attaching above the SMIC coverage is provided by various unaffiliated commercial insurance companies.
This structure effectively results in Towers Watson and SMIC bearing the first $25 million of loss per occurrence or in the aggregate above the $1 million per claim self-insured retention. As a wholly-owned captive insurance company, SMIC is consolidated into our financial statements.
Before the Merger, Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin each obtained substantial professional liability insurance from PCIC. A limit of $50 million per claim and in the aggregate was provided by PCIC subject to a $1 million per claim self-insured retention. PCIC secured reinsurance of $25 million attaching above the $25 million PCIC retained layer from unaffiliated reinsurance companies. Our ownership interest in PCIC is 72.86%. As a consequence, PCIC’s results are consolidated in Towers Watson’s operating results. PCIC ceased issuing insurance policies effective July 1, 2010 and at that time entered into a run-off mode of operation. Our shareholder agreements with PCIC could require additional payments to PCIC if development of claims significantly exceeds prior expectations.
We provide for the self-insured retention where specific estimated losses and loss expenses for known claims are considered probable and reasonably estimable. Although we maintain professional liability insurance coverage, this insurance does not cover claims made after expiration of our current policies of insurance. Generally accepted accounting principles require that we record a liability for incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) professional liability claims if they are probable and reasonably estimable, and for which we have not yet contracted for insurance coverage. We use actuarial assumptions to estimate and record our IBNR liability. As of March 31, 2014, we had a $182.3 million IBNR liability balance, net of recoverable receivables of our captive insurance companies. This net liability was $184.1 million as of June 30, 2013. To the extent our captive insurance companies, PCIC and SMIC, expect losses to be covered by a third party, they record a receivable for the amount expected to be recovered. This receivable is classified in other current or other noncurrent assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheet.
We reserve for contingent liabilities based on ASC 450, Contingencies, when it is determined that a liability, inclusive of defense costs, is probable and reasonably estimable. The contingent liabilities recorded are primarily developed actuarially. Litigation is subject to many factors which are difficult to predict so there can be no assurance that in the event of a material unfavorable result in one or more claims, we will not incur material costs.

18



Former Towers Perrin shareholder litigation
A putative class action lawsuit filed by certain former shareholders of Towers Perrin (the "Dugan Action") previously was reported in Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (File No. 333-161705) filed on November 9, 2009 by the Jupiter Saturn Holding Company (the “Registration Statement”). As reported in the Registration Statement, the complaint was filed on November 5, 2009 against Towers Perrin, members of its board of directors, and certain members of senior management in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
The named Plaintiffs in this action were former members of Towers Perrin’s senior management, who left Towers Perrin at various times between 1995 and 2000. The Dugan plaintiffs sought to represent a class of former Towers Perrin shareholders who separated from service on or after January 1, 1971, but prior to certain changes in Towers Perrin's capital structure that occurred in January 2005, and who also meet certain other specified criteria. The complaint does not contain a quantification of the damages sought.
On December 9, 2009, Watson Wyatt was informed by Towers Perrin of a settlement demand from the plaintiffs in the Dugan Action. Although the complaint in the Dugan Action did not contain a quantification of the damages sought, plaintiffs’ settlement demand, which was orally communicated to Towers Perrin on December 8, 2009 and in writing on December 9, 2009, sought a payment of $800 million to settle the action on behalf of the proposed class. Plaintiffs requested that Towers Perrin communicate the settlement demand to Watson Wyatt.
On December 17, 2009 , four other former Towers Perrin shareholders, all of whom voluntarily left Towers Perrin in May or June 2005 and all of whom were excluded from the proposed class in the Dugan Action, commenced a separate legal proceeding (the "Allen Action") in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging the same claims in substantially the same form as those alleged in the Dugan Action. A fifth plaintiff joined this action on August 29, 2011. These plaintiffs were proceeding in their individual capacities and did not seek to represent a proposed class.
On January 15, 2010 , another former Towers Perrin shareholder who separated from service with Towers Perrin in March 2005 when Towers Perrin and EDS launched a joint venture that led to the creation of a corporate entity known as ExcellerateHRO (“eHRO”), commenced a separate legal proceeding (the "Pao Action") in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging the same claims in substantially the same form as those alleged in the Dugan Action. Towers Perrin contributed its Towers Perrin Administrative Solutions (“TPAS”) business to eHRO and formerly was a minority shareholder (15)% of eHRO. Pao sought to represent a class of former Towers Perrin shareholders who separated from service in connection with Towers Perrin’s contribution to eHRO of its TPAS business and who were excluded from the proposed class in the Dugan Action. Towers Watson was also named as a defendant in the Pao Action. On January 20, 2010, the court consolidated the three actions for all purposes under the Dugan Action file number.
Pursuant to the Towers Perrin Bylaws in effect at the time of their separations, the Towers Perrin shares held by all plaintiffs were redeemed by Towers Perrin at book value when these individuals separated from employment. The complaints alleged variously that there was a promise that Towers Perrin would remain privately owned in perpetuity and an implied or actual promise that in the event of a change to public ownership plaintiffs would receive compensation. Plaintiffs alleged that by agreeing to sell their shares back to Towers Perrin at book value upon separation, they and other members of the putative classes relied upon these alleged promises, which they claim were breached as a result of the consummation of the Merger between Watson Wyatt and Towers Perrin. The complaints all asserted claims for breach of contract, breach of express trust, breach of fiduciary duty, promissory estoppel, quasi-contract/unjust enrichment, and constructive trust, and seek equitable relief including an accounting, disgorgement, rescission and/or restitution, and the imposition of a constructive trust.
On February 22, 2010, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaints in their entireties. By order dated September 30, 2010, the court granted the motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claim for a constructive trust and denied the motion with respect to all other claims alleged. Pursuant to the court’s September 30, 2010 order, defendants also filed answers to plaintiffs’ complaints on October 22, 2010. Discovery in the case was bifurcated, with fact discovery to proceed before expert witness and damages discovery. Neither the plaintiffs in the Dugan Action nor the plaintiff in Pao Action moved for class certification. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on all claims in all actions on December 23, 2011. The court heard argument on June 19, 2012, and on December 11, 2012 granted defendants’ motion, and entered judgment in favor of defendants on all claims. On January 10, 2013, plaintiffs filed a joint notice of their intent to appeal the court’s judgment to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. On February 13, 2013, the parties were notified that the appeal had been assigned for mediation pursuant to the Third Circuit’s mediation program. During the mediation session held on May 7, 2013, the parties reached agreement on settlement terms that include payment of an aggregate $10 million to an agreed settlement class (including all persons in the classes as defined in the respective complaints in the Dugan Action and the Pao Action, plus additional former Towers Perrin shareholders who separated from Towers Perrin between January 1971 and June 2005) estimated to potentially include more

19



than 1,000 former Towers Perrin shareholders, which payment would also cover legal fees of plaintiffs’ attorneys, as determined by the court, and expenses incurred to administer the settlement.
The cases were then returned to the district court for consideration of the proposed settlement. On September 24, 2013, the court preliminarily certified the settlement class and preliminarily approved the parties’ proposed settlement.
At a hearing on February 12, 2014, the court gave its final approval to the settlement. The final order and judgment approving the settlement and dismissing the Dugan, Allen and Pao Actions with prejudice was entered on February 18, 2014. No appeal was taken from that final order and judgment during the applicable appeal period, and the resolution and dismissal of the cases as against all defendants is now final.
Acument Global Technologies, Inc.
In a letter to the Company dated January 26, 2011, Acument Global Technologies, Inc. (“Acument”) and the Acument Global Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan (the “Plan”) claimed that Towers Watson breached its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) in connection with advice provided to Acument relating to investment of certain assets of the Plan in the Westridge Capital Management Enhancements Funds (the “Westridge Funds”). Acument and the Plan demanded that the Company make the Plan whole for losses and damages allegedly sustained as a result of Acument’s decision to invest in the Westridge Funds. Watson Wyatt Investment Consulting, Inc. (“WWIC”), now known as Towers Watson Investment Services, Inc. (“TWIS”), provided investment consulting services to Acument between December 1, 2007 and April 30, 2010. In connection with those services, WWIC recommended an investment in the Westridge Funds. In July 2008, Acument made a $47.0 million investment in the Westridge Funds. During the period December 1, 2008 through January 22, 2009, Acument made additional investments of $9.5 million, bringing the aggregate investment of the Plan’s assets in the Westridge Funds to $56.5 million.
As the result of information obtained during an investigation of Westridge Capital Management, its affiliates WG Trading Investors, L.P. and WG Trading Company, L.P. (collectively referred to as “Westridge”) and their principals, commenced by the National Futures Association on February 5, 2009, the Commodities Future Trading Commission filed suit against Westridge and its principals alleging violations of the Commodity Exchange Act. This resulted in a court-supervised receivership of the assets of Westridge. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filed a separate suit on February 25, 2009 against Westridge and its principals alleging violations of the federal securities laws. In its complaint, the SEC alleges that Westridge had become a fraudulent investment scheme by which its principals purportedly misappropriated approximately $553 million from a number of highly sophisticated institutional investors, including public pension and retirement plans and educational institutions, some of which were investing in Westridge as late as February 6, 2009. We believe that, to date, Acument has recovered approximately $39.7 million of its investment in the Westridge Funds from the receivership. The Company declined Acument’s demand for compensation.

On January 20, 2012, Acument and the Acument Pension Plan (referred to together as “Acument”) filed suit against the Company and TWIS in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges four counts of breach of fiduciary duty under ERISA, claiming principally alleged deficiencies in the Company’s due diligence relating to Westridge and in the disclosures made to Acument concerning Westridge and the nature of the investment. The Company has filed an answer to the complaint denying all claims and asserting affirmative defenses and plans to continue to defend vigorously against these legal proceedings. A mediation took place on September 5, 2012. On January 16, 2014, the Company and TWIS filed an amended answer and counterclaim asserting that Acument Global Technologies, Inc. failed to fulfill its fiduciary duties to the Acument Pension Plan with respect to its investment in the Westridge Funds. On or about February 28, 2014, the Company received Acument’s expert’s damages report, which asserts the range of loss to be between $38.0 million and $86.0 million, which we understand to be comprised primarily of investment losses (including opportunity costs); more specifically, Acument seeks the present-day value of an alternative investment in a “comparable” fund, less what Acument has been returned from the Westridge Receiver. On or about March 27, 2014, the Company submitted a rebuttal expert damages report, which asserts a range of up to $16.6 million. This range assumes a finding of liability and no contribution for the Company’s pending counterclaim. Based on all of the information to date, including the Company’s rebuttal expert damages report, the Company believes there is no reasonably possible material loss in excess of amounts currently accrued. The dispute remains extant.
Note 9 — Variable Interest Entities.
Variable interest entities (“VIEs”) are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a voting interest entity and therefore require a different approach in determining which party involved with the VIE should consolidate the entity. With a VIE, either the entity does not have sufficient equity at risk to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial

20



support from other parties or the entity has equity investors that do not have the ability to make significant decisions relating to the entity’s operations through voting rights. The entity that has a controlling financial interest in a VIE is referred to as the primary beneficiary and is required to consolidate the VIE.
Through our wholly owned subsidiaries, Towers Watson Investment Management Limited and Towers Watson Investment Management, Ireland, we manage approximately $1.8 billion of assets in investment funds that are considered VIEs and for which our management fee is considered a variable interest. We have determined that these funds qualify for the deferral to certain provisions of ASC Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation – Overall, afforded by ASU 2010-10, Consolidation – Amendments for Certain Investment Funds. In accordance with this deferral, we determine whether we consolidate the fund based on whether we absorb a majority of the fund’s expected losses or receive a majority of the fund’s expected returns.
During our third fiscal quarter we deconsolidated two previously consolidated funds. Previously, the contracts governing these two funds contained language that restricted the investors' ability to exercise their economic interests in the funds, thereby causing the investors to become related parties of the Company and requiring the Company to combine its own interests with the interests of these investors for purposes of performing the primary beneficiary test. This restrictive language was modified during our third fiscal quarter, which resulted in the investors, other than the Company's defined benefit retirement plans, to no longer be considered related parties, and the Company to no longer be considered the primary beneficiary of the funds. The mark-to-market gains on the investments prior to deconsolidation were $3.0 million and $6.3 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2014, and are reflected on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations in other non-operating income. The fair value of these investments on the date of deconsolidation, inclusive of the cumulative gains, was $339.0 million, and was removed from the condensed consolidated balance sheets by eliminating the investments of consolidated variable interest entity and by reducing non-controlling interests. The non-controlling interest balance was considered temporary equity as the units held by the investors were redeemable. The changes of the redeemable non-controlling interests balance for the nine months ended March 31, 2014 are as follows:
 
Balance as of June 30, 2013
$

Subscriptions of non-controlling interest holders in consolidated VIEs
332,722

Mark-to-market gains on investments held by consolidated VIEs
6,297

Deconsolidation of VIEs
(339,019
)
Balance as of March 31, 2014
$


We are not the primary beneficiary and therefore do not consolidate any of the remaining funds as of March 31, 2014. Our maximum exposure to loss of these unconsolidated VIEs is limited to collection of any unpaid management fees (which are not material) and any potential increase to pension funding obligation due to losses incurred by the funds.

Note 10 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss).
Changes in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of non-controlling interests, are provided in the following table. The difference between the amounts presented in this table and the amounts presented in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income are the corresponding components attributable to non-controlling interests, which are not material for further disclosure.
 
 
Foreign
currency
translation
(1)

Hedge effectiveness (1)

Available-for-sale
securities (2)

Defined pension and
post-retirement benefit costs (3)
 

Before
Tax

Tax

After
Tax

Before
Tax

Tax

After
Tax

Before
Tax

Tax

After
Tax
As of June 30, 2013
$
(131,096
)
 
$
237

 
$
(105
)
 
$
132

 
$
547

 
$
(134
)
 
$
413

 
$
(233,817
)
 
$
64,904

 
$
(168,913
)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications
88,573

 
(1,978
)
 
681

 
(1,297
)
 
457

 
(130
)
 
327

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

 
852

 
(293
)
 
559

 
(761
)
 
173

 
(588
)
 
11,942

 
(2,605
)
 
9,337

Net current-period other comprehensive income/(loss)
88,573


(1,126
)

388

 
(738
)
 
(304
)
 
43

 
(261
)
 
11,942

 
(2,605
)
 
9,337

As of March 31, 2014
$
(42,523
)

$
(889
)

$
283


$
(606
)

$
243


$