Form 6-K
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 6-K
Report of Foreign Private Issuer
Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
Commission file number 1- 32479
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
4th Floor, Belvedere Building
69 Pitts Bay Road
Hamilton, HM 08 Bermuda
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F þ Form 40-F o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1).
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7).
Yes o No þ
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
REPORT ON FORM 6-K FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2011
INDEX
2
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOYAGE REVENUES (note 10b) |
|
|
92,247 |
|
|
|
91,846 |
|
|
|
185,466 |
|
|
|
184,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
Vessel operating expenses (note 10b) |
|
|
23,388 |
|
|
|
22,041 |
|
|
|
44,195 |
|
|
|
43,069 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22,171 |
|
|
|
22,407 |
|
|
|
44,520 |
|
|
|
44,563 |
|
General and administrative (notes 10a and 10b) |
|
|
6,535 |
|
|
|
5,037 |
|
|
|
12,861 |
|
|
|
10,429 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
52,779 |
|
|
|
50,104 |
|
|
|
102,631 |
|
|
|
98,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
39,468 |
|
|
|
41,742 |
|
|
|
82,835 |
|
|
|
85,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ITEMS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense (notes 8 and 10a) |
|
|
(12,136 |
) |
|
|
(11,320 |
) |
|
|
(23,890 |
) |
|
|
(24,094 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
1,698 |
|
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
|
3,276 |
|
|
|
3,302 |
|
Realized and unrealized loss on derivative instruments (note 11) |
|
|
(27,329 |
) |
|
|
(45,549 |
) |
|
|
(16,560 |
) |
|
|
(72,361 |
) |
Foreign currency exchange (loss) gain (note 8) |
|
|
(8,859 |
) |
|
|
36,635 |
|
|
|
(29,892 |
) |
|
|
59,856 |
|
Equity income (loss) |
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
(2,930 |
) |
|
|
11,504 |
|
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
Other income (expense) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other items |
|
|
(43,038 |
) |
|
|
(21,629 |
) |
|
|
(55,832 |
) |
|
|
(34,520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income before income tax (expense) recovery |
|
|
(3,570 |
) |
|
|
20,113 |
|
|
|
27,003 |
|
|
|
50,948 |
|
Income tax expense (note 9) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
|
(3,689 |
) |
|
|
19,891 |
|
|
|
26,048 |
|
|
|
50,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest in net (loss) income |
|
|
(561 |
) |
|
|
(2,875 |
) |
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
(2,574 |
) |
Dropdown Predecessors interest in net (loss) income (note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,258 |
|
General Partners interest in net (loss) income (note 13) |
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
4,283 |
|
Limited partners interest in net (loss) income (note 13) |
|
|
(5,431 |
) |
|
|
20,656 |
|
|
|
16,685 |
|
|
|
46,945 |
|
Limited partners interest in net (loss) income per unit (note 13) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
Subordinated unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
Total unit (basic and diluted) |
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average number of units outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
59,152,816 |
|
|
|
52,339,849 |
|
|
|
57,140,637 |
|
|
|
48,676,558 |
|
Subordinated units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663,291 |
|
Total units (basic and diluted) |
|
|
59,152,816 |
|
|
|
52,339,849 |
|
|
|
57,140,637 |
|
|
|
52,339,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions declared per unit |
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party transactions (note 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
74,508 |
|
|
|
81,055 |
|
Restricted cash current (note 6) |
|
|
91,723 |
|
|
|
82,576 |
|
Accounts receivable, including non-trade of $9,802 (2010 $12,832) (note 11) |
|
|
11,423 |
|
|
|
19,362 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
5,532 |
|
|
|
5,911 |
|
Current portion of derivative assets (note 11) |
|
|
16,967 |
|
|
|
16,758 |
|
Current portion of net investments in direct financing leases (note 6) |
|
|
5,857 |
|
|
|
5,635 |
|
Advances to affiliates (note 10c) |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
6,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
209,167 |
|
|
|
217,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash long-term (note 6) |
|
|
493,820 |
|
|
|
489,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment (note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At cost, less accumulated depreciation of $223,643 (2010 $200,708) |
|
|
1,093,251 |
|
|
|
1,059,465 |
|
Vessels under capital leases, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $189,134
(2010 $172,113) |
|
|
869,543 |
|
|
|
880,576 |
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts (note 12) |
|
|
40,835 |
|
|
|
79,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total vessels and equipment |
|
|
2,003,629 |
|
|
|
2,019,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in joint ventures |
|
|
184,229 |
|
|
|
172,898 |
|
Net investments in direct financing leases (note 6) |
|
|
406,971 |
|
|
|
410,060 |
|
Advances to joint venture partner (note 7) |
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
|
10,200 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
21,778 |
|
|
|
22,967 |
|
Derivative assets (note 11) |
|
|
50,562 |
|
|
|
45,525 |
|
Intangible assets net |
|
|
118,981 |
|
|
|
123,546 |
|
Goodwill liquefied gas segment |
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
35,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
3,534,968 |
|
|
|
3,547,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable (includes $275 and $567 for 2011 and 2010, respectively,
owing to related parties) (note 10c) |
|
|
5,720 |
|
|
|
4,355 |
|
Accrued liabilities (includes $3,316 and $3,020 for 2011 and 2010, respectively,
owing to related parties) (notes 10c and 11) |
|
|
40,716 |
|
|
|
38,672 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
13,411 |
|
|
|
13,944 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
289,651 |
|
|
|
76,408 |
|
Current obligations under capital lease |
|
|
271,940 |
|
|
|
267,382 |
|
Current portion of derivative liabilities (note 11) |
|
|
47,041 |
|
|
|
50,603 |
|
Advances from joint venture partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
Advances from affiliates (note 10c) |
|
|
83,721 |
|
|
|
133,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
752,200 |
|
|
|
584,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
1,030,026 |
|
|
|
1,322,707 |
|
Long-term obligations under capital lease |
|
|
471,072 |
|
|
|
470,752 |
|
Long-term unearned revenue |
|
|
40,636 |
|
|
|
41,700 |
|
Other long-term liabilities (note 6) |
|
|
66,944 |
|
|
|
64,777 |
|
Derivative liabilities (note 11) |
|
|
154,394 |
|
|
|
149,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,515,272 |
|
|
|
2,634,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (notes 6, 8, 11 and 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest |
|
|
21,191 |
|
|
|
17,123 |
|
Partners equity |
|
|
998,505 |
|
|
|
896,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
1,019,696 |
|
|
|
913,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and total equity |
|
|
3,534,968 |
|
|
|
3,547,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation of variable interest entities (note 12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Cash and cash equivalents provided by (used for) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
26,048 |
|
|
|
50,912 |
|
Non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative instruments (note 11) |
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
|
|
50,566 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
44,520 |
|
|
|
44,563 |
|
Unrealized foreign currency exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
29,730 |
|
|
|
(58,640 |
) |
Equity based compensation |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Equity (income) loss |
|
|
(11,504 |
) |
|
|
1,613 |
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and other |
|
|
1,512 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
17,023 |
|
|
|
9,197 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
(2,233 |
) |
Expenditures for drydocking |
|
|
(7,185 |
) |
|
|
(6,016 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating cash flow |
|
|
96,719 |
|
|
|
91,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution to Teekay Corporation for the acquisition of Alexander Spirit LLC,
Bermuda Spirit LLC and Hamilton Spirit LLC (note 2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,997 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
100,640 |
|
|
|
35,049 |
|
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(38,129 |
) |
|
|
(40,427 |
) |
Prepayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(173,000 |
) |
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
Scheduled repayments of capital lease obligations and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
(4,983 |
) |
|
|
(1,854 |
) |
Proceeds from follow-on offering net of offering costs (note 13) |
|
|
161,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to and from affiliates |
|
|
1,443 |
|
|
|
(4,223 |
) |
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
(3,227 |
) |
|
|
495 |
|
Equity contribution from Teekay Corporation to Dropdown Predecessor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
466 |
|
Cash distributions paid |
|
|
(78,238 |
) |
|
|
(65,269 |
) |
Purchase of Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary (note 10e) |
|
|
(55,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Repayment of joint venture partners advances |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(1,264 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net financing cash flow |
|
|
(89,312 |
) |
|
|
(120,155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to joint venture partner and to joint venture |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,900 |
) |
Receipts from direct financing leases |
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
2,666 |
|
Expenditures for vessels and equipment |
|
|
(16,821 |
) |
|
|
(4,820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investing cash flow |
|
|
(13,954 |
) |
|
|
(9,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(6,547 |
) |
|
|
(37,351 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period |
|
|
81,055 |
|
|
|
108,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period |
|
|
74,508 |
|
|
|
70,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information (note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES (Note 1)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TOTAL EQUITY
(in thousands of U.S. dollars and units)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners Equity |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
Partner |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Balance as at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
55,106 |
|
|
|
856,421 |
|
|
|
39,779 |
|
|
|
17,123 |
|
|
|
913,323 |
|
Net income and comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,685 |
|
|
|
5,167 |
|
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
26,048 |
|
Cash distributions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72,112 |
) |
|
|
(6,126 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(78,366 |
) |
Equity based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
Proceeds from follow-on public offering of
units, net of
offering costs of
$7.0 million (note
13) |
|
|
4,252 |
|
|
|
158,309 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,682 |
|
Acquisition of Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary (note
10e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,011 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
59,358 |
|
|
|
956,453 |
|
|
|
42,052 |
|
|
|
21,191 |
|
|
|
1,019,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
6
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
United States generally accepted accounting principles (or GAAP). These financial statements
include the accounts of Teekay LNG Partners L.P., which is a limited partnership organized under
the laws of the Republic of The Marshall Islands, its wholly owned or controlled subsidiaries,
the Dropdown Predecessor, as described in Note 2 below, and variable interest entities for which
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. or its subsidiaries are the primary beneficiaries (see Note 12)
(collectively, the Partnership). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Certain information and footnote disclosures required by GAAP for complete annual financial
statements have been omitted; therefore, these interim financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the Partnerships audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2010. In the opinion of management of Teekay GP L.L.C., the general partner of
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. (or the General Partner), these interim consolidated financial
statements reflect all adjustments consisting solely of a normal recurring nature, necessary to
present fairly, in all material respects, the Partnerships consolidated financial position,
results of operations, and changes in total equity and cash flows for the interim periods
presented. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily
indicative of those for a full fiscal year. Significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated upon consolidation.
On March 17, 2010, the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation two 2009-built Suezmax
tankers, the Bermuda Spirit and the Hamilton Spirit (or the Centrofin Suezmaxes), and a
2007-built Handymax Product tanker, the Alexander Spirit, and the related long-term, fixed-rate
time-charter contracts. These transactions were deemed to be business acquisitions between
entities under common control. As a result, the Partnerships consolidated statements of (loss)
income and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 reflect these three vessels and
their results of operations, referred to herein as the Dropdown Predecessor, as if the
Partnership had acquired them when each respective vessel began operations under the ownership
of Teekay Corporation. These vessels began operations under the ownership of Teekay Corporation
on May 27, 2009 (Bermuda Spirit), June 24, 2009 (Hamilton Spirit) and September 3, 2009
(Alexander Spirit). The effect of adjusting the Partnerships financial statements to account
for these common control exchanges up to March 17, 2010, increased the Partnerships net income
by $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The Partnerships consolidated financial statements include the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows of the Dropdown Predecessor. In the preparation of these consolidated
financial statements, general and administrative expenses and interest expense were not
identifiable as relating solely to the vessels. General and administrative expenses (consisting
primarily of salaries and other employee related costs, office rent, legal and professional
fees, and travel and entertainment) were allocated based on the Dropdown Predecessors
proportionate share of Teekay Corporations total ship-operating (calendar) days for the period
presented. In addition, the Dropdown Predecessor was capitalized in part with non-interest
bearing loans or equity from Teekay Corporation and its subsidiaries. These intercompany loans
and equity were generally used to finance the acquisition of the vessels. Interest expense
includes the allocation of interest to the Dropdown Predecessor from Teekay Corporation and its
subsidiaries based upon the weighted-average outstanding balance of these intercompany loans and
equity and the weighted-average interest rate outstanding on Teekay Corporations loan
facilities that were used to finance these intercompany loans and equity. Management believes
these allocations reasonably present the general and administrative expenses and interest
expense of the Dropdown Predecessor.
3. |
|
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements |
In January 2011, the Partnership adopted an amendment to Financial Accounting Standards Board
(or FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (or ASC) 605, Revenue Recognition, that provides for
a new methodology for establishing the fair value for a deliverable in a multiple-element
arrangement. When vendor specific objective or third-party evidence for deliverables in a
multiple-element arrangement cannot be determined, the Partnership will be required to develop a
best estimate of the selling price of separate deliverables and to allocate the arrangement
consideration using the relative selling price method. The adoption of this amendment did not
have an impact on the Partnerships consolidated financial statements.
7
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
a) Fair Value Measurements
For a description of how fair value is estimated, see Note 2 in the Partnerships audited
consolidated financial statements filed on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010. The
estimated fair value of the Partnerships financial instruments and categorization using the
fair value hierarchy for those financial instruments that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2011 |
|
|
December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Asset |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
Hierarchy |
|
(Liability) |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
|
Level(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash |
|
|
|
|
660,051 |
|
|
|
660,051 |
|
|
|
653,193 |
|
|
|
653,193 |
|
Advances to and from affiliates |
|
|
|
|
(80,564 |
) |
|
|
(80,564 |
) |
|
|
(127,218 |
) |
|
|
(127,218 |
) |
Long-term debt (note 8) |
|
|
|
|
(1,319,677 |
) |
|
|
(1,222,154 |
) |
|
|
(1,399,115 |
) |
|
|
(1,292,026 |
) |
Advances to and from joint venture partners (note 7) |
|
|
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
10,141 |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Derivative instruments (note 11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements assets |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
72,059 |
|
|
|
72,059 |
|
|
|
66,870 |
|
|
|
66,870 |
|
Interest rate swap agreements liabilities |
|
Level 2 |
|
|
(203,202 |
) |
|
|
(203,202 |
) |
|
|
(201,463 |
) |
|
|
(201,463 |
) |
Other derivative |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
(9,600 |
) |
|
|
(9,600 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The fair value hierarchy level is only applicable to financial instruments on the
consolidated balance sheets that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. |
|
(2) |
|
The fair value of the Partnerships advances to its joint venture partner as at June
30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was not determinable given the amounts are non-current with
no fixed repayment terms. |
Changes in fair value during the six months ended June 30, 2011 for assets and liabilities that
are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset/(Liability) |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
Total unrealized gains |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
(9,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
b) Financing Receivables
The following table contains a summary of the Partnerships loan receivables and other financing
receivables by type of borrower and the method by which the Partnership monitors the credit
quality of its financing receivables on a quarterly basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
Credit Quality |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Class of Financing Receivable |
|
Indicator |
|
Grade |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct financing leases |
|
Payment activity |
|
Performing |
|
|
412,828 |
|
|
|
415,695 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivable included in other assets |
|
Payment activity |
|
Performing |
|
|
596 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
Advances to joint venture partner |
|
Other internal metrics |
|
Performing |
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423,624 |
|
|
|
426,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The following table includes results for the Partnerships segments for the periods
presented in these financial statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
65,885 |
|
|
|
26,362 |
|
|
|
92,247 |
|
|
|
65,822 |
|
|
|
26,024 |
|
|
|
91,846 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
13,145 |
|
|
|
10,243 |
|
|
|
23,388 |
|
|
|
12,744 |
|
|
|
9,297 |
|
|
|
22,041 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,081 |
|
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
22,171 |
|
|
|
15,394 |
|
|
|
7,013 |
|
|
|
22,407 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
6,535 |
|
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
5,037 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
33,657 |
|
|
|
5,811 |
|
|
|
39,468 |
|
|
|
34,936 |
|
|
|
6,806 |
|
|
|
41,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquefied Gas |
|
|
Tanker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Segment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
131,678 |
|
|
|
53,788 |
|
|
|
185,466 |
|
|
|
131,608 |
|
|
|
52,730 |
|
|
|
184,338 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
24,222 |
|
|
|
19,973 |
|
|
|
44,195 |
|
|
|
24,160 |
|
|
|
18,909 |
|
|
|
43,069 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,205 |
|
|
|
14,315 |
|
|
|
44,520 |
|
|
|
30,632 |
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
44,563 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
5,596 |
|
|
|
12,861 |
|
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
5,059 |
|
|
|
10,429 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
69,916 |
|
|
|
12,919 |
|
|
|
82,835 |
|
|
|
71,351 |
|
|
|
14,117 |
|
|
|
85,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate
resources). |
A reconciliation of total segment assets to total assets presented in the consolidated balance
sheets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets of the liquefied gas segment |
|
|
2,880,137 |
|
|
|
2,866,541 |
|
Total assets of the conventional tanker segment |
|
|
560,211 |
|
|
|
568,393 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
74,508 |
|
|
|
81,055 |
|
Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses |
|
|
16,955 |
|
|
|
25,273 |
|
Advances to affiliates |
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
6,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated total assets |
|
|
3,534,968 |
|
|
|
3,547,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The minimum estimated charter hire payments in the next five fiscal years, as at June 30, 2011,
for the Partnerships vessels chartered-in and vessels chartered-out are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of 2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Vessel Charters(1) |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Charters-in capital leases(2)(3)(4) |
|
|
154,448 |
|
|
|
79,175 |
|
|
|
96,766 |
|
|
|
52,093 |
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charters-out operating leases(5) |
|
|
170,998 |
|
|
|
339,646 |
|
|
|
338,718 |
|
|
|
338,718 |
|
|
|
335,564 |
|
Charters-out direct financing leases |
|
|
19,265 |
|
|
|
38,530 |
|
|
|
38,530 |
|
|
|
38,530 |
|
|
|
38,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,263 |
|
|
|
378,176 |
|
|
|
377,248 |
|
|
|
377,248 |
|
|
|
374,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The table does not include the Partnerships minimum charter hire payments to be paid
and received under its operating leases (or Head Lease and Sublease) for the Tangguh Hiri
and the Tangguh Sago (or the Tangguh LNG Carriers), which are described in more detail in
Note 5 to the Partnerships audited consolidated financial statements filed on Form 20-F
for the year ended December 31, 2010. |
|
(2) |
|
As at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Partnership had $571.1 million and
$559.8 million, respectively of cash which, including any interest earned on such amounts,
are restricted to being used for charter hire payments of certain vessels chartered-in
under capital leases. The Partnership also maintains restricted cash deposits relating to
certain term loans, which cash totaled $14.4 million and $12.3 million as at June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
As described in Note 5 in the Partnerships audited consolidated financial statements
filed on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Partnership has leasing
arrangements relating to five of its LNG carriers (three through Teekay Nakilat Corporation
(or the RasGas II LNG Carriers) and two through Teekay BLT Corporation (the Tangguh LNG
Carriers), in which the Partnership owns a 70% and 69% ownership interest, respectively)
whereby it is the lessee and the lessors claim tax depreciation on the capital expenditures
they incurred to acquire these vessels. As is typical in these leasing arrangements, tax
and change of law risks are assumed by the lessee. Lease payments under the lease
arrangements are based on certain tax and financial assumptions at the commencement of the
leases. If an assumption proves to be incorrect, the lessor is entitled to increase the
lease payments to maintain its agreed after-tax margin. |
|
|
|
The tax indemnification is for the duration of the lease contracts with the third parties
plus the years it would take for the lease payments to be statute barred, and ends in 2033
for two vessels and 2041 for three vessels. Although there is no maximum potential amount of
future payments, Teekay Nakilat Corporation and the Teekay BLT Corporation may terminate the
lease arrangements on a voluntary basis at any time. If the lease arrangements terminate,
Teekay Nakilat Corporation and the Teekay BLT Corporation will be required to pay termination
sums to the lessor sufficient to repay the lessors investment in the vessels and to
compensate it for the tax effect of the terminations, including recapture of any tax
depreciation. |
|
(4) |
|
Excludes estimated charter hire payments of $905.1 million for the period from 2016 to
2037. |
|
(5) |
|
The minimum scheduled future charter hire payments for vessels chartered out should not
be construed to reflect total charter hire revenues for any of the periods. In addition,
minimum scheduled future revenues have been reduced by estimated off-hire time for period
maintenance. The amounts may vary given unscheduled future events such as vessel
maintenance. |
7. |
|
Advances to Joint Venture Partner |
Advances to joint venture partner of $10.2 million as at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are
non-interest bearing and unsecured. The Partnership did not recognize any interest income from
the advances during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Revolving Credit Facilities due through 2018 |
|
|
105,000 |
|
|
|
188,000 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2019 |
|
|
359,226 |
|
|
|
371,685 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2021 |
|
|
326,835 |
|
|
|
332,248 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Term Loans due through 2021 |
|
|
117,774 |
|
|
|
120,599 |
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated Unsecured Demand Loan |
|
|
13,282 |
|
|
|
13,282 |
|
Euro-denominated Term Loans due through 2023 |
|
|
397,560 |
|
|
|
373,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,319,677 |
|
|
|
1,399,115 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
289,651 |
|
|
|
76,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,030,026 |
|
|
|
1,322,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
As at June 30, 2011, the Partnership had three long-term revolving credit facilities available,
which, as at such date, provided for borrowings of up to $510.6 million, of which $405.6 million
was undrawn. Interest payments are based on LIBOR plus margins. The amount available under the
revolving credit facilities reduces by $16.2 million (remainder of 2011), $32.9 million (2012),
$33.7 million (2013), $34.5 million (2014), $84.1
million (2015) and $309.2 million (thereafter). All the revolving credit facilities may be used
by the Partnership to fund general partnership purposes and to fund cash distributions. The
Partnership is required to repay all borrowings used to fund cash distributions within 12 months
of their being drawn, from a source other than further borrowings. The revolving credit
facilities are collateralized by first-priority mortgages granted on seven of the Partnerships
vessels, together with other related security, and include a guarantee from the Partnership or
its subsidiaries of all outstanding amounts.
The Partnership has a U.S. Dollar-denominated term loan outstanding, which, as at June 30, 2011,
totaled $359.2 million, of which $191.0 million bears interest at a fixed-rate of 5.39% and
requires quarterly payments. The remaining $168.2 million bears interest based on LIBOR plus a
margin and will require bullet repayments of approximately $56.0 million per vessel due at
maturity in 2018 and 2019. The term loan is collateralized by first-priority mortgages on three
vessels, together with certain other related security and certain guarantees from the
Partnership.
The Partnership owns a 69% interest in the Teekay Tangguh Joint Venture. The Teekay Tangguh
Joint Venture has a U.S. Dollar-denominated term loan outstanding, which, as at June 30, 2011,
totaled $326.8 million. Interest payments on the loan are based on LIBOR plus margins. Interest
payments on one tranche under the loan facility are based on LIBOR plus 0.30%, while interest
payments on the second tranche are based on LIBOR plus 0.625%. One tranche (total value of up to
$324.5 million) reduces in quarterly payments while the other tranche (total value of up to
$190.0 million) correspondingly is drawn up with a final $95.0 million bullet payment per vessel
due in 2021. This loan facility is collateralized by first-priority mortgages on the two vessels
to which the loan relates, together with certain other security and is guaranteed by the
Partnership.
At June 30, 2011, the Partnership had a U.S. Dollar-denominated term loan outstanding in the
amount of $117.8 million. Interest payments on one tranche under the loan facility are based on
LIBOR plus 0.3%, while interest payments on the second tranche are based on LIBOR plus 0.7%. One
tranche reduces in semi-annual payments of $5.4 million while the other tranche correspondingly
is drawn up every six months with a final $20 million bullet payment per vessel due 12 years and
six months from each vessel delivery date. This loan facility is collateralized by
first-priority mortgages on the two vessels to which the loan relates, together with certain
other related security and is guaranteed by Teekay Corporation.
The Partnership has a U.S. Dollar-denominated demand loan outstanding owing to Qatar Gas
Transport Company Ltd. (Nakilat), which, as at June 30, 2011, totaled $13.3 million. Interest
payments on this loan, which are based on a fixed interest rate of 4.84%, commenced in February
2008. The loan is repayable on demand no earlier than February 27, 2027.
The Partnership has two Euro-denominated term loans outstanding, which as at June 30, 2011
totaled 274.1 million Euros ($397.6 million). Interest payments are based on EURIBOR plus a
margin, which margins ranged from 0.60% to 0.66% as of June 30, 2011. The term loans have
varying maturities through 2023. The term loans are collateralized by first-priority mortgages
on two vessels to which the loans relate, together with certain other related security and
guarantees from one of the Partnerships subsidiaries. One of the term loans outstanding in the
amount of 151.6 million Euros ($219.9 million) matures in January 2012. The Partnership expects
to refinance this loan in 2011.
Also at June 30, 2011, the Partnership has an undrawn credit facility equal to the lower of
$122.0 million and 60% of the aggregate purchase price of three liquefied petroleum gas (or LPG)
carriers (or the Skaugen LPG Carriers), and two multigas carriers (or the Skaugen Multigas
Carriers). The facility will mature, with respect to each vessel, seven years after each
vessels first drawdown date. The facility will be collateralized by the vessels to which the
loan relates. The Partnership expects to draw on this facility in 2011 to repay a portion of the
amount it borrowed under its existing revolving credit facilities to purchase two Skaugen LPG
Carriers in April 2009 and November 2009 and one Skaugen Multigas Carrier in June 2011. As at
June 30, 2011, the Partnership had access to draw $71 million on this facility. The Partnership
intends to use the remaining available funds from the facility to assist in purchasing the
remaining Skaugen LPG Carrier and Skaugen Multigas Carrier.
The weighted-average effective interest rate for the Partnerships long-term debt outstanding at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 1.8%. This rate does not reflect the effect of related
interest rate swaps that the Partnership has used to economically hedge certain of its
floating-rate debt (see Note 11). At June 30, 2011, the margins on the Partnerships long-term
debt that has been drawn on ranged from 0.3% to 0.7%.
All Euro-denominated term loans are revalued at the end of each period using the then-prevailing
Euro/U.S. Dollar exchange rate. Due primarily to the revaluation of the Partnerships
Euro-denominated term loans, capital leases and restricted cash, the Partnership recognized
foreign exchange (losses) gains, substantially all of which were unrealized, of ($8.9) million
and $36.6 million, and ($29.9) million and $59.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The aggregate annual long-term debt principal repayments required for periods subsequent to June
30, 2011 are $38.5 million (remainder of 2011), $286.2 million (2012), $70.6 million (2013),
$73.5 million (2014), $129.5 million (2015) and $721.4 million (thereafter).
Certain loan agreements require that minimum levels of tangible net worth and aggregate
liquidity be maintained, provide for a maximum level of leverage, and require one of the
Partnerships subsidiaries to maintain restricted cash deposits. The Partnerships ship-owning
subsidiaries may not, among other things, pay dividends or distributions if the Partnership is
in default under its term loans or revolving credit facilities. One of the Partnerships term
loans is guaranteed by Teekay Corporation and contains covenants that require Teekay Corporation
to maintain the greater of a minimum liquidity (cash and cash equivalents) of at least $50.0
million and 5.0% of Teekay Corporations total consolidated debt which has recourse to Teekay
Corporation. As at June 30, 2011, the Partnership and its affiliates were in compliance with
all covenants relating to the Partnerships credit facilities and capital leases.
11
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The components of the provision for income taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Current |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
|
Related Party Transactions |
a) On March 17, 2010, the Partnership acquired from Teekay Corporation two 2009-built Suezmax
tankers (the Centrofin Suezmaxes), and a 2007-built Handymax Product tanker (the Alexander
Spirit) and the associated long-term fixed-rate time-charter contracts for a total cost of $160
million. As described in Note 2, the acquisition was accounted for as a reorganization of
entities under common control and accounted for on a basis similar to the pooling of interest
basis. The Partnership financed the acquisition by assuming $126 million of debt, drawing $24
million on its existing revolving credit facilities and using $10 million of cash. In addition,
the Partnership acquired approximately $15 million of working capital in exchange for a
short-term vendor loan from Teekay Corporation. The excess of the purchase price over the
historical carrying value of the assets acquired was $3.6 million and is reflected as a
distribution of capital to Teekay Corporation.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, $0.7 million of general and administrative expenses
attributable to the operations of the Centrofin Suezmaxes and Alexander Spirit were incurred by
Teekay Corporation and have been allocated to the Partnership as part of the results of the
Dropdown Predecessor.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, $0.3 million of interest expense attributable to the
operations of the Alexander Spirit was incurred by Teekay Corporation and has been allocated to
the Partnership as part of the results of the Dropdown Predecessor.
b) Two of the Partnerships LNG carriers, the Arctic Spirit and Polar Spirit (or the Kenai LNG
Carriers), are employed on long term charter contracts with subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation.
In addition, the Partnership and certain of its operating subsidiaries have entered into
services agreements with certain subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation pursuant to which the Teekay
Corporation subsidiaries provide the Partnership and its subsidiaries with administrative, crew
training, advisory, technical and strategic consulting services. Finally, the Partnership
reimburses the General Partner for expenses incurred by the General Partner that are necessary
for the conduct of the Partnerships business. Such related party transactions, excluding
expenses allocated to the Partnership as part of the result of the Dropdown Predecessor, were as
follows for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
Revenues(1) |
|
|
8,441 |
|
|
|
9,526 |
|
|
|
17,786 |
|
|
|
17,795 |
|
Vessel operating expenses(2) |
|
|
8,506 |
|
|
|
7,620 |
|
|
|
16,079 |
|
|
|
14,595 |
|
General and administrative(3) (4) (5) |
|
|
4,492 |
|
|
|
2,650 |
|
|
|
8,754 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Commencing in 2008, two of the Partnerships LNG carriers were time-chartered to
Teekay Corporation at a fixed-rate for a period of ten years, (plus options exercisable
by Teekay Corporation to extend up to an additional 15 years). |
|
(2) |
|
Teekay Corporations crew salaries and training. |
|
(3) |
|
Teekay Corporations administrative, advisory, technical and strategic management
fees. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes $0.4 million and $0.3 million, and $0.6 million and $0.5 million of
costs incurred by the General Partner during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
|
(5) |
|
Amounts are net of $0.2 million and $0.3 million, and $0.5 million and $0.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the six months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which consist of the amortization of $3.0 million paid
to the Partnership by Teekay Corporation in March 2009 for the right to provide ship
management services to certain of the Partnerships vessels. |
c) As at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, crewing and manning costs of $3.6 million
were payable to affiliates and were included as part of accounts payable and accrued liabilities
in the Partnerships consolidated balance sheets. In addition, as at June 30, 2011 and December
31, 2010, non-interest bearing advances to affiliates totaled $3.2 million and $6.1 million,
respectively, and non-interest bearing advances from affiliates totaled $83.7 million and $133.4
million, respectively. These advances are unsecured and have no fixed repayment terms.
d) The Partnerships Suezmax tanker the Toledo Spirit, operates pursuant to a time-charter
contract that increases or decreases the otherwise fixed-hire rate established in the charter
depending on the spot charter rates that the Partnership would have earned had it traded the
vessel in the spot tanker market. The remaining term of the time-charter contract is 15 years,
although the charterer has the right to terminate the time-charter in July 2018. The Partnership
has entered into an agreement with Teekay Corporation under which Teekay Corporation pays the
Partnership any amounts payable to the charterer as a result of spot rates being below the fixed
rate, and the Partnership pays Teekay Corporation any amounts payable to the Partnership as a
result of spot rates being in excess of the fixed rate. The amounts payable to or receivable
from Teekay Corporation are recognized at the end of each year (see Note 11).
12
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
e) In July 2008, subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation (or the Skaugen Multigas Subsidiaries)
signed contracts for the purchase of the Skaugen Multigas Carriers from I.M. Skaugen ASA (or
Skaugen), which are two technically advanced 12,000-cubic meter newbuilding ships capable of
carrying LNG, LPG or ethylene. The Partnership agreed to acquire the Skaugen Multigas
Subsidiaries from Teekay Corporation upon delivery of the vessels.
On June 15, 2011, the first Skaugen Multigas Carrier, the Norgas Unikum, was delivered and
commenced service under a 15-year, fixed-rate charter to Skaugen. On delivery, the Partnership
concurrently acquired Teekay Corporations 100% ownership interest in the first Skaugen Multigas
Subsidiary for a purchase price of $55.3 million. This transaction was concluded between two
entities under common control and, thus, the assets acquired were recorded at historical book
value. The excess of the purchase price over the book value of the assets of $3.2 million was
accounted for as an equity distribution to Teekay Corporation. The second Skaugen Multigas
Carrier is expected to be delivered in late 2011 for a cost of approximately $55 million and is
scheduled to commence service under a 15-year, fixed-rate charter to Skaugen (see Note 12).
11. |
|
Derivative Instruments |
The Partnership uses derivative instruments in accordance with its overall risk management
policy. The Partnership has not designated these derivative instruments as hedges for accounting
purposes.
The Partnership enters into interest rate swaps which either exchange a receipt of floating
interest for a payment of fixed interest or a payment of floating interest for a receipt of
fixed interest to reduce the Partnerships exposure to interest rate variability on its
outstanding floating-rate debt and floating-rate restricted cash deposits. As at June 30, 2011,
the Partnership was committed to the following interest rate swap agreements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value / |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Principal |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
Rate |
|
Amount |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Index |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
(%) (1) |
|
LIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
429,638 |
|
|
|
(63,073 |
) |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
212,806 |
|
|
|
(48,748 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
(13,255 |
) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
(18,260 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (3) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
225,000 |
|
|
|
(39,059 |
) |
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
% |
LIBOR-Based Restricted Cash Deposit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps (2) |
|
LIBOR |
|
|
470,673 |
|
|
|
72,059 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
EURIBOR-Based Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-denominated interest rate swaps (4) |
|
EURIBOR |
|
|
397,560 |
|
|
|
(20,807 |
) |
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(131,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes the margins the Partnership pays on its drawn floating-rate debt, which, at
June 30, 2011, ranged from 0.3% to 0.7% (see Note 8). |
|
(2) |
|
Principal amount reduces quarterly. |
|
(3) |
|
Principal amount reduces semiannually. |
|
(4) |
|
Principal amount reduces monthly to 70.1 million Euros ($101.7 million) by the maturity
dates of the swap agreements. |
The Partnership is exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties
to the interest rate swap agreements. In order to minimize counterparty risk, the Partnership
only enters into derivative transactions with counterparties that are rated A- or better by
Standard & Poors or A3 or better by Moodys at the time of the transactions. In addition, to
the extent practical, interest rate swaps are entered into with different counterparties to
reduce concentration risk.
In order to reduce the variability of its revenue, the Partnership has entered into an agreement
with Teekay Corporation under which Teekay Corporation pays the Partnership any amounts payable
to the charterer of the Toledo Spirit as a result of spot rates being below the fixed rate, and
the Partnership pays Teekay Corporation any amounts payable to the Partnership by the charterer
of the Toledo Spirit as a result of spot rates being in excess of the fixed rate. The fair
value of the derivative at June 30, 2011 was a liability of $9.6 million (December 31, 2010
liability of $10.0 million).
13
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of derivative instruments,
segregated by type of contract, on the Partnerships balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
portion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
portion of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
derivative |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
|
receivable |
|
|
assets |
|
|
assets |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
|
liabilities |
|
As at June 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
4,530 |
|
|
|
16,967 |
|
|
|
50,562 |
|
|
|
(11,367 |
) |
|
|
(47,041 |
) |
|
|
(144,794 |
) |
Toledo Spirit time-charter derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,600 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,530 |
|
|
|
16,967 |
|
|
|
50,562 |
|
|
|
(11,367 |
) |
|
|
(47,041 |
) |
|
|
(154,394 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
4,587 |
|
|
|
16,758 |
|
|
|
45,525 |
|
|
|
(11,498 |
) |
|
|
(50,603 |
) |
|
|
(139,362 |
) |
Toledo Spirit time-charter derivative |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,587 |
|
|
|
16,758 |
|
|
|
45,525 |
|
|
|
(11,498 |
) |
|
|
(50,603 |
) |
|
|
(149,362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables present the gains (losses) for those derivative instruments not designated
or qualifying as hedging instruments. All gains (losses) are presented as realized and
unrealized loss on derivative instruments in the Partnerships consolidated statements of (loss)
income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Realized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
(10,046 |
) |
|
|
(16,430 |
) |
|
|
(26,476 |
) |
|
|
(10,581 |
) |
|
|
(32,868 |
) |
|
|
(43,449 |
) |
Toledo Spirit time-charter derivative |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(800 |
) |
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
(2,100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,099 |
) |
|
|
(17,230 |
) |
|
|
(27,329 |
) |
|
|
(10,581 |
) |
|
|
(34,968 |
) |
|
|
(45,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
Realized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains |
|
|
gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
(losses) |
|
|
Total |
|
Interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
(20,283 |
) |
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
(16,907 |
) |
|
|
(21,795 |
) |
|
|
(48,266 |
) |
|
|
(70,061 |
) |
Toledo Spirit time-charter derivative |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,336 |
) |
|
|
3,776 |
|
|
|
(16,560 |
) |
|
|
(21,795 |
) |
|
|
(50,566 |
) |
|
|
(72,361 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
a) The Partnership consolidates certain variable interest entities (or VIEs). In general, a
variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, limited-liability company, trust or any
other legal structure used to conduct activities or hold assets that either (1) has an
insufficient amount of equity to carry out its principal activities without additional
subordinated financial support, (2) has a group of equity owners that are unable to make
significant decisions about its activities, or (3) has a group of equity owners that do not have
the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive returns generated by its operations. A
party that is a variable interest holder is required to consolidate a VIE if it has both (a) the
power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entitys economic
performance and (b) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be
significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be
significant to the VIE.
In July 2008, the Skaugen Multigas Subsidiaries signed contracts for the purchase of the Skaugen
Multigas Carriers from Skaugen. The Partnership agreed to acquire the Skaugen Multigas
Subsidiaries from Teekay Corporation upon delivery of the vessels. Each vessel is scheduled to
commence service under 15-year, fixed-rate charters to Skaugen upon delivery. Subsequent to July
2008 and prior to the delivery of the vessels, the Partnership has consolidated the Skaugen
Multigas Subsidiaries as they are VIEs and the Partnership is the primary beneficiary during this
period. The delivery of the first
Skaugen Multigas Carrier and the Partnerships acquisition of the first Skaugen Multigas
Subsidiary was on June 15, 2011. The remaining vessel is expected to be delivered in late 2011
for a total cost of approximately $55 million.
14
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
The following table summarizes the balance sheets of the second Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary as
at June 30, 2011 and the Skaugen Multigas Subsidiaries as at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vessels and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances on newbuilding contracts |
|
|
40,835 |
|
|
|
79,535 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
41,161 |
|
|
|
80,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Advances from affiliates |
|
|
41,110 |
|
|
|
79,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
41,166 |
|
|
|
80,199 |
|
Total deficit |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and total deficit |
|
|
41,161 |
|
|
|
80,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assets and liabilities of the Skaugen Multigas Subsidiaries are reflected in the
Partnerships financial statements at historical cost as the Partnership and the VIEs are under
common control. The Partnerships maximum exposure to loss as of June 30, 2011, as a result of
its commitment to purchase Teekay Corporations interests in the second Skaugen Multigas
Subsidiary, is limited to the purchase price of its interest in the undelivered vessel, which is
expected to be approximately $55 million. The assets of the second Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary
cannot be used by the Partnership and the creditors of the second Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary
have no recourse to the general credit of the Partnership.
b) The Partnership has an agreement to acquire an LPG carrier from Skaugen upon delivery
for approximately $33.0 million. This vessel is expected to be delivered in late 2011 and upon
delivery, the vessel will be chartered to Skaugen at fixed rates for a period of 15 years.
c) In December 2007, a consortium in which Teekay Corporation has a 33% ownership interest
agreed to charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic meter LNG carriers for a period of 20 years to
the Angola LNG Project. The consortium entered into agreements to construct the four LNG
carriers at a total cost of approximately $906.0 million (of which Teekay Corporations 33%
portion is $299.0 million), excluding capitalized interest. As at June 30, 2011, payments made
towards these commitments by the joint venture companies totaled $339.7 million (of which Teekay
Corporations 33% contribution was $112.1 million), excluding capitalized interest and other
miscellaneous construction costs. As at June 30, 2011, the remaining payments required to be
made under these contracts were $430.4 million (remainder of 2011) and $135.9 million (2012), of
which the Teekay Corporations share is 33% of these amounts. The vessels will be chartered at
fixed rates, with inflation adjustments, commencing in late August 2011 and first quarter of
2012 upon deliveries of the vessels. In March 2011, the Partnership agreed to acquire Teekay
Corporations 33% ownership interest in these vessels and related charter contracts for a total
equity purchase price of approximately $73 million (net of assumed debt in the amount of
approximately $258 million) subject to adjustment based on actual costs incurred at the time of
delivery. It was determined that these vessel companies are VIEs; however, the Partnership is
not the primary beneficiary.
13. |
|
Total Capital and Net (Loss) Income Per Unit |
On April 8, 2011, the Partnership completed a public offering of 4.3 million common units
(including 551,800 common units issued upon exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option)
at a price of $38.88 per unit, for gross proceeds of approximately $168.7 million (including the
Partnerships General Partners 2% proportionate capital contribution). The Partnership used the
net proceeds from the offering of approximately $161.7 million to repay a portion of its
outstanding debt under one of its revolving credit facilities.
At June 30, 2011, of the Partnerships total number of units outstanding, 56.4% were held by the
public and the remaining units were held by a subsidiary of Teekay Corporation (including the
Partnerships General Partners 2% interest).
|
|
Net (Loss) Income Per Unit |
Net (loss) income per unit is determined by dividing net (loss) income, after deducting the
amount of net (loss) income attributable to the Dropdown Predecessor, the non-controlling
interest and the General Partners interest, by the weighted-average number of units outstanding
during the period.
The General Partners, common unitholders and subordinated unitholders interests in net (loss)
income are calculated as if all net (loss) income was distributed according to the terms of the
Partnerships partnership agreement, regardless of whether those earnings would or could be
distributed. The partnership agreement does not provide for the distribution of net (loss)
income; rather, it provides for the distribution of available cash, which is a contractually
defined term that generally means all cash on hand at the end of each quarter after
establishment of cash reserves determined by the Partnerships board of directors to provide for
the proper conduct of the Partnerships business, including reserves for maintenance and
replacement capital expenditure and anticipated credit needs. In addition, the General Partner
is entitled to incentive distributions if the amount the Partnership distributes to unitholders
with respect to any quarter exceeds specified target levels. Unlike available cash, net (loss)
income is affected by non-cash items, such as depreciation and amortization, unrealized gains or
losses on non-designated derivative instruments and foreign currency translation gains (losses).
15
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(all tabular amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars, except unit and per unit data or unless otherwise indicated)
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, cash distributions exceeded
$0.4625 per unit and, consequently, the assumed distribution of net (loss) income resulted in
the use of the increasing percentages to calculate the General Partners interest in net (loss)
income for the purposes of the net (loss) income per unit calculation.
14. |
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
The Partnerships consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010
reflects the Dropdown Predecessor as if the Partnership had acquired the Dropdown Predecessor
when the vessels began operations under the ownership of Teekay Corporation.
15. |
|
Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted |
In May 2011, the FASB issued amendments to FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, which clarify
or change the application of existing fair value measurements, including: that the highest and
best use and valuation premise in a fair value measurement are relevant only when measuring the
fair value of nonfinancial assets; that a reporting entity should measure the fair value of its
own equity instrument from the perspective of a market participant that holds that instrument as
an asset; to permit an entity to measure the fair value of certain financial instruments on a
net basis rather than based on its gross exposure when the reporting entity manages its
financial instruments on the basis of such net exposure; that in the absence of a Level 1 input,
a reporting entity should apply premiums and discounts when market participants would do so when
pricing the asset or liability consistent with the unit of account; and that premiums and
discounts related to size as a characteristic of the reporting entitys holding are not
permitted in a fair value measurement. These amendments are effective for the Partnership on
January 1, 2012. The Partnership is currently assessing the potential impacts, if any, of these
amendments on its consolidated financial statements.
On August 30, 2011, the first of four LNG carriers servicing the Angola LNG Project was delivered and commenced its 20 year fixed-rate charter. Concurrently, the Partnership acquired Teekay Corporations 33% ownership interest in this vessel and related charter contract for a total equity purchase price of approximately $19 million (net of assumed debt of $65 million).
16
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2011
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
Teekay LNG Partners L.P. is an international provider of marine transportation services for
liquefied natural gas (or LNG), liquefied petroleum gas (or LPG) and crude oil. Our current fleet
of 17 LNG carriers, three LPG/Multigas carriers and 11 conventional tankers operates under
long-term, fixed-rate charters primarily with major energy and utility companies and Teekay
Corporation.
SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENTS IN 2011
Equity Offering
On April 8, 2011, we completed a public offering of 4.3 million common units (including 551,800
common units issued upon exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option) at a price of $38.88
per unit, for gross proceeds of approximately $168.7 million (including our general partners 2%
proportionate capital contribution). We used the net proceeds from the offering of approximately
$161.7 million to repay a portion of our outstanding debt under one of our revolving credit
facilities. We intend to draw on our credit facilities to fund the equity purchase price of our
acquisition of Teekay Corporations 33% interest in four LNG newbuilding vessels to service the
Angola LNG Project, as such payments come due.
SIGNIFICANT PROJECTS
Skaugen LPG Project
In December 2006, we agreed to acquire upon delivery three LPG carriers from subsidiaries of I.M.
Skaugen ASA (or Skaugen), each of which has a purchase price of approximately $33 million. The
first two vessels delivered in April and November 2009 and the remaining vessel is scheduled to be
delivered in late 2011. At delivery, each vessel is chartered at fixed rates for 15 years to
Skaugen.
Skaugen Multigas Carriers
In July 2008, subsidiaries of Teekay Corporation (or the Skaugen Multigas Subsidiaries) signed
contracts for the purchase from Skaugen of two technically advanced 12,000-cubic meter newbuilding
Multigas vessels (or the Skaugen Multigas Carriers) capable of carrying LNG, LPG or ethylene. We,
in turn, agreed to acquire the Skaugen Multigas Subsidiaries from Teekay Corporation upon delivery
of the vessels. On June 15, 2011, the first Skaugen Multigas Carrier, the Norgas Unikum, was
delivered and we in turn acquired Teekay Corporations 100% ownership interest in the first Skaugen
Multigas Subsidiary for a purchase price of $55.3 million. The second Skaugen Multigas Carrier is
expected to be delivered in late 2011 for a cost of approximately $55 million. Upon delivery, each
vessel commences service under 15-year, fixed-rate charters to Skaugen.
Angola LNG Project
In December 2007, a consortium in which Teekay Corporation has a 33% ownership interest agreed to
charter four newbuilding 160,400-cubic meter LNG carriers to the Angola LNG Project. The Angola LNG
Project involves the collection and transportation of gas from offshore production facilities to an
onshore LNG processing plant at Soyo, located in northwest Angola. The Project is being developed
by subsidiaries of Chevron Corporation, Sociedade Nacional de Combustiveis de Angola EP, BP Plc,
Total S.A., and Eni SpA. Mitsui & Co., Ltd. and NYK Bulkship (Europe) have 34% and 33% ownership
interests in the consortium, respectively.
Teekay Corporation has offered to us, and we have agreed to purchase, its 33% ownership interest in
these vessels and related charter contracts at a total equity purchase price of approximately $73
million (net of assumed debt in the amount of approximately $258 million) subject to adjustment
based on actual costs incurred at the time of delivery. We will acquire the ownership interests and
pay a proportionate share of the purchase price as each vessel is delivered. The vessels are
scheduled for delivery between late August 2011 and the first quarter of 2012.
Each of the four newbuilding LNG carriers will be chartered at fixed rates, subject to inflation
adjustments, to the Angola LNG Project for a period of 20 years upon delivery from the shipyard,
with two extension periods for five years each. The charterer has the option to terminate the
charter upon 120 days notice and payment of an early termination fee, which would equal
approximately 50% of the fully built-up cost of the vessel. The charterer may also terminate the
charter under other circumstances typical in our long-term charters, such as excessive off-hire
during which we do not provide a replacement vessel, or certain force majeure events. For more
information, please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 12(c) Commitments and
Contingencies.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
There are a number of factors that should be considered when evaluating our historical financial
performance and assessing our future prospects and we use a variety of financial and operational
terms and concepts when analyzing our results of operations. These factors, terms and concepts are
described in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects of our Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on April 4, 2011.
We manage our business and analyze and report our results of operations on the basis of two
business segments: the liquefied gas segment and the conventional tanker segment, each of which are
discussed below.
17
Liquefied Gas Segment
As at June 30, 2011, our fleet included 17 LNG carriers (in which our interest ranges from 40% to
100%). Our partial interests in LNG carriers include our 40% interest in Teekay Nakilat (III)
Corporation, which owns four LNG carriers that are accounted for under the equity method (or the
RasGas 3 LNG Carriers), our 50% interest in our joint ventures with Exmar NV (the Excalibur and
Excelsior Joint Ventures), which own two LNG carriers (the Excalibur and Excelsior Carriers) that
are accounted for under the equity method, our 69% interest in the Tangguh Joint Venture, which
owns the Tangguh Hiri and the Tangguh Sago (or the Tangguh LNG Carriers), our 70% interest in
Teekay Nakilat Corporation (or Teekay Nakilat), which is the lessee under 30-year capital lease
arrangements relating to three LNG carriers (or the RasGas II LNG Carriers), and our 99% interest
in the Arctic Spirit and Polar Spirit LNG carriers (or the Kenai LNG Carriers)) and three LPG
carriers. All of our LNG and LPG carriers operate under long-term, fixed-rate charters. We expect
our liquefied gas segment to increase due to the following:
|
|
|
We have agreed to acquire an LPG carrier from Skaugen for approximately $33 million upon
its delivery scheduled in late 2011. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 12(b)
Commitments and Contingencies. |
|
|
|
As discussed above, we have agreed to acquire the second Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary
from Teekay Corporation for a total cost of approximately $55 million upon delivery of the
related Skaugen Multigas Carrier scheduled in 2011. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 12(a) Commitments and Contingencies. |
|
|
|
As discussed above, we have agreed to acquire Teekay Corporations 33% ownership
interest in the consortium relating to the Angola LNG Project that has four newbuilding LNG
carriers, which are scheduled to deliver during the fall of 2011 and the first quarter of
2012. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 12(c) Commitments and
Contingencies. |
The following table compares our liquefied gas segments operating results for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and compares its net voyage revenues (which is a non-GAAP
financial measure) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 to voyage revenues,
the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. The following tables also provide a summary of
the changes in calendar-ship-days and revenue days for our liquefied gas segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except revenue days, |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
65,885 |
|
|
|
65,822 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
(50.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
65,824 |
|
|
|
65,700 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
13,145 |
|
|
|
12,744 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
15,081 |
|
|
|
15,394 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
3,941 |
|
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
50.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
33,657 |
|
|
|
34,936 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Days (A) |
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
1,259 |
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
Calendar-Ship-Days (B) |
|
|
1,198 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
Utilization (A)/(B) |
|
|
98.0 |
% |
|
|
98.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except revenue days, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
131,678 |
|
|
|
131,608 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
(26.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
131,608 |
|
|
|
131,513 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
24,222 |
|
|
|
24,160 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
30,205 |
|
|
|
30,632 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
69,916 |
|
|
|
71,351 |
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Days (A) |
|
|
2,344 |
|
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
(6.1 |
) |
Calendar-Ship-Days (B) |
|
|
2,368 |
|
|
|
2,534 |
|
|
|
(6.6 |
) |
Utilization (A)/(B) |
|
|
99 |
% |
|
|
98.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of resources). |
18
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, our liquefied gas segments operating results
included 11 LNG carriers (excluding the four RasGas 3 LNG Carriers and the Excalibur and Excelsior
Carriers jointly owned with Exmar that are accounted for under the equity method) and three LPG
carriers. Our total calendar-ship-days decreased by 6.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2011
from the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily as a result of the sale of an LPG carrier, the
Dania Spirit, on November 5, 2010, partially offset by the delivery of a Multigas carrier, Norgas
Unikum, on June 15, 2011.
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 remained
essentially consistent with the same periods last year, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
an increase of $2.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to the
effect on our Euro-denominated revenues from the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S.
Dollar compared to the same periods last year; |
|
|
|
an increase of $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, due to the Arctic
Spirit being off-hire for 22 days in the first quarter of 2010 for scheduled drydocking; |
|
|
|
increases of $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to operating expense adjustments in the charter-hire rates for the
Tangguh LNG Carriers; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to the
delivery of the, Norgas Unikum, on June 15, 2011; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.1 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, due to the Arctic Spirit and Polar Spirit being off-hire for 11 days and 9
days, respectively, in the second quarter of 2011 for scheduled drydockings; |
|
|
|
decreases of $1.0 million and $2.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to the sale of the Dania Spirit on November 5, 2010; |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to a
reduction in the charter rate for delaying the drydocking of the Catalunya Spirit; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to the
Catalunya Spirit and Madrid Spirit being off-hire for 3 days and 1 day, respectively, in
the second quarter of 2011. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three months ended June 30,
2011 and remained essentially consistent from the six months ended June 30, 2011, from the same
periods last year, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
increases of $1.7 million and $1.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to timing of services and maintenance and an increase in manning
levels for certain of our LNG carriers; |
|
|
|
increases of $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to maintenance on the Tangguh Hiri during the second quarter of
2011 relating to a scheduled drydocking; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to an
insurance claim adjustment in the second quarter of 2011 relating to the Madrid Spirit; |
partially offset by
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to
additional crew training expenses relating to the Al Marrouna, the Al Areesh and the Al
Daayen in the second quarter of 2010; and |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.8 million and $1.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to the sale of the Dania Spirit on November 5, 2010. |
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization decreased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, from the same periods last year, primarily as a result of the sale of the
Dania Spirit in the fourth quarter of 2010.
Conventional Tanker Segment
Our fleet includes ten Suezmax-class double-hulled conventional crude oil tankers and one Handymax
Product tanker. All of our conventional tankers operate under long-term, fixed-rate charters.
19
The following table compares our conventional tanker segments operating results for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and compares its net voyage revenues (which is a non-GAAP
financial measure) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 to
voyage revenues, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. The following table also
provide a summary of the changes in calendar-ship-days and revenue days for our conventional tanker
segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except revenue days, |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
26,362 |
|
|
|
26,024 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
68.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
25,738 |
|
|
|
25,653 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
10,243 |
|
|
|
9,297 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
7,013 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
2,411 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
5,811 |
|
|
|
6,806 |
|
|
|
(14.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Days (A) |
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Calendar-Ship-Days (B) |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization (A)/(B) |
|
|
92.8 |
% |
|
|
96.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except revenue days, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
calendar-ship-days and percentages) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voyage revenues |
|
|
53,788 |
|
|
|
52,730 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Voyage expenses |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net voyage revenues |
|
|
52,803 |
|
|
|
52,191 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Vessel operating expenses |
|
|
19,973 |
|
|
|
18,909 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
14,315 |
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
General and administrative (1) |
|
|
5,596 |
|
|
|
5,059 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Restructuring charge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from vessel operations |
|
|
12,919 |
|
|
|
14,117 |
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Days (A) |
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
Calendar-Ship-Days (B) |
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization (A)/(B) |
|
|
96.4 |
% |
|
|
97.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes direct general and administrative expenses and indirect general and
administrative expenses (allocated to each segment based on estimated use of corporate resources). |
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, one of our vessels, the Huelva Spirit, was
off-hire for approximately 72 days relating to a scheduled drydock as compared to 40 off-hire days
for the Tenerife Spirit and Toledo Spirit relating to scheduled drydockings in the same period last
year. As a result our utilization decreased from 96.0% to 92.8% for the three months ended June
30, 2011 and 2010 and from 97.9% to 96.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
Net Voyage Revenues. Net voyage revenues remained essentially consistent for the three months ended
June 30, 2011 from the same period last year and increased slightly for the six months ended June
30, 2011, from the same period last year, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
an increase of $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to the
Tenerife Spirit and the Toledo Spirit being off-hire for 25 and 15 days, respectively,
during the second quarter of 2010 for scheduled drydockings; |
|
|
|
increases of $0.6 million and $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to adjustments to the daily charter rates based on inflation and an
increase in interest rates in accordance with the time-charter contracts for five Suezmax
tankers (however, under the terms of these capital leases, we had corresponding increases
in our lease payments, which are reflected as increases to interest expense; therefore,
these and future similar interest rate adjustments do not affect our cash flow or net
(loss) income); and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, relating to crew manning
adjustments in the charter-hire rates in order to recognize the foreign exchange impact on
Australian-denominated crew manning expenses which flow through to the charterer; the crew
manning adjustments increased due to the strengthening of the Australian Dollar against the
U.S Dollar compared to the same periods last year; |
20
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a decrease of $1.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to the
Huelva Spirit being off-hire for 72 days in the second quarter of 2011 for a scheduled
drydock; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to an
increase in voyage expenses relating to off-hire bunker fuel for the Huelva Spirit; which
is non-recoverable from the charterer. |
Vessel Operating Expenses. Vessel operating expenses increased for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011, from the same periods last year, primarily as a result of an increase $0.9 million
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to timing of services and an increase in
manning levels for certain of our Suezmax tankers.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, from the same periods last year, primarily as a result of amortization of
drydock expenditures incurred in the third and fourth quarters of 2010 and the first and second
quarters of 2011.
Other Operating Results
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased to $6.5 million
and $12.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, from $5.0 million
and $10.4 million for the same periods last year, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
increases of $1.9 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, related to a greater amount of corporate services provided to us by
Teekay Corporation to support our growth; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, relating to the
one-time management fee charged to us by Teekay Corporation associated with the portion of
stock-based compensation grants to Teekay Corporations former Chief Executive Officer that
had not yet vested prior to the date of his retirement on March 31, 2011; |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, due to less
consulting fees incurred by the Partnership. |
Interest Expense. Interest expense increased to $12.1 million and decreased to $23.9 million for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, from $11.3 million and $24.1 million
for the same periods last year. Interest expense primarily reflects interest incurred on our
capital lease obligations and long-term debt. These changes were primarily the result of:
|
|
|
increases of $1.2 million and $1.6 million the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, due to increased EURIBOR rates relating to Euro-denominated debt; and |
|
|
|
increases of $0.5 million and $0.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to an interest rate adjustment on our five Suezmax tanker capital
lease obligations (however, as described above, under the terms of the time-charter
contracts for these vessels, we have a corresponding increase in charter receipts, which
are reflected as an increase to voyage revenues); |
offset by
|
|
|
decreases of $0.6 million and $1.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to principal debt repayments made during the third and fourth
quarters of 2010 and the first and second quarters of 2011; |
|
|
|
decreases of $0.3 million and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, from the scheduled capital lease repayments on the Madrid Spirit (the
Madrid Spirit is financed pursuant to a Spanish tax lease arrangement, under which we
borrowed under a term loan and deposited the proceeds into a restricted cash account and
entered into a capital lease for the vessel; as a result, this decrease in interest expense
from the capital lease is offset by a corresponding decrease in the interest income from
restricted cash); |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, relating to higher
amortization of deferred debt issuance costs in the first quarter of 2010; and |
|
|
|
a decrease of $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, relating to the
interest expense attributable to the operations of the Alexander Spirit that was incurred
by Teekay Corporation and allocated to us as part of the results of the Dropdown
Predecessor. |
21
Interest Income. Interest income increased to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30,
2011, from $1.4 million for the same period last year and remained consistent for the six months
ended June 30, 2011. Interest income primarily reflects interest earned on restricted cash deposits
that
approximate the present value of the remaining amounts we owe under lease arrangements on four of
our LNG carriers. The increase for the three month period was primarily due to the effect on our
Euro-denominated interest income from the strengthening of the Euro against the U.S. Dollar
compared to the same period last year; partially offset by a decrease due to a scheduled capital
lease repayment on one of our LNG carriers that was funded from a restricted cash deposit.
Realized and Unrealized Loss on Derivative Instruments. Net realized and unrealized losses on
derivative instruments decreased to losses of $27.3 million and $16.6 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, from losses of $45.5 million and $72.4 million for the
same periods in 2010. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 11 Derivative
Instruments.
The Partnership uses derivative instruments in accordance with its overall risk management policy.
The Partnership has not designated these derivative instruments as hedges for accounting purposes.
The Partnership enters into interest rate swaps which either exchange a receipt of floating
interest for a payment of fixed interest or a payment of floating interest for a receipt of fixed
interest to reduce the Partnerships exposure to interest rate variability on its outstanding
floating-rate debt and floating-rate restricted cash deposits.
Foreign Currency Exchange (Losses) Gains. Foreign currency exchange (losses) gains were ($8.9)
million and ($29.9) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively,
compared to gains of $36.6 million and $59.9 million for the same periods last year. These foreign
currency exchange losses and gains, substantially all of which were unrealized, are due primarily
to the relevant period-end revaluation of our Euro-denominated term loans, capital leases and
restricted cash for financial reporting purposes. Losses reflect a weaker U.S. Dollar against the
Euro on the date of revaluation. Gains reflect a stronger U.S. Dollar against the Euro on the date
of revaluation.
Equity Income (Loss). Equity income increased to $3.4 million and $11.5 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, from equity losses of ($2.9) million and ($1.6)
million for the same periods last year, primarily as a result of:
|
|
|
increases of $3.2 million and $7.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, due to the change in unrealized gains (losses) on derivative
instruments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same
periods last year in our 40% investment in Teekay Nakilat (III) Corporation; |
|
|
|
increases of $2.7 million and $4.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2011, respectively, relating to our 50% investments in the Excalibur and Excelsior Joint
Ventures that were acquired in November 2010; and |
|
|
|
an increase of $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, relating
to increased charter-hire rates on the four RasGas (III) LNG Carriers, which are held
within our 40% investment in Teekay Nakilat (III) Corporation. |
Liquidity and Cash Needs
As at June 30, 2011, our cash and cash equivalents were $74.5 million, compared to $81.1 million at
December 31, 2010. Our total liquidity which consists of cash, cash equivalents and undrawn
medium-term credit facilities, was $551.1 million as at June 30, 2011, compared to $459.7 million
as at December 31, 2010. The increase in total liquidity is primarily due to the receipt of
proceeds from the public offering completed in April 2011 which raised net proceeds of
approximately $161.6 million, and changes in operating cash flows, partially offset by borrowings
to partially finance the acquisition of the first Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary, repayments of
long-term debt, cash distributions paid and drydocking expenditures.
Our primary short-term liquidity needs are to pay quarterly distributions on our outstanding units
and to fund general working capital requirements and drydocking expenditures, while our long-term
liquidity needs primarily relate to expansion and maintenance capital expenditures and debt
repayment. Expansion capital expenditures primarily represent the purchase or construction of
vessels to the extent the expenditures increase the operating capacity or revenue generated by our
fleet, while maintenance capital expenditures primarily consist of drydocking expenditures and
expenditures to replace vessels in order to maintain the operating capacity or revenue generated by
our fleet. We anticipate that our primary sources of funds for our short-term liquidity needs will
be cash flows from operations, while our long-term sources of funds will be from cash from
operations, long-term bank borrowings and other debt or equity financings, or a combination
thereof.
In 2011, we may be required to purchase five of our Suezmax tankers, currently on capital lease
arrangements, at the lessors discretion. We have assumed the lessor will not exercise their option
to have us repurchase the vessels until the end of the respective lease terms. We anticipate that
we will purchase these tankers by assuming the outstanding financing obligations that relate to
them. Please read Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations: Contractual Obligations and Contingencies. However, we may be required to obtain
separate debt or equity financing to complete the purchases if the lenders do not consent to our
assuming the financing obligations, and such financing may not be available at favorable terms.
In addition, as of June 30, 2011, we were also committed to acquiring one LPG carrier from Skaugen,
the second Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary and Teekay Corporations 33% interest in four LNG carriers
expected to serve the Angola LNG Project. These additional purchase commitments, scheduled to occur
in 2011 and 2012, total approximately $161 million (net of assumed debt in the amount of
approximately $258 million), subject to adjustment based on actual cost incurred at the time of
deliveries during 2011 and 2012. We intend to finance these purchases with one or more of our
existing revolving credit facilities, incremental debt, surplus cash balances, proceeds from the
issuance of additional common units, or combinations thereof. Please read Item 1 Financial
Statements: Note 12 Commitments and Contingencies.
22
Cash Flows. The following table summarizes our cash flow for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
(in thousands of U.S. dollars) |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
96,719 |
|
|
|
91,858 |
|
Net cash flow used for financing activities |
|
|
(89,312 |
) |
|
|
(120,155 |
) |
Net cash flow used for investing activities |
|
|
(13,954 |
) |
|
|
(9,054 |
) |
Operating Cash Flows. Net cash flow from operating activities increased to
$96.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from $91.9 million for the same period last
year, primarily due to changes in working capital due to the timing of our cash receipts and
payments. Net cash flow from operating activities depends upon the timing and amount of drydocking
expenditures, repairs and maintenance activity, the impact of vessel additions and dispositions on
operating cash flows, foreign currency rates, changes in interest rates and fluctuations in working
capital balances. The number of vessel drydockings tends to vary each period.
Financing Cash Flows. Our investments in vessels and equipment are financed primarily with term
loans and capital lease arrangements. Proceeds from long-term debt were $100.6 million and $35.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. From time to time we
refinance our loans and revolving credit facilities. During 2011, we used the proceeds from
long-term debt primarily to fund a portion of the acquisition of one of the Skaugen Multigas
Subsidiaries for $55.3 million.
On April 8, 2011, the Partnership completed a public offering of 4.3 million common units
(including 551,800 common units issued upon exercise of the underwriters over-allotment option) at
a price of $38.88 per unit, for gross proceeds of approximately $168.7 million (including our
general partners 2% proportionate capital contribution).
Cash distributions paid during the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $78.2 million from
$65.3 million for the same period last year. This increase was the result of:
|
|
|
an increase in the number of units eligible to receive the cash distribution as a result
of the direct equity placement of approximately 1.7 million common units in July 2010 in
connection with our acquisition of the Excalibur and Excelsior Joint Ventures in November
2010 and our public offering in April 2011; and |
|
|
|
an increase in our quarterly distribution to $0.63 per unit from $0.57 per unit. |
Investing Cash Flows. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, we incurred $16.8
million in expenditure for vessels and equipment. These expenditures represent construction
payments for the two Skaugen Multigas newbuildings and capital modifications for certain of our
vessels.
Credit Facilities
Our revolving credit facilities and term loans are described in Item 1 Financial Statements:
Note 8 Long-Term Debt. Our term loans and revolving credit facilities contain covenants and
other restrictions typical of debt financing secured by vessels, including, but not limited to, one
or more of the following that restrict the ship-owning subsidiaries from:
|
|
|
incurring or guaranteeing indebtedness; |
|
|
|
changing ownership or structure, including mergers, consolidations,
liquidations and dissolutions; |
|
|
|
making dividends or distributions if we are in default; |
|
|
|
making capital expenditures in excess of specified levels; |
|
|
|
making certain negative pledges and granting certain liens; |
|
|
|
selling, transferring, assigning or conveying assets; |
|
|
|
making certain loans and investments; and |
|
|
|
entering into a new line of business. |
Certain loan agreements require that minimum levels of tangible net worth and aggregate liquidity
be maintained, provide for a maximum level of leverage and require one of our subsidiaries to
maintain restricted cash deposits. Our ship-owning subsidiaries may not, among other things, pay
dividends or distributions if we are in default under our loan agreements and revolving credit
facilities. Our capital leases do not contain financial or restrictive covenants other than those
relating to operation and maintenance of the vessels. One of our term loans is guaranteed by Teekay
Corporation and contains covenants that require Teekay Corporation to maintain the greater of a
minimum liquidity (cash and cash equivalents) of at least $50.0 million and 5.0% of Teekay
Corporations total consolidated debt which has recourse to Teekay Corporation. As at June 30,
2011, we and our affiliates were in compliance with all covenants in our credit facilities and
capital leases.
23
Contractual Obligations and Contingencies
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as at June 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
and |
|
|
and |
|
|
Beyond |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. Dollars) |
|
U.S. Dollar-Denominated Obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (1) |
|
|
922.1 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
125.4 |
|
|
|
185.3 |
|
|
|
580.1 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (2) |
|
|
204.5 |
|
|
|
48.4 |
|
|
|
128.0 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments under capital leases (3) |
|
|
1,013.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
905.1 |
|
Commitments under operating leases (4) |
|
|
445.4 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
332.5 |
|
Purchase obligations (5) |
|
|
161.0 |
|
|
|
142.7 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. Dollar-denominated obligations |
|
|
2,746.1 |
|
|
|
246.9 |
|
|
|
369.9 |
|
|
|
311.6 |
|
|
|
1,817.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Euro-Denominated Obligations: (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (7) |
|
|
397.6 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
231.4 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
141.3 |
|
Commitments under capital leases (8) |
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Euro-denominated obligations |
|
|
491.6 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
|
231.4 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
3,237.7 |
|
|
|
348.1 |
|
|
|
601.3 |
|
|
|
329.3 |
|
|
|
1,959.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $8.0 million (remainder of 2011), $28.3
million (2012 and 2013), $22.5 million (2014 and 2015) and $33.3 million (beyond 2015).
Expected interest payments are based on the existing interest rates (fixed-rate loans) and
LIBOR at June 30, 2011, plus margins on debt that has been drawn that ranges up to 0.70%
(variable-rate loans). The expected interest payments do not reflect the effect of related
interest rate swaps that we have used as an economic hedge of certain of our variable-rate
debt. One of our term loans require us to have a minimum balance of $3.0 million in a
restricted cash account at all times until maturity of the loan. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes, in addition to lease payments, amounts we are required to pay to purchase
certain leased vessels at the end of the lease terms. We are obligated to purchase five of our
existing Suezmax tankers at the lessors discretion. We have assumed the counter-party will
not exercise their option to have us repurchase the vessels until the end of the respective
lease terms. The purchase price will be based on the unamortized portion of the vessel
construction financing costs for the vessels, which are included in the table above. We
expect to satisfy the purchase price by assuming the existing vessel financing, although we
may be required to obtain separate debt or equity financing to complete the purchases if the
lenders do not consent to our assuming the financing obligations. |
|
(3) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $476.4 million, together with the interest
earned on these deposits, are expected to be sufficient to repay the remaining amounts we
currently owe under the lease arrangements. |
|
(4) |
|
We have corresponding leases whereby we are the lessor and expect to receive
approximately $404.7 million for these leases from 2011 to 2029. As at June 30, 2011, we had
received $105.7 million of lease receipts. |
|
(5) |
|
We entered into an agreement to acquire an LPG carrier from Skaugen, for
approximately $33.0 million upon its delivery scheduled for late 2011. In July 2008, the
Skaugen Multigas Subsidiaries signed contracts for the purchase of the Skaugen Multigas
Carriers and we have agreed to purchase the Skaugen Multigas Subsidiaries from Teekay
Corporation upon delivery of the vessels. The delivery of the first Skaugen Multigas Carrier
and the Partnerships acquisition of the first Skaugen Multigas Subsidiary were completed on
June 15, 2011. The remaining vessel is expected to be delivered in late 2011 for a total cost
of approximately $55 million. In March 2011, we agreed to acquire Teekay Corporations 33%
ownership interest in four LNG newbuilding carriers for a total equity purchase price of
approximately $73 million (net of assumed debt in the amount of approximately $258 million)
subject to adjustment based on actual cost incurred at the time of deliveries during 2011 and
2012. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 12 Commitments and Contingencies. |
|
(6) |
|
Euro-denominated obligations are presented in U.S. Dollars and have been converted
using the prevailing exchange rate as of June 30, 2011. |
|
(7) |
|
Excludes expected interest payments of $3.8 million (remainder of 2011), $8.6
million (2012 and 2013), 5.9 million (2014 and 2015) and $14.5 million (beyond 2015). Expected
interest payments are based on EURIBOR at June 30, 2011, plus margins that range up to 0.66%,
as well as the prevailing U.S. Dollar/Euro exchange rate as of June 30, 2011. The expected
interest payments do not reflect the effect of related interest rate swaps that we have used
as an economic hedge of certain of our variable-rate debt. We also maintain restricted cash
deposits relating to certain of our term loans, which cash totaled 10.0 million Euros ($14.4
million) as at June 30, 2011. One of the term loans outstanding in the amount of 151.6
million Euros ($219.9 million) will mature in January 2012. We expect to refinance this loan
in 2011. |
|
(8) |
|
Existing restricted cash deposits of $91.7 million, together with the interest
earned on these deposits, are expected to approximately equal the
remaining amounts we owe under the lease arrangement, including our obligation to purchase the
vessel at the end of the lease term. |
24
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2011, we are committed to acquire from Teekay Corporation its 33% ownership interest
in four LNG newbuilding carriers upon delivery for a total equity purchase price of approximately
$73 million (net of assumed debt in the amount of approximately $258 million) and one LPG carrier
from Skaugen upon delivery for a total cost of approximately $33 million. Please read Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 12 Commitments and Contingencies.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP, which require us to make
estimates in the application of our accounting policies based on our best assumptions, judgments
and opinions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions,
estimates and judgments to ensure that our consolidated financial statements are presented fairly
and in accordance with GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined
with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such
differences could be material. Accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in Item 5 Operating
and Financial Review and Prospects Critical Accounting Estimates of the Form 20-F for the year
ended December 31, 2010 are those that we consider to be the most critical to an understanding of
our financial statements, because they inherently involve significant judgments and uncertainties.
For a further description of our material accounting policies, please read Item 5 Operating and
Financial Review and Prospects in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2010. There were no significant changes in accounting estimates and assumptions from those
discussed in the Form 20-F.
At June 30, 2011, we had one reporting unit with goodwill attributable to it. Based on conditions
that existed at June 30, 2011, we do not believe that there is a reasonable possibility that the
goodwill attributable to this reporting unit might be impaired for the remainder of the year.
However, certain factors that impact this assessment are inherently difficult to forecast and, as
such, we cannot provide any assurances that an impairment will or will not occur in the future. An
assessment for impairment involves a number of assumptions and estimates that are based on factors
that are beyond our control. These are discussed in more detail in the following section entitled
Forward-Looking Statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Report on Form 6-K for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 contains certain
forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1933 as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) concerning
future events and our operations, performance and financial condition, including, in particular,
statements regarding:
|
|
|
our future financial condition; |
|
|
|
results of operations and revenues and expenses, including performance of our
liquefied gas segment; |
|
|
|
our ability to make cash distributions on our units or any increases in
quarterly distributions; |
|
|
|
LNG, LPG and tanker market fundamentals, including the balance of supply and
demand in the LNG, LPG and tanker markets; |
|
|
|
future capital expenditures and availability of capital resources to fund
capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
offers of vessels to us from Teekay Corporation and associated contracts; |
|
|
|
delivery dates of newbuildings; |
|
|
|
the commencement of service of newbuildings under long-term contracts; |
|
|
|
the duration of drydockings; |
|
|
|
the future valuation of goodwill; |
|
|
|
the expected timing, amount and method of financing for the purchase of joint
venture interests and vessels, including our five Suezmax tankers operated pursuant to
capital leases; |
|
|
|
the timing of the acquisition of the Angola LNG Project vessels; and |
|
|
|
the timing of the acquisition of the Skaugen projects. |
25
Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast,
indicate or imply future results, performance or achievements, and may contain the words
believe, anticipate, expect, estimate, project, will be, will continue, will likely
result, plan, intend or words or phrases of similar meanings. These statements involve known
and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that are inherently
subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control.
Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but
are not limited to: changes in production of LNG, LPG or oil; greater or less than anticipated
levels of vessel
newbuilding orders or greater or less than anticipated rates of vessel scrapping; changes in
trading patterns; changes in our expenses; changes in applicable industry laws and regulations and
the timing of implementation of new laws and regulations; LNG or LPG infrastructure constraints
and community and environmental group resistance to new LNG or LPG infrastructure; potential
development of active short-term or spot LNG or LPG shipping markets; potential inability to
implement our growth strategy; competitive factors in the markets in which we operate; potential
for early termination of long-term contracts and our potential inability to renew or replace
long-term contracts; loss of any customer, time-charter or vessel; shipyard production or vessel
delivery delays; changes in tax regulations; our potential inability to raise financing to
purchase additional vessels; our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations; conditions in
the public equity markets; LNG or LPG project delays or abandonment; and other factors detailed
from time to time in our periodic reports filed with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010. We do not intend to release publicly any updates or
revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our
expectations with respect thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which
any such statement is based.
26
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2011
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
ITEM 3 |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes primarily through our borrowings that require
us to make interest payments based on LIBOR or EURIBOR. Significant increases in interest rates
could adversely affect our operating margins, results of operations and our ability to service our
debt. We use interest rate swaps to reduce our exposure to market risk from changes in interest
rates. The principal objective of these contracts is to minimize the risks and costs associated
with our floating-rate debt.
We are exposed to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to the interest
rate swap agreements. In order to minimize counterparty risk, we only enter into derivative
transactions with counterparties that are rated A- or better by Standard & Poors or A3 or better
by Moodys at the time of the transactions. In addition, to the extent practical, interest rate
swaps are entered into with different counterparties to reduce concentration risk.
The table below provides information about our financial instruments at June 30, 2011, that are
sensitive to changes in interest rates. For long-term debt and capital lease obligations, the table
presents principal payments and related weighted-average interest rates by expected maturity dates.
For interest rate swaps, the table presents notional amounts and weighted-average interest rates by
expected contractual maturity dates.
Expected Maturity Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remainder |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
after |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
Rate (1) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except percentages) |
|
|
Long-Term Debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable Rate ($U.S.) (2) |
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
95.4 |
|
|
|
487.7 |
|
|
|
717.7 |
|
|
|
(644.6 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
Variable Rate (Euro) (3) (4) |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
223.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
397.6 |
|
|
|
(371.2 |
) |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate Debt ($U.S.) |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
92.4 |
|
|
|
204.4 |
|
|
|
(206.4 |
) |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
Average Interest Rate |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Lease Obligations (5) (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-Rate ($U.S.) (7) |
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
45.1 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180.7 |
|
|
|
(180.7 |
) |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
Average Interest Rate (8) |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount ($U.S.) (6) (9) |
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
539.8 |
|
|
|
627.8 |
|
|
|
(119.3 |
) |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (2) |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount (Euro) (4) (10) |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
222.4 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
141.2 |
|
|
|
397.6 |
|
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Average Fixed Pay Rate (3) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Rate refers to the weighted-average effective interest rate for our long-term debt and
capital lease obligations, including the margin we pay on our floating-rate debt and the
average fixed pay rate for our interest rate swap agreements. The average interest rate for
our capital lease obligations is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in our lease
obligations at the inception of the leases. The average fixed pay rate for our interest rate
swaps excludes the margin we pay on our drawn floating-rate debt, which as of June 30, 2011
ranged from 0.3% to 0.7%. Please read Item 1 Financial Statements: Note 8 Long-Term
Debt. |
|
(2) |
|
Interest payments on U.S. Dollar-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on
LIBOR. |
|
(3) |
|
Interest payments on Euro-denominated debt and interest rate swaps are based on EURIBOR. |
|
(4) |
|
Euro-denominated amounts have been converted to U.S. Dollars using the prevailing exchange
rate as of June 30, 2011. |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes capital lease obligations (present value of minimum lease payments) of $64.8
million Euros ($94.0 million) on one of our existing LNG carriers with a weighted-average
fixed interest rate of 5.8%. Under the terms of this fixed-rate lease obligation, we are
required to have on deposit, subject to a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.1%, an
amount of cash that, together with the interest earned thereon, will
fully fund the amount owing under the capital lease obligation, including a vessel purchase
obligation. As at June 30, 2011, the amount on deposit was 63.2 million Euros ($91.7 million).
Consequently, we are not subject to interest rate risk from these obligations or deposits. |
27
|
|
|
(6) |
|
Under the terms of the capital leases for the RasGas II LNG Carriers (see Item 1
Financial Statements: Note 6 Vessel Charters), we are required to have on deposit, subject
to a variable rate of interest, an amount of cash that, together with interest earned on the
deposit, will equal the remaining amounts owing under the variable-rate leases. The deposits,
which as at June 30, 2011 totaled $476.4 million, and the lease obligations, which as at June
30, 2011 totaled $471.1 million, have been swapped for fixed-rate deposits and fixed-rate
obligations. Consequently, Teekay Nakilat is not subject to interest rate risk from these
obligations and deposits and, therefore, the lease obligations, cash deposits and related
interest rate swaps have been excluded from the table above. As at June 30, 2011, the
contract amount, fair value and fixed interest rates of these interest rate swaps related to
Teekay Nakilats capital lease obligations and restricted cash deposits were $429.6 million
and $470.7 million, ($63.1) million and $72.1 million, and 4.9% and 4.8%, respectively. |
|
(7) |
|
The amount of capital lease obligations represents the present value of minimum lease
payments together with our purchase obligation, as applicable. We are obligated to purchase
five of our existing Suezmax tankers at the lessors discretion, which may occur in 2011. We
have assumed the counter-party will not exercise their option to have us repurchase the
vessels until the end of the respective lease terms. |
|
(8) |
|
The average interest rate is the weighted-average interest rate implicit in the capital
lease obligations at the inception of the leases. |
|
(9) |
|
The average variable receive rate for our U.S. Dollar-denominated interest rate swaps is
set quarterly at 3-month LIBOR. |
|
(10) |
|
The average variable receive rate for our Euro-denominated interest rate swaps is set
monthly at 1-month EURIBOR. |
Spot Market Rate Risk
One of our Suezmax tankers, the Toledo Spirit, operates pursuant to a time-charter contract that
increases or decreases the otherwise fixed-rate established in the charter depending on the spot
charter rates that we would have earned had we traded the vessel in the spot tanker market. The
remaining term of the time-charter contract is 15 years, although the charterer has the right to
terminate the time-charter in July 2018. We have entered into an agreement with Teekay Corporation
under which Teekay Corporation pays us any amounts payable to the charterer as a result of spot
rates being below the fixed rate, and we pay Teekay Corporation any amounts payable to us from the
charterer as a result of spot rates being in excess of the fixed rate. The amounts payable to or
receivable from Teekay Corporation are settled at the end of each year. At June 30, 2011, the fair
value of this derivative liability was $9.6 million and the change from the prior period to the
reporting period has been reported in realized and unrealized loss on derivative instruments.
Foreign Currency Fluctuations
Our functional currency is U.S. dollars. Our results of operations are affected by fluctuations in
currency exchange rates. The volatility in our financial results due to currency exchange rate
fluctuations is attributed primarily to foreign currency revenues and expenses and our
Euro-denominated loans and restricted cash deposits. A portion of our voyage revenues are
denominated in Euros. A portion of our vessel operating expenses and general and administrative
expenses are denominated in Euros, which is primarily a function of the nationality of our crew and
administrative staff. We also have Euro-denominated interest expense and interest income related to
our Euro-denominated loans, Euro-denominated capital leases and Euro-denominated restricted cash
deposits, respectively. As a result, fluctuations in the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar have
caused, and are likely to continue to cause, fluctuations in our reported voyage revenues, vessel
operating expenses, general and administrative expenses, interest expense, interest income and
realized and unrealized loss on derivative instruments.
28
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P. AND SUBSIDIARIES
JUNE 30, 2011
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report on Form 6-K, you should
carefully consider the risk factors discussed in Part I, Item 3. Key Information-Risk
Factors in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 and Item 1A.
Risk Factors in our report on Form 6-K for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, which could materially affect our business, financial condition
or results of operations.
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3 Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4 Reserved
Item 5 Other Information
None
Item 6 Exhibits
None
THIS REPORT ON FORM 6-K IS HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THE FOLLOWING REGISTRATION
STATEMENTS OF THE PARTNERSHIP:
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-8 (NO. 333-124647) FILED WITH THE SEC ON MAY 5, 2005 |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (NO. 333-162579) FILED WITH THE SEC ON OCTOBER 20, 2009 |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3 (NO.333-170838) FILED WITH THE SEC ON NOVEMBER 24, 2010 |
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM F-3ASR (NO.333-174220) FILED WITH THE SEC ON MAY 13, 2011 |
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEEKAY LNG PARTNERS L.P.
|
|
|
By: |
Teekay GP L.L.C., its General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 31, 2011 |
By: |
/s/ Peter Evensen
|
|
|
|
Peter Evensen |
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
30