UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A

(Mark One)

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

NVR, Inc.

Virginia		54-1394360
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

11700 Plaza America Drive, Suite 500
Reston, Virginia 20190
(703) 956-4000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

(Not Applicable)

(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ       No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Large accelerated filer þ      Accelerated filer o      Non-accelerated filer o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o      No þ

As of October 20, 2006 there were 5,588,179 total shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

EXPLANATORY NOTE: This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A is filed for the purpose of amending Note 10 in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, which now includes expanded reportable segment footnote disclosure related to our homebuilding operations. This amendment has no impact on our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2005, or September 30, 2006, or our consolidated statements of income and related earnings per share amounts, consolidated statements of cash flows or consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. Conforming changes have been made to the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation in Part I, Item 2, and our Controls and Procedures discussion in Part I, Item 4 of this Form 10-Q/A. See Note 10 in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding this amendment. This Form 10-Q/A has not been updated for events or information subsequent to the date of the filing of the original Form 10-Q, except in connection with the foregoing.

NVR, Inc.
Form 10-Q
INDEX

				Page
PART I		FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.		NVR, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005			4
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and September 30, 2005 (unaudited) and the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and September 30, 2005 (unaudited)			6
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 (unaudited) and September 30, 2005 (unaudited)			7
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements			8
Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			19
Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			33
Item 4.		Controls and Procedures			33
PART II		OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.		Legal Proceedings			34
Item 1A.		Risk Factors			34
Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			34
Item 6.		Exhibits			35
		Signature			36
		Exhibit Index			37

PART I.		FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.		Financial Statements

NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

		September 30, 2006				December 31, 2005
		(unaudited)
ASSETS
Homebuilding:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	235,771			$	170,090
Receivables			16,762				40,562
Inventory:
Lots and housing units, covered under sales agreements with customers			912,111				723,657
Unsold lots and housing units			89,765				60,419
Manufacturing materials and other			9,263				9,899
			1,011,139				793,975
Assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R			262,534				275,306
Property, plant and equipment, net			36,985				31,096
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, net			41,580				41,580
Goodwill and indefinite life intangibles, net			11,686				11,686
Definite life intangibles, net			281				375
Contract land deposits, net			437,519				517,241
Other assets			201,167				142,851
			2,255,424				2,024,762
Mortgage Banking:
Cash and cash equivalents			2,834				7,436
Mortgage loans held for sale, net			203,443				193,932
Property and equipment, net			1,260				1,003
Reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets, net			7,347				7,347
Other assets			2,437				3,189
			217,321				212,907
Total assets		$	2,472,745			$	2,237,669

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

(Continued)

NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Continued)
(in thousands, except share and per share data)

		September 30, 2006				December 31, 2005
		(unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Homebuilding:
Accounts payable		$	281,082			$	262,086
Accrued expenses and other liabilities			262,072				276,702
Liabilities related to assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R			207,579				215,284
Obligations under incentive plans			39,669				60,555
Customer deposits			213,379				256,837
Other term debt			3,141				3,325
Senior notes			200,000				200,000
Notes payable			—				103,000
			1,206,922				1,377,789
Mortgage Banking:
Accounts payable and other liabilities			11,245				25,902
Note payable			168,062				156,816
			179,307				182,718
Total liabilities			1,386,229				1,560,507
Commitments and contingencies
Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 20,592,640 shares issued as of both September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005			206				206
Additional paid-in-capital			562,608				473,886
Deferred compensation trust – 547,238 and 547,697 shares as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, of NVR, Inc. common stock			(80,090	)			(76,303	)
Deferred compensation liability			80,090				76,303
Retained earnings			3,060,873				2,608,628
Less treasury stock at cost – 14,947,725 and 14,964,482 shares at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively			(2,537,171	)			(2,405,558	)
Total shareholders’ equity			1,086,516				677,162
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	2,472,745			$	2,237,669

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Homebuilding:
Revenues		$	1,528,964			$	1,350,465			$	4,435,503			$	3,546,965
Other income			3,238				1,224				8,248				4,157
Cost of sales			(1,238,671	)			(970,437	)			(3,403,893	)			(2,557,268	)
Selling, general and administrative			(95,574	)			(86,626	)			(329,131	)			(243,276	)
Operating income			197,957				294,626				710,727				750,578
Interest expense			(3,141	)			(2,905	)			(14,773	)			(8,835	)
Homebuilding income			194,816				291,721				695,954				741,743
Mortgage Banking:
Mortgage banking fees			24,447				22,557				71,491				57,178
Interest income			1,986				1,492				5,236				3,276
Other income			403				435				1,017				1,022
General and administrative			(8,847	)			(7,957	)			(27,867	)			(22,486	)
Interest expense			(698	)			(277	)			(2,619	)			(730	)
Mortgage banking income			17,291				16,250				47,258				38,260
Income before taxes			212,107				307,971				743,212				780,003
Income tax expense			(82,774	)			(118,528	)			(290,967	)			(304,981	)
Net income		$	129,333			$	189,443			$	452,245			$	475,022
Basic earnings per share		$	22.59			$	30.08			$	79.60			$	73.73
Diluted earnings per share		$	19.63			$	24.33			$	67.23			$	59.87
Basic average shares outstanding			5,725				6,298				5,682				6,443
Diluted average shares outstanding			6,588				7,787				6,727				7,934

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NVR, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)

		Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2006				2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income		$	452,245			$	475,022
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization			10,089				7,418
Contract land deposit impairments and write-offs			113,759				7,698
Stock option compensation expense			41,010				2,674
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options			(82,809	)			—
Mortgage loans closed			(1,925,389	)			(1,559,051	)
Proceeds from sales of mortgage loans			1,955,567				1,582,859
Principal payments on mortgage loans held for sale			12,751				12,636
Gain on sale of loans			(52,891	)			(41,484	)
Loss (Gain) on sale of fixed assets			6				(278	)
Net change in assets and liabilities:
Increase in inventories			(217,164	)			(324,228	)
Decrease (increase) in receivables			24,192				(4,885	)
Increase in contract land deposits			(29,605	)			(139,556	)
Increase in accounts payable, customer deposits and accrued expenses			29,901				292,372
Decrease in obligations under incentive plans			(20,886	)			(12,436	)
Other, net			(58,378	)			(11,190	)
Net cash provided by operating activities			252,398				287,571
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property, plant and equipment			(16,040	)			(10,072	)
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired			—				(7,465	)
Other, net			560				3,647
Net cash used in investing activities			(15,480	)			(13,890	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (repayments) borrowings under notes payable and other term debt			(91,938	)			103,245
Purchase of treasury stock			(183,286	)			(510,532	)
Excess income tax benefit from exercise of stock options			82,809				—
Proceeds from exercise of stock options			16,576				12,007
Net cash used by financing activities			(175,839	)			(395,280	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			61,079				(121,599	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period			177,526				367,365
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period		$	238,605			$	245,766
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid during the period		$	17,352			$	6,564
Income taxes paid, net of refunds		$	303,834			$	172,728
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash activities:
Net assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R		$	(5,067	)		$	9,859

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

1. Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited, condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NVR, Inc. (“NVR” or the “Company”) and its subsidiaries and certain other entities in which the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary (see note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements). Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. Because the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, they should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals except as otherwise noted herein) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006.

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

     For the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, comprehensive income equaled net income; therefore, a separate statement of comprehensive income is not included in the accompanying financial statements. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications have no impact on the net income or retained earnings previously reported.

2. Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

     In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Revised Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46R”), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which was effective for NVR as of March 31, 2004. FIN 46R requires the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity to consolidate that entity in its financial statements. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is the party that absorbs a majority of the variable interest entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual, or other financial interests in the entity. Expected losses are the expected negative variability in the fair value of an entity’s net assets, exclusive of its variable interests, and expected residual returns are the expected positive variability in the fair value of an entity’s net assets, exclusive of its variable interests. As discussed below, NVR evaluates the provisions of FIN 46R as it relates to NVR’s finished lot acquisition strategy.

     NVR does not engage in the land development business. Instead, the Company typically acquires finished building lots at market prices from various development entities under fixed price purchase agreements. The purchase agreements require deposits that may be forfeited if NVR fails to perform under the agreement. The deposits required under the purchase agreements are in the form of cash or letters of credit in varying amounts, and typically range up to 10% of the aggregate purchase price of the finished lots. As of September 30, 2006, the Company controlled approximately 98,000 lots with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $594,000 and $17,000, respectively.

     The Company believes that this lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and land development. NVR may, at its option, choose for any reason

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

and at any time not to perform under these purchase agreements by delivering notice of its intent not to acquire the finished lots under contract. NVR’s sole legal obligation and economic loss for failure to perform under these purchase agreements is limited to the amount of the deposit pursuant to the liquidating damage provisions contained within the purchase agreements. In other words, if NVR does not perform under a purchase agreement, NVR loses only its deposit. NVR does not have any financial or specific performance guarantees, or completion obligations, under these purchase agreements, with the exception of two specific performance contracts pursuant to which the Company is committed to purchasing approximately seven finished lots at an aggregate purchase price of approximately $130. None of the creditors of any of the development entities with which NVR enters fixed price purchase agreements have recourse to the general credit of NVR. Except as described below, NVR also does not share in an allocation of either the profit earned or loss incurred by any of these entities with which NVR enters fixed price purchase agreements.

     On a very limited basis, NVR also obtains finished lots using joint venture limited liability corporations (“LLC’s”). All LLC’s are structured such that NVR is a non-controlling member and is at risk only for the amount invested. NVR is not a borrower, guarantor or obligor on any of the LLC’s debt. NVR enters into a standard fixed price purchase agreement to purchase lots from the LLC’s.

     At September 30, 2006, NVR had an aggregate investment in twelve separate LLC’s totaling approximately $14,000, which controlled approximately 800 lots. NVR recognizes its share of the earnings of the LLC’s as an adjustment of the cost basis of the lots at the time that the lot and related home is settled with an external customer. During the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, NVR adjusted cost of sales by approximately $260 and $240, respectively, which represented NVR’s share of the earnings of the LLC’s.

     Forward contracts, such as the fixed price purchase agreements utilized by NVR to acquire finished lot inventory, are deemed to be “variable interests” under FIN 46R. Therefore, the development entities with which NVR enters fixed price purchase agreements, including the LLC’s, are examined under FIN 46R for possible consolidation by NVR of such development entities on NVR’s financial statements. NVR has developed a methodology to determine whether it, or conversely, the owner(s) of the applicable development entity is the primary beneficiary of a development entity. The methodology used to evaluate NVR’s primary beneficiary status requires substantial management judgment and estimation. These judgments and estimates involve assigning probabilities to various estimated cash flow possibilities relative to the development entity’s expected profits and losses and the cash flows associated with changes in the fair value of finished lots under contract. Although management believes that its accounting policy is designed to properly assess NVR’s primary beneficiary status relative to its involvement with the development entities from which NVR acquires finished lots, changes to the probabilities and the cash flow possibilities used in NVR’s evaluation could produce widely different conclusions regarding whether NVR is or is not a development entity’s primary beneficiary.

     The Company has evaluated all of its fixed price purchase agreements and LLC arrangements and has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of twenty-eight of those development entities with which the agreements and arrangements are held. As a result, at September 30, 2006, NVR has consolidated such development entities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. Where NVR deemed itself to be the primary beneficiary of a development entity created after December 31, 2003 and the development entity refused to provide financial statements to NVR, NVR utilized estimation techniques to perform the consolidation. The effect of the consolidation under FIN 46R at September 30, 2006 was the inclusion on the balance sheet of $262,534 as Assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R, with a corresponding inclusion of $207,579 as Liabilities related to assets not owned, consolidated per FIN 46R, after elimination of intercompany items. Inclusive in these totals were assets of approximately $25,000 and liabilities of approximately $20,000 estimated for five development entities created after December 31, 2003 that did not provide financial statements.

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

Following is the consolidating schedule at September 30, 2006:

		NVR, Inc.
		and				FIN 46R								Consolidated
		Subsidiaries				Entities				Eliminations				Total
ASSETS
Homebuilding:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	235,771			$	—			$	—			$	235,771
Receivables			16,762				—				—				16,762
Homebuilding inventory			1,011,139				—				—				1,011,139
Property, plant and equipment, net			36,985				—				—				36,985
Reorganization value in excess of amount allocable to identifiable assets, net			41,580				—				—				41,580
Goodwill and intangibles, net			11,967				—				—				11,967
Contract land deposits, net			483,457				—				(45,938	)			437,519
Other assets			210,184				—				(9,017	)			201,167
			2,047,845				—				(54,955	)			1,992,890
Mortgage banking assets:			217,321				—				—				217,321
FIN 46R Entities:
Land under development			—				258,801				—				258,801
Other assets			—				3,733				—				3,733
			—				262,534				—				262,534
Total assets		$	2,265,166			$	262,534			$	(54,955	)		$	2,472,745
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Homebuilding:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities		$	582,823			$	—			$	—			$	582,823
Customer deposits			213,379				—				—				213,379
Other term debt			3,141				—				—				3,141
Senior notes			200,000				—				—				200,000
			999,343				—				—				999,343
Mortgage banking liabilities:			179,307				—				—				179,307
FIN 46R Entities:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities			—				12,619				—				12,619
Debt			—				152,318				—				152,318
Contract land deposits			—				45,938				(45,938	)			—
Advances from NVR, Inc.			—				8,200				(8,200	)			—
Minority interest			—				—				42,642				42,642
			—				219,075				(11,496	)			207,579
Equity			1,086,516				43,459				(43,459	)			1,086,516
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	2,265,166			$	262,534			$	(54,955	)		$	2,472,745

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

     Under FIN 46R, an enterprise with an interest in a variable interest entity or potential variable interest entity created before December 31, 2003, is not required to apply FIN 46R to that entity if the enterprise, after making an “exhaustive effort”, is unable to obtain the information necessary to perform the accounting required to consolidate the variable interest entity for which it is determined to be the primary beneficiary. At September 30, 2006, NVR has been unable to obtain the information necessary to perform the accounting required to consolidate seven separate development entities created before December 31, 2003 for which NVR determined it was the primary beneficiary. NVR has made, or has committed to make, aggregate deposits, totaling approximately $8,200 to these seven separate development entities, with a total aggregate purchase price for the finished lots of approximately $69,000. The aggregate deposit made or committed to being made is NVR’s maximum exposure to loss. As noted above, because NVR does not have any contractual or ownership interests in the development entities with which it contracts to buy finished lots (other than the limited use of the LLC’s as discussed above), NVR does not have the ability to compel these development entities to provide financial or other data to NVR. Because NVR has no ownership rights in any of these seven development entities, the consolidation of such entities has no impact on NVR’s net income or earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006. Aggregate activity with respect to the seven development entities is included in the following table:

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Finished lots purchased — dollars		$	5,182			$	2,147			$	10,955			$	2,756
Finished lots purchased — units			24				25				76				39

3. Contract Land Deposits

     During the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006, the Company incurred pre-tax charges of approximately $80,800 and $114,000, respectively, related to the impairment of contract land deposits due to deteriorating market conditions in the homebuilding industry. These impairment charges were recorded in cost of sales on the accompanying condensed, consolidated statement of income. The contract land deposit asset is shown net of a $110,000 and $31,919 impairment valuation allowance at September 30, 2006, and December 31, 2005, respectively.

4. Stock-Based Compensation

     On January 1, 2006 (the “Effective Date”), the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123R, Share-Based Payment, which revised SFAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. Prior to fiscal year 2006 and the adoption of SFAS 123R, NVR followed the intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation arrangements as defined by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.

     SFAS 123R requires an entity to recognize an expense within its income statement for all share-based payment arrangements, which includes employee stock option plans. The expense is based on the grant-date fair value of the options granted, and is recognized ratably over the requisite service period. NVR adopted SFAS 123R under the modified prospective method. Under the modified prospective method, SFAS 123R applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required Effective Date, as well as to the unvested portion of awards outstanding as of the required Effective Date. The Company’s stock options are accounted for as equity awards.

     NVR’s option plans provide for the granting of stock options to certain key employees of the Company to purchase shares of common stock. The exercise price of options granted is equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Options are granted for a ten-year

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

term, and vest in separate tranches over periods of 7 to 9 years, depending upon the plan from which the shares were granted. For options granted prior to May 2005, vesting was predicated solely on continued employment over a long-term vesting schedule (“service-only” options). For options granted in May 2005 and thereafter, option vesting is contingent first on the Company achieving an aggregate four-year diluted earnings per share target, and if that target is met, then on continued employment over a five year period subsequent to the conclusion of the performance period (“performance condition” options). At September 30, 2006, there was an aggregate of 2,761,433 options outstanding, and an additional 261,058 options were available for grant, under existing stock option plans.

     The following table provides additional information relative to NVR’s stock option plans:

		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006
										Weighted
						Weighted				Average
						Average				Remaining				Aggregate
						Exercise				Contract Life				Intrinsic
		Options				Price				(Years)				Value
Stock Options
Outstanding at beginning of period			3,085,019			$	265.05				5.77
Granted			42,888				664.34
Exercised			(305,698	)			54.22
Forfeited or expired			(60,776	)			336.61
Outstanding at end of period			2,761,433			$	293.01				5.35			$	668,239
Exercisable at end of period			323,623			$	51.66				2.75			$	156,420

     To estimate the grant-date fair value of its stock options, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Black-Scholes model estimates the per share fair value of an option on its date of grant based on the following: the option’s exercise price; the price of the underlying stock on the date of grant; the estimated dividend yield; a “risk-free” interest rate; the estimated option term; and the expected volatility. For the “risk-free” interest rate, the Company uses a U.S. Treasury Strip due in a number of years equal to the option’s expected term. NVR has concluded that its historical exercise experience is the best estimate of future exercise patterns to determine an option’s expected term. To estimate expected volatility, NVR analyzed the historic volatility of its common stock. The estimated fair value of the options granted under SFAS 123R during the first nine months of 2006 was calculated using the following assumptions:

		Nine Months
		Ended
		September 30, 2006
Estimated option life		8.93 years
Risk free interest rate (range)			4.46% - 5.24	%
Expected volatility (range)			32.01% - 34.00	%
Expected dividend rate			0.00	%
Weighted average grant-date fair value per share of options granted		$	343.38

     Compensation cost for “service-only” option grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award (from the date of grant through the period of the last separately vesting portion of the grant). Compensation cost for “performance condition” option grants is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each vesting tranche of the award as if the award was, in substance, multiple awards (graded vesting attribution method). Of the 2,761,433 options outstanding at September 30, 2006, 2,334,795 vest solely based on a service condition, and 426,638 vest based on a combined performance and service condition. Compensation cost is recognized in the income statement in the same expense line as the cash compensation paid to the respective employees. SFAS 123R also requires the Company to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

related to stock-based compensation. NVR has concluded that its historical forfeiture rate is the best measure to estimate future forfeitures of granted stock options. The impact on compensation costs due to changes in the expected forfeiture rate will be recognized in the period that they become known.

     The effect of adopting SFAS 123R on the period ended September 30, 2006 is as follows:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30, 2006				September 30, 2006
Total pre-tax stock-based compensation		$	13,855			$	41,010
Total stock-based compensation, net of tax			9,365				27,516
Effect on basic earnings per share			(1.64	)			(4.84	)
Effect on diluted earnings per share			(1.42	)			(4.09	)

     As of September 30, 2006, the total unrecognized compensation cost for outstanding unvested stock option awards equals approximately $258,000, and the weighted-average period over which the unrecognized compensation will be recorded is equal to approximately 5.3 years.

     Because NVR adopted SFAS 123R using the modified prospective basis, the prior interim periods have not been restated. The following table sets forth the effect on net income and basic and diluted earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions for its stock-based compensation arrangements for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2005:

		Three Months				Nine Months
		Ended				Ended
		September 30, 2005				September 30, 2005
Net income, as reported		$	189,443			$	475,022
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects			1,626				1,626
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method, net of tax			(10,078	)			(22,296	)
Pro forma net income		$	180,991			$	454,352
Earnings per share:
Basic—as reported		$	30.08			$	73.73
Basic—pro forma		$	28.74			$	70.52
Diluted—as reported		$	24.33			$	59.87
Diluted—pro forma		$	23.52			$	58.06

     The Company settles option exercises by issuing shares of treasury stock to option holders. Shares are relieved from the treasury account based on the weighted average cost of treasury shares acquired. During the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2006, 21,061 and 305,698 options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock were exercised, respectively. Information with respect to the exercised options is as follows:

		Three Months				Nine Months
		Ended				Ended
		September 30, 2006				September 30, 2006
Aggregate exercise proceeds		$	1,944			$	16,576
Aggregate intrinsic value on exercise dates			8,451				208,003

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

     The Company has elected the alternative transition method pursuant to FASB Staff Position SFAS 123R-3 to establish the beginning balance of the additional paid-in capital pool available to absorb any future write-offs of deferred tax benefits associated with stock-based compensation.

5. Earnings per Share

     The following weighted average shares and share equivalents are used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding			5,725,000				6,298,000				5,682,000				6,443,000
Shares issuable upon exercise of dilutive options			863,000				1,489,000				1,045,000				1,491,000
Diluted average number of shares outstanding			6,588,000				7,787,000				6,727,000				7,934,000

     As discussed in note 4, NVR adopted SFAS 123R on the modified prospective basis. Prior period amounts have not been restated. Beginning in 2006 with the adoption of SFAS 123R, the assumed proceeds used in the treasury method for calculating NVR’s diluted earnings per share includes the amount the employee must pay upon exercise, the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized, and the amount of tax benefits that would be credited to additional paid-in capital assuming exercise of the option. Beginning in 2006, the assumed amount credited to additional paid-in capital equals the tax benefit from assumed exercise after consideration of the intrinsic value upon assumed exercise less the actual stock-based compensation expense to be recognized in the income statement in 2006 and future periods. During 2005 when the Company was still accounting for its stock-based compensation under APB 25, there was no compensation cost attributed to future services included in the assumed proceeds calculation, and the amount assumed to be credited to additional paid-in capital equaled the full assumed tax benefit resulting from the intrinsic value of the options upon the assumed exercise.

     “Service-only” options to purchase 237,146 and 120,852 shares of common stock during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, and 1,750 shares of common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2005, were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. There were no anti-dilutive options for the three-month period ended September 30, 2005. In addition, the 376,350 options outstanding under the 2005 Stock Option Plan, 9,055 options outstanding under the 1998 Directors’ Long-Term Stock Option Plan, 26,555 options outstanding under the 2000 Broadly-Based Stock Option Plan, and 14,678 options outstanding under the 1998 Management Long-Term Stock Option Plan are considered performance-based equity compensation, and accordingly, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the performance target has not been achieved as of September 30, 2006, pursuant to the requirements of SFAS 128, Earnings Per Share.

6. Excess Reorganization Value, Goodwill and Other Intangibles

     SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, requires goodwill and reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets (“excess reorganization value”) to be tested for impairment on an annual basis subsequent to the year of adoption. The Company completed the annual assessment of impairment during the first quarter of 2006, and as of September 30, 2006, management believes that goodwill, indefinite life intangibles, and excess reorganization value were not impaired.

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

7. Debt

     The Company increased its commitment under its existing revolving credit agreement by $45,000 and by $155,000 in the first and third quarters of 2006, respectively, increasing the total commitment to $600,000. There were no changes made to any other terms of the credit agreement.

     During the third quarter of 2006, NVR’s mortgage revolving warehouse credit facility (“Warehouse Credit Facility”) was amended, extending the expiration date to August 23, 2007 and decreasing the interest rate to LIBOR plus 1.00%. The Warehouse Credit Facility provides for borrowings up to $175,000, of which the Company had $168,062 outstanding at September 30, 2006. The other terms and conditions of the facility are materially the same as the previous Warehouse Credit Facility.

8. Shareholders’ Equity

     A summary of changes in shareholders’ equity is presented below:

						Additional												Deferred				Deferred
		Common				Paid-In				Retained				Treasury				Comp.				Comp.
		Stock				Capital				Earnings				Stock				Trust				Liability				Total
Balance, December 31, 2005		$	206			$	473,886			$	2,608,628			$	(2,405,558	)		$	(76,303	)		$	76,303			$	677,162
Net income			—				—				452,245				—				—				—				452,245
Deferred compensation activity			—				—				—				—				(3,787	)			3,787				—
Purchase of common stock for treasury			—				—				—				(183,286	)			—				—				(183,286	)
Stock-based compensation			—				41,010				—				—				—				—				41,010
Proceeds from exercises of stock options			—				16,576				—				—				—				—				16,576
Tax benefit from stock-based compensation activity			—				82,809				—				—				—				—				82,809
Treasury shares issued upon option exercise			—				(51,673	)			—				51,673				—				—				—
Balance, September 30, 2006		$	206			$	562,608			$	3,060,873			$	(2,537,171	)		$	(80,090	)		$	80,090			$	1,086,516

     The Company repurchased approximately 289,000 shares of its common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2006.

9. Product Warranties

     The Company establishes warranty and product liability reserves to provide for estimated future expenses as a result of construction and product defects, product recalls and litigation incidental to NVR’s homebuilding business. Liability estimates are determined based on management’s judgment, considering such factors as historical experience, the likely current cost of corrective action, manufacturers’ and subcontractors’ participation in sharing the cost of corrective action, consultations with third party experts such as engineers, and discussions with our general counsel and outside counsel retained to handle specific product liability cases. The following table reflects the changes in the Company’s warranty reserve during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Warranty reserve, beginning of period		$	65,265			$	42,470			$	60,112			$	42,319
Provision			13,802				19,515				39,127				38,662
Payments			(12,425	)			(12,555	)			(32,597	)			(31,551	)
Warranty reserve, end of period		$	66,642			$	49,430			$	66,642			$	49,430

10. Segment Disclosures

     Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, management determined that the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements should be amended to provide expanded disclosure of reportable segments pursuant to SFAS 131, Disclosures of Reportable Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The Company had historically aggregated its homebuilding operating activity into a single reportable segment. This amendment disaggregates the homebuilding single reportable segment presentation into four homebuilding reportable segments. This amendment has no impact on our consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, or our consolidated statements of income and related earnings per share amounts, consolidated statements of cash flows or consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005.

     Consistent with the principles and objectives of SFAS 131, the following disclosure includes four homebuilding reportable segments that aggregate geographically the Company’s homebuilding operating segments, and the mortgage banking operations presented as a single reportable segment. The homebuilding reportable segments are comprised of operating divisions in the following geographic areas:

     Homebuilding Mid Atlantic — Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Delaware
     Homebuilding North East — New Jersey, and eastern Pennsylvania
     Homebuilding Mid East — Kentucky, Michigan, New York, Ohio, and western Pennsylvania
     Homebuilding South East — North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee

     Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale of homes, less the cost of homes sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, and a corporate capital allocation charge determined at the corporate headquarters. The corporate capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation, is based on the segment’s average net assets employed, and is charged using a consistent methodology in the periods presented. The corporate capital allocation charged to the operating segment allows the Chief Operating Decision Maker to determine whether the operating segment’s results are providing the desired rate of return after covering the Company’s cost of capital. We record charges on contract land deposits when we determine that it is probable that recovery of the deposit is impaired. For segment reporting purposes, impairments on contract land deposits are charged to the operating segment upon the determination to terminate a finished lot purchase agreement with the developer. Mortgage banking profit before tax consists of revenues generated from mortgage financing, title insurance and closing services, less the costs of such services and general and administrative costs. Mortgage banking operations are not charged a capital allocation.

     In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments discussed above, the other reconciling items between homebuilding segment profit and homebuilding consolidated profit before tax include unallocated corporate overhead, consolidation adjustments, stock option compensation expense, and external corporate interest. NVR’s overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury, human resources, land acquisition, etc., are centrally performed and the costs of which are not allocated to the Company’s

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

operating segments. Consolidation adjustments consist of such items to convert the reportable segments’ results, which are predominantly maintained on a cash basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to the Company’s operating segments. Likewise, stock option compensation expenses are also not charged to the operating segments. External corporate interest expense is primarily comprised of interest charges on the Company’s outstanding Senior Notes and working capital line borrowings, and are not charged to the operating segments because the charges are included in the corporate capital allocation discussed above.

     Following are tables presenting revenues, segment profit and segment assets for each reportable segment, with reconciliations to the amounts reported for the consolidated enterprise, where applicable:

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Revenues:
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	931,526			$	825,992			$	2,825,914			$	2,222,318
Homebuilding North East			174,051				136,191				466,592				320,694
Homebuilding Mid East			258,097				263,147				702,406				667,827
Homebuilding South East			165,290				125,135				440,591				336,126
Mortgage Banking			24,447				22,557				71,491				57,178
Consolidated revenues		$	1,553,411			$	1,373,022			$	4,506,994			$	3,604,143
		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Profit:
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	162,824			$	226,954			$	610,308			$	596,327
Homebuilding North East			20,318				17,446				51,708				34,619
Homebuilding Mid East			22,137				27,190				52,233				63,808
Homebuilding South East			24,181				12,913				62,525				36,336
Mortgage Banking			18,157				16,442				49,850				38,452
Segment profit			247,617				300,945				826,624				769,542
Contract land deposit impairments			(48,559	)			(2,500	)			(77,808	)			(7,250	)
Stock option expense			(13,854	)			(2,674	)			(41,010	)			(2,674	)
Corporate capital allocation			49,116				39,551				139,344				105,047
Unallocated corporate overhead			(11,758	)			(23,457	)			(73,527	)			(74,053	)
Consolidation adjustments and other			(7,638	)			(1,008	)			(16,320	)			(2,190	)
Corporate interest expense			(2,817	)			(2,886	)			(14,091	)			(8,419	)
Reconciling items sub-total			(35,510	)			7,026				(83,412	)			10,461
Consolidated income before taxes		$	212,107			$	307,971			$	743,212			$	780,003

NVR, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(dollars in thousands except per share data)

		September 30,
		2006				2005
Assets:
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	1,157,135			$	1,029,741
Homebuilding North East			177,952				184,997
Homebuilding Mid East			200,222				191,182
Homebuilding South East			121,642				94,508
Mortgage Banking			209,974				152,484
Segment assets			1,866,925				1,652,912
Assets not owned, consolidated per Fin 46R			262,534				167,184
Cash			235,729				240,307
Deferred taxes			156,400				73,191
Intangible assets			60,894				59,912
Land reserve			(110,000	)			(29,219	)
Consolidation adjustments and other			263				22,608
Reconciling items sub-total			605,820				533,983
Consolidated assets		$	2,472,745			$	2,186,895

11. Legal Proceedings

     In 2006 and 2005, NVR received requests for information pursuant to Section 308(a) of the Clean Water Act (the “Act”) from Regions 3 and 4 of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”). The requests sought information regarding the Company’s storm water management discharge practices in North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia during the homebuilding construction process. NVR has provided the EPA with information in response to each of its requests. Additionally, in 2005, the EPA notified the Company of alleged storm water management violations under the Act at a homebuilding site in Pennsylvania, and that the Company may potentially be subject to administrative fines of up to $157 for the alleged violations. The Company has completed its building activity at the homebuilding site alleged to be in violation. NVR cannot predict the outcome of the EPA’s review of our storm water management practices. Further, it is not known at this time whether the EPA will seek to take legal action or impose penalties in connection with the alleged violation at the construction site in Pennsylvania.

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (dollars in thousands)

Forward-Looking Statements

     Some of the statements in this Form 10-Q, as well as statements made by NVR in periodic press releases and other public communications, constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Certain, but not necessarily all, of such forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “will,” “should,” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other variations thereof or comparable terminology, or by discussion of strategies, each of which involves risks and uncertainties. All statements other than those of historical facts included herein, including those regarding market trends, NVR’s financial position, business strategy, projected plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results or performance of NVR to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, general economic and business conditions (on both a national and regional level), interest rate changes, access to suitable financing, competition, the availability and cost of land and other raw materials used by NVR in its homebuilding operations, shortages of labor, weather related slow downs, building moratoria, governmental regulation, the ability of NVR to integrate any acquired business, fluctuation and volatility of stock and other financial markets and other factors over which NVR has little or no control. NVR has no obligation to update such forward-looking statements. For additional information regarding risk factors, see Part II, Item 1(a) of this Report.

     Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “NVR”, “we”, “us” or “our” include NVR and its subsidiaries.

Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

Overview

Our Business

     Our primary business is the construction and sale of single-family detached homes, townhomes and condominium buildings. To fully serve our homebuilding customers, we also operate a mortgage banking and title services business. Our homebuilding reportable segments consist of the following markets:

		Mid Atlantic:		Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia and Delaware
		North East:		Eastern Pennsylvania and New Jersey
		Mid East:		Kentucky, Michigan, New York, Ohio and western Pennsylvania
		South East:		North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee

     We believe that we operate our business with a conservative operating strategy. We do not engage in land development and primarily construct homes on a pre-sold basis. This strategy allows us to maximize inventory turnover, which we believe enables us to minimize market risk and to operate with less capital, thereby enhancing rates of return on equity and total capital. In addition, we focus on obtaining and maintaining a leading market position in each market we serve. This strategy allows us to gain valuable efficiencies and competitive advantages in our markets which management believes contributes to minimizing the adverse effects of regional economic cycles and provides growth opportunities within these markets.

     Because we are not active in the land development business, our continued success is contingent upon our ability to control an adequate supply of finished lots at current market prices on which to build, and on our developers’ ability to timely deliver finished lots to meet the sales demands of our customers. We acquire finished lots from various development entities under fixed price purchase agreements (“purchase agreements”). These purchase agreements require deposits in the form of cash or letters of credit that may be forfeited if we fail to perform under the purchase agreement. However, we believe this lot acquisition strategy reduces the financial requirements and risks associated with direct land ownership and development. As of September 30, 2006, we controlled approximately 98,000 lots with deposits in cash and letters of credit totaling approximately $594,000 and $17,000, respectively.

Current Overview

     The current home sales environment is characterized by an increase in the number of existing and new homes available for sale, higher mortgage interest rates (which are beginning to moderate to year ago levels), and declining homebuyer confidence. As a result of these market conditions, new orders for the third quarter of 2006 declined by 18% from the third quarter of 2005, with significant declines occurring in our Baltimore (Baltimore, MD metropolitan area and adjacent counties in Pennsylvania), and Washington (Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and adjacent counties in Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia) sub-markets, which declined 38% and 18%, respectively. Year to date new orders for 2006 have declined 8% from the same period in 2005. In addition to lower sales, the current market conditions are exerting downward pressure on selling prices, and in response, we have increased incentives to homebuyers and reduced prices in many of our markets. These selling price pressures resulted in our overall average selling price declining 9% in the third quarter of 2006 compared to the year ago quarter, negatively impacting gross profit margins in the current period. We expect that these reduced selling prices will further negatively impact gross profit margins in future periods. Additionally, our new order cancellation rate increased to 27% in the current quarter from 15% during the same period in 2005 and 13% in the second quarter of 2006. Increased cancellations led to a higher unsold inventory balance at September 30, 2006 of approximately $89,800, as compared to approximately $53,300 at September 30, 2005 and $60,400 at December 31, 2005.

     The Company is actively involved in implementing other strategic steps to address the currently challenging homebuilding market. In certain communities, we are seeking concessions from our developers to reduce lot purchase prices to current market values and/or to defer scheduled lot purchases. In communities where we are unsuccessful in negotiating necessary concessions, we may exit the community and forfeit our deposit. During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, we recorded a contract land deposit impairment charge of approximately $80,800, and for the year to date period we recorded contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $114,000. For the nine-month 2005 period, our contract land deposit impairments totaled $7,700. See note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information regarding contract land deposits.

     During the quarter we adjusted staffing levels to size our organization to meet the current expected level of sales activity, and we consolidated certain of our homebuilding profit centers. We plan to continue to assess our staffing levels and organizational structure as conditions warrant.

Current Financial Results

     For the quarter ended September 30, 2006, consolidated revenues increased 13% from the same period in 2005 due to higher settlement volume and a higher average settlement price per unit. However, net income and diluted earnings per share in the current quarter decreased 32% and 19%, respectively, as compared to the third quarter of 2005. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, consolidated revenues increased 25% from the same period in 2005. Net income decreased 5% over the same comparative periods, while diluted earnings per share increased 12% period over period as a result of our continuing share repurchase program.

     We implemented Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 123R in the first quarter of 2006, which resulted in a consolidated pre-tax charge of $41,010 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. See note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding stock based compensation.

Homebuilding Operations

     The following table summarizes the results of operations and other data for the consolidated homebuilding operations:

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Revenues		$	1,528,964			$	1,350,465			$	4,435,503			$	3,546,965
Cost of sales		$	1,238,671			$	970,437			$	3,403,893			$	2,557,268
Gross profit margin percentage			19.0	%			28.1	%			23.3	%			27.9	%
Selling, general and administrative		$	95,574			$	86,626			$	329,131			$	243,276
Settlements (units)			3,854				3,576				11,137				9,607
Average settlement price		$	396.3			$	377.5			$	397.7			$	368.5
New Orders (units)			2,378				2,897				10,215				11,038
Average new order price		$	362.5			$	399.3			$	380.6			$	403.8
Backlog (units)											7,388				8,875
Average backlog price										$	424.0			$	431.7

Consolidated Homebuilding — Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     Homebuilding revenues increased 13% for the third quarter of 2006 from the same period in 2005 as a result of an 8% increase in the number of units settled and a 5% increase in the average settlement price. The increase in units settled is attributable to a higher backlog turnover rate quarter over quarter.

     Gross profit margins in the third quarter of 2006 declined as compared to the third quarter of 2005 as a result of an increase in contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $78,000. These land deposit impairments negatively impacted gross profit margins by 529 basis points for the quarter. In addition, gross profit margins were negatively impacted by the downward pressure on selling prices experienced during 2006, resulting from higher selling incentives required to generate sales, and higher lot and certain commodity costs, excluding lumber. We expect continued gross profit margin pressure over at least the next several quarters due to the current market conditions.

     New orders for the third quarter of 2006 decreased 18% from the same period in 2005. The new order reduction was primarily a result of an increasingly competitive sales environment driven by affordability issues partially resulting from higher mortgage interest rates quarter over quarter, and higher levels of new and existing home inventory for sale as discussed in the Overview section above. Net new orders were also unfavorably impacted by an increase in our cancellation rate for the current quarter to 27% from 15% in the third quarter of 2005. The increase in the cancellation rate was driven by higher cancellations in our largest sub-markets, Washington and Baltimore. Cancellation rates in the Washington sub-market were 39% in the current quarter compared to 19% in the third quarter of 2005 and 21% in the second quarter of 2006. In the Baltimore sub-market the cancellation rate was 24% in the current quarter as compared to 11% and 14% in the third quarter of 2005 and the second quarter of 2006, respectively. The average sales price of new orders decreased 9% from the third quarter of 2005. The decline is a result of a 25% decline in average new order price in Washington, and to a lesser extent, to a shift in new orders into lower priced markets from our higher priced Washington and Baltimore sub-markets.

     Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses for the third quarter increased by approximately $8,900, but as a percentage of revenue remained consistent with the prior year at approximately 6.3%. The increase in SG&A expenses is primarily attributable to an increase in marketing costs and the

recording of compensation costs associated with the implementation of SFAS 123R in 2006, offset partially by lower management incentive compensation costs. Marketing costs increased approximately $4,900 due primarily to an 18% increase in the average number of active communities to 609 in the third quarter of 2006, from 518 for the same period in 2005. During the third quarter of 2006, we recognized approximately $12,500 in SG&A compensation costs related to outstanding stock options compared to approximately $2,400 in the third quarter of 2005 (see note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein for additional discussion). Management incentive compensation costs were $7,200 lower in the current quarter.

Consolidated Homebuilding — Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     Homebuilding revenues increased 25% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from the prior year due to a 16% increase in the number of units settled and an 8% increase in the average settlement price. The increase in the number of units settled is attributable to a 13% higher number of homes in backlog entering 2006 as compared to the same period in 2005. Additionally, we have experienced a higher backlog turnover rate year over year. The increase in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 12% higher average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over period.

     Gross profit margins in the first nine months of 2006 declined as compared to the first nine months of 2005 as a result of an increase in contract land deposit impairments of approximately $106,000 period over period. These land deposit impairments reduced gross profit margins by 256 basis points for the year to date period ended September 30, 2006. In addition, gross profit margins were negatively impacted by the downward pressure on selling prices experienced during 2006, resulting from higher selling incentives required to generate sales, and higher lot and certain commodity costs, excluding lumber. As previously discussed, we expect gross profit margins to continue to be negatively impacted by the current market conditions.

     New orders for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 decreased by 8% from the same period in 2005. New orders in Washington and Baltimore declined 20% and 19%, respectively, primarily as a result of an increasingly competitive sales environment driven by affordability issues partially resulting from higher mortgage interest rates year over year, and higher levels of new and existing home inventory for sale as discussed in the Overview. Net new orders were also unfavorably impacted by an increase in our cancellation rate to 18% in the first nine months of 2006 from 11% in the same period 2005. The average sales price of new orders decreased 6% as a result of a shift in new orders into lower priced markets in our North East, Mid East and South East markets, and an 11% decline in average new order price in the Washington sub-market.

     SG&A expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 increased approximately $85,900 as compared to the same period in 2005, and as a percentage of revenue increased to 7.4% from 6.9% for the respective periods. The increase in SG&A expenses is attributable to an increase in marketing costs of approximately $26,200 attributable to a 20% increase in the average number of active communities year over year and an approximate $12,900 increase in personnel costs due to higher average staffing levels year over year. We have reduced approximately 10% of our employee base in the first nine months of 2006, which will result in cost savings in the fourth quarter and future periods. Additionally, as a result of the implementation of SFAS 123R in 2006, we recognized approximately $37,000 in SG&A compensation costs related to outstanding stock options compared to approximately $2,400 for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 (see note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional discussion).

     Backlog units and dollars were 7,388 and $3,132,419, respectively, as of September 30, 2006 compared to 8,875 and $3,831,608 as of September 30, 2005. The decrease in backlog units is attributable to the aforementioned decrease in new orders coupled with an improved backlog turnover rate year over year. Backlog dollars are 18% lower primarily as a result of the 17% decrease in backlog units.

Reportable Segments

     Homebuilding profit before tax includes all revenues and income generated from the sale of homes, less the cost of homes sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, and a corporate capital allocation charge determined at the corporate headquarters. The corporate capital allocation charge eliminates in consolidation, is based on the segment’s average net assets employed, and is charged using a consistent methodology in the periods presented. The corporate capital allocation charged to the operating segment allows the Chief Operating Decision Maker to determine whether the operating segment’s results are providing the desired rate of return after covering the Company’s cost of capital. We record charges on contract land deposits when we determine that it is probable that recovery of the deposit is impaired. For segment reporting purposes, impairments on contract land deposits are charged to the operating segment upon the determination to terminate a finished lot purchase agreement with the developer.

     The following table summarizes certain homebuilding operating activity by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:

		Three Months Ended								Nine Months Ended
		September 30,								September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Mid Atlantic:
Revenues		$	931,526			$	825,992			$	2,825,914			$	2,222,318
Settlements (units)			1,791				1,691				5,511				4,718
Average settlement price		$	519.9			$	487.5			$	512.4			$	470.6
New orders (units)			1,128				1,487				4,740				5,633
Average new order price		$	438.0			$	501.3			$	488.8			$	522.2
Backlog (units)											4,203				5,297
Average backlog price										$	519.5			$	525.5
Gross margin		$	235,817			$	285,436			$	828,946			$	757,669
Gross profit margin percentage			25.32	%			34.56	%			29.33	%			34.09	%
Segment profit		$	162,824			$	226,954			$	610,308			$	596,327
North East:
Revenues		$	174,051			$	136,191			$	466,592			$	320,694
Settlements (units)			441				347				1,197				833
Average settlement price		$	394.6			$	391.4			$	389.8			$	384.9
New orders (units)			264				310				1,119				1,090
Average new order price		$	385.3			$	413.4			$	375.3			$	397.8
Backlog (units)											706				972
Average backlog price										$	383.3			$	391.0
Gross margin		$	34,475			$	30,280			$	93,992			$	67,458
Gross profit margin percentage			19.81	%			22.23	%			20.14	%			21.04	%
Segment profit		$	20,318			$	17,446			$	51,708			$	34,619
Mid East:
Revenues		$	258,097			$	263,147			$	702,406			$	667,827
Settlements (units)			966				946				2,606				2,417
Average settlement price		$	265.8			$	276.5			$	268.0			$	274.5
New orders (units)			482				609				2,489				2,524
Average new order price		$	266.2			$	283.7			$	268.4			$	276.7
Backlog (units)											1,484				1,568
Average backlog price										$	273.4			$	279.1
Gross margin		$	45,203			$	49,175			$	120,327			$	123,033
Gross profit margin percentage			17.51	%			18.69	%			17.13	%			18.42	%
Segment profit		$	22,137			$	27,190			$	52,233			$	63,808
South East:
Revenues		$	165,290			$	125,135			$	440,591			$	336,126
Settlements (units)			656				592				1,823				1,639
Average settlement price		$	252.0			$	216.3			$	241.7			$	205.1
New orders (units)			504				491				1,867				1,791
Average new order price		$	273.5			$	224.9			$	258.4			$	214.2
Backlog (units)											995				1,038
Average backlog price										$	274.0			$	222.0
Gross margin		$	36,917			$	24,566			$	97,948			$	66,688
Gross profit margin percentage			22.33	%			19.63	%			22.23	%			19.84	%
Segment profit		$	24,181			$	12,913			$	62,525			$	36,336

Mid Atlantic

Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $64,000 reduction in segment profit quarter over quarter. Revenues increased 13% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from the prior year quarter due to a 6% increase in the number of units settled and a 7% increase in the average settlement price. The increase in units settled is attributable to a higher backlog turnover rate quarter over quarter. The increase in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 4% higher average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over period. The Mid Atlantic segment’s gross profit margin percentage decreased to 25.3% in 2006 from 34.6% in 2005. Gross profit margins were negatively impacted by contract land deposit impairment charges of $29,000, the downward pressure on selling prices experienced during 2006, resulting from higher selling incentives required to generate sales, and higher lot and certain commodity costs, excluding lumber. Selling and marketing costs also increased approximately $4,800 due primarily to a 20% increase in the average number of active communities to 290 in the third quarter of 2006, from 242 for the same period in 2005.

     New orders for the third quarter of 2006 decreased 24% from the same period in 2005. New orders in the Baltimore and Washington sub-markets declined 38%, and 18%, respectively. The new order reduction was primarily a result of an increasingly competitive sales environment driven by affordability issues partially resulting from higher mortgage interest rates quarter over quarter, and higher levels of new and existing home inventory for sale as discussed above. The Mid Atlantic segment’s net new orders were also unfavorably impacted by an increase in our cancellation rate to 31% in 2006 from 15% in 2005. The segment’s overall average sales price of new orders decreased 13% from the third quarter of 2005, with the Washington sub-market declining 25%.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     The Mid Atlantic segment had an approximate $14,000 increase in segment profit period over period. Revenues increased 27% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from the prior year period on a 17% increase in the number of units settled and a 9% increase in the average settlement price. The increase in units settled is attributable to a 14% higher unit backlog at the beginning of the period and a higher backlog turnover rate period over period. The increase in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 15% higher average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over period. The segment’s gross profit margin percentage fell to 29.3% in 2006 from 34.1% in 2005. Gross profit margins were adversely affected by land impairment charges of approximately $33,000, the downward pressure on selling prices experienced during 2006, resulting from higher selling incentives required to generate sales, and higher lot and certain commodity costs, excluding lumber. Selling and marketing costs also increased approximately $24,000 due primarily to a 23% increase in the average number of active communities open for sale to 280 in the 2006 nine month period, from 228 for the same period in 2005. Backlog units and dollars decreased approximately 21% each on the comparative new order reduction of 16% and higher backlog turn.

North East

Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     The North East segment had an approximate $3,000 increase in segment profit quarter over quarter. Revenues increased 28% primarily on a 27% increase in the number of units settled. The increase in units settled is attributable to a higher backlog turnover rate quarter over quarter. Gross profit margins decreased to 19.8% in 2006 from 22.2% in 2005 from the downward pressure in selling prices experienced in 2006. New orders for the third quarter of 2006 decreased 15% from the same period in 2005, as a result of the competitive sales environment, higher mortgage interest rates, and higher levels of new and existing home inventory for

sale as discussed above. Cancellation rates in the North East segment also increased to 18% in the 2006 quarter from 12% in 2005.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     The North East segment had an approximate $17,000 increase in segment profit period over period. Revenues increased 45% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from the prior year period due principally to a 44% increase in the number of units settled. The increase in the number of units settled is primarily attributable to a 10% higher beginning backlog period over period, a 10% increase in new orders for the first six months of 2006, and a higher backlog turn. Gross profit margins decreased slightly to 20.1% in 2006 from 21.0% in 2005. Backlog units and dollars were 27% and 29% lower, respectively, than the 2005 period, due to the comparative higher backlog turn experienced during the period.

Mid East

Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     The Mid East segment had an approximate $5,000 reduction in segment profit quarter over quarter. Revenues decreased 2% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from the prior year quarter due to a 4% decrease in the average settlement price offset by a 2% increase in the number of units settled. The decrease in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a lower average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over period. Gross profit margins decreased to 17.5% from 18.7%. Gross profit margins were adversely affected by the downward pressure in selling prices experienced in 2006 and contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $2,700 during the 2006 period. New orders for the third quarter of 2006 decreased 21% from the same period in 2005, also as a result of the competitive sales environment and higher mortgage interest rates as discussed above. Cancellation rates in the Mid East segment increased to 28% in the 2006 quarter from 17% in 2005.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     The Mid East segment had an approximate $12,000 decrease in segment profit period over period. Revenues increased 5% on an 8% increase in the number of units settled. The increase in the number of units settled is primarily attributable to a 10% higher beginning backlog period over period. The average settlement price declined 2% from the 2005 nine month period, and gross profit margins decreased to 17.1% in 2006 from 18.4% in 2005. Gross profit margins were adversely affected by the downward pressure in selling prices experienced in 2006 and contract land deposit impairment charges of approximately $2,800 during the 2006 period. Selling, general and administrative costs also increased approximately $8,500 due primarily to the increase in revenues and an average number of communities open for sales to 188 in 2006 from 156 in 2005. Backlog units and dollars were 5% and 7% lower, respectively, than the 2005 period.

South East

Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     The South East segment has not been as severely impacted by the recent adverse economic conditions within the homebuilding industry. The segment had an approximate $11,000 increase in segment profit quarter over quarter. Revenues increased 32% for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from the prior year quarter due to an 11% increase in the number of units settled and a 17% increase in the average settlement price. The increase in units settled is attributable to a higher backlog turnover rate quarter over quarter. The increase in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 21% higher average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over period. Gross profit margins increased to 22.3% in 2006 from 19.6% in 2005, and new orders and average new order price increased 3% and 22%, respectively.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 and 2005

     The South East segment had an approximate $26,000 increase in segment profit period over period. Revenues increased 31% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from the prior year period due to an 11% increase in the number of units settled and an 18% increase in the average settlement price. The increase in units settled is attributable to a higher beginning backlog at the beginning of the period and a higher backlog turnover rate period over period. The increase in the average settlement price is primarily attributable to a 13% higher average price of homes in the beginning backlog period over period. Gross profit margins increased to 22.2% in 2006 from 19.8% in 2005, and new orders and average new order price increased 4% and 21%, respectively. Gross margins have increased primarily due to stronger market conditions and our ability increase prices. The higher backlog turn has resulted in a lower number of units in backlog at September 30, 2006 compared to September 30, 2005. Backlog dollars were 18% higher than the 2005 period due to the comparative higher average selling price of 21% during the period.

Homebuilding Segment Reconciliations to Consolidated Homebuilding Operations

     In addition to the corporate capital allocation and contract land deposit impairments discussed above, the other reconciling items between homebuilding segment profit and homebuilding consolidated profit before tax include unallocated corporate overhead, consolidation adjustments, stock option compensation expenses, and external corporate interest. NVR’s overhead functions, such as accounting, treasury, human resources, land acquisition, etc., are centrally performed and the costs of which are not allocated to the Company’s operating segments. Consolidation adjustments consist of such items to convert the reportable segments’ results, which are predominantly maintained on a cash basis, to a full accrual basis for external financial statement presentation purposes, and are not allocated to the Company’s operating segments. Likewise, stock option compensation expenses are not charged to the operating expenses. External corporate interest expense is primarily comprised of interest charges on the Company’s outstanding Senior Notes and working capital line borrowings, and are not charged to the operating segments because the charges are included in the corporate capital allocation discussed above.

		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2006				2005				2006				2005
Homebuilding Consolidate Gross Profit
Homebuilding Mid Atlantic		$	235,817			$	285,436			$	828,946			$	757,668
Homebuilding North East			34,475				30,280				93,992				67,458
Homebuilding Mid East			45,203				49,175				120,327				123,033
Homebuilding South East			36,917				24,566				97,948				66,688
Consolidation adjustments and other (1)			(62,119	)			(9,429	)			(109,603	)			(25,150	)
Segment gross profit		$	290,293			$	380,028			$	1,031,610			$	989,697