sv4za
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 22, 2005
Registration
No. 333-129096
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
Mariner Energy, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
1311 |
|
86-0460233 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
2101 CityWest Blvd., Bldg. 4, Suite 900
Houston, Texas 77042
(713) 954-5500
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrants principal executive
offices)
Teresa Bushman
Vice President and General Counsel
Mariner Energy, Inc.
2101 CityWest Blvd., Bldg. 4, Suite 900
Houston, Texas 77042
(713) 954-5505
(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of agent for service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
|
Kelly B. Rose
Baker Botts L.L.P.
910 Louisiana
One Shell Plaza
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 229-1234 |
|
Cyrus D. Marter IV
Forest Oil Corporation
707 Seventeenth Street
Suite 3600
Denver, CO 80202
(303) 812-1400 |
|
Alan P. Baden
Shelley A. Barber
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
666 Fifth Avenue, 26th Floor
New York, NY 10103-0040
(212) 237-0000 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable after this
registration statement becomes effective and upon consummation
of the merger described in the enclosed proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement.
If the securities being registered on this Form are to be
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following
box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act
of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act
registration statement number of the earlier effective
registration statement for the same
offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following box and list the Securities Act registration statement
number of the earlier effective registration statement for the
same
offering. o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until this Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this proxy statement/prospectus-information
statement is not complete and may be changed. Mariner Energy,
Inc. may not distribute or issue the shares of Mariner Energy,
Inc. common stock being registered pursuant to this registration
statement until the registration statement filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This proxy
statement/prospectus-information statement is not an offer to
distribute these securities and Mariner Energy, Inc. is not
soliciting offers to receive these securities in any state where
such offer or distribution is not permitted.
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED
DECEMBER 22, 2005
Houston, Texas
,
2006
Fellow Stockholder:
We invite you to attend the annual meeting of stockholders of
Mariner Energy, Inc. to be held
on , ,
2006 at 10:00 a.m., Central Standard Time,
at ,
Houston,
Texas .
At the meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon a
proposal to adopt the merger agreement entered into among
Mariner, Forest Oil Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc.
and MEI Sub, Inc., to consider and vote upon a proposal to amend
Mariners certificate of incorporation to increase its
authorized shares of stock, to consider and vote upon a proposed
amendment and restatement of Mariners stock incentive
plan, to elect one director to serve until the annual meeting of
stockholders in 2009 and to elect two directors to serve until
the annual meeting of stockholders in 2007.
If the merger agreement is adopted and the merger consummated,
Forest Energy Resources will become a wholly owned subsidiary of
Mariner, and Mariner will be a publicly traded company. Mariner
has applied to list its common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange. Each Forest shareholder will be entitled to receive
one share of common stock of Mariner in exchange for each share
of Forest Energy Resources common stock they own. Mariner
stockholders will not receive consideration in the merger.
We believe that this transaction will increase Mariners
scale and balance its portfolio in the Gulf of Mexico, provide a
strong financial platform for our exploration and development
efforts, and enlarge our stockholder base for greater liquidity.
There are, however, risks associated with the proposed
transaction, some of which are described under Risk
Factors beginning on page 23 of the accompanying
proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement.
The Mariner board of directors has determined that the merger
is fair to and in the best interests of Mariner and its
stockholders, and that the merger agreement is advisable. The
Mariner board of directors has unanimously approved the merger
agreement and recommends that the Mariner stockholders vote
for the adoption of the merger agreement.
In order to consummate the merger, Mariners certificate of
incorporation must be amended to increase the number of shares
of stock Mariner is authorized to issue. Mariner proposes to
increase its authorized shares to 200 million, of which
180 million will be shares of common stock and
20 million will be shares of preferred stock, subject to
the completion of the merger. The Mariner board of directors
has unanimously approved the amendment to the certificate of
incorporation, and recommends that the Mariner stockholders vote
for the amendment.
Mariner also proposes to amend and restate its stock incentive
plan to, among other things, add 4.5 million shares of
common stock, or approximately 5% of its outstanding shares
following the completion of the merger, to the plan, subject to
the completion of the merger. The Mariner board of directors
has unanimously approved the amended and restated stock
incentive plan, and recommends that the Mariner stockholders
vote for the amended and restated plan.
In considering the recommendations of the Mariner board of
directors, stockholders of Mariner should be aware that members
of the Mariner board of directors and executive officers of
Mariner have agreements and arrangements that provide them with
interests in the merger that differ from, or are in addition to,
those of Mariner stockholders. Please read The Mariner
Annual Meeting Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger beginning on page 38 of the accompanying proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement.
All stockholders are invited to attend the meeting. Your
participation at the meeting, in person or in proxy, is
important. Even if you only own a few shares, we want your
shares to be represented at the meeting. The merger cannot be
completed without the approval of the holders of a majority of
the outstanding shares of common stock of Mariner. Whether or
not you expect to attend the meeting in person, please complete,
sign, date and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the
enclosed postage-prepaid envelope. Stockholders of record also
have the option of voting via the Internet or by telephone.
Specific instructions on how to vote via the Internet or by
telephone are included on the proxy card. Each proxy is
revocable and will not affect your right to vote in person if
you attend the meeting.
The proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement that
accompanies this letter contains detailed information about the
proposed merger and the other proposals, and we urge you to read
it carefully. In particular, you should read the Risk
Factors section beginning on page 23 for a
description of various risks you should consider in evaluating
the proposed merger.
Thank you and we look forward to seeing you at the meeting.
|
|
|
Sincerely yours, |
|
|
/s/ Scott D. Josey |
|
|
|
Scott D. Josey |
|
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved the new shares
of Mariner common stock to be issued in the merger or determined
that this proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement is
accurate or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a
criminal offense.
This proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement is
dated ,
2006, and is first being mailed to stockholders on or
about ,
2006.
Denver, Colorado
,
2006
To the Shareholders of Forest Oil Corporation:
On September 12, 2005, we announced that we would spin-off
to our shareholders our offshore Gulf of Mexico operations, and
that the Gulf of Mexico operations would immediately thereafter
be acquired in a merger transaction by Mariner Energy, Inc.
After the spin-off and merger, Mariner will be a separately
traded public company that will own and operate the combination
of Mariners business and our Gulf of Mexico operations.
As a result of the transaction, in addition to retaining all of
your shares of Forest common stock, you will receive
approximately 0.8 shares of Mariner common stock for each
Forest share you own on the record date of the transaction. You
will not be required to pay for the shares of Mariner common
stock that you receive. Forest shareholders will receive
approximately 58% of the common stock of Mariner on a pro forma
basis. Mariner has applied to list its common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange.
This transaction represents a significant strategic step that we
believe will sharpen Forests focus on its onshore
businesses, and will provide operational clarity. While we
believe the spin-off will also allow Forest shareholders to
benefit from the success and upside potential of Mariner, there
are risks that are described under Risk Factors
beginning on page 23 of the accompanying proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement.
Forests board of directors has determined that the
spin-off of the Gulf of Mexico operations and the combination of
these operations with Mariner are advisable and in the best
interests of Forest and its shareholders, and has approved the
proposed transaction. You need not take any action to
participate in the spin-off or the merger no vote of
Forest shareholders is required in connection with this
transaction. Following the completion of the merger, you will
receive information explaining how to obtain your shares of
Mariner common stock.
The following document constitutes an information statement of
Forest relating to the spin-off and contains important
information describing the terms of the spin-off, the merger,
Forest, Mariner, the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations and the
combined businesses. We encourage you to read it carefully.
We look forward to completing the spin-off and merger and to the
exciting opportunities this transaction presents for our
shareholders.
|
|
|
Sincerely, |
|
|
/s/ H. Craig Clark |
|
|
|
H. Craig Clark |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Houston, Texas
,
2006
Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders
To the Stockholders of Mariner Energy, Inc.
The annual meeting of holders of common stock of Mariner Energy,
Inc. will be held
on , ,
2006 at 10:00 a.m., Central Standard Time,
at ,
Houston,
Texas ,
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon the adoption of the Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as of September 9, 2005, among Forest Oil
Corporation, Forest Energy Resources, Inc., Mariner Energy, Inc.
and MEI Sub, Inc., subject to the approval of the amendment
to Mariners certificate of incorporation described below, |
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposed amendment to Mariners
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of stock from
90 million to 200 million, subject to the completion
of the merger, |
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon the proposed amendment and restatement
of the Mariner Energy, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, |
|
|
|
|
|
to elect one director to serve until the annual meeting of
stockholders in 2009, |
|
|
|
|
|
to elect two directors to serve until the annual meeting of
stockholders in 2007, |
|
|
|
|
|
to grant to the proxyholders the authority to vote in their
discretion with respect to the approval of any proposal to
postpone or adjourn the annual meeting to a later date to
solicit additional proxies in favor of the other proposals, if
there are not sufficient votes for approval of the other
proposals at the annual meeting, and |
|
|
|
|
|
to transact any other business that may properly come before the
annual meeting. |
|
The board of directors of Mariner has determined that owners of
record of Mariners common stock at the close of business
on ,
2006 are entitled to notice of, and have the right to vote at,
the Mariner annual meeting and any reconvened meeting following
any adjournment or postponement of the meeting.
The Mariner board of directors has determined that the merger
is fair to and in the best interests of Mariner and its
stockholders, and that the merger agreement is advisable. The
Mariner board of directors has unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the other proposals and recommends that the
Mariner stockholders vote for the adoption of
the merger agreement and the other proposals.
In considering the recommendations of the Mariner board of
directors, stockholders of Mariner should be aware that members
of the Mariner board of directors and executive officers of
Mariner have agreements and arrangements that provide them with
interests in the merger that differ from, or are in addition to,
those of Mariner stockholders. Please read The Mariner
Annual Meeting Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger beginning on page 38 of the accompanying proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement.
|
|
|
By Order of the Board of Directors |
|
of Mariner Energy, Inc. |
|
|
/s/ Teresa Bushman |
|
|
|
Teresa Bushman |
|
Vice President and General Counsel |
Your Vote is Important.
Whether or Not You Plan to Attend the Annual Meeting, Please
Complete, Sign, Date and Return Your Proxy Card
PROXY STATEMENT/ PROSPECTUS-INFORMATION STATEMENT
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Certain Financial Projections
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A-1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-1 |
|
iii
iv
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MERGER
These questions and answers, together with the section titled
Summary immediately following this section, provide
a summary of the material terms of the spin-off and the merger
and the other proposals to be acted upon at the annual meeting.
To better understand the proposed merger and the other
proposals, you should read this entire proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement carefully, as well as those
additional documents to which we refer you.
This proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a proxy statement of Mariner for use in the solicitation of
proxies for Mariners annual meeting of stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
|
a prospectus of Mariner relating to the issuance of shares of
Mariner common stock in connection with the merger; and |
|
|
|
|
|
an information statement of Forest relating to the spin-off
of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations to the shareholders of
Forest. |
|
For an explanation of oil and gas abbreviations and terms
used in this proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement,
see Glossary of Oil and Natural Gas Terms on
page 183.
In this proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The terms we, us, our and
like terms, and the term Mariner, refer to Mariner
Energy, Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
|
MEI Sub refers to MEI Sub, Inc.; |
|
|
|
|
|
Forest refers to Forest Oil Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Energy Resources refers to Forest Energy
Resources, Inc.; and |
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations refers to the
offshore Gulf of Mexico operations conducted by Forest that have
been contributed to Forest Energy Resources and the shares of
which will be spun-off to Forest shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Please briefly describe the proposed merger and related
transactions. |
|
|
A: |
|
Forest has transferred and contributed the assets and certain
liabilities associated with its offshore Gulf of Mexico
operations to Forest Energy Resources, a newly formed subsidiary
of Forest. Immediately prior to the merger, Forest will
distribute all of the outstanding shares of Forest Energy
Resources to Forest shareholders on a pro rata basis. Forest
Energy Resources will then merge with a newly formed subsidiary
of Mariner, and become a new wholly owned subsidiary of Mariner.
When the merger is complete, approximately 58% of the Mariner
common stock will be held by shareholders of Forest and
approximately 42% of Mariner common stock will be held by the
pre-merger stockholders of Mariner, each on a pro forma basis. |
|
Following the merger, Mariner will:
|
|
|
|
|
|
be an independent public company; |
|
|
|
|
|
own both the Mariner operations and the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations; and |
|
|
|
|
|
have total assets of approximately $2.1 billion and total
debt of approximately $279.0 million on a pro forma
combined basis, assuming the spin-off and the merger occurred on
September 30, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What are Mariner stockholders being asked to vote upon? |
|
A: |
|
Mariner stockholders are being asked to |
|
|
|
|
|
adopt the merger agreement entered into among
Forest, Forest Energy Resources, Mariner and MEI Sub, Inc.,
subject to the approval of the proposed amendment to
Mariners certificate of incorporation; |
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
approve the proposed amendment to Mariners
certificate of incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of stock from 90 million to
200 million, subject to completion of the merger; |
|
|
|
|
|
approve the proposed amendment and restatement of
Mariners stock incentive plan; |
|
|
|
|
|
to elect one director to serve until the annual
meeting of stockholders of Mariner in 2009; |
|
|
|
|
|
to elect two directors to serve until the annual
meeting of stockholders of Mariner in 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
|
approve the proposed granting of authority to the
proxyholders to vote in their discretion on a motion to adjourn
or postpone the meeting. |
|
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What changes to Mariners stock incentive plan am I
being asked to approve? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
You are being asked to approve an amendment and restatement of
the plan whereby 4.5 million shares of common stock would
be added to the plan, the plan would be extended to
October 12, 2015 and the number of shares subject to stock
options or shares of restricted stock issuable under the plan to
any individual would be limited to 2.85 million, subject to
the completion of the merger. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Why am I being asked to grant to the proxy holders the
authority to vote in their discretion on a motion to adjourn or
postpone the meeting? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
We may determine to adjourn or postpone the meeting, for
example, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient
votes at the time of the meeting to adopt the merger agreement. |
|
|
Q: |
|
What will Forest shareholders receive in the merger? |
|
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed, each Forest shareholder will
ultimately receive shares of Mariner common stock. As a result
of the spin-off, Forest shareholders will initially receive
shares of Forest Energy Resources, which will then be converted
in the merger into the right to receive shares of Mariner. After
the merger, Forest shareholders will be entitled to receive
approximately 0.8 shares of Mariner for each Forest share
that they own. Forest shareholders will not be required to pay
for the shares of Forest Energy Resources distributed in the
spin-off transaction or the shares of Mariner issued in the
merger. Shareholders who would hold less than one full Mariner
share after the merger will receive cash in lieu of such
fractional share. All shares of Forest Energy Resources common
stock distributed in the spin-off and Mariner common stock
issued in the merger will be issued in book-entry form, meaning
that, although Forest shareholders will own the shares, they
will not be issued physical share certificates. |
|
|
Q: |
|
What will Mariner stockholders receive in the merger? |
|
A: |
|
Mariner stockholders will keep the shares of Mariner common
stock they currently own, but will not receive any additional
shares in the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Does the Mariner board of directors support the merger and
the other proposals? |
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. The Mariner board of directors has determined that the
merger is fair to and in the best interests of Mariner and its
stockholders, and that the merger agreement is advisable. The
Mariner board of directors has unanimously approved the merger
agreement and the other proposals and recommends that the
Mariner stockholders vote for the adoption of
the merger agreement and the other proposals. A more
detailed description of the background and reasons for the
merger is set forth under The Spin-Off and Merger
beginning on page 40. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Do the directors and executive officers of Mariner have
interests in the merger that are different from mine? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
When considering the recommendations of the Mariner board of
directors, you should be aware that the directors and executive
officers of Mariner have interests and arrangements that may be
different from your interests as stockholders, including: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
arrangements regarding the appointment of directors and officers
of Mariner following the merger; and |
|
|
|
|
|
arrangements whereby the executive officers of Mariner will
receive a cash payment of $1,000 each in exchange for the waiver
of certain rights under their employment agreements, including
the automatic |
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
vesting or acceleration of restricted stock and options upon the
completion of the merger and the right to receive a lump sum
cash payment if the officer voluntarily terminates employment
without good reason within nine months following the completion
of the merger. |
At the close of business on December 21, 2005, directors
and executive officers of Mariner and their affiliates as a
group beneficially owned and were entitled to vote approximately
3.7 million shares of Mariner common stock (including
restricted stock subject to vesting), representing approximately
10.4% of the shares of Mariner common stock outstanding on that
date. All of the directors and executive officers of Mariner who
are entitled to vote at the meeting have indicated that they
intend to vote their shares of Mariner common stock in favor of
adoption of the merger agreement.
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What factors did the Mariner board of directors consider in
reaching its decision on the merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
In reaching its decision on the merger, the Mariner board of
directors considered a number of factors, including the
following among others: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the increased size of the combined company could reduce
volatility and allow it to participate in larger scale drilling
projects and acquisition opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger would be expected to increase Mariners
estimated proved reserves and undeveloped acreage; |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger could generate increased visibility in the capital
markets and trading liquidity for the combined company; |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger would increase the number of Mariners producing
fields, thereby reducing Mariners dependence on a
concentrated number of properties; |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger would be consummated only if approved by the holders
of a majority of the Mariner common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger is structured as a tax-free reorganization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and, accordingly, would
not be taxable either to Mariner or its stockholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Mariner board of directors also identified and considered
some risks and potential disadvantages associated with the
merger, including, among others, the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that there may be difficulties in combining the
business of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations; |
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the potential benefits sought in the merger might
not be fully realized; |
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the proved undeveloped, probable and possible
reserves of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations may never be
converted to proved developed reserves; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that, in order to preserve the tax-free treatment of
the spin-off, Mariner would be required to abide by restrictions
that could reduce its ability to engage in certain business
transactions. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the judgment of the Mariner board of directors, the potential
benefits of the merger outweigh the risks and the potential
disadvantages. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Did Mariners financial advisor render its opinion with
respect to the fairness from a financial point of view of the
exchange ratio in the merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. Lehman Brothers Inc., Mariners financial advisor, has
delivered to Mariners board of directors a written opinion
that, as of September 9, 2005, based upon and subject to
the factors and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the
exchange ratio in the merger was fair from a financial point of
view to Mariner. This opinion is attached as Annex B to
this proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement. |
|
|
Q: |
|
Are there risks that Mariner stockholders should consider in
deciding whether to vote on the merger? |
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. Mariner stockholders should read the Risk
Factors beginning on page 23 for a description of
various risks Mariner stockholders should carefully consider in
evaluating the proposed merger. |
|
3
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Can Mariner stockholders dissent and require appraisal of
their shares of Mariner common stock? |
|
A: |
|
No. Mariner stockholders are not entitled to
dissenters rights or appraisal rights in connection with
the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Why does Mariner want to increase the number of authorized
Mariner shares? |
|
|
A: |
|
Mariners certificate of incorporation currently does not
authorize a sufficient number of shares of common stock to
complete the merger. Mariner currently is authorized to issue
70 million shares of Mariner common stock and
20 million shares of Mariner preferred stock. As of
December 21, 2005, approximately 35.6 million shares
of Mariner common stock were issued and outstanding. Under the
terms of the merger agreement, Mariner must issue approximately
50.6 million shares (representing approximately
0.8 shares of Mariner common stock for each share of Forest
common stock) of common stock in the merger, which would result
in approximately 86 million shares of Mariner common stock
outstanding. Therefore, the number of authorized shares of
Mariner common stock must be increased in order to complete the
merger. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What vote is required to adopt the merger agreement and the
other proposals? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
For the merger to occur, the holders of a majority of the
outstanding Mariner common stock must adopt the merger agreement
and approve the amendment to the certificate of incorporation.
The amendment to Mariners stock incentive plan must be
approved by a majority of votes cast by stockholders present in
person or by proxy, a quorum being present. Director nominees
receiving a plurality of all votes cast at the meeting will be
elected to Mariners board of directors. Mariner
stockholders will have one vote for each share of Mariner common
stock they own.
On ,
2006, the record date for Mariners annual
meeting, shares
of Mariner common stock were issued and outstanding and entitled
to vote at the meeting. The approval of Forest shareholders is
not required for the spin-off or the merger. |
|
|
Q: |
|
Where will Mariners common stock be listed? |
|
|
A: |
|
We have applied to list Mariners common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange. |
|
|
Q: |
|
Who will be the executive officers of Mariner? |
|
A: |
|
The current executive officers of Mariner will remain in their
current positions following the merger. |
|
Q: |
|
Who will be the directors of Mariner? |
|
A: |
|
If the merger is completed, Mariners board will consist of
seven members, five of whom will be the current directors of
Mariner, and two of whom will be mutually agreed between Mariner
and Forest prior to the completion of the merger. The Chairman
of the Mariner board will be Mr. Scott D. Josey, the
current Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of
Mariner. |
|
|
Q: |
|
Who are the new directors of Mariner, as mutually agreed by
Forest and Mariner? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
The two Mariner directors to be mutually agreed by Forest and
Mariner pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement have not
yet been designated. We will update this proxy
statement/prospectus-information statement when information with
respect to the new directors becomes available. |
|
|
Q: |
|
When do you expect to complete the spin-off and the
merger? |
|
|
A: |
|
If the merger agreement and the proposed amendment to the
certificate of incorporation are adopted and approved by the
stockholders of Mariner, then Mariner, Forest, Forest Energy
Resources and MEI Sub expect to complete the spin-off and the
merger as soon as possible after the satisfaction (or waiver,
where permissible) of the other conditions to the spin-off and
the merger. We currently anticipate that the merger will be
completed during the first calendar quarter of 2006. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Who is entitled to vote at the meeting of Mariner
stockholders? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Holders of Mariner common stock of record at the close of
business
on ,
2006. |
|
|
Q: |
|
What should Mariner stockholders do now? |
|
A: |
|
You should mail your signed and dated proxy card(s) in the
enclosed envelope or vote via telephone or via the Internet by
following the instructions on your proxy card(s) as soon as
possible so that your shares of |
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner common stock will be represented and voted at the
meeting. The telephone voting number
is ,
and the web address for Internet voting
is . |
|
|
Q: |
|
Do Mariner stockholders need to send in their share
certificate(s)? |
|
A: |
|
No. Mariner stockholders should not send in their share
certificate(s). Mariner stockholders will not exchange their
share certificates in connection with the merger; only
shareholders of Forest will do so. |
|
|
Q: |
|
If I am not going to attend the meeting, should I return my
proxy card(s)? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
Yes. Returning your proxy card(s) ensures that your shares of
Mariner common stock will be represented at the meeting, even if
you are unable to or do not attend. |
|
|
Q: |
|
How do I vote my shares of Mariner common stock if they are
held in the name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary? |
|
A: |
|
Your bank, broker or other fiduciary will vote your shares of
Mariner common stock with respect to the merger only if you
provide written instructions to them on how to vote, so it is
important that you provide them with instructions. If you do not
provide them with instructions, they will not be authorized to
vote with respect to the merger or the other proposals. If you
wish to vote in person at the meeting and hold your shares of
Mariner common stock in the name of a bank, broker or other
fiduciary, you must contact your bank, broker or other fiduciary
and request a legal proxy. You must bring this legal proxy to
the meeting in order to vote in person. Shares of Mariner common
stock held by a broker, bank or other fiduciary that are not
voted because the customer has not provided instructions to the
broker, bank or other fiduciary (referred to as a broker
non-vote) will have the same effect as a vote
against the proposals. |
|
Q: |
|
Can I change my vote after I mail my proxy card(s)? |
|
A: |
|
Yes. If you are a record holder of Mariner common stock, you can
change your vote by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
completing, signing and dating a new proxy card and
returning it by mail to our proxy solicitor so that it is
received prior to the meeting; |
|
|
|
|
|
voting via telephone
( )
or via the Internet
( )
by following the instructions provided on your proxy card; |
|
|
|
|
|
sending a written notice to the Corporate Secretary
of Mariner that is received prior to the meeting stating that
you revoke your proxy; or |
|
|
|
|
|
attending the meeting and voting in person or by
legal proxy, if appropriate. |
|
|
|
|
|
Internet and telephone voters must use the same procedure to
revoke or change their votes as they used to cast their original
votes. If your shares of Mariner common stock are held in the
name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary and you have directed
such person(s) to vote your shares of Mariner common stock, you
should instruct such person(s) to change your vote or obtain a
legal proxy to do so yourself. You may revoke your proxy all the
way up until the time of the meeting. |
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What if I do not vote, or abstain from voting, or do not
instruct my broker to vote my shares of Mariner common stock? |
|
|
A: |
|
If you do not vote, it will have the same effect as a vote
against the merger and the proposal to amend Mariners
certificate of incorporation. Shares that are not voted will not
count for purposes of calculating a quorum, which is necessary
to have a valid meeting of stockholders. If a quorum of
stockholders is not present in person or by proxy at the
meeting, no vote will be taken on the merger and the other
proposals. Shares that are not voted have the effect of reducing
the number of shares required to approve the proposal to amend
and restate Mariners stock incentive plan and to elect
directors, which require the affirmative vote of a majority of a
quorum, but do not have the effect of reducing the number of
shares required to adopt the merger agreement and to approve the
proposed amendment to Mariners certificate of
incorporation, both of which require the affirmative vote of a
majority of Mariners outstanding shares. Abstentions and
broker non-votes also will have the effect of votes against the
merger and the proposal to |
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
amend Mariners certificate of incorporation. If you
sign your proxy card but do not indicate how you want to vote,
your shares of Mariner common stock will be voted for the merger
and the other proposals. |
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What factors did the Forest board of directors consider in
reaching its decision on the spin-off and merger? |
|
|
|
A: |
|
In reaching its decision on the spin-off and the merger, the
Forest board of directors considered a number of factors,
including the following among others: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the transaction creates two highly focused and
valuable enterprises for Forests shareholders, Forest and
Mariner; |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
with the Mariner business creates a high quality, well
positioned Gulf of Mexico independent with an excellent track
record and growth outlook; |
|
|
|
|
|
following the spin-off, Forest will be a
highly-focused onshore resource company with an acquire and
exploit strategy and a portfolio of long-life, concentrated
assets in high quality basins that provide a foundation for
sustainable growth; |
|
|
|
|
|
the determination to execute a tax-free transaction
designed to increase the value of Forests Gulf of Mexico
assets; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the determination that a spin-off followed by a
merger transaction represents a better alternative for
Forests shareholders than any other type of transaction
considered, providing optionality and returning value directly
to Forests shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
The Forest board of directors also considered some risks and
potential disadvantages associated with the spin-off and merger,
including the following among others: |
|
|
|
|
|
the lack of a liquid trading market and established
market value for the Mariner shares; |
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that there may be difficulties in combining
the business of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations; |
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the potential benefits sought in the
merger might not be fully realized; and |
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the proved undeveloped, probable and
possible reserves of the Mariner business may never be converted
to proved developed reserves. |
|
|
|
|
|
In the judgment of the Forest board of directors, the potential
benefits of the merger outweigh the risks and the potential
disadvantages. |
|
|
|
|
Q: |
|
Do Forest shareholders need to send in any share
certificates? |
|
A: |
|
No. If the merger is completed, Forest shareholders will
exchange their shares of Forest Energy Resources for share
certificates representing Mariner common stock. Forest
shareholders who are entitled to receive shares of Forest Energy
Resources (i.e., shareholders of record on the record date for
the distribution) will be mailed book entry statements
evidencing their shares of Forest Energy Resources. The exchange
of Forest Energy Resources and Mariner shares will be effected
through book-entry, without the exchange of physical share
certificates. |
|
Q: |
|
Has Forest set a record date for the distribution of Forest
Energy Resources shares in the spin-off? |
|
A: |
|
No. Forest will publicly announce the record date when it has
been determined. |
|
Q: |
|
Can Forest shareholders dissent and require appraisal of
their shares of Forest Energy Resources common stock? |
|
A: |
|
No. Forest shareholders are not entitled to dissenters
rights or appraisal rights in respect of the Forest Energy
Resources stock they receive in the merger. |
6
|
|
|
Q: |
|
What should Forest shareholders do now? |
|
A: |
|
Forest shareholders should carefully read this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement, which contains important
information about the spin-off, the merger, Mariner, the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations and the combined businesses. Forest
shareholders are not required to take any action to approve the
spin-off or the merger. As described above, if the merger is
completed, shares of Forest Energy Resources will be converted
into shares of Mariner common stock. |
|
Q: |
|
Who can answer my questions? |
|
|
A: |
|
If Mariner stockholders have any questions regarding the meeting
or need assistance in voting their shares of Mariner common
stock, please contact our proxy solicitor: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other questions from Mariner stockholders should be directed
to: |
|
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc.
Attention: Investor Relations
2101 CityWest Blvd.
Building 4, Suite 900
Houston, Texas 77042
Facsimile: (713) 954-5555
Telephone: (713) 954-5500 |
|
|
|
All other questions from Forest shareholders should be directed
to: |
|
|
|
Forest Oil Corporation
Attention: Investor Relations
707 17th Street, Suite 3600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Facsimile: (303) 812-1510
Telephone: (303) 812-1400 |
7
SUMMARY
This summary, together with the section titled
Questions and Answers About the Merger immediately
preceding this summary, provides a summary of the material terms
of the spin-off and the merger and the other proposals to be
acted upon at the meeting. To better understand the proposed
merger and the other proposals, you should read this entire
proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement carefully, as
well as those additional documents to which we refer you. We
have included page references at various points in this summary
to direct you to a more detailed description of the topics
presented.
The Companies
Mariner Energy, Inc.
2101 CityWest Blvd.
Building 4, Suite 900
Houston, Texas 77042
(713) 954-5500
Mariner Energy, Inc. is an independent oil and gas exploration,
development and production company with principal operations in
the Gulf of Mexico, both shelf and deepwater, and the Permian
Basin in West Texas. As of December 31, 2004, Mariner
had 237.5 Bcfe of estimated proved reserves, of which
approximately 64% were natural gas and 36% were oil and
condensate. As of December 31, 2004, the present value,
discounted at 10% per annum, of estimated future net
revenues from Mariners estimated proved reserves, before
income tax (PV10), was approximately
$668 million, and Mariners standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows attributable to its estimated
proved reserves was approximately $494 million. Please see
Mariner Estimated Proved Reserves for a
reconciliation of PV10 to the standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows. As of December 31, 2004,
approximately 46% of Mariners estimated proved reserves
were classified as proved developed. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, Mariners total net production was
37.6 Bcfe. Of Mariners estimated proved reserves, 48%
are located in the Permian Basin in West Texas, 37% in the Gulf
of Mexico deepwater and 15% on the Gulf of Mexico shelf as of
December 31, 2004. In the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, Mariner deployed approximately
$337 million of capital on acquisitions, exploration and
development while adding approximately 191 Bcfe of
estimated proved reserves and producing approximately
111 Bcfe.
MEI Sub, Inc.
c/o Mariner Energy, Inc.
2101 CityWest Blvd.
Building 4, Suite 900
Houston, Texas 77042
(713) 954-5500
MEI Sub, Inc. is a wholly owned subsidiary of Mariner. MEI Sub
was organized on August 30, 2005 for the purposes of
merging with Forest Energy Resources in the merger. It has not
carried on any activities other than in connection with the
merger agreement.
Forest Oil Corporation
707 17th Street, Suite 3600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Facsimile: (303) 812-1400
Forest is an independent oil and gas company engaged in the
acquisition, exploration, development and production of natural
gas and liquids in North America and selected international
locations. Forest was incorporated in New York in 1924, as the
successor to a company formed in 1916, and has been a publicly
held company since 1969. Forest operates from offices located in
Denver, Colorado; Lafayette and Metairie, Louisiana; Anchorage,
Alaska; and Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
8
Forest Energy Resources, Inc.
c/o Forest Oil Corporation
707 17th Street, Suite 3600
Denver, Colorado 80202
Facsimile: (303) 812-1400
Forest Energy Resources is a wholly owned subsidiary of Forest.
Forest Energy Resources was formed in Delaware on
August 18, 2005 for the purpose of completing the spin-off
of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations. As of December 31,
2004, the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations that have been
contributed to Forest Energy Resources prior to the merger had
339.7 Bcfe of estimated proved reserves, of which approximately
79% were natural gas and 21% were oil and condensate. As of
December 31, 2004, the PV10 of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations was approximately $1,222.2 million, and the
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
attributable to its estimated proved reserves was approximately
$925.8 million. Please see The Forest Gulf of Mexico
Operations Estimated Proved Reserves for a
reconciliation of PV10 to the standardized measure of discounted
future net cash flows. As of December 31, 2004,
approximately 76% of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
estimated proved reserves were classified as proved developed.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations total net production was 81.1 Bcfe. In
the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations deployed approximately
$560 million of capital on acquisitions, exploration and
development while adding approximately 182 Bcfe of
estimated proved reserves and producing approximately
215 Bcfe.
9
Ownership Structure Before and After the Spin-off and
Merger
The following diagrams and accompanying descriptions serve to
describe generally the transactions that will take place in
connection with the spin-off and merger. For more information,
please read The Spin-off and Merger.
1. Current Corporate Ownership
Structure
Forest Energy Resources is a wholly owned subsidiary of Forest.
MEI Sub is a wholly owned subsidiary of Mariner.
2. The Contribution and
Spin-Off
Forest has contributed the assets and certain liabilities
associated with its Gulf of Mexico operations to Forest Energy
Resources. Forest will, immediately prior to the merger,
distribute all of the shares of Forest Energy Resources to its
shareholders on a pro rata basis.
3. The Merger
MEI Sub will merge with and into Forest Energy Resources, with
Forest Energy Resources surviving as a wholly owned subsidiary
of Mariner. Forest Energy Resources will be renamed Mariner
Energy Resources, Inc. In conjunction with the merger, shares of
Forest Energy Resources stock will automatically be converted
into shares of Mariner stock.
10
4. Corporate Ownership Structure
following the Spin-Off and Merger
At the conclusion of the merger, Forest shareholders will own
approximately 58% of Mariner and the stockholders of Mariner who
owned shares prior to the merger will own the remaining 42% of
Mariner.
Material United States Federal Tax Consequences of the
Spin-Off and the Merger (page 61)
It is a condition to the completion of the spin-off that Forest
receive an opinion from its tax counsel to the effect that the
contribution and transfer of the assets and liabilities of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations to Forest Energy Resources and
the spin-off by Forest of all the shares of Forest Energy
Resources common stock to the holders of Forest common stock
generally will be treated as a tax-free transaction for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. As a tax-free transaction
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the spin-off will be
tax-free to Forest shareholders and will generally be tax-free
to Forest.
It is a condition to the completion of the merger that Forest,
Forest Energy Resources and Mariner receive opinions from their
respective tax counsels to the effect that the merger will
constitute a tax-free reorganization for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. As a tax-free reorganization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes, the merger will be
tax-free to the stockholders of Mariner and tax-free to the
shareholders of Forest, except for cash received in lieu of
fractional shares of Mariner for shares of Forest Energy
Resources.
We encourage you to consult your own tax advisor for a full
understanding of the tax consequences of the spin-off and/or the
merger to you.
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger (page 82)
The merger will be completed only if certain conditions,
including the following, are satisfied (or waived in certain
cases):
|
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by Mariner stockholders
holding a majority of the Mariner common stock and the approval
of the proposed amendment to Mariners certificate of
incorporation; |
|
|
|
the absence of legal restrictions that would prevent the
completion of the transactions; |
|
|
|
the receipt by Forest, Mariner and Forest Energy Resources of an
opinion from their respective counsel to the effect that the
merger will be treated as a reorganization for federal income
tax purposes; |
|
|
|
the completion of the spin-off in accordance with the
distribution agreement; |
|
|
|
the receipt of material consents, approvals and authorizations
of governmental authorities; |
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act; |
|
|
|
the SEC declaring effective the registration statements of
Mariner relating to the shares of Mariner common stock to be
issued in the merger and those shares held by its existing
stockholders; |
|
|
|
|
the representations and warranties contained in the merger
agreement being materially true and correct, and the performance
in all material respects by the parties of their covenants and
other agreements in the merger agreement; |
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange or
Nasdaq of Mariners common stock; and |
|
|
|
|
Mariner and Forest receiving the consents required pursuant to
their credit facilities (with Mariner or Forest Energy Resources
having entered into a new or amended credit facility sufficient
to operate the combined businesses), and Forest receiving any
consents required from its bondholders. |
|
On November 14, 2005, the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act with respect to the merger expired. On
October 19, 2005, Forest received the consent required
pursuant to its credit facility. As of December 21, 2005,
no other conditions to closing have been satisfied. On
December 16, 2005, Mariner received clearance from the New
York Stock Exchange to file a listing application for its common
stock, and on December 22, 2005 Mariner filed a listing
application and other ancillary documents with the New York
Stock Exchange. Mariner is currently negotiating the definitive
documents for its new credit facility, which documents also will
grant the consent required pursuant to its existing facility.
Mariner and Forest are actively working to obtain necessary
consents, approvals and authorizations from governmental
authorities, including the Minerals Management Service.
Based on its current valuation of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations and the current amount of distributions permitted by
the covenants contained in the indentures governing
Forests outstanding bonds, Forest believes that no
consents of its bondholders will be required for the spin-off
and the merger. If Forests belief that bondholder consents
are not necessary remains unchanged as the merger closing
approaches, it intends to waive conditions in the merger
agreement and distribution agreement related to such consents.
Neither Mariner nor Forest currently believes that any other
condition to closing is likely to be waived. Mariner and Forest
will recirculate revised proxy materials and resolicit proxies
if there are any material changes in the terms of the merger,
including those that result from waivers of conditions to
closing.
Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the closing of
the merger will occur as promptly as practicable, and in no
event later than the second business day following the
satisfaction or, if permissible, waiver of the conditions to
closing set forth in the merger agreement, or at such other time
as Mariner and Forest Energy Resources mutually agree.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 84)
Forest and Mariner may mutually agree to terminate the merger
agreement without completing the merger. In addition, either
party may terminate the merger agreement if:
|
|
|
|
|
the other party breaches its representations, warranties,
covenants or agreements under the merger agreement so as to
create a material adverse effect, and the breach has not been
cured within 30 days after notice was given of such breach; |
|
|
|
the parties do not complete the merger by March 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
a governmental order prohibits the merger; or |
|
|
|
Mariner does not receive the required approval of its
stockholders. |
In addition, Mariner may terminate the merger agreement if it
receives a proposal to acquire Mariner that Mariners board
of directors determines in good faith to be more favorable to
Mariners stockholders than the merger. Forest may
terminate the merger agreement if Mariners board of
directors withdraws or modifies its approval of the merger to
Mariners stockholders.
Termination Fee and Expenses (page 85)
Mariner must pay Forest a termination fee of $25 million
and out-of-pocket fees
and expenses of up to $5 million if Mariner terminates the
merger agreement to accept an alternative proposal that
Mariners board of directors determines in good faith to be
more favorable to Mariners stockholders than the merger.
In addition, Mariner must pay Forest a termination fee of
$25 million and reimbursement of
out-of-pocket fees and
expenses of up to $5 million if the merger agreement is
terminated for the other reasons set forth under The
Merger Agreement Termination Fees and Expenses
on page 85.
12
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws (page 61)
The proposed amendment to Mariners certificate of
incorporation is in the form attached as Annex E to this
proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement. Following the
merger, the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of Mariner
would differ from the current certificate of incorporation and
by-laws only with respect to the number of authorized shares of
stock, which pursuant to the proposed amendment would be
increased from 90 million to 200 million.
Financing Arrangements Relating to the Spin-Off and the
Merger (page 93)
At the closing of the merger Mariner and Mariner Energy
Resources expect to enter into a new $500 million senior
secured revolving credit facility, and Mariner will enter into
an additional $40 million senior secured letter of credit
facility. The revolving credit facility will mature on the
fourth anniversary of the closing, and the letter of credit
facility will mature on the third anniversary of the closing.
The outstanding principal balance of loans under the revolving
credit facility may not exceed the borrowing base, which will be
initially set at $400 million. In addition, Forest Energy
Resources expects to enter into a new senior term loan facility
in connection with the spin-off, which facility is expected to
be repaid with borrowings under Mariners and Mariner
Energy Resources $500 million revolving credit
facility.
Ancillary Agreements (page 90)
In addition to the merger agreement and the distribution
agreement, Forest, Forest Energy Resources and Mariner have
entered into a tax sharing agreement relating to the allocation
of certain tax liabilities. The tax sharing agreement is
attached as Annex D to this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement. See Ancillary
Agreements Tax Sharing Agreement beginning on
page 90. In addition, Forest and Forest Energy Resources
have entered into an employee benefits agreement addressing
certain benefits matters for former Forest employees who become
employees of Forest Energy Resources in connection with the
spin-off and the merger. See Ancillary
Agreements Employee Benefits Agreement
beginning on page 91. Finally, Forest and Forest Energy
Resources have entered into a transition services agreement
under which Forest will provide certain services to Forest
Energy Resources for a limited period of time following the
merger. See Ancillary Agreements Transition
Services Agreement beginning on page 92.
Regulatory Matters (page 69)
None of the parties is aware of any other material governmental
or regulatory approval required for the completion of the
merger, other than the effectiveness of the registration
statement of which this proxy statement/ prospectus-information
statement is a part and the effectiveness of Mariners
registration statement on
Form S-1 relating
to the currently-outstanding shares of Mariner common stock, and
compliance with applicable antitrust law (including the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as
amended) and the corporate law of the State of Delaware. On
November 14, 2005, the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act with respect to the merger expired.
Comparison of Stockholder Rights (page 179)
Forests shareholders, whose rights are currently governed
by Forests certificate of incorporation, by-laws and New
York law, will, if the merger is completed, also become
stockholders of Mariner and their rights will be governed by
Mariners certificate of incorporation, by-laws and
Delaware law. Material differences exist in the terms of these
documents and statutes which may affect the rights of
stockholders of Mariner and Forest.
13
SUMMARY SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
Sources of Information
We are providing the following selected consolidated financial
data of Mariner and selected consolidated financial data of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, to help you in your analysis
of the financial aspects of the merger and related transactions.
We derived this information from the audited and unaudited
financial statements for Mariner and from the audited and
unaudited statements of revenues and direct operating expenses
of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations for the periods
presented. You should read this information in conjunction with
the financial information included elsewhere in this proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement. See Where You
Can Find More Information; Incorporation by Reference
beginning on page 185, Index to Financial
Statements on
page F-1 and
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial
Information beginning on page 95.
How We Prepared the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed
Financial Information
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information
is presented to show you how Mariner might have looked if the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations had been an independent company
and combined with Mariner for the periods presented. We prepared
the pro forma financial information using the purchase method of
accounting, with Mariner treated as the acquiror. See The
Spin-Off and Merger Accounting Treatment
beginning on page 69.
If the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations had been an independent
company, and if Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
had been combined in the past, they might have performed
differently. You should not rely on the pro forma financial
information as an indication of the financial position or
results of operations that Mariner would have reported if the
spin-off and merger had taken place earlier or of the future
results that Mariner will achieve after the merger. See
Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial
Information beginning on page 95.
14
Summary Historical Consolidated Financial Data of Mariner
The following table shows Mariners summary historical
consolidated financial data as of and for each of the four years
ended December 31, 2003, the period from January 1,
2004 through March 2, 2004, the period from March 3,
2004 through December 31, 2004, the period from
March 3, 2004 through September 30, 2004 and the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2005. The summary
historical consolidated financial data as of and for the four
years ended December 31, 2003, the period from
January 1, 2004 through March 2, 2004 and the period
from March 3, 2004 through December 31, 2004 are
derived from Mariners audited financial statements
included herein, and the summary historical consolidated
financial data for the period from March 3, 2004 through
September 30, 2004 and the nine-month period ended
September 30, 2005 are derived from unaudited financial
statements of Mariner. You should read the following data in
connection with Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Mariner and the consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this proxy statement/ prospectus-information
statement, where there is additional disclosure regarding the
information in the following table, including pro forma
information regarding the merger. Mariners historical
results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected
in future periods.
On March 2, 2004, Mariners former indirect parent,
Mariner Energy LLC, merged with MEI Acquisitions Holdings, LLC,
an affiliate of the private equity funds, Carlyle/ Riverstone
Global Energy and Power Fund II, L.P. and ACON Investments
LLC. The financial information contained herein is presented in
the style of Pre-2004 Merger activity (for all periods prior to
March 2, 2004) and Post-2004 Merger activity (for the
March 3, 2004 through December 31, 2004 period and the
March 3, 2004 through September 30, 2004 period) to
reflect the impact of the restatement of assets and liabilities
to fair value as required by push-down purchase
accounting at the March 2, 2004 merger date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-2004 Merger | |
|
|
Pre-2004 Merger | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
March 3, | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
March 3, | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
2004 through | |
|
through | |
|
|
through | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
March 2, | |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues(1)
|
|
$ |
151.2 |
|
|
$ |
122.5 |
|
|
$ |
174.4 |
|
|
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
|
$ |
142.5 |
|
|
$ |
158.2 |
|
|
$ |
155.0 |
|
|
$ |
121.1 |
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
Transportation expenses
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
Impairment of production equipment held for use
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of Enron related receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
58.7 |
|
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
88.2 |
|
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(10.3 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
54.0 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
82.4 |
|
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(18.4 |
) |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(28.8 |
) |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting method
net of tax effects
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
53.6 |
|
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
|
Income before cumulative effect per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
.50 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
.42 |
|
|
|
.74 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
.50 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
.42 |
|
|
|
.74 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
53.6 |
|
|
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
38.2 |
|
|
$ |
30.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.4 |
|
|
$ |
21.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
.50 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
.42 |
|
|
|
.74 |
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.20 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
.50 |
|
|
|
1.29 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
.42 |
|
|
|
.74 |
|
Capital Expenditure and Disposal Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration, including leasehold/seismic
|
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
$ |
35.7 |
|
|
$ |
40.4 |
|
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
31.6 |
|
|
$ |
40.4 |
|
|
$ |
66.3 |
|
|
$ |
46.7 |
|
|
Development and other
|
|
|
106.8 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
93.2 |
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
51.7 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
98.2 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
Proceeds from property conveyances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(121.6 |
) |
|
|
(52.3 |
) |
|
|
(90.5 |
) |
|
|
(29.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures net of proceeds from property
conveyances
|
|
$ |
130.4 |
|
|
$ |
85.9 |
|
|
$ |
133.6 |
|
|
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
|
$ |
(38.3 |
) |
|
$ |
53.8 |
|
|
$ |
74.0 |
|
|
$ |
79.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Includes effects of hedging.
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-2004 Merger | |
|
|
Pre-2004 Merger | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Balance Sheet Data:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net, full cost method
|
|
$ |
393.3 |
|
|
$ |
303.8 |
|
|
|
$ |
207.9 |
|
|
$ |
287.6 |
|
|
$ |
290.6 |
|
|
$ |
287.8 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
502.2 |
|
|
|
376.0 |
|
|
|
|
312.1 |
|
|
|
360.2 |
|
|
|
363.9 |
|
|
|
335.4 |
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities
|
|
|
79.0 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
178.6 |
|
|
|
133.9 |
|
|
|
|
218.2 |
|
|
|
170.1 |
|
|
|
180.1 |
|
|
|
141.9 |
|
|
Working capital (deficit)(2)
|
|
|
(30.2 |
) |
|
|
(18.7 |
) |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
(15.4 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
Balance sheet data as of December 31, 2004 reflects
purchase accounting adjustments to oil and gas properties, total
assets and stockholders equity resulting from the
acquisition of our former indirect parent on March 2, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Working capital (deficit) excludes current derivative assets and
liabilities, deferred tax assets and restricted cash. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post-2004 Merger | |
|
|
Pre-2004 Merger | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
March 3, | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months | |
|
March 3, | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
2004 through | |
|
through | |
|
|
through | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
March 2, | |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$ |
102.7 |
|
|
$ |
97.5 |
|
|
$ |
143.5 |
|
|
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
|
$ |
100.3 |
|
|
$ |
113.9 |
|
|
$ |
113.6 |
|
|
$ |
89.6 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
135.4 |
|
|
|
96.8 |
|
|
|
135.9 |
|
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
103.5 |
|
|
|
60.3 |
|
|
|
113.5 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(142.1 |
) |
|
|
(85.9 |
) |
|
|
(133.6 |
) |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
(53.8 |
) |
|
|
(74.0 |
) |
|
|
(79.1 |
) |
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
(74.9 |
) |
|
|
64.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30.0 |
) |
|
|
17.4 |
|
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(1)
|
|
$ |
102.7 |
|
|
$ |
97.5 |
|
|
$ |
143.5 |
|
|
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
|
$ |
100.3 |
|
|
$ |
113.9 |
|
|
$ |
113.6 |
|
|
$ |
89.6 |
|
Changes in working capital
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
(13.2 |
) |
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
Non-cash hedge gain(2)
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(23.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization/other
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest expense
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
135.4 |
|
|
$ |
96.8 |
|
|
$ |
135.9 |
|
|
|
$ |
20.3 |
|
|
$ |
103.5 |
|
|
$ |
60.3 |
|
|
$ |
113.5 |
|
|
$ |
63.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
EBITDA means earnings before interest, income taxes,
depreciation, depletion and amortization. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2005, EBITDA includes
$17.6 million in non-cash stock compensation expense
related to restricted stock and stock options granted in 2005.
We believe that EBITDA is a widely accepted financial indicator
that provides additional information about our ability to meet
our future requirements for debt service, capital expenditures
and working capital, but EBITDA should not be considered in
isolation or as a substitute for net income, operating income,
net cash provided by |
16
|
|
|
operating activities or any other measure of financial
performance presented in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles or as a measure of a companys
profitability or liquidity. |
|
(2) |
In accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended
by SFAS No. 137 and No. 138, we de-designated our
contracts effective December 2, 2001 after the counterparty
(an affiliate of Enron Corp.) filed for bankruptcy and
recognized all market value changes subsequent to such
de-designation in our earnings. The value recorded up to the
time of de-designation and included in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (AOCI), has reversed out of
AOCI and into earnings as the original corresponding production,
as hedged by the contracts, is produced. We have designated
subsequent hedge contracts as cash flow hedges with gains and
losses resulting from the transactions recorded at market value
in AOCI, as appropriate, until recognized as operating income in
our Statement of Operations as the physical production hedged by
the contracts is delivered. |
17
Summary Selected Consolidated Statements of Revenues and
Direct Operating Expenses of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
Operations
The selected financial data for the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were
derived from the historical records of Forest. You should read
the following data in connection with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of the Forest Gulf of Mexico Operations and the
consolidated statements of revenues and direct operating
expenses of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations included
elsewhere in this proxy statement/ prospectus-information
statement. Complete financial and operating information related
to the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, including balance sheet
and cash flow information, are not presented below because the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations were not maintained as a
separate business unit, and therefore the assets, liabilities or
indirect operating costs applicable to the operations were not
segregated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions, except production data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas revenues(1)
|
|
$ |
326.7 |
|
|
$ |
324.4 |
|
|
$ |
453.1 |
|
|
$ |
342.0 |
|
|
$ |
228.9 |
|
|
Direct Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
63.0 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
52.1 |
|
|
|
Transportation
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct operating expenses
|
|
|
61.8 |
|
|
|
65.6 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
56.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues in excess of direct operating expenses
|
|
$ |
264.9 |
|
|
$ |
258.8 |
|
|
$ |
369.3 |
|
|
$ |
292.1 |
|
|
$ |
172.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Production Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
41,442 |
|
|
|
46,036 |
|
|
|
61,684 |
|
|
|
58,785 |
|
|
|
50,566 |
|
|
Oil and condensate (MBbls)
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
2,004 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,143 |
|
|
|
1974 |
|
|
Natural gas liquids (MBbls)
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Total (MMcfe)
|
|
|
56,280 |
|
|
|
59,176 |
|
|
|
81,064 |
|
|
|
71,655 |
|
|
|
62,446 |
|
|
Per day (MMcfe)
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Average realized sales price per unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas ($/Mcf):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales price received
|
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
$ |
6.02 |
|
|
$ |
6.30 |
|
|
$ |
5.41 |
|
|
$ |
3.39 |
|
|
|
Effects of hedging
|
|
|
(1.13 |
) |
|
|
(0.45 |
) |
|
|
(0.56 |
) |
|
|
(0.63 |
) |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales price received
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
September 30, | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions, except production data) | |
|
Oil ($/bbl):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales price received
|
|
$ |
51.97 |
|
|
$ |
38.13 |
|
|
$ |
40.06 |
|
|
$ |
30.19 |
|
|
$ |
24.85 |
|
|
|
Effects of hedging
|
|
|
(19.95 |
) |
|
|
(6.61 |
) |
|
|
(8.55 |
) |
|
|
(1.90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales price received
|
|
|
32.02 |
|
|
|
31.52 |
|
|
|
31.51 |
|
|
|
28.29 |
|
|
|
24.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas liquids ($/bbl)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales price received
|
|
$ |
29.54 |
|
|
$ |
25.40 |
|
|
$ |
27.28 |
|
|
$ |
19.00 |
|
|
$ |
12.33 |
|
Average realized sales price per Mcfe (including effects of
hedging) ($/Mcfe)
|
|
$ |
5.81 |
|
|
$ |
5.48 |
|
|
$ |
5.59 |
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
|
$ |
3.67 |
|
|
Production costs per Mcfe:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
Transportation
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
Production taxes
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
Capital Expenditure Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration
|
|
$ |
47.4 |
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
|
$ |
39.7 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
Development
|
|
|
57.3 |
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
70.8 |
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
87.2 |
|
|
|
168.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
104.7 |
|
|
$ |
166.0 |
|
|
$ |
185.5 |
|
|
$ |
282.9 |
|
|
$ |
91.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes effects of hedging. |
19
Summary Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed
Financial Information
The following summary selected unaudited pro forma combined
condensed financial information has been prepared to reflect the
merger. This unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial
information is based on the historical financial statements of
Mariner and the historical statements of revenues and direct
operating expenses of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, all
of which are included in this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement, and the estimates and
assumptions set forth in the Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Condensed Financial Information of Mariner beginning on
page 95. The unaudited pro forma combined condensed
operating results give effect to the merger as if it had
occurred on January 1, 2004. The unaudited pro forma
combined condensed balance sheet gives effect to the merger as
if it had occurred on September 30, 2005.
The unaudited pro forma combined condensed financial information
is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may
have been different had the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
been an independent company and had the companies always been
combined. You should not rely on the unaudited pro forma
combined condensed financial information as being indicative of
the historical results that would have been achieved had the
merger occurred in the past or the future financial results that
Mariner will achieve after the merger.
The merger will be accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting, with Mariner treated as the acquiror. In addition,
the purchase price allocation is preliminary and will be
finalized following the closing of the merger. The final
purchase price allocation will be determined after closing based
on the actual fair value of current assets, current liabilities,
indebtedness, long-term liabilities, proven and unproven oil and
gas properties, identifiable intangible assets and unvested
stock options that are outstanding at closing. We are continuing
to evaluate all of these items; accordingly, the final purchase
price may differ in material respects from that presented in the
unaudited pro forma combined condensed balance sheet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the | |
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended | |
|
For the Year Ended | |
|
|
September 30, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share | |
|
|
and proved reserve data) | |
OPERATING RESULTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
477,967 |
|
|
$ |
667,326 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
71,221 |
|
|
$ |
106,298 |
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
83,075 |
|
|
|
80,385 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
83,950 |
|
|
|
80,385 |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,118,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$ |
279,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,152,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, | |
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ESTIMATED PROVED RESERVES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (MBbls)*
|
|
|
29,261 |
|
|
|
25,905 |
|
|
Gas (MMcf)
|
|
|
423,352 |
|
|
|
421,741 |
|
|
Equivalent (MMcfe)
|
|
|
598,918 |
|
|
|
577,173 |
|
|
Proved developed percentage
|
|
|
63.9 |
% |
|
|
63.7 |
% |
|
|
* |
Includes 3,285.6 MBbls of natural gas liquids. |
20
Comparative Per Share Data
The following table presents historical per share data of
Mariner common stock and combined per share data of Mariner and
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations on an unaudited pro forma
basis after giving effect to the spin-off and the merger. The
merger will be accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting, with Mariner treated as the acquiror. The combined
pro forma per share data was derived from the Unaudited Pro
Forma Combined Condensed Financial Information as presented
beginning on page 95. The assumptions related to the
preparation of the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed
Financial Information are described beginning at page 95.
The data presented below should be read in conjunction with the
historical consolidated financial statements of Mariner and the
historical statements of revenues and direct operating expenses
of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations included elsewhere in
this proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement.
The Mariner unaudited pro forma equivalent data was calculated
with reference to the total number of shares of Mariner common
stock expected to be outstanding after the merger, including the
shares to be issued to Forest shareholders and the
currently-outstanding shares of Mariner common stock.
The pro forma combined per share data may not be indicative of
the operating results or financial position that would have
occurred if the merger had been consummated at the beginning of
the periods indicated, and may not be indicative of future
operating results or financial position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Combined | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2005(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
2.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book Value per share As of September 30, 2005(3)
|
|
$ |
5.01 |
|
|
$ |
13.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Mariners historical basic and diluted earnings per share
calculation for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
assumes Mariner had 32,438,240 and 33,312,831 weighted
average shares of common stock outstanding, respectively.
Mariners pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share
calculation for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
assumes Mariner had 83,075,250 and 83,949,841 weighted average
shares of common stock outstanding, respectively. |
|
|
|
(2) |
Mariners historical basic and diluted earnings per share
calculation for the year ended December 31, 2004 assumes
Mariner had 29,748,130 and 29,748,130 weighted average shares of
common stock outstanding, respectively. Mariners pro forma
basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the year
ended December 31, 2004 assumes Mariner had 80,385,140 and
80,385,140 weighted average shares of common stock outstanding,
respectively. |
|
|
|
(3) |
Book value per share calculation assumes that Mariner had
35,615,400 shares of common stock outstanding and
86,252,410 combined pro forma shares of common stock outstanding
as of September 30, 2005. |
|
21
Comparative Stock Price and Dividends
In March 2005, Mariner completed a private placement of
16,350,000 shares of its common stock to qualified
institutional buyers,
non-U.S. persons
and accredited investors. There is no established public trading
market for the shares of Mariner common stock, and it is not
expected that a public trading market will be established until
the completion of the merger. The shares of Mariners
common stock issued to qualified institutional buyers in
connection with its March 2005 private equity placement are
eligible for the PORTAL
Market®.
Forest Energy Resources was incorporated as a wholly owned
subsidiary of Forest in August 2005. There is no established
public trading market for the shares of Forest Energy Resources
common stock.
Mariner has not paid any cash dividends on its shares of common
stock for the fiscal years 2003 and 2004 or during the fiscal
year 2005 to date, and it anticipates that it will not pay any
dividends in 2005. Forest Energy Resources has not paid any cash
dividends on its shares of common stock for the fiscal year 2005
to date, and it anticipates that it will not pay any dividends
in 2005. The payment of any dividends by Mariner or Forest
Energy Resources prior to the merger is subject to the
limitations included in the merger agreement and in the credit
facilities of Mariner and Forest, respectively, and following
the merger the payment of dividends will continue to be subject
to restrictions included in the parties credit facilities.
22
RISK FACTORS
You should consider carefully the following risk factors,
which we believe include all material risks associated with our
business, the merger, and the offering of our common stock,
together with all of the other information included in this
prospectus, in determining whether to vote to adopt the merger
agreement and the other proposals at the meeting. Realization of
any of the following risks could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of
operations. In that case, the trading price of our common stock
could decline and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
Risks Related to the Spin-Off and the Merger
|
|
|
The market value of our common stock could decline if
large amounts of our common stock are sold following the
spin-off and merger. |
The market price of our common stock could decline as a result
of sales of a large number of shares in the market after the
completion of the spin-off and merger or the perception that
these sales could occur. Immediately after the merger, Forest
shareholders will hold, in the aggregate, approximately 58% of
our common stock on a pro forma basis. Currently, Forest
shareholders include index funds tied to various stock indices,
and institutional investors subject to various investing
guidelines. Because we may not be included in these indices at
the time of the merger or may not meet the investing guidelines
of some of these institutional investors, these index funds and
institutional investors may decide to sell the Mariner common
stock they receive in the merger. These sales may negatively
affect the price of our common stock and also may make it more
difficult for us to obtain additional capital by selling equity
securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem
appropriate.
Historically, Forest has operated with properties in diverse
geographic locations, including the Gulf Coast, the Western
United States, Alaska, Canada and other international locations.
In contrast, following the spin-off and merger, Mariner will
operate as a stand-alone oil and gas exploration, development
and production company with operations primarily in the Gulf of
Mexico and in West Texas. Shareholders of Forest who chose to
invest in a geographically diverse company may not wish to
continue to invest in one that is less geographically diverse,
such as Mariner. As a result, such shareholders may seek to sell
the shares of our common stock received in the merger.
|
|
|
The integration of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
following the merger will be difficult, and will divert our
managements attention away from our normal
operations. |
There is a significant degree of difficulty and management
involvement inherent in the process of integrating the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations. These difficulties include:
|
|
|
|
|
the challenge of integrating the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations while carrying on the ongoing operations of our
business; |
|
|
|
the challenge of managing a significantly larger company, with
more than twice the PV10 of Mariner on a stand-alone basis; |
|
|
|
faulty assumptions underlying our expectations; |
|
|
|
the difficulty associated with coordinating geographically
separate organizations; |
|
|
|
the challenge of integrating the business cultures of the two
companies; |
|
|
|
attracting and retaining personnel associated with the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations following the merger; and |
|
|
|
the challenge and cost of integrating the information technology
systems of the two companies. |
The process of integrating operations could cause an
interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities of our
business. Members of our senior management may be required to
devote considerable amounts of time to this integration process,
which will decrease the time they will have to manage our
23
business. If our senior management is not able to effectively
manage the integration process, or if any significant business
activities are interrupted as a result of the integration
process, our business could suffer.
|
|
|
If we fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the
merger, stockholders may receive lower returns than they
expect. |
The success of the merger will depend, in part, on our ability
to realize the anticipated growth opportunities from combining
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations with Mariner. Even if we
are able to successfully combine the two businesses, it may not
be possible to realize the full benefits of the proved reserves,
enhanced growth of production volume, cost savings from
operating synergies and other benefits that we currently expect
to result from the merger, or realize these benefits within the
time frame that is currently expected. The benefits of the
merger may be offset by operating losses relating to changes in
commodity prices, or in oil and gas industry conditions, or by
risks and uncertainties relating to the combined companys
exploratory prospects, or an increase in operating or other
costs or other difficulties. If we fail to realize the benefits
we anticipate from the merger, stockholders may receive lower
returns on our stock than they expect.
|
|
|
We expect to incur significant charges relating to the
integration plan that could materially and adversely affect our
period-to-period results of operations following the
merger. |
We are developing a plan to integrate the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations with our operations after the merger. Following the
merger, we anticipate that from time to time we will incur
charges to our earnings in connection with the integration.
These charges will include expenses incurred in connection with
relocating and retaining employees and increased professional
and consulting costs. We also expect to incur significant
expenses related to being a public company. We will not be able
to quantify the exact amount of these charges or the period(s)
in which they will be incurred until after the merger is
completed. Some factors affecting the cost of the integration
include the timing of the closing of the merger, the training of
new employees, the amount of severance and other
employee-related payments resulting from the merger, and the
limited length of time during which transitional services are
provided by Forest.
|
|
|
The number of shares Forest shareholders will receive in
the merger is not subject to adjustment based on the value of
the Mariner or the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations.
Accordingly, because this value may fluctuate, the market value
of the Mariner common stock that Forest shareholders receive in
the merger may not reflect the value of the individual companies
at the time of the merger. |
Following the spin-off and the merger, the holders of Forest
common stock will ultimately become entitled to receive
approximately 0.8 shares of Mariner common stock for each
Forest share they own. This ratio will not be adjusted for
changes in the value of our company or the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations. If our value relative to the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations increases (or the value of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations decreases relative to our value) prior to the
completion of the merger, the market value of the Mariner common
stock that Forest shareholders receive in the merger may not
reflect the then-current relative values of the individual
companies.
|
|
|
Regulatory agencies may delay or impose conditions on
approval of the spin-off and the merger, which may diminish the
anticipated benefits of the merger. |
Completion of the spin-off and merger is conditioned upon the
receipt of required government consents, approvals, orders and
authorizations. While we intend to pursue vigorously all
required governmental approvals and do not know of any reason
why we would not be able to obtain the necessary approvals in a
timely manner, the requirement to receive these approvals before
the spin-off and merger could delay the completion of the
spin-off and merger, possibly for a significant period of time
after Mariner stockholders have approved the merger proposal at
the meeting. In addition, these governmental agencies may
attempt to condition their approval of the merger on the
imposition of conditions that could have a material adverse
effect on our operating results or the value of our common stock
after the spin-off and merger are completed.
24
Any delay in the completion of the spin-off and merger could
diminish anticipated benefits of the spin-off and merger or
result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenue or other
effects associated with uncertainty about the transaction. Any
uncertainty over the ability of the companies to complete the
spin-off and merger could make it more difficult for us to
retain key employees or to pursue business strategies. In
addition, until the spin-off and merger are completed, the
attention of our management may be diverted from ongoing
business concerns and regular business responsibilities to the
extent management is focused on matters relating to the
transaction, such as obtaining regulatory approvals.
|
|
|
In order to preserve the tax-free treatment of the
spin-off, we will be required to abide by potentially
significant restrictions which could limit our ability to
undertake certain corporate actions (such as the issuance of our
common shares or the undertaking of a change in control) that
otherwise could be advantageous. |
The tax sharing agreement imposes ongoing restrictions on Forest
and on us to ensure that applicable statutory requirements under
the Internal Revenue Code and applicable Treasury regulations
continue to be met so that the spin-off remains tax-free to
Forest and its shareholders. As a result of these restrictions,
our ability to engage in certain transactions, such as the
redemption of our common stock, the issuance of equity
securities and the utilization of our stock as currency in an
acquisition, will be limited for a period of two years following
the spin-off. Please see The Spin-Off and
Merger Material United States Federal Tax
Consequences of the Spin-Off and the Merger Material
U.S. Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off.
If Forest or Mariner takes or permits an action to be taken (or
omits to take an action) that causes the spin-off to become
taxable, the relevant entity generally will be required to bear
the cost of the resulting tax liability to the extent that the
liability results from the actions or omissions of that entity.
Please read Ancillary Agreements Tax Sharing
Agreement. If the spin-off became taxable, Forest would be
expected to recognize a substantial amount of income, which
would result in a material amount of taxes. Any such taxes
allocated to us would be expected to be material to us, and
could cause our business, financial condition and operating
results to suffer. These restrictions may reduce our ability to
engage in certain business transactions that otherwise might be
advantageous to us and our stockholders and could have a
negative impact on our business and stockholder value.
|
|
|
Some of our directors and executive officers have
interests that are different from, or in addition to, the
interests of our stockholders. |
When considering the recommendations of our board of directors,
you should be aware that some of our directors and executive
officers have interests and arrangements that may be different
from your interests as stockholders, including:
|
|
|
|
|
arrangements regarding the appointment of directors and officers
of Mariner following the merger; and |
|
|
|
arrangements whereby our executive officers will receive a cash
payment of $1,000 each in exchange for the waiver of certain
rights under their employment agreements, including the
automatic vesting or acceleration of restricted stock and
options upon the completion of the merger and the right to
receive a lump sum cash payment if the officer voluntarily
terminates employment without good reason within nine months
following the completion of the merger. |
See Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
beginning on page 38.
Risks Related to the Combined Operations After the Merger
|
|
|
Oil and natural gas prices are volatile, and a decline in
oil and natural gas prices would reduce our revenues,
profitability and cash flow and impede our growth. |
Our revenues, profitability and cash flow depend substantially
upon the prices and demand for oil and natural gas. The markets
for these commodities are volatile and even relatively modest
drops in prices can affect significantly our financial results
and impede our growth. Oil and natural gas prices are currently
at or near historical highs and may fluctuate and decline
significantly in the near future. Prices for oil and natural
25
gas fluctuate in response to relatively minor changes in the
supply and demand for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty
and a variety of additional factors beyond our control, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign supply of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
price and quantity of foreign imports; |
|
|
|
actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and
other state-controlled oil companies relating to oil price and
production controls; |
|
|
|
level of consumer product demand; |
|
|
|
domestic and foreign governmental regulations; |
|
|
|
political conditions in or affecting other oil-producing and
natural gas-producing countries, including the current conflicts
in the Middle East and conditions in South America and Russia; |
|
|
|
weather conditions; |
|
|
|
technological advances affecting oil and natural gas consumption; |
|
|
|
overall U.S. and global economic conditions; and |
|
|
|
price and availability of alternative fuels. |
Further, oil prices and natural gas prices do not necessarily
fluctuate in direct relationship to each other. Because
approximately 73% of our pro forma estimated proved reserves as
of December 31, 2004 (including reserves of the Forest Gulf
of Mexico operations) were natural gas reserves, our financial
results are more sensitive to movements in natural gas prices.
Lower oil and natural gas prices may not only decrease our
revenues on a per unit basis but also may reduce the amount of
oil and natural gas that we can produce economically. This may
result in our having to make substantial downward adjustments to
our estimated proved reserves and could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Reserve estimates depend on many assumptions that may turn
out to be inaccurate. Any material inaccuracies in these reserve
estimates or underlying assumptions will affect materially the
quantities and present value of our reserves and the reserves of
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, which may lower our bank
borrowing base and reduce our access to capital. |
Estimating oil and natural gas reserves is complex and
inherently imprecise. It requires interpretation of the
available technical data and making many assumptions about
future conditions, including price and other economic
conditions. In preparing estimates we and Forest project
production rates and timing of development expenditures. We and
Forest also analyze the available geological, geophysical,
production and engineering data. The extent, quality and
reliability of this data can vary. This process also requires
economic assumptions about matters such as oil and natural gas
prices, drilling and operating expenses, capital expenditures,
taxes and availability of funds. Actual future production, oil
and natural gas prices, revenues, taxes, development
expenditures, operating expenses and quantities of recoverable
oil and natural gas reserves most likely will vary from our and
Forests estimates, perhaps significantly. In addition, we
may adjust estimates of proved reserves to reflect production
history, results of exploration and development, prevailing oil
and natural gas prices and other factors, many of which are
beyond our control. At December 31, 2004, 36% of our pro
forma proved reserves (including reserves of the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations) were proved undeveloped.
If the interpretations or assumptions we use in arriving at our
estimates prove to be inaccurate, the amount of oil and natural
gas that we ultimately recover may differ materially from the
estimated quantities and net present value of reserves shown in
this proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement. See
Mariner Estimated Proved Reserves for
information about our oil and gas reserves and The Forest
Gulf of Mexico Operations Estimated Proved
Reserves for more information about the oil and gas
reserves of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations.
26
|
|
|
In estimating future net revenues from proved reserves, we
and Forest assume that future prices and costs are fixed and
apply a fixed discount factor. If these assumptions or discount
factor are materially inaccurate, our revenues, profitability
and cash flow could be materially less than our
estimates. |
The present value of future net revenues from our proved
reserves and the proved reserves of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations referred to in this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement is not necessarily the actual
current market value of our estimated oil and natural gas
reserves. In accordance with SEC requirements, we and Forest
base the estimated discounted future net cash flows from our
proved reserves and the proved reserves of the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations on fixed prices and costs as of the date of
the estimate. Actual future prices and costs fluctuate over time
and may differ materially from those used in the present value
estimate. In addition, discounted future net cash flows are
estimated assuming that royalties to the MMS with respect to our
affected offshore Gulf of Mexico properties will be paid or
suspended for the life of the properties based upon oil and
natural gas prices as of the date of the estimate. See
Mariner Royalty Relief. Since actual
future prices fluctuate over time, royalties may be required to
be paid for various portions of the life of the properties and
suspended for other portions of the life of the properties.
The timing of both the production and expenses from the
development and production of oil and natural gas properties
will affect both the timing of actual future net cash flows from
our proved reserves and the proved reserves of the Forest Gulf
of Mexico operations and their present value. In addition, the
10% discount factor that we and Forest use to calculate the net
present value of future net cash flows for reporting purposes in
accordance with the SECs rules may not necessarily be the
most appropriate discount factor. The effective interest rate at
various times and the risks associated with our business or the
oil and gas industry in general will affect the appropriateness
of the 10% discount factor in arriving at an accurate net
present value of future net cash flows.
|
|
|
Unless we replace our oil and natural gas reserves, our
reserves and production will decline. |
Our future oil and natural gas production depends on our success
in finding or acquiring additional reserves. If we fail to
replace reserves through drilling or acquisitions, our level of
production and cash flows will be affected adversely. In
general, production from oil and natural gas properties declines
as reserves are depleted, with the rate of decline depending on
reservoir characteristics. Our total proved reserves decline as
reserves are produced unless we conduct other successful
exploration and development activities or acquire properties
containing proved reserves, or both. Our ability to make the
necessary capital investment to maintain or expand our asset
base of oil and natural gas reserves would be impaired to the
extent cash flow from operations is reduced and external sources
of capital become limited or unavailable. We may not be
successful in exploring for, developing or acquiring additional
reserves.
|
|
|
Relatively short production periods or reserve life for
Gulf of Mexico properties subjects us to higher reserve
replacement needs and may impair our ability to replace
production during periods of low oil and natural gas
prices. |
Due to high production rates, production of reserves from
reservoirs in the Gulf of Mexico generally declines more rapidly
than from reservoirs in other producing regions. As a result,
our reserve replacement needs from new prospects may be greater
than those of other oil and gas companies. If the merger is
consummated, the proportion of short-lived Gulf of Mexico
properties relative to our total properties will increase
substantially. Also, our revenues and return on capital will
depend significantly on prices prevailing during these
relatively short production periods. Our ability to slow or shut
in production from producing wells during periods of low prices
for oil and natural gas may be limited by reservoir
characteristics or by our need to generate revenues to fund
ongoing capital commitments or repay debt.
27
|
|
|
Any production problems related to our Gulf of Mexico
properties could reduce our revenue, profitability and cash flow
materially. |
A substantial portion of our exploration and production
activities are located in the Gulf of Mexico. This concentration
of activity makes us more vulnerable than some other industry
participants to the risks associated with the Gulf of Mexico,
including delays and increased costs relating to adverse weather
conditions such as hurricanes, which are common in the Gulf of
Mexico during certain times of the year, drilling rig and other
oilfield services and compliance with environmental and other
laws and regulations.
|
|
|
Our exploration and development activities may not be
commercially successful. |
Exploration activities involve numerous risks, including the
risk that no commercially productive oil or natural gas
reservoirs will be discovered. In addition, the future cost and
timing of drilling, completing and producing wells is often
uncertain. Furthermore, drilling operations may be curtailed,
delayed or canceled as a result of a variety of factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
unexpected drilling conditions; |
|
|
|
pressure or irregularities in formations; |
|
|
|
equipment failures or accidents; |
|
|
|
adverse weather conditions, including hurricanes, which are
common in the Gulf of Mexico during certain times of the year; |
|
|
|
compliance with governmental regulations; |
|
|
|
unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs, equipment or labor; |
|
|
|
reductions in oil and natural gas prices; and |
|
|
|
limitations in the market for oil and natural gas. |
If any of these factors were to occur with respect to a
particular project, we could lose all or a part of our
investment in the project, or we could fail to realize the
expected benefits from the project, either of which could
materially and adversely affect our revenues and profitability.
|
|
|
Our exploratory drilling projects are based in part on
seismic data, which is costly and cannot ensure the commercial
success of the project. |
Our decisions to purchase, explore, develop and exploit
prospects or properties depend in part on data obtained through
geophysical and geological analyses, production data and
engineering studies, the results of which are often uncertain.
Even when used and properly interpreted,
3-D seismic data and
visualization techniques only assist geoscientists and
geologists in identifying subsurface structures and hydrocarbon
indicators. They do not allow the interpreter to know
conclusively if hydrocarbons are present or producible
economically. In addition, the use of
3-D seismic and other
advanced technologies require greater predrilling expenditures
than traditional drilling strategies. Because of these factors,
we could incur losses as a result of exploratory drilling
expenditures. Poor results from exploration activities could
have a material adverse effect on our future cash flows, ability
to replace reserves and results of operations.
|
|
|
Oil and gas drilling and production involve many business
and operating risks, any one of which could reduce our levels of
production, cause substantial losses or prevent us from
realizing profits. |
Our business is subject to all of the operating risks associated
with drilling for and producing oil and natural gas, including:
|
|
|
|
|
fires; |
|
|
|
explosions; |
|
|
|
blow-outs and surface cratering; |
28
|
|
|
|
|
uncontrollable flows of underground natural gas, oil and
formation water; |
|
|
|
natural disasters; |
|
|
|
pipe or cement failures; |
|
|
|
casing collapses; |
|
|
|
lost or damaged oilfield drilling and service tools; |
|
|
|
abnormally pressured formations; and |
|
|
|
environmental hazards, such as natural gas leaks, oil spills,
pipeline ruptures and discharges of toxic gases. |
If any of these events occur, we could incur substantial losses
as a result of injury or loss of life, severe damage to and
destruction of property, natural resources and equipment,
pollution and other environmental damage,
clean-up
responsibilities, regulatory investigation and penalties,
suspension of our operations and repairs to resume operations.
|
|
|
Our offshore operations involve special risks that could
increase our cost of operations and adversely affect our ability
to produce oil and gas. |
Offshore operations are subject to a variety of operating risks
specific to the marine environment, such as capsizing,
collisions and damage or loss from hurricanes or other adverse
weather conditions. These conditions can cause substantial
damage to facilities and interrupt production. As a result, we
could incur substantial liabilities that could reduce or
eliminate the funds available for exploration, development or
leasehold acquisitions, or result in loss of equipment and
properties. For more information on the impact of recent
hurricanes on Mariners operations and the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of
Mariner Recent Developments beginning on
page 107 and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico Operations Recent
Developments beginning on page 144.
Exploration for oil or natural gas in the deepwater of the Gulf
of Mexico generally involves greater operational and financial
risks than exploration on the shelf. Deepwater drilling
generally requires more time and more advanced drilling
technologies, involving a higher risk of technological failure
and usually higher drilling costs. Our deepwater wells use
subsea completion techniques with subsea trees tied back to host
production facilities with flow lines. The installation of these
subsea trees and flow lines requires substantial time and the
use of advanced remote installation mechanics. These operations
may encounter mechanical difficulties and equipment failures
that could result in significant cost overruns. Furthermore, the
deepwater operations generally lack the physical and oilfield
service infrastructure present in the shallow waters of the Gulf
of Mexico. As a result, a significant amount of time may elapse
between a deepwater discovery and our marketing of the
associated oil or natural gas, increasing both the financial and
operational risk involved with these operations. Because of the
lack and high cost of infrastructure, some reserve discoveries
in the deepwater may never be produced economically.
|
|
|
Our hedging transactions may not protect us adequately
from fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices and may limit
future potential gains from increases in commodity prices or
result in losses. |
We enter into hedging arrangements from time to time to reduce
our exposure to fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices and
to achieve more predictable cash flow. These financial
arrangements typically take the form of price swap contracts and
costless collars. Hedging arrangements expose us to the risk of
financial loss in some circumstances, including situations when
the other party to the hedging contract defaults on its contract
or production is less than expected. During periods of high
commodity prices, hedging arrangements may limit significantly
the extent to which we can realize financial gains from such
higher prices. For example, in calendar year 2004, on a pro
forma basis (including the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations),
our hedging arrangements reduced the benefit we received from
increases in the prices for oil and natural gas by approximately
$76.9 million. Although we currently maintain an active
hedging program, we may choose not
29
to engage in hedging transactions in the future. As a result, we
may be affected adversely during periods of declining oil and
natural gas prices.
|
|
|
We will require additional capital to fund our future
activities. If we fail to obtain additional capital, we may not
be able to implement fully our business plan, which could lead
to a decline in reserves. |
We depend on our ability to obtain financing beyond our cash
flow from operations. Historically, we have financed our
business plan and operations primarily with internally generated
cash flow, bank borrowings, proceeds from the sale of oil and
natural gas properties, entering into exploration arrangements
with other parties, the issuance of public debt, privately
raised equity and, prior to the bankruptcy of Enron Corp. (our
indirect parent company until March 2, 2004), borrowings
from Enron affiliates. In the future, we will require
substantial capital to fund our business plan and operations. We
expect to be required to meet our needs from our excess cash
flow, debt financings and additional equity offerings (subject
to certain federal tax limitations during the two-year period
following the spin-off). Sufficient capital may not be available
on acceptable terms or at all. If we cannot obtain additional
capital resources, we may curtail our drilling, development and
other activities or be forced to sell some of our assets on
unfavorable terms.
The issuance of additional debt would require that a portion of
our cash flow from operations be used for the payment of
interest on our debt, thereby reducing our ability to use our
cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions and general corporate requirements, which could
place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to other
competitors. Additionally, if revenues decrease as a result of
lower oil or natural gas prices, operating difficulties or
declines in reserves, our ability to obtain the capital
necessary to undertake or complete future exploration and
development programs and to pursue other opportunities may be
limited, which could result in a curtailment of our operations
relating to exploration and development of our prospects, which
in turn could result in a decline in our oil and natural gas
reserves.
|
|
|
Properties we acquire (including the Forest Gulf of Mexico
properties) may not produce as projected, and we may be unable
to determine reserve potential, identify liabilities associated
with the properties or obtain protection from sellers against
such liabilities. |
Properties we acquire, including the Forest Gulf of Mexico
properties, may not produce as expected, may be in an unexpected
condition and may subject us to increased costs and liabilities,
including environmental liabilities. The reviews we conduct of
acquired properties prior to acquisition are not capable of
identifying all potential adverse conditions. Generally, it is
not feasible to review in depth every individual property
involved in each acquisition. Ordinarily, we will focus our
review efforts on the higher value properties or properties with
known adverse conditions and will sample the remainder. However,
even a detailed review of records and properties may not
necessarily reveal existing or potential problems or permit a
buyer to become sufficiently familiar with the properties to
assess fully their condition, any deficiencies, and development
potential. Inspections may not always be performed on every
well, and environmental problems, such as ground water
contamination, are not necessarily observable even when an
inspection is undertaken.
|
|
|
Market conditions or transportation impediments may hinder
our access to oil and natural gas markets or delay our
production. |
Market conditions, the unavailability of satisfactory oil and
natural gas transportation or the remote location of our
drilling operations may hinder our access to oil and natural gas
markets or delay our production. The availability of a ready
market for our oil and natural gas production depends on a
number of factors, including the demand for and supply of oil
and natural gas and the proximity of reserves to pipelines or
trucking and terminal facilities. In deepwater operations, the
availability of a ready market depends on the proximity of and
our ability to tie into existing production platforms owned or
operated by others and the ability to negotiate commercially
satisfactory arrangements with the owners or operators. We may
be required to shut in wells or delay initial production for
lack of a market or because of inadequacy or unavailability of
pipeline or gathering system capacity. When that occurs, we are
unable to realize revenue from those wells
30
until the production can be tied to a gathering system. This can
result in considerable delays from the initial discovery of a
reservoir to the actual production of the oil and natural gas
and realization of revenues.
|
|
|
The unavailability or high cost of drilling rigs,
equipment, supplies or personnel could affect adversely our
ability to execute on a timely basis our exploration and
development plans within budget, which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations. |
Shortages or the high cost of drilling rigs, equipment, supplies
or personnel could delay or affect adversely our exploration and
development operations, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition and results of operations. An
increase in drilling activity in the U.S. or the Gulf of
Mexico could increase the cost and decrease the availability of
necessary drilling rigs, equipment, supplies and personnel.
|
|
|
Competition in the oil and natural gas industry is
intense, and many of our competitors have resources that are
greater than ours giving them an advantage in evaluating and
obtaining properties and prospects. |
We operate in a highly competitive environment for acquiring
prospects and productive properties, marketing oil and natural
gas and securing equipment and trained personnel. Many of our
competitors are major and large independent oil and natural gas
companies, and possess and employ financial, technical and
personnel resources substantially greater than ours. Those
companies may be able to develop and acquire more prospects and
productive properties than our financial or personnel resources
permit. Our ability to acquire additional prospects and discover
reserves in the future will depend on our ability to evaluate
and select suitable properties and consummate transactions in a
highly competitive environment. Also, there is substantial
competition for capital available for investment in the oil and
natural gas industry. Larger competitors may be better able to
withstand sustained periods of unsuccessful drilling and absorb
the burden of changes in laws and regulations more easily than
we can, which would adversely affect our competitive position.
We may not be able to compete successfully in the future in
acquiring prospective reserves, developing reserves, marketing
hydrocarbons, attracting and retaining quality personnel and
raising additional capital.
|
|
|
Financial difficulties encountered by our farm-out
partners or third-party operators could affect the exploration
and development of our prospects adversely. |
From time to time, we enter into farm-out agreements to fund a
portion of the exploration and development costs of our
prospects. Moreover, other companies operate some of the other
properties in which we have an ownership interest. Liquidity and
cash flow problems encountered by our partners and co-owners of
our properties may lead to a delay in the pace of drilling or
project development that may be detrimental to a project.
In addition, our farm-out partners and working interest owners
may be unwilling or unable to pay their share of the costs of
projects as they become due. In the case of a farm-out partner,
we may have to obtain alternative funding in order to complete
the exploration and development of the prospects subject to the
farm-out agreement. In the case of a working interest owner, we
may be required to pay the working interest owners share
of the project costs. We cannot assure you that we would be able
to obtain the capital necessary in order to fund either of these
contingencies.
|
|
|
We cannot control the drilling and development activities
on properties we do not operate, and therefore we may not be in
a position to control the timing of development efforts, the
associated costs or the rate of production of the
reserves. |
Other companies operate some of the properties in which we have
an interest. As a result, we have a limited ability to exercise
influence over operations for these properties or their
associated costs. Our dependence on the operator and other
working interest owners for these projects and our limited
ability to influence operations and associated costs could
materially adversely affect the realization of our targeted
31
returns on capital in drilling or acquisition activities. The
success and timing of drilling and development activities on
properties operated by others therefore depend upon a number of
factors that are outside of our control, including timing and
amount of capital expenditures, the operators expertise
and financial resources, approval of other participants in
drilling wells and selection of technology.
|
|
|
Compliance with environmental and other government
regulations could be costly and could affect production
negatively. |
Exploration for and development, production and sale of oil and
natural gas in the U.S. and the Gulf of Mexico are subject to
extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations,
including environmental and health and safety laws and
regulations. We may be required to make large expenditures to
comply with these environmental and other requirements. Matters
subject to regulation include, among others, environmental
assessment prior to development, discharge and emission permits
for drilling and production operations, drilling bonds, and
reports concerning operations and taxation.
Under these laws and regulations, and also common law causes of
action, we could be liable for personal injuries, property
damage, oil spills, discharge of pollutants and hazardous
materials, remediation and
clean-up costs and
other environmental damages. Failure to comply with these laws
and regulations or to obtain or comply with required permits may
result in the suspension or termination of our operations and
subject us to remedial obligations as well as administrative,
civil and criminal penalties. Moreover, these laws and
regulations could change in ways that substantially increase our
costs. We cannot predict how agencies or courts will interpret
existing laws and regulations, whether additional or more
stringent laws and regulations will be adopted or the effect
these interpretations and adoptions may have on our business or
financial condition. For example, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990
(the OPA) imposes a variety of regulations on
responsible parties related to the prevention of oil
spills. The implementation of new, or the modification of
existing, environmental laws or regulations promulgated pursuant
to the OPA could have a material adverse impact on us. Further,
Congress or the MMS could decide to limit exploratory drilling
or natural gas production in additional areas of the Gulf of
Mexico. Accordingly, any of these liabilities, penalties,
suspensions, terminations or regulatory changes could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations. See Mariner Regulation
for more information on our regulatory and environmental matters.
|
|
|
Our insurance may not protect us against our business and
operating risks. |
We maintain insurance for some, but not all, of the potential
risks and liabilities associated with our business. For some
risks, we may not obtain insurance if we believe the cost of
available insurance is excessive relative to the risks
presented. As a result of market conditions, premiums and
deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase
substantially, and in some instances, certain insurance may
become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of
coverage. As a result, we may not be able to renew our existing
insurance policies or procure other desirable insurance on
commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
Although we maintain insurance at levels we believe are
appropriate and consistent with industry practice, we are not
fully insured against all risks, including drilling and
completion risks that are generally not recoverable from third
parties or insurance. In addition, pollution and environmental
risks generally are not fully insurable. Losses and liabilities
from uninsured and underinsured events and delay in the payment
of insurance proceeds could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations. The impact of
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita have resulted in escalating
insurance costs and less favorable coverage terms.
32
Risks Related to our Common Stock After the Merger
|
|
|
An active market for our common stock may not develop and
the market price for shares of our common stock may be highly
volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations after this
offering. |
We are a private company, and there is no public market for our
common stock. An active market for our common stock may not
develop or may not be sustained after this offering. In
addition, we cannot assure you as to the liquidity of any such
market that may develop or the price that our stockholders may
obtain for their shares of our common stock.
Even if an active trading market develops, the market price for
shares of our common stock may be highly volatile and could be
subject to wide fluctuations. Some of the factors that could
negatively affect our share price include:
|
|
|
|
|
actual or anticipated downward revisions in our reserve
estimates; |
|
|
|
our operating results being less than anticipated; |
|
|
|
reductions in oil and gas prices; |
|
|
|
publication of unfavorable research reports about us or the
exploration and production industry; |
|
|
|
increases in market interest rates which may increase our cost
of capital; |
|
|
|
the enactment of more stringent laws or regulations applicable
to our business, or unfavorable court rulings or enforcement or
legal actions; |
|
|
|
increases in royalties or taxes payable in the operation of our
business; |
|
|
|
a general decline in market valuations of similar companies; |
|
|
|
adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness we incur
in the future; |
|
|
|
departures of key management personnel; |
|
|
|
increases to our asset retirement obligations; |
|
|
|
adverse actions taken by our stockholders; |
|
|
|
negative speculation in the press or investment
community; and |
|
|
|
adverse general market and economic conditions. |
|
|
|
We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common
stock in the foreseeable future. |
We do not expect to declare or pay any cash or other dividends
in the foreseeable future on our common stock. Our existing
revolving credit facility restricts our ability to pay cash
dividends on our common stock, and we may also enter into other
credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future
that restrict our ability to declare or pay cash dividends on
our common stock.
|
|
|
Mariner stockholders will experience substantial and
immediate dilution as a result of the merger, and may experience
dilution of their ownership interests due to the future issuance
of additional shares of our common stock, which could have an
adverse effect on our stock price. |
If the merger is completed, the current owners of Mariners
common stock will experience substantial and immediate dilution
from the issuance of shares of Mariner common stock to Forest
shareholders, such that the Mariner stockholders will own
approximately 42% of the Mariner common stock following the
merger. Additionally, we may in the future issue our previously
authorized and unissued securities, resulting in the dilution of
the ownership interests of our present stockholders. We are
currently authorized to issue 70 million shares of common
stock and 20 million shares of preferred stock with such
designations, preferences and rights as determined by our board
of directors. As a result of the proposed amendment to our
certificate of incorporation, our authorized shares would be
increased to 180 million shares of common stock and
20 million shares of preferred stock. Pursuant to the
proposed addition of shares to our stock incentive
33
plan, the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan
would, if the proposal is approved, be increased to
6.5 million shares.
The potential issuance of such additional shares of common stock
may create downward pressure on the trading price of our common
stock. We may also issue additional shares of our common stock
or other securities that are convertible into or exercisable for
common stock (subject to certain federal tax limitations during
the two-year period following the spin-off) in connection with
the hiring of personnel, future acquisitions, future public
offerings or private placements of our securities for capital
raising purposes, or for other business purposes. Future sales
of substantial amounts of our common stock, or the perception
that sales could occur, could have a material adverse effect on
the price of our common stock.
|
|
|
Provisions in our organizational documents and under
Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in control of our
company, which could adversely affect the price of our common
stock. |
The existence of some provisions in our organizational documents
and under Delaware law could delay or prevent a change in
control of our company, which could adversely affect the price
of our common stock. The provisions in our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws that could delay or prevent an
unsolicited change in control of our company include a staggered
board of directors, board authority to issue preferred stock,
and advance notice provisions for director nominations or
business to be considered at a stockholder meeting. In addition,
Delaware law imposes restrictions on mergers and other business
combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our
outstanding common stock. See Description of Mariner
Capital Stock.
34
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Various statements in this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement, including those that express a
belief, expectation, or intention, as well as those that are not
statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements may include projections and
estimates concerning the timing and success of specific projects
and our future production, revenues, income and capital
spending. Our forward-looking statements are generally
accompanied by words such as estimate,
project, predict, believe,
expect, anticipate,
potential, plan, goal or
other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or
outcomes. The forward-looking statements in this proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement speak only as of the
date of this proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement;
we disclaim any obligation to update these statements unless
required by securities law, and we caution you not to rely on
them unduly. We have based these forward-looking statements on
our current expectations and assumptions about future events.
While our management considers these expectations and
assumptions to be reasonable, they are inherently subject to
significant business, economic, competitive, regulatory and
other risks, contingencies and uncertainties, most of which are
difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.
We disclose important factors that could cause our actual
results to differ materially from our expectations under
Risk Factors, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico Operations, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations of Mariner and elsewhere in this proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement. These risks,
contingencies and uncertainties relate to, among other matters,
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the volatility of oil and natural gas prices; |
|
|
|
discovery, estimation, development and replacement of oil and
natural gas reserves; |
|
|
|
cash flow, liquidity and financial position; |
|
|
|
business strategy; |
|
|
|
amount, nature and timing of capital expenditures, including
future development costs; |
|
|
|
availability and terms of capital; |
|
|
|
timing and amount of future production of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
availability of drilling and production equipment; |
|
|
|
operating costs and other expenses; |
|
|
|
prospect development and property acquisitions; |
|
|
|
marketing of oil and natural gas; |
|
|
|
competition in the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
the impact of weather and the occurrence of natural disasters
such as fires, floods and other catastrophic events and natural
disasters; |
|
|
|
governmental regulation of the oil and natural gas industry; |
|
|
|
developments in oil-producing and natural gas-producing
countries; |
|
|
|
the contemplated transactions, including strategic plans,
expectations and objectives for future operations, the
completion of those transactions, and the realization of
expected benefits from the transactions; and |
|
|
|
disruption from the merger making it more difficult to manage
Mariners business. |
35
THE MARINER ANNUAL MEETING
Purpose, Time and Place
The Mariner annual meeting will be held
on , ,
2006 at 10:00 a.m., Central Standard Time,
at ,
Houston,
Texas .
The purpose of the meeting is:
|
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon the adoption of the Agreement and Plan
of Merger, dated as of September 9, 2005, among Forest,
Forest Energy Resources, Mariner and MEI Sub, subject to the
approval of the proposed amendment to Mariners certificate
of incorporation, |
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon a proposed amendment to Mariners
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
increase the number of authorized shares of stock from
90 million shares to 200 million shares, subject to
the completion of the merger, |
|
|
|
|
to consider and vote upon the proposed amendment and restatement
of the Mariner stock incentive plan, |
|
|
|
|
|
to elect one director to serve until the annual meeting of
stockholders of Mariner in 2009, |
|
|
|
|
|
to elect two directors to serve until the annual meeting of
stockholders of Mariner in 2007, |
|
|
|
|
|
to approve the proposed granting of authority to the
proxyholders to vote in their discretion on a motion to adjourn
or postpone the meeting, and |
|
|
|
|
|
to transact any other business that may properly come before the
meeting. |
|
We currently expect that no other matters will be considered at
the meeting.
Recommendation of the Mariner Board of Directors
The Mariner board of directors has determined that the merger is
fair to and in the best interests of Mariner and its
stockholders, and that the merger agreement is advisable. The
Mariner board of directors has unanimously approved the merger
agreement, the proposed amendment to the certificate of
incorporation and the proposed amendment and restatement of the
stock incentive plan, and recommends that the Mariner
stockholders vote for the adoption of the
merger agreement and the other proposals.
In considering the recommendations of the Mariner board of
directors, stockholders of Mariner should be aware that members
of the Mariner board of directors and executive officers of
Mariner have agreements and arrangements that provide them with
interests in the merger that differ from, or are in addition to,
those of Mariner stockholders. Please read
Interests of Certain Persons in the
Merger.
Record Date; Stock Entitled to Vote; Quorum
Stockholders of record of Mariner common stock at the close of
business
on ,
2006, the record date for the Mariner meeting, are entitled to
receive notice of, and have the right to vote at, the meeting
and any reconvened meeting following any adjournment or
postponement of the meeting. On the record
date, shares
of Mariner common stock were issued and outstanding and entitled
to vote at the meeting. Stockholders of record of shares of
Mariner common stock on the record date are each entitled to one
vote per share on the proposals.
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to have a valid meeting of
stockholders. The holders of a majority of the stock issued and
outstanding and entitled to vote at the meeting, present in
person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the
meeting. Shares that are not voted will not count for purposes
of calculating a quorum.
Abstentions and broker non-votes count as present
for establishing a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs
on an item when a broker is not permitted to vote on that item
without instructions from the beneficial
36
owner of the shares and no instructions are given. We expect
that, in the event that a quorum is not present at the meeting,
the meeting will be adjourned or postponed to solicit additional
proxies.
Votes Required
Adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
proposed amendment to Mariners certificate of
incorporation will require the affirmative vote of the holders
of a majority of the shares of Mariner common stock outstanding
on the record date.
The proposal to amend and restate Mariners stock incentive
plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares
of Mariner common stock represented in person or by proxy at the
meeting. For purposes of the vote, abstentions will be counted
and have the same effect as a vote against these
proposals. In addition, failing to vote or to instruct your
broker to vote will have the same effect as a vote
against these proposals. Director nominees receiving
a plurality of all votes cast at the meeting will be elected to
Mariners board of directors. Abstentions and broker
non-votes have no effect on the election of directors.
Nonvoted shares have the effect of reducing the number of shares
required to approve the proposal to amend and restate
Mariners stock incentive plan, and to elect directors,
which require the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares
of Mariner common stock represented in person or by proxy at the
meeting, but do not have the effect of reducing the number of
shares required to adopt the merger agreement and to approve the
proposed amendment to Mariners certificate of
incorporation, both of which require the affirmative vote of a
majority of Mariners outstanding shares.
Voting by Proxy
Stockholders of record may vote their stock by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
attending the meeting and voting their stock in person at the
meeting, |
|
|
|
|
completing the enclosed proxy card, signing and dating it and
mailing it in the enclosed postage pre-paid envelope, or |
|
|
|
|
voting via telephone
( )
or via the Internet
( )
by following the instructions provided on the enclosed proxy
card. |
|
If a proxy card is signed by a stockholder of record and
returned without specific voting instructions, the stock
represented by the proxy will be voted for the
proposals presented at the meeting.
Stockholders whose shares of Mariner common stock are held in
the name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary must either direct
the record holder of their shares of Mariner common stock as to
how to vote their shares of Mariner common stock or obtain a
proxy from the record holder to vote at the meeting.
All proxies received at or prior to the meeting will be counted
in the vote on the adoption of the merger and the approval of
the other proposals.
Stockholders of record may revoke their proxies at any time
prior to the time their proxies are voted at the meeting. This
means that you may revoke your proxy all the way up until the
time of the meeting. Stockholders can revoke their proxies and
change their votes by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
completing, signing and dating a new proxy card and returning it
by mail to the proxy solicitor so that it is received prior to
the meeting; |
|
|
|
|
|
voting via telephone
( )
or via the Internet
( )
by following the instructions provided on your proxy card; |
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
sending a written notice to the Secretary of Mariner that is
received prior to the meeting stating that you revoke your
proxy; or |
|
|
|
|
|
attending the meeting and voting in person or by legal proxy, if
appropriate. |
|
Internet and telephone votes must use the same procedure to
revoke or change their votes as they used to cast their original
votes. If your shares of Mariner common stock are held in the
name of a bank, broker or other fiduciary and you have directed
such person(s) to vote your shares of Mariner common stock, you
should instruct such person(s) to change your vote or obtain a
legal proxy to do so yourself.
Any written notice of a revocation of a proxy should be sent to
the following address:
|
|
|
Mariner Energy, Inc. |
|
Attention: Secretary |
|
2101 CityWest Blvd. |
|
Building 4, Suite 900 |
|
Houston, Texas 77042 |
|
Facsimile: (713) 954-5555 |
|
|
|
Other Business; Adjournments |
Mariner is not aware of any other business to be acted upon at
the meeting. If, however, other matters are properly brought
before the meeting or any adjourned meeting, your proxies will
have discretion to act on those matters or to adjourn the
meeting, according to their best judgment.
The cost of solicitation of proxies from stockholders will be
paid by Mariner, other than the costs of printing, filing and
mailing this proxy statement/prospectus-information statement
and the registration statement of which it is a part, which will
be borne equally by Mariner and Forest. In addition to
solicitation by mail, the directors, officers and employees of
Mariner may also solicit proxies from stockholders by telephone,
facsimile or in person. Mariner also will make arrangements with
brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries
to send the proxy materials to beneficial owners. Upon request,
Mariner will reimburse those brokerage houses and custodians for
their reasonable expenses in so doing.
Mariner has
retained to
provide advice and to aid with the solicitation of proxies from
Mariner stockholders for the
meeting. will
receive a fee of
$ as
compensation for its services and reimbursement for its related
out-of-pocket expenses.
Do not send any stock certificate(s) with your proxy cards.
Mariner stockholders will not be required to send in their stock
certificates if the merger is completed. After the merger is
completed, the shares of Forest Energy Resources common stock
held by Forest shareholders will be exchanged for shares of
Mariner common stock via book-entry procedures.
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of the Mariner board of
directors to vote for the proposals to adopt the merger
agreement and to approve the other proposals, stockholders of
Mariner should be aware that members of the Mariner board of
directors and executive officers of Mariner have agreements and
arrangements that provide them with interests in the merger that
differ from, or are in addition to, those of Mariner
stockholders. The Mariner board of directors was aware of these
agreements and arrangements during its deliberations of the
merits of the merger and in determining to recommend to the
stockholders of Mariner that they vote for the proposal to adopt
the merger agreement. These agreements and arrangements can be
summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Governance Structure. Under the terms of the merger
agreement, the board of directors of Mariner after completion of
the merger will be comprised of seven individuals, five of whom
are current directors |
38
|
|
|
of Mariner, and two of whom will be mutually agreed to by
Mariner and Forest prior to the completion of the merger. |
|
|
|
Payments for Waivers of Rights under Employment
Agreements. The executive officers of Mariner will receive
cash payments of $1,000 each in exchange for the waiver of
certain rights under their employment agreements, including the
automatic vesting or acceleration of restricted stock and
options upon the completion of the merger and the right to
receive a lump sum cash payment, equal to 2.0 (2.5 for
Mr. Polasek and 2.99 for Mr. Josey) times the sum of
the officers base salary and three year average annual
bonus, if the officer voluntarily terminates employment without
good reason within nine months following the completion of the
merger. |
|
|
|
|
Severance Arrangements. The executive officers have
employment agreements that will remain in effect after the
completion of the merger. These agreements generally entitle the
officers to severance benefits in the event of a resignation for
good reason, a termination without cause or, in the case of
Scott Joseys agreement, Mariners non-renewal of the
agreement. These severance benefits are comprised of (i) a
payment equal to 18 months of salary continuation (two
years for Mr. Josey and Mr. Polasek) at the highest
rate in effect prior to termination, (ii) health care
coverage for a period of eighteen months (two years for
Mr. Josey and Mr. Polasek), (iii) an amount equal
to the sum of all bonuses paid to the officer in the year prior
to the year in which termination occurs, (iv) 100% vesting
of all restricted shares under our Equity Participation Plan,
and (v) 50% vesting of all other rights under any other
equity plans, including our Stock Incentive Plan. |
|
|
|
|
The employment agreements also provide for certain change of
control benefits. Upon termination for any reason other than
cause at any time within nine months after a change of control
that occurs while the executive is employed, or upon the
occurrence of a change of control within nine months following
resignation of employment for good reason or termination without
cause, the agreements provide for the following benefits:
(i) a lump sum payment equal to 2.0 (2.5 for
Mr. Polasek and 2.99 for Mr. Josey) times the sum of
the officers base salary and three year average annual
bonus, and (ii) 100% vesting of all rights under any equity
plans, including our Equity Participation Plan and our Stock
Incentive Plan. The officers are entitled to a full tax
gross-up payment if the
aggregate payments and benefits to be provided constitute a
parachute payment subject to a Federal excise tax.
Pursuant to the waivers described above, the executive officers
will waive their rights to the automatic vesting or acceleration
of restricted stock and options upon completion of the merger
and to receive a lump sum payment if they terminate their
employment with Mariner without good reason within nine months
following the completion of the merger. |
|
Stock Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
As of the close of business on December 21, 2005, directors
and executive officers of Mariner and their affiliates as a
group beneficially owned and were entitled to vote approximately
3.7 million shares of Mariner common stock (including restricted
stock subject to vesting), representing approximately 10.4% of
the shares of Mariner common stock outstanding on that date.
All of the directors and executive officers of Mariner who are
entitled to vote at the meeting have indicated that they intend
to vote their shares of Mariner common stock in favor of
adoption of the merger agreement.
Appraisal and Dissenters Rights
In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, there
will be no appraisal rights or dissenters rights available
to holders of Mariner common stock in connection with the merger.
39
THE SPIN-OFF AND MERGER
The discussion in this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement of the merger and the principal
terms of the merger agreement is subject to and qualified in its
entirety by reference to the merger agreement, a copy of which
is attached to this proxy statement/ prospectus-information
statement as Annex A and is incorporated by reference into
this proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement.
Background of the Merger
At regular meetings of Forests board held on
November 10, 2004 and February 23, 2005, Forests
management made presentations regarding the estimated value of
Forests business units. Forests board and management
agreed to examine alternatives to increase the value of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations. The alternatives were taxable
and non-taxable divestments of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations, and included an outright cash sale of those
operations, an initial public offering, and some form of a
merger transaction. Forests board determined that, due to
the disparity in the market value and tax basis of the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations, a non-taxable alternative would be
most attractive to Forest and its shareholders. One specific
alternative presented by management was merging the Forest Gulf
of Mexico operations with another company that was more focused
on offshore activities and possessed a complementary asset base.
Forests directors instructed Forests management to
consider means to accomplish such a merger and to discuss such a
strategy with financial advisors and legal and tax counsel.
On April 18, 2005, Mr. David Keyte, the Chief
Financial Officer of Forest, spoke briefly with
Mr. Scott Josey, the Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chairman of Mariner, at a meeting of the
Independent Petroleum Association of America in New York City.
Mr. Keyte told Mr. Josey that Forest was interested in
examining the possibility of spinning off its Gulf of Mexico
operations utilizing a reverse Morris Trust
structure. In general terms, a reverse Morris Trust structure in
this context would entail a Forest distribution of the stock of
one of its subsidiaries (preexisting or newly formed) to Forest
shareholders, followed by a merger between such subsidiary and
Mariner. Mr. Josey expressed interest in a potential
transaction, and Messrs. Keyte and Josey agreed to discuss
the matter with greater specificity at a later date.
Forests initial contact with Mariner regarding a potential
transaction was not the result of affiliations between the
parties. Forest and Mariner do not have common directors, and no
member of senior management of either party is a former employee
of, or is otherwise affiliated with, the other party.
Mariners largest stockholder, FMR Corp. (which holds
approximately 12.2% of Mariners outstanding shares), is
also the second largest shareholder of Forest (holding
approximately 12.7% of Forests outstanding shares).
FMR Corp. has no board representation or other management
control over either party. Mr. Forrest E. Hoglund, the
Chairman of Forests board of directors, served as Chairman
of the Board of EOG Resources, Inc., an affiliate of Enron
Corp., from 1987 to 1999 and as President from 1990 to 1996.
During part of this period, Mariner was also an affiliate of
Enron Corp., though the companies respective management
teams were separate. Neither Mr. Hoglund nor Mariner is
currently affiliated with Enron Corp.
On May 10, 2005, at a regularly scheduled board meeting at
Forests offices in Denver, Colorado, Forest management
made a presentation to the Forest board of directors regarding a
potential spin-off of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations,
utilizing a reverse Morris Trust structure. The Forest board
authorized Forest management to begin efforts to evaluate and
pursue the potential spin-off.
On or about May 21, 2005, Forest sent to Mariner a
confidentiality agreement regarding the proposed transaction and
any subsequent due diligence reviews. From May 21, 2005
through May 23, 2005, Forest and Mariner negotiated the
terms of the confidentiality agreement and on May 23, 2005,
Forest and Mariner executed the confidentiality agreement. Over
the course of the following week, Forest executed
confidentiality agreements with three other potential merger
parties, and Forest management made presentations regarding a
possible spin-off and merger to each such party.
On May 24, 2005, Mr. Keyte, Mr. Michael Kennedy,
the Investor Relations Manager of Forest, and Mr. Josey met
in Houston, Texas. At the meeting, Mr. Keyte made a
presentation detailing the transaction contemplated by Forest.
The presentation described the transaction structure and
provided information on the
40
assets, reserves, acreage, personnel and performance metrics
(including production and EBITDA) of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations. The presentation also covered the pro forma
operational and financial characteristics of the combined
company based on preliminary figures. Mr. Keyte identified
several potential advantages to Mariner of undertaking the
proposed transaction, including increased liquidity, an
attractive, balanced asset portfolio in the Gulf of Mexico, and
property prospects for future development. Mr. Keyte did
not propose economic terms for the transaction, such as the
ownership stake Forest shareholders would hold in Mariner after
the completion of the transaction. After this, Mr. Josey
made a presentation regarding Mariner and the merits of
consummating a transaction with Mariner. The presentation
provided an overview of Mariners operations, properties,
production and reserves; management structure; exploration and
development projects, including the Swordfish project (please
see Mariner Significant Properties
Gulf of Mexico Deepwater for more information on this
project); and financial data, including capital expenditures.
Prior to the conclusion of the meeting, Mr. Keyte requested
that Mariners management team make a presentation to
Forests board of directors at a later date.
On June 2, 2005, Forest made available to Mariner, for
purposes of its due diligence review, electronic data regarding
the reserves, lease operating expenses, capital expenditures,
production, general and administrative expenses and financial
performance of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations. Forest also
made the same information available to the other potential
merger parties. Representatives of Mariner and the other
potential parties conducted reviews of these materials on an
ongoing basis over the course of the following weeks.
On June 16, 2005, the executive committee of Forests
board of directors, consisting of Messrs. Forrest E.
Hoglund, James H. Lee and Craig Clark, met in Houston, Texas
with members of Forest management and representatives of
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (Citigroup) (one of
Forests financial advisors) to discuss the contemplated
spin-off and merger. Representatives of two potential merger
parties (other than Mariner) then sequentially joined the
meeting and made presentations to the executive committee.
On June 22, 2005, the executive committee of Forests
board of directors held a meeting in Forests offices in
Denver, Colorado. Members of Forest management and
representatives of Citigroup were also present at the meeting.
At this meeting, the executive committee was briefed on the
status of discussions with potential merger parties.
Mr. Josey, accompanied by Messrs. Dalton Polasek,
Chief Operating Officer, Rick Lester, Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, Mike van den Bold, Vice President and Chief
Exploration Officer, and Jesus Melendrez, Vice
President Corporate Development of Mariner, then
joined the meeting and made a presentation to the executive
committee and the other attendees. The presentation provided an
overview of Mariners operations, properties, production
and reserves; management structure; exploration and development
projects, including the King Kong/ Yosemite, Pluto II, Bass
Lite, LaSalle, Swordfish, Green Pepper and Rigel projects;
prospect inventory; drilling programs; seismic databases; and
financial data, including a capital expenditure budget for 2005.
Mr. Josey presented Mariners views on its own
enterprise value and discussed a proposed method for
establishing an exchange ratio focused primarily upon the PV10
values of the parties estimated proved reserves. He did
not propose an exchange ratio for the transaction or other
specific economic terms. Mr. Josey advised Forest that
Mariner would require that the evaluation of Mariner for
purposes of establishing an exchange ratio give effect to its
anticipated West Texas acquisition.
On June 23, 2005, a special committee of Forests
board of directors was formed to consider proposals to spin-off
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations. The directors named to be
members of the committee were Messrs. Hoglund, Dod A.
Fraser, Mr. Lee, James D. Lighter, and Patrick R. McDonald.
On June 28, 2005, Mariner and the other potential merger
parties received a written request from Forest for a
non-binding, preliminary proposal to acquire the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations. The proposal was requested to be submitted no
later than July 6 and to include certain information, including
the percentage of shares of the combined entity to be held by
Forest shareholders, key assumptions used in arriving at the
level of consideration to be offered, transaction structure, and
a statement of intent with respect to employees of the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations.
On June 29, 2005, Mr. Clark, Forests Chief
Executive Officer, and other members of Forests management
and technical teams made a presentation to another potential
merger party on the attributes and
41
upside potential of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations.
Representatives of Citigroup were also present at the meeting.
The size of the other potential merger party in comparison to
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations was identified as an issue
that might preclude Forest from structuring the spin-off as a
tax-free transaction. Therefore, Forest could be required to
include more assets in the transaction, either in the form of
additional oil and gas operations or cash.
On July 6, 2005, Mariner submitted to Forest a non-binding
preliminary written proposal to acquire the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations. In the proposal, Mariner indicated its
willingness to consummate a transaction in which Forest
shareholders would hold between 53% and 56% of Mariners
shares after the transaction, and Mariner would assume
$300 million of indebtedness as part of the merger, which
would be incurred by Forests subsidiary prior to being
spun off by Forest in order to fund a distribution to Forest
prior to the spin-off. Mariner stated that it had based its
valuation of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations at between 90%
and 100% of the value of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
estimated proved reserves and 100% of the value of
Mariners estimated proved reserves. The proposal was
subject to due diligence, and assumed an economic effective date
of June 30, 2005 (i.e., all revenues and expenditures of
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations would accrue to the account
of Mariner from that date). Mariner also included supporting
schedules providing details on Mariners calculations of
the respective values of the companies, based on the
parties respective PV10 values at June 30, 2005.
Mariners schedules estimated Mariners value, based
upon PV10 values for its estimated proved reserves, and adjusted
for debt, working capital and derivatives, at approximately
$883 million. Mariners schedules estimated the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations value, based upon PV10 values
for its estimated proved reserves, and adjusted for
$300 million of debt, in a range from $978 million to
$1.1 billion.
Also on July 6, 2005, one of the other potential merger
parties submitted a written proposal to Forest to acquire the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations. The other proposal included
other assets of Forest, provided for no cash payment to Forest,
and for a stock repurchase to accomodate the other parties
assessment of relative value.
On July 11, 2005, the special committee of Forests
board of directors met by teleconference with members of Forest
management and representatives of Citigroup and Credit Suisse
First Boston (CSFB) (another of Forests
financial advisors). At this meeting, the special committee was
briefed on the status of discussions with the potential merger
parties and the parties July 6 proposals. After
discussion, the special committee concluded that, with respect
to the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, the valuation contained
in the other potential merger partys proposal was
comparable to the valuation contained in Mariners proposal
but that, with respect to Forests other assets, the other
potential merger partys valuation was insufficient.
On July 14, 2005, Mr. Clark and other members of
Forests management and technical teams made a presentation
to Mr. Josey and other members of Mariners management
and technical teams in Houston, Texas, on the attributes and
upside potential of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations.
Representatives of Citigroup and CSFB were also present at the
meeting. The presentation provided detail on several pending
exploration and development projects.
On July 15, 2005, members of Forest management, together
with representatives of Citigroup and CSFB, met in Houston,
Texas with the other party that had submitted a proposal to
discuss the potential benefits of a transaction.
Following further technical and reserve due diligence, on
July 21, 2005, Mariner submitted a revised non-binding
preliminary written proposal to Forest. In the proposal, Mariner
stated that it had revised the basis of its valuation to 100% of
the value of the proved reserves of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations, and was therefore confirming its willingness to
enter into a transaction in which Forest shareholders would hold
approximately 56% of Mariners shares, subject to due
diligence and adjustment based upon material changes occurring
prior to the execution of the merger agreement. As with the
July 6, 2005 proposal, Mariner would assume
$300 million of indebtedness, and the transaction would
have an economic effective date of June 30, 2005. Mariner
also requested that Forest enter into an exclusivity agreement,
whereby Forest would agree to negotiate exclusively with Mariner
for a period of 45 days.
42
On July 25, 2005, in accordance with Forests
instructions, representatives of Citigroup met with
Mr. Josey by teleconference. At the conclusion of the
discussion, Mr. Josey indicated that he would ask the
Mariner board to consider a transaction in which Forest
shareholders would hold approximately 57% of the equity
interests of the combined company after the merger, subject to
due diligence and adjustment based upon material changes
occurring prior to execution of the merger agreement.
On July 27, 2005, the special committee of Forests
board of directors met by teleconference. Members of Forest
management and representatives of Citigroup, CSFB and
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., outside counsel to Forest, were
also present at the meeting. At this meeting, the special
committee was updated on discussions with the potential merger
parties since the committees July 11th meeting
and on the proposals of Mariner and one other party. The special
committee also discussed alternative transactions involving the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, including an initial public
offering, an outright sale of the underlying assets, and the
creation of a net-profits master limited partnership. The
special committee instructed Forest management to pursue
negotiations with Mariner. The special committee based its
decision on the following factors: (i) Mariners
deepwater property portfolio was complementary to Forests
Gulf of Mexico portfolio, (ii) a spin-off followed by a
merger transaction could be done with Mariner without having to
involve assets other than the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations,
and (iii) the other potential merger partys valuation
of Forests other producing operations did not appear to be
sufficient.
On July 27, 2005, in accordance with Forests
instructions, a representative of Citigroup advised
Mr. Josey that Forests board had approved
managements pursuit of a transaction with Mariner.
Subsequently, Mr. Josey advised Mr. Clark by
teleconference that Mariner was not willing to proceed unless
Forest would agree to an exchange ratio adjustment for changes
in Mariners working capital and debt since June 30,
2005.
On July 28, 2005, Mr. Clark and Mr. Josey again
met by teleconference. They discussed the proposed exchange
ratio and adjustments and agreed to commence negotiating
definitive documentation. Mr. Clark advised Mr. Josey
that Forest would give Mariner access to additional due
diligence materials.
On July 29, 2005, Forest distributed a draft non-binding
term sheet for the transaction. The term sheet reflected the 57%
exchange ratio and other agreed-upon terms, and was subject to
mutual due diligence. Over the following three days,
representatives of Forest and Mariner discussed various
provisions in the term sheet, including whether interim
operating covenants would apply to Mariner as well as the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations, board representation and whether or
in what manner transaction expenses would be split between the
parties.
Subsequently, Forest and Mariner executed an exclusivity
agreement effective August 1, 2005, whereby the parties
agreed to negotiate exclusively with each other through
August 22, 2005. The agreement also contained a customary
standstill provision, which provided that neither company would
pursue an acquisition of the other party without that
partys consent.
On August 2, 2005, Forest and Mariner finalized the terms
of the non-binding term sheet for the transaction. The term
sheet reflected the 57% exchange ratio, provided that interim
operating covenants would be applicable to both Mariner and the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, provided for the addition of
two mutually agreeable members to Mariners board and
provided that transaction costs would be borne by both parties.
On August 4 and 5, 2005, representatives of Forest
conducted a due diligence review of certain legal and employee
benefits materials of Mariner at the offices of Baker Botts
L.L.P., Mariners outside counsel, in Houston, Texas.
Materials provided included general corporate materials,
litigation summaries, material contracts, employment agreements,
benefits arrangements and summaries, licenses and permits and
environmental and regulatory information.
On August 5, 2005, Vinson & Elkins distributed a
draft merger agreement to Mariner and Baker Botts.
43
On August 7, 2005, Mr. Josey met with representatives
of Lehman Brothers (Mariners financial advisor) in the
offices of Mariner. They discussed the general terms and
structure of the transaction and the proposed exchange ratio.
On August 8 and 9, 2005, technical teams from Forest
conducted a due diligence review and valuation analysis of
Mariners proved reserves, drilling inventory and
undeveloped acreage. Forest continued its technical, reserve,
accounting, employee benefits, title and legal due diligence
review over the course of the following weeks.
On August 9, 2005, representatives of Mariner and Baker
Botts began a due diligence review of certain legal, title and
employee benefits materials at the offices of Forest in Denver,
Colorado, and Mariners technical team conducted further
due diligence and continued its evaluation of Forests
proved reserves, drilling inventory and undeveloped acreage.
Materials provided included general corporate materials,
litigation summaries, land, lease and title materials, material
contracts, employment agreements, benefits arrangements and
summaries, licenses and permits and environmental and regulatory
information. With the assistance of appropriate legal, title,
financial, tax, engineering, and human resources consultants,
Mariner continued its technical, reserve, accounting, employee
benefits, title and legal due diligence review over the course
of the following weeks.
On August 10, 2005, Messrs. Clark and Keyte,
Mr. Matthew Wurtzbacher, Senior Vice President, Corporate
Planning and Development of Forest, and Mr. Cyrus Marter,
Vice President and General Counsel of Forest, and
Messrs. Josey, Lester, and Melendrez, and Ms. Teresa
Bushman, Vice President and General Counsel of Mariner, together
with representatives of Vinson & Elkins, Baker Botts,
Citigroup and Lehman Brothers, met in the offices of
Vinson & Elkins in Houston, Texas. Vinson &
Elkins explained how the draft merger agreement had addressed
some of the details of the proposed transaction structure, which
led to a discussion of whether Mariner or Forest Energy
Resources would be the surviving entity in the business
combination. Discussion of the structural issue was postponed
pending further analysis. The parties also discussed interim
operations following the execution of the merger agreement, with
Mariner suggesting that both parties covenant to continue their
exploration and development programs in accordance with their
capital budgets. Forest indicated that it was amenable to this
approach. Finally, the draft agreement proposed superior offer
termination provisions in favor of Forest, which Mariner and
Baker Botts stated would not be acceptable. Also, Mariner and
Baker & Botts objected to the Mariner fiduciary
provisions since they did not include a fiduciary termination
provision. A fiduciary termination provision allows a
partys board of directors, if required by its fiduciary
duties, to terminate the agreement in order to accept a
subsequent superior offer. Representatives of Forest, Mariner,
Baker Botts and Vinson & Elkins negotiated and
exchanged drafts of the merger agreement, distribution agreement
and other ancillary agreements over the course of the following
week.
On August 15, 2005, Messrs. Keyte and Marter of
Forest, and Messrs. Josey, Lester and Melendrez and
Ms. Bushman of Mariner, together with representatives of
Citigroup, Vinson & Elkins and Baker Botts, met by
teleconference to discuss the draft distribution agreement. The
companies discussed, and reached agreement in principle on, the
manner in which known and unknown liabilities, including
environmental and plugging and abandonment liabilities, would be
allocated between Mariner and Forest. The companies also
discussed the mechanism for handling revenues and expenses
associated with the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations between
July 1, 2005 and the closing of the merger.
On August 16, 2005, representatives of Baker Botts and
Vinson & Elkins met by teleconference to discuss the
deal protection provisions proposed by Forest in the
draft merger agreement. Vinson & Elkins indicated
Forests unwillingness to proceed with a transaction in
which it did not have the right to terminate the agreement in
the face of a superior proposal to purchase the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations or Forest as a whole. Baker Botts indicated
that Mariner would not be willing to enter into a merger
agreement that included such a termination right.
On August 18, 2005, representatives of Mariner, Forest,
Baker Botts and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
(Forests outside tax counsel) met by teleconference to
discuss the draft tax sharing agreement and related documents.
During the meeting, Forest and Weil, Gotshal & Manges
discussed certain factual circumstances
44
involving forward contracts to sell Forest stock entered into by
a Forest shareholder who held more than 10% of Forest stock, the
effect of which could have imposed increased restraints on
Mariner in the future in order to maintain favorable tax
treatment of the spin-off.
Also on August 18, representatives of Mariner, Forest,
Citigroup, Baker Botts and Vinson & Elkins met by
teleconference to discuss the other transaction agreements.
Following this teleconference, Lehman Brothers contacted
Citigroup to notify them of Mariners unwillingness to
proceed further until the potential tax issue regarding how the
forward contracts entered into by the 10% Forest shareholder
could impact the tax-free nature of the spin-off was resolved to
Mariners satisfaction.
On August 19, 2005, Lehman Brothers contacted Citigroup to
discuss various matters pertaining to the transaction and to
propose that, in order to resolve the potential tax issue raised
on August 18, the cash distribution to Forest be decreased
by $100 million (thereby decreasing the amount of debt to
be incurred in the transaction) and the number of Mariner shares
to be issued to Forest shareholders be correspondingly increased.
On August 21, 2005, Mr. Josey of Mariner sent
Messrs. Clark and Keyte of Forest a list of the most
significant outstanding issues, including the potential tax
issue, the superior offer termination provision, the
representations on diligence materials and public filings, the
treatment of Forest stock options, retention arrangements, the
allocation of specified abandonment and derivative liabilities
and the status of Mariners then-pending
drill-to-earn
transaction in West Texas. The parties agreed to meet in person
to attempt to resolve the issues identified.
On August 22, 2005, Messrs. Josey, Clark, Keyte and
Melendrez met in Forests offices in Denver, Colorado. At
the meeting, the parties agreed, in order to resolve the
potential tax issue, to decrease the cash distribution to Forest
by $100 million, to have Mariner assume certain
mark-to-market
derivative liabilities of approximately $50 million at
June 30, 2005, and to increase the number of Mariner shares
to be issued to Forest shareholders to approximately 58%. They
also discussed the superior offer termination provision and the
amount of the termination fee, without reaching agreement. The
parties respective counsels revised the transaction
agreements accordingly, and the transaction teams continued to
negotiate various provisions in the agreements and to discuss
various diligence issues over the course of the week.
On August 23, 2005, Messrs. Keyte and Josey met
briefly by teleconference to discuss, among other things, the
West Texas drill-to-earn transaction, the superior offer
termination provision and the amount of the termination fee.
That same day, the parties agreed to extend the exclusivity
period under their existing agreement until August 29.
On August 24, 2005, Forests board of directors held a
regular meeting at Forests offices in Denver, Colorado.
Members of Forest management and representatives of Citigroup
and CSFB were also present during the portion of the meeting
devoted to the potential spin-off and merger transaction. At
this meeting, the board was briefed on financial and other
aspects of the transaction, including the status of negotiations
with Mariner and the current terms of the transaction
agreements. Also on August 24, 2005, Messrs. Clark and
Josey met by teleconference to discuss additional diligence
requests regarding reserves, current projects and plugging and
abandonment costs from Mariner and Forest. Mr. Clark and
Mr. Josey agreed to speak again when responsive data had
been gathered.
On August 25, 2005, Messrs. Clark and Josey met by
teleconference, during which the requested diligence information
described above was exchanged and additional diligence matters
were discussed.
On August 27, 2005, Mr. Marter of Forest, and
Messrs. Lester and Melendrez and Ms. Bushman of
Mariner, together with representatives of Vinson &
Elkins and Baker Botts, met in the offices of Vinson &
Elkins in Houston, Texas. The parties discussed and negotiated
some of the outstanding issues remaining with respect to the
transaction agreements, including the scope and pricing of the
transition services to be provided by Forest after the closing,
and the allocation of certain specified abandonment and
environmental liabilities of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations. The parties reached substantial agreement on
transition services, but did not agree which party would bear
the abandonment and environmental liabilities associated with
two properties.
45
On August 28, 2005, Messrs. Keyte, Wurtzbacher and
Marter of Forest, and Messrs. Lester and Melendrez and
Ms. Bushman of Mariner, together with representatives of
Vinson & Elkins and Baker Botts, met in the offices of
Vinson & Elkins in Houston, Texas. The parties
negotiated and discussed the outstanding issues remaining with
respect to the transaction agreements, including Forests
proposed superior offer termination right, the status of
Mariners then-pending
drill-to-earn
transaction in West Texas and the specified abandonment and
environmental liabilities. The parties agreed that Mariner would
obtain a performance bond to secure its performance in the
drill-to-earn program,
and that it would assume a portion of the abandonment and
environmental liabilities, subject to a cap. Mr. Keyte
stated that Forest would be willing to proceed without a
superior offer termination provision in favor of Forest. The
parties also agreed that Mariner would have the ability to
terminate the agreement in certain circumstances in order to
accept a superior proposal to acquire Mariner. Finally, the
parties agreed on a termination fee of $25 million and an
expense reimbursement provision payable by Mariner if the merger
agreement were terminated or rejected by its stockholders in
order to accept an alternative transaction. The Mariner
representatives did not insist on a termination fee or
reimbursement provision applicable to Forest because there would
be no provisions in the merger agreement pursuant to which
Forest could terminate the agreement in order to accept an
alternative transaction. The parties concluded the meeting by
agreeing to keep each other updated on developments related to
Hurricane Katrina, which was expected to reach the parties
properties in the Gulf of Mexico that evening.
On August 29, 2005, Messrs. Clark and Josey met in
Mariners offices in Houston, Texas to discuss retention
arrangements for Mariners executive officers and for the
employees of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations. During the
meeting, they reviewed organizational charts and discussed the
companies benefits and incentive plans. The parties
discussed the basic retention parameters for both sets of
employees, including the terms of Mariners executive
officers waivers of change of control benefits, with
details to be agreed upon later. The parties also agreed to
exchange periodic updates on the impact of Hurricane Katrina on
the companies respective assets and equipment. Baker Botts
and Vinson & Elkins exchanged drafts of the transaction
documents over the course of the day. That same day, the Forest
board of directors held a special meeting by teleconference.
Members of Forest management and representatives of Citigroup,
Vinson & Elkins and Weil, Gotshal & Manges
were also present at the meeting. Forest management and a
representative of Vinson & Elkins briefed the board on
the status of negotiations with Mariner and the current form of
the transaction agreements. Mr. Kenneth Heitner of Weil,
Gotshal & Manges briefed the board regarding the
various tax issues that were relevant to the spin-off, how those
issues were addressed in the transaction agreements, and the
constraints that Mariner and Forest would face in the future in
order to maintain favorable tax treatment of the spin-off.
Vinson & Elkins advised the board regarding various
corporate law matters and confirmed that a superior offer
termination provision in favor of Forest was not necessary from
a legal point of view. Forest management also briefed the board
regarding Forests on-going investigation of the potential
impact of Hurricane Katrina on both Forest and Mariner.
On August 30, 2005, the board of directors of Mariner held
a special meeting by teleconference, at which Mariners
management, together with Lehman Brothers and Baker Botts,
updated the board on the proposed transaction and related
matters, including the strategic and business considerations
relating to the transaction, the ongoing diligence review, the
status of discussions between the parties and the principal
terms of the transaction agreements. Lehman Brothers discussed
with the board the expected financial terms of the transaction
and the preliminary valuation analyses it had performed with
respect to Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations,
noting that the valuation inputs and ranges used in the analysis
were subject to change until due diligence was completed and the
terms of the transaction were finalized. A representative of
Baker Botts reviewed in detail the fiduciary termination
provisions of the agreement and certain other principal terms of
the transaction agreements. Following extensive discussion,
including discussions regarding the potential impact of
Hurricane Katrina on both Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations, the Mariner board authorized continuing discussions
regarding the proposed transaction.
On August 31, 2005, Messrs. Clark and Josey met by
teleconference to finalize their agreement with respect to
retention arrangements and to provide one another with updates
regarding the potential impact of Hurricane Katrina on the
companies respective assets.
46
On September 1, 2005, the Forest board of directors met by
teleconference. Members of Forest management and representatives
of Citigroup, Vinson & Elkins and Weil,
Gotshal & Manges were also present at the meeting. At
this meeting, the Forest board was updated on financial and
other aspects of the transaction, including Forests
investigation of the potential impact of Hurricane Katrina on
Forest and Mariner and the status of negotiations with Mariner.
The Forest board then granted full authority to the executive
committee to finalize the transaction agreements.
On September 3 and 4, 2005, representatives from
Forest and Mariner conducted visual inspections by helicopter
and fixed-wing aircraft of certain of Forests and
Mariners properties in the Gulf of Mexico in order to
assess the damage sustained as a result of Hurricane Katrina.
From September 2 through September 6, 2005, the parties
exchanged revised drafts of the transaction agreements. On
September 6, 2005, the executive committee of Forests
board met by teleconference. Members of Forest management were
also present at the meeting. The executive committee was briefed
by management on the status of discussions with Mariner and
regarding Forests investigation of the potential impact of
Hurricane Katrina on Forest and Mariner. The executive committee
instructed Forest management regarding necessary changes to the
transaction agreements, focusing on the need to clarify the
impact of Hurricane Katrina.
On September 7, 2005, Mr. Keyte of Forest and
Mr. Melendrez of Mariner met by teleconference to resolve
the remaining issues relating to the transaction, including the
limitation applicable to the specified abandonment and
environmental liabilities and the scope of the condition to
closing that Forest obtain the consent of its bondholders. The
parties reached compromises on both points and also agreed to
exchange written reports detailing the damage sustained to their
respective assets as a result of Hurricane Katrina, which
reports, along with finalized projections for both companies,
were subsequently exchanged on September 8, 2005.
On September 9, 2005, the board of directors of Mariner
held a special meeting by teleconference, to review the proposed
transaction. At the meeting, Mariners management, together
with representatives of Lehman Brothers and Baker Botts,
apprised the Mariner board of the status of discussions and
reviewed the terms of the transaction as reflected in the final
forms of the transaction agreements. Lehman Brothers delivered
its oral opinion (subsequently confirmed in writing) to the
board that, as of September 9, 2005, based upon and subject
to the factors and assumptions set forth in the opinion, the
exchange ratio in the merger was fair from a financial point of
view to Mariner. There were no material differences between
Lehman Brothers written opinion and the oral opinion given
at the board meeting. Baker Botts advised the board regarding
certain corporate law matters. Following extensive discussion,
the Mariner board approved the merger and the merger agreement
and resolved to recommend that Mariners stockholders vote
to adopt the merger agreement. That same day, the executive
committee of Forests board of directors met by
teleconference. Members of Forest management and representatives
of Citigroup and Vinson & Elkins were also present at
the meeting. At this meeting, the executive committee was
briefed on the final form of the transaction agreements
(including the agreed upon financial terms of the transaction as
reflected in the transaction documents) and on Forests
latest assessment of Hurricane Katrinas impact on Forest
and Mariner. After full discussion, the executive committee
approved the final form of the merger agreement and other
transaction agreements. Shortly after the meetings, the merger
agreement and other transaction agreements were executed by the
parties to the agreements.
Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the Mariner Board
of Directors
The Mariner board of directors has determined that the merger is
fair to and in the best interests of Mariner and its
stockholders, and that the merger agreement is advisable. The
Mariner board of directors has unanimously approved the merger
agreement, the proposed amendment to the certificate of
incorporation and the proposed amendment and restatement of the
stock incentive plan, and recommends the adoption of the merger
agreement and the approval of the other proposals by the Mariner
stockholders.
In considering the recommendation of the Mariner board of
directors with respect to the merger, you should be aware that
some executive officers and directors of Mariner have interests
in the merger that may be
47
different from, or in addition to, the interests of Mariner
stockholders generally. The Mariner board of directors was aware
of these interests in approving the merger and merger agreement.
Please refer to The Mariner Annual Meeting
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger beginning on
page 38 for more information about these interests.
In reaching its decision on the merger, the Mariner board of
directors considered a number of factors, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the increased size of the combined company, which would have
approximately three times the pro forma daily net production of
Mariner on a stand-alone basis, could reduce volatility related
to large-scale deepwater projects, and could allow it to
participate in larger scale exploratory and development drilling
projects and acquisition opportunities than would be available
to Mariner on a stand-alone basis; |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger would be expected to increase Mariners
estimated proved reserves, on a pro forma basis as of
December 31, 2004, by approximately 243%, making Mariner
larger on a reserve basis than many of its peer companies, and
would more than double Mariners undeveloped acreage; |
|
|
|
|
|
the integration of the businesses and the realization of
expected benefits could be facilitated by the fact that Mariner
is already active in the Gulf of Mexico with assets that are
complementary to the Forest Gulf of Mexico assets; |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger could generate increased visibility in the capital
markets and trading liquidity for the combined company, which
could enhance the market valuation of Mariner common stock; |
|
|
|
|
|
the merger would increase the number of Mariners producing
fields by approximately 400%, thereby diversifying
Mariners asset base and reducing Mariners dependence
on a concentrated number of properties; |
|
|
|
|
|
the assets comprising the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations,
which historically have been used as a cash flow generator for
Forest, could be candidates for increased exploitation; |
|
|
|
|
|
oil and natural gas prices are currently at or near historical
highs, which could increase the revenues and enhance the
profitability of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations; |
|
|
|
|
the merger would be consummated only if approved by the holders
of a majority of the Mariner common stock; |
|
|
|
the merger is structured as a tax-free reorganization for
U.S. federal income tax purposes and, accordingly, would
not be taxable either to Mariner or its stockholders; |
|
|
|
the boards belief that the potential financial benefits
stemming from the enhanced growth prospects of the combined
company outweigh the anticipated direct and indirect costs of
the merger; |
|
|
|
|
the terms of the merger agreement permit Mariner to terminate
the merger agreement at any time before the meeting to accept a
superior proposal, subject to its obligation to comply with
certain procedural requirements and to pay a termination fee and
expense reimbursement; and |
|
|
|
|
the opinion, dated September 9, 2005, of Lehman Brothers
Inc. to the Mariner board of directors that, as of that date,
based upon and subject to the factors and assumptions set forth
in the opinion, the exchange ratio in the merger was fair from a
financial point of view to Mariner. |
The Mariner board of directors also identified and considered
some risks and potential disadvantages associated with the
merger, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that there may be difficulties in combining the
business of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations; |
|
|
|
the risk that the potential benefits sought in the merger might
not be fully realized; |
48
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that the proved undeveloped, probable and possible
reserves of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations may never be
converted to proved developed reserves; |
|
|
|
|
the risks inherent in owning properties located in the Gulf of
Mexico, including the risks of future hurricanes that could
damage or destroy the acquired properties; |
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that current high commodity prices could fall, thereby
reducing the profitability of the acquired operations; |
|
|
|
|
the risk that the merger might not be completed; |
|
|
|
the fact that, in order to preserve the tax-free treatment of
the spin-off, Mariner would be required to abide by restrictions
that could reduce its ability to engage in certain business
transactions that otherwise might be advantageous; |
|
|
|
the fact that under the merger agreement, Mariner could be
required to pay Forest a termination fee and expense
reimbursement in certain circumstances; and |
|
|
|
|
certain of the other matters described under Risk
Factors beginning on page 23. |
|
In the judgment of the Mariner board of directors, the potential
benefits of the merger outweigh the risks and the potential
disadvantages. In view of the variety of factors considered in
connection with its evaluation of the proposed merger and the
terms of the merger agreement, the Mariner board of directors
did not quantify or assign relative weights to the factors
considered in reaching its conclusion. Rather, the Mariner board
of directors views its recommendation as being based on the
totality of the information presented to and considered by it.
In addition, individual Mariner directors may have given
different weights to different factors.
Certain Financial Projections
In connection with the due diligence process during
negotiations, Mariner and Forest provided each other with
financial and operating projections for 2005 and 2006.
Mariners projections are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue (in millions)
|
|
$ |
230.2 |
|
|
$ |
421.4 |
|
EBITDA (in millions)
|
|
$ |
185.2 |
|
|
$ |
353.9 |
|
Net income (in millions)
|
|
$ |
60.9 |
|
|
$ |
158.7 |
|
Net income per common share
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
4.45 |
|
Capital expenditures (in millions)
|
|
$ |
257.4 |
|
|
$ |
250.5 |
|
Mariners projections were based on a number of
assumptions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average common shares outstanding of 35.6 million
in both periods; |
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX prices for oil and Henry Hub prices for gas, as adjusted
for pricing differentials and hedging contracts in place at such
date as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$ |
41.27 |
|
|
$ |
48.83 |
|
Gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$ |
6.86 |
|
|
$ |
7.87 |
|
Total (per Mcfe)
|
|
$ |
6.87 |
|
|
$ |
7.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
annual production as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
Total (Bcfe)
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
53.1 |
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
|
a depreciation, depletion and amortization rate of $1.84 per
Mcfe for 2005 and $1.80 per Mcfe for 2006; |
|
|
|
|
|
an effective income tax rate of 35% in each period; and |
|
|
|
|
|
various assumptions relating to delays in scheduled commencement
of production at Pluto, Swordfish, Ochre and Dice, suspension of
production at producing fields and increased capital
expenditures due to Hurricane Katrina. |
|
Forests projections for the Forest Gulf of Mexico
Operations are summarized below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue (in millions)
|
|
$ |
214.1 |
|
|
$ |
529.4 |
|
EBITDA (in millions)
|
|
$ |
173.5 |
|
|
$ |
450.5 |
|
Net income (in millions)
|
|
$ |
43.9 |
|
|
$ |
124.3 |
|
Net income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
Capital expenditures (in millions)
|
|
$ |
123.0 |
|
|
$ |
202.3 |
|
Forests projections were based on a number of assumptions,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
weighted average common shares outstanding of 50.6 million
in each period; |
|
|
|
|
|
NYMEX prices for oil and Henry Hub prices for gas, as adjusted
for pricing differentials and hedging contracts in place at such
date as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Oil (per Bbl)
|
|
$ |
47.42 |
|
|
$ |
48.41 |
|
Gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$ |
6.64 |
|
|
$ |
7.13 |
|
Total (per Mcfe)
|
|
$ |
7.02 |
|
|
$ |
7.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
annual production as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Oil (MBbls)
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Gas (Bcf)
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
Total (Bcfe)
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
|
|
72.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a depreciation, depletion and amortization rate of $3.26 per
Mcfe for 2005 and $3.43 per Mcfe for 2006; |
|
|
|
|
|
an effective income tax rate of 35% in each period; |
|
|
|
|
|
the allocation from July 1, 2005 to December 31, 2005 of
general and administrative expenses as set forth in the
distribution agreement; |
|
|
|
|
|
net hedging losses of $11.7 million in 2005 and
$19.5 million in 2006; |
|
|
|
|
|
various assumptions relating to general and administrative
expenses to reflect the allocation set forth in the distribution
agreement; and |
|
|
|
|
|
transaction-related expenses of $12 million in 2005. |
|
Mariner and Forest make public only very limited information as
to future performance and neither company provides specific or
detailed information as to earnings or performance over an
extended period. The foregoing prospective financial information
is included in this proxy statement/prospectusinformation
statement only because this information was provided to the
other party during negotiations. The prospective financial
information was not prepared with a view to public disclosure or
with a view toward complying with the published guidelines of
the SEC or the guidelines established by the American Institute
of Certified Public Accountants regarding prospective financial
information. The projections do not purport to present
50
operations in accordance with GAAP. The internal financial
forecasts (upon which these projections were based in part) are,
in general, prepared solely for internal use and capital
budgeting and other management decisions and are subjective in
many respects and thus susceptible to interpretations and
periodic revision based on actual experience and business
developments. Neither Mariners nor Forests
independent auditors, nor any other independent accountants,
have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect
to the prospective financial information, nor have they
expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such
information or its achievability, and assume no responsibility
for, and disclaim any association with, the prospective
financial information.
In addition to the specific assumptions set forth above, the
projections also reflect numerous assumptions made by management
of both companies, including assumptions with respect to general
business, economic, market and financial conditions and other
matters, including effective tax rates and interest rates and
the anticipated amount of borrowings, all of which are difficult
to predict and many of which are beyond the control of the
preparing party. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the
assumptions made in preparing the projections will prove
accurate. Actual results may be materially greater or less than
those contained in the projections. The inclusion of the
projections in this proxy statement/prospectusinformation
statement should not be regarded as an indication that the
projections will be predictive of actual future events, and the
projections should not be relied upon as such.
The projections were disclosed to the other party and its
representatives as a matter of due diligence, and are included
in this proxy statement/ prospectus/information statement on
that account. Each of Mariner and Forest believes that the
projections prepared by it were reasonable at the time they were
made; however, none of Mariner or Forest or any of their
respective representatives has made or makes any representation
to any stockholder regarding the ultimate performance of Mariner
or the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations compared to the
information contained in the projections, and none of them
intends to update or otherwise revise the projections to reflect
circumstances existing after the date when made or to reflect
the occurrence of future events in the event that any or all of
the assumptions underlying the projections are shown to be in
error. In particular, these projections were prepared prior to,
and do not take into account the full effects of business
interruptions due to, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in August 2005
and September 2005, respectively.
Opinion of Mariners Financial Advisor
Mariner engaged Lehman Brothers to act as its financial advisor
in connection with the merger. On September 9, 2005, Lehman
Brothers rendered its written opinion to the board of directors
of Mariner, that, as of that date, based upon and subject to the
matters stated in its opinion letter, from a financial point of
view, the exchange ratio of 1.0 share of Mariner common
stock for each share of Forest Energy Resources common stock in
the merger was fair to Mariner.
The Mariner board of directors determined that the process
leading up to the execution of the merger agreement was
procedurally fair to all stockholders, including unaffiliated
stockholders. The board did not obtain an independent
advisors opinion with respect to procedural fairness,
because numerous factors supported the conclusion that
sufficient procedural safeguards existed to protect the
interests of all stockholders, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Mariners board of directors unanimously
approved the merger, including all directors with no interest in
the merger other than their interests as stockholders of Mariner; |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that the stockholders of Mariner will be given the
opportunity to vote on the merger, and that the merger agreement
would not be adopted without the affirmative vote of at least a
majority of Mariners common stock; |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Mariner does not have a controlling stockholder,
and that directors and officers of Mariner own less than 11% of
the outstanding stock of Mariner; |
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that independent financial and legal advisors were
retained to assist in the negotiation of the terms of the merger
agreement, the distribution agreement and the other ancillary
agreements; and |
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
the fact that Mariner received a written opinion from its
independent financial advisor as to the fairness, from a
financial point of view, of the merger consideration. |
The full text of Lehman Brothers opinion dated
September 9, 2005, which sets forth assumptions made,
procedures followed, matters considered and limitations upon the
review undertaken in connection with the opinion, is included as
Annex B to this joint proxy
statement/prospectus-information statement. The following is a
summary of Lehman Brothers opinion and the methodology
that Lehman Brothers used to render its opinion. This summary is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the
opinion.
Lehman Brothers advisory services and opinion were
provided for the information and assistance of the board of
directors of Mariner in connection with its consideration of the
merger. Lehman Brothers opinion is not intended to be and
does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder of
Mariner as to how such stockholder should vote in connection
with the merger. Lehman Brothers was not requested to opine as
to, and Lehman Brothers opinion does not in any manner
address, Mariners underlying business decision to proceed
with or effect the merger.
In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers reviewed, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
the merger agreement, the distribution agreement, the other
transaction agreements and the specific terms of the merger; |
|
|
|
publicly available information concerning Mariner that Lehman
Brothers believed to be relevant to its analysis, including,
without limitation, the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on
Form S-1 filed on
July 26, 2005 by Mariner; |
|
|
|
publicly available information concerning Forest that Lehman
Brothers believed to be relevant to its analysis, including,
without limitation, the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and the Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q for the
periods ended March 31, 2005 and June 30, 2005; |
|
|
|
financial and operating information with respect to the
business, operations and prospects of Mariner as furnished to
Lehman Brothers by Mariner, including financial projections and
oil and gas reserve estimates as of June 30, 2005 for
Mariner as prepared by the management of Mariner; |
|
|
|
financial and operating information with respect to the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations as furnished to Lehman Brothers by
Forest, including financial projections and oil and gas reserve
estimates as of June 30, 2005 for the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations as prepared by the management of Forest; |
|
|
|
a comparison of the historical financial results and present
financial condition of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations with each other and with those of other companies
that Lehman Brothers deemed relevant; |
|
|
|
a comparison of the financial terms of the merger with the
financial terms of certain other transactions that Lehman
Brothers deemed relevant; |
|
|
|
commodity prices assumptions used by the management of Mariner,
commodity prices assumptions published by Lehman Brothers equity
research, and commodity prices as quoted on the NYMEX on
August 19, 2005 (collectively the Commodity Price
Assumptions); |
|
|
|
estimates of certain proved reserves generated by third-party
reserve engineers as of December 31, 2004 for Mariner and
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations; |
|
|
|
the potential pro forma impact of the merger on the current
financial condition and future financial performance of Mariner,
including the impact on Mariners operating metrics,
including, the composition of its reserves between oil and gas;
the percentage of reserves attributable to onshore, the shelf of
the Gulf of Mexico and deepwater Gulf of Mexico; and the ratio
of reserves as of June 30, 2005 to 2005 expected production; |
|
|
|
the relative contributions of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations to the current and future financial
performance of the combined company on a pro forma basis; |
52
|
|
|
|
|
the report dated as of September 9, 2005, prepared by the
management of Mariner, assessing the damage to the Gulf of
Mexico assets of Mariner caused by Hurricane Katrina; and |
|
|
|
the report dated as of September 9, 2005, prepared by the
management of Forest, assessing the damage to the Gulf of Mexico
assets of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations caused by
Hurricane Katrina. |
In addition, Lehman Brothers had discussions with the
managements of Mariner and Forest concerning their respective
businesses, operations, assets, financial conditions, reserves,
production profiles, hedging levels, exploration programs and
prospects of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
and undertook such other studies, analyses and investigations as
Lehman Brothers deemed appropriate.
In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers assumed and relied
upon the accuracy and completeness of the financial and other
information used by Lehman Brothers without assuming any
responsibility for independent verification of such information.
Lehman Brothers further relied upon the assurances of the
managements of Mariner and Forest that they were not aware of
any facts or circumstances that would make such information
inaccurate or misleading. With respect to the financial
projections of Mariner, upon advice of Mariner, Lehman Brothers
assumed that such projections were reasonably prepared on a
basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and
judgments of the management of Mariner as to the future
financial performance of Mariner and that Mariner would perform
substantially in accordance with such projections. With respect
to the financial projections of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations, upon advice of Forest, Lehman Brothers assumed that
such projections were reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting
the best currently available estimates and judgments of the
management of Forest as to the future financial performance of
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations and that the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations would perform substantially in accordance with
such projections. However, in the course of its analysis and in
arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers also considered the
various Commodity Price Assumptions, which resulted in certain
adjustments to the projections of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations. Lehman Brothers discussed these adjusted
projections with the management of Mariner and they agreed with
the appropriateness of the use of such adjusted projections, as
well as Forests management projections, in performing its
analysis.
In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers did not conduct a
physical inspection of the properties and facilities of Mariner
and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations and did not make or
obtain from third parties any evaluations or appraisals of the
assets and liabilities of Mariner or the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations. Lehman Brothers opinion is necessarily based
upon market, economic and other conditions as they existed on,
and could be evaluated as of, the date of its opinion letter.
In arriving at its opinion, Lehman Brothers did not ascribe a
specific range of value to Mariner or the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations, but rather made its determination as to the fairness
to Mariner, from a financial point of view, of the exchange
ratio in the merger on the basis of the financial, comparative
and other analyses described below. The preparation of a
fairness opinion involves various determinations as to the most
appropriate and relevant methods of financial, comparative and
other analyses and the application of those methods to the
particular circumstances, and, therefore, such an opinion is not
readily susceptible to summary description. Furthermore, in
arriving at its fairness opinion, Lehman Brothers did not
attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor
considered by it, but rather made qualitative judgments as to
the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor.
Accordingly, Lehman Brothers believes that its analyses must be
considered as a whole and that considering any portion of such
analyses and factors considered, without considering all
analyses and factors as a whole, could create a misleading or
incomplete view of the process underlying the opinion. In its
analyses, Lehman Brothers made numerous assumptions with respect
to industry performance, general business and economic
conditions and other matters, many of which are beyond the
control of Mariner or Forest. Any estimates contained in the
analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or
predictive of future results or values, which may be
significantly more or less favorable than as set forth in the
analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of
businesses do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the
prices at which businesses could actually be sold.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses
used by Lehman Brothers in connection with providing its opinion
to Mariners board of directors. The financial analyses
summarized below include
53
information presented in tabular format. In order to fully
understand the methodologies used by Lehman Brothers and the
results of financial, comparative and other analyses, the tables
must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables
alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial,
comparative and other analyses. Considering any portion of such
analyses and of the factors considered, without considering all
analyses and factors as a whole, could create a misleading or
incomplete view of the process underlying Lehman Brothers
opinion.
|
|
|
Valuation Analyses Used to Derive Implied Exchange
Ratios |
Lehman Brothers separately analyzed the value of Mariner and the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations in accordance with the
following methodologies: net asset valuation analysis,
comparable company analysis and comparable transaction analysis.
Each of these methodologies was used to generate a reference
enterprise value range for each of Mariner and the Forest Gulf
of Mexico operations. The enterprise value range for each entity
was adjusted for appropriate on- and off-balance sheet assets
and liabilities to arrive at a common equity value range (in
aggregate dollars) for each entity. The equity value range for
each entity was used to derive implied exchange ratios which
were then compared to the exchange ratio agreed to in the
merger. The implied exchange ratios, derived using the various
valuation methodologies listed, supported the conclusion that
the exchange ratio agreed to in the merger was fair to Mariner
from a financial point of view.
54
The various valuation methodologies noted above and the implied
exchange ratios derived therefrom are included in the following
table. This table should be read together with the more
detailed descriptions set forth below. In particular, in
applying the various valuation methodologies to the particular
businesses, operations and prospects of Mariner and the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations, and the particular circumstances of
the merger, Lehman Brothers made qualitative judgments as to the
significance and relevance of each analysis. In addition, Lehman
Brothers made numerous assumptions with respect to industry
performance, general business and economic conditions and other
matters, many of which are beyond the control of Mariner or
Forest. Accordingly, the methodologies and the implied exchange
ratios derived therefrom set forth in the table must be
considered as a whole and in the context of the narrative
description of the financial analyses, including the assumptions
underlying these analyses. Considering the implied exchange
ratios set forth in the table without considering the full
narrative description of the financial analyses, including the
assumptions underlying these analyses, could create a misleading
or incomplete view of the process underlying, and conclusions
represented by, Lehman Brothers opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implied | |
|
|
|
|
Exchange | |
Valuation Methodology |
|
Summary Description of Valuation Methodology |
|
Ratio Range* | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Net Asset Valuation Analysis
|
|
Net present valuation of after-tax cash flows generated by
producing to exhaustion existing proved reserves, using selected
hydrocarbon pricing scenarios and discount rates plus the
evaluation of probable and possible reserves and certain other
assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case I Commodity Prices |
|
|
0.84 - 1.11 |
|
|
|
Case II Commodity Prices |
|
|
0.95 - 1.30 |
|
|
|
Case III Commodity Prices |
|
|
0.88 - 1.14 |
|
Comparable Company Analysis
|
|
Market valuation benchmark based on trading multiples of
selected comparable companies for selected financial and
asset-based measures |
|
|
0.78 - 1.14 |
|
Comparable Transactions Analysis
|
|
Market valuation benchmark based on consideration paid in
selected comparable transactions |
|
|
0.80 - 1.32 |
|
Exchange Ratio in the Merger
|
|
|
|
|
1.00* |
|
|
|
* |
Shares of Forest Energy Resources will be exchanged for shares
of Mariner on a one-for-one basis. The exchange ratio represents
the number of Mariner shares to be issued in the merger for each
Forest Energy Resources share. As a result of this exchange
ratio and the number of shares of Forest Energy Resources to be
issued in the spin-off, Forest shareholders will receive
approximately 0.8 shares of Mariner common stock for each
share of Forest common stock they own or, in the case of Forest
shareholders who would receive less than one full Mariner share
in the merger, cash in lieu of such fractional share. |
|
|
|
Net Asset Valuation Analysis |
Lehman Brothers estimated the present value of the future
after-tax cash flows expected to be generated from each
entitys proved reserves as of June 30, 2005, based on
estimated reserves and production cost estimates. The present
values of the future after-tax cash flows were determined using
a range of discount rates and risking factors based on geography
and reserve category risk and assuming a tax rate of 35%. Lehman
Brothers added to such estimated proved reserves the estimated
values of certain other assets and liabilities, including each
of Mariners and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
probable and possible reserves, each of Mariners and the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations exploration portfolio,
and each of Mariners and the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations current commodity hedging portfolio. The net
asset
55
valuation analysis was performed under three commodity price
scenarios (Case I, Case II and Case III), which
are described below.
Certain of the natural gas and oil price forecasts employed by
Lehman Brothers were based on New York Mercantile Exchange, or
NYMEX, price forecasts (Henry Hub, Louisiana delivery for
natural gas and West Texas Intermediate, Cushing, Oklahoma
delivery for oil) from which adjustments were made to reflect
location and quality differentials. NYMEX gas price quotations
are stated in heating value equivalents per million British
Thermal Units, or MMBtu, which are adjusted to reflect the value
per thousand cubic feet, or MCF, of gas. NYMEX oil price
quotations are stated in dollars per barrel, or BBL, of crude
oil. In addition to the NYMEX prices, Lehman Brothers considered
the impact of a flat pricing scenario in which we employed
natural gas and oil prices of $5.00 per MMBtu, and
$45.00 per BBL respectively. In another pricing scenario,
we valued the proved developed producing reserves using NYMEX
pricing and all other categories using $5.00 per MMBtu and
$45.00 per BBL for gas and oil, respectively. The table
below presents a summary of natural gas and oil price forecasts
employed by Lehman Brothers for each commodity price scenario.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escalation | |
|
|
2005E | |
|
2006E | |
|
2007E | |
|
2008E | |
|
2009E | |
|
2010E | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Natural Gas ($MMBtu)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case I: All reserve classifications
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Case II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed producing reserves
|
|
$ |
9.24 |
|
|
$ |
8.89 |
|
|
$ |
8.29 |
|
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
$ |
7.47 |
|
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
All other reserve classifications
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Case III: All reserve classifications
|
|
$ |
9.24 |
|
|
$ |
8.89 |
|
|
$ |
8.29 |
|
|
$ |
7.85 |
|
|
$ |
7.47 |
|
|
$ |
7.14 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Oil ($/BBL)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case I: All reserve classifications
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Case II:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved developed producing reserves
|
|
$ |
64.06 |
|
|
$ |
64.81 |
|
|
$ |
62.71 |
|
|
$ |
60.55 |
|
|
$ |
59.15 |
|
|
$ |
58.45 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
|
All other reserve classifications
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
$ |
45.00 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
Case III: All reserve classifications
|
|
$ |
64.06 |
|
|
$ |
64.81 |
|
|
$ |
62.71 |
|
|
$ |
60.55 |
|
|
$ |
59.15 |
|
|
$ |
58.45 |
|
|
|
0.0% |
|
The net asset valuation analyses yielded valuations for Mariner
and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations that implied a range of
exchange ratios of 0.84 to 1.11 for Case I, a range of
exchange ratios of 0.95 to 1.30 for Case II and a range of
exchange ratios of 0.88 to 1.14 for Case III.
|
|
|
Comparable Company Analysis |
With respect to Mariner, Lehman Brothers reviewed the public
stock market trading multiples for the following exploration and
production companies, which Lehman Brothers selected because
their businesses and operating profiles are reasonably similar
to that of Mariner:
|
|
|
|
|
Bois dArc Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
Comstock Resources, Inc. |
|
|
|
Energy Partners, Ltd. |
|
|
|
The Houston Exploration Company |
|
|
|
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation |
|
|
|
Spinnaker Exploration Company |
|
|
|
Stone Energy Corporation |
|
|
|
W&T Offshore, Inc. |
As part of its comparable company analysis, Lehman Brothers
calculated and analyzed Mariners and each comparable
companys equity and adjusted capitalization multiples of
certain historical and projected
56
financial and operating criteria (such as earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, depletion, amortization and
exploration expense, or EBITDE; net income; discretionary cash
flow, or DCF; proved reserves; and daily production). The
adjusted capitalization of each comparable company was obtained
by adding its total debt to the sum of the market value of its
common equity, the book value of its preferred stock and the
book value of any minority interest minus its cash balance. The
ratios of each comparable company of adjusted capitalization to
proved reserves and to daily production were calculated by
excluding from each selected companys adjusted
capitalization calculation, an estimate of the value of
non-proved reserves and other businesses that are unrelated to
exploration and production of oil and gas.
Based on a review of the multiples derived for the comparable
companies, Lehman Brothers selected multiple ranges to apply to
Mariners corresponding financial and operating statistics.
The selected multiple ranges applied to Mariners projected
2005 and projected 2006 EBITDE statistics were 3.5x to 4.0x and
3.4x to 3.9x, respectively. The selected multiple ranges applied
to Mariners projected 2005 and projected 2006 earnings
statistics were 8.0x to 10.0x and 8.0 to 10.0x, respectively.
The selected multiple ranges applied to Mariners projected
2005 and projected 2006 DCF statistics were 3.0x to 3.5x and 2.8
to 3.3x, respectively. The selected multiple ranges applied to
Mariners proved reserve statistics were $15.00 to
$18.00 per barrel of oil equivalent, referred to as BOE,
and $2.50 to $3.00 per thousand cubic feet equivalent,
referred to as Mcfe. The selected multiple ranges applied to
Mariners daily production statistics were $48,000 to
$60,000 per thousand barrels of oil equivalent produced per
day, referred to as MBOE/d, and $8,000 to $10,000 per
million cubic feet equivalent produced per day, referred to as
Mmcfe/d. For the proved reserves and daily production multiples,
an estimate of the value of Mariners non-proved reserves
(including probable and possible reserves and Mariners
exploration portfolio) was added to the analysis. All of these
calculations were performed, and based on publicly available
financial data, including independent equity research analyst
estimates, and closing prices as of September 8, 2005, the
last trading date prior to the delivery of Lehman Brothers
opinion.
With respect to the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, Lehman
Brothers reviewed the public stock market trading multiples for
the following exploration and production companies, which Lehman
Brothers selected because their businesses and operating
profiles are reasonably similar to that of the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations:
|
|
|
|
|
Bois dArc Energy, Inc. |
|
|
|
Energy Partners, Ltd. |
|
|
|
The Houston Exploration Company |
|
|
|
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation |
|
|
|
Spinnaker Exploration Company |
|
|
|
Stone Energy Corporation |
|
|
|
W&T Offshore, Inc. |
As part of its comparable company analysis, Lehman Brothers
calculated and analyzed the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations and each comparable companys equity and
adjusted capitalization multiples of certain historical and
projected financial and operating criteria (such as EBITDE, net
income, DCF, proved reserves, and daily production). The
adjusted capitalization of each comparable company was obtained
by adding its total debt to the sum of the market value of its
common equity, the book value of its preferred stock and the
book value of any minority interest minus its cash balance. The
ratios of each comparable company of adjusted capitalization to
proved reserves and to daily production were calculated by
excluding from each selected companys adjusted
capitalization calculation, an estimate of the value of
non-proved reserves and other businesses that are unrelated to
exploration and production of oil and gas.
Based on a review of the multiples derived for the comparable
companies, Lehman Brothers selected multiple ranges to apply to
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations corresponding
financial and operating statistics. The selected multiple ranges
applied to the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations projected
2005 and
57
projected 2006 EBITDE statistics were 3.0x to 3.5x and 2.9x to
3.4x, respectively. The selected multiple ranges applied to the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations projected 2005 and
projected 2006 earnings statistics were 8.0x to 10.0x and 8.5 to
10.5x, respectively. The selected multiple ranges applied to the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations projected 2005 and
projected 2006 DCF statistics were 2.8x to 3.3x and 2.6 to 3.1x,
respectively. The selected multiple ranges applied to the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations proved reserve statistics were
$18.00 to $21.00 per BOE and $3.00 to $3.50 per Mcfe.
The selected multiple ranges applied to the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations daily production statistics were $30,000
to $42,000 per MBOE/d and $5,000 to $7,000 per
Mmcfe/d. For the proved reserves and daily production multiples,
an estimate of the value of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations non-proved reserves (including probable and
possible reserves and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
exploration portfolio) was added to the analysis. All of these
calculations were performed, and based on publicly available
financial data, including independent equity research analyst
estimates, and closing prices as of September 8, 2005, the
last trading date prior to the delivery of Lehman Brothers
opinion.
The comparable company methodology yielded valuations for
Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations that implied a
range of exchange ratios of 0.78 to 1.14.
Because of the inherent differences between the corporate
structure, businesses, operations, commodity mix and prospects
of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations and the
corporate structure, businesses, operations, commodity mix and
prospects of the selected comparable companies, Lehman Brothers
believed that it was inappropriate to, and therefore did not
rely solely on the quantitative results of the comparable
company analysis. Accordingly, Lehman Brothers also made
qualitative judgments concerning differences between the
financial and operating characteristics and prospects of Mariner
and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations and the companies
included in the comparable company analysis that would affect
the public trading values of each in order to provide a context
in which to consider the results of the quantitative analysis.
These qualitative judgments related primarily to the differing
sizes, growth prospects, profitability levels and degree of
operational risk between Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations and the companies included in the comparable company
analysis.
|
|
|
Comparable Transactions Analysis |
Lehman Brothers conducted a comparable transactions analysis to
assess how similar transactions were valued. In the case of
Mariner, Lehman Brothers reviewed certain publicly available
information on selected corporate level exploration and
production transactions it deemed comparable to the merger, in
whole or in part, which were announced from January 2001 to
September 2005. The transactions included, but were not limited
to:
|
|
|
|
|
Petrohawk Energy Corporation/ Mission Resources Corporation |
|
|
|
Cimarex Energy Company/ Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. |
|
|
|
Noble Energy Inc./ Patina Oil & Gas Corporation |
|
|
|
EnCana Corporation/ Tom Brown, Inc. |
|
|
|
Kerr-McGee Corporation/ Westport Resources Corporation |
For the corporate transactions analysis, for each comparable
transaction, relevant transaction multiples were analyzed
including the transaction value (equity purchase price plus
assumed obligations) divided by proved reserves and daily
production. The selected multiple ranges applied to
Mariners proved reserve statistic were $13.50 to
$16.50 per BOE and $2.25 to $2.75 per Mcfe. The
selected multiple ranges applied to Mariners daily
production multiple ranges were $45,000 to $57,000 per
MBOE/d and $7,500 to $9,500 per Mmcfe/d. For the proved
reserves and daily production multiples, an estimate of the
value of Mariners non-proved reserves (including probable
and possible reserves and Mariners exploration portfolio).
In the case of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, Lehman
Brothers reviewed certain publicly available information on
selected corporate level exploration and production transactions
it deemed comparable to the
58
merger, in whole or in part, which were announced from January
2001 to September 2005. The transactions included, but were not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
Cimarex Energy Company/ Magnum Hunter Resources, Inc. |
|
|
|
Noble Energy Inc./ Patina Oil & Gas Corporation |
|
|
|
EnCana Corporation/ Tom Brown, Inc. |
|
|
|
Kerr-McGee Corporation/ Westport Resources Corporation |
For the corporate transactions analysis for each company,
relevant transaction multiples were analyzed including the
corresponding transaction values (equity purchase price plus
assumed obligations) divided by proved reserves and daily
production. The selected multiple ranges applied to the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations proved reserve statistics were
$18.00 to $21.00 per BOE and $3.00 to $3.50 per Mcfe.
The selected multiple ranges applied to the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations daily production statistic were $30,000
to $36,000 per MBOE/d and $5,000 to $6,000 per
Mmcfe/d. For the proved reserves and daily production multiples,
an estimate of the value of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations non-proved reserves (including probable and
possible reserves and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
exploration portfolio).
The comparable transactions methodology yielded valuations for
Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations that implied a
range of exchange ratios of 0.80 to 1.32.
Because the market conditions, rationale and circumstances
surrounding each of the transactions analyzed were specific to
each transaction and because of the inherent differences between
the businesses, operations and prospects of Mariner and the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations and the acquired businesses
analyzed, Lehman Brothers believed that it was inappropriate to,
and therefore did not, rely solely on the quantitative results
of the analysis and, accordingly, also made qualitative
judgments concerning differences between the characteristics of
these transactions and the merger that could affect the
acquisition values of such acquired companies or companies to
which they are being compared.
Lehman Brothers analyzed the relative income statement
contribution of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
to the combined company based on 2005 and 2006 financial data as
projected by the managements of Mariner and Forest,
respectively. The contribution analysis treats all cash flow and
earnings the same regardless of capitalization, expected growth
rates, upside potential or risk profile.
This analysis indicated that Mariner will contribute
approximately 39.5% to 51.5% of the combined companys net
income and 35.8% to 44.6% of the combined companys DCF for
the periods analyzed. This analysis indicated that the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations will contribute approximately 48.5% to
60.5% of the combined companys net income and 55.4% to
64.2% of the combined companys DCF for the periods
analyzed.
|
|
|
Pro Forma Merger Consequences Analysis |
Lehman Brothers analyzed the pro forma impact of the merger on
Mariners projected 2005 and 2006 earnings per share and
DCF per share. Lehman Brothers prepared a pro forma merger model
which incorporated the financial projections of Mariner and the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations as provided by the managements
of Mariner and Forest, respectively. Lehman Brothers then
compared the earnings per share and DCF per share of Mariner on
a standalone basis to the earnings per share and DCF per share
of Mariner pro forma for the merger. Lehman Brothers noted that
the merger is expected to be dilutive to earnings per share and
accretive to DCF per share in 2005 and is expected to be
dilutive to both earnings and DCF per share in 2006.
59
Lehman Brothers is an internationally recognized investment
banking firm and, as part of its investment banking activities,
is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their
securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions,
negotiated underwritings, competitive bids, secondary
distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private
placements and valuations for corporate and other purposes.
Mariners board of directors selected Lehman Brothers
because of its expertise, reputation and familiarity with
Mariner and the energy industry generally and because its
investment banking professionals have substantial experience in
transactions comparable to the merger.
Pursuant to the terms of an engagement letter dated
August 9, 2005 between Lehman Brothers and Mariner, Mariner
paid Lehman Brothers a fee upon delivery of Lehman
Brothers opinion, dated September 9, 2005. Mariner
has also agreed to pay Lehman Brothers an additional fee at the
time of closing. Mariner also has agreed to reimburse Lehman
Brothers for its reasonable expenses incurred in connection with
this engagement, and to indemnify Lehman Brothers and certain
related persons against certain liabilities that may arise out
of its engagement by Mariner and the rendering of the Lehman
Brothers opinion. The estimated aggregate compensation
Lehman Brothers will receive in connection with the merger is
$3.0 million, of which $1.0 million was contingent on
the execution of a merger agreement and an additional
$1.25 million is contingent on the consummation of the
merger. Lehman Brothers in the past has rendered investment
banking services to Mariner and Forest and received customary
fees for such services. Lehman Brothers has provided no
financing advisory or other financing services to Mariner during
the past two years. In July 2004 Lehman Brothers participated as
an underwriter in a senior note offering of Forest. Lehman
Brothers aggregate compensation for the transaction was
$72,000.
During the course of its engagement, representatives of Lehman
Brothers participated in discussions with members of
Mariners senior management regarding the rationale for,
benefits of and risks and uncertainties relating to the merger.
Among the benefits discussed with senior management were the
economies of scale and the portfolio management opportunities
provided by the increases to proved reserves and undeveloped
acreage, the potential reduction in volatility related to
deepwater projects, and increased visibility in the capital
markets. Among the uncertainties discussed with senior
management were those related to current high commodity prices
and the possibility that probable and possible reserves of the
acquired operations may never be converted to proved developed
reserves.
In the ordinary course of its business, Lehman Brothers may
actively trade in the debt or equity securities of Mariner and
Forest for its own account and for the accounts of its customers
and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position
in such securities.
The Spin-Off
On September 12, 2005, Forest announced that Forest would
spin-off to its shareholders the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations, and that the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations would
immediately thereafter be acquired in a merger transaction by
Mariner. Forest is carrying out the spin-off to facilitate
Mariners acquisition of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations and the spin-off is a condition to the merger. After
the spin-off and merger, Mariner will be a separately traded
public company that will own and operate the combination of
Mariners business and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations.
As a result of the transaction, in addition to retaining all of
their shares of Forest common stock, Forest shareholders will
receive approximately 0.8 shares of Mariner common stock
for each share of Forest common stock owned on the record date
of the transaction. Forest shareholders will receive
approximately 58% of the common stock of Mariner on a pro forma
basis. Mariner has applied to list its common stock on the
New York Stock Exchange.
While Forest believes the spin-off will allow Forest
shareholders to benefit from the success and upside potential of
Mariner, there are risks that are described under Risks
Factors beginning on page 23 of this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement.
60
Forests board of directors has determined that the
spin-off of the Gulf of Mexico operations and the combination of
these operations with Mariner are advisable and in the best
interests of Forest and its shareholders, and has approved the
proposed transaction. Forest shareholders need not take any
action to participate in the spin-off or the merger
no vote of Forest shareholders is required in connection with
this transaction.
As of December 1, 2005, Forest has transferred and
contributed the assets and certain liabilities associated with
the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations to Forest Energy Resources
pursuant to the terms of the distribution agreement. The
distribution agreement is attached as Annex C to this proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement. See The
Distribution Agreement beginning on page 87.
Immediately prior to the merger, Forest will spin off Forest
Energy Resources by distributing all of the shares of Forest
Energy Resources common stock to Forest shareholders on a pro
rata basis. MEI Sub will then be merged with and into Forest
Energy Resources in accordance with the terms of the merger
agreement, with the result being that Forest Energy Resources
will become a wholly owned subsidiary of Mariner. The merger
agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement. See The Spin-Off and
Merger beginning on page 40 and The Merger
Agreement beginning on page 73.
The distribution of Forest Energy Resources common stock will
take the form of a special stock dividend to Forest shareholders
of record on the record date for the dividend. Forest
shareholders who are entitled to receive shares of Forest Energy
Resources will be mailed book-entry statements evidencing their
shares of Forest Energy Resources. Upon completion of the
merger, the exchange of Forest Energy Resources shares and
Mariner shares will be effected through book-entry (with cash
paid in lieu of any fractional shares held by holders of less
than one full Mariner share), without the exchange of physical
share certificates. Forest shareholders will not be required to
pay for the shares of Forest Energy Resources common stock that
they receive in the spin-off or the shares of Mariner common
stock that they receive in the merger. The distribution of the
Forest Energy Resources shares will not alter the number of
outstanding shares of Forest common stock, and Forest
shareholders should not send in their stock certificates
representing shares of Forest common stock.
Stock Exchange Listing
Mariner has applied to list its common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange.
Certificate of Incorporation and By-Laws
The proposed amendment to Mariners certificate of
incorporation is in the form attached as Annex E to this
proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement. Following the
merger, the certificate of incorporation and by-laws of Mariner
would differ from the current certificate of incorporation and
by-laws only with respect to the number of authorized shares of
stock, which pursuant to the proposed amendment would be
increased from 90 million to 200 million.
Material United States Federal Tax Consequences of the
Spin-Off and the Merger
The following discussion summarizes certain material
U.S. tax consequences of the spin-off to Forest and its
shareholders, and the merger to Mariner stockholders and to
stockholders of Forest Energy Resources at the effective time of
the merger. It is a condition to the completion of the spin-off
that Forest receive an opinion from Weil, Gotshal &
Manges LLP, tax counsel to Forest, to the effect that the
spin-off will generally qualify as a distribution that is
tax-free under Sections 355 and 368 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. The discussion below of the
Material U.S. Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off
represents the further opinion of Weil, Gotshal &
Manges LLP of the tax consequences of the spin-off that will
follow from the distribution qualifying as tax-free under
Sections 355 and Section 368 of the Internal Revenue
Code. It is a condition to the completion of the merger that
Forest and Forest Energy Resources receive an opinion from Weil,
Gotshal & Manges LLP, tax counsel to Forest and to
Forest Energy Resources, and that Mariner receive an opinion
from Baker Botts L.L.P., tax counsel to Mariner, in both cases
dated as of the effective date
61
of the merger, to the effect that the merger will qualify as a
reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code. The discussion below of the
Material U.S. Tax Consequences of the Merger
represents the further opinions of Weil, Gotshal &
Manges LLP and Baker Botts L.L.P. of the tax consequences of the
merger that will follow from the merger qualifying as a
reorganization under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue
Code.
This discussion is based upon existing U.S. tax law,
including legislation, regulations, administrative rulings and
court decisions, as in effect on the date of this proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement, all of which are
subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect.
For purposes of this discussion:
|
|
|
|
|
a U.S. holder is a beneficial owner of Forest,
Forest Energy Resources or Mariner common stock that is
(1) an individual citizen or resident of the U.S.,
(2) a corporation or any other entity taxable as a
corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the
U.S. or of a state of the U.S. or the District of
Columbia, (3) a trust (i) in respect of which a
U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over the
administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons
have the authority to control all substantive decisions of the
trust or (ii) that was in existence on August 20, 1996
and validly elected to continue to be treated as a domestic
trust, or (4) an estate that is subject to U.S. tax on
its worldwide income from all sources; |
|
|
|
a
non-U.S. holder
is any holder of Forest, Forest Energy Resources or Mariner
common stock other than a U.S. holder; and |
|
|
|
the term U.S. tax means U.S. federal
income tax under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. |
The discussion assumes that holders hold their Forest, Forest
Energy Resources or Mariner common stock, as applicable, as
capital assets. Other tax consequences may apply to holders who
are subject to special treatment under U.S. tax or
U.S. federal estate tax law, such as:
|
|
|
|
|
tax exempt organizations; |
|
|
|
financial institutions, insurance companies and broker-dealers; |
|
|
|
holders who hold their Forest, Forest Energy Resources or
Mariner common stock, as applicable, as part of a hedge,
straddle, wash sale, synthetic security, conversion transaction
or other integrated investment comprised of Forest, Forest
Energy Resources or Mariner common stock and one or more other
investments; |
|
|
|
mutual funds; |
|
|
|
holders that have a functional currency other than the
U.S. dollar; |
|
|
|
traders in securities who elect to apply a
mark-to-market method
of accounting; |
|
|
|
holders who acquired their shares in compensatory transactions; |
|
|
|
holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax; or |
|
|
|
non-U.S. holders
who are or have previously been engaged in the conduct of a
trade or business in the U.S. or who have ceased to be
U.S. citizens or to be taxed as resident aliens. |
In the case of a stockholder that is a partnership,
determinations as to tax consequences will generally be made at
the partner level, but other special considerations not
described may apply. The discussion is generally limited to
U.S. federal income and estate tax considerations and does
not address other U.S. federal tax considerations or state,
local or foreign tax considerations.
The opinions of counsel referred to above to be delivered at
closing will be, and the opinions of counsel set forth herein
are, based on present law, which is subject to change, possibly
with retroactive effect. In providing their opinions at the
closing of the spin-off and the merger, counsel will make
customary assumptions and rely
62
upon the accuracy of certain representations made to them by
Forest, Forest Energy Resources, and Mariner, in officers
certificates. In addition, counsel will rely upon the accuracy
of the information in this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement and in other documents filed by
Mariner and by Forest with the SEC and upon other information
provided to them by Mariner and Forest. Any change in present
law, or the failure of factual assumptions or representations to
be true, correct and complete in all respects, could affect the
continuing validity of counsels tax opinions. The
conditions to the completion of the spin-off and merger relating
to the receipt of the tax opinions may not be waived by Forest
or Mariner after receipt of the Mariner shareholder approval
unless further shareholder approval is obtained with appropriate
disclosure. If any condition relating to the receipt of a tax
opinion is waived, Mariner will recirculate a proxy statement/
prospectus and will resolicit proxies of the Mariner
stockholders if there is a material change in the tax
consequences of the spin-off or the merger. No ruling will be
requested from the Internal Revenue Service on any aspect of the
proposed transactions. An opinion of counsel represents
counsels best legal judgment and is not binding on the
Internal Revenue Service or any court. Accordingly, there can be
no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service will agree with
the conclusions set forth herein or in the opinion letters to be
delivered at closing, and it is possible that the Internal
Revenue Service or another tax authority could assert a position
contrary to one or all of those conclusions and that a court
could sustain that contrary position.
This summary is not a substitute for an individual analysis
of the tax consequences of the proposed transaction to a Forest,
Forest Energy Resources or Mariner stockholder. Each Forest,
Forest Energy Resources or Mariner stockholder is urged to
consult a tax adviser as to the U.S. tax consequences of
the proposed transactions, including any consequences arising
from the particular facts and circumstances of the Forest,
Forest Energy Resources or Mariner stockholder, and as to any
estate, gift, state, local or foreign tax consequences of the
proposed transaction.
|
|
|
Material U.S. Tax Consequences of the Spin-Off |
The spin-off is conditioned upon receipt by Forest of an opinion
from Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, to the effect that the
spin-off will generally qualify as a distribution that is
tax-free under Sections 355 and 368 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
is of the opinion that the U.S. federal income tax consequences
of such treatment will be that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Forest shareholder will not recognize any income, gain or loss
as a result of the spin-off; |
|
|
|
|
|
a Forest shareholders aggregate tax basis for his or her
Forest common stock on which Forest Energy Resources common
stock is distributed and the Forest Energy Resources common
stock received by such shareholder in the spin-off will be the
same as the tax basis of Forest common stock held by such
shareholder immediately prior to the spin-off. A Forest
shareholders aggregate tax basis will be allocated between
his or her Forest common stock and Forest Energy Resources
common stock received in the spin-off in proportion to the
relative fair market value of the Forest common stock and Forest
Energy Resources common stock on the spin-off date; |
|
|
|
|
|
a Forest shareholders holding period for the Forest Energy
Resources common stock received in the spin-off will include the
holding period of the Forest common stock on which the
distribution is made; and |
|
|
|
|
Forest will not recognize any income, gain or loss on the
spin-off, other than with respect to any excess loss
account or intercompany transaction required
to be taken into account by Forest under the Treasury
regulations relating to consolidated returns. It is also
possible that Forest may recognize income with respect to
certain cash received from Forest Energy Resources under the
distribution agreement. |
There are numerous requirements that must be satisfied in order
for the spin-off to be accorded tax-free treatment under the
Internal Revenue Code. If the spin-off were not to qualify as
tax-free under Sections 355 and 368 of the Internal Revenue
Code, Forest would be required to recognize gain equal to the
excess of the fair market value of the Forest Energy Resources
common stock distributed to its shareholders over Forests
tax basis in the Forest Energy Resources common stock.
Additionally, each Forest shareholder would be
63
treated as if such shareholder had received a distribution in an
amount equal to the fair market value of the Forest Energy
Resources common stock received, taxed as a dividend to the
extent of Forests current and accumulated earnings and
profits (including earnings and profits arising from the gain to
Forest described above) and then treated as a non-taxable return
of capital to the extent of the holders tax basis in the
Forest common stock and thereafter as capital gain from the sale
or exchange of Forest common stock. Under current law,
individual citizens or residents of the U.S. are subject to
U.S. federal income tax on dividends at a maximum rate of
15% (assuming holding period and other requirements are met) and
long-term capital gains (i.e., capital gains on assets held for
more than one year) at a maximum rate of 15%.
Even if the spin-off otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment
under Sections 355 and 368 of the Internal Revenue Code,
the distribution of Forest Energy Resources common stock to
Forest shareholders may be disqualified as tax-free to Forest
under Section 355(e) of the Internal Revenue Code if 50% or
more of the stock of Forest, Forest Energy Resources or Mariner
is acquired as part of a plan or series of related transactions
that include the spin-off. For purposes of this test, any
acquisitions of Forest stock or Forest Energy Resources stock
within two years before or after the spin-off, and any
acquisitions of Mariner stock within two years after the
spin-off, are presumed to be part of such a plan, although
Forest, Forest Energy Resources or Mariner may be able to rebut
that presumption. Also, for purposes of this test, the merger
will already be treated as resulting in a deemed acquisition by
Mariner stockholders of approximately 42% of Forest Energy
Resources common stock. Under U.S. Treasury Regulations,
certain safe harbors exist under which certain issuances of
shares of Mariner and Forest Energy Resources will not be deemed
part of the same plan as the spin-off. Among other safe harbors,
safe harbors exist for transactions if specific timing
conditions are met as to when agreements or substantial
negotiations relating to such transactions occur, and a safe
harbor exists for certain issuances pursuant to compensatory
employment-related arrangements. The process for determining
whether a change of ownership has occurred under the tax rules
is complex, inherently factual and subject to interpretation of
the facts and circumstances of a particular case. If an
acquisition of Forest stock, Forest Energy Resources stock or
Mariner stock results in the application of Section 355(e)
of the Internal Revenue Code, Forest would recognize taxable
gain as described in the preceding paragraph but the spin-off
would generally be tax-free to each Forest shareholder. Pursuant
to the tax sharing agreement, depending on the event, Forest may
have to indemnify Mariner, or Mariner may have to indemnify
Forest, for some or all of the taxes resulting from the
spin-off. See Ancillary Agreements Tax Sharing
Agreement beginning on page 90.
The tax sharing agreement entered into by Forest, Forest Energy
Resources and Mariner imposes ongoing restrictions on Forest,
Forest Energy Resources and Mariner to ensure that applicable
statutory requirements under the Internal Revenue Code and
applicable Treasury regulations continue to be met so that the
spin-off remains tax-free to Forest and its shareholders. As a
result of these restrictions, the ability of Mariner to engage
in certain transactions, such as the redemption of its common
stock, the issuance of equity securities and the utilization of
its stock as currency in an acquisition, will be limited for a
period of up to two years following the spin-off. These
restrictions may reduce the ability of Mariner under certain
circumstances to engage in certain business transactions that
otherwise might be advantageous to Mariner and its stockholders
and could have a negative impact on its business and stockholder
value. If the spin-off became taxable, Forest would be expected
to recognize a substantial amount of taxable income, which would
result in a material amount of taxes. Depending on the
circumstances, the tax sharing agreement allocates to Forest or
Mariner all, or a portion of, any tax liability resulting from
the spin-off being taxable. Any such taxes allocated to Mariner
would be expected to be material to Mariner. This proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement summarizes certain
effects of the tax sharing agreement on Mariner and Mariner
stockholders. See Ancillary Agreements Tax
Sharing Agreement beginning on page 90. Mariner
stockholders are encouraged to read the summary and the tax
sharing agreement in its entirety for a more complete discussion
of these tax matters.
Current Treasury regulations require each Forest shareholder who
receives Forest Energy Resources common stock pursuant to the
spin-off to attach to his or her federal income tax return for
the year in which the spin-off occurs a detailed statement
setting forth such data as may be appropriate in order to show
the
64
applicability of Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Forest will provide the appropriate information to each
shareholder of record as of the record date.
|
|
|
Material U.S. Tax Consequences of the Merger |
It is a condition to the consummation of the merger that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner receive an opinion from Baker Botts L.L.P., dated as of
the effective date of the merger, to the effect that the merger
will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code; and |
|
|
|
|
Forest and Forest Energy Resources receive an opinion from Weil,
Gotshal & Manges LLP, tax counsel to Forest, dated as
of the effective date of the merger, to the effect that the
merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code. |
Baker Botts L.L.P. is of the opinion that the U.S. federal
income tax consequences of such treatment will be that:
|
|
|
|
|
a Mariner stockholder will not recognize gain or loss pursuant
to the merger, and such holders tax basis and holding
period in Mariner common stock will not be affected by the
merger; |
Baker Botts L.L.P. and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
are of the opinion that the U.S. federal income tax consequences
of such treatment will be that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a Forest Energy Resources stockholder who exchanges Forest
Energy Resources common stock solely for Mariner common stock in
the merger will not recognize gain or loss except, as described
below, to the extent of any cash received in lieu of fractional
shares of Mariner common stock; |
|
|
|
|
|
the aggregate tax basis in the Mariner common stock a Forest
Energy Resources stockholder receives in the merger (including
any fractional shares for which cash is received) will be the
same as his or her aggregate tax basis in the Forest Energy
Resources common stock surrendered in the merger; |
|
|
|
|
|
the holding period of the Mariner common stock received in the
merger by a holder of Forest Energy Resources common stock
(including any fractional shares for which cash is received)
will include the holding period of Forest Energy Resources
common stock that such stockholder surrendered in the merger; and |
|
|
|
|
|
a Forest Energy Resources stockholder who receives fractional
share proceeds as a result of the sale of shares of Mariner
common stock by the transfer agent will be treated as if such
fractional share had been received by the shareholder as part of
the merger and then sold by such stockholder. Accordingly, such
stockholder will recognize capital gain or loss equal to the
difference between the cash so received and the portion of the
tax basis in Mariner common stock that is allocable to such
fractional share. Any such capital gain or loss will be treated
as a long-term or short-term capital gain or loss based on the
holders holding period for the Mariner common stock (as
determined above).
Non-U.S. holders
who receive fractional share proceeds may be subject to
withholding tax with respect to the fractional share proceeds
under special rules governing the disposition of interests in a
United States real property holding corporation. |
|
Under the Internal Revenue Code, a holder of Forest Energy
Resources common stock may be subject, under certain
circumstances, to backup withholding at a current rate of 28%
with respect to the amount of cash, if any, received as a result
of the sale of fractional share interests unless such holder
provides proof of an applicable exemption or correct taxpayer
identification number, and otherwise complies with applicable
requirements of the backup withholding rules. Any amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules are not additional
tax and may be refunded or credited against the holders
federal income tax liability, provided the required information
is timely furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
65
|
|
|
Material U.S. Federal Tax Consequences to
U.S. Holders of Holding and Disposing of Mariner Common
Stock |
|
|
|
Distributions on Common Stock |
A distribution to a U.S. holder on a Mariner share will be
(i) first, a dividend to the extent of Mariners
current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under
general U.S. tax principles, (ii) second, a
non-taxable recovery of basis in that Mariner share, causing a
reduction in the adjusted basis of the shares of Mariner common
stock to the extent thereof (thereby increasing the amount of
gain, or decreasing the amount of loss, to be recognized by the
holder on a subsequent disposition of our common stock), and
(iii) finally, an amount that is received in exchange for
the Mariner share. A dividend on a Mariner share that is
received by a U.S. holder generally before January 1,
2009 is subject to U.S. tax at a maximum rate of
15 percent provided that the stockholder satisfies certain
holding period and other requirements with respect to that
Mariner share. Any amount that is deemed to have been received
in exchange for a Mariner share will be taxed as a sale or
disposition of a Mariner share, discussed below.
|
|
|
Sales or Dispositions of Common Stock |
Upon a sale or other disposition of a Mariner share, a
U.S. holder generally will recognize gain or loss in an
amount that is equal to the difference between (i) the sum
of any cash and the fair market value of any other property
received and (ii) such U.S. holders adjusted
basis in such Mariner share. Any such gain or loss will
generally be a capital gain or loss if the Mariner share that is
surrendered was held as a capital asset and will be a long-term
capital gain or loss if the Mariner share had been held more
than one year when the sale or other disposition occurs.
Deduction of capital losses is subject to certain limitations
under the Internal Revenue Code.
|
|
|
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding |
Payments of dividends and the proceeds of a disposition of a
Mariner share that are made within the U.S. or through
certain U.S. related financial intermediaries may be
required to be reported to the Internal Revenue Service and may
be subject to backup withholding unless (i) the
U.S. holder is a corporation or other exempt recipient, or
(ii) such person provides a taxpayer identification number
or complies with applicable certification requirements. Amounts
withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a
refund or credit against a persons U.S. tax liability
if the required information is timely furnished to the Internal
Revenue Service.
Common stock owned or treated as owned by an individual who is a
U.S. holder for U.S. federal estate tax purposes at
the time of death will be included in the individuals
gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, and
therefore may be subject to U.S. federal estate tax.
|
|
|
Material U.S. Federal Tax Consequences to
Non-U.S. Holders
of Holding and Disposing of Mariner Common Stock |
|
|
|
Distributions on Common Stock |
A distribution to a
non-U.S. holder on
a Mariner share will be (i) first, a dividend to the extent
of Mariners current or accumulated earnings and profits,
as determined under general U.S. tax principles,
(ii) second, a non-taxable recovery of basis in that
Mariner share, causing a reduction in the adjusted basis of the
shares of common stock to the extent thereof (thereby increasing
the amount of gain, or decreasing the amount of loss, to be
recognized by the holder on a subsequent disposition of our
common stock), and (iii) finally, an amount that is
received in exchange for the Mariner share.
Dividends paid to
non-U.S. holders
that are not effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a U.S. trade or business will be subject to
U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate, or if a tax
treaty applies, a lower rate specified by the treaty.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their tax advisors regarding their
66
entitlement to benefits under a relevant income tax treaty.
Dividends that are effectively connected with a
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. and, if an income tax
treaty applies, are attributable to a permanent establishment in
the U.S., are taxed on a net income basis at the regular
graduated rates and in the manner applicable to
U.S. persons. In that case, Mariner will not have to
withhold U.S. federal withholding tax if the
non-U.S. holder
complies with applicable certification and disclosure
requirements. In addition, a branch profits tax may
be imposed at a 30% rate, or a lower rate under an applicable
income tax treaty, on dividends received by a foreign
corporation that are effectively connected with its conduct of a
trade or business in the U.S.
A non-U.S. holder
that claims the benefit of an applicable income tax treaty
generally will be required to satisfy applicable certification
and other requirements. However,
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of Mariner common stock held by a foreign
partnership, the certification requirement will generally be
applied to the partners of the partnership and the partnership
will be required to provide certain information; |
|
|
|
in the case of Mariner common stock held by a foreign trust, the
certification requirement will generally be applied to the trust
or the beneficial owners of the trust depending on whether the
trust is a foreign complex trust, foreign
simple trust or foreign grantor trust as
defined in the U.S. Treasury Regulations; and |
|
|
|
look-through rules will apply for tiered partnerships, foreign
simple trusts and foreign grantor trusts. |
A non-U.S. holder
that is a foreign partnership or a foreign trust is urged to
consult its own tax advisor regarding its status under these
U.S. Treasury Regulations and the certification
requirements applicable to it.
A non-U.S. holder
that is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal
withholding tax under an income tax treaty may obtain a refund
or credit of any excess amounts withheld by timely filing an
appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service.
|
|
|
Sales or Dispositions of Common Stock |
A non-U.S. holder
generally will not be subject to U.S. tax on gain
recognized on a disposition of a share of Mariner common stock
unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with the
non-U.S. holders
conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. and, if an income tax
treaty applies, is attributable to a permanent establishment
maintained by the
non-U.S. holder in
the U.S.; in these cases, the gain will be taxed on a net income
basis at the rates and in the manner applicable to
U.S. persons, and if the
non-U.S. holder is
a foreign corporation, the branch profits tax described above
may also apply; |
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder is
an individual who is present in the U.S. for 183 days
or more in the taxable year of the disposition and meets other
requirements; or |
|
|
|
Mariner is or has been a United States real property
holding corporation for U.S. tax purposes at any time
during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of
disposition or the period that the
non-U.S. holder
held such Mariner common stock. |
Generally, a corporation is a United States real property
holding corporation if the fair market value of its United
States real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of the sum
of the fair market value of its worldwide real property
interests and its other assets used or held for use in a trade
or business. The tax relating to stock in a United States real
property holding corporation generally will not apply to a
non-U.S. holder
whose holdings, direct and indirect, at all times during the
applicable period, constituted 5% or less of Mariner common
stock, provided that Mariner common stock was regularly traded
on an established securities market. Mariner believes that it
currently is, and after the merger will continue to be, a United
States real property holding corporation for U.S. tax
purposes. Mariner also expects its common stock to be regularly
traded on an established securities market immediately after the
completion of the merger.
67
|
|
|
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding |
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
may be subject to information reporting and U.S. backup
withholding. A
non-U.S. holder
will be exempt from this backup withholding tax if such
non-U.S. holder
properly provides a Form W-8BEN certifying that such
stockholder is a
non-U.S. holder or
otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for
establishing that such stockholder is a
non-U.S. holder or
otherwise qualifies for an exemption.
The gross proceeds from the disposition of Mariner common stock
may be subject to information reporting and backup withholding.
If a
non-U.S. holder
sells its common stock outside the U.S. through a
non-U.S. office of
a non-U.S. broker
and the sales proceeds are paid to such stockholder outside the
U.S., then the U.S. backup withholding and information
reporting requirements generally will not apply to that payment.
However, U.S. information reporting will generally apply to
a payment of sale proceeds, even if that payment is made outside
the U.S., if a
non-U.S. holder
sells Mariner common stock through a
non-U.S. office of
a broker that:
|
|
|
|
|
is a U.S. person for U.S. tax purposes; |
|
|
|
derives 50% or more of its gross income in specific periods from
the conduct of a trade or business in the U.S.; |
|
|
|
is a controlled foreign corporation for
U.S. tax purposes; or |
|
|
|
is a foreign partnership, if at any time during its tax year: |
|
|
|
|
|
one or more of its partners are U.S. persons who in the
aggregate hold more than 50% of the income or capital interests
in the partnership; or |
|
|
|
the foreign partnership is engaged in a U.S. trade or
business, |
unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that the
non-U.S. holder is
a non-U.S. person
and certain other conditions are met, or the
non-U.S. holder
otherwise establishes an exemption. In such circumstances,
backup withholding will not apply unless the broker has actual
knowledge that the seller is not a
non-U.S. holder.
If a
non-U.S. holder
receives payments of the proceeds of a sale of Mariner common
stock to or through a U.S. office of a broker, the payment
is subject to both U.S. backup withholding and information
reporting unless such
non-U.S. holder
properly provides a Form W-8BEN certifying that such
stockholder is a
non-U.S. person or
otherwise establishes an exemption.
A non-U.S. holder
generally may obtain a refund of any amounts withheld under the
backup withholding rules that exceed such stockholders
U.S. tax liability by timely filing a properly completed
claim for refund with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service.
Mariner common stock owned or treated as owned by an individual
who is a
non-U.S. holder
for U.S. federal estate tax purposes at the time of death
will be included in the individuals gross estate for
U.S. federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable
estate tax or other treaty provides otherwise, and therefore may
be subject to U.S. federal estate tax.
Mariner stockholders and Forest shareholders are urged to
consult their own tax advisors as to the specific tax
consequences to them of the spin-off and the merger, as
applicable, including tax return reporting requirements, the
applicability and effect of federal, state, local, and other
applicable tax laws and the effect of any proposed changes in
the tax laws.
Federal Securities Laws Consequences of the Merger
All shares of Mariner common stock received by Forest
shareholders in the merger will be freely transferable, except
that shares of Mariner common stock received by persons who are
deemed to be
68
affiliates of Forest Energy Resources under the
Securities Act may resell such stock only in transactions
permitted by Rule 145 under the Securities Act, or as
otherwise permitted under the Securities Act. Persons who may be
affiliates of Forest Energy Resources for those purposes
generally include individuals or entities that control, are
controlled by, or are under common control with Forest Energy
Resources, but would not include stockholders who are not
officers, directors or principal stockholders of Forest Energy
Resources.
The merger agreement requires Forest Energy Resources to use all
commercially reasonable efforts to cause each of its affiliates
to execute a written agreement, substantially in the form
attached as an exhibit to the merger agreement, to the effect
that such affiliate will not sell, assign, transfer or otherwise
dispose of any of the shares of Mariner common stock issued to
such affiliate in exchange for Forest Energy Resources common
stock in the merger except:
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to an effective registration statement under the
Securities Act; |
|
|
|
in conformity with the volume and other limitations of
Rule 145 promulgated under the Securities Act; or |
|
|
|
in a transaction which, in the opinion of independent counsel
reasonably satisfactory to Mariner or as described in a
no-action or interpretative letter from the Staff of
the SEC, is not required to be registered under the Securities
Act. |
Accounting Treatment
If the merger is consummated, the acquisition of Forest Energy
Resources by Mariner will be accounted for under the purchase
method of accounting under U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles, with Mariner treated as the acquiror. As
a result, the assets and liabilities of the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations will be recorded at their estimated fair
values at the date of merger with any excess of the purchase
price over the net amount of such fair values recorded as
goodwill.
Regulatory Matters
None of the parties is aware of any other material governmental
or regulatory approval required for the completion of the
merger, other than the effectiveness of the registration
statement of which this proxy statement/ prospectus-information
statement is a part and the effectiveness of Mariners
registration statement on
Form S-1 relating
to the
currently-outstanding
shares of Mariner common stock, and compliance with applicable
antitrust law (including the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act) and the
corporate law of the State of Delaware. On November 14,
2005, the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act with
respect to the merger expired.
Appraisal and Dissenters Rights
In accordance with the Delaware General Corporation Law, there
will be no appraisal rights or dissenters rights available
to holders of Mariner common stock in connection with the merger.
69
STRENGTHS AND STRATEGIES OF MARINER FOLLOWING THE MERGER
Following the merger we expect Mariner to be an independent oil
and gas exploration, development and production company focused
offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and onshore in the Permian Basin
of West Texas. On a pro forma basis as of December 31,
2004, the combined company had 577 Bcfe of estimated proved
reserves. Approximately 64% of these reserves were developed;
36% were undeveloped. Approximately 73% of our estimated proved
reserves were natural gas and natural gas liquids, and 27% were
oil and condensate. The reserves are geographically distributed
approximately 62% on the Gulf of Mexico shelf, 18% in the Gulf
of Mexico deepwater and 20% in the Permian Basin in West Texas.
As of December 31, 2004, the pro forma PV10 of the combined
company was approximately $1.9 billion, and the pro forma
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows
attributable to its estimated proved reserves was approximately
$1.4 billion. Please see Mariner
Estimated Proved Reserves and The Forest Gulf of
Mexico Operations Estimated Proved Reserves
for a definition of PV10 and reconciliations of PV10 to the
standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows.
Mariner is focused on the generation and development of new Gulf
of Mexico deepwater, deep shelf and shelf projects and the
development of its existing asset base in West Texas.
Historically, Mariner has achieved growth through the drill bit;
however, as part of our growth strategy, we also seek to acquire
assets that provide acceptable risk-adjusted rates of return and
have significant potential for further reserve additions through
development and exploitation activities.
We believe Mariners core resources and strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
our high-quality assets with geographic and geological diversity; |
|
|
|
our successful track record of finding and developing oil and
gas reserves; and |
|
|
|
our depth of operating experience. |
The integration and further development and exploitation of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations into our business will further
diversify and, in our view, complement our existing business,
provide additional resources for future growth beyond the
producing assets acquired, and afford a larger scale to increase
our ability to compete effectively. We expect the effectiveness
of our growth strategy to be enhanced by the addition of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico assets.
High-Quality Assets. We believe our asset base has
significant potential:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our deepwater projects have the potential to provide large
reserves, high production volumes and substantial cash flow.
Approximately 65 Bcfe of our undeveloped estimated proved
reserves as of December 31, 2004, are located in our
high-impact deepwater projects Swordfish, Pluto,
Rigel, Baccarat, and Daniel Boone. The Baccarat project
commenced production in July 2005 (although production was
shut-in due to Hurricane Rita and is expected to recommence in
the first quarter of 2006), and the Swordfish project commenced
production in October 2005. Notwithstanding delays caused
primarily by 2005 hurricane activity, we believe Pluto and Rigel
will commence production in the second quarter of 2006. Proved
undeveloped reserves attributable to those projects have been
recategorized as proved developed reserves. Daniel Boone is
currently scheduled for production in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
The Gulf of Mexico is an area that offers substantial growth
opportunities, and we expect to continue to generate shelf, deep
shelf and deepwater Gulf of Mexico prospects. The Forest Gulf of
Mexico assets will more than double our existing undeveloped
acreage position to approximately 465,000 net acres and
increase our total net leasehold acreage offshore to nearly
1 million acres, providing numerous exploration,
exploitation and development opportunities. We believe the
additional acreage also will provide increased exposure to
farm-out opportunities from other oil and gas operators. Our
team of geoscientists currently has access to seismic data from
multiple, recent vintage 3-D seismic databases covering
more than 6,600 blocks in the Gulf of Mexico that we intend
to continue to use to develop prospects on acreage being
evaluated for leasing and to develop and further refine
prospects on our expanded acreage position. The combination of
our undeveloped acreage position, inventory of |
70
|
|
|
|
|
development prospects, seismic data and technical knowledge
should enhance our ability to select projects with the greatest
return potential for future development. We will also gain
access to a significant infrastructure in the shelf that we
believe will provide substantial cost efficiencies to the
combined operations. |
|
|
|
|
Our West Texas assets provide stable cash flow and long-lived
reserves, with significant development opportunities. In West
Texas, during the three years ended December 31, 2004, we
drilled 105 wells, all commercially successful, added
approximately 76 Bcfe of estimated proved reserves, and
increased our average daily production by more than 400%. Our
52 Bcfe of undeveloped estimated proved reserves in West
Texas includes 162 locations. Our recent West Texas
acquisition adds to our asset base an approximate 35% working
interest in over 200 existing producing wells and, we
believe, will provide future infill development opportunities,
much like our Aldwell unit. This recent acquisition, in
conjunction with our existing West Texas acreage, gives Mariner
an inventory of multi-year development drilling opportunities. |
|
Successful Track Record of Finding and Developing Oil and Gas
Reserves. In the three-year period ended December 31,
2004, Mariner deployed approximately $337 million of
capital on acquisitions, exploration and development, while
adding approximately 191 Bcfe of proved reserves and
producing approximately 111 Bcfe. In addition to our
successful West Texas drilling program, in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2004, we have participated in the
drilling of 33 exploration wells in the Gulf of Mexico,
with 15 of these wells resulting in the discovery of commercial
oil and gas reserves.
Our technical professionals average more than 20 years of
experience in the exploration and production business, much of
it with major oil companies, including extensive experience in
the Gulf of Mexico. The addition of experienced Forest personnel
to Mariners team of geoscientists and technical and
operational professionals should further enhance our ability to
generate and maintain an inventory of high-quality drillable
prospects and to further develop and exploit our assets.
We seek to mitigate our risk in drilling projects by entering
into arrangements with industry partners in which they agree to
pay a disproportionate share of dry hole costs and compensate us
for expenses incurred in prospect generation. We intend to
continue our practice of sharing costs of offshore exploration
and development activities by selling interests in projects to
industry partners. From time to time, we may sell entire
interests in offshore prospects in order to better diversify our
portfolio. We also enter into trades or farm-in transactions
whereby we acquire interests in third-party generated prospects.
We expect more opportunities to participate in these prospects
as a result of the scale and increased cash flow the merger will
bring.
Depth of Operating Experience. Our engineers have
extensive experience in offshore Gulf of Mexico completion and
production techniques, both in the deepwater and on the shelf.
We have extensive experience and a successful track record in
the use of subsea tieback technology to connect offshore wells
to existing production facilities. This technology facilitates
production from offshore properties without the necessity of
fabrication and installation of more costly platforms and top
side facilities that typically require longer lead times. We
believe the use of subsea tiebacks in appropriate projects
enables us to bring production online more quickly, makes target
prospects more profitable, and allows us to exploit reserves
that may otherwise be considered non-commercial because of the
high cost of infrastructure. In the Gulf of Mexico, in the three
years ended December 31, 2004, we were directly involved in
thirteen projects (five of which we operated) utilizing subsea
tieback systems in water depths ranging from 475 feet to
more than 7,000 feet, and in five projects (three of which
we operated) developed through the use of platforms.
Mariner has proven to be an effective and efficient operator in
West Texas, as evidenced by our results there in recent years.
In addition to conducting a successful drilling program,
increasing our production and expanding our asset base, we have
improved our net operating margin by reducing our operating
costs and increasing our realized share of production.
71
We expect that our acquisition of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
assets and the scale it brings to our business will:
|
|
|
|
|
reduce our concentration risk; |
|
|
|
provide many exploration, exploitation and development
opportunities; |
|
|
|
enable us to increase the number of our internally-generated
prospects; |
|
|
|
expand our sphere of influence and enhance our ability to
participate in prospects generated by other operators; and |
|
|
|
add a significant cash flow generating resource that will
improve our ability to compete effectively in the Gulf of Mexico
and provide funding for acquisition projects. |
We believe we are well positioned to optimize the Forest Gulf of
Mexico assets through aggressive and timely exploitation. Our
diverse, high-quality assets, our ability to find and develop
oil and gas reserves, and our operating experience should
provide a strong platform from which to grow and create value
for our shareholders.
72
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms of the
merger agreement. This summary is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the merger agreement, a copy of which is attached
as Annex A to this proxy statement/ prospectus-information
statement and is incorporated by reference into this proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement. We urge you to read
the merger agreement in its entirety for a more complete
description of the terms and conditions of the merger.
The Merger
At the effective time of the merger, MEI Sub, a newly formed,
wholly owned subsidiary of Mariner, will merge with and into
Forest Energy Resources. Forest Energy Resources will remain as
the surviving corporation and immediately after the merger will
become a wholly owned subsidiary of Mariner.
|
|
|
Effective Time of the Merger |
The closing of the merger will occur within two business days
after the fulfillment or waiver of the conditions described
under Conditions to the Completion of the
Merger below, unless Forest Energy Resources and Mariner
agree in writing upon another time or date. The merger will
become effective upon the filing of a certificate of merger with
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware or at such later
time as the parties to the merger agreement may agree and as is
provided in the certificate of merger. The filing of the
certificate of merger will take place as soon as practicable at
or after the time of the closing of the merger.
The merger agreement provides that each share of Forest Energy
Resources common stock (other than certain shares described
under Cancellation of Certain Shares
below) that is outstanding immediately prior to the effective
time of the merger will, at the effective time of the merger, be
converted into the right to receive one share of Mariner common
stock as adjusted for any stock split, reverse stock split,
stock dividend, subdivision, reclassification, combination,
exchange, recapitalization or other similar transaction, except
that Forest Energy Resources shareholders who own less than one
share of Forest Energy Resources will receive cash in lieu of
such fractional share of Mariner common stock.
|
|
|
Cancellation of Certain Shares |
Each share of Forest Energy Resources common stock held by
Forest Energy Resources as treasury stock, and each share of
Forest Energy Resources common stock owned by Mariner or MEI
Sub, in each case immediately prior to the effective time of the
merger, will automatically be canceled and no stock or
consideration will be delivered in exchange therefor. Neither
Mariner nor MEI Sub currently owns any shares of Forest Energy
Resources common stock.
|
|
|
Procedure for Surrender of Certificates |
Shares of Forest Energy Resources common stock to be issued in
the spin-off will be issued in
book-entry form,
meaning that, although Forest shareholders will own the shares,
they will not be issued physical share certificates. Prior to
the effective time of the merger, an exchange agent will be
appointed to handle the exchange of Forest Energy Resources
stock certificates for Mariner stock certificates. As promptly
as practicable after the effective time of the merger, Mariner
will cause the exchange agent to effect the exchange, via
book-entry procedures,
of Forest Energy Resources shares for Mariner shares. Mariner
will not issue physical certificates for the shares of common
stock issued in the merger. After the merger becomes effective,
Forest Energy Resources will not register any further transfers
of shares of Forest Energy Resources common stock.
73
|
|
|
Treatment of Certain Forest Stock Options |
At the effective time of the merger, the portion of each
outstanding option to acquire Forest common stock that is
unexercisable as of the effective time and which is held by a
Forest Energy Resources employee who remains employed by Forest
Energy Resources, Mariner or their subsidiaries after the
effective time of the merger will be converted into an option to
acquire from Mariner a number of shares of Mariner common stock
determined by multiplying:
|
|
|
|
|
the number of shares of Forest common stock subject to the
portion of such option that is unexercisable immediately before
the effective time, by |
|
|
|
the option exchange ratio described below, |
and rounding to the nearest whole number. The purchase price per
share of Mariner common stock under the converted option will be
the exercise price per share under the original Forest stock
option divided by the option exchange ratio, with the resulting
price rounded to the nearest whole cent.
The option exchange ratio means the quotient,
rounded to the third decimal place, determined by dividing:
|
|
|
|
|
the average of the daily closing prices per share of Forest
common stock for the last five trading days immediately
preceding the effective time of the merger, by |
|
|
|
the average of the daily closing prices per share of Mariner
common stock for the first five trading days following the
effective time of the merger, |
subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of any stock
split, stock dividend or recapitalization after the date of the
merger agreement applicable to shares of Forest common stock or
Mariner common stock.
Mariner will take all actions necessary to reserve for issuance,
from and after the effective time of the merger, a sufficient
number of shares of Mariner common stock for delivery under the
Forest stock options that are deemed to constitute options to
purchase shares of Mariner common stock in accordance with the
preceding paragraphs, and, on or as soon as practicable after
the effective time of the merger, Mariner will file with the SEC
a registration statement with respect to such Mariner common
stock and cause such shares to be listed on the NYSE.
|
|
|
Board of Directors and Officers of Mariner |
The board of directors of Mariner immediately after the
effective time of the merger will consist of seven directors,
five of whom will be the directors of Mariner immediately before
the effective time of the merger and two of whom will be
mutually agreed upon by Mariner and Forest prior to the
effective time of the merger. The board of directors of Mariner
will also appoint committees as appropriate, including an audit
committee, a compensation committee and a nominating committee.
The officers of Mariner immediately prior to the effective time
of the merger will continue as the officers of Mariner
immediately after the effective time of the merger.
Representations and Warranties
The merger agreement contains certain representations and
warranties made by Forest and Forest Energy Resources jointly,
and by Mariner. These representations and warranties, which are
generally reciprocal unless otherwise stated below, relate to:
|
|
|
|
|
corporate existence, qualifications to conduct business and
corporate standing and power; |
|
|
|
corporate authorization, enforceability and actions by the board
of directors; |
|
|
|
capitalization; |
|
|
|
financial statements and undisclosed liabilities; |
|
|
|
absence of certain material changes or events since
June 30, 2005; |
74
|
|
|
|
|
governmental investigations and litigation; |
|
|
|
licenses and compliance with laws; |
|
|
|
the registration statements to be filed with the SEC and this
proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement; |
|
|
|
information supplied to governmental authorities; |
|
|
|
compliance with environmental laws; |
|
|
|
tax matters; |
|
|
|
benefit plans; |
|
|
|
labor matters; |
|
|
|
intellectual property matters; |
|
|
|
material contracts; |
|
|
|
financial advisor opinion (given only by Mariner); |
|
|
|
payment of brokers and finders fees in connection
with the merger agreement and other transaction agreements; |
|
|
|
takeover statutes (given only by Mariner); |
|
|
|
certain findings of the board of directors to approve the merger; |
|
|
|
stockholder votes necessary to complete the merger; |
|
|
|
|
absence of requirement for Forest stockholder approval (given
only by Forest); |
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Energy Resources stockholder approval (given only by
Forest Energy Resources); |
|
|
|
|
payments to certain affiliated individuals or entities; |
|
|
|
title to, and sufficiency of, assets; |
|
|
|
loans made to third parties; |
|
|
|
oil and gas reserves; and |
|
|
|
derivative transactions. |
Forest, on behalf of itself only, also makes representations and
warranties to Mariner with respect to its:
|
|
|
|
|
due organization and good standing; |
|
|
|
corporate power, authorization and validity of agreements; |
|
|
|
information supplied to governmental authorities; |
|
|
|
payment of brokers and finders fees in connection
with the merger agreement and other transaction
agreements; and |
|
|
|
rights plan. |
The parties acknowledge that the other parties to the merger
agreement do not make any express or implied representations or
warranties except as set forth in the merger agreement, the
distribution agreement or the ancillary agreements. The
representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement
do not survive the effective time of the merger.
75
Covenants
Forest Energy Resources, Forest and Mariner have each undertaken
certain covenants in the merger agreement. The following
summarizes the material covenants:
The merger agreement provides that Mariner will not, and will
not permit its directors and officers, and will use all
reasonable efforts to cause its employees, agents and
representatives not to:
|
|
|
|
|
solicit, initiate, encourage, facilitate or induce any inquiry,
proposal or offer with respect to an acquisition proposal; |
|
|
|
participate in any discussions or negotiations regarding,
provide nonpublic information with respect to, or otherwise
facilitate any acquisition proposal; |
|
|
|
engage in discussions with respect to an acquisition proposal; |
|
|
|
approve, endorse or recommend an acquisition proposal, except as
provided in the merger agreement; or |
|
|
|
enter into any agreement related to any acquisition proposal,
except as provided by the merger agreement. |
When we refer to an acquisition proposal, we mean
any inquiry, offer or proposal for a transaction or series of
related transactions involving any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
any purchase by any person, entity or group, as defined in
Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act, of more than 15% of the
total outstanding voting securities of Mariner; |
|
|
|
any tender or exchange offer that would result in any person,
entity or group, as defined in Section 13(d) of the
Exchange Act, owning 15% or more of the total outstanding voting
securities of Mariner; |
|
|
|
any merger, consolidation, business combination or similar
transaction involving Mariner; |
|
|
|
any sale, exchange, transfer, acquisition or disposition, or any
lease or license outside of the ordinary course of business, of
more than 15% of Mariners assets; or |
|
|
|
any liquidation of dissolution of Mariner. |
As of the date the merger agreement was executed, Mariner agreed
to immediately cease and terminate any existing discussions or
negotiations with respect to any acquisition proposal.
In the event that Mariner receives an acquisition proposal or
any request for nonpublic information or inquiry that it
reasonably believes could lead to an acquisition proposal,
Mariner agrees to:
|
|
|
|
|
notify Forest and Forest Energy Resources orally and in writing
of the material terms of the acquisition proposal, request or
inquiry; |
|
|
|
identify to Forest and Forest Energy Resources the person making
the acquisition proposal, request or inquiry; |
|
|
|
furnish to Forest and Forest Energy Resources copies of all
written materials provided in connection with the acquisition
proposal or inquiry; |
|
|
|
provide to Forest and Forest Energy Resources as promptly as
practicable, both orally and in writing, all information
reasonably necessary to keep Forest and Forest Energy Resources
informed in all material respects of the status and details of
the acquisition proposal, request or inquiry, including
providing copies of written materials received from and provided
to the third party making the acquisition proposal, request or
inquiry; and |
76
|
|
|
|
|
provide Forest and Forest Energy Resources 48 hours
prior notice (or such lesser notice as is provided to
Mariners directors) of any meeting of Mariners board
of directors at which it will consider an acquisition proposal,
unless shorter notice is provided to the board of directors, in
which case Forest and Forest Energy Resources are to be provided
the same notice. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Mariners board of directors
may provide nonpublic information to, and engage in negotiations
with, a third party in response to an unsolicited, bona fide
acquisition proposal with respect to Mariner, if:
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner has complied with all of its non-solicitation and
notification obligations in the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
in the good faith judgment of Mariners board of directors
(after receiving the advice of its legal counsel and financial
advisor), the acquisition proposal is a superior offer or is
reasonably likely to result in a superior offer; |
|
|
|
concurrently with furnishing any nonpublic information, Mariner
notifies Forest and Forest Energy Resources in writing of its
intention to furnish nonpublic information and furnishes the
same nonpublic information to Forest and Forest Energy Resources; |
|
|
|
concurrently with engaging in negotiations with the third party,
Mariner notifies Forest and Forest Energy Resources in writing
of its intent to enter into negotiations with the third
party; and |
|
|
|
Mariner executes a customary confidentiality agreement with the
third party with terms at least as restrictive as the
confidentiality agreement between Forest and Mariner. |
When we refer to a superior offer, we mean an
unsolicited bona fide written proposal made by a third party to
acquire, directly or indirectly, pursuant to a tender or
exchange offer, merger, consolidation or other business
combination, all or substantially all of the assets of Mariner
or substantially all of the total outstanding voting securities
of Mariner. The superior offer must be on terms that the Mariner
board of directors has in good faith concluded, after receiving
the advice of its legal counsel and financial adviser and taking
into account all legal, financial, regulatory and other aspects
of the offer and the third party offeror, to be more favorable,
from a financial point of view, to Mariners stockholders
than the terms of the merger and to be reasonably capable of
being consummated.
If Mariner receives a superior offer and that superior offer has
not been withdrawn, Mariners board of directors is
permitted to change its recommendation that the Mariner
stockholders approve the merger if:
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner stockholders have not already approved the merger and
the merger agreement; |
|
|
|
Mariner notifies Forest and Forest Energy Resources in writing: |
|
|
|
|
|
that it has received a superior offer; |
|
|
|
of the terms and conditions of the superior offer; |
|
|
|
of the identity of the third party making the superior
offer; and |
|
|
|
that it intends to change its recommendation that Mariner
stockholders approve the merger and the manner in which it
intends to do so; |
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner provides Forest and Forest Energy Resources with copies
of all written materials delivered by Mariner to the third party
making the superior offer that have not previously been provided
to Forest and Forest Energy Resources, and Mariner has otherwise
made available to Forest and Forest Energy Resources all
materials and information made available to the third
party; and |
|
|
|
Mariner has not breached any of the provisions of the merger
agreement relating to acquisition proposals and superior offers. |
Subject to complying with its fiduciary duties under applicable
law, Mariners obligation to call, give notice of, convene
and hold its stockholders meeting regarding approval of
the merger agreement will not be
77
limited or otherwise affected by the commencement, disclosure,
announcement or submission to it of any acquisition proposal
unless the merger agreement is terminated. Prior to termination
of the merger agreement, Mariner will not submit to the vote of
its stockholders any acquisition proposal other than the merger
or enter into any agreement, agreement in principle or letter of
intent with respect to, or accept any acquisition proposal other
than, the merger.
In addition, notwithstanding the foregoing, Mariner and its
board of directors may take a position, and disclose to its
stockholders that position, with respect to a tender or exchange
offer by a third party in compliance with
Rule 14d-9 or
Rule 14e-2(a) of
the Exchange Act to the extent required by applicable law. The
content of any document disclosing the position of the Mariner
board of directors to Mariner stockholders will be governed by
the provisions of the merger agreement. The Mariner board of
directors may not recommend that Mariner stockholders tender or
exchange their Mariner common stock unless the Mariner board of
directors determines in good faith, after receiving advice of
its legal counsel and financial adviser, that the acquisition
proposal is a superior offer.
|
|
|
Board of Directors Covenant to Call Stockholders
Meeting and to Recommend the Merger |
As promptly as practicable following the date of the merger
agreement and the effectiveness of the registration statements,
Mariner has agreed to call a meeting of its stockholders to be
held as promptly as practicable for the purpose of voting upon
the adoption of the merger agreement and any related matters,
and to submit the merger agreement will be submitted for
adoption to the stockholders of Mariner at such Mariner meeting.
The meeting to which this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement relates is intended to fulfill
this requirement. Mariner has agreed to cause the Mariner
meeting to be held and the vote taken within 60 days
following the effectiveness of Mariners registration
statement of which this proxy statement/ prospectus-information
statement is a part. Mariner will deliver to its stockholders
the proxy statement/ prospectus-information statement in
definitive form in connection with the Mariner meeting, at the
time and in the manner provided by, and will conduct the Mariner
meeting and the solicitation of proxies in connection with the
Mariner meeting in accordance with, the applicable provisions of
the law of the State of Delaware, the Exchange Act and
Mariners certificate of incorporation and by-laws. Subject
to the provisions described in No
Solicitation above, Mariners board of directors has
agreed to recommend that the stockholders of Mariner adopt the
merger agreement.
|
|
|
Operations of Forest (in respect of the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations), Forest Energy Resources and Mariner Pending
Closing |
Forest (in respect of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations),
Forest Energy Resources and Mariner have each undertaken that,
until the earlier of the effective time of the merger and the
termination of the merger agreement, each will conduct its
business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice
and use all commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact
its business organization, maintain its material rights and
franchises, keep available the services of its current officers
and key employees and preserve its relationships with material
third parties. Each has further agreed that it will not, except
as permitted by the distribution agreement or any ancillary
agreement or with the prior written consent of the other parties
(such consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed), do
any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
declare or pay any dividends on or make other distributions in
respect of its capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
split, combine or reclassify any of its capital stock or issue
or authorize or propose the issuance of any other securities in
respect of, in lieu of, or in substitution for, shares of its
capital stock; |
|
|
|
redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire (or permit any
subsidiary to redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire) any
shares of its capital stock; |
|
|
|
issue, deliver or sell any shares of, or securities convertible
into, its capital stock of any class, except, in the case of
Mariner, the issuance of stock options with three-year vesting
or restricted stock for up to 300,000 shares of Mariner
common stock; |
|
|
|
amend its governing documents; |
78
|
|
|
|
|
other than purchases from vendors or suppliers in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice, exercises of
preferential rights and, in the case of Mariner, certain
specified transactions, engage in acquisitions valued at more
than $25 million in the aggregate; |
|
|
|
other than product sales and other dispositions in connection
with normal equipment maintenance or salvage in the ordinary
course of business and consistent with past practice and
permitted liens, dispose of assets valued at more than
$10 million in the aggregate, except, in the case of
Mariner, transactions permitted as described under
No Solicitation above; |
|
|
|
|
incur or guarantee indebtedness, other than, in the case of
Forest Energy Resources, indebtedness incurred or guaranteed in
connection with the spin-off, or, in the case of Mariner, up to
$170 million pursuant to a new or amended credit agreement; |
|
|
|
|
fail to continue its capital expenditure program for exploration
and development or fail to perform, to the extent reasonably
practicable, all capital expenditures at an aggregate cost not
exceeding 120% of the aggregate costs set forth in the capital
expenditure program; |
|
|
|
make material changes to employment arrangements; |
|
|
|
fail to comply with any laws, ordinances or regulations or
permit to expire or terminate without renewal any license that
is necessary to the operation of the business, to the extent the
same would result in a material adverse effect; |
|
|
|
adopt a plan of complete or partial liquidation or dissolution; |
|
|
|
change its fiscal year or make any material change in its
methods of accounting except as required by the Financial
Accounting Standards Board or changes in generally accepted
accounting principles, or in response to comments made by the
SEC with respect to any registration statement; |
|
|
|
amend any agreement or arrangement with any affiliates
(including employees of Mariner and Forest Energy Resources) on
terms materially less favorable than could be reasonably
expected to have been obtained with an unaffiliated third party
on an arms-length basis; |
|
|
|
except in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice, modify, amend, terminate or renew any material
contract or waive, release or assign any material rights or
claims, in each case if the action would have a material adverse
effect or impair in any material respect the partys
ability to perform its obligations under the merger agreement
and other transaction agreements; |
|
|
|
waive any preferential rights; |
|
|
|
enter into any contract not in the ordinary course of business
involving total consideration of $2 million or more with a
term longer than one year, unless it can be terminated by it
without penalty upon no more than 30 days prior
notice; |
|
|
|
fail to maintain insurance in amounts and against risks and
losses as are customary for companies engaged in their
respective businesses, except, in the case of Mariner,
self-insurance with respect to operators extra expense
insurance, physical damage to wellsite real and personal
property insurance and business interruption insurance; |
|
|
|
make or rescind any material express or deemed election relating
to taxes unless the action will not materially and adversely
affect that party on a going-forward basis; |
|
|
|
settle or compromise any material claim or controversy relating
to taxes, except where the settlement or compromise will not
result in a material adverse effect on that party; |
|
|
|
amend any material tax returns; |
|
|
|
change in any material respect any of its methods of reporting
income or deductions for federal income tax purposes, except as
may be required by applicable law or except for changes that are
reasonably expected not to result in a material adverse effect
on that party; |
79
|
|
|
|
|
pay, discharge or satisfy any material claims, liabilities or
obligations, other than the payment, discharge or satisfaction,
in the ordinary course of business or, in the case of Mariner,
in accordance with their terms, of liabilities reflected or
reserved against in, or contemplated by, the most recent
consolidated financial statements or incurred in the ordinary
course of business; |
|
|
|
take or cause or permit to be taken any action that would
disqualify the spin-off under the distribution agreement from
constituting a tax-free spin-off or that would disqualify either
the merger or the contribution of assets from Forest to Forest
Energy Resources from constituting a tax-free reorganization; |
|
|
|
intentionally take or agree or commit to take any action that
would result in any of the conditions set forth in the merger
agreement not being satisfied at the effective time of the
merger; |
|
|
|
enter into any derivative transaction or any fixed price
commodity sales agreement with a term of more than
60 days; and |
|
|
|
agree or otherwise take any action inconsistent with the
foregoing. |
Mariner has also undertaken that it will cause MEI Sub not to
conduct any business operations, enter into any contract,
acquire any assets or incur any liabilities, and will use
reasonable commercial efforts to obtain the lender consent and
to enter into a new credit facility. Forest and Forest Energy
Resources have also undertaken not to form or propose to form a
new subsidiary of Forest Energy Resources.
Also, the parties agree to promptly advise the other parties
orally and in writing of any change or event having, or that,
insofar as can reasonably be foreseen, could have, either
individually or together with other changes or events, a
material adverse effect.
|
|
|
Commercially Reasonable Efforts, Further Assurances |
Forest, Forest Energy Resources, Mariner and MEI Sub have agreed
to use all commercially reasonable efforts to take, or cause to
be taken, all actions and to do, or cause to be done, all things
necessary under applicable laws and regulations to consummate
the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the
other transaction agreements. These actions include providing
information and obtaining all necessary exemptions, rulings,
consents, authorizations, approvals and waivers to effect all
necessary registrations and filings and to lift any injunction
or other legal bar to the merger and the other transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement and the other transaction
agreements as promptly as practicable, and taking all other
actions necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by
the merger agreement and the other transaction agreements in a
manner consistent with applicable law. Forest, Forest Energy
Resources, Mariner and MEI Sub also agreed to cooperate and to
use their respective commercially reasonable efforts to obtain
any government clearances required to consummate the merger and
to respond to any government requests for information.
Forest Energy Resources and Mariner agreed in the merger
agreement that Forest Energy Resources employees who remain
employed by Forest Energy Resources, Mariner or their
subsidiaries from and after the effective time of the merger:
|
|
|
|
|
will participate in Mariner benefit plans as of the effective
time of the merger on a basis no less favorable than that
applicable to similarly situated Mariner employees, and be
granted full credit for all purposes under such plans for prior
service with Forest and Forest Energy Resources and their
affiliates before the effective time of the merger (except to
the extent necessary to avoid duplication of benefits); |
|
|
|
will, if the effective time of the merger occurs in 2006,
receive vacation benefits for 2006 that are equal to the
employees accrued and unused vacation under Forests
vacation policy as of the effective time of the merger plus any
additional vacation entitlement the employee would have earned
under the terms of Mariners vacation policy; and |
80
|
|
|
|
|
will receive specified relocation benefits if, from the
effective time of the merger to the later of June 30, 2006
or six months after the effective time of the merger, Mariner or
a subsidiary of Mariner relocates the principal place of
employment of the employee by 50 miles or more from the
location of his or her principal place of employment immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger. |
In addition, Forest Energy Resources employees will, in lieu of
the payment of any annual bonuses for 2005 under annual
incentive and bonus plans maintained by Forest, be eligible to
receive potential retention benefits, paid in installments
commencing in October 2005 and ending in June 2006, in an
aggregate amount equal to 250% of the employees target
annual bonus for 2005 under the annual incentive or bonus plan
maintained by Forest and applicable to the employee.
If, during the period beginning on the effective time of the
merger and ending on the later of June 30, 2006, or the
date that is six months after the effective time of the merger,
a Forest Energy Resources employee (a) voluntarily
terminates his employment within 30 days after a reduction
in his base salary or base wages from that in effect immediately
prior to the effective time of the merger, (b) voluntarily
terminates his employment after being notified that the
principal place of his employment is changing to a location
50 miles or more from the location of his principal place
of employment immediately prior to the effective time of the
merger, or (c) is involuntarily terminated from employment
other than for cause, then Mariner shall pay specified severance
benefits to such employee, reduced, however, by the amount of
any retention benefits previously paid to such employee, and
provided that such employee executes a release and is not
subsequently re-hired by Forest or any subsidiary of Forest
during the six-month period after the effective time of the
merger.
Mariner will reimburse Forest for severance amounts paid to
employees of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations who are
terminated by Forest with Mariners consent prior to the
effective time of the merger, provided that any such employee is
not subsequently rehired by Forest or any Forest subsidiary
during the six month period following the effective time of the
merger.
After the effective time of the merger, Forest will transfer the
aggregate account balances of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations employees under Forests retirement savings plan
to Mariners comparable plan. Any loans under the plan will
be transferred as part of the balance transfers. All savings
plan investments in shares of Forest or Mariner common stock
will be converted to cash prior to transfer.
|
|
|
Directors and Officers Indemnification |
From and after the effective time of the merger, Forest Energy
Resources will indemnify any persons who are or were officers or
directors of Mariner prior to the effective time of the merger
for losses in connection with any action arising out of or
pertaining to acts or omissions, or alleged acts or omissions,
by them in their capacities as such, whether commenced, asserted
or claimed before or after the effective time of the merger.
Forest Energy Resources will maintain existing, or provide
comparable, directors and officers liability
insurance policies for a period of six years following the
effective time of the merger.
Additional Covenants
Each of Forest, Forest Energy Resources, Mariner and MEI Sub
will use all commercially reasonable efforts to defend against
all actions in which such party is named as a defendant that
challenge or otherwise seek to enjoin, restrain or prohibit the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or seek
damages with respect to such transactions.
Each party to the merger agreement will use its commercially
reasonable efforts to ensure that, following the effective time
of the merger, Mariner will establish a fiscal year ending on
December 31.
81
Forest, Forest Energy Resources, Mariner and MEI Sub intend that
the merger will qualify as a reorganization within the meaning
of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and the
parties have agreed to take the position for all tax purposes
that the merger so qualifies unless a contrary position is
required by a final determination within the meaning of
Section 1313 of the Internal Revenue Code. Forest, Forest
Energy Resources, Mariner and MEI Sub will each use their
respective commercially reasonable efforts to cause the merger
to qualify as a reorganization within the meaning of
Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, and will not
take actions, cause actions to be taken or fail to take actions
that are reasonably likely to prevent such result.
Mariner will obtain and maintain a letter of credit in favor of
Forest with an aggregate principal amount of $40.0 million
to secure Mariners performance of its obligations under an
existing drill-to-earn
program. The principal amount of the letter of credit will
decrease over time as Mariner drills more wells under the
program.
Conditions to the Completion of the Merger
The respective obligations of Forest, Mariner, MEI Sub and
Forest Energy Resources to complete the merger are subject to
the fulfillment, or the waiver by Forest and Mariner, of various
conditions which include, in addition other customary closing
conditions, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
completion of the spin-off in accordance with the distribution
agreement; |
|
|
|
obtaining all material consents, approvals and authorizations of
any governmental authority legally required for the consummation
of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the
other transaction agreements; |
|
|
|
the expiration or termination of any applicable waiting period
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act; |
|
|
|
the SEC having declared effective the registration statements of
Mariner relating to the shares of Mariner common stock to be
issued in connection with the merger; |
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange or
Nasdaq of the shares of Mariner common stock and such other
shares required to be reserved for issuance in connection with
the merger, subject to official notice of issuance; |
|
|
|
|
approval of the merger and adoption of the merger agreement by
the Mariner stockholders at the meeting; |
|
|
|
|
the absence of a final and non-appealable injunction or other
prohibition issued by a court or other governmental entity that
restrains, enjoins or prohibits the spin-off or the merger; |
|
|
|
there being no action by a governmental authority pending to
restrain, enjoin, prohibit or delay consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, or to impose
any material restrictions or requirements on the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement or on Forest Energy
Resources or Mariner with respect to the transactions; |
|
|
|
there being no action taken and no statute, rule, regulation or
executive order enacted, entered, promulgated or enforced by any
governmental authority with respect to the merger that,
individually or in the aggregate, would restrain, prohibit or
delay the consummation of the merger or impose material
restrictions or requirements on consummation of the merger or on
Forest Energy Resources or Mariner with respect to the
transactions; |
|
|
|
the performance by Forest, Forest Energy Resources and Mariner
in all material respects of their respective covenants and
agreements contained in the merger agreement and the
truthfulness and correctness of the representations and
warranties in the merger agreement in all respects, except in |
82
|
|
|
|
|
each case where the failure to be true and correct, individually
or in the aggregate, would not have a material adverse effect or
to the extent specifically contemplated or permitted by the
merger agreement; and |
|
|
|
Forest, Forest Energy Resources and Mariner having received an
opinion from their respective counsel to the effect that the
merger will be treated for federal income tax purposes as a
reorganization. |
Additionally, the obligation of Forest and Forest Energy
Resources to complete the merger is subject to the fulfillment
or waiver by Forest of the following additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest having received any consents required from its
bondholders; and |
|
|
|
|
Forest having received the consents required pursuant to its
credit facility. |
Additionally, the obligation of Mariner and MEI Sub to complete
the merger is subject to the fulfillment or waiver by Mariner of
the following additional conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner having received the consents required pursuant to its
credit facility; and |
|
|
|
Forest Energy Resources and/or Mariner having entered into a new
or amended credit facility with available borrowing capacity
sufficient to operate the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations and
Mariners business after the closing of the merger
transaction consistent with past practice. |
None of Forest, Forest Energy Resources or Mariner may rely on
the failure of any condition set forth in the merger agreement
to be satisfied if such failure was caused by such partys
failure to act in good faith or to use its commercially
reasonable efforts to consummate the merger and the other
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and the other
transaction agreements.
A material adverse effect is, with respect to any
person, any circumstance, change or effect that is or is
reasonably likely to be materially adverse to (i) the
business, operations, assets, liabilities, results of operations
or condition (financial or otherwise) of such person and its
subsidiaries, taken as a whole (which may include damage
attributable, both directly and indirectly, to Hurricane
Katrina), except for such effects on or changes in general
economic or capital market conditions and effects and changes
that generally affect the U.S. domestic oil and gas
exploration and production business, or (ii) the ability of
such person to perform its obligations under the merger
agreement or under the other transaction agreements, in each
case other than any such circumstance, change or effect that
relates to or results primarily from (x) the announcement,
pendency or consummation of the transactions contemplated by the
merger agreement or the other transaction agreements or
(y) acts of war, insurrection, sabotage or terrorism.
Damages attributable to Hurricane Katrina disclosed in the
damage reports of Mariner and Forest will not be taken into
account in determining whether a material adverse effect exists
or has occurred.
On November 14, 2005, the waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act expired. On October 19, 2005, Forest
received the consent required pursuant to its credit facility.
As of December 21, 2005 no other conditions to closing have
been satisfied. On December 16, 2005, Mariner received
clearance from the New York Stock Exchange to file a listing
application for its common stock, and on December 22, 2005
Mariner filed a listing application and other ancillary
documents with the New York Stock Exchange. Mariner is currently
negotiating the definitive documents for its new credit
facility, which documents also will grant the consent required
pursuant to its existing facility. Mariner and Forest are
actively working to obtain necessary consents, approvals and
authorizations from governmental authorities, including the
Minerals Management Service.
83
Based on its current valuation of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations and the current amount of distributions permitted by
the covenants contained in the indentures governing
Forests outstanding bonds, Forest believes that no
consents of its bondholders will be required for the spin-off
and the merger. If Forests belief that bondholder consents
are not necessary remains unchanged as the merger closing
approaches, it intends to waive conditions in the merger
agreement and distribution agreement related to such consents.
Neither Mariner nor Forest currently believes that any other
condition to closing is likely to be waived. Mariner and Forest
will recirculate revised proxy materials and resolicit proxies
if there are any material changes in the terms of the merger,
including those that result from waivers of conditions to
closing.
Termination of the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement may be terminated and the transactions
contemplated by the merger agreement may be abandoned at any
time prior to the effective time of the merger as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
by mutual written consent of the parties; |
|
|
|
by any party: |
|
|
|
|
|
if the effective time of the merger has not occurred on or
before March 31, 2006, except that a party may not
terminate the merger agreement if the cause of the merger not
being completed on or before such date resulted from the
partys failure to fulfill its obligations; |
|
|
|
if a court or other governmental entity issues a final and
non-appealable injunction or otherwise prohibits the merger and
the terminating party has used all commercially reasonable
efforts to remove such injunction or prohibition; or |
|
|
|
if the adoption of the merger agreement and the approval of the
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement by the Mariner
stockholders is not obtained, except that Mariner may not
terminate the merger agreement if the cause of the approval not
being obtained resulted from the action or failure to act of
Mariner and such action or failure to act constitutes a breach
by Mariner of the provisions of the merger agreement relating to
non-solicitation in any respect or a material breach by Mariner
of any of the other covenants or agreements contained in the
merger agreement; |
|
|
|
|
|
if either Forest or Forest Energy Resources fails to perform in
any material respect any of its respective covenants or
agreements contained in the merger agreement required to be
performed at or prior to the effective time of the merger, or
the respective representations and warranties of Forest or
Forest Energy Resources in the merger agreement are or will
become untrue in any respect at any time prior to the effective
time of the merger and the failure to be true and correct,
individually or in the aggregate, would have a material adverse
effect on the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations, Forest Energy
Resources or Mariner and has not been cured within 30 days
after written notice was given to Forest and Forest Energy
Resources of such failure or untruth; or |
|
|
|
if the board of directors of Mariner changes its recommendation
that Mariner stockholders approve the merger in order to accept
a superior offer, provided that: |
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner is not in breach of the provisions of the merger
agreement relating to non-solicitation or in material breach of
any other covenant or agreement contained in the merger
agreement, and has not breached any of its representations and
warranties contained in the merger agreement in any material
respect; |
|
|
|
Forest has not made an offer that is at least favorable as the
superior offer within three business days after Forest receives
written notice of the superior offer; |
84
|
|
|
|
|
the Mariner board of directors authorizes Mariner to enter into
a binding written agreement with respect to the superior offer
and notifies Forest and Forest Energy Resources of its intent to
do so and provides a copy of the most current version of the
agreement; and |
|
|
|
Mariner pays the termination fee and expense reimbursement; |
|
|
|
|
|
if Mariner fails to perform in any material respect any of its
covenants or agreements contained in the merger agreement
required to be performed at or prior to the effective time of
the merger, or the representations and warranties of Mariner in
the merger agreement are or will become untrue in any respect at
any time prior to the effective time of the merger and the
failure to be true and correct, individually or in the
aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on Mariner, the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations or Forest Energy Resources and
has not been cured within 30 days after written notice was
given to Mariner of such failure or untruth; or |
|
|
|
if the board of directors of Mariner (i) fails to reaffirm
publicly its approval of the merger, as soon as reasonably
practicable, and in no event within three business days after
Forests request, or resolves not to reaffirm the merger,
(ii) fails to include in this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement its recommendation, without
modification or qualification, that Mariner stockholders approve
the merger, (iii) withholds, withdraws, amends or modifies
its recommendation that Mariner stockholders approve the merger,
(iv) changes its recommendation that Mariner stockholders
approve the merger or (v) within ten business days after
commencement, fails to recommend against acceptance of any
tender or exchange offer for shares of Mariner common stock or
takes no position with respect to any tender or exchange offer. |
|
|
|
Termination Fees and Expenses |
If either Forest or Mariner terminates the merger agreement as a
result of:
|
|
|
|
|
the other partys failure to perform in any material
respect any of its covenants or agreements contained in the
merger agreement; or |
|
|
|
the representations and warranties of such other party in the
merger agreement being or becoming untrue; and |
|
|
|
the failure to be true and correct, individually or in the
aggregate, would have a material adverse effect on Forest Energy
Resources, the Mariner business or Mariner and has not been
cured within 30 days after written notice was given to such
party of such failure or untruth, |
the terminating party will be entitled to reimbursement of all
of its documented
out-of-pocket expenses
and fees incurred by such terminating party up to
$5 million in the aggregate.
In addition to the reimbursement of
out-of-pocket expenses
and fees, Mariner has agreed to pay Forest a termination fee of
$25 million, together with the expense reimbursement
described above, if:
|
|
|
|
|
(i) either Forest or Mariner terminates the merger
agreement as a result of the failure to obtain the requisite
stockholder approval from Mariner stockholders, (ii) either
Forest or Mariner terminates the merger agreement as a result of
the effective time of the merger not occurring on or before
March 31, 2006 or (iii) Forest terminates the merger
agreement as a result of the failure of Mariner to perform in
any material respect any of its covenants and agreements
contained in the merger agreement, plus an acquisition proposal
had been publicly announced prior to the termination and, within
twelve months of the date of termination, Mariner either
completes an acquisition proposal with a third party or enters
into an agreement or recommends approval of any acquisition
proposal that is subsequently completed (whether or not within
the twelve-month period); |
|
|
|
Forest terminates the merger agreement as a result of the board
of directors of Mariner (i) having failed to reaffirm
publicly its approval of the merger, as soon as reasonably
practicable, and in no event later than three business days,
after request by Forest, or having resolved not to reaffirm the
merger, |
85
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) having failed to include in this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement its recommendation, without
modification or qualification, that Mariner stockholders approve
the merger, (iii) having withheld, withdrawn, amended or
modified its recommendation that Mariner stockholders approve
the merger, (iv) having changed its recommendation that
Mariner stockholders approve the merger or (v) within ten
business days after commencement, having failed to recommend
against acceptance of any tender or exchange offer for shares of
Mariner common stock or takes no position with respect to any
such tender or exchange offer; or |
|
|
|
Mariner terminates the merger agreement as a result of the board
of directors of Mariner changing its recommendation that Mariner
stockholders approve the merger in order to permit Mariner to
accept a superior offer. |
Amendments and Waiver
Any provision of the merger agreement may, to the extent legally
allowed, be amended or waived at any time prior to the effective
time of the merger. However, if a provision of the merger
agreement is amended or waived after the Mariner stockholders
adopt the merger agreement, such amendment or waiver will be
subject to any necessary stockholder approval. Forest, Forest
Energy Resources, Mariner and MEI Sub must sign any amendments.
Any waiver must be signed by the party against whom the waiver
is to be effective. Mariner and Forest will recirculate revised
proxy materials and resolicit proxies if there are any material
changes in the terms of the merger, including those that result
from amendments or waivers.
86
THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material terms of the
distribution agreement. This summary is qualified in its
entirety by reference to the distribution agreement, a copy of
which is attached as Annex C to this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement and is incorporated by
reference into this proxy statement/ prospectus-information
statement. We urge you to read the distribution agreement in its
entirety for a more complete description of the terms and
conditions of the spin-off.
Summary of the Transactions
In connection with the merger, Forest has contributed the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations to Forest Energy Resources pursuant to
the terms and conditions of the distribution agreement
summarized below. Prior to the merger, Forest will spin-off
Forest Energy Resources by distributing all of the shares of
Forest Energy Resources common stock to Forest shareholders on a
pro rata basis.
Contribution of the Forest Gulf of Mexico Assets and
Assumption of Liabilities
Under the distribution agreement, Forest has taken or caused to
be taken all actions necessary to cause the transfer to Forest
Energy Resources of all of the ownership interest of Forest and
its subsidiaries in:
|
|
|
|
|
all real property interests, overriding royalty interests,
reversionary interests, real or immovable property (including
use and occupation rights, rights to pooled, communitized or
unitized acreage, and platforms, pipelines and improvements),
easements, inventory, hydrocarbons, equipment, personal or
movable property, spare parts, contracts, books and records,
proceeds, refunds, settlements, claims and current assets to the
extent comprising a part of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations; |
|
|
|
other assets of Forest and the subsidiaries of Forest to the
extent specifically assigned by Forest or any subsidiaries
pursuant to the distribution agreement; and |
|
|
|
all rights of Forest Energy Resources under the distribution
agreement and the other agreements entered into in connection
with the merger and the spin-off. |
Forest Energy Resources has assumed certain liabilities,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
all of the liabilities of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
to the extent arising after June 30, 2005 and attributable
to the conduct of the business after that date; |
|
|
|
legal obligations to plug, abandon, remove or retire platforms,
pipelines, improvements, equipment, personal or movable
property, fixtures and improvements comprising part of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico assets, to the extent the obligation was
previously disclosed to Mariner, arose after June 30, 2005
or was not known to Forest after due inquiry on the date of the
distribution agreement; |
|
|
|
environmental liabilities arising from the conduct of the Forest
Gulf of Mexico operations (subject to a monetary cap with
respect to specified conditions), unless such liability was
required to have been disclosed to Mariner prior to the
execution of the merger agreement and was not so
disclosed; and |
|
|
|
liabilities under specified derivatives contracts with an
estimated fair value of $50.8 million as of June 30,
2005. |
In connection with the spin-off, Forest Energy Resources will
also transfer a cash amount to Forest, which Forest will use to
reduce its indebtedness. The cash amount will equal
$200 million, plus or minus the following amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
minus revenue derived from the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
from June 30, 2005 through the date of the spin-off (which
period is referred to as the measurement period); |
|
|
|
minus cash consideration from any sale of property, plant and
equipment related to the Forest Gulf of Mexico assets during the
measurement period; |
|
|
|
plus certain net assets and liabilities specified on the date of
the distribution agreement; |
87
|
|
|
|
|
plus or minus the net gas balancing assets or liabilities of the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations as of June 30, 2005; |
|
|
|
plus or minus the net settlement amounts in respect of
settlements of gas imbalances effected during the measurement
period; |
|
|
|
plus capital and operating expenditures attributable to the
Forest Gulf of Mexico operations during the measurement period; |
|
|
|
plus an amount equal to hypothetical income taxes attributable
to the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations during the measurement
period; |
|
|
|
plus interest expense attributable to the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations during the measurement period; |
|
|
|
plus $1.6 million per month during the measurement period
in respect of general and administrative expenses; |
|
|
|
plus an amount, not to exceed $7 million, in respect of the
fees and expenses of Forest and Forest Energy Resources in
connection with the merger and related transactions; |
|
|
|
plus or minus an amount equal to the change in working capital
accounts (other than cash) of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations during the measurement period. |
To the extent that any transfers are not completed before the
spin-off, the parties will use their commercially reasonable
efforts to effect any remaining transfers as promptly as
practicable following the spin-off.
Spin-off
Before the merger, Forest will distribute
50,637,010 shares, which will represent all of the
then-outstanding shares of Forest Energy Resources common stock,
to Forests shareholders. As a result of the spin-off,
Forest Energy Resources will be a separate company that will own
and operate the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations.
Representations and Warranties
In the distribution agreement Forest represents to Mariner and
Forest Energy Resources that, at the time of the spin-off and on
June 30, 2005, the Forest Gulf of Mexico assets to be
contributed to Forest Energy Resources in connection with the
spin-off constitute all of Forests business and assets in
the offshore Gulf of Mexico, and that all such assets are owned
free and clear of all liens other than liens permitted under the
agreement.
Indemnification
Forest Energy Resources has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold
Forest and each of its affiliates and their representatives
harmless from and against all losses or liabilities arising out
of or related to any liabilities assumed by Forest Energy
Resources or from Forest Energy Resources failure to
perform its obligations under the distribution agreement.
Forest has agreed to indemnify, defend and hold Forest Energy
Resources and each of its affiliates and their representatives
harmless from and against all losses or liabilities arising out
of or related to the failure of Forest or any of its
subsidiaries:
|
|
|
|
|
to pay, among other things, any losses or liabilities of Forest
or its subsidiaries (including liabilities under the agreements
entered into in connection with the merger and the spin-off); |
|
|
|
to transfer to Forest Energy Resources or any of its
subsidiaries all of the assets to be transferred to Forest
Energy Resources; and |
|
|
|
to perform any of its obligations under the distribution
agreement. |
88
Forest has agreed that it will use commercially reasonable
efforts to assist Forest Energy Resources in asserting claims
relating to the assets transferred to Forest Energy Resources or
liabilities assumed by Forest Energy Resources under
Forests insurance policies, to the extent such claims are
based on events prior to the spin-off date or were commenced
prior to the spin-off date.
Conditions to the Spin-off
The obligations of Forest under the distribution agreement are
subject to the fulfillment (or waiver by Forest) at or prior to
the spin-off of a number of conditions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
obtaining all material consents, approvals and authorizations of
any governmental authority that are legally required for the
spin-off and other transactions contemplated by the other
agreements entered into in connection with the spin-off and the
merger; |
|
|
|
the absence of an injunction or other prohibition issued by a
court or other governmental entity that restrains, enjoins or
prohibits or otherwise imposes material restrictions on the
spin-off or the merger; |
|
|
|
the SEC having declared effective the registration statement of
Mariner relating to the shares of Mariner common stock to be
issued into which shares of Forest Energy Resources common stock
will be converted pursuant to the merger, of which this proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement forms a part; |
|
|
|
the approval for listing on the New York Stock Exchange or
Nasdaq of the Mariner common stock and the other shares required
to be reserved for issuance in connection with the merger,
subject to official notice of issuance; |
|
|
|
|
the adoption of the merger agreement by the Mariner stockholders
at the meeting; |
|
|
|
|
Forest having received an opinion from its tax counsel to the
effect that the contribution will constitute a reorganization
under Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and the
distribution will qualify under Section 355 of the Internal
Revenue Code; |
|
|
|
Forest having received the consents required from its
bondholders; |
|
|
|
the performance by Mariner in all material respects of its
covenants and agreements contained in the merger agreement
required to be performed at or prior to the date of the
spin-off; and |
|
|
|
the truthfulness and correctness of the representations and
warranties of Mariner in the merger agreement in all respects,
except as permitted by the merger agreement or where the failure
to be true and correct would not have a material adverse effect. |
Based on its current valuation of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations and the current amount of distributions permitted by
the covenants contained in the indentures governing
Forests outstanding bonds, Forest believes that no
consents of bondholders will be required for the spin-off and
the merger. If Forests belief that bondholder consents are
not necessary remains unchanged as the merger closing
approaches, it intends to waive conditions in the merger
agreement and distribution agreement related to such consents.
89
ANCILLARY AGREEMENTS
Forest and Forest Energy Resources have entered into agreements
that will govern the ongoing relationships among Mariner, Forest
Energy Resources and Forest and provide for an orderly
transition after the spin-off and the merger. These agreements
are summarized below.
Tax Sharing Agreement
In order to allocate the responsibilities for payment of taxes
and certain other tax matters, Forest, Mariner and Forest Energy
Resources have entered into a tax sharing agreement. The
following is a summary of the material terms of the tax sharing
agreement. This summary is qualified in its entirety by
reference to the tax sharing agreement, a copy of which is
attached as Annex D to this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement and which is filed as an
exhibit to this registration statement of which this proxy
statement/ prospectus-information statement is a part. We urge
you to read the tax sharing agreement in its entirety for a more
complete discussion of the tax matters.
|
|
|
Preparation and Filing of Tax Returns |
Forest will prepare and file all tax returns (including any tax
returns reporting the results of Forest Energy Resources) for
periods ending on or prior to the date of the distribution of
Forest Energy Resources to the shareholders of Forest, as well
as any consolidated or combined returns of Forest that include
Forest Energy Resources or the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations.
Mariner and Forest Energy Resources will be responsible for
filing all tax returns with respect to Forest Energy
Resources operations for all other periods.
Each party has agreed to indemnify the other in respect of all
taxes for which it is responsible under the tax sharing
agreement. Forest is responsible for all taxes for all periods
arising from the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations prior to the
time that the common stock of Forest Energy Resources is
distributed to the Forest shareholders and agrees to hold Forest
Energy Resources and Mariner harmless in respect of those taxes.
Forest is entitled to receive all refunds of previously paid
taxes arising from the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations during
such time. Forest remains responsible for all taxes related to
the businesses of Forest other than the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations and has agreed to indemnify Forest Energy Resources
and Mariner in respect of any liability for any of such taxes.
Forest Energy Resources and Mariner are responsible for all
taxes for all periods arising from the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations subsequent to the time that Forest Energy Resources
is distributed to the Forest shareholders and agree to hold
Forest harmless in respect of those taxes.
If the spin-off fails to qualify as a tax-free transaction
because of an action by Mariner (or one of its affiliates) that
was not contemplated or permitted by the transaction agreements,
Mariner and Forest Energy Resources agree to indemnify and hold
Forest harmless for any resulting tax liability (or for the
utilization of any tax attributes used to absorb any resulting
taxable gain). In all other circumstances, Forest is liable for
and agrees to indemnify and hold Forest Energy Resources and
Mariner harmless for any tax liability if the spin-off fails to
qualify as a tax-free transaction.
Forest, Mariner and Forest Energy Resources each agrees not to
take (and each agrees to cause its respective affiliates to
refrain from taking) any position on a tax return that will be
inconsistent with the treatment of the spin-off and the merger
as tax-free transactions under the applicable provisions of the
Internal Revenue Code. In addition, Forest, Forest Energy
Resources and Mariner each agrees that, during the two-year
period following the spin-off, it will not take or fail to take
(or permit any affiliate to take or fail to take) any action
which would cause the spin-off to fail to qualify as a tax-free
spin-off.
90
Moreover, Forest and Mariner each agrees that, during the
two-year period following the spin-off, prior to entering into
any agreement, or failing to take any action, that would result
in a more than immaterial possibility that the spin-off would be
treated as part of a plan pursuant to which one or more persons
acquire directly or indirectly Forest Energy Resources stock or
Forest stock representing a 50-percent or greater
interest within the meaning of Section 355(e)(4) of
the Internal Revenue Code, it will obtain:
|
|
|
|
|
a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service to the effect that
the action contemplated would not affect the tax-free status of
the spin-off, |
|
|
|
an opinion from a nationally recognized law firm both reasonably
acceptable to Forest and Mariner to the effect that the action
contemplated would not affect the tax-free status of the
spin-off, or |
|
|
|
the agreement of both Forest and Mariner that such contemplated
action would not affect the tax-free status of the spin-off. |
Actions which may be restricted by these requirements include an
issuance of shares of Mariner (or any instrument that is
convertible or exchangeable into Mariner shares) in an
acquisition or public or private offering. Under
U.S. Treasury Regulations, certain safe harbors exist under
which certain issuances of shares of Mariner will not be deemed
part of the same plan as the spin-off and thus not restricted.
Among other safe harbors, safe harbors exist for transactions if
specific timing conditions are met as to when agreements or
substantial negotiations relating to such transactions occur and
a safe harbor exists for certain issuances pursuant to
compensatory employment-related arrangements.
The tax sharing agreement also provides that Forest and Forest
Energy Resources will cooperate with each other and exchange
necessary information in connection with tax audits and
examinations and the tax sharing agreement contains provisions
entitling the appropriate party to control particular tax audits
and controversies.
Employee Benefits Agreement
Forest and Forest Energy Resources have entered into an employee
benefits agreement that provides for the transfer of the
employees of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations to Forest
Energy Resources, effective upon completion of the spin-off. The
employee benefits agreement is filed as an exhibit to this
registration statement of which this proxy statement/
prospectus-information statement is a part.
The employee benefits agreement also allocates the assets and
liabilities under certain existing Forest employee benefit plans
and other employment-related liabilities to Forest and Forest
Energy Resources, respectively. In general, at the time of the
spin-off, Forest Energy Resources will assume the liabilities
relating to the former employees of the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations arising after the date of the spin-off and other
specified liabilities, and Forest will retain the pre-spin-off
liabilities relating to the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
employees and all liabilities relating to its continuing
employees. The employee benefits agreement also:
|
|
|
|
|
sets forth the rights of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
employees under certain of the Forest plans in which they
previously participated, including with respect to the portion
of their stock options that are exercisable at the effective
time of the merger; and |
91
|
|
|
|
|
provides for the assumption by Forest Energy Resources of
certain liabilities of Forest relating to employees who are
transferred to Forest Energy Resources, including the assumption
of liabilities under Forests educational assistance plan
and accrued vacation liabilities. |
Pursuant to the employee benefits agreement, each of Forest
Energy Resources and Forest has agreed that, without the prior
consent of the other, it will not solicit employees of the other
party for two years following the spin-off date.
Transition Services Agreement
Forest and Forest Energy Resources have entered into a
transition services agreement under which Forest will provide
services to Forest Energy Resources on an as-needed basis for a
limited period of time after the merger.
92
FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS RELATING TO THE SPIN-OFF AND THE
MERGER
At the closing of the merger, Mariner and Mariner Energy
Resources expect to enter into a new $500 million senior
secured revolving credit facility, and Mariner also will obtain
a $40 million senior secured letter of credit facility. The
revolving credit facility will mature on the fourth anniversary
of the closing, and the letter of credit facility will mature on
the third anniversary of the closing. We may use the borrowings
under the revolving credit facility to retire existing debt, to
facilitate the merger and for general corporate purposes. The
letter of credit facility will be used to obtain a letter of
credit in favor of Forest to secure our performance of our
obligations under an existing
drill-to-earn program.
The outstanding principal balance of loans under the revolving
credit facility may not exceed the borrowing base, which
initially will be set at $400 million. The borrowing base
will be redetermined semi-annually by the lenders, subject to
reduction by Mariner. In addition, the agent and Mariner may
request one additional redetermination during the interval
between each scheduled redetermination, and the agent may
require redeterminations in connection with certain material
dispositions. If the borrowing base falls below the outstanding
balance under the revolving credit facility, we will be required
to prepay the deficit, pledge additional unencumbered collateral
or some combination of such prepayment and pledge.
Interest under the revolving credit facility will be determined
by reference to the following grid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable Margin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usage as a % |
|
LIBOR |
|
Reference |
|
Unused |
Borrowing Base |
|
Loans |
|
Rate Loans |
|
Fee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 50%
|
|
|
1.25% |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
0.375% |
|
51% to 75%
|
|
|
1.50% |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
0.375% |
|
76% to 90%
|
|
|
1.75% |
|
|
|
0.25% |
|
|
|
0.250% |
|
Greater than 90%
|
|
|
2.00% |
|
|
|
0.50% |
|
|
|
0.250% |
|
Interest will be payable quarterly for Union Bank of California
Reference Rate loans and at the applicable maturity date for
LIBOR (London interbank offered rate) loans. The fee for letters
of credit issued under the revolving credit facility will be the
LIBOR margin indicated in the grid, per annum. The fee for
letters of credit under the letter of credit facility will be
1.50% due quarterly in advance.
The obligations under the credit facilities will be secured by
first priority liens on substantially all of our real and
personal property, including our existing and after-acquired oil
and gas properties and related real property interests.
Additionally, the obligations under the credit facilities will
be guaranteed by us and each of our subsidiaries.
The credit facilities will contain various covenants that limit
our ability to do the following, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
incur certain indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
|
grant certain liens; |
|
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with another entity; |
|
|
|
|
|
sell unmortgaged property or other assets which generate
proceeds in excess of 10% of the borrowing base; |
|
|
|
|
|
sell assets comprising collateral pledged to the lenders; |
|
|
|
|
|
make certain loans and investments; |
|
|
|
|
|
enter new lines of business; and |
|
|
|
|
|
permit certain trade payables to exceed 90 days. |
|
93
The credit facilities also will contain covenants, which, among
other things, require us to maintain specified ratios or
conditions as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
consolidated current assets plus the unused borrowing base to
consolidated current liabilities of not less than 1.0 to
1.0; and |
|
|
|
|
|
total debt to EBITDA of not more than 2.5 to 1.0. |
|
If an event of default exists under the credit facilities, the
lenders will be able to accelerate the maturity of the credit
facilities and exercise other rights and remedies. Events of
default will include defaults in payment or performance under
the credit facilities, misrepresentations, cross-defaults to
other debt or material obligations, and insolvency, material
adverse judgments, change of control (including certain changes
in ownership and in the event Mr. Scott D. Josey ceases to
be involved in Mariners management, the failure to timely
replace him with someone with comparable qualifications) and any
material adverse change.
94
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information
and explanatory notes present how the combined financial
statements of Mariner and the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
may have appeared had the businesses actually been combined as
of September 30, 2005 (with respect to the balance sheet
information using currently available fair value information) or
as of January 1, 2004 (with respect to statements of
operations information). The unaudited pro forma combined
financial information shows the impact of the merger on the
historical financial position and results of operations under
the purchase method of accounting with Mariner treated as the
acquirer. Under this method of accounting, the assets and
liabilities of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations are recorded
by Mariner at their estimated fair values as of the date the
merger is completed.
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of
September 30, 2005 assumes the merger was completed on that
date. The unaudited pro forma combined statements of operations
gives effect to the merger as if it had been completed on
January 1, 2004. The merger agreement was executed on
September 9, 2005 and provides for Mariner to issue
approximately 50.6 million shares of common stock as
consideration to Forest Energy Resources common stockholders.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information has been
derived from and should be read together with the historical
consolidated financial statements of Mariner and the statements
of revenues and direct operating expenses of the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations, which are included herein. The statements of
revenues and direct operating expenses of the Forest Gulf of
Mexico operations do not include all of the costs of doing
business.
The Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed Financial Information
is for illustrative purposes only. The financial results may
have been different had the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations
been an independent company and had the companies always been
combined. You should not rely on the Unaudited Pro Forma
Combined Condensed Financial Information as being indicative of
the historical results that would have been achieved had the
merger occurred in the past or the future financial results that
Mariner will achieve after the merger.
In addition, the purchase price allocation is preliminary and
will be finalized following the closing of the merger. The final
purchase price allocation will be determined after closing based
on the actual fair value of current assets, current liabilities,
indebtedness, long-term liabilities, proven and unproven oil and
gas properties, identifiable intangible assets and the final
number of shares of Mariner common stock issued in the merger
and for unvested stock options that are outstanding at closing.
We are continuing to evaluate all of these items; accordingly,
the final purchase price may differ in material respects from
that presented in the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Condensed
Balance Sheet.
The combination of the Forest Gulf of Mexico operations with
Mariners is expected to cause the average reserve life of
Mariners oil and gas properties to decrease from current
levels and to result in a higher rate of depreciation,
depletion, and amortization for the combined operations. For
example, the estimated proved reserves of the Forest Gulf of
Mexico properties as of June 30, 2005 were 328 Bcfe and
production for the six months ended June 30, 2005 (prior to
hurricane related disruptions) was approximately 40.8 Bcfe, a
reserve life on an annualized basis of 4.0. This ratio is
indicative of the relatively higher productive rates of offshore
oil and gas properties when compared to most onshore fields.
While the higher productive rates generally result in a faster
return on investment than onshore fields, they also result in a
faster depletion of the underlying proved reserves and a
resulting higher rate of depreciation, depletion, and
amortization. As of June 30, 2005, Mariners proved
reserves totaled 328 Bcfe and production for the six months
ended June 30, 2005 (prior to hurricane disruptions) was
approximately 16.5 Bcfe, a reserve life on an annualized basis
of 9.9. For the combined operations, as of June 30, 2005,
proved reserves would have totaled approximately 599 Bcfe and
production for the six months ended June 30, 2005 would
have totaled 57.3 Bcfe, a reserve life on an annualized basis of
5.7. Mariner will also write-up the Forest Gulf of Mexico
operations to estimated fair value as of the merger date, which
is also expected to cause the underlying DD&A rate to
increase for the combined operations.
95
In connection with the merger, Mariner and Mariner Energy
Resources expect to enter into a $500 million senior
secured revolving credit facility, and Mariner also expects to
obtain a $40 million senior secured letter of credit
facility. The initial borrowing base of the revolving credit
facility will be $400 million. The revolving credit
facility will mature on the fourth anniversary of the closing
and may be used for general corporate purposes. The letter of
credit facility will mature on the third anniversary of the
closing.
In connection with the spin-off and the payment of the cash
amount by Forest Energy Resources to Forest pursuant to the
distribution agreement, Forest Energy Resources intends to enter
into a new senior term loan facility in an amount equal to the
lesser of the cash amount and $200 million. At Forest
Energy Resources election, interest will be determined by
reference to (1) the UBOC Reference Rate or (2) the London
interbank offered rate, or LIBOR, plus 1.50% per annum. In the
event that any portion of the facility is outstanding after
30 days, the interest rate will increase, at Forest Energy
Resources election, to (1) the UBOC Reference Rate, plus
5% per annum or (2) LIBOR + 6.50% per annum. Interest will
be payable at the applicable maturity date for LIBOR-loans and
quarterly for UBOC Reference Rate loans.
The Forest Energy Resources facility is expected to be repaid
with borrowings under Mariners and Mariner Energy
Resources $500 million revolving credit facility. The
facility will mature 90 days from closing and the principal
will be due at maturity. Prepayments will be permitted at any
time without premium or penalty (except for breakage and related
costs associated with prepayments of Eurodollar loans), subject
to minimum amount requirements. The facility will be unsecured
with a negative pledge on Forest Energy Resources existing
oil and gas properties and all other assets of Forest Energy
Resources.
The facility will contain various covenants that limit Forest
Energy Resources ability to do the following, among other
things, except as contemplated by the distribution agreement and
the merger agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
incur indebtedness; |
|
|
|
|
|
grant certain liens; |
|
|
|
|
|
merge or consolidate with another entity; |
|
|
|
|
|
sell assets except in the ordinary course of business; |
|
|
|
|
|
make certain loans and investments; |
|
|
|
|
|
change the ownership of Forest Energy Resources; and |
|
|
|
|
|
permit trade payables to exceed 90 days. |
|
If an event of default exists under the facility, the lender
will be able to accelerate the maturity of the facility and
exercise other rights and remedies. Events of default include
defaults in payment or performance under the facility,
misrepresentations, cross-defaults to other debt or material
obligations, and insolvency, material judgments, certain changes
of ownership, certain changes in management and any material
adverse change affecting Forest Energy Resources.
96
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariner | |
|
|
Mariner | |
|
Merger | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Adjustments(1) | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
ASSETS |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
4,564 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,564 |
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
50,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,259 |
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
30,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,480 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other
|
|
|
18,732 |
|
|
|
2,874 |
(2) |
|
|
21,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
104,035 |
|
|
|
2,874 |
|
|
|
106,909 |
|
Property and Equipment, net
|
|
|
393,258 |
|
|
|
1,463,846 |
(3) |
|
|
1,857,104 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,000 |
(3) |
|
|
142,000 |
|
Other Assets, net of amortization
|
|
|
4,916 |
|
|
|
7,597 |
(2) |
|
|
12,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
502,209 |
|
|
$ |
1,616,317 |
|
|
$ |
2,118,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
14,573 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14,573 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
88,993 |
|
|
|
32,491 |
(2) |
|
|
121,484 |
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
76,902 |
|
|
|
108,031 |
(2) |
|
|
184,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
180,609 |
|
|
|
140,522 |
|
|
|
321,131 |
|
Long-Term Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abandonment liability
|
|
|
26,314 |
|
|
|
116,203 |
(2) |
|
|
142,517 |
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
168,852 |
(4) |
|
|
175,320 |
|
|
Derivative liability
|
|
|
28,221 |
|
|
|
17,203 |
(2) |
|
|
45,424 |
|
|
Bank debt
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
(5) |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
Note payable
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
New debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
143,003 |
|
|
|
502,258 |
|
|
|
645,261 |
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
(6) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
171,667 |
|
|
|
973,532 |
(3) |
|
|
1,145,199 |
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
(14,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,548 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)
|
|
|
(67,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,708 |
) |
|
Accumulated retained earnings
|
|
|
89,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
178,597 |
|
|
|
973,537 |
|
|
|
1,152,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
502,209 |
|
|
$ |
1,616,317 |
|
|
$ |
2,118,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Energy | |
|
|
|
Mariner | |
|
|
Mariner | |
|
Resources, Inc. | |
|
Merger | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical(7) | |
|
Adjustments(1) | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & gas sales
|
|
$ |
148,492 |
|
|
$ |
326,722 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
475,214 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
151,245 |
|
|
|
326,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
477,967 |
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
20,170 |
|
|
|
59,379 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,549 |
|
|
Transportation expenses
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,726 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
43,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201,255 |
(8) |
|
|
244,712 |
|
|
Impairment of production equipment held for use
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
92,548 |
|
|
|
61,863 |
|
|
|
201,255 |
|
|
|
355,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
58,697 |
|
|
|
264,859 |
|
|
|
(201,255 |
) |
|
|
122,301 |
|
Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
Expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(5,416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,010 |
)(9) |
|
|
(13,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
53,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209,265 |
) |
|
|
109,571 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(18,414 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,936 |
)(10) |
|
|
(38,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
35,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229,201 |
) |
|
|
71,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per share basic
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per share diluted
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
32,438,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,637,010 |
|
|
|
83,075,250 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted
|
|
|
33,312,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,637,010 |
|
|
|
83,949,841 |
|
98
MARINER ENERGY, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forest Energy | |
|
|
|
Mariner | |
|
|
Mariner | |
|
Resources, Inc. | |
|
Merger | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Historical(7) | |
|
Adjustments(1) | |
|
Combined | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil & gas sales
|
|
$ |
214,187 |
|
|
$ |
453,139 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
667,326 |
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
214,187 |
|
|
|
453,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667,326 |
|
Costs and Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease operating expenses
|
|
|
25,484 |
|
|
|
81,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,111 |
|
|
Transportation expenses
|
|
|
3,029 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,204 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,772 |
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
|
64,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,261 |
(8) |
|
|
368,172 |
|
|
Impairment of production equipment held for use
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
103,153 |
|
|
|
83,802 |
|
|
|
303,261 |
|
|
|
490,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
111,034 |
|
|
|
369,337 |
|
|
|
(303,261 |
) |
|
|
177,110 |
|
Interest:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
Expense, net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
(6,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,840 |
)(9) |
|
|
(13,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes
|
|
|
105,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311,101 |
) |
|
|
163,536 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(36,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,383 |
)(10) |
|
|
(57,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
68,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331,484 |
) |
|
|
106,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income per share basic
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|