10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended April 30, 2011
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number 1-33913
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
26-1561397 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
1900 West Loop South, Suite 1500, Houston, Texas 77027
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (713) 961-4600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
Class |
|
Outstanding at June 6, 2011 |
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
37,874,595 |
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
INDEX
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1. |
|
Financial Statements |
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands except share amounts) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
57,727 |
|
|
$ |
187,178 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,278 and $1,037 |
|
|
99,286 |
|
|
|
87,007 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
68,567 |
|
|
|
45,200 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
16,140 |
|
|
|
10,547 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
9,190 |
|
|
|
8,229 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
250,910 |
|
|
|
338,623 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
156,375 |
|
|
|
135,517 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
7,892 |
|
|
|
30,563 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
69,785 |
|
|
|
25,189 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
97,404 |
|
|
|
44,668 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
17,710 |
|
|
|
16,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
600,076 |
|
|
$ |
591,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
84,183 |
|
|
$ |
70,986 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
36,480 |
|
|
|
43,447 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
124,518 |
|
|
|
114,790 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
1,616 |
|
Deferred pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
|
3,667 |
|
Non-current environmental reserves |
|
|
11,430 |
|
|
|
12,027 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
23,113 |
|
|
|
17,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
164,331 |
|
|
|
149,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, no par value, shares authorized 1,000,000; issued and outstanding -
none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, shares authorized 125,000,000; issued 37,874,595
and 37,862,441, respectively |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
Additional paid-in-capital |
|
|
240,335 |
|
|
|
238,079 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
200,894 |
|
|
|
210,366 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
(1,757 |
) |
Less treasury stock at cost, 373,444 and 351,626 shares, respectively |
|
|
(6,085 |
) |
|
|
(5,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
435,745 |
|
|
|
441,432 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
600,076 |
|
|
$ |
591,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Page 1
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
203,112 |
|
|
$ |
199,386 |
|
|
$ |
362,920 |
|
|
$ |
350,808 |
|
Cost and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales (exclusive of items shown separately below) |
|
|
175,512 |
|
|
|
167,626 |
|
|
|
315,167 |
|
|
|
293,760 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
22,024 |
|
|
|
19,046 |
|
|
|
42,318 |
|
|
|
35,153 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,861 |
|
|
|
7,035 |
|
|
|
15,386 |
|
|
|
14,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(2,285 |
) |
|
|
5,679 |
|
|
|
(9,951 |
) |
|
|
7,526 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
1,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
|
|
(2,057 |
) |
|
|
7,003 |
|
|
|
(9,744 |
) |
|
|
8,804 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
(2,619 |
) |
|
|
3,627 |
|
|
|
(3,337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
|
(1,389 |
) |
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
(6,117 |
) |
|
|
5,467 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,389 |
) |
|
$ |
4,313 |
|
|
$ |
(6,129 |
) |
|
$ |
4,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share |
|
$ |
(0.04 |
) |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
(0.17 |
) |
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
37,092 |
|
|
|
37,357 |
|
|
|
37,092 |
|
|
|
37,348 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
37,092 |
|
|
|
37,892 |
|
|
|
37,092 |
|
|
|
37,835 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Page 2
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(6,129 |
) |
|
$ |
4,507 |
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by (used for) operating activities from
continuing operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on bargain purchase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,272 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,420 |
|
|
|
14,404 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(4,539 |
) |
|
|
2,363 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
743 |
|
Decrease (increase) in inventory |
|
|
(12,961 |
) |
|
|
(2,536 |
) |
Decrease (increase) in other current assets |
|
|
(1,095 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable |
|
|
6,097 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities |
|
|
(7,675 |
) |
|
|
2,412 |
|
Increase (decrease) in income taxes payable |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
12,005 |
|
Increase (decrease) in deferred pension and postretirement benefits |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
845 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
3,556 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(5,337 |
) |
|
|
40,601 |
|
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities |
|
|
(5,405 |
) |
|
|
40,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(110,845 |
) |
|
|
(1,590 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(10,896 |
) |
|
|
(7,404 |
) |
Proceeds from property insurance claim |
|
|
|
|
|
|
105 |
|
Proceeds from executive life insurance |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(120,983 |
) |
|
|
(8,889 |
) |
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
|
|
(120,983 |
) |
|
|
(8,799 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
Common stock dividends paid |
|
|
(3,001 |
) |
|
|
(2,264 |
) |
Issuance of common stock from stock option exercises, including related tax benefits |
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities from continuing operations |
|
|
(3,088 |
) |
|
|
(2,261 |
) |
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities from discontinued operations |
|
|
(392 |
) |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
(3,480 |
) |
|
|
(2,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
Less: (Increase) decrease in cash and equivalents from discontinued operations |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents from continuing operations |
|
|
(129,451 |
) |
|
|
29,481 |
|
Cash and equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
187,178 |
|
|
|
123,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
57,727 |
|
|
$ |
152,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Page 3
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
Six Months Ended April 30, 2011 |
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Balance at October 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
238,079 |
|
|
$ |
210,366 |
|
|
$ |
(1,757 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,635 |
) |
|
$ |
441,432 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,129 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment
(net of taxes of $272) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
Common dividends ($0.08 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,001 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,001 |
) |
Treasury shares purchased, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
Stock-based compensation activity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation earned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
Stock options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
Restricted stock awards |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation tax
benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
240,335 |
|
|
$ |
200,894 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
(6,085 |
) |
|
$ |
435,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.
Page 4
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
Quanex Building Products Corporation and its subsidiaries (Quanex or the Company) are managed
on a decentralized basis and operate in two business segments: Engineered Products and Aluminum
Sheet Products. The Engineered Products segment produces engineered systems, products and
components primarily serving the window and door industry, while the Aluminum Sheet Products
segment produces mill finished and coated aluminum sheet serving the broader building products
markets and secondary markets such as capital goods and transportation. The primary market drivers
are residential housing starts and residential remodeling expenditures. Quanex believes it is a
technological leader in the production of aluminum sheet products, flexible insulating glass spacer
systems, extruded vinyl profiles, thin film solar panel sealants, and precision-formed metal and
wood products which primarily serve the North American building products markets. The Company uses
low-cost production processes, and engineering and metallurgical expertise to provide customers
with specialized products for specific applications.
On December 12, 2007, Quanex Building Products Corporation was incorporated in the state of
Delaware as a subsidiary of Quanex Corporation to facilitate the separation of Quanex Corporations
vehicular products and building products businesses. The separation occurred on April 23, 2008
through the spin-off of Quanex Corporations building products business to its shareholders
immediately followed by the merger of Quanex Corporation (consisting principally of the vehicular
products business and all non-building products related corporate accounts) with a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Gerdau S.A. (Gerdau). This is hereafter referred to as the Separation.
In January 2010, management committed to a plan to close its start-up facility in China due to
the contraction of demand and the Companys ability to serve the overseas thin film solar panel
market from its U.S. operation. Accordingly, the China assets and liabilities, results of
operations and cash flows are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Unless otherwise noted, all disclosures in the notes accompanying the consolidated financial
statements reflect only continuing operations.
On March 31, 2011, the Company acquired Edgetech for $104.4 million in an all cash
transaction (net of cash acquired). Headquartered in Cambridge, Ohio, Edgetech has three
manufacturing facilities (U.S., U.K. and Germany) that produce and market a full line of insulating
glass spacer systems for window and door customers in North America and abroad. See Note 3 for
discussion of this acquisition.
The interim unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company include all adjustments
which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys
financial position and results of operations. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions
to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. The preparation of these financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Estimates and assumptions about future events and
their effects cannot be perceived with certainty. Estimates may change as new events occur, as
more experience is acquired, as additional information becomes available and as the Companys
operating environment changes. Actual results could differ from estimates. These statements
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC Topic No. 2010-29
Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805) Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for
Business Combinations which amended ASC Topic 805 Business Combinations to specify that if a
public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and
earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the year
had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The ASC also
expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under ASC Topic 805 to include a description of the
nature and the amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the
business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The ASC is effective
prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning
of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010 (November 1, 2011 for
the Company). Early adoption is permitted. The Company has disclosed information in accordance
with this ASC effective March 31, 2011.
Page 5
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASC Topic No. 2010-28 IntangiblesGoodwill and Other
(ASC Topic 350) When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with
Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts which amended ASC Topic 350 Goodwill and Other. The ASC
requires an entity with reporting units that have carrying amounts that are zero or negative to
assess whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units goodwill is impaired. If the
entity determines that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting
units is impaired, the entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for
those reporting unit(s) and record any resulting impairment as a cumulative-effect adjustment to
beginning retained earnings. The provisions of this ASC are effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010 (November 1, 2011 for the
Company). Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this ASC
to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASC Topic No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements. The ASC
requires new disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 (fair value determined based on
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities) and 2 (fair value determined
based on significant other observable inputs) and separate disclosures about purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. Except for the detailed Level 3 roll-forward disclosures, the new standard is
effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 31,
2009 (February 1, 2010 for the Company). The requirement to provide detailed disclosures about the
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll-forward activity for Level 3 fair value
measurements is effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 31, 2010 (February 1, 2011 for the Company). Other than requiring additional disclosures,
none that currently impact the Company, the adoption of this new guidance does not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (ASU 2011-04), Fair
Value Measurement (ASC Topic 820) Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amended guidance changes the wording used to
describe many requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information
about fair value measurements. Additionally, the amendments clarify the FASBs intent about the
application of existing fair value measurement requirements. The guidance provided in ASU 2011-04
is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied
prospectively. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect
on its consolidated financial statements.
3. Acquisitions
On March 31, 2011, Quanex completed its acquisition of Edgetech I.G., Inc., an Ohio
corporation (Edgetech I.G.), the United Kingdom division of Edgetech (Edgetech UK), and
Edgetech Europe GmbH, a German company (Edgetech Germany and together with Edgetech I.G. and
Edgetech UK, Edgetech). Headquartered in Cambridge, Ohio, Edgetech has three manufacturing
facilities located in the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany that produce a full line of
warm-edge, dual seal insulating glass spacer systems for window and door customers in North America
and abroad. Edgetechs products separate and seal double and triple glass within a window and act
as a thermal barrier that enhances the windows energy efficiency.
Quanex acquired Edgetech by merging its wholly-owned subsidiary, QSB Inc., a Delaware
corporation (QSB), with and into Lauren International, Inc. formerly known as Lauren Holdco Inc.,
an Ohio corporation and parent of the Edgetech Entities (Holdco), pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the previously filed Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), dated as
of January 31, 2011, among the Company, QSB, Lauren International Ltd. fka Lauren International
Inc., a privately-held Ohio corporation (Lauren), Holdco and Kevin E. Gray, as agent for the
shareholders of Holdco (Agent). Holdco is now Quanexs wholly-owned subsidiary. As
consideration for the acquisition of all of the issued and outstanding capital shares of Holdco,
Quanex paid $104.4 million in cash, net of $0.8 million of cash acquired. Of the cash paid, $7.0
million was placed into an escrow fund to satisfy certain indemnity obligations under the Merger
Agreement. Additionally, Quanex will be responsible for the tax liability resulting from the
pre-closing reorganization of Lauren and its subsidiaries limited to $3.5 million.
Page 6
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Edgetech has been integrated into the Engineered Products segment. The acquisition of
Edgetech complements Quanexs ongoing efforts to provide its customers with the broadest range of
high quality components, products, systems and services the fenestration industry has to offer. The
vast majority of windows manufactured today feature double or triple insulating glass, and with
window production set to rise as the housing and remodeling markets recover, Quanex believes that
the long-term outlook for the business is excellent. Acquiring Edgetech will allow the Company to
better serve its growing base of national and regional customers and will further accelerate its
international growth as Edgetech has a solid market presence overseas.
The Edgetech acquisition is being accounted for as a business combination using the
acquisition method of accounting under which the total purchase price consideration is allocated to
assets and liabilities assumed based upon their fair values. Fair value measurements have been
applied based on assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or
liability. The excess of the purchase price over the amounts assigned to tangible or intangible
assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill. The following table summarizes
the fair values assigned to the net assets acquired as of the March 31, 2011 acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of Date of |
|
|
|
Opening Balance |
|
|
|
Sheet |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
828 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
10,447 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
10,123 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
21,914 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
18,046 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
43,724 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
52,320 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
137,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
6,185 |
|
Accrued laibilities |
|
|
1,795 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
3,780 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
340 |
|
Current maturities of long term debt |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
12,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
40 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
32,150 |
|
Investment |
|
|
105,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity |
|
$ |
137,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 7
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
As of June 14, 2011, the purchase price allocation is provisional and could change
materially in subsequent periods. Any subsequent changes to the purchase price allocation that
result in material changes to the consolidated financial results will be adjusted retrospectively.
The final purchase price allocation is pending the finalization of valuation work and the
completion of the Companys internal review of such work, which is expected to be completed during
fiscal 2011. The provisional items pending finalization include, but are not limited to, the
valuation of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, goodwill and income tax related
matters. These adjustments could include, but are not limited to, adjustments to reflect the fair
value of tangible and intangible assets acquired, and the resulting goodwill and tax related items.
In connection with applying the provisions of purchase accounting to state inventory at fair
value, the Company increased Edgetechs inventory value by $2.0 million, which negatively impacts
Quanexs Cost of sales following the acquisition. In April 2011, Cost of sales was negatively
impacted by $0.9 million as a result of the $2.0 million increase in inventory value.
The preliminary allocations resulted in goodwill of $43.7 million, which is not deductible for
income tax purposes. Goodwill consists of the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
the acquired assets and represents the estimated economic value attributable to future operations.
The other intangible assets are being amortized over periods which reflect the pattern in which the
economic benefits of the assets are expected to be realized. Specifically, the trademarks and
trade names are being amortized over an average estimated useful life of 8 years, patents and other
developed technology is being amortized over an average life of 10 years and customer relationships
are being amortized over an average of 11 years. The weighted average useful life of intangible
assets, excluding goodwill, created as a result of the acquisition is 10 years. No residual value
is estimated for the intangible assets.
The Company recorded $2.2 million of transaction-related costs in connection with the Edgetech
acquisition within Selling, general and administrative expense in its Consolidated Statement of
Income during the six months ended April 30, 2011.
The Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended April 30, 2011,
include one months of financial results (April) of Edgetech. The April 2011 Edgetech revenues and
operating loss reflected such statements are $6.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively. As
discussed above, the April 2011 Edgetech results include $0.9 million of Cost of sales associated
with the increase in inventory value from purchase accounting as well as $0.5 million in
amortization expense from the acquired intangibles. The following table provides unaudited pro
forma consolidated results of operations for the combined entity for the three and six months ended
April 30, 2011 and 2010 as if Edgetech had been acquired as of the first day of the Companys
fiscal 2010 period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
215,582 |
|
|
$ |
217,345 |
|
|
$ |
392,917 |
|
|
$ |
383,844 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
4,942 |
|
|
|
(7,585 |
) |
|
|
2,896 |
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(422 |
) |
|
$ |
3,814 |
|
|
$ |
(4,730 |
) |
|
$ |
2,644 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common
share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
Page 8
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations were prepared using the
acquisition method of accounting and are based on the historical financial information of the
Company and Edgetech. The unaudited pro forma financial information does not purport to reflect
the results the combined company may achieve in future periods or the results that would have been
obtained had Quanex acquired Edgetech on the first day of its fiscal 2010 period. The unaudited
pro forma financial information does not include any operating efficiencies or cost savings that
may be achieved or any integration expenses. Additionally, the historical Edgetech financial
information has not been adjusted to remove expenses that will cease under Quanexs ownership, such
as the prior parent company allocation, or to add incremental anticipated stand-alone expenses
going forward. Generally, the pro forma financial information reflects the allocation of the
purchase price to the appropriate assets and liabilities based upon their fair values, and related
changes in depreciation and amortization expense. Accordingly, such amounts are not necessarily
indicative of the results that would have occurred if the acquisition had occurred on the dates
indicated or that may result in the future. The unaudited pro forma information reflects primarily
the following unaudited pro forma adjustments:
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to the fair value of identifiable intangible assets
acquired; |
|
|
|
Additional depreciation expense related to the fair value adjustment to
property, plant and equipment acquired; |
|
|
|
Additional facility rental expense; |
|
|
|
Additional cost of goods sold of $2.0 million in the three and six months ended
April 30, 2010 to reflect the increased value of inventory sold as a result of
applying purchase accounting, and a partially offsetting impact of $0.9 million in
the three and six months ended April 30, 2011; |
|
|
|
Additional expense of $2.5 million in the three and six months ended April 30,
2010 to reflect the transaction-related costs incurred, and partially offsetting
impact of $2.2 million in the three and six months ended April 30, 2011; |
|
|
|
The Edgetech historical results and all of the above adjustments were adjusted
for the applicable tax impact. |
In March 2011, the Company also acquired JELD-WENs vinyl extrusion assets in Yakima,
Washington (Yakima) for $6.4 million in cash consideration. This acquisition was effected through
an asset purchase of vinyl extrusion related equipment and certain other assets. Yakima was
integrated into one of the Companys existing Engineered Products businesses, and the net assets
acquired primarily included $5.0 million of property, plant and equipment and $1.4 million of
intangible assets. There was no goodwill recognized in connection with the Yakima acquisition.
4. Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the periods ended April 30, 2011 and
October 31, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered |
|
|
Aluminum Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, gross |
|
$ |
175,455 |
|
|
$ |
20,389 |
|
|
$ |
195,844 |
|
Accumulated impairment losses |
|
|
(150,266 |
) |
|
|
(20,389 |
) |
|
|
(170,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net |
|
$ |
25,189 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition |
|
|
43,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,724 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, gross |
|
|
220,051 |
|
|
|
20,389 |
|
|
|
240,440 |
|
Accumulated impairment losses |
|
|
(150,266 |
) |
|
|
(20,389 |
) |
|
|
(170,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net |
|
$ |
69,785 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
69,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 9
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of April 30, 2011 |
|
|
As of October 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships |
|
$ |
47,311 |
|
|
$ |
(7,029 |
) |
|
$ |
21,200 |
|
|
$ |
(6,291 |
) |
Trademarks and trade names |
|
|
45,783 |
|
|
|
(10,029 |
) |
|
|
33,530 |
|
|
|
(9,156 |
) |
Patents and other technology |
|
|
26,604 |
|
|
|
(6,582 |
) |
|
|
11,560 |
|
|
|
(6,175 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
121,090 |
|
|
$ |
(23,686 |
) |
|
$ |
66,290 |
|
|
$ |
(21,622 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense for the three and six month period ended April 30, 2011 was
$1.3 million and $2.1 million, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for the three and
six month period ended April 30, 2010 was $0.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Estimated
amortization expense for the next five years, based upon the amortization of pre-existing
intangibles follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Years Ending |
|
Estimated |
|
October 31, |
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
2011 (remaining six months) |
|
$ |
4,527 |
|
2012 |
|
$ |
9,055 |
|
2013 |
|
$ |
8,992 |
|
2014 |
|
$ |
8,851 |
|
2015 |
|
$ |
8,710 |
|
5. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
26,381 |
|
|
$ |
18,823 |
|
Finished goods and work in process |
|
|
38,179 |
|
|
|
23,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,560 |
|
|
|
42,579 |
|
Supplies and other |
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
68,567 |
|
|
$ |
45,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 10
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Fixed costs related to excess manufacturing capacity, if any, have been expensed in the
period, and therefore, are not capitalized into inventory. The values of inventories in the
consolidated balance sheets are based on the following accounting methods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
LIFO |
|
$ |
26,392 |
|
|
$ |
20,122 |
|
FIFO |
|
|
42,175 |
|
|
|
25,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
68,567 |
|
|
$ |
45,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An actual valuation of inventory under the last in, first out (LIFO) method can be made
only at the end of each year based on the inventory costs and levels at that time. Accordingly,
interim LIFO calculations must be based on managements estimates of expected year-end inventory
costs and levels. Because these are subject to many factors beyond managements control, interim
results are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation which could significantly differ
from interim estimates. To estimate the effect of LIFO on interim periods, the Company performs a
projection of the year-end LIFO reserve and considers expected year-end inventory pricing and
expected inventory levels. Depending on this projection, the Company may record an interim
allocation of the projected year-end LIFO calculation. This projection resulted in $2.0 million
interim LIFO allocation for the six months ended April 30, 2011. With respect to inventories
valued using the LIFO method, replacement cost exceeded the LIFO value by approximately $12.1
million and $10.1 million as of April 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010, respectively.
6. Earnings and Dividends Per Share
Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the three and six months
ended April 30, 2011 are identical as the Company reported a loss from continuing operations. The
computational components of basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the
three and six months ended April 30, 2010 are below (shares and dollars in thousands except per
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended |
|
|
For the Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
April 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
(Numerator) |
|
|
(Denominator) |
|
|
Amount |
|
Basic earnings and earnings per share |
|
$ |
4,384 |
|
|
|
37,357 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
5,467 |
|
|
|
37,348 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock equivalents arising
from stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock held by rabbi trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings and earnings per share |
|
$ |
4,384 |
|
|
|
37,892 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
$ |
5,467 |
|
|
|
37,835 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes outstanding options and other
common stock equivalents in periods where inclusion of such potential common stock instruments
would be anti-dilutive in the periods presented. When income from continuing operations is a loss,
all potential dilutive instruments are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
as they would be anti-dilutive. Accordingly, for the three months ended April 30, 2011, 0.3
million of restricted stock and 0.4 million of common stock equivalents were excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share as the Company had a loss from continuing operations.
For the six months ended April 30, 2011, 0.2 million of restricted stock and 0.4 million of common
stock equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as the Company
had a loss from continuing operations.
Page 11
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
For the six months ended April 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had $0.3 million and $0.3
million, respectively, of securities that are potentially dilutive in future earnings per share
calculations. Such dilution will be dependent on the excess of the market price of the Companys
stock over the exercise price and other components of the treasury stock method.
Dividends Per Share
The Company pays a quarterly cash dividend on the Companys common stock. During the three
and six months ended April 30, 2011, the Company paid $0.04 and $0.08, respectively, cash dividend
per common share. During the three and six months ended April 30, 2010, the Company paid $0.03 and
$0.06, respectively, cash dividend per common share.
7. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income comprises net income and all other non-owner changes in equity, including
foreign currency translation, pension related adjustments and realized and unrealized gains and
losses on derivatives, if any. Comprehensive income for the three and six months ended April 30,
2011 and 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,389 |
) |
|
$ |
4,313 |
|
|
$ |
(6,129 |
) |
|
$ |
4,507 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
1,977 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income (loss),
net of taxes |
|
$ |
496 |
|
|
$ |
4,378 |
|
|
$ |
(4,152 |
) |
|
$ |
4,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2011 foreign currency translation activity is primarily associated with Edgetech, acquired
by the Company on March 31, 2011. As a result of this acquisition, Quanex now has operations in
Germany and the United Kingdom whose functional currency is the Euro and the British Pound,
respectively.
Page 12
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
8. Long-Term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revolving Credit Facility |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
City of Richmond, Kentucky Industrial Building Revenue Bonds |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
Scott County, Iowa Industrial Waste Recycling Revenue Bonds |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
Capital lease obligations and other |
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
1,984 |
|
|
$ |
1,943 |
|
Less maturities due within one year included in current liabilities |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,633 |
|
|
$ |
1,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Facility
The Companys $270.0 million Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (the Credit Facility)
was executed on April 23, 2008. The Credit Facility has a five-year term and is unsecured. The
Credit Facility expires April 23, 2013 and provides for up to $50.0 million for standby letters of
credit, limited to the undrawn amount available under the Credit Facility. Borrowings under the
Credit Facility bear interest at a spread above LIBOR based on a combined leverage and ratings
grid. Proceeds from the Credit Facility may be used to provide availability for acquisitions,
working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes.
Under the Credit Facility, the Company is obligated to comply with certain financial covenants
requiring the Company to maintain a Consolidated Leverage Ratio of no more than 3.25 to 1 and a
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio of no less than 3.00 to 1. As defined by the Credit
Facilitys indenture, the Consolidated Leverage Ratio is the ratio of consolidated indebtedness as
of such date to consolidated EBITDA for the previous four fiscal quarters; and the Consolidated
Interest Coverage Ratio is the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense, in
each case for the previous four consecutive fiscal quarters. EBITDA is defined by the indenture to
include proforma EBITDA of acquisitions and to exclude certain items like non-cash charges.
Additionally, the Credit Facility contains certain limitations on additional indebtedness, asset or
equity sales, and acquisitions. Dividends and other distributions are permitted so long as after
giving effect to such dividend or stock repurchase, there is no event of default.
As of April 30, 2011, the Company had no borrowings under the Credit Facility, and the Company
was in compliance with all Credit Facility financial covenants. The availability under the Credit
Facility is a function of both the facility amount utilized and meeting covenant requirements.
Although there were no borrowings on the Credit Facility and only $5.6 million of outstanding
letters of credit under the Credit Facility, the aggregate availability under the Credit Facility
was limited by the Consolidated Leverage Ratio resulting in an availability of $214.7 million at
April 30, 2011.
9. Retirement Plans
The Company has a number of retirement plans covering substantially all employees. The
Company provides both defined benefit and defined contribution plans. In general, the plant or
location of employment determines an employees coverage for retirement benefits. Effective with
the respective acquisition dates in the second fiscal quarter of 2011, the Edgetech and Yakima
employees were eligible to participate in the Companys retirement plans.
Page 13
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Pension Plan
The Company has a non-contributory, single employer defined benefit pension plan that covers
substantially all non-union employees. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company amended this defined
benefit pension plan to include a new cash balance formula for all new salaried employees hired on
or after January 1, 2007 and for any non-union employees who were not participating in a defined
benefit plan prior to January 1, 2007. All new salaried employees are eligible to receive credits
equivalent to 4% of their annual eligible wages, while some of the employees at the time of the
plan amendment were grandfathered and are eligible to receive credits ranging up to 6.5% based
upon a percentage they received in the defined contribution plan prior to the amendment of the
pension plan. Additionally, every year the participants will receive an interest related credit on
their respective balance equivalent to the prevailing 30-year Treasury rate. Benefits for
participants in this plan prior to January 1, 2007 continue to be based on a more traditional
formula for retirement benefits, where the plan pays benefits to employees upon retirement using a
formula based upon years of service and pensionable compensation prior to retirement. Of the
Companys participants, 99% are under the cash balance formula.
The components of net periodic pension cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
945 |
|
|
$ |
899 |
|
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
|
$ |
1,651 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(519 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost |
|
$ |
908 |
|
|
$ |
913 |
|
|
$ |
1,810 |
|
|
$ |
1,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys pension funding policy generally has been to make the minimum annual
contributions required by applicable regulations while considering targeted funded percentages. In
fiscal 2010, the Company decided to modify its funding strategy and accelerate contributions to
target a 100% funding threshold. Additionally, the Company will consider funding fiscal year
requirements early in the fiscal year to potentially maximize returns on assets. During the three
and six months ended April 30, 2011, the Company contributed $1.2 million and $1.9 million to its
defined benefit plan. The Company does not expect to make any additional contributions for the
balance of fiscal 2011. Expected contributions are dependent on many variables, including the
variability of the market value of the assets as compared to the obligation and other market or
regulatory conditions. In addition, the Company takes into consideration its business investment
opportunities and resulting cash requirements. Accordingly, actual funding may differ greatly from
current estimates.
Defined Contribution Plans
The Company has defined contribution plans to which both employees and the Company make
contributions. Effective April 1, 2009, the Company temporarily suspended its matching
contributions to the Quanex Building Products Salaried and Non-Union Employee 401(k) Plan as part
of its efforts to reduce controllable spending. Effective February 1, 2010, these matching
contributions were reinstated. The Company matches 50% up to the first 5% of employee deferrals.
Page 14
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
10. Industry Segment Information
Quanex has two reportable segments: Engineered Products and Aluminum Sheet Products. The
Engineered Products segment produces engineered systems, finished products and components serving
the OEM residential window and door industry, while the Aluminum Sheet Products segment produces
mill finished and coated aluminum sheet serving the broader building products markets. The main
market drivers of both segments are residential remodeling activity and housing starts.
The Company measures its inventory at the segment level on a FIFO or weighted-average basis;
however at the consolidated Company level, approximately half of the inventory is measured on a
LIFO basis. The LIFO reserve is computed on a consolidated basis as a single pool and is thus
treated as a corporate expense. See Note 5 to the financial statements for more information. LIFO
inventory adjustments along with corporate office charges and intersegment eliminations are
reported as Corporate, Intersegment Eliminations or Other. The Company accounts for intersegment
sales and transfers as though the sales or transfers were to third parties, that is, at current
market prices. Intersegment sales, related cost of sales, and intercompany profit are eliminated
in consolidation at Corporate. Corporate assets primarily include cash and equivalents partially
offset by the Companys consolidated LIFO inventory reserve.
Page 15
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net Sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products |
|
$ |
82,493 |
|
|
$ |
84,717 |
|
|
$ |
166,504 |
|
|
$ |
157,527 |
|
Aluminum Sheet Products |
|
|
123,059 |
|
|
|
117,088 |
|
|
|
202,197 |
|
|
|
198,651 |
|
Intersegment Eliminations |
|
|
(2,440 |
) |
|
|
(2,419 |
) |
|
|
(5,781 |
) |
|
|
(5,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
203,112 |
|
|
$ |
199,386 |
|
|
$ |
362,920 |
|
|
$ |
350,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products |
|
$ |
1,914 |
|
|
$ |
5,760 |
|
|
$ |
1,266 |
|
|
$ |
9,838 |
|
Aluminum Sheet Products |
|
|
6,058 |
|
|
|
7,232 |
|
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
10,866 |
|
Corporate & Other |
|
|
(10,257 |
) |
|
|
(7,313 |
) |
|
|
(17,826 |
) |
|
|
(13,178 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
(2,285 |
) |
|
$ |
5,679 |
|
|
$ |
(9,951 |
) |
|
$ |
7,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Identifiable Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products 1 |
|
$ |
403,853 |
|
|
$ |
258,919 |
|
Aluminum Sheet Products |
|
|
163,009 |
|
|
|
152,113 |
|
Corporate, Intersegment Eliminations & Other |
|
|
33,214 |
|
|
|
179,756 |
|
Discontinued Operations 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
600,076 |
|
|
$ |
591,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products |
|
$ |
69,785 |
|
|
$ |
25,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
69,785 |
|
|
$ |
25,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Stock-Based Compensation
Effective with the Separation on April 23, 2008, the Company established the Quanex Building
Products Corporation 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the 2008 Plan). The 2008 Plan provides for the
granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock
units (RSUs), performance stock awards, performance unit awards, annual incentive awards, other
stock-based awards and cash-based awards. The 2008 Plan is administered by the Compensation and
Management Development Committee of the Board of Directors and allows for immediate, graded or
cliff vesting options, but options must be exercised no later than ten years from the date of
grant. The aggregate number of shares of common stock authorized for grant originally under the
2008 Plan was 2,900,000. In February 2011, the 2008 Plan was amended by the Companys shareholders
to increase the aggregate number of shares available for awards by an additional 2,400,000 shares.
Any officer, key employee and/or non-employee director of the Company or any of its affiliates is
eligible for awards under the 2008 Plan. The initial awards granted under the 2008 Plan were on
April 23, 2008; service is the vesting condition.
|
|
|
1 |
|
Increase in Engineered Products identifiable assets and goodwill are primarily attributable to the Edgetech acquisition on
March 31, 2011. See note 3 for discussion of this acquisition. |
|
2 |
|
In January 2010, management committed to a plan to shut down the operations of its start-up facility in China; therefore,
the China assets are included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. |
Page 16
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The Companys practice is to grant options and restricted stock or RSUs to non-employee
directors on October 31st of each year, with an additional grant of options to each
director on the date of his or her first anniversary of service. Additionally, the Companys
practice is to grant options and restricted stock or RSUs to employees at the Companys December
board meeting and occasionally to key employees as deemed appropriate at other times during the
year. The exercise price of the option awards is equal to the closing market price on the date
granted. The Company generally issues shares from treasury stock, if available, to satisfy stock
option exercises and grants of restricted stock. If there are no shares in treasury stock, the
Company issues additional shares of common stock. The Company has not capitalized any stock-based
compensation cost as part of inventory or fixed assets during the six months ended April 30, 2011
and 2010.
Restricted Stock Awards
Under the 2008 Plan, common stock may be awarded to key employees, officers and non-employee
directors. The recipient is entitled to all of the rights of a shareholder, except that during the
forfeiture period the shares are nontransferable. The awards vest over a specified time period,
but typically either immediately vest or cliff vest over a three-year period with service as the
vesting condition. Upon issuance of stock under the plan, fair value is measured by the grant-date
price of the Companys shares. This fair value is then expensed over the restricted period with a
corresponding increase to additional paid-in-capital. A summary of non-vested restricted stock
award changes during the six months ended April 30, 2011 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted -Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Value Per Share |
|
Non-vested at October 31, 2010 |
|
|
378,616 |
|
|
$ |
13.07 |
|
Granted |
|
|
69,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(80,085 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(25,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at April 30, 2011 |
|
|
342,524 |
|
|
$ |
13.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted stock granted during the six months
ended April 30, 2011 and 2010 was $17.14 and $16.21 per share, respectively. The total fair value
of restricted stock vested during the six months ended April 30, 2011 was $1.2 million. There were
no restricted shares that vested during the six months ended April 30, 2010. Total unrecognized
compensation cost related to unamortized restricted stock awards was $1.9 million as of April 30,
2011. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
Page 17
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Stock Options
As described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31,
2010, the Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of
its stock options. The fair value of each option was estimated on the date of grant. The
following is a summary of valuation assumptions and resulting grant-date fair values for grants
during the following periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average expected volatility |
|
|
53.0 |
% |
|
|
55.0 |
% |
Expected term (in years) |
|
|
4.9-5.1 |
|
|
|
4.9-5.1 |
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Expected dividend yield over expected term |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per share |
|
$ |
7.57 |
|
|
$ |
7.32 |
|
Below is a table summarizing the stock option shares activity for the 2008 Plan since October
31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Per |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Term (in years) |
|
|
Value (000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 31, 2010 |
|
|
1,724,301 |
|
|
$ |
13.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
419,100 |
|
|
|
17.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(59,831 |
) |
|
|
14.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2,419 |
) |
|
|
13.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at April 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,081,151 |
|
|
|
14.05 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
14,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at April 30, 2011 |
|
|
2,009,378 |
|
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
13,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at April 30, 2011 |
|
|
1,207,879 |
|
|
$ |
13.25 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
9,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the
date of exercise exceeded the exercise price of the option) exercised during the six months ended
April 30, 2011 and 2010 was $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The total fair value of
shares vested during the six months ended April 30, 2011 was $2.1 million. Total unrecognized
compensation cost related to stock options granted under the 2008 Plan was $3.7 million as of April
30, 2011. This cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.0 years.
12. Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes is determined by applying an estimated annual effective income
tax rate to income from continuing operations before income taxes. The rate is based on the most
recent annualized forecast of pretax income, permanent book versus tax differences and tax credits.
The Companys estimated annual effective tax rate for the six months ended April 30, 2011 is 37.2%
compared to the estimated annual effective tax rate of 37.9% for the six months ended April 30,
2010. The decline in the 2011 six month effective rate is primarily due to more benefit from the
manufacturers deduction.
Prepaid and other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets include an income tax
receivable of $2.6 million as of April 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010.
The non-current deferred income taxes asset balance decreased from $30.6 million as of October
31, 2010 to $7.9 million as of April 30, 2011. This large decrease primarily relates to the
non-current deferred income tax liability established in the Edgetech acquisition.
Page 18
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The income tax payable balance of $3.5 million as of April 30, 2011 relates to the
reorganization taxes assumed in the acquisition of Edgetech.
The Companys unrecognized tax benefit (UTB) is related to the Separation and state tax items
regarding the interpretations of tax laws and regulations. The total UTB as of April 30, 2011 is
$18.8 million. Of this, $6.4 million is recorded in other liabilities and $12.4 million is recorded
in non-current deferred income taxes. The UTB includes $0.9 million for which the disallowance of
such items would not affect the annual effective tax rate.
Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been
recognized in the Companys financial statements or income tax returns. The final outcome of the
future tax consequences of legal proceedings, if any, as well as the outcome of competent authority
proceedings, changes in regulatory tax laws, or interpretation of those tax laws could impact the
Companys financial statements. The Company is subject to the effects of these matters occurring
in various jurisdictions. The Company has no knowledge of any event that would materially increase
or decrease the unrecognized tax benefit within the next twelve months.
13. Contingencies
Environmental
Quanex is subject to extensive laws and regulations concerning the discharge of materials into
the environment and the remediation of chemical contamination. To satisfy such requirements,
Quanex must make capital and other expenditures on an ongoing basis. The Company accrues its best
estimates of its remediation obligations and adjusts such accruals as further information and
circumstances develop. Those estimates may change substantially depending on information about the
nature and extent of contamination, appropriate remediation technologies, and regulatory approvals.
In accruing for environmental remediation liabilities, costs of future expenditures are not
discounted to their present value, unless the amount and timing of the expenditures are fixed or
reliably determinable. When environmental laws might be deemed to impose joint and several
liability for the costs of responding to contamination, the Company accrues its allocable share of
liability taking into account the number of parties participating, their ability to pay their
shares, the volumes and nature of the wastes involved, the nature of anticipated response actions,
and the nature of the Companys alleged connections. The cost of environmental matters has not had
a material adverse effect on Quanexs operations or financial condition in the past, and management
is not currently aware of any conditions that it believes are likely to have a material adverse
effect on Quanexs operations, financial condition or cash flows.
As described below, the Company currently is engaged in remediation activities at one of its
plant sites. The total associated environmental reserve and corresponding recovery as of April 30,
2011 and October 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
October 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
$ |
1,700 |
|
|
$ |
1,564 |
|
Non-current 1 |
|
|
11,430 |
|
|
|
12,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total environmental reserves |
|
|
13,130 |
|
|
|
13,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivable for recovery of remediation costs 2 |
|
$ |
12,506 |
|
|
$ |
12,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Reported in Accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
|
2 |
|
Reported in Accounts receivable and Other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
Page 19
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
Approximately $1.3 million of the April 30, 2011 reserve represents administrative costs;
the balance represents estimated costs for investigation, studies, cleanup, and treatment. The
reserve has not been discounted. As discussed below, an associated $12.5 million and $12.7 million
undiscounted recovery from indemnitors of remediation costs at one plant site is recorded as of
April 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010, respectively.
The Companys Nichols Aluminum-Alabama, LLC (NAA) subsidiary operates a plant in Decatur,
Alabama that is subject to an Alabama Hazardous Wastes Management and Minimization Act Post-Closure
Permit. Among other things, the permit requires NAA to remediate, as directed by the state,
historical environmental releases of wastes and waste constituents. Consistent with the permit,
NAA has undertaken various studies of site conditions and, during the first quarter 2006, started a
phased program to treat in-place free product petroleum that had been released underneath the
plant. During the third quarter 2010, NAA submitted to the state its proposed workplan for
implementing a site-wide remedy; a revised version reflecting both additional sampling data and
responses to state comments was submitted during the second quarter 2011. Based on those plans,
which remain subject to further state review and approval, the Companys remediation reserve at
NAAs Decatur plant is $13.1 million. NAA was acquired through a stock purchase in which the
sellers agreed to indemnify Quanex and NAA for identified environmental matters related to the
business and based on conditions initially created or events initially occurring prior to the
acquisition. Environmental conditions are presumed to relate to the period prior to the
acquisition unless proved to relate to releases occurring entirely after closing. The limit on
indemnification is $21.5 million excluding legal fees. While the Companys current estimates
indicate it will not reach this limit, changing circumstances could result in additional costs or
expense that are not foreseen at this time. In accordance with the indemnification, the
indemnitors paid the first $1.5 million of response costs and have been paying 90% of ongoing
costs. Based on its experience to date, its estimated cleanup costs going forward, and costs
incurred to date as of April 30, 2011, the Company expects to recover from the sellers
shareholders an additional $12.5 million. Of that, $11.8 million is recorded in Other assets on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the balance is reflected in Accounts receivable on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The Companys final remediation costs and the timing of those expenditures will depend upon
such factors as the nature and extent of contamination, the cleanup technologies employed, the
effectiveness of the cleanup measures that are employed, and regulatory concurrences. While actual
remediation costs, therefore, may be more or less than amounts accrued, the Company believes it has
established adequate reserves for all probable and reasonably estimable remediation liabilities.
It is not possible at this point to reasonably estimate the amount of any obligation for
remediation in excess of current accruals because of uncertainties as to the extent of
environmental impact, cleanup technologies, and concurrence of governmental authorities. The
Company currently expects to pay the accrued remediation reserve through at least fiscal 2034,
although some of the same factors discussed earlier could accelerate or extend the timing.
Other
From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries are involved in various litigation matters
arising in the ordinary course of their business. Although the ultimate resolution and impact of
such litigation on the Company is not presently determinable, the Companys management believes
that the eventual outcome of such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on the overall
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.
14. Warranty Obligations
The Companys estimated obligations for warranty are accrued concurrently with the revenue
recognized. The Company makes provisions for its warranty obligations based upon historical
experience incurred for such obligations adjusted, as necessary, for current conditions and
factors. Due to the significant uncertainties and judgments involved in estimating the Companys
warranty obligations, including changing product designs, variance in customer installation process
and future claims experience varying from historical claims experience, the ultimate amount
incurred for warranty costs could change in the near and long term from the current estimate.
Page 20
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
The following table provides a reconciliation of the activity related to the Companys
accrued warranty, including both the current (reported in Accrued liabilities on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets) and long-term portions (reported in Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets), for the six months ended April 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at October 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
3,697 |
|
Provision for warranty expense |
|
|
2,650 |
|
Warranty costs paid |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total accrued warranty |
|
$ |
5,661 |
|
Less long-term portion |
|
|
4,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current accrued warranty |
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
During the first fiscal quarter of 2011, the reserve was increased by $2.1 million related to
a rise in projected claim experience for a legacy product that was discontinued some years ago.
15. Fair Value Measurement of Assets and Liabilities
The Company holds Money Market Fund investments that are classified as cash equivalents and
are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, based on quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets (Level 1). The Company had cash equivalent investments totaling approximately
$52.4 million and $180.6 million at April 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010, respectively. The
decrease is primarily related to the $104.4 million cash paid for the acquisition of Edgetech, net
of cash received of $0.8 million. Inputs and valuation techniques used to measure the fair value
of the Companys pension plan assets vary according to the type of security being valued. All of
the equity and debt securities held directly by the plans are actively traded and fair values are
determined based on quoted market prices. As of April 30, 2011 and October 31, 2010, the fair
value of pension plan assets was $15.1 million and $12.9 million, respectively. As of April 30,
2011, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities obtained from readily available pricing
sources for comparable instruments (Level 2) or requiring measurement at fair value without
observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (Level
3).
16. Stock Repurchase Program and Treasury Stock
On May 27, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program of 1.0 million
shares. The objectives of this program are to manage the dilution created by shares issued under
stock-based compensation plans and to repurchase shares opportunistically. The Company records
treasury stock purchases under the cost method whereby the entire cost of the acquired stock is
recorded as treasury stock. The Company uses a moving-average method on the subsequent reissuance
of shares, and any resulting proceeds in excess of cost are credited to additional paid in capital
while any deficiency is charged to retained earnings.
As of October 31, 2010, the number of shares in treasury was 351,626. During the six months
ended April 30, 2011, the Company purchased 86,649 shares at a cost of $1.5 million partially
offset by shares issued for stock option exercises and restricted stock grants for a net increase
to the number of shares in treasury to 373,444 as of April 30, 2011. The remaining shares
authorized for repurchase in the program was 663,351 as of April 30, 2011.
Page 21
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
17. Other Income (Expense)
During the three and six months ended April 30, 2011, the Company incurred $0.3 million of
transaction gains which are included in determining net income primarily related to Edgetechs
international operations and foreign currency denominated receivables. There are no transaction
gains or losses during the three and six months ended April 30, 2010.
In February 2010, the Company completed a small acquisition for approximately $1.6 million in
consideration. This operation was integrated into one of its existing Engineered Products
businesses. ASC 805 Business Combinations requires that a gain be recorded when the fair value
of the net assets acquired is greater than the fair value of the consideration transferred. Though
uncommon, bargain purchases can occur because of underpayments for the business acquired due to a
forced liquidation or distress sale. These assets were acquired at auction due to the business
being in Wisconsin receivership proceedings. As such, the Company obtained the assets at a bargain
and recognized a gain of approximately $1.3 million in Other, net.
Page 22
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
General
The discussion and analysis of Quanex Building Products Corporation and its subsidiaries
financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the April 30, 2011
Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the accompanying notes and in conjunction with
the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2010. References made to the Company or Quanex
include Quanex Building Products Corporation and its subsidiaries and Quanex Corporation
(Predecessor to Quanex Building Products Corporation) unless the context indicates otherwise.
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
Certain of the statements contained in this document and in documents incorporated by
reference herein, including those made under the caption Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations are forward-looking statements as defined under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Generally, the words expect, believe,
intend, estimate, anticipate, project, will and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements, which generally are not historical in nature. All statements which
address future operating performance, events or developments that the Company expects or
anticipates will occur in the future, including statements relating to volume, sales, operating
income and earnings per share, and statements expressing general outlook about future operating
results, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks
and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Companys
historical experience and the present projections or expectations. As and when made, management
believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable. However, caution should be taken not
to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements since such statements speak only as
of the date when made and there can be no assurance that such forward-looking statements will
occur. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Factors exist that could cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from the
expected results described in or underlying the Companys forward-looking statements. Such factors
include domestic and international economic activity, prevailing prices of aluminum scrap and other
raw material costs, the rate of change in prices for aluminum scrap, energy costs, interest rates,
construction delays, market conditions, particularly in the home building and remodeling markets,
any material changes in purchases by the Companys principal customers, labor supply and relations,
environmental regulations, changes in estimates of costs for known environmental remediation
projects and situations, world-wide political stability and economic growth, warranty obligations,
the Companys successful implementation of its internal operating plans, acquisition strategies and
integration, performance issues with key customers, suppliers and subcontractors, and regulatory
changes and legal proceedings. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking
statements contained herein will occur or that objectives will be achieved. All written and verbal
forward-looking statements attributable to the Company or persons acting on its behalf are
expressly qualified in their entirety by such factors. For more information, see Part I, Item 1A,
Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, for the year ended October 31, 2010.
About Third-Party Information
In this report, the Company relies on and refers to information regarding industry data
obtained from market research, publicly available information, industry publications, U.S.
government sources and other third parties. Although the Company believes the information is
reliable, it cannot guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and has not
independently verified it.
Page 23
Description of Business
On December 12, 2007, Quanex Building Products Corporation was incorporated in the state of
Delaware as a subsidiary of Quanex Corporation to facilitate the separation of Quanex Corporations
vehicular products and building products businesses. The separation occurred on April 23, 2008
through the spin-off of Quanex Corporations building products business to its shareholders
immediately followed by the merger of Quanex Corporation (consisting principally of the vehicular
products business and all non-building products related corporate accounts) with a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Gerdau S.A. (Gerdau).
The spin-off and subsequent merger is hereafter referred to as the Separation. For purposes
of describing the events related to the Separation, as well as other events, transactions and
financial results of Quanex Corporation and its subsidiaries related to periods prior to April 23,
2008, the term the Company refers to Quanex Building Products Corporations accounting
predecessor, Quanex Corporation.
In January 2010, management committed to a plan to close its start-up facility in China due to
the contraction of demand and the Companys ability to serve the overseas thin film solar panel
market from its North American operations. Accordingly, the China assets and liabilities, results
of operations and cash flows are reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.
Unless otherwise noted, all discussions reflect only continuing operations.
On March 31, 2011, the Company acquired Edgetech for $104.4 million in an all cash transaction
(net of cash acquired). Headquartered in Cambridge, Ohio, Edgetech has three manufacturing
facilities located in the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany that produce a full line of
warm-edge, dual seal insulating glass spacer systems for window and door customers in North America
and abroad. Edgetechs products separate and seal double and triple pane glass within a window and
act as a thermal barrier that enhances the windows energy efficiency. Edgetech is being integrated
into the Engineered Products segment. Acquiring Edgetech will allow the Company to better serve
its growing base of national and regional customers and will further accelerate its international
growth as Edgetech has a solid market presence overseas.
Page 24
Consolidated Results of Operations
Summary Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
203.1 |
|
|
$ |
199.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
362.9 |
|
|
$ |
350.8 |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Cost of sales 1 |
|
|
175.5 |
|
|
|
167.7 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
315.2 |
|
|
|
293.7 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(140.4 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(17.5 |
) |
|
|
(233.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(78.6 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
Income tax (expense) benefit |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
(126.9 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
(209.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
(1.4 |
) |
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(131.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.2 |
) |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
(212.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overview
The first half of fiscal 2011 has been a tale of two quarters. The first quarter experienced
demand pull-forward in advance of the $1,500 window tax credit that expired on December 31, 2010,
while the second fiscal quarter experienced an expected hangover due to demand being pulled ahead
into the first fiscal quarter. All of this is in contrast to an earlier than normal building
season in the comparative first half of fiscal 2010 as demand was accelerated to beat the April 30,
2010 deadline for the homebuyers tax credit. The three and six months ended April 30, 2011 figures
include one month of financial results (April) from the Edgetech acquisition. The $6.4 million of
Edgetech Net sales was partially offset by a $2.7 million or 1.3% decline in Net sales from the
balance of the Quanex businesses for the three months ending April 30, 2011 compared to the same
2010 period. Net sales for the six months ended April 30, 2011 were up by $6.4 million from the
Edgetech acquisition and up $5.7 million or 1.6% for the balance of the Quanex businesses for the
six months ended April 30, 2011 compared to the same period of last year. Operating income in the
second quarter of 2011 was $8.0 million lower than the year ago quarter due to lower shipments at
both Engineered Products and Aluminum Sheet Products, coupled with higher maintenance costs at
Aluminum Sheet Products, transaction related costs associated with the Edgetech acquisition and
higher Engineered Products sales and marketing costs as the Company invested in driving long-term
organic growth. Operating income for the six months ended April 30, 2011, was $17.5 million lower
than the same period last year due to the same factors described for the second quarter, coupled
with costs at Engineered Products associated with rationalizing operations, higher raw material
costs and warranty expense.
The Company believes that consumer demand for more energy efficient products and its ability
to provide innovative window and door systems in addition to stand-alone components, along with its
new sales and marketing efforts targeted at regional OEM customers will help fuel long-term organic
growth even if the housing market continues to experience sustained hardship. Demographics for
long-term housing demand in the U.S. remain favorable when factoring the projected population
increase and continuing immigration. The Company believes that taking a disciplined approach to
the way it seeks new business opportunities will make it a more successful company and a stronger
competitor by offering a broader range of customers a more robust slate of systems, products and
services. Additionally, the Company is elevating its programs to develop more energy efficient
products. These programs and initiatives coupled with an eventual return to a more normal housing
market will benefit Quanex over the long term.
|
|
|
1 |
|
Exclusive of items shown separately below. |
Page 25
Business Segments
Quanex has two reportable segments: Engineered Products and Aluminum Sheet Products. The
Engineered Products segment produces systems, finished products, and components serving the OEM
residential window and door industry, while the Aluminum Sheet Products segment produces mill
finished and coated aluminum sheet
serving the broader building products markets. The primary market drivers of both segments
are residential remodeling activity and housing starts.
For financial reporting purposes, four of the Companys five operating segments, Homeshield,
Truseal, Edgetech and Mikron, have been aggregated into the Engineered Products reportable segment.
The remaining operating segment, Aluminum Sheet Products (Nichols Aluminum), is reported as a
separate reportable segment. Corporate & Other is comprised of corporate office expenses and
certain inter-division eliminations. The sale of products between segments is recognized at market
prices. The financial performance of the operations is based upon operating income. The segments
follow the accounting principles described in Item 1, Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements of the Companys 2010 Form 10-K. The two reportable segments value inventory on a FIFO
or weighted-average basis while the LIFO reserve relating to those operations accounted for under
the LIFO method of inventory valuation is computed on a consolidated basis in a single pool and
treated as a corporate item.
Three and Six Months Ended April 30, 2011 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended April 30, 2010
Engineered Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
82.5 |
|
|
$ |
84.7 |
|
|
$ |
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
$ |
166.5 |
|
|
$ |
157.5 |
|
|
$ |
9.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Cost of sales 1 |
|
|
63.1 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
131.6 |
|
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
(67.2 |
) |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
(86.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products is a family of businesses focused on providing window and door OEM
customers with fenestration components, products and systems. Key end markets are residential
remodeling and repair (R&R) and new home construction. Net sales for the second fiscal quarter of
2011 were up by $6.4 million from Edgetech and down $8.6 million or 10.2% from the remaining
Engineered Products businesses compared to the same period of 2010. The second quarter
year-over-year comparison was negatively impacted by the higher than normal demand realized in the
second quarter of 2010 driven by the homebuyers tax credit, coupled with the volume that was pulled
forward into the first fiscal quarter of 2011 ahead of the expiration of the $1,500 window tax
credit in December 2010. The Company expects the hangover from the expiration of the $1,500 window
tax credit to dissipate in the third fiscal quarter; however, uncertainty remains as to what level
the seasonal volume pickup in demand will be during the Companys fiscal second half. Net sales
for the six months ended April 30, 2011 were higher by $9.0 million including Edgetech and $2.6
million from the remaining Engineered Products businesses compared to the same period of 2010. The
first fiscal quarter of 2011 benefited from the demand pull forward generated by the expiration of
the $1,500 window tax credit, while the second quarter was hurt by the same.
|
|
|
1 |
|
Exclusive of items shown separately below. |
Page 26
Net sales less Cost of sales at Engineered Products for the three and six months ended April
30, 2011 compared to the same period of last year declined by $1.4 million and $4.1 million,
respectively. Net sales less Cost of sales as a percent of Net sales for the three and six months
ended April 30, 2011 is below the same 2010 periods due to higher raw material costs and temporary
increases in labor expense as the Company used overtime to meet a hike in orders in November and
December; additionally, the first fiscal quarter of 2010 benefited from hourly labor savings
associated with the strike at the segments Barbourville, Kentucky facility in mid-December 2009.
Further reducing margins during the six months ended April 30, 2011 was $3.1 million of costs
associated with plant consolidations and closings as the Company rationalized production
facilities. The Company finished the building consolidation project at its facility in Kent,
Washington where four buildings have been consolidated to one, and the Company closed a facility in
The Dalles, Oregon. Of the $3.1 million in plant consolidation costs, $1.3 million is
recognized in Cost of sales. During the six months ended April 30, 2011, $2.1 million of
expense was recognized in Cost of sales to increase the warranty reserve associated with a legacy
product that was discontinued some years ago. Because the establishment of the warranty reserve is
an inherently uncertain process involving estimates of the number of future claims and the cost to
settle claims, the Companys ultimate losses may differ from the warranty reserve and future
adjustments to the reserve may be necessary. Finally, April 2011 results were negatively impacted
by $0.9 million of additional non-cash Cost of goods sold to reflect the increased value of
inventory sold from applying purchase accounting to the Edgetech inventory acquired. The Company
expects the $1.1 million balance of the increased purchase accounting inventory to be recognized
during the remainder of fiscal 2011, primarily in the third fiscal quarter.
The increase in Selling, general and administrative costs for the year were primarily
attributable to $1.4 million (included in the total $3.1 million discussed above) of costs
associated with the aforementioned plant consolidations and closing during the first fiscal quarter
of 2011. The majority of the $1.4 million represents an estimated liability to terminate a
facility operating lease; if the associated sublease differs from the sublease assumptions used to
derive the reserve, additional expense or a recovery of expense could be recognized in future
periods. Furthermore, the Company incurred additional sales and marketing expenses in 2011
associated with the roll out of new products and programs and increasing resources necessary to
achieve long-term organic growth, with a focus on expanding further into the repair and remodel
segment of the residential market. Benefiting the comparative 2011 results is $1.0 million of
costs associated with the aforementioned strike in mid December 2009 (partially offset by the
direct labor savings in Cost of sales). Lastly, Edgetech incurred $1.2 million of Selling, general
and administrative costs in April 2011.
Depreciation and amortization has increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to $0.6
million of provisional April 2011 depreciation and amortization associated with Edgetech and $0.3
million (included in the total $3.1 million discussed above) of accelerated depreciation related to
the plant consolidation. Depreciation and amortization is expected to increase as a full quarter
of expense associated with the recognition of Edgetech intangible assets and the step-up in
Edgetechs tangible assets is realized going forward.
The Company formally announced Project Nexus in February 2010, a long-term organic growth
program focused on connecting the sales, marketing, and product development efforts of its
Engineered Products operating divisions: Mikron, Truseal and Homeshield (and as of March 31, 2011,
Edgetech). The Company believes it will drive profitable growth at Engineered Products by
furthering the goal of becoming the leading energy efficient expert in the market by offering
customers state-of-the-art engineering, design and marketing support. The organic growth program
is comprised of related initiatives to execute this strategy; the sales, marketing and engineering
efforts of these three divisions operated independently in the past. Today, the Engineered
Products sales and marketing employees have been organized into a single team to better utilize
their combined capabilities to expand sales opportunities to the existing customer base.
Additionally, the new sales and marketing structure is focused on developing and capturing more
regional OEM business. Regional OEMs, a customer class the Company has historically underserved,
are believed to comprise about 60% of the market. The engineering resources across Engineered
Products are also working together to develop products and systems that provide customers with the
latest innovations in technology and energy efficiency. The Company is in the early stages of this
long-term organic growth initiative but believes that it could have a valuable impact on the
long-term growth and profitability of Engineered Products. The Company will be investing in
additional resources throughout fiscal 2011 to support this organic growth effort. Annualized
incremental operating expenses and capital expenditures associated with this initiative will be
approximately $3.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively, in fiscal 2011.
Page 27
Aluminum Sheet Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
123.0 |
|
|
$ |
117.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
202.2 |
|
|
$ |
198.7 |
|
|
$ |
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Cost of sales 1 |
|
|
112.7 |
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
187.1 |
|
|
|
179.1 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(33.3 |
) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
Depreciation and
amortization |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(39.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shipped pounds |
|
|
79.7 |
|
|
|
83.1 |
|
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
131.9 |
|
|
|
144.3 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.6 |
) |
The primary market drivers for the Aluminum Sheet Products segment are residential
remodeling activity and housing starts (together approximately 70% of the segments sales) and
transportation (approximately 20% of the segments sales) markets.
The increase in net sales at the Aluminum Sheet Products segment for the second quarter of
fiscal 2011 was the result of a 9.6% increase in average selling price per pound during the period
compared to the same period of 2010, partially offset by a decrease in shipped pounds of 4.1%. The
Aluminum Association reported non-can sheet aluminum shipments in the second quarter were up 4%
from a year ago while Aluminum Sheet Products second quarter shipments were down 4%. Part of the
Companys underperformance versus the industry can be attributed to relatively weak building and
construction demand in the quarter, where Quanex has a sizable presence, compared to relatively
strong distribution and transportation demand, where Quanex has a relatively small presence.
Additionally, at this time last year, the Companys customers were aggressively restocking to meet
pre-buying demand ahead of the expiration of the $8,000 first time home buyers tax credit compared
to the second quarter of 2011 where there was no such artificial demand pull. The segment also
experienced an unplanned shutdown at its facility in Alabama resulting from an extended loss of
power stemming from tornados that ravaged the region near the end of the second fiscal quarter.
Average selling price increased primarily due to higher London Metal Exchange (LME) aluminum
prices. LME aluminum prices are the most commonly used index for correlating aluminum sheet
prices.
Selling, general and administrative costs decreased by $1.0 million and $0.4 million for the
three and six months ended April 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the same 2010 period. Second
fiscal quarter 2010 costs were higher due to a $0.9 million increase in the environmental reserve
that was recognized in the second quarter of fiscal 2010.
Operating income decreased at the Aluminum Sheet Products segment for the three and six months
ended April 30, 2011, compared to prior year primarily as a result of lower shipped pounds and
higher repair and maintenance expenses. This decline was partially offset by an increase in
spreads (sales price less material costs). Second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 spreads
increased by 4.2% and 5.5% over the same 2010 period, respectively. Spread for the
second quarter of fiscal 2011 decreased 7.2% from the sequential first quarter of fiscal 2011. The
higher spread compared to the previous year was generally a result of higher aluminum prices, while
the sequential decrease was driven by a decrease in the mix of higher margin painted sheet
shipments. The segmentss operating income and margins are impacted by changes in LME aluminum
prices as its material spread is correlated with aluminum prices over time. Declines in aluminum
prices generally result in spread compression; however, as aluminum prices rebound, spread and
profits generally expand.
|
|
|
1 |
|
Exclusive of items shown separately below. |
Page 28
Corporate and Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(5.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
|
Cost of sales 1 |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(70.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
Selling, general
and administrative |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
37.3 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
(loss) |
|
$ |
(10.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
$ |
(17.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(13.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other operating expenses, which are not in the segments mentioned above,
include intersegment eliminations, the consolidated LIFO inventory adjustments (calculated on a
combined pool basis), if any, and corporate office expenses. Net sales amounts represent
intersegment eliminations between the Engineered Products segment and the Aluminum Sheet Products
segment with an equal and offsetting elimination in Cost of sales. Included in Cost of sales for
the three and six months ended April 30, 2011 was $2.0 million of LIFO expense compared to $1.3
million of LIFO expense for the same 2010 periods. LIFO related expense/income is derived from
managements estimate of year-end inventory volume and pricing. Management is currently estimating
that aluminum scrap values held by the Company will be higher at October 31, 2011 compared to
October 31, 2010. Accordingly, 50% of the projected 2011 year-end LIFO adjustment was recorded
during the six months ended April 30, 2011. Management updates this estimate each quarter in an
effort to determine what amount, if any, should be recorded in the period. The actual adjustment
is trued-up in the fourth quarter once the year-end volume levels and pricing are known.
Selling, general and administrative costs for the three and six months ended April 30, 2011
increased by $2.2 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The single largest reason are the
transaction related costs associated with the acquisition of Edgetech of $1.1 million for the
second quarter of 2011 and $2.2 million for the first half of fiscal 2011. While the transaction
has closed, the Company expects to incur additional Edgetech transaction related costs as it
conducts integration activities. Also increasing selling, general and administrative costs are
those costs associated with the development and rollout of a company-wide ERP system. The Company
initiated this project (Project Quest) in March 2011 to support the drive for long-term organic
growth by bringing the myriad of disparate systems currently existing throughout the Company
together into a single standard system supported by a common set of processes. For the first six
months of fiscal 2011, the Company recognized $0.6 million of Project Quest expense. The current
plan anticipates the conversion of all of the Companys disparate systems to a single system over a
period of three years. Additionally, stock-based compensation expense has increased as the Company
is adding layers of vesting awards with each annual grant since the Companys Separation; as the
Companys stock option and restricted awards typically have three-year vesting periods, the Company
expected stock-based compensation expense to continue to increase through the Companys third
anniversary of the Separation in April 2011. The balance of the increase in the quarters Selling,
general and administrative costs are primarily attributable to various other programs including
lean six sigma employee training that the Company believes will result in future cost savings.
Other items
Other, net typically includes interest income earned on the Companys cash and equivalents and
beginning with the acquisition of Edgetech in April 2011 foreign currency transaction gains and
losses. Other income was lower for both the three and six months ended April 30, 2011 compared to
the same periods of fiscal 2010 by $1.1 million due to a $1.3 million acquisition related bargain
purchase gain recognized in the second quarter of 2010.
|
|
|
1 |
|
Exclusive of items shown separately below. |
Page 29
The Companys estimated annual effective tax rate for the three and six months ended April 30,
2011 is 32.5% and 37.2%, respectively, compared to 37.4% and 37.9% for the three and six months
ended April 30, 2010. The decline in the 2011 six months effective rate is primarily due to more
benefit from the manufacturers deduction. The decline in the expected 2011 effective rate leads
to an even lower effective rate for the 2011 second fiscal quarter.
Outlook
Weak GDP growth, high unemployment, a lack of housing related tax incentives, a tight credit
market, and a large inventory of homes available for sale has created a challenging business
environment this year. The growth in the economy appears to have stalled, and in turn, the pace of
the recovery in residential housing activity has slowed from previous expectations. The Company is
now anticipating reduced customer demand in the second half of 2011 compared to its original
outlook. Therefore, Engineered Products financial guidance for 2011 has been reduced.
Engineered Products now expects to earn about $30 million in 2011 (pre-Edgetech), down $5
million from previous guidance, compared to $34 million it earned in 2010. Engineered Products
sales are now expected to be about flat to last year, not higher, and as previously disclosed,
operating expenses are expected to be higher as the group continues to invest in long term growth
initiatives.
Aluminum Sheet Products guidance remains unchanged. It expects to earn about $25 million in
2011 compared to $30 million last year. This estimate is based on lower shipped pounds because
Nichols did not see the same level of restocking demand that was present in the first half of 2010
repeated in the first half of 2011.
Segment guidance for 2011 assumes no LIFO activity, and excludes estimated corporate expenses
of $26 million (pre-Edgetech transaction and integration costs). Capital expenditures are
estimated at $30 million (pre-Edgetech). Depreciation & amortization expenses are expected to be
$29 million (pre-Edgetech). Corporate expenses and capital expenditures include $2.5 million and
$9 million, respectively, of costs associated with the launch of Quanexs $30 million multiyear ERP
program.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Companys principal sources of funds are cash on hand, cash flow from operations, and
borrowings under its $270.0 million Senior Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (the Credit
Facility). As of April 30, 2011, the Company has a solid liquidity position, comprised of cash and
equivalents and adequate availability under the Companys Credit Facility. The Company has $57.7
million of cash and equivalents, $214.7 million of current availability under the revolving credit
facility and minimal debt of $2.0 million as of April 30, 2011. The Company has grown its cash and
equivalents balance steadily since its spin-off from Quanex Corporation in April 2008, throughout
2009 and 2010 from $40.5 million as of April 30, 2008 to $123.5 million at October 31, 2009 and to
$187.2 million at October 31, 2010. In a very weak year, Quanex was able to grow its cash balance
in 2010 ending the year with $187.2 million, a $63.7 million increase over 2009. Cash equivalents
during the three and six months ended April 30, 2011 were reduced primarily due to $110.8 million
of cash paid (net of cash acquired) for the acquisition of Edgetech and JELD-WENs vinyl extrusion
assets in Yakima, Washington (Yakima) in addition to a decline in earnings including the impact of
plant consolidations and transaction costs. The Companys strategy for cash uses are to make
strategic acquisitions that fit its fenestration vision, invest in organic growth opportunities,
and making ongoing purchases of Quanex stock and funding the cash dividend.
The Companys excess cash and equivalents are currently invested only in large, overnight
money market funds due to the conditions of the financial market. The funds are diversified by
security type across Treasuries, Government Agencies and Prime Corporate. These funds are all
AAA-rated, approved by the NAIC and compliant with Rule 2A-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
The Companys current investments are diversified across multiple institutions that the Company
believes to be financially sound. The Company intends to remain in highly rated money market
funds, financial institutions and treasuries following a prudent investment philosophy. The
Company had no material losses on its cash and marketable securities investments.
Page 30
The Credit Facility was executed on April 23, 2008 and has a five-year term. Proceeds from
the Credit Facility may be used to provide availability for acquisitions, working capital, capital
expenditures, and general corporate purposes. Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest
at a spread above LIBOR based on a
combined leverage and ratings grid. There are certain limitations on additional indebtedness,
asset or equity sales, and acquisitions. Dividends and other distributions are permitted so long as
after giving effect to such dividend or stock repurchase, there is no event of default. Under the
Credit Facility, the Company is obligated to comply with certain financial covenants requiring the
Company to maintain a Consolidated Leverage Ratio of no more than 3.25 to 1 and a Consolidated
Interest Coverage Ratio of no less than 3.00 to 1. As defined by the indenture, the Consolidated
Leverage Ratio is the ratio of consolidated indebtedness as of such date to consolidated EBITDA
(Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) for the previous four fiscal
quarters, and the Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio is the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to
consolidated interest expense, in each case for the previous four consecutive fiscal quarters.
EBITDA is defined by the indenture to include proforma EBITDA of acquisitions and to exclude
certain items like goodwill and intangible asset impairments and certain other non-cash charges and
non-recurring items. The availability under the Credit Facility is a function of both the facility
amount utilized and meeting covenant requirements. Additionally, the availability of the Credit
Facility is dependent upon the financial viability of the Companys lenders. The Credit Facility
is funded by a syndicate of nine banks, with three banks comprising over 55% of the commitment. If
any of the banks in the syndicate were unable to perform on their commitments to fund the facility,
the availability under the Credit Facility could be reduced; however, the Company has no reason to
believe that such liquidity will be unavailable or decreased.
As of April 30, 2011, the Company had no borrowings under the Credit Facility, and the Company
was in compliance with all Credit Facility covenants as seen by the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At April 30, 2011 |
|
Required |
|
Actual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio |
|
No less than 3.00 to 1 |
|
|
154.86 to 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Leverage Coverage Ratio |
|
No more than 3.25 to 1 |
|
|
0.13 to 1 |
|
Although there were no borrowings on the Credit Facility and only $5.6 million of
outstanding letters of credit under the Credit Facility, the aggregate availability under the
Credit Facility was limited by the Consolidated Leverage Ratio resulting in an availability of
$214.7 million at April 30, 2011. Because the Consolidated Leverage Ratio is based on a rolling
twelve months of EBITDA, a change in future earnings will impact the amount available under the
Credit Facility in future quarters, absent any pro-forma EBITDA benefit from any potential
acquisitions. To have access to the full availability of the $270.0 million Credit Facility, the
Company must have a minimum rolling EBITDA of approximately $84 million for the previous four
fiscal quarters. Actual rolling EBITDA for the previous four fiscal quarters was $68.8 million as
of April 30, 2011. Increased earnings for any future periods could increase availability under the
Credit Facility; conversely, reduced earnings for any future periods could adversely impact the
amount available under the Credit Facility in future quarters, absent any pro-forma EBITDA benefit
from any potential acquisitions.
The Company believes that it has sufficient funds and adequate financial resources available
to meet its anticipated liquidity needs. The Company also believes that cash balances and cash
flow from operations will be sufficient in the next twelve months and foreseeable future to finance
anticipated working capital requirements, capital expenditures, debt service requirements,
environmental expenditures, and dividends.
The Companys working capital was $126.4 million on April 30, 2011 compared to $223.8 million
on October 31, 2010. Working capital declined by $97.4 million from the impact of the
acquisitions of Edgetech and Yakima, of which $110.8 million represents the cash paid for these
acquisitions (net of cash acquired). Partially offsetting this decline was an $8.0 million
increase in conversion capital (accounts receivable plus inventory less accounts payable) during
the six months ended April 30, 2011. Conversion capital increased primarily due to an increase in
inventory reflecting a rise in raw material costs and an increase in levels of raw materials and
finished goods held. The Company increased inventory levels partly to enhance customer service as
well as to temporarily build inventory and increase raw materials in stock in advance of upcoming
supplier price increases.
Page 31
The following table summarizes the Companys cash flow results from continuing operations for
the six months ended April 30, 2011 and 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
April 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
$ |
(5.3 |
) |
|
$ |
40.6 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
$ |
(121.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(8.9 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
$ |
(3.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
Highlights from the Companys cash flow results for the six months ended April 30, 2011
and 2010 are as follows:
Operating Activities Continuing Operations
Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations for the first six months of
fiscal 2011 compared to the same period last year declined by $45.9 million. This decline is
primarily attributable to reduced income and an increase in conversion capital during the six
months ended April 30, 2011 compared to the same 2010 period. Conversion capital during the six
months ended April 2011 used $8.6 million of cash primarily attributable to an increase in
inventory from a rise in raw material costs and increases in raw and finished goods on hand. The
Company increased inventory levels partly to enhance customer service as well as to temporarily
build inventory and increase raw materials in stock in advance of upcoming supplier price
increases. Additionally, during the three and six months ended April 30, 2010, the Company
received a federal income tax refund of $11.4 million; the Company did not receive a tax refund in
2011. Quanex expects to remit an estimated $3.5 million in fiscal 2011 relating to reorganization
taxes assumed in the Edgetech acquisition. The Company expects operating cash flows to improve
during the balance of fiscal 2011 as the Companys second half of its fiscal year is typically
seasonally stronger.
Investing Activities Continuing Operations
Cash spending from investing activities from continuing operations during the six months ended
April 30, 2011, increased $112.1 million compared to spending during the same prior year period.
The increase in investing cash spending is attributable to the Companys acquisition activity
during the second fiscal quarter of 2011. On March 31, 2011, the Company acquired Edgetech for
$104.4 million in an all cash transaction (net of cash acquired). Edgetech is headquartered in
Cambridge, Ohio, and has three manufacturing facilities (U.S., U.K. and Germany) that produce and
market a full line of insulating glass spacer systems for window and door customers in North
America and abroad. In March 2011, the Company also acquired JELD-WENs vinyl extrusion assets in
Yakima, Washington (to be integrated into one of its existing Engineered Products businesses) for
$6.4 million in cash consideration. This acquisition was effected through an asset purchase of
vinyl extrusion related equipment and certain other assets. During the first half of fiscal 2010,
the company spent approximately $1.6 million on a small acquisition.
Capital expenditures increased by $3.5 million during the six months ended April 30, 2011
compared to spending during the same prior year period. In the first six months of fiscal 2011,
the Company incurred $1.6 million associated with the rollout of its company-wide ERP system
(Project Quest) initiated in March 2011. The current plan anticipates the conversion of all of the
Companys disparate systems to a single system over a period of three years. The Company expects
2011 capital expenditures to approximate $30.0 million. The increase in spending from prior year
levels reflect approximately $9.0 million associated with Project Quest. Additionally, the
increase relates to organic growth initiatives including capital to support new product development
as well as spending on previously deferred projects. At April 30, 2011, the Company had
commitments of approximately $3.7 million for the purchase or construction of capital assets. The
Company plans to fund these capital expenditures through cash flow from operations.
Page 32
Financing Activities Continuing Operations
The Company used $3.1 million for financing activities from continuing operations during the
six months ended April 30, 2011, compared to $2.3 million in the same prior year period. The $0.8
million increase in cash spending from financing activities was primarily the result of the
Companys stock repurchase program and to a
lesser extent an increase in the cash dividend in mid fiscal 2010. This increase in spending
was partially offset by more proceeds from stock option exercises of $0.7 million. The Board of
Directors approved a stock repurchase program of 1.0 million shares in May 2010. During the six
months ended April 30, 2011, the Company purchased 86,649 shares of common stock at a cost of $1.5
million. In the first six months of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company paid quarterly dividends of
$0.04 per common share and $0.03 per common share, respectively, with shares outstanding remaining
relatively flat. The Company increased its quarterly cash dividend in May 2010 by 33% to $0.04 per
share from $0.03 per share.
Discontinued Operations
Cash flows from discontinued operations represent results related to the Companys start-up
facility in China that was closed in fiscal year 2010. Residual 2011 cash flows represent wind-up
activities, including repayment by the China facility (discontinued cash outflow) to its Quanex
parent (offsetting financing cash inflow in continuing operations).
Critical Accounting Estimates
In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, the Companys management must make decisions
which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. Such decisions include the
selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and assumptions on which to base
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the
Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, allowances for
doubtful accounts, inventory, long-lived assets, environmental contingencies, insurance, U.S.
pension and other post-employment benefits, litigation and contingent liabilities, warranty
obligations and income taxes. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates
under different assumptions or conditions. The Companys management believes the critical
accounting estimates listed and described in Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the Companys 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K
are the most important to the fair presentation of the Companys financial condition and results.
These policies require managements significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of the
Companys consolidated financial statements. There have been no significant changes to the
Companys critical accounting estimates since October 31, 2010.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC Topic No. 2010-29
Business Combinations (ASC Topic 805) Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for
Business Combinations which amended ASC Topic 805 Business Combinations to specify that if a
public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and
earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the year
had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The ASC
also expands the supplemental pro forma disclosures under ASC Topic 805 to include a description of
the nature and the amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to
the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. The ASC is
effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010 (November 1,
2011 for the Company). Early adoption is permitted. The Company has disclosed information in
accordance with this ASC effective March 31, 2011.
Page 33
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASC Topic No. 2010-28 IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (ASC
Topic 350) When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero
or Negative Carrying Amounts which amended ASC Topic 350 Goodwill and Other. The ASC requires an
entity with reporting units that have carrying amounts that are zero or negative to assess whether
it is more likely than not that the reporting units goodwill is impaired. If the entity
determines that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting units
is impaired, the entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for those
reporting unit(s) and record any resulting impairment as a cumulative-effect adjustment to
beginning retained earnings. The provisions of this ASC are effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010 (November 1, 2011 for the
Company). Early adoption is not permitted. The
Company does not expect the adoption of this ASC to have a material impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASC Topic No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures (ASC Topic 820) Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements. The ASC
requires new disclosures about transfers into and out of Levels 1 (fair value determined based on
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities) and 2 (fair value determined
based on significant other observable inputs) and separate disclosures about purchases, sales,
issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarifies existing fair value
disclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. Except for the detailed Level 3 roll-forward disclosures, the new standard is
effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 31,
2009 (February 1, 2010 for the Company). The requirement to provide detailed disclosures about the
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll-forward activity for Level 3 fair value
measurements is effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 31, 2010 (February 1, 2011 for the Company). Other than requiring additional disclosures,
none that currently impact the Company; the adoption of this new guidance does not have a material
impact on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In April 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04 (ASU 2011-04), Fair
Value Measurement (ASC Topic 820) Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and
Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amended guidance changes the wording used to
describe many requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information
about fair value measurements. Additionally, the amendments clarify the FASBs intent about the
application of existing fair value measurement requirements. The guidance provided in ASU 2011-04
is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and is applied
prospectively. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2011-04 to have a material effect
on its consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Item 3. |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
The following discussion of the Company and its subsidiaries exposure to various market risks
contains forward looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These projected
results have been prepared utilizing certain assumptions considered reasonable in light of
information currently available to the Company. Nevertheless, because of the inherent
unpredictability of interest rates, foreign currency rates and metal commodity prices as well as
other factors, actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward looking
information. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading
purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
The Company and its subsidiaries have a Credit Facility and other long-term debt which subject
the Company to the risk of loss associated with movements in market interest rates.
At April 30, 2011, the Company had fixed-rate debt totaling $0.2 million or 9% of total debt,
which does not expose the Company to the risk of earnings loss due to changes in market interest
rates. The Company and certain of its subsidiaries floating-rate obligations totaled $1.8
million, or 91% of total debt at April 30, 2011. Based on the floating-rate obligations
outstanding at April 30, 2011, a one percent increase or decrease in the average interest rate
would result in a change to pre-tax interest expense of approximately $18 thousand.
Commodity Price Risk
Within the Aluminum Sheet Products segment, the Company uses various grades of aluminum scrap
as well as minimal amounts of prime aluminum ingot as raw materials for its manufacturing
processes. The price of this raw material is subject to fluctuations due to many factors in the
aluminum market. In the normal course of business, Nichols Aluminum enters into firm price sales
commitments with its customers. In an effort to reduce the risk of fluctuating raw material
prices, Nichols Aluminum enters into firm price raw material purchase commitments (which are
designated as normal purchases under ASC Topic 815 Derivatives and Hedging (ASC 815)) as well
as option contracts on the London Metal Exchange (LME). The Companys risk management policy as it
relates to these LME contracts is to enter into contracts to cover the raw material needs of the
Companys committed sales orders, to the extent not covered by fixed price purchase commitments.
Page 34
Nichols Aluminum maintains a balanced metals book position which excludes a normal operational
inventory level. This operating inventory level as a matter of practice is currently not hedged
against material price (LME) movements. This practice reflects that over the commodity price
cycle, no gain or loss is incurred on this inventory. Through the use of firm price raw material
purchase commitments and LME contracts, the Company intends to protect cost of sales from the
effects of changing prices of aluminum. To the extent that the raw material costs factored into
the firm price sales commitments are matched with firm price raw material purchase commitments,
changes in aluminum prices should have no effect. During fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company
primarily relied upon firm price raw material purchase commitments to protect cost of sales tied to
firm price sales commitments. At April 30, 2011, there were 21 open LME forward contracts
associated with metal exchange derivatives covering notional volumes of 1.2 million pounds with a
fair value mark-to-market net gain of approximately $0.4 million. At April 30, 2011 there were no
open LME short sale contracts associated with metal exchange derivatives. These contracts were not
designated as hedging instruments, and any mark-to-market net gain or loss was recorded in Cost of
sales with the offsetting amount reflected as a current asset or liability on the balance sheet.
At October 31, 2010, there were 22 open LME forward contracts associated with metal exchange
derivatives covering notional volumes of 1.2 million pounds with a fair value mark-to-market net
gain of approximately $0.2 million. In addition, at October 31, 2010, there were 116 open LME
short sale contracts associated with metal exchange derivatives covering notional volumes of 6.4
million pounds with a fair value mark-to-market net loss of approximately $0.4 million.
Within the Engineered Products segment, polyvinyl resin (PVC) is the significant raw material
consumed during the manufacture of vinyl extrusions. The Company has a monthly resin adjuster in
place with the majority of its customers and resin supplier that is adjusted based upon published
industry resin prices. This adjuster effectively shares the base pass-through price changes of PVC
with the Companys customers commensurate with the market at large. The Companys long-term
exposure to changes in PVC prices is thus significantly reduced due to the contractual component of
the resin adjuster program.
|
|
|
Item 4. |
|
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of the Companys management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of
its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Act) as of April 30, 2011. Based on that evaluation, the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of April 30, 2011, the
disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
As a result of the acquisition of Edgetech on March 31, 2011, certain information included in
the Companys consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended April 30, 2011, was obtained
from accounting and information systems utilized by Edgetech that have not yet been fully
integrated in the Companys systems and procedures. In connection with the integration, the
Company implemented certain compensating manual procedures and controls at Edgetech to ensure the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
There have been no other changes in internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the 1934 Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal control
over financial reporting.
Page 35
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
In addition to those Risk Factors described in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2010 and elsewhere in this report, the following is a potential risk factor that could
cause the Companys actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking
statements. This factor, as well as the other information contained in this document and the Risk
Factors described in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010, should be
carefully considered when evaluating an investment in the Companys securities. The following
risks and any of the Risk Factors in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2010
could have material adverse effects on the Companys financial condition, operating results and
cash flow. The factor below and the Risk Factors in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2010 are not all-inclusive or necessarily in order of importance.
Product liability claims and product replacements could harm our reputation, sales and financial
condition.
The Company designs and manufactures most of its standard products and expects to continue to
do so. The Company has on occasion found flaws and deficiencies in the manufacturing, design,
testing and installation of its products. Some deficiencies may not become apparent until after
the products are installed by customers.
The Company may need to replace products, and it may be liable for any costs necessary to
retrofit the affected structures. Any such replacement or retrofit could entail substantial costs
and adversely affect the Companys reputation, sales and financial condition. The Company does not
carry insurance against product replacement costs or the adverse business effect of a product
replacement, and its product liability insurance may not cover retrofit costs.
|
|
|
Item 2. |
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
On May 27, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that authorized
the repurchase of 1.0 million shares of the Companys common stock. Set forth below is a table
summarizing the program and the repurchase of shares during the quarter ended April 30, 2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total Number of |
|
|
(d) Maximum Number of |
|
|
|
(a) Total Number |
|
|
(b) Average |
|
|
Shares Purchased as Part |
|
|
Shares that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid per |
|
|
of Publicly Announced |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
Share |
|
|
Plans or Programs (1) |
|
|
Plans or Programs |
|
February 1, 2011 thru
February 28, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 1, 2011 thru
March 31, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2011 thru
April 30, 2011(2) |
|
|
26,839 |
|
|
$ |
20.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
26,839 |
|
|
$ |
20.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
On May 27, 2010, the Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program of
1.0 million shares. The program does not have a dollar limit or an expiration date. |
|
(2) |
|
In April 2011, shares were surrendered to the Company by employees to satisfy
individual tax withholding obligations upon vesting of previously issued shares of restricted stock
awards. Average price paid per share reflects the closing price of Quanex stock on the business
day the shares were surrendered by the employee stockholder to satisfy individual tax withholding. |
Page 36
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 31, 2011, by and among
Quanex Building Products Corporation, QSB, Inc., Lauren Holdco, Inc., Lauren
International, Inc., and Kevin E. Gray, as agent for the shareholders of
Lauren Holdco, Inc., filed as Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrants Current Report
on Form 8-K (Reg. No. 001-33913) filed with the Commission on February 2,
2011, and incorporatated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated as of December 12, 2007,
filed as Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form 10
(Reg. No. 001-33913) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 11, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant dated as of August 28, 2008,
filed as Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Reg.
No. 001-33913) for the quarter ended January 31, 2009, and incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Form of Registrants Common Stock certificate, filed as Exhibit 4.1 of
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form 10 (Reg.
No. 001-33913) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 14, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of April 23, 2008, among the Company, certain of
its subsidiaries as guarantors, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, in
its capacity as administrative agent, and certain lender parties, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (Reg. No.
001-33913) dated April 23, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 31.1 |
|
|
Certification by chief executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 31.2 |
|
|
Certification by chief financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
As permitted by Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has not filed with
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term
debt of the Registrant and its subsidiaries because the total amount of securities authorized under
any of such instruments does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Registrant and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of any such
agreements to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Page 37
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUANEX BUILDING PRODUCTS CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Brent L. Korb
Brent L. Korb
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
Date: June 14, 2011
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
Page 38
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of January 31, 2011, by and among
Quanex Building Products Corporation, QSB, Inc., Lauren Holdco, Inc., Lauren
International, Inc., and Kevin E. Gray, as agent for the shareholders of
Lauren Holdco, Inc., filed as Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrants Current Report
on Form 8-K (Reg. No. 001-33913) filed with the Commission on February 2,
2011, and incorporatated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant dated as of December 12, 2007,
filed as Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrants Registration Statement on Form 10
(Reg. No. 001-33913) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
January 11, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant dated as of August 28, 2008,
filed as Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (Reg.
No. 001-33913) for the quarter ended January 31, 2009, and incorporated
herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
Form of Registrants Common Stock certificate, filed as Exhibit 4.1 of
Amendment No. 1 to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form 10 (Reg.
No. 001-33913) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 14, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Credit Agreement dated as of April 23, 2008, among the Company, certain of
its subsidiaries as guarantors, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, in
its capacity as administrative agent, and certain lender parties, filed as
Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K (Reg. No.
001-33913) dated April 23, 2008, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 31.1 |
|
|
Certification by chief executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 31.2 |
|
|
Certification by chief financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* 32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Page 39